alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this yearly report on Form 10-KSB of China Elite Information Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Li Kin Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   Date:  March 15, 2007
        By
        /s/ Li Kin Shing
 ---------------------------------------------
 Li Kin Shing
 President, Chief Executive Officer
 and Chief Financial Officer
Deshawn Maurice FLETCHER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/03/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      137,077
COMMITMENTS
  35,864   20,301   20,017   62,961   71,174  118,843  111,492   18,234   25,585

CHANGES FROM 10/27/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,968)
  -1,568    2,517    2,301    3,447     -840    4,180    3,978     -212       -9

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.2     14.8     14.6     45.9     51.9     86.7     81.3     13.3     18.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      41       28       42       64       69      131      120
```

----

Updated November 6, 2009
# Official Journal L 206/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.206.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 206 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 536 August 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.206.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 206

English edition

Legislation

Volume 536 August 2010

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2010/421/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2010/421/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to the definitive adoption of the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2010
  (OJ L 64, 12.3.2010) | 21 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to the definitive adoption of the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2010
  (OJ L 64, 12.3.2010)

(OJ L 64, 12.3.2010)

21

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euros unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Edward J. Puisis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 14, 2006              /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
Michael CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5811.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                ______ __, 2000

To:   The Dow Chemical Company


Gentlemen:

     This letter confirms certain disclosures by CrossWorlds Software, Inc. (the
"Company") to you under Section 2 of the Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of
the above date.  In particular, the Company's representations in Section 2 are
true and correct as of today's date, except as follows:

     2.5.  Comdisco and Silicon Valley Bank have liens on the Company's assets.

     Additionally, the Company agrees with you that, except for the maximum
number of shares being purchased under the Stock Purchase Agreement and except
as otherwise provided further below, the material terms of the Stock Purchase
Agreement and Investor Rights Agreement attached thereto will be no less
favorable to you than the terms applicable under agreements with other investors
(including investors that may enter into such agreements after the date hereof,
if any) that are purchasing shares of the Company's capital stock in private
placements that are intended to close concurrently with the closing of the IPO.
The Company will not enter into any amendment or supplement to the terms of any
of such other agreements without first providing the Investor with reasonable
notice thereof and the opportunity, if Investor so elects, to so amend or
supplement the Stock Purchase Agreement and Investor Rights Agreement attached
thereto.

     In addition to the foregoing, however, you acknowledge that if the SEC
takes the position that one or more of the Company's stock purchase agreements
with investors (including you) cannot be closed as a private placement of
securities concurrently with the closing of the IPO, the Company may terminate
any or all of such agreements as the Company sees fit in the Company's sole
discretion, without regard to the provisions of the above paragraph or any other
factor.  Any such termination will be without liability on the part of any party
to the other, consistent with the provisions of Section 7.8 of the Stock
Purchase Agreement.

     If the foregoing correctly states your understanding, please so indicate by
signing where indicated below.

                                CrossWorlds Software, Inc.


                                By:
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Alfred J. Amoroso, President and Chief
                                   Executive Officer

The Dow Chemical Company

By:
   -----------------------------

Title:
      ---------------------------
Exhibit 21

BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Subsidiaries of the Registrant

|Company Name                                  |  | State of
Incorporation
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|BMCA Insulation Products Inc.                 |  | Delaware              
|BMCA Quakertown Inc.                          |  | Delaware              
|Building Materials Investment Corporation     |  | Delaware              
|Building Materials Manufacturing Corporation  |  | Delaware              
|Ductwork Manufacturing Corporation            |  | Delaware              
|GAF Leatherback Corp.                         |  | Delaware              
|GAF Materials Corporation (Canada)            |  | Delaware              
|GAF Premium Products Inc.                     |  | Delaware              
|GAF Real Properties, Inc.                     |  | Delaware              
|GAFTECH Corporation                           |  | Delaware              
|LL Building Products Inc.                     |  | Delaware              
|Pequannock Valley Claim Service Company, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|South Ponca Realty Corp.                      |  | Delaware              
|Wind Gap Real Property Acquisition Corp.      |  | Delaware              

---



QuickLinks
Olufemi S. COLLINS, et ux., petitioners, v. ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC., et al.

No. 17-6214.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Troy DAVIS, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-6492.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2013291EN.01004201.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/42

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 81/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2012 of 18 December 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of social security systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2012 of 18 December 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of social security systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex VI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex VI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in points 1 (Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) and 2 (Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 1224: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2012 of 18 December 2012 (OJ L 349, 19.12.2012, p. 45).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 1224: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2012 of 18 December 2012 (OJ L 349, 19.12.2012, p. 45).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1224/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 349, 19.12.2012, p. 45.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Charles Daniel HUBBARD, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-6435.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 31.1









CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of RedCell Power Corporation, certify that:



I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of RedCell Power Corporation;



Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.



Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.



I and the other certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company.



I and the other certifying officers have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared.



I and the other certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report; and



I and the other certifying officers have presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation as of that date.



I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



(i)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(ii)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and



I and the other certifying officers have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: December 22, 2003







BY: /s/ CAMERON KING

Cameron King

Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer
Richard GEASLAND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6824.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 11

XATA CORPORATION
EARNINGS PER SHARE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                                                        <C>
Net loss                                                                                                   $ (454,591)
Less: preferred stock dividend                                                                                (10,925)
                                                                                                           ----------
Net loss as adjusted                                                                                         (465,516)
                                                                                                           ==========

Weighted average shares outstanding                                                                         6,950,376

                                                                                                           ----------
         BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE                                                                  $    (0.07)
                                                                                                           ==========
</TABLE>

BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION LOSS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                                                        <C>
Net loss                                                                                                   $ (454,591)
Less: preferred stock dividend                                                                                (10,925)
Less: preferred stock deemed dividend                                                                        (628,982)
                                                                                                           ----------
Net loss to common shareholders                                                                            (1,094,498)
                                                                                                           ==========

Weighted average shares outstanding                                                                         6,950,376

                                                                                                           ----------
         BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE                                                                  $    (0.16)
                                                                                                           ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VARIAN,
INC.'s OCTOBER 1, 1999 FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                          23,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     66,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,332
<PP&E>                                         196,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           306
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,076
<SALES>                                        598,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,887
<CGS>                                          374,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  583,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2758

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Vernon Montrell Webster, also known as Webster Connell Spunky, Jr., also

known as Tracy Connell Webster, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo

____________

Submitted: November 8, 2019

Filed: November 21, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Vernon Webster pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, see

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and he received an enhanced sentence as an armed career

criminal, see id. § 924(e). We affirmed his sentence, despite his argument that his

three prior Wisconsin convictionsfor burglary under Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1m) did not
qualify as violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), on the

authority of United States v. Lamb, 847 F.3d 928 (8th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 138

S. Ct. 1438 (2018), in which we held that an identical burglary conviction qualified

as a violent felony under the ACCA. See United States v. Webster, 730 F. App’x 396

(8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam). Webster then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ

of certiorari, which granted it, vacated our judgment, and remanded the case to us

with instructions to reconsider the matter in light of United States v. Franklin, 2019

WI 64, 387 Wis. 2d 259, 928 N.W.2d 545. See Webster v. United States, 589 U.S.

---, 2019 WL 4921146 (Oct. 7, 2019). 

The parties agree, as we have already recognized, that Lamb is no longer good

law following Franklin. See United States v. Holston, 773 F. App’x 336, 337 (8th

Cir. 2019) (per curiam). In light of Franklin, they also agree that the Wisconsin

burglary statute under which Webster was convicted is broader than generic burglary

under the ACCA. Thus, these convictions “do not qualify as violent felonies under

the ACCA.” See id. The Government “agrees that the case should be remanded to

the district court for resentencing” without the ACCA enhancement.

Accordingly, we vacate Webster’s sentence and remand for resentencing

without application of the ACCA.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge, concurring.

United States v. Holston is an unpublished opinion that is not controlling

precedent, and I believe it was wrongly decided. However, asthe government agrees

this case should be remanded for resentencing, I concur.

______________________________

-2-