alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4672 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, as the ‘‘Petty 

Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. HILL of California, Ms. LEE of 

California, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. PETERS, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. SPEIER, and Mrs. TORRES of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, 

California, as the ‘‘Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 2ND CLASS (SEAL) MATTHEW 

4 G. AXELSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard 

7 in Cupertino, California, shall be known and designated 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4672 IH

1 as the ‘‘Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. 

2 Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Petty Officer 2nd 

7 Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Joseph CHHIM, petitioner, v. GOLDEN NUGGETT LAKE CHARLES, L.L.C.

No. 18-7601.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 8 -1 7 80

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Deway n e Barn es ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Pl a in t i

f f - Ap p el l an t

v . Sen t ry M an ag em en t , In c.; Th e St . Reg is Ap art m en t s , In c. l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l Def

en d a n t s - Ap p el l ees

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t ed St at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t he Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f M i s s o u ri - St . Lo u i s

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su b m i t t ed : Ap ri l 2 4, 2 0 19 Fi l ed : M ay

2 3 , 2 01 9 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re ERICKSON, BOW M AN, an d GRASZ, Ci rcu i t J ud g es
.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.
In t h i s Ti t l e VII act i o n , D e w a yn e Barn es ap p eal s aft er th e d is t ri ct co u rt 1 g ran t ed m o t i o n s to di sm i s s fi l ed b y Se n t ry Man ag em en t , In c. (“ Sen t ry ”) an d Th e

1 Th e Ho n o rab l e J ean C. Ham i l t o n , Un i t ed St at es Di st ri ct J u d g e fo r t h e Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f M i s s o u ri

.St

. Reg is Ap art m en ts , In c. (“ St

. Reg i s ”). Up o n carefu l de n o vo rev i ew, w e co n cl u d e

t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt d i d n o t err i n g ran t i n g t h e m o t io n s t o d i s m i s s
. S ee Kel l y v. Ci t y o f Oma h a , 81 3 F.3 d 1 0 7 0, 1 0 75 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 1 6) (s t an d ard o f rev i ew). W e fi rs t ag ree w i t h th e d i s tri ct co u rt t h at t he cl ai m s ag ai n s t St

. Reg i s were ti m e-b arred

. S ee 4 2 U.S.C. § 2 0 0 0 e-5 (f)(1 ) (s et ti n g fo rt h 9 0

- d a y p e r i o d t o fi l e s u i t fo l l o wi ng recei p t o f ri gh t -t o -s u e no t i ce). W e fu rt h er ag ree t h at Barn es fai l ed t o al l eg e s u ffi ci en t fact s to
s u p p ort a p l au s i bl e cl ai m ag ai n s t Sen t ry u n d er Ti t le VII. S ee As h cr of

t v. Iq b a l , 5 5 6 U.S. 6 6 2 , 6 7 8

– 8 3 (2 0 0 9) (d i s cu s s i n g p l au s ib i l i t y req u irem en t in co n tex t o f m o t i o n to d i s m i s s ).

Acco rd i ng l y , we affi rm

t h e ju dg m en t

. S

ee 8 t h Ci r. R. 4 7 B. W e al s o d en y as m o ot St

. Reg i s ’ s p en di n g m o t i o n t o s u pp l em en t t h e reco rd

.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

-2

-
# Official Journal C 294/4 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 294 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 634 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 294

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 634 September 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 294/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 294/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 294/02 | State aid — Czechia — State aid SA.55208 (2020/C) (ex 2020/N) — USO Compensation to Czech Post — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 24 |
| 2020/C 294/03 | State aid — Portugal — State aid SA.58101 (C/2020) (ex 2020/N) — Rescue aid to SATA — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 41 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 294/02

State aid — Czechia — State aid SA.55208 (2020/C) (ex 2020/N) — USO Compensation to Czech Post — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

24

2020/C 294/03

State aid — Portugal — State aid SA.58101 (C/2020) (ex 2020/N) — Rescue aid to SATA — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

41

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## COURT OF APPEALS SECO ND DISTRICT OF T EXAS FORT WORTH N O
. 2
- 0 9
- 4 0 7
- C V

I N R E P A N A S O N I C C O R P O R A T I O N R E L A T O R O F N O R T H A M E R I C A

- - - - - - - - - - - - O R I G I N A L P R O C E E D I N G

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1

- - - - - - - - - - - - W e h a v e c o n s i d e r e d t h e p a r t i e s ’ a g r e e d m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s w i t h o u t
p r e j u d i c e . I t i s t h e c o u r t ’ s o p i n i o n t h a t t h e m o t i o n s h o u l d b e g r a n t e d ; t h e r e f o r e ,
w e d i s m i s s t h i s o r i g i n a l p r o c e e d i n g . R e l a t o r s h a l l p a y a l l c o s t s o f t h i s o r i g i n a l p r o c e e d i n g , f o r w h i c h l e t

e x e c u t i o n i s s u e . P E R C U R I A M

P A N E L : M C C O Y , D A U P H I N O T , a n d G A R D N E R , J J

. D E L I V E R E D : A p r i l 6 , 2 0 1 0

1  S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 4 7

. 4 , 5 2

. 8 ( d )

.
Clayton Andrew SCHWERS, petitioner, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO, et al.

No. 17-5241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-77299, 333-89523, 333-42118, 333-42112, 333-42110, 333-54614,333-66754, 333-99627, 333-109687, 333-119780,333-124804 and 333-131644; Form S-3 Nos. 333-51754, 333-42120, 333-45304, 333-51754, 333-66752 and333-109683) of Informatica Corporation of our reports dated February 24, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of Informatica Corporation, Informatica Corporationmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Informatica Corporation, included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Informatica Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Francisco, California
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-8581 Non-Argument Calendar
D. C. Docket No. 5:96-CV-418-1(HL)

ROOSEVELT WORTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
SHEILA E. WIDNALL, Secretary, Department of the Air Force,
Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
(April 7, 1998)

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY and HILL, Senior Circuit Judges. 

### PER CURIAM: This appeal arises out of the four th Title VII action filed by Appellant Roosevelt Worthy against his employer, the Secretary of the Air Force, in the space of two years. All four of these actions were found by the district court to be meritless and1 Worthy v. Widnall , 900 F. Supp. 475 (M.D. Ga. 1995), aff’d , 86 F.3d 1171 (11 th Cir. 1996)(unpublished table decision); Worthy v. Widnall , No. 5:95-CV-76-1 (DF)(M.D. Ga. 1996), aff’d , 108 F.3d 344 (11 th Cir. 1997)(unpublished table decision); Worth v. Widnall, No. 5:95-CV-412-4(WDO)(M.D. Ga. 1996), aff’d F.3d (11 th Cir. 1998)(unpublished table decision). 2 

### dismissed on motion for summary judgment. This court affirmed the first three appeals summarily without publication. 1 

### This fourth time we publish our opinion.

Two orders are involved here: first, the district court order dismissing Worthy’s action on summary judgment, and, second, the district court order imposing sanctions upon Worthy’s lawyer in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(2). We affirm the summary judgment order without discussion. See 11 th 

### Cir. R. 36-1. We discuss only the order imposing sanctions. The same lawyer brought all four of Worthy’s meritless actions. In the third suit, at the conclusion of his order granting summary judgment against Worthy’s claims, the district judge issued the following warning: The complaint presently before the court is sufficiently without merit and potentially frivolous as to subject both plaintiff and his counsel to the imposition of sanctions. FRCP 11(b). In declining to impose sanctions at this time, the court gives plaintiff’s counsel the benefit of the doubt by assuming that the present claims arise out of a profound and fundamental misunderstanding of the scope and purpose of Title VII, rather than from a total lack of respect for this court and for his role as an officer of it. Worthy v. Widnall, No. 5:95-cv-412-4 (WDO)(M.D.Ga., Oct. 15, 1996).3 

### Three weeks after receiving this ster n admonition from the court, Worthy’s lawyer filed the present lawsuit and the c ourt’s sanction warning became reality. Instead of imposing the $500.00 sanction against Worthy’s lawyer, the district judge in this case might have ordered him to reimburse the Air Force for all attorneys fees required for defense. Ther e is no question that this relatively mild sanction was reasonable and ade quately supported by the record.
AFFIRMED.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/03/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      208,722
COMMITMENTS
  67,359   10,816   29,589   83,922  135,488  180,871  175,893   27,851   32,829

CHANGES FROM 07/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,432)
     688      873   -5,117   11,066   11,970    6,637    7,726    3,795    2,706

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.3      5.2     14.2     40.2     64.9     86.7     84.3     13.3     15.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      216)
      67       33       47       65       95      152      160
```

----

Updated August 6, 2010
John LASCHKEWITSCH, petitioner, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 18-6228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Lester MOODY, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-7672.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
# Official Journal C 292/17 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6117 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 292

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6117 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 292/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 292/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32

                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

         To my knowledge, this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.

                            By:  /s/ Harry J. Bailey
                                 -------------------------------------
                                 Name:   Harry J. Bailey
                                 Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 14, 2004



                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

         To my knowledge, this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Ameriana Bancorp.

                            By:  /s/ Bradley L. Smith
                                 -------------------------------------
                                 Name:   Bradley L. Smith
                                 Title:  Senior Vice President - Treasurer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer




Date: May 14, 2004









                                                                           21
# Official Journal L 235/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.235.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5410 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.235.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 235

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5410 September 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/526/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 29 September 2010 on State aid C 32/09 (ex NN 50/09) implemented by Germany for the restructuring of Sparkasse KölnBonn
  (notified under document C(2010) 6470)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2011/527/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel)
  (notified under document C(2011) 275)

   (1) | 26 |
| | | 2011/528/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 8 March 2011 on State aid measure C 24/09 (ex N 446/08) — State aid for energy-intensive businesses under the Green Electricity Act in Austria
  (notified under document C(2011) 1363)

   (1) | 42 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2011/526/EU

*

Commission Decision of 29 September 2010 on State aid C 32/09 (ex NN 50/09) implemented by Germany for the restructuring of Sparkasse KölnBonn
  (notified under document C(2010) 6470)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2010) 6470)

1

2011/527/EU

*

Commission Decision of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel)
  (notified under document C(2011) 275)

   (1)

Sanierungsklausel

(notified under document C(2011) 275)

26

2011/528/EU

*

Commission Decision of 8 March 2011 on State aid measure C 24/09 (ex N 446/08) — State aid for energy-intensive businesses under the Green Electricity Act in Austria
  (notified under document C(2011) 1363)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 1363)

42

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1279 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1279

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 236 Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ``Aaron E. 
         Henry Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1279

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 236 Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ``Aaron E. 
         Henry Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 236 
Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Aaron E. Henry Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the Federal building and United 
States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Aaron E. Henry Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

The following certification is
provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAF
Bancorp, Inc. on the basis of each such officers knowledge and belief for the sole
purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

# Certification of Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MAF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
November 9, 2006, (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: November 9, 2006 |  | BY: /s/ Allen H. Koranda
Allen H. KorandaChairman of the Board and   Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: November 9, 2006 |  | BY: /s/ Jerry A. Weberling
Jerry A. WeberlingExecutive Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request. This certification accompanies the Companys Form 10-Q for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and shall not be treated as having been filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/30/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      516,178
COMMITMENTS
  32,481   23,986  104,709  358,549  366,772  495,738  495,466   20,439   20,711

CHANGES FROM 03/23/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,092)
  -2,344   -2,133    6,800   13,976   13,389   18,432   18,055    2,659    3,036

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.3      4.6     20.3     69.5     71.1     96.0     96.0      4.0      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      105)
      24       13       32       58       64       96       98
```

----

Updated April 2, 2010