alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012076EN.01003401.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 150/2011

of 2 December 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2010/9139/EU of 20 December 2010 amending Commission Decision 2010/774/EU of 13 April 2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security containing information as referred to in point (a) of Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2010/9139/EU of 20 December 2010 amending Commission Decision 2010/774/EU of 13 April 2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security containing information as referred to in point (a) of Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66hf (Commission Decision C(2010) 774 final) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 D 9139: Commission Decision 2010/9139/EU of 20 December 2010 amending Commission Decision 2010/774/EU of 13 April 2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security containing information as referred to in point (a) of Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 D 9139: Commission Decision 2010/9139/EU of 20 December 2010 amending Commission Decision 2010/774/EU of 13 April 2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security containing information as referred to in point (a) of Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2011, p. 85.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Sergio MIRANDA, petitioner, v. Allan Huber SELIG, Bud, et al.

No. 17-453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3

          RATIO OF EBITDA (AS DEFINED) TO INTEREST EXPENSE (AS DEFINED)

                                   1996      1997      1998      1999      2000

EBITDA (as defined)             $17,213   $24,522   $43,547   $50,562   $54,011
Interest expense (as defined)     4,510     3,463     3,175    20,722    25,924
                                -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Ratio                               3.8       7.1      13.7       2.4       2.1
                                =======   =======   =======   =======   =======


                                      iii
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/27/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      528,294
COMMITMENTS
  33,171   13,128  116,543  357,901  378,855  507,615  508,526   20,679   19,768

CHANGES FROM 04/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,543)
  -4,338   -3,822   16,431   14,905   15,206   26,998   27,815      545     -272

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.3      2.5     22.1     67.7     71.7     96.1     96.3      3.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      113)
      22       20       37       60       64      103      104
```

----

Updated April 30, 2010
Ronald Bruce MYERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Michael A. BRUZZONE, petitioner, v. INTEL CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-6008.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.2
APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES USED IN CALCULATION (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                Year Ended
                                                                            December 31, 2000
                                                                          -------------------
<S>                                                                                 <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
        Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                  21,413,362
        Weighted average shares issued during the year
        ended December 31, 2000 (4,573,585 shares)                                  2,866,712
                                                                                 ------------
                                                                                   24,280,074
                                                                                 ------------
Net loss available to common stockholders                                        ($52,633,000)
                                                                                 ============
Basic and diluted loss per common share                                                ($2.17)
                                                                                 ============
</TABLE>



(1)     For a description of basic and diluted loss per share, See Note B of the
        Notes to the Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this
        Form 10-K.


                                       95
SEALED APPELLANT, petitioner, v. SEALED APPELLEE.

No. 17M69.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4439

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to make permanent the 
   authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric 
                               diseases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2019

  Mr. Butterfield (for himself, Mr. McCaul, Ms. Speier, Mr. Kelly of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Engel, Mr. Bilirakis, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. 
Hudson, Mr. Rush, and Mr. Mullin) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to make permanent the 
   authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric 
                               diseases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating Hope Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR PERMANENT AUTHORITY TO ISSUE PRIORITY REVIEW 
              VOUCHERS TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS FOR RARE PEDIATRIC 
              DISEASES.

    Section 529(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360ff(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-159804, 333-144384, 333-143410, 333-129987, 333-120295, 333-112070, 333-100228, 333-86436, 333-65986, 333-51408, 333-45634, 333-89653 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-121327 on FormS-3 of our report dated March 25, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Looksmart, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP 

San Francisco, California

March 25, 2010
Mohammed Abdallah OMRAN, petitioner, v. Andrew SCHULMAN.

No. 16-9205.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# Official Journal C 132/30 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 132 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5730 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 132

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5730 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 132/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 32nd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 132/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 32nd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2004106EN.01000802.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 1 April 2004

in Case C-112/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen): Kohlpharma GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
   (1)

Kohlpharma GmbH

Bundesrepublik Deutschland

1

(‘Free movement of goods - Medicinal products - Importation - Application for marketing authorisation under a simplified procedure - Common origin’)

(2004/C 106/12)

Language of the case. German

In Case C-112/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Higher Regional Court for the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Kohlpharma GmbH and Bundesrepublik Deutschland – on the interpretation of Community law, in particular Articles 28 EC and 30 EC – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the Sixth Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and F. Macken, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; H.A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 April 2004, in which it ruled:

Kohlpharma GmbH

Bundesrepublik Deutschland

In the case where

| an application for a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product is submitted with reference to a medicinal product that has already been authorised, |
| --- |

an application for a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product is submitted with reference to a medicinal product that has already been authorised,

| the medicinal product which is the subject of the application is imported from a Member State in which it has obtained a marketing authorisation, |
| --- |

the medicinal product which is the subject of the application is imported from a Member State in which it has obtained a marketing authorisation,

| the assessment of safety and efficacy carried out for the medicinal product which is already authorised can be used in the application for a marketing authorisation for the second medicinal product without any risk to public health, |
| --- |

the assessment of safety and efficacy carried out for the medicinal product which is already authorised can be used in the application for a marketing authorisation for the second medicinal product without any risk to public health,

Articles 28 EC and 30 EC preclude the application being rejected solely on the ground that the two medicinal products do not have a common origin.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 29.6.2002.

1

---
Chad Wallace BROWN, aka Chad Johnson, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6993.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. (the Company)
on Form [10-Q] for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief:  1) the  Periodic Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

|/s/  DONALD L UNGER                                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                                                                   | 
|Donald L. Unger President & Chief Executive Officer                | 
|                                                                   | 
|                                                                   | 
|/s/ FREDERICK A. BOARD                                             | 
|                                                                   | 
|Frederick A. Board Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | 
|                                                                   | 
|                                                                   | 
|Date:  November 14, 2002                                          
|                                                                   | 
|                                                                   |
Billy R. MELOT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9687.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

*492Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Genesis HILL, petitioner, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden.

No. 16-9016.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24593-24594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09013]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, May 5, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.; Thursday, May 5, 
2022, at 4:00 p.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza SW, in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: Thursday, May 5, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.--Closed. Thursday, May 5, 
2022, at 4:00 p.m.--Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Thursday, May 5, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial and Operational Matters.
    3. Personnel Matters.
    4. Executive Session.
    5. Administrative Items.

Thursday, May 5, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. (Open)

    1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board of Governors.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.

[[Page 24594]]

    3. Approval of the Minutes.
    4. Committee Reports.
    5. Quarterly Financial Report.
    6. Quarterly Service Performance Report.
    7. Approval of Tentative Agenda for August 9 Meeting.
    A public comment period will begin immediately following the 
adjournment of the open session on May 5, 2022. During the public 
comment period, which shall not exceed 45 minutes, members of the 
public may comment on any item or subject listed on the agenda for the 
open session above. Additionally, the public will be given the option 
to join the public comment session and participate via teleconference. 
Registration of speakers at the public comment period is required. 
Should you wish to participate via teleconference, you will be required 
to give your first and last name, a valid email address to send an 
invite and a phone number to reach you should a technical issue arise. 
Speakers may register online at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/bog-05-05-2022. No more than three minutes shall be allotted to each speaker. 
The time allotted to each speaker will be determined after registration 
closes. Registration for the public comment period, either in person or 
via teleconference, will end on May 3 at 5 p.m. ET. Participation in 
the public comment period is governed by 39 CFR 232.1(n).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Elston, Secretary of 
the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, 
Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09013 Filed 4-22-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Jerry L. CARY, Sr., petitioner, v. Eddie L. PEARSON, Warden.

No. 17-6958.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4465 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 

local educational agencies to use certain grant funds provided through 

the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program for school security measures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to allow local educational agencies to use certain 

grant funds provided through the Student Support and 

Academic Enrichment Program for school security measures, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhance School Safety 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4465 IH

1 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

2 It is the sense of Congress that giving local edu3 cational agencies the choice to use certain grant funds, 

4 provided through the Student Support and Academic En5 richment Program, for school security measures achieves 

6 the goals of providing all students with access to a well7 rounded education, improving school conditions for stu8 dent learning and safety, and ensuring a safe learning en9 vironment. 

10 SEC. 3. ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT SAFE AND HEALTHY STU11 DENTS. 

12 Section 4108(5) of the Elementary and Secondary 

13 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7118(5)) is amended— 

14 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

15 the end; 

16 (2) in subparagraph (I), by striking the period 

17 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(J) the purchase and use of school secu20 rity measures, including security cameras and 

21 metal detectors.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Lance Deon HAWES, petitioner, v. Jack PALMER, Warden, et al.

No. 17-6437.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interland, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel J. Kocher,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2004

                                               /s/ Joel J. Kocher
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Joel J. Kocher
                                               Chairman of the Board, President,
                                               and Chief Executive Officer

                                       33