alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4632 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to disseminate to part D subsidy eligible 

individuals information comparing the premiums under LIS benchmark 

plans for such individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, and Mr. BUTTERFIELD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to disseminate to part D subsidy eligible individuals information 

comparing the premiums under LIS benchmark plans 

for such individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Transparency 

5 in Information for Medicare Beneficiaries Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4632 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISSEMINATION TO MEDICARE PART D SUBSIDY EL2 IGIBLE INDIVIDUALS OF INFORMATION COM3 PARING PREMIUMS OF CERTAIN PRESCRIP4 TION DRUG PLANS. 

5 Section 1860D–1(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395w–101(c)(3)) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) INFORMATION ON PREMIUMS FOR

9 SUBSIDY ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For plan year 

11 2022 and each subsequent plan year, the 

12 Secretary shall disseminate to each subsidy 

13 eligible individual (as defined in section 

14 1860D–14(a)(3)) information under this 

15 paragraph comparing premiums that would 

16 apply to such individual for prescription 

17 drug coverage under LIS benchmark plans, 

18 including, in the case of an individual en19 rolled in a prescription drug plan under 

20 this part, information that compares the 

21 premium that would apply if such indi22 vidual were to remain enrolled in such plan 

23 to premiums that would apply if the indi24 vidual were to enroll in other LIS bench25 mark plans. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4632 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) LIS BENCHMARK PLAN.—For 

2 purposes of clause (i), the term ‘LIS 

3 benchmark plan’ means, with respect to an 

4 individual, a prescription drug plan under 

5 this part that is offered in the region in 

6 which the individual resides and— 

7 ‘‘(I) that provides for a premium 

8 that is not more than the low-income 

9 benchmark premium amount (as de10 fined in section 1860D–14(b)(2)) for 

11 such region; or 

12 ‘‘(II) with respect to which the 

13 premium would be waived as de mini14 mis pursuant to section 1860D– 

15 14(a)(5) for such individual.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Bruce Elliott MILLER, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-8624.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### Young, Appellant *v.*Mathews Trucking Corporation.

Argued November 18, 1955.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Bell, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*465January 3, 1956:

*Clyde P. Bailey,*with him *James B. Ceris, Thomas J. Dempsey*and *Weller, Wicks & Wallace,*for appellants.

*Oran W. Panner,*with Mm *Thompson Bradshaw*and *Bradshaw & Panner,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

TMs was a petition to strike off a judgment entered by default. It necessarily had to do with the regularity of the record under admitted facts, and could not be based upon any equities of the situation. The court declined to strike off the judgment but opened it, and the plaintiffs appealed.

This appeal is by the plaintiffs and not by the defendant, and there is not before this Court the validity of the ruling of the court below refusing to strike off the judgment: *Bowser v. Citizens Light, Heat & Power Company,*267 Pa. 483, 489, 110 A. 372; *Miller v. Wayne Title & Trust Company,*154 Pa. Superior Ct. 329, 338, 35 A. 2d 786.

Without the consent or even the knowledge of the parties, the court below converted the rule to strike into a rule to open, and thereupon made the rule absolute. This was error: *Hamborsky v. Magyar Presbyterian Church (No.1),*78 Pa. Superior Ct. 519. See also *Nixon v. Nixon,*329 Pa. 256, 263, 198 A. 154.

Before the court could open the judgment it was necessary for the petition to set forth (1) due diligence; *466(2) the grounds for opening the judgment; and (3) the existence of a meritorious defense, by averring the facts upon which the meritorious defense is based: *Planters Nut and Chocolate Company v. Brown-Murray Co., Inc.,*128 Pa. Superior Ct. 239, 244, 193 A. 381. See also *Britton v. Continental Mining and Smelting Corporation,*366 Pa. 82, 84, 76 A. 2d 625.

In addition, the appellee in the case at bar entered only a qualified appearance, and to open the judgment he must first submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court.

As was done in *Rome Sales and Service Station v. Finch,*120 Pa. Superior Ct. 402, 404, 183 A. 54, we make the following order:

Order reversed, without prejudice to the appellee to present in 20 days a petition to the court below to open said judgment; that court to dispose of the same after taking whatever testimony may be necessary.
Robert J. KULICK, petitioner, v. Steven REIN.

