Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2022 / Notices 25661 

additional opportunities for public 

participation upon publication of the 

EIS/DRMPA. The public will have the 

opportunity to comment during a 90- 

day public comment period on the EIS/ 

DRMPA. 

Any persons wishing to be added to 

a mailing list of interested parties can 

call or write to the BLM, as described in 

this Notice. Additional information 

meetings may be conducted throughout 

the process to keep the public informed 

of the progress of the EIS. 

Request for Identification of Potential 

Alternatives, Information, and 

Analyses Relevant to the Proposed 

Action 

The BLM encourages comments 

concerning the proposed Greenlink 

West Project, feasible alternatives, 

possible measures to minimize and/or 

avoid adverse environmental impacts, 

and any other information relevant to 

the proposed action. Planning criteria 

are the standards, rules, and other 

factors developed by managers and 

interdisciplinary team members for use 

in forming judgements about decision 

making, analysis, and data collection 

during the planning process. The BLM 

has identified some preliminary 

planning criteria to guide development 

of the RMP amendments, to avoid 

unnecessary data collection and 

analysis, and to ensure the RMP 

amendments are tailored to the issues. 

These criteria may be modified and/or 

other criteria may be identified during 

the public scoping process. The 

following preliminary specific planning 

criteria will help guide the planning 

process. 

Criteria 1: The BLM will use a 

systematic interdisciplinary approach to 

integrate physical, biological, economic, 

and other sciences. 

Criteria 2: The BLM will use the best 

available data regarding natural 

resources. 

Criteria 3: The BLM will consider the 

present and potential uses of public 

lands and where existing RMP decisions 

are valid, those decisions will remain 

unchanged. 

Criteria 4: The BLM will consider the 

relative scarcity of values and 

availability of alternative means and 

sites for recognizing those values. 

Criteria 5: Any plan amendments will 

be completed in compliance with 

FLPMA, NEPA, and all other relevant 

Federal laws, executive orders, and 

BLM polices. 

Criteria 6: The BLM will seek 

coordination and consistency with other 

government programs including Tribal 

plans and policies. 

Criteria 7: Existing valid planning 

decisions for RMPs in effect will not 

change unless specifically amended, 

and any new plan decisions will not 

conflict with existing planning 

decisions. 

Criteria 8: Any RMP amendments will 

recognize valid existing rights. 

The BLM also requests assistance 

with identifying potential alternatives to 

the Proposed Action. As alternatives 

should resolve a problem with the 

Proposed Action, please indicate the 

purpose of the suggested alternative. In 

addition, the BLM requests the 

identification of potential impacts that 

should be analyzed. Impacts should be 

a result of the action; therefore, please 

identify the activity along with the 

potential impact. Information that 

reviewers have that would assist in the 

development of alternatives or analysis 

of resources issues is also helpful. 

Actions not relevant to the Greenlink 

West Project include considerations of 

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern 

for nomination or recommendations. 

Permanent closure of public land to 

hunting, fishing, or recreational 

shooting are also not proposed as part 

of the Greenlink West Project and 

therefore a shooting ‘‘notice of intent’’ is 

not applicable under this Notice. 

Lead and Cooperating Agencies 

The BLM Nevada State Office is the 

lead agency for this EIS. At this time, 

the following have agreed to participate 

in the environmental analysis of the 

Greenlink West Project as Cooperating 

Agencies: Bureau of Indian Affairs— 

Pacific Region, Bureau of Indian 

Affairs—Western Region, Department of 

the Air Force, National Park Service, 

National Nuclear Security 

Administration, U.S. Army and Air 

National Guard, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency Region 9, U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest 

Service, Nevada Department of 

Transportation, Fallon Paiute Shoshone 

Tribe, Fort McDermitt Paiute and 

Shoshone Tribe, Las Vegas Paiute Tribe, 

Lovelock Paiute Tribe, Pyramid Lake 

Paiute Tribe, Reno-Sparks Indian 

Colony, Summit Lake Paiute Tribe, 

Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, Walker River 

Paiute Tribe, Washoe Tribe of Nevada 

and California, Winnemucca Paiute and 

Shoshone Tribe, Yerington Paiute Tribe, 

Yomba Shoshone Tribe, Nevada 

Department of Wildlife, Nevada 

Division of Environmental Protection, 

Nevada Division of Minerals, Nevada 

Division of State Lands, Clark County, 

Esmeralda County, Lyon County, 

Mineral County, Nye County, Storey 

County, Washoe County, Silver State 

Energy Association, City of Carson City, 

City of Las Vegas, City of North Las 

Vegas, City of Reno, and Town of 

Tonopah. 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

The BLM will decide whether to 

grant, grant with conditions, or deny the 

application for a ROW. Pursuant to 43 

CFR 2805.10, if the BLM issues a grant, 

the BLM decision maker may include 

terms, conditions, and stipulations 

determined to be in the public interest. 

The BLM will make the decision as to 

whether or not to approve any RMP 

amendments, in accordance with BLM 

policy about delegation of authorities. In 

the ROD, the BLM will clearly 

distinguish the RMP amendment 

decision from the selected alternative 

for the proposed electric transmission 

project. 

Personal Identifying Information 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. Comments submitted 

anonymously will be accepted and 

considered. 

