alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 428/28 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 428 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5728 November 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 428

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5728 November 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 428/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 31 October 2014(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2014/C 428/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 October 2014 to 31 October 2014(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 428/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 31 October 2014(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2014/C 428/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 October 2014 to 31 October 2014(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Joseph Kevin ROGERS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-8894.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
Thomas Bradford WATERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6894.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Chester S. VAUGHN, petitioner, v. James Hoot GIBSON, Warden, et al.

No. 18M127.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Antonio Lee MIXON, petitioner, v. NEVADA, et al.

No. 18-7509.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| | Exhibit
  32.1
| | --------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, John Veltheer, the
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of The Electric Network.com,
Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of
The Electric Network.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of The Electric Network.com, Inc.

Dated February 17, 2006.



|/s/ John VeltheerJohn Veltheer,President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive
Officer)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
MAXWELL & MORGAN, P.C., et al., petitioners, v. Martha A. McNAIR.

No. 18-729.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jerry WALKER, aka Jerry Richmond, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Angel BARTLETT, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 18-6365.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.44
 EXECUTION VERSION
 
 Amendment Borrowers Article I
  Existing Credit Agreement Credit Agreement
     Certain Definitions
 Amendment preamble
 Amendment Effective Date Article IV
 Borrowers preamble
 Credit Agreement first recital
 Existing Credit Agreement first recital




---



##### 



Other Definitions
   Article II
 Amendments to Section 1.01
   Excluded Accounts
 2




---



##### 



ASTI
 ASKI provided
 provided
  3




---



##### 



clauses (a) (b)
    Amendment
Effective Date
   Cross-References
 Loan Document Pursuant to Existing Credit Agreement
 Successors and Assigns
 4




---



##### 



Counterparts
 Governing Law THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH, THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
 Full Force and Effect; Limited Amendment and Waiver
 Representations and Warranties
 5




---



##### 



ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Steve DebenhamName:Title:ASYST JAPAN, INC.By:
    /s/ Stephen S. SchwartzName:Title: 6




---



##### 



Acknowledged byBANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
as Administrative AgentBy:
    /s/  Ken PuroName:
    Ken PuroTitle:
    Vice President 7




---



##### 



BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
as a Lender, L/C Issuer and Swing Line LenderBy:
    /s/ Lee A. Merkle-RaymondName: Lee A. Merkle-RaymondTitle: Managing Director 8




---



##### 



COMERICA BANK,
as a LenderBy:
    /s/ Stephanie KaricName: Stephanie KaricTitle: Vice President 9




---



##### 



KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as a LenderBy:
    /s/ Kim A. RichmondName:  Kim A. RichmondTitle:  Assistant Vice President 10




---



##### 



UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.
as a LenderBy:
    /s/ Allan B. MinerName:  Allan B. MinerTitle:  Vice President 11




---



##### 



DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPAN
as a LenderBy:
    /s/ Z. YamazakiName:  Zenya YamazakiTitle:  Director GeneralDepartment for International Affairs 12
Frank D. MONSEGUE, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7859.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Rajeshwar Singh YADAV, et ux., petitioners, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

No. 18-702.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHERMAN BALCH
, Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 0959

[ March 9, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; James Nutt , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CA5002

.

Sherman Balch, Palm City, pro se.

Hallie S. Evans of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Inv. Tr. Servs., LLC v. DLJ Mortg. Cap., Inc. , 225 So. 3d

833 , 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (stating that “[t]he law is well settled that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene or otherwise be made a party to the ongoing lawsuit”); Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay , 111 So.

531 , 531 (Fla. 1927) ( explaining that “ [t] his court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene ”).

C ONNER , C.J., G ROSS and M AY , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig P. Keller, chief financial officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/Craig P. Keller

Craig P. Keller
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Craig S. Fawcett, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of XATA Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting. February 11, 2005 Signature:
    
    /s/ Craig S. FawcettName:
    
    Craig S. FawcettPrint Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 15**

**ACCOUNTANTS’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT**

We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the March 23, 1995Registration Statement on Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (formerly known as InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated April 28, 2006 included with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2006. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act. 

/s/ BKD, LLP 

*Cincinnati, Ohio*

November 9, 2006
Nicole M. MOORE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7298.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1330

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the mandatory minimum

penalties provided for possessing, brandishing, or discharging a firearm

during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the

mandatory minimum penalties provided for possessing,

brandishing, or discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1330 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN THE MANDATORY MINIMUM PEN2 ALTIES PROVIDED FOR POSSESSING, BRAN3 DISHING, OR DISCHARGING A FIREARM DUR4 ING AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIO5 LENCE OR DRUG TRAFFICKING CRIME.

6 Section 924(c)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code,

7 is amended—

8 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘5’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘10’’;

10 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘7’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘15’’; and

12 (3) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘10’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘20’’.

Æ
Javonte T. MORGAN, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-8074.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
Michael Kenneth YOUNG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8054.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Brad Stephen FRANCIS, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1596.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Charles Lavel STRINGER, petitioner, v. STORESONLINE, Inc., et al.

No. 18-996.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,089
COMMITMENTS
     615    4,291   13,227   69,129   65,463   82,971   82,981      118      108

CHANGES FROM 11/29/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,495)
     249    1,093      932   11,720   10,770   12,901   12,795   -2,406   -2,300

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.7      5.2     15.9     83.2     78.8     99.9     99.9      0.1      0.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       21)
       2        7        5        7       12       13       20
```

----

Updated December 9, 2011
**Exhibit 10.13**

 

**SECOND AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**SUPPLY AGREEMENT**

 

**This Second Amendment** (“**Amendment No. 2**”) dated as of December 30, 2010, to the Supply Agreement (the “**Original Agreement**”) dated as of August 7, 2006, as amended by the First Amendment to the Supply Agreement dated as of June, 2007 (the “**Amendment No. 1**”) (the Original Agreement and Amendment No. 1, collectively, the “**Agreement**”), is entered into by and between Amscan Inc. (“**Amscan**”) and iParty Corp. (“**iParty**”).  All defined terms in the Agreement that are referred to in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the same meaning herein unless otherwise defined herein.

 

In consideration of the mutual promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1.     The first clause of Paragraph 5.A. shall be amended and restated in its entirety to extend the Term until December 31, 2013 as follows:

 

“A.          This Agreement shall be deemed effective from and after August 7, 2006 through and including December 31, 2013 (the “**Term**”), unless sooner terminated as follows:”

 

2.     Schedule A shall be amended by deleting the first paragraph of Schedule A (the definition of an “iParty Store”), and inserting a new definition of “iParty Store” as follows:

 

“As used in this Agreement the term “iParty Store” means any party goods retail store operated under the name “iParty” other than (i) any store opened or acquired after the date of this Agreement that has less than 8,000 square feet of retail space or (ii) any temporary, seasonal or “pop-up” stores opened from time to time.  In addition, the existing iParty Store in Manchester CT and any store opened or operated by iParty in Buckland Hills during the term shall be counted as one (1) iParty Store for the purposes of calculating the Annual Purchase Commitment.”

 

3.     Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are unchanged by this Amendment No. 2.

 

[Signatures Appear on Following Page]

 

----

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the day and year written above.

 
|   | **AMSCAN INC.**                  |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |                             |
|   | By:                              | /s/   James M. Harrison |
|   | Title:   President               |
|   |                             |
|   | **iPARTY   CORP.**               |
|   |                             |
|   | By:                              | /s/   Sal Perisano |
|   | Name:   Sal Perisano             |
|   | Title:   Chief Executive Officer |

 

2

----
Detric LEWIS, petitioner, v. Nicole ENGLISH, Warden.

No. 18-292.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08945]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, May 10, 2022.

PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20594.

STATUS: The one item is open to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 
68241 Aviation Investigative Report--Collision into Terrain, Safari 
Aviation Inc., Airbus AS350 B2, N985SA, Kekaha, Hawaii, December 26, 
2019, ANC20MA010.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f0fbfcf5f1d2fce6e1f0bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e3e8efe6e2c1eff5f2e3afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Media Information Contact: Eric Weiss email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b1e091218550c1e1208083b150f0819551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c594e555f124b59554f4f7c52484f5e125b534a">[email protected]</span></a> 
or at (202) 314-6100.
    Any press and public attending in person must comply with the 
COVID-19 guidelines and may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour 
prior to the meeting for set up and seating.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314-6305 or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#21734e4249444d4d440f6c4262404d4d4852554453614f5552430f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7e5d8d4dfd2dbdbd299fad4f4d6dbdbdec4c3d2c5f7d9c3c4d599d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a> by Wednesday, May 4, 2022.
    Additional Information: The public is invited to attend the Safety 
Board's meeting live by webcast at the Web address http://ntsb.windrosemedia.com. Further information about attending in person 
will be posted on www.ntsb.gov and NTSB social media sites closer to 
the event date.
    Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also 
available at www.ntsb.gov.
    The National Transportation Safety Board is holding this meeting 
under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

    Dated: Friday, April 22, 2022.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-08945 Filed 4-22-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00415-CR

LORETTA J. MESERVE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 36,293

ORDER

Loretta J. Meserve pled guilty to the felony offense of theft in the amount of 

$1,500 or more but less than $20,000. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West 

Supp. 2013). The trial court deferred a finding of guilt and placed Meserve on 

community supervision for five years. Two years later, Meserve was adjudicated guilty 

and sentenced to two years in a state jail facility. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment 

on October 24, 2013. See Meserve v. State, No. 10-12-00415-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 

13252, (Tex. App.—Waco Oct. 24, 2013, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication).
Meserve v. State Page 2

Meserve was represented by appointed counsel on appeal. The time to file a 

motion for rehearing has passed, and counsel has not filed such a motion. However, 

Meserve, acting on her own, has timely filed a motion for rehearing. 

Meserve’s motion for rehearing is denied. The date of this denial begins the time 

table for Meserve to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal 

Appeals or to request an extension of time from the Court of Criminal Appeals to file a 

petition for discretionary review. TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a), (c).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed December 5, 2013
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, petitioner, v. Marlene NALLY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Nally, Sr., Deceased.

No. 18-897.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0638

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KATHRYN ERIN ALM,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss 

appeal and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s appeal in the above 

matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 2 2020

10/02/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0638