alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive 
Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Neuroscience of Basic Visual 
Processes Study Section.
    Date: June 8-9, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kirk Thompson, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5184, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1242, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a8a4b783aea2aaafedadaaabeda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="79121e0d391418101557171011571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Vascular and Hematology Integrated Review 
Group; Basic Biology of Blood, Heart and Vasculature Study Section.
    Date: June 16-17, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Katherine M. Malinda, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4140, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-0912, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1875797471767c797375587b6b6a36767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9df0fcf1f4f3f9fcf6f0ddfeeeefb3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 22, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08958 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1








June 1, 2018


Art Peck




Dear Art:


This letter confirms your agreement to not sell or otherwise transfer Common Stock of The Gap, Inc. (the “Company”) as set forth below.


In consideration of the grant of Restricted Stock Units with respect to shares of Common Stock of the Company granted to you on the date hereof, you agree that until June 1, 2021 you will not sell, transfer, assign, pledge, hedge, or otherwise encumber any shares of Common Stock of the Company, whether currently owned or acquired through Company stock programs, except (i) to satisfy tax withholding obligations, (ii) transfers by gift to nonprofits, including donor advised funds, and (iii) transfers for estate planning purposes to family members or trusts, limited partnerships, or limited liability companies primarily for the benefit of family members, provided those shares so transferred under (iii) will be restricted from sale during the same period.  Such restrictions shall lapse in the event of termination of your employment prior to June 1, 2021.
        
You understand that your employment is “at-will.”  This means that you do not have a contract of employment for any particular duration or limiting the grounds for your termination in any way.  You are free to resign at any time.  Similarly, the Company is free to terminate your employment at any time for any reason.  The only way your at-will status can be changed is through a written agreement with the Company, signed by an authorized officer of the Company.   


Yours sincerely,




/s/ Julie Gruber                
Julie Gruber
EVP, Global General Counsel, Corporate Secretary, & Chief Compliance Officer, Gap Inc.




Agreed this 1st day of June 2018




/s/ Art Peck                
Art Peck
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4208 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4208

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit treatment of 
certain non-native, non-indigenous hoofstock born within the borders of 
 the United States as an endangered species, a threatened species, an 
   essential experimental population, or a nonessential experimental 
                              population.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 23, 2019

   Mr. Yoho introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit treatment of 
certain non-native, non-indigenous hoofstock born within the borders of 
 the United States as an endangered species, a threatened species, an 
   essential experimental population, or a nonessential experimental 
                              population.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HOOFSTOCK AS ENDANGERED 
              SPECIES, THREATENED SPECIES, ESSENTIAL EXPERIMENTAL 
              POPULATION, OR NONESSENTIAL EXPERIMENTAL POPULATION.

    Section 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1532) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting before the first sentence the following:
    ``(a) In General.--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Limitation.--
            ``(1) A covered hoofstock born within the borders of the 
        United States shall not be treated as an endangered species, a 
        threatened species, an essential experimental population, or a 
        nonessential experimental population under this Act.
            ``(2) In this subsection the term `covered hoofstock' means 
        any barasingha, red lechwe, Arabian oryx, Eld's deer, Grevy's 
        zebra, gaur, or banteng.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15




                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Central Newspapers, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position
of Central Newspapers, Inc., and its subsidiaries as of September 26, 1999, and
the related consolidated statement of income, for each of the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 26, 1999 and September 27, 1998 and the
consolidated statements of shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
nine-month periods ended September 26, 1999 and September 27, 1998. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above
for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We previously audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 27, 1998, and
the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and of cash
flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated
January 29, 1999 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying consolidated statement of financial position as of December 28,
1998, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated
statement of financial position from which it has been derived.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    Phoenix, Arizona
    October 18, 1999
Raymond WARREN, petitioner, v. Dushan ZATECKY, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

No. 17-6171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Gilbert Arcides

,

Appellant,

v.

