# Official Journal C 88/15 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 88 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6415 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 88

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6415 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2021/C 88/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2021/C 88/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2021/C 88/02 | Decision of the Court of Justice of 2 February 2021 on official holidays and judicial vacations | 2 |
| | General Court |
| 2021/C 88/03 | Decision of the General Court of 10 February 2021 on judicial vacations | 4 |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2021/C 88/04 | Case C-595/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission, Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Entity controlling 100 % of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company) | 5 |
| 2021/C 88/05 | Case C-764/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Ayuntamiento de Pamplona v Orange España SAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Authorisation of electronic communications networks and services — Municipal charge for the occupation or use of public land — Directive 2002/20/EC — Application to undertakings providing fixed telephony and Internet access services — Concepts of ‘electronic communications network’ and of ‘electronic communications services’ — Article 12 — Administrative charges — Article 13 — Fees for rights of use and rights to install facilities — Scope — Limitations on the Member States’ power to impose fees) | 6 |
| 2021/C 88/06 | Case C-16/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie — Poland) — VL v Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 2(1) and (2)(a) and (b) — ‘Concept of discrimination’ — Direct discrimination — Indirect discrimination — Discrimination on grounds of disability — Difference in treatment within a group of workers with disabilities — Grant of an allowance to workers with disabilities who have submitted disability certificates after a date chosen by the employer — Exclusion of workers with disabilities who have submitted their certificates before that date) | 6 |
| 2021/C 88/07 | Joined Cases C-229/19 and C-289/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam, Gerechtshof Den Haag — Netherlands) — Dexia Nederland BV v XXX (C-229/19), Z (C-289/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Articles 3(1), 4(1) and 6(1) — Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms — Term fixing in advance the creditor’s potential advantage in the event of termination of the contract — Significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract — Date on which the imbalance must be assessed — Finding that a term is unfair — Consequences — Replacement of an unfair term with a supplementary provision of national law) | 7 |
| 2021/C 88/08 | Case C-361/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Support scheme for farmers — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) — Direct payments — Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules — Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction — Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 — Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a)) | 8 |
| 2021/C 88/09 | Joined Cases C-422/19 and C-423/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 January 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Johannes Dietrich (C-422/19), Norbert Häring (C-423/19) v Hessischer Rundfunk (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Economic and monetary policy — Article 2(1) and Article 3(1)(c) TFEU — Monetary policy — Exclusive competence of the European Union — Article 128(1) TFEU — Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank — Article 16, first paragraph — Concept of ‘legal tender’ — Effects — Obligation to accept euro banknotes — Regulation (EC) No 974/98 — Whether possible for Member States to impose limitations on payments by means of banknotes and coins denominated in euro — Conditions — Regional legislation precluding the payment in cash of a radio and television licence fee to a regional public broadcasting body) | 9 |
| 2021/C 88/10 | Case C-466/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2021 — Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Europe Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for UMTS-compliant baseband chipsets — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 18(3) — Decision to request information — Necessity of the information requested — Proportionality — Burden of proof — Self-incrimination) | 10 |
| 2021/C 88/11 | Case C-649/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against IR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2012/13/EU — Articles 4 to 7 — Letters of Rights set out in Annexes I and II — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Letter of Rights on arrest — Right to be informed of the accusation — Right of access to the materials of the case — Person arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant in the executing Member State) | 10 |
| 2021/C 88/12 | Case C-787/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Application to all types of clients — National legislation excluding travel services that are provided to taxable persons who use those services for their business — Article 73 — Taxable amount — Determination of a taxable amount on a flat-rate basis for groups of services or for all services provided during the taxable period — Incompatibility) | 11 |
| 2021/C 88/13 | Case C-266/20 P: Appeal brought on 15 June 2020 by ZU against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 31 March 2020 in Case T-499/19, ZU v EEAS | 11 |
| 2021/C 88/14 | Case C-390/20 P: Appeal brought on 17 August 2020 by HZ, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of etc-gaming GmbH, and OX, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH, against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2020 in Case T-803/19, etc-gaming GmbH and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH v European Commission | 12 |
| 2021/C 88/15 | Case C-404/20 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2020 by Brands Up OÜ against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 25 June 2020 in Case T-651/19 Brands Up OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office | 12 |
| 2021/C 88/16 | Case C-652/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 2 December 2020 — HW, ZF, MZ v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG | 12 |
| 2021/C 88/17 | Case C-657/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Cazalla de la Sierra (Spain) lodged on 4 December 2020 — Caixabank, S.A. v ZN, SD, AH | 13 |
| 2021/C 88/18 | Case C-669/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 December 2020 — Veridos GmbH v Ministar na vatreshnite raboti na Republika Bulgaria, Mühlbauer ID Services GmbH — S&T | 13 |
| 2021/C 88/19 | Case C-689/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 18 December 2020 — ‘Banka DSK’ EAD v RP | 14 |
| 2021/C 88/20 | Case C-710/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava I (Slovakia) lodged on 29 December 2020 — Criminal proceedings against A.M. | 16 |
| 2021/C 88/21 | Case C-711/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 31 December 2020 — TanQuid Polska Sp. z o. o. v Generální ředitelství cel | 16 |
| 2021/C 88/22 | Case C-720/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Cottbus (Germany) lodged on 24 December 2020 — RO, legally represented v Bundesrepublik Deutschland | 17 |
| 2021/C 88/23 | Case C-721/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 30 December 2020 — DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH | 18 |
| 2021/C 88/24 | Case C-1/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 January 2021 — MC v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite | 18 |
| 2021/C 88/25 | Case C-7/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Bleiburg (Austria) lodged on 8 January 2021 — LKW WALTER Internationale Transportorganisation AG v CB and Others | 19 |
| 2021/C 88/26 | Case C-8/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Germanwings GmbH v KV | 20 |
| 2021/C 88/27 | Case C-9/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — AX v Deutsche Lufthansa AG | 20 |
| 2021/C 88/28 | Case C-10/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v TZ | 21 |
| 2021/C 88/29 | Case C-11/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v IY and TP | 21 |
| 2021/C 88/30 | Case C-12/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v FL | 22 |
| 2021/C 88/31 | Case C-17/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 11 January 2021 — Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrija v SIA GM | 22 |
| | General Court |
| 2021/C 88/32 | Case T-699/17: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Poland v Commission (Environment — Directive 2010/75/EU — Industrial emissions — Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 — Large combustion plants — Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions — Article 16(4) and (5) TEU — Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions — Application of the law ratione temporis — Comitology) | 25 |
| 2021/C 88/33 | Case T-691/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — KPN v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Vertical effects — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons) | 26 |
| 2021/C 88/34 | Case T-9/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — ClientEarth v EIB (Environment — Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia — Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing — Access to justice in environmental matters — Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention — Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Request for an internal review — Refusal of the request as inadmissible — Action for annulment — Admissibility of a ground of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of an act adopted under environmental law — Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect) | 26 |
| 2021/C 88/35 | Case T-382/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Turk Hava Yollari v EUIPO — Sky (skylife) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark skylife — Earlier EU word mark SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 27 |
| 2021/C 88/36 | Case T-817/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — OmniVision (Hydrovision) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Hydrovision — Earlier EU word mark Hylo-Vision — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 28 |
| 2021/C 88/37 | Case T-829/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 28 |
| 2021/C 88/38 | Case T-830/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 29 |
| 2021/C 88/39 | Case T-831/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 30 |
| 2021/C 88/40 | Case T-287/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Eggy Food v EUIPO (EGGY FOOD) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark EGGY FOOD — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 30 |
| 2021/C 88/41 | Case T-734/19: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Member of Parliament — Privileges and immunities — Request for an urgent initiative to confirm the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility) | 31 |
| 2021/C 88/42 | Case T-533/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 January 2021 — Green Power Technologies v Commission and ECSEL Joint Undertaking (Interim measures — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Reimbursement of sums paid — Application for interim measures — No urgency) | 32 |
| 2021/C 88/43 | Case T-580/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — KC v Commission (Action for damages — State aid — Complaint — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 32 |
| 2021/C 88/44 | Case T-761/20: Action brought on 20 December 2020 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB | 33 |
| 2021/C 88/45 | Case T-765/20: Action brought on 31 December 2020 — The Floow v Commission | 33 |
| 2021/C 88/46 | Case T-005/21: Action brought on 7 January 2021 — Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt v EEA | 34 |
| 2021/C 88/47 | Case T-26/21: Action brought on 20 January 2021 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT) | 35 |
| 2021/C 88/48 | Case T-27/21: Action brought on 20 January 2021 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT) | 36 |
| 2021/C 88/49 | Case T-28/21: Action brought on 20 January 2021 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT) | 37 |
| 2021/C 88/50 | Case T-32/21: Action brought on 22 January 2021 — Daw v EUIPO (Muresko) | 37 |
| 2021/C 88/51 | Case T-41/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — QD v Parliament | 38 |
| 2021/C 88/52 | Case T-45/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Ciano Trading & Services CT & S and Others v Commission | 39 |
| 2021/C 88/53 | Case T-46/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY) | 40 |
| 2021/C 88/54 | Case T-47/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (LIEBLINGSMENSCH) | 41 |
| 2021/C 88/55 | Case T-48/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021– Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (Lieblingsmensch) | 41 |
| 2021/C 88/56 | Case T-54/21: Action brought on 29 January 2021 — OHB System v Commission | 42 |
| 2021/C 88/57 | Case T-57/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Hungary v Commission | 43 |
| 2021/C 88/58 | Case T-66/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — Precisis v EUIPO — Easee (EASEE) | 44 |
| 2021/C 88/59 | Case T-67/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — ultra air v EUIPO — Donaldson Filtration Deutschland (ultrafilter international) | 45 |
| 2021/C 88/60 | Case T-64/19: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2021 — ECSEL Joint Undertaking v Personal Health Institute International | 45 |
| 2021/C 88/61 | Case T-545/19: Order of the General Court of 28 January 2021 — Global Steel Wire and Others v Commission | 46 |
| 2021/C 88/62 | Case T-16/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Hub Culture v EUIPO — PayPal (VEN) | 46 |
| 2021/C 88/63 | Case T-166/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — JD v EIB | 46 |
| 2021/C 88/64 | Case T-478/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Bigben Connected v EUIPO — Forsee Power (FORCE POWER) | 46 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Justice

2021/C 88/02

Decision of the Court of Justice of 2 February 2021 on official holidays and judicial vacations

2

General Court

2021/C 88/03

Decision of the General Court of 10 February 2021 on judicial vacations

4

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2021/C 88/04

Case C-595/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission, Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Entity controlling 100 % of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company)

5

2021/C 88/05

Case C-764/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Ayuntamiento de Pamplona v Orange España SAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Authorisation of electronic communications networks and services — Municipal charge for the occupation or use of public land — Directive 2002/20/EC — Application to undertakings providing fixed telephony and Internet access services — Concepts of ‘electronic communications network’ and of ‘electronic communications services’ — Article 12 — Administrative charges — Article 13 — Fees for rights of use and rights to install facilities — Scope — Limitations on the Member States’ power to impose fees)

6

2021/C 88/06

Case C-16/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie — Poland) — VL v Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 2(1) and (2)(a) and (b) — ‘Concept of discrimination’ — Direct discrimination — Indirect discrimination — Discrimination on grounds of disability — Difference in treatment within a group of workers with disabilities — Grant of an allowance to workers with disabilities who have submitted disability certificates after a date chosen by the employer — Exclusion of workers with disabilities who have submitted their certificates before that date)

6

2021/C 88/07

Joined Cases C-229/19 and C-289/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam, Gerechtshof Den Haag — Netherlands) — Dexia Nederland BV v XXX (C-229/19), Z (C-289/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Articles 3(1), 4(1) and 6(1) — Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms — Term fixing in advance the creditor’s potential advantage in the event of termination of the contract — Significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract — Date on which the imbalance must be assessed — Finding that a term is unfair — Consequences — Replacement of an unfair term with a supplementary provision of national law)

7

2021/C 88/08

Case C-361/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Support scheme for farmers — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) — Direct payments — Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules — Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction — Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 — Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a))

8

2021/C 88/09

Joined Cases C-422/19 and C-423/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 January 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Johannes Dietrich (C-422/19), Norbert Häring (C-423/19) v Hessischer Rundfunk (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Economic and monetary policy — Article 2(1) and Article 3(1)(c) TFEU — Monetary policy — Exclusive competence of the European Union — Article 128(1) TFEU — Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank — Article 16, first paragraph — Concept of ‘legal tender’ — Effects — Obligation to accept euro banknotes — Regulation (EC) No 974/98 — Whether possible for Member States to impose limitations on payments by means of banknotes and coins denominated in euro — Conditions — Regional legislation precluding the payment in cash of a radio and television licence fee to a regional public broadcasting body)

9

2021/C 88/10

Case C-466/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2021 — Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Europe Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for UMTS-compliant baseband chipsets — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 18(3) — Decision to request information — Necessity of the information requested — Proportionality — Burden of proof — Self-incrimination)

10

2021/C 88/11

Case C-649/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against IR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2012/13/EU — Articles 4 to 7 — Letters of Rights set out in Annexes I and II — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Letter of Rights on arrest — Right to be informed of the accusation — Right of access to the materials of the case — Person arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant in the executing Member State)

10

2021/C 88/12

Case C-787/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Application to all types of clients — National legislation excluding travel services that are provided to taxable persons who use those services for their business — Article 73 — Taxable amount — Determination of a taxable amount on a flat-rate basis for groups of services or for all services provided during the taxable period — Incompatibility)

11

2021/C 88/13

Case C-266/20 P: Appeal brought on 15 June 2020 by ZU against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 31 March 2020 in Case T-499/19, ZU v EEAS

11

2021/C 88/14

Case C-390/20 P: Appeal brought on 17 August 2020 by HZ, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of etc-gaming GmbH, and OX, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH, against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2020 in Case T-803/19, etc-gaming GmbH and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH v European Commission

12

2021/C 88/15

Case C-404/20 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2020 by Brands Up OÜ against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 25 June 2020 in Case T-651/19 Brands Up OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office

12

2021/C 88/16

Case C-652/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 2 December 2020 — HW, ZF, MZ v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG

12

2021/C 88/17

Case C-657/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Cazalla de la Sierra (Spain) lodged on 4 December 2020 — Caixabank, S.A. v ZN, SD, AH

13

2021/C 88/18

Case C-669/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 December 2020 — Veridos GmbH v Ministar na vatreshnite raboti na Republika Bulgaria, Mühlbauer ID Services GmbH — S&T

13

2021/C 88/19

Case C-689/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 18 December 2020 — ‘Banka DSK’ EAD v RP

14

2021/C 88/20

Case C-710/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava I (Slovakia) lodged on 29 December 2020 — Criminal proceedings against A.M.

16

2021/C 88/21

Case C-711/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 31 December 2020 — TanQuid Polska Sp. z o. o. v Generální ředitelství cel

16

2021/C 88/22

Case C-720/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Cottbus (Germany) lodged on 24 December 2020 — RO, legally represented v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

17

2021/C 88/23

Case C-721/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 30 December 2020 — DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH

18

2021/C 88/24

Case C-1/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 January 2021 — MC v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

18

2021/C 88/25

Case C-7/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Bleiburg (Austria) lodged on 8 January 2021 — LKW WALTER Internationale Transportorganisation AG v CB and Others

19

2021/C 88/26

Case C-8/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Germanwings GmbH v KV

20

2021/C 88/27

Case C-9/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — AX v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

