alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott D. Howarth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/    Scott D. HowarthScott D. HowarthPresident and Chief Executive Officer February 12, 2010


I, John M. Cobb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated
Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/     John M. CobbJohn M. CobbVice President and Chief Financial Officer February 12, 2010
Amy HEBERT, petitioner, v. James ROGERS, Warden.

No. 18-6306.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2013163EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 163/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 163/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
Ramiro PLASCENCIA-OROZCO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John T. MORRIS, appellant, v. TEXAS, et al.

No. 17-780.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
# L_2011085EN.01001301.xml

| 31.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 129/2010

of 10 December 2010

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 101/2010 of 1 October 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 101/2010 of 1 October 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2010/4/EU of 8 February 2010 amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annex III to Council Directive 76/768/EEC concerning cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2010/4/EU of 8 February 2010 amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annex III to Council Directive 76/768/EEC concerning cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 L 0004: Commission Directive 2010/4/EU of 8 February 2010 (OJ L 36, 9.2.2010, p. 21).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 L 0004: Commission Directive 2010/4/EU of 8 February 2010 (OJ L 36, 9.2.2010, p. 21).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2010/4/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 December 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 332, 16.12.2010, p. 51.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 36, 9.2.2010, p. 21.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
In Re Brandon LEE, petitioner.

No. 18-7461.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1191 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1191

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
                           Chicago, Illinois.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1191

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
                           Chicago, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARDISS COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 433 West Harrison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Cardiss Collins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Cardiss Collins Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 2. OTIS GRANT COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2302 South Pulaski Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Otis Grant Collins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Otis Grant Collins Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 3. MARY ALICE (MA) HENRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4222 West Madison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 4. ROBERT LEFLORE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 50001 West Division Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in a law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/19/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      235,525
COMMITMENTS
  85,428    7,524   36,639   85,925  157,755  207,992  201,919   27,533   33,606

CHANGES FROM 10/12/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,357)
   1,453      777    6,039     -904     -744    6,588    6,073   -2,231   -1,716

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    36.3      3.2     15.6     36.5     67.0     88.3     85.7     11.7     14.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      222)
      81       25       70       61       92      166      176
```

----

Updated October 22, 2010
EXHIBIT 11

                              ACTV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                             COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


        Three Months Ended March 31,         1998              1999
                                        (as restated)
                                        -------------      ------------


Weighted average shares outstanding..    16,088,087         31,990,224


Common stock equivalents.............            --                 --
                                        -------------      ------------

         Total.......................    16,088,087         31,990,224
                                        =============      ============


Net loss applicable to common            
shareholders.........................    $2,772,137         $7,380,471
                                        =============      ============


Basic and diluted loss per common
share                                         $.17               $.23
EXHIBIT 13.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officers of Thomson, a French company (the Company), hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 6, 2009





| | /s/
      Frederic Rose         
| | --------------------------------
| | Name:
        Frederic Rose     
| | Title:   Chief Executive Officer





| | /s/
      Stéphane Rougeot      
| | --------------------------------
| | Name: Stéphane Rougeot          
| | Title:   Chief Financial Officer





|Thomson
46, quai A. Le Gallo - 92648 Boulogne Cedex - France
tél. +33 (0)1 41 86 50 00 - fax +33 (0)1 41 86 58 59
www.thomson.net | S.A. au capital de 1 012 087 605 euros
Siège social : 46, quai A. Le Gallo
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt
333 773 174 R.C.S. Nanterre
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 11

                           InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.
               Computation of Consolidated Earnings Per Common Share
                 (in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                For the Three Months       For the Nine Months
                                 Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                    1997        1996          1997       1996
<S>                            <C>         <C>           <C>        <C>
Net income                     $    1,364      1,088         3,712     3,384
                                =========  =========     ========= =========
Weighted average shares:
     Common shares issued       1,545,983  1,541,666     1,544,808 1,546,604
     Less-Unreleased common 
      shares held by ESOP          11,861     14,166        12,424    14,759
                                ---------  ---------     --------- ---------
     Common shares 
      outstanding               1,534,122  1,527,500     1,532,384 1,531,845

Add - common equivalent shares
      representing shares 
      issuable upon exercise 
      of employee stock options    45,289     41,801        44,521    38,391
                                ---------  ---------     --------- ---------
Adjusted weighted average 
number of shares outstanding 
used in calculation of 
earnings per common and common 
equivalent share                1,579,411  1,569,301     1,576,905 1,570,236

Add - incremental shares 
      representing shares 
      issuable upon exercise
      of employee stock 
      options based on September 
      30 estimated fair value 
      (1)                           2,115        426         5,055     3,923
                                ---------  ---------     --------- ---------
Adjusted weighted average number 
of shares outstanding used in 
calculation of earnings per 
common share - assuming full 
dilution                        1,581,526  1,569,727     1,581,960 1,574,159
                                =========  =========     ========= =========
Earnings per common share - 
assuming no dilution                $ .89        .71          2.42      2.21

Earnings per common and common
equivalent share                      .86        .69          2.35      2.16

Earnings per common share - 
assuming full dilution                .86        .69          2.35      2.15

<FN>
(1)  There is presently no active public trading market for the Company's 
shares, nor are the prices at which common shares have been traded published by
any national securities association or quotation service.  Fair value for 
earnings per common share purposes was assumed to be $35.00 at September 30, 
1997, and $27.50 at September 30, 1996.
</FN>
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1212 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1212

To protect producers of agricultural commodities who applied for a Crop 
 Revenue Coverage PLUS supplemental endorsement for the 1999 crop year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 1999

 Mr. Combest (for himself, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Berry, and Mr. 
   Cooksey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To protect producers of agricultural commodities who applied for a Crop 
 Revenue Coverage PLUS supplemental endorsement for the 1999 crop year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS WHO APPLIED FOR CROP 
              REVENUE COVERAGE PLUS.

    (a) Eligible Producers.--This section applies with respect to 
producers eligible for insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act 
(7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who applied for the supplemental crop insurance 
endorsement known as Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS (referred to in this 
section as ``CRCPLUS'') for the 1999 crop year for an agricultural 
commodity.
    (b) Additional Period for Obtaining or Transferring Coverage.--
Notwithstanding the sales closing date for obtaining crop insurance 
coverage established under section 508(f)(2) of the Federal Crop 
Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation shall provide 
a 14-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, but not 
to extend beyond April 12, 1999, during which a producer described in 
subsection (a) may--
            (1) obtain from any approved insurance provider a level of 
        coverage for the agricultural commodity for which the producer 
        applied for the CRCPLUS endorsement that is equivalent or less 
        than the level of coverage that the producer applied for from 
        the insurance provider that offered the CRCPLUS endorsement; 
        and
            (2) transfer to any approved insurance provider any 
        federally reinsured coverage provided for other agricultural 
        commodities of the producer by the same insurance provider that 
        offered the CRCPLUS endorsement.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2011182EN.01000101.xml

| 12.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 182/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Faeroe Islands on Scientific and Technological Cooperation

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Faeroes on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (1), signed on 3 June 2010, has, in accordance with Article 5(2) thereof, entered into force on 28 June 2011.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 245, 17.9.2010, p. 2.

1

---
Robert KALABA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9196.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Charles GIVENS, petitioner, v. Marty ALLEN, Warden.

No. 17-9319.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2017161EN.01003601.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/36

---

Action brought on 21 March 2017 — Bernard Krone Holding v EUIPO (Coil Liner)

(Case T-188/17)

(2017/C 161/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bernard Krone Holding SE & Co. KG (Spelle, Germany) (represented by: T. Weeg and K. Lüken, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Coil Liner’ — Application for registration No 14 473 193

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2017 in Case R 443/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it dismisses the appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
|  Investment In             |   |  Location    |   |  Owned By                   |   | % of Ownership |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|----------------|--------|
| George Foreman Management, Inc. |   | Pennsylvania, USA |   | George Foreman Enterprises, Inc. |   |           | 100    | % |
| George Foreman Ventures LLC     |   | Delaware, USA     |   | George Foreman Enterprises, Inc. |   |           | 100    | % |
| G- Nutritional LLC              |   | Delaware, USA     |   | George Foreman Ventures LLC      |   |           | 100    | % |
| InStride Ventures LLC           |   | New Jersey, USA   |   | George Foreman Ventures LLC      |   |           | 50.1   | % |
| Vita Ventures LLC               |   | New Jersey, USA   |   | G-Nutritional LLC                |   |           | 50.1   | % |

----
A00A1325.

#### GARRETT v. THE STATE.

(536 SE2d 560)

Decided June 28, 2000.

*Beverly Harris,*for appellant.

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

This appeal follows James Mack Garrett’s conviction by a Union County jury of aggravated assault, aggravated assault on a correctional officer, and escape. The State has moved to dismiss the appeal because Garrett, upon remand to the sheriff, escaped custody on November 7, 1999, and remains at large. In support of the motion to dismiss, the State has submitted the affidavit of David Atkins, Sheriff of Union County. In her brief in support of the appeal, Garrett’s attorney acknowledges that his exact whereabouts remain unknown.

> As defendant has escaped and remains without the lawful custody and control of the authorities of this state, this case has become moot. Therefore, the motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal must be granted. [Cits.] The public policy of this state is to deter escapes.

*Blassingame v. State,*155 Ga. App. 235-236 (270 SE2d 399) (1980). See also *Gilbert v. State,*188 Ga. App. 602 (373 SE2d 668) (1988). Accordingly, Garrett’s appeal is dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Eldridge and Barnes, JJ, concur.*

*670
      *N. Stanley Gunter, District Attorney, William J. Langley, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.
Gregory WARREN, petitioner, v. Cathy J. SAWYER, et al.

No. 17-6308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.