alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 199A/16 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 199A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5816 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 199A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5816 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2015/C 199A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2015/C 199A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 305/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 305 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6315 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 305

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6315 September 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 305/01 | Euro exchange rates — 14 September 2020 | 1 |
| 2020/C 305/02 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 305/01

Euro exchange rates — 14 September 2020

1

2020/C 305/02

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 305/03 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 3 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 305/03

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Derek L. McSMITH, petitioner, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA.

No. 16-9120.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Modification Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit modification request received and permit 
issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish a 
notice of requests to modify permits issued to conduct activities 
regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has 
published regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act in the Code 
of Federal Regulations. This is the required notice of a requested 
permit modification issued.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-7420; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c2d2f2d1c091e0105181f2c021f0a420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d7c7e7c4d584f5054494e7d534e5b135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation (NSF), as 
directed by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541, 45 
CFR 671), as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation 
Act of 1996, has developed regulations for the establishment of a 
permit system for various activities in Antarctica and designation of 
certain animals and certain geographic areas as requiring special 
protection.
    Description of Permit Modification Requested: The Foundation issued 
a permit (ACA 2020-013) to Dr. Nicholas Teets on January 2, 2020. The 
issued permit allows the permit holder and agents to access sites along 
the Antarctic Peninsula, including ASPAs 108, 126, and 134, to collect 
midges (Belgica antarctica) for physiology and genetic studies.
    A recent modification to this permit, dated January 17, 2021, 
included ASPA 149 to the list of protected areas authorized for entry 
under this permit.
    Now the applicant proposes a modification to extend the expiration 
date of the permit, which is set to expire July 1, 2022. Unforeseen 
circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in delayed 
fieldwork which will now be conducted during the 2022-2023 Antarctic 
research season.
    The Environmental Officer has reviewed the modification request and 
has determined that the amendment is not a material change to the 
permit, and it will have a less than a minor or transitory impact.

DATES: January 2, 2020-July 1, 2023.
    The permit modification was issued on April 15, 2022.

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-08884 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jack GOSSETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7356.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Harry Mund,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


November 14, 2005                   /s/ Harry Mund
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Harry Mund
                                    Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Phillip A.Perillo, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Quotesmith.com, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                 evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                  disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a.                  all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: March 15, 2006 |                                             |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ PHILLIP A. PERILLO                      |
|                      | Phillip A. Perillo  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
WINDOW ROCK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, petitioner, v. Ann REEVES, et al.

No. 17-447.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of National School Boards Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4557 

To prohibit the termination of advisory committees before the end of their 

charter unless authorized by law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. CASTEN of Illinois (for himself, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. QUIGLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the termination of advisory committees before 

the end of their charter unless authorized by law, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserve Science in 

5 Policymaking Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4557 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TERMINATION OF ADVISORY COM2 MITTEES. 

3 Section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

4 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by inserting at the end the 

5 following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(d) An advisory committee created under para7 graphs (1) or (2) of section 9(a) may not be terminated 

8 by the President, the head of an agency, or any officer 

9 of the Federal Government before the end of the charter 

10 of the advisory committee unless— 

11 ‘‘(1) the termination is authorized by law; or 

12 ‘‘(2) the termination is unanimously approved 

13 by the Chief Data Officer, Chief Evaluation Officer, 

14 and Chief Information Officer of the relevant agen15 cy. 

16 ‘‘(e) Before the termination of an advisory committee 

17 under subsection (d)(2) and not later than 60 days before 

18 the date on which the advisory committee is scheduled to 

19 be terminated, the head of the relevant agency shall sub20 mit to Congress a notification of such termination and 

21 provide for a public notice and comment period.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/11/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      153,653
COMMITMENTS
  40,899   24,340   26,994   69,743   76,166  137,636  127,500   16,017   26,153

CHANGES FROM 05/04/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,981)
    -346   -1,390      558    1,721    2,467    1,933    1,635    1,048    1,346

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.6     15.8     17.6     45.4     49.6     89.6     83.0     10.4     17.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      173)
      42       29       51       52       67      126      132
```

----

Updated May 14, 2010
# Official Journal C 146A/26 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 146A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5926 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 146A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5926 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2016/C 146A/1 | Reserve list (order of merit) — ECA/2015/JUR — Two lawyer posts (grade AD 8 — AD 9) — Legal Service — Presidency | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Auditors

2016/C 146A/1

Reserve list (order of merit) — ECA/2015/JUR — Two lawyer posts (grade AD 8 — AD 9) — Legal Service — Presidency

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Willie E. BOYD, petitioner, v. Francisco J. QUINTANA, Warden.

No. 18-7495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2017

p0117 

# Order

Clerk January 24, 2017

153732

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153732

COA: 325144

Genesee CC: 13

- 033028

- FC

TRAVIS JAMES HENRY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 5, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00701-CV 

HENDOLPH HOLDINGS LLC, CHRISTOPHER RANDOLPH, AND 

HENDA SALMERON, Appellants 

V. 

DEAN CALDWELL, LINDA CALDWELL, AIRMASTER AERATOR, LLC, 

AND AIRMASTER ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-09850 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See id.

 

230701F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

HENDOLPH HOLDINGS LLC, 

CHRISTOPHER RANDOLPH, 

AND HENDA SALMERON, 

Appellants 

No. 05-23-00701-CV V. 

DEAN CALDWELL, LINDA 

CALDWELL, AIRMASTER 

AERATOR, LLC, AND 

AIRMASTER ENVIRONMENTAL, 

LLC, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 68th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-09850. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns, Justices Molberg and 

Pedersen, III participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellees Dean Caldwell, Linda Caldwell, Airmaster 

Aerator, LLC, and Airmaster Environmental, LLC recover their costs, if any, of this 

appeal from appellants Hendolph Holdings LLC, Christopher Randolph, and Henda 

Salmeron. 

Judgment entered this 5th day of September 2023.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with amendment no.1 tothe Annual Report of EPOD International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/Afor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on November 14, 2007 (the "Report"), I, L. Mark Roseborough,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tomy knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by EPOD International,Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. /s/ L. Mark    Roseborough L. Mark Roseborough *Chief Executive    Officer* EPOD INTERNATIONAL    INC.
November 14, 2007Kelowna, British Columbia
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6213** 

UMADEAN HATCH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. NCCIW , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00791

- CCE

- JEP )

Submitted : December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Umadean Hatch, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Umadean Hatch seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss with out prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U. S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). Because the pleading deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that t he o rder Hatch seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993)
. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.4

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

          TheCompany maintains an annual incentive plan whereby certain employees areeligible to receive cash bonuses equal to a percentage of their base salariesif certain corporate financial objectives and individual performance objectivesare achieved. The employees selected each year to participate in the annualincentive plan, as well as the performance targets on which the cash bonusesare based and the amount of the cash bonuses are determined each year in the discretionof the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. 

          Employeesin the following categories are eligible to participate in the plan: members ofthe senior management team and other employees who can have a significant impacton the financial results of the Company. Each year, the Chief Executive Officerrecommends to the Compensation Committee the employees whom he believes shouldparticipate in the plan, and the final determination is made by theCompensation Committee. 

          Ifthe Company achieves the performance targets set by the Compensation Committee,the designated management employees receive specified percentages of theirannual salaries in the form of cash bonuses. Company performance below thetarget levels will result in lower or no bonus payments, and Companyperformance above the target levels will result in higher bonus payments.

----
# L_2013222EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 222/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 222/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---