T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t an dth e r e f o r e d e n ie s W illia m s ’ r e q u e s t. See Fe d . R. A p p . P. 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A B E W I L L I A M S , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. A RN O L D S C H W A R Z E N E G G E R , e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 06- 16997 D . C. N o . CV - 0 2 - 0 0 8 6 4 - M CE ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , a n dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C al i forni a s t at e pri soner A be W i l l i am s, Jr . appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED OC T 13 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 16997 2 un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew de no vo a di stri ctcourt ’ s grantof sum m ary ju d g m e n t, T

oguc hiv . Chung , 39 1 F . 3d 10 51 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 20 04 ), and for an ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n ad e n ia l o f

am o tio n to c o m p e l d is c o v e ry , H al le t t v . Mor gan , 2 9 6 F .3 d7 3 2 , 7 5 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e a f f irm . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y g ran t edsu m m ary j u d g m en tb ecau se W i l l i am s’ al l egat i on s thatD ef

endant s m i sapp l y var i ou s provi si on s of the C al i forni a P enal C ode r e s ton e rr one ous i nt e rpr e t a t i ons of s t a t e l a w s uc h tha tW i l l i a m s ha s not s u f f e r e da n yc o n s titu tio n a l in ju ry . See 42 U . S . C . § 1983; In re D a n n en b erg , 34 C al . 4th 1 06 1, 10 79 -80 (20 05 ); I n r e D ay an , 2 3 1 C a l. A p p . 3 d1 8 4 , 1 8 6 - 8 9 ( 1 9 9 1 ) . M o r e o v e r , to th e e x te n t W illia m s ’ § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n c h a lle n g e s p r io rp a r o le s ui t abi l i tyde c i s i ons orw oul d othe rw i s e ne c e s s a r i l yde m ons tr a t e the i nva l i di tyof th e du rat i o n o f h i s co n fi n em en t , i ti s b arredb y H ec k v . H um ph re y , 512 U . S . 477 (199 4). Se e W

i lki ns on v . D ot

s on , 5 4 4 U .S . 7 4 , 8 2 ( 2 0 0 5 ) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g W illia m s ’ m o tio n to c o m p e l d is c o v e ry . Se e H a lle tt , 2 9 6 F .3 da t 7 5 1 ( tr ia l c o u rt’s b r o a dd is c r e tio n to deny di sc ov ery “ w i l l no tbe di sturbed exceptup on the cl eare stshow i ng that[the] de ni a l of di s c ove ryr e s ul t [ e d] i n a c tua l a nd s ubs t a nt i a l pr e j udi c e t o the c om pl a i ni ng l i t i gant ”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks and ci t at i on om i tt ed). W i l l i am s’ re m ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve.06- 16997 3 W e d e n yW illia m s ’ m o tio n f o rr e m o v a l o f

th e s tayo f

p r o c e e d in g s a s m o o t. AF F I RME D.