alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ULTRATECH
STEPPER INC., FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          54,634
<SECURITIES>                                    84,487
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,578
<INVENTORY>                                     44,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,012
<PP&E>                                          45,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,728
<SALES>                                         50,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,536
<CGS>                                           51,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,535
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,182)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.06)
        

</TABLE>
No. 85-6807.

#### Sauers *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/20/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      156,992
COMMITMENTS
  16,477   23,622   35,099   89,659   83,909  141,235  142,630   15,757   14,362

CHANGES FROM 12/13/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,562)
   2,181    1,072    1,295    4,656    4,289    8,132    6,656   -1,570      -94

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.5     15.0     22.4     57.1     53.4     90.0     90.9     10.0      9.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       79)
      29       21       29       24       23       67       62
```

----

Updated December 23, 2011
Aura MOODY, petitioner, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE.

No. 18-393.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Stephen Todd BOOKER, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Doyle Lee HAMM, Applicant v. Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17A900

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 22, 2018.

**ORDER**

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant,

IT IS ORDERED that execution of the sentence of death is hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court.

*/s/ Clarence Thomas*

Associate Justice of the Supreme

Court of the United States
Leigh Anne MARSHALL, petitioner, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

No. 17-1697.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9471.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Form 10-KSB/A of DOMAIN  REGISTRATION,  CORP.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Scott Curtis  Nilson,  Treasurer,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Director of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: July 25, 2005


/s/ SCOTT CURTIS NILSON
______________________________________
Scott Curtis Nilson
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DOMAIN REGISTRATION CORP. AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY DOMAIN  REGISTRATION  CORP.  AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Dinora ORTEGA-MORALES, petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-939.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1370Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,593
<SECURITIES>                                    47,237
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,519
<PP&E>                                       2,025,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 622,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,495,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,793
<BONDS>                                        643,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     505,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,495,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,602
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        



</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1478

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect breastfeeding by new

mothers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1999

Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect

breastfeeding by new mothers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Discrimina5 tion Act Amendments of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS

7 ACT OF 1964.

8 Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

9 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) is amended—
2

•HR 1478 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘breastfeeding,’’ after ‘‘child2 birth’’, and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For

4 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘breastfeeding’

5 means the feeding of a child directly from the breast

6 or the expression of milk from the breast by a lac7 tating woman.’’.

Æ
ZAPPOS.COM, INC., petitioner, v. Theresa STEVENS, et al.

No. 18-225.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1377 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1377

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
9308 South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, as the ``John J. Buchanan 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service, located at 9308 
South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60617, is designated as the 
``John J. Buchanan Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``John J. Buchanan Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
KANSAS, petitioner, v. Charles GLOVER.

No. 18-556.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas granted.
Thomas Earl GLADDEN, Sr., petitioner, v. Matt BARBER, Warden, et al.

No. 17-9229.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  366,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,334
<PP&E>                                      10,123,711
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,134,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,363,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,363,434
<SALES>                                      1,192,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,193,899
<CGS>                                          356,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,697,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,503,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,503,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,503,892)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1497

___________________________

Stephen Klick

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: November 7, 2022 

Filed: November 10, 2022

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before COLLOTON, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Klick appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of

disability insurance benefits. We find that substantial evidence in the record as a

1The Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the

District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
whole supports the adverse decision. See Galloway v. Kijakazi, 46 F.4th 686, 689

(8th Cir. 2022) (standard of review). Specifically, the ALJ’s determination that Klick

did not have the medically determinable impairment of post-traumatic stress disorder

(PTSD) during the relevant period was supported. See Gallus v. Callahan, 117 F.3d

1061, 1064-65 (8th Cir. 1997) (substantial evidence supported ALJ’s finding that

claimant did not have medically determinable mental impairment; while one provider

had assigned diagnosis, it was not supported by record, and other providers had

concluded claimant did not have impairment). While the evidence showed that

Klick’s psychologist diagnosed “other trauma- and stressor-related disorder” in 2019,

we conclude that the ALJ’s failure to include this diagnosis among Klick’s severe

impairments was harmless error, as the ALJ thoroughly evaluated all of the medical

evidence relating to his mental impairments in determining his residual functional

capacity (RFC), and as Klick has not identified any symptoms or limitations arising

from this condition that the ALJ did not consider. See Warburton v. Apfel, 188 F.3d

1047, 1050-51 (8th Cir. 1999) (finding ALJ’s decision adequate where, although

record did not contain precise diagnosis of claimant’s mental impairment, ALJ

adequately captured effects of impairment in RFC determination); Trenary v. Bowen,

898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (critical question in disability claim is not

diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment). We also find no

merit to Klick’s argument that the district court erred in declining to consider his new

evidence. See Baker v. Barnhart, 457 F.3d 882, 891 (8th Cir. 2006) (upon judicial

review of Commissioner’s decision denying disability benefits, evidence outside

administrative record is generally precluded from consideration by court).

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
In Re Steve G. HERNANDEZ, petitioner.

No. 18-6486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Terry A. BURLISON, petitioner, v. Pam ANGUS, Individually and as a Marion County, Florida Court Deputy Clerk.

No. 18-8283.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Joseph SUSALLA, petitioner, v. Shirlee HARRY, Warden.

No. 17-9337.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
TEN'S CABARET, INC., fka Stringfellow's of New York, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-841.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1397

For the relief of Herman J. Koehler, III.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Herman J. Koehler, III.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF GRANTED.

4 Herman J. Koehler, III, of Boonton, New Jersey, is

5 relieved of any disabilities imposed upon him pursuant to

6 section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, as a result

7 of his September 1990 conviction of a violation of section

8 371 of title 18, United States Code.

Æ
```

```

----

Updated September 30, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     4,940,512
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     3,019,505
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    75,033,147
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      74,851,100
<LOANS>                                  298,141,732
<ALLOWANCE>                                1,093,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           393,028,221
<DEPOSITS>                               321,639,792
<SHORT-TERM>                              11,300,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        8,205,257
<LONG-TERM>                                7,829,032
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                               10,779,231
<OTHER-SE>                                33,274,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           393,028,221
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           17,249,940
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          4,450,176
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             339,125
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          22,039,241
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                        12,023,904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,017,869
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      9,021,372
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                147,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            6,596,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            4,278,972
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 4,278,972
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,759,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     0
<LOANS-NON>                                        0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
Michael A. MAGGIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6272.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 690

- CV

EX PARTE Brant FISCUS

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

On September 19, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, complaining

Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz has failed to give him “good time” credit during his 180 day confinement

after being held in contempt for failure to pay child support. However, a relator is not entitled to

habeas corpus relief unless he was deprived of his liberty without due process of law, or if we

conclude the judgment ordering him confined is void. See In re Alexander , 243 S.W.3d 822, 824

(Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2007, orig. proceeding). Relator has failed to meet his burden to show

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1999

- EM5

- 00243 , in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,

Texas, the Honorable David A. Berchelmann presiding.04

- 11

- 00690

- CV

- 2

- he is entitled to habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DENIED.

PER CURIAM