# Official Journal C 98/22 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 98 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6422 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 98

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6422 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2021/C 98/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2021/C 98/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2021/C 98/02 | Case C-600/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 November 2020 by Ms Anne-Marie Klose against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-81/20, Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) | 2 |
| 2021/C 98/03 | Case C-640/20 P: Appeal brought on 23 November 2020 by PV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) on 30 January 2020 in Joined Cases T-786/16 and T-224/18, PV v Commission | 2 |
| 2021/C 98/04 | Case C-643/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 30 November 2020 — ENERGOTT Fejlesztő és Vagyonkezelő Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága | 3 |
| 2021/C 98/05 | Case C-670/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 December 2020 — EP and Others v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. | 4 |
| 2021/C 98/06 | Case C-673/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire d’Auch (France) lodged on 9 December 2020 — EP v Préfet du Gers, Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques | 5 |
| 2021/C 98/07 | Case C-675/20 P: Appeal brought on 11 December 2020 by Colin Brown against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 5 October 2020 in Case T-18/19, Brown v Commission | 6 |
| 2021/C 98/08 | Case C-701/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 December 2020 — Avis Autovermietung Gesellschaft mbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation | 7 |
| 2021/C 98/09 | Case C-718/20 P: Appeal brought on 28 December 2020 by Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 October 2020 in Case T-307/18, Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals v Commission | 7 |
| 2021/C 98/10 | Case C-14/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Sea Watch E.V. v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Capitaneria di Porto di Palermo | 9 |
| 2021/C 98/11 | Case C-15/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Sea Watch E.V. v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Capitaneria di Porto di Porto Empedocle | 11 |
| 2021/C 98/12 | Case C-20/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 January 2021 — JW, HD, XS v LOT Polish Airlines | 13 |
| 2021/C 98/13 | Case C-31/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 19 January 2021 — Eurocostruzioni Srl v Regione Calabria | 14 |
| 2021/C 98/14 | Case C-34/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 20 January 2021 — Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium | 15 |
| 2021/C 98/15 | Case C-35/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 January 2021 — ‘Konservinvest’ OOD v ‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD | 15 |
| 2021/C 98/16 | Case C-42/21 P: Appeal brought on 27 January 2021 by Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-814/17, Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commission | 16 |
| 2021/C 98/17 | Case C-46/21 P: Appeal brought on 27 January 2021 by European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-735/18, Aquind v ACER | 17 |
| 2021/C 98/18 | Case C-60/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium | 18 |
| | General Court |
| 2021/C 98/19 | Case T-110/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kazembe Musonda v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 19 |
| 2021/C 98/20 | Case T-111/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 20 |
| 2021/C 98/21 | Case T-113/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kampete v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 20 |
| 2021/C 98/22 | Case T-116/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kande Mupompa v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 21 |
| 2021/C 98/23 | Case T-118/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 22 |
| 2021/C 98/24 | Case T-119/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Mutondo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 23 |
| 2021/C 98/25 | Case T-120/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Numbi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 23 |
| 2021/C 98/26 | Case T-121/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ruhorimbere v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 24 |
| 2021/C 98/27 | Case T-122/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ramazani Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 25 |
| 2021/C 98/28 | Case T-123/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 26 |
| 2021/C 98/29 | Case T-124/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality) | 26 |
| 2021/C 98/30 | Case T-258/20: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 27 |
| 2021/C 98/31 | Case T-352/18: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2021 — Germann Avocats v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award criteria — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible) | 28 |
| 2021/C 98/32 | Case T-35/21: Action brought on 22 January 2021 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION) | 28 |
| 2021/C 98/33 | Case T-38/21: Action brought on 19 January 2021 — Inivos and Inivos v Commission | 29 |
| 2021/C 98/34 | Case T-40/21: Action brought on 25 January 2021 — Slovakia v Commission | 30 |
| 2021/C 98/35 | Case T-50/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U) | 31 |
| 2021/C 98/36 | Case T-51/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U) | 32 |
| 2021/C 98/37 | Case T-69/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — Rotondaro v EUIPO — Pollini (COLLINI) | 33 |
| 2021/C 98/38 | Case T-72/21: Action brought on 3 February 2021 — Bowden and Young v Europol | 33 |
| 2021/C 98/39 | Case T-74/21: Action brought on 5 February 2021 — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Cephalon v Commission | 34 |
| 2021/C 98/40 | Case T-80/21: Action brought on 5 February 2021 — Cargolux v Commission | 35 |
| 2021/C 98/41 | Case T-85/21: Action brought on 8 February 2021 — QF v Commission | 36 |
| 2021/C 98/42 | Case T-602/20: Order of the General Court of 28 January 2021 — MS v Commission | 36 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2021/C 98/02

Case C-600/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 November 2020 by Ms Anne-Marie Klose against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-81/20, Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

2

2021/C 98/03

Case C-640/20 P: Appeal brought on 23 November 2020 by PV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) on 30 January 2020 in Joined Cases T-786/16 and T-224/18, PV v Commission

2

2021/C 98/04

Case C-643/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 30 November 2020 — ENERGOTT Fejlesztő és Vagyonkezelő Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

3

2021/C 98/05

Case C-670/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 December 2020 — EP and Others v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.

4

2021/C 98/06

Case C-673/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire d’Auch (France) lodged on 9 December 2020 — EP v Préfet du Gers, Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

5

2021/C 98/07

Case C-675/20 P: Appeal brought on 11 December 2020 by Colin Brown against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 5 October 2020 in Case T-18/19, Brown v Commission

6

2021/C 98/08

Case C-701/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 December 2020 — Avis Autovermietung Gesellschaft mbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

7

2021/C 98/09

Case C-718/20 P: Appeal brought on 28 December 2020 by Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 October 2020 in Case T-307/18, Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals v Commission

7

2021/C 98/10

Case C-14/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Sea Watch E.V. v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Capitaneria di Porto di Palermo

9

2021/C 98/11

Case C-15/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 8 January 2021 — Sea Watch E.V. v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Capitaneria di Porto di Porto Empedocle

11

2021/C 98/12

Case C-20/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 January 2021 — JW, HD, XS v LOT Polish Airlines

13

2021/C 98/13

Case C-31/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 19 January 2021 — Eurocostruzioni Srl v Regione Calabria

14

2021/C 98/14

Case C-34/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 20 January 2021 — Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium

15

2021/C 98/15

Case C-35/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 January 2021 — ‘Konservinvest’ OOD v ‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD

15

2021/C 98/16

Case C-42/21 P: Appeal brought on 27 January 2021 by Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-814/17, Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commission

16

2021/C 98/17

Case C-46/21 P: Appeal brought on 27 January 2021 by European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-735/18, Aquind v ACER

17

2021/C 98/18

Case C-60/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

18

General Court

2021/C 98/19

Case T-110/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kazembe Musonda v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

19

2021/C 98/20

Case T-111/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

20

2021/C 98/21

Case T-113/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kampete v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

20

2021/C 98/22

Case T-116/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kande Mupompa v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

21

2021/C 98/23

Case T-118/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

22

2021/C 98/24

Case T-119/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Mutondo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

23

2021/C 98/25

Case T-120/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Numbi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

23

2021/C 98/26

Case T-121/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ruhorimbere v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

24

2021/C 98/27

Case T-122/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ramazani Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

25

2021/C 98/28

Case T-123/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

26

2021/C 98/29

Case T-124/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

26

2021/C 98/30

Case T-258/20: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

27

2021/C 98/31

Case T-352/18: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2021 — Germann Avocats v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award criteria — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible)

28

2021/C 98/32

Case T-35/21: Action brought on 22 January 2021 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION)

28

2021/C 98/33

Case T-38/21: Action brought on 19 January 2021 — Inivos and Inivos v Commission

29

2021/C 98/34

Case T-40/21: Action brought on 25 January 2021 — Slovakia v Commission

30

2021/C 98/35

Case T-50/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)

31

2021/C 98/36

Case T-51/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)

32

2021/C 98/37

Case T-69/21: Action brought on 1 February 2021 — Rotondaro v EUIPO — Pollini (COLLINI)

33

2021/C 98/38

Case T-72/21: Action brought on 3 February 2021 — Bowden and Young v Europol

33

2021/C 98/39

Case T-74/21: Action brought on 5 February 2021 — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Cephalon v Commission

34

2021/C 98/40

Case T-80/21: Action brought on 5 February 2021 — Cargolux v Commission

35

2021/C 98/41

Case T-85/21: Action brought on 8 February 2021 — QF v Commission

36

2021/C 98/42

Case T-602/20: Order of the General Court of 28 January 2021 — MS v Commission

36

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN