alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 11 XATA CORPORATIONEARNINGS PER SHAREThree and Six Months Ended March 31, 2004 Three Months
    
    Six MonthsEnded
    
    EndedMarch 31, 2004
    
    March 31, 2004BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION OF NET LOSSNet loss
    
    $
    (169,560
    )
    
    $
    (624,151
    )Less: preferred stock dividend
    
    
    (40,968
    )
    
    
    (51,893
    )Net loss as adjusted
    
    
    (210,528
    )
    
    
    (676,044
    )Weighted average common and common shares equivalents
    
    
    7,006,293
    
    
    
    6,976,654Basic and diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.03
    )
    
    $
    (0.10
    )BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION OF LOSS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERSNet loss
    
    $
    (169,560
    )
    
    $
    (624,151
    )Less: preferred stock dividend
    
    
    (40,968
    )
    
    
    (51,893
    )Less: preferred stock deemed dividend
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (628,982
    )Net loss to common shareholders
    
    
    (210,528
    )
    
    
    (1,305,026
    )Weighted average common and common shares equivalents
    
    
    7,006,293
    
    
    
    6,976,654Basic and diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.03
    )
    
    $
    (0.19
    )
 Note: See Note 6 in Notes to Financial Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period ended March 31, 2004.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00085-CR

Jerry Paul Lundgren

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law

of Wise County (CR-66896)

August 22, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

Dissent by Justice Dauphinot

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
##### **EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of First Financial Service Corporation(the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that: 

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange          Act of 1934 and;

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation; 

 
| Date:  August 9, 2004 | By:  /s/ | B.  Keith Johnson                      |   |
|----------------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |          | B.  Keith Johnson                      |
|                       |          | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |          |
|                       |          |
| Date:  August 9, 2004 | By:  /s/ | Gregory  Schreacke                     |   |
|                       |          | Gregory  Schreacke                     |
|                       |          | Chief  Financial Officer               |
|                            |               |                                        |        |  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
|Exhibit 31.3CERTIFICATION
|-------------------------

I,   Patricia Graham, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2008

| |  |                               
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | /s/   Patricia Graham         
| |  | Patricia Graham               
| |  | Chief Accounting Officer      
| |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)

---



2

2

---
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.1      SUBSIDIARIES OF APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION



The Company has the following domestic wholly-owned subsidiaries:

1.   AppliedTheory California Corporation, a Delaware corporation

2.   AppliedTheory Seattle Corporation, a Washington corporation

3.   AppliedTheory Austin Corporation, a Texas corporation

4.   AppliedTheory Virginia Corporation, a Virginia corporation

5.   AppliedTheory Georgia Corporation, a Georgia corporation

6.   AppliedTheory Colorado Corporation, a Colorado corporation

7.   AppliedTheory New Jersey Corporation, a New Jersey corporation

8.   Sacramento AppliedTheory Corporation, a California corporation



                                       97
Malcolm A. SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-916.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on
their knowledge and belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|/s/    DONALD L.
UNGERDonald L. Unger President & Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|/s/    FREDERICK A.
BOARDFrederick A. Board Chief Financial Officer      
|                                                                         
|Date:
Harry Jackson BOYD, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-585.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Earl REYES, petitioner, v. Dale ARTUS.

No. 16-8243.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-269.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 12, 2018.

Motion of Modoc Point Irrigation District, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/07/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      501,920
COMMITMENTS
  60,857   25,606   77,504  344,979  381,284  483,340  484,394   18,580   17,526

CHANGES FROM 08/31/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     28,082)
     362       91   -2,027   25,310   25,883   23,645   23,947    4,437    4,135

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.1      5.1     15.4     68.7     76.0     96.3     96.5      3.7      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      123)
      29       16       34       68       74      111      111
```

----

Updated September 10, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       346,751                 18,673,304
<SECURITIES>                                       0                    973,877
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0                     99,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0                          0
<INVENTORY>                                        0                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             491,049                 20,226,314
<PP&E>                                       341,441                  1,271,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0                    410,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               842,160                 27,256,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        547,508                  2,202,682
<BONDS>                                            0                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                          0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                      2,395
<COMMON>                                      11,006                     11,006
<OTHER-SE>                                   283,646                 25,040,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 842,160                 27,256,750
<SALES>                                            0                    138,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0                    138,545
<CGS>                                              0                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             843,087                 10,679,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               401                    714,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (862,398)               (11,255,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                          0
<CHANGES>                                          0                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (862,398)               (11,255,415)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.08)                     (2.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.08)                     (2.97)



</TABLE>
BE Y GENERAL 

AUSTXN. TEXAS 787 

February 23, 1966 

Honorable Homer Garrison, Jr. Opinion NO. c-623 

Director 

Department of Public Safety Construction of Article 

Austin, Texas E&b Section l(n) V C S 

and Aiticle 6687b, ~ection'3, 

Subsection 4a, as to whether 

the operators of certain enumerated motor vehicles and 

combinations of such vehicles 

and trailers are required to 

have a commercial operator's 

Dear Sir: license. 

In your apinion request you ask whether or not an 

operator of a pickup truck, panel delivery truck,, station 

wagon, carry-all truck or passenger automobile when operated 

in combination with a trailer or trailers, is required to 

have a commercial operator's license, when operating such 

combination for commercial or delivery purposes. 

Acts, 59th De islature, 1965, Chapter 350 

which amends Article 6 g 87b, 4 

P. 752, 

Section 3, Subsection a, Vernon's Civil Statutes , provides as follows: 

"A Derson oneratina a truck with a 

manufa‘cturer's-rated carrying capacity 

not to exceed 2,000 pounds, which is intended to include trucks commonly known 

as pickup trucks, panel delivery-trucks, 

station wagons. and carrv-all trucks. who 

holds an operator's license shall not be 

required to obtain a commercial operator's 

license. " (Emphasis added.) 

It is the opinion of this office that the addition 

of a trailer or trailers to one of the enumerated vehicles 

does not alter the manufacturer's rated carrying capacity; 

therefore, the operator of such vehicle is not required to 

obtain a commercial operatorts license when he holds an 

operator's license. 

SUMMARY 

A person operating a pickup truck, 

-3026- 
Honorable Homer Garrison, Jr., page 2 (c-623) 

panel delivery truck, station wagon or txrryall truck with a manufacturer's rated c8rr.p 

ing capacity of 2,000 pounds or lee6 la not 

required to obtain a commercial operator's 

license when he holds an operator's license 

regardless of whether or not said vehicle IS 

operated in combination with one or more 

trailers. 

Your6 very truly, 

WAGGO@R CARR 

al of Texas 

orney General 

REO/bd/br 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Carlos Vela 

Malcolm Quick 

Pat Bailey 

Sam L. Kelley~ 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

By: T. B. Wright 

‘i 

-3027-
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/22/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      493,270
COMMITMENTS
  39,333   11,172  106,689  329,502  356,803  475,524  474,664   17,746   18,606

CHANGES FROM 06/15/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -22,386)
  -7,236    5,004  -14,901    1,585  -11,850  -20,552  -21,747   -1,834     -639

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.0      2.3     21.6     66.8     72.3     96.4     96.2      3.6      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      102)
      18       12       28       58       68       90       97
```

----

Updated June 25, 2010
Brian L. POSLEY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7004.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
FENG LI, petitioner, v. Diana PENG as Administratrix of the Estate of Alfred T.C. Peng, Tzuli Hsu, Joseph Huang, Stephen Huang, and Pen Fa Lee, et al.

No. 17-822.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996               
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996               
<CASH>                                         127620000
<SECURITIES>                                   41983000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3001000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    7483000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159155000
<PP&E>                                         4914000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2106000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184879000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22742000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3500000
<COMMON>                                       41000
<OTHER-SE>                                     138523000<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184879000
<SALES>                                        6901000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17692000
<CGS>                                          6008000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9904000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             34000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2931000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2931000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2931000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Additional paid-in capital-$248,232,000
    Accumulated Deficit-$(109,709,000)
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Raul Roy VASQUEZ, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-9021.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# L_2012161EN.01002901.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 24/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 165/2011 of 19 December 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 165/2011 of 19 December 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 201/2011 of 1 March 2011 on the model of declaration of conformity to an authorised type of railway vehicle (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 201/2011 of 1 March 2011 on the model of declaration of conformity to an authorised type of railway vehicle (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 37de (Commission Decision 2011/155/EU) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘37df. | 32011 R 0201: Commission Regulation (EU) No 201/2011 of 1 March 2011 on the model of declaration of conformity to an authorised type of railway vehicle (OJ L 57, 2.3.2011, p. 8).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘37df.

32011 R 0201: Commission Regulation (EU) No 201/2011 of 1 March 2011 on the model of declaration of conformity to an authorised type of railway vehicle (OJ L 57, 2.3.2011, p. 8).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 201/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 15.3.2012, p. 57.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 57, 2.3.2011, p. 8.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Anthony SMITH, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-5694.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
George T. VICKERS, Jr., petitioner, v. Cynthia LINK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

No. 17-6672.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
John MILLS, petitioner, v. Christopher LaROSE, Warden.

No. 17-5654.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.