alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices 

# Order

April 1, 2014

145773

ESTATE OF BARBARA JOHNSON, by

JOEDEANNA JOHNSON, Successor Personal Representative,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145773

COA: 297066

Wexford CC: 07

- 020602

- NH

ROBERT F. KOWALSKI, M.D.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

TRINITY HEALTH

- MICHIGAN d/b/a MERCY

HOSPITAL CADILLAC, FOUR SEASONS

EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., and

MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted, and the briefs and oral

argument of the parties having been considered by the Court, we REVERSE in part the

judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the March 2, 2010 judgment of the

Wexford Circuit Court. The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court abused

its discretion in excluding from evidence correspondence between counsel for the

plaintiff and the claims representative for Dr. Urse’s liability insurer. The trial court

r easonably found that there was no evidence that Dr. Urse was aware of the

correspondence, or that by executing the affidavit he was intending to confirm, or

respond to, the facts of the case as understood by the plaintiff’s counsel. The

correspondence at issue was not admissible under MRE 104(b) because the plaintiff

failed to offer evidence of a condition of fact that would permit the introduction of the

conditional evidence. Specifically, the correspondence was properly excluded under

MRE 104(b) based o n the plaintiff's failure to establish, as a factual condition precedent

to admissibility, that Dr. Urse was aware of the correspondence. As such, the trial court

did not abuse its discretion in failing to admit the correspondence into evidence.I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1, 2014

t0325 2

Clerk In light of our holding, we also VACATE that portion of the Court of Appeals

judgment holding that the trial court abused its discretion in not admitting Dr. Urse’s

affidavit. Given that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit th e correspondence, the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that any error in not admitting

the affidavit was harmless because the trial court allowed the contents of the affidavit into

evidence, allowed the plaintiff’s counsel to discuss its contents durin g closing argument,

and instructed the jury to consider whether the affidavit contradicted Dr. Urse’s

testimony.
Antron EDWARDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7238.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1217Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/01/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      534,493
COMMITMENTS
  48,399   15,199  128,837  338,179  372,820  515,415  516,856   19,078   17,638

CHANGES FROM 05/25/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,350)
     840   -3,400   16,779  -10,085   -4,220    7,535    9,159     -185   -1,810

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.1      2.8     24.1     63.3     69.8     96.4     96.7      3.6      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      109)
      15       17       31       64       73       99      105
```

----

Updated June 4, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

VIDEL LAMONT LITTLE, 

 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 165 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
Clifton Donell LYLES, petitioner, v. Angela BROACH, et al.

No. 18-7924.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charlette Dufray JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9311.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Brandon LEE, petitioner.

No. 18-7461.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Dre'Shawn Markuise LEE, petitioner, v. William MUNIZ, Warden.

No. 18-7687.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dominos Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer




Dated: March 23, 2004
# CA2004138EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 138/1

---

Image

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MidNet, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tom Locke, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Tom Locke
---------------------------
Tom Locke
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date: March 31, 2005


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO MIDNET, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED
BY MIDNET, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in their capacities as CEO, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer, respectively, of NetREIT, Inc. (the “ Company ”) that, to the best of his knowledge:

|   | (i) | the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company on Form 10-K (the “ Report ”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: April 20, 2017 | By :   | /s/ Jack K. Heilbron         |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                 |   | Jack K. Heilbron,            |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|                 |   |                         |
|                 |   |                         |
|                 |   |                         |
| Date: April 20, 2017 | By:    | /s/ Heather L. Pittard       |
|                 |   | Heather L. Pittard,          |
|                 |   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|                 |   |                         |
|                 |   |                         |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NetREIT, Inc. and will be retained by NetREIT, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



This Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.



|                      |  |        |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen                 
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Jerome J. Gassen                     
|                      |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |       
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Bradley L. Smith                 
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Bradley L. Smith                     
|                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President  Treasurer and
|                      |  |        |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.163



                                   DEMAND NOTE


$200,000.00                                                  New York, New York
                                                             March 2, 2000


        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Two Hundred
Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($200,000.00), together with interest on the unpaid
principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from the date
hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest plus 3.0%, or
the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.


                                              Wilshire Technologies, Inc.


                                              By: /s/ Kathleen E. Terry
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Kathleen E. Terry
                                                 Title:Chief Financial Officer
Joseph David ROBERTSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-609.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion to substitute Carri Robertson, authorized representative, as petitioner in place of Joseph D. Robertson, Deceased is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for consideration of the question whether the case is moot.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         June 9-10, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge I, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 205-H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7969,                         *Pintuccig@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

                        (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and                               ( print page 27173)                            Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)                    

Dated: May 2, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-09716 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
William DAVENPORT, petitioner, v. James FALK, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7757.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Scott PETERS, petitioner, v. John BALDWIN.

No. 18-6607.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Manuel PEREIRA-GOMEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6972.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Stacie DEMERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7682.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EX 99.3
                         OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                  SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1999-A

Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (July 1998 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated January 1,1999 among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood
Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and Chase Manhattan Trust Co., the
undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period October 1, 1998 through September
30, 1999 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.



By:  /s/ Douglas R. Muir

Name:  Douglas R. Muir

Title:    Vice President

Date:   September 30, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHONTONIO L. WITHERSPOON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior 

District Judge. (2:08-cr-00844-PMD-1)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shontonio L. Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew J. Modica, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shontonio L. Witherspoon appeals the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the 

criminal judgment entered in his case in 2010. Rule 60, 

however, is applicable only in civil cases; it is not a 

mechanism available to reopen or overturn a criminal judgment. 

See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 

2010) (holding that a district court has no authority to grant a 

motion to reconsider its previous order denying an 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion). And in any event, it is evident from the 

record that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

denying Witherspoon’s motion. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 

496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district 

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Douglas FAUCONIER, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7762.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Randy A. JONES, petitioner.

No. 18-8541.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 13, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
In Re Masao YONAMINE, petitioner.

No. 17-9468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.