alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1317

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit

for taxpayers owning certain commercial power takeoff vehicles.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. COLLINS, and Mr.

HERGER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

refundable credit for taxpayers owning certain commercial power takeoff vehicles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fuel Tax Equalization

5 Credit for Substantial Power Takeoff Vehicles Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR TAXPAYERS OWNING

7 COMMERCIAL POWER TAKEOFF VEHICLES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 34 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to certain uses of gasoline
2

•HR 1317 IH

1 and special fuels) is amended by adding at the end the

2 following new subsection:

3 ‘‘(c) CREDIT FOR COMMERCIAL POWER TAKEOFF

4 VEHICLES.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be allowed as a

6 credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle for

7 the taxable year the amount of $250 for each quali8 fied commercial power takeoff vehicle owned by the

9 taxpayer as of the close of the calendar year in

10 which or with which the taxable year of the taxpayer

11 ends.

12 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED COMMERCIAL POWER TAKEOFF

13 VEHICLE.—For purposes of this subsection, the term

14 ‘qualified commercial power takeoff vehicle’ means

15 any highway vehicle described in paragraph (3)

16 which is propelled by any fuel subject to tax under

17 section 4041 or 4081 if such vehicle is used in a

18 trade or business or for the production of income

19 (and is licensed and insured for such use).

20 ‘‘(3) HIGHWAY VEHICLE DESCRIBED.—A high21 way vehicle is described in this paragraph if such ve22 hicle is—

23 ‘‘(A) designed to engage in the daily collec24 tion of refuse or recyclables from homes or

25 businesses and is equipped with a mechanism
3

•HR 1317 IH

1 under which the vehicle’s propulsion engine pro2 vides the power to operate a load compactor, or

3 ‘‘(B) designed to deliver ready mixed con4 crete on a daily basis and is equipped with a

5 mechanism under which the vehicle’s propulsion

6 engine provides the power to operate a mixer

7 drum to agitate and mix the product en route

8 to the delivery site.

9 ‘‘(4) EXCEPTION FOR VEHICLES USED BY GOV10 ERNMENTS, ETC.—No credit shall be allowed under

11 this subsection for any vehicle owned by any person

12 at the close of a calendar year if such vehicle is used

13 at any time during such year by—

14 ‘‘(A) the United States or an agency or in15 strumentality thereof, a State, a political sub16 division of a State, or an agency or instrumen17 tality of one or more States or political subdivi18 sions, or

19 ‘‘(B) an organization exempt from tax

20 under section 501(a).’’

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

22 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De23 cember 31, 1999.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      | Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                      |                                  
|Date: January 8, 2016 | By:                              
|                      |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1366 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1366

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax on beer to 
                          its pre-1991 level.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 1999

 Mr. English (for himself, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
   Holden, Mr. Bliley, Mr.  Schaffer, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
 McInnis, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Talent, Mr. Nethercutt, and Mr. Sessions) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax on beer to 
                          its pre-1991 level.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1990 TAX INCREASE ON BEER.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 5051(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition and rate of tax on beer) 
is amended by striking ``$18'' and inserting ``$9''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Jamal KNOX, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-949.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion of Michael Render, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Cato Institute, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Art Scholars and Historians for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.
Donelle L. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Jennifer McDERMOTT, Warden.

No. 18-7517.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Penions Assets Partnership 1989-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained  in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         158,627
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,497
<PP&E>                                         3,754,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,324,624)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,734,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,183
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,727,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,734,429
<SALES>                                        256,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,025
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,264<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            109,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,677
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Billy Joe GREENWOOD, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE.

No. 18-7359.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
Josephloc T. NGUYEN, petitioner, v. Kirstjen M. NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security.

No. 18-6321.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2908

___________

Peggy Kimzey, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri

*

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

*

___________

Submitted: September 2, 1997

Filed: September 16, 1997

___________

Before Fagg, Heaney, and Murphy, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. objects to a recent award of attorney fees

and interest by the district court. After a jury verdict in June of 1995 in Peggy

Kimzey's favor on her discrimination claims, she was awarded attorney fees, costs, and

interest in the amount of $84,525.22. In making that award the district court rejected

her request for a 20 percent enhancement in the lodestar figure. Judgment was entered

on the award on December 8, 1995, and Kimzey took no appeal from it. After the

appeal on the liability issues was resolved earlier this year, Kimzey filed a motion in
-2-

the district court to "clarify" its fees award. The district court then issued an order

enhancing the lodestar used in the original fee award by 20 percent and granting

postjudgment interest on that award from the date of the jury verdict on liability, June

29, 1995. Wal-Mart appealed, arguing that the enhancement is too late and that interest

should run from the date of the judgment, rather than the verdict.

After carefully considering the arguments presented by the parties, we conclude

that the court erred in attempting at this late date to increase the fees for the same work

that was the subject of the original award and that the postjudgment interest on the fees

award should be calculated from the date judgment was entered, which was December

8, 1995. See 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); Jenkins by Agyei v. State of Missouri, 931 F.2d

1273, 1277 (8th Cir. 1991). Since Kimzey has not prevailed on this appeal, her request

for fees and costs is denied. Accordingly, the 20 percent enhancement of the attorney

fees in the trial court is reversed, and the matter is remanded for recalculation of the

postjudgment interest from the date of the entry of judgment. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2293

ABDUL WAHEED,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND, Office of Comptroller; DEBORAH S. RICHARDSON, 

Judge OAH; JAMES T. MURRAY, Judge OAH; GERALDINE A. KLAUBER, 

Judge OAH; STATE OF MARYLAND RETIREMENT AGENCY; WORKERS 

COMPENSATION COMMISSION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01931-GLR)

Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdul Waheed, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Spiering, Assistant Attorney General, Kevin 

Michael Cox, Baltimore, Maryland, Brian L. Oliner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdul Waheed appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against 

Appellees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. However, the dismissal of Waheed’s complaint should have been without 

prejudice. See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. OpenBand at 

Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir 2013) (explaining that court lacking 

“jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits”). We 

therefore modify the district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice, 

see 28 U.S.C. § 2106, and affirm the judgment as modified. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
# L_2014092EN.01002101.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 195/2013

of 8 November 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 344/2013 of 4 April 2013 amending Annexes II, III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1), as corrected by OJ L 142, 29.5.2013, p. 10, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 344/2013 of 4 April 2013 amending Annexes II, III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1), as corrected by OJ L 142, 29.5.2013, p. 10, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32013 R 0344: Commission Regulation (EU) No 344/2013 of 4 April 2013 (OJ L 114, 25.4.2013, p. 1), as corrected by OJ L 142, 29.5.2013, p. 10.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32013 R 0344: Commission Regulation (EU) No 344/2013 of 4 April 2013 (OJ L 114, 25.4.2013, p. 1), as corrected by OJ L 142, 29.5.2013, p. 10.’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 344/2013, as corrected by OJ L 142, 29.5.2013, p. 10, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 November 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 114, 25.4.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**Certification     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), Stephen S.Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of Asyst Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), and Michael Sicuro,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     1. The Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: February 9, 2007       /S/ STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ   /S/ MICHAEL A. SICURO         Stephen S. Schwartz, Ph.D.   Michael A. Sicuro  Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer  This certification is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification isnot deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates itby reference.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
Lucatz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




November
      18, 2010
              /s/
      David LucatzDavid
      LucatzChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JOSEPH D.
FREHE    
|Joseph D. Frehe        
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 15, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Harold Shawgnessy SIMS, petitioner, v. KING, et al.

No. 18-7246.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 126/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 126 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6317 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 126

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6317 April 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 126/01 | Joint European Roadmap towards lifting COVID-19 containment measures | 1 |
| 2020/C 126/02 | Communication from the Commission COVID-19: Guidance on the implementation of relevant EU provisions in the area of asylum and return procedures and on resettlement | 12 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 126/01

Joint European Roadmap towards lifting COVID-19 containment measures

1

2020/C 126/02

Communication from the Commission COVID-19: Guidance on the implementation of relevant EU provisions in the area of asylum and return procedures and on resettlement

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN