alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T.H. HILL, petitioner, v. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al.

No. 16-8931.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 166/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 166 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5830 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 166

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5830 June 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 110 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of: | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 120 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of internal combustion engines to be installed in agricultural and forestry tractors and in non-road mobile machinery, with regard to the measurement of the net power, net torque and specific fuel consumption [2015/1000] | 170 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 110 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of:

1

*

Regulation No 120 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of internal combustion engines to be installed in agricultural and forestry tractors and in non-road mobile machinery, with regard to the measurement of the net power, net torque and specific fuel consumption [2015/1000]

170

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Jerry L. GATER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7078.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Saul Garcia CUEVAS, petitioner, v. James D. HARTLEY, Warden.

No. 17-6107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Russell THAW, et al., petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, et al.

No. 17-594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, petitioner, v. SF MARKETS, L.L.C., dba Sprouts Farmers Market.

No. 16-801.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4434 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4434

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to reauthorize the Appalachian 
              Regional Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2019

Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mr. Trone, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. 
Fleischmann, Mrs. Miller, and Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to reauthorize the Appalachian 
              Regional Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Appalachian Regional Commission 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. APPALACHIAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 14703 of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ``through 2020.'' 
                and inserting ``through 2020; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 
        2025.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$20,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``2020'' and inserting ``2025''.
    (b) Termination.--Section 14704 of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``2020'' and inserting ``2025''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7544

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

XIOMARO E. HERNANDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District

Judge. (CR-90-348-A; CA-05-191)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Willard Dunham, Jr., Meghan Suzanne Skelton, OFFICE OF THE

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark

Clayton Grundvig, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Xiomaro E. Hernandez, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order and order on reconsideration denying her

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as well as the court’s order denying

a certificate of appealability. The orders are not appealable

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find the district court’s assessment of her

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are likewise

debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hernandez has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Alvin Sheldon KANOFSKY, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 17-1271.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/10/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      100,370
COMMITMENTS
     640   15,875    3,476   81,972   64,607   86,088   83,958   14,282   16,412

CHANGES FROM 08/03/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,877)
     121    2,004    1,452    4,037    1,047    5,610    4,503    1,267    2,374

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     0.6     15.8      3.5     81.7     64.4     85.8     83.6     14.2     16.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       4       16       11       19       24       32       42
```

----

Updated August 13, 2010
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 10, 2005



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ CINDY MCPIKE                                 
|Cindy McPike                                     
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Juliette FAIRLEY, petitioner, v. Mauricette FAIRLEY, et al.

No. 17-7005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
**Exhibit 10.21**

 

**DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS**

**BETWEEN VARIAN, INC. AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

 

Each director (other than the Chairman of the Board) who is not a Company employee is paid an annual retainer fee of $30,000. Each non-employee directoris also paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each Board meeting attended by telephone and $1,000 for each Board committee meeting attended in person or by telephone (effective following the next annual meeting of theCompany’s stockholders, scheduled to be held on February 3, 2005, this committee meeting fee will be increased to $1,500). The director who chairs the Audit Committee of the Board is paid an additional annual retainer fee of $15,000. Thedirectors who chair the Compensation and the Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board are each paid an additional annual retainer fee of $5,000 (effective following the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders, scheduled to beheld on February 3, 2005, this additional annual retainer fee will be increased to $7,500). 

 

The non-employee Chairman of the Board is paid an annual retainer fee of $120,000 (in lieu of any other annual retainer, committee chair or attendance fees). 

 

Directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the retainer,chairman or meeting fees described above, shares of the Company’s common stock based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the fees would have been paid. 

 

Under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not aCompany employee receives upon initial appointment or election to the Board a nonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and receives annually thereafter a nonqualified stock option to acquire 5,000 sharesof the Company’s common stock. In lieu of these grants, the non-employee Chairman of the Board receives upon initial appointment as such a nonqualified stock option to acquire 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. All such stockoptions are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, are vested and exercisable beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year term. 

 

Each director is reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses thatsuch director and his or her spouse incurs attending Board meetings and functions.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd F. Chadee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 25, 2010



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Floyd F. Chadee                              
|Floyd F. Chadee                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Mark Stephen ELLIS, petitioner, v. Rick RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Robert A. RUCHO, et al., applicants, v. COMMON CAUSE, et al.

No. 17A745.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 6, 2018.

The motion of appellees to construe the application for stay as a jurisdictional statement and for an expedited briefing and oral argument schedule is denied.

Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would grant the motion.
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-78379, 333-35484, 333-99251, and 333-116062 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-91954 on Form S-3, of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc., of our report dated March 10, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and managements report of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP    



Portland, Oregon

March 10, 2005
Manhua Mandy LIN, petitioner, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, dba Dow Advanced Materials.

No. 17-784.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*986Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc.



|   |  |                                                 |  |         
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | --------
|   |  | Company Name                                    |  | Location
|1. |  | Standard Insurance Company                      |  | Oregon  
|2. |  | The Standard Life Insurance Company of New York |  | New York
|3. |  | StanCorp Retirement Services, Inc.              |  | Oregon  
|4. |  | StanCorp Mortgage Investors, LLC                |  | Oregon  
|5. |  | StanCorp Investment Advisers, Inc.              |  | Oregon  
|6. |  | StanCorp Equities, Inc.                         |  | Oregon  
|7. |  | StanCorp Real Estate, LLC                       |  | Oregon  
|8. |  | StanCorp Trust Company                          |  | Oregon  
|9. |  | Standard Management, Inc.                       |  | Oregon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      33,510,000
<SECURITIES>                                   999,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  685,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,348,000
<PP&E>                                       1,538,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,255,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,403,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,401,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,500,000
<COMMON>                                        43,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,270,000<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,403,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,751,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,953,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,141,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                17,141,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<FN>
<F1>Additional paid-in-capital - $273,733,000
Accumulated deficit - $(252,617,000)
Accumulated other comprehensive income - $1,154,000
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 460 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 460

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to amend the Federal 
 medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia for fiscal 
               years after 2020, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2019

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to amend the Federal 
 medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia for fiscal 
               years after 2020, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FMAP FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR FISCAL YEARS AFTER 2020.

    Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``, and (aa)'' and inserting ``, 
                (aa), and (ff)''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``for each fiscal year before 
                fiscal year 2021'' after ``District of Columbia shall 
                be 70 percent''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(ff) FMAP for District of Columbia for Fiscal Years After 2020.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (b), 
        beginning with fiscal year 2021, the Federal medical assistance 
        percentage for the District of Columbia for a fiscal year shall 
        be the higher of the Federal medical assistance percentage 
        otherwise determined under subsection (b) for the District of 
        Columbia for such fiscal year or the alternative Federal 
        medical assistance percentage specified in paragraph (2) for 
        such fiscal year.
            ``(2) Alternative fmap.--The alternative Federal medical 
        assistance percentage specified in this paragraph for--
                    ``(A) fiscal year 2021 is 68 percent;
                    ``(B) fiscal year 2022 is 66 percent;
                    ``(C) fiscal year 2023 is 64 percent;
                    ``(D) fiscal year 2024 is 62 percent;
                    ``(E) fiscal year 2025 is 60 percent;
                    ``(F) fiscal year 2026 is 58 percent;
                    ``(G) fiscal year 2027 is 56 percent; and
                    ``(H) fiscal year 2028 and each succeeding fiscal 
                year is 54 percent.''.
                                 <all>
```
Kirk A. SIMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6185.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
David J. RIDELL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 17-568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50595

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS PILAR GARCIA-DELGADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(MO-95-CR-68-1)

_________________________________________________________________

February 25, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Pilar Garcia-Delgado entered a conditional guilty plea

to possession with intent to distribute marijuana, reserving his

right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence.

Garcia-Delgado contends that his Fourth Amendment rights were

violated because the Border Patrol Agent who stopped the vehicle he

was driving on a private ranch road (this route allowed a bypass of

Marfa, Texas, where the border patrol sector headquarters is

located) lacked reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. He

contends further that the Agent made a second illegal stop of the
- 2 -

vehicle and that he did not consent voluntarily to a search of the

vehicle following that stop. Pursuant to our review of the record,

we AFFIRM essentially for the reasons stated by the district court

in its thorough, well-reasoned opinion. See United States v.

Garcia-Delgado, No. MO-95-CR-068 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 1996).

AFFIRMED
Order issued September 20, 2012 

In The 

Qtourt of l\ppeats 

lF.ifth ilistrid of ID~~as at ilallas > 

No. 05-12-01239-CV 

IN RE WILLIAM THOMAS BEANE, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. WOS-50820-V(A) 

ORDER 

Before Justices Morris, Richter, and Lang-Miers 

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator's petition for writ ofhabeas 

corpus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.