alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          53,405
<SECURITIES>                                       145
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,586
<PP&E>                                          20,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           706
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,422
<SALES>                                         14,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,430
<CGS>                                            1,127
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
Ada A. GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. Alfredo Ernesto GONZALEZ.

No. 18-8334.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Eric V. BARTOLI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8162.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.36

Order To Convert

 

The Promissory Note ‘Holder’, Marsadi Parliament hereby instructs the ‘Maker’ to convert to common shares (stock) of the ‘Maker’, Bravo Multinational Incorporated, ‘two’ Promissory Notes (plus accrued interest) originally dated December 31, 2017 with original principle face values owed to the ‘holder’ in the amounts of $125,000 US and $125,000 US as per the terms of conversion as mutually agreed to and as stipulated by the Board of Directors on November 19, 2018. The shares will be electronically deposited into an account in the ‘Holders’ name at the transfer agent of the ‘Maker’, Transfer Online Inc., located in Portland Oregon. The ‘Holder’ acknowledges that the shares are to be issued as restricted, but said shares are not subject to any further holding period (under Rule 144) as the original dates on the Promissory Notes have been sufficiently aged, and the company shall provide written confirmation of this and irrevocable release authorization to the transfer agent. Furthermore, no fees and or costs shall be incurred by the current ‘holder’ for the conversion and issuance of the shares.  

Shares to be issued: Effective date November 19th, 2018

670,697 common shares (stock) – note #1

670,697 common shares (stock) – note #2 (from gift)

 

Dated and signed on December 4th, 2018

 

/s/ Marsadi Parliament

‘Holder’: Marsadi Parliament




/s/ Rich Kaiser

Acknowledgment by ‘Maker’: 

Rich Kaiser, Acting CFO

Bravo Multinational Incorporated
Raheem WILCOX, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 18-7812.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Gerald ARANOFF, petitioner, v. Susan ARANOFF.

No. 18-7160.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Rodney MARTIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7995.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Kevin CHECKSFIELD, petitioner, v. Stefan BERG.

No. 17-1663.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
##### 



Exhibit 11.1
 IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
   SharesNet Income
    
    outstanding and
    
    Amount per(unaudited)
    
    equivalents
    
    ShareQuarter ended June 30, 2006:Basic EPS (available to common shareholders)
    
    $
    104,444
    
    
    
    63,630,224
    
    
    $
    1.64Diluted EPS
    
    $
    108,822
    
    
    
    72,635,057
    
    
    $
    1.50Quarter ended June 30, 2005:Basic EPS
    
    $
    64,050
    
    
    
    48,348,475
    
    
    $
    1.32Diluted EPS
    
    $
    64,050
    
    
    
    48,426,669
    
    
    $
    1.32Six months ended June 30, 2006Basic EPS (available to common shareholders)
    
    $
    162,857
    
    
    
    63,621,492
    
    
    $
    2.56Diluted EPS
    
    $
    171,469
    
    
    
    72,626,599
    
    
    $
    2.36Six months ended June 30, 2005Basic EPS
    
    $
    108,005
    
    
    
    48,339,643
    
    
    $
    2.23Diluted EPS
    
    $
    108,005
    
    
    
    48,427,886
    
    
    $
    2.23
 24
Exhibit 15.1

IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

IPC Holdings, Ltd.

Hamilton, Bermuda

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-149118, 133605, 128905, 126434 and 107052

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 3, 2008, related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG             
|Chartered Accountants
|Hamilton, Bermuda    
|November 3, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (#1115).                

*Date and Time:*                     May 16, 2022-11:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (Eastern); May 17, 2022-11:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. (Eastern)                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual).                

                    Virtual meeting attendance only; to attend the virtual meeting, please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following email:                     *cmessam@nsf.gov.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Persons:*                     KaJuana Mayberry, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8900; email:                     *kmayberry@nsf.gov*

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to Computer and Information Science and Engineering programs and activities.

## Agenda

    - NSF and CISE update
    - NASEM report on responsible computing research
    - NSF activities towards geography of innovation

*Reason for Late Notice:*                     Due to the unforeseen scheduling complications and the necessity to proceed with CISE updates and the NASEM reports to the committee.                

Dated: May 5, 2022.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-09996 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Lancey Darnell RAY, petitioner, v. Tracy McCOLLUM, Warden.

No. 17-9504.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40862 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. BERNARDO REYES

- HERNANDEZ, also known as Juan Antonio Reyes

Hernandez, also known as Nayo Reyes

- Hernandez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 1429

- 1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bernardo Reyes

- Hernandez pled guilty to illegal reentry after removal

. The district court sentenced him to 44 months in prison and three years of supervised release. On appeal, Reyes

- Hernandez seek s reformation of the judgment to reflect conviction and sentencing under 8 U.S.C § 1326(b)(1) rather than Section 1326(b) (2). We reform the judgment and affirm.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 15, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40862 Document: 00514515386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2018No. 17

- 40862

2 Reyes

- Hernandez’s first argument is that Section 1326(b)(2) is inapplicable because the s upposedly predicate conviction, a 2006 Texas state conviction for indecency by contact with a child under 17, did not actually precede the 2003 removal date specified in the factual basis for his guilty plea. We need not reach this issue, though , because we conclude that his second argument clearly mandates the reformation of the judgment

. The second argument is that his 2006 Texas state conviction for indecency by contact with a child under 17 is not an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) because the incorporated “crime of violence” definition found in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is unconst itutionally vague. The Supreme Court has recently held that such arguments are correct. See Sessions v. Dimaya , 138 S. Ct. 1204, 1223 (2018). Reyes

- Hernandez ha s thus shown a clear or obvious error in t he district court’s application of Section 1326(b)(2)

. S ee Johnson v. United States , 520 U.S. 461, 468 (1997)

. Despite the validity of the vagueness challenge, Reyes

- Hernandez has admitted that the error had no effec t on his substantial rights . That is because his within

- Guidelines sentence was below the 10

- year statutory maximum in Section 1326(b)(1) for removals following non

- aggravated felony convictions and the record does not indicate that the error influe nced the district court’s determination of the sentence. S ee United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 369 (5th Cir. 2009). Resentencing is therefore not warranted , but reformation of the judgment to reflect that Reyes

- Hernandez was convicted

an d sentenced under Section 1326(b)(1) is proper. S ee id

. We REFORM the district court’s judgment to reflect conviction and sentencing under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) , and AFFIRM as modified

. Case: 17-40862 Document: 00514515386 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2018
EX-10.4



 EXHIBIT 10.4 

NON-EMPLOYEE SUB-PLAN 

TO THE AUTOLUS THERAPEUTICS PLC 2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This sub-plan (the “Non-Employee
Sub-Plan”) to the Autolus Therapeutics plc 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) governs the grant of Awards to Consultants (defined below) and Directors who are not
Employees, and has been adopted in accordance with Section 10.5 of the Plan. The Non-Employee Sub-Plan incorporates all the provisions of the Plan except as
modified in accordance with the provisions of this Non-Employee Sub-Plan and was adopted by the Board on June 15, 2018. 

Awards granted pursuant to the Non-Employee Sub-Plan are not granted pursuant
to an “employees’ share scheme” for the purposes of UK legislation. 
 For the purposes of the
Non-Employee Sub-Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall operate subject to the following modifications: 

 

	1.	Eligibility 

  

	 	1.1	A definition of “Consultant” shall be included as follows: 


“Consultant” means any person, including any adviser, engaged by the Company or its parent or Subsidiary to render services to
such entity if the consultant or adviser: (i) renders bona fide services to the Company; (ii) renders services not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and does not directly or indirectly
promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities; and (iii) is a natural person. 
  

	 	1.2	The definition of “Service Provider” set out in the Plan shall be read and construed as follows: 


“Service Provider” means a Consultant or Director.
# Jornal Oficial C 6A/6 de

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 6A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 65.° ano6 de janeiro de 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 6A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

65.° ano6 de janeiro de 2022

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Retificação do anúncio de concurso geral — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Juristas linguistas (AD 7) de língua irlandesa (GA) ( JO C 466 A de 18.11.2021 ) | 1 |

Índice

Página

Retificações

2022/C 6 A/01

Retificação do anúncio de concurso geral — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Juristas linguistas (AD 7) de língua irlandesa (GA) ( JO C 466 A de 18.11.2021 )

( JO C 466 A de 18.11.2021 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 6.1.2022 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 6/1

---

Retificação do anúncio de concurso geral — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Juristas linguistas (AD 7) de língua irlandesa (GA)

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 466 A de 18 de novembro de 2021
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

Na página 1, debaixo do título:

| onde se lê: | «Data-limite de inscrição: 21 de dezembro de 2021, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas», |
| --- | --- |

onde se lê:

«Data-limite de inscrição: 21 de dezembro de 2021, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas»,

| deve ler-se: | «Data-limite de inscrição: 25 de janeiro de 2022, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora do Luxemburgo». |
| --- | --- |

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se:

«Data-limite de inscrição: 25 de janeiro de 2022, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora do Luxemburgo».

Na página 5, último parágrafo:

| onde se lê: | «As candidaturas devem ser apresentadas em linha no sítio Web do EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities até:


  21 de dezembro de 2021, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas.
  », |
| --- | --- |

onde se lê:

onde se lê:

«As candidaturas devem ser apresentadas em linha no sítio Web do EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities até:

21 de dezembro de 2021, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas.
  »,

| deve ler-se: | «As candidaturas devem ser apresentadas em linha no sítio Web do EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities até:


  25 de janeiro de 2022, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora do Luxemburgo.
  ». |
| --- | --- |

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se:

«As candidaturas devem ser apresentadas em linha no sítio Web do EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities até:

25 de janeiro de 2022, às 12h00 (meio-dia), hora do Luxemburgo.
  ».

---
PROMEGA CORPORATION, petitioner, v. LIFE TECNOLOGIES CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-1669.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 6.18




                              ARTICLES OF EXCHANGE

                                     BETWEEN

                                DIPPY FOODS, INC.
                             (a Nevada corporation)

                                       AND

                          AMERICAS FAVORITE FOOD CORP.
                           (a California corporation)

                             Pursuant to NRS 92A.200

         The undersigned corporations DO HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the name and jurisdiction of organization of each
constituent entity in the exchange is as follows:

         Name                                      Jurisdiction
         ----                                      ------------

         Dippy Foods, Inc.                         Nevada

         Americas Favorite Food Corp.              California

         SECOND: That a plan of exchange has been adopted by each constituent
entity.

         THIRD: That approval of the owners of Dippy Foods, Inc. was not
required.

         FOURTH: That the plan of exchange was approved by the unanimous consent
of the owners of Americas Favorite Food Corp.

         FIFTH: That the complete executed plan of exchange is on file at the
principal office of Dippy Foods, Inc. The address of the principal place of
business of Dippy Foods, Inc. is 10554 Progress Way, Suite K, Cypress, CA 90630.




                           [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned corporations have caused these
Articles of Exchange to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of this
25 day of May, 2001.

                                           DIPPY FOODS, INC.,
                                           a Nevada Corporation

                                           By:  /s/ Jon Stevenson
                                                --------------------
                                                    Jon Stevenson
                                           Its:     President

                                           By:  /s/ Munjit Johal
                                                --------------------
                                                    Munjit Johal
                                           Its:     Secretary


                                           AMERICAS FAVORITE FOOD CORP.,
                                           a California Corporation

                                           By:  /s/ Gary Place
                                                --------------------
                                                    Gary Place
                                           Its:     President
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.4

                                  BILL OF SALE

         For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, ENMAX CORPORATION, a Utah corporation
("Transferor"), hereby sells, transfers, assigns, conveys and delivers to
ENVIRONMAX.COM, INC., a Utah corporation("Transferee"), all right, title and
interest in and to certain personal property used by Transferor in connection
with its business including, but not limited to, such tangible personal
property, machinery, equipment, tools and furniture, mobile equipment, computer
equipment, inventory, leases, contracts, and books and records as listed on the
attached Exhibit A.

                  This document and the covenants and agreements herein
contained shall be binding upon Transferor and its successors and assigns.

                  This Bill of Sale does not supersede or waive any contractual
remedies between Transferor and Transferee. Such remedies are in addition to and
are not merged into this instrument.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Transferor has caused this Bill of Sale to
be executed on its behalf effective as of the 15th day of March, 2000.

                                            ENMAX CORPORATION




                                            BY
                                               ---------------------------------

                                            ITS
                                               ---------------------------------
Harvey L. SHOATE, petitioner, v. Jason LEWIS, Warden.

No. 18-6230.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 11.0

                    MONOCACY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                      Information used in the computation
                         of net income per common share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Nine Months Ended               Three Months Ended
                                                       September 30,                   September 30,
                                                -------------------------        ------------------------
                                                   1998           1997             1998           1997
                                                ----------     ----------        ---------     ----------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>               <C>           <C>
Basic:
Net income                                      $2,343,161     $1,636,627        $ 655,787     $  390,963
                                                ==========     ==========        =========     ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding       1,797,769      1,784,166         1,798,93      1,787,524
                                                ==========     ==========        =========     ==========

Net income per common share - basic                  $1.30           $.92             $.36           $.22
                                                     =====           ====             ====           ====

Diluted:
Net income                                      $2,343,161     $1,636,627        $  655,787     $  390,963
                                                ==========     ==========        ==========     ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding       1,797,769      1,784,166         1,798,935      1,787,524
Adjustment for common stock equivalents             49,154         28,959            45,216         29,627
                                                ----------     ----------        ----------     ----------

Weighted average common shares outstanding       1,846,923      1,813,125         1,844,151      1,817,151
                                                ==========     ==========        ==========     ==========

Net income per common share - diluted                $1.27           $.90              $.36           $.22
                                                     =====           ====              ====           ====
</TABLE>

                                       14