alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Zimmermann Will.

*43November 14, 1955:

Argued October 5, 1955.

Before Stern, O. J., Stearns, Jones, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*H. Ober*Hess, with him *Sherwin T. McDowell*and *Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll,*for appellant.

*H. Olay McCormick,*with him *Malcolm Muir, James T. Smith,*and *Furst, McCormick, Muir & Lynn,*for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is from a decree of the Orphans’ Court of Clinton County refusing an issue *devisavit vel non*on the ground of alleged testamentary incapacity. The court decided that no substantial dispute existed upon any material fact.

Counsel for appellant, in' their paper book, make reference to the Orphans’ Court Act of August 10,195.1, P. L. 1163, 20 PS 2080.101 et seq. Section 745 of art. YII of the Act provides that where a substantial dispute shall arise in a will contest the right to a jury trial is a matter of right. In Section 746 (c) of the Act, it is enacted: “Effect of verdict. The verdict of the jury in the orphans’ court shall have the same ef*44feet as the verdict of a jury in a case at law in a court of common pleas.” The Act, however, does not change the well-established principle that before an issue *devismit vel non*is granted there must be a judicial determination that a substantial dispute exists. The question of construing Section 746 (c) of the Act of 1951, supra, relating to jury trials, is not now before us.

Undoubtedly there is evidence in the present case on behalf of appellant which, standing alone without considering the overwhelming testimony of proponent to the contrary, might indicate a substantial dispute. We have read and considered the evidence with great care. We are unable to profitably add to what Judge van Roden has correctly decided in his opinion refusing the grant of an issue.

Decree affirmed. Parties to bear their respective costs.
# C_2008288EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
```

```

----

Updated September 16, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m. on Thursday, April 28, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: April 21, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08855 Filed 4-21-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit
32.2







CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ken
Cleveland, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of New
Century Energy Corp. on Form 10-KSB/A for the annual period ended December 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-KSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of New Century Energy Corp.





By:/s/ Ken
Cleveland


Ken
Cleveland


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)





April
14, 2008
Roger L. HARRISON, Jr., et al., petitioners, v. Charlotte H. HUGGINS, et al.

No. 18-7524.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
Cleola SULLIVAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9291.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
| i.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ii.   | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the    Report. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      13, 2009 | By:      /s/ Ron Morgan                   |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|              | Ron      Morgan                           |
|              | Chief      Executive Officer              |
|              |                                      |
| May      13, 2009 | By:      /s/ Shannon L.  Greene           |
|              | Shannon      L. Greene                    |
|              | Chief      Financial Officer andTreasurer |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1325 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1325

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the amount of the 
charitable deduction allowable for contributions of food inventory, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

    Mr. Hall of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Houghton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the amount of the 
charitable deduction allowable for contributions of food inventory, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Good Samaritan Tax Act''.

SEC. 2. CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOOD INVENTORY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain contributions of ordinary 
income and capital gain property) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Special rule for contributions of food inventory.--
                    ``(A) Contributions by non-corporate taxpayers.--In 
                the case of a charitable contribution of food, 
                paragraph (3) shall be applied without regard to 
                whether or not the contribution is made by a 
                corporation.
                    ``(B) Determination of fair market value.--For 
                purposes of this section, in the case of a charitable 
                contribution of food which is a qualified contribution 
                (within the meaning of paragraph (3), as modified by 
                subparagraph (A) of this paragraph) and which, solely 
                by reason of internal standards of the taxpayer, lack 
                of market, or similar circumstances, cannot or will not 
                be sold, the fair market value of such contribution 
                shall be determined--
                            ``(i) without regard to such internal 
                        standards, such lack of market, or such 
                        circumstances, and
                            ``(ii) if applicable, by taking into 
                        account the price at which the same or similar 
                        food items are sold by the taxpayer at the time 
                        of the contribution (or, if not so sold at such 
                        time, in the recent past).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David R. Koos


David R. Koos


Acting Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)





Date: September 21, 2010
RPD HOLDINGS, L.L.C., petitioner, v. TECH PHARMACY SERVICES, dba Advanced Pharmacy Services.

