alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.18

                              NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE

APPLICANT: Fu- Lin, ZHOU


The application submitted on August 20, 1995 to obtain patent of invention named
A BUILDING ADDITION SHOCK REDUCING METHOD satisfies requirements of patent
application. According to section twenty-eight of the Patent Act and section
thirty-nine in Details and Regulations of the Patent Act, this application has
been accepted. The application number and application date are assigned as
followings :



APPLICATION NUMBER  :            95 1 09347.9
APPLICATION DATE    :            950820

FEE : 1 - 80% Reduced


Explanation in Brief:

This notice is a proof indicating that the Department of Patent of China has
accepted the applicant's application for a patent.

The Application number is the file number assigned by the Department of Patent
of China. Nine digits or characters compose the application number. The third
digit counting from the left represents the type of the application. Digit "1"
stands for invention; Digit "2" stands for practical new model type; Digit
"3"stands for apparent design. If the applicant finds that the application
number does not correctly stands for his/her application type, he/she should ask
the Department of Patent to make correction within 15 days from the date when
this notice is received by the applicant.

According to the twenty-eighth regulation stated in the Patent Act, if the
application is submitted by mail, the date of the postmark on the application
documents is assigned as the application date. If the applicant finds the
application date assigned different from the mailing date, he/ she can ask the
Department of Patent to change the application date provided with proof of the
mail register within one month from the date when this notice is received by the
applicant.

This notice has very important instructions printed on the back. It is the
applicants' responsibilities to read those instructions carefully.
BEST AUTO REPAIR, INC., et al., petitioners, v. UNIVERSAL INSURANCE GROUP, et al.

No. 17-1609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk June 1 , 2018

157413 ( 1 2 )

WALTER T. CRAWLEY,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 157413

AGC: 17

- 1649

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_______________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff to waive the fee for his motion

for entry of default is GRANTED as to that motion only

.
Kimberly D. HENDRIX, petitioner, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.

No. 17-488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 10.30





[LETTERHEAD OF REMEDENT USA, INC.]





March 20, 2002





New BitSnap, N.V.


Guy DeVreese


Robin List





This letter will serve to confirm the agreement between Remedent USA, Inc. (the Company) and New BitSnap, N.V., Guy DeVreese, Robin List.





| | (1) |  | New BitSnap, N.V. hereby agrees to the receipt of 3,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock in full repayment of the $240,000, representing the
outstanding indebtedness for consulting services and advances through March 31, 2002. Repayment is calculated as the outstanding balance as of the date of this agreement, at $0.08 per share.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | Guy DeVreese hereby agrees to the receipt of 60,000 shares of the Companys common stock in full repayment of the $30,000, representing accrued expenses
and fees through March 31, 2002. Repayment is calculated as the accrued salary at $0.50 per share.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (3) |  | Robin List hereby agrees to the receipt of 712,500 shares of the Companys common stock in full repayment of the $57,000, representing accrued expenses and
fees through March 31, 2002. Repayment is calculated as the accrued salary at $0.08 per share.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (4) |  | The Company hereby agrees to file for registration on an SB-2 Registration Statement, the shares of common stock outlined in (1), (2) & (3) above.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The above-mentioned terms are agreed upon on this day, by the following:





/s/    STEPHEN F. ROSS



/s/    GUY DEVREESEStephen F. Ross Chief Financial Officer Remedent USA, Inc.



Guy DeVreese President New BitSnap, N.V.








/s/    GUY DEVREESE



/s/    ROBIN LISTGuy DeVreese



Robin List
John Carlos RIOS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-6881.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Henry Lincoln SMITH, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-6814.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
Lawrence JONES, petitioner, v. Pam BONDI, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

No. 17-6458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 25031)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; ADRD Program Project.                    

*Date:*                         June 1, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1622,                         *bissonettegb@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 22, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-08969 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Christopher W. HELTON, petitioner, v. Ronda PASH, Warden.

No. 17-9092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/23/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      491,277
COMMITMENTS
  53,948   30,906  110,299  308,367  333,331  472,613  474,536   18,663   16,740

CHANGES FROM 11/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -48,021)
   1,435    2,326  -15,170  -28,376  -33,705  -42,112  -46,550   -5,909   -1,471

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.0      6.3     22.5     62.8     67.9     96.2     96.6      3.8      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      121)
      31       19       40       60       66      108      109
```

----

Updated November 29, 2010
Deandre Antoine STURGES, petitioner, v. Cindi S. CURTIN, Warden.

No. 17-9004.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 14, 2005



                                           /s/  John B. Sawyer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John B. Sawyer,
                                           President and COO
TROPIC LEISURE CORP., et al., petitioners, v. Jerry A. HAILEY.

No. 17-367.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Peter D. BOMMERITO, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

No. 18-7289.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3968 — Sovion/Südfleisch)

(2006/C 124/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
# L_2012248EN.01003301.xml

| 13.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 248/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 248/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 95/2012

of 30 April 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 65/2012 of 30 March 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 65/2012 of 30 March 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2010 of 3 November 2010 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2010 of 3 November 2010 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66he (Commission Regulation (EU) No 185/2010) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 R 0983: Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2010 of 3 November 2010 (OJ L 286, 4.11.2010, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 R 0983: Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2010 of 3 November 2010 (OJ L 286, 4.11.2010, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 983/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 2.8.2012, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 286, 4.11.2010, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 16, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-60635

BOYD D. HUDSON, CINDY KAYE HUDSON, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., RACHI HOLDING, INC., E.I. DUPONT 

DE NEMOURS & CO., E I. DuPont De Nemours and Company;

 JOHN DOES 1-20, 

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

2:02-CV-860

Before DAVIS, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the

briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the

district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its

June 10, 2003 Oral Bench Opinion. See also Bridges v. Metabolife
2

Intern., Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 65498 (5th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   97,717,392
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 47,231,747
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      18,325,282
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               4,658,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             167,932,920
<COMMON>                                     6,580,736
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   44,957,691
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         23,814,430
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              75,352,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 10,106,135
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        51,500,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           2,745,177
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                3,001,351
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              25,227,400
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              167,932,920
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   21,947,310
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           999,097
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  20,355,464
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,591,846
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             817,143
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               2,408,989
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,028,585
<NET-INCOME>                                   381,307
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    134,046
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  247,261
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     1,641,417
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       3,446,691
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/28/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      507,321
COMMITMENTS
  45,615   26,388  118,529  324,819  346,627  488,963  491,544   18,358   15,777

CHANGES FROM 09/21/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,246)
  -3,388    2,219    7,232    7,961    2,507   11,805   11,958    3,441    3,288

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.0      5.2     23.4     64.0     68.3     96.4     96.9      3.6      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      123)
      26       24       37       61       71      107      112
```

----

Updated October 1, 2010