alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Summer Research Education R25 and DSR Member Conflict SEP.                    

*Date:*                         June 17, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Aiwu Cheng, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *Aiwu.cheng@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 18, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-08522 Filed 4-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08764]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's ad hoc Committee on Elections hereby 
gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction 
of National Science Board business, pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: April 26, 2022, from 4:00-4:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Committee Chair's opening remarks; discussion 
of additional information proposed for the Board book associated with 
the Chair and Vice Chair elections related to Board members who are 
eligible for reappointment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Andrea Rambow, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4f5c4f434c41596e405d4800494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8aebf8ebe7e8e5fdcae4f9eca4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>, 703-292-7000. You may find meeting 
updates at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/index.jsp#up.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-08764 Filed 4-20-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jose MORENO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-6726.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David KEELEY, petitioner, v. David W. GRAY, Warden.

No. 17-6165.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4495 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through 

the Director of the Indian Health Service, to acquire private land to 

facilitate access to the Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, 

California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. AGUILAR, and Mr. COOK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

acting through the Director of the Indian Health Service, 

to acquire private land to facilitate access to the Desert 

Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, California, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCESS ROAD FOR DESERT SAGE YOUTH 

4 WELLNESS CENTER. 

5 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4495 IH

1 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of Health 

2 and Human Services, acting through the Director of 

3 the Indian Health Service, is authorized to acquire, 

4 from willing sellers, the land in Hemet, California, 

5 upon which is located a dirt road known as ‘‘Best 

6 Road’’, beginning at the driveway of the Desert Sage 

7 Youth Wellness Center at Faure Road and extending 

8 to the junction of Best Road and Sage Road. 

9 (2) COMPENSATION.—The Secretary shall pay 

10 fair market value for the land authorized to be ac11 quired under paragraph (1). Fair market value shall 

12 be determined— 

13 (A) using Uniform Appraisal Standards 

14 for Federal Land Acquisitions; and 

15 (B) by an appraiser acceptable to the Sec16 retary and the owners of the land to be ac17 quired. 

18 (3) ADDITIONAL RIGHTS.—In addition to the 

19 land referred to in paragraph (1), the Secretary is 

20 authorized to acquire, from willing sellers, land or 

21 interests in land as reasonably necessary to con22 struct and maintain the road as required by sub23 section (b). 

24 (b) CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ROAD.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4495 IH

1 (1) CONSTRUCTION.—After the Secretary ac2 quires the land pursuant to subsection (a), the Sec3 retary shall construct on that land a paved road that 

4 is generally located over Best Road to facilitate ac5 cess to the Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in 

6 Hemet, California. 

7 (2) MAINTENANCE.—The Secretary— 

8 (A) shall maintain and manage the road 

9 constructed pursuant to paragraph (1); or 

10 (B) enter into an agreement with Riverside 

11 County, California, to own, maintain and man12 age the road constructed pursuant to paragraph 

13 (1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Sievert Daydrill RUNNING CRANE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6112.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HENDRI PHANG,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 71371

Agency No. A095

- 025

- 161

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 26, 2016 **

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Hendri Phang, a native and citizen of In donesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the BIA’ s denial of a motion to reopen, Najma badi v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 4 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71371

Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Phang’s untimely motion to

reopen because he failed to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought

.

Se e To ufighi v. Mukasey , 538 F.3d 988, 996

- 97 (9th Cir. 2008) ( evidence must

establish prima facie eligibility for relief sought)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                    PAMRAPO BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                -----------------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                              March 31, 1999
                                                            ------------------
<S>                                                         <C> 
Net income                                                      $ 1,089,707
                                                                ===========

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted           2,842,924
                                                                ===========
 
Basic and diluted earnings per share                            $      0.38 
                                                                ===========
</TABLE>

                                      -18-
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

 

**CONSENT OF**

**PKF BEDRIJFSREVISOREN, ANTWERP, BELGIUM**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Remedent, Inc.

Xavier de Cocklaan 42

9831 Deurle, Belgium

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to Remedent, Inc.’s 2004 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of our report dated July 13, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Remedent, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended March 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Antwerp, Belgium

July 13, 2006

 

PKF bedrijfsrevisoren

Registered Auditors

Represented by

 

/s/ Ria Verheyen

 

Ria Verheyen

Registered Auditor
Arthur L. VITASEK, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-6473.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Willie YOUNGBLOOD, petitioner, v. Sherry BURT, Warden.

No. 17-6935.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Thomas Earl JONES, petitioner, v. WILBERT BURIAL VAULT, INC., et al.

No. 17-6457.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,835,696
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          32,525
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            14,337,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,592,872
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,681,360
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,588,722
<LOANS>                                     86,222,103
<ALLOWANCE>                                    877,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,821,893
<DEPOSITS>                                 112,719,578
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            438,239
<LONG-TERM>                                    213,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,051,441
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,399,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             123,821,893
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,003,836
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              513,597
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               498,618
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,016,051
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,959,208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,972,159
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,043,892
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  273,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,014,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,436,012
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,436,012
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   932,151
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.19
<LOANS-NON>                                    414,638
<LOANS-PAST>                                   872,801
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               769,410
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  227,225
<RECOVERIES>                                    61,946
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              877,531
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           877,531
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

In connection with the Annual Report of MPAC Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

We have reviewed the Report;

based on our knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; and

based on our knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated this 16rd day of February, 2005

/s/ David Uppal                               David Uppal                               
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ David Uppal                        David Uppal
Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,895,777
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,800,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,994,677
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     123,677,107
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       125,799,000
<LOANS>                                    230,272,187
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,369,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             397,215,627
<DEPOSITS>                                 314,592,478
<SHORT-TERM>                                23,841,065
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          9,321,327
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,426,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             397,215,627
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,404,315
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            6,308,878
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               847,018
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            21,560,211
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,454,650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,161,326
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,398,885
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  225,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,017,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,160,771
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,160,771
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,286,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.32
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,180,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   865,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,717,871
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,475,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  342,969
<RECOVERIES>                                    12,473
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,369,504
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           503,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,866,504
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7159
In Re: RAYMOND OUTLER, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-99-213-5) Submitted: August 14, 2001 Decided: September 20, 2001 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Outler, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Outler filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to appoint him counsel and hold an evidentiary hearing in regards to his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). A magistrate judge filed findings and a recommendation on November 7, 2000, but the district court has taken no action since that time. The body of Outler's mandamus petition leads us to construe it as also requesting that we compel the district court to act on the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987) (citing Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct. , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976)).We decline to exercise our supervisory power to take the extraordinary action of issuing a writ of mandamus in this case. Therefore, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to Outler’s right to file another mandamus petition if the district court does not act within a reasonable time. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
----

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

  

In connection with the Annual Reportof Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSBfor the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Lee, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that tomy knowledge: 

  

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

  

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

  

***/s/ Robert Lee           ***

Robert Lee

President

Date:        March 21, 2005

----
Domonick Blair GRANT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6264.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Antonio Jermaine MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6941.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 24 - 0344 GERALD A. UNRUH, MICHAL L. UNRUH, Plaintiff - Appellees

- vs URBAN LIFESTYLE 10 LLC, a Washington State limited liability company, Defendant - Appellant **ORDER GRANTING**  **SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION**  **OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT OPENING** 

**BRIEF**

Pursuant to Mont.R.App.P. 26(2), Appellants have moved this Court for a 28 - day extension of

time. Having reviewed the motion and the declaration attached thereto, **IT IS HEREBY ORDERED** that the Court determines that Appellants have shown that diligence and substantial need warrant the requested extension and **GRANTS** Appellant’s motion. A ppellants are granted a 28 - day extension of time up to and including September 6, 2024, to file their opening brief. **ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.**
Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 5 2024

08/05/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0344