# Official Journal C 256/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.256.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 256 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5224 October 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.256.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 256

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5224 October 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2009/C 256/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 244, 10.10.2009 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Justice

2009/C 256/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 244, 10.10.2009

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2009/C 256/02 | Case C-535/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Moser Baer India Ltd v Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities, Committee of European CD-R and DVD+/-R Manufacturers (CECMA) (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of recordable compact discs originating in India — Regulation (EC) No 960/2003 — Calculation of the amount of countervailable subsidy — Determination of injury — Article 8(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97) | 2 |
| 2009/C 256/03 | Case C-166/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 1968/2006 — Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland — Choice of legal basis) | 2 |
| 2009/C 256/04 | Joined Cases C-322/07 P, C-327/07 P and C-338/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Papierfabrik August Koehler AG, Bolloré SA, Distribuidora Vizcaína de Papeles SL v Commission of the European Communities (Appeals — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Carbonless paper — Inconsistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Consequences — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Participation in the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Regulation No 17 — Article 15(2) — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of proportionality — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Reasonable period for duration of proceedings before the Court of First Instance) | 3 |
| 2009/C 256/05 | Case C-482/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank te ’s-Gravenhage (Netherlands)) — AHP Manufacturing BV v Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom (Patent law — Proprietary medicinal products — Regulations (EEC) No 1768/92 and (EC) No 1610/96 — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Conditions for granting certificates to two or more holders of basic patents for the same product — Clarification on the existence of pending applications) | 3 |
| 2009/C 256/06 | Case C-489/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lahr (Germany)) — Pia Messner v Firma Stefan Krüger (Directive 97/7/EC — Consumer protection — Distance contracts — Exercise by the consumer of the right of withdrawal — Compensation for use to be paid to the seller) | 4 |
| 2009/C 256/07 | Case C-498/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Aceites del Sur-Coosur SA, formerly Aceites del Sur v Koipe Corporación, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark La Española — Overall assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Decisive element) | 4 |
| 2009/C 256/08 | Case C-534/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — William Prym GmbH & Co. KG, Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European haberdashery market (needles) — Market sharing agreements — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Fine — Guidelines — Gravity of the infringement — Actual impact on the market — Implementation of the cartel) | 5 |
| 2009/C 256/09 | Case C-2/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — Amministrazione dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate v Fallimento Olimpiclub Srl (VAT — Primacy of Community law — Provision of national law laying down the principle of res judicata) | 5 |
| 2009/C 256/10 | Case C-457/08: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/14/EC — Insurance against civil liability — Motor vehicles — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period) | 6 |
| 2009/C 256/11 | Case C-464/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Estonia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/65/EC — Transport policy — Security of ports — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period) | 6 |
| 2009/C 256/12 | Case C-527/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/65/EC — Transport policy — Port facility security — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period) | 7 |
| 2009/C 256/13 | Case C-280/09: Action brought on 22 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic | 7 |
| 2009/C 256/14 | Case C-281/09: Action brought on 22 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain | 7 |
| 2009/C 256/15 | Case C-284/09: Action brought on 23 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany | 8 |
| 2009/C 256/16 | Case C-288/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 24 July 2009 — British Sky Broadcasting Group plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs | 9 |
| 2009/C 256/17 | Case C-289/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 24 July 2009 — Pace plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs | 9 |
| 2009/C 256/18 | Case C-295/09: Action brought on 28 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain | 10 |
| 2009/C 256/19 | Case C-302/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic | 10 |
| 2009/C 256/20 | Case C-303/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic | 11 |
| 2009/C 256/21 | Case C-304/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic | 11 |
| 2009/C 256/22 | Case C-305/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic | 11 |
| 2009/C 256/23 | Case C-311/09: Action brought on 4 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland | 12 |
| 2009/C 256/24 | Case C-313/09: Action brought on 6 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria | 12 |
| 2009/C 256/25 | Case C-315/09: Action brought on 7 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium | 13 |
| 2009/C 256/26 | Case C-325/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 12 August 2009 — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Maria Dias | 13 |
| 2009/C 256/27 | Case C-332/09 P: Appeal brought on 18 August 2009 by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) on 3 June 2009 in Case T-189/07 Frosch Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 14 |
| 2009/C 256/28 | Case C-333/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes de Caen (France) lodged on 20 August 2009 — Sophie Noël v SCP Brouard Daude as liquidator in the judicial liquidation of Pronuptia Boutiques Province SA, and Centre de Gestion et d’Étude AGS (C.G.E.A.) IDF Est | 15 |
| 2009/C 256/29 | Case C-340/09: Action brought on 25 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain | 15 |
| 2009/C 256/30 | Case C-355/09: Action brought on 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland | 16 |
| 2009/C 256/31 | Case C-366/09: Action brought on 11 September 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic | 16 |
| | Court of First Instance |
| 2009/C 256/32 | Joined Cases T-30/01 to T-32/01 and T-86/02 to T-88/02: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (State aid — Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State — Tax exemptions — Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out — Classification as new aid or as existing aid — Operating aid — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty — Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC — No need to adjudicate) | 18 |
| 2009/C 256/33 | Joined Cases T-227/01 to T-229/01, T-265/01, T-266/01 and T-270/01: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (State aid — Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State — Tax credit of 45 % of the amount of investments — Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out — Trade association — Admissibility — Classification as new aid or as existing aid — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of proportionality) | 19 |
| 2009/C 256/34 | Joined Cases T-230/01 to T-232/01 and T-267/01 to T-269/01: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (State aid — Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State — Reduction of the tax base for corporation tax — Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out — Trade association — Admissibility — Withdrawal of a plea in law — Classification as new aid or as existing aid — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of proportionality) | 20 |
| 2009/C 256/35 | Case T-301/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Clearstream v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Financial services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Refusal to provide cross-border clearing and settlement services — Discriminatory pricing — Relevant market — Imputability of the infringement) | 21 |
| 2009/C 256/36 | Case T-211/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by the Italian authorities in favour of newly listed companies — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Obligation to state reasons — Selective nature — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition) | 21 |
| 2009/C 256/37 | Case T-303/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2009 — AceaElectrabel v Commission (State aid — Energy sector — Investment aid for the construction of a distance heating system — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market — Obligation to repay first aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market — Concept of economic unit) | 21 |
| 2009/C 256/38 | Case T-368/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Austria v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Cattle premium — Suckler cow premium — Payment for extensification — Key controls — Duty to use a computerised geographical information system — Control of Alpine forage areas — Duty to cooperate — Duty to state reasons — Type of financial correction applied — Extrapolation of the findings of default) | 22 |
| 2009/C 256/39 | Case T-437/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Brink’s Security Luxembourg v Commission (Public services contracts — Community tender procedure — Security and surveillance of the Commission’s buildings in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Equal treatment — Access to documents — Effective judicial protection — Duty to give reasons — Transfer of undertaking — Action for damages) | 22 |
| 2009/C 256/40 | Case T-369/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Holland Malt v Commission (State aid — Malt production — Investment aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Adverse effect on competition — Effect on trade between Member States — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector) | 23 |
| 2009/C 256/41 | Case T-404/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2009 — ETF v Landgren (Appeals — Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision to dismiss — Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of other servants — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Manifest error of assessment — Unlimited jurisdiction — Monetary compensation) | 23 |
| 2009/C 256/42 | Joined Cases T-37/07 and T-323/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 September 2009 — El Morabit v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — List of persons, groups and entities — Action for annulment) | 23 |
| 2009/C 256/43 | Case T-152/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 September 2009 — Lange Uhren v OHIM (Geometric shapes on a watch-face) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark — Geometric shapes on a watch-face — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 24 |
| 2009/C 256/44 | Case T-326/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 September 2009 — Cheminova and Others v Commission (Plant-protection products — Active substance ‘malathion’ — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Evaluation procedure — Assessment by EFSA — Plea of illegality — Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 — Submission of new studies — Article 8(2) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 451/2000 — Legitimate expectation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Principle of subsidiarity — Article 95(3) EC, Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of Directive 91/414) | 24 |
| 2009/C 256/45 | Case T-446/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte (Centrixx) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark Centrixx — Earlier national word mark sensixx — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 25 |
| 2009/C 256/46 | Case T-471/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Wella v OHIM (TAME IT) (Community trade mark — International registration — Request for territorial extension of protection — Word mark TAME IT — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 25 |
| 2009/C 256/47 | Case T-308/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Parfums Christian Dior v OHIM — Consolidated Artists (MANGO adorably) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark MANGO adorably — Earlier national and international word marks J’ADORE and ADIORABLE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Risk of unfair advantage being taken of the repute of the earlier marks — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 26 |
| 2009/C 256/48 | Case T-174/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Inalca and Cremonini v Commission (Non-contractual liability — OLAF investigations concerning irregularities in export refunds on beef and veal exported to Jordan — Communication to the national authorities of information on the facts capable of giving rise to criminal proceedings — National decision to recover the refunds — Provision of Guarantees — Action for damages — Limitation period — Continuing nature of the harm — Partial inadmissibility — Causation) | 26 |
| 2009/C 256/49 | Case T-367/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 August 2009 — Abouchar v Commission (Non-contractual liability — EDF — Conditions for the grant and control of credits for an agricultural holding project in Senegal — Limitation period — Inadmissibility) | 27 |
| 2009/C 256/50 | Case T-296/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — EFIM v Commission | 27 |
| 2009/C 256/51 | Case T-299/09: Action brought on 29 July 2009 — Gühring v OHIM (combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey) | 27 |
| 2009/C 256/52 | Case T-300/09: Action brought on 29 July 2009 — Gühring OHG v OHIM (combination of the colours ochre yellow and silver grey) | 28 |
| 2009/C 256/53 | Case T-323/09: Action brought on 18 August 2009 — Commission v Irish Electricity Generating | 28 |
| 2009/C 256/54 | Case T-324/09: Action brought on 18 August 2009 — J & F Participações v OHIM — Fribo Foods (Friboi) | 29 |
| 2009/C 256/55 | Case T-325/09 P: Appeal brought on 17 August 2009 by Vahan Adjemian and Others against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 4 June 2009 in Joined Cases F-134/07 Adjemian and Others v Commission and F-8/08 Renier v Commission | 30 |
| 2009/C 256/56 | Case T-326/09: Action brought on 10 August 2009 — E v Parliament | 32 |
| 2009/C 256/57 | Case T-336/09: Action brought on 25 August 2009 — Häfele v OHIM — Topcom Europe (Topcom) | 32 |
| 2009/C 256/58 | Case T-337/09: Action brought on 24 August 2009 — Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia v Commission | 32 |
| 2009/C 256/59 | Case T-341/09: Action brought on 27 August 2009 — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava and Others v OHIM (TXAKOLI) | 33 |
| 2009/C 256/60 | Case T-342/09: Action brought on 28 August 2009 — Bard v OHIM — Braun Melsungen (PERFIX) | 33 |
| 2009/C 256/61 | Case T-344/09: Action brought on 31 August 2009 — Hearst Communications v OHIM — Vida Estética (COSMOBELLEZA) | 34 |
| 2009/C 256/62 | Case T-345/09: Action brought on 28 August 2009 — Bodegas y Viñedos Puerta de Labastida v OHIM — Unión de Cosecheros de Labastida (PUERTA DE LABASTIDA) | 35 |
| 2009/C 256/63 | Case T-346/09: Action brought on 1 September 2009 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Alcon (BAÑOFTAL) | 35 |
| 2009/C 256/64 | Case T-351/09: Action brought on 4 September 2009 — Acetificio Marcello de Nigris v Commission | 36 |
| 2009/C 256/65 | Case T-429/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 7 September 2009 — Grain Millers v OHIM — Grain Millers (GRAIN MILLERS) | 37 |
| 2009/C 256/66 | Case T-569/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 July 2009 — Visonic v OHIM — Sedea Electronique (VISIONIC) | 37 |
| 2009/C 256/67 | Case T-107/09: Order of the Court of First Instance of 1 September 2009 — United Kingdom v Commission | 37 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2009/C 256/68 | Case F-72/09: Action brought on 17 August 2009 — Simone Daake v OHIM | 38 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2009/C 256/02

Case C-535/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Moser Baer India Ltd v Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities, Committee of European CD-R and DVD+/-R Manufacturers (CECMA) (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of recordable compact discs originating in India — Regulation (EC) No 960/2003 — Calculation of the amount of countervailable subsidy — Determination of injury — Article 8(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97)

2

2009/C 256/03

Case C-166/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 1968/2006 — Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland — Choice of legal basis)

2

2009/C 256/04

Joined Cases C-322/07 P, C-327/07 P and C-338/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Papierfabrik August Koehler AG, Bolloré SA, Distribuidora Vizcaína de Papeles SL v Commission of the European Communities (Appeals — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Carbonless paper — Inconsistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Consequences — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Participation in the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Regulation No 17 — Article 15(2) — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of proportionality — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Reasonable period for duration of proceedings before the Court of First Instance)

3

2009/C 256/05

Case C-482/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank te ’s-Gravenhage (Netherlands)) — AHP Manufacturing BV v Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom (Patent law — Proprietary medicinal products — Regulations (EEC) No 1768/92 and (EC) No 1610/96 — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Conditions for granting certificates to two or more holders of basic patents for the same product — Clarification on the existence of pending applications)

3

2009/C 256/06

Case C-489/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lahr (Germany)) — Pia Messner v Firma Stefan Krüger (Directive 97/7/EC — Consumer protection — Distance contracts — Exercise by the consumer of the right of withdrawal — Compensation for use to be paid to the seller)

4

2009/C 256/07

Case C-498/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Aceites del Sur-Coosur SA, formerly Aceites del Sur v Koipe Corporación, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark La Española — Overall assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Decisive element)

4

2009/C 256/08

Case C-534/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — William Prym GmbH & Co. KG, Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European haberdashery market (needles) — Market sharing agreements — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Fine — Guidelines — Gravity of the infringement — Actual impact on the market — Implementation of the cartel)

5

2009/C 256/09

Case C-2/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — Amministrazione dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate v Fallimento Olimpiclub Srl (VAT — Primacy of Community law — Provision of national law laying down the principle of res judicata)

5

2009/C 256/10

Case C-457/08: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/14/EC — Insurance against civil liability — Motor vehicles — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

6

2009/C 256/11

Case C-464/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Estonia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/65/EC — Transport policy — Security of ports — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

6

2009/C 256/12

Case C-527/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/65/EC — Transport policy — Port facility security — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

7

2009/C 256/13

Case C-280/09: Action brought on 22 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

7

2009/C 256/14

Case C-281/09: Action brought on 22 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

7

2009/C 256/15

Case C-284/09: Action brought on 23 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

8

2009/C 256/16

Case C-288/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 24 July 2009 — British Sky Broadcasting Group plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

9

2009/C 256/17

Case C-289/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 24 July 2009 — Pace plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

9

2009/C 256/18

Case C-295/09: Action brought on 28 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

10

2009/C 256/19

Case C-302/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

10

2009/C 256/20

Case C-303/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic

11

2009/C 256/21

Case C-304/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic

11

2009/C 256/22

Case C-305/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic

11

2009/C 256/23

Case C-311/09: Action brought on 4 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

12

2009/C 256/24

Case C-313/09: Action brought on 6 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

12

2009/C 256/25

Case C-315/09: Action brought on 7 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

13

2009/C 256/26

Case C-325/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 12 August 2009 — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Maria Dias

13

2009/C 256/27

Case C-332/09 P: Appeal brought on 18 August 2009 by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) on 3 June 2009 in Case T-189/07 Frosch Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

14

2009/C 256/28

Case C-333/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes de Caen (France) lodged on 20 August 2009 — Sophie Noël v SCP Brouard Daude as liquidator in the judicial liquidation of Pronuptia Boutiques Province SA, and Centre de Gestion et d’Étude AGS (C.G.E.A.) IDF Est

15

2009/C 256/29

Case C-340/09: Action brought on 25 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

15

2009/C 256/30

Case C-355/09: Action brought on 3 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

16

2009/C 256/31

Case C-366/09: Action brought on 11 September 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic

16

Court of First Instance

2009/C 256/32

Joined Cases T-30/01 to T-32/01 and T-86/02 to T-88/02: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (State aid — Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State — Tax exemptions — Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out — Classification as new aid or as existing aid — Operating aid — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty — Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC — No need to adjudicate)

18

2009/C 256/33

Joined Cases T-227/01 to T-229/01, T-265/01, T-266/01 and T-270/01: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (State aid — Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State — Tax credit of 45 % of the amount of investments — Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out — Trade association — Admissibility — Classification as new aid or as existing aid — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of proportionality)

19

2009/C 256/34

Joined Cases T-230/01 to T-232/01 and T-267/01 to T-269/01: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (State aid — Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State — Reduction of the tax base for corporation tax — Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out — Trade association — Admissibility — Withdrawal of a plea in law — Classification as new aid or as existing aid — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of proportionality)

20

2009/C 256/35

Case T-301/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Clearstream v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Financial services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Refusal to provide cross-border clearing and settlement services — Discriminatory pricing — Relevant market — Imputability of the infringement)

21

2009/C 256/36

Case T-211/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by the Italian authorities in favour of newly listed companies — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Obligation to state reasons — Selective nature — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition)

21

2009/C 256/37

Case T-303/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2009 — AceaElectrabel v Commission (State aid — Energy sector — Investment aid for the construction of a distance heating system — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market — Obligation to repay first aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market — Concept of economic unit)

21

2009/C 256/38

Case T-368/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Austria v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Cattle premium — Suckler cow premium — Payment for extensification — Key controls — Duty to use a computerised geographical information system — Control of Alpine forage areas — Duty to cooperate — Duty to state reasons — Type of financial correction applied — Extrapolation of the findings of default)

22

2009/C 256/39

Case T-437/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Brink’s Security Luxembourg v Commission (Public services contracts — Community tender procedure — Security and surveillance of the Commission’s buildings in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Equal treatment — Access to documents — Effective judicial protection — Duty to give reasons — Transfer of undertaking — Action for damages)

22

2009/C 256/40

Case T-369/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Holland Malt v Commission (State aid — Malt production — Investment aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Adverse effect on competition — Effect on trade between Member States — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector)

23

2009/C 256/41

Case T-404/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2009 — ETF v Landgren (Appeals — Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision to dismiss — Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of other servants — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Manifest error of assessment — Unlimited jurisdiction — Monetary compensation)

23

2009/C 256/42

Joined Cases T-37/07 and T-323/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 September 2009 — El Morabit v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — List of persons, groups and entities — Action for annulment)

23

2009/C 256/43

Case T-152/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 September 2009 — Lange Uhren v OHIM (Geometric shapes on a watch-face) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark — Geometric shapes on a watch-face — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

24

2009/C 256/44

Case T-326/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 September 2009 — Cheminova and Others v Commission (Plant-protection products — Active substance ‘malathion’ — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Evaluation procedure — Assessment by EFSA — Plea of illegality — Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 — Submission of new studies — Article 8(2) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 451/2000 — Legitimate expectation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Principle of subsidiarity — Article 95(3) EC, Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of Directive 91/414)

24

2009/C 256/45

Case T-446/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte (Centrixx) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark Centrixx — Earlier national word mark sensixx — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

25

2009/C 256/46

Case T-471/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Wella v OHIM (TAME IT) (Community trade mark — International registration — Request for territorial extension of protection — Word mark TAME IT — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

25

2009/C 256/47

Case T-308/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Parfums Christian Dior v OHIM — Consolidated Artists (MANGO adorably) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark MANGO adorably — Earlier national and international word marks J’ADORE and ADIORABLE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Risk of unfair advantage being taken of the repute of the earlier marks — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

26

2009/C 256/48

Case T-174/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Inalca and Cremonini v Commission (Non-contractual liability — OLAF investigations concerning irregularities in export refunds on beef and veal exported to Jordan — Communication to the national authorities of information on the facts capable of giving rise to criminal proceedings — National decision to recover the refunds — Provision of Guarantees — Action for damages — Limitation period — Continuing nature of the harm — Partial inadmissibility — Causation)

26

2009/C 256/49

Case T-367/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 August 2009 — Abouchar v Commission (Non-contractual liability — EDF — Conditions for the grant and control of credits for an agricultural holding project in Senegal — Limitation period — Inadmissibility)

27

2009/C 256/50

Case T-296/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — EFIM v Commission

27

2009/C 256/51

Case T-299/09: Action brought on 29 July 2009 — Gühring v OHIM (combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey)

27

2009/C 256/52

Case T-300/09: Action brought on 29 July 2009 — Gühring OHG v OHIM (combination of the colours ochre yellow and silver grey)

28

2009/C 256/53

Case T-323/09: Action brought on 18 August 2009 — Commission v Irish Electricity Generating

28

2009/C 256/54

Case T-324/09: Action brought on 18 August 2009 — J & F Participações v OHIM — Fribo Foods (Friboi)

29

2009/C 256/55

Case T-325/09 P: Appeal brought on 17 August 2009 by Vahan Adjemian and Others against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 4 June 2009 in Joined Cases F-134/07 Adjemian and Others v Commission and F-8/08 Renier v Commission

30

2009/C 256/56

Case T-326/09: Action brought on 10 August 2009 — E v Parliament

32

2009/C 256/57

Case T-336/09: Action brought on 25 August 2009 — Häfele v OHIM — Topcom Europe (Topcom)

32

2009/C 256/58

Case T-337/09: Action brought on 24 August 2009 — Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia v Commission

32

2009/C 256/59

Case T-341/09: Action brought on 27 August 2009 — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava and Others v OHIM (TXAKOLI)

33

2009/C 256/60

Case T-342/09: Action brought on 28 August 2009 — Bard v OHIM — Braun Melsungen (PERFIX)

33

2009/C 256/61

Case T-344/09: Action brought on 31 August 2009 — Hearst Communications v OHIM — Vida Estética (COSMOBELLEZA)

34

2009/C 256/62

Case T-345/09: Action brought on 28 August 2009 — Bodegas y Viñedos Puerta de Labastida v OHIM — Unión de Cosecheros de Labastida (PUERTA DE LABASTIDA)

35

2009/C 256/63

Case T-346/09: Action brought on 1 September 2009 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Alcon (BAÑOFTAL)

35

2009/C 256/64

Case T-351/09: Action brought on 4 September 2009 — Acetificio Marcello de Nigris v Commission

36

2009/C 256/65

Case T-429/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 7 September 2009 — Grain Millers v OHIM — Grain Millers (GRAIN MILLERS)

37

2009/C 256/66

Case T-569/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 July 2009 — Visonic v OHIM — Sedea Electronique (VISIONIC)

37

2009/C 256/67

Case T-107/09: Order of the Court of First Instance of 1 September 2009 — United Kingdom v Commission

37

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2009/C 256/68

Case F-72/09: Action brought on 17 August 2009 — Simone Daake v OHIM

38

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN