alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 16, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00260-CR

LAWRENCE RICHARD PARKER, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81571-2015

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due July 8, 2016. By postcard dated July 11, 2016, we notified 

appellant his brief was past due and instructed him to file his brief along with a motion to extend 

time. To date, the Court has not received his brief or a motion to extend time to file the same. 

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### George Burns, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*232
      *Price, Price, Kehoe & Kassewitz,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no harmful error in the conduct of the trial of said cause. It does appear that the judgment is defective in that there is no clear adjudication of defendant’s guilt.

Reversed for proper judgment and sentence.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., and Long, Circuit Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-02-1999
<CASH>                                         158,549
<SECURITIES>                                   204,727
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,185
<INVENTORY>                                     22,766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               556,115
<PP&E>                                         262,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 755,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           963
<OTHER-SE>                                     472,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   755,892
<SALES>                                        352,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               352,952
<CGS>                                          266,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  336,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,031)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,620
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-03-1999
<CASH>                                         265,329
<SECURITIES>                                    97,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,740
<INVENTORY>                                     21,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               534,023
<PP&E>                                         249,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 698,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          229,048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           962
<OTHER-SE>                                     443,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   698,406
<SALES>                                      1,104,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,104,762
<CGS>                                          911,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,080,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (12,082)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,808
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
Reba Marcelle MYERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-836.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2012161EN.01002701.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 21/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex X (Services in general) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex X to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2011 of 30 September 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex X to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2011 of 30 September 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2011/130/EU of 25 February 2011 establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/130/EU of 25 February 2011 establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 1b (Commission Decision 2009/767/EC) of Annex X to the Agreement:

| ‘1c. | 32011 D 0130: Commission Decision 2011/130/EU of 25 February 2011 establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 53, 26.2.2011, p. 66).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘1c.

32011 D 0130: Commission Decision 2011/130/EU of 25 February 2011 establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 53, 26.2.2011, p. 66).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/130/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 1.12.2011, p. 35.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 53, 26.2.2011, p. 66.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Elena NOGUERO, petitioner, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 17-5985.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1 – CEO
Certification








ROYAL INVEST INTERNATIONAL
CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Royal Invest International Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nathan Lapkin, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Nathan
Lapkin


Nathan
Lapkin, CFO





August
26, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Gary Allen ULLAND, petitioner, v. James COKER, Warden.

No. 17-5796.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1162 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1162

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 1999

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the 
   Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the 
                     ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio River 
between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the bridge referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Bobby O. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Jacqueline LASHBROOK, Warden.

No. 17-6370.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Lindsey EWING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7195.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XATA Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 August 8, 2008Signature:
    
    /s/ Mark E. TiesName:
    
    Mark E. TiesPrint Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,283
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          18,989
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                53,026
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    223,687
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         191,696
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           192,847
<LOANS>                                      2,934,828
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,605,904
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,343,786
<SHORT-TERM>                                   210,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            681,000
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,837
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           254
<OTHER-SE>                                     280,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,605,904
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                157,938
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,142
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,135
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               185,215
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              72,545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,323
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          112,868
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 606
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 44,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,790
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      28,808
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.47
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,734
<LOANS-PAST>                                       625
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,475
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      311
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,808
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         15,808
        

</TABLE>
Order filed August 28, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00510-CV

____________

SUSANA V. IZAGUIRRE, Appellant

V.

FIDENCIO ALVAREZ AND MARIA I. CHAVEZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-30420

ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The court reporter, Norma Duarte, 

informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the 

reporter’s record. On July 2, 2012, the clerk of this court notified appellant that we 

would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter=s record unless 

appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the 

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before 

September 27, 2012. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
# Official Journal C 235/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6417 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 235

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6417 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 235/01 | Position (EU) No 24/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information SystemAdopted by the Council on 27 May 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 235/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 24/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information System | 84 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 235/01

Position (EU) No 24/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information SystemAdopted by the Council on 27 May 2021

1

2021/C 235/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 24/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information System

84

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN