alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Gary S. Hirstein, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of International Fuel Technology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained inSEC Release 34-47986]; and(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s internal controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s disclosure control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                  March 30, 2007 By:  /s/ *Gary S. Hirstein*    Gary S. Hirstein    Principal financial and accounting officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,143 
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          78,065
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                49,775
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    162,873
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         302,311
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           303,485
<LOANS>                                      2,561,198
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,321,464
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,301,664
<SHORT-TERM>                                   134,804
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            539,800
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,743
<COMMON>                                           169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,321,464
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 96,395
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,803
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,610
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               116,808
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              48,311
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,982
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           46,826
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  88
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,302
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,496
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.04
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,493
<LOANS-PAST>                                       870
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,914
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      339
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,182
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         18,182
        


</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/16/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      539,298
COMMITMENTS
  52,513   28,581  125,469  336,743  367,037  514,725  521,086   24,573   18,212

CHANGES FROM 11/09/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -10,641)
 -19,318    2,646      737    3,919  -16,956  -14,662  -13,573    4,022    2,932

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.7      5.3     23.3     62.4     68.1     95.4     96.6      4.6      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      39       16       46       65       69      122      116
```

----

Updated November 19, 2010
A00A0384.

#### HEWETT v. THE STATE.

(534 SE2d 867)

Miller, Judge.

A jury found Gene Hewett, Jr. guilty under Count 1 of driving under the influence to the extent it was less safe for him to drive1 and guilty under Count 2 of driving a moving vehicle while his alcohol concentration was more than 0.10 grams (a “per se” violation)2 using the same factual scenario. Observing that the two counts were in the alternative and were to be sentenced as though they were one count, the judge gave Hewett a single sentence. The judge failed to identify which count merged into the other or to identify on which count he was sentencing Hewett.

Where two DUI charges are based on the same conduct, the evidence will not support convictions of two separate offenses.3 Even though the trial court enters only a single sentence, if that sentence applies to both DUI counts of the accusation, by definition the court has convicted defendant of two counts of DUI.4 Here the court noted that it was giving Hewett a single sentence on the two counts, because the court considered the counts alternative and was treating them as though they were one count. The court did not merge one count into the other nor indicate that the sentence applied only to *113one count. Thus, the sentence applied to both counts and was improper.

Decided May 19, 2000.

*Jackie G. Patterson, Yasma Patterson,*for appellant.

*L. Jack Kirby, Solicitor,*for appellee.

The question then becomes what the remedy should be. Though some prior decisions have remanded the case for resentencing on only one count of the DUI offense,5 these cases are not applicable where “it is apparent from the transcript that for purposes of sentencing the trial judge considered the charges alternative and sentenced appellant for only one offense.”6 This is the case here, and therefore, we follow those cases that simply vacate the “per se” DUI conviction and affirm the “less safe” DUI conviction, with no remand.7 Accordingly, we affirm the “less safe” conviction under Count 1 and vacate the “per se” conviction under Count 2. No remand is necessary.

*Judgment affirmed as to Count 1. Judgment vacated as to Count 2.*

*Pope, P. J., and Smith, P. J., concur.*

1

 OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (1).

2

 OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (5).

3

*Sanders v. State,*176 Ga. App. 869, 870 (4) (338 SE2d 5) (1985).

4

Id. at 871.

5

 See *Bache v. State,*208 Ga. App. 591, 593 (431 SE2d 412) (1993); *Mattarochia*v. *State,*200 Ga. App. 681, 686 (7) (409 SE2d 546) (1991); *Sanders,*supra.

6

*Hoffman v. State,*208 Ga. App. 574, 576 (2) (430 SE2d 886) (1993); see *Page v. State,*202 Ga. App. 828, 830-831 (4) (415 SE2d 487) (1992).

7

 See *Hoffman,*supra;*Page,*supra;*Fudge v. State,*184 Ga. App. 590, 592-593 (6) (362 SE2d 147) (1987) (physical precedent only); cf. *Ellerbee v. State,*215 Ga. App. 102, 103 (1) (449 SE2d 874) (1994).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Torbay Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Thomas Large, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: April 28, 2006                   By: /s/ William Thomas Large
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            William Thomas Large
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales), Civil Division, by order of that court of 21 July 2004, in Talacre Beach Caravan Sales Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

(Case C-251/05)

(2005/C 205/19)

Language of the case: English

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Court of Appeal (England and Wales), Civil Division, of 21 July 2004, received at the Court Registry on 14 June 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Talacre Beach Caravan Sales Ltd and Commissioners of Customs and Excise on the following question:

Where a Member State has, pursuant to Article 28(2) (a) the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) (1), by its domestic legislation exercised its right of derogation so as to zero-rate a supply of specified goods but in the same legislation has identified items that should not be included in the scope of the zero-rating (‘excluded items’), does the fact that there is a single supply of goods (together with the excluded items) preclude the member state from charging VAT at the standard rate on the supply of the excluded items?

----

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ L 145, 13.06.1977, p. 1).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854709
<NAME> DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,918)
<INVENTORY>                                     41,266
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,314
<PP&E>                                          76,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,097
<BONDS>                                        212,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       138,623
<OTHER-SE>                                   (130,512)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,465
<SALES>                                        174,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,505
<CGS>                                          108,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,969)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,470)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,812)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6827** 

CLOREY EUGENE FRANCE , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00250

- JAB

- LPA )

Submitted : September 23, 2014 Decided: October 2, 2014

Before MOTZ and GREGO RY , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Clorey Eugene France, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clorey Eugene France appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for mandamus . We have reviewed the record and find no reversi ble error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. France v. North Carolina , No. 1:13

- cv - 00250

- JAB

- LPA (M.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2014)
. We grant leave to proceed in form a pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts a nd legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**








**ROYAL
      INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Royal Invest International Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.





By:
      /s/ Nathan Lapkin


Nathan
      Lapkin


Chief
      Financial Officer





August
      3,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BLANCA MARTINEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00269-CR

Appeal from the

 County Court at Law No. 2

of El Paso, Texas 

(TC# 20190C03397)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until April 15, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Justo Fernandez-Gonzalez, the Appellant’s attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 15, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/06/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,915
COMMITMENTS
  12,318    5,481    4,486   16,544   19,158   33,348   29,125    7,567   11,790

CHANGES FROM 03/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        917)
     366      821     -452      599     -189      513      180      404      737

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.1     13.4     11.0     40.4     46.8     81.5     71.2     18.5     28.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       65)
      17       10       12       30       22       49       44
```

----

Updated April 9, 2010
Dale LAMBERT, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 16-9132.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of Criminal Justice Reform Clinic for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

This Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Ameriana Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the report.



|                   |  |        |  |                                                              
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen                                         
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Jerome J. Gassen                                             
|                   |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                        
|                   |  |       
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ John J. Letter                                           
|                   |  | Name:  |  | John J. Letter                                               
|                   |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/21/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      510,634
COMMITMENTS
  75,481   16,081  113,588  303,881  364,352  492,950  494,021   17,684   16,613

CHANGES FROM 12/14/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,244)
   2,635   -1,306   -3,830    3,339    5,543    2,144      407      100    1,837

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.8      3.1     22.2     59.5     71.4     96.5     96.7      3.5      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      112)
      37       12       40       57       59      105      100
```

----

Updated December 27, 2010
sing_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
  	 
	1

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	2

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	3

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	4

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	5

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	6

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	7

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	8

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	9

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	10

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	11

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	12

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	13

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	14

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	15

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	16

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	17

	 

	 


  
  
  
  	18