alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte Rogelio Villegas Dominquez

, * From the 3 2nd District Court

of Nolan County

Trial Court No. 12318

.

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 2 23

- CR * November 21 , 2019

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

( Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Vito A. PELINO, petitioner, v. Kathryn HENS-GRECO, et al.

No. 17-5130.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### Flora J. Fischer et al., *Appellants,*v. Georgia Shook *et al., Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*H. D. Wentworth,*for Appellants;

*W. T. Martin,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, *226ordered, and. adjudged by the Court that said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          52,764
<SECURITIES>                                    50,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,499
<INVENTORY>                                     51,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,610
<PP&E>                                          27,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,659
<BONDS>                                            350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,184
<SALES>                                         91,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,795
<CGS>                                           64,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Northcore Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as at, and for the fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2010.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Dated: March 31, 2011                                                                        -sd/_____________


Duncan Copeland


Chief Executive Officer








This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such incorporation is expressly referenced within.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Jimmy S.M. LeeJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive
OfficerFebruary 8, 2005




I, Gary L. Fischer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Gary L. FischerGary L. FischerPresident, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial OfficerFebruary 8, 2005
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-82390, 333-75527, 333-31704 and 333-122562) of Varian, Inc. of our report dated December 5, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,
managements assessment of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    

San Jose, California

December 4, 2006
Aaron KINZER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, David Uppal, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of American United Gold Corp. (the "Company"), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March 7, 2006

/s/ David Uppal

David Uppal

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
CONNECTICUT, petitioner, v. Nina C. BACCALA.

No. 17-464.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Motion of respondents for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Johnathan Joseph GARCIA, petitioner, v. T. PEREZ, Warden.

No. 17-5425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23495-23496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-83-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7--Mayaguez, Puerto Rico; Authorization 
of Production Activity; CooperVision Manufacturing PR LLC (Disposable 
Contact Lenses), Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico

    On December 16, 2021, CooperVision Manufacturing PR LLC submitted a

[[Page 23496]]

notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ 7, in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 73730, December 28, 2021). On 
April 15, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: April 15, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08418 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>

                            CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT                  EXHIBIT 10.7

                       FOURTH AMENDMENT TO IRU AGREEMENT

       This Amendment to IRU Agreement ("Amendment") is made and entered into as
of the 5th day of February, 1999, by and between Qwest Communications
Corporation ("Qwest") and GTE Intelligent Networks Services Incorporated
("GTE").

                                    RECITALS

       A.  Qwest and GTE previously entered into an IRU Agreement dated as of
       May 2, 1997, as amended by the First Amendment dated August 13, 1997, the
       Second Amendment dated May 29, 1998 and the Third Amendment dated
       November 16, 1998 (the "Agreement").

       B.  Qwest and GTE wish to amend the Agreement to add additional Dark
       Fiber.

                                   AGREEMENT

       In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Qwest and GTE agree as follows:

       1.  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein
shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.

       2.  In accordance with Section 1.01(a) and subject to the provisions of
the Agreement, Qwest hereby grants GTE an IRU in twenty four (24) Dark Fibers in
a route in Dallas, Texas described as follow: Commencing at 4316 Bryan Street,
then proceeding south along N. Peak Street to Live Oak then, proceeding
southwest along Live Oak to N. Pearl, continuing northwest to San Jacinto,
continuing northeast to Leonard and then continuing southeast to 2323 Bryan;
then from 2323 Bryan Street along Bryan to 4316 Bryan Street (the "Dallas Ring
Fibers"), as shown on the map attached hereto.

       3.  GTE hereby agrees to pay Qwest an IRU Fee of [*Material Omitted and
Separately Filed Under an Application for Confidential Treatment] for the Dallas
Ring Fibers. [*Material Omitted and Separately Filed Under an Application for
Confidential Treatment].

       4.  Except as modified in this Amendment, all other provisions of the
Agreement shall be applicable to the Dallas Ring Fibers.

<PAGE>

                            CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

       In Witness Whereof, Qwest and GTE have executed this Amendment effective
as of the day first written above.

