alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4027 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4027

   To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (commonly 
referred to as the Communications Decency Act) to stop censorship, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Meadows, Mr. King of Iowa, and Mr. Norman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (commonly 
referred to as the Communications Decency Act) to stop censorship, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Censorship Act''.

SEC. 2. REVOCATION OF IMMUNITIES.

    Section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(c)) 
is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``and Screening of 
        Offensive Material'' and inserting ``of Unlawful or 
        Objectionable Material''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)--
                            (i) by striking ``material that the 
                        provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, 
                        lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, 
                        harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether 
                        or not such material is constitutionally 
                        protected'' and inserting ``unlawful 
                        material''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
                        semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``paragraph 
                (1).'' and inserting ``subparagraph (A); or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
                    ``(C) any action taken to provide users with the 
                option to restrict access to any other material, 
                whether or not such material is constitutionally 
                protected.''.
                                 <all>
```
Brian TERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6990.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23047-23048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(718) 834-2203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section

[[Page 23048]]

10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Tuesday, May 10, 2022, at 
12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Robert Rosalia. For more information, please contact Robert 
Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP Office, 2 
Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or contact us 
at the website: https://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include 
various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 11, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-08207 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Johnny GARCIA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9219.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/02/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      240,739
COMMITMENTS
  90,871    7,477   35,967   81,017  161,989  207,855  205,433   32,884   35,306

CHANGES FROM 10/26/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,068)
     683       35    3,018   -1,238    2,321    2,463    5,374    4,605    1,694

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    37.7      3.1     14.9     33.7     67.3     86.3     85.3     13.7     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      226)
      89       20       66       60       90      167      169
```

----

Updated November 5, 2010
# L_2013318EN.01002901.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 127/2013

of 14 June 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 of 10 August 2011 laying down detailed rules for air traffic controllers’ licences and certain certificates pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 of 10 August 2011 laying down detailed rules for air traffic controllers’ licences and certain certificates pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 66nc (Commission Regulation (EU) No 6/2013) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66nd. | 32011 R 0805: Commission Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 of 10 August 2011 laying down detailed rules for air traffic controllers’ licences and certain certificates pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 206, 11.8.2011, p. 21).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66nd.

32011 R 0805: Commission Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 of 10 August 2011 laying down detailed rules for air traffic controllers’ licences and certain certificates pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 206, 11.8.2011, p. 21).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 805/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 206, 11.8.2011, p. 21.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
John Eldridge CONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6913.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Glenn L. Cooper                     
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer February 7,
2007
Charlotte KOKOCINSKI, Derivatively on Behalf of Medtronic, Inc., petitioner, v. Arthur D. COLLINS, Jr., et al.

No. 17-375.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00018

- CR No. 02

- 22

- 00019

- CR

On Appeal from the 235th District Court Cooke County, Texas Trial Court No. CR21

- 00132, CR21

- 00133

ABATEMENT ORDER We have considered the “Motion To Withdraw As Counsel” filed by appellant’s retained counsel, Dan L. Wyde

. The motion is GRANTED . The Hon. Dan L. Wyde is perm itted to withdraw as attorney of record for appellant. It is ORDERED that this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct a hearing with appellant present to:
1. Determine whether appellan t desires to prosecute his appeal; 

### T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS 

### , Appellant

V



### . J OSEPH 

### T URNER2 2. Determine whether appellant is indigent;

3. If appellant is determined to be indigent, determine whether counsel should be appointed to represent appellant and appoint counsel, if necessary; 1

4. If appellant desires to proce ed pro se, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self

- representation, in accordance with Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975) , and Hubbard v. State , 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 ( Tex. Crim. App

. 1987) , and determine whether appellant’s decision to proceed pro se is competently and intelligently made; and
5. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to e nsure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal. Appellant may participate remotely, such as by telephone, videoc onference, or other appropriate and reasonable means, unless the trial court determines that it is necessary to have appellant appear in person. The trial court shall make findings and file a record of the hearing in this court

on or before Wednesday , July 2 7 , 2022
. The record shall include a supplemental reporter’s record and supplemental clerk’s record. On our receipt of the supplemental record, the appeal of this cause shall be automatically reinstated without further order.

1 If counsel has been appointed to represen t appellant, the supplemental record shall reflect that appointed counsel has been notified of the appointment. If appellant is incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain him in the county for a reasonable period of time to allow appointed counsel an opportunity to confer with appellant.3 We dir ect the clerk of th is court to send a notice of this order to the appellant,
Hon. Dan L. Wyde , the State’s attorney, the trial judge, the trial court clerk, and the
court reporter. Dated June 27, 2022

. Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                       
|--- |  | --------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Glenn L. Cooper                   
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer August 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7638

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

WILLIAM ERIC BOLTON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:03-cr-00095-RAJ-FBS-1) 

Submitted: February 24, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

William Eric Bolton, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 William Eric Bolton appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction 

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Bolton cannot benefit from Amendment 706 to the 

Sentencing Guidelines because of the quantities of cocaine 

powder and marijuana for which he was originally held 

accountable. Those quantities convert to a total of 16,820.817 

kilograms of marijuana and a base offense level of thirty-six, 

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 (2008), which is the 

same base offense level applied at Bolton’s original sentencing 

when he was also held accountable for a quantity of crack 

cocaine. Consequently, Bolton may not now receive a reduction 

in base offense level, see id. § 2D1.1 cmt. n.10(D)(ii)(II), and 

he is therefore ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 

§ 3582(c)(2). Accordingly, we grant Bolton leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm the district court. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Glenn L. Cooper 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | May 12, 2004
R. David WEISSKOPF, petitioner, v. Philip MARCUS, et al.

No. 17-754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FILED 
AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY 
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           345,526
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         130
<MORTGAGE>                                       2,983
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      541
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 372,771
<CASH>                                           1,345
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              69,242
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          21,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 637,038
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                428,533
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,390
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 20,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,795
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,481
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   637,038
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,897
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,199
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 174
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,749
<BENEFITS>                                       2,389
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        825
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    953
<INCOME-TAX>                                       310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Lorenzo Estabon THOMAS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-6740.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-6020MN

_____________

In re: *

 *

Jerry Clark Vincent, *

 *

Debtor. *

 * Appeal from the United States

Dwight R.J. Lindquist, Trustee, * Bankruptcy Court

for the

 * District of Minnesota

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

 *

City Meat Market of St. Paul, Inc., *

 *

Defendant - Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: March 17, 1998

Filed: March 20, 1998

_____________

Before KOGER, Chief Judge, WILLIAM A. HILL, and SCHERMER, Bankruptcy

Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant, City Meat Market of St. Paul, Inc. (“CMM”),

and the plaintiff-appellee, Dwight R.J. Lindquist (“trustee”), were parties

to an adversary proceeding before the bankruptcy court. On March 3, 1998,

CMM filed a notice of appeal from the following orders of the bankruptcy

court, which were entered in connection with the adversary proceeding:
(1) an order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the trustee,

entered January 7, 1998; (2) orders denying CMM’s objection, and granting

trustee’s motion, to dismiss count one of the trustee’s complaint, entered

February 19, 1998; and (3) a judgment in favor of trustee against CMM in the

amount of $32,429.03, entered February 19, 1998. 

Pursuant to Rule 8002(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,

“[t]he notice of appeal shall be filed with the clerk within 10 days of the

date of the entry of the judgment, order, or decree appealed from.” Fed. R.

Bankr. P. 8002(a). CMM filed its notice of appeal outside the ten day period

provided for in the rule. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(a). Additionally, CMM

has not made a request for an extension of time to appeal the rulings of the

bankruptcy court pursuant to Rule 8002(c). 

Thus, CMM has failed to timely file its notice of appeal. Its failure

deprives us of jurisdiction to entertain its appeals, which must therefore

be dismissed. See Veltman v. Whetzal, 93 F.3d 517, 520-21 (8th Cir. 1996);

Jacobson v. Nielsen, 932 F.2d 1272-73 (8th Cir. 1991); accord Solomon v.

Smith (In re Moody), 41 F.3d 1024, 1026-27 (5th Cir. 1995); see also In re

Morrilton Plastics Prods., Inc., 177 B.R. 622, 624 n.4 (Bankr. E.D. Ark.

1995). 

Accordingly, CMM’s appeals from the bankruptcy court are DISMISSED.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL, EIGHTH 

CIRCUIT.
# C_2022320EN.01000201.xml

| 24.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/2

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 11 January 2021 concerning a draft decision in case COMP/AT.40422 Bandai Namco

Rapporteur: Latvia

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 320/02)

1.

The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) overall agrees with the draft decision and agrees with the Commission’s assessment that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

2.

The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003.

3.

The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---