alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TECHNOLOGY INC. December 31, 1999 Form 10-KA2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         26,846
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,719
<PP&E>                                         15,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 68,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         363,692
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      168,184
<OTHER-SE>                                  (463,712)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   68,164
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,726,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            405,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (5,132,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (5,132,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (5,132,140)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.32)



</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/05/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,325
COMMITMENTS
   9,431    2,751    8,728   19,679   23,095   37,838   34,574    8,487   11,751

CHANGES FROM 12/29/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -220)
     566     -750       31       93    1,508      690      789     -910   -1,009

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.4      5.9     18.8     42.5     49.9     81.7     74.6     18.3     25.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       57)
      10       10       17       22       20       43       44
```

----

Updated January 8, 2010
Alfredo TAPIA, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5802.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           200227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1419
<OTHER-SE>                                     (201646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (8667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (8667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 5, 2019

t0529

Order 

Clerk

June 5, 2019

157417

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157417

COA: 334063

Wayne CC: 15-007041-FC

FRANKLYN DIMUN GARRISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County 

Prosecuting Attorney to answer Issue VI in the application for leave to appeal within 28 

days after the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4566 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4566

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
   for the relief of the families of victims of the mass shooting in 
               Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2019

  Mrs. Luria (for herself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Connolly, Mr. McEachin, Mr. 
 Riggleman, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. Spanberger, Ms. Wexton, and Mr. 
   Wittman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
   for the relief of the families of victims of the mass shooting in 
               Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Virginia Beach Strong Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF THE FAMILIES OF 
              THE MASS SHOOTING IN VIRGINIA BEACH.

    (a) Clarification That Contribution Will Not Fail To Qualify as a 
Charitable Contribution.--A cash contribution made for the relief of 
the families of the dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in 
Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, shall not fail to be treated 
as a charitable contribution for purposes of section 170 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 merely because such contribution is for 
the exclusive benefit of such families. The preceding sentence shall 
apply to contributions made on or after May 31, 2019.
    (b) Clarification That Payments by Charitable Organizations to 
Families Treated as Exempt Payments.--For purposes of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, payments made on or after May 31, 2019, and on or 
before June 1, 2021, to the spouse or any dependent (as defined in 
section 152 of such Code) of the dead or wounded victims of the mass 
shooting in Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, by an 
organization which (determined without regard to any such payments) 
would be an organization exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such 
Code shall--
            (1) be treated as related to the purpose or function 
        constituting the basis for such organization's exemption under 
        such section; and
            (2) shall not be treated as inuring to the benefit of any 
        private individual,
if such payments are made in good faith using a reasonable and 
objective formula which is consistently applied with respect to such 
victims.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      99.1**




**Certification**





I,
      Duncan Copeland, certify that:





1.  I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Northcore Technologies
      Inc.





2.  Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report.





Dated:  August
                20, 2007
            /s/
                Duncan CopelandDuncan
                CopelandChief
                Executive Officer










6
Ivan GOODLOW, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-8915.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Ernesto BENAVIDES, Jr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5670.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Presidential Documents

23419 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 76 

Wednesday, April 20, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of April 13, 2022 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 621 of the Foreign 

Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State 

the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown 

of up to an aggregate value of $800 million in defense articles and services 

of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, to provide 

assistance to Ukraine and to make the determinations required under such 

section to direct such a drawdown. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, April 13, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–08536 

Filed 4–19–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOCBIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 12, 2007


                          /s/ John B. Sawyer
                          ------------------------------
                          John B. Sawyer
                          Chief Operating Officer
                          (Principal Operating Officer)
Charles B. DOUGLAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6619.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4394 

To prohibit Federal funds from being used to violate the terms of the 

Flores settlement agreement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2019 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. 

CORREA, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. JUDY

CHU of California, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being used to violate the 

terms of the Flores settlement agreement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Flores 

5 Agreement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLORES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 

7 No Federal funds may be used to violate the terms 

8 of the stipulated settlement agreement filed on January 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4394 IH

1 17, 1997, in the United States District Court for the Cen2 tral District of California in Flores v. Reno, CV 85–4544– 

3 RJK, (commonly known as the ‘‘Flores settlement agree4 ment’’). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Jerome WILLIAMS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6334.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4275 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
 Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION PROGRAM 
              REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Review of Comprehensive Management Plan.--Section 121 of the 
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) ensure that the comprehensive conservation and 
        management plan approved for the Basin under section 320 is 
        reviewed and revised in accordance with section 320 not less 
        often than once every 5 years, beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``recommended by a 
        management conference convened for the Basin under section 
        320'' and inserting ``identified in the comprehensive 
        conservation and management plan approved for the Basin under 
        section 320''.
    (b) Definitions.--Section 121(e)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(e)(1)) is amended by striking ``, a 5,000 
square mile''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 121(f) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2001 through 2012 and 
        the amount appropriated for fiscal year 2009 for each of fiscal 
        years 2013 through 2017'' and inserting ``2021 through 2025''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Administrative expenses.--The Administrator may use 
        for administrative expenses not more than 5 percent of the 
        amounts appropriated to carry out this section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
 Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program, and for other purposes.
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4490 

To require the Inspector General, Department of Justice, to submit a report 

to the Congress on the number of firearm transaction denials issued 

by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System that are 

referred to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives 

for investigation, the number of prosecutions resulting from such investigations, and the number of firearms recovered by the Bureau in cases 

in which such a denial was issued after the firearm was transferred. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Inspector General, Department of Justice, 

to submit a report to the Congress on the number of 

firearm transaction denials issued by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System that are referred to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 

Explosives for investigation, the number of prosecutions 

resulting from such investigations, and the number of 

firearms recovered by the Bureau in cases in which such 

a denial was issued after the firearm was transferred. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4490 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPORT ON FIREARM TRANSFERS DENIED AS 

2 A RESULT OF A NICS CHECK. 

3 Within 90 days after the date of the enactment of 

4 this Act, the Inspector General, Department of Justice, 

5 shall prepare and submit to the Congress a written re6 port— 

7 (1) on the number of firearm transactions with 

8 respect to which the national instant criminal back9 ground check system established under the Brady 

10 Handgun Violence Prevention Act has determined 

11 that receipt of a firearm by the prospective firearm 

12 transferee would violate Federal or State law, and 

13 which have been referred to the Bureau of Alcohol, 

14 Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives for investigation; 

15 (2) on the number of persons prosecuted by a 

16 United States attorney for an alleged violation of 

17 Federal law in connection with a transaction re18 ferred to in paragraph (1); and 

19 (3) assessing the efforts of the Bureau to seize 

20 firearms received by persons— 

21 (A) with respect to whom the system re22 ferred to in paragraph (1) of this section was 

23 contacted pursuant to section 922(t) of title 18, 

24 United States Code, in relation to a firearm 

25 transaction; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4490 IH

1 (B) to whom a firearm was transferred 

2 after the 3-day period described in section 

3 922(t)(1)(B)(ii) of such title that applied with 

4 respect to the transaction; and 

5 (C) with respect to whom the system re6 ferred to in paragraph (1) of this section subse7 quently made the determination described in 

8 such paragraph. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Kimberly Michelle SHEPARD, petitioner, v. FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION.

No. 17-493.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
#### Edward Roney, *Appellant,*v. Miami Bank & Trust Company, a Corporation, as Trustee, and O. O. Ziegler and Emma C. Ziegler, his wife, *Appellees.*

Division A.

Decision filed March 30, 1929.

*Snedigar, Miller, McKay <& Baya,*for Appellant;

*McCaskill, Taylor <& McCaskill,*for Appellees-.

*398Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.