alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/29/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      532,922
COMMITMENTS
  51,004   21,532  103,780  352,715  388,395  507,499  513,707   25,423   19,215

CHANGES FROM 03/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     11,412)
     963   -1,890    6,032    4,477    9,501   11,472   13,643      -60   -2,231

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.6      4.0     19.5     66.2     72.9     95.2     96.4      4.8      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      33       25       48       62       63      122      113
```

----

Updated April 1, 2011
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curtis L. Dinan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Curtis L. Dinan                    
|Curtis L. Dinan Chief Financial
Officer

August 3, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
WINN, Marcella v. MELLEN, Susan, et al.

No. 18-645 (R46-14 / OT 2018).

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2019.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on April 2, 2019, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit 10.61
 Amended & Restated
ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
 Whereas
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Now, Therefore
 AGREEMENT
 Services to the Corporation.




---



##### 



Indemnity.
   3. Limitations on Indemnity.
          2




---



##### 



Continuation of Indemnity.
 Notification and Defense of Claim.
  3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Expenses.
    Determination by the Corporation.
     5




---



##### 



Enforcement by Arbitration Only.
     Subrogation.
 Liability Insurance.
  6




---



##### 



11. Non-Exclusivity of Rights.
 Survival of Rights.
   Severability/Separability.
   No Duplication of Payments.
 15. Governing Law/Jurisdiction/Venue.
  7




---



##### 



Amendment and Termination; Waiver.
 Contribution.
 18. Identical Counterparts.
 Headings.
 Notices.
 a.
    
    if to Indemnitee, at the address indicated below Indemnitees signature
hereunder (or such last address provided by Indemnitee to the Corporation).b.
    
    if to the Corporation, to
 
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  8




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ Stephen S. SchwartzStephen S. SchwartzChief Executive Officer
Chair, Board of DirectorsINDEMNITEE   9
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          9,307
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,668,756
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     582,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,573,988
<PP&E>                          2,475,241
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,548,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           8,746,180
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     215,000
<COMMON>                        31,803
<OTHER-SE>                      3,527,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,548,996
<SALES>                         4,573,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,573,816
<CGS>                           5,141,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,141,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,792,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              45,173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4,403,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (4,403,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,403,175)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (1.45)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hornby International Inc.(the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maureen Brogan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of May 2004

/s/ Maureen Brogan
--------------------------
Maureen Brogan
Chief Executive Officer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 29, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00546-CV 

MIA WAFER, Appellant 

V. 

HILLTOP RESIDENTIAL, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00777-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Smith 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

After reviewing the clerk’s record, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over 

this appeal because the judgment is not definite in its award of appellate attorney’s 

fees. We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the Court’s concern with 

an opportunity for appellee to respond. 

Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a judgment that is final and 

definite. See Hinde v. Hinde, 701 S.W.2d 637, 639 (Tex. 1985) (per curiam). A 

judgment is final if it disposes of all parties and issues; it is definite if it defines the 

parties’ rights or “provide[s] a definite means of ascertaining [the parties’] rights” 

such that “ministerial officers can carry the judgment to execution without 
 –2– 

ascertainment of facts” not stated in the judgment. Id. (quoting Steed v. State, 183 

S.W.2d 458, 460 (Tex. 1944)). 

The trial court’s judgment in the underlying forcible detainer action awards to 

appellee possession of the property, attorney’s fees through trial in the amount of 

$1,000 and “in the event of an unsuccessful appeal by [appellant], any reasonable 

and necessary amounts.” The award of appellate attorney’s fees is not definite such 

that ministerial officers could carry the judgment to execution without ascertainment 

of facts not stated in the judgment. See id. In her letter brief, appellant addresses 

the timeliness of the appeal which the Court does not dispute. She fails to address 

the indefinite award of appellate attorney’s fees. 

Because the judgment does not set the amount of appellate attorney’s fees 

awarded in the event of an unsuccessful appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(a). 

220546F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MIA WAFER, Appellant 

No. 05-22-00546-CV V. 

HILLTOP RESIDENTIAL, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00777-

D. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and Smith 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 

Judgment entered August 29, 2022
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00369 - CR VAL WAYNE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 46th District Court Hardeman County, Texas Trial Court No. 4226, Honorable Dan Mike Bird, Presiding



### December 12 , 2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Val Wayne Williams appeals his conviction for evading arrest or detention with a vehicle. He was sentenced on March 13, 2013. 1 Appellant filed his notice of appeal on October 9, 2013. Therefore, the notice appeared to be late. This circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant and opport unity was granted him

1 We note that the appellate record contains two separate judgments concerning the matter on appeal. One judgment is dated February 27, 2013 and imposed sentence on that date; and the second judgment dated March 13, 2013 also imposed sentence on the same da y. We, further, note that a motion for new trial was filed on March 8, 2013 and the indictment was amended on March 13, 2013. The judgment entered on March 13, 2013 was the result of a plea bargain.2

to show why we have jurisdiction. He was also afforded the opportunity to file with the court, a trial court certification showing he had the right to appeal as the one on file showed the matter was the result of a plea bargain, and therefore he had no right to appeal. Appellant filed a response addressing the trial court certification and requested appointed counsel but failed to address the late notice of appeal. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days a fter the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.2(a). Appellant did file a motion for new trial; therefore, the deadline for perfecting an appeal here la psed in June of 2013. Again, the notice at bar was not filed until October of 2013. A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed. Per Curiam Do not publish.
---

Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of AuRico Gold Inc. (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rene
Marion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|March 28, 2012 | /s/ Rene Marion        
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Rene Marion            
|               | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to AuRico Gold Inc. and will be retained by AuRico Gold
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of AuRico Gold Inc. (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott
Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|March 28, 2012 | /s/ Scott Perry        
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Scott Perry            
|               | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to AuRico Gold Inc. and will be retained by AuRico Gold
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/05/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      522,009
COMMITMENTS
  48,074   24,664   86,146  366,030  389,820  500,250  500,630   21,759   21,379

CHANGES FROM 12/29/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,858)
  -3,038    4,459    5,979   11,409    4,676   14,350   15,114    3,508    2,744

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2      4.7     16.5     70.1     74.7     95.8     95.9      4.2      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      115)
      28       17       39       56       64      100      107
```

----

Updated January 8, 2010
# Official Journal C 321E/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 321E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4929 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 321E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4929 December 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| 2006/C 321E/1 | EUROPEAN UNION — CONSOLIDATED VERSIONS OF THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION AND OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

2006/C 321E/1

EUROPEAN UNION — CONSOLIDATED VERSIONS OF THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION AND OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Carl Burnie WELLBORN, petitioner, v. Shane JACKSON, Warden.

No. 18-7497.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Bradford D'Vol ALLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8265.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Safe Travel Care, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, LeRoy Willoughby, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ LeRoy Willoughby

LeRoy Willoughby

Chief Financial Officer

April 19, 2005
# Official Journal C 131/7 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 131 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 477 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 131

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 477 May 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 131/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 131/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 131/2 | Call for Proposals - INTERACT Programme 2002-2006 | 2 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 131/2

Call for Proposals - INTERACT Programme 2002-2006

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 131/3 | Notice to readers | s3 |

2004/C 131/3

Notice to readers

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
               AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                           ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                           a California corporation


       The undersigned, Douglas J. McCutcheon and James C. Kitch hereby
certify that:

       1.  They are the duly elected and acting Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary, respectively of Asyst Technologies, Inc., a
California corporation.

       2.  Article III(A) of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
(the "Articles of Incorporation") of this corporation is amended to read as
follows:

                 "Classes of Stock. This corporation is authorized to
                  ----------------
           issue two classes of stock designated, respectively, Common
           Stock ("Common") and Preferred Stock ("Preferred"). The
           total number of shares that this corporation is authorized
           to issue is 54,000,000 shares, without par value, of which
           50,000,000 shares shall be Common and 4,000,000 shares shall
           be Preferred."

       3.  The foregoing amendment of the Articles of Incorporation has been
duly approved by the board of directors.

       4.  The foregoing amendment of the Articles of Incorporation has been
duly approved by the required vote of shareholders in accordance with sections
902 and 903 of the California Corporations Code. The total number of outstanding
shares of the corporation was 12,251,366 shares of Common Stock. The number of
shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required.
The percentage vote required was more than 50% of the Common Stock.

       We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and
correct of our own knowledge.

Dated: September 24, 1999


                         /s/ Douglas J. McCutcheon
                         -------------------------------------------------
                         Douglas J. McCutcheon
                         Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


                         /s/ James C. Kitch
                         -------------------------------------------------
                         James C. Kitch, Secretary
David Joseph PITTMAN, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9015.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
May 16, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-60635

BOYD D. HUDSON, CINDY KAYE HUDSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., RACHI HOLDING, INC., E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO., E I. DuPont De Nemours and Company; JOHN DOES 1-20,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

2:02-CV-860

Before DAVIS, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the

briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the

district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its

June 10, 2003 Oral Bench Opinion. See also Bridges v. Metabolife2

Intern., Inc. , ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 65498 (5 th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27174-27175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09696]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

[[Page 27175]]

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Initial Review Group; Genome Research Study Section.
    Date: June 2, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 
20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dr. Sarah Wheelan, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3100, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-
435-1580, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 2, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09696 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```