alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### New Kensington *v.*Municipal Authority of the City of New Kensington, Appellant.

*183November 14, 1955:

Argued October 11, 1955.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*Carl E. Glock,*with him *Gilbert J. Helwig, Albert 8. Yoder, Robert D. McYey, Reed, Smith, Shaw & Mc-Glay,*and *Yoder é McYey,*for appellant.

*James Gregg,*with him *Anthony J. Bonadio*and *Yincent R. Smith,*for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the grant of . a preliminary injunction against the defendant-appellant. The injunction was issued after the court had taken testimony of both parties. This is an unedifying example of each of two bodies claiming to represent the people in the same geographical subdivision. Under the law our review is very much limited, being confined to whether, under the facts before the court below, there were *184reasonable grounds for its action: *Roth v. Columbia Distributing*Company, 371 Pa. 297, 305, 89 A. 2d 825.

The court’s action fully satisfies the foregoing rule, and we accordingly affirm the decree of the court below on the opinion of Judge Bauer, reported at 3 D. & C. 2d 784; costs to abide the event.

Due to the importance of the cause, it is further ordered that the court below hold final hearing and render a decision thereon within sixty days from the date of filing of this opinion.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

This Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Ameriana Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the report.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen                        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name: Jerome J. Gassen                      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Bradley L. Smith                        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name: Bradley L. Smith                      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title: Senior Vice President  Treasurer and
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Anglotajik Minerals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Matthew
Markin, as Principal Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 13, 2007

Signed:

/s/ Matthew Markin
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Acting Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 89I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 089I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6318 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 089I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6318 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 89 I/01 | Commission Notice Interpretative Guidelines on EU passenger rights regulations in the context of the developing situation with Covid-19 | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 89 I/01

Commission Notice Interpretative Guidelines on EU passenger rights regulations in the context of the developing situation with Covid-19

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      456,945
COMMITMENTS
  44,919   31,034  102,527  280,392  303,831  427,838  437,392   29,107   19,553

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,826)
  -4,001   12,090    6,692   15,881     -606   18,572   18,176     -746     -350

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.8      6.8     22.4     61.4     66.5     93.6     95.7      6.4      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      135)
      31       25       47       67       68      124      118
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           553,157
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,298
<MORTGAGE>                                       9,504
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    3,441
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 605,361
<CASH>                                           6,578
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              77,484
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          71,133<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,003,035
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                661,658
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 35,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,530
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,360
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,136<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,003,035
<PREMIUMS>                                       4,083
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             10,476
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  17
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,107<F3>
<BENEFITS>                                       9,080<F4>
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,501
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                       319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16<F5>
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $28,391 of present value of future profits.
<F2>Includes retained earnings of $11,136 and other comprehensive income of
$(2,000).
<F3>Includes policy charges of $1,629 and fees from separate accounts of $478.
<F4>Includes benefits and claims of $3,244 and interest credited on financial
products of $5,836.
<F5>EPS data does not inclukde reductions for preferred stock dividends.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Jamar Rashaad HODGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9183.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1292 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1292

   To provide that no Federal income tax shall be imposed on amounts 
             received by Holocaust victims or their heirs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

  Mr. Weller (for himself, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Porter, and Mr. Hayworth) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that no Federal income tax shall be imposed on amounts 
             received by Holocaust victims or their heirs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX ON AMOUNTS RECEIVED BY HOLOCAUST 
              VICTIMS OR THEIR HEIRS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 
gross income shall not include any amount received by an individual (or 
any heir of the individual) from any person as a result of any moral or 
legal injustice experienced by such individual as a Holocaust victim.
    (b) Holocaust Victim.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``Holocaust victim'' means any individual who was persecuted for racial 
or religious reasons by Nazi Germany or any other Axis regime as a 
result of the Holocaust.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply to any amount 
received before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Danny D. TRAN, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 18-7312.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
Kelvin PACE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7140.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Barry DRUILHET, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8225.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1573Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials and Equipment Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Materials and Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet 
on May 12, 2022, 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, via teleconference. 
The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to materials and related 
technology.

Agenda

Open Session

    1. Opening Remarks and Introduction by BIS Senior Management.
    2. Report from working groups.
    3. Report by regime representatives.

Closed Session

    4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 
Sec. Sec.  10 (a)(1) and 10 (a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference on a first 
come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to 
Ms. Yvette Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4ad8291808091daa784869d9a939186b4969d87da909b97da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="431a35263737266d1033312a2d24263103212a306d272c206d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than May 
5, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any 
time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution 
of public presentation materials to Committee members, the materials 
should be forwarded prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on February 
14, 2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. Sec.  10(d)), that the portion of the 
meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control 
List and the U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 
Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting 
will be open to the public.
    For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-09097 Filed 4-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/19/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      557,000
COMMITMENTS
  58,060   28,054  147,172  335,874  366,804  541,106  542,030   15,894   14,970

CHANGES FROM 10/12/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -22,345)
   6,418     -327  -13,283  -12,361   -7,998  -19,225  -21,607   -3,120     -738

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.4      5.0     26.4     60.3     65.9     97.1     97.3      2.9      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      131)
      33       26       47       61       68      117      119
```

----

Updated October 22, 2010
Eddie Earl PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-8254.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2616

JOHNNY T. BELCHER,

Petitioner,

versus

HARMAN MINING COMPANY; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE

COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(97-242-BLA)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 22, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny T. Belcher, Petitioner Pro Se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura

Metcoff Klaus, ARTER & HADDEN, Washington, D.C.; Cathryn Celeste

Helm, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1998). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the Board.

Belcher v. Harman Mining Co., No. 97-242-BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 23,

1997). Appellant also raises claims of constitutional deficiencies

in the applicable statutory scheme. However, he fails to allege any

cognizable harm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 11.0



                    MONOCACY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


                      Information used in the computation
                         of net income per common share





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Nine Months Ended         Three Months Ended
                                                                  September 30,              September 30,
                                                                  -------------              -------------
                                                                1997         1996           1997         1996
                                                                ----         ----           ----         ----
<S><C>
Net income                                                  $1.636,627     $1,278,643   $  390,963    $  308,444
                                                            ==========     ==========   ==========    ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding                   1,621,319      1,606,785    1,624,677     1,609,561
                                                             =========     ==========   ==========    ==========

Earnings per common share                                        $1.01           $.80         $.24          $.19
                                                                 =====           ====         ====          ====
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21336 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARNULFO AMAYA-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-189-ALL

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arnulfo Amaya-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Amaya-Salazar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Amaya-Salazar maintains that heNo. 02-21336 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Amaya-Salazar acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
# Official Journal C 182/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.182.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 182 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 537 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.182.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 182

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 537 July 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 182/01 | Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.5675 — Syngenta/Monsanto's Sunflower Seed Business) (1) | 1 |
| 2010/C 182/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5878 — CVC/Caixanova/R Cable) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 182/01

Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.5675 — Syngenta/Monsanto's Sunflower Seed Business) (1)

1

2010/C 182/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5878 — CVC/Caixanova/R Cable) (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 182/03 | Act of the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust of 23 June 2009 laying down its rules of procedure (adopted unanimously at the plenary meeting of the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust on 23 June 2009) | 3 |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 182/04 | Euro exchange rates | 11 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2010/C 182/03

Act of the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust of 23 June 2009 laying down its rules of procedure (adopted unanimously at the plenary meeting of the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust on 23 June 2009)

(adopted unanimously at the plenary meeting of the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust on 23 June 2009)

3

European Commission

2010/C 182/04

Euro exchange rates

11

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 182/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5774 — Holtzbrinck/Bertelsmann/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 12 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 182/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5774 — Holtzbrinck/Bertelsmann/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN