alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1359

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street

in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ‘‘Frank J. Battisti and

Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States

Courthouse’’.
2

HR 1359 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 to be constructed at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngs6 town, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank

7 J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and

8 United States Courthouse’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

12 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec13 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frank

14 J. Battisti and Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and

15 United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/05/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      212,295
COMMITMENTS
  31,149   47,189   45,602  111,061   99,040  187,812  191,831   24,483   20,464

CHANGES FROM 06/28/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        176)
  10,805    3,945   -4,413   -7,636      180   -1,244     -288    1,420      464

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.7     22.2     21.5     52.3     46.7     88.5     90.4     11.5      9.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      126)
      46       33       58       27       26      109       99
```

----

Updated July 8, 2011
Exhibit 4

NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

48 N. South Street

Wilmington, OH 45177

August 13, 2009

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: NB&T Financial Group, Inc.  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NB&T Financial Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation
(NBTF), is today filing a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q), as executed on August 13, 2009.

Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, NBTF hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights
of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument represents long-term debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of NBTF and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.



|                           
|---------------------------
|Very truly yours,          
|                           
|/s/ Craig F. Fortin        
|Craig F. Fortin            
|Senior Vice President & CFO
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 11011 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DESHAWN MCCARTER , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 285

- 1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Deshawn Mc Carter appeals his 37

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Raising one issue on appeal, McCarter argues that the district cour t erred in finding that his prior California robbery conviction is a “crime of violence” sufficient to qualify him for a base offense level of 20 pursuant to

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 19, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-11011 Document: 00515422048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2020No. 19

- 11011

2 U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). According to McCarter, his California robbery conviction does not qual ify as a crime of violence because it criminalizes a broader range of conduct than generic robbery or generic extortion. McCarter acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Tellez

Martinez

 ̧ 517 F.3d 813 (5th Cir. 2008) , but raises t he issue to preserve it for further review. The Government filed a n unopposed motion for summary affirmance agreeing that the issue is foreclosed and, in the alternative, a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. As the Government argues, and McCarter concedes, the sole issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Tellez

- Martinez , 517 F.3d at 814

- 15 , wherein we held that the relevant statute, California Penal Code § 211, fell within the “generic or contemporary meaning of robbery as unde rstood by this court” and thus qualified as a crime of violence under the former U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See United States v. Montiel

- Cortez , 849 F.3d 221 , 226

- 27 nn.10

- 20 (5th Cir. 2017) ; see also United States v. Flores

- Vasquez , 641 F.3d 667, 670 n.1 (5th Cir. 2011) (noting that a prior conviction that qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the former § 2L1.2, also qualifies as a crime of violence under § 4B1.2)

. Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the G overnment’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to fil e a brief is
DENIED. Case: 19-11011 Document: 00515422048 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2020
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

Pursuant to Section 1350of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Phillip A. Perillo, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Quotesmith.com, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifythat, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)          The Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ PHILLIP A.  PERILLO   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Phillip A. Perillo  |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date: March 15, 2006      |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toQuotesmith.com, Inc. and will be retained by Quotesmith.com, Inc andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companyfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
# Official Journal L 177/12 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4712 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 177

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4712 May 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2004 of 11 May 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 959/2004 of 11 May 2004 concerning the issue of import licences for certain preserved mushrooms | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2004 of 11 May 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 959/2004 of 11 May 2004 concerning the issue of import licences for certain preserved mushrooms

3

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 745/2004 of 21 April 2004 determining the extent to which applications lodged in April 2004 for import rights in respect of frozen beef intended for processing may be accepted (OJ L 116, 22.4.2004) | 4 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 745/2004 of 21 April 2004 determining the extent to which applications lodged in April 2004 for import rights in respect of frozen beef intended for processing may be accepted (OJ L 116, 22.4.2004)

(OJ L 116, 22.4.2004)

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                1,751
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,870
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                          49,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     58,009
<PP&E>                               38,536
<DEPRECIATION>                     (10,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       88,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                19,993
<BONDS>                               2,798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                194
<OTHER-SE>                           61,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         88,048
<SALES>                             186,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    188,508
<CGS>                               102,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       102,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      17,723
<INCOME-TAX>                          6,646
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  11,077
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         11,077
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.58


</TABLE>
Juan RODRIGUEZ-MANTOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith
|                        |  | Timothy L. Smith    



21
Vincent E. REED, petitioner, v. FLORISSANT COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.

No. 18M117.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J A M ES L. SN I D ER, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. C U R R Y , W ar de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 15805 D. C . No . 3 : 0 7 - C V- 0 4 3 1 1 - MHP ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M ar i l y n H . P a t e l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner J am es L . S ni der app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng the B o ard ’ s 2 0 0 6 d eci si o n d en yi n g h i m p aro l e. W e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED JU L 7 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 15805

S n id e rc o n te n d s th a t th e C a lif o rn iaP e n a l C o d e § 3 0 4 1 c r e a te s af e d e r a lly p r o te c te dlib e rtyin te r e s t in p ar o le a n dth a t th e B o ar d ’s f a ilu r e to s e t ap ar o le d a te a thi s 2006 he ar i ng vi ol a t e d hi s f e de r a l c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s . S ni de ra l s o c ont e nds th a t th e B o ar dv io la te dh is r ig h ts u n d e rth e E q u a l P r o te c tio n C lau s e . A ft erbri ef

i ng w as com pl et ed i n thi s c as e, thi s c ou rthel d thata c ert i fi cat e of ap p e a lab ilityis r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e th e d e n ia l o f p ar o le . Se e H

ay w ard v . M a rs h a ll , 60 3 F . 3d 54 6, 55 4-55 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( en banc). B ec ause S ni der has n o t h a s m a d e as ub s tan tia l s h o w in g o f th e d e n ia l o f

af e d e r a l c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t, w e d e c lin e to c e rtif

yh is c la im s . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 131 S . C t . 859, 862- 63 ( 2 0 1 1 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) ; 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) . S n id e r ’s m o tio n f

o rap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l is d e n ie d . D I S M I S S E D .
Exhibit 4.2
































CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We have issued our report dated June 26, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Alaia Market Linked Trust Series 4-5, comprising the Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio, contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-225607) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.












/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP







Chicago, Illinois


June 26, 2018
Chris G. GILKERS, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-7045.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jessie Lee SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6989.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1325Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Christopher FRENCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7127.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated October 14, 2011
Aaron FORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7358.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II

Calendar No. 577

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1291

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 17, 2000

Recieved

MAY 24, 2000

Read the first time

MAY 25, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet

service providers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1291 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Access Charge

3 Prohibition Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON PROVIDERS OF

5 INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.

6 Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47

7 U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end the following

8 new subsection:

9 ‘‘(l) PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON INTERNET SERV10 ICE PROVIDERS.—

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection

12 (b)(4) or (d) or any other provision of this title, the

13 Commission shall not impose on any provider of

14 Internet access service (as such term is defined in

15 section 231(e)) any contribution for the support of

16 universal service that is based on a measure of the

17 time that telecommunications services are used in

18 the provision of such Internet access service.

19 ‘‘(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in

20 this subsection shall preclude the Commission from

21 imposing access charges on the providers of Internet

22 telephone services, irrespective of the type of cus-
3

HR 1291 PCS

1 tomer premises equipment used in connection with

2 such services.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 577

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1291

AN ACT

To prohibit the imposition of access charges on

Internet service providers, and for other purposes.

MAY 25, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

d0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144636

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144636 COA: 301543 Allegan CC: 09-016354-FH JOSHUA DEAN HAVEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.