alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4312

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify when educational 
   assistance is available for an individual who pursues an approved 
 program of education leading to a degree while on active duty in the 
                             Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2019

   Mrs. Davis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify when educational 
   assistance is available for an individual who pursues an approved 
 program of education leading to a degree while on active duty in the 
                             Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reserve and Guard GI Bill Housing 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO 
              PURSUE AN APPROVED PROGRAM OF EDUCATION LEADING TO A 
              DEGREE WHILE ON ACTIVE DUTY.

    Section 3313(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by inserting ``for a Period of More 
        Than 30 Days'' after ``Active Duty'';
            (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``for a period of more 
        than 30 days'' after ``active duty''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph 
        (A), by inserting ``for a period of more than 30 days'' after 
        ``active duty''.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1178

To amend section 922 of chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to

protect the rights of citizens under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. COBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend section 922 of chapter 44 of title 18, United

States Code, to protect the rights of citizens under the

Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Amendment

5 Rights Protection Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1178 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

2 Subsection (t) of section 922 of chapter 44 of title

3 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the

4 end thereof the following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(7) None of the funds appropriated pursuant

6 to any provision of law may be used for (1) any sys7 tem to implement this subsection that does not re8 quire and result in the immediate destruction of all

9 information, in any form whatsoever, submitted by

10 or on behalf of any person who has been determined

11 not to be prohibited from owning a firearm; (2) the

12 implementation or collection of any tax or fee by any

13 officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or

14 by any state or local officer or agent acting on be15 half of the United States, in connection with the im16 plementation of this subsection; provided, that any

17 person aggrieved by a violation of this provision may

18 bring an action in the Federal district court for the

19 district in which the person resides; provided fur20 ther, that any person who is successful with respect

21 to any such action shall receive damages, punitive

22 damages, and such other remedies as the court may

23 determine to be appropriate, including a reasonable

24 attorney’s fee.’’.

Æ
FOOT LOCKER, INC, et al., petitioners, v. Geoffrey OSBERG.

No. 17-690.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**EXHIBIT
      8.1**




**LIST
      OF SUBSIDIARIES**




Unless
      otherwise indicated, ADB Systems International Ltd. (“ADB”), or one of its
      subsidiaries, owns 100%, except as otherwise noted, of the outstanding capital
      stock of the following companies:




**Name
                of Subsidiary**
            
            **Country
                of Incorporation**ADB
                Systemer AS(1)
            
            NorwayADB
                Systems International Limited
            
            IrelandADB
                Systems Limited
            
            EnglandADB
                Systems, Inc.
            
            USA
                (Delaware)Bid.Com
                USA, Inc.
            
            USA
                (Florida)ADB
                Systems USA, Inc.
            
            USA
                (Delaware)GE
                Asset Manager LLC(2)
            
            USA
                (Delaware)







(1)  As
      of December 31, 2005, ADB owned 99.5% of the outstanding voting shares of ADB
      Systemer AS. Under Norwegian corporate law, ADB may trigger compulsory
      acquisition of the remaining shares at any time. The remaining shareholders
      each
      have the same right. The value for the shares acquired shall be as agreed,
      failing which the value shall be determined by arbitration.


(2)        ADB
      owns 50% of the membership interest of GE Asset Manager LLC.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd F. Chadee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 27, 2009



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Floyd F. Chadee                              
|Floyd F. Chadee                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Emily M. ODERMATT, petitioner, v. Amy WAY, et al.

No. 18-741.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.5

                             WOODCREST CAPITAL, LLC

                           3113 South University Drive

                                    6th Floor

                              Fort Worth, TX 76109

                                 April 30, 2001

Mr. Dan Witte
Emergisoft Holding, Inc.
2225 Avenue J
Arlington, TX 76006


                  Re: Emergisoft Holding, Inc.

Dear Dan:

         I am pleased to inform you that Woodcrest  Capital,  LLC  ("Woodcrest")
has approved a commitment  of a total of $750,000 in  financing  for  Emergisoft
Holding,  Inc.,  subject  to the  execution  and  delivery  by  Emergisoft  of a
promissory note or promissory  notes  substantially in the form attached here to
as  Exhibit A and/ or this  issuance  of shares of  Emergisoft  common  stock to
Woodcrest or its  affiliates  under the terms and  conditions  of an  investment
letter or  investment  letters  substantially  in the form of Exhibit B attached
hereto.  An  additional  condition  to  Woodcrest's  obligation  to fund  any of
Emergisoft's  draws  will be that a draw of equal  amount he made and  funded by
Berlwood Five, LTD. ("Berlwood") on equivalent terms.

         The commitment  described  above will expire on April 30, 2002,  unless
extended by  Woodcrest.  Emergisoft  may draw on such  commitment in whole or in
part,  from time to time and at any time prior in the expiration  date by giving
Woodcrest  five (5) days  advance  written  notice.  Draws  will be  limited  to
$750,000 in the aggregate  and must be in an amount of at least  $100,000 or the
remaining  balance of the commitment,  if less, or any whole multiple of 550,000
in excess of $100,000. Upon receipt of a draw request from Emergisoft, Woodcrest
may elect to fund on the basis of a promissory note or a common stock investment
or in a combination or the two. Common stock issued will be at a price per share
of $.2536855.

         It  is  expressly   agreed  that  upon   consummation   of  the  merger
contemplated  by the Agreement  and Plan of the Merger by and among  Emergisoft,
Pierce International  Discover,  Inc. and EMS Acquisitions Corp. dated March 28,
2001, the Woodcrest  commitment shall automatically be converted to a commitment
to provide financing for Pierce on the same terms and conditions.

<PAGE>
                                       2

         Accompanying  this letter is a copy of a letter  from Fred  Mesch,  CPA
Woodcrest's accountant,  confirming Woodcrest's ability to provide to Emergisoft
the funds necessary to fulfill the commitment.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   WOODCREST CAPITAL, LLC.

                                   By:      WOODCREST CAPITAL, LLC.


                                   By:      /s/ James Ryffel
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Jim Ryffel, Manager
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.28

                              FIRST LEASE AMENDMENT

THIS INDENTURE, is made this 5th day of May, 2003 by and between Hoyt
Properties, Inc, as assigned to WPT CLIFF SIX, LLC ("Landlord") and XATA
Corporation, a Minnesota corporation ("Tenant").

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a certain lease agreement, dated
December 27, 1996 ("Lease") for the premises commonly known as Nicollet Business
Campus VI located at 151 East Cliff Road, Burnsville, Minnesota; and

WHEREAS, said Lease is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2004; and

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend said Lease.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the covenants and
agreements herein undertaken and to be kept and performed, it is agreed as
follows:

      (1)   The term of the Lease is hereby extended for a period of 30 months
            commencing on the first day of June 2004, and expiring on the last
            day of November 2006.

      (2)   As of June 1, 2003, the Leased Premises shall be reduced to
            approximately 15,794 feet of office space and 4,794 square feet of
            warehouse space (20,588 total square feet). This is a reduction of
            4,800 square feet of warehouse space.

      (3)   As of June 1, 2003, and throughout the term of this extension, the
            Monthly Base Rent for the Premises shall be: $12,541.52 ($7.31 per
            square feet annually).

      (4)   Section 1.8 Pro Rata Share shall be amended to read as follows:
            Months 1-20 40.94%, months 21-72 50.48%; months 73-114 40.94%,
            subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.2 hereof.

      (5)   That the amended Lease shall in all other respects remain the same.

Landlord:                                       Tenant:

WPT CLIFF SIX, LLC                              XATA CORPORATION


By:   /s/                                       By:  /s/ John G. Lewis
      -----------------------------                  ---------------------------

Its:  Manager                                  Its:  Chief Financial Officer
      -----------------------------                  ---------------------------

Date: May 9, 2003                              Date: May 5, 2003
      -----------------------------                  ---------------------------


                                       1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4324 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4324

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand to all firearms the 
 requirement that Federal firearms licensees report sales of 2 or more 
 handguns to the same unlicensed person within 5 consecutive business 
                                 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2019

Mrs. Torres of California (for herself, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Engel, Mrs. 
 Murphy, Ms. Norton, Mr. Cicilline, and Mr. Lowenthal) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand to all firearms the 
 requirement that Federal firearms licensees report sales of 2 or more 
 handguns to the same unlicensed person within 5 consecutive business 
                                 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Multiple Firearm Sales Reporting 
Modernization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF FEDERAL FIREARM LICENSEE MULTIPLE SALES REPORTING 
              REQUIREMENT TO ALL FIREARMS.

    Section 923(g)(3)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``pistols, or revolvers, or any combination of pistols and 
revolvers totalling two or more,'' and inserting ``firearms''.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/20/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,260,070
COMMITMENTS
 255,439   63,001  1598988  2334611  2541440  4189038  4203429   71,032   56,641

CHANGES FROM 07/13/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     86,183)
 -27,003  -40,265   87,847   22,351   36,063   83,195   83,645    2,988    2,538

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.0      1.5     37.5     54.8     59.7     98.3     98.7      1.7      1.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      228)
      41       36       69      142      131      217      204
```

----

Updated July 23, 2010
NORTH CAROLINA, petitioner, v. ALCOA POWER GENERATING, INC., et al.

No. 17-683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of XATA Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that
based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/ Craig S. Fawcett 
  Dated: May 13, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to XATA Corporation and will be retained by XATA Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2251

In re: PHILLIP O’BRIANT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:18-cv-02736-GJH)

Submitted: February 8, 2019 Decided: February 14, 2019

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip O’Briant, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip O’Briant petitions for a writ of mandamus, contending the district court 

erroneously dismissed his civil complaint and returned his post-judgment pleadings. 

“[M]andamus is a drastic remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In 

re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks and 

citations omitted). “Courts provide mandamus relief only when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no 

other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires’; (2) petitioner has shown a ‘clear 

and indisputable’ right to the requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ 

‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” Id. (quoting Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 

367, 380-81 (2004)). The writ of mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. Will v. United 

States, 389 U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 

2007). We conclude that O’Briant fails to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, although we grant him leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his

petition for a writ of mandamus.∗

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

 ∗ Alternatively, to the extent that any of O’Briant’s post-judgment pleadings were 

sufficient to provide notice of his intent to appeal the district court’s orders under Fed. R. 

App. P. 3, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s orders. See O’Briant v. Bana, No. 1:18-cv-02736-GJH (D. 

Md., Sept. 11, 2018; filed Sept. 25, 2018, entered Sept. 26, 2018; Oct. 9, 2018).
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 45 

To designate the portion of Interstate Route 57 that is located in Illinois 

as the ‘‘Barack Obama Highway’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. RUSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the portion of Interstate Route 57 that is 

located in Illinois as the ‘‘Barack Obama Highway’’, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Barack Obama High5 way Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION. 

7 The portion of Interstate Route 57 that is located 

8 in Illinois shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Barack 

9 Obama Highway’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 45 IH

1 SEC. 3. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the portion 

4 of Interstate Route 57 referred to in section 1 shall be 

5 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Barack Obama High6 way’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Joel Marvin MUNT, petitioner, v. Michelle SMITH, Warden.

No. 16-9066.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*86Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BENNIE RICHARDSON, 

Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent

______________________

2024-1847

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH-0845-20-0281-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required 

Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is 

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

August 19, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 19, 2024

Case: 24-1847 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 08/19/2024
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134316 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, BRIAN JOHN DOWELL and KELLY DOWELL, Justices 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 134316 

 COA: 274532 

Macomb CC: 2005-003918-NH 

BARBARA ANN MARSACK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1128 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 5, 2007 

 Clerk
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/27/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       84,826
COMMITMENTS
   1,411   12,774    1,625   69,993   58,216   73,029   72,615   11,797   12,211

CHANGES FROM 07/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,357)
     304   -4,824     -449   -9,629   -2,882   -9,774   -8,155   -1,583   -3,202

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     1.7     15.1      1.9     82.5     68.6     86.1     85.6     13.9     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       2       13        7       20       22       28       36
```

----

Updated July 30, 2010