alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1953
SHEREE MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00097-F) Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: July 3, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. B. Ervin Brown, II, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General, Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, Ebony J. Pittman, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sheree Mills appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant on her Title VII complaint and denying her subsequent post-judgment motion for reconsideration. On appeal, Mills argues that the court erred in denying relief on her disparate treatment claim and in finding that she failed to adequately allege a disparate impact claim. This court reviews de novo a district court’s order granting summary judgment. Moore Bros. v. Brown & Root, Inc. , 207 F.3d 717, 722 (4th Cir. 2000). Summary judgment is appropriate only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986); Evans v. Technologies Applications & Serv. Co. , 80 F.3d 954, 958 (4th Cir. 1996). In order to withstand a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party must produce competent evidence sufficient to reveal the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. Greensboro Prof’l Fire Fighters Ass’n v. City of Greensboro, 64 F.3d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1995). We have reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Abatement Order filed January 11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00413-CV

____________

34TH S&S, LLC D/B/A CONCRETE COWBOY AND DANIEL JOSEPH 

WIERCK, Appellants

V.

KACY CLEMENS AND CONNER CAPEL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-07278

ABATEMENT ORDER

On December 2, 2021, this court granted the trial court’s court reporter an

extension of time to December 27, 2021 to file the reporter’s record in this case. In 

granting this extension, this court noted that no further extensions would be 

granted absent exceptional circumstances. As of the date of this order, the 

reporter’s record has not been filed with the court. The trial and appellate courts 
2

are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as 

ordered, we issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the 113th District Court to conduct a hearing at 

which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall 

participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish 

a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as 

to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file 

the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in 

the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of 

fact and conclusions of law and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing 

record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the 

record before the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated, and the trial 

court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
EXHIBIT 21



|   |  |                                                 |  |          |  | 
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | 
|   |  | Subsidiaries of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc.  |  |          |  | 
|   |  |                                                 | 
|   |  | Company Name                                    |  | Location |  | 
|1. |  | Standard Insurance Company                      |  | Oregon   |  | 
|2. |  | The Standard Life Insurance Company of New York |  | New York |  | 
|3. |  | StanCorp Retirement Services, Inc.              |  | Oregon   |  | 
|4. |  | StanCorp Mortgage Investors, LLC                |  | Oregon   |  | 
|5. |  | StanCorp Investment Advisers, Inc.              |  | Oregon   |  | 
|6. |  | StanCorp Equities, Inc.                         |  | Oregon   |  | 
|7. |  | StanCorp Real Estate, LLC                       |  | Oregon   |  | 
|8. |  | Standard Management, Inc.                       |  | Oregon   |  |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alan F. McIlroy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton
Superior Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
     March 28, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements
     of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)) and

     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: May 12, 2003



                                   /s/ Alan F. McIlroy

                                   Alan F. McIlroy

                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
In Re John E. REARDON, petitioner.

No. 17-507.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
William G. SCOTT, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-6917.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/10/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,017,839
COMMITMENTS
 265,182   94,543  1414242  2305401  2485240  3984825  3994025   33,014   23,814

CHANGES FROM 08/03/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     46,129)
 -29,064   38,731   35,568   47,158  -21,939   53,662   52,360   -7,533   -6,231

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.6      2.4     35.2     57.4     61.9     99.2     99.4      0.8      0.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      225)
      44       35       74      139      128      217      204
```

----

Updated August 13, 2010
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

----

**CERTIFICATION**

**I**, John A. Warehime, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed  this Form 10-Q of Hanover Foods Corporation;

2.      Based on  my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,  in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading  with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.      Based  on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included  in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in this report; 

4.      The registrant's  other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)      Designed such  disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures  to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating  to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this report is being prepared;

b)      (Intentionally  Omitted)

c)      Evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this  report based on such evaluation; and;

d)      Disclosed in this  report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and;

5.      The registrant’s  other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation  of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors  and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent functions):

a)      All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal  control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect  the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial  information; and 

b)      Any fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have  a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial  reporting. 

 

| Date: January 14, 2004 |  /s/ John      A. Warehime |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                   | John A. Warehime                |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer         |

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: May 12, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-627-3390, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f998989b9b9c80b9979098909dd7979091d79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="caababa8a8afb38aa4a3aba3aee4a4a3a2e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 12, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08204 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Roberto RIOS-VIZCARRA, petitioner, v. George WIGEN, Warden.

No. 16-9415.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/16/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    3,916,704
COMMITMENTS
 610,807  114,374  1122001  2162018  2667445  3894826  3903820   21,878   12,884

CHANGES FROM 03/09/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    109,425)
  -1,258   26,046   17,242   78,814   62,927   94,798  106,215   14,627    3,210

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.6      2.9     28.6     55.2     68.1     99.4     99.7      0.6      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      212)
      35       42       74      126      118      203      195
```

----

Updated March 19, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      24,598,000
<SECURITIES>                                74,642,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  269,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,704,000
<PP&E>                                       1,546,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,308,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,207,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,357,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,500,000
<COMMON>                                        43,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,118,000<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,207,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,751,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,446,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,158,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,158,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<FN>
<F1>ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL         -- $ 274,078,000
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT                    -- $(254,600,000)
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME -- $    (360,000)
</FN>


</TABLE>
Harold M. NYANJOM, petitioner, v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT, INC.

No. 17-6076.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

	
<CAPTION>
                                             Three months ended January 31,        Six months ended January 31,
                                             ------------------------------        ---------------------------- 
                                                   1997           1996                 1997           1996
                                                ----------     ----------           ----------     ----------
Primary                                                    	
 				
<S>                                             <C>            <C>                  <C>            <C>
Net earnings for primary per share 
    amounts                                     $3,134,000     $2,317,000           $6,106,000     $4,441,000
                              						            ==========     ==========           ==========     ==========
Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding                           9,847,441      8,231,837            9,872,673      8,229,293
	
Add - common equivalent shares
    (determined using the	
    "treasury stock" method)                       880,760        863,340              857,636        838,459
                                                   -------        -------              -------        ------- 
Weighted average number of shares
    used in calculation of primary net
    earnings per common share                   10,728,201      9,095,177           10,730,309      9,067,752  
                                        		      ==========     ==========           ==========     ==========
Primary net earnings per common share                $0.29          $0.25                $0.57          $0.49
	                                                    =====          =====                =====          =====
	
Fully Diluted                                             

Net earnings for fully diluted per share
    amounts                                      $3,134,000     $2,317,000           $6,106,000    $4,441,000
     	                                           ==========     ==========           ==========    ========== 
Weighted average number of shares
    used in calculation of fully diluted
    net earnings per common share                10,755,636      9,156,477           10,780,867     9,153,294 
                                                 ==========     ==========           ==========    ==========  
Fully diluted net earnings per common
    share                                             $0.29          $0.25                $0.57         $0.49
                                                      =====          =====                =====         =====
</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4503 

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from entering into a collective 

bargaining agreement with a labor union that offers financial incentives 

to prospective members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 

Mr. DUNN (for himself and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from entering 

into a collective bargaining agreement with a labor union 

that offers financial incentives to prospective members. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Workplace Integ5 rity Act.’’ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4503 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING 

2 AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE SECRETARY OF 

3 VETERANS AFFAIRS AND CERTAIN LABOR 

4 UNIONS. 

5 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not enter into 

6 a collective bargaining agreement with a labor union that 

7 offers financial incentives to employees of the Department 

8 of Veterans Affairs to join that labor union. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
10.12




Equity
InvestmentCommitment between Rex Carr and International Fuel Technology,
Inc.
 
 Effective
December 11, 2007, I, Rex Carr, a director of International Fuel Technology,
Inc. (the “Company”) and a holder of over five (5%) of the Company’s common
stock agree to invest up to an aggregate of $1,000,000 in the Company (the
“Commitment”), at such time or times as the Company may request, in the form of
a purchase or purchases of restricted common stock of the
Company.  The Company may elect to draw from the Commitment at one
time or from time to time, subsequent to March 1, 2008; provided, however, that
the aggregate of such draws may not exceed $1,000,000.  If and when
the Company elects to utilize available Commitment funds, the Company shall
issue to me that number of shares of restricted common stock of the Company
equal to the value of the investment then provided to the
Company.  The number of shares to be issued will be calculated based
on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on The OTC Bulletin
Board on the date of the sale.
   By:
              /s/Rex
Carr
              
              Date
              December 11, 2007Rex
      CarrDirectorBy:
              /s/Jonathan R.
      Burst
              
              Date
              December 11, 2007Jonathan
      R. BurstChief
      Executive Officer
In Re Lonnell WIDEMAN, petitioner.

No. 17-5445.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Peter A. PROSTYAKOV, petitioner, v. MASCO CORPORATION.

No. 17-268.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.