alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7326

BERNARD BAGLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DALE CAUSEY; CHRIS SIUNARD; ESCOD INDUSTRIES BOARD OF DIRECTORS; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, ECI Warden; GENE BAKER, ECI Prison Industry; LINDA WILLIAMS, ECI Classification; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-594-2-8AJ, CA-95-595-2-8AJ) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Bagley, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Malloy McEachin, Jr., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissinghis two consolidated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. Appellant's cases were referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to the recommendations could waive appellate review of the district court orders based upon the recommendations. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendations. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2023-1055

LT Case No. 2019-10751-CIDL 

_____________________________ 

STATE FARM FLORIDA 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellant, 

v.

GLENN BROSNAN and LUCILLE 

BROSNAN, 

Appellees. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. 

Kathryn D. Weston, Judge. 

Bretton C. Albrecht, of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

Appellant. 

Mark A. Nation, and Paul W. Pritchard, of The Nation Law Firm, 

Longwood, for Appellees. 

August 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

JAY, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           6,741
<SECURITIES>                                    88,921
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                       493
<INVENTORY>                                     18,963
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,609
<PP&E>                                          43,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,604
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,048
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,955
<SALES>                                         66,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,616
<CGS>                                           27,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,347)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,638
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,638
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Hanover Compressor
Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John E. Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ John E. Jackson
------------------------------
Name:  John E. Jackson
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  December 2, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00326-CR

__________________

IN RE THOMAS WAYNE PARKER

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-26054

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Thomas Wayne Parker filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, 

in which he alleges that the trial court has refused to rule on his motion to award him 

the proper amount of pre-sentence jail-time credits. Parker has not demonstrated that 

he is clearly entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v. 

Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) 

(holding that to establish entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish 

that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty and that relator has no other 
2

adequate legal remedy). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 1, 2019

Opinion Delivered October 2, 2019

Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Johnny Joe GUERRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  OF  PRINCIPAL  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER  AND  PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  of
Diversified  Product  Inspections,  Inc. for the fiscal year ended  December 31,
2003, the undersigned  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)   such Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31,
      2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the  information  contained  in such Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the
      fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2003 fairly  presents,  in all  material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations.



March 24, 2004                    /s/ John Van Zyll
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:  John Van Zyll
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
Patrick LAFFERTY, et ux., petitioners, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18-1012.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the use in the form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of our report dated March 15, 2006, except for footnote 2, which is July 12, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of George Foreman Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 

 

/s/Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co.

Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co., P.C.

Kingston, Pennsylvania

July 13, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1321 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1321

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the holding period 
           for long-term capital gain treatment to 6 months.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

  Mr. Foley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the holding period 
           for long-term capital gain treatment to 6 months.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investment Assets Security Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. DECREASE IN HOLDING PERIOD REQUIRED FOR LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN 
              TREATMENT.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Capital gain.--Paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 1222 
        of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to other terms 
        relating to capital gains and losses) are each amended by 
        striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``6 months''.
            (2) Capital losses.--Paragraphs (2) and (4) of section 1222 
        of such Code are each amended by striking ``1 year'' and 
        inserting ``6 months''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The following provisions of such Code 
are each amended by striking ``1 year'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``6 months'':
            (1) Section 1(h)(6)(A)
            (2) Section 166(d)(1)(B).
            (3) Section 422(a)(1).
            (4) Section 423(a)(1).
            (5) Section 584(c).
            (6) Subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 631.
            (7) Section 642(c)(3).
            (8) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 702(a).
            (9) Section 818(b)(1).
            (10) Section 852(b)(3)(B).
            (11) Section 857(b)(3)(B).
            (12) Paragraphs (11) and (12) of section 1223.
            (13) Section 1231.
            (14) Subsections (b), (d), and subparagraph (A) of 
        subsection (e)(4) of section 1233.
            (15) Section 1234(b)(1).
            (16) Section 1235(a).
            (17) Section 1246(a)(4).
            (18) Section 1247(i).
            (19) Subsections (b) and (g)(2)(C) of section 1248.
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 1231(b)(3)(B) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``12 months'' and inserting ``6 months''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to dispositions after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Paul L. MUCKLE, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, et al.

No. 18-6796.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 02/72-0619]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 02/72-0619 issued to Edison Fund V, L.P. said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Michele Schimpp,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-09613 Filed 5-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Johnny TIPPINS, petitioner, v. Patricia CARUSO, et al.

No. 17-9272.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Theresa RIFFEY, et al., petitioners, v. Bruce RAUNER, Governor of Illinois, et al.

No. 17-981.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Janus v.*

*2709*State, County and Municipal Employees,* 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2448, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018).
IB

House Calendar No. 194

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1359

[Report No. 106–551]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the

‘‘Frank J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United

States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

MARCH 29, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street

in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ‘‘Frank J. Battisti and

Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1359 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngs4 town, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank

5 J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and

6 United States Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frank

12 J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and

13 United States Courthouse’’.

House Calendar No. 194

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1359

[Report No. 106–551]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United

States courthouse to be constructed at 10 EastCommerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the‘‘Frank J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

MARCH 29, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Chad C. Deaton, certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A-2 of Hanover
Compressor Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: April 5, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Chad C. DeatonName:
    
    Chad C. DeatonTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive
Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on form 10-K of Empire Global Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Vic
Dominelli, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: October 30, 2009               By: /s/ Vic Dominelli
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Vic Dominelli
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-82390, 333-75527, 333-31704 and
333-122562) of Varian, Inc. of our report dated November 25, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
|                              
|San Jose, California          
|November 25, 2008