alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 286/7Sep

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 477 September 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 286

English edition

Legislation

Volume 477 September 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1571/2004 of 6 September 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1571/2004 of 6 September 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6563
ALLAN A. PETERSEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LAVEDA RAWLS; TONY BAKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-178-5-BO) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan A. Petersen, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Allan A. Petersen appeals the district court’s order denying his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeePetersen v. Rawls , No. CA-03-178-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NEW WORLD CAR NISSAN, INC., d/b/a 

WORLD CAR HYUNDAI, AND NEW 

WORLD CAR IMPORTS, SAN 

ANTONIO, INC., d/b/a WORLD CAR 

HYUNDAI, 

 Appellants,

v.

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA AND 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR 

VEHICLES,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00147-CV

Appeal from the

53rd District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# D-1-GN-20-002662)

O R D E R

The reformed briefs have been filed per this Court’s order of October 6, 2022. Therefore, 

the Court REINSTATES the appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal.

# SUMMARY:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is publishing this notice to announce the renewal of the Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC). The Commission has determined that the renewal of the MRAC is necessary and in the public's interest, and the Commission has consulted with the General Services Administration's Committee Management Secretariat regarding the MRAC's renewal.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alicia Lewis, MRAC Designated Federal Officer, at 202-418-5862 or                         *alewis@cftc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In support of the Commission's mission of promoting the integrity, resilience, and vibrancy of the U.S. derivatives markets through sound regulation as well as the monitoring and management of systemic risk, the MRAC's objectives and scope of activities are to conduct public meetings, advise, and submit reports and recommendations to the Commission on: (1) Systemic issues that impact the stability of the derivatives markets and other related financial markets; and (2) the impact and implications of the evolving market structure of the derivatives markets and other related financial markets. The MRAC will operate for two years from the date of renewal unless the Commission directs that the MRAC terminate on an earlier date. A copy of the renewal charter will be posted on the Commission's website at                     *www.cftc.gov.*

Dated: April 18, 2022.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-08540 Filed 4-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
James Eric JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 17-6318.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*724Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Eileen L. ZELL, petitioner, v. Katherine M. KLINGELHAFER, et al.

No. 18-1005.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
ENCINO MOTORCARS, LLC, petitioner, v. Hector NAVARRO, et al.

No. 16-1362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 28, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, David Uppal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American United Gold Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 16, 2006

/s/ David Uppal

David Uppal

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission [FR ID 83571]
 The following items were released by the Commission on April 19, 2022 and deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Thursday, April 21, 2022, Open Meeting. These items were previously listed in the Commission's Sunshine Notice on Thursday, April 14, 2022. 3
MEDIA
*Title:*
                             Restricted Adjudicatory Matter.
                             
                                *Summary:*
                                 The Commission will consider a restricted adjudicatory matter.4
MEDIA
*Title:*
                             Restricted Adjudicatory Matter.
                             
                                *Summary:*
                                 The Commission will consider a restricted adjudicatory matter.
 
 The meeting will be webcast with open captioning at: 
                    *www.fcc.gov/​live.*
                     Open captioning will be provided as well as a text only version on the FCC website. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. In your request, include a description of the accommodation you will need and a way we can contact you if we need more information. Last minute requests will be accepted but may be impossible to fill. Send an email to: 
                    *fcc504@fcc.gov*
                     or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530. Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from the Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-0500. Audio/Video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the internet from the FCC Live web page at 
                    *www.fcc.gov/​live.* Marlene Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2022-09059 Filed 4-25-22; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Falon B. DAVIS, petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al.

No. 17-6972.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Donate GRAHAM, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-6679.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Jared MORRISON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5888.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal C 302/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 302 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 576 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 302

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 576 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 302/01 | Information from the Commission about notifications by the Member States of decisions concerning the application of Decision No 565/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 302/01

Information from the Commission about notifications by the Member States of decisions concerning the application of Decision No 565/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 302/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 302/03 | Notice from the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Croatia pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 302/02

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 302/03

Notice from the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Croatia pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 302/04 | Re-notification of a previously notified concentration (Case M.7265 — Zimmer/Biomet) (1) | 4 |
| 2014/C 302/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems / KSPG / KS AluTech JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 302/04

Re-notification of a previously notified concentration (Case M.7265 — Zimmer/Biomet) (1)

4

2014/C 302/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems / KSPG / KS AluTech JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert S. Bland, certify that:

1.               I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quotesmith.com, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

c)              disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)              all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 15, 2005
|   |   |   | /s/ ROBERT S. BLAND     |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Robert S. Bland         |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth Schilling, Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer of IBIZ
Technology Corp, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
         ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: February 12, 2003

                                             /s/ Kenneth Schilling
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Name: Kenneth Schilling
                                             Title: CEO and Acting CFO
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1234

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax

on telephone and other communications services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1999

Mr. GARY MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. MCCOLLUM,

Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. FOLEY, Ms. DUNN, Mr. FORBES, Mr. TANCREDO,

Mr. TERRY, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. THORNBERRY, and Mr. BOEHLERT)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the excise tax on telephone and other communications

services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND

4 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to facilities and services) is

7 amended by striking subchapter B.

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
2

•HR 1234 IH

1 (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by

2 striking ‘‘chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed

3 by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of

4 chapter 33,’’ and inserting ‘‘and chapter 32 (other

5 than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and

6 4121),’’.

7 (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such

8 Code is amended by striking ‘‘section 4251 or’’.

9 (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such

10 Code is amended—

11 (i) by striking ‘‘imposed by— and all that

12 follows through ‘‘with respect to’’ and inserting

13 ‘‘imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect

14 to’’, and

15 (ii) by striking ‘‘bills rendered or’’.

16 (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e)

17 is amended by striking ‘‘COMMUNICATIONS SERV18 ICES AND’’.

19 (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by

20 striking ‘‘4251, 4261, or 4271’’ each place it ap21 pears and inserting ‘‘4261 or 4271’’.

22 (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such

23 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of

24 subparagraph (B), by striking subparagraph (C),
3

•HR 1234 IH

1 and by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subpara2 graph (C).

3 (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of

4 such Code is amended by striking the item relating

5 to subchapter B.

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

7 this section shall apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills

8 first rendered more than 90 days after the date of the

9 enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

            PHILADELPHIA CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
          (Dollars and Share Data in Thousands, except Per Share Data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         As of and For the Three 
                                                          Months Ended March 31,
                                                         -----------------------
                                                          1999             1998
                                                          ----             ----
<S>                                                     <C>              <C>    
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding               12,209           12,263

Weighted-Average Share Equivalents  Outstanding           2,824            2,791
                                                        -------          -------
Weighted-Average Shares and Share
 Equivalents Outstanding                                 15,033           15,054
                                                        =======          =======

Net Income                                              $ 4,937          $ 4,518
                                                        =======          =======

Basic Earnings per Share                                $  0.40          $  0.37
                                                        =======          =======

Diluted Earnings per Share                              $  0.33          $  0.30
                                                        =======          =======
</TABLE>


                                       14
Troun Vanreckus BROCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7030.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.