alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4628-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4628-DR), dated October 26, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on March 12, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Gerard M. Stolar, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Catharine O. Fan as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-09277 Filed 4-29-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-93403, No. 333-38114, No. 333-85392) of ourreport dated March 27, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP 

 

Ernst & Young, LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 24, 2005
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Frank J. Fradella, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Solutions of America, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2007 /s/ Frank J. Fradella   Frank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/08/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,336,901
COMMITMENTS
 389,113   54,138  1504810  2407001  2753095  4300924  4312043   35,977   24,858

CHANGES FROM 06/01/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    123,738)
  48,640  -28,739   26,029   36,580  115,873  111,249  113,163   12,489   10,575

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.0      1.2     34.7     55.5     63.5     99.2     99.4      0.8      0.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      218)
      48       28       70      130      126      206      200
```

----

Updated June 11, 2010
Dwayne STOUTAMIRE, petitioner, v. Christopher LA ROSE, Warden.

No. 18-7236.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Damion SLEUGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aztar Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert M. Haddock, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Neil A. Ciarfalia, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|ROBERT M. HADDOCK |                                                             
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:             | Robert M. Haddock                                           
|Title:            | Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             | May 2, 2006                                                 
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|NEIL A. CIARFALIA |                                                             
|Name:             | Neil A. Ciarfalia                                           
|Title:            | Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President and Treasurer       
|Date:             | May 2, 2006                                                 
|                  |                                                             

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aztar Corporation and will be retained by Aztar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Bruce ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al.

No. 18-796.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Dated: | June 14, 2005 | /s/ Bruce E. Schreiner                    
|------ | ------------- | ------------------------------------------
|       |               | Bruce E. Schreiner                        
|       |               | President and Principal Accounting Officer

---
**Release:
    ��������������������
    #4301-99****For Release:
    ������������
    August 10, 1999**

**CFTC FILES ENFORCEMENT ACTION
    ALLEGING COMMODITY FUTURES AND OPTIONS FRAUD AGAINST MAX E.
    WALTERS**

**Walters Allegedly Defrauded Limited Partnership And Limited
    Partner Out Of $1 Million By Making Misrepresentations Concerning Profits
    And Misappropriating Funds**
     WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it has filed an administrative
    complaint against **Max E. Walters** of Kansas City,
    Missouri, alleging that Walters, a general partner in a limited
    partnership, defrauded the limited partnership and the limited partner out
    of more than $1 million in connection with commodity futures and options
    trading.
     The CFTC's complaint against Walters alleges that from August 1993 through
    October 1996, Walters violated the anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity
    Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC Regulations. Specifically, the complaint
    alleges that Walters violated Sections 4b(a)(i), 4b(a)(ii), 4b(a)(iii) and
    4c(b) of the CEA and Regulation 33.10(a), by, among other things,
    misrepresenting, orally and in writing, to the limited partner that the
    limited partnership was earning constant trading profits that eventually
    exceeded $945,000 when, in fact, it was accumulating trading losses that
    exceeded $800,000 by September 1996, and by misappropriating limited
    partnership funds for his own personal trading and other personal uses.
     A public hearing has been ordered to determine whether the allegations of
    the complaint against Walters are true and, if so, what sanctions, if any,
    should be imposed. Possible sanctions include a cease and desist order, a
    civil monetary penalty, a trading prohibition and restitution.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/27/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       56,619
COMMITMENTS
  18,837    2,018    8,205   19,064   33,996   46,106   44,219   10,513   12,400

CHANGES FROM 07/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,229)
   1,609      737      179      261    1,001    2,049    1,917     -820     -688

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.3      3.6     14.5     33.7     60.0     81.4     78.1     18.6     21.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       74)
      26       10       16       26       25       58       46
```

----

Updated July 30, 2010
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, petitioner, v. Manuel PANTOJA.

No. 17-255.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
In Re Arthur ROUSE, petitioner.

No. 17-6903.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
In Re Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, petitioner.

No. 18-7205.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK MARC COOLEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

R. LEUNG, P # 8556; E. LUDTKE,

P # 9044,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 16268

D.C. No. 2:10

- cv

- 01138

- RLH

- NJK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2017 **

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MU RGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Frederick Marc Coo l ey appeals pro se from a jury verdict for defendants in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging unlawful search and seizure. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a

district court’s formulation of the jur y instructions, Jones v. Williams , 297 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 5 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16268

930, 934 (9th Cir. 2002) , and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in formulating the jury

instructions, which fairly and adequately stated the law, covered the issues

presented at trial, a nd were not misleading. See i d. ( setting forth requirements for

jury instructions ); Brewer v. City of Napa , 210 F.3d 1093, 1097 (9th Cir. 2000)

(rejection of theory

- of

- the

- case instruction is not error where party is able to argue

his or her theory to the jury and the theory is adequately covered by the other

instructions )

.

We reject as without merit Cooley’s allegations that the district court

improperly interrupted his closing arguments.

AFFIRMED.
Consuelo JORDAN, petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-7251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR 

BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS 

SERVICING, LP, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

HARRY DARBY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 954 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Muge CODY, petitioner, v. MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

No. 18-1009.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Alberto Alba VILLARREAL, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-347.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District denied.
George W. MATHIAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 17-740.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Jonathan D. OSWALT, petitioner, v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 16-9002.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Teresa MILLER, petitioner, v. WEST VIRGINIA.

No. 17-5849.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Eldon L. BOISSEAU.

No. D-2989.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
Exhibit 4

NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

48 N. South Street

Wilmington, OH 45177

May 12, 2011

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: NB&T Financial Group, Inc.  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NB&T Financial
Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation (NBTF), is today filing a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Form 10-Q), as executed on May 12, 2011.

Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, NBTF hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon
request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument represents
long-term debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of NBTF and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.



|                           
|---------------------------
|Very truly yours,          
|                           
|/s/ Craig F. Fortin        
|Craig F. Fortin            
|Senior Vice President & CFO
Cory GROSHEK, petitioner, v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC., et al.

No. 17-688.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 10.32

         Letter agreement between the Company and Pacific BioTechnologies Inc.
         dated August 14, 1998

The 1996 Agreement for 2 million cuttings is modified as follows:

The 2 million cuttings will be purchased by NaPro for U.S$.20 each. (US$400,000
for the cuttings of which US$350,000 has been paid previously). NaPro will pay
PRT US$.0575 per cutting for planting of the cuttings into liner beds
(US$115,000 for planting). NaPro will pay PRT US$65,000 per year for maintenance
of the 2 million cuttings. Payment for the maintenance shall be due annually in
advance, with the first year's payment due immediately and the second year's
payment due by August 15, 1999. PRT shall not be required to maintain the
cuttings beyond October 15, 2000. Total owed by NaPro to PRT for cuttings,
planting, and first year's maintenance is US$580,000 less US$350,000 already
paid for a net payment to PRT of US$230,000.

Claims under the 1993 Plantation Agreement:

NaPro will abandon its claims for payment under the Plantation Agreement for
services rendered but not paid for, including the charges referred to in the
August 7 letter. The net effect of the settlement of the NaPro and PRT claims is
that neither party owes the other anything under the Plantation Agreement
through the first 2 quarters of 1998 (through June 1, 1998). PRT and NaPro will
enter into negotiations regarding a lease and will also discuss the possibility
of PRT maintaining the plantation during the notice period. I believe that we
are scheduled to meet and begin these negotiations in early September. In the
interim, while we are resolving the issues of the lease and deciding if PRT or a
third party will maintain the plantation, NaPro will pay PRT for maintenance
services performed from June 1, 1998 onward according to the terms of the
Plantation Agreement.

If my understanding of the compromise as set forth in this letter is consistent
with that of PRT, please countersign this letter as evidence of settlement of
our respective claims according to the terms set forth above.

Very Truly Yours,

NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc.

BY: /s/ Gordon Link

    VP Finance, Chief Financial Officer

Accepted and Agreed,
Pacific Biopharms, Inc.

BY: /s/ Christopher Worthy

    VP Finance, Chief Financial Officer
Willie G. SMITH, petitioner, v. Ben CARSON, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

No. 16-9215.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.