alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                      |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/02/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    3,720,691
COMMITMENTS
 591,564  103,808  1104721  1998061  2499425  3694346  3707954   26,345   12,737

CHANGES FROM 02/23/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:   -201,568)
  26,181   14,596  -84,911 -136,092 -124,381 -194,822 -194,696   -6,746   -6,872

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.9      2.8     29.7     53.7     67.2     99.3     99.7      0.7      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      206)
      44       32       70      119      114      194      188
```

----

Updated March 2, 2010
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3767 

To ensure an evidence-based funding approach to study the effects of health 

professions opportunity grant demonstration projects, and to evaluate 

the demonstration projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2019 

Mr. SCHNEIDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To ensure an evidence-based funding approach to study the 

effects of health professions opportunity grant demonstration projects, and to evaluate the demonstration 

projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Impacts and Outcomes 

5 for Health Career Training Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3767 IH

1 SEC. 2. EVIDENCE-BASED FUNDING APPROACH TO STUDY 

2 THE EFFECTS OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS OP3 PORTUNITY GRANT DEMONSTRATION 

4 PROJECTS; EVALUATION OF DEMONSTRA5 TION PROJECTS. 

6 Section 2008 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1397g) is amended by redesignating subsections (c) and 

8 (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively, and by insert9 ing after subsection (b) the following: 

10 ‘‘(c) STUDY.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall con12 duct a study of the short-, medium-, and long-term 

13 impacts of the demonstration projects for which a 

14 grant is made under this section, including the em15 ployment and earnings of project participants. 

16 ‘‘(2) FUNDING.—The Secretary shall use not 

17 less than 4 percent of total amount made available 

18 to carry out this section for each fiscal year for the 

19 study required by paragraph (1), evaluations, and 

20 associated staffing, for the purpose of supporting the 

21 rigorous evaluation of the demonstration projects, 

22 and supporting the continued study of the short-, 

23 medium-, and long-term effects of the demonstration 

24 projects, including the effectiveness of new or added 

25 elements of the demonstration projects.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3767 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

3 on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 22013A0709(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22013A0709(01)

**Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation **

*
Official Journal L 188 , 09/07/2013 P. 0002 - 0002 *

Agreement

between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation

THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY,

Hereinafter referred to as "the Community", and

THE KOREAN PENINSULA ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION,

Hereinafter referred to as "KEDO",

Whereas:

(1) KEDO was established pursuant to the Agreement of 9 March 1995 on the Establishment of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation, as amended on 19 September 1997, between the Governments of the Republic of Korea, Japan and the United States of America;

(2) The fifth Agreement concluded between the Community and KEDO expired on 31 May 2012;

(3) After its decision to terminate KEDO’s nuclear light water reactor project and the 2007 decision to fulfil the responsibilities of the Secretariat with a greatly reduced staff and minimal office facilities, KEDO’s Executive Board decided in 2011 to continue KEDO beyond 31 May 2012;

(4) Both the Community and KEDO have expressed the wish to continue their cooperation with the objective of implementing the termination of the LWR project and an orderly winding up of KEDO;

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Application of the provisions of previous Agreement

Unless otherwise specified in one of the articles here below, the provisions of the previous Agreement between the Community and KEDO, which expired on 31 May 2012, shall remain applicable under this Agreement.

Article 2

Community contribution

There shall be no financial contribution from the Community to KEDO’s budget under this Agreement.

Article 3

Duration

This Agreement will expire on 31 May 2013. It will be automatically renewed each year for a period of another year, unless a party notifies the other party that it wishes to terminate the Agreement at least one month before the date of expiry. It may also be terminated with immediate effect after withdrawal from KEDO by any of the other Members currently represented in the Executive Board. This Agreement will not be renewed beyond 31 May 2015.

Article 4

Entry into force

This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Community and KEDO and will take effect from 1 June 2012.

Done at Brussels on the fourth day of July in the year two thousand and thirteen, in two originals.

For the European Atomic Energy Community

Günther Oettinger

Done at New Jersey on the twenty-fourth day of June in the year two thousand and thirteen, in two originals.

For the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation

David Wallace

--------------------------------------------------
XIAO-YING YU, petitioner, v. MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, et al.

No. 17-213.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Brian William SCHUMAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Emile MYRTHIL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6009.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
## In the



# United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 19

- 14434

____________________

RICHARD HUNSTEIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus PREFERRED COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:19

- cv

- 00983

- TPB

- TGW

____________________ USCA11 Case: 19-14434 Date Filed: 11/17/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 19

- 14434

Before WILLIAM PRYO R, C HIEF J UDGE , WILSON, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, AND BRASHER, C IRCUIT J UDGES

. A judge of this Court having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in act ive service having voted in favor, the Court sua sponte ORDERS that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED. USCA11 Case: 19-14434 Date Filed: 11/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 97-31293

_______________ JOHN MCCORKLE and VIRGIE MCCORKLE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
VERSUS CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al., Defendants, CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

_______________ No. 98-30068

_______________ JOHN MCCORKLE and VIRGIE MCCORKLE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al., Defendants, CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2042-S)

_________________________ August 19, 1999* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

* * Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec edent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 2 Before JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and STAGG, * District Judge:
PER CURIAM: **
I n these two consolidated appeals, we have carefully considered the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, the applicable law, and the oral arguments of counsel. We conclude that there is no reversible error either in the summary judgment granted in favor of plaintiffs on the issue of liability (which the city appeals) or in the amount of damages (which the plaintiffs appeal).
AFFIRMED.
Kenny BLANC, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Philip Andra GRIGSBY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Alexander ACEVAL, petitioner, v. Derrick BOND.

No. 16-1374.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4598 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4598

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
   FIRPTA for interests held by certain foreign insurance companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2019

Mr. Suozzi (for himself and Mr. Holding) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
   FIRPTA for interests held by certain foreign insurance companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRPTA EXEMPTION FOR INTERESTS HELD BY CERTAIN FOREIGN 
              INSURANCE COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 897(l)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``a qualified foreign pension fund shall 
        not'' and inserting ``a qualified foreign entity shall not''; 
        and
            (2) by striking ``held by a qualified foreign pension fund 
        shall be treated as such a fund'' and inserting ``held 
        (directly or indirectly) by one or more qualified foreign 
        entities shall be treated as such an entity''.
    (b) Qualified Foreign Entity.--Section 897(l) of such Code is 
amended by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and 
(4), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (1) the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(2) Qualified foreign entity.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `qualified foreign entity' means--
                    ``(A) any qualifying insurance corporation (as 
                defined in section 1297(f)(1)), and
                    ``(B) any qualified foreign pension fund.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The heading of section 897(l) is amended 
by striking ``Qualified Foreign Pension Funds'' and inserting ``Certain 
Foreign Entities''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to dispositions and distributions after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Craig S. Fawcett, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of XATA Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
May 13, 2005    Signature: /s/ Craig S. Fawcett  Name: Craig S. Fawcett  Print Title: Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 144A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.144.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 144A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5523 May 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.144.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 144A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5523 May 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 144A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2012/C 144A/01

Reserve lists — Open competition

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 159/13 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 159 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5813 May 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 159

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5813 May 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 159/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (Publication of titles and references of technical standards within the meaning of Article 20 of the Directive)
   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 159/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (Publication of titles and references of technical standards within the meaning of Article 20 of the Directive)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of technical standards within the meaning of Article 20 of the Directive)

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
John David BATTAGLIA, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7165 (17A792).

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 1, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
EXHIBIT 4.3

                               EP MEDSYSTEMS, Inc.
              Form of 1995 Long Term Incentive Plan Award Agreement

EP MedSystems
100 Stierli Court
Suite 107
Mt. Arlington, NJ 07856
Tel: 973-398-2800
Fax: 973-398-8636

                     [FORM OF INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AWARD]
[Recipient]

                      Re: Incentive Stock Option

Dear [ Recipient]

      This letter confirms that you have been granted an incentive stock option
representing an aggregate of [insert quantity] shares of common stock of EP
MedSystems, Inc. (the "Company") dated as of [insert date of grant], pursuant to
the Amended 1995 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). A copy of the Plan is
attached and made a part hereof. This option is subject to the terms of such
Plan, and the terms of the Plan shall control in the event of any conflict with
this letter.

You may exercise purchase rights for [insert quantity] shares under this option
[insert vesting schedule]. The exercise price for the shares covered by this
option is [insert exercise price] per share and the exercise period for this
option is [insert exercise term] from the date of grant.

NEITHER THE OPTION GRANTED HEREUNDER, NOR THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BE
ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF SUCH OPTION, HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND MAY NEITHER BE REOFFERED
OR SOLD UNLESS REGISTERED OR UNLESS AN EXEMPTION FROM SUCH REGISTRATION IS
AVAILABLE. THE CERTIFICATES FOR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF THIS OPTION WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DESIGNATED WITH A RESTRICTIVE
LEGEND SIMILAR TO THAT SET FORTH ABOVE.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            David A. Jenkins,
                                            President

Accepted and agreed to:


-----------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4268 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4268

 To require that the headquarters for the Bureau of Land Management be 
    located in the National Capital Region, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2019

 Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Trone, Mr. Brown of Maryland, 
   Mr. Raskin, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Wexton, and Mr. 
  Sarbanes) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that the headquarters for the Bureau of Land Management be 
    located in the National Capital Region, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLM HEADQUARTERS LOCATED IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.

    (a) Headquarters.--The headquarters for the Bureau of Land 
Management shall be located in the National Capital Region.
    (b) Employee Stations.--All employee positions stationed in the 
National Capital Region on the date of the enactment of this Act must 
remain stationed in the National Capital Region.
                                 <all>
```