No. 18-988.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.32

FISCAL 2009 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (the Compensation Committee) of Alloy, Inc. (the Company) determined during the first fiscal quarter of the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 (Fiscal 2009) the base salaries and the bonus compensation
for services performed during fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (Fiscal 2008) for the executive officers of the Company, namely Matthew C. Diamond, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of its Board of Directors; James
K. Johnson, Jr., its President and Chief Operating Officer; Joseph D. Frehe, its Chief Financial Officer; Gina R. DiGioia, its Chief Legal Officer and Secretary; and Robert L. Bell, its Chief Technology Officer (the Executives). Given
the number of shares available under the Companys 2007 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan) and certain tax related limitations, the Compensation Committee will be reviewing the compensation of the
Executives at a time when further shares have been added to and other amendments have been made to the 2007 Plan, with reference to Fiscal 2008 results and year to date financial performance. The following table sets forth a summary of the
compensation for each of the Executives:



|                      |  |                          |  |                        |  |               |  |                                    |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Executive Officer     |  | Title                    |  | Fiscal 2008 BaseSalary |  | Cash Bonus(1) |  | Value of RestrictedStock Grants($) |  | Value of StockOptions($)
|Matthew C. Diamond    |  | Chief Executive Officer  |  | $450,000               |  | $400,000      |  |                                   |  |                        
|James K. Johnson, Jr. |  | Chief Operating Officer  |  | $450,000               |  | $400,000      |  |                                   |  |                        
|Joseph D. Frehe       |  | Chief Financial Officer  |  | $240,000               |  | $  69,500     |  |                                   |  |                        
|Gina R. DiGioia       |  | Chief Legal Officer      |  | $225,000               |  | $  50,000     |  |                                   |  |                        
|Robert L. Bell        |  | Chief Technology Officer |  | $402,000               |  |              |  |                                   |  |                        



|(1) | Represents a cash bonus for performance during Fiscal 2008, which was paid during Fiscal 2009.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OneSource Information Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Roy D. Landon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 29, 2004

                                            /s/ Roy D. Landon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Roy D. Landon
                                            Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL MCDOWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 297 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132558 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DIANA JUCKETT,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132558 

 COA: 260350 

Calhoun CC: 02-004703-NH 

RAGHU ELLURU, M.D., and 

GREAT LAKES PLASTIC 

RECONSTRUCTIVE & HAND 

SURGERY, P.C.,

 Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
David Fehr HARDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8436.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09997]



[[Page 28001]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5124-022]


Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Notice of Meeting

    a. Project Name and Number: North Branch No. 3 Hydroelectric 
Project No. 5124-022.
    b. Applicant: Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc. (WEC).
    c. Date and Time of Meeting: May 20, 2022 from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 
a.m. EST.
    d. FERC Contact: Michael Tust, (202) 502-6522, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6904000a01080c05471d1c1a1d290f0c1b0a470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3954505a51585c55174d4c4a4d795f5c4b5a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    e. Purpose of Meeting: Commission staff will hold a teleconference 
with staff from WEC and the Vermont State Historic Preservation Office 
to discuss the Draft Programmatic Agreement and a schedule for 
finalizing and signing a Final Programmatic Agreement.
    f. All local, state, and federal agencies, Native American tribes, 
and other interested parties are invited to attend the meeting. Please 
call or email Michael Tust at (202) 502-6522 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a373339323b3f36742e2f292e1a3c3f2839743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deb3b7bdb6bfbbb2f0aaabadaa9eb8bbacbdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a> 
by May 18, 2022 at 4:30 p.m. EST, to RSVP and to receive specific 
instructions on how to participate.

    Dated: May 4, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09997 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Lakhdeep DEOL, petitioner, v. Gary W. DEPRETA, et al.

No. 18-541.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/06/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      489,942
COMMITMENTS
  34,880   24,170  105,981  331,591  339,934  472,452  470,085   17,490   19,857

CHANGES FROM 06/29/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,241)
    -745    9,761   -3,180    7,147   -3,494    3,222    3,087    2,019    2,154

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.1      4.9     21.6     67.7     69.4     96.4     95.9      3.6      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      104)
      13       20       31       58       66       92       99
```

----

Updated July 9, 2010
Enrique SERRATO-NAVARRO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9402.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/21/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       60,830
COMMITMENTS
  20,023    1,034    5,423   20,898   40,907   46,344   47,364   14,486   13,466

CHANGES FROM 06/14/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        531)
  -1,494     -144      426    3,456      270    2,388      552   -1,857      -21

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.9      1.7      8.9     34.4     67.2     76.2     77.9     23.8     22.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      30        6       18       34       26       71       46
```

----

Updated June 24, 2011
Michael DEUSCHEL, petitioner, v. USC FACULTY DENTAL PRACTICE, et al.

No. 18-7384.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.