alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regina DREXLER, petitioner, v. Rachel BROWN.

No. 17-837.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Colorado, Denver County denied.
Paul Joseph SHOEMAKER, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-9103.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kevin BALFOUR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jose DUARTE, petitioner, v. Raymond MADDEN, Warden.

No. 16-9072.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. **

**SECTION      1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| (1) |   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   |
|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |   | The                information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Registrant.   |
|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                January 9, 2007 | By:                                                          | /s/ David                Koos |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                 | David                KoosActing                Chief Financial Officer |
Geoffrey M. YOUNG, petitioner, v. Sannie L. OVERLY, et al.

No. 18-718.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.12


                      ONESOURCE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.

                 Amendment No. 1 to Employee Stock Purchase Plan

                                 April 21, 1999

The 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

1. The first paragraph of Article 5 is hereby deleted its entirety and replaced
with the following:

         "The first Payment Period during which payroll deductions will be
         accumulated under the Plan shall commence on June 1, 1999 and shall end
         on January 31, 2000. For the remainder of the duration of the Plan,
         Payment Periods shall consist of the six-month periods commencing on
         February 1 and August 1 and ending on July 31 and January 31.
         respectively, of each calendar year."

In all other respects, the Plan is hereby affirmed and shall remain in full
force and effect.


                  [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.]





<PAGE>   2




                                 ONESOURCE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.



                                 By: /s/ Roy D. Landon
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Name:  Roy D. Landon
                                    Title: Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Deanna SHINE, petitioner, v. Judith Kolb MORRIS, et al.

No. 17-6460.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Anthony McNEIL, petitioner, v. Mr. GRIM, et al.

No. 18-6803.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/23/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       63,913
COMMITMENTS
  19,712    1,866    6,416   24,641   40,488   50,769   48,770   13,144   15,143

CHANGES FROM 11/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,645)
    -923     -228     -464     -503   -2,586   -1,890   -3,278   -1,755     -367

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.8      2.9     10.0     38.6     63.3     79.4     76.3     20.6     23.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       90)
      35        7       25       32       28       75       57
```

----

Updated November 29, 2010
**Exhibit 15**

**ACCOUNTANTS’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT**

We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in theMarch 23, 1995 and the April 19, 2006, Registration Statements on Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (formerly known as InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated May 12, 2011 included with the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 ofthe Act. 

*/s/***BKD, LLP**

Cincinnati, Ohio 

May 12, 2011
Sargent K. MAJOR, petitioner, v. WYOMING.

No. 17-5851.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
David GRAHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6587.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that theCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 25,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 25, 2005 | /s/ PATRICK FARELL                      |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Patrick Farrell                         |
|                 | *President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
In Re Steven Wayne BONILLA, petitioner.

No. 16-9037.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Corla JACKSON, petitioner, v. GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION.

No. 18-7070.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 131/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 131 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5828 May 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 131

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5828 May 2015

---

| Contents | | III   Other acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 301/14/COL of 16 July 2014 amending for the ninety-eighth time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by adopting new Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 [2015/790] | 1 |

Contents

III   Other acts

page

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 301/14/COL of 16 July 2014 amending for the ninety-eighth time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by adopting new Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 [2015/790]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Lewis TEMPLETON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7313.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
In Re Andre BARNES, petitioner.

No. 18-7255.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Richard Douglas LATKA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6834.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MONTANA NIXON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 155 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6838

GREGORY W. BUCKLEW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director; SHERIFF WEATHERHOLTZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-94-872)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory W. Bucklew, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based

upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to

object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 283/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 283 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 595 August 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 283

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 595 August 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 283/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8090 — Tencent Holdings Limited/Supercell OY) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 283/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8090 — Tencent Holdings Limited/Supercell OY) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 283/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 283/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 283/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8138 — Shiseido/Dolce Gabbana’s fragrances, colour cosmetics and skincare business) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2016/C 283/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8092 — PSP/OTPP/Cubico/Renewable Energy Power Generation Companies) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 283/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8138 — Shiseido/Dolce Gabbana’s fragrances, colour cosmetics and skincare business) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2016/C 283/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8092 — PSP/OTPP/Cubico/Renewable Energy Power Generation Companies) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/08/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       86,728
COMMITMENTS
   1,417    9,251    4,210   71,524   59,716   77,151   73,177    9,577   13,551

CHANGES FROM 06/01/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,109)
    -943      234     -282    3,300    2,211    2,075    2,163    2,034    1,946

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.6     10.7      4.9     82.5     68.9     89.0     84.4     11.0     15.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       5       12        8       20       27       30       42
```

----

Updated June 11, 2010
Donna NICHOLSON, petitioner, v. CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 17-6649.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 29, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Donyall WHITE, petitioner, v. Wendy KNIGHT, Superintendent, Correctional Industrial Facility.

No. 17-9052.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                        339,588
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 12,107,991
<ALLOWANCES>                  1,069,251
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                11,711,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         452,551
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                    11,259,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  11,711,813
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,344,059
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 178,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              313,483
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            172,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>               679,429
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           679,429
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  679,429
<EPS-BASIC>                 .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .00


</TABLE>
Mark HALPER, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 17-6189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Edward TAUPIER, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 18-752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Gordon PRAILOW, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-7210.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1213Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7544

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus XIOMARO E. HERNANDEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CR-90-348-A; CA-05-191) Submitted: February 23, 2006 D ecided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Willard Dunham, Jr., Meghan Suzanne Skelton, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark Clayton Grundvig, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Xiomaro E. Hernandez, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order and order on reconsideration denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as well as the court’s order denying a certificate of appealability. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of her constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hernandez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Nathaniel ESTES, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 17-6912.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Colorado, Denver County denied.
# Official Journal C 440/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 440 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5926 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 440

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5926 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 440/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8191 — ArcelorMittal/CLN/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 440/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8055 — Coherent/Rofin-Sinar Technologies) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 440/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8191 — ArcelorMittal/CLN/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 440/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8055 — Coherent/Rofin-Sinar Technologies) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 440/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 440/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 440/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8216 — Allianz/Dalmore/BEL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 440/05 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 440/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8216 — Allianz/Dalmore/BEL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 440/05

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN