alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.8 ENDORSEMENT NO. 2 Attached to and made a part ofAGREEMENT OF REINSURANCE
NO. 9034
betweenPHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY COMPANY
PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY
(herein collectively referred to as the Company)
andGENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
(herein referred to as the Reinsurer) IT IS MUTUALLY AGREEDthat, as respects new and renewal policies of the Company becoming effective
at and after 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2005, and policies of the Company in force at 12:01 A.M.,
January 1, 2005, Section 7of Exhibit Ato this Agreement is amended to read: Section 7    REINSURANCE PREMIUM The Company shall pay to the Reinsurer:  (a)
    For the First Excess Cover, 2.50% of the Companys Subject Earned
Premium;(b)
    For the Second Excess Cover, 1.15% of the Companys Subject Earned
Premium. IT IS FURTHER AGREEDthat, as respects Terrorism Occurrences taking place at and after 12:01 A.M.,
January 1, 2005, Exhibit Bto this Agreement is hereby renewed subject to all its terms, conditions
and limitations, except as modified below, for a period of one year. Accordingly, the first paragraph of Section 2  TERMis amended to read: This Exhibit shall apply to new and renewal policies of the Company becoming effective at and
after 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2005, and to policies of the Company in force at 12:01 A.M., January
1, 2005, with respect to claims and losses resulting from Terrorism Occurrences taking place at and
after the aforesaid time and date, and prior to 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2006. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Endorsement to be executed GENERAL REINSURANCE
CORPORATIONA Berkshire Hathaway Company




---



##### 



in duplicate, this  day of , 200, PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY COMPANYPHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANYAttest:and this 14th day of March 200_5___.GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATIONJoan Lafrance, Vice President
 Attest: Diane B. Hyland, Second Vice President - 2 -
Endorsement No. 2
Agreement No. 9034GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
Josephenie ROBERTSON, petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA, et al.

No. 18-978.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1367

To amend section 211 of the Clean Air Act to prohibit the use of the

fuel additive MTBE in gasoline.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend section 211 of the Clean Air Act to prohibit

the use of the fuel additive MTBE in gasoline.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF MTBE AS A FUEL ADDITIVE.

4 (a) AMENDMENT OF CLEAN AIR ACT.—Section

5 211(c) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.7545(c)) is amend6 ed by adding at the end of paragraph (1) the following:

7 ‘‘The regulations under this paragraph shall prohibit the

8 use of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) as a fuel addi9 tive.’’.
2

•HR 1367 IH

1 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Administrator of the Envi2 ronmental Protection Agency shall amend the regulations

3 under section 211(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act as promptly

4 as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act to

5 conform to the amendment made by this Act.

6 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

7 Section 1 takes effect upon the expiration of the

8 three-year period beginning on the date of the enactment

9 of this Act.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1195

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction

for meal and entertainment expenses of small businesses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. MCCRERY (for himself, Mr. TANNER, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. FARR of California,

Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. TALENT, Mr. RAMSTAD, and Ms. DUNN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deduction for meal and entertainment expenses of

small businesses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SMALL BUSINESSES ALLOWED INCREASED DE4 DUCTION FOR MEAL AND ENTERTAINMENT

5 EXPENSES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (n) of section 274 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only 50

8 percent of meal and entertainment expenses allowed as de-
2

•HR 1195 IH

1 duction) is amended by adding at the end the following

2 new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES.—

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any

5 taxpayer which is a small business, paragraph

6 (1) shall be applied by substituting ‘the applica7 ble percentage (as defined in paragraph

8 (3)(B))’ for ‘50 percent’.

9 ‘‘(B) SMALL BUSINESS.—For purposes of

10 this paragraph, the term ‘small business’

11 means, with respect to expenses paid or in12 curred during any taxable year—

13 ‘‘(i) any C corporation which meets

14 the requirements of section 55(e)(1) for

15 such year, and

16 ‘‘(ii) any S corporation, partnership,

17 or sole proprietorship which would meet

18 such requirements if it were a C corpora19 tion.’’

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

22 December 31, 1999.

Æ
Bradley B. MILLER, petitioner, v. TEXAS, et al.

No. 18-7450.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Anthony LEWALLYN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6533.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 161/27 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 161 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5727 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 161

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5727 May 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 161/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Fifth supplement to the 32nd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 161/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Fifth supplement to the 32nd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

d0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

146903

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146903

COA: 304509

Oakland CC: 2010-234803-FH

MICHAEL DEAN WORDEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of June 25, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Earl (Docket No. 145677). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

March 26, 2014, 495 Mich 33 (2014), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, petitioner, v. SOLARCITY CORPORATION.

