alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that, at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement, with respect to the statement in such registration statement or report which purports to have been prepared or certified by the accountant.

In March 2002, Company appointed Ernst & Young LLP as its independent auditors following the termination of the engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”). For additional information, see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2002. Because Andersen is no longer in practice as a public accountant, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company’s Registration Statement (No. 333-90363) on Form S-8 (the “Registration Statement”) of Andersen’s audit report with respect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years in the period then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the RegistrationStatement, without a written consent from Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in the Company’s securities pursuant to the Registration Statement that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact, or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated herein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act. The Company believes, however, that other persons that may be liable under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act, including the Company’s officers and directors, may still rely on Andersen’s audit reports as being made by an expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence defense under Section 11(b) of the Securities Act.

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the
period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curtis L. Dinan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Curtis L. Dinan    
|Curtis L. Dinan        
|Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6423

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FELTON ANTHONY WIGGINS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-32) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felton Anthony Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Felton Wiggins appeals the district court order denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for relief from the district court order entered November 18, 1997, denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wiggins , No. CR-91-32 (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal L 265/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 265 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5930 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 265

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5930 September 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 44 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (‘Child Restraint Systems’) [2016/1722] | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 48 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices [2016/1723] | 125 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 44 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (‘Child Restraint Systems’) [2016/1722]

1

*

Regulation No 48 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices [2016/1723]

125

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXIBIT 32 (b)


                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Report of Legal Club of America Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elvie
Lamar Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the issuer.


September 26, 2003                     /s/ ELVIE LAMAR WEBER
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Elvie Lamar Weber
                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       67
**Amendment
No. 1 to**
 
 **Employment
Agreement**
 
 **By
and Between**
 
 **EDGAR
Online, Inc. and**
 
 **Stefan
Chopin**
 
 
 This
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement is dated as of January 31, 2005 and
amends that certain Employment Agreement by and between EDGAR Online, Inc. and
Stefan Chopin dated as of February 18, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”).
  WHEREAS,
the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:
  1. The
following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 7(b):
 
 “However,
in the event of termination of the Employee’s employment pursuant to this
Section 7(b), on the date of the death of the Employee or the 181rst day after
the Employee is deemed physically or mentally disabled for the purposes of this
Agreement, all stock options and other awards under the Company’s stock option
plans shall immediately vest and remain exercisable by the Employee or the
Employee’s representative or Estate for the period of the lesser of (i) the
original term of the stock option or (ii) five years.”
 
 2. The
following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section
7(c):
 
 “In
addition, all stock options and other awards under the Company’s stock option
plans shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for the period of the lesser
of (i) the original term of the stock option or (ii) five years.”
 
 3. The
following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section
7(f):
 
 “In
addition, all stock options and other awards under the Company’s stock option
plans shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for the period of the lesser
of (i) the original term of the stock option or (ii) five years.”
 
 Other
than as provided for herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
 The
parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.
  **EDGAR ONLINE,
      INC.**Date: January 31,
    2005
    By:
    /s/ SUSAN
  STRAUSBERGSusan StrausbergChief Executive Officer and
      President
  ****By:
    /s/ STEFAN
CHOPINStefan Chopin
Earnest BARNES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7295.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         9,819
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         9,017
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       103,556
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          99,508
<LOANS>                                      304,067
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               459,924
<DEPOSITS>                                   361,507
<SHORT-TERM>                                  38,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            9,295
<LONG-TERM>                                    7,115
<COMMON>                                       7,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    36,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               459,924
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               15,690
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,824
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              21,112
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            10,974
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            11,892
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          9,220
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     98
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,995
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,995
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,731
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                      953
<LOANS-PAST>                                      35
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 894
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,198
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,284
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     60
<RECOVERIES>                                      17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,339
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,339
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0


</TABLE>
David ROSALES-AGUILAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9205.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Dayomashell David AGUILAR, petitioner, v. William GITTERE, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8312.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/06/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,097
COMMITMENTS
  12,314    5,482    4,898   17,031   19,360   34,243   29,740    7,854   12,357

CHANGES FROM 03/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,008)
     353      820     -429      686     -197      610      193      398      815

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.3     13.0     11.6     40.5     46.0     81.3     70.6     18.7     29.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       66)
      17       11       13       31       23       51       46
```

----

Updated April 9, 2010
Gibran Richardo FIGUEROA-BELTRAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6747.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /S/ R.H. DillonPrint Name: R.H. DillonTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 10, 2006/S/ James F. LairdPrint Name: James F. LairdTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 10, 2006
 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                           9,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,800
<INVENTORY>                                     18,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,523
<PP&E>                                          16,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,776)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,007
<SALES>                                        102,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,665
<CGS>                                           60,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,551
<DISCONTINUED>                                (14,665)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,092)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1387 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1387

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for Government 
   furnished headstones or markers for the marked graves of veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1999

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. Filner, Mr. Shows, Mrs. 
  Chenoweth, Mr. Olver, Mr. English, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. 
     McNulty, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Ney, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. 
  Underwood, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Doyle, Mrs. Morella, Mr. 
 Payne, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Wynn, Mr. 
  Davis of Florida, Mr. Clement, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Jefferson, Ms. 
Lofgren, Mr. Metcalf, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Hill 
 of Montana, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Graham, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Levin, Mr. Wolf, 
Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Lipinski, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Gonzalez, and 
 Mr. Spratt) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for Government 
   furnished headstones or markers for the marked graves of veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF GOVERNMENT HEADSTONES FOR MARKED GRAVES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2306(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
``appropriate Government headstones or markers at the expense of the 
United States for the unmarked graves of the following:'' and inserting 
``one appropriate Government headstone or marker at the expense of the 
United States, other than for replacement, to mark the grave of the 
following:''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to applications for Government headstones or markers 
received by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for individuals dying on 
or after November 1, 1990.
                                 <all>
```
Michael BUSH, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8108.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/18/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      174,006
COMMITMENTS
  11,734   33,780   27,110  113,220   95,169  152,064  156,059   21,942   17,947

CHANGES FROM 01/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     25,093)
   2,887    3,535     -959   20,055   20,389   21,983   22,965    3,110    2,128

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.7     19.4     15.6     65.1     54.7     87.4     89.7     12.6     10.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      103)
      24       33       37       30       35       80       88
```

----

Updated January 21, 2011
# Official Journal C 122A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.122.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 122A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5420 April 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.122.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 122A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5420 April 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 122A/01 | Budget DG — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (Grade AD 14) — Directorate ‘Budget Execution’ (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2011/10307 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2011/C 122A/01

Budget DG — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (Grade AD 14) — Directorate ‘Budget Execution’ (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2011/10307

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Thad THOMPSON, petitioner, v. Nolan UEHARA.

No. 18M102.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.