alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014256EN.01001601.xml

| 28.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 42/2014

of 8 April 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 463/2013 of 17 May 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to fertilisers for the purposes of adapting Annexes I, II and IV thereto to technical progress (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 463/2013 of 17 May 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to fertilisers for the purposes of adapting Annexes I, II and IV thereto to technical progress (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 R 0463: Commission Regulation (EU) No 463/2013 of 17 May 2013 (OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 R 0463: Commission Regulation (EU) No 463/2013 of 17 May 2013 (OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 463/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 April 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
John JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Dennis DINGUS, Warden.

No. 17-5518.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4279 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Melinda Gene Piccotti Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4279 RFS

1 SECTION 1. MELINDA GENE PICCOTTI POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, 

4 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Melinda Gene Piccotti Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Melinda Gene Piccotti 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
DLD
- 248 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 4

- 1811

___________ IN RE: TERRELL GEE , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States Dist rict Court for the District of Delaware (Related to D. Del. Ci v . No. 1

- 11

- c v - 00 416)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

May 8, 2014 Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN and NYGAARD , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 16, 2014 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Terrell Gee filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the District Court to rule on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus . For the reason that follow s , we will deny the mandamus petitio n. Gee filed a habeas corpus petition in 2011 , which the District Court dismissed as time

- barred on April 3, 2014. Prior to that disposition, the matter had been pending without action fo r two years. Gee prepared and mailed his mandamus petition before the2

District Court acted on his habeas petition, but the mandamus petition was docketed shortly after the District Court’s decision. The Clerk notified Gee that a decision had been issued regarding his habeas petition, but Gee did not seek to withdraw his mandamus petition

. As the District Court has already done what Gee asks this Court to order it to do

– rule on his habeas petition

– Gee ’s mandamus petition is moot. See In re Surrick , 338 F.3d 224, 230 (3d Cir. 2003) ( noti ng that “the central question of all mootness problems is whether changes in circumstances that prevailed at the beginning of the litigation have forestalled any occasion for meaningful relief”) (quotation marks omitted)

. W e will therefore deny the mandamus petit ion.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/19/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       82,266
COMMITMENTS
  24,892    3,783   10,243   29,792   45,832   64,926   59,857   17,339   22,409

CHANGES FROM 05/12/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -580)
     723     -679     -758      732    1,359      697      -79   -1,276     -501

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.3      4.6     12.5     36.2     55.7     78.9     72.8     21.1     27.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      128)
      35       16       23       54       57      104       84
```

----

Updated May 22, 2009
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/11/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       87,814
COMMITMENTS
   1,076    9,069    4,503   73,080   61,628   78,659   75,200    9,155   12,614

CHANGES FROM 05/04/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,766)
    -492     -116     -874   19,628   18,599   18,262   17,609   -5,496   -4,843

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.2     10.3      5.1     83.2     70.2     89.6     85.6     10.4     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       2       14        7       28       28       36       43
```

----

Updated May 14, 2010
#### Hinton Folsom, as Tax Collector of Jackson County Florida, and Ernest Amos, as Comptroller of The State of Florida, *Appellants,*v. First National Bank of Marianna, a corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed April 1, 1929.

*425
      *James E. Finch*and *Fred E. Davis,*Attorney General, for Appellants;

*B. S. Pierce, Jr.,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The decree herein is affirmed on the authority of Roberts, Tax Collector v. American National Bank of Pensacola, this day filed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7009
JABARI ZAKIYA, formerly known as Douglas Ross, Petitioner - Appellant, versus KATHLEEN HAWK, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-468-AM) Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: March 25, 1999Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jabari Zakiya, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jabari Zakiya appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) the district court’s earlier order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zakiya v. Hawk , No. CA-98-468-AM (E.D. Va. May 28, 1998). We also deny Zakiya’s petition for a writ of mandamus essentially seeking the same relief as prayed for in his Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Hanover Foods Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.







Date:  October 15, 2003

                                              /s/ John A. Warehime
                                              -----------------------
                                              John A.Warehime
                                              Chief Executive Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
Annette CUMMINGS, petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION SECURITY POLICE AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS OF AMERICA (SPFPA), LOCAL 555, et al.

No. 16-8812.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 29, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-13212 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cv-61448-JIC

DONN LILES,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

STUART WEITZMAN, LLC,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(March 29, 2011)

Before BARKETT, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Donn Liles appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of his former

employer, Stuart Weitzman, LLC (“Stuart Weitzman”), in his
employment-discrimination action, brought under the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1), and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla.

Stat.§ 760.10(1)(a) (2009). After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and

the record in this case and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no

reversible error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Stuart

Weitzman. 

AFFIRMED.

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11715]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)), and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated April 5, 2022, I hereby determine that an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine. I further determine that the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $100 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated. April 5, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-08261 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
William W. SPENCER, Jr., petitioner, v. James MATTIS, Secretary of Defense.

No. 17-461.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2010125EN.01000101.xml

| 21.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/1

---

Amendment to the Customs Convention on the international transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention) of 14 November 1975
   (1)

According to the UN Depositary Notification C.N.387.2009.TREATIES-3 the following amendment has entered into force on 1 October 2009 for all Contracting Parties

In Annex 6, the following Explanatory Note is inserted:

| ‘0.3. | Article 3 |
| --- | --- |

‘0.3.

| 0.3(a)(iii) | The provisions of Article 3(a)(iii) do not cover passenger cars (HS code 8703) travelling by their own means. However, passenger cars may be carried under the TIR procedure if transported by means of other vehicles as referred to in subparagraph (a)(i) and (a)(ii) of Article 3.’ |
| --- | --- |

0.3(a)(iii)

---

(1)  Consolidated text published by Council Decision 2009/477/EC (OJ L 165, 26.6.2009, p. 1).

1

---
# L_2005010EN.01002201.xml

| 13.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/22

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks

The Agreement between the European Community and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks (1), entered into force on 1 June 2004, the procedures provided for in Article 41 of the Agreement having been completed on 27 April 2004.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 35 of 6.2.2004, p. 3.

1

---
John Howard BRADY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6560.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,806,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,849,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   323,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,023,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,909,000
<PP&E>                                       2,526,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,660,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,433,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,415,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    22,661,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,413,000
<SALES>                                      4,378,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,378,000
<CGS>                                        2,724,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,726,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,326,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (661,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (661,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2010101EN.01001801.xml

| 22.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 101/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 101/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 9/2010

of 29 January 2010

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2009 of 3 July 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2009 of 3 July 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2009/36/EC of 16 April 2009 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annex III thereto to technical progress (2), as corrected by OJ L 103, 23.4.2009, p. 30, is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2009/36/EC of 16 April 2009 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annex III thereto to technical progress (2), as corrected by OJ L 103, 23.4.2009, p. 30, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 L 0036: Commission Directive 2009/36/EC of 16 April 2009 (OJ L 98, 17.4.2009, p. 31), as corrected by OJ L 103, 23.4.2009, p. 30.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 L 0036: Commission Directive 2009/36/EC of 16 April 2009 (OJ L 98, 17.4.2009, p. 31), as corrected by OJ L 103, 23.4.2009, p. 30.’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/36/EC, as corrected by OJ L 103, 23.4.2009, p. 30, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 January 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 January 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 277, 22.10.2009, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 98, 17.4.2009, p. 31.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Charlton Reed TIPTON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-8449.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.