alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012287EN.01000202.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — Société d’investissement pour l’agriculture tropicale SA (SIAT) v État belge

(Case C-318/10) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Tax legislation - Deduction as business expenses of expenses incurred as payment for the provision of services - Expenses incurred in relation to a service provider established in another Member State in which that provider is not subject to tax on income or is subject there to a tax regime which is appreciably more advantageous - Deductibility conditional upon the provision of proof of the genuine and proper nature of the services and the normal nature of the related payments - Obstacle - Justification - Combating tax evasion and avoidance - Effectiveness of fiscal supervision - Balanced allocation between Member States of the power to impose taxes - Proportionality)

2012/C 287/03

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société d’investissement pour l’agriculture tropicale SA (SIAT)

Applicant:

Defendant: État belge

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation — Interpretation of Article 49 EC — Tax legislation allowing the deduction of business expenses incurred by a resident taxpayer, but not allowing the deduction of such expenses if the taxpayer resides or is established in another Member State in which that taxpayer is not subject to any tax on income or is subject there to a tax regime which is appreciably more advantageous — Restriction on the freedom to provide services

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as the legislation at issue in the main proceedings, under which payments made by a resident taxpayer to a non-resident company for supplies or services are not to be regarded as deductible business expenses where the non-resident company is not subject, in the Member State of establishment, to tax on income or is subject, as regards the relevant income, to a tax regime which is appreciably more advantageous than the applicable regime in the former Member State, unless the taxpayer proves that such payments relate to genuine and proper transactions and do not exceed the normal limits, whereas, under the general rule, such payments are to be regarded as deductible business expenses if they are necessary for acquiring or retaining taxable income and if the taxpayer demonstrates the authenticity and amount of those expenses.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---
Yusufu DANMOLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7080.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kedrick Howard HUGHES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6015.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ronald JACKSON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-7512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                                                                 October 3, 2003

Mr. Peter Astrauskas
3034 E. Nance Street
Mesa, AZ 85213-1644

         Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear Peter,

This letter will serve as an amendment to the Employment Agreement between
Dayton Superior Corporation and you dated August 13, 2003. The Employment
Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   Dayton Superior will pay up to $1,000 per month towards your living
          expenses in Dayton, Ohio. The rental for an apartment will be paid
          directly by Dayton Superior, and all utilities associated with the
          apartment shall be paid by you, then reimbursed by Dayton Superior.

     2.   Dayton Superior will make a one-time payment to you of $4,000 to cover
          the cost of furniture, appliances, and other furnishings for the
          apartment in Dayton, Ohio.

     3.   Dayton Superior will pay up to $2,500 in moving expenses to move
          furniture and other personal items from your home in Mesa, Arizona to
          Dayton, Ohio.

     4.   Regarding your business travel on behalf of Dayton Superior, it shall
          be acceptable for you to travel to and from Phoenix, AZ, or to layover
          in Phoenix, AZ for a period of time, if the airfare is not
          significantly higher (i.e. less than 10%) than the comparable airfare
          to and from Dayton, Ohio.

All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect. Please indicate your acceptance of these revised terms by
signing below.

                                        DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION

                                        Stephen R. Morrey
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Agreed:

__________________________
Peter Astrauskas
Robert R. DAVIES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-919.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jonathan SEBERT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 326/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.326.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 326 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5526 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.326.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 326

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5526 October 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2012/C 326/1 | Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union | 1 |
| Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union | 13 |
| Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union | 47 |
| Protocols | 201 |
| Annexes | 331 |
| Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 | 337 |
| Tables of equivalences | 363 |
| 2012/C 326/2 | Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union | 391 |
| 2012/C 326/3 | | s2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2012/C 326/1

Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

1

Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union

13

Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

47

Protocols

201

Annexes

331

Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007

337

Tables of equivalences

363

2012/C 326/2

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

391

2012/C 326/3

s2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1191 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1191

To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
                           Chicago, Illinois.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 1999

Mr. Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
                           Chicago, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARDISS COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 433 
West Harrison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby designated as the 
``Cardiss Collins Post Office Building''. Any reference to such 
facility in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 
``Cardiss Collins Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. OTIS GRANT COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2302 
South Pulaski Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby designated as the 
``Otis Grant Collins Post Office Building''. Any reference to such 
facility in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Otis 
Grant Collins Post Office Building''.

SEC. 3. MARY ALICE (MA) HENRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4222 
West Madison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby designated as the 
``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry Post Office Building''. Any reference to such 
facility in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Mary 
Alice (Ma) Henry Post Office Building''.

SEC. 4. ROBERT LEFLORE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 50001 
West Division Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby designated as the 
``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post Office Building''. Any reference to such 
facility in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Robert 
LeFlore, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Joseph MARTINEZ-ARMESTICA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1160 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1160

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers for the marked graves 
                        of certain individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1999

  Mr. Kildee (for himself, Mr. Evans, and Mr.  Stupak) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers for the marked graves 
                        of certain individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF MARKED GRAVES AS ELIGIBLE GRAVES FOR DEPARTMENT 
              FURNISHED HEADSTONES OR MARKERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended in subsection (a), by striking out ``unmarked''.
    (b) Previously Marked Graves Ineligible.--Section 2306 of such 
title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f)(1) In the case of the grave of an individual described in 
subsection (a) that is marked before January 1, 2000, with a headstone 
or marker, the person entitled under subsection (a) to request a 
headstone or marker for such individual may receive from the Secretary 
such headstone or marker.
    ``(2) The Secretary may only furnish the headstone or marker under 
paragraph (1) at no cost to the United States.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made under this section shall 
take effect on January 1, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020076EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2018-2019 SESSION

Sittings of 28 to 31 May 2018

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 99, 14.3.2019.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Raymond Alfred GAGNON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9090.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00031

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C. AND AS.C. , Children,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, T exas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00160

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appell ee ’ s brief was originally due on March 17, 2014

. On March 18, 2014 , appell ee

filed its f irst request for an extension, asking for additional time until April 17, 2014

.

The request is GRANTED; and a ppell ee ’s brief is due no later than April 17, 2014

. However, because this is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental

rights, no further extensions of time will be granted.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, J ustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Cle rk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket No. USCG-2022-0279]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of enforcement of regulation; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coast Guard is correcting a notice of enforcement of regulation that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 20, 2022. That notification entitled Safety Zones; Annual Events in the Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone—Lake Erie Open Water Swim. This correction applies to the docket number.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective April 27, 2022.

      ( print page 24870)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For information about this document call or email Spencer Phillips, Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-3854, email                         *spencer.phillips@uscg.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2022-08428, appearing on page 23445 in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 20, 2022, the following correction is made:                

## Federal Register Correction

On page 23445, in the first column, in the headings, “[Docket No. 0279]” is corrected to read “[Docket No. USCG-2022-0279]”.

Dated: April 22, 2022.

James E. McLeod,

Acting Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-08996 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17425 and #17426; Texas Disaster Number TX-00628]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Texas dated 04/27/2022. *Incident:*
                         Eastland Complex Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         03/16/2022 through 03/30/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 04/27/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/27/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/27/2023.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Eastland *Contiguous Counties:* Texas: Brown, Callahan, Comanche, Erath, Palo Pinto, Shackelford, Stephens The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.438Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.880Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.940Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.940Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17425 5 and for economic injury is 17426 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Texas. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-09431 Filed 5-2-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric E. Parsons, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 27, 2009



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Eric E. Parsons                 
|Eric E. Parsons                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Johnnie O'NEAL, petitioner, v. Jose MORALES, et al.

No. 17-518.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Bowe, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DAVID E. BOWEDavid E. Bowe President and Chief Executive Officer March 29, 2005
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/02/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       47,960
COMMITMENTS
   3,741    6,136    5,406   30,889   30,253   40,036   41,795    7,924    6,165

CHANGES FROM 01/26/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        150)
     626      113     -275      729    1,134    1,080      972     -930     -822

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.8     12.8     11.3     64.4     63.1     83.5     87.1     16.5     12.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
      10        9       11       18       16       35       31
```

----

Updated February 5, 2010