alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the annual report on form 10-K of Empire Global Corp.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael
Ciavarella, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: October 10, 2012                  By: /s/ Michael Ciavarella
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael Ciavarella
                                         Chief Executive Officer, and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/27/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,738
COMMITMENTS
  12,494    2,975    5,158   17,671   22,657   35,323   30,790    7,415   11,948

CHANGES FROM 04/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        371)
    -154     -640     -162    1,249      819      933       18     -563      353

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.2      7.0     12.1     41.3     53.0     82.7     72.0     17.3     28.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       61)
      17        6       14       30       23       51       42
```

----

Updated April 30, 2010
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

General Atomics 

Under Contract No. N68335-04-C-0167 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60382 

Karen L. Manos, Esq. 

Justin P. Accomando, Esq. 

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Carson, CA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 13 July 2016 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60382, Appeal of General Atomics, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID SBIR Phase II Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U44 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         May 25, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,  5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tara Capece, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-191-4281,                         *capecet2@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 25, 2022. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-09191 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Jorge Eliecer BUENO-SIERRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M120.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
W.A. GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. UNITED HEALTHCARE OF GEORGIA, Inc., et al.

No. 18-1033.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1550Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Darnell WILKINS, petitioner, v. John F. WAGNER, President Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania, Fayette County, et al.

No. 17-6934.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.
Vadim Stanley MIESEGAES, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALOFORNIA, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, et al.

No. 17-7028.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Order filed, July 07, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00009

- CV

____________ VALERO REFINING

- TEXAS, L.P., AND VAL ERO REFINING

- NEW

ORLEANS, L.L.C. , Appellant

V.

VESUVIUS USA CORPORA TION C&H LABORATORIE S, CC, AN D DR. JOHN HANCOCK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 52532A



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due June 26, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a requ est to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Scotty Baldwin , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in

t his appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
# C_2005271EN.01001802.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/18

---

Removal from the register of Case C-108/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 271/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

By order of 3 May 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-108/04 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia): Divina Cortiñas Yáñez v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
NO. 07-10-00317-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

IN RE GREGORY BANISTER, RELATOR

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Gregory Dean Banister has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. He

seeks an order compelling respo ndent, the Honorable Fe lix Klein, to ru le on seventeen

motions Banister asserts are pending in his habeas corpus proceeding.

In response to our request, Judge Klein has filed a detailed response to

Banister’s petition. By i t, he identifies each of Banister’s motions and the corresponding

ruling of the court. 1 Accordingly, we do not reach the me rits of Banister’s issue, and the

petition for writ of mandam us is dismissed as moot. See In re Duncan, 62 S.W.3d 333,

1 The response does not, however, indicate whether the court’s rulings were memorialized in an order or orders filed with t he district clerk. From his response, we presume that Judge Klein has , or promptly will, sign an d file an order or orders expressing the trial court’s rulings and provide a copy to relator.2 334 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (also di smissing mandamus

petition as moot afte r trial court ruling).

Per Curiam
No. 01

- 14 -00721- CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT, SITTING AT

HOUSTON

____________

JAMES JORDAN, APPELLANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

STATE = S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO THE HONORABLE COURTOF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through the undersigned Assistant District Attorney, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time for the State to file its brief in the above styled and numbered cause. In support thereof, the State would show the following:
1. The Clerk = s Record was filed in this case on September 10, 2014. Approximately seven supplemental Clerk’s Record s were filed, with the latest being filed on December 18, 2014.
2. The Reporter = s Record was filed in this case on October 20, 2014.
3. The State = s brief in this cause was due on March 9, 2015. The State has not filed any previous requests for extension of time. The Appellant requested and was granted two extensions of time.
4. The State’s attorney assigned to this case currently has many other pending matters including several pending appeals and writs, including a writ in a death penalty case, Andrus v. State . Further, the State ’ s attorney assigned to this case had an absence from the office during the period that this brief was due in relation to the birth of his second child. ACCEPTED 01-14-00721-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/20/2015 2:52:44 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK5. The State would request that the deadl ine for the State’s brief in this
cause be extended 60 ( sixty ) days.
6. This extension is not sought for the sole purpose of delay. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State prays that this Honorable Court grant this motion and extend the deadline for filing the State = s brief
in this case. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jason Bennyhoff JASON BENNYHOFF ASST. DISTRICT A TTORNEY Fort Bend County, Texas State Bar Number 24050277 1422 Eugene Heimann Cir. Richmond, Texas 77469 Phone: (281) 238

- 3352 Fax: (281) 238

- 3366CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jason Bennyhoff, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was sent t o counsel for the Appellant on March 20, 2015 , via electronic mail through the EFile Texas electronic filing system

.

