alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              19,368,969
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,330,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                           624,485
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    33,851,766
<PP&E>                                              14,252,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                      10,786,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      44,835,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               20,897,271
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               113,589
<OTHER-SE>                                          19,888,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        44,835,151
<SALES>                                              3,565,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,542,922
<CGS>                                                  490,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,407,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,212,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        22,619
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      15,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,362,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                           521,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    841,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           841,614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.07<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.07
<FN>
<F1>This amount is reported as EPS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Adelmo A. FAUNTLEROY, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-7199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999 Broadway
Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.

Includes $2,609,000 of restricted cash.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,621,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      51,027,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,997,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,754,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     37,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     754,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,754,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,815,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,537,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (2,888,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (542,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (542,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (542,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (1,167.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1,167.39)






</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**WAH KING INVEST CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Wah King Invest Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum

Jerry Gruenbaum

Chief Executive Officer, and

Chairman of the Board

 

November 15, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Wah King Invest Corp., and will be retained by Wah King Invest Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1173

To provide that States may use redistricting systems for Congressional

districts other than single-member districts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. WATT of North Carolina (for himself, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr.

SANDERS, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. FRANK

of Massachusetts, Ms. LEE, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. BROWN

of California, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that States may use redistricting systems for

Congressional districts other than single-member districts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘States’ Choice of Vot5 ing Systems Act’’.
2

•HR 1173 IH

1 SEC. 2. RIGHT OF STATES TO CHOOSE DISTRICTING SYS2 TEMS.

3 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act for the relief of Doctor Ri4 cardo Vallejo Samala and to provide for congressional re5 districting’’, approved December 14, 1967 (2 U.S.C. 2c),

6 is amended by striking ‘‘In each State’’ and all that fol7 lows and inserting the following:

8 ‘‘SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING.

9 ‘‘In each State entitled in the One Hundred Eighth

10 Congress or in any Congress thereafter to more than one

11 Representative in Congress under an apportionment made

12 pursuant to the provisions of section 22(a) of the Act of

13 June 18, 1929 (ch. 28; 46 Stat. 26)—

14 ‘‘(1) there may be established by law a number

15 of districts equal to the number of Representatives

16 to which such State is so entitled and Representa17 tives may be elected only from single-member dis18 tricts so established, or

19 ‘‘(2) such State may establish a number of dis20 tricts for election of Representatives that is less than

21 the number of Representatives to which the State is

22 entitled and Representatives may be elected from

23 single-member districts, multi-member districts, or a

24 combination of single-member and multi-member

25 districts, if that State uses a system that meets the

26 constitutional standard that each voter should have
3

•HR 1173 IH

1 equal voting power and does not violate the Voting

2 Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.).’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jeffrey M. StibelJeffrey M. StibelPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules will hold a meeting 
on October 13, 2022 in Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the 
public for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting 
materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: 
http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books.

DATES: October 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bridget Healy, Esq., Acting Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6735120b021424080a0a0e131302023834020415021306151e27060849121404081215131449000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a381f060f1929050707031e1e0f0f35390f09180f1e0b18132a0b05441f1909051f181e19440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: April 26, 2022.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2022-09217 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/26/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      243,889
COMMITMENTS
  88,594    7,393   40,109   86,007  161,417  214,711  208,918   29,178   34,970

CHANGES FROM 10/19/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,364)
   3,166     -131    3,470       83    3,662    6,719    7,000    1,645    1,364

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    36.3      3.0     16.4     35.3     66.2     88.0     85.7     12.0     14.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      224)
      82       26       70       65       94      170      177
```

----

Updated October 29, 2010
Alvin E. THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7254.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY OF DIRECTORS OF

STANCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

The undersigned hereby appoints each of Eric E. Parsons and Michael T. Winslow, signing singly, as the undersigneds true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc.,
the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission; and

(2) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of
such attorney-in-fact, may be in the best interest of, or legally required by the undersigned.

The undersigned hereby ratifies and
confirms all that the attorney-in-fact and agent shall do or cause to be done under this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney this 27th day of February 2008.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Virginia L. Anderson
|Virginia L. Anderson    
|                        
|/s/ Frederick W. Buckman
|Frederick W. Buckman    
|                        
|/s/ John E. Chapoton    
|John E. Chapoton        
|                        
|/s/ Stanley R. Fallis   
|Stanley R. Fallis       
|                        
|/s/ Wanda G. Henton     
|Wanda G. Henton         
|                        
|/s/ Peter O. Kohler, MD 
|Peter O. Kohler, MD     
|                        
|/s/ Jerome J. Meyer     
|Jerome J. Meyer         
|                        
|/s/ Ralph R. Peterson   
|Ralph R. Peterson       
|                        
|/s/ E. Kay Stepp        
|E. Kay Stepp            
|                        
|/s/ Michael G. Thorne   
|Michael G. Thorne       
|                        
|/s/ Ronald E. Timpe     
|Ronald E. Timpe
Terrence RICHARDSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7080.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, et al.

No. 16-1364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of XATA Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/ Craig S. Fawcett
Craig S. Fawcett, Chief Executive Officer
 Dated: May 14, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to XATA Corporation and
will be retained by XATA Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In Re Chris JAYE, petitioner.

No. 17-738.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
# Official Journal C 199/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 199 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4924 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 199

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4924 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 199/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 199/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4344 — Lactalis/Nestlé) (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 199/3 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 3 |
| 2006/C 199/4 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment (1) | 7 |
| 2006/C 199/5 | Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 8 |
| | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2006/C 199/6 | Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority under Article 4.1(a) of the Act referred to in point 64a in Annex XIII of the EEA Agreement (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes) — Imposition of new public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services on routes in Finnmark and North-Troms (Norway) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 199/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 199/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4344 — Lactalis/Nestlé) (1)

2

2006/C 199/3

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

3

2006/C 199/4

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment (1)

7

2006/C 199/5

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

8

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2006/C 199/6

Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority under Article 4.1(a) of the Act referred to in point 64a in Annex XIII of the EEA Agreement (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes) — Imposition of new public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services on routes in Finnmark and North-Troms (Norway)

9

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 199/7 | NO-Oslo: scheduled air services in Finnmark and North Troms (Norway) — Invitation to tender | 19 |

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 199/7

NO-Oslo: scheduled air services in Finnmark and North Troms (Norway) — Invitation to tender

19

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 20-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF ANDREW L. HOWELL

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE

OF MONTANA

PLED

OCT 0 6 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

O R D tit 

of Montana

Andrew L. Howell has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Howell has provided the necessary

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion

under Rule V. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, Andrew L. Howell may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk

of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this 40 day of October, 2020.

Chief Justic

A

10/06/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
Justices
Steven M. CRUTCHFIELD, petitioner, v. WILLIAMSON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE.

No. 17-5337.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
  MM COMPANIES, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of MM Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Seymour Holtzman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Seymour Holtzman
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Seymour Holtzman
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 March 31, 2005