alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3938 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that children of certain 

permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be preference eligible 

for purposes of appointments in the civil service, and for other purpose. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2019 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. CRENSHAW, 

Mr. BACON, Mrs. LURIA, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. 

KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. PANETTA, and Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that children of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be preference eligible for purposes of appointments in the civil service, and for other purpose. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Children 

5 Act’’. 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3938 IH

1 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE STATUS FOR CHILDREN OF 

2 CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR DE3 CEASED VETERANS. 

4 Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (H), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

9 after the semicolon; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(I) the child (including an adopted child, 

12 recognized natural child, stepchild, or foster 

13 child) of— 

14 ‘‘(i) an individual who lost his or her 

15 life under honorable conditions while serv16 ing in the armed forces during a period 

17 named by paragraph (1)(A); or 

18 ‘‘(ii) a service-connected permanently 

19 and totally disabled veteran;’’. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1196 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1196

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 60-month 
limitation on the amount of education loan interest which is allowable 
                            as a deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 1999

     Mr. George Miller of California (for himself, Mrs. Johnson of 
  Connecticut, Mr. Matsui, and Mr. English) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 60-month 
limitation on the amount of education loan interest which is allowable 
                            as a deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 60-MONTH LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF EDUCATION LOAN 
              INTEREST WHICH IS ALLOWABLE AS A DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to interest on education loans) is amended by striking 
subsection (d) and by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as 
subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (e) of section 6050S of such 
Code is amended by striking ``section 221(e)(1)'' and inserting 
``section 221(d)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to loan interest payments due and paid after December 31, 1997, 
in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/29/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      149,658
COMMITMENTS
  36,991   20,820   23,378   70,885   78,925  131,254  123,124   18,404   26,534

CHANGES FROM 12/22/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,691)
     260   -1,112       62      404    1,734      726      684    1,965    2,007

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.7     13.9     15.6     47.4     52.7     87.7     82.3     12.3     17.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      172)
      46       29       48       58       67      129      130
```

----

Updated January 7, 2010
Carston Markel WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5858.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jeffrey T. HOWARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
U.S. INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,832,210
<SECURITIES>                                   410,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,079,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,749,057
<PP&E>                                         434,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,952,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,193,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,640
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,558,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,952,161
<SALES>                                     15,072,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,072,655
<CGS>                                       12,423,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,423,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,664,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,974,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,288,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,685,912
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,685,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/07/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      149,232
COMMITMENTS
   9,957   21,831   33,198   91,341   79,549  134,496  134,578   14,736   14,654

CHANGES FROM 11/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,933)
    -744   -1,670    4,582    1,667    3,750    5,505    6,662   -3,572   -4,729

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.7     14.6     22.2     61.2     53.3     90.1     90.2      9.9      9.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       93)
      18       29       41       26       32       75       84
```

----

Updated December 10, 2010
DARA C., petitioner, v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES.

No. 17-6789.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX
MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,662,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,019,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,224,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   461,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,330,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,752,000
<PP&E>                                       4,532,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,971,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,540,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,042,000
<BONDS>                                      3,152,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,129,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,540,000
<SALES>                                     18,628,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,628,000
<CGS>                                        5,755,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,755,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,729,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (21,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,165,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,165,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,165,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on May 11, 2022, at 11:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, via teleconference. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

## Agenda

### Public Session

1. Welcome and Introductions.

2. Status reports by working group chairs.

3. Public comments and Proposals.

### Closed Session

4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).

                    The open session will be accessible via teleconference. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yvette.Springer@bis.doc.gov*                     no later than May 4, 2022.                

To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.

The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on February 14, 2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. § (10)(d)), that the portion of the meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public.

For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-09095 Filed 4-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
Astrit BEKTESHI, aka Ermir Muhamet Gonxhi, aka Erimi Goxhaj, aka Miri, aka Billy, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1298.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
----

Action brought on 15 October 2004 by Confcooperative and Others against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-418/04)

(2004/C 300/103)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 October 2004 by Confcooperative FVG Federagricole, il Consorzio Friulvini S.C.a.r.l., la Cantina Sociale di Ramoscello, S. Vito S.C.a.r.l., la Cantina Produttori Cormòns S.C.a.r.l. and Luigi Soini, represented by Fausto Capelli.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put forward in Case T-417/04 Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia v Commission (1).

----

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

----
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/04/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       75,048
COMMITMENTS
   1,568    9,185    5,377   53,452   43,029   60,397   57,591   14,651   17,457

CHANGES FROM 04/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,214)
     -37    2,615      977    3,146      224    4,086    3,816    2,128    2,398

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.1     12.2      7.2     71.2     57.3     80.5     76.7     19.5     23.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       6       15        9       24       25       37       42
```

----

Updated May 7, 2010
Crystal SELLS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Larry Sells, Deceased, petitioner, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

No. 17-384.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Daniel SULLIVAN, petitioner, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, MARYLAND, et al.

No. 18-773.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

*1265Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
### E-ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN. **TEXAS** 78711 March 18, 1977

The Honorable Joe Resweber County Attorney Harris County Courthouse Houston, Texas Opinion No. H-959 Re: Validity of Texas Youth Council Community Assistance Program funding formula. Dear Mr. Resweber: You have requested our opinion concerning the constitutionality of a community assistance funding formula of the Texas Youth Council. SeeV.T.C.S. art. 5143d, S 6. The formula would grant funds on thebasis of reductions of committments ofyouths from the county to theYouth Council. You have asked whether this incentive to reduce commitments would violate article 2, section 1of the Texas Constitution as an infringement upon thepower of the judiciary todispose of cases involving juveniles. Article 2, section 1prohibits aperson of one of the departments of state government from exercising powers properly attached to either of the other twodepartments. State Board of Insurance v. Betts, 308 S.W. 2d 846 (Tex. 1958).The Ruth Council5 funding formula merely provides an incentive for areduction in commitments toYouth Council facilities. The Youth Council has not attempted to limit its acceptance of such commitments or otherwise to require such a reduction. We donotperceive any exercise of judicial powers by theYouth Council. The funding formula is merely an incident of the exercise of theCouncil's administrative power togrant funds for local programs. Accordingly, inour opinion the funding formula does not violate article 2, section 1of the Texas Constitution.

p. 4000The Honorable Joe Resweber -page 2 (H-959)

SUMMARY The Community Assistance funding formula of theTexas Youth Council does notviolate article 2, section 1of the Texas Constitution. ery truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas APPROVED:

KENDALL, First Assistant

C.ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jwb

p. 4001
Patricia Ragland McGEHEE, et vir, petitioners, v. KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.

No. 17-757.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
Kirk R. MOLDER, petitioner, v. Leroy KIRKEGARD, Warden, et al.

No. 17-6419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 213/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.213.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 213 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5419 August 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.213.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 213

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5419 August 2011

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2011/495/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2011/495/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2011

1

| All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.


  Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.


  Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue. |
| --- |

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: 

### Healthcare Security Services, Inc. d/b/a Groves Security

Solutions and all Occupants of 829 Yale Street, Houston, Texas v. Nicholas Fugedi, in his Capacity as Trustee of the Carb Pura

Vida Trust

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 036

- C V

Trial court case number: 1 150005

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1

Date motion filed : April 15, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that the “M otion for R ehearing or Alternatively to Abate Pending Fifth Circuit
Decision as to Title” is denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 49

. 3

. The relief requested in appellants’ response to the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

_____ Sherry Radack

_____

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Landau

.

Date:

__ May 10, 2022

_____
David R. BOSCH, petitioner, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

No. 18-413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Fan GU, petitioner, v. INVISTA S.A.R.L.

No. 17-6183.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
WESTERNGECO LLC, petitioner, v. ION GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION.

No. 18-861.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Russell F. WALKER, petitioner, v. HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al.

No. 17-6309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.