alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MONOCACY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY             EXHIBIT 11.0


                      Information used in the computation
                         of net income per common share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Six Months Ended                Three Months Ended
                                                          June 30,                         June 30,
                                                          --------                         --------
                                                 1997                1996           1997             1996
                                                 ----                ----           ----             ----
<S><C>
Net income                                   $1.245,664         $  970,199      $  578,423        $  501,973
                                             ==========         ==========      ==========        ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding    1,619,611          1,605,697       1,621,463         1,606,551
                                             ==========         ==========      ==========        ==========
Earnings per common share                          $.77               $.60            $.36              $.31
                                                   ====               ====            ====              ====
</TABLE>



                                       13
In Re Richard MADKINS, petitioner.

No. 18-8322.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Danilo VELASQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8346.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert A. RUCHO, et al., appellants, v. COMMON CAUSE, et al.

No. 18-422.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 15, 2019.

Joint motion of appellees for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument granted in part, and the time is divided as follows: 35 minutes for appellants, 20 minutes for appellees Common Cause, et al., and 15 minutes for appellees League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al.
Michael FULLER, petitioner, v. Lashann EPPINGER, Warden.

No. 18-7565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated March 6, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1930 contained in Amendment No.
2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-229062) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 6, 2019
Edward LONGORIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9099.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Anglotajik Minerals Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Matthew
Markin, as Principal Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2004

Signed:

/s/ Matthew Markin
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Acting Chief Executive Officer
H. R. 1212

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To protect producers of agricultural commodities who applied for a Crop Revenue

Coverage PLUS supplemental endorsement for the 1999 crop year.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS WHO

APPLIED FOR CROP REVENUE COVERAGE PLUS.

(a) ELIGIBLE PRODUCERS.—This section applies with respect

to a producer eligible for insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who applied for the supplemental

crop insurance endorsement known as Crop Revenue Coverage

PLUS (referred to in this section as ‘‘CRCPLUS’’) for the 1999

crop year for a spring-planted agricultural commodity.

(b) ADDITIONAL PERIOD FOR OBTAINING OR TRANSFERRING

COVERAGE.—Notwithstanding the sales closing date for obtaining

crop insurance coverage established under section 508(f)(2) of the

Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance

Corporation shall provide a 14-day period beginning on the date

of enactment of this Act, but not to extend beyond April 12, 1999,

during which a producer described in subsection (a) may—

(1) obtain from any approved insurance provider a level

of coverage for the agricultural commodity for which the producer applied for the CRCPLUS endorsement that is equivalent

to or less than the level of federally reinsured coverage that

the producer applied for from the insurance provider that

offered the CRCPLUS endorsement; and

(2) transfer to any approved insurance provider any

federally reinsured coverage provided for other agricultural

commodities of the producer by the same insurance provider
H. R. 1212—2

that offered the CRCPLUS endorsement, as determined by

the Corporation.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 

**- 24**  **8 1** 

ROSA TIBAU PONCE

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent,

-------------------------------------------------

FRIENDS OF RULE OF LAW IN ECUADOR, INC.,

Amicus Curiae

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : April 17, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rosa Tibau Ponce, Petitioner Pro Se

. Brianne Whelan Cohen

, Samuel P. Go, Jonathan Aaron Robbins, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent

. Margaret L. Petito, FRIENDS O F RULE OF LAW IN ECUADOR, INC., Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae

.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Ros a Tibau Ponce

, a native and citizen of Ecuador and

a citizen of Spain

, petition s for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying h er motion to

reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and

conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2013). Accordingly,

although we grant Friends of Rule of Law in Ecuador’s motion to

file an amicus curiae brief, w e deny the petition for review.

See In re: Tibau Ponce (B.I.A. Nov. 15 , 2013). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2016224EN.01000101.xml

| 21.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2014-2015 SESSION

Sittings of 1 to 3 July 2014

The minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 151, 7.5.2015.

The minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 151, 7.5.2015.

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 14 to 17 July 2014

The minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 167, 21.5.2015.

The minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 167, 21.5.2015.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Alvin Stanley BRIGGS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8231.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Sonny Ray JEFFRIES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9329.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Shaun ROBERTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M136.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
33 SEMINARY LLC, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF BINGHAMPTON, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-83.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Alloy, Inc.
New York, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-109788, 333-106382 and 333-90681) of Alloy,
Inc. and in the Prospectuses constituting part of such Registration Statements,
of our report dated April 15, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial
statements, and the effectiveness of Alloy, Inc.'s internal control over
financial reporting and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form
10-K.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
April 15, 2005
James Patrick BURKE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8038.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Lashon BROWNING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6369.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in light of *Stokeling v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 544, 202 L.E.2d 512 (2019).
Stacia CROMARTIE, petitioner, v. ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 17-9261.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
Nashid PORTER, petitioner, v. Carlton JOYNER, Warden.

No. 17-9420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATIONS



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Thomson, a French company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                       |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 29, 2004 |  | /s/ Julian D. Waldron
|                     |  | Name:                 |  | Julian D. Waldron      
|                     |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
In Re Dennis BOWDEN, petitioner.

No. 18-8156.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Michael Lynn HEARD, petitioner, v. Scott SOLOMON, et al.

No. 18-7633.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BARBARA FOURNIER and BRUCE JENKINS, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. TERRY CUDDEFORD, Defendant - Appellee. No. 12-36062 D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00343-AC
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon John V. Acosta, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted May 13, 2014 ** Portland, Oregon Before: GOODWIN, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Barbara Fournier and Bruce Jenkins (co llectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiffs allege that Clackamas County Sheriff’s Deputy Terry Cuddeford violated their 

# FILED
MAY 19 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when he responded to their 911 call reporting that they were being subjected to an unlawful eviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. On de novo review, Morrison v. Hall , 261 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir. 2001), we affirm. Plaintiffs failed to raise a genuine dis pute of material fact as to whether Cuddeford’s conduct constituted state ac tion because Cuddeford was summoned to a scene not of his making after the confrontation had already occurred. See Meyers v. Redwood City , 400 F.3d 765, 771-72 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that police officers who were summoned to a scene not of their making, where the confrontation was not conducted under their purview, “were not so enmeshed in effectuating the repossession that the deprivation and seizure . . . is attributable to the state”); see also Howerton v. Gabica , 708 F.2d 380, 383-84 (9th Cir. 1983) (relying on repossession cases to set out the legal frame work for state action in a case alleging unlawful eviction). AFFIRMED.

2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1412

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of

initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the

arbitration of initial contract negotiation disputes, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations First

5 Contract Negotiations Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES.

7 Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29

8 U.S.C. 158) is amended by adding at the end the following

9 new subsection:
2

•HR 1412 IH

1 ‘‘(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certifi2 cation of a new representative of employees for the pur3 pose of collective bargaining, the employer of the employ4 ees and the representative have not reached a collective

5 bargaining agreement with respect to the terms and condi6 tions of employment, the employer and the representative

7 shall jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on

8 which the employer and the representative cannot agree.

9 ‘‘(2) If the employer and the representative are un10 able to agree upon a mediator, either party may request

11 the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to select

12 a mediator and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation

13 Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as

14 mediator.

15 ‘‘(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the

16 selection of a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the

17 employer and the representative have not reached an

18 agreement, the employer or the representative may trans19 fer the matters remaining in controversy to the Federal

20 Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitra21 tion.’’.

Æ
In Re William Earl RAYFORD, petitioner.

No. 17-7569 (17A801).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 30, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Nickie Thomas GRAY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8259.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

l0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138340 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138340 

 COA: 289813 

Wayne CC: 08-005379-FC 

DARRYL BYRD, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/29/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       72,594
COMMITMENTS
     366    3,198   12,295   57,409   54,693   70,070   70,186    2,524    2,408

CHANGES FROM 11/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,922)
    -380    1,036    1,292    2,546    1,216    3,458    3,544    1,464    1,378

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.5      4.4     16.9     79.1     75.3     96.5     96.7      3.5      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       22)
       3        7        4        6       11       11       20
```

----

Updated December 2, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Empire Global Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ken Chu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of April 2006.





/s/ Ken Chu
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   I, Stanley Shuster, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc.
  ****By:
/s/ Stanley ShusterTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Varian, Inc. for the period ended September 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian, Inc.

Date: November 21, 2007



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                             
|Garry W. Rogerson                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer Varian, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and
will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Patrick MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-7075.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District denied.
Joel GOMEZ, petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 18-7551.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Donte Lamar JONES, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 16-1337.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Brent William BOGSETH, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-7834.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.