alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013081EN.01002401.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 222/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex VII (Recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 623/2012 of 11 July 2012 amending Annex II to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 623/2012 of 11 July 2012 amending Annex II to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0623: Commission Regulation (EU) No 623/2012 of 11 July 2012 (OJ L 180, 12.7.2012, p. 9).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0623: Commission Regulation (EU) No 623/2012 of 11 July 2012 (OJ L 180, 12.7.2012, p. 9).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 623/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 180, 12.7.2012, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4224 

For the relief of Edith Espinal Moreno. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2019 

Mrs. BEATTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Edith Espinal Moreno. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR EDITH 

4 ESPINAL MORENO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Edith Espinal Moreno shall be eligible for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4224 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Edith Espinal 

2 Moreno enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Edith Espinal Moreno, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4224 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Edith Espinal Moreno 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Sulyaman Alislam WASALAAM, petitioner, v. Christ YOUNG, et al.

No. 16-9093.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Richard A. SALES, petitioner, v. Jay CASSADY, Warden.

No. 17-7000.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,015-01

EX PARTE KWESIE WILSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 14F0523-005-A IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BOWIE COUNTY 

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON, J., joined.

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., joined.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful restraint

while in custody and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years. He did not appeal his conviction.

On April 21, 2016, the trial court signed an order designating issues. The habeas record has

been forwarded to this Court prematurely. We remand this application to the 5th District Court of

Bowie County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings

of fact and conclusions of law.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: June 15, 2016

Do not publish
Darrell I. BOLDEN, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 16-1308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128527 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128527 

 COA: 259248 

St. Clair CC: 02-001945-FH 

THOMAS KELLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4682 

To provide for United States participation in the Inter-Parliamentary Union, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2019 

Ms. LEE of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for United States participation in the InterParliamentary Union, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN THE INTER4 PARLIAMENTARY UNION. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), 

7 founded in 1889, is the world organization of na8 tional parliaments comprising 170 parliaments (in9 cluding all the major allies of the United States) and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4682 IH

1 working closely with the regional parliamentary or2 ganizations on all continents. 

3 (2) The core mission of the IPU is the pro4 motion of parliamentary democracy, the elaboration 

5 of standards and criteria for democratic parliamen6 tary practice, the protection of human rights, inter7 national peace and security, the political empower8 ment of women, sustainable international develop9 ment, and greater transparency and accountability 

10 at the global level, which are in line with United 

11 States interests and priorities. 

12 (3) Congress was a founding member of the 

13 IPU, and played an active and prominent role for 

14 many decades. 

15 (4) The main concerns of Congress, including 

16 the scheduling of main assembly and arrears, have 

17 been fully addressed by the IPU. 

18 (5) Through the activities of the IPU, the 

19 United States can usefully promote its core values of 

20 freedom, democracy, and human rights, and help 

21 build stronger parliaments around the world. 

22 (b) UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN THE INTER23 PARLIAMENTARY UNION.—Notwithstanding section 2503 

24 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4682 IH

1 1998 (division G of Public Law 105–277; 22 U.S.C. 276 

2 note)— 

3 (1) the Secretary of State is authorized to— 

4 (A) facilitate the readmission and partici5 pation of the United States in the Inter-Par6 liamentary Union; and 

7 (B) pay expenses to meet the annual obli8 gations of membership in the Inter-Parliamen9 tary Union, in accordance with the assessments 

10 determined by the Governing Council; and 

11 (2) the majority leader of the Senate, in con12 sultation with the minority leader of the Senate, and 

13 the Speaker of the House of Representatives, in con14 sultation with the minority leader of the House of 

15 Representatives, are authorized to designate Mem16 bers of Congress to serve as delegates to the Assem17 bly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2022472EN.01001901.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Instituto do Cinema e do Audiovisual IP v NOWO Communications SA

(Case C-411/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Services consisting in the creation and production of cinematographic and audiovisual works - Operators of subscription television services - Subscription fee payable by subscription television operators - Allocation of the revenue from the fee - Restriction - Effects too uncertain or too indirect)

(2022/C 472/21)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Instituto do Cinema e do Audiovisual IP

Defendant: NOWO Communications SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation introducing a fee intended to finance the promotion and dissemination of cinematographic and audiovisual works, provided that any effects of that fee on the freedom to provide services for the production of such works are too uncertain and indirect to constitute a restriction within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.

---
Kenneth Wayne MORGAN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference of the Committee on Strategy for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Friday, April 29, 2022, from 10:30-11:00 a.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference organized through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda is: Committee Chair's Opening Remarks; Update on NSF's FY 2023 Budget Request.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Members of the public can observe this meeting through a You Tube livestream. Meeting information including a You Tube link is available from the NSB website at                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​index.jsp#up.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-09045 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 20, 2019.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-1448

Lower Tribunal No. 14-27809

________________

Eduardo F. Eduartez,

Appellant,

vs.

Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Rodney Smith, Judge.

Kenzie N. Sadlak, P.A., and Kenzie N. Sadlak, for appellant.

Straley & Otto, P.A., and Shelley J. Murray and Brian T. Meanley (Fort

Lauderdale), for appellee Sunshores Condominium Association, Inc; The Griffith

Law Firm, P.A., and Derek R. Griffith, for appellee Degel, LLC.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After rendering its decision in Bank of New York Mellon v. Glenville, 252

So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 2018), the Florida Supreme Court quashed this Court’s June 13,
2018 decision in this case, and remanded the matter back to us for reconsideration

upon application of Glenville. Eduartez v. Federal Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, No. SC18-

1436 (Fla. S. Ct. Dec. 7, 2018). We ordered supplemental briefing from the parties.

We agree with appellees Degel, LLC and Sunshores Condominium Association

that Glenville requires affirmance of the trial court’s May 30, 2017 order that

denied appellant Eduardo F. Eduartez’s May 18, 2017 motion to vacate the surplus

fund disbursement order.

Affirmed.

2
Nathanael Lenard REYNOLDS, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 17-6489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
<PAGE>


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$______________                                                 December 9, 1999



      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _______________ an individual (hereinafter referred to
as the "Maker"), promises to pay to the order of Teltran International Group,
Ltd. ("Payee"), at _________________ or at such other place as the Payee may
from time to time designate in writing to the Maker, in lawful money of the
United States of America, in immediately available funds, the principal sum of
_____________________Dollars and No Cents.

      This note has been issued by the Maker in connection with the Maker's
exercise of options to purchase ______ shares of common stock ("Shares") of
Teltran International Group, Ltd. on the date hereof, at an exercise price of
______ cents ($0.__) per share (the "Exercise Price").

      The outstanding principal balance hereof shall be due and payable on
December 8, 2001; provided, however, that upon the sale by Maker of any Shares,
an amount equal to (x) the number of Shares times (y) the Exercise Price shall
become immediately due and payable. The principal balance hereof may be prepaid
in whole or in part at any time without penalty.

      Maker waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and all other demands
and notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance or
enforcement of this Note.

      The Payee shall not, by any act, delay, omission or otherwise, be deemed
to have waived any right or remedies hereunder unless such waiver be in writing
and signed by the Payee. A waiver on any one occasion shall not be construed as
a bar to or waiver of any such right or remedy on any future occasion.

      All provisions of this note shall be considered as separate terms and
conditions, and in the event that any one shall be held illegal, invalid or
unenforceable, all other provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect
as if the illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision were not a part hereof;
provided, however, that whenever possible, the illegal, invalid or unenforceable
provision shall be deemed modified and amended to the extent that it may thereby
be made legal, valid and enforceable.

      This note shall be governed by, construed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York respecting agreements negotiated, entered
into and to be fully performed within the State of New York.

      This note may not be altered, modified, amended, terminated or discharged
orally.

      Given under the hand and seal of the undersigned, the date and year
indicated above.




                                          ---------------------------------
SOLIDFX, LLC, petitioner, v. JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC.

No. 16-1303.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
YU HUA WANG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8837.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of dot com Entertainment Group, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31 2002 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,David C. Outhwaite, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and,                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ David C. Outhwaite

David C. OuthwaiteChief Executive OfficerMarch 28, 2003

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to dot com Entertainment Group, Inc. ("dot com") and will be retainedby dot com and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
George E. MAYERS, Jr., petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 17-7055.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF James W. KENNEDY.

No. D-3001.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

James W. Kennedy, of Toms River, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to *497show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, et al., petitioners, v. AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS, et al.

No. 17-40.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

*469Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jose OCHOA-CALEDO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7025.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mark A. VINZANT, petitioner, v. Jesus FERNANDEZ, et al.

No. 17-5493.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Alan Justin SMITH, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-6743.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
HARLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC., petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

No. 16-1310.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.