alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Jimmy S.M. LeeJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2004




I, Gary L. Fischer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated
Silicon Solution, Inc.





By:

/s/ Gary L. FischerGary L. FischerPresident, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2004
# Official Journal C 472A/23 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 472A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6423 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 472A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6423 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Union Intellectual Property Office |
| 2021/C 472 A/01 | Vacancy Notice – Member of a Board of Appeal (EXT/21/109/AD 11/BOA) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Union Intellectual Property Office

2021/C 472 A/01

Vacancy Notice – Member of a Board of Appeal (EXT/21/109/AD 11/BOA)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 14.4







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
  consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 24, 2007,
  with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TCL Multimedia Technology
  Holdings Limited, included in this Form 20-F/A of Thomson S.A for the year ended
  December 31, 2006.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

·

Registration Statement No. 333-13178 on Form S-8,

·

Registration Statement No. 333-14224 on Form S-8,

·

Registration Statement No. 333-119938 on Form S-8,

·

Registration Statement No.333-124241 on Form S-8,

·

Registration Statement No. 333-130657 on Form S-8,

·

Registration Statement No. 333-137680 on Form S-8,



of
  our report dated July 24, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
  of TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings Limited, incorporated herein by reference,
  and our report included in this Form 20-F/A of Thomson S.A.









Ernst & Young

Hong Kong, China

July 24, 2007
Ilirjan BIDA, petitioner, v. Sharon JOHNSON.

No. 18-7499.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until April 15, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Caleb DEASON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9357.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Brian L. DAVIS, petitioner, v. YORK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al.

No. 17-9093.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DECEMBER 31, 1999 YEAR END REPORT FILED ON THE FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   7,200,857
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            3,015,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                               550,000
<INVENTORY>                                                913,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        10,632,425
<PP&E>                                                     172,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                              28,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          12,164,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    3,635,614
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     2,976
<OTHER-SE>                                               8,525,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            12,164,016
<SALES>                                                  4,365,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         4,365,107
<CGS>                                                      438,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            3,318,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             7,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         218,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            827,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                               391,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        827,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               433,411
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.19



</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 7489** 

LAWRENCE ADRAIN COXSON ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

JEFFREY SHANK, MCTC; MARVIN METZ, MCTC; UNKNOWN OFFICER; ATTORNEY GENERAL ,
Defendants

- Appellees ,
and

RA KESH MALIK, Dr.; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:07

- cv
- 01976

- RWT )

Submitted : February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lawrence Adrain Coxson, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah W. Rice, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Balti more, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Adrain Coxson appeals the district court ’ s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

. On appeal, we confine our revi ew to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Coxson’ s

informal brief raises no issues challeng ing the district court’s
disposition, Coxson has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly , we affirm th e district court ’ s
judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
CALIFORNIA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, petitioner, v. Julie A. SU.

No. 18-887.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Grace S. WONG, petitioner, v. Jay J. LUBETKIN, Chapter 7 Trustee, et al.

No. 18M99.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                        EX-32.2


             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ViaVid Broadcasting Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Kathler, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
-------------------------------------
Brian Kathler
Chief Financial Officer
July 12, 2005
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1398

To amend section 211 of the Clean Air Act to prohibit the use of certain

fuel additives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mr. POMBO (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr. DOOLITTLE) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend section 211 of the Clean Air Act to prohibit

the use of certain fuel additives.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 211.

4 Section 211(c) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

5 7545(c)) is amended as follows:

6 (1) By adding at the end of paragraph (1) the

7 following: ‘‘The Administrator shall amend the regu8 lations under this paragraph as promptly as prac9 ticable after the date of enactment of this sentence
2

•HR 1398 IH

1 to prohibit the use of methyl tertiary butyl ether

2 (MTBE) as a fuel additive.’’.

3 (2) By adding the following new subparagraph

4 at the end of paragraph (2):

5 ‘‘(D) The Administrator shall prohibit under para6 graph (1) any additive in gasoline registered under sub7 section (a) after the enactment of this subparagraph un8 less it has been determined (through scientific testing and

9 peer review) not to have any adverse effects on the pub10 lic.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-129058, 333-126360, 333-111841, 333-111830, 333-38896, 333-61284, 333-61278,
333-72704, 333-89396 and 333-145853) of ValueClick, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los
Angeles, California
February 29, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NB&T
Financial Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                        |  |                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin
|                        |  | Craig F. Fortin
Roosevelt BIGBEE, Jr., petitioner, v. Cherry LINDAMOOD, Warden.

No. 16-9199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1177

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow health insurance

premiums to be fully deductible, whether or not a taxpayer itemizes

deductions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. RILEY, Mr. PAUL, Mr. COBURN, Mr. FRANK

of Massachusetts, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow health

insurance premiums to be fully deductible, whether or

not a taxpayer itemizes deductions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance Af5 fordability Act’’.
2

•HR 1177 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS

2 DETERMINED WITHOUT REGARD TO 7.5 PER3 CENT THRESHOLD.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 213 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to medical,

6 dental, etc., expenses) is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—There shall be

8 allowed as a deduction the following amounts not com9 pensated for by insurance or otherwise—

10 ‘‘(1) the amount by which the amount of ex11 penses paid during the taxable year (reduced by the

12 amount deductible under paragraph (2)) for medical

13 care of the taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents (as

14 defined in section 152) exceeds 7.5 percent of ad15 justed gross income, plus

16 ‘‘(2) an amount equal to the expenses paid dur17 ing the taxable year for insurance which constitutes

18 medical care for the taxpayer, his spouse, and de19 pendents.’’

20 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAX21 PAYER ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a)

22 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting after

23 paragraph (17) the following new paragraph:

24 ‘‘(18) HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS.—The

25 deduction allowed by section 213(a)(2).’’.
3

•HR 1177 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Jose R. RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-6929.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
Curtis Clifford INGRAM, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 17-9563.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Mary-Ann Bernadette KERRIGAN, petitioner, v. QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION.

No. 18-7241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until March 12, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this court.
Juliana James ENGLAND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Johnnie C. IVY, III, et al., petitioners, v. H. Thomas MORAN, II.

No. 18-758.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Matthew C. Diamond, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alloy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  May 27, 2004           By: /s/ Matthew C. Diamond
                              -----------------------------
                              Matthew C. Diamond
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer)
Franz P. CANNET, aka Chico, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7006.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Desmond FARMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8145.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/09/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2,500 MMBTU'S)                                      OPEN INTEREST:    3,899,020
COMMITMENTS
 567,159   46,989  1222783  2072051  2605547  3861993  3875319   37,027   23,701

CHANGES FROM 02/02/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    175,259)
  -7,448   10,534   75,370  102,779   85,597  170,701  171,501    4,558    3,758

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.5      1.2     31.4     53.1     66.8     99.1     99.4      0.9      0.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      203)
      48       24       65      120      117      190      186
```

----

Updated February 7, 2010
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-56472, 333-77851, 333-32436) pertaining to the 2000 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, and 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Portal Software, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Portal Software, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended January 31, 2002.





/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Palo Alto, California


August 26, 2002
Joseph Adam MORA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7516.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Shawn J. GIESWEIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.