alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15

ACCOUNTANTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge the incorporation by
reference in the March 23, 1995 and the April 19, 2006, Registration Statements on Form S-8 and the October 4, 2011 Post-effective Amendment No.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (formerly known
as InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated May 10, 2012 included with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ BKD, LLP



|                
|----------------
|Cincinnati, Ohio
|May 10, 2012
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/27/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,217,420
COMMITMENTS
 561,856   55,080  1268643  2359702  2875509  4190201  4199232   27,219   18,188

CHANGES FROM 04/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     74,856)
  43,534  -16,021  -77,279  102,199  158,394   68,454   65,094    6,402    9,762

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.3      1.3     30.1     56.0     68.2     99.4     99.6      0.6      0.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      219)
      43       34       73      134      126      212      199
```

----

Updated April 30, 2010
Duane BEARD, petitioner, v. Jeff NORMAN, Warden.

No. 17-6286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Terrance Gerard STANTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Gary ORAM, Jr., petitioner, v. CITY OF DILLON, MONTANA, et al.

No. 17-5783.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stefan RODGERS, petitioner, v. Darrell MILLER, Warden.

No. 18-6020.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 11

XATA Corporation
Earnings per Share
Three and Nine months Ending June 30, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months       Nine Months
                                                          Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,
                                                          --------------     --------------
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>
BASIC COMPUTATION
-----------------
  Net earnings                                            $      302,056     $      830,927
  Less: Preferred Stock dividend                          $        8,022     $       35,023
                                                          --------------     --------------
Earnings available to common shareholders                 $      294,034     $      795,904
                                                          --------------     --------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                            4,535,225          4,481,982

                                                          --------------     --------------
                BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                  $         0.06     $         0.18
                                                          ==============     ==============


DILUTED COMPUTATION
-------------------
  Net earnings available to common shareholders           $      294,034     $      795,904
  Plus: Preferred Stock dividend (assumed conversion)              8,022     $       35,023
Earnings available to common shareholders                 --------------     --------------
   plus assumed conversions                               $      302,056     $      830,927
                                                          --------------     --------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                            4,535,225          4,481,982
Common stock equivalents *                                       495,313            514,285
                                                          --------------     --------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
   plus equivalents                                            5,030,538          4,996,267


                                                          --------------     --------------
               DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                 $         0.06     $         0.17
                                                          ==============     ==============
</TABLE>


* includes 400,000 and 433,460 shares underlying the Company's Series A
  Convertible Preferred Stock for the Three and Nine Months Ending June 30,
  2000, respectively.
# L_2005239EN.01006701.xml

| 15.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/67

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 74/2005

of 29 April 2005

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 116/2004 of 6 August 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 116/2004 of 6 August 2004 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include cooperation in the implementation and development of the Internal Market. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include cooperation in the implementation and development of the Internal Market.

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this cooperation to continue beyond 31 December 2004, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this cooperation to continue beyond 31 December 2004,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

In Article 7(6) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement ‘year 2004’ shall be replaced by ‘years 2004 and 2005’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended October 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Paul R. Sinsheimer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



December 8, 2005                 /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
----------------                 ---------------------------
Date                             Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President
# L_2014092EN.01002601.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/26

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 200/2013

of 8 November 2013

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2012/688/EU of 5 November 2012 on the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980 and 2 110-2 170 MHz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2012/688/EU of 5 November 2012 on the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980 and 2 110-2 170 MHz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 5czh (Commission Decision 2010/267/EU) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘5czi. | 32012 D 0688: Commission Implementing Decision 2012/688/EU of 5 November 2012 on the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980 and 2 110-2 170 MHz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Union (OJ L 307, 7.11.2012, p. 84).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5czi.

32012 D 0688: Commission Implementing Decision 2012/688/EU of 5 November 2012 on the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980 and 2 110-2 170 MHz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Union (OJ L 307, 7.11.2012, p. 84).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2012/688/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 November 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 307, 7.11.2012, p. 84.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
* District Judge for the Southern District of Texas,

sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50013

JOE BALANDRAN; DOLORES BALANDRAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

July 24, 1998

Before DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL, District

Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

In October 1996, this case was tried to a jury in the United

States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The jury

found that the damage to the Balandran home was caused by a leaky

sewer line and awarded the Balandrans $66,500. Shortly thereafter,

Safeco moved for judgment as a matter of law asserting that the
g:\opin\979-0013.op2 2

Balandrans’ claim was excluded from coverage under Subsection (h)

of the insurance policy in question. The district court granted

the motion and entered judgment in favor of Safeco. The Balandrans

appealed, claiming that Subsection (h) does not exclude from

coverage losses that fall within the accidental discharge peril. 

On November 18, 1997, this Court certified the following

question to the Supreme Court of Texas. 

Whether the exclusion in Subsection (h) of the

1991 Texas Standard Homeowner Policy--Form B

excludes from coverage damage to a dwelling caused

by a movement of its foundation that was caused by

an underground plumbing leak?

The factual circumstances and procedural background involved in

this controversy are fully described in our published opinion

certifying this question. Balandran v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America,

129 F.3d 747 (5th Cir. 1997).

On July 3, 1998, the Supreme Court of Texas issued its opinion

and judgment in response to our certified question, holding that:

1) Exclusion 1(h) of the 1991 Texas Standard

Homeowner Policy--Form B does not exclude from

coverage damage to a dwelling caused by a

movement of its foundation that was caused by

an underground plumbing leak.

2) Joe Balandran and Delores Balandran shall

recover from Safeco Insurance Company of

America, which shall pay the costs in this

Court.

See Balandran v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America, No. 97-1093, 1998 WL

352968 (Tex. S. Ct. July 3, 1998).

In light of the decision of the Supreme Court of Texas, we now
g:\opin\979-0013.op2 3

vacate the judgment entered by the district court in favor of

Safeco; and remand this case to the district court for entry of

judgment on the jury verdict consistent with the decision of the

Supreme Court of Texas.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4612 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign 

nationals from making disbursements for communications promoting, 

supporting, attacking, or opposing the election of a candidate for public 

office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2019 

Mr. PHILLIPS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit foreign nationals from making disbursements 

for communications promoting, supporting, attacking, or 

opposing the election of a candidate for public office, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firewall Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4612 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING DISBURSEMENTS BY FOREIGN NA2 TIONALS FOR CERTAIN COMMUNICATIONS 

3 INVOLVING CANDIDATES. 

4 (a) DISBURSEMENTS DESCRIBED.—Section 

5 319(a)(1) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 

6 (52 U.S.C. 30121(a)(1)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

8 (B); and 

9 (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(C) an expenditure; 

12 ‘‘(D) an independent expenditure; 

13 ‘‘(E) a disbursement for an electioneering 

14 communication (within the meaning of section 

15 304(f)(3)); 

16 ‘‘(F) a disbursement for a communication 

17 which is placed or promoted for a fee on a 

18 website, web application, or digital application 

19 that refers to a clearly identified candidate for 

20 election for Federal office and is disseminated 

21 within 60 days before a general, special or run22 off election for the office sought by the can23 didate or 30 days before a primary or pref24 erence election, or a convention or caucus of a 

25 political party that has authority to nominate a 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4612 IH

1 candidate for the office sought by the can2 didate; or 

3 ‘‘(G) a disbursement for a broadcast, cable 

4 or satellite communication, or for a communica5 tion which is placed or promoted for a fee on 

6 a website, web application, or digital applica7 tion, that promotes, supports, attacks or op8 poses the election of a clearly identified can9 didate for Federal, State, or local office (re10 gardless of whether the communication contains 

11 express advocacy or the functional equivalent of 

12 express advocacy); or’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply with respect to disbursements 

15 made on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Home Solutions of America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Fradella, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 15, 2006 

/s/ FrankFradella FrankFradella, Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|  |
|--|
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Seymour Holtzman, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of George Foreman Enterprises, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual  report based on such evaluation; and

c)	disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ Seymour Holtzman		
Seymour Holtzman
Chief Executive Officer 
March 31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                       7,073
<SECURITIES>                                                   282
<RECEIVABLES>                                                6,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 2,641
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                       5,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                               5,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              13,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  12,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                13,802
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               516
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                107
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            107
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
CONSOL ENERGY INC., et al., petitioners, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

No. 17-380.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.