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS                         GTE INTELLIGENT NETWORK SERVICES
CORPORATION                                  INCORPORATED

By_____________________________              By_____________________________
Name:                                        Name:
Title:                                       Title:
Date:                                        Date:



                                       2
Duane HUTCHINGS, petitioner, v. ONE NEVADA CREDIT UNION, fka Nevada Federal Credit Union.

No. 17-8454.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Jimmy S.M. LeeJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2005




I, Gary L. Fischer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated
Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Gary L. FischerGary L. FischerPresident, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/17/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      105,469
COMMITMENTS
     811   17,908    3,788   86,708   65,373   91,307   87,069   14,162   18,400

CHANGES FROM 08/10/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,099)
     171    2,033      312    4,736      766    5,219    3,111     -120    1,988

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     0.8     17.0      3.6     82.2     62.0     86.6     82.6     13.4     17.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
       4       20       13       24       25       40       46
```

----

Updated August 20, 2010
Rosendo RODRIGUEZ, III, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5723.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Release: #3912-96 (Civ CS-96-0200-WFN)

For Release:May 16, 1996

WASHINGTON STATE COMMODITY POOL OPERATOR, KEN WILLEY,

HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR REFUSING TO REVEAL LOCATION OF
    COMMODITY POOL ASSETS

Court Orders Willey Jailed After Order To Show Cause Hearing; Action
    Stems from CFTC Anti-Fraud Enforcement Action Against Willey Filed in
    April

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that on May 8, 1996, U.S. District Court Judge William F. Nielsen of
    the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington entered an
    order finding Ken Willey of Twisp, Washington -- a defendant in a
    CFTC anti-fraud action in the same court -- in contempt of court for
    failing to comply with the court's April 9, 1996, order of preliminary
    injunction entered against Willey.

Willey Ordered Jailed Until $12 Million in Customer
    Funds is Accounted For

The court ordered Willey into custody until he accounts for assets
    totaling approximately $12 million allegedly held by Willey in a commodity
    pool that he operated. Willey's records reflect that he had 274 customers
    and that pool assets totalled $17.5 million. To date, the CFTC has frozen
    over $5.5 million of customer funds; the remaining funds are unaccounted
    for.

This matter arose from a three-count civil injunctive complaint filed by
    the CFTC on April 9, 1996, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
    District of Washington. (See CFTC News Release #3902-96, April 11,
    1996.) The CFTC action alleges, among other things, that Willey violated
    the Commodity Exchange Act by acting as an unregistered commodity pool
    operator; engaging in a scheme to defraud pool participants by distributing
    false account statements to investors; receiving investor funds in a name
    other than that of the pool's; and commingling pool property with assets of
    other persons.

The CFTC is seeking a permanent injunction that would, among other
    things, require an accounting, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains,
    restitution to customers, and the payment of a civil monetary penalty of
    $100,000, or triple the monetary gains to the defendant, whichever is
    greater, for each violation.

Willey is ordered to appear back in court on June 7, 1996.

# # #

---
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                   HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Twenty-Six Weeks Ended           Thirteen Weeks Ended
                              November 29,    November 30,    November 29,    November 30,
                                  1998            1997            1998            1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
PRIMARY

Earnings:
  Net Earnings                $ 4,878,000     $ 4,039,000     $ 3,242,000     $ 2,512,000

Preferred stock dividends         (23,000)        (16,000)        (11,000)         (8,000)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings applicable to
   common stock               $ 4,855,000     $ 4,023,000     $ 3,231,000     $ 2,504,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES

Weighted average number
   of shares outstanding
         Basic                    717,085         718,688         717,197         719,037
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES

Weighted average number
   of shares outstanding
         Diluted                  732,006         724,474         732,118         724,823
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings per share
         Basic                $      6.77     $      5.60     $      4.51     $      3.48
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings per share
         Diluted              $      6.66     $      5.58     $      4.43     $      3.47
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


                                       28
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47 .5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20396 Summary Calendar

__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID J. TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-92-120-ALL

______________________________________________

February 7, 1996 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for David J. To wnsend has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and

we have independently reviewed counsel's brief and the record, and
found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Warren DURHAM, Jr., petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-6730.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
Masoud BAMDAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8278.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4562 

To amend the exemption of certain legal requirements applied to Amtrak 

in making improvements to exclude the construction of advertisements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. ESPAILLAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the exemption of certain legal requirements applied to Amtrak in making improvements to exclude the 

construction of advertisements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Allowing More Trans5 parency in Reviewing Advertising Construction Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘AMTRAK Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXEMPTION FOR AMTRAK FROM 

8 CERTAIN LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. 

9 Section 24902(j) of title 49, United States Code, is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4562 IH

1 ‘‘(k) LIMITATION ON EXEMPTIONS.—Subsection (j) 

2 shall not apply to an improvement activity carried out for 

3 the purpose of construction or display of an advertise4 ment.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Brian William SCHUMAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6048.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Nadine ESPINOZA-HORIUCHI, petitioner, v. WALMART STORES, INC.

No. 17-5279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.