RENDERED: JANUARY 27, 2023; 10:00 A.M.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Commonwealth of Kentucky

Court of Appeals

NO. 2022-CA-0359-MR

DE’QUON SMITH APPELLANT 

v. 

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT

HONORABLE KATHLEEN S. LAPE, JUDGE

ACTION NO. 19-CR-01227

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE 

OPINION

AFFIRMING

**   **  **

BEFORE: THOMPSON, CHIEF JUDGE; ACREE AND MCNEILL, JUDGES.

MCNEILL, JUDGE: In 2019, Appellant, De’Quon Smith (Smith), was indicted in 

Kenton County, Kentucky, on one count of first-degree trafficking in a controlled 

substance, Fentanyl, with a firearm; one count of trafficking in a controlled 

substance, marijuana, with a firearm; possession of handgun by a convicted felon;

and for being a second-degree persistent felony offender (PFO-2). On August 24, 

2020, Smith pled guilty to two counts of prohibited acts relating to a controlled 
-2-

substance, and to the PFO-2 charge. The Kenton Circuit Court sentenced Smith to 

serve a total of 15 years’ incarceration, probated for five years. The terms of 

probation, inter alia, also required Smith to serve 180 days in the Kenton County 

Detention Center with credit for time served; obey standard rules and regulations 

of the Probation and Parole Department pursuant to KRS1 439.553; be subjected to 

a system of graduated sanctions to be imposed by the Probation and Parole 

department; and to commit no criminal act. 

Smith violated the terms of his probation on several occasions,

involving violence or threats of violence. The Commonwealth unsuccessfully 

sought to revoke probation. However, after it became clear that Smith absconded 

from supervision and was a threat to the community, the court revoked his

probation. He was sentenced to serve 15 years’ incarceration, with credit for time 

served. Smith now appeals to this Court as a matter of right. He raises the 

following issues on appeal: 1) the Commonwealth failed to prove a willful 

probation violation for absconding by a preponderance of the evidence; 2) the 

circuit court abused its discretion when it failed to apply KRS 439.3106; and 3) 

that the sentence imposed was illegal. 

1

 Kentucky Revised Statutes.
-3-

STANDARD OF REVIEW

“Revocation of probation does not require proof beyond a reasonable 

doubt. The Commonwealth’s burden is to prove by a preponderance of the 

evidence that the defendant violated the conditions of his or her probation.” Helms 

v. Commonwealth, 475 S.W.3d 637, 641 (Ky. App. 2015) (citation omitted). We 

review probation revocation determinations for an abuse of discretion. 

Blankenship v. Commonwealth, 494 S.W.3d 506, 508 (Ky. App. 2015). An abuse 

of discretion occurs when the trial court’s decision in “arbitrary, unreasonable, 

unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles.” Commonwealth v. English, 993 

S.W.2d 941, 945 (Ky. 1999). 

ANALYSIS

A revocation hearing was conducted on February 21, 2022. Ohio 

Probation and Parole Officer Kristin Abbott testified at length about her 

supervision of Smith after his probation was transferred from Kentucky to Ohio. 

Due to his misconduct while on probation, Officer Abbott informed Smith over the 

telephone that “he needed to turn himself in.” Smith replied that he needed to 

speak with his lawyer first and “they would have to catch [him] on the streets.” 

Smith then hung up on Officer Abbott. Thereafter, Smith never reported or 
-4-

contacted her, and it appears that she was unable to supervise him any further.2 

Therefore, we conclude that there was a preponderance of evidence that Smith 

absconded from supervision, as determined by the circuit court in its revocation 

order. We now turn to KRS 439.3106(1), which: 

requires trial courts to consider whether a probationer’s 

failure to abide by a condition of supervision constitutes 

a significant risk to prior victims or the community at 

large, and whether the probationer cannot be managed in 

the community before probation may be revoked.

Commonwealth v. Andrews, 448 S.W.3d 773, 780 (Ky. 2014). “Neither KRS 

439.3106 nor Andrews require anything more than a finding to this effect 

supported by the evidence of record.” McClure v. Commonwealth, 457 S.W.3d 

728, 733 (Ky. App. 2015). 

First, the circuit court’s revocation order indicates that KRS 

439.3106(1) was satisfied here. Second, there was significant evidence of record 

supporting the court’s findings. For example, Officer Abbott testified that Smith 

choked his girlfriend, Mariah Stone, at a taco shop, and threatened an employee

there. The shop’s surveillance video was played at the revocation hearing 

depicting the incident. At the conclusion of the revocation hearing, the judge 

orally ruled that Smith’s actions on the video were completely unacceptable in 

2

 The record also indicates that on a prior occasion while on probation, Smith traveled to 

Georgia without permission and failed to report to his probation officer. 
-5-

society, and that Smith could not be adequately supervised in the community. 

Abbott also testified concerning additional allegations of criminal conduct alleged 

against Smith, and that there were previous warrants out for his arrest for assault 

and criminal damaging. Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the circuit court 

properly considered KRS 439.3106. 

Lastly, in support of his argument that his sentence was illegal, Smith 

relies on Moreland v. Commonwealth, No. 2021-CA-0621-MR, 2022 WL 

1051762, at *1-3 (Ky. App. Apr. 8, 2022), discretionary review granted (Sep. 14, 

2022). The present case is distinguishable from Moreland because the sentence at 

issue here is permitted under KRS 533.010. In sum, we cannot conclude that the 

circuit court abused its discretion by revoking Smith’s probation, or that his 

sentence was illegal. 

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the Kenton Circuit Court’s 

Order Revoking Probation entered on March 1, 2022. 

ALL CONCUR.
-6-

BRIEFS FOR APPELLANT:

Chase A. Cox

Covington, Kentucky

BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General of Kentucky

Courtney J. Hightower

Assistant Attorney General

Frankfort, Kentucky