alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex.-31)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Mayer, certify that:

l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Structured Asset Mortgage
Investments Inc., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1999-1.

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Master Servicer and Securities
Administrator
Bank of America, N.A., as Servicer
Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, as Servicer
Cendant Mortgage Company, as Servicer
Chase Mortgage Company, as Servicer
EverHome Mortgage Company (f/k/a Alliance Mortgage Company), as Servicer
GMAC Mortgage Company, as Servicer
Washington Mutual, F.A., as Servicer
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., as Servicer





                                      -8-
<PAGE>

Date: March 26, 2004

                                           By: /s/ Jeffrey Mayer
                                              ---------------------------
                                           Name: Jeffrey Mayer
                                           Company: Structured Asset Mortgage
                                                    Investments Inc.
                                           Title: President





                                      -9-
Nimon NAPHAENG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7484.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
George E. KERSEY, petitioner, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States.

No. 18-7991.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Anthony PISZEL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1356.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Ronnie W. WILSON, petitioner, v. Michael STEPHAN, Warden.

No. 18-8126.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1570Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
David Michael DECKER, petitioner, v. Garrett LANEY, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution.

No. 18-8337.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Tavis Labron HOUPE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7627.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0215 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRUCE ALAN GARAY,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 19 , 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2021

10/14/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0215
Kevin Scott VARNER, petitioner, v. John CHRISTIANSEN, Warden.

No. 18-7053.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
----

UNIFORM APPLICATION OF THE COMBINED NOMENCLATURE (CN)

(Goods classification)

(2004/C 271/03)

Explanatory notes drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 10, paragraph 1, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2344/2003 (2).

The explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities (3) shall be amended as follows:

Page 276

After code 7302 10 10, insert the following text:

----

(1)OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 38.

(3)OJ C 256, 23.10.2002, p. 1.

----
Peter MATHIS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
James Gregory ARMISTEAD, petitioner, v. Jennie BOWEN, et al.

No. 18-7315.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Susan ROSE, petitioner.

No. 17-9201.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Gary W. SUTTON, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 17-9409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
Edward G. McDONOUGH, petitioner, v. Youel SMITH, Individually and as Special District Attorney for the County of Rensselaer, New York, aka Trey Smith.

No. 18-485.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 12, 2019.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted. Motion of Indiana, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as *amici curiae* and for divided argument denied. Motion of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as *amici curiae* and for divided argument denied. Motion of St. Thomas More Lawyers Guild of Rochester, New York for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument denied.
Montgomery Carl AKERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8230.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, et al., applicants, v. Rosalie SIMON, et al.

No. 18A942.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 3, 2019.

Application for stay, presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court denied.
KING LAW GROUP, PLLC, et al., petitioners, v. M2 TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED.

No. 18-904.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2004344EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 344/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
Luis FIGUEROA, petitioner, v. Gio RAMIREZ, Warden.

No. 17-9255.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing *141fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
The GEO GROUP, INC., petitioner, v. Alejandro MENOCAL, et al.

No. 17-1648.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*144Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Charles HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Christine BRANNON, Warden.

No. 17-9228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
1

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3767

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of South Dakota.

Juan Valadez, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 5, 2007

Filed: January 12, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Juan Valadez appeals the 120-month prison sentence imposed by the district

court1

 after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and to

distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 846. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning whether Valdadez’s guilty

plea and corresponding appeal waiver were knowing and voluntary and asserting

several other arguments at Valadez’s request.
-2-

We conclude that this appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver

Valadez agreed to as part of his written plea agreement. Further, though Valadez

repeatedly expressed his displeasure at the inclusion of the appeal waiver in the plea

agreement, he also repeatedly expressed his understanding of the implications of the

waiver and his understanding that the plea agreement was dependent on inclusion of

the waiver. Thus, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, and we enforce it. See

United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court should

enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, both

plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no

miscarriage of justice would result; one important way district court can ensure plea

agreement and appeal waiver are knowing and voluntary is to properly question

defendant about decision to enter agreement and to waive right to appeal); see also

United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam)

(enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues falling outside the scope of the

appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw. 

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

p0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

139871

BARNARD MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139871 COA: 286003 Clinton CC: 06-010113-CK GATES PERFORMANC E ENGINEERING, INC., and GREG N. GATES, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Mohammed BAH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8501.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael R. SPENGLER, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS AANGELES COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-7655.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Daryl SHARP, petitioner, v. Timothy DOLAN.

No. 18-8184.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No
. 21

- 2293

ABDUL WAHEED , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF MARYLAND, Office of Comptroller; DEBORAH S. RICHARDSON, Judge OAH; JAMES T. MURRAY, Judge OAH; GERALDINE A. KLAUBER, Judge OAH; STATE OF MARYLAND RETIREMENT AGENCY; WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. ( 1:2 0

- cv - 01931

- GLR )

Submitted : March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.

Abdul Waheed , Appellant Pro Se. Emily Spiering, Assistant Attorney General, Kevin Michael Cox , Baltimore, Maryland , Brian L. Oliner , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee s
.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Abdul Waheed appeals t he district court’s order dismissing his complaint against Appellees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. However, the dismissal of Waheed’s complaint should have been without prejudice. See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC , 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir 2013) (explaining that court lacking “jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits”). We therefore modify the district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice,

see 28 U. S.C. § 2106, and affirm the judgment as modified. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
# Official Journal L 199I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 199I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 647 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 199I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 647 June 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/906 of 3 June 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 4096)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/906 of 3 June 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 4096)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 4096)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Jason Michael ZANK, petitioner, v. Liz Lorena LOPEZ MORENO.

No. 18-661.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Motion of Reunite International Child Abduction Centre for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Billy Leon KEARSE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7643.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                          16,069
<SECURITIES>                                   103,017
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                       493
<INVENTORY>                                     23,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,070
<PP&E>                                          38,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,279
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,426
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,835
<SALES>                                         60,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,362
<CGS>                                           25,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
Bradley Jared BARTON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7813.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Sandra WAITE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Waite, Jr., petitioner, v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-998.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Duane YATES, petitioner, v. IOWA.

No. 18-7705.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Energy Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Fahrner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: April
          6, 2011/s/ James J. FahrnerJames J. FahrnerChief Financial Officer
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/15/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      178,591
COMMITMENTS
  21,948   30,703   38,810   98,169   96,894  158,927  166,407   19,664   12,184

CHANGES FROM 02/08/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,359)
   1,849   -4,245   -1,545   -3,256    3,933   -2,952   -1,857    1,593      498

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.3     17.2     21.7     55.0     54.3     89.0     93.2     11.0      6.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      113)
      38       31       42       31       33       93       90
```

----

Updated February 18, 2011
Fernando CASTILLO-QUINTANILLA, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES;

Jorge Miguel Choy-Soto, petitioner, v. United States; Alfredo Mario Alberto Ruizesparza Navarrette, petitioner, v. United States; Yezel Eunice Nevarez-Martell, petitioner, v. United States; Jose Guadalupe Villarreal-Cardenas, petitioner, v. United States; and Aria Lizbeth Vite-Garcia, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 18-8360.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.