alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1264 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1264

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that each 
employer show on the W-2 form of each employee the employer's share of 
taxes for old-age, survivors, and disability insurance and for hospital 
 insurance for the employee as well as the total amount of such taxes 
                           for such employee.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1264

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that each 
employer show on the W-2 form of each employee the employer's share of 
taxes for old-age, survivors, and disability insurance and for hospital 
 insurance for the employee as well as the total amount of such taxes 
                           for such employee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right-To-Know National Payroll 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF FICA AND MEDICARE TAX ON W-2 FORM.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 6051 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to requirement of receipts for 
employees) is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (10), 
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (11) and inserting a 
comma, and by inserting after paragraph (11) the following new 
paragraphs:
            ``(12) the total amount of tax with respect to the employee 
        imposed on such person under--
                    ``(A) section 3111(a),
                    ``(B) section 3111(b),
                    ``(C) so much of the tax imposed under section 
                3221(a) as relates to section 3111(a), and
                    ``(D) so much of the tax imposed under section 
                3221(a) as relates to section 3111(b), and
            ``(13) the total amount of tax with respect to the employee 
        for old-age, survivors, and disability insurance and for 
        hospital insurance, which is the sum of--
                    ``(A) each of the amounts shown under subparagraphs 
                (A) through (D) of paragraph (12), plus
                    ``(B) the amount shown under paragraph (6).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to remuneration paid after December 31, 2000.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 18, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO

     To my knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September
30, 2002,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.

                               By:/s/ Harry J. Bailey
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Harry J. Bailey
                                  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2002

<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                              CERTIFICATION OF CFO

     To my knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September
30, 2002,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 14(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.



                               By:/s/ Bradley L. Smith
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Bradley L. Smith
                                  Title:  Senior Vice President - Treasurer



Date: November 14, 2002
Antonio BRYANT, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-7270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4595 

To require that the headquarters for any agency of the Federal Government 

located in the National Capital region shall remain in the National 

Capital region unless relocation legislation is enacted, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2019 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. RASKIN, and Mr. BROWN of Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require that the headquarters for any agency of the 

Federal Government located in the National Capital region shall remain in the National Capital region unless 

relocation legislation is enacted, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Federal 

5 Agencies and Employees from Political Interference Act 

6 of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4595 IH

1 SEC. 2. AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS LO2 CATED IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

3 (a) HEADQUARTERS.—The headquarters for any 

4 agency of the Federal Government located in the National 

5 Capital region on the date of introduction in the House 

6 of Representatives of this Act shall remain in the National 

7 Capital region unless legislation is enacted into law ap8 proving or otherwise providing for relocation. 

9 (b) EMPLOYEE STATIONS.—Any employee position 

10 with a duty station in the National Capital region on the 

11 date of introduction in the House of Representatives of 

12 this Act shall remain stationed in the National Capital re13 gion unless legislation is enacted into law approving or 

14 otherwise providing for relocation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4609 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4609

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include a full-time job 
 with a veterans or military service organization as a public service 
           job eligible for public service loan forgiveness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2019

  Mr. Levin of California (for himself and Ms. Porter) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include a full-time job 
 with a veterans or military service organization as a public service 
           job eligible for public service loan forgiveness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veteran Service Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. FULL-TIME JOB WITH VETERANS OR MILITARY SERVICE ORGANIZATION.

    Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) a full-time job with a veterans or 
                        military service organization (as described in 
                        paragraph (19) or (23) of section 501(c) of the 
                        Internal Revenue Code) that does not engage in 
                        partisan political campaign activity.''.
                                 <all>
```
Tony DICKINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/09/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      152,447
COMMITMENTS
  36,525   27,536   24,318   71,977   71,410  132,820  123,263   19,627   29,184

CHANGES FROM 02/02/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -322)
   1,593    4,688   -1,146     -948   -3,351     -502      190      179     -513

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.0     18.1     16.0     47.2     46.8     87.1     80.9     12.9     19.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      169)
      46       33       53       60       63      134      134
```

----

Updated February 7, 2010
**Exhibit10.A**

**AMENDMENTNO. 1TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

             **THISAMENDMENT NO. 1** (the “Amendment No. 1”) is entered into as of June30, 2001, and amends the Employment Agreement, dated February 18, 2000, by andamong Voice and Wireless Corporation, a Minnesota corporation f/k/a KensingtonInternational Holding Corporation (the “Company”), Mail Call, Inc., a Floridacorporation (“Mail Call”), and Ronald Schnell (“Employee”) (the"Agreement").  Defined terms herein shall have the meaningascribed to them in the Agreement unless defined herein.

**AGREEMENT**

             **NOW,THEREFORE**,in consideration of the mutual covenants andconditions set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration thereceipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto dohereby agree as follows:

             1.          Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is herebyamended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

1.          Employment.  The Employee is to be employed in thecapacity of Vice President of the Company and Vice President of Mail Call, andshall perform the duties customarily performed by persons situated in a similarcapacity.  The Employee’s other dutiesshall be such as the Company's President or the Company's Board of Directors(the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) may from time to time reasonablydirect.  The Employee agrees that shouldMail Call be merged into the Company, the Employee shall continue as the VicePresident of the Company.  The Employeeagrees that as Vice President, his duties do not include any sales, marketingor administrative duties, unless specifically assigned by the Company's ChiefExecutive Officer or President.  TheEmployee further agrees that he shall work full-time for the Company ontechnical services and on enhancing technical services for the Company asdirected by the Company's President. The Employee further agrees to train other employees of the Company ontechnical aspects of Mail Call and the Company, and agrees to oversee thetechnical employees of the Company and Mail Call.

             2.          Exceptfor the provisions expressly amended pursuant to the terms of this AmendmentNo. 1, all of the remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement remain infull force and effect and are unaffected by the execution of this Amendment No.1.

             3.          ThisAmendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts and by theseveral parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemedto be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and thesame instrument.****             IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersignedhave executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.
 VOICE AND WIRELESS CORPORATION    By:     Mark Haggerty  President and Chief Executive Officer    MAIL CALL, INC.    By:     Mark Haggerty  President        Ronald Schnell, Individually
 **
Darnell GRIMSLEY, petitioner, v. Tom McGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 18-7713.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jonathan Kip JONES, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5856.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Shomari Salim DALEY, petitioner, v. MARYLAND, et al.

No. 18-6878.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Allen H. Koranda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAF Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: |  | November 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/    ALLEN H.
KORANDA  
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Allen H. Koranda         
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Heriberto MENENDEZ, petitioner, v. Marshall GARBER.

No. 18-566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank J. Fradella, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:			 August 14, 2006 | /s/Frank J. FradellaFrank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, et al., appellants, v. Golden BETHUNE-HILL, et al.

No. 18-281.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted in part, and the time is divided as follows: 25 minutes for appellants, 10 minutes for the Solicitor General as *amicus curiae* , 10 minutes for appellees Virginia State Board of Elections, et al., and 15 minutes for appellees Golden Bethune-Hill, et al.
Michael R. HAYNES, petitioner, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, et al.

No. 18-7355.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 114

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Federal Credit Union 
      Act to prohibit fees for using teller windows at depository 
                 institutions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Olver, 
Mr. Filner, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Luther, and Ms. Lee) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Federal Credit Union 
      Act to prohibit fees for using teller windows at depository 
                 institutions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teller Fee Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. FEES FOR USING TELLER WINDOWS PROHIBITED.

    (a) Federal Deposit Insurance Act.--Section 18 of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(t) Prohibition on Fees for Using Teller Windows.--
            ``(1) In general.--No fee may be imposed, directly or 
        indirectly, on a customer of an insured depository institution 
        for using the services, in person, of any individual employed 
        by the depository institution at a domestic branch of the 
        institution.
            ``(2) Regulations.--Each Federal banking agency shall 
        prescribe such regulations as the agency determines to be 
        appropriate to ensure compliance by insured depository 
        institutions with the requirements of this subsection.''.
    (b) Federal Credit Union Act.--Section 205 of the Federal Credit 
Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1785) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(h) Prohibition on Fees for Using Teller Windows.--
            ``(1) In general.--No fee may be imposed, directly or 
        indirectly, on a member of an insured credit union for using 
        the services, in person, of any individual employed by the 
        credit union at an office of the credit union where deposits 
        are accepted or checks are paid or money lent.
            ``(2) Regulations.--The Board shall prescribe such 
        regulations as the Board determines to be appropriate to ensure 
        compliance by insured credit unions with the requirements of 
        this subsection.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply after the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Patrick J. MacPHERSON v. ManorCARE OF YEADON PA, et al.

No. 16-1175 (R46-015).

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
Leona Louise SUTTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6925.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.