alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee (FRPCC) advises the public that the FRPCC will meet on August 1, 2001 in Washington, DC. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on August 1, 2001, at 9 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Federal Emergency Management Agency Conference Center in the lobby of 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Pat Tenorio, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, telephone (202) 646-2870; fax (202) 646-3508; or e-mail                         *pat.tenorio@fema.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The role and functions of the FRPCC are described in 44 CFR 351.10(a) and 351.11(a). The Agenda for the upcoming FRPCC meeting is expected to include: (1) Introductions, (2) reports from FRPCC subcommittees, (3) old and new business, and (4) business from the floor. 

                    The meeting is open to the public, subject to the availability of space. Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for oral statements from the public not more than five minutes in length. Any member of the public who wishes to make an oral statement at the August 1, 2001, FRPCC meeting should request time in writing from Russell Salter, FRPCC Chair, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472. The request should be received at least five business days before the meeting. Any member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the FRPCC should mail the statement to: Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee, c/o Pat Tenorio, Federal                           ( print page 33543)                        Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.                 

Russell Salter,

Chair, Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee. 

[FR Doc. 01-15712 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-06-U
# L_2014248DE.01002802.xml

| 22.8.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 248/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 248/28

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 223/2013 vom 13. Dezember 2013 zur Änderung von Anhang II (Technische Vorschriften, Normen, Prüfung und Zertifizierung) des EWR-Abkommens

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 154 vom 22. Mai 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 154 vom 22. Mai 2014

Auf Seite 20, Erwägungsgrund 1:

anstatt:

| „(1) | Da die Geltungsdauer des Beschlusses Richtlinie 2009/135/EG der Kommission ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(1)

Da die Geltungsdauer des Beschlusses Richtlinie 2009/135/EG der Kommission ...“

muss es heißen:

| „(1) | Da die Geltungsdauer der Richtlinie 2009/135/EG der Kommission ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(1)

Da die Geltungsdauer der Richtlinie 2009/135/EG der Kommission ...“

.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00739-CV

Hillsboro Independent School District, Appellant

v.

Robert Scott, in his Official Capacity as

Commissioner of the Texas Education Agency, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GV-11-001715, HONORABLE RHONDA HURLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 20, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         233,954
<SECURITIES>                                     5,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (14,807)
<INVENTORY>                                        382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               276,975
<PP&E>                                         108,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                (85,130)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       443,817
<OTHER-SE>                                   (225,550)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   311,196
<SALES>                                         39,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,500
<CGS>                                            4,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    63
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,046
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,146)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with BlackRock
  
    



  When
              10/22/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Irina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Joanne MederoSupurna Vedbrat

  Organization(s)
              BlackRock


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
# L_2005161EN.01001101.xml

| 23.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/11

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 5/2005

of 8 February 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 162/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 162/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2004/86/EC of 5 July 2004 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, Council Directive 93/93/EEC on the masses and dimensions of two or three-wheel motor vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2004/86/EC of 5 July 2004 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, Council Directive 93/93/EEC on the masses and dimensions of two or three-wheel motor vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 45p (Council Directive 93/93/EEC) of Chapter I of Annex II to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32004 L 0086: Commission Directive 2004/86/EC of 5 July 2004 (OJ L 236, 7.7.2004, p. 12).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32004 L 0086: Commission Directive 2004/86/EC of 5 July 2004 (OJ L 236, 7.7.2004, p. 12).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2004/86/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 236, 7.7.2004, p. 12.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Troy Lee CURTIS, petitioner, v. Anthony MACKEY, Judge, Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, et al.

Kenneth E. Shatzer, petitioner, v. Anthony Mackey, Judge, Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, et al.; and David Levy Greenberg, petitioner, v. Anthony Mackey, Judge, Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, et al.

No. 17-5962.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
# C_2010246EN.01001502.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-19/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulations (EC) Nos 273/2004 and 111/2005 - Drug precursors - Control and monitoring within the Union - Monitoring of trade between the Union and third countries - Penalties)

2010/C 246/26

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and S. Mortoni, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Art. 12 of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors (OJ 2004 L 47, p. 1) and Art. 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors (OJ 2005 L 22, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the national measures necessary for the implementation, first, of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors and, secondly, of Art. 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those regulations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the national measures necessary for the implementation, first, of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors and, secondly, of Art. 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those regulations;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.03.2010.

1

---
Jorge CASANOVA, petitioner, v. Robert ULIBARRI, Warden.

No. 17-7715.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### A. W. Harz, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. G. P. Paxton, et al., *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion filed February 7, 1929.

*Dickinson & Dickinson,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*DeCottes & Spencer,*for Defendant in Error.

Terrell, C. J.

In this cause writ of error was taken from an order of the Circuit Court of Seminole County, granting the motion of Defendants in Error to quash the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissing the petition of Plaintiff in Error.

It is contended here that ordinance 152 of the City of Sanford, Florida, regulating the issuance of building permits prescribes no rule for the issuance of such permits but attempts to substitute a government by Boards and Commissions in lieu of a government by law, leaving the issuance of such permits subject to the arbitrary will of said Boards and Commissions, to be granted or refused subject to their whim and caprice.

The answer to this question is determined by deciding whether or not the City of Sanford had. duly authorized the Defendants in Error to issue building permits and *155whether or not' they had arbitrarily and unreasonably denied the Plaintiff in Error a permit in the instant case.

We have examined the record and it appears that the City of Sanford is fully authorized to zone the city and to regulate by ordinance the issuance of building permits such as are here involved. When the ordinance in question and the action of the city officials pursuant thereto are considered with reference to the rules applicable to the exercise of the police power in the regulation of the erection of filling stations and public garages, the operation of which involve acts which are generally recognized as potential menaces to the public safety and health because of the storage and handling therein of highly inflammable and explosive substances, it does not appear that in denying the permit here sought the respondent city officials have acted arbitrarily or unreasonably. See State ex rel. Lane v. Fleming, 225 Pac. Rep. 647, 34 A. L. R. 500; A. G. Construction Co. v. Scott, 136 Atl. Rep. 207; Cayce v. Hopkinsville, 289 S. W. Rep. 223; State ex rel. Lieberman v. Van DeCarr, 199 U. S. 552, 50 L. Ed. 305; State v. Harrison, 114 So. R. 159. A different rule, however, might apply when buildings or businesses of innoxious character are involved. See State ex rel. Scotch Title Trust Co. v. Roberge, 278 U. S. -, 73 L. Ed. 39, Dillon Munic. Corp. (5th Ed.) See. 598.

The order quashing the alternative writ and dismissing the petition is affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Wi-iitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
# L_2014342EN.01005001.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 142/2014

of 27 June 2014

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2013 of 25 July 2013 establishing criteria determining when copper scrap ceases to be waste under Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2013 of 25 July 2013 establishing criteria determining when copper scrap ceases to be waste under Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

1

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added after point 32ffb (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1179/2012) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘32ffc. | 32013 R 0715: Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2013 of 25 July 2013 establishing criteria determining when copper scrap ceases to be waste under Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 201, 26.7.2013, p. 14).
  The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
  In Article 2(4), the words “or the territory of the EFTA States” shall be inserted after the words “the customs territory of the Union”.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘32ffc.

32013 R 0715: Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2013 of 25 July 2013 establishing criteria determining when copper scrap ceases to be waste under Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 201, 26.7.2013, p. 14).

The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:

In Article 2(4), the words “or the territory of the EFTA States” shall be inserted after the words “the customs territory of the Union”.’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 715/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 June 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (2).

2

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  OJ L 201, 26.7.2013, p. 14.

1

(2)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

2

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4219 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that an appeal of an 

order granting a nationwide injunction issued by a district court of 

the United States shall lie to the Supreme Court. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2019 

Mr. JOHN W. ROSE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that 

an appeal of an order granting a nationwide injunction 

issued by a district court of the United States shall 

lie to the Supreme Court. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPEAL OF ORDER GRANTING A NATIONWIDE 

4 INJUNCTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 155 of title 28, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4219 IH

1 ‘‘§ 2285. Appeal of order granting a nationwide in2 junction 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case that a district court 

4 of the United States grants a nationwide injunction, the 

5 appeal from the order granting such injunction shall lie 

6 to the Supreme Court. 

7 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘nation8 wide injunction’ means an order issued by a Federal court 

9 that purports to restrain the enforcement of a Federal 

10 statute, regulation, order, or similar authority against a 

11 non-party, unless the non-party is represented by a party 

12 acting in a representative capacity pursuant to the Federal 

13 Rules of Civil Procedure.’’. 

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

15 for chapter 155 of title 28, United States Code is amended 

16 by inserting after the item relating to section 2285 the 

17 following: 

‘‘2285. Appeal of order granting a nationwide injunction.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS