alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 242/24 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 242 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6524 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 242

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6524 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 242/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 242/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 17 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 242/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 242/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Byron Anthony HORN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7692.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Willie WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9353.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jason Andrew WRIGHT, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 18-8282.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| i.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ii.   | The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 13, 2011 | By: /s/ Jon Thompson                  |
|--------------|---------------------------------------|
|         | Jon Thompson                          |
|         | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|         |                                  |
| May 13, 2011 | By: /s/ Shannon L. Greene             |
|         | Shannon L. Greene                     |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
SOUTHERN TRUST METALS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION.

No. 18-1123.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7087

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus CLINTON STANLEY MATTHEWS, a/k/a Howard L. Eastwood, a/k/a Stanley Matthews, a/k/a Clinton Mallhew, a/k/a William Christopher Hinton, a/k/a Bernard Jones, a/k/a Craig Jerrod Ingram, a/k/a Ian Bernard Matthew, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00066-HCM-1) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 26, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Stanley Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Clinton Stanley Matthews appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Matthews , No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM (E.D. Va. July 3, 2007). We deny Matthews’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 315/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 315 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 665 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 315

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 665 September 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 315/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10855 – CAPGEMINI / ORANGE / JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 315/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11201 – REXEL DEVELOPPEMENT / WASCO) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 315/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10855 – CAPGEMINI / ORANGE / JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 315/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11201 – REXEL DEVELOPPEMENT / WASCO) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 315/03 | Euro exchange rates – 4 September 2023 | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2023/C 315/04 | Notice of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 315/03

Euro exchange rates – 4 September 2023

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2023/C 315/04

Notice of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 315/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2023/C 315/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11223 – PAI PARTNERS/INFRA GROUP) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2023/C 315/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11150 - VERSALIS / NOVAMONT) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2023/C 315/05

Prior notification of a concentration (
  1
  )

1

5

2023/C 315/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11223 – PAI PARTNERS/INFRA GROUP) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

2023/C 315/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11150 - VERSALIS / NOVAMONT) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Al-Rashid Muhammad ABDULLAH, petitioner, v. PLANT CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 18-7962.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2014092EN.01001901.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 193/2013

of 8 November 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 847/2012 of 19 September 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards mercury (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 847/2012 of 19 September 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards mercury (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0847: Commission Regulation (EU) No 847/2012 of 19 September 2012 (OJ L 253, 20.9.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0847: Commission Regulation (EU) No 847/2012 of 19 September 2012 (OJ L 253, 20.9.2012, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 847/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 November 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 253, 20.9.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Marco M. TORRES, petitioner, v. Michael S. WILLIAMS, Judge, Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Hillsborough County.

No. 18-8286.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 125

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to direct the Federal Communications Commission to establish an ethnic and minority affairs section.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. ENGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to direct the

Federal Communications Commission to establish an ethnic and minority affairs section.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ethnic and Minority

5 Bias Clearinghouse Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF ETHNIC AND MINORITY AF7 FAIRS SECTION.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Communications

9 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 155) is amended by inserting after

10 subsection (e) the following new subsection:
2

HR 125 IH

1 ‘‘(f)(1) There shall be established within the Commis2 sion an ethnic and minority affairs section. Such ethnic

3 and minority affairs section shall—

4 ‘‘(A) establish a clearinghouse for complaints,

5 grievances, and opinions relating to radio, television,

6 and cable television broadcast programming and

7 their depiction of ethnic and minority groups;

8 ‘‘(B) collect, analyze, and prepare information

9 from public and private agencies relating to the por10 trayal of ethnic and minority groups by radio, tele11 vision, and cable television broadcast programming,

12 and furnish such information, upon request and

13 without charge, to public and private agencies that

14 serve the needs and interests of such groups;

15 ‘‘(C) conduct an annual conference which shall

16 be designed to focus public attention upon the im17 ages of ethnic and minority groups depicted by

18 radio, television, and cable television broadcast pro19 gramming, discuss the impact which these images

20 have on such groups, and encourage the participa21 tion of such individuals and public and private orga22 nizations that serve the interests of such groups;

23 and

24 ‘‘(D) prepare and transmit to Congress an an25 nual report which details the activities of the ethnic
3

HR 125 IH

1 and minority affairs section, including a compilation

2 of all complaints, grievances, and opinions filed

3 under paragraph (1).

4 ‘‘(2) The chairman of the Commission shall establish

5 an advisory committee to assist the ethnic and minority

6 affairs section in implementing the annual conference pur7 suant to paragraph (1)(C). The advisory committee shall

8 be composed of 15 members chosen from among radio and

9 television broadcasters and program producers, educators,

10 representatives from the mental health community, and

11 leaders from ethnic and minority communities.’’.

12 (b) TIME LIMIT.—Not later than 90 days after the

13 date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall estab14 lish the ethnic and minority affairs section referred to in

15 section 5(f) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amend16 ed by this Act.

Æ
| i.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ii.   | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the    Report. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      14, 2008 | By:      /s/ Ronald C.  Morgan            |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | Ronald      C. Morgan                     |
|                   | Chief      Executive Officer              |
|                   |                                      |
| November      14, 2008 | By:      /s/ Shannon L.  Greene           |
|                   | Shannon      L. Greene                    |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer andTreasurer |
Randall JENNETTE, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-8507.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
In re UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18A410.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 19, 2018.

**ORDER**

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,

IT IS ORDERED that discovery and trial in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, in case No. 6:15-cv-01517, are stayed pending receipt of a response, due on or before Wednesday, October 24, 2018, by 3 p.m., and further order of the undersigned or of the Court.

*/s/ John G. Roberts, Jr.*

Chief Justice of the United States
SPEEDYPC SOFTWARE, petitioner, v. Archie BEATON.

No. 18-1127.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northern Border
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Jerry L. Peters, as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Partnership,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Dated:  August 8, 2005                      /s/ Jerry L. Peters
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jerry L. Peters
                                          Chief Financial and Accounting Officer


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
Toni R. PALMER, petitioner, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS TECHNOLOGY RISK OFFICE.

No. 18-7514.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Patricia A. GRANT, petitioner, v. Jay WHITE, et al.

No. 17-9392.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

Pursuant to Section 1350of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Robert S. Bland, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Quotesmith.com, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)          The Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ROBERT S. BLAND                                                              |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Robert S. Bland  Title: Chief Executive Officer  Date: March 15, 2006 |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toQuotesmith.com, Inc. and will be retained by Quotesmith.com, Inc andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companyfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
Aaron HAAS, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 18-8520.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioners are allowed until May 20, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Joseph J. BUTTERCASE, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 17-9210.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.
Dee Deidre FARMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 18-8376.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Ernest Lee GLOVER, Jr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7636.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Alberto SOSTRE-CINTRON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8494.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, May 17, 2022, 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

# PLACE: 

                        Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be held as a live streamed videoconference, with an option for listen-only audio dial-in by telephone. The public may observe the videoconference or connect to the audio-only dial-in by following the instructions that will be posted on                         *www.eeoc.gov*                         24 hours before the meeting. Closed captioning and ASL services will be available.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        The following item will be considered at the meeting:                              ( print page 26757)    

Knocking Down Walls: Discrimination and Harassment in Construction.

*Note:*                         In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the public will be able to observe the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides information about Commission meetings on its website,                         *www.eeoc.gov,*                         and provides a recorded announcement a week in advance on future Commission meetings.)                    

                        Please telephone (202) 921-2750, or email                         *commissionmeetingcomments@eeoc.gov*                         at any time for information on this meeting.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Shelley Kahn, Acting Executive Officer, (202) 921-3061.

Dated: May 3, 2022.

Shelley Kahn,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2022-09744 Filed 5-3-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P