alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tuad Damonn WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7016.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Richard Lee WANN, petitioner, v. ST. FRANCOIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.

No. 17-1195.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

*1701Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Miguel QUINTERO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10796 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUANN FREEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:98-CR-8-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luann Freeman appeals the sentence imposed following her conviction for misapplication of bank funds, making false entries, and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 656, 1005, and 1341. She argues that the district court erred in imposing a two-level vulnerable-victim enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b), and a two-level enhancement for abuse of a position of trust, pursuant to § 3B1.3.No. 98-10796 -2- We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and conclude that the district court did not err in assessing either enhancement. See United States v. Robinson , 119 F.3d 1205, 1218 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 1104 (1998)(upholding vulnerable-victim enhancement); United States v. Fisher , 7 F.3d 69, 70 (5th Cir. 1993)(upholding enhancement for abuse of a position of trust).
AFFIRMED.
Tomas Liriano CASTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7046.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond Hill Investment
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Laird, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                            /S/ James F. Laird
                                            -----------------------------------

                                            Print Name:  James F. Laird

                                            Title:  Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date:  November 7, 2002
APPLIED UNDERWRITERS CAPTIVE RISK ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. MINNIELAND PRIVATE DAY SCHOOL, INC.

No. 17-717.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
STREAMBEND PROPERTIES II, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. IVY TOWER MINNEAPOLIS, LLC, et al.

No. 17-1639.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Saleh O. HAMID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NB&T
Financial Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin
|                     |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exabyte Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom Ward, President and Chief Executive Officer (since June 3, 2002) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Tom Ward

Tom Ward
President and Chief Executive Officer
(since June 3, 2002)
August 13, 2002
Jonathan YANCEY, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-7170.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1219

AN ACT

To amend the Miller Act, relating to payment prorials for Federal construction projects. tections for persons providing labor and mate-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1219

AN ACT

To amend the Miller Act, relating to payment protections

for persons providing labor and materials for Federal

construction projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1219 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Construction Industry

3 Payment Protection Act of 1999’’.

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE MILLER ACT.

5 (a) ENHANCEMENT OF PAYMENT BOND PROTEC6 TION.—Subsection (a)(2) of the first section of the Miller

7 Act (40 U.S.C. 270a(a)(2)) is amended by striking the

8 second, third, and fourth sentences and inserting in lieu

9 thereof the following: ‘‘The amount of the payment bond

10 shall be equal to the total amount payable by the terms

11 of the contract unless the contracting officer awarding the

12 contract makes a written determination supported by spe13 cific findings that a payment bond in that amount is im14 practical, in which case the amount of the payment bond

15 shall be set by the contracting officer. In no case shall

16 the amount of the payment bond be less than the amount

17 of the performance bond.’’.

18 (b) MODERNIZATION OF DELIVERY OF NOTICE.—

19 Section 2(a) of the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 270b(a)) is

20 amended in the last sentence by striking ‘‘mailing the

21 same by registered mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope

22 addressed’’ and inserting ‘‘any means which provides writ23 ten, third-party verification of delivery.’’.

24 (c) NONWAIVER OF RIGHTS.—The second section of

25 the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 270b) is amended by adding

26 at the end the following new subsection:
3

•HR 1219 EH

1 ‘‘(c) Any waiver of the right to sue on the payment

2 bond required by this Act shall be void unless it is in writ3 ing, signed by the person whose right is waived, and exe4 cuted after such person has first furnished labor or mate5 rial for use in the performance of the contract.’’.

6 SEC. 3. IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT7 WIDE PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS.

8 (a) PROPOSED REGULATIONS.—Proposed revisions

9 to the Government-wide Federal Acquisition Regulation to

10 implement the amendments made by this Act shall be pub11 lished not later than 120 days after the date of the enact12 ment of this Act and provide not less than 60 days for

13 public comment.

14 (b) FINAL REGULATIONS.—Final regulations shall be

15 published not less than 180 days after the date of the en16 actment of this Act and shall be effective on the date that

17 is 30 days after the date of publication.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal L 147/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 147 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 593 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 147

English edition

Legislation

Volume 593 June 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/869 of 27 May 2016 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 31 March until 29 June 2016 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/869 of 27 May 2016 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 31 March until 29 June 2016 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Daniel J.H. BARTELT, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 17-1584.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
# Official Journal L 3/5 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 485 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 3

English edition

Legislation

Volume 485 January 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
John Norbert CONTRERAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5954.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

J E S S E B U S K ; L A

U R I E C A S T R

O , on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants ,
v . I N T E G R I T Y S T A F F I

N G S O L U T I O N S , I N C ., Defendant-Appellee

. N o. 11-16892 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01854- RL H-RJ J
ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

F iled J uly 7, 2015 B e fore: Sidney

R. Thomas, Chief J udg e and J e rome F arris and N. Randy Smith, Circuit J udg es.
ORDER Pursuant to the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Integrity Staffing Solutions, I

nc. v. Busk

, 574 U.S.___, 135 S. Ct. 513 (2014) , t he judg ment of the district court dismissing Plaintiffs’ claims that they were entitled to compensation for time spent pass i n g t h r oug h security screening at the end o f the work day under the F air L abor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq . , as amended b y the Portal -to-Portal A ctB U S K V
. I N T E G R I T Y S T A F F I

N G S O L U T I O N S 2 of 1947, § 251 et seq. , and under paralle l s t a t e law, is AF F IRMED. Costs are awarded to Defendant in the amount of $1,077.25.
- 1"'

fp-oIS

CO

*'

Cathy

<^k<<&. ^^
<?0& ITtzsw ^zJ&i^q

DOCUMENT SCANNED AS FILED

2012C206825 -0073

NO. 2012-CI-06825

CATHY GIDDINGS

Plaintiff

vs.

RALPH CURTIS, M.D.

Defendant

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

73rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT

BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CAME ON TO BE HEARD Defendant, RALPH CURTIS, M.D.'s No-evidence

Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, CATHY GIDDINGS appeared pro se and

Defendant appeared by and through counsel. The Court, having reviewed the motion

and having considered the arguments presented to the Court, hereby GRANTS the

motion.

IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff, CATHY GIDDINGS take nothing by way of her claims

and causes of action against Defendant, RALPH CURTIS, M.D. IT IS FURTHER

ORDERED that all costs of court be taxed against Plaintiff.

All relief requested in this case and not expressly granted is denied. This

judgment finally disposes of all parties and claims and is appealable.

SIGNED and ENTERED this _26_ day of January, 2015.

HON. JUDGE

.6
DOCUMENT SCANNED AS FILED

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE:

Cathy Giddings

107 Whisper Way

Boerne, Texas 78006

Telephone: (830) 357-0820

Telephone: (210)209-7296

BY:

CATHY GIDDINGS

PLAINTIFF PRO SE

EVANS, ROWE HOLBROOK, P.C.

10101 Reunion Place, Suite 900

San Antonio, Texas 78216

Telephone: (210) 340-6555

Telecopier: (210) 340-6664

BRETT B. ROWE

State Bar No. 17331750

MATTHEW M. EDWARDS

State Bar No. 24032034

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
# L_2013231EN.01001901.xml

| 29.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 231/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 231/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 45/2013

of 15 March 2013

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2009/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2009/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 21ata (Commission Decision 2011/92/EU) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘21au. | 32009 L 0126: Directive 2009/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 36).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘21au.

32009 L 0126: Directive 2009/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 36).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/126/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 March 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 36.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/29/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       48,789
COMMITMENTS
   9,000    6,177    6,794   23,893   24,753   39,687   37,723    9,101   11,065

CHANGES FROM 09/22/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        738)
    -264      -84      808      439    1,248      984    1,972     -246   -1,234

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    18.4     12.7     13.9     49.0     50.7     81.3     77.3     18.7     22.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       71)
      12       16       16       32       30       53       57
```

----

Updated October 2, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-73129) and Form S-3 (No. 333-73131) of our report dated
January 29, 2001 relating to the consolidated statements of condition of
Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 21, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1199 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1199

     To prohibit the expenditure of funds from the Land and Water 
  Conservation Fund for the creation of new National Wildlife Refuges 
      without specific authorization from Congress pursuant to a 
  recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to 
                           create the refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 1999

  Mr. Pombo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the expenditure of funds from the Land and Water 
  Conservation Fund for the creation of new National Wildlife Refuges 
      without specific authorization from Congress pursuant to a 
  recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to 
                           create the refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Wildlife Refuge Authorization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NEW REFUGES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds may be 
expended from the Land and Water Conservation Fund established by 
Public Law 88-578, for the creation of a new refuge within the National 
Wildlife Refuge System without specific authorization from Congress 
pursuant to recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, to create that new refuge.
                                 <all>
```