alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 90/10 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6610 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6610 March 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 90/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 90/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 17 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 90/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 90/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Edward ANDERSON, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 17-5671.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
Franklin R. LACY, petitioner, v. BP P.L.C., et al.

No. 17-759.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**C****ertificationof Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing FinancialStatements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

            I, Rick J. O'Brien, Chief Financial Officer of Home Solutions ofAmerica, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, herebycertify that (i) the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in thatreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presentedtherein. 

 

| Date: August 16, 2004 | /s/ RICKJ. O'BRIEN                           |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | RickJ. O'Brien                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                        |
Gordon C. REID, petitioner, v. WARDEN, et al.

No. 18-7006.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                   SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF DOMINO'S, INC.

    Domino's Pizza LLC                                    Michigan
    Domino's Franchise Holding Co.                        Michigan
    Domino's Pizza PMC, Inc.                              Michigan
    Domino's Pizza California LLC                         California
    Domino's Pizza International, Inc.                    Delaware
    Domino's Pizza International Payroll Services, Inc.   Florida
    Domino's Pizza NS Co.                                 Canada
    Domino's Pizza of Canada                              Canada
    Domino's Pizza of France S.A.S.                       France
    Dutch Pizza Beheer B.V.                               Netherlands
# L_2013202EN.01000102.xml

| 27.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the facilitation of the issuance of visas entered into force on 1 July 2013, the procedure provided for in Article 2 of the Agreement having been completed on 14 May 2013.

---
# Official Journal C 449/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 449 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5716 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 449

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5716 December 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 449/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 449/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 449/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7464 — Bladt Industries/EEW Special Pipe Constructions/TAG Energy Solutions Limited’s Assets) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 449/03 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 449/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7464 — Bladt Industries/EEW Special Pipe Constructions/TAG Energy Solutions Limited’s Assets) (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 449/03

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Todd James LUH, petitioner, v. FULTON STATE HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 18-7073.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for *1196writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed no to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305(1992) (*per curiam* ).
Andres REYES-QUINTERO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9080.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>              This schedule contains summary financial
                      information extracted from Form 10-Q for the period ended
                      June 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
                      reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<CASH>                               $34,404
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        96,970
<ALLOWANCES>                         4,903
<INVENTORY>                          30,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     170,029
<PP&E>                               355,179
<DEPRECIATION>                       153,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       403,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                129,746
<BONDS>                              221,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                          (153,396)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         403,699
<SALES>                              382,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     382,780
<CGS>                                262,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        262,015 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   17,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      43,383
<INCOME-TAX>                         16,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  26,791
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         26,791
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0



</TABLE>
Robert J. KULICK, petitioner, v. LEISURE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC.

No. 18-6743.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William Billy Gene CARTER, petitioner, v. Kenny HUTERSON, et al.

No. 16-7916.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 81/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.081.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 81 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5719 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.081.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 81

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5719 March 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 260/2014 of 24 January 2014 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 260/2014 of 24 January 2014 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Willie Gene WOODARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6893.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report of Hanover
Foods Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
1, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, the undersigned, in
my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ John A. Warehime
------------------------------------------
John A. Warehime, Chief Executive Officer               Date:  January 15, 2003
Lucina ROJO-RIVAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6377.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2013021EN.01004301.xml

| 24.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 21/43

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 195/2012

of 26 October 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 412/2012 of 15 May 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 412/2012 of 15 May 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0412: Commission Regulation (EU) No 412/2012 of 15 May 2012 (OJ L 128, 16.5.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0412: Commission Regulation (EU) No 412/2012 of 15 May 2012 (OJ L 128, 16.5.2012, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 412/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 128, 16.5.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 21, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12608

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00149-CR-1-003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL NELSON MURPHY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(January 21, 2009)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Joe Carl Jordan, appointed counsel for Michael Nelson Murphy, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Murphy’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
Christopher Adin GRAHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1191 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1191

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
 To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
                           Chicago, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARDISS COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 433 West Harrison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Cardiss Collins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in any law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Cardiss Collins Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 2. OTIS GRANT COLLINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2302 South Pulaski Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Otis Grant Collins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in any law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Otis Grant Collins Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 3. MARY ALICE (MA) HENRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4222 West Madison Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in any law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Mary Alice (Ma) Henry 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 4. ROBERT LEFLORE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 50001 West Division Street in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby 
designated as the ``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to such facility in any law, 
regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Robert LeFlore, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Lou TYLER, petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 17-8494.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
DeJuan FRAZIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9148.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Release:#3969-96 (CFTC Docket 97-4)

For Release: November 25, 1996

CFTC FILES ANTI-FRAUD ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST LEXUS FINANCIAL
    GROUP, INC., DAVID ALAN LUGER, AND MARK LEE SINGER, ALL OF FLORIDA

CFTC Administrative Complaint Alleges Fraud in Soliciting Commodity
    Options Customers and Failure to Supervise Diligently

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today
    announced the filing of a two-count administrative complaint alleging that
    Lexus Financial Group, Inc. (Lexus), a registered introducing broker
    of Hollywood, Florida; David Alan Luger of North Miami Beach,
    Florida, Lexus' co-owner and president; and Mark Lee Singer of Fort
    Lauderdale, Florida, its co-owner and vice president, violated the
    anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC
    regulations by soliciting fraudulently customers to purchase commodity
    options. Lexus has been registered as an IB since December 1992, and Luger
    and Singer have been registered as Associated Persons of Lexus since
    November 1992.

CFTC Charges that Since 1992, Over 88 percent of Lexus' Customers
    Have Lost Money, While Lexus Received $5.3 Million in Commissions

Specifically, the CFTC complaint alleges that the respondents committed
    fraud by making false, deceptive, and misleading statements in radio
    infomercials and in telephone solicitations of customers to purchase
    commodity options, including fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions of
    material facts by: 1) virtually guaranteeing commodity price increases; 2)
    overstating the extent to which option customers would profit from these
    price increases; 3) exaggerating the likelihood of profit in trading
    commodity options; 4) minimizing the risk of loss involved in trading
    commodity options; and 5) overstating Lexus' performance record. The
    complaint further alleges that the respondents violated CFTC regulations by
    failing to supervise diligently the sales force employed by Lexus.

Since its inception in late 1992, Lexus has traded over 800 customer
    accounts -- over 88 percent of which have lost money, while Lexus has
    received $5.3 million in commissions, according to the complaint.
    Commissions received by Lexus represent more than 75 percent of total
    customer losses, the complaint further alleges.

A public hearing is to be held to determine whether the allegations are
    true and, if so, what sanctions, if any, should be imposed. Possible
    sanctions include revocation or suspension of the respondents'
    registrations; cease and desist orders; imposition of civil monetary
    penalties of up to $100,000 or triple the monetary gain to each respondent,
    whichever is greater, for each violation of the Commodity Exchange Act or
    CFTC regulations; trading prohibitions; and restitution to customers.

---
Fernando DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6700.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.