alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ennis REED, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6411.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

*1261Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/02/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       45,010
COMMITMENTS
  12,146    3,537    6,099   17,807   21,280   36,052   30,916    8,958   14,094

CHANGES FROM 01/26/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,752)
     -43     -506       90   -1,179   -1,010   -1,132   -1,426     -620     -326

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.0      7.9     13.6     39.6     47.3     80.1     68.7     19.9     31.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      11       12       15       23       17       44       40
```

----

Updated February 5, 2010
**Exhibit 23.2**

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

	Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective containsan untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be statedtherein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiringa security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that, at the time ofsuch acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claimagainst, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certifiedany part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use inconnection with the registration statement, with respect to the statement insuch registration statement or report which purports to have been prepared orcertified by the accountant.  

	In March 2002, the Company appointed Ernst& Young LLP as its independent auditors following the termination of the engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"). For additionalinformation, see the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2002.Because Andersen is no longer in practice as a public accountant, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen's writtenconsent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's RegistrationStatement (No. 333-90363) onForm S-8 (the "Registration Statement") of Andersen's auditreport with respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements as of December31, 2001 and for each of the two years in the period then ended.  Under these circumstances, Rule437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report on Form10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement, without awritten consent from Andersen.  As a result, with respect to transactions in theCompany's securities pursuant to the Registration Statement that occur subsequent to thedate this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the SecuritiesAct for any untrue statements of a material fact, or any omissions of a material factrequired to be stated herein.  Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim againstAndersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.

The Company believes, however, that other persons thatmay be liable under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act, including the Company'sofficers and directors, may still rely on Andersen's audit reports as being madeby an expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence defense under Section11(b) of the Securities Act.
William G. ALLEN, petitioner, v. Bruce WESTBROOKS, Warden.

No. 17-6074.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Carol MURPHY, petitioner, v. MAINE.

No. 17-6786.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/14/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      125,941
COMMITMENTS
   2,042   16,971    8,992   96,737   83,643  107,771  109,606   18,170   16,335

CHANGES FROM 09/07/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,645)
      93    3,501    1,254   10,857    3,933   12,204    8,688    4,441    7,957

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     1.6     13.5      7.1     76.8     66.4     85.6     87.0     14.4     13.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       61)
       5       24       20       20       25       43       56
```

----

Updated September 17, 2010
Sherwin V. KOYLE, petitioner, v. SAND CANYON CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-7463.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1233Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1229

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the types of equipment which may be acquired with tax-exempt financing by volunteer

fire departments and to provide a comparable treatment for emergency

medical service organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1999

Mr. GEJDENSON (for himself, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. METCALF, Mr. SHOWS, Mr.

RAHALL, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. FROST, Mr. CALVERT, Mr.

RANGEL, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. MCINNIS, and Mr.

LATOURETTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand

the types of equipment which may be acquired with

tax-exempt financing by volunteer fire departments and

to provide a comparable treatment for emergency medical

service organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volunteer Firefighter

5 Equipment Enhancement Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1229 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EQUIPMENT OF VOLUNTEER FIRE

2 DEPARTMENTS ELIGIBLE FOR TAX-EXEMPT

3 FINANCING.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

5 150(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

6 to bonds of certain volunteer fire departments) is amended

7 by striking ‘‘or firetruck’’ and inserting ‘‘firetruck, ambu8 lance, or other emergency response vehicle’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall apply to bonds issued after the date

11 of the enactment of this Act.

12 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE

13 ORGANIZATIONS UNDER TAX-EXEMPT BONDS

14 RULES.

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 150 of

16 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesig17 nating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting

18 after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:

19 ‘‘(3) COMPARABLE TREATMENT FOR VOLUN20 TEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ORGANIZA21 TIONS.—

22 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An organization which

23 provides volunteer emergency medical services

24 shall be treated for purposes of this subsection

25 as if—
3

•HR 1229 IH

1 ‘‘(i) such organization were a volun2 teer fire department, and

3 ‘‘(ii) such services were firefighting

4 services.

5 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE.—For purposes of ap6 plying this subsection to an organization de7 scribed in subparagraph (A) which does not

8 provide firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)

9 shall be applied by substituting ‘other emer10 gency medical services’ for ‘other firefighting

11 services’.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall apply to bonds issued after the date

14 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-95411) pertaining to the Quotesmith.com, Inc. 1997 Stock Option
Plan and the Quotesmith.com, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 16, 2004 (except Note 10, as to which the date is March 3, 2004) with
respect to the financial statements of Quotesmith.com, Inc included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Chicago,
Illinois
March 18, 2004

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TheStreet.com, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric Ashman, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
              Eric AshmanEric
                Ashman
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              March
                14, 2008
Ronald DUHE, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, et al.

No. 18-720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Anton WATKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6807.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interland, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Gonzalo Troncoso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: July 6, 2005 /s/ Gonzalo TroncosoGonzalo TroncosoVice President and Chief Financial
Officer
PAPIERFABRIK AUGUST KOEHLER SE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-384.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4699 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 

requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds for 

Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2019 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove 

the matching requirement for a territory to use specially 

allocated Federal funds for Medicare covered part D 

drugs for low-income individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4699 IH

1 SECTION 1. REMOVING MATCHING REQUIREMENT FOR A 

2 TERRITORY TO USE SPECIALLY ALLOCATED 

3 FEDERAL FUNDS FOR MEDICARE COVERED 

4 PART D DRUGS FOR LOW-INCOME INDIVID5 UALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1935(e)(1)(B) of the So7 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u–5(e)(1)(B)) is amend8 ed by inserting before the period at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘and the Federal medical assistance percentage shall be 

10 100 percent for expenditures under such plan that are at11 tributable to this subsection and the additional amounts 

12 provided under paragraph (3)’’. 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1905(b) of 

14 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended 

15 by striking ‘‘section 1933(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘sections 

16 1933(d) and 1935(e)(1)(B)’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts expended for fiscal pe19 riods beginning on or after October 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TheStreet.com, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Clarke, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

> (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
>   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
>     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ THOMAS J. CLARKE, JR.
|-------------------------
|Thomas J. Clarke, Jr.    
|Chairman of the Board and
|Chief Executive Officer  
|March 16, 2007           

---
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tali
Dinar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




November
      18, 2010
              /s/
      Tali DinarTali
      DinarChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
# L_2009026EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER MIRANDA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 349

- CR

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20130D04013 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until August 11

, 2016

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Veronica Teresa Lerma , the Appellant’s Attorney,

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 11 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 th day of July , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez , and Hughes , JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                     
|--------------------- |  | --------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith
|                      |  | Timothy L. Smith    



47
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1239

To designate certain lands in Alaska as wilderness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1999

Mr. VENTO (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. FORBES, Mr.

BONIOR, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr.

SHAYS, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr.

COYNE, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. LEACH, Mrs. MEEK

of Florida, Mr. CAMPBELL, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr.

MCNULTY, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. NADLER, Mr. MARKEY,

Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. WYNN, Mr. BARRETT

of Wisconsin, Ms. RIVERS, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. WEYGAND, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mrs.

MINK of Hawaii, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr.

LOBIONDO, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. FARR of California, Mr. BERMAN, Mr.

LAFALCE, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. RANGEL, Mr.

MARTINEZ, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. STARK, Mrs. KELLY, Mr.

ROTHMAN, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. CLAY, Mr.

WEXLER, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. HOLT, Mr. MATSUI, Mr.

DEUTSCH, Mr. FILNER, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts,

Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MORAN of Virginia,

Mr. PAYNE, Mr. KIND, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr.

DIXON, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. EVANS, Mr.

BALDACCI, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. INSLEE, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr.

THOMPSON of California, Mr. SABO, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. HALL of Ohio,

Ms. WATERS, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. SANCHEZ, Mr.

PORTER, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. SAWYER, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr.

LAMPSON, Mr. MOORE, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. OLVER, Mr.

MINGE, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. BOUCHER,

Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. LUTHER, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs.

CAPPS, Mr. OBEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, and Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Resources
2

•HR 1239 IH

A BILL

To designate certain lands in Alaska as wilderness.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Morris K. Udall Wil5 derness Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREA.

7 In furtherance of the provisions of the Wilderness

8 Act, an area in Alaska comprising approximately

9 1,559,538 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled

10 ‘‘Arctic National Wildlife Refuge—1002 Area Alternative

11 E—Wilderness Designation’’, dated October 28, 1991,

12 and available for inspection in the offices of the Secretary

13 of the Interior, is hereby designated as wilderness and,

14 therefore, as a component of the National Wilderness

15 Preservation System.

Æ
Relmon H. DAVIS, III, petitioner, v. Dave DAVEY, Warden, et al.

No. 17-5416.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., et al., petitioners, v. Richard BOATRIGHT, et ux.

No. 18-654.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Briand WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7278.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.