alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, James P. Bryce, certify that:1 . I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Holdings, Ltd. ;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 1, 2005/s/ James P. Bryce
Joyce Ann SMITH, petitioner, v. CITY OF PRINCETON, TEXAS, et al.

No. 18-7791.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mick R. Jackson, President of Virtual Education Software, Inc. certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Virtual Education Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.



Dated: March 27, 2009



/s/ Mick R. Jackson

Mick R. Jackson, President

(Principal Executive Officer)

















1
Samuel SILVA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6265.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
23.2
 
 
 INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
TheStreet.com, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-145295) of our report dated March
10, 2009, except for the effects of the restatement as discussed in Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements which are dated February 3, 2010 (not
presented herein) appearing under Item 8 of the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1), with respect to our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and the related consolidated financial statement schedule
of TheStreet.com, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2008, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
  (Formerly
Marcum & Kliegman LLP)
 March 30,
2010
 New York,
New York
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/26/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       57,127
COMMITMENTS
  13,842    1,764    7,334   22,991   35,472   44,167   44,570   12,960   12,557

CHANGES FROM 07/19/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,010)
     -47       34     -195      205      -76      -37     -237     -973     -773

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.2      3.1     12.8     40.2     62.1     77.3     78.0     22.7     22.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      24        7       20       35       28       67       55
```

----

Updated July 29, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

      ( print page 26724)    
In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Department of Agriculture (USDA) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a six-month emergency approval of the following information collection: ICR 0560-NEW, Cotton and Wool Appeal Program. The Farm Service Agency (FSA) will begin distributing payments for Cotton and Wool Apparel (CAWA) Program. USDA directed FSA to implement payments under CAWA to apparel manufacturers of men's and boys' worsted wool suits, sport coats, pants, or Pima cotton dress shirts; Pima cotton spinners; and wool fabric manufacturers and wool spinners who had a decrease in sales or consumption compared to a previous year and have filed an affidavit for a payment in any year from 2017 to 2021 from the trust funds authorized by sections 12602 and 12603 of the 2018 Farm Bill.

## Farm Service Agency

*Title:*                     Cotton and Wool Apparel (CAWA) Program.                

*OMB Control Number:*                     0560-NEW.                

*Summary of Collection:*                     The Farm Service Agency (FSA) is requesting emergency clearance and review through 5 CFR 1320.13 for a new information collection for the Cotton and Wool Apparel Program. FSA will assist in the development and restoration of the market for domestically produced cotton and wool products and ultimately for the underlying commodities.                

Ruth Brown,

Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-09584 Filed 5-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Philip ZODHIATES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-900.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Motion of Foundation for Moral Law for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
FOURTH DIVISION

DOYLE, P. J.,

MARKLE, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN

THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES.

March 28, 2022

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A19A2460. KINSLOW v. THE STATE.

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Jereno Sadatrice Kinslow was convicted of one count of computer trespass. In

Kinslow v. State,

1

he challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his

conviction, and we affirmed.

2 The Supreme Court of Georgia granted Kinslow’s

petition for certiorari and reversed thisCourt’sjudgment, ruling that the evidence was

insufficient to support the conviction under the Code section relied upon by the State,

OCGA § 16-9-93 (b) (2).3

1

 353 Ga. App. 839 (839 SE2d 660) (2020).

2

 See id.

3

 See Kinslow v. State, 311 Ga. 768, 768-769 (860 SE2d 444) (2021).
We hereby vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court

as our own, and reverse the judgment of conviction by the trial court.

Judgment reversed. Markle, J., and Senior Appellate Judge Phipps concur.

2
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/31/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      481,077
COMMITMENTS
  60,466   24,626   82,940  323,466  360,012  466,872  467,578   14,204   13,499

CHANGES FROM 08/24/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     26,683)
   8,198      424    1,216   18,298   24,642   27,712   26,283   -1,029      400

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.6      5.1     17.2     67.2     74.8     97.0     97.2      3.0      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      124)
      28       16       35       66       73      110      112
```

----

Updated September 3, 2010
Steven CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. Robert C. TANNER, Warden.

No. 17-6642.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated August 12, 2011
Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali REHAIF, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9560.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION1**

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Reynolds C. Bish, the ChiefE/xecutive Officer of Captiva Software Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.         The Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

2.         The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company atthe end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report. 

Date:  August 13, 2003

|                           |        |
|---------------------------|--------|
| /s/ REYNOLDS C. BISH |   |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 12, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10029 Filed 5-5-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

WILLIAM ANTHONY REEVES,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 526 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, v. Vivian TURNER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vivian Wilkinson.

No. 17-638 (R46-014/OT 2017).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 12, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/09/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      510,400
COMMITMENTS
  40,702   25,924  103,798  346,255  359,200  490,755  488,922   19,645   21,478

CHANGES FROM 03/02/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,099)
  -4,253    1,032    2,982   12,328    8,108   11,057   12,122    1,042      -23

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.0      5.1     20.3     67.8     70.4     96.2     95.8      3.8      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      107)
      28        9       31       60       66       97       99
```

----

Updated March 12, 2010
Shawn SADIK, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-7034.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
Daniel Lee WHITE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7008.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 139 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 139

 To provide for the extension of the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail 
              into the Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

   Mr. Franks of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the extension of the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail 
              into the Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL.

    The second sentence of section 2 of Public Law 100-515 (102 Stat. 
2563; 16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended by inserting ``including sites in 
the Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey,'' after the words ``cultural 
sites''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30553 Summary Calendar

DUNCAN VICTOR AYEMERE IDOKOGI, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT; KEVIN D. ROONEY; EDWARD J. MCELROY; BENEDICT FERRO; CARYL G. THOMPSON; U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-205

-------------------- Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi, a Nigerian citizen who is a permanent resident of the United States, appeals the district court’s order lifting the stay of his removal. Idokogi argues that he is not an aggravated felon. He argues that the denial of a stay is an unconstitutional violation of his due-process rights and that permanent exile from this country and separation from his family is irreparable injury.No. 02-30553 -2- Appeal from an order dissolving an injunction is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). “[T]he first question . . . is whether the order appealed from specifically denied an injunction (whether permanent or preliminary), or merely had the practical effect of doing so.” E.E.O.C. v. Kerrville Bus Co., Inc. , 925 F.2d 129, 131 (5th Cir. 1991). If the order specifically denied an injunction, “that order is appealable as of right, right away.” Id. at 132. We have noted that a request for a judicial stay of deportation is akin to and should be treated as a request for an injunction. See Ignacio v. INS , 955 F.2d 295, 299 n.5 (5th Cir. 1992)). In Idokogi’s petition, Idokogi requested an order enjoining the Government from deporting him until a full hearing on the merits of his claim was had. By lifting the previous grant of the request for a stay, the district court’s order specifically denies this request. Therefore, we have jurisdiction over Idokogi’s appeal from the district court’s decision to lift the stay of the removal order. We review an order denying an injunction for abuse of discretion. See Regions Bank v. Rivet , 224 F.3d 483, 488 (5th Cir. 2000); Lakedreams v. Taylor , 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991). The relief sought by Idokogi in the district court is connected “directly and immediately” with the Attorney General’s decision to commence removal proceedings against him. See Humphries v. Various Federal USINS Employees , 164 F.3d 936, 943No. 02-30553 -3- (5th Cir. 1999). The district court therefore correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to stay the order of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g); Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 482 (1999). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the stay lifted. The district court’s order is
AFFIRMED.
Vilaychith KHOUANMANY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6314.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
David L. WOODWARD, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 17-9346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.