alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In Re Stephen F. ULRICH, petitioner.

No. 17-6544.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Keith THARPE, v. Eric SELLERS, Warden.

No. 17-6130, 17A350 (R46-002).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 29, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 50507 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Jeffery Bell,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22

- CR

- 247

- 1

**_________________________ _____**  Before **Jones, Southwick,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeffery Bell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bell has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

**_____________________**

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 19, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50507 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024No. 23

- 50507

2 brief and the rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respon sibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 23-50507 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Corps of Engineers

          - 33 CFR Part 334
          - [Docket Number COE-2019-0010]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) withdraws the proposed rules to establish a restricted area in the Washington Channel adjacent to Fort McNair in Washington, DC. The first notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 8, 2019, and a revised notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 13, 2020. In correspondence dated March 22, 2022, Fort McNair withdrew their request for the establishment of the restricted area.                    

# DATES:

As of May 2, 2022, the Corps is withdrawing the proposed rules published on August 9, 2019 (84 FR 38893) and October 13, 2020 (85 FR 64434).

# DATES:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO-R (David B. Olson), 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. David Olson, Headquarters, Operations and Regulatory Division, Washington, DC at 202-761-4922.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In a correspondence dated September 15, 2017, Ft. McNair requested that the Corps, pursuant to the Corps' authorities in 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3), establish a restricted area in navigable waters in the Washington Channel adjacent to Fort McNair. On August 8, 2019 (84 FR 38893), the Corps published a proposed rule to establish the restricted area. On October 13, 2020 (85 FR 64434), the Corps published a revised proposed rule to establish the restricted area. In correspondence dated March 22, 2022, Fort McNair withdrew their request for the establishment of the restricted area.

Thomas P. Smith,

Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division, Directorate of Civil Works.

[FR Doc. 2022-09323 Filed 4-29-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ BENNIE RICHARDSON, Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1847

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH

- 0845

- 20

- 0281

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the pe tition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

August 19, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 19, 2024 Case: 24-1847 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 08/19/2024
EXHIBIT 10.8 - PMR AND ASSOCIATES INVESTOR RELATIONS
               SERVICES AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 6, 1999.
------------------------------------------------------------
<P>
      AGREEMENT OF INVESTOR RELATIONS SERVICES
<P>
AGREEMENT dated this 6th day of April, 1999, by and between
The Auxer Group, Inc. (the "Company") having its principal
place of business at 30 Galesi Drive, Wayne, NJ 07470 and
PMR and Associates, LLC (the "Consultant") having its
principal place of business at 162 S. Santa Fe Road; Suite
F-50, Encinitas, CA 92024.
<P>
WHEREAS, The Company desires acquire the services of PMR and
Associates, LLC; and
<P>
WHEREAS, PMR and Associates is a consultant with special
knowledge, skills and experience within the investment and
business community;
<P>
THEREFORE, it NOW agreed that in consideration of the mutual
convenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
<P>
     1.     Services
<P>
The Consultant shall provide the following services:
Maintain investor package Liaison between the Company and
shareholders Assist in development of investor website
Assist in drafting and dissemination of press releases.
Maintain mailing lists Introduce industry analyst
<P>
      2.     Compensation & Terms
<P>
1.1     Retainer equal to $2000 per month for a minimum of
three (3) months from the date of this agreement.
<P>
1.2     Finder's Fees of 10% of any funding arrangements
originating through introductions through the Consultant
<P>
     3.     Other Covenants
<P>
2.1     The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the
Consultant for any acts conducted by the Company relating to
this agreement;
<P>
2.2     The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the
Company for any acts conducted by the Consultant relating to
this agreement;
<P>
2.3      The Consultant shall abide by all federal and state
laws and regulations concerning investor relations, stock
promotions and public disclosure requirements
<P>
2.4      The Consultant shall keep confidential all
materials and information obtained and derived as result of
this agreement and this relationship with the Company
<P>
Agreed Upon By:            Patrick M. Rost, PMR & Assoc
Dated:
<P>
Agreed Upon By:            Eugene Chiaramonte, Auxer
                           Group
Dated:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1194

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the exclusion

from gross income for foster care payments shall also apply to payments

by qualified placement agencies, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. NUSSLE, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr.

TERRY, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BOUCHER, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr.

PAYNE, Mr. DELAY, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. MCINNIS, and Mr.

BLILEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the exclusion from gross income for foster care

payments shall also apply to payments by qualified placement agencies, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1194 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR FOSTER CARE PAYMENTS TO

2 APPLY TO PAYMENTS BY QUALIFIED PLACE3 MENT AGENCIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The matter preceding subpara5 graph (B) of section 131(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue

6 Code of 1986 (defining qualified foster care payment) is

7 amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified foster

9 care payment’ means any payment made pursuant to

10 a foster care program of a State or political subdivi11 sion thereof—

12 ‘‘(A) which is paid by—

13 ‘‘(i) a State or political subdivision

14 thereof, or

15 ‘‘(ii) a qualified foster care placement

16 agency, and’’.

17 (b) QUALIFIED FOSTER INDIVIDUALS TO INCLUDE

18 INDIVIDUALS PLACED BY QUALIFIED PLACEMENT AGEN19 CIES.—Subparagraph (B) of section 131(b)(2) of such

20 Code (defining qualified foster individual) is amended to

21 read as follows:

22 ‘‘(B) a qualified foster care placement

23 agency.’’

24 (c) QUALIFIED FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT AGENCY

25 DEFINED.—Subsection (b) of section 131 of such Code

26 is amended by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph
3

•HR 1194 IH

1 (4) and by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new

2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT

4 AGENCY.—The term ‘qualified foster care placement

5 agency’ means any placement agency which is li6 censed or certified by—

7 ‘‘(A) a State or political subdivision there8 of, or

9 ‘‘(B) an entity designated by a State or

10 political subdivision thereof,

11 for the foster care program of such State or political

12 subdivision to make foster care payments to pro13 viders of foster care.’’

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

16 December 31, 1998.

Æ
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                     |   |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   | Date:                December 21, 2007                              |   |   |   |
| By:    | /s/ Sandrine                Crisafulli                              |   |   |   |
|   | Sandrine                CrisafulliChief                Financial Officer |   |   |   |
|   |                                                                     |

----
Herman BRIGHT, petitioner, v. Homer BRYSON, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9154.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75529, 333-103032 and 333-113430) of Varian SemiconductorEquipment Associates, Inc.**** of our report dated October 22, 2004, except for the first paragraph in Note 20, as to which the date is November 8, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts

December 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH (B) UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER
31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,257
<SECURITIES>                                    12,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,931
<INVENTORY>                                     41,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,491
<PP&E>                                          59,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,022
<BONDS>                                         11,971
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,232
<SALES>                                         39,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,414
<CGS>                                           30,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,736)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
David McGUIRE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-6752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/26/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       47,810
COMMITMENTS
   3,115    6,023    5,681   30,160   29,119   38,956   40,823    8,854    6,987

CHANGES FROM 01/19/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,653)
     904     -500    1,320  -13,589  -13,784  -11,365  -12,964   -4,288   -2,689

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.5     12.6     11.9     63.1     60.9     81.5     85.4     18.5     14.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       9        9        9       19       19       33       33
```

----

Updated January 29, 2010
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51406

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO MUNOZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-1012-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arturo MunozMartinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., petitioner, v. Mary BROWN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rayfield Brown.

No. 18-552.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Diamond Hill Investment  Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, James Laird,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /S/ James F. Laird
                                        ----------------------------------

                                        Print Name:  James F. Laird

                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer

                                        Date:  August 12, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854663
<NAME> RMI TITANIUM
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          19,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,158
<INVENTORY>                                    107,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,949
<PP&E>                                         144,668
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,880
<BONDS>                                          1,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,002
<SALES>                                        235,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,180
<CGS>                                          182,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (701)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,205)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.23
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/20/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,260,070
COMMITMENTS
 255,439   63,001  1598988  2334611  2541440  4189038  4203429   71,032   56,641

CHANGES FROM 07/13/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     86,183)
 -27,003  -40,265   87,847   22,351   36,063   83,195   83,645    2,988    2,538

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.0      1.5     37.5     54.8     59.7     98.3     98.7      1.7      1.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      228)
      41       36       69      142      131      217      204
```

----

Updated July 23, 2010