alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Standard Management Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael B. EdwardsMichael B. EdwardsChief Financial Officer
James Brown MADISON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17M61.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          22,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,178
<INVENTORY>                                    333,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               521,800
<PP&E>                                         280,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 998,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,244
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                     450,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   998,037
<SALES>                                        471,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               474,445
<CGS>                                          237,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               311,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (105,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,554
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (80,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (80,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.49)


</TABLE>
Betty FLOYD, petitioner, v. GLENN GARDENS ASSOCIATES, et al.

No. 17-5231.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, IAN HERMAN, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Renegade Venture
     (NEV.) Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.



Date: August 17, 2004


/s/  Ian Herman
-----------------------------------
     Ian Herman,
     Principal Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2363

___________________________

Steven E. Hill

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

C.V. Rivera, Warden

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: May 15, 2018

Filed: May 29, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Steven E. Hill appeals after the district court dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms in part,

vacates in part, and remands the case for further proceedings.
Hill is a federal inmate who was tried and convicted on several charges in a

military court-martial. Upon de novo review, the judgment is affirmed as to Hill’s

claimof insufficient evidence to support his conviction. See Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders,

590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir. 2010), Allen v. U.S. Air Force, 603 F.3d 423, 431 (8th

Cir. 2010) (“it is not our duty to stand in the stead of the military courts to reexamine

and weigh each item of evidence of the occurrence of events which tend to prove or

disprove one of the allegations in the application for relief” (internal quotation marks

omitted)). The judgment also is affirmed to the extent Hill argued that the military

court-martial lacked jurisdiction solely due to his break in military service. See 10

U.S.C. § 803(a) (subject to statute of limitations, person who is in a status in which

person is subject to Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and who committed

offense against UCMJ while formerly in statusin which person wassubject to UCMJ

is not relieved from amenability to UCMJ jurisdiction for that offense by reason of

termination of that person’s former status). 

To the extent Hill asserted an argument based on the applicable statute of

limitations, the judgment is vacated and the matter isremanded for the parties and the

district court to reconsider this case in light of United States v. Mangahas, 77 M.J.

220 (C.A.A.F. 2018).

______________________________

-2-
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4436 

To authorize a National Poverty Research Center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2019 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Ms. NORTON, and Ms. JAYAPAL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To authorize a National Poverty Research Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Poverty Re5 search Center Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL POVERTY RESEARCH CENTER. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Health and 

8 Human Services shall award, every 5 years, one or more 

9 5-year grants or cooperative agreements with institutions 

10 of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the 

11 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) to 

12 operate one or more National Poverty Research Centers. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4436 IH

1 (b) RESEARCH.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—National Poverty Research 

3 Centers shall perform poverty policy research, pov4 erty policy research training, and poverty policy re5 search dissemination. 

6 (2) COLLABORATION.—National Poverty Re7 search Centers shall coordinate formal networks in 

8 order to facilitate a sustainable, nationwide infra9 structure of poverty policy researchers and to better 

10 inform public policies that seek to reduce poverty 

11 and its effects in the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/23/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      142,712
COMMITMENTS
  38,403   25,248   18,262   69,201   73,719  125,866  117,229   16,846   25,483

CHANGES FROM 02/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,966)
     339     -329     -956   -1,780     -721   -2,397   -2,006   -2,569   -2,960

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.9     17.7     12.8     48.5     51.7     88.2     82.1     11.8     17.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      160)
      43       27       40       57       62      122      119
```

----

Updated February 26, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4246 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4246

 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to clarify the venue for judicial 
          review of Commission rules, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2019

 Mrs. Kirkpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to clarify the venue for judicial 
          review of Commission rules, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF COMMISSION RULES.

    The Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 24. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF COMMISSION RULES.

    ``(a) A person adversely affected by a rule of the Commission 
promulgated under this Act may obtain review of the rule in the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or the 
United States Court of Appeals for the circuit where the party resides 
or has the principal place of business, by filing in the court, within 
60 days after publication in the Federal Register of the entry of the 
rule, a written petition requesting that the rule be set aside.
    ``(b) A copy of the petition shall be transmitted forthwith by the 
clerk of the court to an officer designated by the Commission for that 
purpose. Thereupon the Commission shall file in the court the record on 
which the rule complained of is entered, as provided in section 2112 of 
title 28, United States Code, and the Federal Rules of Appellate 
Procedure.
    ``(c) On the filing of the petition, the court has jurisdiction, 
which becomes exclusive on the filing of the record, to affirm and 
enforce or to set aside the rule in whole or in part.
    ``(d) The court shall affirm and enforce the rule unless the 
Commission's action in promulgating the rule is found to be arbitrary, 
capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with 
law; contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; 
in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or 
short of statutory right; or without observance of procedure required 
by law.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0228

IN THE MATTER OF:

J.G.F.,

A Youth Under the Age of 18.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 4 2022

11/04/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0228
Carlos GILCHRIST, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5063.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Marvin RIDEOUT, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-6525.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    130,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               469,005
<PP&E>                                         628,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                 276,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,107,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          961,945
<BONDS>                                        661,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,647,670
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,176,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,033,071
<SALES>                                        654,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               654,648
<CGS>                                          409,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  635,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        


</TABLE>
Alfred MEANS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-6866.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF JANUARY 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                            4297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   507059
<ALLOWANCES>                                      9008
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  503214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4921
<OTHER-SE>                                       93810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    503214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9926
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<FN>
<F1>THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDE A NONCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/14/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       63,023
COMMITMENTS
  22,239    2,255    4,685   22,829   40,292   49,753   47,232   13,270   15,791

CHANGES FROM 09/07/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,310)
     784     -165      128      884      919    1,796      882      514    1,428

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    35.3      3.6      7.4     36.2     63.9     78.9     74.9     21.1     25.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      31        7       15       30       26       64       46
```

----

Updated September 17, 2010
John L. CORRIGAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-622.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Majestic ZULU, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5934.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Landrail M. DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6341.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.