alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|By:               |  | /S/    GLENN L. COOPER 
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                 
|February 12, 2004
Jason BECKMAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6185.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
Exhibit 12.1
**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
**Principal Executive Officer Certification**
I, Federico Minoli, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ducati Motor HoldingS.p.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 30, 2004                          /s/ Federico Minoli   Managing Director
Efrim RENTERIA, et al., petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, TULARE COUNTY, et al.

No. 17-789.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES TINDAL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 0789

[ July 12, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Paul L. Backman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09

- 002708CF10A

.

James Tindal, Punta Gorda, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/20/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,142,564
COMMITMENTS
 518,322   71,101  1345922  2257503  2717115  4121747  4134138   20,817    8,426

CHANGES FROM 04/13/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     56,252)
  -4,356    3,191   62,377    2,409       36   60,430   65,604   -4,178   -9,352

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.5      1.7     32.5     54.5     65.6     99.5     99.8      0.5      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      212)
      44       31       71      131      123      204      196
```

----

Updated April 28, 2010
Nancy LUMA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

No. 17-9152.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*122Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# C_2012331EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/1

---

(2012/C 331/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 319, 20.10.2012

Past publications

OJ C 311, 13.10.2012

OJ C 303, 6.10.2012

OJ C 295, 29.9.2012

OJ C 287, 22.9.2012

OJ C 273, 8.9.2012

OJ C 258, 25.8.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Gibson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John W. Gibson     
|John W. Gibson         
|Chief Executive Officer

May 2, 2007

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 353/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 353 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6323 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 353

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6323 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1538 of 16 October 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ (PGI)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1539 of 16 October 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Sainte-Maure de Touraine’ (PDO) | 3 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1540 of 22 October 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1793 as regards sesamum seeds originating in India (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/1541 of 13 October 2020 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/1/2020) | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1538 of 16 October 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ (PGI))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1539 of 16 October 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Sainte-Maure de Touraine’ (PDO)

3

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1540 of 22 October 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1793 as regards sesamum seeds originating in India (
  1
  )

1

4

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/1541 of 13 October 2020 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/1/2020)

8

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KINGFISH INVESTMENT, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

WAWA FLORIDA, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1406

[December 22, 2022]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; G. Joseph Curley, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 502020CA014072XXXXMBAI.

S. Brian Bull of Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A., Palm 

Beach Gardens, for appellant.

Robert Rivas, Victor R. Berwin, and Joel D. Kenwood of Sachs Sax 

Caplan, PL, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1545 V

UNPUBLISHED

MEI H. LI

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 7, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Timothy James Lessman

, Knutson & Casey Law Firm

, Mankato

, MN , for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On October 3, 20 19 , Mei Li filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she was diagnosed with Guillain

- Barre Syndrom e (GBS) as a result of her October 17, 2016 influ enza vaccination . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 1, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espond en t determined that “ [P]etitioner suffered the Table injury of GBS following a flu vaccine within the Table time period, and that there is not a

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the

E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012 ).2

preponderance of the medical evidence that [P ]etitioner ’ s GBS was due to a factor

unrelated to the vaccination. ” Id

. a t 6. Respondent also determined that the claim

“ meets the statutory severity requirements be cause [P]etitioner experienced sequelae of

her GBS for more than six months

. ” T herefore

, Respondent concluded that “ [ P ] etitioner

has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. ” Id . Respondent further agrees that the scope of damages to be awarded is limited to Pet itioner ’ s GBS and its related sequ elae only

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 15, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 15, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0313. PATRICK HENRY NELSON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

02CR00268
Rosenthal 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 5, 2014

No. 04-14-00206-CV

PMSALS 1, LLC,

Appellant

v.

ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER LLP and Jonathan Starr,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-17620

Honorable Olin B. Strauss, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record 

has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s 

fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. It 

is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made 

to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    MATTHEW C.
DIAMOND
|Matthew C. Diamond       
|Chief Executive Officer  

Dated: April 2, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Brandon Lee COLBERT, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7194.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1159 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1159

   To improve the Federal capability to deal with child exploitation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1999

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Horn, Ms. 
Dunn, Mr. Shows, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. LaFalce, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Gilman, 
Mr. Bilbray, and Mr. McGovern) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To improve the Federal capability to deal with child exploitation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Children From On-Line 
Predators and Exploitation Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. CHILD CYBERSMUGGLING CENTER OF THE CUSTOMS SERVICE.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Customs Service $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2000 to 
carry out the Child Pornography/Child Sexual Exploitation Program 
established by the Child Cybersmuggling Center of the Customs Service.
    (b) Use of Amounts for Child Pornography Cyber Tipline.--Of the 
amount appropriated under subsection (a), the Customs Service shall 
provide 3.75 percent of such amount to the National Center for Missing 
and Exploited Children for the operation of the child pornography cyber 
tipline of the Center and for increased public awareness of the 
tipline.

SEC. 3. WIRETAPPING AUTHORITY.

    Section 2516(1)(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``section 2423(b) (relating to travel with intent to engage 
in sexual acts with juveniles),'' before ``section 1203''.
                                 <all>
```
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/16/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      141,982
COMMITMENTS
  36,752   26,673   22,105   66,482   66,762  125,339  115,540   16,643   26,442

CHANGES FROM 03/09/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,393)
    -458      867    2,068     -610   -1,141      999    1,794      395     -400

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.9     18.8     15.6     46.8     47.0     88.3     81.4     11.7     18.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      164)
      44       37       52       57       55      131      126
```

----

Updated March 19, 2010
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/03/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       60,125
COMMITMENTS
  19,471    2,964    7,850   21,245   34,588   48,567   45,402   11,558   14,723

CHANGES FROM 07/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,432)
   1,093      828   -1,648    1,284      479      729     -340      702    1,772

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.4      4.9     13.1     35.3     57.5     80.8     75.5     19.2     24.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      23       15       15       30       24       62       46
```

----

Updated August 6, 2010
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1359

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States courthouse to be constructed at 10 EastCommerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the‘‘Frank J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1359

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street

in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ‘‘Frank J. Battisti and

Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States

Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 1359 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngs6 town, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank

7 J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and

8 United States Courthouse’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

12 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec13 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frank

14 J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and

15 United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.