alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Daniel M. DAVIS, petitioner, v. Charles C. CRAFTS, et al.

No. 17-6981.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Idaho dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Romelly DASTINOT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 248/23 S

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 248 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4823 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 248

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4823 September 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | European Parliament |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2005 | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

European Parliament

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2005

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# L_2013204EN.01000102.xml

| 31.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of Part IV (trade matters) of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other (Panama)

Pending the completion of the procedures for the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other, signed at Tegucigalpa on 29 June 2012, Part IV thereof concerning trade matters shall, in accordance with its Article 353(4), be applied on a provisional basis between the European Union and Panama as from 1 August 2013. By virtue of Article 3 (1) of the Council Decision of 25 June 2012 on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement, Article 271 shall not be provisionally applied.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,354
<SECURITIES>                                     7,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,496
<INVENTORY>                                     30,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,826
<PP&E>                                          22,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,974
<SALES>                                         26,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,801
<CGS>                                           22,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,804)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       633
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
Christopher RIDGEWAY, et al., petitioners, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9710-01-OMS]


Good Neighbor Environmental Board

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a public meeting of the Good 
Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB or Board). The GNEB is an 
independent federal advisory committee. Its mission is to advise the 
President and Congress of the United States on good neighbor practices 
along the U.S. border with Mexico. Its recommendations are focused on 
environmental infrastructure needs within the U.S. states contiguous to 
Mexico. The Board is a federal advisory committee chartered under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Purpose of Meeting: To discuss and develop the framework for the 
Board's annual letter to the President, which will focus on water and 
wastewater infrastructure issues and challenges along the U.S.-Mexico 
border.

DATES: May 5, 2022, from 2:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m. (EST). A copy of the 
agenda will be posted at www.epa.gov/faca/gneb.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be conducted virtually and is open to the 
public with limited access available on a first-come, first-served 
basis. Members of the public wishing to participate in the 
teleconference, should contact Eugene Green at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9b8e999992d299899b999299bc998c9dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e98e9b8c8c87c78c9c8e8c878ca98c9988c78e869f">[email protected]</span></a> by 
April 28th.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or submit 
written public comments to the Board, should also be directed to Eugene 
Green at least five business days prior to the teleconference.
    Meeting Access: Information regarding access and/or accommodations 
for individuals with disabilities should be directed to Eugene Green at 
the email address or phone number listed above. To ensure adequate time 
for processing, please make requests for accommodations at least 10 
days prior to the teleconference meeting. For additional information 
regarding the teleconference, please contact Eugene Green at (202) 564-
2432 or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8becf9eeeee5a5eefeeceee5eecbeefbeaa5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="baddc8dfdfd494dfcfdddfd4dffadfcadb94ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 14, 2022.
Eugene Green,
Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2022-08439 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4541 

To establish a grant program to provide certain eligible entities engaged 

in food recovery with grants to support certain costs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To establish a grant program to provide certain eligible entities engaged in food recovery with grants to support 

certain costs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FOOD WASTE RECOVERY TRANSPORTATION 

4 GRANTS. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—From amounts made avail7 able to carry out this section, the Secretary of Agri8 culture shall make grants to assist an eligible entity 

9 with— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4541 IH

1 (A) purchasing, leasing, or otherwise ac2 quiring vehicles, including refrigerated vehicles, 

3 or other equipment to carry out activities re4 lated to food recovery; 

5 (B) reimbursing travel costs related to 

6 food recovery at the per mile rate established by 

7 the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Serv8 ice; and 

9 (C) the costs of preparing, storing, and 

10 transporting donated food. 

11 (2) LIMITATION.—An eligible entity may only 

12 receive one grant under this section. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant 

14 under subsection (a), an eligible entity shall submit an ap15 plication to the Secretary of Agriculture, at such time, in 

16 such manner, and containing such information as the Sec17 retary of Agriculture may require. 

18 (c) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—To be eligible for a grant 

19 under subsection (a), a public food program service pro20 vider, a tribal organization, or a private nonprofit entity 

21 (including a gleaner) shall— 

22 (1) have experience in the area of— 

23 (A) food recovery and distribution, particu24 larly concerning small and medium-sized farms; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4541 IH

1 (B) job training and business development 

2 activities for food-related activities in low-in3 come communities; or 

4 (C) efforts to reduce food insecurity in the 

5 community, including food recovery and dis6 tribution, improving access to services, or co7 ordinating services and programs; and 

8 (2) demonstrate competency to implement a 

9 project, provide fiscal accountability, collect data, 

10 and prepare reports and other necessary documenta11 tion. 

12 (d) GLEANER DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

13 ‘‘gleaner’’ has the meaning given the term in section 

14 25(a)(2) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 

15 2034(a)(2)). 

16 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

17 authorized to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal 

18 year 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4562 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4562

To amend the exemption of certain legal requirements applied to Amtrak 
 in making improvements to exclude the construction of advertisements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2019

Mr. Espaillat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the exemption of certain legal requirements applied to Amtrak 
 in making improvements to exclude the construction of advertisements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Allowing More Transparency in 
Reviewing Advertising Construction Act'' or the ``AMTRAK Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXEMPTION FOR AMTRAK FROM CERTAIN LEGAL 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 24902(j) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Limitation on Exemptions.--Subsection (j) shall not apply to 
an improvement activity carried out for the purpose of construction or 
display of an advertisement.''.
                                 <all>
```
Dennis TURNER, petitioner, v. Kathy GRIFFIN, Warden.

No. 16-8962.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Kunta TOLBERT, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, Warden.

No. 17-6469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Larry Antron FRIDIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6589.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### Bernetta V. Ziegler, Nelson C. Ziegler, her husband, Wiear L. Rowell and Eva M. Rowell, his wife, Roy G. Martyne and wife, Leona B. Martyne, Appellants, v. William Ohlhaber, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed April 10, 1929.

*Abbott & Gaulden,*for Appellants;

*Jack B. Ohlhaber,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon tire transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there *525is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 6002 66

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### MA DISON V

. FIELDER Seaman (E

- 3 ), U.S. Navy Appellant

_________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: C aptain Paul C

. LeBlanc
, JAGC, USN

. For Appellant : C ommander R.D.Evans, Jr.
, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 15 December 2016

______________

___________ Before C AMPBELL , H TCHISON , and M ILLER , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening author ity. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/01/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       82,619
COMMITMENTS
   2,360    9,017    4,492   68,224   57,505   75,076   71,014    7,543   11,605

CHANGES FROM 05/25/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,529)
    -548      865      855    5,887    4,572    6,194    6,292     -665     -763

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.9     10.9      5.4     82.6     69.6     90.9     86.0      9.1     14.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       4       13       10       21       26       32       42
```

----

Updated June 4, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4658 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4658

   To require the Secretary of Education to develop and implement a 
process that enables certain borrowers to elect to repay certain loans 
   through written, electronic, or verbal notice to the Secretary of 
                   Education, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2019

    Mrs. Murphy of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Education to develop and implement a 
process that enables certain borrowers to elect to repay certain loans 
   through written, electronic, or verbal notice to the Secretary of 
                   Education, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Student Borrowers Act''.

SEC. 2. WRITTEN, ELECTRONIC, OR VERBAL ENROLLMENT IN INCOME-BASED 
              REPAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Education shall develop and 
implement a process that enables a covered borrower of a loan made 
under part D of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et 
seq.) who desires to elect to repay such loan under income-based 
repayment under subparagraph (D) or (E) of section 455(d)(1) of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(d)(1)) to make such 
election through written, electronic, or verbal notice to the Secretary 
of Education.
    (b) Covered Borrower Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
borrower'' means a borrower of a loan made under part D of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) who--
            (1) is enrolled in an income-based repayment under 
        subparagraph (D) or (E) of section 455(d)(1) of the Higher 
        Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(d)(1)); or
            (2) has not yet selected a repayment plan and is in the 
        grace period for such loan.
                                 <all>
```
Christopher Brian HORTON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-9102.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         730,962
<SECURITIES>                                 2,884,701
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,497,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    168,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,650,527
<PP&E>                                       1,601,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 685,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,128,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,120,542
<BONDS>                                        344,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,848
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,211,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,128,711
<SALES>                                      5,112,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,112,450
<CGS>                                        2,603,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,497,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        



</TABLE>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/10/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      100,370
COMMITMENTS
     640   15,875    3,476   81,972   64,607   86,088   83,958   14,282   16,412

CHANGES FROM 08/03/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,877)
     121    2,004    1,452    4,037    1,047    5,610    4,503    1,267    2,374

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.6     15.8      3.5     81.7     64.4     85.8     83.6     14.2     16.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       4       16       11       19       24       32       42
```

----

Updated August 13, 2010
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xstream Beverage Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
A. Haglund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         a.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         b.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Steve A. Haglund
--------------------------------------------
By: Steve A. Haglund, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 14, 2002
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE 189 LABOR COMMITTEE, petitioner, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION.

No. 17-592.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Marc Anthony Lowell ENDSLEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS.

No. 17-5536.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.