alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

d0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141191(79)(80)

BILLIE J. MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141191 COA: 288893 Wayne CC Family Division: JOAN MEADOWS, 07-705162-DO Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s October 26, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion fo r miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
Michael VALENZUELA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9096.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Latellis EVERETTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6054.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
  14.1



CONSENT
  OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
  Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13178, 333-14224, 333-119938, 333-124241 and 333-130657)
  of our report dated March 24, 2006 (except for the note 40 for which the date
  is May 10, 2006) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Thomson
  included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005,
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.







|MAZARS
        & GUERARD
      MAZARS
      
      
      
      
      
      
      /s/
        Thierry de Bailliencourt          /s/
        Frédéric Allilaire | BARBIER
        FRINAULT & AUTRES
      ERNST
        & YOUNG
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      /s/
        Jérôme Guirauden
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Thierry
        de Bailliencourt                Frédéric
        Allilaire                                                                                         | Jérôme
        Guirauden                                                                                                                         





Paris-La
  Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine, France





May
  10, 2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3813

_____________________________
R OBERT W ILLIAM W OODHAMS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

. January 3, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Greg Caracci
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31287

JOSEPH CURLEY BABINEAUX, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, JOSEPH CURLEY BABINEAUX, Individually & on behalf of Bradley Babineaux on behalf of Brandon Babineaux on behalf of Billy Babineaux on behalf of David Babineaux, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. M & W TANK CONSTRUCTION CO, INC.; ET AL., Defendants, M & W TANK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(98-CV-1209)

_______________________________

November 2, 1999 Before GARWOOD, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant Joseph Curley Babineaux (“Babineaux”) appeals from the determination of the district court denying remand and granting summary judgment to appellee M&W Tank Construction, Inc.2

(“M&W”) for the reason that Babineaux had failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to establish the intentional tort exception to the Louisiana Worker’s Compensation Act, La. R.S. 23:1032. For the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum ruling of September 10, 1998, we agree that Babineaux cannot recover against M&W. See also Reeves v. Structural Preservation Sys. , 731 So. 2d 208, 212 (La. 1999). Denial of remand and granting summary judgment were therefore
proper. Appellee M-I Drilling Fluids, LLC. (“M-I”) intervened to argue that Babineaux is covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, and that it provides his exclusive remedy against his employer. We observe, however, that the district court neither considered nor issued a judgment in these matters. Inasmuch as we consider this case under a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) certification of a final order for immediate appeal, we have no jurisdiction to consider M-I’s claims because, obviously, the district court certified no final judgment with respect to these issues.
AFFIRMED
Luis Roberto Ramirez CASTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet Brands, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alexander E. Hansen, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/ Alexander E. HansenAlexander E. Hansen
Chief Financial Officer
Internet Brands, Inc.
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
March 12, 2008

---



QuickLinks
PDR NETWORK, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC, INC.

No. 17-1705.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
# Official Journal C 136A/14 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 136A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4714 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 136A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4714 May 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 136A/1 | Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Ninth supplement to the 22nd complete edition | 1 |
| 2004/C 136A/2 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 22nd complete edition | 141 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 136A/1

Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Ninth supplement to the 22nd complete edition

1

2004/C 136A/2

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 22nd complete edition

141

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|Certificate Number XX | XXX Shares                 
|--------------------- | ---------------------------
|                      | of Series A Preferred Stock













MM Companies, Inc.



Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware











XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX



is the owner of



XXX (X) Shares of





SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK

PAR VALUE $0.01 EACH





XXXX XX, 200X



___________________________________					           	________________________________

Chairman of the Board									Secretary



THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND NEITHER SUCH SECURITIES NOR ANY INTEREST IN SUCH SECURITIES MAY BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED, ASSIGNED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT UPON SUCH REGISTRATION OR UPON DELIVERY TO THE COMPANY OF AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY STATING THAT SUCH SALE, PLEDGE, ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION UNDER SUCH ACT OR LAWS.
Michael Anthony ALMENDAREZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/05/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      114,994
COMMITMENTS
   4,473   18,539   12,258   85,049   69,059  101,780   99,856   13,214   15,138

CHANGES FROM 09/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        427)
    -199      803    1,738   -2,117   -1,825     -578      716    1,005     -289

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.9     16.1     10.7     74.0     60.1     88.5     86.8     11.5     13.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       62)
       7       25       19       16       24       37       59
```

----

Updated October 8, 2010
# Official Journal C 312/9 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 312 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 489 December 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 312

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 489 December 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 312/1 | Communication from the Commission — Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 312/1

Communication from the Commission — Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Eli CHABOT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-477.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Richard Michael SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7593.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

## **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstFinancial Service Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and;

 

2.                                       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Corporation;

 

 
| Date: November 9, 2005 | By:    |  /s/ | B. Keith Johnson                       |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |      | B. Keith Johnson                       |   |
|                        |   |      | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |   |
| Date: November 9, 2005 | By:    |  /s/ | Gregory Schreacke                      |   |
|                        |   |      | Gregory Schreacke                      |   |
|                        |   |      | Chief Financial Officer                |   |
|                        |   |      | Principal  Accounting Officer          |
|                             |        |           |                                        |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Corporation and will be retainedby the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

1

----
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 11

                           InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.
               Computation of Consolidated Earnings Per Common Share
             For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998
                 (in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                For the Three Months       For the Six Months
                                   Ended June 30,            Ended June 30,
                                    1999        1998          1999       1998
<S>                            <C>         <C>           <C>        <C>
Net income                     $    1,446 $    1,374    $    2,682 $    2,557
                                =========  =========     =========  =========
Weighted average common
  shares issued                 3,180,896  3,179,249     3,180,632  3,173,585

  Less-Unreleased common
   shares held by ESOP             16,209     20,432        16,707     20,966
                                ---------  ---------     ---------  ---------
  Weighted average number
   of shares outstanding
   used in the calculation
   of basic earnings per
   common share                 3,164,687  3,158,817     3,163,925  3,152,619

  Add - Dilutive effect of
   stock options (1)               77,029     82,784        77,488     81,802
                                ---------  ---------     ---------  ---------
Adjusted weighted average
number of shares outstanding
used in the calculation of
duiluted earnings per common
share                           3,241,716  3,241,601     3,241,413  3,234,421
                                =========  =========     =========  =========
Basic earnings per common
 share                               $.46       $.43          $.85       $.81

Diluted earnings per common
 share                                .45        .42           .83        .79

<FN>
(1)  There is presently no active trading market for the Company's shares, nor
are the prices at which common shares have been traded published by any
national securities association or quotation service.  Fair value for earnings
per common share purposes was assumed to be $28.50 at June 30, 1999, and
$23.25 at June 30, 1998.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Antonio TURNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6105.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION**

PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,  UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Onsite Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the quarterlyreport of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Form 10-QSB”) that, to the best of their knowledge:

|   | (1)    | the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| Dated:   February 12, 2003 | **/s/  R****ICHARD****T.S****PERBERG** |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                  |
|                                 | **Richard T. Sperberg**                          |
|                                 | **Chief Executive Officer**                      |
|                                 |                                             |
| Dated:   February 12, 2003 | **/s/****PAUL****E.B****LEVINS**                 |
|                                 |                                                  |
|                                 | **Paul E. Blevins**                              |
|                                 | **Chief Financial Officer**                      |
<PAGE>


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

         Unless otherwise indicated, ADB Systems International Ltd. ("ADB"), or
one of its subsidiaries, owns 100% of the outstanding capital stock of the
following companies:

         Name of Subsidiary                             Country of Incorporation

         ADB Systemer AS (1)                            Norway
         ADB Systems International Limited              Ireland
         ADB Systems Limited                            England
         Bid.Com (U.K.) Limited                         England
         ADB Systems, Inc.                              USA (Delaware)
         Bid.Com USA, Inc.                              USA (Florida)
         Bid.Com International Inc.                     Canada (Ontario)
         Bid.Com International Pty. Ltd. (2)            Australia
         Internet Liquidators USA, Inc. (2)             USA (Florida)

     (1)     As of December 31, 2002, ADB owned 98.3% of the outstanding voting
             shares of ADB Systemer AS. Under Norwegian corporate law, ADB may
             trigger compulsory acquisition of the remaining shares at any time.
             The remaining shareholders each have the same right. The value for
             the shares acquired shall be as agreed, failing which the value
             shall be determined by arbitration.

     (2)     Dormant.  ADB anticipates dissolving these companies in 2003.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF
ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-56472, 333-77851, 333-32436) pertaining to the 2000 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Portal Software, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Portal Software, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2002.





| | /s/ | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| | --- | -----------------




Palo Alto, California


March 25, 2002
Exhibit 31.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Eric R. Zimmerman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        August 14, 2006 /s/ Eric R. Zimmerman   Eric R. Zimmerman   President, Chief Executive Officer
Donald SANDERS, petitioner, v. Domingo URIBE, Jr., Warden.

No. 18-6988.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.