alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument and therefore denies Williams’ request. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABE WILLIAMS, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-16997

D.C. No. CV-02-00864-MCE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Abe Williams, Jr. appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction

FILED

OCT 13 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-16997

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary

judgment, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and for an

abuse of discretion a denial of a motion to compel discovery, Hallett v. Morgan,

296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Williams’

allegations that Defendants misapply various provisions of the California Penal

Code rest on erroneous interpretations of state law such that Williams has not

suffered any constitutional injury. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983; In re Dannenberg, 34

Cal. 4th 1061, 1079-80 (2005); In re Dayan, 231 Cal. App. 3d 184, 186-89 (1991). 

Moreover, to the extent Williams’ § 1983 action challenges prior parole

suitability decisions or would otherwise necessarily demonstrate the invalidity of

the duration of his confinement, it is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477

(1994). See Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Williams’ motion to

compel discovery. See Hallett, 296 F.3d at 751 (trial court’s broad discretion to

deny discovery “will not be disturbed except upon the clearest showing that [the]

denial of discovery result[ed] in actual and substantial prejudice to the complaining

litigant”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Williams’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
3 06-16997

We deny Williams’ motion for removal of the stay of proceedings as moot.

AFFIRMED.
David S. NEAL, petitioner, v. ASTA FUNDING, INC.

No. 18-7618.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Bradley Christopher STARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 26 August 2004         

amending Decision 98/320/EC on the organisation of a temporary experiment on seed sampling and seed testing pursuant to Council Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC

(notified under document number C(2004) 2942)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/626/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2002/54/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of beet seed (1), and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (2), and in particular Article 13a thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (3), and in particular Article 13a thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (4), and in particular Article 16 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 4 of Decision 98/320/EC the date ‘31 July 2004’ is replaced by the date ‘27 April 2005’.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 12. Directive as amended by Directive 2003/61/EC (OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 23).

(2)OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2298/66. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/55/EC (OJ L 114, 21.4.2004, p. 18).

(3)OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2309/66. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(4)OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 74. Directive as last amended by Directive 2003/61/EC (OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 23).

(5)OJ L 140, 12.5.1998, p. 14. Decision as amended by Decision 2002/280/EC (OJ L 99, 16.4.2002, p. 22).

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 13477 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:10

- cr - 20484

- DMM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus FABIAN A. SCOTT, a.k.a. Faybo, a.k.a. Fabo, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( March 27, 2015 ) Before TJOFLAT , WILSON a nd BLACK , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-13477 Date Filed: 03/27/2015 Page: 1 of 22 J. Rafael Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Fabian A. Scott in this direct criminal appeal , has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Scott’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-13477 Date Filed: 03/27/2015 Page: 2 of 2
## IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-10766 Summary Calendar
DELORIS PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division

No. 3:10-CV-01197-G
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D August 10, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. 

### Case: 11-10766 Document: 00511952798 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2012
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1327

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480 Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post

Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1327 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Postal Service building located at

3 34480 Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger

5 United States Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States Postal Service building referred to in section 1 shall

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger

11 United States Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Hugo Loaiza RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. Paul KLEE, Warden.

No. 17-6386.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1327 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1327

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480 
Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ``Maurine B. Neuberger 
                      United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Postal Service building located at 34480 Highway 
101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 
``Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Postal Service 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Shaeed CALHOUN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9235.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/26/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      501,031
COMMITMENTS
  40,147   28,202   87,086  356,550  364,312  483,783  479,600   17,248   21,431

CHANGES FROM 01/19/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,321)
  -5,619   -2,801    2,937   -2,217   -7,399   -4,899   -7,263     -422    1,942

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.0      5.6     17.4     71.2     72.7     96.6     95.7      3.4      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      114)
      26       19       36       59       64      101      105
```

----

Updated January 29, 2010
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATIONS



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Thomson, a French company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 29, 2004 |  | /s/ Charles Dehelly
|                     |  | Name:               |  | Charles Dehelly        
|                     |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Manuel SANDOVAL-ENRIQUE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7073.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jovan COOPER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-7425.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

MICHAEL LINDSEY, § 

 § No. 411, 2018 

 Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court 

 § of the State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID Nos. N1708003578, 

 § N1708006225 

 Plaintiff Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

 Submitted: March 27, 2019 

 Decided: April 9, 2019 

Before STRINE; Chief Justice, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER 

 This 9th day of April, 2019, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Superior 

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in its February 

8, 2018 transcript ruling. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/27/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,217,420
COMMITMENTS
 561,856   55,080  1268643  2359702  2875509  4190201  4199232   27,219   18,188

CHANGES FROM 04/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     74,856)
  43,534  -16,021  -77,279  102,199  158,394   68,454   65,094    6,402    9,762

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.3      1.3     30.1     56.0     68.2     99.4     99.6      0.6      0.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      219)
      43       34       73      134      126      212      199
```

