alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1286 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1286

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases 
  presumed to be service connected with respect to radiation-exposed 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

  Mr. Evans (for himself, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Filner, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. 
Brown of Florida, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Ms. Carson, Mr. Reyes, Mr. 
 Rodriguez, Mr. Shows, Mr. Olver, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Frank 
 of Massachusetts, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Underwood, Mr. Kleczka, 
and Mr. Frost) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases 
  presumed to be service connected with respect to radiation-exposed 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Atomic Veterans Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF LIST OF DISEASES PRESUMED TO BE SERVICE CONNECTED 
              FOR RADIATION-EXPOSED VETERANS.

    Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(P) Lung cancer.
            ``(Q) Bone cancer.
            ``(R) Skin cancer.
            ``(S) Colon cancer.
            ``(T) Posterior subcapsular cataracts.
            ``(U) Non-malignant thyroid nodular disease.
            ``(V) Ovarian cancer.
            ``(W) Parathyroid adenoma.
            ``(X) Tumors of the brain and central nervous system.
            ``(Y) Rectal cancer.''.
                                 <all>
```
Carl J. MARINELLO, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1144.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 25, 2017.

The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00380-CV

IN RE W.W.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 5, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 27, 2020, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a 

motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of 

mandamus, which this court granted on July 28, 2020. The real party in interest filed a response.

After considering the petition, the response, and the record, this court concludes Relator is 

not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on July 28, 2020 is lifted. 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CI-17241, styled In the Interest of W.W., a Child, pending in the 73rd 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez signed the temporary orders at issue 

in this original proceeding.
Jerry WANZER, petitioner, v. Debra GLOOR, et al.

No. 17-6582.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# L_2012161EN.01003301.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 27/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was last amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 165/2011 of 19 December 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was last amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 165/2011 of 19 December 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be inserted after point 66wh (Commission Regulation (EC) No 262/2009) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘66wi. | 32010 R 0255: Commission Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (OJ L 80, 26.3.2010, p. 10).
  The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
  This Regulation shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘66wi.

32010 R 0255: Commission Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (OJ L 80, 26.3.2010, p. 10).

The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:

This Regulation shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 15.3.2012, p. 57.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 80, 26.3.2010, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Harson CHONG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9074.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Thomas CURETON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8644.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and *67petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Dean v. United States,* 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1170, 197 L.Ed.2d 490 (2017).
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/30/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,089
COMMITMENTS
  11,961    4,663    5,327   16,345   19,558   33,633   29,547    7,456   11,541

CHANGES FROM 03/23/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        637)
    -251      545    1,047      553   -1,082    1,349      509     -711      128

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.1     11.3     13.0     39.8     47.6     81.9     71.9     18.1     28.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       64)
      15       11       13       31       22       50       45
```

----

Updated April 2, 2010
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, dated the date of
this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                      |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



24
##### 



TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /S/ R.H. DillonPrint  Name:
    R.H. DillonTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    August 9, 2007/S/ James F. LairdPrint Name:
    James F. LairdTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    August 9, 2007 26
**EXHIBIT
      99.4**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**






The
      undersigned, being the Corporate Controller of Northcore Technologies Inc.
      (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as
      at, and for the fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2006.




A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.







Dated:  October
                5, 2007
            /s/
                Tam NguyenTam
                NguyenCorporate
                Controller











9
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Richard Allen ROBERTS.

No. D-3031.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Disbarment order entered.
| Date:  November      13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen                                        |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   | Name:  Jerome      J. Gassen                      |
|                                    |   | Title:  President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

| Date:  November 13,      2009 | By:    | /s/ John J. Letter                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         |   | Name:  John      J. Letter                               |
|                                         |   | Title:  Senior Vice President – Treasurer      and |
|                                         |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                       |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS

TRUSTEE FOR NMST 2004-1,

 Respondent

 v.

MARK DAVID FRANKEL AND

CHRISTINE S. FRANKEL 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 220 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

PETITON OF: MARK DAVID 

FRANKEL
DISMISS and Opinion F iled September 5, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00701-CV
HENDOLPH HOLDINGS LLC, CHRISTOPHER RANDOLPH, AND HENDA SALMERON, Appellants V. DEAN CALDWELL, LINDA CALDWELL , AIRMASTER AERATOR, LLC, AND AIRMASTER ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-09850

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See id.

230701F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HENDOLPH HOLDINGS LLC, CHRISTOPHER RANDOLPH, AND HENDA SALMERON, Appellants

No. 05-23-00701-CV V.

DEAN CALDWELL, LINDA CALDWELL, AIRMASTER AERATOR, LLC, AND AIRMASTER ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-09850. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Pedersen, III participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Dean Caldwe ll, Linda Caldwell, Airmaster Aerator, LLC, and Airmaster E nvironmental, LLC recover thei r costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Hendolph Holdings LLC, Christopher Randolph, and Henda Salmeron.

Judgment entered this 5th day of September 2023.
# L_2013204EN.01000103.xml

| 31.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of Part IV (trade matters) of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other (Honduras)

Pending the completion of the procedures for the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other, signed at Tegucigalpa on 29 June 2012, Part IV thereof concerning trade matters shall, in accordance with its Article 353(4), be applied on a provisional basis between the European Union and Honduras as from 1 August 2013. By virtue of Article 3 (1) of the Council Decision of 25 June 2012 on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement, Article 271 shall not be provisionally applied.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN JILAVDARYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71137

Agency No. A200-908-550

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Karen Jilavdaryan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

DEC 9 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010),

and we deny the petition for review. 

Jilavdaryan contends he suffered past persecution and has a fear of future

persecution by “Armenian mobsters” who extorted money from him. Substantial

evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal. See Zetino v.

Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An alien’s desire to be free from

harassment by criminals motivated by theft . . . bears no nexus to a protected

ground.”); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (a

protected ground must be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant). 

We reject Jilavdaryan’s contention that the BIA failed to address his arguments,

and also reject his request for a remand.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Jilavdaryan’s CAT

claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured

by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in Armenia. See Silaya

v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-71137
## ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 05-13-01482-CR OFFENSE: 2.04 

### ErickEugene Ford v.The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Dallas 

# I5Z-/S*

COA DISPOSITION: MODIFY TRIAL COURT: 195th Judicial District Court DATE: 01/26/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1355893-N



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ErickEugene Ford v. The State of STYLE: Texas 

## PRQ fiE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: JUDGE: CCA#: 

# \5%-/f CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC RECORD
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of TheStreet.com,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-90363) and Form S-8 (File No.  333-131753)  of our reports dated  February 3, 2006,  with respect to our audits of the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule of TheStreet.com,  Inc.,  TheStreet.com,  Inc. managements  assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting,  and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of TheStreet.com, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP

New York, New York
March 15, 2006

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,859-08
IN RE WILLIAM CHARLES WE BB, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 2012-678-C2H IN THE 54TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM MC LENNAN COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an a pplication for a

writ of habe as cor

pus in the 54th District Court of McL ennan County , that more than 35 day s have e lapsed, a nd that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of M cLen n an C ounty , is order ed to file a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habeas corpus application, subm itting a copy of a timely filed order t hat desi gn ates iss ues t o be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating2

that Relator has not filed an application f o r a wr it of habeas corpus in McL ennan County
. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was
serve d with the habeas ap p l i ca t i o n shall also be subm itted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Mar ch 22, 2017 Do not publish
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OneSource Information Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Roy D. Landon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Roy D. Landon

Roy D. Landon
Chief Financial Officer
March 27, 2003
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

This Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Ameriana Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the report.



|                      |  |        |  |                                                              
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2007 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen                                         
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Jerome J. Gassen                                             
|                      |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                        
|                      |  |       
|Date: August 13, 2007 |  | By:    |  | /s/ John J. Letter                                           
|                      |  | Name:  |  | John J. Letter                                               
|                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-67302, 333-67298 and333-73129) and Form S-3 (No. 333-73131) of our report dated January 27, 2003 relating to the consolidated statements of condition of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statementsof income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ KPMGLLP

Stamford, Connecticut March 28, 2003
Albert Pete VEENSTRA, III, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR the DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

No. 17-6739.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.