alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J .R . MCFARLANE, D.C. KING, D.A. NORKIN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DRAKE A. STANLEY

LANCE CORPORAL (E

- 3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 20 1400187

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 21 January 2014

. Military Judge: LtCol L.J. Francis, USMC

. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 2nd Battalion

, 7th

Marine Regiment

, 1st Marine Division, Twentynine Palms, CA

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol V.G. Laratta,

USMC

. For Appellant: CAPT Charles Stimson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

30 September 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

----------------------------- ----------------------

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit














NOTE
$50,000,000                                                 June 22, 2018
Cincinnati, Ohio


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ohio, hereby promises to pay to the order of U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (the “Bank”), at its main office in Cincinnati, Ohio, in lawful money of the United States of America in Immediately Available Funds (as such term and each other capitalized term used herein are defined in the Credit Agreement hereinafter referred to) on the Termination Date the principal amount of FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS ($50,000,000) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Revolving Loans made by the Bank under the Credit Agreement, and to pay interest (computed on the basis of actual days elapsed and a year of 360 days) in like funds on the unpaid principal amount hereof from time to time outstanding at the rates and times set forth in the Credit Agreement.
This note is the Note referred to in the Credit Agreement dated May 18, 2016 entered into by and between the undersigned and the Bank, as amended by a First Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of June 15, 2017, a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of May 17, 2018, and a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of June 22, 2018 (as so amended, and as the same may hereafter be from time to time amended, restated or otherwise modified, the “Credit Agreement”).  The maturity of this note is subject to acceleration upon the terms provided in said Credit Agreement.  
Effective as of the date of this note, this note amends and replaces in its entirety and restates  the promissory note of the Borrower to the Bank dated May 18, 2016 in the principal amount of $10,000,000 (the “Existing Note”).  The terms and conditions of this note supersede, effective as of the date of this note, the terms and conditions of the Existing Note, provided, however, that the obligations incurred under the Existing Note shall continue under this note, and shall not in any circumstance be terminated, extinguished or discharged hereby but shall hereafter be governed by the terms of this note.
In the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.  The undersigned waives demand, presentment, notice of nonpayment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor.
THE VALIDITY, CONSTRUCTION AND ENFORCEABILITY OF THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.
PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION


By:  /s/ Brady T. Burt    
Name:  Brady T. Burt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron Markovitz,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                  13, 2007
            
            /s/
                      Miron MarkovitzMiron
                      MarkovitzChief
                      Financial Officer
Rosenthal



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00206

- CV

PMSALS 1, LLC, Appellant

v.

ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER LLP and Jonathan Starr, Appellee s

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 17620 Honorable Olin B. Strauss, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record

has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the t ime provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


GEORGE FOREMAN ENTERPRISES, INC.


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of George Foreman Enterprises, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeremy AndersonJeremy AndersonChief Financial OfficerAugust 25, 2011
Michael VECHERY, petitioner, v. Florence COTTET-MOINE.

No. 17-790.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Julian OKEAYAINNEH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7116.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Maggae Jo JACKSON, petitioner, v. Benita Y. PEARSON, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

No. 17-5211.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/04/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      549,164
COMMITMENTS
  37,117   14,129  113,093  375,584  400,241  525,794  527,463   23,370   21,701

CHANGES FROM 04/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,870)
   3,946    1,001   -3,450   17,683   21,386   18,179   18,937    2,691    1,933

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.8      2.6     20.6     68.4     72.9     95.7     96.0      4.3      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      108)
      22       15       33       61       68       98      103
```

----

Updated May 7, 2010
Chad HANSMEIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7175.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
William Anthony JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 10.32


                         Schedule of additional Warrants
        Issued in Connection with Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       No. of Shares
Date of             Name of Warrant                     Warrant        of Common            Exercise       Expiration
Issuance            Recipient                           No.            Stock                Price          Date
--------            ---------------                     -------        -------------        --------       ----------
<S>                <C>                                 <C>            <C>                  <C>            <C>
7/13/99             Progressive Group                   C-2            150,000              $3.00          7/13/2004
11/12/99            The Shaar Fund, Ltd.                C-1b           100,000              $3.00          7/13/2004
11/12/99            The Shaar Fund, Ltd.                C-3            200,000              $2.00          7/13/2004

</TABLE>
Susan Ann FISHER, petitioner, v. MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, et al.

No. 17-16.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Clinton Mack REID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6970.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-60286,  333-77219,  333-30464,  333-42964,
333-89464 and 333-104468) of Net Perceptions, Inc. of our report dated March 29,
2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March  31, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, John F. Craven, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986, 33-8618 and 33-8760];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ JOHN F. CRAVEN John F. Craven Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)


Date: November 14, 2007
Diwone A. WALLACE, petitioner, v. Michael MELVIN, Warden.

No. 17-6936.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Deborah Elizabeth GOUCH-ONASSIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5375.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50544 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ROYSHENA HOLT , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:17

- CR

- 21

- 1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Royshena Holt pleaded guilty to failing to surrender for service of a federal prison sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(2). She was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to 21 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised releas e. Holt argues that her sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50544 Document: 00514374585 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2018No. 17

- 50544

2 nature and circumstances of the offense. She contends that her attempt to self

surrender to law enforcement received insufficient weight and warranted a
more lenient sentence. Because Holt did not object to the reasonableness of her sentence, we review for plain error only. United States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391

- 92 (5th Cir. 2007)

. To show plain error, Holt must show a forfeited error t hat is clear or obvious and that also affects her substantial rights. Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If she makes such a showing, this court has discretion to correct the error only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity,

or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.
The record reflects that the district court considered all of the mitigating factors and ar guments for leniency but concluded that a within

- guidelines sentence was appropriate under the circumstances and in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Rodriguez , 523 F.3d 519, 525 (5th Cir. 2008)

. Holt has not shown that the district court committed substantive error, plain or otherwise, in determining her sentence. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50544 Document: 00514374585 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2018
# C_2017104EN.01004402.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Jaguar Land Rover v EUIPO — Nissan Jidosha (Land Glider)

(Case T-71/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Land Glider - Earlier EU and national word and figurative marks LAND ROVER - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 104/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Ingerl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Garrido Otaola, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nissan Jidosha KK (Yokohama, Japan) (A. Franke, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 December 2014 (Case R 1415/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Jaguar Land Rover and Nissan Jidosha.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 December 2014 (Case R 1415/2013-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 December 2014 (Case R 1415/2013-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Jaguar Land Rover Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Jaguar Land Rover Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Nissan Jidosha KK to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Nissan Jidosha KK to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
<PAGE>



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond Hill Investment
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.H. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                    /S/ R.H. Dillon
                                    ---------------------------------------

                                    Print Name:  R.H. Dillon

                                    Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                    Date:  November 7, 2002
Victor LEJI, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.

No. 16-9175.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Jose Joaquin RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-7058.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
George KING, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 17-6965.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

*749Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09277]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4628-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4628-DR), dated October 26, 
2021, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on March 12, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Gerard M. 
Stolar, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Catharine O. Fan as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-09277 Filed 4-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Jesus GARCIA-ACOSTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6761.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.