alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 27, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                             $1,499
<SECURITIES>                                        4,523
<RECEIVABLES>                                       1,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (145)
<INVENTORY>                                         2,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   10,711
<PP&E>                                             14,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (7,996)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     18,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               4,098
<BONDS>                                             6,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               99
<OTHER-SE>                                          9,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       18,055
<SALES>                                             6,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    6,851
<CGS>                                               3,093
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       3,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    5,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.15)
                                               


</TABLE>
# L_2012341EN.01001201.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 161/2012

of 28 September 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 223/2012 of 14 March 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to fertilisers for the purposes of adapting Annexes I and IV thereto to technical progress (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 223/2012 of 14 March 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to fertilisers for the purposes of adapting Annexes I and IV thereto to technical progress (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0223: Commission Regulation (EU) No 223/2012 of 14 March 2012 (OJ L 75, 15.3.2012, p. 12).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0223: Commission Regulation (EU) No 223/2012 of 14 March 2012 (OJ L 75, 15.3.2012, p. 12).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 223/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 75, 15.3.2012, p. 12.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
John LAUVE, petitioner, v. Richard SNYDER, Governor of Michigan.

No. 17-509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Rohan HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Thomas GRIFFIN, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

No. 17-6517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

*669Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Benjamin Salofi ASAELI, petitioner, v. Jeri BOE, Superintendent, Clallam Bay Corrections Center.

No. 17-6699.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Alexander EDIONWE, petitioner, v. Guy BAILEY, et al.

No. 17-693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Waseem DAKER, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-9532.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.24.2
 th
  
  Loan Agreement Digital TwinVision Borrowers Guarantor Loan Parties Lender
 Brazil
Pledge
 Demore Shares Memorandum Exhibit A Transactions
 Transaction Defaults




---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,BHC INTERIM FUNDING III, L.P.,By:
    
    BHC Interim Funding Management III, L.P.,its General PartnerBy:
    
    BHC Investors III, L.L.C.,its Managing MemberBy:
    
    GHH Holdings III, L.L.C.
 By:
    /s/   Gerald H. HoughtonName:
    Gerald H. HoughtonTitle:
    Managing Member  DIGITAL RECORDERS, INC.By:
Name:
    
    /s/ David L. Turney

David L. TurneyTitle:
    
    CEO, PresidentTWINVISION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.By:
    
    /s/ David L. TurneyName:
    
    David L. TurneyTitle:
    
    CEO, PresidentDRI CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ David L. TurneyName:
    
    David L. TurneyTitle:
    
    CEO, President
 Signature Page to Letter Agreement (Brazil Share Purchase)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:           July 14, 2011By:
/s/ Guy De VreeseName:  Guy De VreeseTitle:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive

Officer)
Santos Alfonso ZAMORA-SALAZAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6104.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                       7,910
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               10,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 2,524
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      14,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                              14,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              33,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  31,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                33,491
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             4,294
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                2,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              2,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          2,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 2,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1. D

THIS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT MADE THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 1997

                                    Between:

AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC., a body corporate duly incorporated under the laws
of Florida, having an office at 501 Fairway Drive, Deerfield Beach, Florida
33441

(ABFG)
                                       And

FULCRUM HOLDINGS OF AUSTRALIA INC., a body corporate incorporated under the laws
of Florida, having an office at 1 South Ocean Blvd., Suite 301, Boca Raton,
Florida, 33432.

("FULCRUM")

WITNESSES THAT WHEREAS:

FULCRUM is a Party to an Agreement and Assignment of Agreement copies of which
are attached hereto.

And whereas FULCRUM wishes to Assign its interest in said Agreements to AMERICAN
BENEFITS GROUP, INC. and AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC. wishes to acquire said
interest.

And whereas "deemed publicly traded Company" referred to in the attached
Agreements is AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC.

And whereas FULCRUM was acting as AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC. agent in
negotiating the attached Agreements and AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC. requires
no further diligence by FULCRUM or AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC. to give full
effect to this Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE:

1.    FULCRUM assigns its interest in the said contracts to AMERICAN BENEFITS
      GROUP, INC. in consideration for AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC.
      transferring Three Million (3,000,000) common voting shares of AMERICAN
      BENEFITS GROUP, INC. to FULCRUM subject to pricing of US Ten ($0.10) Cents
      per share and will arrange for a release of the common voting shares in
      accordance with the rules prescribed by the Securities Exchange
      Commission.

2.    The One Million Five Hundred Thousand (1,500,000) shares noted in
      paragraph 2(a) of the Assignment Agreement attached hereto is payment of
      one-half of the said Three Million (3,000,000) shares.


 /s/  Jerry G. Mikolajczyk               /s/ Peter Jones
-----------------------------------      -----------------------------
AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP INC.                 Witness


/s/ Gerald E Sklar                       /s/ Peter Jones
-----------------------------------      -----------------------------
FULCRUM HOLDINGS OF AUSTRALIA                 Witness


MISS SAOWANI CHAQIPHAN                   /s/ Saowani Chaqiphan
                                         -----------------------------
                                             Initial


MR. DROR MORADOV                         /s/ Dror Moradov
                                         -----------------------------
                                             Initial


SAOWANI DEVELOPMENT S.A.R.L.             /s/ Saowani Chaqiphan
                                         -----------------------------
                                             Initial


                                       40
Kirk Lee ANDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6216.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Charles B. WEATHERMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6985.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Edward J. Puisis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        May 14, 2007 /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
FOURTH ESTATE PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, petitioner, v. WALL-STREET.COM, LLC, et al.

No. 17-571.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Jarrod Joseph MILLER, petitioner, v. Stu SHERMAN, Warden.

No. 17-6645.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XATA Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  Signature: 
Name:
    
    /s/ John J. Coughlan

John J. CoughlanPrint Title:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
Terrance A. SCOTT, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-5825.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
David M. OESTREICHER, petitioner, v. CARPENTER, BENNETT & MORRISSEY, et al.

No. 16-1335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,364,991
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,569,471
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,887,125
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     130,105,327
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       126,347,000
<LOANS>                                    285,407,184
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,088,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             452,461,212
<DEPOSITS>                                 371,194,857
<SHORT-TERM>                                25,800,676
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          9,052,597
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,378,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             452,461,212
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,300,044
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,139,415
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               837,264
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            16,276,723
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,494,770
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,326,853
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,949,870
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,151,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,427,343
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,427,343
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,181,927
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.66
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,904,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,421,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,048,233
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,000,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   58,561
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,060
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,088,492
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           428,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,660,492



</TABLE>
DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY, petitioner, v. Anthony J. CARROLL.

No. 16-1286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Michael KELLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6974.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.