alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 137/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 137 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6419 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 137

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6419 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 137/01 | Position (EU) No 7/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Anti-Fraud Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 250/2014Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 137/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 7/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Anti-Fraud Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 | 15 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 137/01

Position (EU) No 7/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Anti-Fraud Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 250/2014Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021

1

2021/C 137/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 7/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Anti-Fraud Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 250/2014

15

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
In Re Christopher PARKER, petitioner.

No. 16-9565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2013081EN.01003501.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 233/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 911/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the European Earth monitoring programme (GMES) and its initial operations (2011 to 2013) (1) was incorporated into the Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 139/2012 (2) of 13 July 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 911/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the European Earth monitoring programme (GMES) and its initial operations (2011 to 2013) (1) was incorporated into the Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 139/2012 (2) of 13 July 2012.

| (2) | The suspension of the applicability of the Regulation to Iceland should be terminated. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The suspension of the applicability of the Regulation to Iceland should be terminated.

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this termination to take effect from 1 January 2013, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this termination to take effect from 1 January 2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In paragraph 8c of Article 1 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, adaptation (e) shall be deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2013.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 309, 8.11.2012, p. 21.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
H. R. 1191

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in Chicago, Illinois.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARDISS COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 433 West Harrison Street in Chicago, Illinois,

is hereby designated as the ‘‘Cardiss Collins Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference to such facility in any law,

regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United

States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Cardiss Collins

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. OTIS GRANT COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 2302 South Pulaski Street in Chicago, Illinois,

is hereby designated as the ‘‘Otis Grant Collins Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference to such facility in any law,

regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United

States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Otis Grant

Collins Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 3. MARY ALICE (MA) HENRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 4222 West Madison Street in Chicago, Illinois,

is hereby designated as the ‘‘Mary Alice (Ma) Henry Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference to such facility in any law,

regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United

States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Mary Alice

(Ma) Henry Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 4. ROBERT LEFLORE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 50001 West Division Street in Chicago, Illinois,

is hereby designated as the ‘‘Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference to such facility in any law,

regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United
H. R. 1191—2

States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert LeFlore,

Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/20/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      159,479
COMMITMENTS
  37,264   28,949   28,682   74,486   72,572  140,432  130,203   19,047   29,276

CHANGES FROM 04/13/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -216)
     715   -4,745    1,811   -2,684    1,813     -158   -1,122      -58      906

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.4     18.2     18.0     46.7     45.5     88.1     81.6     11.9     18.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      40       37       56       60       62      135      132
```

----

Updated April 28, 2010
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1212

AN ACT

To protect producers of agricultural commodities

year.supplemental endorsement for the 1999 cropwho applied for a Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1212

AN ACT

To protect producers of agricultural commodities who applied

for a Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS supplemental endorsement for the 1999 crop year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1212 EH

1 SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS

2 WHO APPLIED FOR CROP REVENUE COV3 ERAGE PLUS.

4 (a) ELIGIBLE PRODUCERS.—This section applies

5 with respect to a producer eligible for insurance under the

6 Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who

7 applied for the supplemental crop insurance endorsement

8 known as Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS (referred to in

9 this section as ‘‘CRCPLUS’’) for the 1999 crop year for

10 a spring-planted agricultural commodity.

11 (b) ADDITIONAL PERIOD FOR OBTAINING OR TRANS12 FERRING COVERAGE.—Notwithstanding the sales closing

13 date for obtaining crop insurance coverage established

14 under section 508(f)(2) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act

15 (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other pro16 vision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

17 shall provide a 14-day period beginning on the date of en18 actment of this Act, but not to extend beyond April 12,

19 1999, during which a producer described in subsection (a)

20 may—

21 (1) obtain from any approved insurance pro22 vider a level of coverage for the agricultural com23 modity for which the producer applied for the

24 CRCPLUS endorsement that is equivalent to or less

25 than the level of federally reinsured coverage that
3

•HR 1212 EH

1 the producer applied for from the insurance provider

2 that offered the CRCPLUS endorsement; and

3 (2) transfer to any approved insurance provider

4 any federally reinsured coverage provided for other

5 agricultural commodities of the producer by the

6 same insurance provider that offered the CRCPLUS

7 endorsement, as determined by the Corporation.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
ON REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN DOE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 20-7470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN DOE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:01-cr-00027-BO-1; 7:18-cv-00053-

BO)
2

Submitted: July 16, 2021 Decided: August 5, 2021

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Doe, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

John Doe appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion 

for relief from the district court’s prior order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, 

denying his motion to seal, denying his motions to proceed by pseudonym, and denying 

reconsideration. First addressing the motions to seal and to proceed by pseudonym, we 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm these 

portions of the district court’s orders.

Turning to the portions of the district court’s orders denying Doe’s Rule 60(b)

motion and denying reconsideration, these portions of the orders are not appealable unless 

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). 

See generally United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck 

v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Doe has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this 
4

portion of the appeal. We deny Doe’s motions to recuse. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1251 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 395
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1251


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                            November 4, 1999

              Reported by Mr. Thompson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 8850 
South 700 East, Sandy, Utah, as the ``Noal Cushing Bateman Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Postal Service building located at 8850 South 700 
East, in Sandy, Utah, shall be known and designated as the ``Noal 
Cushing Bateman Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Noal Cushing Bateman Post 
Office Building''.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 395

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1251

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 8850 
South 700 East, Sandy, Utah, as the ``Noal Cushing Bateman Post Office 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`
Burdette SEARCEY, et al., petitioners, v. James L. DEAN, et al.

No. 18-648.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH (B) UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          43,834
<SECURITIES>                                     5,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,916
<INVENTORY>                                     67,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,008
<PP&E>                                          66,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,190
<BONDS>                                         14,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,042
<SALES>                                        105,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,098
<CGS>                                           89,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,505
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 77/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 77 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5224 March 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 77

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5224 March 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 206/2009 of 5 March 2009 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 206/2009 of 5 March 2009 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26217-26218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Aging and Cognition.
    Date: June 21, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Anita H. Undale, Ph.D., MD, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7428, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e4ebecf1e4abf0ebe1e4e9e0c5ebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d2c2324392c633823292c21280d232425632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 26218]]


    Dated: April 27, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09393 Filed 5-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Richard MORALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M95.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, dated the date of
this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                   |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Alex Andrew SERNAS, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-6593.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Michale Anthony HOFFMAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-841.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1214Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Exhibit
32.2







CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ken
Cleveland, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of New
Century Energy Corp. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of New Century Energy Corp.





By:/s/ Ken
Cleveland


Ken
Cleveland


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)





April   27,
2009