----

Updated April 30, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1374 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1374

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. 
Highway 130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, as the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN K. RAFFERTY HAMILTON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. Highway 
130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 
``John K. Rafferty Hamilton Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the United States Post Office 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Obelin JAIMES-AVILES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7982.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
MARQUETTE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.

No. 18-555.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
David L. PRICE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/15/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       47,209
COMMITMENTS
  16,997    1,068    2,695   14,131   31,821   33,823   35,584   13,386   11,625

CHANGES FROM 11/08/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -647)
   1,767       10     -426     -838      -85      503     -501   -1,150     -146

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    36.0      2.3      5.7     29.9     67.4     71.6     75.4     28.4     24.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      21        2       15       23       20       50       37
```

----

Updated November 18, 2011
James FREEMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7748.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  CONSENT

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.  333-90681,  333-39416,  333-43888,  333-76490,  333-73166,  333-66658,
333-83358,  333-81648, 333-48372) on Form S-3 of Alloy, Inc. of our report dated
March  14, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Alloy, Inc. as
of  January  31,  2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders' (deficit) equity, and cash
flows  for  the  year ended January 31, 2003 which report appears in the January
31,  2003  annual  report  on  Form 10-K of Alloy, Inc. Our report refers to the
adoption  in  2002  of  the  provisions  of  Statement  of  Financial Accounting
Standards  No.  142,  "Goodwill  and  Other  Intangible  Assets."

                                      /s/  KPMG  LLP

                                           KPMG  LLP


New  York,  New  York
May  1,  2003


<PAGE>
ALDONA B., petitioner, v. NICHOLAS S.

No. 18-7475.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
Exhibit 10.17





DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS


BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS





Each director who is not an employee of the Registrant receives an annual retainer fee of $20,000, plus $1,000 for each Board of Directors
and Board committee meeting attended. The non-employee Chairman of the Board receives a retainer fee of $90,000 (in lieu of any other annual retainer, committee chair or attendance fees). The director who chairs the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors receives an additional annual retainer fee of $15,000. The directors who chair the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors each receive an additional annual retainer fee of $5,000. Under
the Registrants Omnibus Stock Plan, non-employee directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the foregoing fees, shares of the Registrants common stock based on the fair market value of the stock on the date the fees
would have been paid. Each non-employee director also receives nonqualified stock options under the Registrants Omnibus Stock Plan, as set forth in that Plan. Each non-employee director is reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
that such director and his or her spouse incurs attending Board meetings and functions, and is authorized, subject to certain requirements and limitations, to use the Registrants fractionally-owned aircraft for personal travel.
# Official Journal C 89/13 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 89 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4813 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 89

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4813 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 089/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 089/2 | Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 2 |
| 2005/C 089/3 | Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the antidumping measures applicable to imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus and Russia | 3 |
| 2005/C 089/4 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the antidumping measures applicable to imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus | 7 |
| 2005/C 089/5 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 9 |
| 2005/C 089/6 | State aid — France — State aid No C 46/2004 (ex NN 65/2004) — Fiscal economic interest groupings: tax depreciation favourable to firms that are approved by the Ministry of the Budget — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 15 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 089/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 089/2

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2

2005/C 089/3

Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the antidumping measures applicable to imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus and Russia

3

2005/C 089/4

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the antidumping measures applicable to imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus

7

2005/C 089/5

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

9

2005/C 089/6

State aid — France — State aid No C 46/2004 (ex NN 65/2004) — Fiscal economic interest groupings: tax depreciation favourable to firms that are approved by the Ministry of the Budget — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

15

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 089/7 | Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2005’(OJ C 65, 17.3.2005) | 21 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 089/7

Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2005’(OJ C 65, 17.3.2005)

(OJ C 65, 17.3.2005)

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN