alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth D. WalterKenneth D. Walter Chief Financial
Officer




May 10, 2005
In Re Derek WARDLAW, petitioner.

No. 17-9355.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/26/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      186,380
COMMITMENTS
  59,266    7,936   20,850   80,244  129,918  160,360  158,704   26,020   27,676

CHANGES FROM 04/19/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,479)
   3,975      269   -4,106   -4,674     -916   -4,805   -4,753   -2,674   -2,726

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.8      4.3     11.2     43.1     69.7     86.0     85.2     14.0     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      201)
      73       17       53       65       79      159      139
```

----

Updated April 29, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, dated the date
of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 5, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                                              
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



24
Robert R. TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9034.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ronell HOWLETT, petitioner, v. Reed RICHARDSON, Warden.

No. 18-7847.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Music and Health review meeting.
    Date: May 26-27, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: W. Ernest Lyons, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-4056, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a5b0a6a7baac89a7a0a7adbae7a7a0a1e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3afbaacadb0a683adaaada7b0edadaaabeda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 25, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09185 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jerry Anthony BRANDON, aka Jerry L. Brandon, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-8037.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1279 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1279

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2000

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 236 Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ``Aaron E. 
         Henry Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 236 
Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Aaron E. Henry Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the Federal building and United 
States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Aaron E. Henry Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Jonathan Glen TURNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 23.1          **

**CONSENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders            Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. on Forms S-8 (#333-82374 and #333-127424) of our report dated February 24, 2009, on the consolidated balance sheets of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows            for the years then ended, as appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

By: /s/ Hoberman, Miller, Goldstein & Lesser, P.C

Hoberman, Miller, Goldstein & Lesser, P.C

New York, New York            February 24, 2009

39

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 11 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 11

   To amend the Clean Air Act to permit the exclusive application of 
  California State regulations regarding reformulated gas in certain 
                        areas within the State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

   Mr. Bilbray (for himself, Mr. Lewis of California, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. 
 Millender-McDonald, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Campbell, Mr. George Miller of 
California, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Horn, Mr. Cox, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Packard, Mr. 
Thomas, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Hunter, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Dixon, 
  Mr. McKeon, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Ose, Mrs. 
    Bono, Mr. Kuykendall, Mr. Pombo, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Becerra, Mr. 
Rohrabacher, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Rogan, Mr. Condit, Mr. Doolittle, and Ms. 
Roybal-Allard) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Clean Air Act to permit the exclusive application of 
  California State regulations regarding reformulated gas in certain 
                        areas within the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA REFORMULATED GAS RULES.

    Section 211(c)(4)(B) of the Clean Air Act is amended by adding the 
following at the end thereof: ``Whenever any such State that has 
received a waiver under section 209(b)(1) has promulgated reformulated 
gasoline rules for any covered area of such State (as defined in 
subsection (k)), such rules shall apply in such area in lieu of the 
requirements of subsection (k) if such State rules will achieve 
equivalent or greater emission reductions than would result from the 
application of the requirements of subsection (k) in the case of the 
aggregate mass of emissions of toxic air pollutants and in the case of 
the aggregate mass of emissions of ozone-forming compounds.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 FOR ONSITE ENERGY CORPORATION AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,642,509
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,752,809        
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (15,030)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,134,637
<PP&E>                                       1,236,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                (559,339)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,127,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,545,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        200
<COMMON>                                        14,659
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,127,625
<SALES>                                      5,943,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,943,914
<CGS>                                        4,141,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,141,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,693,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                113,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      571,255
COMMITMENTS
  55,421   22,893  113,225  380,447  417,924  549,093  554,042   22,162   17,213

CHANGES FROM 02/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -10,697)
   1,647    8,992     -679   -7,654  -17,572   -6,686   -9,259   -4,011   -1,438

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.7      4.0     19.8     66.6     73.2     96.1     97.0      3.9      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      129)
      30       26       44       62       67      118      114
```

----

Updated February 25, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41126

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR FIGUEROA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-128-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Figueroa appeals his conviction and sentence for attempting to 

entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(b). 

He argues that the district court abused its discretion and violated his right to 

a fair trial by requiring him to be escorted into the courtroom by two bailiffs in 

front of the jury panel for purely logistical reasons with no safety justification. 

He contends that his case is analogous to the case of a defendant forced to wear 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 30, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41126 Document: 00514010867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2017
No. 16-41126

2

shackles or prison clothing to trial and is inherently prejudicial, mandating 

reversal.

Figueroa’s argument is unpersuasive. The Supreme Court has held that 

noticeable use of security personnel in a courtroom during trial is not an 

inherently prejudicial practice, which, like shackling, is permissible only when 

justified by an essential state interest. See Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U.S. at 560, 

568-72. In that case, the Court upheld the district court’s use of four uniformed 

and armed state troopers and other officers seated in the first row of the 

spectator section behind the defendant throughout trial as not inherently 

prejudicial because the officers were “unlikely to be taken as a sign of anything 

other than a normal official concern for the safety and order of the 

proceedings.” Id. at 571. In the instant case, the fact that Figueroa was 

brought into the courtroom followed by two officers, who it appears were 

neither uniformed nor armed, on a single occasion at the beginning of the 

proceedings was likewise not inherently prejudicial as the jurors were unlikely 

to assume anything other than that the officers’ presence was reflective of the 

normal official concern for the safety and order of the proceedings. See id. at 

571-72. Furthermore, Figueroa cannot show any actual prejudice resulting 

from the procedure given the overwhelming evidence of his guilt. See id. at 

572. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-41126 Document: 00514010867 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2017
RIVERSTONE GROUP, INC., petitioner, v. MIDWEST OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND, et al.

No. 16-1350.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Antoine D. DEGRATE, petitioner, v. Scott S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States.

No. 17-9069.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,502-01

EX PARTE NATHAN JOHN ELLIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W401-81123-09-HC IN THE 401 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts

of online solicitation of a minor. In count one, Applicant was sentenced to ten years confinement,

probated, and placed on community supervision for ten years. In count two, Applicant was

sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ellis

v. State, No. 05-10-01325-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 23, 2012)(not designated for publication).

In his sole ground, Applicant alleges that he was convicted of an offense that has been found
2

unconstitutional. Ex parte Lo, 439 S.W.3d (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant’s ground attacking

his conviction and probated sentence in count one for online solicitation of a minor is dismissed

without prejudice. Ex parte Hiracheta, 307 S.W.3d 323, 325 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Based on this

Court’s independent review of the entire record, we find that Applicant’s claim as it relates to count

two is denied. 

Delivered: February 24, 2016

Do not publish
II

Calendar No. 477

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1487

[Report No. 106–250]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

MARCH 28, 2000

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To provide for public participation in the declaration of national monuments under the Act popularly known as

the Antiquities Act of 1906.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1487 RS

1 SECTION 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE DECLARATION

2 AND SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT OF NA3 TIONAL MONUMENTS.

4 Section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 (34 Stat. 225,

5 16 U.S.C. 431; popularly known as the Antiquities Act

6 of 1906), is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘SEC. 2. That the’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘SEC. 2. (a) The’’; and

9 (2) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(b)(1) To the extent consistent with the protection

11 of the historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric struc12 tures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest

13 located on the public lands to be designated, the President

14 shall—

15 ‘‘(A) solicit public participation and comment in

16 the development of a monument declaration; and

17 ‘‘(B) consult with the Governor and congres18 sional delegation of the State or territory in which

19 such lands are located, to the extent practicable, at

20 least 60 days prior to any national monument dec21 laration.

22 ‘‘(2) Before issuing a declaration under this section,

23 the President shall consider any information made avail24 able in the development of existing plans and programs

25 for the management of the lands in question, including

26 such public comments as may have been offered.
3

HR 1487 RS

1 ‘‘(c) Any management plan for a national monument

2 developed subsequent to a declaration made under this

3 section shall comply with the procedural requirements of

4 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.’’.

5 SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

6 Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this

7 Act shall be construed to enlarge, diminish, or modify the

8 authority of the President to act to protect public lands

9 and resources.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 477

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1487

[Report No. 106–250]

AN ACT

To provide for public participation in the declaration of national monuments under the Act popularly known as the Antiquities Act of 1906.

MARCH 28, 2000

Reported without amendment
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/08/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       67,681
COMMITMENTS
     846    1,986   11,217   55,538   54,428   67,601   67,631       80       50

CHANGES FROM 11/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,449)
      91      245      974    1,557    1,438    2,622    2,657     -173     -208

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.2      2.9     16.6     82.1     80.4     99.9     99.9      0.1      0.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       21)
       3        5        5        6       11       11       20
```

----

Updated November 14, 2011
Thomas Reid DeCARLO, petitioner, v. William TRUE, Warden.

No. 17-9101.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.