alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012248EN.01003801.xml

| 13.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 248/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 248/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 100/2012

of 30 April 2012

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 32/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 32/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1205/2011 of 22 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 7 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1205/2011 of 22 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 7 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 10ba (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008) of Annex XXII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 1205: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1205/2011 of 22 November 2011 (OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 1205: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1205/2011 of 22 November 2011 (OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 16).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1205/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 39.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 16.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michael MARTIN, petitioner, v. Robert C. TANNER, Warden.

No. 17-8420.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51069

Conference Calendar

 

KENNETH W. BOULDS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

R.D. MILES, Warden, FCI Bastrop,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A:01-CV-566-JN

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth W. Boulds, federal prisoner # 66282-079, appeals the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition based on

its determination that Boulds had not demonstrated that relief

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was inadequate or unavailable. On appeal,

Boulds renews the merits of the claims he raised in his petition. 

He briefs no argument that his claims are proper under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 or that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief is unavailable to him. 

By failing to brief such argument, Boulds has abandoned any

challenge to the reasons for the district court’s judgment and
No. 01-51069

-2-

has thus waived the sole ground for appeal. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P.

28. The appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is

DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         605,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               868,275
<PP&E>                                      16,826,673
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,941,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,752,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,752,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,752,995
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,028,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  782,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   223,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Jose PENA-TRUJILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5532.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2010063EN.01005202.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/52

---

Action brought on 15 December 2009 — AA v Commission

(Case F-101/09)

2010/C 63/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

By way of principal claim, partial annulment of the decision to classify the applicant in Grade AD6, Step 2, and an order against the defendant to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage caused. In the alternative, an order against the defendant to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage caused by the delay in recruiting the applicant.

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | As the main claim, annulment of the part of the decision of 19 February 2009 establishing the final classification of the applicant, and an order against the defendant to pay damages of EUR 320 854 and interest by way of damages and for delay at the rate of 6.75 % in respect of the material and non-material damage suffered. |
| --- | --- |

—

As the main claim, annulment of the part of the decision of 19 February 2009 establishing the final classification of the applicant, and an order against the defendant to pay damages of EUR 320 854 and interest by way of damages and for delay at the rate of 6.75 % in respect of the material and non-material damage suffered.

| — | In the alternative, an order against the defendant to pay damages of up to EUR 2 331 246 and interest by way of damages and for delay at the rate of 6.75 % in respect of the material and non-material damage caused by the delay in recruiting the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, an order against the defendant to pay damages of up to EUR 2 331 246 and interest by way of damages and for delay at the rate of 6.75 % in respect of the material and non-material damage caused by the delay in recruiting the applicant;

| — | Costs order against the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

Costs order against the European Commission.

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75529, 333-87738, 333-103032,333-113430, 333-123329, 333-132060 and 333-133167) of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. of our report dated December 6, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

December 6, 2006
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00107

- CV

Venky Venkatraman , Appellant

v.

Texas Board of Law Examiners , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAK ER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

VACATED AND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

–

OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the or der signed by th e tr i a l court on January 26, 2024

. Having reviewed

the record

, the Court holds that district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction

. Therefore,

the C ourt vacates the district court ’ s order and dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdict ion

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no ad judication of costs is made.
James MOSS, petitioner, v. Kathleen OLSON, Warden.

No. 17-6570.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”)hereby certifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof the Company’s annualreport on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 29, 2007,filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 13,  2008 |  /s/ DAVID ROBERTSON  |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |                       |
|                       | David Robertson            |
|                       | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 10.98 Translated From Japanese  Request for Loan with Draft Loan (Change) [Notice of Applicable Interest Rate Period] Application date: June 19, 2008 Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation
 Address
        11F NishiShinjuku Showa Building
 13-12 NishiShinjuku 1 cho-me, Shinjuku-ku Tokyo
 Name
        IA Partners, Inc.
 President& CEO
        Hideki Anan
  Having confirmed the following conditions, I do hereby submit a request to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation for loan with draft loan service (change) as outlined below. If you consent, please deposit the applicable amount to my (the applicants) account. If this request is the request for change and rejected after your judgment, I will not object. If I apply market rate for basic interest rate, I notify applicable interest rate period here.  Amount
        100,000,000 yenUse
        Operating fundsDesired date of deposit
        June 19, 2008
        Expected date of final repayment
        July 31, 2008
  Payment details
        Payment cycle
        Payment date
        Number of payments
        Amount repaidmonths
        of each month
        times
        YenYenYenYenFinal due date
        
        100,000,000 yenMethod of interest payment
        Lump sum paymentHandling of bank holidays
        In the event that one of the dates above falls on a bank holiday, the payment shall be made on the following business day.
  Basic interest rate
        □  Short-term prime rate
        Applicable interest rate
        3.35% APR□Applicable interest
rate period
        In the event that the applicable interest rate period is divided within the borrowing period and rates are adjusted accordingly:Starts:
Ends:
        1. Rates automatically adjusted on theeverymonths.
2. Notification made each time with Notice of Applicable Interest Rate Period.
  -------------------------------------------For Bank Use--------------------------------------------------------- Branch No.
        Branch Name
        Process for Final Date
        Decision (Approved / Not Approved)
        Verification
        Verification
        Person in Charge
        Transaction copy check
        Loan seal check0223
        Nakano Branch
        Manager
        Section Chief
        Person in ChargeLoan Acct. No.
        Activity No.
        □ Automatic transfer2000350
        0400017
        □ ID check
PAPIERFABRIK AUGUST KOEHLER SE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             565
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   565
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,080
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       713 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4370 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4370

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to veterans with 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2019

   Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Armstrong, and Mr. Hunter) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to veterans with 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TBI and PTSD Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY FOR VETERANS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN 
              INJURY OR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1710E the following new section:
``Sec. 1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress 
              disorder: hyperbaric oxygen therapy
    ``(a) Authority.--The Secretary shall furnish hyperbaric oxygen 
therapy to a veteran who has a condition specified in subsection (b) 
through a health care provider described in section 1703(c)(5) of this 
title.
    ``(b) Covered Conditions.--The conditions specified in this 
subsection are the following:
            ``(1) Traumatic brain injury.
            ``(2) Post-traumatic stress disorder.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1710E the following new item:

``1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder: 
                            hyperbaric oxygen therapy.''.
                                 <all>
```
|EXHIBIT 32.1STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,   Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:   April 12, 2008 |  |                        
|                       |  | /s/     Ian M. Herman  
|                       |  | Ian M. Herman          
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer

---
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Global Markets Advisory Committee Meeting 

March 11, 2021

AGENDA 

9:00 AM

Welcome and Opening Remarks 

• Commissioner Dawn D. Stump (GMAC Sponsor) 

• Acting Chairman Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz 

• Commissioner Dan Berkovitz 

9:30 AM

Panel 1: Trends in Retail Investing and Impact on Global Derivatives Markets 

Description: A discussion of recent developments in retail investing activity in the global derivatives 

markets. Panelists will discuss the data surrounding retail activity, certain of the CFTC’s core principles 

for Designated Contract Markets and their particular relevance to retail market participants, and 

international differences in the regulation of retail activity in the derivatives markets. 

Presenters: 

• Mel Gunewardena, Chief Market Intelligence Officer, and Eugene Kunda, Market Analyst, 

Markets Intelligence Branch, Division of Market Oversight, CFTC 

• Jonathan Lave, Associate Director, Division of Market Oversight, CFTC 

• Alison Beer, Senior Legal Counsel, Derivatives Branch, Ontario Securities Commission

10:45 AM

Panel 2: Derivatives Clearing: 2020 in Review 

Description: A continuation of the discussion from the December 17, 2020 GMAC meeting on 

derivatives clearing in 2020, with a particular focus on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global 

clearing. Panelists will discuss, among other topics, the impact of the pandemic on margin 

requirements, clearing volume, and CCP operations. 

Presenters: 

• Pedro Gurrola-Perez, Head of Research, The World Federation of Exchanges Ltd.

• Nicholas Lincoln, Group Head of Market Risk & Liquidity Risk, LCH Group 

• Ulrich Karl, Head of Clearing Services, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

11:45 AM Closing Remarks 

12:00 PM Adjourn Meeting
Michael SMITH, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Order entered January 31, 2018 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01416-CR 

No. 05-16-01417-CR 

SUSAN GAY PRUITT, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 380-82407-2014, 380-32408-2014 

ORDER 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the September 18, 2017 motion of 

Lara E. Bracamonte for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to remove Lara E. Bracamonte as counsel of record for appellant. We 

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to 

Susan Gay Pruitt, TDCJ No. 02101449, Christina Melton Crain Unit, 1401 State School Road, 

Gatesville, Texas, 76599-2999. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
In Re Derek LUCAS, petitioner.

No. 17-6564.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Charles A. BOWSHER, petitioner, v. LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT.

No. 16-9497.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In Re Terry G. WATSON, petitioner.

No. 17-6510.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.