No. 17-368.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 1, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/16/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      171,471
COMMITMENTS
  57,427   10,398   25,636   66,254  110,136  149,317  146,170   22,154   25,301

CHANGES FROM 08/09/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -228)
    -248   -3,515      443      157    5,720      352    2,648     -580   -2,876

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.5      6.1     15.0     38.6     64.2     87.1     85.2     12.9     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      63       23       58       64       76      144      147
```

----

Updated August 19, 2011
Zainab KAMARA, petitioner, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 17-6899.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*987Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1379 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1379

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental 
 Appropriations Act, 1999, to make a technical correction relating to 
              international narcotics control assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Western Hemisphere Drug Elimination 
Technical Corrections Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS RELATING TO RESOURCES FOR 
              ILLICIT NARCOTICS IN CERTAIN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Subtitle B of title VIII of 
division C of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-277), is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

``SEC. 826. FURTHER MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONAL RESOURCES.

    ``(a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated for the 
Department of State for fiscal year 1999 such sums as may be necessary 
to carry out section 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 
U.S.C. 2291).
    ``(b) Rule of Construction.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) are in addition to 
amounts made available to carry out section 481 of such Act under any 
other provision of law.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Title VIII of division C of such Act 
(Public Law 105-277) is amended in the table of contents in section 
801(b) by adding at the end of the item relating to subtitle B the 
following:

        ``Sec. 826. Further miscellaneous additional resources.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in subtitle B of title VIII of division C of such 
Act (Public Law 105-277).

            Passed the House of Representatives April 20, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KAREN JILAVDAR

Y AN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-71137 Age n c y No. A200-908-550 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. Kare n Jila

vda ry an, a native and c itiz e n of Arm e n ia , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r (“ B IA” ) dism i ssing his a p p e a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for withholding of re m ova l and prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture (“ C AT” ). W e hav e 

# FIL ED DEC 9 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, W a k k ary v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th C ir. 2010), and we de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Jila vda ry an c onte nds he suffe re d pa st pe rse c ution a nd ha s a fe ar of future pe rse c ution by

“ Arm e nia

n m obste rs” who e xtorte d m one y from him . Substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the

a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of withholding of re m ova l. Se eZe t ino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ An a lie n’ s de sire to be fre e from ha ra ssm e nt by

c rim i na l s m otiva

te d by the ft . . . be ars no ne xus to a prote c t e d ground.” ); s e ealso Parussimov a v . Muk ase y , 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th C ir. 2009) (a prote c te d ground m

ust be at le a st one c e ntra l re a son for pe rse c uting thea pplic ant). W e re je c t Jila vda ry an’ s c onte ntion tha

t the B IA fa ile d to a ddre ss his a rgum e nts, and a lso re

je c t his re que st for a

re m and. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e a lso supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of Jila

vda ry an ’ s C A T c la im be c a use he fa ile d to e s ta

blish it is m

ore like ly tha n not he would be torture d by or with thec onse nt or a c quie sc e nc e of a public offic ia l in Arm e nia . Se eSilay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 1 1 3 7 2
Michael S. BENT, petitioner, v. Pamela TALKIN, Marshal, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

No. 18-917.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Darrell Lamar MARSHALL, petitioner, v. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 41-5797.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Henry Clay SMITH, petitioner, v. Steven E. HADDOCK, Judge, 8th Circuit Court of Alabama, et al.

No. 17-6815.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Benjamin CRUMP, petitioner, v. DELAWARE.

No. 18-8106.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2010, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s Craig F. Fortin                               
|                      |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dale Ray HURD, petitioner, v. Joe A. LIZARRAGA, Warden.

No. 17-9108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Guadalupe AVENDANO-VASQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8264.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                    
|--------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: August 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin
|                      |  | Craig F. Fortin    



22
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
Part II.  Other information,   Item 6a.
Exhibit 11.1

                              INPUT SOFTWARE, INC.
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                September 30,       September 30,
                             ------------------- -------------------
                               1999      1998      1999      1998
                             --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)...........      $42      $354      $354   ($2,037)
                             ========= ========= ========= =========

Shares used in basic EPS
 calculation................    4,255     5,352     4,478     5,890

Dilutive effect of stock
 options....................        2        88         8       105
                             --------- --------- --------- ---------
Shares used in diluted EPS
 calculation................    4,257     5,440     4,486     5,995
                             ========= ========= ========= =========

Basic EPS...................    $0.01     $0.07     $0.08    ($0.35)

Diluted EPS.................    $0.01     $0.07     $0.08    ($0.35)
                             ========= ========= ========= =========

</TABLE>
Options outstanding at September 30, 1999 and September 30, 1998 of
2.4 million and 1.2 million respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted EPS because exercise price was greater than
the average market price.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-60707-01

IMH Assets Corp IMPAC CMB Trust Series 1999-1
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California     			33-0705301
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

20371 Irvine Ave., Suite 200
Santa Ana Heights, CA 92707
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

714-556-0122
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.