alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        |  |  |
| NAME                                   |    | LOCATION |
| Extreme Networks International         |    | Cayman Islands |
| Extreme Networks K.K.                  |    | Japan |
| Extreme Networks Hong Kong Limited     |    | Hong Kong |
| Extreme Networks IHC, Inc.             |    | Delaware |
| Extreme Networks UK Limited            |    | United Kingdom |
| Extreme Networks B.V.                  |    | The Netherlands |
| Extreme Networks GmbH                  |    | Germany |
| Extreme Networks Sarl                  |    | France |
| Extreme Networks Srl                   |    | Italy |
| Extreme Networks Canada, Inc.          |    | Canada |
| Extreme Networks Korea, Ltd.           |    | Korea |
| IHC Networks AB                        |    | Sweden |
| Extreme Networks Australia PTY, Ltd.   |    | Australia |
| Extreme Networks EMEA                  |    | Cayman Islands |
| Extreme Networks Argentina, SRL        |    | Argentina |
| Extreme Networks Brasil, Ltda.         |    | Brazil |
| Extreme Networks Mexico, Ltda.         |    | Mexico |
| Extreme Networks Chile, Ltda.          |    | Chile |
| Extreme Networks Singapore PTE, Ltd.   |    | Singapore |
| Extreme Networks China Ltd.            |    | China |
| Extreme Networks Spain, SL             |    | Spain |
| Extreme Networks Switzerland GmbH      |    | Switzerland |
| Extreme Networks India Private Limited |    | India |
| Extreme Networks Mauritius             |    | Mauritius |
| Extreme Networks Rus, LLC.             |    | Russia |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2251

In re: PHILLIP O’BRIANT , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 1:18

- cv - 02736

- GJH )

Submitted : February 8, 2019 Decided: February 14, 2019

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Phillip O’Briant, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Phillip O’Briant petitions for a w rit of mandamus, contending the district court erroneously dismissed his civil complaint and returned his post

- judgment pleadings. “[M]andamus is a drastic remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). “Courts provide mandamus relief only when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires’; (2) petitioner has shown a ‘clear and indisputable’ right to the requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ ‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” Id. (quoting Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court , 542 U.S. 367, 380

- 81 (2004)). The writ of mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. Will v. United
States , 389 U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). We conclude that O’Briant fails to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant him leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. ∗ We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

∗ Alternatively, to the extent that any of O’Briant’s post

- judgment pleadings were sufficient to provide notice of his intent to appeal the district court’s orders under Fed. R. App. P. 3, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingl y, we affirm the district court’s orders. See O’Briant v. Bana , No. 1:18

- cv - 02736

- GJH (D. Md., Sept. 11, 2018; filed Sept. 25, 2018, entered Sept. 26, 2018; Oct. 9, 2018).
Shan Edward CARTER, petitioner, v. Edward THOMAS, Warden.

No. 16-9073.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Juan Carlos DIAZ, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 16-9003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries



|                                    |  |               
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Name of Entity                      |  | Jurisdiction  
|BTLookSmart Pty Ltd.                |  | Australia     
|LookSmart (Barbados), Inc.          |  | Barbados      
|LookSmart Germany GmbH              |  | Germany       
|LookSmart Holdings (Delaware), Ltd. |  | Delaware      
|LookSmart International Pty Ltd.    |  | Australia     
|LookSmart Netherlands B.V.          |  | Netherlands   
|LookSmart United Kingdom Ltd.       |  | United Kingdom
|WiseNut, Inc.                       |  | Delaware
In Re Guy Tobias LeGRANDE, petitioner.

No. 17-6182.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Juan CASTILLO-RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5054.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.3
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PATRICIA GRAHAM, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 30, 2005



                                            /s/  Patricia Graham
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Patricia Graham,
                                            Principal Financial Officer
Brian S. BROWDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6757.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY OF DIRECTORS OF

STANCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

The undersigned hereby appoints each of Eric E. Parsons and Michael T. Winslow, signing singly, as the undersigneds true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of StanCorp Financial Group,
Inc., the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission; and

(2) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the
opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be in the best interest of, or legally required by the undersigned.

The undersigned hereby ratifies
and confirms all that the attorney-in-fact and agent shall do or cause to be done under this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney this 27th day of February 2009.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Virginia L. Anderson
|Virginia L. Anderson    
|                        
|/s/ Frederick W. Buckman
|Frederick W. Buckman    
|                        
|/s/ John E. Chapoton    
|John E. Chapoton        
|                        
|/s/ Stanley R. Fallis   
|Stanley R. Fallis       
|                        
|/s/ Peter O. Kohler, MD 
|Peter O. Kohler, MD     
|                        
|/s/ Jerome J. Meyer     
|Jerome J. Meyer         
|                        
|/s/ Ralph R. Peterson   
|Ralph R. Peterson       
|                        
|/s/ Mary F. Sammons     
|Mary F. Sammons         
|                        
|/s/ E. Kay Stepp        
|E. Kay Stepp            
|                        
|/s/ Michael G. Thorne   
|Michael G. Thorne       
|                        
|/s/ Ronald E. Timpe     
|Ronald E. Timpe
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, IAN HERMAN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 12, 2007


                         /s/ Ian Herman
                         ------------------------------
                         Ian Herman,
                         Chief Executive Officer
                         (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24151-24152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-821-000.
    Applicants: Centra Pipelines Minnesota Inc.
    Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: Updated Index of Shippers 
Apr 2022 to be effective 4/18/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220418-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/2/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-822-000.
    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Maine to 
Emera Release to be effective 4/15/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220418-5198.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/2/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-823-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Pre-Filing Settlement Associated 
with Docket No. RP17-972 to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 4/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220418-5245.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/2/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing

[[Page 24152]]

requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 18, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08591 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999
Broadway Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      15,664,000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      50,098,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,496,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,494,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     37,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,002,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,494,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,480,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,480,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,839,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            201,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      436.96<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    436.96<F2>
<FN>
<F1>
Includes $2,629,000 of restricted cash.
<F2>
Primary EPS and diluted EPS include $436.96 per Preferred Unit of
Limited Partnership Interest.
</FN>



</TABLE>
William SAPPINGTON, petitioner, v. Bill OLDHAM, Sheriff, Shelby County, Tennessee.

No. 17-6147.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Irving Marcello REYES, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 10.30

February 8, 2007

Richard A. Aurelio

460 Indian
Springs Road

Jackson, Wyoming 83001

Dear Dick:

This letter confirms our agreement that the letter agreement dated January 2, 2006 (the Agreement), between you and Varian Semiconductor Equipment
Associates, Inc. (VSEA) is hereby amended to extend the Term (as defined therein) until December 31, 2007. For the sake of clarity, pursuant to paragraph 4 of the Agreement, in consideration for your service as VSEAs
Non-Executive Chairman during the period beginning January 1, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2007, VSEA shall pay you $200,000, paid periodically during this Term in the same intervals as VSEAs payroll practices.

Please sign below and return a copy of this letter to confirm your agreement with the above.



Very Truly Yours,VARIAN SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ Eric ChenName:

Eric ChenTitle:

Chair, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee




|                      
|----------------------
|AGREED:               
|                      
|/s/ Richard A. Aurelio
|Richard A. Aurelio
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:              March 26,              2008 |   |   |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |                                           |   |   |   |
|   |                                           |   |   |   |
| By:    | /s/ Sandrine                Crisafulli    |   |   |        |
|   | Sandrine                Crisafulli             |   |   |        |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer         |   |   |        |

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 416 

To amend section 524(c) of title 18, United States Code, to use lawfully 

forfeited drug seizures to increase border security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. DAVID

P. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. GIBBS, and Mr. HICE

of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 524(c) of title 18, United States Code, 

to use lawfully forfeited drug seizures to increase border 

security. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Build up Illegal Line 

5 Defenses with Assets Lawfully Lifted Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 416 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESERVATION OF PORTION OF FORFEITS IN THE 

2 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL ASSET FOR3 FEITURE FUND FOR BUILDING A PHYSICAL 

4 BARRIER OR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO 

5 PREVENT ILLEGAL ENTRY OVER OUR SOUTH6 ERN BORDER. 

7 Section 524(c) of title 28, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

10 provided in paragraph (12),’’ before ‘‘be available to 

11 the Attorney General’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(12)(A) Not later than on December 1 of each 

14 year, the Attorney General shall report to Congress 

15 the total of any funds in the Fund as of October 1 

16 which are derived from Mexican cartels. 

17 ‘‘(B) The Attorney General shall conduct an on18 going study with a view to deriving more funds than 

19 have historically been the case for the Fund from 

20 Mexican cartels. The Attorney General shall report 

21 from time to time to Congress any suggestions found 

22 through the study. The first such report shall be 

23 transmitted not later than 180 days after the date 

24 of the enactment of this paragraph. 

25 ‘‘(C) An amount equal to 50 percent of the 

26 total reported under subsection (a) shall be made 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 416 IH

1 available without fiscal year limitation to install ad2 ditional physical barriers and roads (including the 

3 removal of obstacles to detection of illegal entrants) 

4 in the vicinity of the United States border to deter 

5 illegal crossings in areas of high illegal entry into 

6 the United States.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON RELEASE OF PROPERTY. 

8 Section 983(f)(8) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

11 (C); 

12 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub13 paragraph (D) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(E) is currency or contraband likely to 

16 belong to or used in support of a foreign, illegal 

17 trafficking organization.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Charles R. THIBEAULT, Sr., petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-5935.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.