alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### F. A. Miller, *Appellant,*v. John T. Walbridge Engineering Company, a Corporation, Trustee, Naples Tamiami Realty Company, a Corporation, and F. L. Miles, individually and as agent for Naples Tamiami Realty Company, a Corporation, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion filed April 2,1929.

*Clements, Clements & Craven*for Appellant;

*Henderson, Franklin*c& *Christie,*for Appellees.

Buford, J.

This is an appeal from the order of the Chancellor dissolving á temporary injunction. The order appealed from is as follows:

> This matter coming on to be heard upon motion of the defendants, F. L. Miles and Naples Tamiami Realty Company, a corporation, to dissolve the temporary in*448junction heretofore issued in said cause, and the matter being presented to the court, and the court having considered the bill of complaint, the answer of such defendants, the affidavits filed in behalf of such defendants and the oral testimony and the exhibits of the complainant, and the court being advised of its judgment in the premises, it is thereupon

> ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the temporary injunction, or restraining order, heretofore issued in said cause, be, and the same is hereby dissolved as against the said defendants, Naples Tamiami Realty Company, a corporation, and F. L. Miles, individually and as agent for Naples Tamiami Realty Company, a corporation. Exception is noted for the complainant.

> The complainant having announced his intention to appeal from this order of the court, it is thereupon ORDERED that the order herein made, dissolving such temporary injunction, be superseded upon the said complainant tendering and filing in said cause a supersedeas bond in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), with good and sufficient sureties thereon.

> DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 18 day of June, A. D. 1927.”

It will be observed that the order of the Chancellor as stated therein is based upon the consideration of certain matters, such language being as follows: “And the court having considered the bill of complaint, the answer of such defendants, the affidavits filed in behalf of such defendants and the oral testimony and the exhibits of the complainant.”

The oral testimony referred to in the order as forming a part of the basis upon which the order is made is not *449found in the transcript of the record, and, therefore, this Court is not in a position to say that the Chancellor committed error in entering such order. For the reasons stated, the order appealed from should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum, J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Bobby Wayne WALDROP, petitioner, v. Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9132.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Patrick MINOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6078.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Technology Systems, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract Nos. N00039-07-C-0006 ) 

N00014-07-C-0236 ) 

N00014-07-C-0340 ) 

NOO 178-05-D-4527 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60126 

Mr. Charles Benton 

President/Owner 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Debra Berg, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Boston, MA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

By status report filed on 6 March 2017, the government informed the Board that 

the parties had come to an agreement over the issues in this appeal and that it would not 

object to its dismissal with prejudice once appellant filed the anticipated request. On 

7 March 2017, appellant submitted a letter to the Board requesting the dismissal of this 

appeal with prejudice. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with 

prejudice. 

Dated: 10 March 2017 

J~ Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60126, Appeal of Technology 

Systems, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Eric K. WATKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7979.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jonathan Henry HILL, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-7336.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jack Eugene TURNER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-9156.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Stephen Daniel LEONARD, petitioner, v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 18-7408.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Gordon Lawrence PENN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9194.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999 Broadway
Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,429,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      697,000 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                          41,815,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (12,553,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,869,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                         26,130,000
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,382,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,869,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,304,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,561,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 669,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (827,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (827,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (827,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1,780.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1,780.43)
<FN>
<F1> Includes $330,000 of other assets.
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4566 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4566

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
   for the relief of the families of victims of the mass shooting in 
               Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Virginia Beach Strong Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF THE FAMILIES OF 
              THE MASS SHOOTING IN VIRGINIA BEACH.

    (a) Clarification That Contribution Will Not Fail To Qualify as a 
Charitable Contribution.--A cash contribution made for the relief of 
the families of the dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in 
Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, shall not fail to be treated 
as a charitable contribution for purposes of section 170 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 merely because such contribution is for 
the exclusive benefit of such families. The preceding sentence shall 
apply to contributions made on or after May 31, 2019.
    (b) Clarification That Payments by Charitable Organizations to 
Families Treated as Exempt Payments.--For purposes of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, payments made on or after May 31, 2019, and on or 
before June 1, 2021, to the spouse or any dependent (as defined in 
section 152 of such Code) of the dead or wounded victims of the mass 
shooting in Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, by an 
organization which (determined without regard to any such payments) 
would be an organization exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such 
Code shall--
            (1) be treated as related to the purpose or function 
        constituting the basis for such organization's exemption under 
        such section; and
            (2) shall not be treated as inuring to the benefit of any 
        private individual,
if such payments are made in good faith using a reasonable and 
objective formula which is consistently applied with respect to such 
victims.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.



|                                                                    |  |                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Subsidiaries                                                        |  | Country of Organization   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Asia, Ltd.                |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Japan Holdings, LLC                                          |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Pacific, LLC              |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates China, Ltd.               |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates International, LLC        |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates S.A.S.                    |  | France                    
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates GmbH                      |  | Germany                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Italia S.r.l.             |  | Italy                     
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment K.K.                                 |  | Japan, and USA, DE        
|Varian Korea, Ltd.                                                  |  | Korea                     
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Europe B.V.               |  | Netherlands               
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates UK Limited                |  | United Kingdom            
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates GesmbH                    |  | Austria                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (Barbados) Holdings, Ltd. |  | Barbados                  
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (HK) Limited              |  | Hong Kong                 
|Altin Ltd.                                                          |  | Hong Kong                 
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (Shanghai), Ltd.          |  | Peoples Republic of China
|Varian Precision Instruments Maintenance (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.       |  | Peoples Republic of China
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Overseas Holdings, Ltd.   |  | Cayman Islands            
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates PacRim Pte. Ltd.          |  | Republic of Singapore     
|4 Stanley Tucker Drive LLC                                          |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates GmbH                      |  | Switzerland               
|Varian Semiconductor Management GmbH                                |  | Switzerland               
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Luxembourg S.a.r.l.       |  | Luxembourg                
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (Gibraltar), Ltd.         |  | Gibraltar
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB



I, James F. Laird, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report out conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ James F. Laird     
|                      |  | James F. Laird         
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 241/1 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 241 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 591 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 241

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 591 July 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 241/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 241/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 241/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 241/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

9

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 241/03 | State aid — Italy — State aid SA.38613 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) — Alleged aid to Ilva in A.S. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 12 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 241/03

State aid — Italy — State aid SA.38613 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) — Alleged aid to Ilva in A.S. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
J.C., petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES.

No. 18-7301.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
In Re Octavious DeMont WILLIAMS, petitioner.

No. 18-1064.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/09/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      511,207
COMMITMENTS
  40,726   25,924  104,092  346,705  359,703  491,522  489,719   19,685   21,488

CHANGES FROM 03/02/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,024)
  -4,253    1,032    2,959   12,273    8,061   10,978   12,051    1,046      -28

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.0      5.1     20.4     67.8     70.4     96.1     95.8      3.9      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      107)
      28        9       31       60       66       97       99
```

----

Updated March 12, 2010
ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., at al., petitioners, v. HEBEI WELCOME PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD., et al.

No. 16-1220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 12, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.
Anthony CASANOVA, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-7047.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Osama H. SALOUHA, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-576.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 289A/22 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 289A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4822 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 289A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4822 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | The European Food Safety Authority |
| 2005/C 289A/1 | Call for expressions of interest in membership of the Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels of the European Food Safety d Authority | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

The European Food Safety Authority

2005/C 289A/1

Call for expressions of interest in membership of the Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels of the European Food Safety d Authority

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Rafael E. SANTOS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-5725.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/12/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      221,537
COMMITMENTS
  85,253    6,797   23,488   83,716  157,019  192,457  187,304   29,080   34,233

CHANGES FROM 10/05/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,705)
   1,549       78    3,147    1,496    3,316    6,192    6,541    1,513    1,164

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    38.5      3.1     10.6     37.8     70.9     86.9     84.5     13.1     15.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      211)
      84       18       52       58       89      153      153
```

----

Updated October 15, 2010
Michael VIGIL, petitioner, v. SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 16-9504.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.