# Official Journal C 279/24 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6324 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6324 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 279/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 279/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 279/02 | Case C-92/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — French Republic v European Parliament (Action for annulment — Law of the institutions — Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union — European Parliament — Concept of ‘budgetary session’ held in Strasbourg (France) — Article 314 TFEU — Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session held in Brussels (Belgium)) | 2 |
| 2020/C 279/03 | Case C-570/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — HF v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — European Parliament — Member of contract staff — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Right to be heard — Rejection of a request for assistance — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Scope of judicial review) | 2 |
| 2020/C 279/04 | Case C-729/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — VTB Bank PAO, formerly VTB Bank OAO v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Inclusion of the appellant’s name on the list of entities to which restrictive measures apply — Principle of proportionality — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity) | 3 |
| 2020/C 279/05 | Case C-730/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — SC v Eulex Kosovo (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Staff of EU international missions — Internal competition — Non-renewal of a contract of employment — Measure separable from the contract) | 4 |
| 2020/C 279/06 | Case C-731/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Appellant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of power — Right to property — Equal treatment) | 4 |
| 2020/C 279/07 | Joined Cases C-762/18 and C-37/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Haskovo, Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy, Bulgaria) — QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria (C-762/18), CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-37/19) (References for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Worker unlawfully dismissed then reinstated in her employment by decision of a court — Exclusion of any right to paid annual leave not taken for the period between the dismissal and the reinstatement — No right to financial compensation in lieu of annual leave not taken for that period where the employment relationship subsequently ceases) | 5 |
| 2020/C 279/08 | Case C-835/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Terracult SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara — Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Arad — Serviciul Inspecţie Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5, ANAF Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara Serviciul de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Invoice correction — Tax invoiced incorrectly — Refund of tax paid but not due — Reverse charge mechanism for VAT — Transactions relating to a tax period that has already been the subject of a tax inspection — Fiscal neutrality — Principle of effectiveness — Proportionality) | 6 |
| 2020/C 279/09 | Case C-14/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Union Satellite Centre v KF, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Action for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration) | 7 |
| 2020/C 279/10 | Case C-18/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WM v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Conditions of detention — Article 16(1) — Detention in prison accommodation for the purpose of removal — Third-country national who poses a serious threat to public policy or public security) | 7 |
| 2020/C 279/11 | Case C-24/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vergunningsbetwistingen — Belgium) — A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions) | 8 |
| 2020/C 279/12 | Case C-116/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) — Reassignment — Legal basis — Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Interests of the service — Substantial changes in tasks — Qualification — Transfer — Change — Misuse of power — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Right to a fair hearing — Right to effective judicial protection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) | 9 |
| 2020/C 279/13 | Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance) | 10 |
| 2020/C 279/14 | Case C-215/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings initiated by the Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Supply of services — Article 135(1)(l) — Exemption from VAT — Letting of immovable property — Concept of ‘immovable property’ — Exclusion — Article 47 — Place of taxable transactions — Supply of services connected with immovable property — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 — Articles 13b and 31a — Equipment cabinets — Computing centre services) | 10 |
| 2020/C 279/15 | Case C-231/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 135(1)(g) — Exemption of transactions for the management of special investment funds — Single supply used for the management of special investment funds and for other funds) | 11 |
| 2020/C 279/16 | Case C-380/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2013/11/EU — Alternative dispute resolution — Article 13(1) and (2) — Mandatory information — Accessibility of information) | 12 |
| 2020/C 279/17 | Case C-477/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 12(1) — System of strict protection for animal species — Annex IV — Cricetus cricetus (European hamster) — Resting places and breeding sites — Deterioration or destruction — Areas which have been abandoned) | 12 |
| 2020/C 279/18 | Case C-684/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — mk advokaten GbR v MBK Rechtsanwälte GbR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1) — Use in the course of trade of a sign that is identical with or similar to another person’s trade mark for goods or services that are identical with or similar to those for which that mark is registered — Scope of the term ‘using’ — Advertisement placed on a website by order of a person operating in the course of trade and subsequently reproduced on other websites) | 13 |
| 2020/C 279/19 | Case C-36/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción No 3 de San Bartolomé de Tirajana — Spain) — proceedings concerning VL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Asylum and immigration policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 6 — Access to the procedure — Application for international protection made to an authority competent under national law to register such applications — Application made to other authorities that are likely to receive such applications but are not, under national law, competent to register them — Definition of ‘other authorities’ — Article 26 — Detention — Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 8 — Detention of the applicant — Grounds for detention — Decision to hold an applicant in detention on account of a lack of capacity at humanitarian reception centres) | 14 |
| 2020/C 279/20 | Case C-319/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 April 2019 — KPKONPI v ZV, AX, Meditsinski tsentar po dermatologia i estetichna meditsina PRIMA DERM OOD | 14 |
| 2020/C 279/21 | Case C-798/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 October 2019 by Paix et justice pour les juifs séfarades en Israël against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 September 2019 in Case T-337/19, Paix et justice pour les juifs séfarades en Israël v Commission and Council of Europe | 16 |
| 2020/C 279/22 | Case C-893/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by Roxtec AB against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2019 in Case T-261/18, Roxtec v EUIPO — Wallmax | 16 |
| 2020/C 279/23 | Case C-80/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 12 February 2020 — Wilo Salmson France SAS v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București, and Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București — Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenți | 17 |
| 2020/C 279/24 | Case C-81/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 12 February 2020 — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili | 18 |
| 2020/C 279/25 | Case C-99/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 24 February 2020 — Siebenburgisches Nugat Srl, Hans Draser Internationales Marketing v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală a Vămilor — Direcția Regională Vamală Brașov — Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu | 18 |
| 2020/C 279/26 | Case C-116/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara (Romania) lodged on 28 February 2020 — S.C. Avio Lucos SRL v Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Dolj, Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură (APIA) — Aparat Central | 19 |
| 2020/C 279/27 | Case C-145/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 March 2020 — DS v Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG and Volkswagen AG | 20 |
| 2020/C 279/28 | Case C-148/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 March 2020 — AC v Deutsche Lufthansa AG | 21 |
| 2020/C 279/29 | Case C-149/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 March 2020 — DF v Deutsche Lufthansa AG | 21 |
| 2020/C 279/30 | Case C-150/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2020 — BD v Deutsche Lufthansa AG | 22 |
| 2020/C 279/31 | Case C-152/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Mureș (Romania) lodged on 30 March 2020 — DG, EH v SC Gruber Logistics SRL | 23 |
| 2020/C 279/32 | Case C-157/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2020 — FI v Eurowings GmbH | 23 |
| 2020/C 279/33 | Case C-177/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 7 April 2020 — ‘Grossmania’ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal | 24 |
| 2020/C 279/34 | Case C-178/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) lodged on 7 April 2020 — Pharma Expressz Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet | 24 |
| 2020/C 279/35 | Case C-189/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 May 2020 — Laudamotion GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation | 25 |
| 2020/C 279/36 | Case C-190/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 5 May 2020 — DocMorris NV v Apothekerkammer Nordrhein | 26 |
| 2020/C 279/37 | Case C-197/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 May 2020 — KAHL GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover | 26 |
| 2020/C 279/38 | Case C-210/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 30 March 2020 — Rad Service Srl Unipersonale and Others v Del Debbio SpA and Others | 27 |
| 2020/C 279/39 | Case C-215/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 19 May 2020 — JV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland | 27 |
| 2020/C 279/40 | Case C-216/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 May 2020 — C.E. Roeper GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg | 29 |
| 2020/C 279/41 | Case C-220/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2020 — XX v OO | 29 |
| 2020/C 279/42 | Case C-222/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 27 May 2020 — OC v Bundesrepublik Deutschland | 30 |
| 2020/C 279/43 | Case C-224/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten (Denmark) lodged on 29 May 2020 — Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MSD DANMARK ApS, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Novartis AG, FERRING LÆGEMIDLER A/S and H. Lundbeck A/S v Abacus Medicine A/S, Paranova Danmark A/S, 2CARE4 ApS | 31 |
| 2020/C 279/44 | Case C-232/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 3 June 2020 — NP v Daimler AG | 33 |
| 2020/C 279/45 | Case C-248/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 9 June 2020 — Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus Aktiebolag | 34 |
| 2020/C 279/46 | Case C-252/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 June 2020 — CY v Eurowings GmbH | 34 |
| 2020/C 279/47 | Case C-255/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 10 June 2020 — Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio delle dogane di Gaeta v Punto Nautica Srl | 35 |
| 2020/C 279/48 | Case C-257/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 June 2020 — Viva Telekom Bulgaria EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika — Sofia | 36 |
| 2020/C 279/49 | Case C-262/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 June 2020 — VB v Glavna Direktsia ‘Pozharna bezopasnost i zaschtita na naselenieto’ kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti | 37 |
| 2020/C 279/50 | Case C-263/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 15 June 2020 — Airhelp Limited v Laudamotion GmbH | 37 |
| 2020/C 279/51 | Case C-270/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 18 June 2020 — AG and Others v Austrian Airlines AG | 38 |
| 2020/C 279/52 | Case C-275/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 39 |
| 2020/C 279/53 | Case C-287/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — EL and CP v Ryanair Designated Activity Company | 39 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 279/54 | Case T-330/20: Action brought on 28 May 2020 — ACMO and Others v SRB | 41 |
| 2020/C 279/55 | Case T-338/20: Action brought on 27 May 2020 KI v eu-LISA | 42 |
| 2020/C 279/56 | Case T-358/20: Action brought on 11 June 2020 — Net Technologies Finland v REA | 42 |
| 2020/C 279/57 | Case T-377/20: Action brought on 18 June 2020 — KN v EESC | 43 |
| 2020/C 279/58 | Case T-384/20: Action brought on 16 June 2020 — OC (*1) v Commission | 44 |
| 2020/C 279/59 | Case T-389/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — KO v Commission | 45 |
| 2020/C 279/60 | Case T-390/20: Action brought on 17 June 2020 — Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission | 45 |
| 2020/C 279/61 | Case T-391/20: Action brought on 17 June 2020 — Stena Line Scandinavia v Commission | 46 |
| 2020/C 279/62 | Case T-393/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 –Polisario Front v Council | 48 |
| 2020/C 279/63 | Case T-397/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO — Dermavita Company (JUVEDERM) | 50 |
| 2020/C 279/64 | Case T-403/20: Action brought on 19 June 2020 — Wuxi Suntech Power v Commission | 50 |
| 2020/C 279/65 | Case T-408/20: Action brought on 2 July 2020 — KR v Commission | 52 |
| 2020/C 279/66 | Case T-409/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — KS v Frontex | 52 |
| 2020/C 279/67 | Case T-417/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — Esteves Lopes Granja v EUIPO — Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto (PORTWO GIN) | 53 |
| 2020/C 279/68 | Case T-418/20: Action brought on 7 July 2020 — GitLab v EUIPO — Gitlab (GitLab) | 54 |
| 2020/C 279/69 | Case T-419/20: Action brought on 7 July 2020 — Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB | 55 |
| 2020/C 279/70 | Case T-424/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Portigon v SRB | 55 |
| 2020/C 279/71 | Case T-426/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Techniplan v Commission | 56 |
| 2020/C 279/72 | Case T-427/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Max Heinr.Sutor v SRB | 57 |
| 2020/C 279/73 | Case T-428/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Deutsche Hypothekenbank v SRB | 58 |
| 2020/C 279/74 | Case T-429/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) | 60 |
| 2020/C 279/75 | Case T-430/20: Action brought on 9 July 2020 — KV v Commission | 60 |
| 2020/C 279/76 | Case T-431/20: Action brought on 9 July 2020 — UniCredit Bank v SRB | 61 |
| 2020/C 279/77 | Case T-433/20: Action brought on 6 July 2020 — KY v Court of Justice of the European Union | 62 |
| 2020/C 279/78 | Case T-436/20: Action brought on 10 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) | 63 |
| 2020/C 279/79 | Case T-437/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Ultrasun v EUIPO (ULTRASUN) | 63 |
| 2020/C 279/80 | Case T-450/20: Action brought on 15 July 2020 — Tempora v Parliament | 64 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 279/02

Case C-92/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — French Republic v European Parliament (Action for annulment — Law of the institutions — Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union — European Parliament — Concept of ‘budgetary session’ held in Strasbourg (France) — Article 314 TFEU — Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session held in Brussels (Belgium))

2

2020/C 279/03

Case C-570/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — HF v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — European Parliament — Member of contract staff — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Right to be heard — Rejection of a request for assistance — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Scope of judicial review)

2

2020/C 279/04

Case C-729/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — VTB Bank PAO, formerly VTB Bank OAO v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Inclusion of the appellant’s name on the list of entities to which restrictive measures apply — Principle of proportionality — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity)

3

2020/C 279/05

Case C-730/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — SC v Eulex Kosovo (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Staff of EU international missions — Internal competition — Non-renewal of a contract of employment — Measure separable from the contract)

4

2020/C 279/06

Case C-731/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Appellant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of power — Right to property — Equal treatment)

4

2020/C 279/07

Joined Cases C-762/18 and C-37/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Haskovo, Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy, Bulgaria) — QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria (C-762/18), CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-37/19) (References for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Worker unlawfully dismissed then reinstated in her employment by decision of a court — Exclusion of any right to paid annual leave not taken for the period between the dismissal and the reinstatement — No right to financial compensation in lieu of annual leave not taken for that period where the employment relationship subsequently ceases)

5

2020/C 279/08

Case C-835/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Terracult SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara — Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Arad — Serviciul Inspecţie Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5, ANAF Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara Serviciul de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Invoice correction — Tax invoiced incorrectly — Refund of tax paid but not due — Reverse charge mechanism for VAT — Transactions relating to a tax period that has already been the subject of a tax inspection — Fiscal neutrality — Principle of effectiveness — Proportionality)

6

2020/C 279/09

Case C-14/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Union Satellite Centre v KF, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Action for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration)

7

2020/C 279/10

Case C-18/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WM v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Conditions of detention — Article 16(1) — Detention in prison accommodation for the purpose of removal — Third-country national who poses a serious threat to public policy or public security)

7

2020/C 279/11

Case C-24/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vergunningsbetwistingen — Belgium) — A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions)

8

2020/C 279/12

Case C-116/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) — Reassignment — Legal basis — Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Interests of the service — Substantial changes in tasks — Qualification — Transfer — Change — Misuse of power — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Right to a fair hearing — Right to effective judicial protection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

9

2020/C 279/13

Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)

10

2020/C 279/14

Case C-215/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings initiated by the Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Supply of services — Article 135(1)(l) — Exemption from VAT — Letting of immovable property — Concept of ‘immovable property’ — Exclusion — Article 47 — Place of taxable transactions — Supply of services connected with immovable property — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 — Articles 13b and 31a — Equipment cabinets — Computing centre services)

10

2020/C 279/15

Case C-231/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 135(1)(g) — Exemption of transactions for the management of special investment funds — Single supply used for the management of special investment funds and for other funds)

11

2020/C 279/16

Case C-380/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2013/11/EU — Alternative dispute resolution — Article 13(1) and (2) — Mandatory information — Accessibility of information)

12

2020/C 279/17

Case C-477/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 12(1) — System of strict protection for animal species — Annex IV — Cricetus cricetus (European hamster) — Resting places and breeding sites — Deterioration or destruction — Areas which have been abandoned)

12

2020/C 279/18

Case C-684/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — mk advokaten GbR v MBK Rechtsanwälte GbR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1) — Use in the course of trade of a sign that is identical with or similar to another person’s trade mark for goods or services that are identical with or similar to those for which that mark is registered — Scope of the term ‘using’ — Advertisement placed on a website by order of a person operating in the course of trade and subsequently reproduced on other websites)

13

2020/C 279/19

Case C-36/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción No 3 de San Bartolomé de Tirajana — Spain) — proceedings concerning VL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Asylum and immigration policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 6 — Access to the procedure — Application for international protection made to an authority competent under national law to register such applications — Application made to other authorities that are likely to receive such applications but are not, under national law, competent to register them — Definition of ‘other authorities’ — Article 26 — Detention — Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 8 — Detention of the applicant — Grounds for detention — Decision to hold an applicant in detention on account of a lack of capacity at humanitarian reception centres)

14

2020/C 279/20

Case C-319/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 April 2019 — KPKONPI v ZV, AX, Meditsinski tsentar po dermatologia i estetichna meditsina PRIMA DERM OOD

14

2020/C 279/21

Case C-798/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 October 2019 by Paix et justice pour les juifs séfarades en Israël against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 September 2019 in Case T-337/19, Paix et justice pour les juifs séfarades en Israël v Commission and Council of Europe

16

2020/C 279/22

Case C-893/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by Roxtec AB against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2019 in Case T-261/18, Roxtec v EUIPO — Wallmax

16

2020/C 279/23

Case C-80/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 12 February 2020 — Wilo Salmson France SAS v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București, and Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București — Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenți

17

2020/C 279/24

Case C-81/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 12 February 2020 — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

18

2020/C 279/25

Case C-99/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 24 February 2020 — Siebenburgisches Nugat Srl, Hans Draser Internationales Marketing v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală a Vămilor — Direcția Regională Vamală Brașov — Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu

18

2020/C 279/26

Case C-116/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara (Romania) lodged on 28 February 2020 — S.C. Avio Lucos SRL v Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Dolj, Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură (APIA) — Aparat Central

19

2020/C 279/27

Case C-145/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 March 2020 — DS v Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG and Volkswagen AG

20

2020/C 279/28

Case C-148/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 March 2020 — AC v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

21

2020/C 279/29

Case C-149/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 March 2020 — DF v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

21

2020/C 279/30

Case C-150/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2020 — BD v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

22

2020/C 279/31

Case C-152/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Mureș (Romania) lodged on 30 March 2020 — DG, EH v SC Gruber Logistics SRL

23

2020/C 279/32

Case C-157/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2020 — FI v Eurowings GmbH

23

2020/C 279/33

Case C-177/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 7 April 2020 — ‘Grossmania’ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

24

2020/C 279/34

Case C-178/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) lodged on 7 April 2020 — Pharma Expressz Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet

24

2020/C 279/35

Case C-189/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 May 2020 — Laudamotion GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

25

2020/C 279/36

Case C-190/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 5 May 2020 — DocMorris NV v Apothekerkammer Nordrhein

26

2020/C 279/37

Case C-197/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 May 2020 — KAHL GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover

26

2020/C 279/38

Case C-210/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 30 March 2020 — Rad Service Srl Unipersonale and Others v Del Debbio SpA and Others

27

2020/C 279/39

Case C-215/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 19 May 2020 — JV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

27

2020/C 279/40

Case C-216/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 May 2020 — C.E. Roeper GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg

29

2020/C 279/41

Case C-220/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2020 — XX v OO

29

2020/C 279/42

Case C-222/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 27 May 2020 — OC v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

30

2020/C 279/43

Case C-224/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten (Denmark) lodged on 29 May 2020 — Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MSD DANMARK ApS, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Novartis AG, FERRING LÆGEMIDLER A/S and H. Lundbeck A/S v Abacus Medicine A/S, Paranova Danmark A/S, 2CARE4 ApS

31

2020/C 279/44

Case C-232/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 3 June 2020 — NP v Daimler AG

33

2020/C 279/45

Case C-248/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 9 June 2020 — Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus Aktiebolag

34

2020/C 279/46

Case C-252/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 June 2020 — CY v Eurowings GmbH

34

2020/C 279/47

Case C-255/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 10 June 2020 — Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio delle dogane di Gaeta v Punto Nautica Srl

35

2020/C 279/48

Case C-257/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 June 2020 — Viva Telekom Bulgaria EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika — Sofia

36

2020/C 279/49

Case C-262/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 June 2020 — VB v Glavna Direktsia ‘Pozharna bezopasnost i zaschtita na naselenieto’ kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti

37

2020/C 279/50

Case C-263/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 15 June 2020 — Airhelp Limited v Laudamotion GmbH

37

2020/C 279/51

Case C-270/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 18 June 2020 — AG and Others v Austrian Airlines AG

38

2020/C 279/52

Case C-275/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

39

2020/C 279/53

Case C-287/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — EL and CP v Ryanair Designated Activity Company

39

General Court

2020/C 279/54

Case T-330/20: Action brought on 28 May 2020 — ACMO and Others v SRB

41

2020/C 279/55

Case T-338/20: Action brought on 27 May 2020 KI v eu-LISA

42

2020/C 279/56

Case T-358/20: Action brought on 11 June 2020 — Net Technologies Finland v REA

42

2020/C 279/57

Case T-377/20: Action brought on 18 June 2020 — KN v EESC

43

2020/C 279/58

Case T-384/20: Action brought on 16 June 2020 — OC (*1) v Commission

*1

44

2020/C 279/59

Case T-389/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — KO v Commission

45

2020/C 279/60

Case T-390/20: Action brought on 17 June 2020 — Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

45

2020/C 279/61

Case T-391/20: Action brought on 17 June 2020 — Stena Line Scandinavia v Commission

46

2020/C 279/62

Case T-393/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 –Polisario Front v Council

48

2020/C 279/63

Case T-397/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO — Dermavita Company (JUVEDERM)

50

2020/C 279/64

Case T-403/20: Action brought on 19 June 2020 — Wuxi Suntech Power v Commission

50

2020/C 279/65

Case T-408/20: Action brought on 2 July 2020 — KR v Commission

52

2020/C 279/66

Case T-409/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — KS v Frontex

52

2020/C 279/67

Case T-417/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — Esteves Lopes Granja v EUIPO — Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto (PORTWO GIN)

53

2020/C 279/68

Case T-418/20: Action brought on 7 July 2020 — GitLab v EUIPO — Gitlab (GitLab)

54

2020/C 279/69

Case T-419/20: Action brought on 7 July 2020 — Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB

55

2020/C 279/70

Case T-424/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Portigon v SRB

55

2020/C 279/71

Case T-426/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Techniplan v Commission

56

2020/C 279/72

Case T-427/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Max Heinr.Sutor v SRB

57

2020/C 279/73

Case T-428/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Deutsche Hypothekenbank v SRB

58

2020/C 279/74

Case T-429/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+)

60

2020/C 279/75

Case T-430/20: Action brought on 9 July 2020 — KV v Commission

60

2020/C 279/76

Case T-431/20: Action brought on 9 July 2020 — UniCredit Bank v SRB

61

2020/C 279/77

Case T-433/20: Action brought on 6 July 2020 — KY v Court of Justice of the European Union

62

2020/C 279/78

Case T-436/20: Action brought on 10 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+)

63

2020/C 279/79

Case T-437/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Ultrasun v EUIPO (ULTRASUN)

63

2020/C 279/80

Case T-450/20: Action brought on 15 July 2020 — Tempora v Parliament

64

---

(*1)Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

| | |
| --- | --- |

---

| EN | For reasons of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality, some information contained in this issue cannot be disclosed anymore and therefore a new authentic version has been published. |
| --- | --- |

EN

For reasons of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality, some information contained in this issue cannot be disclosed anymore and therefore a new authentic version has been published.