alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000854662
<NAME> MAF BANCORP, INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          38,319
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          38,179
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                49,850
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    162,726
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         293,220
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           295,558
<LOANS>                                      2,657,571
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,370,587
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,296,139
<SHORT-TERM>                                    94,804
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            632,859
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,370,587
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                147,027
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,540
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,714
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               177,281
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              73,511
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,223
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           70,058
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      850
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 225
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 40,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,392
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      28,692
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.00
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,861
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,571
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,914
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      509
<RECOVERIES>                                        82
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,337
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         18,337
        

</TABLE>
Daniel G. SZMANIA, petitioner, v. E-LOAN, INC., et al.

No. 18-734.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

.

R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

March 5, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50832

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAWRENCE W. FEW,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-1195-2

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lawrence W. Few (Few) appeals his conviction on count three of

an indictment charging him under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 with knowingly

making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation

(FBI) during its investigation into a grand jury leak. Few

challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him, attacks

the credibility of two key Government witnesses, and asserts that

the Government failed to prove the falsity of his statements to the

FBI.2

None of the trial witnesses “assert[ed] facts that the witness

physically could not have observed or events that could not have

occurred under the laws of nature.” U nited States v. Gadison

, 8

F.3d 186, 190 (5th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks, brackets,

and citation omitted). Consequently, the jury was free to weigh

the credibility of the witnesses and choose which testimony to

credit as true. S ee id. at 189-90. There was sufficient evidence

to show that Few lied to the FBI. Therefore, “viewing the evidence

and the inferences that may be drawn from it in the light most

favorable to the verdict, a rational jury could have found the

essential elements of [Few’s] offense[ ] beyond a reasonable

doubt.” I d. at 189 (internal quotation marks and citation

omitted).

Few also argues that his acquittal on counts one and two for

conspiracy to obstruct and obstructing justice is inconsistent with

his conviction on count three, and, therefore, his conviction

should be reversed. However, “inconsistent verdicts are not a bar

to conviction so long as there is sufficient evidence to support3 G:\opin-sc\02-50832.opn.wpd the jury’s determination of guilt.” United States v. Gieger , 190

F.3d 661, 664 (5th Cir. 1999). Therefore, because there was

sufficient evidence to support Few’s conviction on count three, his

conviction may stand. Id.

Accordingly, Few’s conviction is hereby AFFIRMED.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00278

- CR

Bobby Lee Harris

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarrant County (1496615R )

June 28, 2018

Opinion by Jus tice Birdwell

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the

judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed and vaca ted in part

.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments of conviction for continuous sexual abuse of

a young child and for sexual assault. We reverse and vacate the trial court’s

judgment of conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child.

SECOND DISTRIC T COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Wade Birdwell

__________________ Justice Wade Birdwell
# L_2013257EN.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of Part IV (trade matters) of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other (Costa Rica)

Pending the completion of the procedures for the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other, signed at Tegucigalpa on 29 June 2012, Part IV thereof concerning trade matters shall, in accordance with its Article 353(4), be applied on a provisional basis between the European Union and Costa Rica as from 1 October 2013. By virtue of Article 3(1) of the Council Decision 2012/734/EU on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement, Article 271 shall not be provisionally applied.

---
Steve AUSTIN, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-5667.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Robert Gene BAILEY, petitioner, v. Joseph GARDNER, et al.

No. 17-9007.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4439 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4439

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to extend the 
   authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric 
                               diseases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating Hope Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ISSUE PRIORITY REVIEW VOUCHERS TO 
              ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS FOR RARE PEDIATRIC DISEASES.

    Section 529(b)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360ff(b)(5)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 11, 2020'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2024''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``December 11, 2022'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2026''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4439

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to extend the 
   authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric 
                               diseases.
```
# C_2019035EN.01002501.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/25

---

Action brought on 22 November 2018 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Vieta Audio (Vita)

(Case T-690/18)

(2019/C 35/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vieta Audio, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Vita — European Union trade mark No 9 993 361

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2018 in Case R 695/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         658,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  341,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               999,851
<PP&E>                                      17,562,734
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,764,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,798,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,798,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,798,125
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               329,422
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  264,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,744
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES WHITE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2629

[January 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-14527CF10A.

James White, Miami, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Walter WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7143.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Dale Allen HURICK, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, Warden.

No. 16-9200.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** Certificationof Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing FinancialStatements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

            I, Frank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer of Home Solutions ofAmerica, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, herebycertify that (i) the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in thatreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presentedtherein. 

 

| Date: May 17, 2004 | /s/FRANK J. FRADELLA                  FrankJ. FradellaChiefExecutive Officer |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              IBIZ TECHNOLOGY CORP.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of iBIZ Technology Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth W.
Schilling, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to iBIZ Technology Corp. and will be retained by iBIZ Technology Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Date: May 6, 2005

                              /s/ Kenneth W. Schilling
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Kenneth W. Schilling
                              Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
                              Officer
## NO. 12

- 11

- 00 03 6

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §

JAMES ALLEN LEE

, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM In this original proceeding, Relator James Allen Lee seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to rule on his motion for ―Enforcement of Possessory Rights and for Contempt.‖ We deny the petition. To obtain a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to consider and rule o n a motion, a relator must establish that the trial court (1) had a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act, (2) was asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so. In re Molina , 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, orig. pro ceeding). Generally, a trial court has a nondiscretionary duty to consider and rule on a motion within a reasonable time. In re Thomas
, No. 12

– 05

– 00261

– CV, 2005 WL 2155244, at *4 (Tex. App.

— Tyler Sept. 7, 2005, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). But a trial court cannot be expected to consider a motion not called to
its attention. See In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Merely filing a motion with the district clerk does not impute the clerk’s knowledge of the filin g to the trial court. Id . at 228. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the relator
to establish that the motion has been called to the trial court’s attention. See id

. The record in this proceeding includes a copy of one letter from Lee to the district cl erk relating to the status of his motion. However, we cannot conclude from the record that Lee has requested a hearing on the motion or that the trial court has otherwise been made aware of the2

motion. Consequently, Lee has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d at 228. Accordingly, Lee’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied

. Opinion delivered March 16 , 20 1 1

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( PUBLISH )
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2989223-DEC-201009:00 AM
Niki-Alexander SHETTY, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee, et al.

No. 17-794.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Craig S. Fawcett, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of XATA
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business
issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting. May 14, 2004 Signature:
    
    /s/ Craig S. FawcettName:
Print Title:
    
    Craig S. Fawcett
Chief Executive Officer