alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report of Hanover
Foods Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
1, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, the undersigned, in
my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


      /s/ John A. Warehime
      -----------------------------------------
      John A. Warehime, Chief Executive Officer           Date:  October 16,2002
Henry E. GOSSAGE, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 17-484.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of Domino's, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

    1)   the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December
         29, 2002 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2)   the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ David A. Brandon
                                    -------------------------------
                                    David A. Brandon
                                    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 25, 2003
Gregory EVERETT, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6126.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 207/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 641 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 641 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 207/01 | Euro exchange rates — 31 May 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 207/01

Euro exchange rates — 31 May 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 207/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10134 —EG Group/OMV Germany Business) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2021/C 207/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10269 – TDR Capital/Arrow Global) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2021/C 207/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10238 — Nordic Capital/LEO Foundation/LEO Pharma) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2021/C 207/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10297 - CDPQ/OTPP/Ohio) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 207/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10134 —EG Group/OMV Germany Business) (
  1
  )

1

2

2021/C 207/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10269 – TDR Capital/Arrow Global) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2021/C 207/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10238 — Nordic Capital/LEO Foundation/LEO Pharma) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2021/C 207/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10297 - CDPQ/OTPP/Ohio) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Call for proposals 2021 – EAC/A01/2021 – Erasmus+ Programme ( OJ C 103, 25.3.2021 ) | 10 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Call for proposals 2021 – EAC/A01/2021 – Erasmus+ Programme ( OJ C 103, 25.3.2021 )

( OJ C 103, 25.3.2021 )

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1







STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.









/s/ Donald L. Unger

Donald L. Unger

President & Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Frederick A. Board

Frederick A. Board

Chief Financial Officer







Date:_____5/5/06____
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 451 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 451

 To repeal the section of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation 
  Act of 2012 that requires the Federal Communications Commission to 
              reallocate and auction the T-Band spectrum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2019

Mr. Engel (for himself, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Green of Texas, and Mr. King of 
  New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the section of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation 
  Act of 2012 that requires the Federal Communications Commission to 
              reallocate and auction the T-Band spectrum.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Don't Break Up the T-Band Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO REALLOCATE AND AUCTION T-BAND 
              SPECTRUM.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 6103 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job 
Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1413) is repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 6103.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/15/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       90,375
COMMITMENTS
     426   10,380    3,432   71,487   57,886   75,345   71,698   15,030   18,677

CHANGES FROM 06/08/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,647)
    -991    1,129     -778      -37   -1,830   -1,806   -1,479    5,453    5,126

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.5     11.5      3.8     79.1     64.1     83.4     79.3     16.6     20.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       48)
       2       15       11       22       30       35       45
```

----

Updated June 18, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**C****ertificationof Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing FinancialStatements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

            I, Frank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer of Home Solutions ofAmerica, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, herebycertify that (i) the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in thatreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presentedtherein. 

 

| Date: August 16, 2004 |  /s/ FRANK J.FRADELLA                              FrankJ. FradellaChief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6225** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. HORACE LINTON BROWN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distric t of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:06

- cr - 00140

- PJM

- 1; 8:09

- cv - 00029

- PJM )

Submitted : January 28, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per cu riam opinion
. Horace Linton Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Dawson Belf, James Marton Trusty, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Horace Li nton Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denie s relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Mahbobeh SHARIATI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6073.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Miles Jennings KING, petitioner, v. Peter Allen QUINT.

No. 17-792.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
Jose Hipolito CRUZ DIAZ, aka Pirana, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9095.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2013081EN.01001301.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 213/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 of 11 June 2012 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste batteries and accumulators (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 of 11 June 2012 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste batteries and accumulators (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzh (Commission Decision 2012/78/EU) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzi | 32012 R 0493: Commission Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 of 11 June 2012 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste batteries and accumulators (OJ L 151, 12.6.2012, p. 9).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzi

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 151, 12.6.2012, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
George ANDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7162.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                  1999 BROADWAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                         FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1999 Broadway Associates
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.



Date: November 14, 2002                          /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                 ---------------------
                                                 Michael L. Ashner
                                                 Chief Executive Officer




Date: November 14, 2002                          /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                 ------------------
                                                 Thomas Staples
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


















                                    19 of 19
Dennis M. BUCKOVETZ, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY.

No. 17-513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,704
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          55,277
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                49,625
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    163,507
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         316,434
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           314,923
<LOANS>                                      2,494,954
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,236,449
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,291,065
<SHORT-TERM>                                    50,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            551,114
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,726
<COMMON>                                           169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,236,449
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 47,524
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,792
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 7,651
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                57,967
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,789
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,415
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,552
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  78
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,238
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,286
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.08
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,377
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,686   
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,914
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      206
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,010
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         18,010
        


</TABLE>
Roger Chaves SCOTTON, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5403.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40504 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO HERNANDEZ, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-385-ALL Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave towithdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 16, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40504

2 herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Hernandez’s motion to appeal pro se is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Shawn Germaine FRALEY, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 16-9218.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
Candace J. SIMS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6487.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 210A/20 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 210A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4720 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 210A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4720 August 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Europol |
| 2004/C 210A/1 | Europol notice of recruitment: Director | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Europol

2004/C 210A/1

Europol notice of recruitment: Director

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN