alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4323 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4323

 To provide for the rescheduling of marijuana into schedule III of the 
                       Controlled Substances Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2019

 Mr. Steube (for himself and Mr. Gaetz) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the rescheduling of marijuana into schedule III of the 
                       Controlled Substances Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marijuana 1-to-3 Act of 2019''.

SECTION 1. RESCHEDULING OF MARIJUANA.

    Notwithstanding section 201 and subsections (a) and (b) of section 
202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811, 812) respecting 
the scheduling of controlled substances, the Attorney General of the 
United States shall, by order not later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this section, transfer marijuana (for purposes of this Act 
given the same meaning given the term ``marihuana'' in section 102 of 
such Act) from schedule I of such Act to schedule III of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

**Exhibit 99.16**

**CONSENT OF PETER DROBECK, P. GEO**

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reportand documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated byreference into i) the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the“Company”) and ii) the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No.333-162371) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission:

|   | 1.     | Information relating to the mineral properties for Venus, Los Jarros andMezquite;                                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The annual information form of the Company dated March 23, 2011, whichincludes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Ocampo property, and the properties described therein. |

Date: March 23, 2011 

By: /s/ Peter Drobeck                                                       Peter Drobeck, Registered Geologist Senior VP, Exploration & Business Development Gammon Gold Inc. 

 

----
Yino HERNANDEZ-CARDONA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5421.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Shongo LeCarr OWENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8982.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 233/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 233 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6321 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 233

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6321 July 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/1067 of 13 July 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation in the context of negotiations under Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994 on the modification of Switzerland’s WTO concessions with regard to seasoned meat | 1 |
| | * | Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation in the context of negotiations under Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994 on the modification of Switzerland’s WTO concessions with regard to seasoned meat | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1067 of 13 July 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation in the context of negotiations under Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994 on the modification of Switzerland’s WTO concessions with regard to seasoned meat

1

*

Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation in the context of negotiations under Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994 on the modification of Switzerland’s WTO concessions with regard to seasoned meat

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Michael E. PARKER, Sr., petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 16-8720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

Exhibit 99.11

Consent of Gordon Skrecky

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of AuRico Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with the following reports and documents,
included in the 2012 Annual Information Form of AuRico Gold Inc., dated April 1, 2013 (the “AIF”):

Sections 3, 4, 5, 17, 18, 20.4.3, 20.4.6, 20.4.7, 20.4.8, 20.4.9, 21.4.1, 21.4.2, 21.6, and 22.2.4 of the NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Kemess Underground Project, British Columbia, Canada

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-177638, File No. 333-175079 and File No. 333-173458 ) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-177404) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this 1st day of  April, 2013.

/s/ Gordon SkreckyBy: Gordon Skrecky, PEng 
        Title: Project manager 
        Company: AuRico Gold Inc

---
# L_2005066EN.01002701.xml

| 12.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/27

---

DECISION No 1/2005 OF THE EUROPEAN UNION-MEXICO JOINT COUNCIL

of 21 February 2005

introducing a corrigendum in Decision No 3/2004 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council

(2005/203/EC)

THE JOINT COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part (1), signed in Brussels on 8 December 1997, and in particular Article 47 thereof,

Having regard to Decision No 3/2004 (2) and in particular Article 1(1) and (2) thereof,

Whereas:

It is necessary to introduce a corrigendum with regard to the entry into force of the two Community tariff quotas included in Decision No 3/2004,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following wording shall be inserted below the tariff quotas included in Annex I and II to Decision No 3/2004:

‘This quota will be open from 1 May 2004 to 31 December 2004 and from 1 January to 31 December of each calendar year thereafter, for as long as the quota remains applicable’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on an exchange of written notifications certifying the completion of the necessary legal procedures. The date of entry into force shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the Official Journal of the United Mexican States.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2005.

For the Joint Council

The President

L. E. DERBEZ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 276, 28.10.2000, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 293, 16.9.2004, p. 15.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.27(1)



                         FIRST AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT
                              CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

         This First Amendment to Independent Contractor Agreement (the
"Amendment") is entered into as of the 23rd day of July, 1999, by and between
JORE CORPORATION, a Montana corporation (the "Company") and THOMAS E. MAHONEY,
a resident of the State of Connecticut ("Contractor"), with reference to the
following facts:

                                    RECITALS

         A. The Company and Contractor entered into that certain Independent
Contractor Agreement, effective as of June 3, 1999 (the "Agreement").

         B. The Company and Contractor desire to amend the Agreement by this
Amendment.

         IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES set forth in this Amendment and
in the Agreement, the Company and Contractor hereby amend the Agreement as
follows:

         1. Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following new Section 3.1:

                  3.1 The Company shall pay Contractor the sum of One Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for his services under this Agreement. Payment of
the amount due hereunder shall be made on January 21, 2000.


         2. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.


JORE CORPORATION                            CONTRACTOR



_____________________________               ________________________________
By:  Matt Jore                              Thomas E. Mahoney
Its:  President
James GARLICK, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-5385.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

*503Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
Dale RUSSELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
RECYCLE FOR CHANGE, petitioner, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert Noble HAMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5879.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2013056EN.01000201.xml

| 28.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/2

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultry meat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994, and of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Thailand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultry meat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultry meat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994, and the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Thailand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultry meat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994, signed on 18 June 2012 with Thailand and on 26 June 2012 with Brazil, will enter into force on 1 March 2013.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 13, 2021

No. 04-21-00321-CR

Charles I. COPELAND,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10159

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on September 27, 2021. The court reporter filed a 

notification of late record. The notification of late reporter’s record is hereby NOTED.

Time is extended to October 27, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Brian DORSEY, petitioner, v. Cindy GRIFFITH, Warden.

No. 17-6162.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4396 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4396

   To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to remove the record of 
 default on a loan made, insured, or guaranteed under title IV from a 
borrower's credit history upon repayment of the full amount due on such 
                                 loan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2019

   Ms. Mucarsel-Powell (for herself and Ms. Stevens) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to remove the record of 
 default on a loan made, insured, or guaranteed under title IV from a 
borrower's credit history upon repayment of the full amount due on such 
                                 loan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Slate through Repayment Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RECORD OF DEFAULT.

    Part G of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1088 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 493E. REMOVAL OF RECORD OF DEFAULT.

    ``Upon repaying in full the amount due on a defaulted loan made, 
insured, or guaranteed under this title, the Secretary, guaranty 
agency, or other holder of the loan shall request any consumer 
reporting agency to which the Secretary, guaranty agency or holder, as 
applicable, reported the default of the loan, to remove the record of 
the default from the borrower's credit history.''.
                                 <all>
```
|  | **Commodity Futures Trading     Commission**     Office of External Affairs (202) 418-5080     Three Lafayette Centre     1155 21st Street, NW     Washington, DC 20581 |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Release: 4982-04****For Release: August 30, 2004**

**Statement of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission****Issued on August 30, 2004**

     WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has     completed its seven-month investigation of the sharp upward movement in prices in the     natural gas market that occurred in late 2003. The CFTC’s investigation, which     was initiated in early December 2003, did not uncover evidence that any entity or     individual engaged in activity with an intent to cause an artificial price in natural     gas in late 2003. According to the information obtained during the investigation, the     increase in natural gas prices during that time was the result of distinct factors,     including market reaction to colder than expected weather in the northeast United     States during the first week in December 2003, and market statements and projections     regarding the inventory of natural gas in underground storage caverns made in late     November/early December 2003.    

     The CFTC’s investigation included the extensive review of documents and audio     recordings produced by numerous companies and individuals in the natural gas markets,     including physical and financial traders, industry analysts, and operators of natural     gas storage facilities, as well as testimony and interviews of dozens of individuals.    

     The CFTC conducted its investigation in full cooperation with the Federal Energy     Regulatory Commission (FERC). The CFTC’s investigative work was enhanced by the     cooperative effort of the New York Mercantile Exchange.    

     “Under the Commodity Exchange Act, the primary and chief responsibility of the     CFTC is to ensure that the markets that it regulates are free of manipulation and     fraud. The CFTC recognizes that confidence in the natural gas markets is partially     based on the timely flow of clear and accurate market information and looks forward to     participating, along with other federal agencies and interested market participants,     in the upcoming technical conference sponsored by the FERC. The CFTC’s interest     is to ensure that the pricing of any contract is a function of market participants.     The CFTC will continue to monitor market information and aggressively pursue any     individual or entity that intentionally seeks to undermine the integrity of futures     markets. I wish to commend the team of highly professional attorneys, economists and     investigators who worked diligently on this investigation,” said Acting     Chairman, Sharon Brown-Hruska.    

     # # #    

**Media Contacts**     Alan Sobba     (202) 418-5080     Dennis Holden     (202) 418-5088     Office of External Affairs
Ronald GRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7769.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
Michael Leroy JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6167.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/02/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       46,394
COMMITMENTS
   4,778    5,049    4,609   26,840   30,905   36,227   40,563   10,167    5,831

CHANGES FROM 02/23/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,187)
     331        6       68      459    1,872      858    1,946    2,329    1,241

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.3     10.9      9.9     57.9     66.6     78.1     87.4     21.9     12.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
      12        9       16       17       16       40       35
```

----

Updated March 2, 2010
In Re Jeremy Christopher SOUTHGATE, petitioner.

No. 16-8748.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Saul GUTIERREZ, petitioner, v. Martin BITER, Warden.

No. 17-5806.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GREGOR

Y L. DOW DY, Pe titione r - Appe lla nt, v. B EN C URR

Y, W arde n, R

e sponde n t - Appe lle e . No. 10-17445

D.C . No. 3:09-c v-03144-WHA M EM O R ANDUM *

GREGOR

Y L. DOW DY, Pe titione r - Appe lla nt, v. B EN C URR

Y, W arde n, R

e sponde n t - Appe lle e . No. 14-15604

D.C . No. 3:09-c v-03144-WHA

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia W illia m H . Alsup, Distric t Judge , Pre siding 

# FIL ED SEP 22 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.Subm itte d Se pte m be r 15, 2015 * * San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : C ALLAHAN, C HR ISTEN, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Gre gory Dowdy pe t itione d the distric t c ourt for a writ of ha be a s c orpus. The distric t c o urt dismisse d his pe tition a s untim e l y and de nie d a late r m otion to se t a side this de n ia l. Dowdy a p pe a ls, a rguing tha

t he wa s e ntitle d to e quita

ble tolling be c a use his m e nta l illne ss pre ve nte d him from filing a tim e ly pe tition. W e a ffirm . 1 Dowdy ha s not sa

t isfie d the te st for e quita

ble tolling unde

r the Antite rrorism and Effe c tive De ath Pe na lty Ac t (“ AEDPA” ) be c a

use he ha s not shown tha

t (1) his m e nta l im pa irm e nt wa s a

n “ e xtra ordina

ry c irc um sta

nc e ” tha t re n de re d him

una ble to e i the r “ pe rsona l ly

unde rsta nd the ne e d to tim e ly

file ” or “ pe rsona lly

to pre pa re a ha be a s pe tition a

nd e ffe c tuate its filing”

and (2) de spite his “ d ilige nc e in pursuing the c la i m s to thee xte nt he c ould unde rsta nd the m , . . . the m e nta l im p a i rm e nt m a de it im possibleto m e e t the filing de a dline .” Bills v . C lark , 628 F.3d 1092, 1099–1100 (9th C ir. 2010) (c iting H olland v . Florida , 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010)). As the distric t c ourt found a nd the re c ord supports, me dic ation a de quate ly c ontrolle d Dowdy ’ s m e nta l im p a irm e nt a

t le a st from 2002 to 2008. During this

** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The pa

rtie s a re fam ilia r with thefa c t s, so we will not re c ount the m he re .tim e , Dowdy ’ s Globa l Asse ssm e nt Func tioning (“ GAF” ) indic ate d only m o de ra te sym ptom s of im

pa irm e nt, a

nd Dowdy file d two sta

t e ha be a s pe titions a

n d a nothe r fe de ra l ha be a s pe t ition. AFFIRM E D