Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2022 / Notices 24301 

6 In deciding whether to invoke the exception by 

making and publishing a finding that this final 

action is based on a determination of nationwide 

scope or effect, the Administrator has also taken 

into account a number of policy considerations, 

including his judgment balancing the benefit of 

obtaining the D.C. Circuit’s authoritative centralized 

review versus allowing development of the issue in 

other contexts and the best use of Agency resources. 

7 In the report on the 1977 Amendments that 

revised section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, Congress 

noted that the Administrator’s determination that 

the ‘‘nationwide scope or effect’’ exception applies 

would be appropriate for any action that has a 

scope or effect beyond a single judicial circuit. See 

H.R. Rep. No. 95–294 at 323, 324, reprinted in 1977 

U.S.C.C.A.N. 1402–03. 

under the CAA to make and publish a 

finding that this action is based on a 

determination of ‘‘nationwide scope or 

effect’’ within the meaning of CAA 

section 307(b)(1).6 This final action 

denies petitions for exemptions from the 

RFS program for over 30 small refineries 

across the country and applies to small 

refineries located within 18 states in 7 

of the 10 EPA regions and in 8 different 

Federal judicial circuits.7 This final 

action is based on EPA’s revised 

interpretation of the relevant CAA 

provisions and the RIN discount and 

RIN cost passthrough principles that are 

applicable to all small refineries no 

matter the location or market in which 

they operate. For these reasons, this 

final action is nationally applicable or, 

alternatively, the Administrator is 

exercising the complete discretion 

afforded to him by the CAA and hereby 

finds that this final action is based on 

a determination of nationwide scope or 

effect for purposes of CAA section 

307(b)(1) and is hereby publishing that 

finding in the Federal Register. 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit by June 24, 2022. 

Joseph Goffman, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, 

Office of Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08686 Filed 4–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0160; FRL–9409–12– 

OCSPP] 

Pesticide Product Registration; 

Receipt of Applications for New Active 

Ingredients—March 2022 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications 

to register pesticide products containing 

active ingredients not included in any 

currently registered pesticide products. 

Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 

(FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice 

of receipt and opportunity to comment 

on these applications. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 25, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number and the File Symbol of the 

EPA registration Number of interest as 

shown in the body of this, through the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Additional 

instructions on commenting or visiting 

the docket, along with more information 

about dockets generally, is available at 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/aboutepa-dockets. 

Due to the public health concerns 

related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is 

open to visitors by appointment only. 

For the latest status information on 

EPA/DC services and access, visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Smith, Biopesticides and 

Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) 

(7511P), main telephone number: (202) 

566–2427, email address: 

BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing 

address for each contact person is: 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001. As part of the mailing 

address, include the contact person’s 

name, division, and mail code. The 

division to contact is listed at the end 

of each pesticide petition summary. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

II. Registration Applications 

EPA has received applications to 

register pesticide products containing 

active ingredients not included in any 

currently registered pesticide products. 

Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA 

section 3(c)(4) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA 

is hereby providing notice of receipt and 

opportunity to comment on these 

applications. Notice of receipt of these 

applications does not imply a decision 

by the Agency on these applications. 

For actions being evaluated under EPA’s 

public participation process for 

registration actions, there will be an 

additional opportunity for public 

comment on the proposed decisions. 

Please see EPA’s public participation 

website for additional information on 

this process (https://www2.epa.gov/ 

pesticide-registration/publicparticipation-process-registrationactions). 

A. Notice of Receipt—New Active 

Ingredients 

1. File Symbol: 2375–A. Docket ID 

number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0317. 

Applicant: Chr. Hansen, Inc., 16300 W 

Lincoln Ave., New Berlin, WI 53151. 

Product name: CH4000. Active 

ingredient: Fungicide and nematicide— 

Bacillus subtilis strain CH4000 at 100%. 

Proposed use: For seed treatment and 

applications to soil. Contact: BPPD. 

2. File Symbol: 2375–L. Docket ID 

number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0317. 

Applicant: Chr. Hansen, Inc., 16300 W 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
24302 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2022 / Notices 

Lincoln Ave., New Berlin, WI 53151. 

Product name: Kansas 3 SC. Active 

ingredient: Fungicide and nematicide— 

Bacillus subtilis strain CH4000 at 

3.33%, Bacillus paralicheniformis strain 

CH2970 at 3.33%, and Bacillus 

paralicheniformis strain CH0273 at 

3.33%. Proposed use: For seed 

treatment and applications to soil. 

Contact: BPPD. 

3. File Symbol: 2375–T. Docket ID 

number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0317. 

Applicant: Chr. Hansen, Inc., 16300 W 

Lincoln Ave., New Berlin, WI 53151. 

Product name: Kansas 3 WP. Active 

ingredient: Fungicide and nematicide— 

Bacillus subtilis strain CH4000 at 20%, 

Bacillus paralicheniformis strain 

CH2970 at 20%, and Bacillus 

paralicheniformis strain CH0273 at 

20%. Proposed use: For seed treatment 

and applications to soil. Contact: BPPD. 

4. File Symbol: 2375–U. Docket ID 

number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0317. 

Applicant: Chr. Hansen, Inc., 16300 W 

Lincoln Ave., New Berlin, WI 53151. 

Product name: CH0273. Active 

ingredient: Fungicide and nematicide 

–Bacillus paralicheniformis strain 

CH0273 at 100%. Proposed use: For 

seed treatment and applications to soil. 

Contact: BPPD. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: April 15, 2022. 

Delores Barber, 

Director, Information Technology and 

Resources Management Division, Office of 

Program Support. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08762 Filed 4–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[ET Docket No. 18–295, GN Docket No. 17– 

183; DA 22–253; FR ID 82111] 

Office of Engineering and Technology 

Seeks Comment Following Court 

Remand of 6 GHz Band Order 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission invites comments in 

connection with the remand by the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia Circuit of the 

Commission’s 6 GHz Report and Order. 

The 6 GHz Report and Order opened the 

6 GHz band to the operation of 

unlicensed low power access points. 

The D.C. Circuit largely rejected a 

challenge of the 6 GHz Report and 

Order, but remanded to the Commission 

concerns raised by the National 

Association of Broadcasters (NAB) 

regarding interference to unlicensed 

devices in the 2.4 GHz band. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

May 25, 2022, and reply comments are 

due on or before June 9, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by ET Docket No. 18–295 and 

GN Docket No. 17–183, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Electronic Filers: Comments may be 

filed electronically using the internet by 

accessing the ECFS: http://apps.fcc.gov/ 

ecfs/. 

• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to 

file by paper must file an original and 

one copy of each filing. 

Filings can be sent by commercial 

overnight courier, or by first-class or 

overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All 

filings must be addressed to the 

Commission’s Secretary, Office of the 

Secretary, Federal Communications 

Commission. 

• Commercial overnight mail (other 

than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail 

and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 

Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 

20701. 

• U.S. Postal Service first-class, 

Express, and Priority mail must be 

addressed to 45 L Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20554. 

• Effective March 19, 2020, and until 

further notice, the Commission no 

longer accepts any hand or messenger 

delivered filings. This is a temporary 

measure taken to help protect the health 

and safety of individuals, and to 

mitigate the transmission of COVID–19. 

See FCC Announces Closure of FCC 

Headquarters Open Window and 

Change in Hand-Delivery Policy, Public 

Notice, DA 20–304 (March 19, 2020). 

https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcccloses-headquarters-open-window-andchanges-hand-delivery-policy. People 

with Disabilities: To request materials in 

accessible formats for people with 

disabilities (braille, large print, 

electronic files, audio format), send an 

email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 

Consumer & Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– 

418–0432 (TTY). 

People with Disabilities: To request 

materials in accessible formats for 

people with disabilities (braille, large 

print, electronic files, audio format), 

send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call 

the Consumer & Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 

418–0432 (tty). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicholas Oros, Office of Engineering 

and Technology, (202) 418–0636, email: 

Nicholas.Oros@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s 

document (Public Notice), in ET Docket 

No. 18–295 and GN Docket No. 17–183, 

DA 22–253, released on March 10, 2022. 

The full text of this document is 

available for public inspection and may 

be downloaded at: https://www.fcc.gov/ 

document/oet-seeks-commentfollowing-court-remand-6-ghz-bandorder. 

Synopsis 

In the Public Notice, the Office of 

Engineering and Technology invites 

comments in connection with the 

remand by the United States Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit of the Commission’s 6 GHz 

Report and Order. On February 22, 

2022, the court issued its mandate. 

The Commission’s 6 GHz Report and 

Order ‘‘open[ed up] the entire 6 GHz 

band [(5.925–7.125 GHz)] for unlicensed 

indoor lower power access points.’’ The 

Commission found that ‘‘[t]hese access 

points will be ideal for connecting 

devices in homes and businesses such 

[as] smartphones, tablet devices, 

laptops, and Internet-of-Things devices 

to the Internet.’’ The Commission 

adopted several requirements to 

‘‘protect the various incumbent-licensed 

services in the band, including fixed 

microwave services, various other fixed 

and mobile services, and fixed-satellite 

services.’’ 

Among other things, the 6 GHz Report 

and Order required that the operation of 

devices relying on indoor low power 

access points be: ‘‘(1) limited to indoor 

operation’’ whereby ‘‘the signals 

transmitted by these unlicensed devices 

will be significantly attenuated when 

passing through the walls of 

buildings[;]’’ ‘‘(2) required to use a 

contention-based protocol,’’ such as a 

‘‘listen before talk . . . scheme[;]’’ and 

‘‘(3) subject to low-power operation,’’ 

which, as relevant here, means ‘‘a 

maximum radiated power spectral 

density of 5 dBm per 1 megahertz.’’ The 

Commission concluded that ‘‘the[se] 

restrictions and requirements . . . for 

indoor use of low power access points 

eliminat[e] any significant risk of 

causing harmful interference.’’ 

Petitioners representing licensed 

commercial wireless service providers, 

electric utilities, public safety entities, 

and broadcasters operating in the 6 GHz 

band sought judicial review, asserting 

that the 6 GHz Report and Order 

contravened the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended, and the 

Administrative Procedure Act. 

The D.C. Circuit largely rejected these 

challenges. Holding that ‘‘petitioners 

have failed to provide a basis for 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES