alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Keith THARPE, applicant, v. Eric SELLERS, Warden.

No. 17-6075 (17A330).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 26, 2017.

The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court is granted pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would deny the application.
# Official Journal C 99A/30 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 99A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6030 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 99A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6030 March 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2017/C 99 A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/338/17 — Administrators (AD 5) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2017/C 99 A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/338/17 — Administrators (AD 5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Jerome WANT, petitioner, v. Steven Mark FREI, et al.

No. 17-6080.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Keiron WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6622.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2013318EN.01001901.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 117/2013

of 14 June 2013

amending Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1235/2011 of 29 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the wet grip grading of tyres, the measurement of rolling resistance and the verification procedure (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1235/2011 of 29 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the wet grip grading of tyres, the measurement of rolling resistance and the verification procedure (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 43 (Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IV to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 1235: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1235/2011 of 29 November 2011 (OJ L 317, 30.11.2011, p. 17).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 1235: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1235/2011 of 29 November 2011 (OJ L 317, 30.11.2011, p. 17).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1235/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 30.11.2011, p. 17.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | the information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: November 4, 2003 |                                                                                                           
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | /s/ Gary C. EvansGary C. Evans, ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Pamela Sue BOND, petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

No. 17-6723.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2012161EN.01001901.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 13/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 130/2011 of 2 December 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 130/2011 of 2 December 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2010 of 8 December 2010 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2010 of 8 December 2010 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 12zza (Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008) in Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 R 1152: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2010 of 8 December 2010 (OJ L 324, 9.12.2010, p. 13).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 R 1152: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2010 of 8 December 2010 (OJ L 324, 9.12.2010, p. 13).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1152/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 12/2012 of 10 February 2012 (3), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 15.3.2012, p. 14.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 324, 9.12.2010, p. 13.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(3)  See page 18 of this Official Journal.

3

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Rogers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                         
|--- |  | ------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Michael W. Rogers
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|    | 
|    |  | May 10, 2005
Michael SAMPLE, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 17-5940.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Priscilla Ann ELLIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9305.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11.1
APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES USED IN CALCULATION (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Year Ended
                                                                              December 31, 1999
                                                                              -----------------
<S>                                                                                 <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
        Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                  15,094,336
        Weighted average shares issued during the year
        ended December 31, 1999 (6,319,026 shares)                                  4,397,375
                                                                                  -----------
                                                                                   19,491,711
                                                                                  ------------
Net loss available to common stockholders                                        ($14,067,000)
                                                                                 ============
Basic and diluted loss per common share                                                ($0.72)
                                                                                 ============

</TABLE>


(1)     For a description of basic and diluted loss per share, See Note B of the
        Notes to the Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this
        Form 10-K.



                                       94
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Jimmy S.M. LeeJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 9, 2006




I, Gary L. Fischer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Gary L. FischerGary L. FischerActing Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2006
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/29/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      128,123
COMMITMENTS
  34,290   25,351   17,555   57,982   60,982  109,828  103,888   18,295   24,234

CHANGES FROM 09/22/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,915)
    -776    1,386    1,037    6,091    2,743    6,352    5,167      563    1,748

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.8     19.8     13.7     45.3     47.6     85.7     81.1     14.3     18.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      45       30       38       60       54      123      109
```

----

Updated October 2, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7024

RICKY DONNELL NELSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00349-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: October 5, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Donnell Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ricky Donnell Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Nelson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

----

**HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of    the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Hanover Foods Corporation     (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect    to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedNovember 30, 2003 (the “Report”) that: 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act    of 1934; and                        |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 

Date:  January 14, 2004

                            

|   | /s/ Gary T. Knisely          |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Gary T. KniselyChief Financial Officer |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

1

----

|  |
|--|
Joshua GONSALVES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6018.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Eric R. Zimmerman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending March 30, 2007(the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 14, 2007                                                        /s/ Eric R. Zimmerman   Eric R. Zimmerman   President and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered November 21, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 01225

- CV

IN RE SUNOCO RETAIL LLC AND DERRICK RAY LEWIS , Relators

O riginal Proceeding fro m the 68 th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 18306

O RDER Before Jus tices Myers, Nowell and Goldstein
Before the Court are relator s ’ November 21, 2022 M otion for R ehearing and
Nov e mber 21, 202 2 S econd E mergency M otion for T e mporary R elief. In th ei r motion for tempo rary relief, rela tors ask t he Court to stay the trial court ’ s November 14, 2022 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Settlement Amounts and Assess Costs Against Defendant Sunoco Retail, LLC pending

re sol utio n of rela tor s ’ mot ion for rehea ring.
We GRANT relators ’ second motion for temporary relief and STAY the
trial court ’ s November 14, 2022 order pending res olution of relators ’ motion forrehearing. Relator s shall FILE th e transc ript of the Nov ember 14, 2022 heari ng on plaintiff ’ s motion to compel within THIRTY DAY S of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
# C_2020298EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9918 – Cummins/ETC/NPROXX)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 298/01)

On 31 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9918. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9918. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.2**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Edward J. Puisis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton SuperiorCorporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endingMarch 30, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 14, 2007                                                              /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Executive VicePresident and