alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 223 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4258 

[Report No. 116–278] 

To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court 

Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official guests of the 

Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Mr. STANTON (for himself and Mr. STEUBE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Additional sponsor: Mrs. MCBATH

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4258 RH

A BILL 

To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the 

Supreme Court Police to protect the Justices, employees, 

and official guests of the Supreme Court outside of the 

Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4258 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reauthorizing Security 

5 for Supreme Court Justices Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION AUTHORITY OF MARSHAL OF THE SU7 PREME COURT AND SUPREME COURT PO8 LICE. 

9 Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) in subsection (a)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (2), in the matter pre13 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘any 

14 State’’ and inserting ‘‘any location’’; and 

15 (B) in paragraph (3)— 

16 (i) by striking ‘‘violation of federal or 

17 state law’’ and inserting ‘‘violation of Fed18 eral or State law’’; and 

19 (ii) by striking ‘‘regulation under fed20 eral or state law’’ and inserting ‘‘regula21 tion under Federal or State law’’; and 

22 (2) in subsection (b)— 

23 (A) by striking paragraph (2); 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘ADDITIONAL REQUIRE25 MENTS’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Duties 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 4258 RH

1 under’’ and inserting ‘‘AUTHORIZATION TO

2 CARRY FIREARMS—Duties under’’; and 

3 (C) by striking ‘‘any State’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘any location’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 223 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4258 

[Report No. 116–278] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court 

grounds, and for other purposes. preme Court outside of the Supreme Court tices, employees, and official guests of the Suand the Supreme Court Police to protect the JusNOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Pauline GARCIA, petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 18-7755.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Craig P. Keller, chief financial officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig P. Keller

Craig P. Keller
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)



I, Rick Russo, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Captiva Software Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



| |  |                                       |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | Date:    November 9, 2004             |  | 
| |  |                                      
| |  | /s/ RICK E. RUSSO                     |  | 
| |  | Rick E. Russo Chief Financial Officer |  |
SPOKEO, INC., petitioner, v. Thomas ROBINS.

No. 17-806.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mark Anthony THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

*935Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,444
<SECURITIES>                                        25
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,866
<PP&E>                                         118,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,726
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                   (136,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,810
<SALES>                                        300,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,283
<CGS>                                          130,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               136,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,689
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00077-CR

Jorge Gausin

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1312982R)

March 13, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Lee Gabriel___________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4337 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to prohibit the enforcement 

of certain policies of homeowners associations regarding real property 

of servicemembers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2019 

Mr. DESJARLAIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to prohibit 

the enforcement of certain policies of homeowners associations regarding real property of servicemembers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Property Rights for 

5 Patriots Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4337 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN 

2 POLICIES OF HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS 

3 REGARDING REAL PROPERTY OF 

4 SERVICEMEMBERS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Title III of the Servicemembers 

6 Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3950 et seq.) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating section 308 as section 309; 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting after section 307 the following 

10 new section 308: 

11 ‘‘SEC. 308. ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES OF HOMEOWNERS 

12 ASSOCIATIONS. 

13 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No homeowners association 

14 may seek to enforce a policy— 

15 ‘‘(1) that restricts the right of a member of the 

16 association to lease the real property of that mem17 ber; and 

18 ‘‘(2) against a servicemember— 

19 ‘‘(A) whose residence is that real property; 

20 ‘‘(B) during a period of military service of 

21 the servicemember of not less than 90 days. 

22 ‘‘(b) MISDEMEANOR.—A person who knowingly vio23 lates this section, or who knowingly attempts to do so, 

24 shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States Code, 

25 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4337 IH

1 ‘‘(c) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DEFINED.—In this 

2 section, the term ‘homeowners association’ has the mean3 ing given that term in section 528(c)(1) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 528(c)(1)).’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

6 at the beginning of such Act is amended by striking the 

7 item relating to section 308 and inserting the following 

8 new items: 

‘‘308. Enforcement of policies of homeowners associations. 

‘‘309. Extension of protections to dependents.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Morris E. ZUKERMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-642.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4553 

To expand the tropical disease product priority review voucher program to 

encourage treatments for the Middle East respiratory syndrome, Nipah, 

and Rift Valley fever. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

VEASEY, and Mr. FORTENBERRY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To expand the tropical disease product priority review voucher program to encourage treatments for the Middle East 

respiratory syndrome, Nipah, and Rift Valley fever. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adding Epidemic Dis5 eases to the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4553 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING TROPICAL DISEASE PRODUCT PRI2 ORITY REVIEW VOUCHER PROGRAM TO EN3 COURAGE TREATMENTS FOR MIDDLE EAST 

4 RESPIRATORY SYNDROME, NIPAH, AND RIFT 

5 VALLEY FEVER. 

6 Section 524(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

7 Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360n(a)(3)) is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (S) as sub9 paragraph (V); and 

10 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (R) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(S) Middle East respiratory syndrome. 

13 ‘‘(T) Nipah. 

14 ‘‘(U) Rift Valley fever.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Sylvia Ogbenyeanu WALTER-EZE, aka Sylvia O. Okam, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7083.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Wanda McClure DRY, as Administrator Ad Litem for the Estate of Laurence R. Dry, petitioner, v. Christi Lenay Fields STEELE, et al.

No. 18-804.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of St. John Knits, International, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Richard Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 26, 2005



/s/ Richard CohenRichard Cohen Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2010062EN.01003001.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 137/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2008/681/EC of 28 July 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain substances in Annexes I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2008/681/EC of 28 July 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain substances in Annexes I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 12zj (Commission Decision 2008/831/EC) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘12zk. | 32008 D 0681: Commission Decision 2008/681/EC of 28 July 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain substances in Annexes I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ L 222, 20.8.2008, p. 7).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zk.

32008 D 0681: Commission Decision 2008/681/EC of 28 July 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain substances in Annexes I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ L 222, 20.8.2008, p. 7).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2008/681/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 28.5.2009, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 222, 20.8.2008, p. 7.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. on Form 10-K, for the period ending December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Assaf Ran, Chief Executive Officer of Manhattan Bridge
Capital, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.




Date:
      March 16, 2010
              /s/ Assaf RanAssaf Ran(principal executive officer)




*   A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Nicholas Bernard ACKLIN, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-640.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-33,191-04

EX P ARTE WILL IAM LLOYD MAC EACHRAN, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F 39146-A IN THE 249 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM JOHNSON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 4 1 8 S

. W

. 2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of possession of controlled substanc e and one count of possession of cer tain chemica ls w ith intent to manufa cture and sente nced to f ifteen y ear s’ imprisonment in each c ount. Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary beca use the plea ag ree ment is impossibl e to perf orm, leaving him illega lly restrai n ed. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court i s the2

appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropr iate case , the trial court may rely o n i t s persona l

rec ollection. Id

. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hearing , it shall de termine whether Applicant is indig ent. I f Appl i ca n t is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law in reg ard to A pplicant’s claim that a materia l stipulation in his g uilty plea is impossib l e t o perf orm. The court shall make specific finding s addre ssing whether Applicant understood that the proviso that the stipulation was “subjec t to Chapter 508 of t he Gov’t. Code” could mean that the ter ms of the stipulation could be defe ated by other aspec ts of the Gover nment Code, such as the require ment conditioning mandatory supervision rele ase on the Boa rd’s discretion or the provision allowing potential forf eiture of street time. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A sup p l em en t al t ranscript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: Aug ust 22, 2018 Do not publish