24486 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

or lower MEA; or (c) removal with no 

route structure (T-route) restored in that 

area because the value was determined 

to be insignificant. In support of this 

project, the FAA is proposing to amend 

RNAV route T–271, to improve the 

RNAV network in Alaska by planning 

for the future connectivity with future 

RNAV T-routes. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to 14 CFR part 71 to amend RNAV route 

T–271 in the vicinity of Iliamna, AK in 

support of a large and comprehensive Troute modernization project in the state 

of Alaska. The proposed RNAV T-route 

amendment is described below. 

T–271: T–271 extends between the 

Cold Bay, AK, (CDB) VHF 

Omnidirectional Radar and Tactical Air 

Navigational System (VORTAC) and the 

AMOTT, AK, waypoint (WP). The FAA 

proposes to update the GPS coordinates 

for the Cold Bay, AK, (CBD) VORTAC, 

the King Salmon, AK, (AKN) VORTAC; 

and, the AMOTT, AK, WP because of 

more precise improvements in 

technology. The FAA also proposes to 

remove the BINAL, AK, Fix from the 

legal description due to it having less 

than a 1 degree turn and is not required. 

Although, the BINAL Fix would be 

removed, it will remain as a Fix to the 

airway. Finally, the FAA proposes to 

insert the ZINAM, AK, WP. The rest of 

the route would remain unchanged. 

United States Area Navigation Routes 

are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA 

Order JO 7400.11F dated August 10, 

2021 and effective September 15, 2021, 

which is incorporated by reference in 14 

CFR 71.1. The RNAV route listed in this 

document would be published 

subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 10, 2021, and 

effective September 15, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6011 United States Area 

Navigation Routes. 

* * * * * 

T–271 Cold Bay, AK (CDB) to AMOTT, AK 

Cold Bay, AK (CDB) VORTAC (Lat. 55°16′02.26′′ N, long. 162°46′26.39′′ W) 

King Salmon, AK (AKN) VORTAC (Lat. 58°43′28.97′′ N, long. 156°45′08.45′′ W) 

ZINAM, AK WP (Lat. 60°37′07.20′′ N, long. 152°07′54.44′′ W) 

AMOTT, AK WP (Lat. 60°52′26.59′′ N, long. 151°22′23.60′′ W) 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 20, 

2022. 

Scott M. Rosenbloom, 

Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08784 Filed 4–25–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2022–0275] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Cumberland River, 

Nashville, TN 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Homeland 

Security (DHS). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing 

to a temporary safety zone from mile 

marker 191.1 to 191.5 of the 

Cumberland River. This action is 

necessary to provide for the safety of life 

on these navigable waters near Korean 

Veterans Bridge, Nashville, TN, during 

Music City Grand Prix on August 5 

through August 7, 2022. This proposed 

rulemaking would prohibit persons and 

vessels from being in the safety zone 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a 

designated representative. We invite 

your comments on this proposed 

rulemaking. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 26, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2022–0275 using the Federal Decision 

Making Portal at https://

www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public 

Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 

further instructions on submitting 

comments. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2022 / Proposed Rules 24487 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions about this proposed 

rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer 

Third Class Benjamin Gardner and 

Marine Safety Detachment Nashville, 

U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 615–736– 

5421, email Benjamin.t.gardner@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal 

Basis 

The Coast Guard was notified by Indy 

Car of a proposed racing event that goes 

over the Cumberland River. The event 

would take place from August 5, 2022, 

to August 7, 2022. On August 5, 2022 

the river closure would be from 2:00 

p.m. to 6:30 p.m. On August 6, 2022, the 

river closure would be from 11:00 a.m. 

to 5:00 p.m. On August 7, 2022, the 

river closure would be from 2:00 p.m. to 

4:30 p.m. The COTP has determined 

that there is a need to protect the river 

users while the Indy cars are on the 

track between MM 191.1 and MM 191.5 

on the Cumberland River. This propsed 

rule is needed to protect life and the 

marine environment in the navigable 

waters within the temporary safety zone 

during the racing portion of the event. 

The Coast Guard is proposing this 

rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 

70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). 

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The COTP is proposing to establish a 

safety zone that would be enforced from 

2 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on August 5, 2022, 

from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. on August 6, 

2022, and from 2 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on 

August 7, 2022. The safety zone would 

cover all navigable waters within .4 

miles of the Korean Veterans Bridge on 

the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN. 

The duration of the zone is intended to 

ensure the safety of vessels and these 

navigable waters before, during, and 

after the scheduled Indy Car races. No 

vessel or person would be permitted to 

enter the safety zone without obtaining 

permission from the COTP or a 

designated representative. The 

regulatory text we are proposing appears 

at the end of this document. 

IV. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This NPRM has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

the NPRM has not been reviewed by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the size, location, duration, 

and time-of-day of the safety zone. The 

safety zone will be 13 hours spread over 

the course of 3 days during daylight 

hours in Nashville, TN. The safety zone 

will only encompass .4 miles of the 

Cumberland River. Vessel traffic will be 

able to safely transit around this safety 

zone which would impact a small 

designated area of the Cumberland River 

before or after the time of the events on 

each day. Moreover, the Coast Guard 

would issue a Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 

16 about the zone, and the rulemaking 

would allow vessels to seek permission 

to enter the zone. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this proposed rule would not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this propsed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this proposed rule would economically 

affect it. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule. If the 

proposed rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would not call for 

a new collection of information under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132 

(Federalism), if it has a substantial 

direct effect on the States, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175 (Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments) because it would not 

have a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

If you believe this proposed rule has 

implications for federalism or Indian 

tribes, please call or email the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this propsed rule elsewhere in 

this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
24488 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

associated implementing instructions, 

and Environmental Planning 

COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which 

guide the Coast Guard in complying 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves a safety zone lasting 12 

hours spread over the course of 3 days 

that would prohibit entry within .4 

miles of the Korean Veterans Bridge. 

Normally such actions are categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 

1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01– 

001–01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of 

Environmental Consideration 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket. For instructions 

on locating the docket, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We 

seek any comments or information that 

may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places, or vessels. 

V. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We view public participation as 

essential to effective rulemaking, and 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period. 

Your comment can help shape the 

outcome of this rulemaking. If you 

submit a comment, please include the 

docket number for this rulemaking, 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. 

Submitting comments. We encourage 

you to submit comments through the 

Federal Decision Making Portal at 

https://www.regulations.gov. To do so, 

go to https://www.regulations.gov, type 

USCG–2022–0275 in the search box and 

click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this 

document in the Search Results column, 

and click on it. Then click on the 

Comment option. If you cannot submit 

your material by using https://

www.regulations.gov, call or email the 

person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this proposed rule 

for alternate instructions. 

Viewing material in docket. To view 

documents mentioned in this proposed 

rule as being available in the docket, 

find the docket as described in the 

previous paragraph, and then select 

‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the 

Document Type column. Public 

comments will also be placed in our 

online docket and can be viewed by 

following instructions on the https://

www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked 

Questions web page. We review all 

comments received, but we will only 

post comments that address the topic of 

the proposed rule. We may choose not 

to post off-topic, inappropriate, or 

duplicate comments that we receive. 

Personal information. We accept 

anonymous comments. Comments we 

post to https://www.regulations.gov will 

include any personal information you 

have provided. For more about privacy 

and submissions to the docket in 

response to this document, see DHS’s 

eRulemaking System of Records notice 

(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing 

to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0275 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T08–0275 Safety Zone; Cumberland 

River, Nashville, TN. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All navigable waters of the 

Cumberland River from mile marker 

191.1 to mile marker 191.5. 

(b) Definitions: As used in this 

section, designated representative 

means a Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, including a Coast Guard 

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer 

operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 

Federal, State, and local officer 

designated by or assisting the Captain of 

the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) in 

the enforcement of the safety zone. 

(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

safety zone regulations in subpart C of 

this part, you may not enter the safety 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the COTP 

or the COTP’s designated representative. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative by VHF–FM radio 

channel 16 or phone at 1–800–253– 

7465. Those in the safety zone must 

comply with all lawful orders or 

directions given to them by the COTP or 

the COTP’s designated representative. 

(d) Enforcement periods. This section 

will be enforced from 2 p.m. until 6:30 

p.m. on August 5, 2022, from 11 a.m. 

until 5 p.m. on August 6, 2021, and 

from 2 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. on August 

7, 2022. 

Dated: April 20, 2022. 

A.M. Beach, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Sector Ohio Valley. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08882 Filed 4–25–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2020–0556; FRL–8335–03– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AV35 

Testing Provisions for Air Emission 

Sources 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This action proposes 

corrections and updates to regulations 

for source testing of emissions under 

various rules. This proposed rule 

includes corrections to inaccurate 

testing provisions, updates to outdated 

procedures, and approved alternative 

procedures that provide testers 

enhanced flexibility. The revisions will 

improve the quality of data but will not 

impose new substantive requirements 

on source owners or operators. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 27, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2020–0556 by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method). Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: a-and-r docket@epa.gov. 

Include docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2020–0556 in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1