alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 254/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 254 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5830 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 254

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5830 September 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1711 of 17 September 2015 establishing for 2015 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1711 of 17 September 2015 establishing for 2015 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q**I, James F. Laird, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report out conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditorsand the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 11, 2006  /s/ James F. Laird   James F. Laird   Chief Financial Officer  
25
EXHIBIT 14.1
 
 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 The Board of Directors
 Northcore Technologies Inc.
 
 Under date of March 31, 2011, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Northcore Technologies Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, deficit and cash flows for the year then ended, as included in the annual report on Form 20-F. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as listed in Exhibit 15.1. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audit.
 
 In our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
 
 Graphic
 Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
 Toronto, Canada
 March 31, 2011
John Joseph CARVALHO, II, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 16-1087.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
#### Tampa Electric Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Claude Williams, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed May 25, 1929.

*899*Knight, Thompson & Turner,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Hampton, Bull & Pencke,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; other than that the award of damages is excessive; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that if the plaintiff below enter a remittitur of $2250.00, the said judgment will stand affirmed for $3500.00 damages, otherwise the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial. See Woolworth Company v. McLeod, filed April 16, 1929.

It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Oree ROBERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6904.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Roderick ENGLISH, petitioner, v. Dennis BUSH, Warden.

No. 16-9188.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Daniel V. MARINO, petitioner, v. USHER, aka Usher Terry Raymond, IV, et al.

No. 16-1332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jose NUNEZ-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/07/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      508,643
COMMITMENTS
  60,832   24,780   80,566  348,513  385,703  489,912  491,049   18,732   17,594

CHANGES FROM 08/31/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,567)
     367      154   -2,374   25,047   25,691   23,039   23,471    4,527    4,096

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.0      4.9     15.8     68.5     75.8     96.3     96.5      3.7      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      123)
      29       16       35       68       74      111      112
```

----

Updated September 10, 2010
HOUSTON AUTO M. IMPORTS GREENWAY, LIMITED, dba Mercedes-Benz of Houston Greenway, petitioner, v. Mark ZASTROW, et al.

No. 18-874.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2015190EN.01001401.xml

| 8.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 April 2015 — BX v Commission

(Case T-352/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition - Constitution of a reserve pool of Administrators (AD 5) of Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the field of Law - Selection board’s decision not to include the appellant on the reserve list - Burden of proof - Comparative assessment - Equal treatment - Stability in the composition of the selection board - Fifth paragraph of Article 3 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations - Distortion of the facts and evidence - Action for damages - Decision as to costs))

(2015/C 190/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: BX (Washington, United States) (represented by: R. Rata, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 24 April 2013, in BX v Commission (F 88/11, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:51), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr BX to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr BX to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John G. Lewis, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of XATA
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business
issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting. August 4, 2004 Signature:
    
    /s/ John G. LewisName:
    
    John G. LewisPrint Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. Joseph CESARZ, et al.

No. 16-163.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
***EXHIBIT
      23.1***








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholders


Audible,
      Inc.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-91107 and 333-110210) on Form S-8, (Nos. 333-45470, 333-119610 and
      333-120588) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-85286) on Forms S-3 and S-3/A of Audible,
      Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2006, with respect to the consolidated
      balance sheets of Audible, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the
      related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income,
      stockholders' (deficit) equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
      three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 30, 2006,
      with respect to management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
      over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports
      appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Audible,
      Inc.





Our
      report dated March 30, 2006, on management's assessment of the effectiveness
      of
      internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, expresses our opinion
      that Audible, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial
      reporting as of December 31, 2005, because of the effect of material weaknesses
      on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an
      explanatory paragraph that states that material weaknesses were identified
      in
      the following areas: insufficient accounting personnel resources; inadequate
      information and communication; inadequate risk assessment; ineffective contract
      management; and ineffective control over retail promotions.








/s/
      KPMG
      LLP











Short
      Hills, New Jersey


March
      31,
      2006
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 14, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01600-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.E.E., R.J.E., AND Z.E.

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-16655

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice Lewis

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated November 15, 2013, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We 

directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that 

failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated November 15, 

2013, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed 

appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated January 22, 2014, we informed 

appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s 

record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the 

clerk’s record or to provide written documentation that he had been found entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, 
–2–

filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded 

with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

131600F.P05

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF T.E.E., R.J.E., 

AND Z.E.

No. 05-13-01600-CV 

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-16655.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Myers 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee ELENA OCHOA recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant DONTAE ELMORE.

Judgment entered this 14th day of April, 2014.

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF W. James JONAS, III.

No. D-3034.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Disbarment order entered.
In Re Robert HEFFERNAN, petitioner.

No. 18-7526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for *1235writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# Official Journal C 21A/30 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 21A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5030 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 21A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5030 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 021A/01 | AVIS AU LECTEUR | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 021A/01

AVIS AU LECTEUR

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 021A/02 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/45/06 — Linguistic administrators (ad5) having Irish as their main language in the field of translation | 3 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2007/C 021A/02

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/45/06 — Linguistic administrators (ad5) having Irish as their main language in the field of translation

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4563 

To repeal Public Law 114–145 to ensure that the Drug Enforcement Administration has the authority to carry out needed enforcement actions 

for drug diversion control investigations and operations to combat the 

opioid epidemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal Public Law 114–145 to ensure that the Drug 

Enforcement Administration has the authority to carry 

out needed enforcement actions for drug diversion control 

investigations and operations to combat the opioid epidemic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4563 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Enforcement 

3 Standards to Track Opioids Responsively and Effectively 

4 Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘RESTORE Act of 2019’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RESTORING DEA’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 

6 NEEDED ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS TO COM7 BAT DRUG DIVERSION AND THE OPIOID EPI8 DEMIC. 

9 (a) REPEAL.—Public Law 114–145 (the Ensuring 

10 Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 

11 2016) is hereby repealed. 

12 (b) RESTORATION OF PROVISIONS.— 

13 (1) Effective as of the date of enactment of 

14 Public Law 114–145, the provisions of section 304 

15 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824) 

16 that were amended by Public Law 114–145 are 

17 hereby restored as if Public Law 114–145 had not 

18 been enacted into law. 

19 (2) Subsection (k) of section 303 of the Con20 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823(k)), as added 

21 by Public Law 114–145 and redesignated by Public 

22 Law 115–83, is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Alesteve CLEATON, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

No. 16-1548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 402A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 402A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6228 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 402A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6228 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 402 A/01 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/150/19 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2019/C 402 A/01

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/150/19

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Charissa A. SMALLS, et vir, petitioners, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et al.

No. 17-5508.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.