alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Mortgage Holding Corporation, a Corporation, O. Falk and Ernest Berger, *Appellants,*v. Joseph P. Summy, and Margaret Summy, *Appellees.*

Opinion filed May 23, 1929.

On Petition for Re-i-iearing.

Buford, J.

In this case petition for re-hearing calls our attention to the fact that in the opinion it is stated. *‘1*The stock was delivered to the appellees at that place”, meaning at the office of the corporation in Hillsborough County; and also that the opinion further states that, ‘ ‘ There is no evidence in the record that the appellant, The Mortgage *410Holding Corporation, at any time offered to deliver any of its capital stock * * * except-in Hillsborough County,” and that these two statements in the opinion are not in accord with the record. Upon an inspection of the record on pages referred to by counsel in petition for rehearing, we find that the contention made is correct.

The certificates of stock were delivered in Pinellas County, but they were so delivered in that County after the purchase and sale had been entirely closed in Hillsborough County. After the sale had been consummated in Hills-borough County and after the elapse of several months, while the certificates were being held, prepared in the manner directed by the purchaser, the purchaser sought to rescind the purchase and for the purpose of determining what should be done an officer of the corporation went with the purchaser and the then owner of the certificates of stock, to the office of the purchaser’s attorney in Clear-water, in Pinellas County, and there the purchaser and the officer of the corporation explained in detail the transactions between the parties, exhibited the evidence of the purchase and sale of the stock, and the purchaser’s attorney then and there advised the purchaser in effect that he had bought and paid for the stock and would have to accept the certificates, and, thereupon the certificates were delivered to him. These facts do not change the status or the rights of the parties, and, therefore, the petition for re-hearing is denied.

Whitfield, Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Edward J. Puisis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton SuperiorCorporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: December 15, 2006     /s/ Edward J. Puisis     Edward J. Puisis  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/23/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       57,147
COMMITMENTS
   4,827    7,957    3,314   38,701   41,847   46,842   53,118   10,305    4,029

CHANGES FROM 03/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -20,162)
  -3,883    1,005   -2,998  -12,559  -16,906  -19,440  -18,899     -722   -1,263

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.4     13.9      5.8     67.7     73.2     82.0     92.9     18.0      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
      11       12        8       17       17       34       31
```

----

Updated March 26, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 11 XATA CORPORATION
EARNINGS PER SHARE
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 Three Months
    
    Nine MonthsEnded
    
    EndedBASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2004Net loss
    
    $
    (127,831
    )
    
    $
    (751,982
    )Less: preferred stock dividend
    
    
    (40,968
    )
    
    
    (92,861
    )Net loss as adjusted
    
    $
    (168,799
    )
    
    $
    (844,843
    )Weighted average common and common share equivalents
    
    
    7,051,079
    
    
    
    7,001,462Basic and diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.02
    )
    
    $
    (0.12
    )
 BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION OF LOSS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2004Net loss
    
    $
    (127,831
    )
    
    $
    (751,982
    )Less: preferred stock dividend
    
    
    (40,968
    )
    
    
    (92,861
    )Less: preferred stock deemed dividend
    
    
    (100,931
    )
    
    
    (729,913
    )Net loss to common shareholders
    
    $
    (269,730
    )
    
    $
    (1,574,756
    )Weighted average common and common share equivalents
    
    
    7,051,079
    
    
    
    7,001,462Basic and diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.04
    )
    
    $
    (0.22
    )
 Note: See Note 6 in Notes to Financial Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the three month perioded
ended June 30, 2004.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's (NSB) Committee on External Engagement hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, April 28, 2022, from 2:00-3:00 p.m. EST.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The agenda of the teleconference is: Approve February 2022 minutes; Discuss NSB survey feedback and draft recommendations to update NSB honorary awards; Recent and upcoming engagement; and Discuss the next iteration of the Committee, what should it aim to do?

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Nadine Lymn,                         *nlymn@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Members of the public can observe this meeting through a YouTube livestream. Meeting information including a YouTube link is available from the NSB website at                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​index.jsp#up.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-09037 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1157 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1157

   To require appropriate off-budget treatment of Social Security in 
                    official budget pronouncements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1999

Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Minge, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Peterson 
of Minnesota, and Mr. Ramstad) introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require appropriate off-budget treatment of Social Security in 
                    official budget pronouncements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Trust Fund Integrity 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING SOCIAL SECURITY FROM BUDGET PRONOUNCEMENTS.

    Any official statement issued by the Office of Management and 
Budget, the Congressional Budget Office, or any other agency or 
instrumentality of the Federal Government of surplus or deficit totals 
of the budget of the United States Government as submitted by the 
President or of the surplus or deficit totals of the congressional 
budget, and any description of, or reference to, such totals in any 
official publication or material issued by either of such Offices or 
any other such agency or instrumentality, shall exclude the outlays and 
receipts of the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program 
under title II of the Social Security Act (including the Federal Old-
Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
Insurance Trust Fund) and the related provisions of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of section 2 shall apply with respect to fiscal year 
2000 and subsequent fiscal years.
                                 <all>
```
Susan DUFFY, petitioner, v. Anthony Fred MARTIN.

No. 17-539.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                  
|                        |  |  |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al., petitioners, v. Mary Faricy PARDUE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John N. Faricy.

No. 18-621.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.

*1262Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Hamid R. ASSADIAN, petitioner, v. Reza PARSI, et al.

No. 17-1626.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
William PINET-FUENTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999 Broadway
Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,125,000   <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      50,872,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,411,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,546,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     37,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,074,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,546,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,315,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,704,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,886,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (221,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (221,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (221,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (476.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (476.09)
<FN>
<F1>  Includes $2,580,000 of restricted cash.
</FN>




</TABLE>
Lisa J. GILLARD, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-6947.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Josh Randall RILEY, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-6288.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Phillip A. Perillo, the Chief Financial Officer of Life Quotes, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PHILLIP A. PERILLO        
|Name: Phillip A. Perillo      
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
|Date: March 5, 2010           

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Life Quotes, Inc. and will be retained by Life Quotes, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6329** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHONTONIO L. WITHERSPOON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. Patrick Michael Duffy , Senior District Judge. ( 2:08

- cr - 00844

- PMD

- 1 )

Submitted : May 23 , 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shontonio L. Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew J. Modica, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shontonio L. Witherspoon appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the criminal judgment entered in his case in 2010. Rule 60, however, is applicable only in civil cases; it is not a mechanism available to r eopen or overturn a criminal judgment.
See United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that a district court has no authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order denying an 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion). And in any event, it is evident from the record that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Witherspoon’s motion. See Aikens v. Ingram , 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Richard HOLMAN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7176.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3653 

To amend section 1342 of title 31, United States Code (the Antideficiency 

Act), to define the term voluntary services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2019 

Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 1342 of title 31, United States Code 

(the Antideficiency Act), to define the term voluntary 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charity And Relief 

5 In Disarray And Distress Act’’ or the ‘‘CARIDAD Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY SERVICES. 

7 Section 1342 of title 31, United States Code (the 

8 Antideficiency Act), is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following new sentence: ‘‘As used in this section, the term 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3653 IH

1 ‘voluntary services’ does not include the donation of 

2 goods.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q REPORT**

**OF**

**EXABYTE CORPORATION**

**FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,2006**

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Exabyte Corporation (“Exabyte”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-Q Report of Exabyte for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

We certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exabyte.

This Certification is executed as of May 12, 2006.

/s/ TOM W. WARD                                                      

Tom W. Ward

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

/s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE                                      

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      102,817
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     45,419
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          20,322
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   4,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,493
<COMMON>                                         6,828
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       44,938
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             22,639
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  74,405
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,080
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            57,045
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               2,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,206
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      2,810
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    90
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  23,357
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  173,493
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       43,971
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,210
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      39,585
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,386
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,646
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   6,032
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,081
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,741
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        267
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,474
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,285
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           5,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-93403, No. 333-38114, No. 333-85392)of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended, and of our report dated June 30, 2004, relating to the financial statements ofThe Staubach Company-West, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years then ended, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 28, 2005
Victor Hugo MALDONADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6858.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.