UNITED STATES OF AME RICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD

DANIEL LYNN, Appellant,

v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERA NS AFFAIRS, Agency. DOCKET NUMBER SF

- 0714

- 17

- 0702

- R

- 1

DATE: September 7, 2023



### THIS FINAL ORDER IS NONPRECEDENTIAL 1

Brook L. Beesley , Alameda, California, for the appellant.

Nadine Scott
, Esquire, Seattle, Washington, for the agency.

BEFORE Cathy A. Harris, Vice Chairman Raymond A. Limon, Member

FINAL ORDER ¶1 The Board issued a final decision in this appeal on July 12, 2023

. Lynn v. Department of Veterans Affairs , MSPB Docket No. SF

- 0714

- 17

- 0702

- I

- 1 , Final Order (July 12, 2023)

. For the reasons set forth below, we REOPEN the appeal
on the Board ’ s own motion under 5 U.S.C. § 7701 (e)( 1)(B) and 5 C.F.R.

1 A nonprecedential order is one that the Board has determined does not add significantly to the body of MSPB case law. Parties may cite nonprecedential orders, but such orders have no precedential value; the Board and administrative judges are not required to follow or dis tinguish them in any future decisions. In contrast, a precedential decision issued as an Opinion and Order has been identified by the Board as significantly contributing to the Board ’ s case law. See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.117 (c).2

§ 1201.118 , VACATE the Board ’ s Final Order in Lynn v. Department of Veterans Affairs , MSPB Docket No. SF

- 0714

- 17

- 0702

- I

- 1 , Final Order (July 12, 2023) , and DISMISS the underlying appeal as settled. ¶2 After t he Board issued a final decision resolving this appeal , the parties
reached a settlement agreement , and the agency filed a motion to reopen the appeal for the express purpose of entering the agreement into the record for purposes of enforcement. Lynn v. Department of Veterans Affairs , MSPB Docket
No. SF

- 0714

- 17

- 0702

- R

- 1, Reopening Appeal File (RAF), Tab 1

. A document
entitled “ SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ” was included with the agency ’ s reopening request and was signed and d ated by the appellant and his attorney on July 5, 2023 , and July 11, 2023, respectively , and by the agency on July 12,
2023

. Id. at 5

- 8. The agreement provides, among other things, for the dismissal
of the appellant ’ s Board appeal. Id. at 5. ¶3 Before di smissing a matter as settled, the Board must decide whether the parties have entered into a settlement agreement, whether they understand its terms, and whether they intend to have the agreement entered into the record for enforcement by the Board. See Ma honey v. U.S. Postal Service
, 37 M.S.P.R.
146 , 149 (1988). In addition, before accepting a settlement agreement into the
record for enforcement purposes, the Board must determine whether the agreement is lawful on its face and whether the parties freely entered into it

. See Delorme v. Department of the Interior
, 124 M.S.P.R. 123 , ¶¶ 10

- 11 (2017 )

. ¶4 Here, we find that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement, understand its terms, and intend for the agreement to be entered into the record
for enforceme nt by the Board. RAF, Tab 1 at 6

- 7

. In addition, we find that the agreement is lawful on its face and freely entered into, and we accept the settlement agreement into the record for enforcement purposes. Accordingly, we
find it appropriate under the cir cumstances to vacate the Board ’ s decision dated July 12, 2023, and dismiss as settled the underlying appeal with prejudice to refiling (i.e., the parties normally may not refile this appeal).3

¶5 This is the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 1201.113 ( 5 C.F.R. § 1201.113 ).

NOTICE TO THE PARTIE S OF THEIR ENFORCEMENT RIGHTS If the agency or the appellant h as not fully carried out the terms of the agreement, either party may ask the Board to enforce the settlement agreement by promptly filing a petition for enforcement with the office that issued the initial decision on this appeal. The petition should cont ain specific reasons why the petitioning party believes that the terms of the settlement agreement have not been fully carried out, and should include the dates and results of any communications between the parties. 5 C.F.R. § 1201.182 (a).

NOTICE OF APPEAL RIG HTS 2 You may obtain review of this final decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (a)(1). By statute, the nature of your claims determin es the time limit for seeking such review and the appropriate forum with which to file. 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b). Although we offer the following summary of available appeal rights, the Merit Systems P rotection Board does not provide legal advice on which option is most appropriate for your situation and the rights described below do not represent a statement of how courts will rule regarding which cases fall within their jurisdiction. If you wish to s eek review of this final decision, you should immediately review the law applicable to your claims and carefully follow all filing time limits and requirements. Failure to file within the applicable time limit may result in the dismissal of your case by y our chosen forum.

2 Since the issuance of the initial decision in this matter, the Board may have updated the notice of review rights included in final decisions. As indicated in the notice, the Board cannot advise which option is mos t appropriate in any matter.4

Please read carefully each of the three main possible choices of review below to decide which one applies to your particular case. If you have questions about whether a particular forum is the appropriate one to review your case, you

s hould contact that forum for more information.

(1) Judicial review in general . As a general rule, an appellant seeking judicial review of a final Board order must file a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which m ust be received by the court
within 60 calendar days of the date of issuance of this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(1)(A). If you submit a petition for review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you must submit your petition to the court at the following address: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 717 Madison Place, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20439 Additional information about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit is available at the court ’ s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular
relevance is the court ’ s “ Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants, ” which is
contained within the court ’ s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, 10, and 11. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Prote ction Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case.
(2) Judicial or EEOC review of cases involving a claim of
disc rimination . This option applies to you only if you have claimed that you5

were affected by an action that is appealable to the Board and that such action was based, in whole or in part, on unlawful discrimination. If so, you may obtain judicial review of this decision

— including a disposition of your discrimination
claims

— by filing a civil action with an appropriate U.S. district court ( not the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you
receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems
Protection Board
, 582 U.S. 420 (2017). If you have a representative in this case, and your representative receives this decision before you do, then you must file
with the district court no later than 30 calendar days after your representative
receives this decision. If the action involves a claim of discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or a disabling condition, you may be entitled to representation by a court

- appointed lawyer and to waiver of any requirement of prepayment of fees, cos ts, or other security. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

- 5 (f) and 29 U.S.C. § 794a

. Contact information for U.S. district courts can be found at their respective websites, which can be accessed through the link below: http://www.uscourts.gov/Court_Locator/CourtWebsites.aspx

. Alternatively, you may request review by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of your discrimination claims only, excluding
all other issues

. 5 U.S.C. § 7702 (b)(1). You must file any such request with the
EEOC ’ s Office of Federal Operations within 30 calendar days after you receive
this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7702 (b)(1). If you have a representative in this case, and your representative receives this decision before you do, then you must file
with the EEOC no later than 30 calendar days after your representative receives
this decis ion. If you submit a request for review to the EEOC by regular U.S. mail, the
address of the EEOC is:6

Office of Federal Operations Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

P.O. Box 77960 Washington, D.C. 20013 If you submit a request for review to the EEOC via commercial delivery or by a method requiring a signature, it must be addressed to: Office of Federal Operations Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

131 M Street, N.E. Suite 5SW12G Washington, D.C. 20507
(3) Judicial review pursuant to the Whistleblower Protection
Enhancement Act of 2012 . This option applies to you only if you have raised claims of reprisal for whistleblowing disclosures under 5 U.S.C. § 2302 (b)(8) or
other protected activities listed in 5 U.S.C. § 2302 (b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D). If so, and your judicial petition for review “ raises no challenge to the Board ’ s disposition of allegations of a prohi bited personnel practice described in section 2302(b) other than practices described in section 2302(b)(8), or 2302(b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D), ” then you may file a petition for judicial review either with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circu it or any court of appeals of competent jurisdiction. 3 The court of appeals must receive your petition for
review within 60 days of the date of issuance of this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)( 1)(B).

3 The original statutory provision that provided for judicial review of certain whistleblower claims by any court of appeals of competent jurisdiction expired on December 27, 2017. The All Circuit Review Act, signed into law b y the President on July 7, 2018, permanently allows appellants to file petitions for judicial review of MSPB decisions in certain whistleblower reprisal cases with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or any other circuit court of appeals of c ompetent jurisdiction. The All Circuit Review Act is retroactive to November 26, 2017. Pub. L. No. 115

- 195, 132 Stat. 1510.7

If you submit a petition for judicial review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you must submit your petition to the court at the following address: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 717 Madison Place, N.W. Wash ington, D.C. 20439 Additional information about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit is available at the court ’ s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular
relevance is the court ’ s “ Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants, ” which is
contained within the court ’ s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, 10, and 11. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at http://www.mspb.gov/pro bono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case. Contact information for the courts of appeals can be found at their respective websites, which can be accessed through the link below: http://www.uscourts.gov/Court_ Locator/CourtWebsites.aspx

.

FOR THE BOARD:

Washington, D.C. /s/ for Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board