26778 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2022 / Notices 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Abstract: The Migratory Bird Treaty 

Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) 

prohibits the unauthorized take of 

migratory birds and authorizes the 

Secretary of the Interior to regulate take 

of migratory birds in the United States. 

Under this authority, we control the 

hunting of migratory game birds through 

regulations in 50 CFR part 20. On 

January 1, 1991, we banned lead shot for 

hunting waterfowl and coots in the 

United States. 

This is a non-form collection. 

Regulations at 50 CFR 20.134 outline 

the application and approval process for 

new types of nontoxic shot. When 

considering approval of a candidate 

material as nontoxic, we must ensure 

that it is not hazardous in the 

environment and that secondary 

exposure (ingestion of spent shot or its 

components) is not a hazard to 

migratory birds. To make that decision, 

we require each applicant to provide 

information about the solubility and 

toxicity of the candidate material. 

Additionally, for law enforcement 

purposes, a noninvasive field detection 

device must be available to distinguish 

candidate shot from lead shot. This 

information constitutes the bulk of an 

application for approval of nontoxic 

shot. The Director uses the data in the 

application to decide whether to 

approve a material as nontoxic. 

Title of Collection: Approval 

Procedures for Nontoxic Shot and Shot 

Coatings (50 CFR 20.134). 

OMB Control Number: 1018–0067. 

Form Number: None. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: 

Businesses that produce and/or market 

approved nontoxic shot types or 

nontoxic shot coatings. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 1. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 1. 

Estimated Completion Time per 

Response: 3,200 hours. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 3,200 hours. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain a benefit. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour 

Burden Cost: $26,630 ($1,630 

application processing fee and $25,000 

for solubility testing). 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Madonna Baucum, 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09630 Filed 5–4–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R1–ES–2022–0029; 

FXES11140100000–223–FF01E0000] 

Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Elliott State Research Forest 

Habitat Conservation Plan in Coos and 

Douglas Counties, OR 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of intent; virtual public 

scoping meeting; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (FWS), provide this 

notice to open a public scoping period 

and announce a virtual public scoping 

meeting, in accordance with 

requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act and its 

implementing regulations. The Oregon 

Department of State Lands is preparing 

a habitat conservation plan (HCP) in 

support of its anticipated applications 

for incidental take permits under the 

Endangered Species Act for activities it 

will undertake in managing the Elliott 

State Forest in southwestern Oregon. 

We intend to prepare an environmental 

impact statement to evaluate the 

impacts on the human environment 

related to the proposed issuance of these 

permits and implementation of the HCP. 

DATES: Submitting Comments: We will 

accept online or hardcopy comments. 

Hardcopy comments must be received 

or postmarked on or before June 6, 2022. 

(See ADDRESSES.) Comments submitted 

online at https://www.regulations.gov/ 

must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time on June 6, 2022. 

Public Meeting: FWS will hold a 

public scoping meeting during the 

scoping period. To help protect the 

public and limit the spread of the 

COVID–19 virus, the public meeting 

will be held virtually at the following 

time: 

• May 16, 2022, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: Submitting Comments: You 

may submit comments by one of the 

following methods: 

• Internet: https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments 

on Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2022–0029. 

• U.S. mail: Public Comments 

Processing; Attn: Docket No. FWS–R1– 

ES–2022–0029; U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service Headquarters, MS: PRB/3W; 

5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 

22041–3803. 

For additional information about 

submitting comments, see Public 

Scoping Process under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

Public Meeting: A link and access 

instructions to the virtual scoping 

meeting will be posted to https://

www.fws.gov/office/oregon-fish-andwildlife at least one week prior to the 

public meeting date. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shauna Everett, by telephone at 503– 

231–6949, or by email at shauna_

everett@fws.gov. Individuals in the 

United States who are deaf, deafblind, 

hard of hearing, or have a speech 

disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or 

TeleBraille) to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

Individuals outside the United States 

should use the relay services offered 

within their country to make 

international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose and Need for the Proposed 

Action 

In accordance with section 10(a)(2)(A) 

of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 

Oregon Department of State Lands 

(ODSL, or the applicant) intends to 

submit the draft Elliott State Research 

Forest Habitat Conservation Plan (ESRF 

HCP) to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (FWS) and the National Marine 

Fisheries Service (NMFS) (together, the 

Services) in support of applications for 

incidental take permits (ITPs) for the 

threatened northern spotted owl (Strix 

occidentalis), threatened marbled 

murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), 

and threatened Oregon Coast coho 

(Oncorhynchus kisutch) (together, the 

covered species). The requested ITPs 

would authorize incidental take of 

covered species likely to result from 

research and management related 

activities on the Elliott State Forest, 

located in Coos and Douglas Counties in 

southwestern Oregon, including timber 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2022 / Notices 26779 

removal associated with a suite of forest 

management prescriptions and 

associated infrastructure maintenance. 

The HCP will include minimization and 

mitigation measures to offset the 

impacts of the taking on covered 

species. 

To meet our requirements under 

NEPA, we intend to prepare a draft 

environmental impact statement (DEIS) 

and, later, a final environmental impact 

statement (FEIS), to evaluate the effects 

on the human environment of issuing 

the requested permit and ODSL’s 

implementation of the ESRF HCP. 

NMFS is a cooperating agency and 

intends to adopt the EIS to address the 

impacts of issuing an ITP addressing the 

listed species under its jurisdiction 

(Oregon Coast coho salmon). 

ODSL’s goals are to implement forest 

management activities on the Elliott 

State Forest to create a managed 

landscape where experimentation can 

occur. The goal of research on the Elliott 

State Forest is to advance more 

sustainable forest management practices 

through the application of a systemsbased approach investigating the 

integration of intensively managed 

forests, forest reserves, dynamically 

managed complex forests, and the 

aquatic and riparian ecosystems that 

flow within them. ODSL’s ESRF HCP 

conservation strategy also includes goals 

specific to offsetting impacts to the 

covered species. FWS has taken these 

goals into account in establishing the 

purpose and need for the proposed 

action, which are (1) to review the 

applicant’s ITP request; and (2) to either 

grant, grant with conditions, or deny the 

ITP request in compliance with FWS’s 

authority under applicable law, 

including, without limitation, section 

10(a) of the ESA and applicable ESA 

implementing regulations. 

Preliminary Proposed Action and 

Alternatives 

Consistent with 40 CFR 1501.9(d)(2), 

the preliminary description of the 

proposed action is issuance of ITPs 

authorizing incidental take of covered 

species in association with covered 

activities and HCP implementation. 

NMFS and FWS will review the 

applications to determine if ESA section 

10(a) permit issuance criteria and all 

other legal requirements related to 

permit issuance are met before making 

separate permit decisions. 

The DEIS will include a reasonable 

range of alternatives, which may 

include but are not limited to variations 

in the level, location, and type of 

minimization and mitigation 

approaches; the scope or types of 

covered activities; limitations in forest 

management in covered species habitat; 

variation in the length of the permit 

term; adding or removing covered 

species or the level of allowable take; 

and variations in conservation 

implementation and effectiveness 

monitoring. Additionally, a No Action 

Alternative will be included. Under the 

No Action Alternative, no ITPs would 

be issued and ODSL would continue to 

manage the Elliott State Forest under 

the current management regime, which 

avoids take of listed species from 

research and management activities on 

the Elliott State Forest. 

Background 

Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ‘‘take’’ 

of fish and wildlife species listed as 

endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C. 

1538 and 16 U.S.C. 1533, respectively). 

The ESA implementing regulations 

extend, under certain circumstances, the 

prohibition of take to threatened species 

(50 CFR 17.31). Under section 3 of the 

ESA, the term ‘‘take’’ means to ‘‘harass, 

harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, 

trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to 

engage in any such conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 

1532(19)). The term ‘‘harm’’ is defined 

by regulations as ‘‘an act which actually 

kills or injures wildlife.’’ ‘‘Such act may 

include significant habitat modification 

or degradation where it actually kills or 

injures wildlife by significantly 

impairing essential behavioral patterns, 

including breeding, feeding, or 

sheltering’’ (50 CFR 17.3; 50 CFR 

222.102). 

Under section 10(a) of the ESA, the 

Services may issue permits to authorize 

incidental take of listed fish and 

wildlife species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is 

defined by the ESA as take that is 

incidental to, and not the purpose of, 

carrying out an otherwise lawful 

activity. Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA 

contains provisions for issuing ITPs to 

non-Federal entities for the take of 

endangered and threatened species, 

provided the following criteria are met: 

1. The taking will be incidental; 

2. The applicant will, to the 

maximum extent practicable, minimize 

and mitigate the impact of such taking; 

3. The applicant will ensure that 

adequate funding for the plan will be 

provided; 

4. The taking will not appreciably 

reduce the likelihood of the survival 

and recovery of the species in the wild; 

and 

5. The applicant will carry out any 

other measures the Services may require 

as being necessary or appropriate for the 

purposes of the HCP. 

Elliott State Research Forest Habitat 

Conservation Plan 

ODSL intends to implement the ESRF 

HCP to cover a variety of research and 

management activities, including timber 

removal associated with a suite of forest 

management prescriptions and 

associated infrastructure maintenance. 

The ESRF HCP includes measures to 

minimize and mitigate impacts of the 

taking on covered species. ODSL is 

expected to request 80-year ITPs from 

FWS and NMFS, respectively. 

Covered Activities 

The proposed covered activities will 

likely include: 

• Research Treatments: Research 

actions, harvest activities, and stand 

management activities that will be 

utilized to maintain the research 

platform. 

• Research Projects: Short, long-term, 

active, or passive potential research 

projects related to climate change, social 

economic and recreation, aquatic and 

terrestrial systems, forest practices and 

management, fire and disturbance, and 

fish and wildlife habitat in managed 

forests. 

• Supporting Management Activities: 

Activities used to facilitate stand 

management activities, including 

mechanical vegetation control and 

controlled burning. 

• Supporting Infrastructure: 

Infrastructure needed to facilitate 

implementation of the research platform 

and programs, including roads, 

landings, drainage structures, quarries, 

and communication sites and lookouts. 

• HCP Implementation Activities: 

Activities identified in the conservation 

strategy and monitoring program that 

may result in short-term effects on 

covered species. 

Covered Species 

The species proposed for coverage 

under the ESRF HCP and ITPs will 

likely include the northern spotted owl, 

marbled murrelet, and Oregon Coast 

coho salmon. Each of the covered 

species is known to occur on the Elliott 

State Forest. The draft ESRF HCP will 

include an analysis of impacts to 

covered species and methodology for 

estimating and quantifying take and 

related conservation outcomes over 

time, and will propose limits on impacts 

resulting from covered activities. 

Measures to minimize and mitigate 

impacts on covered species will be 

described in the HCP for each species as 

conservation measures and conditions 

on covered activities, guided by goals 

and objectives in the conservation 

strategy of the HCP. These measures 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
26780 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2022 / Notices 

would be systematically implemented 

and monitored for success. Impacts 

would be offset by a system of reserve 

areas. Minimization and mitigation 

measures are subject to adaptive 

management to ensure their 

effectiveness, and to ensure 

achievement of the ESRF HCP’s 

biological goals and objectives. 

The ESRF HCP will include funding 

information and assurances, monitoring 

requirements, adaptive management, 

and changed circumstance provisions to 

help ensure conservation outcomes for 

the covered species. Annual reports 

would confirm the amount, type, and 

location of impacts and mitigation, as 

well as the status of monitoring, 

adaptive management, changed 

circumstances, and funding. 

Summary of Expected Impacts 

The DEIS will identify and describe 

the effects of the proposed Federal 

action on the human environment that 

are reasonably foreseeable and have a 

reasonably close causal relationship to 

the proposed action. This includes 

effects that occur at the same time and 

place as the proposed action or 

alternatives and effects that are later in 

time or farther removed in distance from 

the proposed action or alternatives. 

Expected impacts may include, but are 

not limited to, positive and negative 

impacts to the covered species and 

critical habitat, geology and soils, air 

quality, water resources, other biological 

resources, health and safety, land use, 

recreation, aesthetics, historical and 

cultural resources, and socioeconomics. 

The analysis will consider the 

adequacy of each alternative to maintain 

or enhance the status of the covered 

species at appropriate scales, in light of 

the expected effects and other best 

available information. Impacts to air 

quality, water resources, and other 

biological resources, such as fish, 

wildlife, and forest ecosystem, are 

expected to include some negative 

impacts from the research and 

management activities that are 

minimized and or mitigated at the 

landscape level through application of 

applicable law, including local and 

State regulations, and implementation 

of conservation strategies under each 

alternative. The conservation programs 

described in the action alternatives may 

serve to offset or partially offset impacts 

on air quality, water resources, and 

other biological resources at the 

landscape scale, though these actions 

would be targeted at offsetting impacts 

to covered species. Localized positive 

and negative impacts to recreation, 

aesthetics, and historical and cultural 

resources may result from HCP 

implementation due to the expected 

changes in forests from the research and 

management-related activities (covered 

activities). 

Anticipated Permits and Authorizations 

The following permits, consultations, 

or other authorizations are anticipated 

to be required in order to enable the 

Services to proceed with issuance of the 

ITPs: 

• ESA Section 7 consultations, ESA 

Section 10 findings; 

• Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act 

consultation; 

• Tribal consultations; and 

• National Historic Preservation Act 

compliance. 

Related Actions 

Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) 

has also applied for ITPs from FWS and 

NMFS and is currently preparing a 

Western Oregon State Forests HCP 

(WOHCP) to include 17 species 

(including all three species covered 

under the ESRF HCP). A DEIS and draft 

HCP were made available to the public 

on March 18, 2022 (87 FR 15383). 

The proposed WOHCP permit area 

includes all State forest lands west of 

the crest of the Cascade Range that are 

owned by the Oregon Board of Forestry 

and managed by ODF, and also includes 

some Common School Fund Lands 

owned by ODSL but managed by ODF. 

The plan area of the ESRF HCP overlaps 

with the permit area of the WOHCP. The 

overlap consists of 8,897 acres that are 

Oregon Board of Forestry lands inside 

the Elliott State Forest boundary and 

915 acres of other DSL lands adjacent to 

the ESRF. These lands would be 

covered by the WOHCP, if approved. 

However, if any of the Oregon Board of 

Forestry lands were later transferred to 

ODSL, they could be covered instead by 

the ESRF HCP. 

Schedule for the Decision-Making 

Process 

FWS will conduct an environmental 

review to analyze the effects of the 

proposed permit actions, along with 

other alternatives considered and the 

associated impacts of each alternative 

for the development of the DEIS. 

Following completion of the 

environmental review, the Services will 

publish a notice of availability and 

request for public comments on the 

DEIS and the draft HCP submitted with 

the ITP applications. FWS expects to 

make the DEIS and draft HCP available 

to the public in Winter 2022–2023. After 

public review and comment, FWS and 

NMFS will evaluate the permit 

applications, associated documents, and 

any comments received, to determine 

whether the requirements of section 

10(a)(1) of the ESA are met. FWS and 

NMFS will also evaluate whether 

issuance of the requested ITPs would 

comply with section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. 

FWS expects to make the FEIS and final 

HCP available to the public in Summer 

2023. At least 30 days after the FEIS is 

available, the Services’ records of 

decision will be completed in 

accordance with applicable timeframes 

established in 40 CFR 1506.11. If 

appropriate, the Services would issue 

the ITPs after the issuance of the records 

of decision. If issued, the permits may 

include such terms and conditions 

deemed necessary or appropriate to 

carry out the purposes of the permit and 

the conservation plan. 

Public Scoping Process 

Virtual Public Meeting 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process, which aids in the 

development of the EIS. 

To help protect the public and limit 

the spread of the COVID–19 virus, the 

public scoping meeting will be 

conducted online to accommodate best 

practices and local guidelines in place 

at the time this notice was prepared. See 

DATES and ADDRESSES for the date and 

time of the virtual public scoping 

meeting. The virtual public scoping 

meeting will provide ODSL and FWS 

with an opportunity to present to the 

public information pertinent to the 

ESRF HCP, and for the public to ask 

questions on the scope of issues and 

alternatives that FWS should consider 

when preparing the EIS. No opportunity 

for oral comments will be provided. 

Written comments may be submitted by 

the methods listed in ADDRESSES. 

Reasonable Accommodations 

Persons needing reasonable 

accommodations in order to attend and 

participate in the virtual public scoping 

meeting should contact the FWS’s 

Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office (see 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) as 

soon as possible. In order to allow 

sufficient time to process requests, 

please make contact no later than one 

week before the desired public meeting. 

Information regarding this proposed 

action is available in alternative formats 

upon request. 

Request for Information 

We request comments on the 

proposed action, concerning the scope 

of the analysis and identification of 

relevant information, studies, and 

analyses from the public; affected 

Federal, State, Tribal, and local 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2022 / Notices 26781 

governments, agencies, and offices; the 

scientific community; industry; or any 

other interested party. We will consider 

these comments in developing the DEIS. 

Specifically, we seek: 

1. Biological information, analysis 

and relevant data concerning the 

covered species and other wildlife; 

2. Potential effects that the proposed 

permit action could have on the covered 

species, and other endangered or 

threatened species, and their associated 

ecological communities or habitats; 

3. Potential effects that the proposed 

permit action could have on other 

aspects of the human environment, 

including ecological, aesthetic, historic, 

cultural, economic, social, 

environmental justice, or health; 

4. Other possible reasonable 

alternatives to the proposed permit 

action that FWS should consider, 

including additional or alternative 

avoidance, minimization, and 

mitigation measures; 

5. The presence of historic 

properties—including archaeological 

sites, buildings, and structures; historic 

events; sacred and traditional areas; and 

other historic preservation concerns—in 

the proposed plan and permit area, 

which are required to be considered in 

project planning by the National 

Historic Preservation Act; 

6. Information on other current or 

planned activities in, or in the vicinity 

of, the Elliott State Forest and their 

possible impacts on the covered species, 

including any connected actions that are 

closely related and should be discussed 

in the same DEIS; and 

7. Other information relevant to the 

ESRF HCP and its impacts on the 

human environment. 

Public Availability of Comments 

You may submit your comments and 

materials by one of the methods listed 

in ADDRESSES. Before including your 

address, phone number, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—might 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. All submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

made available for public disclosure in 

their entirety. 

Comments and materials we receive, 

as well as supporting documentation we 

use in preparing the DEIS, will be 

available for public inspection online in 

Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2022–0029, at 

https://www.regulations.gov/ (see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 

Next Steps 

Once the DEIS is prepared, there will 

be further opportunity for comment on 

this proposed permit action through an 

additional public comment period. 

Lead and Cooperating Agencies 

FWS is the lead agency for the NEPA 

process. NMFS is a cooperating agency 

in the NEPA process. FWS welcomes 

inquiries from other Federal, State, or 

Tribal, or local agencies potentially 

interested in being a cooperating agency 

for the NEPA process. 

Decision Makers and Nature of 

Decision To Be Made 

The decision makers are the FWS 

Regional Director of the Pacific Region 

and the NMFS West Coast Regional 

Administrator. If, after publication of 

the record(s) of decision, the agencies 

determine that all requirements are met 

for ITP issuance, the decision makers 

will issue separate decisions on the 

requested ITPs. 

Authority 

We provide this notice in accordance 

with the requirements of section 10(c) of 

the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1539(c)) and NEPA 

regulations on the publication of a 

notice of intent to issue an EIS (40 CFR 

1501.9(d)). 

Hugh Morrison, 

Deputy Regional Director, U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09671 Filed 5–4–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–33823; 

PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] 

National Register of Historic Places; 

Notification of Pending Nominations 

and Related Actions 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is 

soliciting electronic comments on the 

significance of properties nominated 

before April 23, 2022, for listing or 

related actions in the National Register 

of Historic Places. 

DATES: Comments should be submitted 

electronically by May 20, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Comments are encouraged 

to be submitted electronically to 

National_Register_Submissions@

nps.gov with the subject line ‘‘Public 

Comment on <property or proposed 

district name, (County) State>.’’ If you 

have no access to email you may send 

them via U.S. Postal Service and all 

other carriers to the National Register of 

Historic Places, National Park Service, 

1849 C Street NW, MS 7228, 

Washington, DC 20240. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register 

of Historic Places/National Historic 

Landmarks Program, 1849 C Street NW, 

MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240, 

sherry_frear@nps.gov, 202–913–3763. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

properties listed in this notice are being 

considered for listing or related actions 

in the National Register of Historic 

Places. Nominations for their 

consideration were received by the 

National Park Service before April 23, 

2022. Pursuant to Section 60.13 of 36 

CFR part 60, comments are being 

accepted concerning the significance of 

the nominated properties under the 

National Register criteria for evaluation. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Nominations submitted by State or 

Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: 

ARKANSAS 

Carroll County 

Kenner Cemetery, 18141 AR 103 South, 

Osage, SG100007756 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

District of Columbia 

Nixon-Mounsey House, The (1949–1976), 

2915 University Terr. NW, Washington, 

SG100007758 

GEORGIA 

Chatham County 

Savannah Beach Town Hall and Auditorium, 

403 Butler Ave., Tybee Island, 

SG100007755 

NEW YORK 

Albany County 

McKownville-Country Club Highlands 

Historic District, Western Ave., Waverly 

Pl., Norwood, Glenwood, Parkwood, and 

Elmwood Sts., Guilderland, SG100007747 

Kings County 

Boulevard Houses, 804–920 Ashford St., 

357–363 Wortman, 785–893 Schenck, and 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1