alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's (NSB) Committee on External Engagement 
hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the 
transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National 
Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, April 28, 2022, from 2:00-3:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda of the teleconference is: Approve 
February 2022 minutes; Discuss NSB survey feedback and draft 
recommendations to update NSB honorary awards; Recent and upcoming 
engagement; and Discuss the next iteration of the Committee, what 
should it aim to do?

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Nadine Lymn, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c02001501022c021f0a420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90fefce9fdfed0fee3f6bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>, 703/292-7000. Members of the public can 
observe this meeting through a YouTube livestream. Meeting information 
including a YouTube link is available from the NSB website at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/index.jsp#up.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-09037 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Mark E. Ties, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of XATA Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
May 13, 2005    Signature: /s/ Mark E. Ties  Name: Mark E. Ties  Print Title: Chief Financial Officer
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Raymond Edward CLUTTS.

No. D-3010.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES WHITE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2629

[ January 24, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11

- 14527CF10A

.

James White

, Miami, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Stanton M. BUCH, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-744.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Faronte Antonio McDUFFIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5803.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS, et al., v. Adlynn K. HARTE, et al.

No. 17-704 (R46-010/OT 2017).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 5, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# L_2014310EN.01003801.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 85/2014

of 16 May 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 681/2013 of 17 July 2013 amending part III of Annex II to Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the safety of toys (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 681/2013 of 17 July 2013 amending part III of Annex II to Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the safety of toys (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 R 0681: Commission Regulation (EU) No 681/2013 of 17 July 2013 (OJ L 195, 18.7.2013, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 R 0681: Commission Regulation (EU) No 681/2013 of 17 July 2013 (OJ L 195, 18.7.2013, p. 16).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 681/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 17 May 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 195, 18.7.2013, p. 16.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1120.1 CA 11-01638 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

PAUL MARINACCIO, SR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TOWN OF CLARENCE, DEFENDANT, AND KIEFFER ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO, PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP (MICHAEL B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOSEPH J. MANNA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered April 28, 2011. The order settled the record for an appeal from a judgment entered November 24, 2009.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by providing that the opposing papers and reply papers with respect to plaintiff’s motion in limine seeking to preclude the testimony of an appraisal expert for defendant Town of Clarence and the order determining that motion shall be included in the record on appeal in appeal No. 1 and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Marinaccio v Town of Clarence ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 30, 2011]).

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Ruben CARDENAS RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-6705(17A515).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 8, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4496 

To extend indemnity for wildfires and hurricanes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Mr. DUNN, Mr. RICE of South 

Carolina, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. YOHO, Mr. YOUNG, Mrs. ROBY, and Mr. 

HARDER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To extend indemnity for wildfires and hurricanes, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfires and Hurri5 canes Indemnity Program Extension Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

7 Title I of subdivision 1 of division B of the Bipartisan 

8 Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–123) is amended 

9 under the heading ‘‘Department of Agriculture—AgriculVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:04 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4496.IH H4496

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4496 IH

1 tural Programs—Processing, Research and Marketing— 

2 Office of the Secretary’’— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2019’’ and in4 serting ‘‘December 31, 2021’’; 

5 (2) by inserting ‘‘Florence, Michael,’’ after 

6 ‘‘Maria,’’; 

7 (3) by inserting ‘‘, 2018, or 2019’’ after ‘‘occur8 ring in calendar year 2017’’; and 

9 (4) by inserting ‘‘, including disasters occurring 

10 in calendar year 2017, 2018, or 2019,’’ after ‘‘such 

11 losses’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 17-531.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Gonzalo Troncoso, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interland, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 6, 2005              /s/ Gonzalo Troncoso   Gonzalo Troncoso   Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

**SECTION      1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| (1) |   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |   | The                information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Registrant.  |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                December 24 2007 | By:                                                                                                | /s/ David                Koos |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | David                KoosChairman,                Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer |                               |
John CODY, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-6506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4563 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4563

   To repeal Public Law 114-145 to ensure that the Drug Enforcement 
   Administration has the authority to carry out needed enforcement 
  actions for drug diversion control investigations and operations to 
          combat the opioid epidemic, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2019

     Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal Public Law 114-145 to ensure that the Drug Enforcement 
   Administration has the authority to carry out needed enforcement 
  actions for drug diversion control investigations and operations to 
          combat the opioid epidemic, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Enforcement Standards to 
Track Opioids Responsively and Effectively Act of 2019'' or the 
``RESTORE Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. RESTORING DEA'S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT NEEDED ENFORCEMENT 
              ACTIONS TO COMBAT DRUG DIVERSION AND THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC.

    (a) Repeal.--Public Law 114-145 (the Ensuring Patient Access and 
Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Restoration of Provisions.--
            (1) Effective as of the date of enactment of Public Law 
        114-145, the provisions of section 304 of the Controlled 
        Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824) that were amended by Public Law 
        114-145 are hereby restored as if Public Law 114-145 had not 
        been enacted into law.
            (2) Subsection (k) of section 303 of the Controlled 
        Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823(k)), as added by Public Law 114-
        145 and redesignated by Public Law 115-83, is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
**FIRST AMENDMENT TO2001 STOCK PLAN**

ThisFirst Amendment (the "***First Amendment***") to the 2001 Stock Plan(the "***Plan***") of Home Solutions of America, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the "***Company***"), is dated as of May 20, 2003.

WHEREAS,on June 14, 2001, the Company's stockholders approved the Plan;

WHEREAS,on May 20, 2003, at the Company's 2003 Annual Stockholders' Meeting, upon therecommendation of the Company's Board of Directors, the Company's stockholders approvedamending the Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant thereunder, as evidenced by this First Amendment.

NOWTHEREFORE, the Company's stockholders have agreed as follows:

1.         InSection 3 of the Plan, entitled "Stock Subject to the Plan", the number"2,000,000" is hereby deleted and replaced with the number "3,000,000."

2.        Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan remains in full force andeffect.  Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the samemeaning assigned to them in the Plan.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the Secretary of the Company has set his hand hereto as of the dateset forth above, to evidence the approval by the Company's stockholders of thisFirst Amendment.

 

|   | /s/ R. ANDREW WHITE        |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | R. Andrew White, Secretary |
Certificate Number                              Number of Preferred Securities
   **P-1**                                                           1,250,000

                              CUSIP NO. 124296 20 3

                   Certificate Evidencing Preferred Securities
                                       of
                              BVBC Capital Trust I

                     _____% Cumulative Preferred Securities
                (liquidation amount $8.00 per Preferred Security)

      BVBC Capital Trust I, a statutory business trust created under the laws of
the State of  Delaware  (the  "Trust"),  hereby  certifies  that Cede & Co. (the
"Holder")  is the  registered  owner of One Million Two Hundred  Fifty  Thousand
(1,250,000) preferred securities of the Trust representing  undivided beneficial
interests  in the  assets of the  Trust and  designated  the  _____%  Cumulative
Preferred  Securities  (liquidation  amount $8.00 per Preferred  Security)  (the
"Preferred Securities").  The Preferred Securities are transferable on the books
and  records  of the Trust,  in person or by a duly  authorized  attorney,  upon
surrender of this  certificate  duly endorsed and in proper form for transfer as
provided  in  Section  5.04 of the  Trust  Agreement  (as  defined  below).  The
designations, rights, privileges, restrictions, preferences, and other terms and
provisions of the Preferred  Securities  are set forth in, and this  certificate
and the  Preferred  Securities  represented  hereby  are issued and shall in all
respects be subject to the terms and  provisions  of, the  Amended and  Restated
Trust  Agreement of the Trust dated as of  __________,  2000, as the same may be
amended from time to time (the "Trust Agreement"),  including the designation of
the terms of Preferred  Securities as set forth therein.  The Holder is entitled
to the benefits of the Preferred  Securities Guarantee Agreement entered into by
Blue Valley Ban Corp., a Kansas  corporation,  and Wilmington Trust Company,  as
guarantee trustee,  dated as of ______________,  2000 (the "Guarantee"),  to the
extent  provided  therein.  The Trust will furnish a copy of the Trust Agreement
and the Guarantee to the Holder without charge upon written request to the Trust
at its principal  place of business or registered  office.  Upon receipt of this
certificate,  the Holder is bound by the Trust  Agreement and is entitled to the
benefits thereunder.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Trustees of the Trust have executed
this certificate this _____ day of ___________, 2000.

                                   BVBC CAPITAL TRUST I



                                    By:________________________________________
                                       Robert D. Regnier, Administrative Trustee




                                    By:________________________________________
                                       Mark A. Fortino, Administrative Trustee




                                       58