alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DANA HOCKENSMITH, § § No. 591, 2014 Appellant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for Kent County § UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE § C.A. No. 14A-03-006 APPEAL BOARD, § § Appellee Below, § Appellee. § Submitted: November 12, 2014 Decided: December 11, 2014

Before STRINE , Chief Justice, RIDGELY and VALIHURA , Justices.

O R D E R

This 11 th day of December 2014, it appears to the Court that : (1) On October 20, 2014, the appellant, Dana Hocken smith, filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court order dated and docketed on September 17, 2014, in an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. On its face, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. Under title 10, section 148 of the Delaware Code and Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(i), the notice of appeal should have been filed on or before2

October 17, 2014. 1 To be effective, a notice of appeal must be recei ved by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within thirty days after entry upon the docket of the order from which the appeal is taken. 2 (2) On October 21, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), directing Hockensmith to show cau se why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. In her response to the notice, Hockensmith asserts that the appeal should not be d ismissed because she filed the notice of appeal on October 20, 2014, wit hin thirty days of September 20, 2014, the date she received the Septe mber 17, 2014 order. (3) “[T]he appellate jurisdiction of this [C]ourt r ests wholly upon the perfecting of an appeal within the period of li mitations fixed by law.” 3 The jurisdictional defect created by the untimely f iling of an appeal cannot be excused unless the appellant can demonstrate tha t the delay in filing the appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. 4

1 See 10 Del. C. § 148 (“No appeal from a final judgment of the Superior Court in a civil action shall be received or entertained in the Supr eme Court unless the . . . notice of appeal is duly filed in the office of the Clerk the reof within 30 days after the date of the judgment or decree.”); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(i) (p roviding that an appeal in a civil case must be filed within thirty days “after entry upon the docket of the judgment, order or decree from which the appeal is taken”).

2 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a).

3 Fisher v. Biggs , 284 A.2d 117, 118 (Del. 1971).

4 McMillan v. State , 2013 WL 5974110 (Del. Nov. 7, 2013) (citing Bey v. State , 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979)).3

(4) In this case, Hockensmith does not contend, and the record does not reflect, that her failure to timely file the ap peal is attributable to courtrelated personnel. The case does not fall within t he exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 6 and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of iParty Corp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the undersigned
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 27, 2003                 /s/ Patrick Farrell
                                     -------------------
                                     Patrick Farrell
                                     President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David R. Koos


David R. Koos


Chief Executive Officer





Date: July 12, 2010
Steven NOLTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8481.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Aaron Charles HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4031 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4031

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
       Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Lakes Restoration Initiative 
Act of 2019'' or the ``GLRI Act of 2019''.
SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE REAUTHORIZATION.
    Section 118(c)(7)(J)(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1268(c)(7)(J)(i)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``is authorized'' and inserting ``are 
    authorized'';
        (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
    semicolon;
        (3) by striking ``this paragraph $300,000,000'' and inserting 
    the following: ``this paragraph--

                    ``(I) $300,000,000''; and

        (4) by adding at the end the following:

                    ``(II) $375,000,000 for fiscal year 2022;
                    ``(III) $400,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;
                    ``(IV) $425,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;
                    ``(V) $450,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; and
                    ``(VI) $475,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Ann Kathrine HUNTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5730.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Lionel FOSTER-ADAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-6242.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Askia WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6986.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jason Ryan McDERMOTT, petitioner, v. Tamika CARLIN, Warden.

No. 17-6158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Derrick Dejuan WOOTEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2018375EN.01000201.xml

| 17.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 October 2018

(2018/C 375/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1587 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87593 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3165 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1444 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 135,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4198 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,821 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2890 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6680 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,7070 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6243 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5010 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0806 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7604 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5925 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 301,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5064 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0095 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4168 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 570,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8083 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,381 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,8119 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,733 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3017 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7751 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,1200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1587

JPY

Japanese yen

129,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87593

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3165

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1444

ISK

Iceland króna

135,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4198

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,821

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2890

RON

Romanian leu

4,6680

TRY

Turkish lira

6,7070

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6243

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5010

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0806

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7604

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5925

KRW

South Korean won

1 301,92

ZAR

South African rand

16,5064

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0095

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4168

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 570,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8083

PHP

Philippine peso

62,381

RUB

Russian rouble

75,8119

THB

Thai baht

37,733

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3017

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7751

INR

Indian rupee

85,1200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Rex H. LEWIS, petitioner, v. IOTA VIOLET, LLC, et al.

No. 17-279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      27,782,000
<SECURITIES>                                60,774,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,847,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,018,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            93,475,000
<PP&E>                                       7,939,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,726,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,537,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,181,000
<BONDS>                                      1,508,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,500,000
<COMMON>                                        41,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,558,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               109,537,000
<SALES>                                      1,670,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,997,000
<CGS>                                          669,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,387,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (42,501,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (42,501,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (42,501,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)
        

</TABLE>
Marcus A. ROBERTS, et al., petitioners, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC.

No. 17-1287.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4162 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the period under which 

an election must be made for entitlement to educational assistance under 

the All-Volunteer Educational Assistance Program of Department of Veterans Affairs, to phase out the use of such program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2019 

Mr. BERGMAN (for himself and Miss RICE of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the period 

under which an election must be made for entitlement 

to educational assistance under the All-Volunteer Educational Assistance Program of Department of Veterans 

Affairs, to phase out the use of such program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Bill Planning Act 

5 of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4162 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERIOD FOR ELECTION TO RECEIVE BENEFITS 

2 UNDER ALL-VOLUNTEER EDUCATIONAL AS3 SISTANCE PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3011 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘Any such 

8 election shall be made at the time the individual ini9 tially enters on active duty as a member of the 

10 Armed Forces’’ and inserting ‘‘Any such election 

11 shall be made during the 90-day period beginning on 

12 the day that is 180 days after the date on which the 

13 individual initially enters initial training’’; and 

14 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘that such 

15 individual is entitled to such pay’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘that begin after the date that is 270 days after the 

17 date on which the individual initially enters initial 

18 training’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

21 of enactment of this Act. 

22 SEC. 3. PHASE OUT OF ALL-VOLUNTEER EDUCATIONAL AS23 SISTANCE PROGRAM. 

24 Subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 3011 of title 38, 

25 United States Code, as amended by section 1, is further 

26 amended by striking ‘‘after June 30, 1985’’ and inserting 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4162 IH

1 ‘‘during the period beginning July 1, 1985, and ending 

2 September 30, 2029’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Abu Ali ABDUR'RAHMAN, et al., petitioners, v. Tony PARKER, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6068.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
Edgar Julian DIETRICH, petitioner, v. Anthony P. PATTI.

No. 17-6322.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 408 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report 

to Congress regarding the pension system of the United States Virgin Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to submit a report to Congress regarding the pension 

system of the United States Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sustainable Pension 

5 Plan Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING VIRGIN ISLANDS 

7 PENSION SYSTEM. 

8 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United 

9 States shall conduct a study of the pension system of the 

10 United States Virgin Islands established by law for emVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:20 Jan 20, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H408.IH H408

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 408 IH

1 ployees of the Government of the United States Virgin Is2 lands (otherwise known as the Government Employees Re3 tirement System), including— 

4 (1) an analysis of— 

5 (A) the benefits provided under such sys6 tem, including in comparison to those offered to 

7 private employees; and 

8 (B) whether such system is adequately 

9 funded; and 

10 (2) recommendations on actions that may be 

11 necessary to ensure that such system can be 

12 sustainably maintained and funded by the Govern13 ment of the United States Virgin Islands for the 20- 

14 year period beginning on the date of enactment of 

15 this Act. 

16 (b) REPORT.—The Comptroller General of the 

17 United States shall, not later than 1 year after the date 

18 of enactment of this Act, report to Congress the results 

19 of the study conducted under subsection (a), including any 

20 recommendations for legislative or administrative actions 

21 or changes with respect to the pension system considered 

22 in the study. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, petitioner, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.

No. 16-1457.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Teleconference with ICE
  
    



  When
              11/05/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Irina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Trabue BlandMark WassersuqJerry PerulloRJ CommingsJoseph AlbertBruce Tupper

  Organization(s)
              ICE


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Paul C. HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Christobal CABRAL, et al.

No. 17-389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/07/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       34,799
COMMITMENTS
   6,724    2,443    5,335   15,444   16,306   27,503   24,083    7,296   10,715

CHANGES FROM 06/30/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         97)
      -3      793      271    1,133       61    1,401    1,126   -1,304   -1,028

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.3      7.0     15.3     44.4     46.9     79.0     69.2     21.0     30.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
      10        8       16       23       17       42       37
```

----

Updated July 10, 2009