alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/18/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       44,513
COMMITMENTS
  12,749    3,546    6,032   17,671   22,667   36,452   32,245    8,061   12,268

CHANGES FROM 05/11/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        665)
    -107    1,187      151    1,097      -31    1,140    1,307     -475     -642

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.6      8.0     13.6     39.7     50.9     81.9     72.4     18.1     27.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       64)
      16        8       14       30       26       52       46
```

----

Updated May 27, 2010
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1210

To provide for continued compensation for Federal employees when funds

are not otherwise available due to a lapse in appropriations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of

the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for continued compensation for Federal employees

when funds are not otherwise available due to a lapse

in appropriations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUED COMPENSATION.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the right of a Government employee to be com6 pensated for any period, at such employee’s regular rate

7 of compensation, shall not be abrogated, diminished, or

8 otherwise affected officer or employee of the United States
2

•HR 1210 IH

1 Government or of the District of Columbia government

2 who is furloughed for any period as a result of a lapse

3 in appropriations. For any period of lapsed appropria4 tions, there are appropriated, out of any moneys in the

5 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may

6 be necessary to provide compensation, at the regular rate

7 of compensation, for civilian officers and employees of the

8 Government of the United States and of the government

9 of the District of Columbia, respectively (including any

10 such officers or employees who have been furloughed due

11 to a lapse in appropriations).

12 (b) CHARGE TO APPLICABLE ACCOUNTS.—Expendi13 tures made pursuant to this Act shall be charged to the

14 applicable appropriation, fund, or authorization whenever

15 a bill or joint resolution in which such applicable appro16 priation, fund, or authorization is contained is enacted

17 into law.

18 (c) FURLOUGHED EMPLOYEES.—Notwithstanding

19 section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, or any other

20 provision of law, any officer or employee furloughed as de21 scribed in subsection (a) shall be compensated, at the reg22 ular rate of compensation, for the period during which

23 such officer or employee is so furloughed.
3

•HR 1210 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply with

2 respect to any fiscal year beginning after the date of the

3 enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: E.H., A.B., AND C.B.

PETITION OF: J.H. :

:

:

:

: No. 565 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
SPECIMEN OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE
                     K & L ELECTRONICS PHOTO AND SUPPLY CO.


                           [________] NUMBER OF SHARES
                    OF K & L ELECTRONICS PHOTO AND SUPPLY CO.
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
                  (100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED,
                          $.001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK)

CUSIP NUMBER

                       SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ________________________________________________________

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF SHARES OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK OF K & L ELECTRONICS PHOTO AND SUPPLY CO. TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOKS OF THE
CORPORATION  IN PERSON OR BY DULY  AUTHORIZED  ATTORNEY  UPON  SURRENDER OF THIS
CERTIFICATE  PROPERLY  ENDORSED.  THIS  CERTIFICATE  AND THE SHARES  REPRESENTED
HEREBY ARE SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, AND TO THE CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS OF THE CORPORATION,  AS NOW OR HEREAFTER AMENDED.  THIS
CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE TRANSFER AGENT.

WITNESS the  facsimile  seal of the  Corporation  and the  signature of its duly
authorized officers.

Dated:  ________________

[SEAL OF K & L ELECTRONICS PHOTO AND SUPPLY CO.]


/s / DANIEL L. HODGES                                       /s/ DANIEL L. HODGES
             President                                                 Secretary


The following  abbreviations,  when used in the  inscription on the face of this
certificate,  shall  be  construed  as  though  they  were  written  out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common   UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - ____Custodian____
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties      (Cust)  (Minor)
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right   under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
of survivorship and not as tenants in common

________________________
             (State)

Additional abbreviation may also be used though not in above list.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

__________________________

__________________________


__________________________________________________________________________
(Please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of assignee)

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do
hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

__________________________________________________________________________
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated: __________________

NOTICE:  The  signature  to this  assignment  must  correspond  with the name as
written  upon  the  face  of  the  Certificate,  in  every  particular,  without
alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.










727150v.4
**Exhibit
32**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of EPOD International Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2005 (the “Report”), I, L. Mark
Roseborough, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
and will be retained by EPOD International, Inc and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/  L.
      Mark RoseboroughL.
      Mark Roseborough
      *Chief
      Executive Officer and*
      *Chief
      Financial Officer*
      EPOD
      INTERNATIONAL INC.March
      31, 2005Kelowna,
      British Columbia
Eric GROS, petitioner, v. Jason KENT, Warden.

No. 18-8094.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             IBIZ TECHNOLOGY CORP.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iBiz Technology Corp. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth
W. Schilling, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IBiz Technology Corp. and will be retained by IBiz Technology Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date: May 9, 2004




            /s/ Kenneth W. Schilling
            ----------------------------------------------------
            Kenneth W. Schilling
            Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Muriel COLLINS, petitioner, v. Alan B. EPSTEIN, et al.

No. 18-7014.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Frank MONTE, petitioner, v. Cyrus R. VANCE, et al.

No. 18-7486.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### Bodine *v.*Boyd (et al., Appellant).

Argued December 1, 1955.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Bell, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*Robert C. Kitchen,*with him *Joseph X. Eeincer,*for appellant.

*Max E. Cohen,*for appellee.

*526January 12, 1956:

*Samuel*Polshy, with him *Thomas Z. Minehart*and *Lewis P.*Green, for appellee.

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The judgments in the above captioned cases are affirmed on the opinion of J udge Milner.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4657 

To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to consider greenhouse 

gas emissions related to natural gas pipelines, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Mr. MCGOVERN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to 

consider greenhouse gas emissions related to natural gas 

pipelines, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 

4 FROM PIPELINE PROJECTS. 

5 In complying with the requirements of the National 

6 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

7 seq.) with respect to the issuance of a certificate of public 

8 convenience and necessity under section 7 of the Natural 

9 Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) for a natural gas pipeline, the 

10 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall consider 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4657 IH

1 greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction 

2 and operation of the pipeline, and the production, trans3 portation, and combustion of the natural gas to be trans4 ported through the pipeline. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Julius Darius JONES, petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 18-7658.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/      B. Keith Johnson                |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |  B.      Keith Johnson              |
|                    |   |  Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                    |   |                                     |
| Date:      May 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Steven M. Zagar                 |
|                    |   |  Steven      M. Zagar               |
|                    |   |  Chief      Financial Officer & |
|                    |   |  Principal      AccountingOfficer   |

----
Robert Allen DeVORE, petitioner, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 18-7365.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4576 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow contributions to 

health savings accounts in the case of individuals with spouses who 

have health flexible spending accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Ms. WEXTON (for herself, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow contributions to health savings accounts in the case of individuals with spouses who have health flexible spending 

accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Savings for 

5 Families Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4576 IH

1 SEC. 2. HSA CONTRIBUTIONS PERMITTED IF SPOUSE HAS A 

2 HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1)(B) of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ 

5 at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at the end 

6 of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by inserting after 

7 clause (iii) the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(iv) coverage under a health flexible 

9 spending arrangement of the spouse of the 

10 individual for any plan year of such ar11 rangement if the aggregate reimburse12 ments under such arrangement for such 

13 year do not exceed the aggregate expenses 

14 which would be eligible for reimbursement 

15 under such arrangement if such expenses 

16 were determined without regard to any ex17 penses paid or incurred with respect to 

18 such individual.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this subsection shall apply to plan years beginning after 

21 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Joel J. Kocher, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interland, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 6, 2005              /s/ Joel J. Kocher   Joel J. Kocher   Chairman of the Board, andChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION

I, Fabrice Zambito, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2003 of
  BusinessWay International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
  report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
  material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
  is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
  and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
  this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
  evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
  our
  most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
  of
  registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
  controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
  identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
  internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
  controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
  annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
  or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
  to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
  with
  regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2003
  /s/ Fabrice Zambito
  ------------------------
  By: Fabrice Zambito, CFO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7326

BERNARD BAGLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DALE CAUSEY; CHRIS SIUNARD; ESCOD INDUSTRIES

BOARD OF DIRECTORS; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, ECI

Warden; GENE BAKER, ECI Prison Industry; LINDA

WILLIAMS, ECI Classification; SOUTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS; SOUTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-594-2-8AJ, CA-95-595-2-8AJ)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Bagley, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Malloy McEachin, Jr.,

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing

his two consolidated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. Appellant's cases were referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that

relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely

objections to the recommendations could waive appellate review of

the district court orders based upon the recommendations. Despite

this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's

recommendations.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED