alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certificationpursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

Inconnection with the annual report on Form 10-K ofValueClick, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), James R. Zarley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andScott H. Ray, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: March 1, 2007 |   | /s/ JAMES R. ZARLEY                                             |   | James R. Zarley |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
|                      |   | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief  Executive Officer |   |            |
| Dated: March 1, 2007 |   | /s/ SCOTT H. RAY                                                |   | Scott H. Ray    |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer                                         |   |            |

 

----
Xavier Lumar J'WEIAL, petitioner, v. Michael SEXTON, Acting Warden.

No. 17-6909.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 11

                   InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.
      Computation of Consolidated Earnings Per Common Share
       For the Three Months Ended March 31, 1998 and 1997
        (in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION> 
                                         For the Three Months
                                           Ended March 31,      
                                       ----------------------
                                       1998              1997
<S>                                      <C>           <C>
Net income                            $   1,173         1,146 
                                      =========     =========
Weighted average
  common shares issued                1,548,237     1,541,150 
    
  Less-Unreleased common shares
    held by ESOP                         10,750        12,987
                                      ---------     ---------
  Weighted average number of
    shares outstanding used in
    the calculation of basic
    earnings per common share         1,537,487     1,528,163 
    
  Add -Dilutive effect of stock
    options (1)                          42,383        42,383 
                                      ---------     ---------
Adjusted weighted average number 
of shares outstanding used in the
calculation of diluted earnings 
per common share                      1,579,870     1,571,427
                                      =========     =========

Basic earnings per common share            $.76           .75

Diluted earnings per common share           .74           .73


<FN>
(1)  There is presently no active public trading market for the Company's
shares, nor are the prices at which common shares have been traded published
by any national securities association or quotation service.  Fair value for
earnings per common share purposes was assumed to be $45.00 at March 31, 1998,
and $28.00 at March 31, 1997.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Steven FAUSNAUGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7654.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jack E. ALLEN, petitioner, v. Barry SMITH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Houtzdale.

No. 18-7259.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.
Edwin J. ORTIZ-FAGOT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7511.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Gregory T. CHRISTIAN, petitioner, v. K.A. PAYNE, et al.

No. 18-915.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                  
|                   |  |  |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Alexander J. GUREVICH.

No. D-3007.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Alexander J. Gurevich, of Greenwich, Connecticut, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Anthony BOYD, petitioner, v. Joe D. DRIVER, et al.

No. 18-8114.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Mund, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                13, 2008
            /s/
                Harry MundHarry
                MundChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                   |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al., petitioners, v. Allen L. MUNRO, et al.

No. 18-703.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

I, Robert J. Farrell,
certify that:

1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of EDGAR Online, Inc.; and

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 2, 2011 |  | By: |  | /S/    ROBERT J.
FARRELL             
|                   |  |     |  | Robert J. Farrell                    
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Virginia CALLAHAN, et al., petitioners, v. PACIFIC CYCLE, INC.

No. 18-1046.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit
      4.1.3**





**ICC
      WORLDWIDE, INC.**





**CERTIFICATE
      OF DESIGNATION**


**INCREASING
      THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK**


**DESIGNATED
      AS SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK OF**


**ICC
      WORLDWIDE, INC.**





ICC
      WORLDWIDE, INC. (formerly Torbay Holdings, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the
      "Corporation"), certifies that pursuant to the authority contained in Article
      Fourth of its Certificate of Incorporation and in accordance with the provisions
      of Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the
      Corporation has the authority to issue 30,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
      par
      value $0.0001 per share; and, further





The
      Board
      of Directors of the Corporation has the authority to issue any or all of such
      shares in one or more series and by resolution to provide for the designation
      of
      each series to be issued pursuant to the foregoing authority.





The
      Board
      of Directors previously designated 700,000 shares as Series 1 Preferred Stock,
      10,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and 7,500,000 as Series C
      Preferred Stock leaving 11,800,000 shares undesignated.





On
      December 3, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Corporation unanimously adopted
      the following resolution regarding the designation of an additional 2,500,000
      shares of preferred stock as Series C Preferred Stock. This brings the total
      of
      preferred stock designated as Series C Preferred Stock to
      10,000,000:





“RESOLVED
      that the Board of Directors of the Company hereby ratifies the filing of the
      Certificate of Designation with the Delaware Secretary of State to increase
      the
      number of shares of preferred stock designated as Series C Preferred Stock
      from
      7,500,000 to a total of 10,000,000 shares.”





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, TORBAY HOLDINGS, INC. has caused this Certificate of
      Designation to be executed by its President and attested to by its Secretary
      this 14th day of December, 2007.





TORBAY
      HOLDINGS, INC.





/s/
      Richard K Lauer


President


ATTEST:






/s/
      Richard K Lauer


Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.41.2
                                                                 ---------------


                                THIRD AMENDMENT
                                ---------------

The Agreement between Merial Limited ("Merial') and Synbiotics Corporation
("Synbiotics"), dated January 1, 1992 and amended on July 27, 1993 and August
22, 1996 (as so amended, the "Agreement"), is amended as follows on March 1,
1999, effective as of July 1, 1998:

     A.   Paragraph 1.2.3 is amended to add "This includes the right to sell
FeLV "Product" and any FeLV "Product" combination vaccines in the USA through
ethical distributors acting as sales agents toward USA veterinarians; it is
understood, however, that Merial doing so will not prevent Synbiotics from
selling FeLV "Product" and FeLV "Product" combination vaccines through the same
and/or other ethical distributors acting as ethical distributors as contemplated
by the Agreement."

     B.   Paragraph 3.3.2 as amended is deleted in its entirety.

     C.   Synbiotics agrees to use its reasonable best efforts and work with
Merial to try to negotiate amendments to Synbiotics' current agreement with Bio-
Trends International, Inc. to allow Bio-Trends International, Inc. and Merial to
deal directly with each other (while preserving Synbiotics' other rights) to
facilitate the operation of Merial's business (as contemplated by the Agreement,
as hereby amended) with respect to the North American/Central American market.

     D.   In consideration for the above, Merial agrees to pay Synbiotics
$1,600,000 immediately.  Royalties paid by Merial to Synbiotics for the quarter
ended September 30, 1998 will be deducted from this amount.

     E.   Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement remains
unchanged and in full force and effect.

Synbiotics Corporation              Merial Limited (domesticated in Delaware as
                                    Merial LLC, and the successor in interest to
                                    Rhone Merieux, Inc.)


By  /s/ Michael Green               By  /s/ Donald G. Hildebrand
    ----------------------              ------------------------
Title  V.P. Finance                 Title  V.P. Merial Limited
Print Name  Michael Green           Print Name  Donald G. Hildebrand
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert S.Bland, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K, as ameded by this Form 10-K/A, ofQuotesmith.com, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)                all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 5,2005
|        | /s/ ROBERT S. BLAND     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Bland         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Gregory CLAYTON, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-8760.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Order entered April 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00325-CR

EX PARTE ZAVIER COMMINEY

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX18-90138-V

ORDER

The record has been filed in this appeal.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by April 23, 2019. We ORDER the State to

file its brief by May 14, 2019. If either party fails to file a brief by the due date, the appeal will 

be submitted without that party’s brief.

Once briefing is complete, the Court will notify the parties of the submission date and 

panel.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1302

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt from the minimum wage recordkeeping and overtime compensation requirements certain specialized employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. BOEHNER (for himself and Mr. ANDREWS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt

from the minimum wage recordkeeping and overtime

compensation requirements certain specialized employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sales Incentive Com5 pensation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION.

7 Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

8 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)) is amended by striking the pe-
2

•HR 1302 IH

1 riod at the end of paragraph (17) and inserting a semi2 colon and by adding at the end the following:

3 ‘‘(18) any employee employed in a sales position

4 if—

5 ‘‘(A) the employee has specialized or tech6 nical knowledge related to products or services

7 being sold;

8 ‘‘(B) the employee’s—

9 ‘‘(i) sales are predominantly to per10 sons or entities to whom the employee’s

11 position has made previous sales; or

12 ‘‘(ii) position does not involve initi13 ating sales contacts;

14 ‘‘(C) the employee has a detailed under15 standing of the needs of those to whom the em16 ployee is selling;

17 ‘‘(D) the employee exercises discretion in

18 offering a variety of products and services;

19 ‘‘(E) the employee receives—

20 ‘‘(i) base compensation, determined

21 without regard to the number of hours

22 worked by the employee, of not less than

23 an amount equal to one and one-half times

24 the minimum wage in effect under section

25 6(a)(1) multiplied by 2,080; and
3

•HR 1302 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) in addition to the employee’s

2 base compensation, compensation based

3 upon each sale attributable to the em4 ployee;

5 ‘‘(F) the employee’s aggregate compensa6 tion based upon sales attributable to the em7 ployee is not less than 40 percent of one and

8 one-half times the minimum wage multiplied by

9 2,080;

10 ‘‘(G) the employee receives a rate of com11 pensation based upon each sale attributable to

12 the employee which is beyond sales required to

13 reach the compensation required by subpara14 graph (F) which rate is not less than the rate

15 on which the compensation required by sub16 paragraph (F) is determined; and

17 ‘‘(H) the rate of annual compensation or

18 base compensation for any employee who did

19 not work for an employer for an entire calendar

20 year is prorated to reflect annual compensation

21 which would have been earned if the employee

22 had been compensated at the same rate for the

23 entire calendar year.’’.
4

•HR 1302 IH

1 SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION.

2 The amendment made by section 2 may not be con3 strued to apply to individuals who are employed as route

4 sales drivers.

Æ
Frederic A. BROWN, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-6284.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,262
<PP&E>                                          42,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         70
<COMMON>                                           510
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,185
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               377,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (377,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (377,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (377,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>