alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph HARDEN, petitioner, v. Michael BOWERSOX, Warden.

No. 17-9286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00012-CV

IN ESTATE OF DAVID ARNOLD MURRAY, DECEASED

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 6021

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant, Andrea Murray.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 7, 2019
Wendy A. NORA, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION.

No. 18-538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal L 15/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.015.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 15 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5320 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.015.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 15

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5320 January 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Robert LARGO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 18-7828.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
<PAGE>

                            CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT                  EXHIBIT 10.5

                       SECOND AMENDMENT TO IRU AGREEMENT

           This Amendment to IRU Agreement ("Amendment") is made and entered
       into as of the _____ day of May, 1998, by and between Qwest
       Communications Corporation ("Qwest") and GTE Intelligent Network Services
       Incorporated ("GTE").


                                   RECITALS

       A.  Qwest and GTE previously entered into an IRU Agreement dated as of
       May 2, 1997 (the "Agreement").

       B.  Qwest and GTE wish to amend the Agreement to add additional Dark
       Fibers and make certain modifications to the Agreement.

                                   AGREEMENT

       In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Qwest and GTE agree as follows:

       1.  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein
shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.

       2.  In accordance with Section 1.1(a) and subject to the provisions of
the Agreement, Qwest hereby grants GTE an IRU in six (6) Dark Fibers between the
Qwest POP in Oakland, California located at 250 5th Street and the Qwest manhole
at the east end of the Bay Bridge, a distance of approximately 4.5 miles (the
"Additional Dark Fibers"). The Additional Dark Fibers shall be included within
the System Route for purposes of the Agreement.

       3.  GTE hereby agrees to pay Qwest an amount equal to [*Material Omitted
and Separately Filed Under an Application for Confidential Treatment] per route
mile for the Additional Dark Fibers, being a total of [*Material Omitted and
Separately Filed Under an Application for Confidential Treatment], payable
[*Material Omitted and Separately Filed Under an Application for Confidential
Treatment].

       4.  In addition to the Additional Dark Fibers, Qwest agrees to provide
GTE with six (6) Dark Fibers on a temporary lease basis between the manhole on
the San Francisco end of the Bay Bridge and the Qwest POP located at 60 Federal
Street (the "Lease Fibers"). The Lease Fibers will be provided to GTE [*Material
Omitted and Separately Filed Under an Application for Confidential Treatment]
for a term ending December 31, 1998.

       5.  Except as modified in this Agreement, all other provisions of the
Agreement shall be applicable to the Additional Dark Fibers.

<PAGE>

                            CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

       Qwest and GTE have executed this Amendment effective as of the day first
written above.

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS                         GTE INTELLIGENT NETWORK SERVICES
CORPORATION                                  INCORPORATED

By_____________________________              By_____________________________
Name:                                        Name:
Title:                                       Title:
Date:                                        Date:



                                       2
Exhibit 15


August 11, 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 13, 2000 on our review of interim
financial information of InterCounty Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2000 and 1999 and included in the Company's quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 23,
1995.

Very truly yours,



/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
Cincinnati, Ohio
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-45330, 333-45332, 333-62894, 333-86350 and 333-135398) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-122435, 333-115670, 333-112542, 333-129519, 333-131310, 333-136023, 333-137030,333-139191, 333-146818 and 333-155660) of Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 13, 2009, with respect the consolidated financial statements of Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 13, 2009
```

```

----

Updated April 29, 2011
Greg ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, et al., appellants, v. Shannon PEREZ, et al.

No. 17-626.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 12, 2018.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Further consideration of the questions of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Philip Andra GRIGSBY, petitioner, v. Juan BALTAZAR, Jr., Warden.

No. 18-8061.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Lavell PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7192.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.8.2




Executives of Rockwell Collins who will be party to a Change of Control
Agreement

1.   P.E. Allen
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)**

 

I, Rick Russo, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Captiva Software Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Gene Donta CARTER, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-7399.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
In Re James R. YOUNG, petitioner.

No. 17-6060.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/04/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      149,085
COMMITMENTS
   5,457   26,849   29,917   92,719   72,811  128,093  129,577   20,992   19,508

CHANGES FROM 12/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,298)
   2,034    5,103     -149    2,779     -712    4,664    4,242    2,634    3,056

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.7     18.0     20.1     62.2     48.8     85.9     86.9     14.1     13.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      16       28       34       22       30       61       76
```

----

Updated January 7, 2011
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/02/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       69,955
COMMITMENTS
  19,895    1,732    9,222   26,726   42,329   55,843   53,283   14,112   16,672

CHANGES FROM 10/26/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,057)
     501      386     -108    1,567    2,107    1,961    2,385    1,096      672

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.4      2.5     13.2     38.2     60.5     79.8     76.2     20.2     23.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       85)
      34        7       22       30       27       72       52
```

----

Updated November 5, 2010
In Re Bill HERRON, petitioner.

No. 18-7583.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Michael Nelson CURRIER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 16-1348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Rick GREER, petitioner, v. GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, et al.

No. 17-1351.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stephen Frank KARBAN, petitioner, v. Mark BRNOVICH, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

No. 17-9251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Raymond AMERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7978.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
In Re Christopher STEGAWSKI, petitioner.

No. 18-8587.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Richard KATZ, petitioner, v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, et al.

No. 18M109.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Dashawn D. BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 14.1

















Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

THOMSON:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13178, 333-14224, 333-119938, 333-124241, 333-130657 and 333-137680) of THOMSON of our reports dated May 7, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of THOMSON as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, recognized income and expense, and changes in equity for the year then ended, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of THOMSON.



|KPMG
        Audit     
|-----------------------
|A division of KPMG S.A.
|                       
|Isabelle Allen         
|                       



Paris La Défense, France



July 24, 2007
Jesse R. PEREZ, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-7334.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00099-CR

NO. 03-10-00100-CR

David Deon Pearson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-09-205891 & 203157, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled substance. The

trial court has certified that the cases are plea bargain cases and that appellant has no right to appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). We therefore dismiss the appeals. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (if trial

court does not certify that defendant has right to appeal, “appeal must be dismissed”).

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 14, 2010

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Theundersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of ADB Systems International Ltd. (the “Company”) do each herebycertify that:

 

(1) The AnnualReport on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,2003 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as at, and forthe fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2003.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: June  29, 2004 |                    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | C/s Jeffrey Lymburner   |   |
|                  | Jeffrey  Lymburner      |   |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                  |                    |   |
|                  |                    |   |
| Dated: June  29, 2004 |                    |   |
|                  | C/s Michael Robb        |   |
|                  | Michael Robb            |   |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual Report of DAG Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yael Shimor-Golan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Yael Shimor-Golan
----------------------------------------------
    Yael Shimor-Golan, Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2003


                                       31
Exhibit 32

                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

     To my  knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30,
2004,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.

                             By:   /s/ Harry J. Bailey
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Harry J. Bailey
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 16, 2004



                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

     To my  knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30,
2004,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 14(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.

                                 By:   /s/ Bradley L. Smith
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Bradley L. Smith
                                       Title:  Senior Vice President - Treasurer



Date: August 16, 2004
Azaniah BLANKUMSEE, petitioner, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF MARYLAND, WASHINGTON COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-7407.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charles Kenneth FOSTER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Alejandro Casillas PRIETO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8269.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Cynthia PROSTERMAN, et al., petitioners, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES INC., et al.

No. 18-934.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.