alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA.

No. 18-948.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Motion of respondent for leave to file a supplemental brief under seal granted. Motion of petitioner for leave to file a supplemental reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted in part; the supplemental reply brief will be filed under seal. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Michael S. GORBEY, petitioner, v. Michael McCALL, Warden.

No. 18-7674.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Mund, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








May 15, 2006
            /s/ Harry
              MundHarry MundChief Executive Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

muiteb ~tate~ Qtourt of £'lppeaI~ 

for tbe jf eberaI Qtircuit 

ALONZO DAY, JR., 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

2012-7035 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in 09-4491, Judge Robert N_ Davis. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, it appears that Alonzo Day, Jr.'s appeal was not timely filed. 

On August 16, 2011, the United States Court of Ap· 

peals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in Day's case. 

The court received Day's notice of appeal on October 24, 

2011,69 days after the date of judgment. 
DAYv. DVA 2 

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by 

the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within 60 days 

of the entry of judgment. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 

U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). 

Accordingly, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Day is directed to show cause, within 30 days of 

the date of filing of this order why this appeal should not 

be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs may also respond within that time. 

(2) The briefing schedule is stayed. 

JAN 1 i 2012 

Date 

cc: Alonzo Day, Jr. 

Elizabeth A. Speck, Esq. 

s19 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly. 

Clerk 

FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JAN 1 72012 

JAN HORBAlV 

ClERK
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                  
|                        |  |  |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 10.16**

 

**ST. JOHN KNITS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED**

 

**WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORCOMPENSATION**

**PURSUANT TO**

**ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) OF REGULATION S-K**

 

Eachdirector who does not hold a salaried position with St. John Knits International, Incorporated or with Vestar Capital Partners, absent an agreement to the contrary, shall receive an annual retainer of $40,000, in addition to an attendance fee of$2,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended personally and $500 for each meeting of the Board and committee of the Board attended telephonically. Such directors may also be granted stock options at the discretion of the Board.Directors shall be reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them that are incidental to attending meetings.****
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2013 WY 155

 October Term, A.D. 2013

 December 18, 2013

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL 

RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING 

STATE BAR,

Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT M. POWERS, WSB #6-3188,

Respondent.

D-13-0008

ORDER OF PUBLIC CENSURE

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon a “Report and Recommendation for 

Public Censure,” filed herein November 14, 2013, by the Board of Professional 

Responsibility for the Wyoming State Bar, pursuant to Section 16 of the Disciplinary 

Code for the Wyoming State Bar (stipulated discipline). The Court, after a careful review 

of the Board of Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation and the file, 

finds that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, confirmed and adopted 

by the Court, and that Respondent Scott M. Powers should be publicly censured for his 

conduct. It is, therefore,

[¶2] ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the Board of Professional Responsibility’s 

Report and Recommendation for Public Censure, which is attached hereto and 

incorporated herein, shall be, and the same hereby is, approved, confirmed, and adopted 

by this Court; and it is further

[¶3] ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that Scott M. Powers is hereby publicly censured

for his conduct, which is described in the Report and Recommendation for Public 

Censure. The public censure shall include issuance of a press release consistent with the 

one set out in the Report and Recommendation for Public Censure; and it is further 
[¶4] ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 26 of the Disciplinary Code for the 

Wyoming State Bar, Mr. Powers shall reimburse the Wyoming State Bar the amount of 

$50.00, representing the costs incurred in handling this matter, as well as pay the 

administrative fee of $500.00. Mr. Powers shall pay the total amount of $550.00 to the 

Clerk of the Board of Professional Responsibility on or before January 31, 2014; and it is 

further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall docket this Order of Public Censure, 

along with the incorporated Report and Recommendation for Public Censure, as a matter 

coming regularly before this Court as a public record; and it is further

[¶6] ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(a)(iv) of the Disciplinary Code for the 

Wyoming State Bar, this Order of Public Censure, along with the incorporated Report 

and Recommendation for Public Censure, shall be published in the Wyoming Reporter 

and the Pacific Reporter; and it is further

[¶7] ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court cause a copy of this Order of Public 

Censure to be served upon Respondent Scott M. Powers.

[¶8] DATED this 18th day of December, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

MARILYN S. KITE

Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 1998, THE
          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND THE RELATED NOTES FOR THE THREE
          MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
          BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         11,664
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                      593
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          1,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,927
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           43
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,020
<SALES>                                        11,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,116
<CGS>                                           1,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   470
<INCOME-TAX>                                      158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               312
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      312
<EPS-BASIC>                                   $0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $0.07



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.Date: November 14, 2006                                                          /s/ Frank J. Fradella   Frank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1308 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1308

To extend the supplemental security income benefits program to Guam and 
                   the United States Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

    Mrs. Christensen (for herself and Mr. Underwood) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the supplemental security income benefits program to Guam and 
                   the United States Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS 
              PROGRAM TO GUAM AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1101(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``, the Virgin Islands, and 
Guam'' each place such term appears.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 303(b) of the Social Security Amendments of 
        1972 (86 Stat. 1484) is amended by striking ``, Guam, and the 
        Virgin Islands''.
            (2) Sections 3(a)(2), 1003(a)(2), 1403(a)(2), and 
        1603(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 303(a)(2), 1203(a)(2), 
        1353(a)(2), and 1383 note) are each amended by striking ``, the 
        Virgin Islands, and Guam''.
            (3) Section 1614(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(e)) is 
        amended by striking ``and the District of Columbia'' and 
        inserting ``, the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, and 
        Guam''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the 1st day of the 3rd calendar month that begins after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Hector MOLINA, petitioner, v. Eric ARNOLD, Acting Warden.

No. 17-6801.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1235 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1235

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with 
   the Solano County Water Agency, California, to use Solano Project 
 facilities for impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water 
  for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1235

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with 
   the Solano County Water Agency, California, to use Solano Project 
 facilities for impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water 
  for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF SOLANO PROJECT FACILITIES FOR NONPROJECT WATER.

    (a) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 
enter into contracts with the Solano County Water Agency, or any of its 
member unit contractors for water from the Solano Project, California, 
pursuant to the Act of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for--
            (1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject 
        water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial 
        purposes, using any facilities associated with the Solano 
        Project, California; and
            (2) the exchange of water among Solano Project contractors, 
        for the purposes set forth in paragraph (1), using facilities 
        associated with the Solano Project, California.
    (b) Limitation.--The authorization under subsection (a) shall be 
limited to the use of that portion of the Solano Project facilities 
downstream of Mile 26 of the Putah South Canal (as that canal is 
depicted on the official maps of the Bureau of Reclamation), which is 
below the diversion points on the Putah South Canal utilized by the 
City of Fairfield for delivery of Solano Project water.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 5, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 1151 Lower Tribunal No. 10

- 30306

________________ 

### Victor Lerner, et al., Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Ino Halegua, et al. , Appellee s

.

An a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Maria d e Jesus Santovenia , Judge. Charlip Law Group, L.C. , and David H. Charlip , for appellant s

. Jones & Adams, P.A. , and Matthew L. Jones, and Daniel Haydar , Joel S. Perwin , P.A. , and Joel S. Perwin , for appellee s

.
Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.
MILLER , J

.2 Appellants challenge a final judgment executed following the rendition of a jury verdict and an accounting bench trial. Observing that “[a] verdict is clothed with a presumption of regularity and is not to be disturbed if supported by the evidence,” Sweet Paper Sales Corp. v. Feldman , 603 So. 2d 109, 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), the trial court is not permitted to “sit as a seventh juror with veto power,” Laskey v. Smith , 239 So. 2d 13, 14 (Fla. 1970), and here, the amount awarded by the jury bore “a reasonable relation to the amount of da mages proved and the injury suffered” and was “such that it could be adduced in a logical manner by reasonable persons,” § 768.74 (5)(d),(e) , Fla. Stat. (2021), we find no error in the denial of additur or new trial. Further, we affirm the accounting award in all respects. See Spring v. Ronel Ref in ., Inc. , 421 So. 2d 46, 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (“If, after the jury verdict, there are unrelated equitable issues remaining, the trial court may then consider those claims.”) , disapproved of on other grounds by Ja ye v. Royal Saxon, Inc. , 720 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1998) ; Ashemimry v. Ba Nafa , 778 So. 2d 495, 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“Where a fiduciary or trust relationship exists, an action for an accounting is considered equitable in nature without regard to other consi derations .” ). Affirmed.
Talbert HINTON, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 18-7617.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 15

                          ACCOUNTANTS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the March 23, 1995 Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (formerly known as
InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated July 18, 2002 included with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Pursuant
to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the
meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

July 18, 2002

                                       17
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4505 

To direct the Drug Enforcement Administration to provide information on 

best practices and strategies for responding in the event of a robbery 

of a pharmacy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 

Mr. SMUCKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Drug Enforcement Administration to provide 

information on best practices and strategies for responding in the event of a robbery of a pharmacy, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Pharmacy 

5 Robbery Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PHARMACY ROBBERY PREVENTION. 

7 The Drug Enforcement Administration, as part of 

8 the diversion control program of the Administration, shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4505 IH

1 disseminate to pharmacies information on best practices 

2 and strategies on how employees of a pharmacy might best 

3 respond to an attempted robbery of that pharmacy. The 

4 Administration shall consult with local law enforcement 

5 agencies to customize such strategies for particular phar6 macies based on the practices of criminal actors in the 

7 locality. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
William KINNEY, et ux., petitioners, v. ANDERSON LUMBER COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 18-1026.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1251

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 8850 South 700 East, Sandy, Utah, as the

‘‘Noal Cushing Bateman Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1251 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Postal Service building located at

3 8850 South 700 East, in Sandy, Utah, shall be known

4 and designated as the ‘‘Noal Cushing Bateman Post Of5 fice Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Noal Cushing Bateman Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Richard BACQUIE, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-1578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1343 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1343

To provide for the continued maintenance and preservation of Governors 
      Island, New York, by the Administrator of General Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

 Mr. Nadler (for himself and Mrs. Maloney of New York) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the continued maintenance and preservation of Governors 
      Island, New York, by the Administrator of General Services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Governors Island Preservation Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUED MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION OF GOVERNORS ISLAND, NEW 
              YORK, BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES.

    (a) Repeal of Disposal Requirement.--The Balanced Budget Act of 
1997 is amended by striking section 9101 (111 Stat. 670).
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Administrator of General Services for maintenance 
and preservation of Governors Island, New York, including buildings and 
other improvements on the island, such sums as may be necessary for 
fiscal year 2000 and each fiscal year thereafter.
                                 <all>
```