alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of China Valves Technology, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:





1.  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 23rd
day of March 2009.




/s/ Renrui TangRenrui
      TangChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Valves Technology, Inc. and will be retained by China Valves Technology,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Diana Beth DENRICH.

No. D-3020.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7638

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. WILLIAM ERIC BOLTON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00095-RAJ-FBS-1)

Submitted: February 24, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Eric Bolton, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Ne wport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Eric Bolton appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Bolton cannot benefit from Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines because of the quantities of cocaine powder and marijuana for which he was originally held accountable. Those quantities convert to a total of 16,820.817 kilograms of marijuana and a base offense level of thirty-six, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 (2008), which is the same base offense level applied at Bolton’s original sentencing when he was also held accountable for a quantity of crack cocaine. Consequently, Bolton may not now receive a reduction in base offense level, see id. § 2D1.1 cmt. n.10(D)(ii)(II), and he is therefore ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). Accordingly, we grant Bolton leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Babubhai PATEL, petitioner, v. McKESSON CORPORATION.

No. 17-6865.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Kevin Abdul GILBERT, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 18-7221.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Community Bankshares,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form [10-Q] for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and
belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
the Report.

   /s/ Donald L. Unger
-----------------------------------
Donald L. Unger
President & Chief Executive Officer

   /s/ Frederick A. Board
-----------------------------------
Frederick A. Board
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6239

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CALVIN MCCROREY, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:98-cr-01186-JFA-11)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin McCrorey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Calvin McCrorey, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCrorey , No. 0:98-cr-01186-JFA-11 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2009) (noting that McCrorey’s Sentencing Guidelines range remained unchanged after Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines because his statutory maximum sentence was below his guidelines sentencing range). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.1(a) (2008) (noting that where statutorily authorized maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable guidelines range, the maximum sentence shall be the guidelines range). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 273/3 Au

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 273 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 613 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 273

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 613 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 273/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 273/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 10.46





THIRD AMENDMENT


TO


AMENDED AND
RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this
Third Amendment), dated January 9, 2003, is entered into by and between St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation (Company), and Marie St. John Gray, an individual (Executive), and amends terms of that
certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 14, 1998, as amended, between the Company and Executive (the 1998 Agreement). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto
agree as follows (all capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 1998 Agreement).





1. Section IV.1(b)(vi) of the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety.





2. Section IV.5(e)
of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to delete the language or 4.1(b)(vi).





3. Section IV.5(f) of
the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety.





4. Section V.1 shall be amended to replace the notice
information for David Krinsky, Esq. with the following:





Mr. Jim Kelley


Vestar Capital Partners


1225 17 th Street, Suite 1660


Denver, Colorado 80202





5. All other provisions contained in Article V of the 1998 Agreement
are incorporated into this Third Amendment by this reference.





6. All other terms and conditions of the 1998
Agreement, as amended, shall remain the same.




---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.





CompanySt. John Knits, Inc., a California corporationBy:

/s/    Roger RuppertRoger Ruppert Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Executive/s/    Marie St. John GrayMarie St. John Gray





Approved as to Content:Jim Kelley Chairman of the Board




2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/06-0336]


Valesco Commerce Street Capital, L.P.; Surrender of License of 
Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 06/06-0336 issued to 
Valesco Commerce Street Capital, L.P., said license is hereby declared 
null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Michele Schimpp,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-09612 Filed 5-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Andrew HOWARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9116.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Keenan G. WILKINS, aka Nerrah Brown, petitioner, v. Paul GONZALEZ, et al.

No. 18-7311.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ben L. FORTSON, petitioner, v. LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al.

No. 16-8871.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jeffrey RUSSO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7538.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, --- S.Ct. ----, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
# Official Journal L 13/18 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 13 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4918 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 13

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4918 January 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the telematic applications for freight subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the telematic applications for freight subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
---

|                                 | Exhibit 99.6            
|-------------------------------- | ------------------------
|                                 |                         
|KPMG LLP                         |                         
|Chartered Accountants            |                         
|Suite 1500 Purdys Wharf Tower I |                         
|1959 Upper Water Street          | Telephone (902) 492-6000
|Halifax NS B3J 3N2               | Telefax (902) 429-1307  
|Canada                           | www.kpmg.ca             

COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR US READERS ON CANADA US REPORTING DIFFERENCES

To the Board of Directors of Gammon Gold Inc.

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require:

-

the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) that
refers to the audit report on the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Our report to the shareholders dated March 29, 2010 is expressed in
accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require a reference
to the audit report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting
in the financial statement auditors' report.

-

the addition of an explanatory statement with respect to revised financial
statements. As discussed in note 1 to the supplemental note entitled
Reconciliation with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,
the December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements have been restated to
correct misstatements. Our report to the shareholders dated March 29, 2010 is
expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require
this reference in the auditors report when the revision is properly accounted
for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants
Halifax, Canada 
March 29, 2010





| | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative 
(KPMG International), a Swiss entity. 
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---
Michael James HORTON, petitioner, v. Clark E. DUCART, Warden.

No. 18-7556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kali ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9219.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$5,000                                                       Englewood, Colorado
                                                                   June 15, 1999

For value received the undersigned, SportsStar Marketing, Inc. ("SSMK"),
hereby promises to pay to Arthur D. Harrison ("the Holder") at 4290 S.
Hudson Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110 the sum of five thousand dollars
($5,000) with a simple interest rate of 10% per annum, payable quarterly, in
lawful money of the United States.

This Note is due and payable in full on or before December 15, 1999 or at the
option of the Holder at the time any financing is received by SSMK.

This Note shall be considered in default if not paid in full on or before
December 15,1999, or if interest due is not paid within five (5) days written
notice. Should default occur, the entire amount of unpaid principal and
interest shall, at the option of the Holder, become immediately due and
payable.

In addition, this Note is convertible into restricted SSMK common shares at
the option of the Holder after September 15, 1999. The number of shares to be
received by the Holder shall be calculated as the amount of principal
outstanding on this Note divided by the average of the Bid/Ask price ("strike
price") on the date the Holder notifies SSMK of his intention to exercise
this option. This option is not exercisable if the strike price falls below
$0.30 per share.

The undersigned agrees, in the event of default, to pay reasonable costs of
collection, including attorney's fees incurred by the Holder, in connection
with the collection of this Note. The undersigned hereby waives presentment,
demand, protest, notice of protest, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment,
and notice of any kind with respect to this Note or any guarantee of it.

This Note is assignable by the Holder and the benefits and rights hereunder
inure to the benefit of the Holder's assigns, heirs, and beneficiaries.

                                    SPORTSSTAR MARKETING, INC.
                                    a Colorado Corporation

                                    /s/ Rick N. Newton
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Rick N. Newton, Chairman of the Board

In addition, this Note shall be personally guaranteed by Rick N. Newton and
Dr. Janice A. Jones, as an individuals, should default occur or SSMK files
bankruptcy.

/s/ Rick N. Newton                       /s/ Janice A. Jones
-----------------------------            --------------------------------
Rick N. Newton                           Dr. Janice A. Jones
Renee D. BELL, petitioner, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 17-9063.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Joel Elias SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Jeffrey A. BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 18-8058.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                  
|                      |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
II

Calendar No. 855

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1235

[Report No. 106–433]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Received

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into

contracts with the Solano County Water Agency, California, to use Solano Project facilities for impounding,

storage, and carriage of nonproject water for domestic,

municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1235 RS

1 SECTION 1. USE OF SOLANO PROJECT FACILITIES FOR

2 NONPROJECT WATER.

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior

4 is authorized to enter into contracts with the Solano Coun5 ty Water Agency, or any of its member unit contractors

6 for water from the Solano Project, California, pursuant

7 to the Act of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for—

8 (1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of

9 nonproject water for domestic, municipal, industrial,

10 and other beneficial purposes, using any facilities as11 sociated with the Solano Project, California; and

12 (2) the exchange of water among Solano

13 Project contractors, for the purposes set forth in

14 paragraph (1), using facilities associated with the

15 Solano Project, California.

16 (b) LIMITATION.—The authorization under sub17 section (a) shall be limited to the use of that portion of

18 the Solano Project facilities downstream of Mile 26 of the

19 Putah South Canal (as that canal is depicted on the offi20 cial maps of the Bureau of Reclamation), which is below

21 the diversion points on the Putah South Canal utilized by

22 the City of Fairfield for delivery of Solano Project water.

Calendar No. 855

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1235

[Report No. 106–433]

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter

into contracts with the Solano County WaterAgency, California, to use Solano Project facilities for impounding, storage, and carriage ofnonproject water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported without amendment