alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014256EN.01001201.xml

| 28.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 39/2014

of 8 April 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 489/2013 of 27 May 2013 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards the substance double stranded ribonucleic acid homologous to viral ribonucleic acid coding for part of the coat protein and part of the intergenic region of the Israel Acute Paralysis Virus (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 489/2013 of 27 May 2013 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards the substance double stranded ribonucleic acid homologous to viral ribonucleic acid coding for part of the coat protein and part of the intergenic region of the Israel Acute Paralysis Virus (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 R 0489: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 489/2013 of 27 May 2013 (OJ L 141, 28.5.2013, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 R 0489: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 489/2013 of 27 May 2013 (OJ L 141, 28.5.2013, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 489/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian language, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 April 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 28.5.2013, p. 4.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4279 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4279

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, as the ``Melinda Gene 
                         Piccotti Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MELINDA GENE PICCOTTI POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Melinda Gene Piccotti Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Melinda 
Gene Piccotti Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4299 

To reauthorize through 2024 the National Geological and Geophysical Data 

Preservation Program Act of 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. 

LOWENTHAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize through 2024 the National Geological and 

Geophysical Data Preservation Program Act of 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Data Preservation Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GEOLOGICAL 

7 AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA PRESERVATION 

8 PROGRAM ACT OF 2005. 

9 Subsection (k) of the National Geological and Geo10 physical Data Preservation Program Act of 2005 (42 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4299 IH

1 U.S.C. 15908(k)) is amended by striking ‘‘2006 through 

2 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2020 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00352-CR

Kathleen COLE-MAYER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 359926

The Honorable Monica A. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 24, 2013.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
Aslan T. SOOBZOKOV, petitioner, v. Eric LICHTBLAU, et al.

No. 16-1312.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Henry Louis DOBBS, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-6176.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Wilfredo Garay REYES, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James M. SAYLOR, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 16-1521.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Jimmy S.M. LeeJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2005




I, Gary L. Fischer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated
Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Gary L. FischerGary L. FischerPresident, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 12, 2005                      /s/ Ian M.Herman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ian M. Herman
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Darcy PILOTO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7029.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Jimmy S.M. LeeJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2006


I, Scott D. Howarth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/ Scott D. HowarthScott D. HowarthChief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2006
Jaime Piero COLE, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-9112.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4566 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2019 

Received 

AN ACT 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash 

contributions for the relief of the families of victims 

of the mass shooting in Virginia Beach, Virginia, on 

May 31, 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 4566 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virginia Beach Strong 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF 

5 OF THE FAMILIES OF THE MASS SHOOTING IN 

6 VIRGINIA BEACH. 

7 (a) CLARIFICATION THAT CONTRIBUTION WILL NOT

8 FAIL TO QUALIFY AS A CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION.— 

9 A cash contribution made for the relief of the families of 

10 the dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in Vir11 ginia Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, shall not fail to 

12 be treated as a charitable contribution for purposes of sec13 tion 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 merely be14 cause such contribution is for the exclusive benefit of such 

15 families. The preceding sentence shall apply to contribu16 tions made on or after May 31, 2019. 

17 (b) CLARIFICATION THAT PAYMENTS BY CHARI18 TABLE ORGANIZATIONS TO FAMILIES TREATED AS EX19 EMPT PAYMENTS.—For purposes of the Internal Revenue 

20 Code of 1986, payments made on or after May 31, 2019, 

21 and on or before June 1, 2021, to the spouse or any de22 pendent (as defined in section 152 of such Code) of the 

23 dead or wounded victims of the mass shooting in Virginia 

24 Beach, Virginia, on May 31, 2019, by an organization 

25 which (determined without regard to any such payments) 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

HR 4566 RDS

1 would be an organization exempt from tax under section 

2 501(a) of such Code shall— 

3 (1) be treated as related to the purpose or func4 tion constituting the basis for such organization’s 

5 exemption under such section; and 

6 (2) shall not be treated as inuring to the benefit 

7 of any private individual, 

8 if such payments are made in good faith using a reason9 able and objective formula which is consistently applied 

10 with respect to such victims. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/04/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,082,626
COMMITMENTS
 401,275   65,108  1310182  2347320  2692492  4058777  4067782   23,849   14,844

CHANGES FROM 04/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:   -134,794)
-160,581   10,028   41,539  -12,382 -183,017 -131,424 -131,450   -3,370   -3,344

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.8      1.6     32.1     57.5     66.0     99.4     99.6      0.6      0.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      213)
      42       33       72      127      124      203      198
```

----

Updated May 7, 2010
Marion WILSON, petitioner, v. Eric SELLERS, Warden.

No. 16-6855.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted, and Mark E. Olive, Esquire, of Tallahassee, Florida, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4394 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4394

 To prohibit Federal funds from being used to violate the terms of the 
          Flores settlement agreement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2019

  Mr. Takano (for himself, Mr. Suozzi, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
  Engel, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Mucarsel-Powell, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Correa, Ms. 
     Pingree, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Judy Chu of 
 California, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Soto) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal funds from being used to violate the terms of the 
          Flores settlement agreement, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Flores Agreement Act''.

SEC. 2. FLORES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.

    No Federal funds may be used to violate the terms of the stipulated 
settlement agreement filed on January 17, 1997, in the United States 
District Court for the Central District of California in Flores v. 
Reno, CV 85-4544-RJK, (commonly known as the ``Flores settlement 
agreement'').
                                 <all>
```
Timothy Joseph CARLSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7075.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### S. E. Spaulding, Appellant, v. Mrs. Lillian T. Allen, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 15, 1929.

*Taylor & Payton*and *Qeo^'ge Campbell,*for Appellant;

*Choate & Lane,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 02-15-00235-CR

NOS. 02-15-00236-CR

NOS. 02-15-00237-CR

NOS. 02-15-00238-CR

NOS. 02-15-00239-CR

NOS. 02-15-00240-CR

NOS. 02-15-00241-CR

HAROLD SCHATZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 10 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. G850946-A2584675, G850947-A2584676, G850947-

A2584677, G850948-A2584678, G850948-A2584679, G850948-A2584680, 

G850949-A2584681

----------

OPINION

----------

On August 20, 2013, Appellant Harold Schatz was found guilty in the 

municipal court of Fort Worth on seven counts of maintaining a substandard 

apartment building and was fined $2,000 on three of the counts, $1,262 on two 
2

counts, and $1,562 on the remaining two counts. Schatz appealed in all seven 

cases to the county criminal court. The county criminal court dismissed the 

cases on June 4, 2015, stating, “The transcript in the . . . appeals do not contain 

a judgment that meets the requirements of Articles 42.01 and 45.041 of the Code 

of Criminal Procedure. Without a record containing a judgment, this Court has 

no jurisdiction over the appeal.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 42.01, 

45.041 (West 2006). On July 8, 2015, Schatz filed notices of appeal in this court.

On July 22, 2015, we notified Schatz of our concern that we lacked 

jurisdiction over these appeals. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 30.00027(a) (West 

Supp. 2014) (providing that court of appeals has jurisdiction of further appeal 

from county court review of municipal court of record judgment if (a) the fine 

assessed is greater than $100 and the county court affirms the municipal court’s 

judgment or (b) the sole issue is the constitutionality of the statute or ordinance 

upon which a conviction is based). We stated that we would dismiss the appeals 

unless any party filed a response on or before August 3, 2015, showing that this 

court has jurisdiction to consider the appeals.

Schatz filed a response to our letter noting that the fine in each case 

exceeded the statutory minimum of $100. However, Schatz did not address the 

other statutory requirement that the county court must affirm the municipal court’s 

judgment. See id. The county court’s judgment in each of these appeals 

dismissed the appeal. Because the county court did not affirm the municipal 

court’s judgment, we lack jurisdiction over the appeals. See id.; Flores v. State, 
3

462 S.W.3d 551 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 5, 2015, no pet.)

(dismissing appeals for lack of jurisdiction when county criminal court dismissed

appeal of municipal court judgments). We therefore dismiss these appeals for 

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Lee Gabriel

LEE GABRIEL

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ.

Publish

DELIVERED: August 13, 2015
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 450 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to prevent certain frauds against veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 450 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Crimes 

3 Against Veterans Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS 

5 AGAINST VETERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 63 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘§ 1352. Fraud regarding veterans’ benefits 

10 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to exe11 cute, any scheme or artifice to defraud an individual of 

12 veterans’ benefits, or in connection with obtaining vet13 eran’s benefits for that individual, shall be fined under this 

14 title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. 

15 ‘‘(b) In this section— 

16 ‘‘(1) the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

17 that term in section 101 of title 38; and 

18 ‘‘(2) the term ‘veterans’ benefits’ means any 

19 benefit provided by Federal law for a veteran or a 

20 dependent or survivor of a veteran.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 63 of title 18, United States 

23 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

24 item: 

‘‘1352. Fraud regarding veterans’ benefits.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

HR 450 RFS

1 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

2 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

3 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

4 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

5 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

6 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

7 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro8 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

9 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 

2019. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                              BGF Industries, Inc.
                     Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA
                             (dollars in thousands)

                                         Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                  2001      2000      1999      1998      1997
                                ------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss)               $ (3,078)  $ 8,330   $ 3,688   $15,317   $21,730
Depreciation and amortization      8,744     8,584     8,206     7,399     6,759
Interest                          13,972    14,168    15,817     4,517     2,355
Taxes                             (1,868)    5,602     2,241     9,854    13,652
Extraordinary loss                    --        --     1,668        --        --
                                ------------------------------------------------
EBITDA                          $ 17,770   $36,684   $31,620   $37,087   $44,496
                                ========   =======   =======   =======   =======