alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, Robert S. Bland, the Chief Executive Officer of Insure.com, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



/s/ ROBERT S. BLAND Name: Robert S. Bland
Title:Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 5, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Insure.com, Inc. and will be retained by
Insure.com, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
Brian BOLTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7751.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: BRAD A. COBL ER,

Appellant

______________________

2018

- 1995

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/668,369.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ERRY R OBIN S ELINGER

, Patterson & Sheridan LLP,

Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by

J AMES B ENDER , Greensboro, NC.

W ILLIAM L A M ARCA

, Office of the Solicitor, United

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by

T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, T HOMAS L. C ASAGRANDE

, J OSEPH

M ATAL

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, S CHALL

, and O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
# C_2016191EN.01004901.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/49

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2016 — Zink v Commission

(Case F-77/15) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Administrative error meaning that no expatriation allowance was paid for a number of years - Adversely affecting act - Salary statements not reflecting a decision - Article 82 of the Rules of Procedure - Absolute bar to proceedings - Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure - Application within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Reasonable time))

(2016/C 191/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Richard Zink (Bamako, Mali) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision to limit the retroactive payment of the expatriation allowance to a period of five years from the date on which the failure to pay that allowance was discovered and an order against the defendant to pay default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Richard Zink to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Richard Zink to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 51.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Evolve Oncology, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Alan Bowen, Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



                      Date: December 15, 2005

                      By: /s/ Alan Bowen
                      ------------------------------------
                      Alan Bowen
                      CFO
                      (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                  End of Filing
Otis Lamar TOWBRIDGE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9054.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Antwain D. ASHLEY, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7230.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jose Rolando ROMERO-PAYAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6878.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Steven Lynn LONG, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-8909.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in *73light of *Moore v. Texas,* 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1039, 197 L.Ed.2d 416 (2017).
Ronald MILTIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Larry M. SLUSSER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6807.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jose Santos PERU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8398.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mohammad SAIDIN, petitioner, v. Sam NEGRON, et al.

No. 16-9293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Marvin HUDGINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9113.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Steven H. COOK, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6291.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal L 112/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.112.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 112 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5430 April 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.112.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 112

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5430 April 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Luis A. SERNA, petitioner, v. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, MINNESOTA.

No. 18-7742.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., petitioner, v. MERUS N.V.

No. 17-1616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of Seven Chicago Patent Lawyers for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Enrico PONZO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-624.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Alan M. BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Wendy S. MORTON, Commissioner, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 17-6124.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bio Matrix Scientific Group,
Inc. (“Registrant”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, David
Koos, Acting Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            
            This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Registrant.














Date:
      12/18/08
            By:
            /s/ David
      KoosDavid
      Koos
              Chairman,
      Chief Executive
              Officer
      and Acting Chief
              Financial
      Officer
Gregory PAPPAS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6803.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Daniel DIAZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00417

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY

AND HYUNDAI MOTOR AM ERICA,

RELATOR S §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging Respondent’s order defining the scope of discovery, which stemmed from a motion to compel filed by Real Party in Interest Randale Case, as representative of t he Estate of Vonda Wynette Case, Deceased, for and on behalf of all those entitled to recover for her death under the Texas Wrongful Death and Survival Acts, and as next friend of XXXXXXX XXXX, minor and Lillie Jean Craig, individually. 1 On March 25, 2020 , this Court conditionally granted the petition and directed Respondent to vacate his order of August 9, 2019, in which it set forth the scope of discovery. By an order signed on March 27, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ
of mandamus as moot

. Opinion delivered April 2 , 2020. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Respondent is th e Honorable J. Clay Gossett, Judge of the 4th District Court in Rusk County, Texas.

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT

APRIL 2 , 2020

NO. 12

- 19

- 00417

- CV

HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPAN Y AND HYUNDAI MOTOR AM ERICA, Relator s V.

HON. J. CLAY GOSSETT , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America; who are the relator s in appellate cause
number 12

- 19

- 00417

- CV and the defendants in trial court cause number 2017

- 172, pending on the
docket of the 4th Judicial District Court of Rusk County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on December 20, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not i ssue , it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot

. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Order filed August 28, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00510

- CV

____________ SUSANA V. IZAGUIRRE , Appellant

V.
FIDENCIO ALVAREZ AND MARIA I. CHAVEZ , Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 30420



### ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The court reporter, Norma Duarte, informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On July 2, 2012, the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter = s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before

September 27, 2012. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Mario BAUTISTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 99.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the periodending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Merrill J. Forgotson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ernest J. Verrico, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ MERRILL J. FORGOTSON                                        |   | /s/ ERNEST J. VERRICO                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                 |   |                                                              |   |
| **Merrill J. Forgotson Chief Executive Officer March 28, 2003** |   | **Ernest J. Verrico Chief Financial Officer March 28, 2003** |   |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Bowe, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DAVID E.
BOWEDavid E. Bowe Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer March 30, 2004
Richard McINTYRE, petitioner, v. Theresa DelBALSO, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.

No. 17-6800.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Ronnie Junior RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Anthony Steven HALL, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8663.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
John S. MYZER, petitioner, v. George W. BUSH, et al.

No. 18-7011.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jesus R. GONZALEZ-NEGRON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6563.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Waseem DAKER, petitioner, v. Neil WARREN, Sheriff, Cobb County, Georgia, et al.

No. 16-9169.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*95Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 121/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.121.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 121 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5626 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.121.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 121

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5626 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 121/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2013(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2013/C 121/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2013 to 31 March 2013(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  ) | 2 |
| 2013/C 121/03 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2013 to 31 March 2013(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 121/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2013(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2013/C 121/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2013 to 31 March 2013(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

)

2

2013/C 121/03

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2013 to 31 March 2013(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN