alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              72                   3,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      72                   3,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        10,755                  10,755
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,683)                 (6,855)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        72                   3,900
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,828                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,828)                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                       0


</TABLE>
Mahogany Taquilla ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8210.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit
23.1
 
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  Edgar
Online, Inc.
 New York,
New York
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-81966), Form S-3 (No. 333-41472) and Form S-8 (No. 333-60246)
of Edgar Online, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear
in this Form 10-K.
  
 /s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 March 25
, 2005
MONOCACY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY              EXHIBIT 11.0


                       Information used in the computation
                         of net income per common share




                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                       -------------------------
                                                          1997           1996
                                                          ----           ----

Net income .......................................     $  667,241     $  468,226
                                                       ==========     ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding .......      1,646,831      1,604,216
                                                       ==========     ==========

Net income per common share ......................     $      .41     $      .29
                                                       ==========     ==========


                                       12
***Exhibit
32.2***
 
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Andrew
Kaplan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on Form
10-K/A of Audible Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Audible
Inc.
 
 
 April 29,
      2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/
      Andrew KaplanAndrew
      KaplanChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           6,741
<SECURITIES>                                    88,921
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                       493
<INVENTORY>                                     18,963
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,609
<PP&E>                                          43,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,604
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,048
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,955
<SALES>                                         66,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,616
<CGS>                                           27,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,347)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,638
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,638
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF ALLOY, INC.


                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                             AS OF JANUARY 31, 2002

1.  17th Street Productions Acquisition Corp.

2.  17th Street Productions, Inc.

3.  Alloy Entertainment, Inc.

4.  Phase Three Holdings, Inc.

5.  Phase Three, Inc. d/b/a CCS, Inc.

6.  Triple Dot Communications, Inc.

7.  Strength Publishing, Inc.

8.  Private Colleges and Universities, Inc.

9.  AVH, Inc.

10. Dan's Competition, Inc.

11. eStudentLoan, Inc.

12. Target Marketing & Promotions, Inc.

13. Cass Communications, Inc.

14. 360 Youth, Inc.

15. On Premises Solutions, Inc.

16. The Staffing Authority, Inc.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/30/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      439,119
COMMITMENTS
  48,920   18,944   95,835  264,511  304,437  409,266  419,216   29,853   19,903

CHANGES FROM 08/23/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,891)
    -712   -2,261   12,003    4,173    6,667   15,464   16,409    2,427    1,482

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.1      4.3     21.8     60.2     69.3     93.2     95.5      6.8      4.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      31       21       39       68       66      117      112
```

----

Updated September 2, 2011
Matthew Clayton LLOYD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6269.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jose FLORES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7715.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Juan Francisco VEGA, et al., petitioners, v. Rebecca KAPUSTA, Interim Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families.

No. 18-7276.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 5, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50832

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAWRENCE W. FEW,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-1195-2

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lawrence W. Few (Few) appeals his conviction on count three of

an indictment charging him under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 with knowingly

making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation

(FBI) during its investigation into a grand jury leak. Few

challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him, attacks

the credibility of two key Government witnesses, and asserts that

the Government failed to prove the falsity of his statements to the

FBI.
2

None of the trial witnesses “assert[ed] facts that the witness

physically could not have observed or events that could not have

occurred under the laws of nature.” United States v. Gadison, 8

F.3d 186, 190 (5th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks, brackets,

and citation omitted). Consequently, the jury was free to weigh

the credibility of the witnesses and choose which testimony to

credit as true. See id. at 189-90. There was sufficient evidence

to show that Few lied to the FBI. Therefore, “viewing the evidence

and the inferences that may be drawn from it in the light most

favorable to the verdict, a rational jury could have found the

essential elements of [Few’s] offense[ ] beyond a reasonable

doubt.” Id. at 189 (internal quotation marks and citation

omitted). 

Few also argues that his acquittal on counts one and two for

conspiracy to obstruct and obstructing justice is inconsistent with

his conviction on count three, and, therefore, his conviction

should be reversed. However, “inconsistent verdicts are not a bar

to conviction so long as there is sufficient evidence to support 
G:\opin-sc\02-50832.opn.wpd 3

the jury’s determination of guilt.” United States v. Gieger, 190

F.3d 661, 664 (5th Cir. 1999). Therefore, because there was

sufficient evidence to support Few’s conviction on count three, his

conviction may stand. Id.

Accordingly, Few’s conviction is hereby AFFIRMED.
Edgar Alonso PINEDA-PINEDA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8190.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Susan ROSE, petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

No. 17-7003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Utah denied.
Exhibit 10.3

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN 

        TheCompany maintains an annual incentive plan whereby certain employees are eligible toreceive cash bonuses equal to a percentage of their base salaries if certain corporatefinancial objectives are achieved. The employees selected each year to participate in theannual incentive plan, as well as the performance targets on which the cash bonuses arebased and the amount of the cash bonuses are determined each year in the discretion of theCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. 

        Employeesin the following categories are eligible to participate in the plan: members of the seniormanagement team and other employees who can have a significant impact on the financialresults of the Company. Each year, the Chief Executive Officer recommends to theCompensation Committee the employees whom he believes should participate in the plan, andthe final determination is made by the Compensation Committee. The participation of suchemployees in the plan is evidenced by written notice from the Company. 

        Ifthe Company achieves the performance targets set by the Compensation Committee, thedesignated management employees receive specified percentages of their annual salaries inthe form of cash bonuses. Company performance below the target levels will result in loweror no bonus payments, and Company performance above the target levels will result inhigher bonus payments.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4530 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4530

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit individuals 
  eligible for Indian Health Service assistance to qualify for health 
                           savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2019

Mr. Moolenaar (for himself and Mr. Ruiz) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit individuals 
  eligible for Indian Health Service assistance to qualify for health 
                           savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Health Savings 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE ASSISTANCE NOT 
              DISQUALIFIED FROM HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Special rule for individuals eligible for 
                assistance under indian health service programs.--For 
                purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), an individual shall 
                not be treated as covered under a health plan described 
                in such subparagraph merely because the individual 
                receives hospital care or medical services under a 
                medical care program of the Indian Health Service or of 
                a tribal organization.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 450 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 450

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2019

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to 
    prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Crimes Against Veterans 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS AGAINST VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1352. Fraud regarding veterans' benefits
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, any 
scheme or artifice to defraud an individual of veterans' benefits, or 
in connection with obtaining veteran's benefits for that individual, 
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or 
both.
    ``(b) In this section--
            ``(1) the term `veteran' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 101 of title 38; and
            ``(2) the term `veterans' benefits' means any benefit 
        provided by Federal law for a veteran or a dependent or 
        survivor of a veteran.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1352. Fraud regarding veterans' benefits.''.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Carl Allen WATTS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-7945.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF BUCKHEAD AMERICA  CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                  3,204
<SECURITIES>                               83
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,157
<ALLOWANCES>                               33
<INVENTORY>                                26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,833
<PP&E>                                 45,059
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         59,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   5,391
<BONDS>                                33,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                             3,000
<COMMON>                                   20
<OTHER-SE>                             16,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           59,062
<SALES>                                19,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       21,523
<CGS>                                  14,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          16,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        3,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           117
<INCOME-TAX>                              (10)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       127
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.05)

        

</TABLE>
Carl Lee WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7470.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Warren TARVER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6925.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
Freddie KING, Jr., petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-7521.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1345 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1345

 To eliminate the mandate that States require people to provide their 
   Social Security numbers on applications for recreational licenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

 Mr. Obey (for himself and Mr. Kleczka) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the mandate that States require people to provide their 
   Social Security numbers on applications for recreational licenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE MANDATE THAT STATES REQUIRE PEOPLE TO 
              PROVIDE THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS ON APPLICATIONS FOR 
              RECREATIONAL LICENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 466(a)(13)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 666(a)(13)(A)) is amended by striking ``recreational 
license,''.
    (b) Retroactivity.--Section 466(a)(13)(A) of the Social Security 
Act shall be applied and administered as if such section had never 
included the term ``recreational license,''.
                                 <all>
```