alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/13/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       86,615
COMMITMENTS
   1,116   15,895    1,696   73,660   56,685   76,472   74,276   10,143   12,339

CHANGES FROM 07/06/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,941)
     644    6,050   -2,211   11,184    8,090    9,617   11,929      324   -1,988

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.3     18.4      2.0     85.0     65.4     88.3     85.8     11.7     14.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
       3       15        9       17       24       27       41
```

----

Updated July 16, 2010
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/04/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,246
COMMITMENTS
  13,111    3,116    4,131   15,380   21,871   32,622   29,118    7,624   11,128

CHANGES FROM 04/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,398)
     605      156     -456   -2,014     -594   -1,865     -894      467     -504

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.6      7.7     10.3     38.2     54.3     81.1     72.4     18.9     27.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       62)
      16        8       13       26       25       48       43
```

----

Updated May 7, 2010
Karen Ann JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Mary MURPHY, Judge, District Court of Grayson County, Texas.

No. 17-5328.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Rafael CHIKVASHVILI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-674.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Terrance TUCKER, petitioner, v. Cynthia LINK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford.

No. 17-5860.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

 

a)              The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 25, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | March 24, 2011 |                          | /s/ SAL PERISANO |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------------------|------------------|
|   |                | Sal Perisano                  |
|   |                | *Chairman of the   Board and* |
|   |                | *Chief Executive   Officer*   |

 

 

----

** A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to iParty Corp. and will be retained by iParty Corp. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request*

 

----
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/14/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      125,941
COMMITMENTS
   2,042   16,971    8,992   96,737   83,643  107,771  109,606   18,170   16,335

CHANGES FROM 09/07/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,645)
      93    3,501    1,254   10,857    3,933   12,204    8,688    4,441    7,957

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.6     13.5      7.1     76.8     66.4     85.6     87.0     14.4     13.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       61)
       5       24       20       20       25       43       56
```

----

Updated September 17, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854709
<NAME> DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1998
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,703
<INVENTORY>                                     35,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,232
<PP&E>                                          61,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,356
<BONDS>                                        125,511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,267
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,049
<SALES>                                        218,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,790
<CGS>                                          135,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
        

</TABLE>
Syed Qaisar MADAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5947.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.5



Promissory Note
Amount in $[__________]
Alajuela, Costa Rica            [date]
FOR VALUE RECEIVED ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC. (hereafter, “Borrower”), a company incorporated in the Virgin British Islands, promises to pay [______________], an individual (hereafter, “Lender”), at [___________________], or at such other place as Lender hereof may from time to time designate in writing, the principal sum of [_________________________________] Dollars ($[____________]), with interest accruing on the unpaid principal at the rate of [_______] percent ([__]%) per annum from _____________ until paid. The aforementioned principal sum represents monies owed to [_________________________] for payment on the purchase of chattels.
Principal and interest are payable in yearly installments due on or before the end of the first quarter of every year until paid in full, with the first such payment to be made on or before [______________], and the last payment to be made on or before [______________]. In no event shall interest exceed the maximum amount permitted by law. Any amount collected in excess of the maximum legal rate shall be applied to reduce the principal balance.
Executed in the presence of:
	
				
	WITNESS
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC.

	Name/Address
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	 

	Name/Address
Lavelle PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7541.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,011,399
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          32,719
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            12,007,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,138,553
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       5,512,313
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         5,405,012
<LOANS>                                     76,849,291
<ALLOWANCE>                                    743,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,450,776
<DEPOSITS>                                  99,295,021
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            566,774
<LONG-TERM>                                    219,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,050,542
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,318,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             109,450,776
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,381,689
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              413,279
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               345,615
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,140,583
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,567,666
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,581,092
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,559,491
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  175,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,828,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,195,993
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,195,993
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   787,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.20
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,604
<LOANS-PAST>                                   824,944
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               754,597
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                (207,361)
<RECOVERIES>                                    20,789
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              743,025
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           743,025
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM A. MORAN, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

ROSALIND LEVETTE RAMSEY,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1567

[April 14, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Kenneth L. Gillespie, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE-17-

006355.

William A. Moran, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with CLS Bank
  
    



  When
              10/21/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Irina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Mandy Lam

  Organization(s)
              CLS Bank


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERTO SALOME,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00256

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01082 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below . This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Nickie R. LOGAN, petitioner, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

No. 17-6599.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Ashley LOWE, petitioner, v. Janel ESPINOZA, Acting Warden.

No. 17-6037.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 26, 2021 t0323

Order 

Clerk

March 26, 2021

158934 & (22)(27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158934

COA: 344555

Macomb CC: 2005-000797-FH

JACOB PLANTE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of July 29, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 

2018 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People 

v Betts (Docket No. 148981). On order of the Court, the parties having filed a joint 

motion to remand this case to the Macomb Circuit Court, the motion is considered, and it 

is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and 

without costs. We REMAND this case to the circuit court for any further necessary 

proceedings. The motion to hold this case in abeyance is DENIED as moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 458 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 458

  To prohibit implementation of the revised definition of short-term, 
limited-duration insurance in order to permit such insurance to provide 
                      up to 12 months of coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2019

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 
    on Education and Labor, and Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit implementation of the revised definition of short-term, 
limited-duration insurance in order to permit such insurance to provide 
                      up to 12 months of coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Affordable Limited Health Coverage 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISED DEFINITION OF SHORT-
              TERM, LIMITED-DURATION INSURANCE IN ORDER TO PERMIT SUCH 
              INSURANCE TO PROVIDE UP TO 12 MONTHS OF COVERAGE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of 
Labor may not take any action to implement, enforce, or otherwise give 
effect to the final rule, entitled ``Excepted Benefits; Lifetime and 
Annual Limits; and Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance'' (81 Fed. 
Reg. 75317-75319, October 31, 2016) insofar as such final rule relates 
to a revised definition of the term ``short-term, limited-duration 
insurance'' and the Secretaries shall implement, enforce, and otherwise 
give effect to the definition of such term applied by the Secretaries 
immediately prior to the publication of such final rule.
                                 <all>
```
Peter BARCLAY, petitioner, v. OREGON, et al.

No. 17-5431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 23, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Deon Anthony Romell BAILEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7034.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4530 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit individuals eligible 

for Indian Health Service assistance to qualify for health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 

Mr. MOOLENAAR (for himself and Mr. RUIZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

individuals eligible for Indian Health Service assistance 

to qualify for health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American 

5 Health Savings Improvement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4530 IH

1 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR INDIAN HEALTH SERV2 ICE ASSISTANCE NOT DISQUALIFIED FROM 

3 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS EL8 IGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER INDIAN

9 HEALTH SERVICE PROGRAMS.—For purposes of 

10 subparagraph (A)(ii), an individual shall not be 

11 treated as covered under a health plan de12 scribed in such subparagraph merely because 

13 the individual receives hospital care or medical 

14 services under a medical care program of the 

15 Indian Health Service or of a tribal organiza16 tion.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS