alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James E. Bartlett, *Plaintiff in Error*v. Bert C. Cohn, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Opinion filed February 21, 1929.

*257
      *Burket & Fish, Harold H. Flower, F. W. Dart*and *Will O. Murrell,*for Plaintiff in Error.

Terreil, C. J.

In May, 1925, defendant in error brought an action at law against' the plaintiff in error. The declaration was in the common counts and laid damages in the sum of $4000.00. There was no appearance or pleadings on the part of defendant below, plaintiff in error here, so judgment was taken by default and execution was issued thereon in March, 1927. A motion for stay of said execution was seasonably made and denied and writ of error was taken to that judgment.

The motion for stay of execution was made pursuant to Section 2829, Rev. Gen. Stats. (Sec. 4515 Comp. Gen. Laws of Fla. 1927) and is predicated on the insufficiency of the sheriff’s return to the summons *ad respondendum*and the further allegation that the record shows that the cause of action did not accrue until after the commencement of the action.

*258Sec. 2829, Rev. Gen. Stats. of Fla., is as follows:

> 2829. Tlie Court before which an execution is returnable may, on a motion and notice to the adverse party, for good cause, upon such terms as the court may impose, direct a stay of the same, and the suspension of proceedings thereon.

This statute contemplates a liberal discretion on the part of trial courts in the matter of control over executions issued from them. Such control may go to the extent of staying the execution and suspending proceedings thereunder on terms directed by the court.

By the facts disclosed in the record the return of the sheriff on the summons was-insufficient to properly identify the defendant and bring him under the jurisdiction of the court. It did not therefore amount to due process and since it was the basis of the execution the execution was without a proper predicate and should have been stayed. The judgment below is accordingly reversed.

Reversed.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Long, Circuit-Judge, concur in the opinion and judgment.
Terrance Jerome CLARKE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7880.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,129
<SECURITIES>                                    39,861
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,983
<INVENTORY>                                     22,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,946
<PP&E>                                          26,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,745
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,314
<SALES>                                         50,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,036
<CGS>                                           30,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,922
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,562)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,971)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.98)
        

</TABLE>
Patrick Dewayne HALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9142.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                      EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We have issued our reports dated February 4, 2000, accompanying the
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of AppliedTheory
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement
of AppliedTheory Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-83177, effective July 19,
1999).

                                          /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
                                          --------------------------------------

New York, New York
March 24, 2000
Order filed July 30, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00337-CR

____________

JAMIE ALBERTO IBARRA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1287084

O R D E R

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction for aggravated assault. The 

clerk’s record was filed July 23, 2013. Appellant’s counsel has determined that

relevant items have been omitted from the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 

34.5(c). Appellant filed an Objection to the Record, and requested that this court 

order the record supplemented. We grant the request, and issue the following 

order:
2

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before August 19, 2013, containing the following items:

1. Motion to Recuse the Honorable Ruben Guerrero, on which the 

orders denying recusal signed October 30, 2012, and November 9, 

2012, are based;

2. Defendant’s Pro se Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Counsel, 

Michael Slider.

3. Defense Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw, filed on or about April 4, 

2013; and

4. Defendant’s Motion Requesting a Psychiatric Examination and the 

trial court’s Order denying same, filed on or about April 5, 2013. 

If any omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

VIRENTEM VENTURES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

______________________ 

2021-1805, 2021-1806

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-

01244, IPR2019-01245.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DENISE MARIE DE MORY, Bunsow De Mory LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. 

 DANIEL ZEILBERGER, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NAVEEN 

MODI, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, ALEXA LOWMAN, JOSEPH 

PALYS. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 21-1805 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2022
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

November 21, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1805 Document: 66 Page: 2 Filed: 11/21/2022
Clifton Stanley DIAZ, Jr., petitioner, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY.

No. 18-7002.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1241Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 11 , 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00547

- CR

RICKY HAYWOOD

- WATSON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. 1494189

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a child. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requir em ent of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to
be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).2

A copy of counsel’s bri ef was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the record was p ro vided to him. On October 14, 2019 , appellant filed a pro se response
to counsel’s brief. Appellant also filed a reply to the State’s brief on December 16,
2019.
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, appellant’s response and reply, and t he State’s brief , and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of
the brief or pro se response would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We
are not to address the me rits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See
Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is a ff irmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b).
Marisol MICHEO-ACEVEDO, petitioner, v. STERICYCLE OF PUERTO RICO, INC.

No. 18-967.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1279 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1279

To designate the Federal building and United States post office located 
  at 223 Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ``Aaron E. 
        Henry Federal Building and United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1999

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States post office located 
  at 223 Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ``Aaron E. 
        Henry Federal Building and United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States post office located at 223 
Sharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Aaron E. Henry Federal Building and United States 
Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Aaron E. Henry 
Federal Building and United States Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James J. Maguire, Jr., chief executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

James J. Maguire, Jr.
---------------------------------
James J. Maguire, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2004
Antonio Lebaron MELTON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9330.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# Official Journal L 82/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 82 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5228 March 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 82

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5228 March 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 259/2009 of 27 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 259/2009 of 27 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2009/300/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 12 March 2009 establishing the revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community Eco-label to televisions
  (notified under document number C(2009) 1830)

   (1) | 3 |
| | | 2009/301/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 25 March 2009 setting up a High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries | 9 |

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

DECISIONS

Commission

2009/300/EC

*

Commission Decision of 12 March 2009 establishing the revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community Eco-label to televisions
  (notified under document number C(2009) 1830)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2009) 1830)

3

2009/301/EC

*

Commission Decision of 25 March 2009 setting up a High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Jack R. KOCH, petitioner, v. Adam ESTRELLA, et al.

No. 18-586.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Shraddha PATEL, petitioner, v. Kirit PATEL, aka Kiritkumar Ambalal Patel, et al.

No. 18-933.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Steven CIOTTA, petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, Warden.

No. 17-9041.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Aaron Neal SAFFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9170.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1327 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1327

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480 
Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ``Maurine B. Neuberger 
                      United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

Ms. Hooley of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480 
Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ``Maurine B. Neuberger 
                      United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Postal Service building located at 34480 Highway 
101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 
``Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Postal Service 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Alhan SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7645.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Renee KING, petitioner, v. Anthony STEWART, Warden.

No. 17-6967.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.17

              DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS
              ------------------------------------------------
                BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
                ---------------------------------------------


     Each director who is not an employee of the registrant receives an annual
retainer fee of $20,000, plus $1,000 for each Board of Directors and Board
committee meeting attended. The Chairman of the Board receives a retainer fee of
$90,000 (in lieu of any other annual retainer, committee chair or attendance
fees), and directors chairing standing committees of the Board each receive an
additional annual retainer fee of $5,000.  Under the registrant's Omnibus Stock
Plan, directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the
foregoing fees, shares of the Company's common stock based on the fair market
value of the stock on the date the fees would have been paid.  Each director is
also reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that such director and
his or her spouse incurs attending Board meetings and functions.
David Leonard JOHNSON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7056.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
Jose Anthony VERDUZCO, petitioner, v. Marion SPEARMAN, Warden.

No. 17-9133.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         NIGMS Initial Review Group; Training and Workforce Development Study Section—C Review of G-RISE and PREP Applications.                    

*Date:*                         June 22-23, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of General Medical Science, Natcher Bldg. 45, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sonia Ivette Ortiz-Miranda, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-0534,                         *sonia.ortiz-miranda@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 27, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-09387 Filed 4-29-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P