alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.18

                          FIRST CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
                        MERCHANT AND INVESTMENT BANKERS
                                3900 WALDEN ROAD
                           DEEPHAVEN, MINNEOSTA 55391

                           TELEPHONE: (212) 475-1666
                           TELEPHONE: (212) 475-0579


April 11, 2000

Mr. Anthony Schnelling, President
Sentry Technology Corporation
350 Wireless Blvd
Hauppauge, NY  11788

Dear Anthony:

I wish to confirm that I, individually and as part of a group of investors,
would be willing to make available to Sentry Technology Corporation (Sentry) up
to $1,000,000 for a period of up to 6 months from the date of first draw. It is
our understanding that the funds we are prepared to make available are to be
used by Sentry for corporate purposes.

We are prepared to make such funds available on a revolving basis, subordinated
and subject to the approval of Sentry's secured lender, General Electric Capital
Corporation ("GECC"), and its willingness to allow repayment provided there is,
at such time as final repayment is contemplated, availability under GECC's
outstanding facility.

I represent that I am a director of Sentry and that I and any members of the
group of investors who would participate in making this loan to Sentry are
Accredited Investors within the meaning of Regulation D under the Securities Act
of 1933. Furthermore, we have satisfied ourselves, after having had sufficient
opportunity to ask questions of Sentry management, of the suitability of our
investment in Sentry.

We represent that we have sufficient funds available in the form of US Treasury
securities or other readily marketable instruments to be able to fund the loan
contemplated hereby without the need on our part to obtain additional financing.

This arrangement is subject to the negotiation of final terms and the execution
of definitive documentation.


Sincerely,

/s/ ROBERT D. FURST
Robert D. Furst
# Official Journal C 293/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 293 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6120 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 293

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6120 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 293/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 293/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/20/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       79,909
COMMITMENTS
   2,747    6,786    4,875   61,268   60,513   68,890   72,174   11,019    7,735

CHANGES FROM 04/13/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,782)
  -3,500   -2,205      603   12,982    7,875   10,085    6,273      697    4,509

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.4      8.5      6.1     76.7     75.7     86.2     90.3     13.8      9.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      13        8       10       31       29       47       44
```

----

Updated April 28, 2010
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">NYCHA Public Housing Preservation I LLC, Managed By New York City Housing Authority—Frederick E. Samuel Apts. Houses, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Charlotte Anderson, Calender Nos. 17-333/334 Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Tenant appeals from (1) an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anthony Cannataro, J.), dated May 16, 2016, which denied her motion to vacate a default final judgment in a nonpayment summary proceeding and (2) an order (same court and Judge) dated July 28, 2016, which denied her motion for leave to renew and reargue the aforesaid order.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Anthony Cannataro, J.), dated July 28, 2016, reversed, without costs, renewal granted and matter remanded for a traverse hearing to determine whether the court had jurisdiction to render the default final judgment. Appeal from order (Anthony Cannataro, J.), dated May 16, 2016, dismissed, without costs, as academic.</p><p>The affidavit of service established that the process server delivered a copy of the petition and notice of petition to a person of suitable age and discretion at the subject commercial space, located at 2529 Adam Clayton Powell Blvd., and then mailed a copy of the petition and notice of petition to tenant at the same address. The papers submitted in support of tenant's renewed motion to vacate the default suggests that prior to such service, landlord had "written information of the residence address" of tenant (RPAPL 735[1][a]), located at 102 Bradhurst Ave, in Manhattan. This evidence was sufficient to rebut the presumption of proper mailing by showing that process was mailed to an incorrect address (<i>see</i> RPAPL 735[1][a]; <i>Northern v Hernandez</i>, 17 AD3d 285 [2005]), thus necessitating a traverse hearing (<i>see Chaudry Constr. Corp. v James G. Kalpakis &amp; Assoc</i>., 60 AD3d 544 [2009]; <i>see also Matter of Pasanella v Quinn</i>, 126 AD3d 504 [2015]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 04, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          91,983
<SECURITIES>                                    12,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,063<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,442
<PP&E>                                          15,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,543
<BONDS>                                         10,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        420
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                     338,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,941
<SALES>                                         65,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,719
<CGS>                                           32,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,396)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,969
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
<FN>
<F1>Includes Raw Material Inventory of $3,298
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


Extreme Networks, Inc.





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-165268, 333-112831, 333- 105767, 333-76798, 333-65636, 333-58634, 333-55644, 333-54278, 333-131705, and 333-83729) on Form S-8 of Extreme Networks, Inc. of our report dated August 29, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Extreme Networks, Inc. as of July 3, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows, and related financial statement schedule, for the year then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 3, 2011, which report appears in the July 3, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of Extreme Networks, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Mountain View, California


August 29, 2011
Jeanetta CARTER, petitioner, v. LABOR READY MID-ATLANTIC, INC., et al.

No. 17-7074.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XATA Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ John J. Coughlan  John J. Coughlan  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4566 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4566

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
   for the relief of the families of victims of the mass shooting in 
               Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Virginia Beach Strong Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF THE FAMILIES OF 
              THE MASS SHOOTING IN VIRGINIA BEACH.

    (a) Clarification That Contribution Will Not Fail To Qualify as a 
Charitable Contribution.--A cash contribution made for the relief of 
the families of the dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in 
Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, shall not fail to be treated 
as a charitable contribution for purposes of section 170 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 merely because such contribution is for 
the exclusive benefit of such families. The preceding sentence shall 
apply to contributions made on or after May 31, 2019.
    (b) Clarification That Payments by Charitable Organizations to 
Families Treated as Exempt Payments.--For purposes of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, payments made on or after May 31, 2019, and on or 
before June 1, 2021, to the spouse or any dependent (as defined in 
section 152 of such Code) of the dead or wounded victims of the mass 
shooting in Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, by an 
organization which (determined without regard to any such payments) 
would be an organization exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such 
Code shall--
            (1) be treated as related to the purpose or function 
        constituting the basis for such organization's exemption under 
        such section; and
            (2) shall not be treated as inuring to the benefit of any 
        private individual,
if such payments are made in good faith using a reasonable and 
objective formula which is consistently applied with respect to such 
victims.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 4566

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
   for the relief of the families of victims of the mass shooting in 
               Virginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 84456 

FLED 

MICHAEL MURRAY; AND MICHAEL 

RENO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON 

BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

CARLI LYNN KIERNY, DISTRICT 

JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

A CAB TAXI SERVICE LLC, A CAB 

SERIES LLC, F/K/A A CAB, LLC; AND 

CREIGHTON J. NADY, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

SEP 2 i 2022 

0 41.1riPatti.ri tLjRT 

The CT.CFt -

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR 

A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus, in an action for 

unpaid wages, seeks a writ directing the district court to (1) terminate its 

order staying the enforcement ofjudgment pending resolution of the appeal 

in Murray v. Dubric, Docket No. 83492 (Order of Affirmance, August 11, 

2022);1 (2) modify the final judgment as directed by this court's opinion in A 

Cab, LLC v. Murray, 137 Nev., Adv. Op. 84, 501 P.3d 961 (2021); (3) consider 

1Because this court entered an order of affirmance in Murray v. 

Dubric, Docket No. 83492, 2022 WL 3335982 (Nev. Aug. 11, 2022) (Order of 

Affirmance), we deny as moot petitioners' request for a writ directing the 

district court to lift the stay of enforcement pending resolution of that 

appeal. 

- `,Doc)2, 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

'047A
,•C.J.S 

arraguirre 

on the merits petitioners' request for a receiver, as directed by this court in 

Murray v. A Cab Taxi Serv., LLC, Docket No. 82539, WL 2022 500818 (Nev. 

Feb. 17, 2022) (Order of Reversal and Remand); and (5) act promptly to 

enforce the final judgment. 

Having reviewed the petition, answer, reply and accompanying 

appendices, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not 

warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 

222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ 

relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Srnith v. Eighth 

Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) 

(recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court 

has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.2

 J. 

Hardesty Stiglich 

cc: Hon. Carli Lynn Kierny, District Judge 

Hon. Maria Gall, District Judge 

Eighth Judicial District Court Department 9 

2Without expressing any opinion as to the merits of this writ petition, 

we deny it without prejudice to petitioner's right to appeal from any 

SUPREME COURT appealable orders or judgment. 

OF 

NEVADA 

10) 19-17A 

J. 
Leon Greenberg Professional Corporation 

Rodriguez Law Offices, P.C. 

Cory Reade Dows & Shafer 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

i( )/
Daniel A. ROCHA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-8971.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
# L_2014326EN.01000501.xml

| 11.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/5

---

Corrigendum to Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 161 of 29 May 2014
  )

On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 3, in the title:

for:

‘
  Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
  ’

read:

‘
  Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
  ’

---
Anthony W. SMITH, petitioner, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY.

No. 17-598.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BusinessWay International Corp. (the
  "Company")
  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  I, Fabrice
  Zambito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Fabrice Zambito
  --------------------------
  Date: August 23, 2004

Dominic Heddo
  Chief Financial Officer
Rachel RUVALCAVA-MORALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7001.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                     QUORUM AFFILIATE COMPLETES ACQUISITION
                  OF DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF STARK COUNTY IN OHIO

NASHVILLE, Tenn., Nov. 1, 1996 -- An affiliate of Quorum Health Group, Inc.
(Nasdaq/NM:QHGI) has completed the acquisition of Doctors Hospital of Stark
County, Massillon, Ohio.

         Today, both parties agreed to the acquisition, completing the
arrangement that began in early July with the signing of a letter of intent to
purchase the hospital.

         Doctors Hospital is a 180-bed acute care hospital and a regional
teaching center of the Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine. While
the Quorum affiliate is the majority owner of the hospital, Summa Health System
and The Cleveland Clinic Foundation will hold minority ownership positions.

         Summa, based in Akron, Ohio, is the parent of Akron City and St.
Thomas Hospitals. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation was founded in 1921 and is
one of the country's first and largest private, nonprofit medical groups with
physician practices and hospitals in Cleveland, Ohio, and Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.

         Headquartered in Brentwood, Tenn., Quorum Health Group, Inc. owns and
operates acute care hospitals and health systems nationwide. Quorum Health
Resources, Inc., a subsidiary, is the nation's largest manager of
not-for-profit hospitals and also provides consulting services to hospitals
throughout the country.