No. 18-6383.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
----

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 78/2004 of 8 June 2004 amending Annex XIV (Competition rules), Protocol 21 (on the implementation of competition rules applicable to undertakings), Protocol 22 (concerning the definition of ‘undertaking’ and ‘turnover’ (Article 56) and Protocol 24 (on cooperation in the field of control of concentrations) to the EEA Agreement

(Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 19 June 2004)

On page 22, in Annex IV, Article 8, point 7:

for:

‘7.   Where the EC Commission carries out investigations ...’,

read:

‘7.   Where the EC Commission carries out inspections ...’.

----
Loren WILLIAMSON, III, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-8151.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Sam CHINN, aka Sam Chinn, III, petitioner, v. Joseph NOETH, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

No. 18-8229.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Energy Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Fahrner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: May 24, 2011/s/ James J. FahrnerJames J. FahrnerChief Financial Officer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/25/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      412,020
COMMITMENTS
  40,227   17,488   84,918  259,682  290,691  384,827  393,097   27,193   18,923

CHANGES FROM 10/18/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -31,897)
   5,511      464  -13,902  -23,533  -19,588  -31,924  -33,026       27    1,129

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.8      4.2     20.6     63.0     70.6     93.4     95.4      6.6      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      124)
      25       23       45       60       66      112      113
```

----

Updated October 28, 2011
Marte HOLLIS, petitioner, v. Randy PFISTER, Warden.

No. 17-9287.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 2, 2007By:
    
    /s/ JOHN E. JACKSON

Name: John E. Jackson
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
          (Principal Executive Officer)
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      136,635
COMMITMENTS
  44,654   25,499   20,981   54,497   66,594  120,132  113,074   16,503   23,561

CHANGES FROM 11/29/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,866)
   2,005       84    1,692   -1,241      110    2,456    1,886     -590      -20

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.7     18.7     15.4     39.9     48.7     87.9     82.8     12.1     17.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      49       30       34       55       56      120      109
```

----

Updated December 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-mos 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                         3,668,624
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  3,846,175
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    582,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               10,924,893
<PP&E>                         3,105,085
<DEPRECIATION>                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 27,876,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          6,128,133
<BONDS>                        188,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    374,000
<COMMON>                       17,634
<OTHER-SE>                     21,168,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   27,876,487
<SALES>                        5,168,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               5,168,758
<CGS>                          4,752,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  4,752,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               3,981,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,176,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (6,741,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (400,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (6,341,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (6,499,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.39)
        


</TABLE>
James BARSTAD, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-8039.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Lee E. BeckelmanName:
    
    Lee E. BeckelmanTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    November 1, 2005
  44
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6656** 

THOMAS MARVIN FAIR, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JON E. OZMINT, Director for the South Carolina Department of Corrections; ROBERT E. WARD, Division Director of O perations for the South Carolina Department of Corrections; JAMES E. SLIGH, JR., Operations Coordinator of the South Carolina Department of Corrections and the rest of the Prison Rape Elimination Act Review Committee et al; ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution; C. YORK, Classification Caseworker at Lee Correctional Institution; BRUCE OBERMAN, Special Management Unit Administrator at Lee Correctional Institution; ANTHONY DAVIS, Lieutenant at Lee Correctional Institution; R. HILTON, Class ification Caseworker at Lee Correctional Institution all in their individual and official capacities , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Richard Mark Gergel , Dist rict Judge. ( 6:10

- cv - 01268

- RMG )

Submitted : September 2 9 , 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr. , appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendat ion of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Fair v. Ozmint , No. 6:10

- cv - 01268

- RMG (D.S.C. May 2,
2011)

. We deny Fair’s motion for appointment of counsel and w e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process

.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1989-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement  of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         459,843
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               817,397
<PP&E>                                         8,394,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,417,275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,902,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          64,843
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,775,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,902,027
<SALES>                                        1,213,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,236,731
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  737,282<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                375,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            375,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   375,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Jorge SOSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8333.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25501-25502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Institute 
of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 25502]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; P41 NCBIB Review SRO D-SEP.
    Date: June 28-30.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John Hayes, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 
National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 451-3398, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7afa6bea2b4ad87aaa6aeabe9a9aeafe9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abc3cad2ced8c1ebc6cac2c785c5c2c385ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09244 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CAO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TheStreet.com, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Broitman,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard BroitmanRichard
      BroitmanChief
      Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)March 30,
      2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tasco Holdings International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Lauring, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
29th day of December 2005.


/s/ John Lauring
------------------------------
John Lauring
Chief Executive Officer