alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JONATHAN E. BRIERE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2662

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public 

Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Allison C. Heim, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Dearick SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5724.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Corey Kirkpatrick STERLING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, --- S.Ct. ----, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Exhibit 99.1

Code of Ethics

Preface

Quotesmith.com, Inc.
(the "Company") expects all of its employees to act in accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity in all aspects of their activities, to
comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, to deter wrongdoing and abide by the Company's policies and procedures adopted that govern the conduct of its employees. As part of the
corporate leadership team, financial officers are vested with both the responsibility and authority to protect, balance, and preserve the interests of all of the Company's stakeholders, including
stockholders, clients, employees, suppliers, and citizens of the communities in which business is conducted. Financial officers fulfill this responsibility by prescribing and enforcing the policies
and procedures employed in the operation of the enterprise's financial organization, and by demonstrating the following:

Honest and Ethical Conduct

Financial
officers will exhibit and promote the highest standards of honest and ethical conduct through the establishment and operation of policies and procedures that:



Financial Records and Periodic Reports

Financial
officers will establish and manage the Company transaction and reporting systems and procedures to ensure that:



---



Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations

Financial
officers will establish and maintain mechanisms to:



Other Items

Individuals
will be held accountable for adherence to this Code of Ethics. Failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of
employment. Violation of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violation of law and may result in civil and criminal penalties.

From
time to time, a committee of the Board of Directors comprised solely of independent directors may waive certain provisions of this Code of Ethics. Any employee who believes that a waiver may be
appropriate should discuss this matter with our outside counsel, David Kaufman of Duane Morris, LLP (312-499-6741).

Employees
are expected to identify and raise potential issues before they lead to problems. If they have any questions regarding the best course of action in a particular situation, they should
promptly contact our outside counsel, David Kaufman of Duane Morris, LLP (312-499-6741). They may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any possible violation of this Code of
Ethics.

---

QuickLinks
Marquez T. HAWKINS, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9300.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00066-CR

__________________

ETHAN THOMAS BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 75th District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 21DC-CR-00521

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The trial court appointed Michelle Mangum-Merendino to represent appellant

Ethan Thomas Brown on appeal. The reporter’s record was filed on March 24, 2022, 

and the clerk’s record was filed on April 21, 2022. On July 26, 2022, the Court 

granted a third extension of time to file the brief, noting that the extension was a 

“final extension”, and we warned appellant’s court-appointed attorney, Michelle 

Mangum-Merendino, that unless we received the brief by August 22, 2022, we 

would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why no brief has been 
2

filed. Although the brief of the appellant was due to be filed by August 22, 2022, the 

brief has not been filed.

We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing 

at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the appellant 

shall be present. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). We direct the trial court to determine 

whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue 

his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has 

not been filed and whether good cause exists for appointed counsel, Michelle 

Mangum-Merendino, to be relieved of her duties as appellate counsel and replaced 

by substitute counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2). If the trial 

court determines that good cause exists to relieve appointed counsel of her duties, 

we direct the trial court to appoint substitute counsel.

The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court 

judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court 

reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial court judge 

are to be filed on or before September 28, 2022. 

ORDER ENTERED August 29, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
In Re Christopher D. SCHNEIDER, petitioner.

No. 17-9240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
---

EXHIBIT 13.02

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nathalie Pilon, Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln Gold Corporation
  (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F, of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/
      Nathalie Pilon
| | ------ | ------------------------
| | Name:  | Nathalie Pilon          
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer 
| |        |                         
| |        |                         
| |        |                         
| | Date:  | July 14, 2008           

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer




Dated: March 3, 2006



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Gary Dan BILBO, Sr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5989.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
| | 
| | 





EXHIBIT 14.1



|KPMG Audit
1, cours Valmy
92923 Paris La Défense Cedex
France | Mazars61, rue Henri Regnault
92400 Courbevoie
France
|------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------









Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms







The Board of Directors

THOMSON:



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13178, 333-14224, 333-119938, 333-124241, 333-130657, 333-137680 and 333-149066) of THOMSON of our reports dated April 30, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of THOMSON as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, recognised income and expense, for the years then ended and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of THOMSON.





|                                
|--------------------------------
|Paris La Défense, April 30, 2009
|KPMG Audit                      
|A division of KPMG S.A.         
|                                
|/s/
        Isabelle Allen      
|Partner
Robert David WATSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7943.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Justin BEAVERS, petitioner, v. KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES.

No. 17-725.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
# Official Journal C 323/30 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 323 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4730 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 323

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4730 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 323/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 323/2 | List of approved firms — First subparagraph of Article 92(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 (public sale of wine alcohol for use as bioethanol in the fuel sector within the European Community) | 2 |
| 2004/C 323/3 | COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 323/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 323/2

List of approved firms — First subparagraph of Article 92(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 (public sale of wine alcohol for use as bioethanol in the fuel sector within the European Community)

2

2004/C 323/3

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

3

---

| | II   Preparatory Acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 323/4 | Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 4 |

II   Preparatory Acts

Commission

2004/C 323/4

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Louis Matthew CLEMENTS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 18-7062.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
# Official Journal L 8/12 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 8 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4812 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 8

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4812 January 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 31/2005 of 20 December 2004 adjusting, with effect from 1 July 2004, the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the correction coefficients applied thereto | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 32/2005 of 11 January 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 7 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2005 of 10 January 2005 initiating a ‘new exporter’ review of Council Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India, repealing the duty with regard to imports from one exporter in this country and making these imports subject to registration | 9 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 31/2005 of 20 December 2004 adjusting, with effect from 1 July 2004, the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the correction coefficients applied thereto

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 32/2005 of 11 January 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

7

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2005 of 10 January 2005 initiating a ‘new exporter’ review of Council Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India, repealing the duty with regard to imports from one exporter in this country and making these imports subject to registration

9

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | 2005/16/EC:Council Decision of 22 December 2004 amending Decision 2003/631/EC adopting measures concerning Liberia under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement in a case of special urgency | 12 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Council

*

2005/16/EC:Council Decision of 22 December 2004 amending Decision 2003/631/EC adopting measures concerning Liberia under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement in a case of special urgency

12

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tasco International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphreys, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
27th day of December, 2002.


/s/ Adrienne Humpheys
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Andrew CHIEN, petitioner, v. Andrew K. CLARK, et al.

No. 18-598.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal C 90A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.090.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5527 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.090.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5527 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2012/C 090A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/194/10 — English-language (EN) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2012/C 090A/01

Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/194/10 — English-language (EN) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Donna NICHOLSON, petitioner, v. CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 17-6649.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Joseph W. EDWARDS, petitioner, v. Frank BISHOP, Warden, et al.

No. 17-6995.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Alejandro OROZCO-MADRIGAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6802.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*983Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/13/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       52,753
COMMITMENTS
  18,430    1,629    8,353   16,613   29,988   43,397   39,970    9,357   12,783

CHANGES FROM 07/06/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,845)
   1,106   -2,247     -222      270    4,198    1,154    1,729      691      115

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.9      3.1     15.8     31.5     56.8     82.3     75.8     17.7     24.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       68)
      21        9       15       28       23       57       42
```

----

Updated July 16, 2010
Tonya MALLETT-RATHELL, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-6897.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
David Allen ANDERTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-846.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Adrian G. RANGEL, petitioner, v. TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA, et al.

No. 18-7541.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARLOS RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 209 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARLOS RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 210 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.