# Official Journal C 215/29 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6329 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 215

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6329 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 215/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 215/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 215/02 | Case C-511/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Györgyné Lintner v UniCredit Bank Hungary Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Foreign currency based loan contract — Article 4(1) — Consideration of all the other terms of the contract for the purpose of assessing the unfairness of the contested term — Article 6(1) — Examination by the national court of its own motion as to whether the clauses in the contract are unfair — Scope) | 2 |
| 2020/C 215/03 | Case C-56/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 March 2020 — European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia, Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o, Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Article 108(2) TFEU — Investment aid — Operating aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision of the European Commission — Aid incompatible with the internal market — Order for recovery of the aid — Annulment by the General Court of the European Union — Essential procedural requirement — Procedural rights of the interested parties) | 3 |
| 2020/C 215/04 | Case C-160/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 — Import of frozen poultrymeat originating in Brazil — Post-clearance recovery of additional import duties — Verification mechanism — Method for calculating additional duties) | 3 |
| 2020/C 215/05 | Case C-215/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8 — Czech Republic) — Libuše Králová v Primera Air Scandinavia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 5(1) — Jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Articles 15 to 17 — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 6 and 7 — Right to compensation in the case where a flight is subject to a long delay — Contract for carriage combining travel and accommodation concluded between the passenger and a travel agency — Action for compensation brought against the air carrier which is not a party to that contract — Directive 90/314/EEC — Package travel) | 4 |
| 2020/C 215/06 | Case C-244/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2020 — Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Capital injections and State guarantees — Concept of State aid — Concept of ‘advantage’ — Private operator principle — Private investor test — European Commission’s obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination — Judicial review — Burden of proof — Concept of ‘firm in difficulty’ — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring — Guarantee Notice — 2011 temporary framework — Amount of aid to be recovered — Duty of the Commission and the General Court of the European Union to state reasons) | 5 |
| 2020/C 215/07 | Case C-314/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of a European arrest warrant against SF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 5(3) — Surrender of the person concerned made subject to a guarantee that that person will be returned to the executing Member State in order to serve there a custodial sentence or a measure involving deprivation of liberty imposed on that person in the issuing Member State — Time of return — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Article 3(3) — Scope — Article 8 — Adaptation of the sentence imposed in the issuing Member State — Article 25 — Enforcement of a sentence under Article 5(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA) | 6 |
| 2020/C 215/08 | Case C-344/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the arbeidshof te Gent — Belgium) — ISS Facility Services NV v Sonia Govaerts, Atalian NV, formerly Euroclean NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/23/EC — Article 3(1) — Transfers of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Public contract for cleaning services — Award of market lots to two new contractors — Re-engagement of a worker assigned to all the market lots) | 7 |
| 2020/C 215/09 | Case C-454/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Linköping — Sweden) — Baltic Cable AB v Energimarknadsinspektionen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market for electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Transmission of electricity — Concept of ‘transmission system operator’ — Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 — Interconnector — Transmission line connecting the national transmission systems of the Member States — Article 16(6) — Scope — Use of revenues resulting from the allocation of interconnection capacity — Undertaking which merely operates a cross-border high-voltage power line connecting two national transmission networks) | 8 |
| 2020/C 215/10 | Joined Cases C-496/18 and C-497/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Hungeod Közlekedésfejlesztési, Földmérési, Út- és Vasúttervezési Kft. (C-496/18), Sixense Soldata (C-496/18), Budapesti Közlekedési Zrt. (C-496/18 and C-497/18) v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures concerning the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors — Directive 92/13/EEC — Public procurement — Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU — Review of the application of public procurement rules — National legislation which allows certain bodies to initiate a procedure of their own motion where there has been an unlawful amendment to a contract which is in the course of being performed — Time-barring of an authority’s right to initiate a procedure of its own motion — Principles of legal certainty and proportionality) | 9 |
| 2020/C 215/11 | Joined Cases C-558/18 and C-563/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi and the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Łódzki (C-558/18) and Prokurator Generalny, represented by the Prokuratura Krajowa, formerly the Prokuratura Okręgowa w Płocku v VX, WW, XV (C-563/18) (References for a preliminary ruling — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principle of judicial independence — Disciplinary regime applicable to national judges — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 267 TFUE — Admissibility — Interpretation necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment — Meaning) | 10 |
| 2020/C 215/12 | Case C-576/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Recovery of unlawful aid granted to the hotel industry in Sardinia — Article 260(2) TFEU — Pecuniary penalties — Penalty payment and lump sum) | 11 |
| 2020/C 215/13 | Case C-583/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Verbraucherzentrale Berlin eV v DB Vertrieb GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Scope — Service contract — Article 2(6) — Contract for passenger transport services — Article 3(3)(k) — Cards conferring entitlement to price reductions when passenger transport contracts are subsequently concluded — Online selling of such cards without informing the consumer about the right of withdrawal) | 11 |
| 2020/C 215/14 | Case C-622/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — AR v Cooper International Spirits LLC, St Dalfour SAS, Établissement Gabriel Boudier SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1)(b) — First subparagraph of Article 10(1) — Article 12(1) — Revocation of a trade mark for lack of genuine use — Right of the trade mark proprietor to plead infringement of his or her exclusive rights as a result of the use by a third party of an identical or similar sign during the period preceding the date on which the revocation took effect) | 12 |
| 2020/C 215/15 | Case C-659/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción n. 4 de Badalona — Spain) — Criminal proceedings against VW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2013/48/EU — Article 3(2) — Right of access to a lawyer — Circumstances in which the right of access to a lawyer must be guaranteed — Non-appearance — Derogations from the right of access to a lawyer — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection) | 13 |
| 2020/C 215/16 | Case C-769/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Caisse d’assurance retraite et de la santé au travail d’Alsace-Moselle v SJ, Ministre chargé de la Sécurité sociale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 5(b) — Increase in the rate for old-age pensions — Taking into account of the allowance paid in respect of the raising of a disabled child in another Member State — Principle of equal treatment of facts) | 14 |
| 2020/C 215/17 | Case C-779/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich — Poland) — Mikrokasa S.A. and Revenue Niestandaryzowany Sekurytyzacyjny Fundusz Inwestycyjny Zamknięty v XO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 3(g), Article 10(2) and Article 22(1) — Level of harmonisation — Concept of ‘non-interest credit costs’ — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Ceiling value for the total non-interest credit costs — Contractual terms reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Not included) | 15 |
| 2020/C 215/18 | Case C-832/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus — Finland) — A and Others v Finnair Oyj (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5 and 7 — Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Entitlement to compensation more than once in the event of a delay or cancellation not only of the original reservation, but also of the subsequent reservation made in the context of a re-routing — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — ‘On condition’ part — Technical shortcomings inherent in aircraft maintenance) | 16 |
| 2020/C 215/19 | Case C-2/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — Criminal procedure against A.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA — Mutual recognition of judgments and probation decisions — Scope — Judgment imposing a suspended custodial sentence — Probation measure — Obligation not to commit a new criminal offence — Obligation prescribed by law) | 17 |
| 2020/C 215/20 | Case C-66/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — JC v Kreissparkasse Saarlouis (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2008/48/EC — Credit agreements for consumers — Right of withdrawal — Time limit for the exercise of that right — Requirements concerning the information to be included in a credit agreement — Information notice merely referring to a series of national provisions) | 17 |
| 2020/C 215/21 | Case C-94/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — San Domenico Vetraria SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC — Articles 2 and 6 — Scope — Taxable transactions — Services supplied for consideration — Secondment of staff by a parent company to its subsidiary — Reimbursement by the subsidiary limited to the costs incurred) | 18 |
| 2020/C 215/22 | Case C-182/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 3005 and heading 3824 — Self-heating patches and belts to relieve pain — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 — Invalidity) | 19 |
| 2020/C 215/23 | Case C-192/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Rensen Shipbuilding BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 8901 — Ship hulls — Maritime navigation — Vessels, designed as seagoing — Meaning) | 19 |
| 2020/C 215/24 | Case C-123/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 4 March 2020 — Ferrari SpA v Mansory Design & Holding GmbH, WH | 20 |
| 2020/C 215/25 | Case C-126/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 6 March 2020 — ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, represented by the Umweltbundesamt | 20 |
| 2020/C 215/26 | Case C-136/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 12 March 2020 — Proceedings against LU | 21 |
| 2020/C 215/27 | Case C-147/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2020 — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Abacus Medicine A/S | 22 |
| 2020/C 215/28 | Case C-153/20 P: Appeal brought on 27 March 2020 by the Republic of Lithuania against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Second Chamber) on 22 January 2020 in Case T-19/18 Lithuania v Commission | 23 |
| 2020/C 215/29 | Case C-156/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom made on 6 April 2020 — Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs | 24 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 215/30 | Case T-607/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Volotea v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy to Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market — Whether imputable to the State — Recovery — Beneficiaries — Advantage to co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Selectivity — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons) | 26 |
| 2020/C 215/31 | Case T-716/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Germanwings v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Imputability to the State — Beneficiaries — Advantage for co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Obligation to state reasons — Aid scheme — De minimis aid — Recovery) | 26 |
| 2020/C 215/32 | Case T-8/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — easyJet Airline v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Imputability to the State — Beneficiaries — Advantage for co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons) | 27 |
| 2020/C 215/33 | Case T-195/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Talanton v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Perform Contract — Eligible costs — Repayment in part of the sums paid — Abuse of contractual rights — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations — Burden of proof — Counterclaim) | 28 |
| 2020/C 215/34 | Case T-290/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Agmin Italy v Commission (Financial Regulation — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general EU budget and by the European Development Fund for a two-year period — Principle of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality) | 29 |
| 2020/C 215/35 | Case T-443/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment) | 29 |
| 2020/C 215/36 | Case T-444/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Invalidity and revocation proceedings — EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the EU trade mark — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment) | 30 |
| 2020/C 215/37 | Case T-445/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment) | 31 |
| 2020/C 215/38 | Case T-446/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment) | 32 |
| 2020/C 215/39 | Case T-534/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment) | 32 |
| 2020/C 215/40 | Case T-535/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek’s) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek’s — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment) | 33 |
| 2020/C 215/41 | Case T-640/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Intercontact Budapest v CdT (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of translation services of texts in the financial and banking fields from English into Hungarian — Ranking of a tenderer — Article 113(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Obligation to state reasons — Tender price of the highest ranked tenderers — Refusal of disclosure) | 34 |
| 2020/C 215/42 | Case T-5/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Clatronic International v EUIPO (PROFI CARE) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark PROFI CARE — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons) | 35 |
| 2020/C 215/43 | Case T-49/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — View. v EUIPO (CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 35 |
| 2020/C 215/44 | Case T-63/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Rot Front v EUIPO — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (РОШЕН) (EU trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark РОШЕН — Earlier international figurative mark РОМАШКИ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 36 |
| 2020/C 215/45 | Case T-76/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Pontinova v EUIPO — Ponti & Partners (pontinova) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark pontinova — Earlier national word mark PONTI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relevant public — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion) | 37 |
| 2020/C 215/46 | Case T-86/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — SolNova v EUIPO — Canina Pharma (BIO-INSECT Shocker) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BIO-INSECT Shocker — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 37 |
| 2020/C 215/47 | Case T-156/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Koenig & Bauer v EUIPO (we’re on it) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark we’re on it — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) | 38 |
| 2020/C 215/48 | Case T-172/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Cognac Ferrand v EUIPO (Shape of braiding on a bottle) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of braiding on a bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 39 |
| 2020/C 215/49 | Case T-284/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Wonder Line v EUIPO — De Longhi Benelux (KENWELL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark KENWELL — Earlier EU word mark KENWOOD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 39 |
| 2020/C 215/50 | Case T-288/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Divaro v EUIPO — Grendene (IPANEMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark IPANEMA — Earlier EU figurative mark Ipanema — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 40 |
| 2020/C 215/51 | Case T-381/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — adp Gauselmann v EUIPO — Gameloft (City Mania) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark City Mania — Earlier EU word mark City Lights — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 41 |
| 2020/C 215/52 | Case T-503/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO (XOXO) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark XOXO — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 41 |
| 2020/C 215/53 | Case T-532/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — EC Brand Comércio, Importação e Exportação de Vestuário em Geral v EUIPO (pantys) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark pantys — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 42 |
| 2020/C 215/54 | Case T-233/20: Action brought on 28 April 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services) | 43 |
| 2020/C 215/55 | Case T-234/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — HB v EIB | 43 |
| 2020/C 215/56 | Case T-240/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Arnaoutakis v Parliament | 44 |
| 2020/C 215/57 | Case T-241/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Susta v Parliament | 46 |
| 2020/C 215/58 | Case T-242/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Frutos Gama v Parliament | 48 |
| 2020/C 215/59 | Case T-243/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Galeote v Parliament | 49 |
| 2020/C 215/60 | Case T-244/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Marques v Parliament | 51 |
| 2020/C 215/61 | Case T-245/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Watson v Parliament | 53 |
| 2020/C 215/62 | Case T-246/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Aerospinning Master Franchising v EUIPO — Mad Dogg Athletics (SPINNING) | 54 |
| 2020/C 215/63 | Case T-249/20: Action brought on 28 April 2020 — Sabra v Council | 55 |
| 2020/C 215/64 | Case T-252/20: Action brought on 23 April 2020 — JU and Others v Council | 56 |
| 2020/C 215/65 | Case T-253/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Oatly v EUIPO (IT'S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS) | 57 |
| 2020/C 215/66 | Case T-254/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO — Krasnyj Octyabr (Representation of a lobster) | 57 |
| 2020/C 215/67 | Case T-256/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Steinel v EUIPO (GluePro) | 58 |
| 2020/C 215/68 | Case T-259/20: Action brought on 8 May 2020 — Ryanair v Commission | 59 |
| 2020/C 215/69 | Case T-260/20: Action brought on 1 May 2020 — Da Silva Carreira v Commission | 60 |
| 2020/C 215/70 | Case T-263/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services) | 60 |
| 2020/C 215/71 | Case T-282/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (APO) | 61 |
| 2020/C 215/72 | Joined Cases T-103/19, T-110/19 to T-113/19 and T-116/19 to T-124/19: Order of the General Court of 17 April 2020 — Mende Omalanga and Others v Council | 62 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 215/02

Case C-511/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Györgyné Lintner v UniCredit Bank Hungary Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Foreign currency based loan contract — Article 4(1) — Consideration of all the other terms of the contract for the purpose of assessing the unfairness of the contested term — Article 6(1) — Examination by the national court of its own motion as to whether the clauses in the contract are unfair — Scope)

2

2020/C 215/03

Case C-56/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 March 2020 — European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia, Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o, Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Article 108(2) TFEU — Investment aid — Operating aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision of the European Commission — Aid incompatible with the internal market — Order for recovery of the aid — Annulment by the General Court of the European Union — Essential procedural requirement — Procedural rights of the interested parties)

3

2020/C 215/04

Case C-160/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 — Import of frozen poultrymeat originating in Brazil — Post-clearance recovery of additional import duties — Verification mechanism — Method for calculating additional duties)

3

2020/C 215/05

Case C-215/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8 — Czech Republic) — Libuše Králová v Primera Air Scandinavia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 5(1) — Jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Articles 15 to 17 — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 6 and 7 — Right to compensation in the case where a flight is subject to a long delay — Contract for carriage combining travel and accommodation concluded between the passenger and a travel agency — Action for compensation brought against the air carrier which is not a party to that contract — Directive 90/314/EEC — Package travel)

4

2020/C 215/06

Case C-244/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2020 — Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Capital injections and State guarantees — Concept of State aid — Concept of ‘advantage’ — Private operator principle — Private investor test — European Commission’s obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination — Judicial review — Burden of proof — Concept of ‘firm in difficulty’ — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring — Guarantee Notice — 2011 temporary framework — Amount of aid to be recovered — Duty of the Commission and the General Court of the European Union to state reasons)

5

2020/C 215/07

Case C-314/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of a European arrest warrant against SF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 5(3) — Surrender of the person concerned made subject to a guarantee that that person will be returned to the executing Member State in order to serve there a custodial sentence or a measure involving deprivation of liberty imposed on that person in the issuing Member State — Time of return — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Article 3(3) — Scope — Article 8 — Adaptation of the sentence imposed in the issuing Member State — Article 25 — Enforcement of a sentence under Article 5(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA)

6

2020/C 215/08

Case C-344/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the arbeidshof te Gent — Belgium) — ISS Facility Services NV v Sonia Govaerts, Atalian NV, formerly Euroclean NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/23/EC — Article 3(1) — Transfers of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Public contract for cleaning services — Award of market lots to two new contractors — Re-engagement of a worker assigned to all the market lots)

7

2020/C 215/09

Case C-454/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Linköping — Sweden) — Baltic Cable AB v Energimarknadsinspektionen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market for electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Transmission of electricity — Concept of ‘transmission system operator’ — Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 — Interconnector — Transmission line connecting the national transmission systems of the Member States — Article 16(6) — Scope — Use of revenues resulting from the allocation of interconnection capacity — Undertaking which merely operates a cross-border high-voltage power line connecting two national transmission networks)

8

2020/C 215/10

Joined Cases C-496/18 and C-497/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Hungeod Közlekedésfejlesztési, Földmérési, Út- és Vasúttervezési Kft. (C-496/18), Sixense Soldata (C-496/18), Budapesti Közlekedési Zrt. (C-496/18 and C-497/18) v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures concerning the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors — Directive 92/13/EEC — Public procurement — Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU — Review of the application of public procurement rules — National legislation which allows certain bodies to initiate a procedure of their own motion where there has been an unlawful amendment to a contract which is in the course of being performed — Time-barring of an authority’s right to initiate a procedure of its own motion — Principles of legal certainty and proportionality)

9

2020/C 215/11

Joined Cases C-558/18 and C-563/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi and the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Łódzki (C-558/18) and Prokurator Generalny, represented by the Prokuratura Krajowa, formerly the Prokuratura Okręgowa w Płocku v VX, WW, XV (C-563/18) (References for a preliminary ruling — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principle of judicial independence — Disciplinary regime applicable to national judges — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 267 TFUE — Admissibility — Interpretation necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment — Meaning)

10

2020/C 215/12

Case C-576/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Recovery of unlawful aid granted to the hotel industry in Sardinia — Article 260(2) TFEU — Pecuniary penalties — Penalty payment and lump sum)

11

2020/C 215/13

Case C-583/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Verbraucherzentrale Berlin eV v DB Vertrieb GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Scope — Service contract — Article 2(6) — Contract for passenger transport services — Article 3(3)(k) — Cards conferring entitlement to price reductions when passenger transport contracts are subsequently concluded — Online selling of such cards without informing the consumer about the right of withdrawal)

11

2020/C 215/14

Case C-622/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — AR v Cooper International Spirits LLC, St Dalfour SAS, Établissement Gabriel Boudier SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1)(b) — First subparagraph of Article 10(1) — Article 12(1) — Revocation of a trade mark for lack of genuine use — Right of the trade mark proprietor to plead infringement of his or her exclusive rights as a result of the use by a third party of an identical or similar sign during the period preceding the date on which the revocation took effect)

12

2020/C 215/15

Case C-659/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción n. 4 de Badalona — Spain) — Criminal proceedings against VW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2013/48/EU — Article 3(2) — Right of access to a lawyer — Circumstances in which the right of access to a lawyer must be guaranteed — Non-appearance — Derogations from the right of access to a lawyer — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection)

13

2020/C 215/16

Case C-769/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Caisse d’assurance retraite et de la santé au travail d’Alsace-Moselle v SJ, Ministre chargé de la Sécurité sociale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 5(b) — Increase in the rate for old-age pensions — Taking into account of the allowance paid in respect of the raising of a disabled child in another Member State — Principle of equal treatment of facts)

14

2020/C 215/17

Case C-779/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich — Poland) — Mikrokasa S.A. and Revenue Niestandaryzowany Sekurytyzacyjny Fundusz Inwestycyjny Zamknięty v XO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 3(g), Article 10(2) and Article 22(1) — Level of harmonisation — Concept of ‘non-interest credit costs’ — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Ceiling value for the total non-interest credit costs — Contractual terms reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Not included)

15

2020/C 215/18

Case C-832/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus — Finland) — A and Others v Finnair Oyj (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5 and 7 — Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Entitlement to compensation more than once in the event of a delay or cancellation not only of the original reservation, but also of the subsequent reservation made in the context of a re-routing — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — ‘On condition’ part — Technical shortcomings inherent in aircraft maintenance)

16

2020/C 215/19

Case C-2/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — Criminal procedure against A.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA — Mutual recognition of judgments and probation decisions — Scope — Judgment imposing a suspended custodial sentence — Probation measure — Obligation not to commit a new criminal offence — Obligation prescribed by law)

17

2020/C 215/20

Case C-66/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — JC v Kreissparkasse Saarlouis (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2008/48/EC — Credit agreements for consumers — Right of withdrawal — Time limit for the exercise of that right — Requirements concerning the information to be included in a credit agreement — Information notice merely referring to a series of national provisions)

17

2020/C 215/21

Case C-94/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — San Domenico Vetraria SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC — Articles 2 and 6 — Scope — Taxable transactions — Services supplied for consideration — Secondment of staff by a parent company to its subsidiary — Reimbursement by the subsidiary limited to the costs incurred)

18

2020/C 215/22

Case C-182/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 3005 and heading 3824 — Self-heating patches and belts to relieve pain — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 — Invalidity)

19

2020/C 215/23

Case C-192/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Rensen Shipbuilding BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 8901 — Ship hulls — Maritime navigation — Vessels, designed as seagoing — Meaning)

19

2020/C 215/24

Case C-123/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 4 March 2020 — Ferrari SpA v Mansory Design & Holding GmbH, WH

20

2020/C 215/25

Case C-126/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 6 March 2020 — ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, represented by the Umweltbundesamt

20

2020/C 215/26

Case C-136/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 12 March 2020 — Proceedings against LU

21

2020/C 215/27

Case C-147/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2020 — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Abacus Medicine A/S

22

2020/C 215/28

Case C-153/20 P: Appeal brought on 27 March 2020 by the Republic of Lithuania against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Second Chamber) on 22 January 2020 in Case T-19/18 Lithuania v Commission

Lithuania

Commission

23

2020/C 215/29

Case C-156/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom made on 6 April 2020 — Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

24

General Court

2020/C 215/30

Case T-607/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Volotea v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy to Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market — Whether imputable to the State — Recovery — Beneficiaries — Advantage to co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Selectivity — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons)

26

2020/C 215/31

Case T-716/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Germanwings v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Imputability to the State — Beneficiaries — Advantage for co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Obligation to state reasons — Aid scheme — De minimis aid — Recovery)

26

2020/C 215/32

Case T-8/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — easyJet Airline v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Imputability to the State — Beneficiaries — Advantage for co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons)

27

2020/C 215/33

Case T-195/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Talanton v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Perform Contract — Eligible costs — Repayment in part of the sums paid — Abuse of contractual rights — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations — Burden of proof — Counterclaim)

28

2020/C 215/34

Case T-290/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Agmin Italy v Commission (Financial Regulation — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general EU budget and by the European Development Fund for a two-year period — Principle of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)

29

2020/C 215/35

Case T-443/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

29

2020/C 215/36

Case T-444/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Invalidity and revocation proceedings — EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the EU trade mark — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

30

2020/C 215/37

Case T-445/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

31

2020/C 215/38

Case T-446/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

32

2020/C 215/39

Case T-534/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

32

2020/C 215/40

Case T-535/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek’s) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek’s — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

33

2020/C 215/41

Case T-640/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Intercontact Budapest v CdT (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of translation services of texts in the financial and banking fields from English into Hungarian — Ranking of a tenderer — Article 113(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Obligation to state reasons — Tender price of the highest ranked tenderers — Refusal of disclosure)

34

2020/C 215/42

Case T-5/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Clatronic International v EUIPO (PROFI CARE) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark PROFI CARE — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

35

2020/C 215/43

Case T-49/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — View. v EUIPO (CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

35

2020/C 215/44

Case T-63/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Rot Front v EUIPO — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (РОШЕН) (EU trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark РОШЕН — Earlier international figurative mark РОМАШКИ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

36

2020/C 215/45

Case T-76/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Pontinova v EUIPO — Ponti & Partners (pontinova) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark pontinova — Earlier national word mark PONTI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relevant public — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion)

37

2020/C 215/46

Case T-86/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — SolNova v EUIPO — Canina Pharma (BIO-INSECT Shocker) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BIO-INSECT Shocker — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

37

2020/C 215/47

Case T-156/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Koenig & Bauer v EUIPO (we’re on it) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark we’re on it — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

38

2020/C 215/48

Case T-172/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Cognac Ferrand v EUIPO (Shape of braiding on a bottle) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of braiding on a bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

39

2020/C 215/49

Case T-284/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Wonder Line v EUIPO — De Longhi Benelux (KENWELL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark KENWELL — Earlier EU word mark KENWOOD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

39

2020/C 215/50

Case T-288/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Divaro v EUIPO — Grendene (IPANEMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark IPANEMA — Earlier EU figurative mark Ipanema — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

40

2020/C 215/51

Case T-381/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — adp Gauselmann v EUIPO — Gameloft (City Mania) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark City Mania — Earlier EU word mark City Lights — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

41

2020/C 215/52

Case T-503/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO (XOXO) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark XOXO — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

41

2020/C 215/53

Case T-532/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — EC Brand Comércio, Importação e Exportação de Vestuário em Geral v EUIPO (pantys) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark pantys — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

42

2020/C 215/54

Case T-233/20: Action brought on 28 April 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services)

43

2020/C 215/55

Case T-234/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — HB v EIB

43

2020/C 215/56

Case T-240/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Arnaoutakis v Parliament

44

2020/C 215/57

Case T-241/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Susta v Parliament

46

2020/C 215/58

Case T-242/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Frutos Gama v Parliament

48

2020/C 215/59

Case T-243/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Galeote v Parliament

49

2020/C 215/60

Case T-244/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Marques v Parliament

51

2020/C 215/61

Case T-245/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Watson v Parliament

53

2020/C 215/62

Case T-246/20: Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Aerospinning Master Franchising v EUIPO — Mad Dogg Athletics (SPINNING)

54

2020/C 215/63

Case T-249/20: Action brought on 28 April 2020 — Sabra v Council

55

2020/C 215/64

Case T-252/20: Action brought on 23 April 2020 — JU and Others v Council

56

2020/C 215/65

Case T-253/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Oatly v EUIPO (IT'S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS)

57

2020/C 215/66

Case T-254/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO — Krasnyj Octyabr (Representation of a lobster)

57

2020/C 215/67

Case T-256/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Steinel v EUIPO (GluePro)

58

2020/C 215/68

Case T-259/20: Action brought on 8 May 2020 — Ryanair v Commission

59

2020/C 215/69

Case T-260/20: Action brought on 1 May 2020 — Da Silva Carreira v Commission

60

2020/C 215/70

Case T-263/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services)

60

2020/C 215/71

Case T-282/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (APO)

61

2020/C 215/72

Joined Cases T-103/19, T-110/19 to T-113/19 and T-116/19 to T-124/19: Order of the General Court of 17 April 2020 — Mende Omalanga and Others v Council

62

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN