alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: August 5, 2004

/s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE
Robert L. HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Don STRAHOTA, Warden.

No. 17-9297.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A-3 of Newtech Resources Ltd. (Registrant) for the annual period
ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), I, Ross Wilmot, chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    
          This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this
          Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
          Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for
the period covered by this Report.

| | 
| | 

/s/ Ross WilmotRoss Wilmot

Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 8, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/16/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,488
COMMITMENTS
  11,795    4,028    4,253   15,709   20,489   31,757   28,770    8,731   11,718

CHANGES FROM 03/09/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        897)
     190      176     -307      933    1,272      816    1,141       81     -244

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.1      9.9     10.5     38.8     50.6     78.4     71.1     21.6     28.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
      15        9       12       29       21       46       42
```

----

Updated March 19, 2010
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      170,219
COMMITMENTS
  18,275   15,494   34,458  100,020  104,060  152,753  154,012   17,466   16,207

CHANGES FROM 03/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -23,982)
    -291  -12,095   -2,954  -16,222   -6,945  -19,467  -21,994   -4,515   -1,988

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.7      9.1     20.2     58.8     61.1     89.7     90.5     10.3      9.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       93)
      33       21       40       23       25       80       75
```

----

Updated March 25, 2011
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 22
- 00 066
- C R

__________________ ETHAN THOMAS BROWN , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 75th District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21DC
- CR
- 00521

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER The trial court appointed Michelle Mangum

- Merendino to represent a ppellant Ethan Thomas Brown on appeal. The reporter’s record was filed on March 24, 2022, and t he clerk’s record w a s filed on April 21, 2022 . On Ju ly 26 , 2022, the Court granted a third extension of time to file the brief, noting that the extension was a “final extension” , and we warned a ppellant’s court

- appointed attorney, Michelle Mangum

- Merendino , that unless we rec eived the brief by August 22, 2022, we would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why no brief has been2 filed. Although the brief of the appellant was due to be filed by August 2 2 , 2022, the brief has not been filed. We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the appellant shall be present. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). We direct the trial court to determine whether or not a ppell ant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has not been filed and whether good cause exists for appointed counsel, Michelle Mangum

- Merendino , to be reli eved of h er duties as appellate counsel and replaced by substitute counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2). If the trial court determines that good cause exists to relieve appointed counsel of h er duties, we direct the trial court to appoint substitute counsel. The record of the hearing, including any orders and fin dings of the trial court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial court judge are to be filed on or before September 28 , 2022.
ORDER ENTERED August 29 , 202 2

. PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 9, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01081-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.B., K.B., C.B., D.B., M.B., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470-55401-2017

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss, stating she no longer wishes to prosecute this 

appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

181081F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF M.B., K.B., C.B., 

D.B., M.B., CHILDREN

No. 05-18-01081-CV 

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470-55401-2017.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, 

Justices Osborne and Reichek participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellee Archer Berryman recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from 

appellant Emily Berryman.

Judgment entered this 9th day of May 2019.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4672 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, 

California, as the ‘‘Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4672 EH

1 SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 2ND CLASS (SEAL) MATTHEW 

2 G. AXELSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard 

5 in Cupertino, California, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. 

7 Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Petty Officer 2nd 

12 Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4672 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. cer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post vard in Cupertino, California, as the ‘‘Petty Offi- al Service located at 21701 Stevens Creek Boule-
Patrick Joseph KOFALT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8247.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**CompensationArrangements with Ditech Communications Corporation Non-Employee Directors**

 

Ditechnon-employee directors currently receive a fee for attendance of $1,000 foreach regular board meeting, $2,500 for the annual offsite regular boardmeeting, and $250 for each special board meeting. Members of the AuditCommittee currently receive a fee for attendance of $2,500 for each regularcommittee meeting, $1,000 for each in-person special meeting, and $500 for eachtelephonic special meeting. Members of the Compensation Committee currentlyreceive a fee for attendance of $2,000 for each regular meeting and $500 foreach special meeting. Members of the Corporate Governance and NominatingCommittee currently receive a fee for attendance of $2,000 for each regularmeeting and $500 per special meeting. Additionally, directors are entitled tobe reimbursed for certain expenses in connection with attendance at board andcommittee meetings.

 

Pursuantto Ditech’s 1999 Non-Employee Directors’ Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”), uponinitial appointment, each non-employee director is automatically granted anoption to purchase 50,000 shares of Ditech’s Common Stock, which is subject toannual vesting over a four-year period from the date of grant. In addition,each non-employee director will automatically be granted a fully-vested optionto purchase 10,000 shares of Ditech’s Common Stock immediately following eachannual meeting of stockholders; provided, that suchperson has served as a non-employee director of Ditech for at least six monthsas of the date of the applicable annual meeting of stockholders. These optionsare granted at 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date ofgrant and have a five-year term. Pursuant to the Directors’ Plan, the initialgrants and the annual grants are non-discretionary and are grantedautomatically, without any further action by Ditech, the Board or thestockholders.

 

----
Furn-Lee SALOMON, petitioner, v. Patrick NOGAN, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 18-7888.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26998-26999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0096]


Safety Zone; Four Seasons Hotel Fireworks Display Event, New 
Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

[[Page 26999]]


ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a temporary safety zone for a 
fireworks display located on the navigable waters of the Lower 
Mississippi River (LMR) between Mile Marker (MM) 94.5 and MM 95.5 Above 
Head of Passes (AHP). This action is needed to provide for the safety 
of life on these navigable waterways during the event. During the 
enforcement periods, the operator of any vessel in the regulated area 
must comply with directions from the Captain of the Port or designated 
representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.845 will be enforced from 8:45 
p.m. to 10 p.m. on May 18, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Commander William 
Stewart, Sector New Orleans, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504-365-2246, 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90c7f9fcfcf9f1fdbed1bec3e4f5e7f1e2e4d0e5e3f3f7befdf9fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aafdc3c6c6c3cbc784eb84f9decfddcbd8deeadfd9c9cd84c7c3c6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce safety zone 
located in 33 CFR 165.845 for the Four Seasons Hotel Fireworks Display 
event. The regulations will be enforced from 8:45 p.m. through 10 p.m. 
on May 18, 2022. This action is being taken to provide for the safety 
of life on navigable waterways during this event, which will be located 
between MM 94.5 and MM 95.5 AHP, LMR, LA. During the enforcement 
periods, the operator of any vessel in the regulated area must comply 
with directions from the Captain of the Port or designated 
representative.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this 
enforcement period via Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs), 
Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
(BNMs).

    Dated: May 2, 2022.
K.K. Denning,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2022-09788 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-15016

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:14-mc-00002-MTT

ANTHONY S. PITCH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM 

PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, 

BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges:

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether 

this case should be reheard en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in 

active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS 

Case: 17-15016 Date Filed: 06/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is 

VACATED.

Case: 17-15016 Date Filed: 06/04/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2017

No. 04-16-00085-CV

WHATABURGER, INC., CA Development LLC, CA Real Estate LLC, Cinco Aguilas LLC, 

Tres Aguilas Enterprises LLC, Tres Aguilas Management LLC, Whataburger International LLC, 

Whataburger Real Estate LLC, Whataburger Restaurants LLC, et al.,

Appellants

v.

WHATABURGER OF ALICE, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-01431

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for leave to file its surreply brief is GRANTED. 

It is so ORDERED on January 24, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE, petitioner, v. ARGUS LEADER MEDIA, dba Argus Leader.

No. 18-481.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Joshua JACOBS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-7590.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

*1449Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Lillian PELLEGRINI, petitioner, v. FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William BURTON, petitioner, v. DELAWARE.

No. 18-8574.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
Samuel BERHE, petitioner, v. Johnson OLESEHA.

No. 18-7218.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Tatyana Evgenievna DREVALEVA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-8315.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.56

                               BORROWER CONSENT

                               December 2, 1999

Cisco Systems Capital Corporation
Worldwide Financial Services
Mailstop SJC2-3rd Floor
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA  95134-1706

          Re:  CAIS Internet, Inc.
               -------------------

Gentlemen:

          Reference is made to that certain Agreement dated as of June 30, 1999
(as amended, modified, renewed or extended from time to time, the "Credit
Agreement") by and between CAIS, Inc. (the "Borrower") and Cisco Systems Capital
Corporation (the "Lender") and in connection therewith, that certain Guaranty
dated June 30, 1999 made by CAIS Internet, Inc. (the "Guarantor") in favor of
Lender (as amended, modified, renewed or extended from time to time, the
"Guaranty").

          The undersigned acknowledges receipt of a copy of the First Amendment
to Guaranty dated December 2, 1999 (the "Amendment") being entered into
concurrently herewith by and between CAIS Internet, Inc. and the Lender.

          The undersigned, in its capacity as Borrower in the Credit Agreement,
hereby acknowledges that its consent to the foregoing Amendment is not required,
but the undersigned nevertheless does hereby consent to the foregoing Amendment
and to the documents and agreements referred to therein and to all future
modifications and amendments thereto and any termination thereof, and to any and
all other present and future documents and agreements between or among the
foregoing parties. Nothing herein shall in any way limit any of the terms or
provisions of any of the Loan Documents, all of which are hereby ratified and
affirmed in all respects.

                                    Sincerely yours,

                                    CAIS, Inc.

                                    /s/ Barton R. Groh
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    By: Barton R. Groh
                                       ------------------------------------
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                          ---------------------------------
Rodolfo Rivero GARCIA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8293.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/12/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      188,985
COMMITMENTS
  29,647   27,091   37,090   98,835  107,441  165,572  171,622   23,413   17,363

CHANGES FROM 04/05/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,697)
   1,082    2,976    3,324      311   -1,961    4,717    4,339    2,980    3,358

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.7     14.3     19.6     52.3     56.9     87.6     90.8     12.4      9.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      113)
      39       31       45       28       29       94       89
```

----

Updated April 15, 2011
John Stephen THORNE, petitioner, v. UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-1169.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1575Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.