alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergisoft Holding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ash R.
Huzenlaub, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Ash R. Huzenlaub
---------------------
Ash R. Huzenlaub
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/06/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      493,477
COMMITMENTS
  34,864   24,208  105,997  331,645  339,934  472,506  470,139   20,971   23,338

CHANGES FROM 06/29/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,502)
    -540    9,799   -4,317    4,909   -5,563       52      -81    5,451    5,584

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.1      4.9     21.5     67.2     68.9     95.8     95.3      4.2      4.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      104)
      12       21       31       58       66       92       99
```

----

Updated July 9, 2010
#### A. B. Coleman and J. H. Coleman, *Appellants,*v. N. B. Kennedy, J. G. Browning and Emily K. Browning, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 20, 1929.

*244
      *II. P. Baya,*for Appellants;

*Jones & White,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hornby International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maureen
Brogan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuanT to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
26th day of September 2005.


/s/ Maureen Brogan
---------------------------
Maureen Brogan
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

 

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES**

 

Unless otherwiseindicated, ADB Systems International Ltd. (“ADB”), or one of its subsidiaries,owns 100%, except as otherwise noted, of the outstanding capital stock of thefollowing companies:

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**              |   | **Country of  Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                |   |                          |
| ADB Systemer AS (1)                 |   | Norway                        |
| ADB Systems International Limited   |   | Ireland                       |
| ADB Systems Limited                 |   | England                       |
| Bid.Com (U.K.) Limited              |   | England                       |
| ADB Systems, Inc.                   |   | USA (Delaware)                |
| Bid.Com USA, Inc.                   |   | USA (Florida)                 |
| Bid.Com International Inc.          |   | Canada (Ontario)              |
| Bid.Com International Pty. Ltd. (2) |   | Australia                     |
| Internet Liquidators USA, Inc. (2)  |   | USA (Florida)                 |
| ADB Systems USA, Inc.               |   | USA (Delaware)                |
| GE Asset Manager LLC(3)             |   | USA (Delaware)                |

 

----

(1)         As ofDecember 31, 2003, ADB owned 99.4% of the outstanding voting shares of ADBSystemer AS.  Under Norwegian corporatelaw, ADB may trigger compulsory acquisition of the remaining shares at anytime.  The remaining shareholders eachhave the same right.  The value for theshares acquired shall be as agreed, failing which the value shall be determinedby arbitration.

(2)         Dormant.  ADB anticipates dissolving these companiesin 2004.

(3)         ADBowns 50% of the membership interest of GE Asset Manager LLC.

 

----
Ahmed Khalfan GHAILANI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9115.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Carston Markel WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5858.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         186,473
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  216,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               403,425
<PP&E>                                         3,738,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,277,214)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,865,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,808
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,857,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,865,094
<SALES>                                        175,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,516
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  57,854<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                95,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            95,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   95,238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAFARI ALEX CARLOS
, Appellant,

v.

YOLIE CARLOS
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2236

[ August 18, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562020DR001292AXXXHC

.

Jafari Alex Carlos, Port St. Lucie, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

K UNTZ , J

.

The husband appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his petition for dissolution of marriage. We revers e the court’s dismissal and remand for further proceedings

.

Fifty

- five days after the h usband filed his petition, the circuit court entered a sua sponte order requiring him to file documents showing service of process. The court required the documents to be filed by October 8, 2020

— t he 120th day after the husband filed his initial pleading

. Because nothing appeared on the docket on October 1 2 , 2020,

the court dismissed the petition. The court’s “order of dismissal” stated that the petition was dismissed “[d]ue to the parties’ failure to comply with a previous court order.”

We appreciate the difficult task of managing a crowded docket , b ut the rules of proced ure do not yield to that task. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j) offers a remedy if service of process is not effectuated within 120 days after filing the initial pleading : “ [T] he court, on its own initiative after notice or on motion, shall direct that service be effected within a specified time or shall dismiss the action without prejudice or2 drop that defendant as a party

. . . .” Id

. But even the authorization to dismiss without prejudice has limits because “if the plaintiff shows good

cause o r excusable neglect for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Id

.

Here, the court issued the order fifty

- five days after the initial pleading

was filed . On day 122, the court dismissed the case without all owing the

husband an opportunity to show “good cause or excusable neglect.”

The rule requires more. See Con n elly v. Crown Cruise Line, Inc. S.A.

, 636 So. 2d 886, 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We reverse and remand for further proceedings to allow the husband an opportunity to show “good cause or excusable neglect” for the failure to serve the respondent within

the time allowed

.

Reversed and Remanded

.

D AMOORGIAN

, J., and F AHNESTOCK

, F ABIENNE E. , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### W. R. Hopkins and Z. W. Evans, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. F. A. Rollins, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Decision filed April 20, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied June 22, 1929.

*615*J ones & J ones,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Maguire & Voorhis,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the.record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment j it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
Gustavo VENTA, petitioner, v. Tamyra JARVIS, Warden.

No. 17-6099.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

*649Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Winfred MILNER, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-6994.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
Martin J. BRADLEY, III v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-282 (R46-009/OT 2017).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 20, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
July 10, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JERRY DOHALICK, Appellant

NO. 14-10-01157-CV V.

MOODY NATIONAL BANK, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee MOODY 

NATIONAL BANK signed September 2, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We order the judgment of the court below REVERSED to the extent that the trial court 

rendered judgment against appellant JERRY DOHALICK, and we RENDER judgment 

that appellee MOODY NATIONAL BANK take nothing from appellant JERRY 

DOHALICK. We order appellee MOODY NATIONAL BANK to pay all costs incurred 

in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.22



On January 8, 2004 a resolution was voiced, faxed or e-mailed to each Board member asking for their vote on the following correction to the employment/pension contract
for Norman H. Reader.



RESOLVED, that paragraph 9. and
paragraph 10. stated in the Employment Agreement with Norman H. Reader dated July 1, 1998 and inadvertently omitted from the May 17, 2001 Employment Agreement be added to and included in the Employment Agreement with Norman H. Reader dated May 17,
2001. The paragraphs read as follows:



9. Retirement Benefits. Upon
expiration of the term of this Agreement beginning on July 1, 2005, or upon earlier termination without cause or earlier termination by reason of a change of control or a potential change in control, or by reason of disability, but not in the event
of voluntary termination of the Employee prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement, the Bank shall pay to Employee, in equal monthly installments, a supplemental retirement benefit equal to $65,000 per year until June 30, 2011. In the
event of the Employees Disability, this supplemental retirement benefit shall commence at the end of the 180-day period described in Section 5.



10. Death Benefits. In the event the Employee shall die before the last monthly payment under Section 9 hereof, all remaining payments shall be paid to the
beneficiary or beneficiaries most Cornerstone Bank

Board Minutes

January 28, 2004

Page 3 of 3



recently designated by the Employee in writing filed with the Bank. In the event no beneficiary designation is on file, all payments shall be made to the Employees
spouse, or if she does not survive him, to the Employees estate.



It is
intended by the parties hereto, in the event of the Employees death prior to the expiration of the term set forth in Section 5 hereof, that, in lieu of any compensation as set forth in Section 2, these death benefits shall commence in the
month following Employees death and continue for the full term stated in Section 9.



RESOLVED FURTHER, that in the event the above stated paragraphs cannot be added to and included in the May 17, 2001 Employment Agreement for Norman H. Reader that the Board authorizes the above paragraphs be
defined in a separate agreement that will have the same effect as having the paragraphs added to and included in the May 17, 2001 Employment Agreement.



The Board approved the resolution unanimously (13 out of 13 in attendance in favor of).



There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.



|                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                         |  | 
|/s/ Merrill J. Forgotson |  |  |  | /s/ Leigh A. Hardisty
|                         |  |  |  |                      
|Merrill J. Forgotson     |  |  |  | Leigh A. Hardisty    
|President                |  |  |  | Secretary
# L_2009232EN.01001901.xml

| 3.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 232/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 232/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 63/2009

of 29 May 2009

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the Agreement, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2009 of 24 April 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2009 of 24 April 2009 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 17i (Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘17j. | 32008 L 0096: Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management (OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 59).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘17j.

32008 L 0096: Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management (OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 59).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2008/96/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 May 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 25.6.2009, p. 31.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 59.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4699 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4699

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 
 requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds 
     for Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2019

Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 
 requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds 
     for Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVING MATCHING REQUIREMENT FOR A TERRITORY TO USE 
              SPECIALLY ALLOCATED FEDERAL FUNDS FOR MEDICARE COVERED 
              PART D DRUGS FOR LOW-INCOME INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1935(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396u-5(e)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ``and the Federal medical assistance 
percentage shall be 100 percent for expenditures under such plan that 
are attributable to this subsection and the additional amounts provided 
under paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1905(b) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended by striking ``section 1933(d)'' and 
inserting ``sections 1933(d) and 1935(e)(1)(B)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts expended for fiscal periods beginning on or after 
October 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 118

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 300

‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.East 8th Street in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘J.J.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 118

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 300 East 8th

Street in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 118 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 300 East 8th Street

3 in Austin, Texas, shall be known and designated as the

4 ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.