alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q REPORT**

**OF**

**EXABYTE CORPORATION**

**FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,2006**

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Exabyte Corporation (“Exabyte”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-Q Report of Exabyte for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

We certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exabyte.

This Certification is executed as of August 11, 2006.

/s/ TOM W. WARD                                                      

Tom W. Ward

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

/s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE                                      

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Jose Joaquin RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Joseph APONTE, et al.

No. 18-5425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Spurgeon GREEN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9149.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Shaun ROBINSON, petitioner, v. NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, et al.

No. 17-9036.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                    
|---------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin
|                       |  | Craig F. Fortin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,781
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             124
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,962
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     88,110
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,018
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,458
<LOANS>                                        270,118
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,161
<DEPOSITS>                                     315,637
<SHORT-TERM>                                    37,503
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,953
<LONG-TERM>                                        892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 394,161
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,608
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    14
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,444
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,550
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,894
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,663
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,663
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        689
<LOANS-PAST>                                       100
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,686
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      273
<RECOVERIES>                                        37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,650
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,650
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 297/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.297.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 297 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5313 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.297.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 297

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5313 November 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 37 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of filament lamps for use in approved lamp units on power-driven vehicles and of their trailers | 1 |
| | * | Amendments to Regulation No 13 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles of categories M, N and O with regard to braking | 183 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 37 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of filament lamps for use in approved lamp units on power-driven vehicles and of their trailers

1

*

Amendments to Regulation No 13 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles of categories M, N and O with regard to braking

183

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
In Re Michael Allyn KENNEDY, petitioner.

No. 17-5914.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/02/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      523,826
COMMITMENTS
  67,647   27,673  118,234  321,323  362,534  507,204  508,440   16,622   15,386

CHANGES FROM 10/26/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,228)
   9,390     -146   -3,993   -9,269      159   -3,873   -3,980   -1,355   -1,248

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.9      5.3     22.6     61.3     69.2     96.8     97.1      3.2      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      134)
      39       21       48       61       70      120      122
```

----

Updated November 5, 2010
# L_2007103EN.01005401.xml

| 20.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 103/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 103/54

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2004/752/EC, Euratom of 2 November 2004 establishing the European Union Civil Service Tribunal

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 333 of 9 November 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union L 333 of 9 November 2004

On page 10, Annex to the Decision (Annex I ‘The European Union Civil Service Tribunal’ to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice), Article 7(5):

for:

‘5.   The Civil Service Tribunal shall rule on the costs of a case. Subject to the specific provisions of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs should the court so decide.’,

read:

‘5.   The Civil Service Tribunal shall rule on the costs of a case. Subject to the specific provisions of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party's pleadings.’.

---
Tyree Marquez BURT, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7025.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
Earnest GIBSON, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8959.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Reginald L. SPEARS, aka RLS Ar Abdul Aziz, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7274.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
David BRANDON, petitioner, v. Sarah BRANDON.

No. 18-930.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as  Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Portal Software, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Little, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2003



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/     JOHN E.
LITTLE
|                      

By: John E. Little

Chief Executive Officer



In connection with the Annual Report of Portal Software, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Howard A. Bain III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2003



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/     HOWARD A. BAIN
III
|                          

By: Howard A. Bain III

Chief Financial Officer
Artez HAMMONDS, petitioner, v. Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9046.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

s0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146079

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146079

COA: 308560

Berrien CC: 2007

- 402268

- FC

JEREMY LARRONN BURRELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEAH S. CALDWELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 17066

D.C. No. 2:19

- cv

- 01357

- TLN

- AC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Leah S. Caldwell appeals pro se from the district court ’ s judgment

dismissing her action alleging, among other violations, claims under the Civil

Rights Act of 1866 and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

. We review for an abuse of discretion a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 17066

district court’s dismissal of an action as frivolous

. Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S.

25, 33 (1992 ). We affirm

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Cald well’s

action as frivolous because the action lacked an arguable basis either in law or in

fact. See id. at 31

- 33 (discussing the meaning of “frivolousness”).

T he district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Caldwell’s

complaint without leave to amend because amendment would be futile

. See

Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

, 656 F.3d 1034 , 1041 (9th Cir. 2011)

(setting forth standard of revie w and explaining that a district court may dismiss

without leave to amend when amendment would be futile).

We reject as without merit Caldwell’s contentions that the district court

should have disqualified itself , or permitted discovery or an evidentiary h earing.

Caldwell’s motion to update the appellees is denied.

AFFIRMED.
James PINKNEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6612.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Stokeling v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 544, 202 L.Ed.2d 512 (2019).
Angadbir Singh SALWAN, petitioner, v. Joseph MATAL, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 17-5614.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal L 119/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 119 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 594 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 119

English edition

Legislation

Volume 594 May 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA | 89 |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime | 132 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (
  1
  )

1

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA

89

*

Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime

132

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Eddie HALL, petitioner, v. J.A. TERRIS, Warden.

No. 18-7498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Steven KLIKNO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5018.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in light of *Stokeling v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 544, 202 L.E.2d 512 (2019).
Antonio U. AKEL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5578.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.