alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Farrell HAYCRAFT, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 18-7479.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT
                                      11.0
<PAGE>   2

            PHILADELPHIA CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
          (Dollars and Share Data in Thousands, except Per Share Data)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   As of and for the             As of and for the
                                                   Three Months Ended            Six Months Ended
                                                        June 30,                      June 30,
                                                 ----------------------        ----------------------
                                                  1997           1996           1997           1996
                                                 -------        -------        -------        -------
<S>                                              <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>  
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                6,088          5,877          6,077          5,846

Weighted Average Stock Options Outstanding         1,758          1,818          1,769          1,849

Assumed Shares Repurchased                          (421)          (621)          (453)          (631)
                                                 -------        -------        -------        -------

Weighted Average Shares and Share
 Equivalents Outstanding                           7,425          7,074          7,393          7,064
                                                 =======        =======        =======        =======



Net Income                                       $ 3,992        $ 3,057        $ 7,614        $ 5,772
                                                 =======        =======        =======        =======

Net Income per Share                             $  0.54        $  0.43        $  1.03        $  0.82
                                                 =======        =======        =======        =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB**I, James F. Laird, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report out conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2005 /s/ James F. Laird   James F. Laird   Chief Financial Officer  
24
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002**





I,
      Edward
      R. DeStefano, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
      New
      Century Energy Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
      2006
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition And results of
      operations of New Century Energy Corp.





Dated:
      April 12, 2007





By:
      /s/ Edward R. DeStefano


Edward
      R.
      DeStefano


Chief
      Executive Officer,


Chief
      Financial Officer, and


Principal
      Accounting Officer
Frank JAMES, petitioner, v. Rebecca KAPUSTA, Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families.

No. 18-7689.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/06/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       76,674
COMMITMENTS
     472    9,845    3,907   62,476   48,595   66,855   62,347    9,819   14,327

CHANGES FROM 06/29/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,227)
      46      255    1,252    1,016      907    2,314    2,414   -1,087   -1,187

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     0.6     12.8      5.1     81.5     63.4     87.2     81.3     12.8     18.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       2       13        7       20       25       29       38
```

----

Updated July 9, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4498

DALE BLANKENSHIP,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston.

Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge.

(CR-01-10)

Submitted: December 10, 2001

Decided: January 24, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

R. Clarke VanDervort, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant.

Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, John C. Parr, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Dale Blankenship pled guilty to distribution of oxycodone in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994) pursuant to a plea agreement.

Blankenship appeals the sentence he received, alleging the amount of

drugs was incorrectly calculated. We affirm. 

Blankenship contends he should be only held responsible for the

actual amount of oxycodone contained in each capsule he sold. He

contends the weight of the filler in the capsules should not be counted

in calculating the amount of drugs involved in his offense. We review

the proper method of calculating drug weight as a legal question subject to de novo review. United States v. Daughtrey, 874 F.2d 213,

217-18 (4th Cir. 1989). 

Base offense levels for drug offenses are determined from the Drug

Quantity Table following USSG § 2D1.1. In a footnote to the Drug

Quantity Table, the Guidelines provide that "[u]nless otherwise specified, the weight of a controlled substance set forth in the table refers

to the entire weight of any mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of the controlled substance." USSG § 2D1.1. We have

held that this gross weight methodology applies to pharmaceuticals.

United States v. Meitinger, 901 F.2d 27, 29 (4th Cir. 1990); United

States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31-32 (4th Cir. 1990). Blankenship

nevertheless contends he should be held responsible only for the

active weight of the controlled substance. This argument was

addressed and foreclosed, however, in United States v. Bayerle, 898

F.2d at 31-32. We see no reason to depart from this well established

rule. 

Accordingly, we affirm Blankenship’s sentence. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. BLANKENSHIP
R.S. RAGHAVENDRA, petitioner, v. Jane E. BOOTH, et al.

No. 18-990.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0215

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BRUCE ALAN GARAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 19, 2021 within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2021

10/14/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0215
Philip Eberhard KOEBEL, petitioner, v. Stevan CHANDLER, et al.

No. 18-7708.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jermaine BRAZILL, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8298.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  annual  report of Evolve
Oncology,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year  ending  February  28, 2005 as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report")
for Evolve Oncology, Inc (the "Company"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1)    to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
      1934; and

2)    to the best of my  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in the  Report
      fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
      result of operations of the Company.


      Date: June 30, 2006

                                                                  /s/ Alan Bowen
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                                      Alan Bowen
                                            CFO, Secretary, Treasurer & Director
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2013291EN.01006001.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/60

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 94/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex XVII (Intellectual property) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2011/77/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 amending Directive 2006/116/EC on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2011/77/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 amending Directive 2006/116/EC on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XVII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XVII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 9f (Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XVII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32011 L 0077: Directive 2011/77/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 (OJ L 265, 11.10.2011, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32011 L 0077: Directive 2011/77/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 (OJ L 265, 11.10.2011, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2011/77/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 265, 11.10.2011, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00908-CR

GLORIA ELENA MELTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-80274-CC2-F

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Myers, and Justice Pedersen, III

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

Gloria Elena Melton appeals her November 28, 2018 conviction for driving while 

intoxicated, third offense. After appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere, the jury found her 

guilty and made an affirmative finding that a deadly weapon was used. Punishment, enhanced by 

two prior convictions, was assessed at sixty years in prison. Appellant’s notice of appeal, dated 

July 22, 2019, was filed in the trial court on August 1, 2019.

A timely filed notice of appeal is required to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Castillo v. 

State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In the absence of a timely filed notice of 

appeal, the Court has no option other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. A defendant perfects an appeal 

by filing with the trial court clerk, within thirty days after the date sentence was imposed or within 
–2–

ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely filed a motion for new trial, a written notice of 

appeal showing her desire to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b), (c), 26.2(a).

Appellant’s sentence was imposed November 28, 2018; absent a timely filed motion for 

new trial, her notice of appeal was due December 28, 2018. Her notice of appeal, dated July 22, 

2019, was filed in the trial court on August 1, 2019. 

Under these circumstances, we have no other option than to dismiss this appeal.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

190908F.U05

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

GLORIA ELENA MELTON, Appellant

No. 05-19-00908-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 2, Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-80274-CC2-F.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. 

Justices Myers and Pedersen, III 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2019.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 587

- CR

Cathy Lynn Gilstrap

, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 01

- 987

- K368 , HONORABLE BURT CARNES , JUDGE PRESIDING

The record reflects that prosecution of this cause was dismissed by the district court on the

State = s motion. There being no conviction, there is nothing to appeal. The State = s motion to dismiss is

granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Counsel = s motion to withdraw is dismissed.

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 24, 2002

Do Not Publish
John TURNER, petitioner, v. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al.

No. 17-6293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated December 30, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1353-013.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: 20220425 Form 2 Calculated Factor 
and Maintenance Capital Spending Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220425-5370.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-837-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2022 Operational Purchases and 
Sales Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220425-5335.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-838-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2022 Operational Purchases and 
Sales Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220425-5377.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 26, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09346 Filed 4-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Charles Dereck ADAMS, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

No. 18-7763.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1354Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Christopher HANSON, petitioner.

No. 18-8098.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/18/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       96,971
COMMITMENTS
   2,403    9,777    3,531   78,042   68,787   83,976   82,095   12,995   14,876

CHANGES FROM 05/11/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,157)
   1,327      708     -972    4,962    7,159    5,317    6,895    3,840    2,262

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.5     10.1      3.6     80.5     70.9     86.6     84.7     13.4     15.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       3       16       10       25       29       36       47
```

----

Updated May 27, 2010