alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Section 30.18 of the Department of Health and Human Services' claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest, which is determined and fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after considering private consumer rates of interest on the date that the Department of Health and Human Services becomes entitled to recovery. The rate cannot be lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate determined from the “Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range of Maturities” unless the Secretary waives interest in whole or part, or a different rate is prescribed by statute, contract, or repayment agreement. The Secretary of the Treasury may revise this rate quarterly. The Department of Health and Human Services publishes this rate in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The current rate of 9                    3/8                    %, as fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury, is certified for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. This rate is based on the Interest Rates for Specific Legislation, “National Health Services Corps Scholarship Program (42 U.S.C. 254o(b)(1)(A))” and “National Research Service Award Program (42 U.S.C. 288(c)(4)(B)).” This interest rate will be applied to overdue debt until the Department of Health and Human Services publishes a revision.                

David C. Horn,

Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.

[FR Doc. 2022-09840 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-P
Nicholas Lawrence TODD, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-1600.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
Deidre Holmes CLARK, petitioner, v. ALLEN & OVERY, LLP.

No. 18-7093.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/15/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      212,527
COMMITMENTS
  66,045    9,383   26,837   82,368  142,808  175,250  179,028   37,277   33,499

CHANGES FROM 02/08/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,360)
  -1,517      160     -944   -1,394   -3,784   -3,855   -4,568    1,495    2,208

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.1      4.4     12.6     38.8     67.2     82.5     84.2     17.5     15.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      218)
      79       23       56       61       83      163      150
```

----

Updated February 18, 2011
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1275

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the interstate movement of

live birds for the purpose of having the birds participate in animal fighting.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the interstate

movement of live birds for the purpose of having the

birds participate in animal fighting.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF INTERSTATE MOVEMENT OF

4 LIVE BIRDS FOR ANIMAL FIGHTING.

5 (a) REMOVAL OF CURRENT EXCEPTION.—Section 26

6 of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) is amended—

7 (1) by striking subsection (d); and

8 (2) by redesignating subsections (e) through (h)

9 as subsection (d) through (g), respectively.
2

•HR 1275 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 subsection (a) shall take effect 30 days after the date of

3 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Charles G. KINNEY, petitioner, v. Tani G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al.

No. 18-906.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
---

|A PARTNERSHIP OFINCORPORATEDPROFESSIONALS | AMISANO
      HANSON
|----------------------------------------- | --------------------
|                                          | CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS

April 14, 2005

Lincoln Gold Corporation 
  Suite 306, 1140 Homer Street
  Vancouver, British Columbia 
  V6B 2X6 Canada

Attention: Mr. Paul F. Saxton, President

Dear Sirs:

|RE: | LINCOLN GOLD CORPORATION (the “Company”)
|--- | ----------------------------------------
|    | REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8      
|    | CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS         

We hereby consent to the inclusion by reference of our report
  dated April 14, 2005 on the balance sheet of the Company as at December 31,
  2004 and 2003 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency
  and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, the period September 25,
  2003 (Inception) to December 31, 2003 and the period September 25, 2003 (Inception)
  to December 31, 2004 in the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statements
  filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on September
  27, 2004.

Yours truly,

“Amisano Hanson”

Chartered Accountants



|750 WEST PENDER STREET, SUITE 604 | TELEPHONE: | 604-689-0188     
|--------------------------------- | ---------- | -----------------
|VANCOUVER CANADA                  | FACSIMILE: | 604-689-9773     
|V6C 2T7                           | E-MAIL:    | amishan@telus.net

---
Frederick GRAY, petitioner, v. Patricia SORRELS, et al.

No. 18-7366.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
PARKER DRILLING MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LTD., petitioner, v. Brian NEWTON.

No. 18-389.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 12, 2019.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Order entered June 1 6 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01217 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF P .G.G., B.N.G., AND R .T.G., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 05 - 03154



### O RDER This appeal stems from proceedings following our reversal and remand, in appellate cause number 05

- 12

- 01001

- CV, of the trial court’s order holding appellee in contempt for failure to pay child support, granting judgment for arrearag es, and suspending commitment. Appellant, appearing pro se, filed her brief May 5, 2015, making appellee’s brief due June 4, 2015. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6 (b). Appellee did not file his brief by that date, but filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appe llee asserts in his motion that appellant’s brief “is based upon the record filed in . . . 05

- 12

- 01001

- CV,” and that record is not before the Court. We note appellant requested on May 13, 2015 a supplemental reporter’s record containing, in part, the rec ord filed in the previous appeal. To date, however, the supplemental record has not been filed. For efficiency purposes, we ORDER , on our own motion, the reporter’s record in appellate cause number 05

- 12

- 01001

- CV transferred into this appeal. We furthe r ORDERTanner Joy Feast to file, no later than June 30, 2015, the record of the trial court’s February 13,

2014 and August 22, 2014 hearings as designated in appellant’s May 13th request. We DENY appellee’s June 4, 2015 motion to dismiss appeal and ORDER appellee to file his brief no later than July 15, 2015
. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Feast and the parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Scott M. SEIDEL, petitioner, v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANY.

No. 18-845.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

12 CFR Part 329


Liquidity Risk Measurement Standards

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    In Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 300 to 346, 
revised as of January 1, 2022, make the following corrections:


Sec.  329.22  [Corrected]

0
1. Amend Sec.  329.22 in paragraphs (a)(2) introductory text, 
(a)(2)(ii), (a)(4), and (a)(5), by removing the text ``'' in its place 
wherever it appears.'' wherever it appears.


Sec.  329.40   [Corrected]

0
2. Amend Sec.  329.40 in paragraph (a) by adding the words ``An FDIC-
supervised institution'' to the beginning of the first sentence.

[FR Doc. 2022-09989 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael Cooperman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, tomy knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 13, 2010 | /s/  Michael Cooperman   |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                 | Michael  Cooperman       |
|                                 | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00430-CV

In re Brenco, LLC d/b/a Brenco Exotic Woods

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Brenco, LLC d/b/a Brenco Exotic Woods filed a petition for writ of

mandamus complaining of the trial court’s refusal to enforce a forum selection clause and dismiss

the underlying lawsuit. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. Having reviewed the petition, the response filed

by the real parties in interest, and the record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

See id. R. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

Filed: July 13, 2017
C.G., petitioner, v. DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER, et al.

No. 18-1.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           304,501
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      64,157
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 368,658
<CASH>                                          45,579
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,906
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          24,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 572,778
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                186,111
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            109,884
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,322
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   572,778
<PREMIUMS>                                     121,125
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             15,261
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,241
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,999
<BENEFITS>                                      74,529
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     38,822
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,028
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,789
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,789
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 137,204<F1><F2>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             74,529
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              17,154
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                31,658
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                162,921<F1>
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES DIFFER FROM THE AMOUNTS REPORTED IN
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE INCLUSION HEREIN OF
REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES OF $23,190 AND $16,120 AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
DECEMBER 31, 1998, RESPECTIVELY.
<F2>BEGINNING OF YEAR BALANCE INCLUDES UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES OF
$2,174 AS A RESULT OF THE ACQUISITION OF THE JERGER COMPANY, INC. ON JULY 16,
1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Keith JENKINS, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-8424.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Paul WAGNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8160.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeline, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
R. Osenbaugh, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     /s/ Charles R. Osenbaugh                    Date:    February 14, 2002
-------------------------------------                 --------------------------
Charles R. Osenbaugh,
President and Chief Financial Officer


                                       29
Ilya LIVIZ, Sr., petitioner, v. SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al.

No. 18-8150.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,433-01

EX PARTE JOSHUA BEAVER-GAINES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 21998-B IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana in a drug free zone and was sentenced

to five years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not file a direct appeal. Applicant filed this application

for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this

Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contendsthat his plea wasinvoluntary because trial counsel failed to advise him of

the correct parole eligibility for a conviction with a drug free zone finding. Based on the record, the

trial court has determined that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that Applicant would

have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s deficient performance.

Relief is granted. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781
2

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The judgment in cause number 21998 in the 104th District Court of Taylor

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Taylor County to

answer the charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: January 13, 2021

Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60181 Conference Calendar

__________________ BILLY RAY FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BILLY MCGEE and FORREST COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEP'T, Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BILLY RAY FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RICHARD MCKENZIE, Judge, and FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BILLY RAY FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RAY HINTON, Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BILLY RAY FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GLEN WHITE, Defendant-Appellee.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BILLY RAY FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ROBIN WHITE, Defendant-Appellee.No. 95-60181 -2-

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:94-cv-332-PS; 2:94-cv-333-PS; 2:94-cv-334-PS; 2:94-cv-335-PS; 2:93-cv-336-PS

- - - - - - - - - - June 30, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bill Ray Ford filed five civil rights complaints, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against various defendants alleging violations of his civil rights arising from the revocation of his probation. The district court consolidated the complaints and dismissed them as frivolous. The district court dismissed the claims against two defendants, Judge Richard McKenzie and Forrest County district attorney Glenn White, based on absolute immunity, and the remaining defendants as premature under Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994). On appeal Ford argues the merits of his underlying claim, but fails to challenge the basis of the dismissal. Issues not raised or briefed are considered abandoned. Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex. , 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993). The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1460 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1460

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2000

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to decrease the requisite blood quantum 
      required for membership in the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 108(a)(2)(i) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-7) is 
amended by striking ``\1/8\'' and inserting ``\1/16\''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Zhordrack BLOODYWONE, petitioner, v. Joseph BELLNIER, Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 18-8585.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.