alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/17/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      244,146
COMMITMENTS
  30,355   37,590   45,169  140,181  141,525  215,705  224,284   28,441   19,862

CHANGES FROM 05/10/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,109)
     679   -3,557    4,879   12,741   14,536   18,299   15,858   -2,190      251

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.4     15.4     18.5     57.4     58.0     88.4     91.9     11.6      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      127)
      46       29       55       29       29      111       98
```

----

Updated May 20, 2011
Corey D. YATES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-410.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Enrique GAMINO-PEREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8095.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

*1462Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1327

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480

Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ‘‘Maurine B.

Neuberger United States Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480 Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post

Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Postal Service building located at

5 34480 Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger

7 United States Post Office’’.
2

•HR 1327 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Postal Service building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger

6 United States Post Office’’.

Æ
Michael Alexander BACON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7615.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Robert WILLIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                     STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                              BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of BGF Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Philippe R. Dorier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

/s/ Philippe R. Dorier
--------------------------
Philippe R. Dorier
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003
Elmos D. HOPKINS, petitioner, v. Robert DOOLEY, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7553.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Informatica Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Sohaib Abbasi, Chief Executive Officer, and Earl E. Fry, Chief
Financial Officer, of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request. /s/ SOHAIB ABBASISohaib AbbasiChief Executive OfficerMarch 7, 2005/s/ EARL E. FRYEarl. E. FryChief Financial OfficerMarch 7, 2005
Jason GERAY, petitioner, v. William MUNIZ, Warden.

No. 17-9227.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
John Paul GALBRAITH, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7531.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                          ALLOY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Alloy, Inc.
360 Youth, LLC
Alloy Mall Marketing Services, LLC
Alloy Marketing and Promotions, LLC
Alloy Merchandise, LLC
Alloy Merchandising Group, LLC
AMG Direct, LLC
Armed Forces Communications, Inc
Canal Park Trust
Care Packages, LLC
Collegiate Carpets, LLC
Dan's Competition, LLC
DX Company, Inc.
GFLA, Inc.
InSite Advertising, Inc.
MPM Holdings, Inc.
Old Glory Boutique Distributing, Inc.
On Campus Marketing, LLC
Skate Direct, LLC
The Staffing Authority, LLC
Triple Rewards, Inc.
dELiA*s Corp.
OnTap.com Inc.
TheSpark.com Inc.
dELiA*s Group, Inc.
iTURF Finance Company
dELiA*s Brand LLC
Droog, Inc.
dELiA*s Operating Company, Inc.
dELiA*s Delaware Company, Inc.
dELiA*s Distribution Company, Inc.
dELiA*s Retail Company
SBH Restructuring Corp.
Screeem! Inc.
dELiA*s Properties Inc.
dELiA*s Japan Company
TSI Soccer Restructuring Corp.
TSI Retail Company
TSI Promotional Company
iTurf International Inc.
dELiA*s Foreign Sales Corp.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John J. Limbert, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                   |  |                    
|------------------ |  | -------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ John J. Limbert
|                   |  | John J. Limbert
# L_2011171EN.01004601.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/46

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 45/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 112/2010 of 10 October 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 112/2010 of 10 October 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 860/2010 of 10 September 2010 establishing for 2010 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 860/2010 of 10 September 2010 establishing for 2010 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 4ah (Commission Regulation (EC) No 163/2009) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

| ‘4ai. | 32010 R 0860: Commission Regulation (EU) No 860/2010 of 10 September 2010 establishing for 2010 the “Prodcom list” of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (OJ L 262, 5.10.2010, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘4ai.

32010 R 0860: Commission Regulation (EU) No 860/2010 of 10 September 2010 establishing for 2010 the “Prodcom list” of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (OJ L 262, 5.10.2010, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 860/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 April 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 332, 16.12.2010, p. 62.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 262, 5.10.2010, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
In Re Ronald NEWTON, petitioner.

No. 17-7016.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1780

___________________________

Dewayne Barnes

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Sentry Management, Inc.; The St. Regis Apartments, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

 ____________

 Submitted: April 24, 2019

Filed: May 23, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this Title VII action, Dewayne Barnes appeals after the district court1

granted motions to dismiss filed by Sentry Management, Inc. (“Sentry”) and The

1The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.
St. Regis Apartments, Inc. (“St. Regis”). Upon careful de novo review, we conclude

the district court did not err in granting the motions to dismiss. See Kelly v. City of

Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). We first agree

with the district court that the claims against St. Regis were time-barred. See 42

U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (setting forth 90-day period to file suit following receipt of

right-to-sue notice). We further agree that Barnes failed to allege sufficient facts to

support a plausible claim against Sentry under Title VII. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556

U.S. 662, 678–83 (2009) (discussing plausibility requirement in context of motion to

dismiss).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as

moot St. Regis’s pending motion to supplement the record.

______________________________

-2-
Bradley B. MILLER, petitioner, v. Andrea PLUMLEE, Judge District Court of Texas, Dallas County, et al.

No. 16-9012.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, dated the date of this Certification (the
Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                       |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                                   |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | John J. Limbert
President and Chief Executive Officer |  |
Jerome BANNISTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8272.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Tyrone ANDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1374 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 474
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1374

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             March 27, 2000

              Reported by Mr. Thompson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. 
Highway 130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, as the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN K. RAFFERTY HAMILTON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. Highway 
130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 
``John K. Rafferty Hamilton Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the United States Post Office 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 474

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1374

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. 
Highway 130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, as the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 27, 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```
Matthew E. JACKSON, Jr., et al., petitioners, v. Frances Edith JACKSON.

No. 18-867.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                  
|                   |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  VARIAN, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                FISCAL YEAR 2000


                                                   STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                      OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION

Chrompack, Inc.                                             New Jersey
Chrompack Onroerend Goed B.V.                               The Netherlands
Intralab Instrumentacao Analitica Limitada                  Brazil
Vankel Technology Group, Inc.                               Delaware
Varian (Shanghai) International Trading Co. Ltd.            China
Varian A.G.                                                 Switzerland
Varian AB                                                   Sweden
Varian Argentina, Ltd.                                      Delaware
Varian Australia Pty. Ltd.                                  Australia
Varian Australia, LLC                                       Delaware
Varian B.V.                                                 The Netherlands
Varian Belgium N.V.                                         Belgium
Varian Canada Inc.                                          Canada
Varian Chrompack International B.V.                         The Netherlands
Varian Deutschland GmbH                                     Germany
Varian FSC, Inc.                                            Barbados
Varian Gessellschaft mbH                                    Austria
Varian Holdings (Australia) Pty. Limited                    Australia
Varian Iberica S.L.                                         Spain
Varian India Pvt. Ltd.                                      Delaware
Varian Industria E. Comercio Limitada                       Brazil
Varian Instruments of Puerto Rico, Inc.                     Delaware
Varian Inter-American Corp.                                 California
Varian Limited                                              United Kingdom
Varian S.A.                                                 France
Varian S.A.                                                 Mexico
Varian S.p.A.                                               Italy
Varian Technologies Asia, Ltd.                              Delaware
Varian Technologies China, Ltd.                             Delaware
Varian Technologies Japan, Ltd.                             Delaware
Varian Technologies Korea, Ltd.                             Korea
Varian Technologies, C.A.                                   Venezuela








All of the above subsidiaries are included in the Company's consolidated
financial statements. The names of certain consolidated subsidiaries have been
omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would
not constitute a significant subsidiary.
Rodney B. BENSON, petitioner, v. UTAH LABOR COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-9124.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

MELISSA BUCKELY,

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00224-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20190D03405)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Melissa Buckley has filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal from 

a habeas corpus action that has since been resolved between her and the State. See TEX.R.APP.P.

42.2(a). The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. 

March 31, 2021

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)