alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1620/2005

of 4 October 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 4 October 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
Raheem Chabezz JOHNSON, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-326.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Johner Taylor WILSON, petitioner, v. Lon W. SHULTZ.

No. 16-9426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4395 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4395

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the removal of the 
 record of default from credit history upon obtaining a Federal Direct 
         Consolidation Loan that discharges the defaulted loan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2019

   Ms. Stevens (for herself and Ms. Mucarsel-Powell) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the removal of the 
 record of default from credit history upon obtaining a Federal Direct 
         Consolidation Loan that discharges the defaulted loan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Slate through Consolidation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RECORD OF DEFAULT FROM CREDIT HISTORY UPON LOAN 
              CONSOLIDATION.

    Section 455(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(g)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``A borrower'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--A borrower''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Consumer reporting agencies.--Upon obtaining a 
        Federal Direct Consolidation Loan that discharges the liability 
        on a defaulted loan made, insured, or guaranteed under this 
        title, the Secretary, guaranty agency, or other holder of the 
        loan shall request any consumer reporting agency to which the 
        Secretary, guaranty agency or holder, as applicable, reported 
        the default of the loan, to remove the record of the default 
        from the borrower's credit history.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 28, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                        SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (UNAUDITED)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

</LEGEND>                                  
                                           
<S>                             <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                      $1,312
<SECURITIES>                                 5,118
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (152)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,217
<PP&E>                                      14,205
<DEPRECIATION>                              (7,790)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,546
<BONDS>                                      6,391
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        99
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,796
<SALES>                                      4,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,651
<CGS>                                        2,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.10)
                                           

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/22/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       49,120
COMMITMENTS
  17,382    1,944    6,959   12,849   25,123   37,190   34,026   11,930   15,094

CHANGES FROM 06/15/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -339)
   2,110   -2,580   -1,362   -1,885    4,385   -1,137      443      798     -782

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    35.4      4.0     14.2     26.2     51.1     75.7     69.3     24.3     30.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       62)
      21        8       16       28       23       55       43
```

----

Updated June 25, 2010
Michael D. PATTERSON, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 17-5747.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
Joseph Michael DONNETTE-SHERMAN, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-192.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
In the Matter of Dennis J. CAMPBELL OWENS.

No. D-2924.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

It having been reported that Dennis J. Campbell Owens, of Kansas City, Missouri, has died, the Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 11, 2016 is discharged.
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner, v. HAWAI'I.

No. 17-687.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Hawai'i denied.
Conrad ZAPIEN, petitioner, v. Ronald DAVIS, Warden.

No. 16-9146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jimmie Eugene WHITE, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on November 30, 2017.
Walter Leroy MOODY, Jr., petitioner, v. Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

No. 17-6665.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENT
                -----------------------------------------------
                   BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND G. EDWARD McCLAMMY
                   -----------------------------------------


     G. Edward McClammy was hired by the Registrant as its Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer on April 16, 1999.  Under the terms of his retention,
the Registrant agreed in an employment offer letter to pay to Mr. McClammy a
minimun annual cash bonus of $100,000 for fiscal year 2000 under the
Registrant's Management Incentive Plan, which amount is to be paid in April 2000
and credited against any annual cash bonus which otherwise becomes due after the
end of fiscal year 2000 based on achievement of fiscal year 2000 performance
objectives.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Remedent  USA,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Robin
List,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and  Stephen  F. Ross,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  respectively  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ ROBIN LIST                               /s/ STEPHEN F. ROSS
--------------------------------             ----------------------------------
Robin List,                                  Stephen F. Ross,
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
July 14, 2003                                July 14, 2003



                                       24
<PAGE>
Ya'shua Amen SHEKHEM EL BEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-5974.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
# Official Journal C 147/17 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 147 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4817 June 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 147

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4817 June 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 147/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 147/2 | Communication from the Commission — State aid — Publication of existing State aid measures in the new Member States in the sector of agriculture | 2 |
| 2005/C 147/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3829 — Mærsk/PONL) (1) | 18 |
| 2005/C 147/4 | Uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) (Classification of goods) | 19 |
| 2005/C 147/5 | Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint No 2005/4316 — SG(2005)A/3050/2 | 20 |
| 2005/C 147/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3593 — Apollo/Bakelite) (1) | 21 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 147/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 147/2

Communication from the Commission — State aid — Publication of existing State aid measures in the new Member States in the sector of agriculture

2

2005/C 147/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3829 — Mærsk/PONL) (1)

18

2005/C 147/4

Uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) (Classification of goods)

19

2005/C 147/5

Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint No 2005/4316 — SG(2005)A/3050/2

20

2005/C 147/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3593 — Apollo/Bakelite) (1)

21

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 147/7 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ | 22 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 147/7

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’

22

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Financial Federal Corporation for the quarter ended January 31,
2004, the undersigned officer, being the Chief Financial Officer of
Financial Federal Corporation, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
     January 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
     and

     (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
     10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of Financial Federal Corporation.

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is
not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.



March 10, 2004                     /s/ Steven F. Groth
--------------                     ----------------------------------
Date                               Steven F. Groth
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Senior
                                   Vice President
# C_2011252EN.01002704.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil (France)) — Accor Services France v Le Chèque Déjeuner CCR, Etablissement Public de Santé de Ville-Evrard

(Case C-269/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/55

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---
# Official Journal C 212/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 212 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6326 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 212

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6326 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | European Systemic Risk Board |
| 2020/C 212/01 | Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 27 May 2020 on restriction of distributions during the COVID-19 pandemic (ESRB/2020/7) | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Systemic Risk Board

2020/C 212/01

Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 27 May 2020 on restriction of distributions during the COVID-19 pandemic (ESRB/2020/7)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 212/02 | Euro exchange rates — 25 June 2020 | 7 |
| 2020/C 212/03 | Commission Statement following the presentation of Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 to the European Parliament and the Council in respect of the prevention and protection of the health and safety of workers that are or can be occupationally exposed to SARS-CoV-2 | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 212/02

Euro exchange rates — 25 June 2020

7

2020/C 212/03

Commission Statement following the presentation of Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 to the European Parliament and the Council in respect of the prevention and protection of the health and safety of workers that are or can be occupationally exposed to SARS-CoV-2

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 212/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9830 – Avacon Natur/NEW AG/Stadtenfalter JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 11 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 212/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9830 – Avacon Natur/NEW AG/Stadtenfalter JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANN LEE DUNCAN; KATHRINE GAY

DUNCAN,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 19

- 72249

Tax Ct. No. 26727

- 13

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted September 8, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Dann Lee Duncan and Kathrine Gay Duncan appeal pro se from the Tax

Court’s order de nying their petition challenging a deficiency in their 2008 joint

income tax. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de

novo the Tax Court’s legal conclusions, and for clear error its factual

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 16 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 72249

determinations

. Hongsermeier v. Comm’r , 621 F.3d 890, 899 (9th Cir. 2010). We

affirm.

The Tax Court properly determined that the notice of deficiency for tax year

2008 was timely. See 26 U.S.C. § 6501(a) (providing that a deficiency must

generally be assessed within three years from the date the taxpayer files his or her

federal income tax return); 26 U.S.C. § 6501(c)(4) (stating that a taxpayer may

consent in writing to the extension of the thre e

- year period for the assessment of

tax).

The Tax Court properly upheld the Commissioner’s determination of

deficiency because the amount paid to Mr. Duncan for his legal services was not

excludable from his gross income as a gift. See 26 U.S.C. § 61 (br oadly defining

gross income); Comm’r v. Dunkin , 500 F.3d 1065, 1069 (9th Cir. 2007)

(“[E]xclusions from gross income are construed narrowly in favor of taxation .” );

see also Comm’r v. Duberstein , 363 U.S. 278, 286 (1960) (“A gift in the statutory

sense

. . . proceeds from a detached and disinterested generosity

. . . out of

affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses.” (citation s and internal

quotation marks omitted) ).

The Tax Court did not clearly err in finding that taxpayers were not entitled

to the alleged deductions because they failed to meet their burden of clearly

showing a right to the deductions. See Sparkman v. Comm’r , 509 F.3d 1149, 11593 19

- 72249

(9th Cir. 2007) ( explaining that the taxpayer bears the burden of clearly showing

the right to the claimed deduction)

.

We reject as meritless t axpayers’ contention that the IRS violated their due

proces s rights

.

The Commissioner’s request to dismiss Mrs. Duncan from this appeal is

denied.

AFFIRMED.