alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard J. Westin, Chief Executive Officer of Agemark Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:



| |  | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.                                                                                       

|                    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: May 29, 2003 |  | /s/ RICHARD J. WESTIN                    
|                    |  |                                          
|                    |  | Richard J. Westin
Chief Executive Officer

53
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854398
<NAME> XATA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         456,234
<SECURITIES>                                   655,545
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,991,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                   238,675
<INVENTORY>                                    600,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,772,016
<PP&E>                                       2,457,403
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,133,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,843,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,232,075
<BONDS>                                        623,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,925
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,943,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,843,257
<SALES>                                      5,998,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,998,692
<CGS>                                        3,470,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,880,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (293,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (176,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (176,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00540-CV

Levi and Michelle MCKENZIE,

Appellants

v.

COMMUNITY 

COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-05-21843-CV

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2014

DISMISSED

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5 provides the following:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—

at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or 

Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that 

is just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

Because Appellants Levi and Michelle McKenzie failed to pay the filing fee in this appeal, 

on August 28, 2014, we ordered appellants to either (1) pay the applicable filing fee or (2) provide 

written proof to this court that they are excused by statute or these rules from paying the filing fee. 
04-14-00540-CV

See TEX.R. APP. P. 20.1 (providing that party who qualifies as indigent under Rule 20 may proceed 

without advance payment of costs). We warned that if appellants failed to respond by September 

8, 2014, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Appellants, however, failed to pay the filing fee or provide written proof that they are

excused from paying the filing fee by the date ordered. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
Ruben CARDENAS RAMIREZ, applicant, v. McCRAW, Dir., TX DPS, et al.

No. 17A516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 8, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 17

- 4912

_____________________________

J OSEPH M. W IPPEL ,
Appellant,

v.

R EEMPLOYMENT A SSISTANCE A PPEALS C OMMISSION ,
Appellee.

___________________________
O n appeal fro m the Reemployment Assistance Appeals C ommission

. Frank E. Brown, Chairman.

December 18, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
Wippel filed an appeal to the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission (RAAC) after he received two contradictory notifications concerning his a pplication for reemployment assistance. RAAC dismissed the appeal as untimely, and Wippel now appeals that dismissal . RAAC concedes error, stating that it should not have dismissed the appeal if it was untimely due to overlapping agency orders. We accept t his concession, and remand for a de termination as to whether Wippel filed a belated appeal to RAAC due to confusion stemming from these orders. See Ellis v. Unemployment Appeals Co m m ’ n , 73 So. 3d 887, 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)

.

R EVERSED and R EMANDED

.2 O ST ERHAUS , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Joseph M. Wippel , pro se , Appellant.

Norman Blessing, General Counsel, and Cristina Velez

, Appellate Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee

.
Fanoris JACKSON, petitioner, v. Homer BRYSON, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-7716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1







STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
 Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.







/s/ Donald L. Unger

Donald L. Unger



President & Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Frederick A. Board

Frederick A. Board

Chief Financial Officer







Date:   10/31/05
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 30, 2005                    /s/ Ian M.Herman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ian M. Herman
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, et al., petitioners, v. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.

No. 17-1426.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-824-000.
    Applicants: Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd.
    Description: Compliance filing: Pre-Filing Settlement Associated 
with Docket No. RP19-276 to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 4/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220418-5251.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/2/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-825-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Pre-Filing Rate Case Settlement 
Associated with Docket No. RP16-1022 to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 4/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220418-5281.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/2/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 19, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08749 Filed 4-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141261

KIMBERLY FINLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141261 COA: 289437 WCAC: 08-000069 SAM’S CLUB and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 18, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
David A. GUY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7091.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.2.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 000-25367) of our report dated September 27, 1999 on our
audits of the financial statements of International Fuel Technology, Inc. as of
March 31,1999 and 1998 and for each of the two years in the period ended March
31, 1999, and for the period from April 9, 1996, the date of inception, to March
31, 1999, which report is included in the Company's Form 8-K filed January 12,
2000.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
May 4, 2000
# L_2011108EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland (1), signed in Brussels on 28 July 2010 and provisionally applicable since 1 March 2011, have been completed on 7 March 2011. Consequently, this Protocol will enter into force, in accordance with its Article 3, second paragraph, on 1 May 2011.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 291, 9.11.2010, p. 14.

1

---
Frizzell Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. Jennifer Moorefield CREWS.

No. 16-9614.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS USED ON PAGE 27 OF MARIMBA'S 1999 FORM 10K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1999
<CASH>                                          22,263
<SECURITIES>                                    56,749
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (104)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,507
<PP&E>                                           5,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,522)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,438
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,799)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,487
<SALES>                                         23,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,413
<CGS>                                              402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,214)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
George McGRATH, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS; and Paul Robinson, petitioner, v. Massachusetts.

No. 17-6483.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
**Order of the Judge hearing the application for interim measures of 5 February 2010 – De Post v Commission**

**(Case T-514/09 R)**

Interim measures – Public procurement – Community tendering procedure – Application for suspension of operation and for interim measures – No urgency

Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Financial loss – Loss of opportunity arising from the exclusion of a tenderer from a tendering procedure (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules
of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2) (see paras 25-35)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for interim measures seeking, in essence, first, an order suspending the operation of the decision by which the Publications Office of the European Union awarded the contract referred to in Invitation to Tender No 10234 ‘Daily transport and delivery of the Official Journal, books, other periodicals and publications’ to Entreprise des postes et télécommunications Luxembourg, second, an order prohibiting the signature of the contract referred to in the Invitation to Tender and, third, if the contract has already been signed, that its performance be suspended until the Court has ruled on the substance of the action. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Costs are reserved. |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24604-24605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17406 and #17407; ARKANSAS Disaster Number AR-
00121]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
Arkansas

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

[[Page 24605]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Arkansas dated 04/20/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/30/2022.

DATES: Issued on 04/20/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/20/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/20/2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Washington
Contiguous Counties:
    Arkansas: Benton, Crawford, Madison
    Oklahoma: Adair

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      2.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.438
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.880
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.940
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.940
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17406 C 
and for economic injury is 17407 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # is Arkansas, 
Oklahoma.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-08794 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
In Re Andrew R. SPENGLER, petitioner.

No. 17-8794.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xstream Beverage Network,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Theodore
Farnsworth, Chairman and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Theodore Farnsworth
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Theodore Farnsworth,
                                                   Chairman, CEO, principal
                                                   executive officer and
                                                   principal financial officer
                                                   August 21, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.