alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

p0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

139871 

BARNARD MANUFACTURING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139871 

 COA: 286003 

Clinton CC: 06-010113-CK 

GATES PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING, 

INC., and GREG N. GATES, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC, petitioner, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.

No. 17-716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 296/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.296.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 296 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5212 November 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.296.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 296

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5212 November 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2009/821/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 28 September 2009 drawing up a list of approved border inspection posts, laying down certain rules on the inspections carried out by Commission veterinary experts and laying down the veterinary units in Traces
  (notified under document C(2009) 7030)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2009/822/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 15 October 2009 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the list of border inspection posts
  (notified under document C(2009) 7789)

   (1) | 59 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2009/821/EC

*

Commission Decision of 28 September 2009 drawing up a list of approved border inspection posts, laying down certain rules on the inspections carried out by Commission veterinary experts and laying down the veterinary units in Traces
  (notified under document C(2009) 7030)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2009) 7030)

1

2009/822/EC

*

Commission Decision of 15 October 2009 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the list of border inspection posts
  (notified under document C(2009) 7789)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2009) 7789)

59

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARONEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      15,884,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,442,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  857,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,823,000
<PP&E>                                       5,445,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,319,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,876,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,354,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,881,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,876,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,757,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,805,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             257,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,305,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,305,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,305,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
Robert Charles COOK, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-5361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      29,466,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,605,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                   544,104
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,967,007
<PP&E>                                      20,459,023
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,867,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,809,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,150,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       131,126
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,267,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,809,353
<SALES>                                     16,032,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,664,853
<CGS>                                        1,508,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,670,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,502,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               585,674
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,304
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,784
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
Dennis Gene SHIPTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6768.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
Mund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lapis Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

August 12, 2004                                      /s/ Harry Mund
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Harry Mund
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that theCompany’s amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December25, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 27, 2005 | /s/ PATRICK FARELL                      |   |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Patrick Farrell                         |
| * *           | *President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4645-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4645-DR), dated March 11, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on April 1, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Robert A. Haywood, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Myra M. Shird as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-09295 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Jose A. GARCIA-ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7176.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Joe Clarence SMITH, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6847.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kirtish PATEL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Casimiro AMEZCUA, petitioner, v. M. Eliot SPEARMAN, Warden.

No. 16-9145.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**








**SATELLITE
      NEWSPAPERS CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Royal Invest International Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.





By:
      /s/ Nathan Lapkin


Nathan
      Lapkin


Chief
      Financial Officer





July 27,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6533

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CANDA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00356-CMH-1; 1:09-cv-00589-CMH)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 3, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Canda, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Grooms, III, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Canda seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Canda has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4672 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4672

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, as the 
    ``Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2019

Mr. Khanna (for himself, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Hill of California, Ms. Lee of 
 California, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Peters, 
 Mr. Schiff, Ms. Speier, and Mrs. Torres of California) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, as the 
    ``Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 2ND CLASS (SEAL) MATTHEW G. AXELSON POST 
              OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 21701 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) 
Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Petty 
Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Matthew G. Axelson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1989-B, Ltd.'s Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations 
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         345,577
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  441,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               787,223
<PP&E>                                         8,415,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,914,370)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,426,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,343
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,207,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,426,982
<SALES>                                        1,436,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,454,381
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  764,685<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                579,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            579,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   579,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and 
amortization expense.  Excludes General and Administrative and interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>