alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4557 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4557

 To prohibit the termination of advisory committees before the end of 
    their charter unless authorized by law, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2019

   Mr. Casten of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Tonko, and Mr. Quigley) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the termination of advisory committees before the end of 
    their charter unless authorized by law, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserve Science in Policymaking Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TERMINATION OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES.

    Section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended by inserting at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) An advisory committee created under paragraphs (1) or (2) of 
section 9(a) may not be terminated by the President, the head of an 
agency, or any officer of the Federal Government before the end of the 
charter of the advisory committee unless--
            ``(1) the termination is authorized by law; or
            ``(2) the termination is unanimously approved by the Chief 
        Data Officer, Chief Evaluation Officer, and Chief Information 
        Officer of the relevant agency.
    ``(e) Before the termination of an advisory committee under 
subsection (d)(2) and not later than 60 days before the date on which 
the advisory committee is scheduled to be terminated, the head of the 
relevant agency shall submit to Congress a notification of such 
termination and provide for a public notice and comment period.''.
                                 <all>
```
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/31/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       59,955
COMMITMENTS
  19,865    2,242    5,183   23,279   38,018   48,326   45,443   11,629   14,512

CHANGES FROM 08/24/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,815)
     555   -1,061   -1,693   -2,677   -1,140   -3,814   -3,893   -1,000     -921

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.1      3.7      8.6     38.8     63.4     80.6     75.8     19.4     24.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      28        8       15       31       28       64       49
```

----

Updated September 3, 2010
James Michael KENNY, petitioner, v. Michael John BARTMAN, Jr., et al.

No. 17M62.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001080008
<NAME>                        VIRILITEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         300
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               300
<PP&E>                                         3,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,350
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       467
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,200
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               172,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,354
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            172,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,354
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
CAMDEN HILLS FARM BY-THE-SEA, LLC, petitioner, v. Kevin R. HALL.

No. 17-724.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
<PAGE>

              Exhibit No. 11. Statement re:  Computation of per share earnings.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended
                                                                     June 30, 2000    June 30, 2000
                                                                      -----------      -----------
            <S>                                                       <C>              <C>
            Net income                                                $13,671,000      $26,780,000
                                                                      ===========      ===========

            Weighted average common shares outstanding                 23,245,139       23,512,690
                                                                      ===========      ===========

            Basic earnings per share                                  $       .59      $      1.14
                                                                      ===========      ===========

            Weighted average common shares outstanding                 23,245,139       23,512,690

            Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
              Effect of stock options                                     273,354          223,554
                                                                      -----------      -----------
            Total weighted average common shares and equivalents
              outstanding for diluted computation                      23,518,493       23,736,244
                                                                      ===========      ===========

            Diluted earnings per share                                $       .58      $      1.13
                                                                      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>

              Exhibit No. 27.  Financial Data Schedule.

         (b)  Reports on Form 8-K.

              A Form 8-K was filed to report that on April 20, 2000, MAF
              Bancorp, Inc. announced its 2000 first quarter earnings results, a
              copy of the press release was included as an exhibit.


                                       33
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1179

To restore the second amendment rights of all Americans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To restore the second amendment rights of all Americans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Amendment

5 Protection Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FEDERAL HARASSMENT PERIOD.

7 Public Law 103–159 is hereby replaced, and any pro8 visions of law amended or repealed by such Act are re9 stored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.

10 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUN BAN.

11 Title XI of Public Law 103–322 is hereby repealed,

12 and any provisions of law amended or repealed by such
2

HR 1179 IH

1 title are restored or revived as if such title had not been

2 enacted.

3 SEC. 4. REPEAL OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTION.

4 (a) Section 201 of title 11 of Public Law 90–618 is

5 amended by striking ‘‘which the Secretary finds is gen6 erally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting pur7 poses,’’ and ‘‘which the owner intends to use solely for

8 sporting purposes.’’

9 (b) Public Law 90–351, as amended, is amended as

10 follows:

11 (1) In section 902, strike ‘‘which the Secretary

12 finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable

13 for sporting purposes,’’ ‘‘which the owner intends to

14 use solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural pur15 poses,’’ ‘‘a projectile which the Secretary finds is

16 primarily intended to be used for sporting pur17 poses,’’ ‘‘devoted to the collection, competitive use,

18 or other sporting use of firearms in the community,’’

19 ‘‘determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be

20 particularly suitable for sporting purposes and,’’

21 ‘‘(A) determined by the Secretary to be generally

22 recognized as particularly suitable for sporting pur23 poses, or determined by the Department of Defense

24 to be a type of firearm normally classified as a war

25 souvenir, and (B),’’ ‘‘and is generally recognized as
3

HR 1179 IH

1 particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to

2 sporting purposes,’’ and ‘‘provided that such hand3 guns are generally recognized as particularly suitable

4 for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes,’’.

5 (2) Strike ‘‘lawful sporting purposes’’ and in6 sert in lieu thereof ‘‘lawful purposes’’.

7 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The provisions of this Act shall take effect imme9 diately upon enactment.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                       
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         691,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  414,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,106,121
<PP&E>                                      17,629,317
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,280,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,455,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,455,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,455,175
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,295,796
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  800,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   540,627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/27/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      191,760
COMMITMENTS
  68,079   10,096   30,379   69,796  122,138  168,254  162,613   23,506   29,147

CHANGES FROM 07/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,380)
   7,298   -1,779      -18    1,546   11,478    8,826    9,681    1,554      699

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    35.5      5.3     15.8     36.4     63.7     87.7     84.8     12.3     15.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      212)
      70       27       47       50       92      135      158
```

----

Updated July 30, 2010
# Official Journal L 279/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.279.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5426 October 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.279.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 279

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5426 October 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1078/2011 of 25 October 2011 concerning the non-approval of the active substance propanil, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2011 of 25 October 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 3 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | | 2011/704/EU |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 14 October 2011 amending Guideline ECB/2007/2 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (ECB/2011/15) | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1078/2011 of 25 October 2011 concerning the non-approval of the active substance propanil, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1)

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2011 of 25 October 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

3

GUIDELINES

2011/704/EU

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 14 October 2011 amending Guideline ECB/2007/2 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (ECB/2011/15)

(ECB/2011/15)

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
31



CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Conrad Clemiss, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Golden Patriot, Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.



Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

---

Exhibit 31

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 27, 2004

/s/ Conrad Clemiss

Conrad Clemiss

President and
 Chief Executive Officer
Albert Miklos KUN, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-6693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 9, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00530

- CR

The State of Texas , Appellant

v.

Devon Lovegrove , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND S MITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the

parties’ arguments, the Court holds that ther e was no reversible error in the trial court’s order

.

Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Brian SIMMONS, petitioner, v. Michael CAPRA, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

No. 18-7100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Ernest DICKENS, petitioner, v. HUDSON SHERATON CORPORATION, LLC, et al.

No. 17-5712.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Richard Allen RATUSHNY, petitioner, v. Kevin KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

No. 18-7099.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Randy LEE, Warden, petitioner, v. Jason CLINARD.

No. 17-1627.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
PFIZER INC., et al., petitioners, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
David JACKSON, petitioner, v. John MARSHALL, Warden.

No. 17-7081.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
----

CONSENT OF JOSE LUIS LEE, Ph.D 

I hereby consent tothe use of my name in connection with the following report and documents, whichare being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into theregistration statement on Form 40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the "Company") beingfiled with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission: 

1.

Information relating to the mineralreserve and mineral resource calculations for the El Cubo property; 
2. 

The annualinformation form of the Company dated March 26, 2008, which includes referenceto my name in connection with information relating to the Ocampo property, andthe properties described therein. 
Date:    March 31, 2008  By:     /s/ Jose Luis Lee                                                         Name: Jose Luis Lee, Ph.D Title: Director of    Exploration, Gammon Gold Inc.