alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Alice Tzu-Shia Hwang,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2003,  that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Nano Superlattice  Technology,  Inc. for the year ended
June 30, 2004 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition and results of operations of Nano Superlattice  Technology,
Inc.

     I,  Chien-Fang  Wang,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Nano Superlattice  Technology,  Inc. for the year ended
June 30, 2004 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition and results of operations of Nano Superlattice  Technology,
Inc.

By: /s/ Alice Tzu-Shia Hwang
   --------------------------------
   Name:  Alice Tzu-Shia Hwang
   Title: President and Chairman of the Board
          (Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Chien-Fang Wang
   --------------------------------
   Name:  Chien-Fang Wang
   Title: Vice President
          (Principal Financial Officer)
Raymond ZAYAS, petitioner, v. Jamey LUTHER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Laurel Highlands, et al.

No. 18-7603.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
SCWC-28826

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

ROBERT KUTKOWSKI, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee,

vs. PRINCEVILLE PRINCE GOLF COURSE, LLC, a Delaware LimitedLiability Company, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee/DefendantCross-Appellant, and DOE CORPORATIONS 1-5, DOE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES 1-5, DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-5, DOE ENTITIES 1–5, JOHN DOES

1-5, AND JANE DOES 1-5, Defendants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 28826; CIV. NO. 05-1-0004)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakasone, assigned by reason of vacancy) Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee Robert Kutkowski’s application for writ of certiorari filed on June 25, 2012, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 1, 2012. Margery S. Bronster, Rex Y. Fujichaku, and Joe P. Moss, for petitioner

David W. Proudfoot and Max W. J. Graham, Jr., for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-28826 01-AUG-2012 09:13 AM
# Official Journal L 43/14 F

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 43 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4914 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 43

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4914 February 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Documents annexed to the general budget of the European Union |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2 | 1 |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2 | 5 |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2 | 9 |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2 | 13 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Documents annexed to the general budget of the European Union

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2

1

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2

5

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2

9

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2

13

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the Financial Year 2005 — Amending budget 1 (OJ L 341, 23.12.2005) | 57 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the Financial Year 2005 — Amending budget 1 (OJ L 341, 23.12.2005)

57

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
James A. OSBURN, et al., petitioners, v. Matthew LOEB, et al.

No. 18-932.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
WILLIE C. FORD, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1485

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 23, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

Willie C. Ford, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
Warren Ray PATTON, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-7373.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134287 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134287 

 COA: 276801 

Wayne CC: 88-014481-01,

BRIAN PATRICK ROGERS, 88-014482-01, 88-014529-01

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

t1128 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 5, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0211

CITY OF MISSOULA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SCOTT ANTHONY CHARLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 21 2024

06/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0211
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1368

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense

from being used for the deployment of ground elements of the United

States Armed Forces in Kosovo unless that deployment is specifically

authorized by law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Mr. GOODLING (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr.

PETRI, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. GEKAS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. GANSKE, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BARR of Georgia, and Mr. WAMP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department

of Defense from being used for the deployment of ground

elements of the United States Armed Forces in Kosovo

unless that deployment is specifically authorized by law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress makes the following findings:
2

•HR 1368 IH

1 (1) United States national security interests in

2 Kosovo do not rise to a level that warrants the intro3 duction of ground troops by the United States.

4 (2) Kosovo is a province of the Republic of Ser5 bia, a sovereign state.

6 (3) An Act of Congress is necessary for the in7 troduction of the Armed Forces of the United States

8 into hostilities, or situations where imminent involve9 ment in hostilities is clearly indicated by the cir10 cumstances, when such action is not required for the

11 defense of the United States, its Armed Forces, or

12 its nationals.

13 (4) The lessons of the United States military

14 involvement in Vietnam and Bosnia clearly argue

15 that the costs and duration of any such deployment

16 will be much heavier and much longer than initially

17 foreseen.

18 (5) The Congress and the American people have

19 the greatest pride in the members of the Armed

20 Forces and strongly support them.
3

•HR 1368 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DE2 FENSE FUNDS FOR DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED

3 STATES GROUND FORCES IN KOSOVO WITH4 OUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATION BY LAW.

5 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise available

6 to the Department of Defense may be obligated or ex7 pended for the deployment of ground elements of the

8 United States Armed Forces in Kosovo unless such de9 ployment is specifically authorized by a law enacted after

10 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30790 Summary Calendar

__________________ BERNADINE CORMIER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-949
- - - - - - - - - - January 31, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant appeals from the denial of relief in her complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security seeking payment of benefits for the entire period of her husband's disability. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the district court's order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss for essentially the reasons given by the district court. See Cormier v. Chater , No. 93-CV-949 (W.D. La. July 5, 1995). APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON LIVING TRUST, fka The James H. Anderson Living Trust, et al., petitioners, v. WPX ENERGY PRODUCTION, LLC, fka WPX Energy San Juan, LLC, et al.

No. 18-1080.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/16/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      508,996
COMMITMENTS
  34,135   27,757   98,450  356,370  361,072  488,955  487,279   20,041   21,717

CHANGES FROM 03/09/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,210)
  -6,591    1,833   -5,642    9,666    1,370   -2,567   -2,439      357      229

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.7      5.5     19.3     70.0     70.9     96.1     95.7      3.9      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      110)
      25       16       31       58       64       98       99
```

----

Updated March 19, 2010
# C_2016279EN.01002801.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/28

---

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2016 — Beele Engineering v EUIPO (WE CARE)

(Case T-222/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark WE CARE - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 279/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Beele Engineering BV (Aalten, the Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ring, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2015 (Case R 1933/2014-1), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign WE CARE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Beele Engineering BV shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Beele Engineering BV shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.

1

---
<PAGE>

                            COHEN & KAMENY CPA'S PLLC
                       3530 Henry Hudson Parkway, Suite B
                            Riverdale, New York 10463

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10 Registration Statement of our report
as of March 31, 2000, dated April 7, 2000, relating to the financial statements
of Parade Holdings, Inc. that appear in such Form 10.



                            Cohen & Kameny CPA'S PLLC
                          Certified Public Accountants



Riverdale, New York
April 12, 2000
Michael Duane WILSON, petitioner, v. Robert LeGRAND, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7808.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert Nathan ALM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8327.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Seaun Llwellyn FARTHING, petitioner, v. Dara WATSON, Warden.

No. 18-7934.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|Dated: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ John Weale                  
|                   |  |  |  | Name: John R. Weale             
|                   |  |  |  | Title:   Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1377 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 397
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1377

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                            November 4, 1999

  Reported by Mr. Thompson, with an amendment and an amendment to the 
                                 title
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 13234 
South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``John J. Buchanan 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

<DELETED>SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 13234 South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``John J. Buchanan Post Office Building''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 2. REFERENCES.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, 
or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in 
section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Buchanan Post Office Building''.</DELETED>

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service, located at 9308 
South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60617, is designated as the 
``John J. Buchanan Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``John J. Buchanan Post 
Office Building''.

            Amend the title so as to read: ``To designate the facility 
        of the United States Postal Service located at 9308 South 
        Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, as the `John J. Buchanan 
        Post Office Building'.''.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 397

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1377

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 13234 
South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``John J. Buchanan 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 1999

        Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the title
```
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/19/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       58,137
COMMITMENTS
  13,889    1,730    7,529   22,786   35,548   44,204   44,807   13,933   13,330

CHANGES FROM 07/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,606)
  -2,875     -154      926    1,106   -1,500     -843     -728     -763     -878

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.9      3.0     13.0     39.2     61.1     76.0     77.1     24.0     22.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       81)
      26        7       19       31       27       64       53
```

----

Updated July 22, 2011
The Honora ble Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western 1 District of Missouri, adopting the report and reco mmendations of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3997

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. James W. Hollowell, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 4, 1998 Filed: March 10, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James W. Hollowell, a federal prisoner at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners at Springfield (USMCFP), appeals the district court’s 18 U.S.C. § 1 4245 order. Havi ng carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in committing Hollowell to the cus tody of the Attorney General, as both the USMCFP staff psychiatrist and an independent psychologist opined that Hollowell-2-

suffers from a me ntal disease or defect and is in need of custody for care or treatment in a suitable facility. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d); United States v. Steil , 916 F.2d 485, 487 (8th Cir. 1990) (standard of review). Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Jose RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 17-9487.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.