alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                        ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Grauer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Wigwam Development,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this annual report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of September, 2003.

/s/ Steven Grauer
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Gregory HATT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7727.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Darrell PATTERSON, petitioner, v. WALGREEN CO.

No. 18-349.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter Bell, Chief Financial Officer of Braden Technologies
  Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/ Peter Bell         
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Peter Bell             
| |        |                        
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | February 18, 2003      

---
Tia Marie-Mitchell SKINNER, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-6782.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
Faiger Megrea BLACKWELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6791.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 19, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00860-CV

NO. 14-18-00861-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.D.W., K.A.J., AND K.E.W.-J. AKA K.E.W., 

CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2015-67083 & 2009-66038

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, K.J. (Father), appeals final decrees signed September 11, 2018, 

terminating his parental rights to the children who are the subject of these suits. 

Appellant filed timely notices of appeal. 

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation 
2

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The Anders

procedures are applicable to an appeal where termination of parental rights is sought 

when an appointed attorney concludes that there are no non-frivolous issues to assert 

on appeal. In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, 329 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

2004, no pet.). 

On January 14, 2019, a copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant and 

appellant was notified of the right to request the record and file a pro se response. 

See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); In re D.E.S., 

135 S.W.3d at 329–30. More than twenty-five days have elapsed and as of this date, 

no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error 

in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the 

state.

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant.
Devon Raymus STURDIVANT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7048.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
      99.2**




**Certification**





I,
      Tam Nguyen, certify that:





1.  I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Northcore Technologies
      Inc.





2.  Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report.





Dated:  October
                5, 2007
            /s/
                Tam NguyenTam
                NguyenCorporate
                Controller



























7
UNITED STATES, et al., Applicants v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF OREGON.

No. 18A65.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 30, 2018.

The application for stay presented to Justice Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is denied.

The Government's request for relief is premature and is denied without prejudice. The breadth of respondents' claims is striking, however, and the justiciability of those claims presents substantial grounds for difference of opinion. The District Court should take these concerns into account in assessing the burdens of discovery and trial, as well as the desirability of a prompt ruling on the Government's pending dispositive motions.
Jesse BREWER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8034.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of iParty Corp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 27, 2003                            /s/ Sal Perisano
                                                ----------------
                                                Sal Perisano
                                                Chief Executive Officer
2013 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-27-2013

In Re: Clinton Barlow Elmalean Bows

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 13-1063

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2013 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Clinton Barlow Elmalean Bows " (2013). 2013 Decisions. Paper 1072.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013/1072
DLD-142 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 13-1063

___________

IN RE: CLINTON C. BARLOW 

ELMALEAN BOWSER a/k/a Elmalean Austin,

Petitioners

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

(12-30150)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 7, 2013

Before: AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: March 27, 2013)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

On January 10, 2013, petitioner Elmalean Bowser filed an appeal in the District Court 

from the Bankruptcy Judge’s order dismissing her case. Her nephew, petitioner Clinton C. 

Barlow, apparently acting with power of attorney for Bowser, concurrently filed a petition for a 

writ of mandamus. Petitioners ask us to remove Bowser’s bankruptcy case from the assigned 

Bankruptcy Judge, alleging that he exhibited racial bias in violation of her constitutional rights. 
2

Mandamus is a drastic remedy available in only the most extraordinary circumstances. 

In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). Not only are 

Petitioners’ allegations entirely unsubstantiated, Bowser’s bankruptcy case is now on appeal to 

the District Court. A mandamus petition is not a substitute for an appeal. In re Kensington 

Int’l Ltd., 353 F.3d 211, 219 (3d Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we will deny the mandamus 

petition.
Joseph Ray RICE, petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden.

No. 17-9237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In Re Dennis Roger BOLZE, petitioner.

No. 18-7247.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, dated the date of
this Certification (the Report), I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith                 
|                   |  |  |  | Timothy L. Smith                     
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/08/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      138,086
COMMITMENTS
  17,688   23,707   30,767   74,337   69,789  122,792  124,263   15,294   13,823

CHANGES FROM 11/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,568)
     585    4,654   -2,001    4,259      182    2,843    2,835  -11,411  -11,403

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.8     17.2     22.3     53.8     50.5     88.9     90.0     11.1     10.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       86)
      31       20       33       23       25       74       67
```

----

Updated November 14, 2011
# Official Journal C 214I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 214I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6329 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 214I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6329 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 214 I/01 | Conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the recovery of the sport sector | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 214 I/01

Conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the recovery of the sport sector

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09219]



[[Page 25547]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules will hold a meeting 
on October 28, 2022 in Phoenix, AZ. The meeting is open to the public 
for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting 
materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: 
https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-rules-committees/agenda-books.

DATES: October 28, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bridget Healy, Esq., Acting Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4b691888197a78b89898d90908181bbb7818796819085969da4858bca9197878b91969097ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fba98e979e88b8949696928f8f9e9ea4a89e98899e8f9a8982bb9a94d58e8898948e898f88d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: April 26, 2022.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2022-09219 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James J. Maguire, Jr., chief executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

James J. Maguire, Jr.
James J. Maguire, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                      6,381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,082
<PP&E>                                         147,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,280
<BONDS>                                         60,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,140
<SALES>                                          2,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,233
<CGS>                                           10,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    72
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (75)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (157)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>