alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          42,966
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          20,824
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                39,310
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    237,563
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         183,856
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           183,166
<LOANS>                                      3,565,144
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,276,664
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,669,886
<SHORT-TERM>                                   210,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            969,500
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           254
<OTHER-SE>                                     343,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,276,664
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                121,045
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,790
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,374
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               136,209
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              49,166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,721
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           57,322
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 538
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 32,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,195
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      24,918
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,918
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.020
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.990
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.46
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,637
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,419
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,770
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      347
<RECOVERIES>                                        55
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,978
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         16,978


</TABLE>
Jerry WALDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6982.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# Official Journal L 282/31 O

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 282 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6031 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 282

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6031 October 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1925 of 12 October 2017 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1925 of 12 October 2017 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Max JERI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6603.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Cornell W. BARBER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7432.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Parish Ramon CARTER, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 17-634.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      27,420,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,746,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,319,535
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,178,910
<PP&E>                                      16,798,611
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,231,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,389,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,217,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       122,375
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,187,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,389,508
<SALES>                                      6,656,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,797,975
<CGS>                                          699,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,897,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,128,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               155,756
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,350,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                   899,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,451,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,451,735
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
<FN>
<F1>This amount is reported as EPS BASIC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 154**  **2**

AMOS VAUGHN , Plaintiff

– Appell ant ,

v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

– Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Cou rt for the East ern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. David W

. Daniel , Magistrate Judge. ( 2 : 09

- c v - 000 2 8

- DAN)

Submitted : January 28, 2011 Decided: February 1 5 , 2011

Before MOTZ, AGEE, a nd KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion

.
Amos Vaughn , Appellant Pro Se
. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh , North Carolina ; Mary Ellen Russell, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income . W e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Astrue , No.
2:09

- cv - 00028

- DAN (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2010) . We deny the motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
October 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Date: December 9, 2004



|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                                                      
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Varian, Inc.



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09266]



[[Page 25511]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4494-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Michigan; Amendment No. 9 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Michigan (FEMA-4494-DR), dated March 27, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on March 28, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Thomas C. 
Sivak, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Moises Dugan as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-09266 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Vince MANN, petitioner, v. Catherine S. BAUMAN, Warden.

No. 17-6627.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Raymond J. LUCIA, et al., petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 17-130.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 12, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/02/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       68,513
COMMITMENTS
  20,425    1,704    8,361   26,028   42,219   54,814   52,284   13,699   16,229

CHANGES FROM 10/26/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,050)
     532      358       12    1,536    2,150    2,080    2,520      970      530

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.8      2.5     12.2     38.0     61.6     80.0     76.3     20.0     23.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       85)
      35        6       21       30       27       72       51
```

----

Updated November 5, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4576 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4576

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow contributions to 
  health savings accounts in the case of individuals with spouses who 
                have health flexible spending accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2019

Ms. Wexton (for herself, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Blumenauer) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow contributions to 
  health savings accounts in the case of individuals with spouses who 
                have health flexible spending accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Savings for Families Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. HSA CONTRIBUTIONS PERMITTED IF SPOUSE HAS A HEALTH FLEXIBLE 
              SPENDING ACCOUNT.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(c)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (ii), by 
striking the period at the end of clause (iii) and inserting ``, and'', 
and by inserting after clause (iii) the following new clause:
                            ``(iv) coverage under a health flexible 
                        spending arrangement of the spouse of the 
                        individual for any plan year of such 
                        arrangement if the aggregate reimbursements 
                        under such arrangement for such year do not 
                        exceed the aggregate expenses which would be 
                        eligible for reimbursement under such 
                        arrangement if such expenses were determined 
                        without regard to any expenses paid or incurred 
                        with respect to such individual.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this subsection shall 
apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Abatement Order filed April 2, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00859-CV

____________

AMERICAN RISK INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant

V.

VERONICA SERPIKOVA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-14955

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from a final judgment signed July 25, 2014. Appellant filed 

a timely motion for new trial. The reporter’s record in this case was due November 

24, 2014, but it has not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On December 2, 2014,

this court ordered Michelle Tucker, the official court reporter, to file the record 

within 30 days. The court reporter did not file the record as ordered or respond to 

this court’s order. On January 21, 2015, this court again ordered Michelle Tucker
to file the record within 30 days. In the order, the court instructed the court reporter 

that if the record was not filed, the court would order the trial court to conduct a 

hearing to determine the reason for the court reporter’s failure to file the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. The court reporter has not filed a 

request for an extension of time to file the record or any response to this court’s 

orders.

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed. Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). The trial court must help 

ensure that the court’s reporter’s work is timely accomplished. Tex. R. App. P. 

13.3. Because the reporter’s record is four months past due and the court reporter 

has not responded to our orders, we issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the 80th District Court to conduct a hearing at 

which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall 

participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish 

a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as 

to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file 

the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the trial court to prepare a record, 

in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The trial judge shall make 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to 

this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. 

The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of 

this court within 30 days of the date of this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

supplemental records ordered herein are filed in this court. The court also will 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 
court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the 

record prior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial 

court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
----

Action brought on 28 February 2005 by Dorian Lacombe against the Council of the European Union

(Case T-116/05)

(2005/C 115/61)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 February 2005 by Dorian Lacombe, residing in Evry (France), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was a member of the auxiliary staff at the Council from 1 December 2002 to 31 July 2003. He claims that the Council reduced from 73 to 59.5 days the amount of overtime to which he was entitled for hours worked on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays and days when the offices were closed, without informing him of the reasons. In support of this claim, the applicant pleads infringement of Article 57 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, infringement of Article 56 of the Staff Regulations, infringement of Staff Notice No 88/93 and breach of the duty to state reasons.

The applicant further alleges that, in breach of Article 70 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, the Council did not pay the contributions payable to the Caisse de Sécurité Sociale (French Social Security Fund) of which he was a member. The applicant also claims compensation for the damage which he suffered as a consequence.

----
Antonio Ledon JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7227.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-78379, 333-35484, 333-99251, and 333-116062 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-91954 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 27, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption, on January 1, 2007, of Statement of Position 05-1, Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs
in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts, and on December 31, 2006, of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans), and the effectiveness of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP    

Portland, Oregon

February 27, 2008