20

2021/C 88/28

Case C-10/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v TZ

21

2021/C 88/29

Case C-11/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v IY and TP

21

2021/C 88/30

Case C-12/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v FL

22

2021/C 88/31

Case C-17/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 11 January 2021 — Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrija v SIA GM

22

General Court

2021/C 88/32

Case T-699/17: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Poland v Commission (Environment — Directive 2010/75/EU — Industrial emissions — Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 — Large combustion plants — Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions — Article 16(4) and (5) TEU — Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions — Application of the law ratione temporis — Comitology)

25

2021/C 88/33

Case T-691/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — KPN v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Vertical effects — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)

26

2021/C 88/34

Case T-9/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — ClientEarth v EIB (Environment — Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia — Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing — Access to justice in environmental matters — Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention — Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Request for an internal review — Refusal of the request as inadmissible — Action for annulment — Admissibility of a ground of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of an act adopted under environmental law — Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect)

26

2021/C 88/35

Case T-382/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Turk Hava Yollari v EUIPO — Sky (skylife) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark skylife — Earlier EU word mark SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

27

2021/C 88/36

Case T-817/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — OmniVision (Hydrovision) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Hydrovision — Earlier EU word mark Hylo-Vision — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

28

2021/C 88/37

Case T-829/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

28

2021/C 88/38

Case T-830/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

29

2021/C 88/39

Case T-831/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

30

2021/C 88/40

Case T-287/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Eggy Food v EUIPO (EGGY FOOD) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark EGGY FOOD — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

30

2021/C 88/41

Case T-734/19: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Member of Parliament — Privileges and immunities — Request for an urgent initiative to confirm the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

31

2021/C 88/42

Case T-533/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 January 2021 — Green Power Technologies v Commission and ECSEL Joint Undertaking (Interim measures — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Reimbursement of sums paid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

32

2021/C 88/43

Case T-580/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — KC v Commission (Action for damages — State aid — Complaint — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

32

2021/C 88/44

Case T-761/20: Action brought on 20 December 2020 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB

33

2021/C 88/45

Case T-765/20: Action brought on 31 December 2020 — The Floow v Commission

33

2021/C 88/46

Case T-005/21: Action brought on 7 January 2021 — Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt v EEA

34

2021/C 88/47

Case T-26/21: Action brought on 20 January 2021 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT)

35

2021/C 88/48

Case T-27/21: Action brought on 20 January 2021 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT)

36

2021/C 88/49

Case T-28/21: Action brought on 20 January 2021 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT)

37

2021/C 88/50

Case T-32/21: Action brought on 22 January 2021 — Daw v EUIPO (Muresko)

37

2021/C 88/51

Case T-41/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — QD v Parliament

38

2021/C 88/52

Case T-45/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Ciano Trading & Services CT & S and Others v Commission

39

2021/C 88/53

Case T-46/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)

40

2021/C 88/54

Case T-47/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (LIEBLINGSMENSCH)

41

2021/C 88/55

Case T-48/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021– Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (Lieblingsmensch)

41

2021/C 88/56

Case T-54/21: Action brought on 29 January 2021 — OHB System v Commission

42

2021/C 88/57

Case T-57/21: Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Hungary v Commission

43

2021/C 88/58

Case T-66/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — Precisis v EUIPO — Easee (EASEE)

44

2021/C 88/59

Case T-67/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — ultra air v EUIPO — Donaldson Filtration Deutschland (ultrafilter international)

45

2021/C 88/60

Case T-64/19: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2021 — ECSEL Joint Undertaking v Personal Health Institute International

45

2021/C 88/61

Case T-545/19: Order of the General Court of 28 January 2021 — Global Steel Wire and Others v Commission

46

2021/C 88/62

Case T-16/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Hub Culture v EUIPO — PayPal (VEN)

46

2021/C 88/63

Case T-166/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — JD v EIB

46

2021/C 88/64

Case T-478/20: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Bigben Connected v EUIPO — Forsee Power (FORCE POWER)

46

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN