alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Edward J. Puisis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        August 10, 2007 /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/10/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      209,005
COMMITMENTS
  66,350    9,049   20,663   91,189  143,374  178,202  173,086   30,803   35,919

CHANGES FROM 08/03/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,689)
  -2,659   -2,119   -3,754   10,508    9,319    4,095    3,446    3,594    4,243

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.7      4.3      9.9     43.6     68.6     85.3     82.8     14.7     17.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      212)
      73       26       42       64       90      149      150
```

----

Updated August 13, 2010
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/21/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      156,004
COMMITMENTS
  10,548   21,676   30,192   93,726   84,548  134,466  136,416   21,538   19,588

CHANGES FROM 12/14/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,500)
  -2,004     -790   -1,540    2,078     -728   -1,466   -3,058    5,966    7,558

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.8     13.9     19.4     60.1     54.2     86.2     87.4     13.8     12.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       86)
      20       25       30       28       31       70       72
```

----

Updated December 27, 2010
# C_2006261EN.01003502.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/35

---

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Blank and Others v Commission

(Case F-103/06)

(2006/C 261/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Klaus Blank (St. Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers )

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the refusal of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) to enter the applicants on the list of officials promoted to Grade A*10 in the 2005 promotion procedure, which decisions are to be implied from Administrative Notice No 85-2005 of 23 November 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the refusal of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) to enter the applicants on the list of officials promoted to Grade A*10 in the 2005 promotion procedure, which decisions are to be implied from Administrative Notice No 85-2005 of 23 November 2005;

| — | Directions to the AIPN as to the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions and, in particular, reclassification of the applicants in Grade A*10, with retrospective effect from 1 March 2005, |
| --- | --- |

—

Directions to the AIPN as to the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions and, in particular, reclassification of the applicants in Grade A*10, with retrospective effect from 1 March 2005,

| — | In the alternative, as regards one of the applicants, first, a direction to the defendant to recognise him as being eligible, on his next promotion, for promotion to Grade A*10 and, second, to order the defendant to compensate the same applicant for the loss he suffered as a result of not being promoted to Grade A*10 from 1 March 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, as regards one of the applicants, first, a direction to the defendant to recognise him as being eligible, on his next promotion, for promotion to Grade A*10 and, second, to order the defendant to compensate the same applicant for the loss he suffered as a result of not being promoted to Grade A*10 from 1 March 2005;

| — | An order that the defendant pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

An order that the defendant pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely on pleas in law very similar to those pleaded in Case F-45/06. (1)

1

---

(1)  OJEU C 143, 17.06.2006, p. 39.

1

---
Stephanie C. ARTIS, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 16-460.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 25, 2017.

The motion of Wisconsin and 23 other states for leave to participate in oral argument *52as *amici curiae* and for divided argument is denied.
Terrence BYRD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1371.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 28, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.
Demetrius DUNCAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9583.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25


     Master License Agreement between Registrant and DEVNET L.L.C. dated
February 18, 2000

     This document is confidential and has been omitted from this Form 10-K. It
has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Brandon COKER, et al., petitioners, v. Julian WHITTINGTON, et al.

No. 17-516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. Scott PRUITT, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency.

No. 17-478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Andrew U.D. STRAW, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, et al.

No. 17-6812.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-4269

Lower Tribunal No. 15-CF-15448-A-O

_____________________________

ERIK NUNEZ,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal Pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Luis F. Calderon, Judge.

July 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WHITE, SMITH and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Erik Nunez, Trenton, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
# Official Journal C 3/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.003.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 537 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.003.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 537 January 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 003/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2010/C 003/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 003/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2010/C 003/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1)

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 003/03 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2010/C 003/03

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                                 XEBEC GALLEON, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                               87-0438447
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

1800 East Sahara, Suite 107
Las Vegas, Nevada                                          89104
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (702) 792-7479

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 7, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 XEBEC GALLEON, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
# C_2006165EN.01003602.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/36

---

Action brought on 22 May 2006 — Pereira Sequeira v Commission

(Case F-65/06)

(2006/C 165/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rosa Maria Pereira Sequeira (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the individual decision relating to a change of category, effective as from 16 August 2005, notified on 19 September 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the individual decision relating to a change of category, effective as from 16 August 2005, notified on 19 September 2005;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a successful candidate of the internal competition COM/PC/04, published before the new Staff Regulations entered into force. She was appointed an official thereunder and classified in grade C*1, that is, the same grade in which she had been classified during her last temporary agent contract. Although previously she had enjoyed a more advantageous classification, she had been downgraded to grade C*1 prior to her appointment as an official.

In support of her action, the applicant alleges breach of Articles 31 and 62 of the Staff Regulations and Articles 5 and 2 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.

The applicant also alleges violation of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of protection of acquired rights.

---
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

AlbanyNet, Inc., a New York corporation

Ascent Networking, Inc., a New York corporation

Telesupport, Inc., a New York corporation

Telecon Communications Corp., Inc., a New York corporation

BOL Acquisition Co. VIII, Inc., a Connecticut corporation

Borg Internet Services, Inc., a New York corporation

Caravela Software, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, d/b/a Connix

Cyberzone, Inc., a Connecticut corporation

Global 2000 Communications, Inc., a New York corporation

Infoboard, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation

NECAnet, Inc., a Connecticut corporation

Prime Communication Systems, Inc., a New York corporation

Ulsternet, Inc., a New York corporation

WebWay Internet, Inc., a New York corporation

Xcalibur Internet, Inc., a New York corporation
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 2, 2006



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/S/ CINDY J. MCPIKE                              
|Cindy J. McPike                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.4

                       SECRETARY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the Annual Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-KSB of The
Bralorne Mining Company (the "Company") for the year ended November 30, 2002, as
filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Lucien
Paquette, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary Treasurer
and  Director,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge  and  belief:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
     15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934, as amended; and

2.   The  information  contained  in  this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.


                                            /s/  "Lucien Paquette"
                                            -----------------------
                                               Lucien Paquette
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer
                                          Chief  Accounting  Officer
                                       Secretary  Treasurer  and  Director

Date: January 12, 2004
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 621 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to an aggregate value of $800 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, to provide assistance to Ukraine and to make the determinations required under such section to direct such a drawdown.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2022-08536

Billing code 4710-10-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH HICKEY,

Appellant,

v.

KENNETH JERKINS,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1404

[January 17, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CA008600XXXXMB AO.

Kent Huffman of Hutchinson & Huffman, P.A., West Palm Beach, and 

Jon L. Brunenkant of Brunenkant & Associates, PLLC, Maryland, for 

appellant.

Kara Berard Rockenbach and Daniel M. Schwarz of Link & 

Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Philip L. Valente of Valente Law 

Firm, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7009

JABARI ZAKIYA, formerly known as Douglas Ross,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN HAWK, Director, Federal Bureau of

Prisons,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-98-468-AM)

Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: March 25, 1999

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jabari Zakiya, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jabari Zakiya appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) the district

court’s earlier order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zakiya v. Hawk,

No. CA-98-468-AM (E.D. Va. May 28, 1998). We also deny Zakiya’s

petition for a writ of mandamus essentially seeking the same relief

as prayed for in his Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d

818 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED