alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2


Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   The undersigned, being the Corporate Controller of Northcore Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as at, and for the fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2009.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  
 Dated:  March 30, 2010
-sd/- Tam NguyenTam NguyenCorporate Controller
   This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such incorporation is expressly referenced within.
PMCM TV, LLC, petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-717.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Brandon Everett Palmer , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00174

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 202nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 22F1714

- 202 ). Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Rambin

.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by replacing

“ N/A ” with “ YES ” in regard to the allegations contained in the first and second enhancement paragraphs and by replacing “ N/A ” with “ TRUE ” as to the jury’s finding in regard to the second enhancement paragraph. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Brandon Everett Palmer , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 23 , 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

s0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146079

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146079

COA: 308560

Berrien CC: 2007-402268-FC

JEREMY LARRONN BURRELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/17/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       84,067
COMMITMENTS
  24,752   12,259   10,553   32,308   38,832   67,614   61,645   16,454   22,423

CHANGES FROM 03/10/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,080)
   2,732   -2,010      248     -589    3,901    2,391    2,139      689      941

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.4     14.6     12.6     38.4     46.2     80.4     73.3     19.6     26.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      31       28       34       58       58      111      104
```

----

Updated March 20, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4643-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4643-DR), dated February 27, 
2022, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on March 18, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Brett H. 
Howard, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of John Brogan as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-09292 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Jeffrey M. Mattich, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Solutions of America, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Jeffrey M. Mattich   Jeffrey M. Mattich, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Harry Mund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lapis Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

November 14, 2004                            /s/ Harry Mund
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Harry Mund
                                             Chief Executive Officer
JOHN CHING EN LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-597.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854398
<NAME> XATA CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         377,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,049,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                   249,995
<INVENTORY>                                    809,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,104,050
<PP&E>                                       2,021,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,557,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,892,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,664,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    700,005
<COMMON>                                        44,356
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,483,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,892,627
<SALES>                                      2,928,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,928,646
<CGS>                                        1,614,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,043,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            134,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,790
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
Daimeyahn STEVENSON, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-6770.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4047 

To require certain Federal financial regulators to carry out an independent 

study of their regulated entities’ processes for allowing third parties 

to access consumer-authorized financial data. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. MEEKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require certain Federal financial regulators to carry out 

an independent study of their regulated entities’ processes for allowing third parties to access consumer-authorized financial data. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open Banking Study 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONSUMER-AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DATA STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Board of Governors of the Federal 

8 Reserve System, the Bureau of Consumer Financial ProVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:00 Aug 14, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4047.IH H4047

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4047 IH

1 tection, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal De2 posit Insurance Corporation, and the National Credit 

3 Union Administration shall, jointly, carry out a study of 

4 their regulated entities’ processes for allowing third par5 ties to access consumer-authorized financial data. 

6 (b) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the 1-year 

7 period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 

8 Federal agencies required to carry out a study under sub9 section (a) shall submit a report to the Committee on Fi10 nancial Services of the House of Representatives and the 

11 Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of 

12 the Senate containing— 

13 (1) a description of all findings and determina14 tions made in carrying out the study required under 

15 subsection (a); and 

16 (2) administrative and legislative recommenda17 tions that would encourage consumer-authorized fi18 nancial data sharing and aggregation consistent with 

19 the agencies’ safety and soundness, consumer pro20 tection, and cybersecurity standards, and all applica21 ble laws and regulations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>







          <ARTICLE> 5

                               FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE 
                                  EIF HOLDINGS, INC.

                    <LEGEND>  
           
                    THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM EIF HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE
                    QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                    ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 

                    </LEGEND>        
                            
                    <S>                                  <C>
                    <PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
                    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 SEP-30-1996
                    <PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1996
                    <CASH>                                109,350
                    <SECURITIES>                                0
                    <RECEIVABLES>                       7,254,144
                    <ALLOWANCES>                        (150,000)
                    <INVENTORY>                           531,854
                    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                    8,426,350
                    <PP&E>                              5,459,141
                    <DEPRECIATION>                    (4,017,024)
                    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     10,831,875
                    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               7,765,333
                    <BONDS>                                     0
                    <COMMON>                            3,019,246
                    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
                    <PREFERRED>                                 0
                    <OTHER-SE>                        (4,004,778)
                    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       10,831,875
                    <SALES>                            19,160,454
                    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                   19,160,454
                    <CGS>                              13,606,949
                    <TOTAL-COSTS>                      21,526,865
                    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (47,378)
                    <LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
                    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    302,873
                    <INCOME-PRETAX>                   (2,621,906)
                    <INCOME-TAX>                                0
                    <INCOME-CONTINUING>               (2,261,906)
                    <DISCONTINUED>                              0
                    <EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
                    <CHANGES>                                   0
                    <NET-INCOME>                      (2,261,906)
                    <EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.13)
                    <EPS-DILUTED>                               0
                             


</TABLE>
Adin Ovidio GOMEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-8898.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
# L_2012076EN.01003201.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 148/2011

of 2 December 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 720/2011 of 22 July 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security as regards the phasing-in of the screening of liquids, aerosols and gels at EU airports (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 720/2011 of 22 July 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security as regards the phasing-in of the screening of liquids, aerosols and gels at EU airports (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66ha (Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/2009) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 0720: Commission Regulation (EU) No 720/2011 of 22 July 2011 (OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 19).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 0720: Commission Regulation (EU) No 720/2011 of 22 July 2011 (OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 19).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 720/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2011, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2011, p. 85.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 19.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 12002E201

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 201 - Article 144 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 144 - EEC Treaty***Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0117 - 0117 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0263 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0057 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 1: The European Parliament

Article 201

Article 144 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 144 - EEC Treaty

Article 201

If a motion of censure on the activities of the Commission is tabled before it, the European Parliament shall not vote thereon until at least three days after the motion has been tabled and only by open vote.

If the motion of censure is carried by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing a majority of the Members of the European Parliament, the Members of the Commission shall resign as a body. They shall continue to deal with current business until they are replaced in accordance with Article 214. In this case, the term of office of the Members of the Commission appointed to replace them shall expire on the date on which the term of office of the Members of the Commission obliged to resign as a body would have expired.