alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Jurisdiction of Incorporation         Corporate Name
   -----------------------------         --------------
<S>                                    <C>

   Australia                             Portal Software International Pty Limited

   Barbados                              Portal Software Foreign Sales Corporation

   Brazil                                Portal Software Brasil Ltda

   California                            Portal International Holdings, Inc.

   Canada                                Portal Software Canada Inc.

   Cayman Islands                        Portal Software Cayman Islands, Inc.

   China                                 Portal Software (Asia Pacific) Limited, Bejing Representative Office

   England and Wales                     Portal Software (Europe) Limited

   France                                Portal Software France

   Germany                               Portal Software (Germany) GmbH

   Germany                               Portal Solutions GmbH

   Germany                               Portal Software (Hamburg) GmbH

   Germany                               42 Consulting-Group GmbH

   Germany                               Solution 42 International GmbH

   Hong Kong                             Portal Software (Asia Pacific) Limited

   Italy                                 Portal Software Italia, S.r.l.

   Japan                                 Portal Software Japan K.K.

   The Netherlands                       Portal Software B.V.

   Singapore                             Portal Software (Asia Pacific) Limited

   South Korea                           Portal Software Korea Limited Company

   Spain                                 Portal Software Informatica S.L.

   Spain                                 Solution 42 Iberica S.L.

   Switzerland                           Portal Software International Sarl

   Taiwan                                Portal Software Taiwan Limited
</TABLE>
John Carlo FREE, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-9222.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1147

To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUNSET OF BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENTS

4 ACT.

5 The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286)

6 is hereby repealed 3 years after the date of enactment of

7 this Act.

8 SEC. 2. SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS.

9 Not later than 3 years after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall with11 draw the United States from the International Monetary

12 Fund, and shall negotiate an agreement on the method
2

•HR 1147 IH

1 of settling accounts with the International Monetary

2 Fund.

3 SEC. 3. REPORT TO THE CONGRESS ON ALTERNATIVES.

4 On the date that is 2 years after the date of the en5 actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall

6 submit to the Committee on Banking and Financial Serv7 ices of the House of Representatives and the Committee

8 on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on alternative

9 ways of addressing the problems that the International

10 Monetary Fund is designed to address, including reliance

11 on the operation of private capital markets, merging the

12 International Monetary Fund with the International Bank

13 for Reconstruction and Development, and establishing an

14 institution to address such problems in a different manner

15 than the International Monetary Fund has addressed such

16 problems.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1296

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish an outpatient clinic

in the Seventh Congressional District of Georgia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. BARR of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish an

outpatient clinic in the Seventh Congressional District

of Georgia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF OUTPATIENT VETERANS

4 CLINIC IN SEVENTH CONGRESSIONAL DIS5 TRICT OF GEORGIA.

6 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish an

7 outpatient clinic in the Seventh Congressional District of

8 Georgia. The Secretary shall ensure that such clinic has
2

•HR 1296 IH

1 adequate staffing and resources to meet the needs of vet2 erans in that congressional district for outpatient care.

Æ
Rowy De Jesus VASQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7666.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC.
                STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                         -----------------------
                                                           1996          1995
                                                         --------       --------   
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>
Net income (loss).................................       $ (1,662)      $ 10,294
                                                         ========       ========

Computation of weighted average common and
     common equivalent shares outstanding:

     Weighted average common shares
       outstanding................................         17,614         17,326

     Common equivalent shares from dilutive
       common stock options and warrants..........              -          1,148
                                                         --------       --------   
Shares used in per share calculations.............         17,614         18,474
                                                         ========       ========

Net income (loss) per share.......................       $  (0.09)      $   0.56
                                                         ========       ========
</TABLE>
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/17/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       62,949
COMMITMENTS
  18,883    2,568    5,719   25,875   38,438   50,476   46,725   12,472   16,223

CHANGES FROM 08/10/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,334)
    -273      586     -615    3,065    2,427    2,177    2,398      157      -64

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.0      4.1      9.1     41.1     61.1     80.2     74.2     19.8     25.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      28        9       15       33       26       67       45
```

----

Updated August 20, 2010
OPTA CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. DAEWOO ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

No. 17-1421.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1296 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1296

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish an outpatient 
        clinic in the Seventh Congressional District of Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

 Mr. Barr of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish an outpatient 
        clinic in the Seventh Congressional District of Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF OUTPATIENT VETERANS CLINIC IN SEVENTH 
              CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish an outpatient 
clinic in the Seventh Congressional District of Georgia. The Secretary 
shall ensure that such clinic has adequate staffing and resources to 
meet the needs of veterans in that congressional district for 
outpatient care.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2591** 

YVONNE W. GIPSON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. THOMAS P. DORE, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; MARK S. DEVAN, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; GERARD F. MILES, JR. Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; SHANNON MENAPACE, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; ERIN GLOTH, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; COVAHEY, BOOZER, DEVAN & DORE, P.A., As Attorneys for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; ALBA LAW GROUP, P.A., As Attorneys for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a/k/a Goldman Sachs & Co.; GOLDMAN SACHS ALT A HOME EQUITY TRUST 2005

- 15, GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15, As Securitized Trust Issuing Entity and Foreclosing Entity, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Trustee & Goldman Sachs & Co. Limited Partnership, a/k/a Goldman Sachs & Co.; HSBC BAN K USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., As for Master Servicer for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15; PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., As Servicer For GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005

- 15, As Servicer For National City Bank, a/k/a PNC, a/k/a PNC Bank, other As Successor In Interest to National City Mortgage Company's Servicing Rights other As Successor in Interest to National City Corporation other As Successor In Interest to National City Bank based in Ohio other As Successor In Interest to National City Bank of Indiana other As Successor In Interest to National City Mortgage Company A Subsidiary of National Bank of Indiana other As Successor In Interest to AccuBanc A division of National Bank of India na , Defendants

- Appellees

.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv
- 02482

- JFM )

Submitted : October 28, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Yvonne W. Gipson, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin Frederick, Lauren Elizabeth Marini, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland; Laurie Beth Goon, DUANE MORRIS, LLP, Baltimore , Maryland; Brett Lawrence Messinger, DUANE MORRIS, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Daniel J. Tobin, BALLAD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Yvonne W. Gipson appeal s the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order . We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1191 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1191

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
                           Chicago, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARDISS COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 433 West Harrison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Cardiss Collins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Cardiss Collins Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 2. OTIS GRANT COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2302 South Pulaski Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Otis Grant Collins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Otis Grant Collins Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 3. MARY ALICE (MA) HENRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4222 West Madison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 4. ROBERT LEFLORE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 50001 West Division Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
John McQUEEN, petitioner, v. Lynn FISHER.

No. 18-6999.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4677 

To direct the Secretary of Education to carry out a program to recognize 

high schools and local educational agencies for expanding high-quality 

dual credit programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2019 

Mr. TAYLOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Education to carry out a program 

to recognize high schools and local educational agencies 

for expanding high-quality dual credit programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dual Credit Innovation 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL BLUE RIBBON SCHOOLS DUAL CREDIT 

7 INNOVATION AWARD. 

8 (a) DUAL CREDIT PRIORITY.—Not later than 1 year 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4677 IH

1 thereafter, the Secretary shall, on a competitive basis, rec2 ognize eligible partnerships with high-quality dual credit 

3 programs with a ‘‘Dual Credit Innovation Award’’ which 

4 shall be an award under the National Blue Ribbon Schools 

5 program of the Department of Education. 

6 (b) APPLICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS.—To be 

7 eligible to be recognized under subsection (a), an eligible 

8 partnership shall submit an application under the Na9 tional Blue Ribbon Schools program of the Department 

10 of Education. 

11 (c) NON-MONETARY VALUE.—The award and rec12 ognition established under this Act may not have mone13 tary value. 

14 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

15 (1) DUAL CREDIT PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘dual 

16 credit program’’ means a program offered by an eli17 gible partnership through which a secondary school 

18 student who has not graduated from high school 

19 with a regular high school diploma is able to enroll 

20 in one or more postsecondary courses and earn post21 secondary credit that— 

22 (A) is transferable to the institutions of 

23 higher education in the partnership; and 

24 (B) applies toward completion of a degree 

25 or recognized educational credential as deVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:36 Oct 23, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4677.IH H4677

dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4677 IH

1 scribed in the Higher Education Act of 1965 

2 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). 

3 (2) ELIGIBLE PARTNERSHIP.—The term ‘‘eligi4 ble partnership’’ means a partnership between— 

5 (A) at least one institution of higher edu6 cation (as defined in section 101 of the Higher 

7 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) that 

8 provides a dual credit program; and 

9 (B) at least one— 

10 (i) local educational agency (as de11 fined in section 8101 of the Elementary 

12 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

13 U.S.C. 7801)); or 

14 (ii) high school. 

15 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

16 the Secretary of Education. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
Anthony C. HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7381.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Alrick A. EVANS, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 18-7745.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

In connection with the Annual Report of MPAC Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

We have reviewed the Report;

based on our knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; and

based on our knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated this 29rd day of July, 2003

/s/ Adam Smith                               Adam Smith
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Michael Laidlaw                        Michael Laidlaw
Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6617

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICO MALLARD CRUMP, a/k/a David Lee Crump, a/k/a Rico Mallard, a/k/a Fred 

Crump,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00293-CCE-5)

Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rico Mallard Crump, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rico Mallard Crump appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Crump’s informal brief 

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Anthony Brian BEVAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7628.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Mario R. LOZANO, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-835.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/05/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      222,259
COMMITMENTS
  82,215    6,735   26,534   85,323  154,911  194,072  188,179   28,187   34,080

CHANGES FROM 09/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,177)
  -3,465      440    1,642      606   -5,640   -1,218   -3,558   -1,959      381

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    37.0      3.0     11.9     38.4     69.7     87.3     84.7     12.7     15.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      207)
      76       26       49       62       90      152      153
```

----

Updated October 8, 2010