alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-77299) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
Informatica Corporation, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-89523)
pertaining to the 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
and 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan of Informatica Corporation,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42118) pertaining to the 2000
Employee Stock Incentive Plan of Informatica Corporation, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42112) pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Option
Plan of Influence Software, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-42110) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of Informatica Corporation, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-54614) pertaining to the Zimba 1999 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-66754) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Informatica Corporation, the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-51754) and the related prospectus of
Informatica Corporation for the registration of 664,276 shares of its common
stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-42120) and the related
prospectus of Informatica Corporation for the registration of 1,299,084 shares
of its common stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45304) and
the related Prospectus of Informatica Corporation for the registration of
2,875,000 shares of its common stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-51754) and the related Prospectus of Informatica Corporation for the
registration of 191,992 shares of its common stock, the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-66752) and the related Prospectus of Informatica
Corporation for the registration of 49,543 shares of its common stock, and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-99627) pertaining to the 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Informatica
Corporation, of our report dated January 20, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Informatica Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP






Palo Alto, California
March 18, 2003
Carl LAWSON, et ux., petitioners, v. BELL SPORTS USA.

No. 18-736.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION I, Alan Bowen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Evolve Oncology,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                      Date: December 15, 2005

                      By: /s/ Alan Bowen
                      ------------------------------------
                      Alan Bowen
                      CFO
                      (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James J. Maguire, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/James J. Maguire

James J. Maguire
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1385

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the financial

limitation on rehabilitation services under part B of the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1999

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal

the financial limitation on rehabilitation services under

part B of the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinstatement of the

5 Medicare Rehabilitation Benefit Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FINANCIAL LIMITATION ON REHABILI7 TATION SERVICES.

8 (a) REPEAL.—
2

•HR 1385 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833 of the Social

2 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l) is amended by strik3 ing subsection (g).

4 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

5 by paragraph (1) shall apply to services furnished on

6 or after January 1, 2000.

7 (b) OFFSETTING PORTION OF ADDITIONAL EXPEND8 ITURES THROUGH PAYMENT REFORM.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

10 provision of law, for outpatient physical therapy

11 services, outpatient occupational therapy services,

12 and outpatient speech-language pathology services

13 covered under title XVIII of the Social Security Act

14 and furnished on or after January 1, 2001, the Sec15 retary of Health and Human Services shall imple16 ment a new payment methodology based on the clas17 sification of individuals by diagnostic category, func18 tional status, and prior use of services in both inpa19 tient and outpatient settings.

20 (2) BUDGET NEUTRALITY IN IMPLEMENTA21 TION.—Such payment methodology shall be designed

22 so that the methodology, taking into account the in23 creased expenditures resulting from the amendment

24 made by subsection (a), does not result in any in25 crease or decrease in the expenditures under title
3

•HR 1385 IH

1 XVIII of the Social Security Act on a fiscal year

2 basis.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David R. Koos


David R. Koos


Chief Executive Officer





Date: May 10, 2011
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION2



Pursuant to Section 906
of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Rick E. Russo, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



/S/    RICK E. RUSSORick E. Russo Chief Financial Officer




Date: May 7, 2004







---

2This Certification accompanies the Periodic Report in accordance with § 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Mitchell B. SWARTZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al.

No. 18-961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1147 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1147

              To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1999

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUNSET OF BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENTS ACT.

    The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286) is hereby repealed 
3 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS.

    Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Treasury shall withdraw the United States from the 
International Monetary Fund, and shall negotiate an agreement on the 
method of settling accounts with the International Monetary Fund.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO THE CONGRESS ON ALTERNATIVES.

    On the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on alternative 
ways of addressing the problems that the International Monetary Fund is 
designed to address, including reliance on the operation of private 
capital markets, merging the International Monetary Fund with the 
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and establishing 
an institution to address such problems in a different manner than the 
International Monetary Fund has addressed such problems.
                                 <all>
```
Zuri Sana Kabisa YOUNG, petitioner, v. M. VOONG, et al.

No. 18-7171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 10.22**

 

**DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS**

**BETWEEN VARIAN, INC. AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

 

Each director (other than the Chairman of the Board) who is not a Company employee is paid an annual retainer fee of $40,000. Each non-employee director(other than the Chairman of the Board) is also paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended and $1,500 for each Board committee meeting attended. The non-employee director who chairs the Audit Committee of the Board is paid an additional annualretainer fee of $15,000. The non-employee directors who chair the Compensation and the Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board are each paid an additional annual retainer fee of $7,500. The non-employee Chairman of the Board is paid anannual retainer fee of $120,000 (in lieu of any other annual cash retainer, committee chair retainer and meeting attendance fees). 

 

Under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not a Company employee receives upon initial appointment or election to the Board anonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and receives annually thereafter (for so long as he or she continues to serve a non-employee director) a nonqualified stock option to acquire 5,000 shares of theCompany’s common stock. In lieu of these grants, the non-employee Chairman of the Board receives upon initial appointment as such a nonqualified stock option to acquire 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. All such stock optionsare granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, are vested and exercisable beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year term. 

 

Under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not aCompany employee is also granted annually (for so long as he or she continues to serve a non-employee director) stock units with an initial value equal to $25,000, based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.The stock units vest and are paid upon termination of the director’s service on the Board of Directors (although the Board may adopt procedures permitting the issuance of such shares to be deferred by a director to a date following thetermination of the director’s service), and are then satisfied by issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock. 

 

Directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the retainer, chairman or meeting fees described above, shares of the Company’s commonstock or stock units based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the fees would have been paid. Stock units vest upon termination of the director’s service on the Board of Directors (although the Board mayadopt procedures permitting the issuance of such shares to be deferred by a director to a date following the termination of the director’s service), and are then satisfied by issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock. 

 

Each director is reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses thatsuch director and his or her spouse incurs attending Board meetings and functions.
Frankie L. McCOY, Sr., petitioner, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden.

No. 16-9109.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 5, 2022.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: April 28, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09506 Filed 4-29-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Extreme Networks, Inc. (the “ Company ”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ JAMES T. JUDSONJames T. JudsonInterim Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 29, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1


# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted September 15, 201 6

Decided September 19, 2016



### Before

R ICHARD A. P OSNER , Circuit Judge

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge

M ICHAEL S. K ANNE , Circuit Judge

No. 16

- 3420

T IMOTHY B ELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

E UGENE M C A DORY , et al. , Defendants

- Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois

.
No. 12

- 3138

- CSB

- DGB Colin S. Bruce
, Judge

.

Order

After Timothy Bell had filed a notice of appeal (No. 15

- 1036), the district court denied a motion to extend the time for appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Bell has filed another notice of appeal, directed to that order.

The only appealable order in this case is the district court’s final decision. Procedural matters such as orders under Rule 4(a)(5) are not separately appealable. Instead they are reviewable in the initia l appeal. The current appeal therefore is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
William J. GOLZ, applicant, v. Benjamin S. CARSON, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

No. 18A692.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Application for stay addressed to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and referred to the Court denied.