alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1369

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to make military helicopters and

other equipment available to State and local governments to assist in

emergency law enforcement and rescue operations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Ms. KILPATRICK (for herself, Mr. FROST, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms.

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. SHOWS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. LUTHER, Mr.

THOMPSON of Mississippi, and Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to make military helicopters and other equipment available to State and local

governments to assist in emergency law enforcement and

rescue operations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Police Pursuit and

5 Rescue Support Act’’.
2

•HR 1369 IH

1 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HELICOPTERS AND

2 OTHER EQUIPMENT FOR EMERGENCY LAW

3 ENFORCEMENT AND RESCUE OPERATIONS.

4 (a) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT.—To im5 prove the safety and success of police pursuits of suspected

6 criminals and police and fire rescue operations, the Sec7 retary of Defense is authorized and encouraged to use the

8 authority provided in section 372 of title 10, United States

9 Code, to make military helicopters and other equipment

10 of the Department of Defense available to assist State and

11 local governments to perform such law enforcement and

12 rescue operations. Sections 375, 376, and 377 of that title

13 shall apply with respect to the provision of equipment

14 under this section.

15 (b) SUBMISSION OF GUIDELINES FOR PURSUIT AND

16 RESCUE.—As a condition on the provision of Department

17 of Defense equipment under this section to assist in police

18 pursuits or police and fire rescue operations, the Secretary

19 of Defense shall require a State or local government re20 questing assistance under this section for either purpose

21 to submit to the Secretary in advance the guidelines pre22 pared by the government regarding the circumstances and

23 procedures under which vehicles and helicopters are used

24 to pursue suspected criminals or equipment is used to con25 duct rescue operations, whichever applies.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1408

To make available funds for a security assistance training and support

program for the self-defense of Kosova.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. OLVER, Mr. GOODLING, Mr.

MORAN of Virginia, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. BONIOR, and Mr. ROHRABACHER)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

A BILL

To make available funds for a security assistance training

and support program for the self-defense of Kosova.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kosova Self-Defense

5 Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES.

7 It shall be the policy of the United States to provide

8 the interim government of Kosova with the capability to
2

HR 1408 IH

1 defend and protect the civilian population of Kosova

2 against armed aggression.

3 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR SECU4 RITY ASSISTANCE.

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In addi6 tion to funds otherwise available to carry out section 23

7 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763), there

8 are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry

9 out the provision of such section, $25,000,000, which

10 amount shall be made available only for grants to the in11 terim government of Kosova to be used for training and

12 support for the established self-defense forces to carry out

13 the policy of section 2.

14 (b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Amounts appro15 priated pursuant to subsection (a) are authorized to re16 main available until expended.

17 SEC. 4. RELATION TO EXISTING AUTHORITIES IN LAW.

18 Assistance provided under section 3 may be made

19 available notwithstanding any other provision of law

20 (including any executive order or directive or any rule or

21 regulation).

Æ
Christopher D. GRIFFITH, petitioner, v. Randy BLADES, Warden.

No. 17-9256.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1448

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to redesign expeditiously the airspace over the New Jersey/New York metropolitan area, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to redesign expeditiously the airspace over the

New Jersey/New York metropolitan area, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airspace Redesign En5 hancement Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REDESIGN OF CERTAIN AIRSPACE.

7 The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Adminis8 tration shall expeditiously redesign the airspace over the
2

•HR 1448 IH

1 New Jersey/New York metropolitan area, and shall com2 plete such redesign not later than the last day of the 2-

3 year period beginning on the date of enactment of this

4 Act.

5 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 There shall be available to the Administrator of the

7 Federal Aviation Administration to carry out section 2 of

8 this Act, out of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund estab9 lished under section 9502 of the Internal Revenue Code

10 of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9502), $6,000,000 for each of fiscal

11 years 2000 and 2001.

Æ
Roy O. DANIELS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7362.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Roger Leon BARLOW, petitioner, v. Mark GARMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

No. 18-7284.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# L_2006090EN.01002101.xml

| 28.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 90/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 90/21

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on cooperation in the field of statistics (1)

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on cooperation in the field of statistics, signed in Luxembourg on 26 October 2004, having been completed on 27 February 2006, this Agreement will enter into force, in conformity with its Article 13(1), on 1 January 2007.

