alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Marvin J. Winkler, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 Form 10-KSB of SSP Solutions, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Dated: April 1, 2004

/S/ MARVIN J. WINKLER
-----------------------------
Marvin J. Winkler,
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


I, Thomas E. Schiff, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 Form 10-KSB of SSP Solutions, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Dated: April 1, 2004

/S/ THOMAS E. SCHIFF
-------------------------------
Thomas E. Schiff,
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4598 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption 

from FIRPTA for interests held by certain foreign insurance companies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2019 

Mr. SUOZZI (for himself and Mr. HOLDING) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exemption from FIRPTA for interests held by certain 

foreign insurance companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRPTA EXEMPTION FOR INTERESTS HELD BY 

4 CERTAIN FOREIGN INSURANCE COMPANIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 897(l)(1) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘a qualified foreign pension 

8 fund shall not’’ and inserting ‘‘a qualified foreign 

9 entity shall not’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4598 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘held by a qualified foreign pen2 sion fund shall be treated as such a fund’’ and in3 serting ‘‘held (directly or indirectly) by one or more 

4 qualified foreign entities shall be treated as such an 

5 entity’’. 

6 (b) QUALIFIED FOREIGN ENTITY.—Section 897(l) of 

7 such Code is amended by redesignating paragraphs (2) 

8 and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively, and by 

9 inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED FOREIGN ENTITY.—For pur11 poses of this subsection, the term ‘qualified foreign 

12 entity’ means— 

13 ‘‘(A) any qualifying insurance corporation 

14 (as defined in section 1297(f)(1)), and 

15 ‘‘(B) any qualified foreign pension fund.’’. 

16 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading of section 

17 897(l) is amended by striking ‘‘Qualified Foreign Pension 

18 Funds’’ and inserting ‘‘Certain Foreign Entities’’. 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to dispositions and distributions 

21 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 25, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Gwen A. Henson, New Orleans, Louisiana;*                     to retain voting shares of The H. Pat Henson Company, Maysville, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Farmers and Merchants Bank, Maysville, Oklahoma, and the Peoples State Bank, Blair, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2022.

Ann E. Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-07613 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Bradley BLACKWELL, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-8355.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
#### Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a corporation, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Clarence Zeigler and Allen Zeigler, doing business as Zeigler Bros., *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

W. *B. Crawford*and *Alexander Aherman,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*E. W. & B. C.*Davis, for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Búford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
I.T., By and Through His Parents RENEE and Floyd T., petitioner, v. HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

No. 17-534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jonathan R. CLARK, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE.

No. 16-1043.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/04/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      105,513
COMMITMENTS
  31,765   10,957   14,689   41,187   55,287   87,641   80,934   17,871   24,579

CHANGES FROM 07/28/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,293)
   2,487   -1,100     -842     -626    4,044    1,019    2,102    1,274      191

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.1     10.4     13.9     39.0     52.4     83.1     76.7     16.9     23.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      154)
      40       19       31       63       66      118      106
```

----

Updated August 7, 2009
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00085

- CR

Jerry Paul Lundgren

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law

o f Wise County (CR

- 66896 )

August 22, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

Dissent by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This cour t has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4566 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions for 

the relief of the families of victims of the mass shooting in Virginia 

Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mrs. LURIA (for herself, Mr. BEYER, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. 

RIGGLEMAN, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. SPANBERGER, Ms. WEXTON, 

and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash 

contributions for the relief of the families of victims 

of the mass shooting in Virginia Beach, Virginia, on 

May 31, 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virginia Beach Strong 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4566 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF 

2 OF THE FAMILIES OF THE MASS SHOOTING IN 

3 VIRGINIA BEACH. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION THAT CONTRIBUTION WILL NOT

5 FAIL TO QUALIFY AS A CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION.— 

6 A cash contribution made for the relief of the families of 

7 the dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in Vir8 ginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, shall not fail to 

9 be treated as a charitable contribution for purposes of sec10 tion 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 merely be11 cause such contribution is for the exclusive benefit of such 

12 families. The preceding sentence shall apply to contribu13 tions made on or after May 31, 2019. 

14 (b) CLARIFICATION THAT PAYMENTS BY CHARI15 TABLE ORGANIZATIONS TO FAMILIES TREATED AS EX16 EMPT PAYMENTS.—For purposes of the Internal Revenue 

17 Code of 1986, payments made on or after May 31, 2019, 

18 and on or before June 1, 2021, to the spouse or any de19 pendent (as defined in section 152 of such Code) of the 

20 dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in Virginia 

21 Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, by an organization 

22 which (determined without regard to any such payments) 

23 would be an organization exempt from tax under section 

24 501(a) of such Code shall— 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4566 IH

1 (1) be treated as related to the purpose or func2 tion constituting the basis for such organization’s 

3 exemption under such section; and 

4 (2) shall not be treated as inuring to the benefit 

5 of any private individual, 

6 if such payments are made in good faith using a reason7 able and objective formula which is consistently applied 

8 with respect to such victims. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al.

No. 17-71.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Edward J. Puisis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     November 13, 2007  /s/Edward J. Puisis Edward J. Puisis    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00505-CR

Norman Ray Driska, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 46,674, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Norman Ray Driska was placed on deferred adjudication community

supervision after pleading no contest to indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann.

§ 21.11 (West Supp. 2002). At a subsequent hearing on the State’s motion to adjudicate, appellant

admitted four of the alleged violations of his supervisory conditions. The court adjudged him guilty

and imposed a sentence of twenty years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements ofAnders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.
2

1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: March 28, 2001

Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SERGE VLADIMIRSKY,

Respondent

v.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF 

PHILADELPHIA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 417 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Glenn L. Cooper    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CCC GlobalCom  Corporation  on form
10QSB for the period  ending June 30,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Paul E. Licata,  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
              (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the  information  in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
              respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.


By  /s/ Paul E. Licata
----------------------
Paul E. Licata
Chief Executive Officer
August 22, 2003
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/07/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       66,233
COMMITMENTS
  20,614    2,643    6,299   25,320   42,236   52,233   51,178   14,000   15,055

CHANGES FROM 11/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,162)
   2,261     -175   -1,112       45    3,543    1,194    2,256    1,968      906

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.1      4.0      9.5     38.2     63.8     78.9     77.3     21.1     22.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       91)
      35        8       19       29       29       70       55
```

----

Updated December 10, 2010
CAREFIRST, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Chantal ATTIAS, et al.

No. 17-641.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.