alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      20,461,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,387,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,374,833
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,258,893
<PP&E>                                      15,249,741
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,510,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,741,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,271,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       116,467
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,431,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,741,928
<SALES>                                     15,326,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,928,469
<CGS>                                        1,355,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,053,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,146,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               426,717
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,085,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,327,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,757,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,757,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<FN>
<F1>This amount is reported as EPS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. C HARLES R

AY M OORE, Jr., a .k.a . C .K. M o, a .k.a . Lil M o, a .k.a . M o, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-50332

D.C . No. 2:11-c r-00410-PSG M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutierre z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

April 7, 2014 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , GR AB ER , a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. C ha rle s R ay M oore , Jr., a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 180-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for c o nspira c y

to distribute

c oc a ine ba se in theform

of c ra c k c o c a i ne , in viola tion 

# FIL ED APR 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).of 21 U.S.C . § 846; a nd distribution of c oc a i ne ba se in theform of c ra c k c oc a ine , in viola tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B )(iii). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a n d we a ffirm . M oore c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt viola

te d Fe de ra l R

ule of C rim ina l Proc e d ure 32(i)(3)(B ) by

fa iling to make findings re g arding a fa c tua l disputetha

t M oore ra ise d for the first tim e during these nte nc ing he aring. W e re vie wthe distric t c o urt’ s c o m

plia nc e with R

ule 32 for pla in e rror. Se eUnite d State s v . C hriste nse n , 732 F.3d 1094, 1101 (9th C ir. 2013). W e ne e d not de c i de whe the r M oore ’ s ora l obje c tion wa s suffic ie nt to trigger the distric t c ourt’ s obliga t ion unde r R ule 32(i)(3)(B ), or whe the r the c ourt m e t a ny obliga tion tha t it ha d unde r that provision by

a dopting the

pre se nte nc e re port, be c a

use M oore ha s not shown a re a s ona ble proba bility tha t he would ha

ve re c e ive d a

diffe re nt se nte nc e a

bse nt the a lle ge d e rror. Se eid. at 1101-02. M oore a lso c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d proc e dura lly by fa iling to c onside r his m itiga

ting a rgum e nts a

nd e xpla in these nte nc e a de quate ly . W e re vie w for pla in e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a

nd find none . The re c ord shows tha t the distric t c ourt he ard M oore ’ s m itiga tion a rgum e nts a

nd suffic ie ntly

e xpla ine d the be low-Guide line s se nte nc e . Se eRita v . Unite d State

s , 551 U.S. 338, 358-59 (2007). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 5 0 3 3 2 2
EXHIBIT 10.16

                              NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE

APPLICANT: Fu- Lin, ZHOU

The application submitted on August 20, 1995 to obtain patent of invention named
'RUBBER SHOCK ABSORBER CUSHION' satisfies requirements of patent application.
According to section twenty-eight of the Patent Act and section thirty-nine in
Details and Regulations of the Patent Act, this application has been accepted.
The application number and application date are assigned as followings:

APPLICATION NUMBER  :           95 2 20019.7
APPLICATION DATE    :           950820

FEE : 1 - 80% Reduced

Explanation in Brief:

This notice is a proof indicating that the Department of Patent of China has
accepted the applicant's application for a patent.

The Application number is the file number assigned by the Department of Patent
of China. Nine digits or characters compose the application number. The third
digit counting from the left represents the type of the application. Digit "1"
stands for invention; Digit "2" stands for practical new model type; Digit
"3"stands for apparent design. If the applicant finds that the application
number does not correctly stands for his/her application type, he/she should ask
the Department of Patent to make correction within 15 days from the date when
this notice is received by the applicant.

According to the twenty-eighth regulation stated in the Patent Act, if the
application is submitted by mail, the date of the postmark on the application
documents is assigned as the application date. If the applicant finds the
application date assigned different from the mailing date, he/ she can ask the
Department of Patent to change the application date provided with proof of the
mail register within one month from the date when this notice is received by the
applicant.

This notice has very important instructions printed on the back. It is the
applicants' responsibilities to read those instructions carefully.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4658 

To require the Secretary of Education to develop and implement a process 

that enables certain borrowers to elect to repay certain loans through 

written, electronic, or verbal notice to the Secretary of Education, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to develop and implement a process that enables certain borrowers to elect 

to repay certain loans through written, electronic, or 

verbal notice to the Secretary of Education, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering Student 

5 Borrowers Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4658 IH

1 SEC. 2. WRITTEN, ELECTRONIC, OR VERBAL ENROLLMENT 

2 IN INCOME-BASED REPAYMENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education shall 

4 develop and implement a process that enables a covered 

5 borrower of a loan made under part D of the Higher Edu6 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) who desires 

7 to elect to repay such loan under income-based repayment 

8 under subparagraph (D) or (E) of section 455(d)(1) of 

9 the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

10 1087e(d)(1)) to make such election through written, elec11 tronic, or verbal notice to the Secretary of Education. 

12 (b) COVERED BORROWER DEFINED.—In this section, 

13 the term ‘‘covered borrower’’ means a borrower of a loan 

14 made under part D of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

15 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) who— 

16 (1) is enrolled in an income-based repayment 

17 under subparagraph (D) or (E) of section 455(d)(1) 

18 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

19 1087e(d)(1)); or 

20 (2) has not yet selected a repayment plan and 

21 is in the grace period for such loan. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32**

## **CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of First Financial Service Corporation (the “Corporation”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation;
| Date: August 9, 2007 | By:    | /s/ B. Keith Johnson                  |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                 |   | B. Keith Johnson                      |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                                  |
| Date: August 9, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Gregory Schreacke                 |
|                 |   | Gregory Schreacke                     |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer               |
|                 |   | Principal Accounting Officer          |

 

37

----
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY P ROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2) , SCACR.



### THE STATE OF SOUTH C AROLINA In The Supreme Court

Daisy Frederick, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Lee McDowell , Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 20 22

- 001480

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Marlboro County Paul M. Burch , Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2024 -MO- 012 Heard May 2, 2024 – Filed May 22, 2024

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

R. Hawthorne Barrett, of Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA
, of Columbia
, for Petitione r.

Robert Brian Critzer
, of Wyche, PA
, of Columbia ; Kaye Gorenflo Hearn, of Wyche, PA, of Conway; and Eric Marc Poulin and Roy T. Willey, IV, both of Poulin, Willey, Anastopoulo, LLC
, of Charleston
, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Frederick v. McDowell , Op. No. 2022

- UP

- 303 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 20, 2022) . We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur.
Waseem DAKER, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-9531.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices: Notice of Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through April 1, 
2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Wharton, M.D., M.P.H., 
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Immunization 
Practices, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of 
Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-8, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, telephone (404) 639-8755, or fax (404) 
471-8347.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-08575 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4227 

To prohibit the submission to the Federal Communications Commission of 

broadband internet access service coverage information or data for the 

purposes of compiling an inaccurate broadband coverage map. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 

Mr. MCEACHIN (for himself, Mr. LONG, Mr. LOEBSACK, and Mr. LATTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the submission to the Federal Communications 

Commission of broadband internet access service coverage information or data for the purposes of compiling 

an inaccurate broadband coverage map. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mapping Accuracy 

5 Promotes Services Act’’ or the ‘‘MAPS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4227 IH

1 (1) BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.— 

2 The term ‘‘broadband internet access service’’ has 

3 the meaning given the term in section 8.1(b) of title 

4 47, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor 

5 regulation. 

6 (2) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

7 means the Federal Communications Commission. 

8 (3) PROVIDER.—The term ‘‘provider’’ means a 

9 provider of fixed or mobile broadband internet access 

10 service. 

11 (4) QUALITY OF SERVICE.—The term ‘‘quality 

12 of service’’ means information regarding offered 

13 download and upload speeds and latency of a pro14 vider’s broadband internet access service as deter15 mined by and to the extent otherwise collected by 

16 the Commission. 

17 SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for a person 

19 to willfully, knowingly, or recklessly submit broadband 

20 internet access service coverage information or data to the 

21 Commission for the purposes of compiling a broadband 

22 coverage map that is inaccurate with respect to the avail23 ability or quality of service of broadband internet access 

24 service. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4227 IH

1 (b) PENALTY.—Any person who violates subsection 

2 (a) shall be subject to an appropriate penalty, as deter3 mined by the Commission, under— 

4 (1) the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

5 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), including section 501 of that 

6 Act (47 U.S.C. 501); and 

7 (2) the rules of the Commission. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para10 graph (2), subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 

11 broadband internet access service coverage informa12 tion or data that is submitted to the Commission on 

13 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (2) QUALITY OF SERVICE INFORMATION OR

15 DATA.—To the extent broadband internet access 

16 service coverage information or data relates to qual17 ity of service, subsection (a) shall apply with respect 

18 to information or data that is submitted on or after 

19 the date that is 180 days after the date of the enact20 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6109

ALLEN LEBEDUN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-683-AM) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 26, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Lebedun, Appellant Pro Se. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Allen Lebedun seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lebedun v. Baskerville , No. CA-01-683-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: April 20, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
April 6, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 217 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2022-50, CP2022-55.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-08453 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2019025EN.01001101.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Finanzamt Feldkirch

(Case C-625/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 56 and 63 TFEU - Freedom to provide services and free movement of capital - Credit institutions - Stability charge and the special contribution for that charge determined according to the unconsolidated balance sheet total of credit institutions established in Austria - Inclusion of cross-border banking transactions - Exclusion of subsidiaries’ transactions in another Member State - Difference in treatment - Restriction - Justification))

(2019/C 25/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG

Defendant: Finanzamt Feldkirch

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in so far as it imposes on credit institutions established in Austria, such as the credit institution at issue in the main proceedings, which do not supply services to their clients resident in other Member States through permanent credit institutions established in those Member States, a charge determined according to the ‘average unconsolidated balance sheet total’, which includes the banking transactions which those institutions enter into directly with nationals of other Member States, whilst excluding the same transactions entered into by subsidiaries of credit institutions established in Austria where those subsidiaries are established in other Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
# Official Journal L 319/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.319.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 319 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 524 December 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.319.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 319

English edition

Legislation

Volume 524 December 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Council |
| | | 2009/850/EC |
| | * | Council Decision of 5 May 2009 on the signature and provisional application of the Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the SADC EPA States, of the other part | 1 |
| Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the SADC EPA States, of the other part | 3 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Council

2009/850/EC

*

Council Decision of 5 May 2009 on the signature and provisional application of the Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the SADC EPA States, of the other part

1

Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the SADC EPA States, of the other part

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Ronald RUHL, petitioner, v. Marcus HARDY, et al.

No. 17-6265.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
ITT CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. Ricky Allen LEE, et al.

No. 16-1128.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.