alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1483

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure the proper payment

of approved nursing and paramedical education programs under the

Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1999

Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. STARK, Mr. CAMP,

Mr. COYNE, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr.

GREEN of Texas, and Mr. FROST) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to

the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure

the proper payment of approved nursing and paramedical

education programs under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Nursing and

5 Paramedical Education Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1483 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF NURSING AND PARAMEDICAL EDU2 CATION COSTS IN CALCULATING

3 MEDICARE+CHOICE PAYMENT RATE.

4 (a) EXCLUDING COSTS IN CALCULATING PAYMENT

5 RATE.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1853(c)(3)(C)(i) of

7 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–

8 23(c)(3)(C)(i)) is amended—

9 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub10 clause (I);

11 (B) by striking the period at the end of

12 subclause (II) and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and

13 (C) by adding at the end the following new

14 subclause:

15 ‘‘(III) for costs attributable to

16 approved nursing and paramedical

17 education programs under section

18 1861(v).’’.

19 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

20 by paragraph (1) apply in determining the annual

21 per capita rate of payment for years beginning with

22 2000.

23 (b) PAYMENT TO HOSPITALS OF NURSING AND

24 PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM COSTS FOR

25 MEDICARE+CHOICE ENROLLEES.—Section 1861(v)(1) of
3

•HR 1483 IH

1 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(v)(1)) is amended by adding

2 at the end the following new subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(V) In determining the amount of payment to a hos4 pital for portions of cost reporting periods occurring on

5 or after January 1, 2000, with respect to the reasonable

6 costs for approved nursing and paramedical education pro7 grams, individuals who are enrolled with a

8 Medicare+Choice organization under part C shall be

9 treated as if they were not so enrolled.’’.

Æ
Anthony SUTTON, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-6816.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

*929Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
Timothy S. CHALFANT, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 18-7535.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4258 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4258

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court 
 Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official guests of the 
   Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reauthorizing Security for Supreme 
Court Justices Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION AUTHORITY OF MARSHAL OF THE SUPREME COURT AND 
              SUPREME COURT POLICE.

    Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding 
                subparagraph (A), by striking ``any State'' and 
                inserting ``any location''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) by striking ``violation of federal or 
                        state law'' and inserting ``violation of 
                        Federal or State law''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``regulation under federal 
                        or state law'' and inserting ``regulation under 
                        Federal or State law''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2);
                    (B) by striking ``Additional Requirements'' and all 
                that follows through ``Duties under'' and inserting 
                ``Authorization To Carry Firearms--Duties under''; and
                    (C) by striking ``any State'' and inserting ``any 
                location''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 4258

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court 
 Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official guests of the 
   Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                   |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ John R. Weale
|                      |  |  |  | Name:             |  | John R. Weale          
|                      |  |  |  | Title:            |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1398 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1398

   To amend section 211 of the Clean Air Act to prohibit the use of 
                        certain fuel additives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1999

 Mr. Pombo (for himself, Mr. Cunningham, and Mr. Doolittle) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 211 of the Clean Air Act to prohibit the use of 
                        certain fuel additives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 211.

    Section 211(c) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(c)) is amended 
as follows:
            (1) By adding at the end of paragraph (1) the following: 
        ``The Administrator shall amend the regulations under this 
        paragraph as promptly as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this sentence to prohibit the use of methyl 
        tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) as a fuel additive.''.
            (2) By adding the following new subparagraph at the end of 
        paragraph (2):
    ``(D) The Administrator shall prohibit under paragraph (1) any 
additive in gasoline registered under subsection (a) after the 
enactment of this subparagraph unless it has been determined (through 
scientific testing and peer review) not to have any adverse effects on 
the public.''.
                                 <all>
```
Shatswell,MacLeod & Company, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

83 Pine Street
West Peabody, Massachusetts 01960-3835
Telephone (978)535-0208
Fassimile (978) 535-9908


To the Board of Directors
Beverly National Bank
Beverly, Massachusetts

Independent Auditors Report

We have examined management's assertion about Beverly National Bank's compliance
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP)  as of  and  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1999  included  in the
accompanying  management  assertion.   Management  is  responsible  for  Beverly
National  Bank's  compliance  with  those  minimum  servicing   standards.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about Beverly National Bank's  compliance
with the minimum servicing  standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on Beverly  National  Bank's  compliance  with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's assertion that Beverly National Bank complied with
the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
January 6, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 3, 2006By:
    
    /s/ JOHN E. JACKSONName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Charles Kelvin JOHNS, petitioner, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES.

No. 18-7940.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1381 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1381

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an 
   employee's ``regular rate'' for purposes of calculating overtime 
   compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1999

 Mr. Ballenger (for himself, Mr. Goodling, and Mr. Dickey) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an 
   employee's ``regular rate'' for purposes of calculating overtime 
   compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rewarding Performance in 
Compensation Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULAR RATE.

    Section 7(e)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
207(e)(3)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon at the end the 
following: ``; or (d) the payments are made to reward an employee or 
group of employees for meeting or exceeding the productivity, quality, 
efficiency, or sales goals as specified in a gainsharing, incentive 
bonus, commission, or performance contingent bonus plan''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1226 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1226

    To direct the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the backlog in 
   satisfying requests of former members of the Armed Forces for the 
      issuance or replacement of military medals and decorations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 1999

  Mr. Evans introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the backlog in 
   satisfying requests of former members of the Armed Forces for the 
      issuance or replacement of military medals and decorations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Expedited Military Medals 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF BACKLOG IN REQUESTS FOR ISSUANCE OR REPLACEMENT 
              OF MILITARY MEDALS AND DECORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense (in this section referred 
to as the ``Secretary'') shall establish and carry out a plan to make 
available to the organizations described in subsection (b) the funds 
and other resources necessary to ensure the elimination of the backlog 
in satisfying requests of former members of the Armed Forces for the 
issuance or replacement of military decorations.
    (b) Organizations.--The organizations described in this subsection 
are the following organizations:
            (1) The Army Reserve Personnel Command.
            (2) The Bureau of Naval Personnel.
            (3) The Air Force Personnel Center.
            (4) The National Archives and Records Administration.
    (c) No Detraction in Personnel Functions.--The Secretary shall make 
available funds and resources under the plan required under subsection 
(a) in a manner that does not detract from the performance of other 
personnel service and personnel support activities within the 
Department of Defense.
    (d) Definition of Military Decoration.--For purposes of this 
section, the term ``military decoration'' means a medal or other 
decoration awarded for military service by the United States to a 
member of the Armed Forces.
    (e) Report.--Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress a report on the 
implementation of this section, including a description of--
            (1) the status of the backlog described in subsection (a); 
        and
            (2) the plan of the Secretary required under subsection 
        (a).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY
FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  9-30-99 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (22,920)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,180
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,920)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Malvin NATER-AYALA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8582.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
John M. FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. Robert MAY, Warden, et al.

No. 18M123.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Shawndell M. McFARLIN, petitioner, v. Scott S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

No. 17-9363.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      414,152
COMMITMENTS
  40,914   28,679  116,592  237,870  255,877  395,376  401,148   18,776   13,004

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,804)
   1,527    4,993   -7,014  -15,379  -21,704  -20,866  -23,725   -3,938   -1,079

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.9      6.9     28.2     57.4     61.8     95.5     96.9      4.5      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      121)
      27       18       41       63       64      112      105
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00780-CV

Ken J. MCLEAN,

Appellant

v.

Maria Martha CISNEROS,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-08-229

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2008

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his

motion to transfer venue. On November 10, 2008, we ordered appellant to show cause why this

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because orders on venue motions are not

appealable until after the entry of final judgment. American Home Prods. Corp. v. Clark, 38 S.W.3d

92, 96 (Tex. 2000). Appellant did not respond to our order. This appeal is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction. See id. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the appellant.

PER CURIAM
Michael TORRES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8281.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1577Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Freddie FOUNTAIN, petitioner, v. John RUPERT, Warden, et al.

No. 17-9301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 15



November 13, 2001


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 8, 2001 on our review of interim
financial information of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2001 and 2000 and included in the Company's quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the
Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 23, 1995.


Very truly yours,



/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
----------------------------
J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.


Cincinnati, Ohio