alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Shayne PARKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7164.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code**

Pursuant to Section 1350of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Phillip A. Perillo, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Quotesmith.com, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)          The Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as amendedby this Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ PHILLIP A. PERILLO         |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Phillip A. Perillo       |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date: April 5, 2005       |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toQuotesmith.com, Inc. and will be retained by Quotesmith.com, Inc andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companyfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
#### Wm. A. Davis, Jr., as Ancillary Executor of the last Will and Testament of W. A. Davis, deceased, and Lura S. Davis, *Appellants,*v. Elsie Gile Scott, a widow, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed February 6, 1929.

*149*A. B. & C. C. Small*and *Wallace Buff,*for Appellants;

*Burwell, Barrett & Sibley,*for Appellee.

Terrell, C. J.

This appeal is from an ordinary foreclosure decree and from the decree confirming the sale of the lands foreclosed against.

It is contended here that the decree confirming the sale of the lands foreclosed against is erroneous because, (1) the main defendant died prior to the entry thereof though subsequent to the final decree, and no one had been substituted as a party defendant in his stead, (2) under Section 3734 Rev. Gen. Stats. of Fla., (Sec. 5605 Comp. Gen. Laws of Fla.) administrators are given six months to pay the debts of the deceased whom they represent, and (3) the master’s report was irregular and amounted to a nullity.

It is well settled that a suit of this kind abates on the date of the death of the main defendant but in this case final decree of foreclosure had been entered before the death of the main defendant and there is no attempt whatever on the part of the appellant to show that such final decree or the decree confirming the sale was unjust, irregular, illegal, or deprived him of any legal right. The assignment with reference to the master’s report does not appear to be supported by the record nor is it shown that Section 3734 R. G. S. of Fla. is violated.

The decree below is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., not participating.
A.R., petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al.

No. 18M98.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal granted.
Christopher BARRELLA, petitioner, v. VILLAGE OF FREEPORT, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-423.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Glenwood F. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Grace Justice JOHNSON.

No. 17-7022.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Billie Wayne COBLE, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-8070 (18A845).

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 28, 2019.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25502-25503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: May 24, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-627-3390, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7415151616110d341a1d151d105a1a1d1c5a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8feeeeededeaf6cfe1e6eee6eba1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 25503]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 25, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09187 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ALOHA BED & BREAKFAST, petitioner, v. Diane CERVELLI, et al.

No. 18-451.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Motion of Foundation for Moral Law for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii denied.
Jaime VILLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7973.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IDAHO, petitioner, v. Ethan Allen WINDOM.

No. 17-560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*978Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Cynthia N. ALMOND, et al., petitioners, v. SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM, et al.

No. 18-876.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 7, 2015

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 14-1889

MOHAMED ABDUL MATHIN, Appeal from the United States District Court

 Plaintiff-Appellant, for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division

v. No. 1:11-cv-05157

JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of State, Joan Humphrey Lefkow, Judge

Defendant-Appellee. 

O R D E R

On consideration of the Petition For Rehearing, filed by Plaintiff-Appellant on

June 22, 2015, and all members of the original panel having voted to DENY the Petition

For Rehearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition For Rehearing is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued in the above-entitled case on

April 7, 2015, is hereby amended as follows:
Appeal No. 14-1889 Page 2

On page 2, the last sentence of the first full paragraph, which

reads: “Because the Government has a <strong and legitimate

interest in ensuring that only qualified persons are granted

citizenship,’ the Supreme Court has recognized that <doubts

should be resolved in favor of the United States.’ Berenyi v.

District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 385

U.S. 630, 637 (1967); Bustamante-Barrera v. Gonzalez, 447 U.S.

388, 394-95 (5th Cir. 2006)” is deleted.

On page 4, in the 3 full paragraph, after the second rd

sentence which begins “The Illinois Department of Public

Health ...,” a footnote is added which reads: “In the course

of the subsequent investigation, the State Department was

informed that the Illinois Bureau of Vital Statistics had

flagged that delayed birth certificate as fraudulent.”
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1240

To amend the Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 to require that the

scores of each judge be made public after each round.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and

the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 to

require that the scores of each judge be made public

after each round.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Professional Boxing

5 Integrity Act’’.
2

•HR 1240 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNOUNCEMENT OF SCORES IN PROFESSIONAL

2 BOXING MATCHES.

3 The Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 (15

4 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) is amended—

5 (1) by redesignating section 15 as 16; and

6 (2) by inserting after section 14 the following

7 new section:

8 ‘‘SEC. 15. SCORING.

9 ‘‘No person may arrange, promote, organize, produce,

10 or fight in a professional boxing match held in a State

11 that does not require that the score of each judge be made

12 public at the end of each round by loudspeaker, score13 board, or equivalent means.’’.

14 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

15 Section 16 of the Professional Boxing Safety Act of

16 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), as redesignated by section

17 2(1) of this Act, is amended by adding after paragraph

18 (2) the following new paragraph:

19 ‘‘(3) Section 15 shall apply to any professional

20 boxing match held after the expiration of the 120-

21 day period beginning on the date of the enactment

22 of the Professional Boxing Integrity Act.’’.

Æ
Glenn BENNETT, Jr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7466.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-K ofNewtech
 Resources, Ltd.
 for the annual period endedAugust
 31, 2008
 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof, I,Kurt Dalmata,
 do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
 best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period
covered by this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 January 14,
 2009





/s/
 Kurt Dalmata

Kurt
 Dalmata,
 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  This
 certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
 required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by
 the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
 of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement
 required by §906 has been provided to the registrantand
 will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
 upon request.



29
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., petitioner, v. Vickie McKEEVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Theodore McKeever.

No. 18-653.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES CONTROLLED BY REGISTRANT  As of December 31, 2009

ValueClick, Inc. Subsidiary Listing

Company

Percentage
OwnershipCommission Junction, Inc. (Delaware)


100%Mediaplex, Inc. (Delaware)


100%MeziMedia, Inc. (California)


100%Web Clients, LLC (Delaware)


100%Web Marketing Holdings, LLC (Delaware)


100%ValueClick AB (Sweden)


100%Pricerunner Sweden AB (Sweden)


100%Pricerunner Ltd. (United Kingdom)


100%Pricerunner SAS (France)


100%ValueClick International Ltd. (Ireland)


100%


---



QuickLinks
| ENTITY                                                |   | JURISDICTION                OF INCORPORATION |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| BankingMyWay.com,                LLC                  |   | Wisconsin                                    |
| Bankers                Financial Products Corporation |   | Wisconsin                                    |
| BFPC                Newco LLC                         |   | Delaware                                     |
| Promotions.com                LLC                     |   | New                York                      |
| TP                Newco LLC                           |   | Delaware                                     |
| Stockpickr                LLC                         |   | Delaware                                     |
| SP-TSC                Holdings LLC                    |   | Delaware                                     |
| TheStreet.com                Ratings, Inc.            |   | Delaware                                     |
| WR                Newco, Inc.                         |   | Delaware                                     |
| SmartPortfolio.com,                Inc.               |   | Delaware                                     |
| TSCSP                Acquisition Corporation          |   | Delaware                                     |

----
Rodney Lyle ROBERTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7887.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Harold HALL, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-7635.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

d0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141430 & (23)(24) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141430 

 COA: 295546 

Wayne CC: 07-007377-FC 

THADDEUS MARCELL WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to vacate conviction 

and sentence is DENIED. 

 DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 18, 2013

p0911

Order 

Clerk

September 18, 2013

146997

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146997

COA: 309961

Washtenaw CC: 10-002051-FH

LYNDON DALE ABERNATHY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
GEULDC.lWfN Au- 1% TEKAS 

D -. 

*--mzY O-AS. February 21, 1939 

Hon.~ShalI.ume H. Glowr 

cdunty Attornay~ 

Marion~County'~' 

Jefferson, Texas 

Dear Sir: opinion No. O-370 

Rar lbuld a foreign corporation tith 

principal offiaa in X County ba prohibited from registering ita motor vabiolas 

in Y County under the provisions of 

Artiola 6675a-2, R.C.S.? 

You request an opinion as to whether or not a foreign corporation 

with its legal msidanca in X County is prohibited frcas registering its 

truaks that ara used prinoiplly in Y County. 

Your attention is directed to Article 66751x-2, R.C.S. of Tams 

118 follows* 

'Evaly omar of a motor vehicle, trailer, or 

semi&railer used or to Ia used upon the public 

highnays of this State, and aaoh ohauffaur, shall 

apply aaah year totha State Highway Dspartmant 

through the oouuly tax oollador of the County In 

which ha resides for the registration of each such 

vehicle omad ar controlled by him . . .II 

Artiola 6666(a) R.C.S. of Tams, provides as follows: 

"All registration fees shall be pid in the 

ooe in whioh the owner lives at the time of ragistration of said motor vehicle." 

Now, prior to the passing and taking affect of the above quoted 

&rtiola 6675ar2, R.C.S. of Texas, Article 6675, nom rapalad, provided that 

the ovmar could payregistration fees at 'the office of the county tax oollaotor ofthe county in which ha resides or in which the vahiola to bs 

registered is being operated." Thus, the amendment of Article 6675 left 

out the last crdarsoorad olause and Artiola 6675a-10, R.C.S. of Texas, 

further amandx&A to Artiola 6675, repealed, provided that all counties 

mill be permitted to retain all registration fees up to the amount of 

$50,omoo. These provisions by amendment olaarly raquira the owners 

of vehicles to register their vahioles in the counties where the ovnars 
Hon. Shalburne H. Olowr, Pabmary 21, 19S9, page 2 (o-370) 

resides and, If a oounty tax assessor and oollactor receives a lioense 

fee for registration from au owner of legal residence In a county other 

then the assessor and oollaotor's county, ha exceeds his authority and 

oonmits en illegal sot. Purthar, if an owner Is permitted to pay registration fees In a oounty other then his legal rasidanoa, that oounty 

raoaivas and appropriates those fees which the Legislature Intended to 

belong to the oouhw oftha mar's resideme. 

Howvar /I-Mole 827b-a, Penal Bde of Tams, pamits nonresidents of the &ate of Texas to pey lioansa fees, ethrough a county 

tax collaotor,s whioh rule rill apply in any want, where the legal 

residence l-as not been established In a Texas oouhty. 

You ara rafarrad to the following oitationa which oonstituta 

all ofnths Texas case law relative to your quastiont 

Cpp V. State, 94 SH180 

tiller V. Poard found, 69 SW (2d) 277 

Cass Couatyv. Morris Qunty, 9,SW 373 

Therafora, It is our opinion end you ara so adpisad that a 

foreign oorporation having Its legal residence in X County cannot ragIster motor vehicles owned by it in any county of Texas other than X 

munty. 

Vary truly yours 

ATTOliiiSY GENERN, OF TEXAS 

By /s/ PatCoon 

Fat Coon 

&.+stant
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Mund, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                  13, 2007
            
            /s/
                    Harry MundHarry
                    MundChief
                    Executive Officer
Adam L. PERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7040.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Derian EIDSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7143.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1206Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.