Raul Angel Rojas and Deepwell Energy

Services, LLC

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 046

- CV

Appeal from the

143 rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 20

- 01

- 23349

- CVR )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s fourth request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until September 19, 2022

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Una King , Court Reporter for the 143 rd District Court

,

for Reeves County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and numbered

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before September 19 , 202 2

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of September , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox

, and Alley

, JJ.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/23/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      149,160
COMMITMENTS
   6,090   21,236   28,306   98,997   82,300  133,393  131,842   15,767   17,318

CHANGES FROM 11/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -18,583)
  -2,293    3,253      251  -13,729  -21,844  -15,771  -18,340   -2,812     -243

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     4.1     14.2     19.0     66.4     55.2     89.4     88.4     10.6     11.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       90)
      18       30       33       24       31       68       78
```

----

Updated November 29, 2010
<PAGE>


                                                                        EX-32.1


             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of ViaVid Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Kathler, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
--------------------------------------
Brian Kathler
Chief Executive Officer
July 12, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

h0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144150

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144150

COA: 304796

Shiawassee CC: 08-007856-FH

RANDALL RAYMOND BALL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EMERALD
     CAPITAL  INVESTMENTS,  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND  IS  QUALIFIED 
     IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     7,663
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         7,663
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,663
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,663
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,663
<SALES>                                        1,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,386)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.001)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION**

PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Onsite Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the quarterly report of theCompany on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Form 10-QSB”) that, to the best of their knowledge:

|        |        |                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and                     |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                     |            |                             |
|---------------------|------------|-----------------------------|
| Dated: May 14, 2003 |       | /s/ RICHARD T. SPERBERG     |
|                |       |                             |
| ** **          | ** ** | **Richard T. Sperberg**     |
| ** **          | ** ** | **Chief Executive Officer** |
|                |       |                        |
|                |       |                        |
| Dated: May 14, 2003 |       | /s/ PAUL E. BLEVINS         |
|                |       |                             |
| ** **          | ** ** | **Paul E. Blevins**         |
| ** **          | ** ** | **Chief Financial Officer** |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2015

NO. 03-12-00558-CV

Happy Jack Ranch, Inc. and Frederick J. Behrend, Appellants

v.

HH&L Development, Inc.; Matthew Stolhandske, Trustee; Michael Strnad, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PURYEAR AND GOODWIN

REFORMED AND, AS REFORMED, AFFIRMED --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 22, 2012. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was error in the trial court’s 

judgment awarding Michael Strnad attorney’s fees. Therefore, the Court reforms the trial court’s 

judgment to delete the award of attorney’s fees. The Court affirms the judgment as reformed. 

Each party shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the 

court below.
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Chief
Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David R.
Koos


David
R. Koos


Chief
Executive Officer





Date:
January 13, 2010
Zane HUBBARD, petitioner, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al.

No. 18-7592.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Omari ROBINSON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-7417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN HOWARD, GARY FRASER, and GLENROY SCHAD, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., AKA Ryder System, Inc., AKA Ryder Transportation Services, Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-15530 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01473-HRH
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona H. Russel Holland, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 14, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: TALLMAN and RAWLINSON, Circ uit Judges, and GARBIS, Senior District Judge. ** 

# FILED
MAR 06 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Marvin J. Garbis, Se nior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.John Howard, Gary Fraser, and Glenr oy Schad (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of their former employer, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. (Ryder). They allege that their termination violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and that Ryder humiliated them by broadcasting their terminations on its closed-circuit television system. 1. Plaintiffs failed to raise a material issue of fact regarding whether Ryder’s stated reason for their terminations was a pretext for discrimination. See Earl v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc. , 658 F.3d 1108, 1113-14 (9th Cir. 2011) (requiring the production of “specific and substantial” circumstantial evidence to raise a material issue of fact regarding pretext). 2. The district court acted within its discretion when it excluded Plaintiffs’ expert’s report from consider ation. The expert’s report addressed matters within the common knowledge of the average layperson, and thus, would not be helpful to the trier of fact. See Fed. R. Evid. 702; see also Ward v. Westland Plastics, Inc. , 651 F.2d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir. 1980) (“The question whether gender was the basis of differential treatment is not so technical as to require the aid of an expert to enlighten the jury or court....”). 3. The district court did not err by granting summary judgment to Ryder on Plaintiffs’ intentional infliction of emotional distress claim because Ryder’s 2alleged conduct in broadcasting Plaintiffs’ terminations on closed-circuit television monitors was not sufficiently “extreme a nd outrageous” as to constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress. Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. , 888 P.2d 1375, 1386-87 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). AFFIRMED
.

3
Manuel GARDNER, petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO.

No. 17-9194.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Mexico denied.