alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/10/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      495,637
COMMITMENTS
  42,255   17,472   96,137  339,647  365,026  478,040  478,634   17,597   17,002

CHANGES FROM 08/03/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,583)
  -3,709      861      627   13,084    9,116   10,003   10,605   -2,419   -3,021

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.5      3.5     19.4     68.5     73.6     96.4     96.6      3.6      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      117)
      28       15       37       59       71      104      109
```

----

Updated August 13, 2010
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


GEORGE FOREMAN ENTERPRISES, INC.


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of George Foreman Enterprises, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jeremy AndersonJeremy AndersonChief Financial OfficerAugust 25, 2011
# C_2005217EN.01005101.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/51

---

Action brought on 1 July 2005 by Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, SA against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-251/05)

(2005/C 217/107)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 July 2005 by Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, SA, established in Lisbon, represented by C. Botelho Moniz and E. Maia Cadete, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul decision C(2005)1236 of the Commission of the European Communities of 14 April 2005‘reducing the amount of the assistance granted by the European Social Fund to Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, Lda in accordance with the Commission's Decision C(89) 0570 of 22 March 1989’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul decision C(2005)1236 of the Commission of the European Communities of 14 April 2005‘reducing the amount of the assistance granted by the European Social Fund to Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, Lda in accordance with the Commission's Decision C(89) 0570 of 22 March 1989’;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Infringement of essential procedural requirements in that the Commission's decision procedure does not satisfy the formal requirements and in that insufficient justification is provided for the contested decision;

Infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations, inasmuch as the contested decision is, to the applicant's detriment, at variance with the earlier act attesting to the factual and accounting accuracy of the documents produced by the applicant with its request for payment of the balance certified by it;

Manifest error in the assessment of the documentary evidence of expenditure produced by Mediocurso; and

Infringement of the principle of proportionality, with regard to the grounds of fact and law put forward in support of the reduction of assistance which is the subject-matter of the contested decision.

---
Joseph Lochuch EWALAN, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-6976.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
Manuel Enrique SANTANA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-682.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Paul R. Sinsheimer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



June 5, 2007                     /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
------------                     ---------------------------
Date                             Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000424

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

G K, Petitioner-Appellee, v. MW, Defendant-Appellant, and CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, STATE OF HAWAI # I,

Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(FC-P NO. 16-1-6296)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before August 3, 2020, and September 2, 2020, respectively;

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant MW failed to file either document or request an extension of time;

(3) On March 9, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing MW that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on March 21, 2022, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and MW could request relief from default by motion; and Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000424 13-APR-2022 07:51 AM Dkt. 23 ODSDN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R 

### (4) MW has not taken any further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 13, 2022. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

2
Fidel Rios SOTO, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7202.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Ian Michael HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9157.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      31,358,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,777,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                   729,617
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            55,853,791
<PP&E>                                      19,782,107
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,411,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,788,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,070,255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,838
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,983,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,788,146
<SALES>                                      9,917,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,652,678
<CGS>                                          874,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,916,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,953,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               268,591
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (116,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (44,428)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Dimitrios N. KESARI, aka Dimitri Kesari, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-606.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

This Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Ameriana Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the report.



|                      |  |        |  |                                                              
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen                                         
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Jerome J. Gassen                                             
|                      |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                        
|                      |  |       
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ John J. Letter                                           
|                      |  | Name:  |  | John J. Letter                                               
|                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President  Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, FOR ONSITE ENERGY  CORPORATION,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         585,325
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,690,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                   35,000
<INVENTORY>                                    183,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,760,913
<PP&E>                                         1,284,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,122,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,205,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,462,845
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    699
<COMMON>                                       18,641
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,473,639)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,205,700
<SALES>                                        9,617,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,617,255
<CGS>                                          7,339,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,764,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,623)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (599,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (602,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (602,922)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Jerry A. Weberling, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAF Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: |  | November 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/    JERRY A.
WEBERLING   
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Jerry A. Weberling          
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4

NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

48 N. South Street

Wilmington, OH 45177

November 13, 2008

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: NB&T Financial Group, Inc.  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NB&T Financial Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation
(NBTF), is today filing a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q), as executed on November 13, 2008.

Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, NBTF hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights
of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument represents long-term debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of NBTF and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.



|                           
|---------------------------
|Very truly yours,          
|                           
|/s/ Craig F. Fortin        
|Craig F. Fortin            
|Senior Vice President & CFO
Richard BOOZE, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-7874.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         511,897
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,611,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15,030
<INVENTORY>                                    110,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,500,404
<PP&E>                                         1,818,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                 651,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,967,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,732,236
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    203
<COMMON>                                       15,512
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,798,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,967,713
<SALES>                                        8,994,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,994,035
<CGS>                                          6,819,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,693,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               30,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (744,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   16,675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (760,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (760,771)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)
        


</TABLE>
Beverly Allen BAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5896.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2009  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
Mund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lapis Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
   August
      18, 2009
                  /s/ Harry MundHarry
      MundChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40335 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MITCHELL LYNN NEWTON, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CR-51-1

_______________________________________

November 19, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mitchell Lynn Newton appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine
base in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Newton contends that the di stri ct court erred by enhancing his bas e o ffense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 for reckless endangerment during flight.We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the district court’s

application of § 3C1.2 was not clearly erroneous. Newton, while resisting arrest, “recklessly created

a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person . . . .” when he accelerated his vehicle in reverse toward a police officer. See § 3C1.2.
AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 17, 2016

s1110 

# Order

Clerk November 17, 2016

153492

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153492

COA: 324551

Shiawassee CC: 13

- 004667

- FH

DONALD EBRAHIMI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.