# Official Journal C 217/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.217.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 217 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5521 July 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.217.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 217

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5521 July 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2012/C 217/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 209, 14.7.2012 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 217/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 209, 14.7.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2012/C 217/02 | Case C-124/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — European Commission v Électricité de France (EDF), French Republic, Iberdrola SA (Appeal — State aid — Waiver of a tax claim — Exemption from corporation tax — Increase in share capital — Conduct of a State acting as a prudent private investor in a market economy — Criteria to distinguish between the State as shareholder and the State exercising public power — Definition of ‘reference private investor’ — Principle of equal treatment — Burden of proof) | 2 |
| 2012/C 217/03 | Case C-489/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Criminal proceedings against Łukasz Marcin Bonda (Common agricultural policy — Single area payment scheme — Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 — Article 138(1) — Exclusion from receiving aid if the area declared is not correct — Administrative or criminal nature of that penalty — Rule against the overlapping of criminal penalties — Ne bis in idem principle) | 2 |
| 2012/C 217/04 | Case C-615/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy (Directive 2004/18/EC — Public contracts in the field of defence — Article 10 — Article 296(1)(b) EC — Protection of a Member State’s essential security interests — Trade in arms, munitions and war material — Product procured by a contracting authority specifically for military purposes — Existence, as regards that product, of a potential and largely identical civilian application — Tiltable turntable for carrying out electromagnetic measurements — Contract not put out to tender in accordance with the procedures provided for by Directive 2004/18) | 3 |
| 2012/C 217/05 | Case C-27/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Anton Vinkov v Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Non-recognition in national law of the right to a judicial remedy in respect of decisions imposing a financial penalty and the deduction of points for certain breaches of road traffic regulations — Purely internal situation — Inadmissibility of the reference) | 3 |
| 2012/C 217/06 | Case C-39/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — VBV — Vorsorgekasse AG v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA) (Free movement of capital — Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU — Severance funds — Investment of assets — Investment funds established in another Member State — Investment in such funds permitted only when they are authorised to market their units within the national territory) | 4 |
| 2012/C 217/07 | Case C-106/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — M.J. Bakker v Minister van Financiën (Social security for migrant workers — Legislation applicable — Worker holding Netherlands nationality working, for an employer established in the Netherlands, on board dredgers flying the Netherlands flag which operate outside the territory of the European Union — Residence in the territory of another Member State — Affiliation to the Netherlands social security system) | 4 |
| 2012/C 217/08 | Case C-132/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck — Austria) — Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH (Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Difference of treatment on grounds of age — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — General principles of European Union law — Collective agreement — Failure to take into account, for the grading on the salary scale of cabin crew members of an airline, professional experience acquired with another airline belonging to the same group of companies — Contract clause) | 5 |
| 2012/C 217/09 | Case C-164/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2012 — DMC Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Mitte | 5 |
| 2012/C 217/10 | Case C-182/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 19 April 2012 — Gábor Fekete v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Középdunántúli Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága | 6 |
| 2012/C 217/11 | Case C-186/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Braga (Portugal) lodged on 23 April 2012 — Impacto Azul, Lda v BPSA 9 — Promoção e Desenvolvimento de Investimentos Imobiliários, SA and Others | 6 |
| 2012/C 217/12 | Case C-193/12: Action brought on 25 April 2012 — European Commission v French Republic | 6 |
| 2012/C 217/13 | Case C-197/12: Action brought on 26 April 2012 — European Commission v French Republic | 7 |
| 2012/C 217/14 | Case C-199/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v X | 7 |
| 2012/C 217/15 | Case C-200/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, the other party being Y | 8 |
| 2012/C 217/16 | Case C-201/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel | 8 |
| 2012/C 217/17 | Case C-228/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri | 9 |
| 2012/C 217/18 | Case C-229/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Fastweb SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others | 9 |
| 2012/C 217/19 | Case C-230/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — WIND Telecomunicazioni SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others | 10 |
