alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex Parte William Cook.

1. Eight op Bail.—Under the state Constitution of 1876, all prisoners are-bailable by sufficient sureties, “unless for capital offenses when the proof is evident.”

2. Same.—Being in custody under an indictment for murder, the appellant. applied by *habeas corpus,*to the district court, for the privilege of bail, and from its judgment refusing it appeals to this court; which, while it declines to discuss the evidence brought up in the record, considers its , sufficiency to make a case in which the “proof is evident” that the appellant is guilty of murder in the first degree; and, determining that it does-not make such a case, reverses the judgment of the district court, and. orders bail to be allowed in a specified sum.

Appeal from the District Court of Wise. Tried below before the Hon. J. A. Carroll.

*Watts, Lanham & Roach,*for the appellant,

filed an able brief.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Ector, P. J.

Appellant was indicted, with William Richards and William Arp, in the district court of Wise county, *389for the murder of Lock Malone, and, having been brought before said district court upon a writ of *habeas corpus,*and the evidence having been heard, it was decided that he was not entitled to bail, and from that decision an appeal was taken to this court.

Article 1, section 11, of the Constitution of the state of Texas is as follows: “ All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient.sureties, unless for capital offenses when the proof is evident; but this provision shall not be so construed as to prevent bail after indictment found, upon examination of the evidence in such manner as may be prescribed by law.”

The amendment to the Code established degrees in murder, by the following provisions, to wit :

> “Art. 608. All murder committed by poison, starving, torture, or with express malice, or committed in the perpetration, or in the attempt at the perpetration, of arson, rape, robbery, or burglary, is murder in the first degree, and all murder not of the first degree is murder of the second degree.

> “ Art. 612 *a.*The punishment of murder in the first degree shall be death, and the punishment of murder in the .second degree shall be confinement in the penitentiary for not less than five years.”

It is not our custom to discuss the facts in the record to sustain the decision in granting or refusing bail. Such a discussion might have an undue influence with the jury on a final trial of the cause. It is not evident to our minds, from the facts in the record, that the appellant is guilty of murder in the first degree, and, therefore, he is entitled to bail.

Because the district court refused to admit appellant to bail, upon sufficient sureties, the judgment is reversed, and It is ordered that he, the said William Cook, be admitted to bail in the "sum of $3,000.

*Ordered accordingly.*
Kenneth SHELTON, petitioner, v. Anthonee PATTERSON.

No. 18-826.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
#### Max Ettinger and Federal Realty Corporation, a Florida corporation, individually, and doing business as Federal Realty Company, Appellants, v. Catherina Maas, *Appellee.*

Special Division A.

Opinion filed February 19, 1929.

*Gilbert G. Robinson*and *A.*Aronovitz, for Appellants;

*Wapne Allen*and *McElya, Milledge &*Jarrell, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this case the plaintiffs in error were the defendants in the court below and, upon judgment being rendered against them, they sued out writ of error.

Pleas to the declaration (if any were filed) do not appear in the transcript of the record and, therefore, this Court is not advised of the issues presented in the trial of the cause. For this reason the Court is not in position to determine whether or not' reversible error occurred in the trial and judgment. *

When a record is presented in this condition the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

*220Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Neil J. GILLESPIE, petitioner, v. REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS.

No. 17-7054.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Antonio MARTINEZ-LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6187.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1167Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
James GOOLSBY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7623.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Ron COLLINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7567.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mark Francis HONISH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9144.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/18/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      157,556
COMMITMENTS
  42,001   31,124   27,022   72,971   72,796  141,994  130,942   15,562   26,614

CHANGES FROM 05/11/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,903)
   1,102    6,784       28    3,228   -3,370    4,358    3,442     -455      461

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.7     19.8     17.2     46.3     46.2     90.1     83.1      9.9     16.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      43       38       54       60       66      137      137
```

----

Updated May 27, 2010
Certification pursuant to
 Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
June 27, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward J. PuisisEdward J. PuisisExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Harry
Mund,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May 16, 2005                      /s/ Harry Mund
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Harry Mund
                                  Chief Executive Officer
Ronald R. SHEA, petitioner, v. WINNEBAGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al.

No. 18-794.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
George L. MOTHERSHED, petitioner, v. APACHE CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-6579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Second Division denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/16/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       69,464
COMMITMENTS
  19,869    2,108    8,252   26,110   43,233   54,231   53,593   15,233   15,871

CHANGES FROM 11/09/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,637)
  -1,798     -496   -1,785     -986   -3,471   -4,569   -5,752   -1,068      115

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.6      3.0     11.9     37.6     62.2     78.1     77.2     21.9     22.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       89)
      34        8       24       31       29       73       58
```

----

Updated November 19, 2010
**Exhibit      21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.**

| **State                  of Organization** |   | **Company                  Name**                      |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |                                                   |
| Texas                                      |   | CRESA                  Capital Markets Group, L.P.     |
| Texas                                      |   | Ascendant                  CRESA LLC                   |
| Texas                                      |   | ASE                  Investments Corporation           |
| Texas                                      |   | VTE,                  L.P.                             |
| Texas                                      |   | Dougherty’s                  Holdings, Inc.      |
| Delaware                                   |   | ASDS                  of Orange County, Inc.           |
| Texas                                      |   | Dougherty’s                  Pharmacy, Inc.      |
| Texas                                      |   | Park                  Infusion Services, L.P.          |
| Texas                                      |   | Park-Medicine                  Man, L.P.               |
| Texas                                      |   | Fairways                  Frisco, L.P.                 |
| Delaware                                   |   | CRESA                  Partners of Orange County, L.P. |
| Texas                                      |   | DM-ASD                  Holding, Co.                   |

**-86-**

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Diamond Hill Investment  Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, R.H.  Dillon,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /S/ R.H. Dillon
                                        -----------------------------------

                                        Print Name:  R.H. Dillon

                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                        Date:  August 12, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7961

HARVEY LEE WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-56) Submitted: April 28, 2004 Decided: June 16, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Harvey Lee Williams, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

THOMASINA OWENS,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (ELWOOD STAFFING 

SERVICES INC.),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 510 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134316 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, BRIAN JOHN DOWELL and KELLY DOWELL, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 134316 COA: 274532 Macomb CC: 2005-003918-NH BARBARA ANN MARSACK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d1128 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Robert S. Bland, the Chief
Executive Officer of Insure.com, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|/s/ ROBERT S. BLANDName: Robert S. Bland
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 3, 2008 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Insure.com, Inc. and will be retained by
Insure.com, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
Martin ARAMBUL-DURAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9126.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mark A. WHITE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8730.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          13,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  434,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                    91,066
<INVENTORY>                                     41,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               449,855
<PP&E>                                       1,220,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                 369,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,857,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,727
<BONDS>                                        877,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           712
<OTHER-SE>                                     651,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,857,243
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,319,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,012,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,060
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,048
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,570
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,570
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53


</TABLE>
James Lee DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5543.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
“Exhibit 33”

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Patriot, Corp. (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bradley Rudman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.

The Report duly complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Bradley Rudman

___________________________

Bradley Rudman, President & Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2006
# Official Journal C 273A/18 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 273A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6018 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 273A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6018 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Economic and Social Committee |
| 2017/C 273 A/01 | Vacancy notice No 22/17 concerning one post of Head of Unit (m/f) in the Communication Department — Unit D.1 — Press (Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Economic and Social Committee

2017/C 273 A/01

Vacancy notice No 22/17 concerning one post of Head of Unit (m/f) in the Communication Department — Unit D.1 — Press (Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN