alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Andre MICHNIAK.

No. D-3005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.
```

```

----

Updated February 11, 2011
Bobby Jo HARDY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6829.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30731

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TRENELL GARNER

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-50-1

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Trenell Garner appeals the district court’s order and judgment revoking

the supervised-release term, begun in October 2006, imposed following his

conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Upon revocation, the

district court sentenced Garner to 12 months of imprisonment but did not

impose any additional term of supervised release.

For the first time on appeal, Garner argues that the revocation judgment

should be reversed because he was not afforded a preliminary hearing in

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 11, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30731

2

connection with his revocation proceedings pursuant to FED. R. CRIM.

P. 32.1(b)(1). Because Garner did not raise this issue in the district court, we

review it only for plain error. To show plain error, Garner must show an error

that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. United States v.

Baker, 538 F.3d 324, 332 (5th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, __ S. Ct. __, 2009 WL

56591 (No. 08-7559) (Jan. 12, 2009). If he makes such a showing, we have the

discretion to correct the error but only if it seriously affects the fairness,

integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.

At his initial appearance, Garner was informed of the allegations against

him. Garner stipulated to detention at his detention hearing. Less than a

month later, at his revocation hearing, Garner was informed once more of the

allegations against him, he was represented by counsel at that hearing, and he

stipulated to all of the allegations against him. Under these circumstances,

Garner has not shown that the failure to conduct a preliminary hearing affected

his substantial rights. Garner even concedes that he was not prejudiced by the

failure to hold a hearing. We find no plain error.

Garner also asserts thatthe failure to hold a preliminary hearing violated

his due process rights. However, in light of his stipulation to the allegations

against him, he has not shown any due process violation, plain or otherwise. Cf.

United States v. Holland, 850 F.2d 1048, 1050-51 (5th Cir. 1988) (probation

revocation case); see also United States v. McCormick, 54 F.3d 214, 221 (5th Cir.

1995) (holding that the same due process rights granted to those facing

revocation of parole are required for those facing revocation of supervised

release).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John F. Metcalfe, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Holmes Biopharma Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 5, 2007/s/ John F. Metcalfe
John F. Metcalfe
Principal Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 NAME
    
    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATIONInformatica GmbH
    
    GermanyInformatica Software Limited
    
    United KingdomInformatica Software Limited
    
    Hong KongInformatica Software Ltd.
    
    CanadaInformatica Japan KK
    
    JapanInformatica Software (Schweiz) AG
    
    SwitzerlandInformatica International, Inc.
    
    DelawareInformatica Cayman Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsInformatica International do Brazil Ltd.
    
    BrazilInformatica Belgie N.V.
    
    BelgiumInformatica Nederland B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsInformatica Nederland C.V.
    
    The NetherlandsInformatica France S.A.S.
    
    FranceStriva Corporation
    
    DelawareStriva Technology Inc.
    
    CaliforniaStriva Technology Ltd
    
    United KingdomEvoke Software Deutchschland GmbH
    
    GermanyInformatica Business Solutions Private Ltd.
    
    IndiaInformatica Australia PTY Limited
    
    AustraliaInformatica International, Inc.  Singapore Branch
    
    SingaporeInformatica (Beijing) Information Technology Company Ltd
    
    ChinaInformatica Taiwan Co. Ltd.
    
    TaiwanInformatica Ireland Ltd.
    
    IrelandSimilarity Systems, Inc.
    
    DelawareTristlam Ltd.
    
    IrelandInformatica Federal Operations
    
    DelawareInformatica Korea Corporation
    
    KoreaInformatica Development Ltd.
    
    United KingdomItemfield, Inc.
    
    DelawareItemfield Ltd.
    
    Israel
##### 



TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /S/ R.H. Dillon

Print Name: R.H. DillonTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 5, 2007/S/ James F. LairdPrint Name: James F. LairdTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 5, 2007
 28
Alan Boyd Donta BARNETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6775.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Josephat MUA, et ux., petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEMNITY EXCHANGE, et al.

No. 17-9262.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# Official Journal C 193/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 193 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 627 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 193

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 627 June 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2019/C 193/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office for the financial year 2019 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2019/C 193/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office for the financial year 2019

1

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
James Arthur BIGGINS, petitioner, v. Carl C. DANBERG, et al.

No. 18-7435.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

To the Board of Directors of
 Diversified Products Inspections, Inc.

We hereby consent to the reference to our report dated May 30, 2001, relating to
the  audited  financial  statements  of  Fairfax  Group, Inc. for the year ended
February 28, 2001, in the annual report of Diversified Product Inspections, Inc.
filed  on  Form  10-KSB  in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

/s/ Michaelson & Co., PA., CPA
-------------------------------
Michaelson & Co., PA., CPA
West Palm Beach, Florida

May 29, 2002
# Official Journal L 233/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 233 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 505 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 233

English edition

Legislation

Volume 505 September 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1026/2007 of 4 September 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1026/2007 of 4 September 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2007/599/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 27 August 2007 implementing Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the adoption of strategic guidelines for 2007 to 2013
  (notified under document number C(2007) 3925) | 3 |

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

DECISIONS

Commission

2007/599/EC

*

Commission Decision of 27 August 2007 implementing Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the adoption of strategic guidelines for 2007 to 2013
  (notified under document number C(2007) 3925)

(notified under document number C(2007) 3925)

3

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 of 25 September 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in the People's Republic of China and Thailand, and terminating the proceeding on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in Malaysia (OJ L 270, 29.9.2006) | 7 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 of 25 September 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in the People's Republic of China and Thailand, and terminating the proceeding on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in Malaysia (OJ L 270, 29.9.2006)

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Thomson, a French company (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: May 12, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Frank E. Dangeard                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                |   |   |  

 

 

Name: Frank E. DangeardTitle: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

  |
| Name      of Subsidiary                               |   | Jurisdiction      of Organization |   | %      Owned |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| China      Valves  Holdings Limited         |   | Samoa                             |   | 100%         |
| China      Valves Holdings Limited                    |   | Hong      Kong                    |   | 100%         |
| Henan      Tonghai Valve Science Technology Co., Ltd. |   | PRC                               |   | 100%         |
| Zhengzhou      City ZhengDie Valve Co., Ltd           |   | PRC                               |   | 100%         |
| Henan      Kaifeng High Pressure Valve Co., Ltd.      |   | PRC                               |   | 100%         |
Order entered January 22, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01207

- CV

LORENA GOMEZ DE GONZ ALEZ BARRERA A/K/A L ORENA TASSINARI

GONZALEZ BARRERA, Appellant

V.

EDUARDO LIVAS

- CANTU, JUAN ANTONIO QUIROG A

- GARCIA, JUAN GONZALEZ MORENO, GRU PO FINANCIERO BANORT E SAB DE CV, DOING BUSINESS AS INTER NA TIONAL BANK IN THE S TATE OF TEXAS., Appellee s

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. PR

- 15

- 02808

- 1



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 16, 2020 first motion to extend time to file h er

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 18, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10(iii)

DEBT SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT

Agreement made on August 31, 2003
between Noni Wee an individual residing at Block 131  #0104 Chilton Park 1955,
Singapore, referred to as Creditor and Newtech Resources Ltd. with offices located at
1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.

SECTION ONE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
EXISTING OBLIGATION

The parties acknowledge that Debtor
is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $260,000 and interest computed at 10% per
annum pursuant to the terms of certain Promissory Notes dated May 31, 1999, April 12,
2000, April 30, 2001 and July 23, 2002.

SECTION TWO

AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT
METHOD OF PAYMENT

Debtor and Creditor desire and agree,
to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms and
provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment
for same contained in the original promissory note as described in Section One above.

SECTION THREE

CONSIDERATION

In consideration of the mutual
promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:

|a. | Method of Payment: Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to
          accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in
          Section One, above, 838,710 shares of Debtors common stock, valued at
          $0.31 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of funds
          provided by Creditor to Debtor.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Debtors board of
          directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 838,710 shares of Debtors
          common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original
          indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be
          forever cancelled and discharged.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, the parties have
executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.

Newtech Resources Ltd.

/s/ Ross WilmotBy: Ross
Wilmot, President

Noni Wee

/s/ Noni Wee
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: : NO. 499

:

AMENDMENT OF RULES 706 : JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

AND 1901 OF THE RULES OF :

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION :

 

 

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2018, it is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 

10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 706 and Rule 1901 of the Rules of 

Judicial Administration are amended in the attached form. 

To the extent that notice of proposed rulemaking would otherwise be required by 

Pa. R.J.A. No. 103, the immediate promulgation of the amendments is found to be in the 

interests of justice and efficient administration. 

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa. R.J.A. No. 103(b), and the 

amendments herein shall be effective immediately. 

Additions are bolded and are underlined.

Deletions are bolded and are [bracketed].
# C_2021385EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2020-2021 SESSION

Sittings of 14 to 17 September 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
David MEYERS, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-7083.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Talk City, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
94183) on Form S-8 of Talk City, Inc. of our reports dated February 2, 2000,
relating to the balance sheets of Talk City, Inc. as of December 31, 1999, and
1998, and the related statements of operations, redeemable preferred stock and
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and related schedule, which reports
appear in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Talk City, Inc.


                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
March 27, 2000
# Official Journal L 171/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 171 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 616 July 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 171

English edition

Legislation

Volume 616 July 2018

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2018/946 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 replacing Annexes A and B to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2018/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 providing further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine | 11 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2018/946 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 replacing Annexes A and B to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2018/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 providing further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Khaled ELBEBLAWY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6667.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1323Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.