alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,780,250
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      13,200,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,843,056
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     125,252,922
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       124,105,000
<LOANS>                                    264,541,482
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,095,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             434,568,301
<DEPOSITS>                                 349,301,951
<SHORT-TERM>                                28,824,443
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          8,562,454
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,844,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             434,568,301
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,469,004
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,146,624
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               673,836
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,289,464
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,724,009
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,566,912
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,722,552
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,754,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,623,813
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,623,813
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,307,357
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.68
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,133,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,360,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,592,049
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,300,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  356,231
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,006
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,095,775
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           457,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,638,775


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

D.W., A Child

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 4057

[ July 20, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Michael James Orlando , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16001793

DLA

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Travis Dunnington, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney,

Assistant Attorney Gener al, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Paula VILLALVA-PATRICIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7884.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Edward Nolan NORWOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7823.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Eric R. Zimmerman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending July 1, 2005 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: August 15, 2005 /s/ Eric R. Zimmerman   Eric R. Zimmerman   President, Chief Executive Officer
Maurice DORVILUS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8739.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron Markovitz,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                13, 2008
            /s/
                Miron MarkovitzMiron
                MarkovitzChief
                Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                Officer)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4645 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain payments 

made by public service employees to qualify for public service repayment, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain 

payments made by public service employees to qualify 

for public service repayment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Service Loan 

5 Forgiveness Inclusion Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4645 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFYING PAYMENTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 455(m) of the Higher 

3 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting ‘‘subject to 

6 paragraph (5),’’ before ‘‘has made’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(5) FIRST 60 MONTHLY PAYMENTS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of 

10 meeting the requirement under subparagraph 

11 (A) of paragraph (1), the first 60 monthly pay12 ments may be payments under a repayment 

13 plan under subsection (d)(1) or (g). 

14 ‘‘(B) APPLICABILITY.—This paragraph 

15 shall apply to borrowers who on or after the 

16 date of the enactment of this paragraph have 

17 made less than 120 monthly payments under 

18 paragraph (1)(A).’’. 

19 (b) NOTIFICATION TO BORROWERS.—Not later than 

20 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

21 Secretary of Education shall— 

22 (1) inform each borrower of a loan made under 

23 part D of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 

24 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) of— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4645 IH

1 (A) paragraph (5) of section 455(m) of the 

2 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

3 1087e(m)), as amended by this Act; and 

4 (B) the effect of such paragraph on loan 

5 cancellation under such section 455(m) (20 

6 U.S.C. 1087e(m)); and 

7 (2) provide information to such borrowers on 

8 how to change repayment plans. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Bryan AUSTIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8019.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Patricia Monet CONNER, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 17-6940.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4

NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

48 N. South Street

Wilmington, OH 45177

November 12, 2009

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | NB&T Financial Group, Inc.  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NB&T Financial Group,
Inc., an Ohio corporation (NBTF), is today filing a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q), as executed on November 12, 2009.

Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, NBTF hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon
request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument represents
long-term debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of NBTF and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.



|                           
|---------------------------
|Very truly yours,          
|                           
|/s/ Craig F. Fortin        
|Craig F. Fortin            
|Senior Vice President & CFO
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4498



# 
D ALE B LANKENSHIP ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge.

(CR-01-10) Submitted: December 10, 2001 Decided: January 24, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL R. Clarke VanDervort, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, John C. Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:Dale Blankenship pled guilty to distribution of oxycodone in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994) pursuant to a plea agreement. Blankenship appeals the sentence he received, alleging the amount of drugs was incorrectly calculated. We affirm. Blankenship contends he should be only held responsible for the actual amount of oxycodone contained in each capsule he sold. He contends the weight of the filler in the capsules should not be counted in calculating the amount of drugs involved in his offense. We reviewthe proper method of calculating drug weight as a legal question subject to de novo review. United States v. Daughtrey , 874 F.2d 213, 217-18 (4th Cir. 1989). Base offense levels for drug offenses are determined from the Drug Quantity Table following USSG § 2D1.1. In a footnote to the DrugQuantity Table, the Guidelines provide that "[u]nless otherwise specified, the weight of a controlled substance set forth in the table refersto the entire weight of any mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of the controlled substance." USSG § 2D1.1. We have held that this gross weight methodology applies to pharmaceuticals. United States v. Meitinger , 901 F.2d 27, 29 (4th Cir. 1990); United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d 28, 31-32 (4th Cir. 1990). Blankenship nevertheless contends he should be held responsible only for the active weight of the controlled substance. This argument was addressed and foreclosed, however, in United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d at 31-32. We see no reason to depart from this well established rule. Accordingly, we affirm Blankenship’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B LANKENSHIP
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John J. Limbert, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                        |  |                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ John J. Limbert
|                        |  | John J. Limbert
Donnie HOWARD, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7297.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Allen GOOSSEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8809.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
William Harold KELLEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-1603.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13477

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20484-DMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FABIAN A. SCOTT, 

a.k.a. Faybo,

a.k.a. Fabo,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(March 27, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-13477 Date Filed: 03/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

J. Rafael Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Fabian A. Scott in this direct 

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire 

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is 

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable 

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scott’s 

convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-13477 Date Filed: 03/27/2015 Page: 2 of 2
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/24/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       62,357
COMMITMENTS
  19,930    3,291    5,419   25,014   39,016   50,363   47,726   11,994   14,631

CHANGES FROM 08/17/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,796)
     438      737    1,302      152      716    1,892    2,755      -96     -959

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.0      5.3      8.7     40.1     62.6     80.8     76.5     19.2     23.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      28        9       15       30       28       62       50
```

----

Updated August 27, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.E.L.M.P., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: T.T., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 254 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
CAPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al.

No. 18-608.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 411/2005

of 11 March 2005         

fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 159th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum aid and processing securities applying for the 159th individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 11 March 2005 fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 159th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

----
Charles H. LEE, Jr., petitioner, v. Gene BORDELON, et al.

No. 17-5265.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1235 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1235

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with 
   the Solano County Water Agency, California, to use Solano Project 
facilities for impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water for 
     domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION.

    The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to enter into contracts 
with the Solano County Water Agency, or any of its member unit 
contractors for water from the Solano Project, California, pursuant to 
the Act of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for--
        (1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water 
    for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes, 
    using any facilities associated with the Solano Project, 
    California; and
        (2) the exchange of water among Solano Project contractors, for 
    the purposes set forth in paragraph (1), using facilities 
    associated with the Solano Project, California.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

    The authorization under section 1 shall be limited to the use of 
that portion of the Solano Project facilities downstream of Mile 26 of 
the Putah South Canal (as that canal is depicted on the official maps 
of the Bureau of Reclamation), which is below the diversion points on 
the Putah South Canal utilized by the City of Fairfield for delivery of 
Solano Project water.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Andre MERRITT, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.