alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 240/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 240 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5012 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 240

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5012 October 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 240/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 240/02 | Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.4726 — Thomson Corporation/Reuters Group) (1) | 3 |
| 2007/C 240/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4861 — KESA/EMH) (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 240/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2007/C 240/02

Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.4726 — Thomson Corporation/Reuters Group) (1)

3

2007/C 240/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4861 — KESA/EMH) (1)

4

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 240/04 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 240/04

Euro exchange rates

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 240/05 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the countervailing measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

Commission

2007/C 240/05

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the countervailing measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jim Kneale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jim Kneale         
|Jim Kneale             
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|November 3, 2006       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20208 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS LERMA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-4784

- - - - - - - - - - September 20, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carlos Roberto Lerma, # 5111-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 but construed as a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Lerma argues that the district court erred when it construed his petition as a § 2255 motion. Section 2255, however, is the proper vehicle for Lerma’sNo. 96-20208 - 2 - claim that his conviction should be reversed because the Government failed to establish federal jurisdiction to prosecute him because it did not show that the property on which he committed his offense was under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction of the United States. See Cox v. Warden, Federal Detention Center , 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed his motion pursuant to Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings inasmuch as Lerma has not shown cause for not raising his new claim in his prior § 2255 motion. United States v. Flores , 981 F.2d 231, 234 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Lerma’s motion to strike the Government’s brief and to correct the caption of his lawsuit are DENIED.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RO N A LD D . D I G G S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. M E T R O P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16792 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 9 -cv -0 2 3 3 9 -R L H -R JJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R oge rL . H unt , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 12, 2013 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , R E IN H A R D T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R o n a ldD . D ig g s ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is m ot i on t o r e c ons i de ri t s or de rdi s m i s s i ng w i th pr e j udi c e hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 ac t i on for f

ai l ure t o n ot i fythe di stri ctcourtof hi s c hang e of a dd re ss . W e r evi ew 

# FI LED MA R 22 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16792 2 f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , B r i ones v . R i v i e r a H ote l & Cas i no , 116 F . 3d 379, 380 ( 9th C i r . 1997) ( pe rc ur i a m ) , a nd w e r e ve r s e a nd r e m a nd. D e n ia l o f

D ig g s ’s m o tio n f

o rr e c o n s id e r a tio n o n th e b a s is o f e x c u s ab le ne gl e c tw a s a n abus e of di s c r e t i on w he r e the di s tr i c tc ourtf a i l e d t o i de nt i f

ya nd a na l y z e the m ot i on unde rthe s t a nda r d s e touti n P i onne e rI nv e s tm e nt

Se rv i c es C o. v . B r u n s w ic k

A s s o c ia tes L im ite d

P a r tn e rs h ip , 507 U . S . 380 ( 1993) a nd i n B ri on es . See L em og e v . U

ni ted States , 58 7 F . 3d 11 88 , 11 92 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( di stri ctcourt ab u ses i t s d i scret i o n w h ere i tfai l s t o i d en t i fy o r ap p l y P i on ee r- B ri on es st andard prop er l y) . A prop erappl i ca t i on of the P i on ee r - B ri on es st andard dem on stra t es “e x c u s ab le n e g le c t” b e c au s e D ig g s ’s f a ilu r e to f

ile w r itte n n o tif

ic a tio n o f

h is c ha nge of

a ddr e s s i m m e di a t e l yupon r e l e a s e f r om c us t odys how e d no da nge rof pr e j udi c e t o the de f

e nda nt s , am i ni m a l de l a yi n the pr oc e e di ngs a nd i m pa c ton the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s doc ke t , good f a i th on the pa rtof

D i ggs , a nd a n e xc us abl e r e a s on f or th e d e la y . B atem an v. U ni ted States P ostalServ . , 23 1 F . 3d 12 20 , 12 24 -25 (9th C i r. 2000) ( appl y i ng P i on ee r - B ri on es s t a nda r d) . A c c or di ngl y , w e r e ve r s e a nd r e m a nd f orf urthe rpr oc e e di ngs c ons i s t e ntw i th ourdi s pos i t i on. RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.
EXHIBIT
23.1





INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
TheStreet.com, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-145295) of our report dated March
10, 2009, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and the related consolidated financial statement schedule of TheStreet.com, Inc.
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of TheStreet.com, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, which report
is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.











/s/
Marcum & Kliegman llp





Marcum
& Kliegman llp


New York,
New York


March 10,
2009
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  August 1, 2005             /s/ John Weale   Name:  John R. Weale   Title:  Chief Financial Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)and is not being filed as part of the Report.
24
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                            CZECH LETTER AGREEMENTS
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 522A/28 d

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 522A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 64° anno28 dicembre 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 522A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

64° anno28 dicembre 2021

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2021/C 522 A/01 | Rettifica del bando di assunzione PE/269/S — Direttore/direttrice (Gruppo di funzioni AD, grado 14) — Direzione generale della Sicurezza e della protezione — Direzione delle Tecnologie e dell’informazione ( GU C 505 A del 15.12.2021 ) | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2021/C 522 A/01

Rettifica del bando di assunzione PE/269/S — Direttore/direttrice (Gruppo di funzioni AD, grado 14) — Direzione generale della Sicurezza e della protezione — Direzione delle Tecnologie e dell’informazione ( GU C 505 A del 15.12.2021 )

( GU C 505 A del 15.12.2021 )

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 28.12.2021 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 522/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2021

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 522/1

---

Rettifica del bando di assunzione PE/269/S — Direttore/direttrice (Gruppo di funzioni AD, grado 14) — Direzione generale della Sicurezza e della protezione — Direzione delle Tecnologie e dell’informazione

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 505 A del 15 dicembre 2021
  )

(2021/C 522 A/01)

Alle pagine 7 e 8, le note a piè di pagina successive alla nota (5) e i relativi richiami (1), (6), (7), (8), (9) diventano rispettivamente le note e i richiami (6), (7), (8), (9), (10).

---
# Official Journal C 342/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.342.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 342 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5510 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.342.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 342

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5510 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 342/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 342/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 342/02 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan | 2 |
| 2012/C 342/03 | Notice of initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia | 12 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 342/02

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan

2

2012/C 342/03

Notice of initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Harold McNEAL, et ux., petitioners, v. NAVAJO NATION, et al.

No. 18-894.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

*1601Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
In Re E. Edward ZIMMERMANN, petitioner.

No. 18-7013.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             6,372,742
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                 9,817
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  10,394,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        5,828,860
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             6,632,492
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               6,453,858
<LOANS>                                           82,175,233
<ALLOWANCE>                                          835,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   116,049,760
<DEPOSITS>                                       105,345,449
<SHORT-TERM>                                               0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  378,700
<LONG-TERM>                                          214,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                           2,051,441
<OTHER-SE>                                         8,059,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   116,049,760
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    3,879,540
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    333,418
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     303,468
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   4,516,426
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 1,881,795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,890,462
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              2,625,964
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        143,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    1,945,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      964,958
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           964,958
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         645,745
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                          5.22
<LOANS-NON>                                          244,042
<LOANS-PAST>                                       1,383,295
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                           0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                            0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     769,410
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        131,389
<RECOVERIES>                                          53,762
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    835,183
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 835,183
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                    0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Corporate
Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Stephen S. Schwartz hereby certifies to the
best of his knowledge as follows:

        -  He is the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer, of Asyst
Technologies, Inc., a California corporation (the "Company").

        -  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
"Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set
                      his hand hereto as of this 14th day of August, 2002.

                                        /s/  Stephen S. Schwartz
               -----------------------------------------------------------------
                 STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ,  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-17-0000455 19-JUL-2017 10:05 AM

SCPW-17-0000455
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP dba KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS, Petitioners,

vs. ROM A. TRADER, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent Judge,
and
STATE OF HAWAI # I and GABRIEL ALISNA, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 13-1-1861)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of Petitioners’ petition for writ of mandamus, filed on June 2, 2017, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that, in light of the stated purpose of the “Motion to Suppress Evidence,” no flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. However, if the attorney-client privilege is invoked during the hearing on the “Motion to Suppress Evidence,” the court shall address the objection at sidebar. Accordingly,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Kema v. Gaddis , 91 Hawai # i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (where a court has discretion to act, a writ of mandamus will not issue, even if the judge has acted erroneously, unless the judge has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court where he or she has a legal duty to act). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, July 19, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
EXHIBIT 10.14  CASH
COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON_EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS  Annual Retainer*:Board Members
  
  $
  25,000Chairman of the
  Board (additional)
  
  $
  15,000Audit Committee
  Chairperson (additional)
  
  $
  7,500Compensation
  Committee Chairperson (additional)
  
  $
  5,000Corporate
  Governance and Nominating Committee Chairperson (additional)
  
  $
  5,000  
 *  Paid quarterly in
arrears.  Meeting Fees:Board of
  DirectorsAnnual offsite
  regular meeting
  
  $
  2,500Regular meeting
  
  $
  1,000Special
  (telephonic)
  
  $
  500Audit CommitteeRegular meeting
  
  $
  2,500Special (in
  person)
  
  $
  1,000Special
  (telephonic)
  
  $
  750Compensation
  CommitteeRegular meeting
  
  $
  2,000Special
  
  $
  750Corporate
  Governance and Nominating CommitteeRegular meeting
  
  $
  2,000Special
  
  $
  750
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27173-27174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Statement of Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, 
National Institutes of Health (NIH), the authorities vested in the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 2 of the 
Accelerating Access to Critical Therapies for ALS Act (Pub. L. 117-79), 
as amended, to award grants to participating entities for purposes of 
scientific research utilizing data from expanded access to 
investigational drugs for individuals who are not otherwise eligible 
for clinical trials for the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, 
treatment, or cure of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    These authorities may be redelegated. Exercise of this authority 
shall be in accordance with established policies, procedures, 
guidelines, and regulations as prescribed by the Secretary. The 
Secretary retains the authority to submit reports to Congress and 
promulgate regulations.
    This delegation is effective immediately. I hereby affirm and 
ratify any actions taken by you or your subordinates that involved the 
exercise

[[Page 27174]]

of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of the 
delegation.

Xavier Becerra,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09776 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P