It is important that reviewers provide 

their comments at such times and in 

such manner that they are useful to the 

agency’s preparation of the EIS. 

Therefore, comments should be 

provided prior to the close of the public 

scoping period and should clearly 

articulate the reviewer’s concerns and 

contentions. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., 40 

CFR 1501.9, 40 CFR 1501.7, 43 CFR 

1610.2. 43 CFR 2091.3–1, and 43 CFR 

2804.25(f). 

Jon K. Raby, 

BLM Nevada State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09373 Filed 4–29–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[22X.LLAZ921000.L14400000.

BJ0000.LXSSA2250000.241A] 

Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; 

Arizona 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of official filing. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
25662 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2022 / Notices 

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the 

following described lands were 

officially filed in the Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM), Arizona State 

Office, Phoenix, Arizona on the dates 

indicated. The surveys announced in 

this notice are necessary for the 

management of lands administered by 

the agency indicated. 

ADDRESSES: These plats will be available 

for inspection in the Arizona State 

Office, Bureau of Land Management, 

One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004–4427. Protests 

of any of these surveys should be sent 

to the Arizona State Director at the 

above address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Geoff Graham, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 

of Arizona; (623) 580–5579; ggraham@

blm.gov. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) 

at 7–1–1 to leave a message or question 

for the above individual. The FRS is 

available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 

You will receive a reply during normal 

business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Gila and Salt River Meridian, 

Arizona 

The plat, in one sheet, representing 

the dependent resurvey of the boundary 

of Tracts 38 and 39, and the metes-andbounds survey of Tract 40, partially 

surveyed Township 11 North, Range 11 

East, accepted December 8, 2021, and 

officially filed January 11, 2022, for 

Group 1217, Arizona. 

This plat was prepared at the request 

of the United States Forest Service. 

The plat, in two sheets, representing 

the dependent resurvey of a portion of 

the Hopi and Navajo Partition Line, the 

completion surveys of the north and 

west boundaries, the survey of the south 

boundary and the subdivisional lines, 

and the subdivision of certain sections, 

partially surveyed Township 30 North, 

Range 12 East, accepted December 8, 

2021, and officially filed January 11, 

2022, for Group 1209, Arizona. 

This plat was prepared at the request 

of the Bureau of Land Management. 

A person or party who wishes to 

protest against any of these surveys 

must file a written notice of protest 

within 30 calendar days from the date 

of this publication with the Arizona 

State Director, Bureau of Land 

Management, stating that they wish to 

protest. 

A statement of reasons for a protest 

may be filed with the notice of protest 

to the State Director, or the statement of 

reasons must be filed with the State 

Director within 30 days after the protest 

is filed. Before including your address, 

or other personal information in your 

protest, please be aware that your entire 

protest, including your personal 

identifying information, may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Authority: 43 U.S.C. chap. 3. 

Geoffrey Graham, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor of Arizona. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09321 Filed 4–29–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–32–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–563 and 731– 

TA–1331–1333 (Review)] 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From 

India, Italy, and Spain; Institution of 

Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted reviews 

pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the 

Act’’), as amended, to determine 

whether revocation of the 

countervailing duty order on finished 

carbon steel flanges from India and the 

antidumping duty orders on finished 

carbon steel flanges from India, Italy, 

and Spain would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested 

parties are requested to respond to this 

notice by submitting the information 

specified below to the Commission. 

DATES: Instituted May 2, 2022. To be 

assured of consideration, the deadline 

for responses is June 1, 2022. Comments 

on the adequacy of responses may be 

filed with the Commission by July 14, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Caitlyn Hendricks (202–205–2058), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On June 14, 2017, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) 

issued an antidumping duty order on 

finished carbon steel flanges from Spain 

(82 FR 27229). On August 24, 2017, 

Commerce issued a countervailing duty 

order on finished carbon steel flanges 

from India (82 FR 40138) and 

antidumping duty orders on finished 

carbon steel flanges from India and Italy 

(82 FR 40136). The Commission is 

conducting reviews pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)), to determine whether 

revocation of the orders would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to the domestic industry 

within a reasonably foreseeable time. 

Provisions concerning the conduct of 

this proceeding may be found in the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts 

A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts 

A and F. The Commission will assess 

the adequacy of interested party 

responses to this notice of institution to 

determine whether to conduct full or 

expedited reviews. The Commission’s 

determinations in any expedited 

reviews will be based on the facts 

available, which may include 

information provided in response to this 

notice. 

Definitions.—The following 

definitions apply to these reviews: 

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or 

kind of merchandise that is within the 

scope of the five-year reviews, as 

defined by Commerce. 

(2) The Subject Countries in these 

reviews are India, Italy, and Spain. 

(3) The Domestic Like Product is the 

domestically produced product or 

products which are like, or in the 

absence of like, most similar in 

characteristics and uses with, the 

Subject Merchandise. In its original 

determinations, the Commission 

defined a single Domestic Like Product 

consisting of flanges coextensive with 

Commerce’s scope. 

(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. 

producers as a whole of the Domestic 

Like Product, or those producers whose 

collective output of the Domestic Like 

Product constitutes a major proportion 

of the total domestic production of the 

product. In its original determinations, 

the Commission defined one Domestic 

Industry consisting of all domestic 

producers of flanges, except for one 

firm, which was excluded from the 

Domestic Industry as a related party. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1