alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DYNAMIC IMAGING GROUP, INC.S FORM 10-KSB FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        3,350
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                18,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                   5,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             65,435
<PP&E>                                      142,537
<DEPRECIATION>                               (9,560)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              283,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       450,190
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      5,757
<OTHER-SE>                                 (172,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                283,337
<SALES>                                     454,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            454,982
<CGS>                                       297,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               297,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,312,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         (1,155,067)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           40,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,195,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (1,620)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,193,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,193,447)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.22)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TheStreet.com, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Clarke,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas J. Clarke, Jr.Thomas
      J. Clarke, Jr.
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              March
      11, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-014]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed April 18, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through April 25, 2022 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20220057, Final, FHWA, MD,*                     Chesapeake Bay Crossing Study Tier 1 NEPA, Contact: Jeanette Mar 410-779-7152. Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), FHWA has issued a single FEIS and ROD. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not apply to this action.                

*EIS No. 20220058, Draft Supplement, FHWA, OR,*                     Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge, Comment Period Ends: 06/13/2022, Contact: Emily Cline 503-316-2547.                

*EIS No. 20220059, Draft, TVA, TN,*                     Cumberland Fossil Plant Retirement, Comment Period Ends: 06/13/2022, Contact: Ashley Pilakowski 865-632-2256.                

*EIS No. 20220060, Draft, BLM, NM,*                     SunZia Southwest Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 07/28/2022, Contact: Adrian Garcia 505-954-2199.                

Dated: April 26, 2022.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2022-09222 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4604 

To clarify the clearing exemption for small financial institutions under the 

Commodity Exchange Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2019 

Mr. DUNN (for himself and Mr. COX of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To clarify the clearing exemption for small financial 

institutions under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Financial Insti5 tution Certainty Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CERTAINTY FOR SMALL HOLDING COMPANIES. 

7 Section 2(h)(7)(C)(ii) of the Commodity Exchange 

8 Act (7 U.S.C. 2(h)(7)(C)(ii)) is amended to read as fol9 lows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4604 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) SMALL FINANCIAL ENTITY EX2 CLUSION.—Such definition shall not in3 clude any— 

4 ‘‘(I) insured depository institu5 tion with total assets of 

6 $10,000,000,000 or less; 

7 ‘‘(II) farm credit system institu8 tion with total assets of 

9 $10,000,000,000 or less; 

10 ‘‘(III) credit union with total as11 sets of $10,000,000,000 or less; 

12 ‘‘(IV) bank holding company (as 

13 defined in section 2 of the Bank Hold14 ing Company Act of 1956) that has 

15 aggregated assets, including the assets 

16 of its subsidiaries, of $10,000,000,000 

17 or less; or 

18 ‘‘(V) savings and loan holding 

19 company (as defined in section 10 of 

20 the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933) 

21 that has aggregated assets, including 

22 the assets of its subsidiaries, of 

23 $10,000,000,000 or less.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
LaTasha FREEMAN, petitioner, v. AMERICAN K-9 DETECTION SERVICES, LLC, et al.

No. 18-950.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
# L_2013187EN.01000101.xml

| 6.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 187/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against pollution resulting from exploration and exploitation of the continental shelf and the seabed and its subsoil to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean

The Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against pollution resulting from exploration and exploitation of the continental shelf and the seabed and its subsoil (1) to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean, adopted in Madrid on 14 October 1994, has entered into force, by virtue of Article 32(4) of the Protocol, on 29 March 2013.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 4, 9.1.2013, p. 15.

1

---
#### J. Haney *v.*The State.

Burglary—Verdict.—Trying an indictment for burglary, the jury found the accused guilty of “Burgerally & Theft,” and he moved in arrest of judgment. *Held,*that there is no such offense, and no such word, as *burgerally,*nor is it *idem sonans*with “burglary; ” wherefore the verdict is unintelligible, and it was error to overrule the motion in arrest.

Appeal from the District Court of Hunt. Tried below before the Hon. G. J. Clark.

The accused, it seems, made a raid one night on a neighbor’s smoke-house, broke into it, and stole half a side of bacon. Hence this indictment.

The loser was a witness for the .state. His account of finding and identifying his meat was as follows :

“ I wont to Johnson Haney’s and told him I had lost the meat, and that he was suspicioned. He said he was innocent. I. asked him to show me his meat, and- he did so. He took out one or two pieces from a box he had it in, and then stopped. I told him to go on, and he then *505got out a piece that I recognized' as mine." It was about a half of a middling. I had split a middling open, and sold ,him half of it, a few. days before, and the piece missed was the other half. I tried to fit it to the piece he had, and which I had sold him, and it *fit verbatum.”*

*Jones &*Lewis, and *E. W. Terhune,*for the appellant.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Ector, P. J.

The indictment in this case charges the defendant with the crime of burglary. The offense is alleged to have been committed June 10, 1875, and the property stolen of the value of $6.80. The indictment was drawn under Article 724 of the Criminal Code.

The motions of the defendant to transfer the case to the county court, and to quash the indictment, were properly overruled.

We think the verdict of the jury is defective, and not sufficient to sustain the judgment. The verdict is as follows : “We the jury find the defendant, Johnson Haney, guilty of Burgerally & Theft as charged in the indictment, •and assess his punishment at (4) four years’ confinement in the penitentiary. J. S. Alexander, foreman.” On the .return of the verdict a judgment was entered by the court ordering and adjudging that the defendant be confined in the state penitentiary for four years.

There is no such offense as “ burgerally” in this state. The verdict is unintelligible. There is no such word in the English language as “burgerally.” This word is so distinctly written in the record that there can be no mistake about it. It is not a mistake committed by the clerk in making up the transcript. The counsel for the defendant raises the question on his motion in arrest of judgment. Bad spelling -will not vitiate a verdict when it has the *506requisites of being certain and intelligible. “Burglary” and burgerally are not *idem sonans.*

For this error in the verdict the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Keith Lamar BLACKWELL, petitioner, v. Charlie A. DOOLEY, et al.

No. 18-7403.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MUKHABBAT REMINES

, Appellant,

v.

BRYAN REMINES

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2206

[ October 7, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Nic kolaus H unter Davis , Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE17

- 007957(58/40)

.

Mark S. Lowry of Lowry Legal, LLC, for appellant.

Gary W. Cole, II of Gary W. Cole, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Hollis E.

Mandell of Law Office of Hollis E. Mandell, Fort Lauderdale, for appe llee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Eric HAYES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7675.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Marcel Emanuel JOHNSON, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-6114.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Randal Chaise Harty, Appellant

No. 06-17-00207-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 188th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 46,602-

A). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Randal Chaise Harty, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 21, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)**

 

I, Reynolds C. Bish, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Captiva Software Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2729

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

James L. Glass, also known as *

Youngster, also known as Bazz, * [UNPUBLISHED]

also known as Jboy, also known as *

Bazzy, also known as Bass, *

also known as JB, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 16, 2009

Filed: December 11, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James Glass appeals the 130-month sentence the district court1

 imposed after

he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she moves to withdraw and suggests that
-2-

the district court erred in ordering Glass’s federal sentence to run consecutively to a

state sentence he was serving on an unrelated offense.

We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a

consecutive sentence. See United States v. Winston, 456 F.3d 861, 867 (8th Cir.

2006) (district court’s decision to impose consecutive or concurrent sentence reviewed

for reasonableness); United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d 997, 1003 (8th Cir. 2005)

(standard of review is whether district court abused discretion by imposing

unreasonable sentence). The court noted its obligation to consider the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors, recited the factors, and explained its decision to run the federal

sentence consecutively to the state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(b) (directing

district court to consider § 3553(a) factors in determining whether sentence should run

consecutively to or concurrently with another sentence); Winston, 456 F.3d at 868

(sentence affirmed where district court explained its decision to run sentence

consecutively and cited § 3553(a) factors).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

request to withdraw subject to counsel informing Glass of the procedures for seeking

rehearing or filing a petition for writ of certiorari, and we affirm the judgment.

______________________________
# Official Journal L 75/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 75 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 657 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 75

English edition

Legislation

Volume 657 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 of 4 March 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450 as regards the publication of references of European Assessment Documents for reinforced high density EPS structural panel system for building units and other construction products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 of 4 March 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450 as regards the publication of references of European Assessment Documents for reinforced high density EPS structural panel system for building units and other construction products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
James DeHOOG, et al., petitioners, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH InBEV SA/NV, et al.

No. 18-802.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2015098EN.01000301.xml

| 25.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 March 2015

(2015/C 98/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0950 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,89 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4603 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2889 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0491 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,390 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,26 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1131 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8043 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3843 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3649 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4912 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4301 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4937 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 209,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9620 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7981 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6480 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 150,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9951 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,011 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,4232 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,569 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4202 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3437 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,2484 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0950

JPY

Japanese yen

130,89

DKK

Danish krone

7,4603

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2889

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0491

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,390

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,26

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1131

RON

Romanian leu

4,4110

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8043

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3843

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3649

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4912

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4301

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4937

KRW

South Korean won

1 209,42

ZAR

South African rand

12,9620

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7981

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6480

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 150,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9951

PHP

Philippine peso

49,011

RUB

Russian rouble

63,4232

THB

Thai baht

35,569

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4202

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3437

INR

Indian rupee

68,2484

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Eshed ALSTON, petitioner, v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, DELAWARE JUDICIARY, et al.

No. 18-785.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /S/ R.H. DillonPrint Name: R.H. DillonTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 8, 2008/S/ James F. LairdPrint Name: James F. LairdTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 8, 2008
 28