alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 215/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.215.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5610 August 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.215.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 215

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5610 August 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 770/2013 of 8 August 2013 operating deductions from fishing quotas available for certain stocks in 2013 on account of overfishing in the previous years | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 771/2013 of 9 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 14 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 770/2013 of 8 August 2013 operating deductions from fishing quotas available for certain stocks in 2013 on account of overfishing in the previous years

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 771/2013 of 9 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

14

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Notice to readers — Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union
  (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |
| | * | Note to readers — way of referring to acts(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Notice to readers — Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union
  (see page 3 of the cover)

Notice to readers — Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

s3

*

Note to readers — way of referring to acts(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to readers — way of referring to acts

s3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
EIF HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          60,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,856,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,222
<INVENTORY>                                    569,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,938,601
<PP&E>                                       5,601,638
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,297,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,021,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,850,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,019,246
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,848,445)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,021,046
<SALES>                                     11,895,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,895,584
<CGS>                                       10,321,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,321,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,206,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             623,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,255,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,255,853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,255,853)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYREE WILSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 146 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Xavier JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6140.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Richard Dean MEARS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9188.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2023024EN.01000901.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 4 de Castelló de la Plana — Spain) — Casilda v Banco Cetelem SA

(Case C-302/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Dispute in the main proceedings which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 24/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 4 de Castelló de la Plana

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Casilda

Defendant: Banco Cetelem SA

Operative part of the judgment

It is not necessary to give a ruling on the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 4 de Castelló de la Plana (Court of First Instance, No 4, Castelló de la Plana, Spain) by decision of 7 May 2021.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.

---
# Official Journal C 163A/5 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 163A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 485 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 163A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 485 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 163A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (Grade A*14) COM/2005/10001 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 163A/1

Publication of a vacancy for Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (Grade A*14) COM/2005/10001

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES CONTROLLED BY REGISTRANT  As of December 31, 2003

ValueClick, Inc. Subsidiary Listing

Company

Percentage OwnershipBe Free, Inc. (Delaware)

100%Be Free Securities Corporation (Massachusetts)

100%Be Free International, Inc. (Delaware)

100%TriVida Corporation (California)

100%Mediaplex, Inc. (Delaware)

100%Commission Junction, Inc. (Delaware)

100%Hi Speed Media, Inc. (California)

100%Search123, Inc. (California)

100%Simpli.com, Inc. (Delaware)

100%ClickAgents, Inc. (Delaware)

100%Z Media, Inc. (Delaware)

100%Bach Acquisition Corp. (Delaware)

100%Adware Systems, Inc. (Kentucky)

100%Adware Systems Canada (Canada)

100%Be Free France (France)

100%Be Free Germany GmbH (Germany)

100%Be Free UK, Ltd. (United Kingdom)

100%Mediaplex Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

100%ValueClick Japan Co., Ltd. (Japan)

59.2%ValueClick Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)

100%ValueClick Sarl (France)

100%ValueClick GmbH (Germany)

100%ValueClick Limitado (Brazil)

100%ValueClick Canada (Canada)

100%


---

QuickLinks
Tony Eugene WARDLOW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8646.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
In Re Michael KENNEDY, petitioner.

No. 18-7001.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        6,076,531
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                       2,455,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,590
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  20,666
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                           392,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,885,680
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                       21,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                             21,380
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    12,002,169
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                              128
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                              128
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       3,450,376
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     2,066,612
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (3,620,881)
<NET-ASSETS>                                 2,864,300
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                2,940
<INTEREST-INCOME>                                  768
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                  41,885
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       (38,177)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                             0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                      312,290
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                          274,113
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                         274,113
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      3,412,199
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   2,066,612
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           14,393
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 41,885
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         2,727,244
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                           20,179
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  (297)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                          2,433
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                             22,315
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert
S. Bland, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Life Quotes, Inc.;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2010



/s/ ROBERT S. BLANDRobert S. BlandChief Executive Officer




12
H. R. 1162

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio River

between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher

Bridge’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio

River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

H. Natcher Bridge’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 21, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00349

- CV

IN RE Venkateswar Rao KODATI

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On May 29, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency temporary relief

. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real part y in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus i n this court no later than July 9 , 2018

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

52.4.

Relator ’ s request for a stay is GRANTED IN PART

. That portion of the trial court’s May 16, 2018 “Order Vacating Prior Order and Orders o n Clarification, Motion for Enforcement and for Contempt ” ordering relator to pay a fine of $500.00 is hereby STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. All other relief requested in relator’s motion for emergency temporary reli ef is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on June 21, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 02059 , styled In the Interest of M. P.K. and P.S.K., Children

, pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée Yanta presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TheStreet.com, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daryl Otte, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Daryl OtteName:
Daryl OtteTitle:
Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)March 11, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Bio-Matrix
Scientific Group, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        | Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                        |                                  
|Date: February 11, 2014 | By:                              
|                        |
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4641 

To improve the Federal Communication Commission’s collection of broadband 

speed data in order to support the effective deployment of broadband 

services to all areas in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Mr. DELGADO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To improve the Federal Communication Commission’s collection of broadband speed data in order to support the 

effective deployment of broadband services to all areas 

in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Broadband Speed 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4641 IH

1 SEC. 2. BROADBAND SPEED TEST. 

2 (a) REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 

3 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Com4 mission shall issue a rule that does the following: 

5 (1) Establishes an annual reporting require6 ment under which each provider of broadband inter7 net access service submits to the Commission a re8 port on broadband speed data based on a reasonable 

9 sample that is captured to demonstrate that the pro10 vider is capable of performing at the speed reported 

11 to the Commission on Form 477 or any successor 

12 report. 

13 (2) Establishes a fine for any provider that is 

14 found under paragraph (1) to have willfully or know15 ingly provided false data about the speeds offered. 

16 (3) Incorporates any other requirements issued 

17 by the Commission related to reporting on 

18 broadband speed data to minimize duplication. 

19 (b) BROADBAND SPEED REQUIREMENT FOR INFRA20 STRUCTURE FUNDING.—Any broadband infrastructure 

21 that is built with funding awarded on or after the date 

22 of the enactment of this Act from the Federal universal 

23 service support programs established pursuant to section 

24 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) 

25 shall provide broadband internet access service with a 

26 download speed of at least 100 megabits per second. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4641 IH

1 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

2 (1) BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.— 

3 The term ‘‘broadband internet access service’’ means 

4 a mass-market retail service by wire or radio that 

5 provides the capability to transmit data to and re6 ceive data from all or substantially all internet 

7 endpoints, including any capabilities that are inci8 dental to and enable the operation of the commu9 nications service, but excluding dial-up internet ac10 cess service. Such term includes any service that the 

11 Commission finds to be providing a functional equiv12 alent of the service described in the previous sen13 tence. 

14 (2) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

15 means the Federal Communications Commission. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60181

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

BILLY RAY FORD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILLY MCGEE and FORREST 

COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEP'T,

 Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

BILLY RAY FORD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD MCKENZIE, Judge,

and FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

 Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

BILLY RAY FORD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS and RAY HINTON,

 Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

BILLY RAY FORD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GLEN WHITE,

 Defendant-Appellee.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

BILLY RAY FORD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBIN WHITE,

 Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-60181

-2-

 

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:94-cv-332-PS; 2:94-cv-333-PS; 

2:94-cv-334-PS; 2:94-cv-335-PS; 2:93-cv-336-PS

- - - - - - - - - -

June 30, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bill Ray Ford filed five civil rights complaints, 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983, against various defendants alleging violations of his

civil rights arising from the revocation of his probation. The

district court consolidated the complaints and dismissed them as

frivolous. The district court dismissed the claims against two

defendants, Judge Richard McKenzie and Forrest County district

attorney Glenn White, based on absolute immunity, and the

remaining defendants as premature under Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S.

Ct. 2364 (1994). On appeal Ford argues the merits of his

underlying claim, but fails to challenge the basis of the

dismissal. Issues not raised or briefed are considered

abandoned. Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex., 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1

(5th Cir. 1993).

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.