alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XB974]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of web conference.

# SUMMARY:

The Center of Independent Experts (CIE) review of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI Pacific ocean perch stock assessment will be held May 9, 2022 through May 13, 2022.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Monday, May 9, 2022 through Friday, May 13, 2022, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., Pacific Time.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be a web conference. Join online through the link at                         *https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/​Plan_​Team/​2022_​pop_​cie/​.*

*Council address:*                         Alaska Fishery Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA 98115; telephone: (206) 526-4000.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Paul Spencer, Alaska Fishery Science Center staff; phone: (206) 526-4000; email:                         *paul.spencer@noaa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

### Monday, May 9, 2022, through Friday, May 13, 2022

                    The CIE will review the Bering Sea Aleutian Islands Pacific Ocean perch stock assessment input data and model. The agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at                     *https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/​Plan_​Team/​2022_​pop_​cie/​*                     prior to the meeting, along with meeting materials.                

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: April 19, 2022.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2022-08608 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### The State of Florida, *Appellant,*v. Walton County, Florida, *Appellee.*

Division A.

Opinion filed January 28, 1929.

*L. L. Fabisinski,*for Appellant;

*D. Stuart Gillis,*for Appellee.

This suit is brought pursuant to Sec. 3296 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats. of Fla., 1920 (Sec. 5106, Comp. Gen. Laws of Fla., 1927), to validate certain bonds of Walton County, Florida, issued under authority of Chap. 13528, Acts of 1927, Laws of Fla. There was an answer to the petition on the part of the State challenging the validity of the said bonds on the ground that they were issued in violation of Sec. 5 of Art. IX of the Constitution of Florida.

Sec. 5 of Art. IX of the Constitution, among other things, provides that the Legislature shall authorize counties in this State to assess and impose taxes for county purpose and for *no other*purpose. It is contended here that the bonds authorized by Chap. 13528, Acts of 1927, are not for a *60county purpose as contemplated by Sec. 5 of Art. IX of the Constitution and that in consequence thereof no county taxes can be assessed and imposed to pay the interest and to provide a sinking fund to retire said bonds.

Chap. 13528, Acts of 1927, authorized the issuance of county bonds to purchase a site and to construct a hospital or hospitals in Walton county. The contention of appellant as to the validity of said bonds is grounded on the decision of this Court in McRae et al. v. McSwain et al., 95 Fla., 893, 116 So. R. 862.

In McRae et al. v. McSwain et al., Chap. 10514, Acts of 1925, was held void because it did not provide that the “general hospital” authorized therein -was for a county purpose and because the said Act did not authorize the County Commissioners of DeSoto County to purchase a site and erect said hospital.

In the main Chap. 10514, Acts of 1925, which was held void and inoperative in McRae v. McSwain, *supra,*and Chap. 13528, Acts of 1927, which is assaulted in the instant case are similar in purpose and construction but the very grounds on which Chap. 10514, Acts of 1925, was held void were cured in Chap. 13528, Acts of Í927, in that said last recited Act specifically authorizes the purchase of a site for the construction of the hospital or hospitals so authorized, and Secs. 13 and 19 of the said Act provide that said hospital or hospitals shall be for a public purpose and for the benefit of all the people of the county.

We think that such provisions bring Chap. 13528, Acts of 1927, within the purview of Sec. 5 of Art. IX of the Constitution so the decree of the chancellor below must be and is hereby affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Rogers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael W. Rogers  
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | May 10, 2007           



47
CAUSE NO S

. 07

- 16

- 00 411

- CR & 07

- 16

- 00 412

- CR

LUIS DANIEL AYALA § IN THE COURT OF §

v. § CRIMINAL APPEALS §

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS



## MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE THE PETITION FOR

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

To the Honorable J udges of the Court of Criminal A ppeals :

COMES NOW Luis Daniel Ayala , Petitioner

, and files this m otion to extend

the time to file his PDR to November 4, 2017

.



### I.

The court of appeals overruled the petitioner’s motion for rehearing on

September 5, 2017

. No prior motion has been filed to ext end time for a PDR

.



### I I

.

The reason for this request is as follows: Undersigned counsel represents

many other clients on appeal and parole revocation proceedings , and has not until

now had time to prepare the PDR in this case

.

WHEREFORE, the Petitioner prays the Court grant an extension of time to

file his PDR to November 4 , 2017

. PD-1104-17

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/5/2017 8:24 PM Accepted 10/6/2017 10:47 AM

DEANA WILLIAMSON

CLERK2 Respectfully submitted,

/s JOHN BENNETT

John Bennett

Post Office Box 19144
Amarillo, Texas 79114 (806 ) 282

- 4455 Fax: (806) 398

- 1988

State Bar Number 00785691 Email: AppealsAttorney@gmail.com Attorney for the petitioner



### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above Motion has been served on

Chris Strowd

, Esq.

, Deaf Smith Co unty Assistant Criminal District Attorney

, email

to him at cstrowd@gmail.com , and on Stacy Soule , Esq., State Prosecuting

Attorney, by email to her at information @spa.texas.gov , both on Octo b er 5 , 2017

.

/s JOHN BENNETT

John Bennett
WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, petitioner, v. Fleur S. BRESLER, as the Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles S. Bresler, et al.

No. 17-248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Yann IANNUCCI, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 17-5422.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00392-CR

James Dewayne Hollis

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1363635D)

December 3, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
# Official Journal C 156/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.156.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 156 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5316 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.156.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 156

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5316 June 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RESOLUTIONS |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 156/01 | Council Resolution of 8 June 2010 on coordination of the Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) and thin capitalisation rules within the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RESOLUTIONS

Council

2010/C 156/01

Council Resolution of 8 June 2010 on coordination of the Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) and thin capitalisation rules within the European Union

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 156/02 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2010/C 156/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 156/02

Euro exchange rates

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2010/C 156/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 156/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5895 — Keolis Nordic/Busslink Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 156/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5895 — Keolis Nordic/Busslink Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Jose Miguel MADRIGALES-RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-741.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Phillip SCHENCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7729.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10(a)

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (Reg. No. 33-29852) of Sun Life of Canada
(U.S.) Variable Account F of our report dated February 10, 2000 accompanying
the financial statements of the Regatta, Regatta Gold, Regatta Classic and
Regatta Platinum Sub-Accounts included in Sun Life of Canada (U.S.) Variable
Account F appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part
of such Registration Statement, to the use of our report dated February 10,
2000 accompanying the statutory financial statements of Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada (U.S.), which includes explanatory paragraphs relating to
the use of statutory accounting practices which differ from generally
accepted accounting principles, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of
such Registration Statement, and to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated February 10, 2000 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) for the year ended December 31,
1999, which includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of statutory
accounting practices which differ from generally accepted accounting
principles.


    We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Accountants" and
"Appendix B - Condensed Financial Information - Accumulation Unit Values" in
such Prospectus and under the heading "Financial Statements" in such Statement
of Additional Information.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts


April 6, 2000
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 12, 2006 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-2306
v. (D.C. No. CIV-05-692 LH/WDS) DENNIS RAY JONES, (D. New Mex.)

Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

Before KELLY , McKAY, and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

Appellant, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, was convicted of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violat ion of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A). He appealed his conviction, whic h we affirmed in United States v. Jones , No. 96-2061, 1998 WL 4355 (10th Cir. Jan. 8, 1998 ). On June 20, 2005, Appellant sought review before the d istrict court to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On July 13, 2005, the district court issued an order requiring Appellant to show w hy his § 2255 motion should not be dismissed as barred by the one-year statute of limitations. The district court disagreed with Appellant’s respo nse–that we had authorized Appellant’s § 2255 motion or, alternativ ely, that the recent Supreme-2-

Court decisions of Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), made his motion timely. Mem orandum Opinion and Order, 1-2 (D.N.M. Oct. 19, 2005). The district court explained that “[e]ven assuming for purposes of this order that Crawford and Booker recognize new rights, these decision[s] have not been made re troactive on collateral review of a criminal sentence.” Id . at 2 (citing Brown v. Uphoff , 381 F.3d 1219, 1227 (10th Cir. 2004)). The issues Appellant raises on appeal are identical to those brought before the district court. To grant a certificate of appe alability, Appellant must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutio nal right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (1994). In order to meet this burden, Appellant must demonstrate “that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different m anner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quotation omitted). We have carefully reviewed Appellant’s brief, the d istrict court’s disposition, and the record on appeal. Nothing in the facts, the record on appeal, or Appellant’s filing raises an issue which meets o ur standard for the grant of a certificate of appealability. For substantially th e same reasons set forth by the district court in its order of October 19, 2005, we cannot say “that reasonable-3-

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner.” Id. We DENY Appellant’s request for a certificate of appealabi lity and DISMISS the appeal. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
Reginald Bryan SPELLMAN, petitioner, v. Gary LANE, Warden.

No. 17-6486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

*666Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.2

   FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND


NEW YORK, NY:  June 2, 2009 - Financial Federal Corporation
(NYSE:FIF) today announced its Board of Directors declared a $0.15
per share quarterly dividend on its common stock.  The dividend is
payable July 10, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on June 19, 2009.  The dividend rate is the same as the
prior quarter.


Financial Federal Corporation is an independent financial services
company specializing in financing construction, road transportation
and refuse equipment through installment sales and leasing programs
for dealers, manufacturers and end users nationwide.  Please visit
www.financialfederal.com for more information.


CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth
          Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
Jose GARCIA-ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6765.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10609 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. DE M ET RI OUS J AC KS ON D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 07- C R
- 271- 1
B e fo r e J O N E S , C h ie f J u d g e , a n d J O L L Ya n d E L R O D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der ap poi n t ed to represent D em et ri ou s Jackson has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S
. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Ja c ks o n ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/28/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      532,176
COMMITMENTS
  85,162   17,273  119,122  310,140  380,100  514,424  516,495   17,752   15,681

CHANGES FROM 12/21/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,542)
   9,681    1,192    5,534    6,259   15,748   21,474   22,474       68     -932

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.0      3.2     22.4     58.3     71.4     96.7     97.1      3.3      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      117)
      41       12       39       57       59      108      100
```

----

Updated January 3, 2011
# L_2014342EN.01003801.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 131/2014

of 27 June 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2013/794/EU of 19 December 2013 on the recognition of Georgia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2013/794/EU of 19 December 2013 on the recognition of Georgia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

1

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 56jq (Commission Implementing Decision 2012/783/EU) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘56jr. | 32013 D 0794: Commission Implementing Decision 2013/794/EU of 19 December 2013 on the recognition of Georgia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (OJ L 349, 21.12.2013, p. 105).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘56jr.

32013 D 0794: Commission Implementing Decision 2013/794/EU of 19 December 2013 on the recognition of Georgia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (OJ L 349, 21.12.2013, p. 105).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision 2013/794/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 June 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (2).

2

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  OJ L 349, 21.12.2013, p. 105.

1

(2)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

2

---
Charlie M. GATSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6193.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Linda SHAO, petitioner, v. McMANIS FAULKNER, LLP, et al.

No. 17-256.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.