alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
SSP Solutions, Inc.

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-90574 and 333-73204) of SSP
Solutions, Inc. of our report dated April 16, 2002, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of SSP Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2001,
and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in Amendment
No. 1 to the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of SSP Solutions, Inc.

         Our report dated April 16, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered significant operating losses, has used cash
in operating activities, has an accumulated deficit and deficit working capital,
which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP
------------
KPMG LLP

Costa Mesa, California
April 25, 2003
Seth J. JOHNSTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6626.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 I, Brad W. Rudover, President, Director, and Principal Executive  Officer of The Electric Network.com, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby  certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

 1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, of the Company for the  year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)  or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company. 

/s/ Brad W. Rudover   President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director  April 8, 2004 

----
Monserrate ZAPATA, petitioner, v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY.

No. 18-6942.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Adrienne L. McADORY, petitioner, v. VAIL TECHNOLOGIES.

No. 17-767.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP22-725-000]

Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Initiation of Section 5 
Proceeding

    On April 21, 2022, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
RP22-725-000, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 
717d, instituting an investigation into whether the rates currently 
charged by Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C. are just and reasonable and 
setting the matter for hearing. Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C., 179 FERC ] 
61,050 (2022).
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. RP22-725-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in 
accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2021), within 30 days of the date of 
issuance of the order.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using 
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to Commission's Public Reference 
Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning 
the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the President on 
March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at 
[email protected] or call toll-free, (886) 208-3676 or TYY, 
(202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFile'' link at 
http://www.ferc.gov. In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a 
paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be 
addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. 
Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly 
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins 
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

    Dated: April 22, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09123 Filed 4-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
TARIQ BELT, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5114

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:10

- cv

- 00466

- NBF, Judge Nancy B. Fir estone.

______________________

P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

T he court directs Tariq Belt to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The order of the Court of Federal Claims that Mr. Belt has appealed returned his complaint but grant ed leave to file a complaint that conformed to the court ’s rules

. Ordinarily, this court is authorized to review only a “final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims.” 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(3). While there are exce pCase: 14-5114 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 07/30/2014BELT v. US 2

tions to this general rule, it does not appear that the order in question falls w ithin any of those exceptions.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) Belt is directed to show cause within 21 days from the date of this order why his appeal should not be di smissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellee may also respond within that time.

(2) Mr. Belt’s motion for an extension of time is denied as moot. The briefing schedule is stayed.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-5114 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 07/30/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   62,207,932
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 43,484,567
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      12,485,112
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               2,544,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,722,039
<COMMON>                                    20,685,523
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   20,420,005
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         21,926,359
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              63,031,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,780,170
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        27,323,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                1,081,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              16,505,982
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              120,722,039
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   12,189,894
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         1,528,927
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   8,428,124
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      3,761,770
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             418,744
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               4,172,240
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       536,366
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,115,221
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    168,108
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                1,947,113
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     1,344,668
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       6,336,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
Charles Heath STEWART, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7052.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
October 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Date: December 9, 2004



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                                               
|Garry W. Rogerson President and Chief Executive Officer Varian, Inc.



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 65/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 652 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 65

English edition

Legislation

Volume 652 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/350 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/351 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/350 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/351 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Steven Scott WELLS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6954.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Therapy.                    

*Date:*                         May 4, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard Ingraham, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4116, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8551,                         *ingrahamrh@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 22, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-08959 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Timothy RICE, petitioner, v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT WAYMART, et al.

No. 17-5513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Rufino Peralta SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6854.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert L. JARRETT, Jr., petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.

No. 17-607.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XATA Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  Signature: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Mark E. Ties

Mark E. TiesPrint Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Oussama EL OMARI, petitioner, v. RAS AL KHAIMAH FREE TRADE ZONE AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 18-652.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Timothy Michael WELLS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/01/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,317
COMMITMENTS
   9,034    1,913    8,187   20,767   25,114   37,988   35,215    8,330   11,103

CHANGES FROM 11/24/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,743)
    -124     -168      561      798      156    1,235      549   -2,978   -2,291

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.5      4.1     17.7     44.8     54.2     82.0     76.0     18.0     24.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
       7        9       16       27       27       47       48
```

----

Updated December 4, 2009
NORTH CAROLINA, et al., applicants, v. Sandra Little COVINGTON, et al.

No. 17A790.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 6, 2018.

The application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted in part and denied in part. The District Court's order of January 21, 2018, insofar as it directs the revision of House districts in Wake County and Mecklenburg County, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court.

Justice THOMAS and Justice ALITO would grant the application for stay in its entirety.

Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would deny the application for stay in its entirety.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7543

JOSEPH HUGO GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE; DOUG CATOE; WALDO PEARSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1504) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Hugo Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Malloy McEachin, Jr., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Hugo Gibbs appeals three district court orders, the first affirming a magistrate judge’s order denying Gibbs’ motion to compel and motion for sanctions in Gibbs’ action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998), the second a district court order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment in the action, and the third a district court order denying his motion for a new trial and motion to amend the order granting Defendants summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gibbs v. Moore , No. CA-97-1504 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Richard Lee CURRY, II, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9030.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.