---

(1)  See page 2 of this Official Journal.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual Report of DAG Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yael Shimor-Golan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Yael Shimor-Golan
----------------------------------------------
    Yael Shimor-Golan, Chief Financial Officer

March 3, 2005
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., et al., applicants, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, et al.

No. 18A963.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 28, 2019.

Application for stay presented to Justice SOTOMAYOR and by her referred to the Court denied.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Hartman, Appellant.

*462January 4, 1956:

Argued November 14, 1955.

Before Steen, C. J., Steaene, Jones, Bell, Musmanno and Aenold, JJ.

*Joseph jW. DeSantis,*with him *Clarence C. Mendelsohn,*for appellant.

*Edward Youngerman,*Assistant District Attorney, with him *Eenry M. Koch,*District Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

Albert D. Hartman was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The Trial Court ordered a new trial. The Commonwealth appealed to the Superior Court which reversed the order. This Court granted an allocatur. “At most, appeals by thé Commonwealth are sanctioned only where the ruling is against the Commonwealth on pure questions of law and no issues of fact are involved.” *(Com. v. Dolan,*155 Pa. Superior Ct. 453, 455.) It is evident that the appeal to the Superior Court was one based *463on an admixture of law and fact and that, therefore, the Commonwealth was not under the circumstances entitled to appeal.

An intoximeter device had been used to test the percentage of alcohol in the defendant’s blood system about an hour after his arrest. In granting the new trial, the lower Court said: “The Commonwealth’s expert, Dr. Muehlberger, testified that from one-half hour to an hour and a half is required for the alcohol in one’s stomach to find its way completely into the blood stream. If defendant in fact did not drink prior to 3:00 p.m., the Commonwealth’s own witness has demonstrated that the alcohol in his system may not have been fully effective until 4:30 p.m., about fifteen minutes before the intoximeter test was apparently given, but at least forty minutes after he stopped driving. Under the circumstances just set forth, the results of the test would not be indicative of defendant’s condition at the time he was arrested ... We conclude that the introduction of evidence of the results of the intoximeter test, when evidence of the Commonwealth’s witness, Dr. Muehlberger, indicates that the alcohol may not have completely entered the blood stream at the time of defendant’s arrest, was improper. Since the jury may have relied upon such evidence and may have found defendant 'guilty’ solely or largely from that evidence, we conclude that a new trial should be awarded.”

“The trial court has wide discretion in granting a new trial, and the appellate court is warranted in reversing only where there has been a clear abuse of that discretion.” *(Commonwealth v. Dellcese,*155 Pa. Superior Ct. 120.)

The record does not show that the lower Court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. The or*464der of the Superior Court should therefore be reversed, and it is reversed with a venire facias de novo.

Mr. Justice Bell would affirm the order of the Superior Court on its opinion.
John Felix GREER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7664.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on form 10-K of Empire Global Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Vic
Dominelli, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 4, 2009               By: /s/ Vic Dominelli
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Vic Dominelli
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 473/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 473 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6430 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 473

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6430 December 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/2280 of 16 December 2021 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein and Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2281 of 16 December 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 792/2012 as regards the addition of a new source code for plants from assisted production and related changes | 131 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/2280 of 16 December 2021 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein and Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2281 of 16 December 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 792/2012 as regards the addition of a new source code for plants from assisted production and related changes

131

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, June 23, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gilbert Martinez at1-888-912-1227 or (737) 800-4060.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Thursday, June 23, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. For more information, please contact Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or (737-800-4060), or write TAP Office 3651 S IH-35, STOP 1005 AUSC, Austin, TX 78741, or post comments to the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

Dated: May 3, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-09828 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Raphael R. HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Joe M. ALLBAUGH, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

No. 18-7504.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Darnell D. OWENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8048.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          95,291
<SECURITIES>                                    11,960
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,023)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,079
<PP&E>                                          37,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,294)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       222,657
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,377
<SALES>                                        131,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,598
<CGS>                                           72,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,088)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,331
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       207
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
WYETH LLC, et al., petitioners, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-771.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, dated the date of
this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                      |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



50
R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, INC., petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-107.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted limited to the following question: Whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender (2) sex stereotyping under *Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins,*490 U.S. 228, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989).
William Nathaniel WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. Scott FRAUENHEIM, Warden.

No. 18-6945.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.