alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,527
<INVENTORY>                                     66,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,272
<PP&E>                                         380,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       269,823
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,685
<SALES>                                         19,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,799
<CGS>                                           15,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,482
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-77299, 333-89523, 333-42118, 333-42112, 333-42110, 333-54614, 333-66754, 333-99627, 333-109687,333-119780, 333-124804, 333-131644, 333-135209 and 333-140027; FormS-3 No. 333-135208) ofInformatica Corporation of our reports dated February 26, 2007 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Informatica Corporation, Informatica Corporation management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Informatica Corporation, included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) of Informatica Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.  /s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Francisco, California
EXHIBIT 12.2

**CHIEF
  FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Julian D. Waldron, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Thomson;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company 's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.





|Dated:
        June 21, 2006 |        | /s/
         Julian D. Waldron
|---------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------
|                             | Name:  | Julian D. Waldron             
|                             | Title: | Financial Officer
Shawn CANADA, petitioner, v. Eddie MILES, Warden.

No. 18-7533.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Ronald C. Blomkamp, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of Patriot Gold Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  August 26, 2005

 

/s/ Ronald C. Blomkamp

Ronald C. Blomkamp

President, Chief Executive Officer, 

Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Carston Markel WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5844.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Lucatz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






August 15, 2011
/s/ David LucatzDavid LucatzChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
## NO. 12

- 16

- 00086

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES N. VICKERY,

APPELLANT

V.

THOMAS H. BLACKWELL,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 266T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ERATH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPIN ION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. He states in his motion that the

parties have reached a settlement and the appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, we grant

Appellant’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal

. See T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a)(1).

Opinion delivered July 29 , 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 29 , 2016

NO. 12

- 16

- 00086

- CV

JAMES N. VICKERY,

Appellant

V.

THOMAS H. BLACKWELL,

Appellee

Appeal from the 266th District Court

of Erath County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV33354)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

th e appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northern Border
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), William R. Cordes, as Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Dated: November 7, 2005                 /s/ William R. Cordes
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William R. Cordes
                                        Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
**Exhibit **32.1

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Timothy K. Montgomery, Chief Executive Officer of DitechNetworks, Inc. (the “Company”), and William J. Tamblyn, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of hisknowledge:

*1.    *TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30,2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the “PeriodicReport”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

*2.    *Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th Dayof July, 2007.
|        | /s/ TIMOTHY  K. MONTGOMERY |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Timothy K. Montgomery      |
|   | *CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER*       |
|   | /s/ WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN     |
|   | William J. Tamblyn         |
|   | *CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER*       |

 

The foregoing certification is not filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as aseparate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
Kimberly FRANETT-FERGUS, petitioner, v. OMAK SCHOOL DISTRICT 19, et al.

No. 18-1148.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Assaf Ran, President and Chief Executive Officer of DAG Media, Inc., certify that: 1.
        I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, of DAG Media, Inc.
  2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
        [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986]
 c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  Date:March 26, 2007
        /s/ Assaf RanAssaf Ran(principal executive officer)
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/14/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      248,976
COMMITMENTS
  22,941   44,430   52,685  147,279  128,275  222,905  225,390   26,071   23,586

CHANGES FROM 06/07/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,314)
  -5,099     -774   -2,185    8,152    3,874      868      915    3,446    3,399

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.2     17.8     21.2     59.2     51.5     89.5     90.5     10.5      9.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      137)
      49       35       64       32       29      120      110
```

----

Updated Jun 17, 2011
In Re Robert F. RUSSO, petitioner.

No. 18-7596.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
NO. 07-10-00317-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 

IN RE GREGORY BANISTER, RELATOR 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Relator Gregory Dean Banister has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. He 

seeks an order compelling respondent, the Honorable Felix Klein, to rule on seventeen 

motions Banister asserts are pending in his habeas corpus proceeding. 

In response to our request, Judge Klein has filed a detailed response to 

Banister’s petition. By it, he identifies each of Banister’s motions and the corresponding 

ruling of the court.1

 Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of Banister’s issue, and the 

petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See In re Duncan, 62 S.W.3d 333, 

 1

 The response does not, however, indicate whether the court’s rulings were 

memorialized in an order or orders filed with the district clerk. From his response, we 

presume that Judge Klein has, or promptly will, sign and file an order or orders 

expressing the trial court’s rulings and provide a copy to relator. 
2 

334 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (also dismissing mandamus 

petition as moot after trial court ruling). 

Per Curiam
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1491

___________

Federico Catalan Lamprea, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Petition for Review of an

* Order of the Board of

John Ashcroft, Attorney General, * Immigration Appeals.

*

Respondent. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: March 8, 2004

Filed: March 29, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federico Lamprea, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an Immigration Judge’s

(IJ’s) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and for relief

under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). In his asylum application, Lamprea

claimed that members of the New People’s Army (NPA) had tortured him mentally

and physically for a number of years before he came to the United States because he

wanted to withdraw his financial support for their cause, and that they would kill him

if he was forced to return to the Philippines.
-2-

After careful review of the record, we deny the petition because substantial

evidence on the record as a whole supports the IJ’s conclusions. See

Menendez-Donis v. Ashcroft, 02-3692, 2004 WL 307451, at *3 (8th Cir. Feb. 19,

2004) (standard of review). The IJ concluded Lamprea was not entitled to asylum

because he had not demonstrated either past persecution or a well-founded fear of

future persecution. Lamprea did not establish that the abduction incident and

harassment he experienced in the Philippines was on account of his political opinion

or any other characteristic that provides a basis for asylum, see Regalado-Garcia v.

INS, 305 F.3d 784, 787-88 (8th Cir. 2002), and the government presented relevant

evidence to show that it is possible to resettle within the Philippines to avoid credible

NPA threats, see Perinpanathan v. INS, 310 F.3d 594, 599 n.1 (8th Cir. 2002). 

As Lamprea did not establish a clear probability of persecution or a likelihood

of torture upon his return to the Philippines, his claims for withholding of removal

and relief under the Convention Against Torture also failed. See Kratchmarov v.

Heston, 172 F.3d 551, 555 (8th Cir. 1999) (withholding-of-removal standard is more

onerous than asylum standard, and requires showing clear probability of persecution);

8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2) (burden is on applicant to show it is more likely than not he

would be tortured upon removal to proposed country).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

______________________________
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 11, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00169-CR

No. 05-13-00171-CR

LESLIE JO ANDERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-25151-X, F09-71586-X

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans

Appellant, who is representing herself, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeals. The

Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeals be DISMISSED and this decision be 

certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130169F.U05