alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCWC-29553

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

HIROKAZU NAKAJIMA,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

AKI NAKAJIMA,

 Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 29553; FC-DIVORCE NO. 05-1-0587)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/plaintiff-appellant Hirokazu Nakajima’s

application for writ of certiorari, which was filed on April 9, 

2013, is hereby accepted.

No oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party

may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i

Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral

argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 21, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29553

21-MAY-2013

09:49 AM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00587-CR

Cathy Lynn Gilstrap, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 01-987-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

The record reflects that prosecution of this cause was dismissed by the district court on the 

State=s motion. There being no conviction, there is nothing to appeal. The State=s motion to dismiss is 

granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Counsel=s motion to withdraw is dismissed.

 

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 24, 2002

Do Not Publish
Edwin A. TOWNE, Jr., petitioner, v. VERMONT.

No. 17-9388.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont denied.
Aretha D. BROWN, petitioner, v. ELITE MODELING AGENCY.

No. 18-6517.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50231 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY RICHARD WILKS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-01-CR-357-2

-------------------- February 18, 2003 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Richard Wilks, Jr. (“Wilks”) appeals the sentencing following his guilty plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine. Wilks argues that the district court erred in not reducing his base offense level by five levels after determining that he was entitled to a safety valve adjustment and a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 downward departure. This court reviews the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines is de novo
. United States v. Charles , 301 F.3d 309,No. 02-50231 -2- 312-13 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc). If the oral sentence is ambiguous, this court will look to the written judgment to determine the intent of the district court. Schurmann v. United
States , 658 F.2d 389, 390-91 (5th Cir. 1981). The record indicates that the district court determined that Wilks’ total offense level was 22 after granting the Government’s motion for a downward departure, and that Wilks was sentenced within the guideline range. Consequently, the district court did not err in sentencing Wilks.
AFFIRMED.
Bennie KENNEDY, et al., petitioners, v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, fka Square D Company.

No. 18-885.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

*1295Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/13/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,119
COMMITMENTS
  12,465    4,937    5,196   16,197   19,556   33,858   29,688    8,261   12,431

CHANGES FROM 04/06/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         22)
     151     -545      298     -834      195     -385      -52      407       74

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.6     11.7     12.3     38.5     46.4     80.4     70.5     19.6     29.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
      16       11       12       28       20       47       42
```

----

Updated April 16, 2010
Order entered January , 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01273-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant

V.

PRIMARY MEDIA GROUP, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-21-1352

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 17, 2023 unopposed second motion 

for an extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the 

brief be filed no later than February 13, 2023. Because this is an accelerated 

appeal and the brief was first due January 3, 2023, we caution appellant that further 

extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
# Official Journal L 201/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 201 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6611 August 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 201

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6611 August 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1626 of 19 April 2023 on amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 as regards the penalty mechanism for settlement fails relating to cleared transactions submitted by CCPs for settlement (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1627 of 10 August 2023 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 as regards the authorisation of the substance bis(2-ethylhexyl)cyclohexane-1,4-dicarboxylate (FCM No 1079) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1628 of 10 August 2023 rejecting an application for protection of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 52(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Лидский квас/Lidski kvas’ (PGI))
  (notified under document C(2023) 5371) | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1626 of 19 April 2023 on amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 as regards the penalty mechanism for settlement fails relating to cleared transactions submitted by CCPs for settlement (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1627 of 10 August 2023 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 as regards the authorisation of the substance bis(2-ethylhexyl)cyclohexane-1,4-dicarboxylate (FCM No 1079) (
  1
  )

1

4

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1628 of 10 August 2023 rejecting an application for protection of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 52(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Лидский квас/Lidski kvas’ (PGI))
  (notified under document C(2023) 5371)

(notified under document C(2023) 5371)

7

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Dennis Michael WILKERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-849.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 14.1
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
 
 The Board of Directors
 Technicolor (formerly THOMSON):
  
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13178, 333-14224, 333-119938, 333-124241, 333-130657, 333-137680 and 333-149066) of Technicolor of our reports dated March 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Technicolor as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in equity for the years then ended (our report thereon includes an explanatory paragraph drawing attention to Notes 1.2 and 3.1 of the consolidated financial statements, which describe, in particular, the Company’s situation in relation to the sauvegarde proceedings and its financial restructuring) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 20-F of Technicolor.
   Paris La Défense, March 30, 2010
Courbevoie, March 30, 2010KPMG Audit
MazarsA division of KPMG S.A.
 /s/ Isabelle Allen
/s/ Grégoire Menou
/s/ Frédéric Allilaire
/s/ Simon BeillevaireIsabelle Allen
Grégoire Menou
Frédéric Allilaire
Simon Beillevaire
Zavia L. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8216.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Northern Border
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), William R. Cordes, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                             /s/ William R. Cordes
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             William R. Cordes
                                             Chief Executive Officer


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the
period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curtis L. Dinan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Curtis L. Dinan    
|Curtis L. Dinan        
|Chief Financial Officer

November 2, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**§ 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Roger G. Ruppert, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of St. John Knits International, Incorporated; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 27, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          16,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,970
<INVENTORY>                                     78,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,101
<PP&E>                                         552,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 772,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       275,185
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   772,223
<SALES>                                         20,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,711
<CGS>                                           15,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,165
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
Mark A. PEREZ, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-7510.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ROLAND O ROD RI GU EZ M ALTE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72610 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 008- 690 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ol ando R odr i gue z M a l t e z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of N i c ar a gua , pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e ope n. W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72610 2 d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n , N

aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 597 F . 3d 983, 9 8 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 1 0 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng R odr i gue z M a l t e z ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as unt i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov ertw o-and-a-hal f y ears af t er th e B I A ’s f

in a l a d m in is tr a tiv e o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and R od ri gu ez M a lte z f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te m a te r ia llyc h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in N ic ar a g u ato qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the t i m e l i m i tf orf i l i ng m ot i ons t o r e ope n, se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; N ajm abadi , 5 9 7 F .3 da t 9 8 9 - 9 0 . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Santos CUEVAS, petitioner, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Prison.

No. 18-7372.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08969]

[[Page 25031]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; ADRD Program Project.
    Date: June 1, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-1622, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 22, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08969 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```