alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Call with Javelin
  
    



  Discussions concerning SEFs.
      
  When
              02/20/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Mark Wetjen

  Visitor(s)
              Jamie Cawley

  Organization(s)
              JavelinSDMA


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Larry Dane BOYKIN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5905.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; 3D Aging and Alzheimer Brain Program.                    

*Date:*                         May 31, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Birgit Neuhuber, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, Ninds, NIH NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-3562,                         *neuhuber@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 24325)    
Dated: April 20, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-08719 Filed 4-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24158-24159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, April 28, 2022, at 10:15 a.m.

[[Page 24159]]


PLACE: The meeting will be held via teleconference.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to public observation for Item Number 
1.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Extension and Termination of COVID-19 Relief 
Measures.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). 
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via teleconference 
must register via using the link below by noon Wednesday April 27, 
2022. After completing the registration, Individuals will receive a 
confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. 
https://teams.microsoft.com/registration/PAFTuZHHMk2Zb1GDkIVFJw,pHLqbjVTrkuy_9KepKN6dQ,MFtnLzltSEGI6EQECdI5iQ,MT1AT3hlIkOnOgl65cOcwg,KoZ0L6eBREKJFAYRixuxVw,suD8J2fVd06L4Yt3PC3QiA?mode=read&tenantId=b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.

Bassam Doughman,
IT Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2022-08747 Filed 4-20-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Rogers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

By: /s/    MICHAEL W. ROGERS            

Chief Financial Officer 

August 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         112,960
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,798
<PP&E>                                         3,763,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,378,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,659,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,980
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,654,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,659,159
<SALES>                                        378,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,817
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,759<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                164,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            164,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   164,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 07-11-18730-CV, in the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina

County, Texas, the Honorable Camile DuBose presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00653-CV

IN RE David Richard LUTZ

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 4, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS DENIED

On October 14, 2009, relator filed an “Original Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis.”

This court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought because the common law

writ of coram nobis is not recognized in Texas. See Ex parte Massey, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1952). Accordingly, the petition is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Additionally, relator filed a “Motion for Leave to File Writ of Error Coram Nobis.” No leave

is required to file an original petition in this court. TEX. R. APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion

for leave to file is DENIED as moot. 

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Seminis, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gaspar Alvarez
Martinez, Vice President Worldwide Corporate Comptroller and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (a) and (b), as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                                                            
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Gaspar Alvarez Martinez
Gaspar Alvarez Martinez
VP WW Corporate Comptroller & Chief Accounting Officer
January 13, 2003
Thomas J. CREAN, et al., petitioners, v. 125 WEST 76TH STREET REALTY CORP., et al.

No. 17-6583.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioners are allowed until January 2, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Lyn Y. NIEMANN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-8913.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
# Official Journal L 337/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.337.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 337 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5321 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.337.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 337

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5321 December 2010

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2010/774/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 1 |
| | | 2010/775/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 5 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 39 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2010/774/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

1

2010/775/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 5 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

39

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al.

No. 16-1436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2017.

Further consideration of motion of respondents Hawaii, et al. to add John Doe as a party to No. 16-1540 is deferred to the hearing of the case on the merits.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under

the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may

be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P.

32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 10, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ESTAC L. LOVE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-5126

(D.C. No. 99-CR-012-TCK-FHM)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, O’BRIEN, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R.

34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

The defendant appeals the district court’s denial of his “Motion for

Reversal of Conviction Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651,” in which he sought

coram nobis relief. He challenged sentences imposed in 2000 for violation
-2-

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), arguing that the sentences violated Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He also argued that the total term of

incarceration imposed of 146 years constituted cruel and unusual

punishment. 

The district court concluded that the defendant could not challenge his

sentences through a petition for a writ of coram nobis. We affirm.

“As courts have explained, a prisoner may not challenge a sentence or

conviction for which he is currently in custody through a writ of coram

nobis.” United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 (10th Cir. 2002). On

appeal, the defendant argues that the district court erroneously reached its

decision on constitutional grounds rather than statutory grounds, and that §

924(c) creates a separate offense and is not a sentencing factor. Because the

defendant is still in custody and is challenging the sentences he is currently

serving, the district court did not err in denying relief.

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
Greg ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, et al., applicants, v. Shannon PEREZ, et al.

No. 17A245.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 25, 2017.

Respondent's letter to the Clerk, dated September 15, 2017, is construed as a motion and denied.
# C_2011089EN.01000402.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/4

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo — Spain) — Angel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros SAE

(Case C-352/10) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 89/07

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Angel Lorenzo González Alonso

Applicant:

Defendant: Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros SAE

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo — Interpretation of Article 3(2)(d) of Council Directive 85/577/EEC of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises (OJ 1985 L 372, p. 31) — Contract, concluded away from business premises, under which life assurance is offered in return for payment of a monthly premium invested in various products of the company itself

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo by decision of 22 June 2010 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/12/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       63,142
COMMITMENTS
   1,702    5,554    3,466   45,666   44,843   50,834   53,863   12,308    9,279

CHANGES FROM 01/05/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,885)
     690   -3,270     -490    2,457    4,275    2,657      515     -772    1,370

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.7      8.8      5.5     72.3     71.0     80.5     85.3     19.5     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       37)
       8        6        8       18       15       31       26
```

----

Updated January 15, 2010
Andrew N. GRIFFITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6855.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.