alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-20022 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Izaiah Guzman, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:22-CR-102-1 

______________________________ 

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Izaiah Guzman was convicted of one charge of possession of a 

machine gun and was sentenced to serve an above-guidelines term of 60 

months in prison as well as a three-year term of supervised release. He 

challenges his prison sentence in this appeal, arguing that it is procedurally 

and substantively unreasonable. 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

June 23, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-20022 Document: 00516797851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2023
No. 23-20022 

2 

In general, sentences are reviewed for reasonableness by engaging in a 

bifurcated review. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). First, this 

court must ensure that the sentencing court committed no significant 

procedural error. Id. A procedural error occurs when, inter alia, the district 

court “fail[s] to consider the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors,” which include 

the history and characteristics of the defendant. Id.; see § 3553(a)(1). If the 

district court’s sentencing decision is procedurally sound, this court should 

then consider the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Gall, 552 U.S. 

at 51. An above-guidelines sentence, such as Guzman’s, is substantively 

unreasonable if it “(1) does not account for a factor that should have received 

significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper 

factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing 

factors.” United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 708 (5th Cir. 2006). 

Guzman shows no procedural error in connection with his sentence. 

See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. Insofar as he argues that the district court failed to 

consider his history and characteristics, specifically his rough childhood, the 

record refutes this contention. Likewise unavailing is Guzman’s argument 

that the district court erred by basing his sentence on his criminal history 

when this factor was already accounted for in the guidelines, as this court has 

held that a defendant’s criminal history, including juvenile offenses, may 

support a non-Guidelines sentence. See Smith, 440 F.3d at 709. Finally, 

Guzman’s argument that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because 

the district court did not account for certain factors fails because it reflects 

no more than a disagreement with the district court’s weighing of the 

pertinent factors, which does not suffice to show substantive 

unreasonableness. See Smith, 440 F.3d at 708. The judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 23-20022 Document: 00516797851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2023
Zonta Tavarus ELLISON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7881.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Moises PEREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5940.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, June 8, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Wednesday, June 8, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Conchata Holloway. For more information, please contact Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 Commerce St. MC 1005, Dallas, TX 75242 or contact us at the website:                     *https://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: May 3, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-09821 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        000909298
<NAME>                       MART
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
<CURRENCY>                   US DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                             1,106
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,027
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS><F1>                   0
<PP&E>                           323,241
<DEPRECIATION>                    55,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   328,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES><F1>              0
<BONDS>                          149,048
<COMMON>                             143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                        97,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     328,641
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  26,254
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     18,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 6,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    6,401
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                6,401
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       6,401
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.44

<FN> <F1>  Mid-Atlantic  Realty Trust (MART) is in the  specialized  real estate
<F1>  industry for which the  current/noncurrent  distinction  is deemed in <F1>
practice  to  have  little  or  no  relevance.  Therefore,  MART  prepares  <F1>
unclassified  balance  sheets which do not report current assets or <F1> current
liabilities.
</FN>




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09779]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-991]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Patheon 
Pharmaceuticals Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. has applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer 
to SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before 
July 5, 2022. Such persons may also file a written request for a 
hearing on the application on or before July 5, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all 
comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into 
the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier 
comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon 
submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. 
Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously 
available for public view on https://www.regulations.gov. If you have 
received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully 
submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on February 3, 2022, Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2110 
East Galbraith Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45237-1625, applied to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid...............    2010  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled 
substance as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) that will be 
further synthesized into Food and Drug Administration-approved dosage 
forms. No other activities for this drug code are authorized for this 
registration.

Matthew J. Strait,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-09779 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6239

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CALVIN MCCROREY, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief 

District Judge. (0:98-cr-01186-JFA-11) 

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Calvin McCrorey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Calvin McCrorey, Jr., appeals from the district 

court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

McCrorey, No. 0:98-cr-01186-JFA-11 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2009) 

(noting that McCrorey’s Sentencing Guidelines range remained 

unchanged after Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines 

because his statutory maximum sentence was below his guidelines 

sentencing range). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 5G1.1(a) (2008) (noting that where statutorily authorized 

maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable 

guidelines range, the maximum sentence shall be the guidelines 

range). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
| i.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ii.   | The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November  15, 2010 | By: /s/ Jon Thompson                  |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                         | Jon Thompson                          |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                         |                                  |
| November 15, 2010            | By: /s/ Shannon L. Greene             |
|                         | Shannon L. Greene                     |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Kevin HOKENSTROM, petitioner, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 18-7487.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 25, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                         124,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,275
<INVENTORY>                                    428,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,020,994
<PP&E>                                       5,167,061
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,715,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,610,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,266,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,744
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,610,835
<SALES>                                      2,448,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,994,995
<CGS>                                        4,994,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,080,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               133,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (219,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (219,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (219,036)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.015)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Charles R. Osenbaugh, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Timeline, Inc.

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a.          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b.          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c.          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a.          All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and

          b.          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: February 10, 2005 |                     |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|
|                    | /s/ CHARLES R. OSENBAUGH |
|                    |                          |
|                    | Charles R. Osenbaugh     |
|                    | President, CEO and CFO   |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1409 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1409

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide that the provisions 
 requiring payment of Federal benefits in the form of electronic funds 
 transfers shall not apply with respect to benefits payable under the 
old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under title II of 
                        the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1999

Mr. English (for himself, Mr. Rahall, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Taylor of North 
 Carolina, Mrs. Emerson, and Mr. Shows) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide that the provisions 
 requiring payment of Federal benefits in the form of electronic funds 
 transfers shall not apply with respect to benefits payable under the 
old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under title II of 
                        the Social Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR OASDI BENEFITS FROM MANDATORY PAYMENT IN THE 
              FORM OF ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS.

    The last sentence of paragraph (3) of section 3332(j) of title 31, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting after ``1986'' the 
following: ``or any benefit payment under the old-age, survivors, and 
disability insurance program under title II of the Social Security 
Act''.
                                 <all>
```