alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Honorable Geo. 3. Sheppard Comptroller

of PublicAccounts Austin,Texas
Dear Sir: opinion NO. o-4283 Re: Construction

of "disabled veterans

of Forsl~.Wars" in the amendment

to Article 2959, R.C.S.,

by SenateBill Wo. 361, Acts of the 47th Legislature. Permitus to quote your recent letterrequesting an opinion from this Department. It reads:

"The last session

of the legislature

amended Article 2959 of the RevisedCivil Statutes to read as follows:
"'A poll tax shallbe collected from every personbetween the ages of twenty-one and sixtywho resided in this state on the first day of Januarypreceding its levy, Indians not taxed,persons Insane, blind, deaf or dumb, those who have .lost a hand or foot, those permanently

disabled,

and all dis- -- abled veterans

of forei disability_

Is forty wtr, where such -x3.? z--

per cent or more, excepted.

. . .I "Several

of the varioustax collectors of this state have called

upon this department for adviceas to what is the definition

of the term disabled veterans

of foreign wars., Does this term includesoldiers of the World War (a) those who went oversea, and (b) those who did not go oversea? "The furtherquestion has arisen as to who shalldetermine

the forty per cent disability of such veterans. Would this department be authorieed to prescribe

the ~method

by which the tax collector shoulddetermine

the disability

of the veteran

tax-Bon. Gee. Ii. Sheppard,

page 2 (O-4283)

payer? If not, then would the tax collector be authorized to-require

certificates

from the Veterans Bureau as to the disability of these veteran

taxpayers?"
It is our opinion,in answer to your first question, that the term "disabled

veterans

of foreign

wars" includes

both soldiers of the World War who went overseas and those who did not go overseas if they were otherwise membersof the amed forces of the United States. In otherwords, it is not required that a soldiershallhave gone overseas

to constitute

him a disabled

veteranof a foreigu war. Such a limitation

would not exist in the absenceof au expressrestriction

to such effectby the Legislature.
The question

of whethera veteran is disabled to the extent of fortyper cent is, of course, one of fact. The etatute does not provide for or require any particular

method of proof. Obviously

the only satisfactory manner in which this fact caube proved Is by the expert testimony of reputable

physicians. The establishment

of a veteran's

disability

for compensation

frois the Federal Government, is iu this way. A certificate from the Veterans Bureauwould be based upon suchproof.

It is our opinion

that your department is authorized

to prescribe

the methodby which the tax collector shoulddetermine the disability

of the taxpayer

and require

that the tax collector shouldaccept as proof of the requisite disability

either the affidavitof a reputable physician

or a certificate

from the Veterans Bureau.
Yours very truly
ATTORNEY

GENZRALOF TEXAS

By /s/ Zollie C. ~Steaklay

Zollie C; Steakley

Assistant

zcs.:Iy:IM APPROVED

JAB 12, 1942 /s/ Grover Sellers APPROVED OPIWION cok.fMmmz
FIRSI ASSISTANT ATTORNEYGExaRAL BY ./s/ BWP CRAIRMAN
David August KILLE, petitioner, v. Debbie L. OLSON.

No. 17-6360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied.
In Re Masao YONAMINE, petitioner.

No. 17-6939.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ANTHONY R. FIORE, JR.

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 194 DB 2014 (No. 13 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 63084 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 4, 2015, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Anthony R. Fiore, Jr., who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended 

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency 

and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be 

and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and 

processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
Exhibit 31.2
**Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer**
Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
I, Edward J. Puisis, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.           April 1, 2005 /s/Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 14-1622, 14-1724 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner, Cross-Respondent,

v. NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on August 17, 2015 is amended as follows: On page 21, footnote 11, line 4, underline "Oakwood Healthcare." On page 48, line 14, change "TSS" to "TSSs."
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/13/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       51,238
COMMITMENTS
  18,757    1,533    7,446   15,865   29,869   42,068   38,848    9,170   12,390

CHANGES FROM 07/06/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,925)
   1,055   -2,296     -170      364    4,249    1,249    1,783      676      142

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    36.6      3.0     14.5     31.0     58.3     82.1     75.8     17.9     24.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       67)
      23        6       12       27       22       55       38
```

----

Updated July 16, 2010
Chris SPHABMISAI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Ruben VALDEZ, petitioner, v. Tim V. VIRGA, Warden.

No. 16-8908.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/27/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       68,834
COMMITMENTS
   1,605    6,570    4,400   50,306   42,805   56,311   53,775   12,523   15,059

CHANGES FROM 04/20/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,075)
  -1,142     -216     -475  -10,962  -17,708  -12,579  -18,399    1,504    7,324

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.3      9.5      6.4     73.1     62.2     81.8     78.1     18.2     21.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       6       11        6       22       22       32       35
```

----

Updated April 30, 2010
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Rodney Howard POWELL.

No. D-3011.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Rodney Howard Powell, of Clive, Iowa, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                                STANDARD DOCUMENT
                               BETWEEN VBA AND FPN


         Aalsmeer Flower Auction, Legmeerdijk 313, 1431 GB, Aalsmeer,
represented by Mr. D. `t Hooft, General Manager, hereinafter referred to as
"VBA" and Flower Purchase Network-Floraplex, the Netherlands, a subsidiary of
World Commerce Online, Inc., Vondelstraat 138, 1054 GT Amsterdam, represented by
its director Mr. Nils van Beek, hereinafter referred to as "FPN".

         Considering that:

               a. The VBA facilitates the classification of quality of the
               supplied ornamental flowers and plants and the payment to the
               suppliers.

               b. FPN offers suppliers worldwide the opportunity to market
               theirs ornamental flowers and plants though its Internet
               e-commerce network.

               c. FPN has invested in the information technology and
               marketing of its trading system through the Internet.

               d. FPN will be responsible for the cost of logistics.

               e. VBA and FPN will utilize each other's services, therefore
               increasing the turnover of both parties.

               In this respect, both parties have agreed as follows:

         1. FPN respects the agreements (the standard conditions) that are made
between VBA and their suppliers, unless specified otherwise.

         2. Suppliers/buyers which use the VBA, by way of the services of FPN,
must let their payment transactions take place through the VBA.

         3. According to the VBA guidelines, after deduction of the commission
rate charged by the VBA, these funds will be directly paid to the suppliers.

         4. This agreement is effective immediately until December 31, 2005 and
will be extended at that time by periods of one year. Cancellation by either of
the parties after the automatic extension, can only take place three months
prior to the end of the calendar year.

         5. The conditions regarding the administrative process of each sale
(chapter 3 of the VBA auction guidelines) will be discussed at a later date by
the parties.

         6. VBA and FPN agree on complete confidentiality regarding the system
and its marketing.

         The above parties have hereunto affixed their signatures as of the 8th
day of December, 1999.

Flower Purchase Network-Floraplex,                   Aalsmeer Flower Auction
the Netherlands,
a subsidiary of World Commerce Online, Inc.

By:  /s/ Nils van Beek                           By:  /s/ D. `t Hooft
   ----------------------                           ----------------------
Dated: December 8, 1999                          Dated: December 8, 1999
Pierre E. DAWSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6597.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF APRIL 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                            5486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1077297
<ALLOWANCES>                                     18084
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1068254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7460
<OTHER-SE>                                      157739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1068254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 80281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               37211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  32355
<INCOME-TAX>                                     12530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              19825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19825
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
<FN>
<F1>THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDE A NONCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
James A. LISO, petitioner, v. Dave MARQUIS, Warden.

No. 17-5517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10(i)



Exhibit 10(i)  Amendment to Agreement Regarding Post-Employment Restrictive Covenants between MAF Bancorp, Inc., Mid America Bank,
fsb and David C. Burba



Section 7 shall be revised to read as follows:



7. Payments to Executive. In
consideration of Executives agreements hereunder, MAF shall pay, or shall cause the Bank or one of its affiliates to pay to Executive, a lump sum payment of $360,000. The payment will be made on or prior to April 15, 2004 and will be subject
to applicable withholding requirements.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment effective this 23rdday of March 2004.



MAF BANCORP, INC.By:

/s/    Allen KorandaIts:

Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer




MID AMERICA BANK, fsbBy:

/s/    Michael J. JanssenIts:

Senior Vice President




EXECUTIVE/s/    David C. BurbaDavid C. Burba
Willis RANDOLPH, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 16-8978.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Sara HASSMAN, petitioner, v. SEASTROM & SEASTROM, et al.

No. 17-7086.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Michael Ladale REEVES, petitioner, v. HAMPTON FOREST APARTMENTS, et al.

No. 17-5583.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/30/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       61,874
COMMITMENTS
   5,069    8,422    3,812   40,605   42,151   49,486   54,385   12,388    7,489

CHANGES FROM 03/23/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,727)
     242      465      498    1,904      304    2,644    1,267    2,083    3,460

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.2     13.6      6.2     65.6     68.1     80.0     87.9     20.0     12.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
      12       13       10       15       17       33       34
```

----

Updated April 2, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of XATA Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/ John G. LewisJohn G. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer
 Dated: August 4, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to XATA Corporation and
will be retained by XATA Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
David PETERSEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6837.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/09/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2,500 MMBTU'S)                                      OPEN INTEREST:    3,899,020
COMMITMENTS
 567,159   46,989  1222783  2072051  2605547  3861993  3875319   37,027   23,701

CHANGES FROM 02/02/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    175,259)
  -7,448   10,534   75,370  102,779   85,597  170,701  171,501    4,558    3,758

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.5      1.2     31.4     53.1     66.8     99.1     99.4      0.9      0.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      203)
      48       24       65      120      117      190      186
```

----

Updated February 7, 2010
Exhibit 10.8


                          ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES
                          -------------------------


     Assumption of  Liabilities dated as of March 15, 1999 by PC DYNAMICS  OF
 TEXAS,  INC.,  a  Texas  corporation  ("BUYER")  in  favor  of  PC  DYNAMICS
 CORPORATION, a Texas corporation ("PC DYNAMICS").

     WHEREAS, PC DYNAMICS and BUYER have entered into that certain  Agreement
 dated March  ___,  1999 (the  "Agreement")  pursant to  which,  among  other
 things, BUYER is acquiring certain assets of PC DYNAMICS;

     WHEREAS,   the   Agreement  provides   that,  concurrently   with   such
 acquisition BUYER assume  and agree  to pay,  defend,  defend, discharge and
 perform certain liabilities and obligations of PC DYNAMICS:

 NOW, THEREFORE, BUYER hereof confirms that it has assumed and agreed to pay,
 defend, discharge and perform when due each of the executory liabilities and
 obligations of PC DYNAMICS under each Contract in effect on the Closing Date
 and assigned to BUYER pursuant to Section 1.1(e) of the Agreement.

     The  Assumption of Liabilities  shall immure to  the benefit  of and  be
 binding upon the successors and assigns of BUYER and PC DYNAMICS.

     All  capitalized terms contained  herein without  definition shall  have
 the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

      This Assumption of Liabilities is executed, delivered and effective  on
 and as of March 15, 1999.

                        PC DYNAMICS OF TEXAS, INC.


                        By:  /s/
                             ---------------------
                        Its:


                        PC DYNAMICS CORPORATION


                        By:  /s/
                             ---------------------
                        Its:
# C_2008280EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---