alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL 

### OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable Clifford B. Jonee, Preeldent Texas Teohuological College Lubbock, Texas Dear air: opinion NO. 

### o-394g Re: Payment by Lwaa Teohnologiaal College of profeaeor for one year’a eervioee not rendered Your letter of September 10, 1941, etates that one 

### OS your profe’eaeore 

### vae advised 

### aeveralmonths ago that hle contract would not be renewed beyond the term of the mnnner eohool employment; that no mneval of hle oontract haa been had nor ia a reneval contemplatedi that he has no oontraat for a further period; that he, being a member of the 

### American Aseooiation of University Profeaeors, placed his cam before that organieatlon, and said aeeoclatlon ie Lneieting that aa a Rterminel adjustment” Tsxae Teohuolo$ioal College should 

### offerthe 

### profeaeorone ye-la ealarg in lieu OS his oontln

### uanoe." You atate in your op%nlon that this 

### vould be violative of the lava of Texas, and eeek our 

### opinionwith referenae thereto.

You are correct in your etstement that ttie prooeedLng vould be ti violation of the lave of thie State. Any ru& payment to the professor vould 

### be a 

### pure gratnlty, prohibited by Artiole III, 

### Seation51, of the Constitution of this state, vhioh reada In part ae follove:

“The LsgLialature shall have no pover to make any grants or authorlse the making of any granttz of public money8 to any individual, association of ladivlduals, munlclpal or other corporations vhataoever;

. . .* Sinoe Texaa Teohno&ogioal College ia but BJ~lnatrumentality or agency of the State, deriving euuh 

### povera aa 

### it

### RWtdb

BonorebleCzlitordB. Jones,page 2

poraearerer suohby ilelegatlon from the Legislature,end d.noe the nmneyeprovidedfor ita operationare pub110moneya, it is obvious that 

### TexasTechnological College aan poeeeae no 

### pover OF authorityvixloh the Sagialature,

under the Oonstitution, is prohibitedSrcmgrantingto it.



# k
EXHIBIT 12.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 No. 333-14224 (December 2001), No. 333-13178 (February 2001) as well as in the registration statement (No. 333-12544) on Form F-3 (September 2000), each filed by Thomson S.A., of our report dated February 13, 2003 (except for the amounts
translated into U.S. dollars for convenience for which the date is May 23, 2003 and except for the note 33 for which the date is May 15, 2003) which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Thomson for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Christian Chiarasini     
|                         
|Barbier Frinault & Autres
|Ernst & Young            



Paris, France



May 28, 2003
Tyshaun ST. VALLIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 29, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00546-CV MIA WAFER, Appellant V. HILLTOP RESIDENT IAL, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00777-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Molberg, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns After reviewing the clerk’s record, th e Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal because the judgment is not defi nite in its award of appellate attorney’s fees. We directed appellant to file a le tter brief addressing the Court’s concern with an opportunity for appellee to respond. Generally, an appeal may be taken onl y from a judgment that is final and definite. See Hinde v. Hinde , 701 S.W.2d 637, 639 (Tex. 1985) (per curiam). A judgment is final if it disposes of all partie s and issues; it is defi nite if it defines the parties’ rights or “provide[s] a definite me ans of ascertaining [the parties’] rights” such that “ministerial officers can car ry the judgment to execution without–2– ascertainment of facts” not stated in the judgment. Id. (quoting Steed v. State , 183 S.W.2d 458, 460 (Tex. 1944)). The trial court’s judgment in the underlyi ng forcible detainer action awards to appellee possession of the property, attorney ’s fees through trial in the amount of $1,000 and “in the event of an unsuccessful appeal by [appellant], any reasonable and necessary amounts.” The aw ard of appellate attorney’s fees is not definite such that ministerial officers could carry the ju dgment to execution without ascertainment of facts not stated in the judgment. See id . In her letter brief, appellant addresses the timeliness of the appeal which the Cour t does not dispute. She fails to address the indefinite award of a ppellate attorney’s fees. Because the judgment does not set the am ount of appellate attorney’s fees awarded in the event of an unsuccessful a ppeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2(a).

220546F.P05 /Robert D. Bu r ns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MIA WAFER, Appellant
No. 05-22-00546-CV V. HILLTOP RESIDENTIAL, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00777- D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Smith participating. In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered August 29, 2022
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Joel J. Kocher, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interland, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: July 7, 2004    s/ Joel J. Kocher
Daniel IMPERATO, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 17-6190.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 33/21 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 33 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6521 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 33

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6521 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 33/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 33/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 10.48





THIRD AMENDMENT TO


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this Third Amendment), dated January 9, 2003 and effective as of November 3, 2002 (the
Effective Date), is entered into by and between St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation (Company), and Kelly A. Gray, an individual (Executive), and amends terms of that certain Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 14, 1998, as amended, between the Company and Executive (the 1998 Agreement). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows (all
capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 1998 Agreement).





1. Section I.1 of
the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to delete the words President and replace it with Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Creative Director; provided, however, that elimination of the titles Co-President and/or
Creative Director shall not be deemed a material change in Executives title under Section IV.1(b)(ii).





2.
Section II.1 of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect an increase in the Base Salary from $650,000 to $750,000, as of the Effective Date.





3. Section IV.1(b)(ii) of the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:





(ii) a substantial alteration in the nature, status or prestige of Executives responsibilities or a change in Executives title or
reporting level from that set forth in this Agreement; provided, however, that after at Change in Control (as defined hereinafter), a change in Executives title or reporting level shall not be deemed Good Reason so long as Executive maintains
substantially the same duties as Executive had prior to the Change in Control;





4. Section IV.1(b)(vi) of
the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety.





5. Section IV.5(e) of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to
delete the language or 4.1(b)(vi) and to change the reference to 1,300,000 to 1,500,000.





6. Section IV.5(f) of the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety.





7. Section V.1 shall
be amended to replace the notice information for David Krinsky, Esq. with the following:





Mr. Jim Kelley


Vestar Capital Partners


1225 17 th Street, Suite 1660


Denver, Colorado 80202





8. All other provisions contained in Article V of the 1998 Agreement are




---




incorporated into this Third Amendment by this reference.





9. All other terms and conditions of the 1998 Agreement, as amended, shall remain the same.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.








Company  St. John Knits,
Inc., a California corporationBy:

/s/    Roger RupperRoger Ruppert Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Executive/s/    Kelly A.
GrayKelly A. Gray





Approved as to Content:





/s/    Jim KelleyJim Kelley Chairman of the Board
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/30/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      472,561
COMMITMENTS
  57,292   19,973  106,204  291,132  330,601  454,628  456,778   17,933   15,783

CHANGES FROM 11/23/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,300)
   4,485  -10,799    2,129   -9,371    6,155   -2,757   -2,515     -543     -785

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.1      4.2     22.5     61.6     70.0     96.2     96.7      3.8      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      124)
      36       14       41       64       67      115      109
```

----

Updated December 3, 2010
Arthur J. FREER, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, et al.

No. 18-7347.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 359I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 359I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6411 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 359I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6411 October 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1791 of 11 October 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1792 of 11 October 2021 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1791 of 11 October 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1792 of 11 October 2021 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Kaylen DeWayne SIMMONS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-901.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1333Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of MidNet, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter
Fentiman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Peter Fentiman
----------------------------
Peter Fentiman
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 8, 2004


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO MIDNET, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED
BY MIDNET, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of American United Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David Uppal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of February, 2007.

BY:
/s/ DAVID UPPAL                        David  Uppal, Principal Executive Officer **
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficerPursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Phillip A. Perillo, the Chief Financial Officerof Insure.com, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief:

(1)       TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ PHILLIP A. PERILLO         |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Phillip A. Perillo       |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: March 15, 2007      |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toInsure.com, Inc. and will be retained by Insure.com, Inc and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companyfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                       499
<INVENTORY>                                     11,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,197
<PP&E>                                          53,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,570
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,646
<SALES>                                         92,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,215
<CGS>                                           56,084
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (9)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   173
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,002
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/  Kenneth D. WalterKenneth D. Walter Chief Financial Officer




August 5, 2004
MICHAEL R. WEBB

,

Petitioner,

v.

SEC. D.O.C. ET AL.

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FIL ED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2161

Opinion filed June 2, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Michael R. Webb, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Jennifer Parker, General Counsel,

Department of C orrections, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So.

2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

RAY, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.