| 2012/C 217/20 | Case C-231/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri | 10 |
| 2012/C 217/21 | Case C-232/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others | 10 |
| 2012/C 217/22 | Case C-233/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale della Spezia (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Simone Gardella v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) | 11 |
| 2012/C 217/23 | Case C-234/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Sky Italia s.r.l. v AGCOM | 11 |
| 2012/C 217/24 | Case C-237/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — European Commission v French Republic | 11 |
| 2012/C 217/25 | Case C-254/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 24 May 2012 — WIND Telecomunicazioni SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni | 12 |
| 2012/C 217/26 | Case C-255/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Telecom Italia SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri | 12 |
| 2012/C 217/27 | Case C-256/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Telecom Italia SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri | 12 |
| 2012/C 217/28 | Case C-257/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Sky Italia Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Commissione di Garanzia dell’Attuazione della Legge sullo Sciopero nei Servizi Pubblici Essenziali | 13 |
| 2012/C 217/29 | Case C-258/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni | 13 |
| 2012/C 217/30 | Case C-263/12: Action brought on 25 May 2012 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 13 |
| 2012/C 217/31 | Case C-286/12: Action brought on 7 June 2012 — European Commission v Hungary | 14 |
| | General Court |
| 2012/C 217/32 | Case T-338/08: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Stichting Natuur en Milieu, Pesticide Action Network Europe v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Maximum residue levels for pesticides — Request for internal review — Refusal — Measure of individual scope — Validity — Aarhus Convention) | 16 |
| 2012/C 217/33 | Case T-246/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Insula v Commission (Arbitration clause — Financing contracts for research and development projects — MEDIS and Dias.Net contracts — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of some of the declared expenses — Retention of a sum intended for another co-contractor — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Counterclaim by the Commission — Partial removal of need to adjudicate in relation to the counterclaim) | 16 |
| 2012/C 217/34 | Case T-366/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 Insula v Commission (Arbitration clause — Financing contracts for research and development projects — Ecres, El Hierro, Islands 2010, Opet I, Opet II, Opet Ola, Respire, Sustainable Communities and Virtual Campus contracts — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of some of the declared expenses — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Counterclaim by the Commission) | 17 |
| 2012/C 217/35 | Case T-396/09: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Vereniging Milieudefensie, Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Obligation of the Member States to protect and improve ambient air quality — Temporary exemption granted to a Member State — Request for internal review — Refusal — Measure of individual scope — Validity — Aarhus Convention) | 17 |
| 2012/C 217/36 | Joined Cases T-492/09 and T-147/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2012 — Mada Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark ALLERNIL — Application for Community word mark ALLERNIL — Earlier national word mark ALLERGODIL — Relative ground of refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Grounds — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 18 |
| 2012/C 217/37 | Case T-110/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Insula v Commission (Arbitration clause — Financing contract for research and development projects — El Hierro contract — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of the declared expenses — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Counterclaim by the Commission) | 18 |
| 2012/C 217/38 | Case T-293/10: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Seven Towns Ltd v OHIM (Representation of seven squares of different colours) (Community trade mark — Application for Community mark representing seven squares of different colours — Sign of which a Community trade mark may consist — Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 18 |
| 2012/C 217/39 | Case T-342/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Paul Hartmann AG v OHIM — Mölnlycke Health Care (MESILETTE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MESILETTE — Earlier national and international word marks MEDINETTE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 19 |
| 2012/C 217/40 | Case T-519/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Seikoh Giken v OHIM — Seiko Holdings (SG SEIKOH GIKEN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration — Application for territorial extension of the protection — Figurative mark SG SEIKOH GIKEN — Earlier Community word mark SEIKO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 19 |
| 2012/C 217/41 | Case T-534/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (HELLIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark HELLIM — Earlier Community collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Article 63(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 20 |
| 2012/C 217/42 | Case T-535/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (GAZI Hellim) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark GAZI Hellim — Prior collective Community word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 20 |
| 2012/C 217/43 | Case T-542/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Meyer Manufacturing (CIRCON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CIRCON — Prior Community word mark CIRCULON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Highly distinctive character — Goodwill — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Procedure before the Board of Appeal — Rights of the defence — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 20 |
| 2012/C 217/44 | Case T-165/11: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2012 — Stichting Regionaal Opleidingencentrum van Amsterdam v OHIM — Investimust (COLLEGE) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark COLLEGE — Absolute ground for refusal — Absence of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 21 |
| 2012/C 217/45 | Case T-277/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Hotel Reservation Service Robert Ragge v OHIM — Promotora Imperial (iHotel) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark iHotel — Earlier Community figurative mark i-hotel — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 21 |
| 2012/C 217/46 | Case T-312/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Süd-Chemie v OHIM — Byk-Cera (CERATIX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CERATIX — Earlier national word mark CERATOFIX — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 22 |
| 2012/C 217/47 | Case T-440/09: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Azienda Agricola Bracesco v Commission (Extra-contractual liability — Agriculture — Bird flu — Exceptional market support measures in the eggs and poultry sector — Non-inclusion of quails among the poultry types for which compensation is available — Equal treatment and non-discrimination — No causal link — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law) | 22 |
| 2012/C 217/48 | Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Ezzedine and Others v Council (Cases T-131/11, T-132/11, T-137/11, T-139/11 to T-141/11, T-144/11 to T-148/11 and T-182/11) (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned — Death of the applicant — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate) | 22 |
| 2012/C 217/49 | Case T-379/11: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Allocation of free greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 — Commission decision determining the product benchmarks to apply for the calculation of the allocation of emission allowances — Article 263, fourth paragraph TFEU — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissible) | 23 |
| 2012/C 217/50 | Case T-381/11: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Eurofer v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission quotas from 2013 — Commission decision determining the product benchmark to be applied for the calculation of the allocation of emission quotas — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 of the TFEU — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory instrument containing implementation measures — Inadmissibility) | 24 |
| 2012/C 217/51 | Case T-202/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — Al Assad v Council | 24 |
| 2012/C 217/52 | Case T-203/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — Alchaar v Council | 24 |
| 2012/C 217/53 | Case T-204/12: Action brought on 15 May 2012 — Vila Vita Hotel und Touristik v OHIM — Viavita (VIAVITA) | 25 |
| 2012/C 217/54 | Case T-217/12: Action brought on 14 May 2012 — Shark v OHIM — Monster Energy (UNLEASH THE BEAST!) | 25 |
| 2012/C 217/55 | Case T-218/12: Action brought on 22 May 2012 — Micrus Endovascular v OHIM — Laboratorios Delta (DELTA) | 26 |
| 2012/C 217/56 | Case T-221/12: Action brought on 25 May 2012 — Sunrider v OHIM — Nannerl (SUN FRESH) | 26 |
| 2012/C 217/57 | Case T-240/12: Action brought on 4 June 2012 — Eni v Commission | 27 |
| 2012/C 217/58 | Case T-243/12: Action brought on 29 May 2012 — International Brands Germany v OHIM — Stuffer (ALOHA 100 % NATURAL) | 28 |
| 2012/C 217/59 | Case T-244/12: Action brought on 30 May 2012 — Unister v OHIM (fluege.de) | 28 |
| 2012/C 217/60 | Case T-258/12: Action brought on 12 June 2012 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS) | 28 |
| 2012/C 217/61 | Case T-431/11: Order of the General Court of 5 June 2012 — Iberdrola v Commission | 29 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2012/C 217/62 | Case F-42/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2012 — Skareby v Commission (Civil service — Duty to provide assistance — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment by a hierarchical superior) | 30 |
| 2012/C 217/63 | Case F-71/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Cantisani v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the contract staff — Conference interpreter — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Conflict of interest — Claim for compensation) | 30 |
| 2012/C 217/64 | Case F-83/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Giannakouris v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Conditions of grant — Deduction of an allowance of like nature paid from other sources) | 30 |
| 2012/C 217/65 | Case F-84/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Chatzidoukakis v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Conditions of grant — Deduction of an allowance of like nature paid from other sources) | 31 |
| 2012/C 217/66 | Case F-91/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Alionescu v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition — Decision to extend the deadline for registration — No complaint — Manifest inadmissibility) | 31 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2012/C 217/02

Case C-124/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — European Commission v Électricité de France (EDF), French Republic, Iberdrola SA (Appeal — State aid — Waiver of a tax claim — Exemption from corporation tax — Increase in share capital — Conduct of a State acting as a prudent private investor in a market economy — Criteria to distinguish between the State as shareholder and the State exercising public power — Definition of ‘reference private investor’ — Principle of equal treatment — Burden of proof)

2

2012/C 217/03

Case C-489/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Criminal proceedings against Łukasz Marcin Bonda (Common agricultural policy — Single area payment scheme — Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 — Article 138(1) — Exclusion from receiving aid if the area declared is not correct — Administrative or criminal nature of that penalty — Rule against the overlapping of criminal penalties — Ne bis in idem principle)

2

2012/C 217/04

Case C-615/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy (Directive 2004/18/EC — Public contracts in the field of defence — Article 10 — Article 296(1)(b) EC — Protection of a Member State’s essential security interests — Trade in arms, munitions and war material — Product procured by a contracting authority specifically for military purposes — Existence, as regards that product, of a potential and largely identical civilian application — Tiltable turntable for carrying out electromagnetic measurements — Contract not put out to tender in accordance with the procedures provided for by Directive 2004/18)

3

2012/C 217/05

Case C-27/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Anton Vinkov v Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Non-recognition in national law of the right to a judicial remedy in respect of decisions imposing a financial penalty and the deduction of points for certain breaches of road traffic regulations — Purely internal situation — Inadmissibility of the reference)

3

2012/C 217/06

Case C-39/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — VBV — Vorsorgekasse AG v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA) (Free movement of capital — Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU — Severance funds — Investment of assets — Investment funds established in another Member State — Investment in such funds permitted only when they are authorised to market their units within the national territory)

4

2012/C 217/07

Case C-106/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — M.J. Bakker v Minister van Financiën (Social security for migrant workers — Legislation applicable — Worker holding Netherlands nationality working, for an employer established in the Netherlands, on board dredgers flying the Netherlands flag which operate outside the territory of the European Union — Residence in the territory of another Member State — Affiliation to the Netherlands social security system)

4

2012/C 217/08

Case C-132/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck — Austria) — Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH (Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Difference of treatment on grounds of age — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — General principles of European Union law — Collective agreement — Failure to take into account, for the grading on the salary scale of cabin crew members of an airline, professional experience acquired with another airline belonging to the same group of companies — Contract clause)

5

2012/C 217/09

Case C-164/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2012 — DMC Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Mitte

5

2012/C 217/10

Case C-182/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 19 April 2012 — Gábor Fekete v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Középdunántúli Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

6

2012/C 217/11

Case C-186/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Braga (Portugal) lodged on 23 April 2012 — Impacto Azul, Lda v BPSA 9 — Promoção e Desenvolvimento de Investimentos Imobiliários, SA and Others

6

2012/C 217/12

Case C-193/12: Action brought on 25 April 2012 — European Commission v French Republic

6

2012/C 217/13

Case C-197/12: Action brought on 26 April 2012 — European Commission v French Republic

7

2012/C 217/14

Case C-199/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v X

7

2012/C 217/15

Case C-200/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, the other party being Y

8

2012/C 217/16

Case C-201/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel

8

2012/C 217/17

Case C-228/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

9

2012/C 217/18

Case C-229/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Fastweb SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others

9

2012/C 217/19

Case C-230/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — WIND Telecomunicazioni SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others

10

2012/C 217/20

Case C-231/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

10

2012/C 217/21

Case C-232/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others

10

2012/C 217/22

Case C-233/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale della Spezia (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Simone Gardella v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)

11

2012/C 217/23

Case C-234/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Sky Italia s.r.l. v AGCOM

11

2012/C 217/24

Case C-237/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — European Commission v French Republic

11

2012/C 217/25

Case C-254/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 24 May 2012 — WIND Telecomunicazioni SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

12

2012/C 217/26

Case C-255/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Telecom Italia SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

12

2012/C 217/27

Case C-256/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Telecom Italia SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

12

2012/C 217/28

Case C-257/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Sky Italia Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Commissione di Garanzia dell’Attuazione della Legge sullo Sciopero nei Servizi Pubblici Essenziali

13

2012/C 217/29

Case C-258/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

13

2012/C 217/30

Case C-263/12: Action brought on 25 May 2012 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

13

2012/C 217/31

Case C-286/12: Action brought on 7 June 2012 — European Commission v Hungary

14

General Court

2012/C 217/32

Case T-338/08: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Stichting Natuur en Milieu, Pesticide Action Network Europe v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Maximum residue levels for pesticides — Request for internal review — Refusal — Measure of individual scope — Validity — Aarhus Convention)

16

2012/C 217/33

Case T-246/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Insula v Commission (Arbitration clause — Financing contracts for research and development projects — MEDIS and Dias.Net contracts — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of some of the declared expenses — Retention of a sum intended for another co-contractor — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Counterclaim by the Commission — Partial removal of need to adjudicate in relation to the counterclaim)

16

2012/C 217/34

Case T-366/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 Insula v Commission (Arbitration clause — Financing contracts for research and development projects — Ecres, El Hierro, Islands 2010, Opet I, Opet II, Opet Ola, Respire, Sustainable Communities and Virtual Campus contracts — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of some of the declared expenses — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Counterclaim by the Commission)

17

2012/C 217/35

Case T-396/09: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Vereniging Milieudefensie, Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Obligation of the Member States to protect and improve ambient air quality — Temporary exemption granted to a Member State — Request for internal review — Refusal — Measure of individual scope — Validity — Aarhus Convention)

17

2012/C 217/36

Joined Cases T-492/09 and T-147/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2012 — Mada Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark ALLERNIL — Application for Community word mark ALLERNIL — Earlier national word mark ALLERGODIL — Relative ground of refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Grounds — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

18

2012/C 217/37

Case T-110/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Insula v Commission (Arbitration clause — Financing contract for research and development projects — El Hierro contract — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of the declared expenses — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Counterclaim by the Commission)

18

2012/C 217/38

Case T-293/10: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Seven Towns Ltd v OHIM (Representation of seven squares of different colours) (Community trade mark — Application for Community mark representing seven squares of different colours — Sign of which a Community trade mark may consist — Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18

2012/C 217/39

Case T-342/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Paul Hartmann AG v OHIM — Mölnlycke Health Care (MESILETTE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MESILETTE — Earlier national and international word marks MEDINETTE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2012/C 217/40

Case T-519/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Seikoh Giken v OHIM — Seiko Holdings (SG SEIKOH GIKEN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration — Application for territorial extension of the protection — Figurative mark SG SEIKOH GIKEN — Earlier Community word mark SEIKO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2012/C 217/41

Case T-534/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (HELLIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark HELLIM — Earlier Community collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Article 63(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)

20

2012/C 217/42

Case T-535/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (GAZI Hellim) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark GAZI Hellim — Prior collective Community word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

20

2012/C 217/43

Case T-542/10: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Meyer Manufacturing (CIRCON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CIRCON — Prior Community word mark CIRCULON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Highly distinctive character — Goodwill — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Procedure before the Board of Appeal — Rights of the defence — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009)

20

2012/C 217/44

Case T-165/11: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2012 — Stichting Regionaal Opleidingencentrum van Amsterdam v OHIM — Investimust (COLLEGE) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark COLLEGE — Absolute ground for refusal — Absence of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

21

2012/C 217/45

Case T-277/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Hotel Reservation Service Robert Ragge v OHIM — Promotora Imperial (iHotel) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark iHotel — Earlier Community figurative mark i-hotel — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

21

2012/C 217/46

Case T-312/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Süd-Chemie v OHIM — Byk-Cera (CERATIX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CERATIX — Earlier national word mark CERATOFIX — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

22

2012/C 217/47

Case T-440/09: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Azienda Agricola Bracesco v Commission (Extra-contractual liability — Agriculture — Bird flu — Exceptional market support measures in the eggs and poultry sector — Non-inclusion of quails among the poultry types for which compensation is available — Equal treatment and non-discrimination — No causal link — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

22

2012/C 217/48

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Ezzedine and Others v Council (Cases T-131/11, T-132/11, T-137/11, T-139/11 to T-141/11, T-144/11 to T-148/11 and T-182/11) (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned — Death of the applicant — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate)

22

2012/C 217/49

Case T-379/11: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Allocation of free greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 — Commission decision determining the product benchmarks to apply for the calculation of the allocation of emission allowances — Article 263, fourth paragraph TFEU — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissible)

23

2012/C 217/50

Case T-381/11: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Eurofer v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission quotas from 2013 — Commission decision determining the product benchmark to be applied for the calculation of the allocation of emission quotas — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 of the TFEU — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory instrument containing implementation measures — Inadmissibility)

24

2012/C 217/51

Case T-202/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — Al Assad v Council

24

2012/C 217/52

Case T-203/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — Alchaar v Council

24

2012/C 217/53

Case T-204/12: Action brought on 15 May 2012 — Vila Vita Hotel und Touristik v OHIM — Viavita (VIAVITA)

25

2012/C 217/54

Case T-217/12: Action brought on 14 May 2012 — Shark v OHIM — Monster Energy (UNLEASH THE BEAST!)

25

2012/C 217/55

Case T-218/12: Action brought on 22 May 2012 — Micrus Endovascular v OHIM — Laboratorios Delta (DELTA)

26

2012/C 217/56

Case T-221/12: Action brought on 25 May 2012 — Sunrider v OHIM — Nannerl (SUN FRESH)

26

2012/C 217/57

Case T-240/12: Action brought on 4 June 2012 — Eni v Commission

27

2012/C 217/58

Case T-243/12: Action brought on 29 May 2012 — International Brands Germany v OHIM — Stuffer (ALOHA 100 % NATURAL)

28

2012/C 217/59

Case T-244/12: Action brought on 30 May 2012 — Unister v OHIM (fluege.de)

28

2012/C 217/60

Case T-258/12: Action brought on 12 June 2012 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS)

28

2012/C 217/61

Case T-431/11: Order of the General Court of 5 June 2012 — Iberdrola v Commission

29

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2012/C 217/62

Case F-42/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2012 — Skareby v Commission (Civil service — Duty to provide assistance — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment by a hierarchical superior)

30

2012/C 217/63

Case F-71/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Cantisani v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the contract staff — Conference interpreter — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Conflict of interest — Claim for compensation)

30

2012/C 217/64

Case F-83/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Giannakouris v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Conditions of grant — Deduction of an allowance of like nature paid from other sources)

30

2012/C 217/65

Case F-84/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Chatzidoukakis v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Conditions of grant — Deduction of an allowance of like nature paid from other sources)

31

2012/C 217/66

Case F-91/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Alionescu v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition — Decision to extend the deadline for registration — No complaint — Manifest inadmissibility)

31

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN