alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Friday, May 13, 2022.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC and Butler employed by Peabody Mining Midwest Mining, LLC,*                         Docket Nos. LAKE 2019-0023, 2019-0122, 2019-0361. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that the operator violated standards when it failed to immediately de-energize equipment when it encountered high methane levels, whether the violation was significant and substantial, and whether a supervisor was liable for individual penalties.).                    

                        Pursuant to the Commission's COVID-19 Workplace Safety Plan, in-person attendance shall be limited to persons participating in the decisional process (                        *e.g.,*                         Chair and Commissioners, Commission employees providing support for the meeting). Non-participating individuals may listen to the meeting by calling the phone number listed below in this notice.                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

# PHONE NUMBER FOR LISTENING TO MEETING:

1-(866) 236-7472, Passcode: 678-100.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: April 27, 2022.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2022-09326 Filed 4-27-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
Terveus HYPPOLITE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7557.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1280

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which

in size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to

ban toys which in size, shape, or overall appearance

resemble real handguns.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TOY HANDGUNS

4 The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall

5 promulgate a rule in accordance with section 9 of the

6 Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058) to de7 clare as a banned hazardous product under section 8 any

8 toy which in size, shape, or overall appearance resembles

9 a real handgun.

Æ
Ricardo MONTANEZ-QUINONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7896.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
12.1
 
 Certification
 
 I,
Duncan Copeland, certify that:
 
 1.  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Northcore Technologies
Inc.
 
 2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in
SEC Release No. 34-47986;
 
 c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Dated:  March
      19, 2008
              /s/
      Duncan CopelandDuncan
      CopelandChief
      Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2014

No. 04-14-00479-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF J.B., a 

Mentally Ill Person,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-MH-2027

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellant’s motion for extension of time to file response is GRANTED. The

appellant’s motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SCEPTER CANADA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

NO SPILL, LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2021-2282

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-

00360.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

SHARON A. ISRAEL, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by KYLE 

E. FRIESEN; RYAN DYKAL, BASIL TRENT WEBB, Kansas City, 

MO.

 ROBERT M. EVANS, JR., Lewis Rice LLC, St. Louis, MO, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL HENRY 

DURBIN, MICHAEL J. HARTLEY.

 ______________________

Case: 21-2282 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 10/05/2022
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

October 5, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2282 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 10/05/2022
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60012 Conference Calendar

__________________
JOSEPH WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EDDIE LUCAS, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. CA 93-236

- - - - - - - - - - August 23, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Wright argues that the magistrate judge abused his discretion by denying Wright's motion for the appointment of counsel. An interlocutory order denying the appointment of counsel in a civil rights action may be immediately appealed. Robbins v. Maggio , 750 F.2d 405, 413 (5th Cir. 1985).No. 95-60012 -2- There is no automatic right to the appointment of counsel in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. Cupit v. Jones , 835 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir. 1987). A district court is not required to appoint counsel in the absence of "exceptional circumstances," which are dependent upon the type and complexity of the case and the abilities of the individual pursuing that case. Id. Absent a clear abuse of discretion, this court will not overturn a decision of the district court on the appointment of counsel. Id. The magistrate judge considered the appropriate factors and gave adequate reasons when he denied Wright's motion for the appointment of counsel. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 213 (5th Cir. 1982). Wright's complaint is not complex; he is simply challenging the conditions of his confinement, alleging that fellow inmates smoke cigarettes wrapped in toilet paper wrappers and that he is forced to inhale the second-hand smoke. Wright's pleadings and numerous motions show that he is literate and capable of presenting coherent arguments to the court. Because Wright's § 1983 action relied on factual matters that Wright is able to investigate and present to the court on his own, he does not need legal skills or training to inform the court adequately of his allegations. See Feist v. Jefferson County Comm'rs Court , 778 F.2d 250, 253 (5th Cir. 1985). Wright has not presented exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel. The magistrate judge thus did not abuse his discretion by denying Wright's motion.
AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 310/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 310 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5712 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 310

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5712 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 310/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/658/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 310/02 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 310/01

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/658/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

European Commission

2014/C 310/02

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 310/03 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |
| 2014/C 310/04 | Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU — Extension of Deadline — Request made by a Member State | 10 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 310/03

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

2014/C 310/04

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU — Extension of Deadline — Request made by a Member State

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, Paul F. Saxton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Lincoln Gold Corporation, (the “Company”), hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (i)    | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company        for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”)        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results        of operations of the Company.                                                                                                 |

|   | By:    | */s/ Paul F. Saxton*        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |   |                             |
|   | Name:  | Paul F. Saxton              |
|   |   |                        |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |   |                        |
|   | Date:  | April 14, 2005              |

*This written statement is being furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on  Form 10-KSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form  10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates  it by reference.*

----
Charles Edward CASE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7457.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1343Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Alan William GOLDER, petitioner, v. Carol CHAPELAINE, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7787.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
John Todd WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7638.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7677

JOSE ALBERTO MALDONADO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

HENRY MCMASTER,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(8:11-cv-01372-TLW)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Alberto Maldonado, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Alberto Maldonado seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Maldonado has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We also deny Maldonado’s pending motion seeking the 

production of transcripts at the Government’s expense. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/08/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      181,031
COMMITMENTS
  18,538   28,241   33,868  108,249  102,790  160,655  164,899   20,376   16,132

CHANGES FROM 03/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,642)
     489      810    1,306   18,008   17,754   19,803   19,870      839      772

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.2     15.6     18.7     59.8     56.8     88.7     91.1     11.3      8.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       98)
      31       24       41       25       29       78       84
```

----

Updated March 11, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 14, 2006

/s/ Ian M.Herman
-------------------------------------
Ian M. Herman Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/15/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,330,899
COMMITMENTS
 396,450   68,429  1579112  2321139  2660783  4296701  4308324   34,198   22,575

CHANGES FROM 06/08/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,002)
   7,337   14,291   74,302  -85,862  -92,312   -4,223   -3,719   -1,779   -2,283

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2      1.6     36.5     53.6     61.4     99.2     99.5      0.8      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      216)
      39       35       72      129      126      205      201
```

----

Updated June 18, 2010
ST. LOUIS HEART CENTER, INC., petitioner, v. NOMAX, INC.

No. 18-778.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Eddie Ray WIESE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7252.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Tina L. WAGONER, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 18-6966.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.