Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-580-809]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020.
 DATES: Applicable May 4, 2022.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dusten Hom, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5075.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background On December 7, 2021, Commerce published the 
                    *Preliminary Results*
                     of this administrative review.[1]
                    
                     The review covers 24 producers and/or exporters of subject merchandise. We invited interested parties to comment on the 
                    *Preliminary Results.*
                     On March 23, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for issuing these final results until April 27, 2022.[2]
                    
                     A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the 
                    *Preliminary Results,*
                     as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[3]
                    
                     Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. Imports of the product are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of the order, 
                    *see*
                     the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[4] Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are listed in Appendix I to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.* Changes Since the Preliminary Results For reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made no changes for the final results of review. Final Determination of No Shipments In the 
                    *Preliminary Results,*
                     Commerce determined that HiSteel Co., Ltd (HiSteel) had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. No party commented on this issue and because we have not received any information to contradict our preliminary finding, we continue to find that HiSteel did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and intend to issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on the final results of this review. *Rate for Non-Examined Companies*
                     The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally “an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.” In this review, we calculated weighted-average dumping margins for the mandatory respondents, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel), that are 4.07 and 1.97 percent, respectively, and we have assigned to the non-selected companies a rate of 3.21 percent, which is the weighted-average dumping margin of Husteel and Hyundai Steel, weighted by their publicly ranged U.S. sales values.[5] Final Results of Review We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exists for the period November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020: Producer/exporter
Weighted-
                             average  
                             dumping  
                             margin  
                             (percent)Husteel Co., Ltd
4.07( print page 26344)Hyundai Steel Company 6
1.97**Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies**Other Respondents 7
3.21
 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these final results to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we calculated importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales to that importer, and we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel or Hyundai Steel, for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined to the United States, and for all entries attributed to HiSteel, for which we found no shipments during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[8] Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
                    *i.e.,*
                     within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    *,*
                     as provided for by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be the rates established in these final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent,[9]
                    
                     the all-others rate established in the investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: April 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the 
                        *Preliminary Results* V. No Shipments VI. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Existence of Particular Market Situation (PMS) Comment 2: Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset VII. Recommendation Appendix II—List of Companies Not Individually Examined 1. Aju Besteel 2. Bookook Steel 3. Chang Won Bending 4. Dae Ryung 5. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (Dsme) 6. Daiduck Piping 7. Dong Yang Steel Pipe 8. Dongbu Steel [10] 9. Eew Korea Company 10. Hyundai Rb 11. Kiduck Industries 12. Kum Kang Kind 13. Kumsoo Connecting 14. Miju Steel Mfg.[11] 15. Nexteel Co., Ltd.[12] 16. Samkang M&T 17. Seah Fs 18. Seah Steel [13] 19. Steel Flower 20. Vesta Co., Ltd. 21. Ycp Co.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020,*86 FR 69225 (December 7, 2021) (
                        *Preliminary Results*), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020,” dated March 23, 2022. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019-2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally calculates (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sale quantities for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. 
                        *See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part,*75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         This company is also known as Hyundai Steel Corporation; Hyundai Steel; and Hyundai Steel (Pipe Division). 7.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix II for a full list of these companies. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea,*57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                             This company is also known as Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Back to Citation
 11.
    
                             This company is also known as Miju Steel Manufacturing. Back to Citation
 12.
    
                             This company is also known as Nexteel. Back to Citation
 13.
    
                             This company is also known as Seah Steel Corporation. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2022-09553 Filed 5-3-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P