/s/ Jason Bennyhoff Jason Bennyhoff
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1474 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1474

     To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 1999

 Mr. Gibbons introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF TRADITIONAL DAY OF OBSERVANCE OF MEMORIAL 
              DAY.

    (a) In General.--Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended in the item relating to Memorial Day by striking ``the last 
Monday in May.'' and inserting ``May 30.''.
    (b) Display of Flag.--Section 174(d) of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``the last Monday in May;'' and inserting 
``May 30;''.
    (c) Proclamation.--The President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe Memorial Day as a day for prayer and ceremonies that show 
respect for American veterans of wars and other military conflicts.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>





                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32


                                   ALLOY, INC.
         COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR CERTAIN NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 ("Fiscal 2004") bonuses and fiscal year
ending January 31, 2006 ("Fiscal 2005") salaries have been set for certain named
executive officers of Alloy, Inc. as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
Named Executive         Position                          Fiscal 2004 Bonus     Fiscal 2005 Salary   Other Compensation
----------------        --------                          -----------------     ------------------   ------------------
<S>                     <C>                               <C>                   <C>                  <C>

Matthew C. Diamond      Chief Executive Officer and
                        Chairman                          None                  $420,000                $31,232.67(1)

James K. Johnson, Jr.   President and Chief Financial
                        Officer/Chief Operating Officer   None                  $420,000                $31,601.97(1)

Samuel. A. Gradess      Executive Vice President          None                  $150,000                $37,247.57(1)

Robert Bernard          Chief Executive Officer,          $120,000 payable in   $600,000                $20,000.00(3)
                        Merchandise Division              cash and 100,000
                                                          options(2)
</Table>


(1) Represents dollar value of insurance paid by Alloy, Inc. with respect to a
split dollar life insurance policy, which policy, including death benefits, will
be assigned to the Company during Fiscal 2005.

(2) 25,000 options vesting on each of March 7, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

(3) Represents amount paid to Mr. Bernard to be applied to a term life
insurance policy for the benefit of a beneficiary to be designated by
Mr. Bernard.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1444

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to develop and implement projects

for fish screens, fish passage devices, and other similar measures to

mitigate adverse impacts associated with irrigation system water diversions by local governmental entities in the States of Oregon, Washington,

Montana, and Idaho.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself and Mr. WALDEN of Oregon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to develop and

implement projects for fish screens, fish passage devices,

and other similar measures to mitigate adverse impacts

associated with irrigation system water diversions by

local governmental entities in the States of Oregon,

Washington, Montana, and Idaho.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1444 IH

1 SECTION 1. AQUATIC RESOURCES RESTORATION IN THE

2 NORTHWEST.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In cooperation with other Federal

4 agencies, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to de5 velop and implement projects for fish screens, fish passage

6 devices, and other similar measures agreed to by non-Fed7 eral interests and relevant Federal agencies to mitigate

8 adverse impacts associated with irrigation system water

9 diversions by local governmental entities in the States of

10 Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Idaho.

11 (b) PROCEDURE AND PARTICIPATION.—

12 (1) CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT; USE OF EX13 ISTING DATA.—In providing assistance under sub14 section (a), the Secretary shall consult with other

15 Federal, State, and local agencies and make max16 imum use of data and studies in existence on the

17 date of enactment of this Act.

18 (2) PARTICIPATION BY NON-FEDERAL INTER19 ESTS.—Participation by non-Federal interests in

20 projects under this section shall be voluntary. The

21 Secretary shall not take any action under this sec22 tion that will result in a non-Federal interest being

23 held financially responsible for an action under a

24 project unless the non-Federal interest has volun25 tarily agreed to participate in the project.
3

•HR 1444 IH

1 (c) COST SHARING.—Projects carried out under this

2 section on lands owned by the United States shall be car3 ried out at full Federal expense. The non-Federal share

4 of the cost of any such project undertaken on lands not

5 in Federal ownership shall be 35 percent.

6 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

7 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

8 $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2000 and each fiscal year

9 thereafter.

Æ
Joseph CACCIAPALLE, et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, et al.

No. 17-578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Isaac MONTANEZ, petitioner, v. The CHEESECAKE FACTORY RESTAURANTS, INC.

No. 17-5084.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Howard WEBBER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7720.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-548 and 731-TA-1298 (Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2021 (86 FR 54470) and determined on January 4, 2022, that it would conduct expedited reviews (87 FR 17336, March 28, 2022).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on April 29, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5320 (April 2022), entitled                     *Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-548 and 731-TA-1298 (First Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: April 29, 2022.

Katherine Hiner,

Acting Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-09600 Filed 5-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Raoul A. GALAN, petitioner, v. Larry GEGENHEIMER, et al.

No. 18-7999.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.