alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Allen H. Koranda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAF Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: August 12, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Allen H. Koranda                                              
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |     |  | Allen H. Koranda Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1351 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1351

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
                               gift tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

 Mr. Scarborough introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
                               gift tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Sunset Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) Repeal of Estate and Gift Taxes.--Subtitle B of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to estate and gift taxes) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to the estates of decedents dying, and gifts and generation-skipping 
transfers made, after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAF Bancorp, Inc. on the basis of each such officers knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MAF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 10, 2006, (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|                   |  |        |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  |        |  | /s/ Allen H. Koranda                                
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Allen H. Koranda                                    
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   
|                   |  |       
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  |        |  | /s/ Jerry A. Weberling                              
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Jerry A. Weberling                                  
|                   |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies the Companys Form 10-Q for the
three month period ended March 31, 2006 and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1509 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1509

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial Foundation to 
  establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to 
honor veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of 
                           the United States.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1509

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial Foundation to 
  establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to 
honor veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMORIAL TO HONOR DISABLED VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES 
              ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Memorial Authorized.--The Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial 
Foundation is authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in the 
District of Columbia or its environs to honor veterans who became 
disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of the United States.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with the 
Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
    (c) Payment of Expenses.--The Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial 
Foundation shall be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions 
for, and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial. 
No Federal funds may be used to pay any expense of the establishment of 
the memorial.
    (d) Deposit of Excess Funds.--If, upon payment of all expenses of 
the establishment of the memorial (including the maintenance and 
preservation amount required under section 8(b) of the Commemorative 
Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1008(b))), or upon expiration of the authority for 
the memorial under section 10(b) of such Act (40 U.S.C. 1010(b)), there 
remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the 
memorial, the Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial Foundation shall 
transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Treasury for 
deposit in the account provided for in section 8(b)(1) of such Act (40 
U.S.C. 1008(b)(1)).

            Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-7191 SALOMON S. LOAYZA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-95-11, CA-98-69-4) Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 10, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Salomon S. Loayza, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Mark Salsbury, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Salomon Loayza appeals the district court's order denying his request for collateral relief from his criminal conviction for mail fraud. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. However, we disagree with the district court's reasoning that Loayza's complaint should be construed asdemanding a writ of coram nobis. Rather, Loayza's complaint is properly before the courts as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) b ecause he filed the motion while still incarcerated for the conviction currently challenged, see Carafas v. LaVallee , 391 U.S. 234, 238 (1968), and b ecause the c onditions of supervised release to which Loayza is currently subject are sufficient to satisfy the "custody" requirement. See Jones v. Cunningham , 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963). Nevertheless, for the reasons stated by the district court, we agree that Loayza is not entitled to collateral relief. Accordingly, we deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis,deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal based substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Loayza , Nos. CR-95-11; CA-98-69-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

_________________________________________________________________ *To the extent that Loayza raises new arguments on appeal, we decline to address them. See Karpel v. Inova Health Sys. Servs. , 134 F.3d 1222, 1227 (4th Cir. 1998). 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1464

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that farm income

may be allocated among taxable years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. RYUN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. TIAHRT, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. BURR of

North Carolina, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. BLILEY, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that farm income may be allocated among taxable years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Income Averaging Eq5 uity Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AVERAGING OF FARM INCOME.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1301 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to averaging of farm income)

9 is amended by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as
2

•HR 1464 IH

1 subsections (c) and (d), respectively, and by inserting after

2 subsection (a) the following new subsection:

3 ‘‘(b) ELECTION TO MOVE FARM INCOME AMONG

4 TAXABLE YEARS.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In lieu of the election

6 under subsection (a) for a taxable year, a taxpayer

7 may elect to increase or decrease taxable income for

8 the taxable year and the 3 previous taxable years by

9 moving elected farm income from any of such tax10 able years to any other of such taxable years.

11 ‘‘(2) APPLICATION TO SUBSEQUENT YEARS.—

12 Any adjustment under this subsection for any tax13 able year shall be taken into account in applying this

14 section for any subsequent taxable year.

15 ‘‘(3) INTEREST.—For purposes of applying sec16 tions 6601 and 6611 to returns modified under

17 paragraph (1), the filing date (as defined in section

18 6611(f)(4)(A)) for a returned modified by reason of

19 paragraph (1) shall be the same as the filing date

20 of the return for the current taxable year.’’.

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

22 (1) The last sentence of subsection (a) of sec23 tion 1301 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘sec24 tion’’ the first place it appears and inserting ‘‘sub25 section’’.
3

•HR 1464 IH

1 (2) Clause (ii) of section 1301(b)(1)(A) of such

2 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or (b)’’ after ‘‘sub3 section (a)’’.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

6 December 31, 1998.

Æ
Lloyd Gene BEAM, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-1016.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
```

```

----

Updated August 26, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR ITS FISCAL QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000909483
<NAME> N/A
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                         208,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  174,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    767,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,651,651
<PP&E>                                       4,588,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,620,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,747,943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,994
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,754,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,620,031
<SALES>                                      1,046,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,496,285
<CGS>                                          544,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,177,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (681,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (720,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (720,026)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/29/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      138,609
COMMITMENTS
  20,435   19,660   29,566   73,262   77,938  123,263  127,164   15,346   11,445

CHANGES FROM 11/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,678)
  -1,198    3,403      220    6,527    3,097    5,549    6,720     -871   -2,042

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.7     14.2     21.3     52.9     56.2     88.9     91.7     11.1      8.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      25       20       28       23       23       66       59
```

----

Updated December 2, 2011
Jonathan Leroy HOMEDEW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8514.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Michael ST. HUBERT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8025.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-mos 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                         3,668,624
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  3,846,175
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    582,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               10,924,893
<PP&E>                         3,105,085
<DEPRECIATION>                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 26,713,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          6,128,133
<BONDS>                        188,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    374,000
<COMMON>                       17,634
<OTHER-SE>                     20,005,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   26,713,443
<SALES>                        5,168,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               5,168,758
<CGS>                          4,752,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  4,752,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               3,981,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             194,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (3,759,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (400,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (3,359,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (3,359,485)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.21)
        


</TABLE>
Lonzo BONNER, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-7653.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
**Exhibit 12.1****IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES**RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS     Our consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges for each of the five fiscal yearsended December 31, 2005 and the nine months ended September 30, 2006, are as follows:                           Nine months    ended    September Year ended December 31,  30, 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001  ($ in thousands)Net income (loss) $286,434  $(623,399) $138,613  $260,629  $157,906  $(3,933)Preferred share dividends  12,941   2,644   —   —   —   — Fixed charges  —   —   —   —   —   —  Ratio of earnings tocombined fixed chargesand preferred sharedividends  22.1 : 1   *(i**)*  —   —   —   —  *(i)* Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2005 were insufficient to cover combined fixedcharges and preferred share dividends by $626.0 million.
24
Gerald S. LEPRE, Jr., petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING.

No. 17-6968.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
H. R. 1509

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To authorize the Disabled Veterans’ LIFE Memorial Foundation to establish a

memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to honor veterans who

became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of the United States.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMORIAL TO HONOR DISABLED VETERANS OF THE

UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) MEMORIAL AUTHORIZED.—The Disabled Veterans’ LIFE

Memorial Foundation is authorized to establish a memorial on

Federal land in the District of Columbia or its environs to honor

veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces

of the United States.

(b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMORATIVE

WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance

with the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).

(c) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—The Disabled Veterans’ LIFE

Memorial Foundation shall be solely responsible for acceptance

of contributions for, and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial. No Federal funds may be used to pay

any expense of the establishment of the memorial.

(d) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If, upon payment of all

expenses of the establishment of the memorial (including the

maintenance and preservation amount required under section 8(b)

of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1008(b))), or upon

expiration of the authority for the memorial under section 10(b)

of such Act (40 U.S.C. 1010(b)), there remains a balance of funds

received for the establishment of the memorial, the Disabled Veterans’ LIFE Memorial Foundation shall transmit the amount of

the balance to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in the
H. R. 1509—2

account provided for in section 8(b)(1) of such Act (40 U.S.C.

1008(b)(1)).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Glenn BLAIR, petitioner, v. Angela McCLINTON, et al.

No. 18-786.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.