alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ALLONGE
2


TO



CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURE


DUE
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018


 


This
Allonge 2 (“Allonge”) is made as of June 13, 2018, by The Greater Cannabis Company, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Borrower”)
to Emet Capital Partners LLC (“Holder”). Reference is hereby made to that certain Convertible Note Due September 14,
2018 issued by Borrower to Holder dated September 14, 2017 (“Debenture”). Except as amended hereby, the terms of the
Debenture remain as originally stated. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Debenture.


 


1.       The
Principal Amount as stated on the face of the Debenture shall be increased to $31,350.00 ($13,750.00 original Principal Amount
of the Debenture + $12,100.00 Allonge dated March 28, 2018 + $5,500 Allonge hereto the “New Principal”). The amendment
to the Principal Amount due and owing on the Debenture described herein notwithstanding, Holder does not waive interest that may
have accrued at a default rate of interest and liquidated damages, if any, that may have accrued on the Debenture through the
date of this Allonge, which default interest and liquidated damages, if any, remain outstanding and payable.


 


2.       In
the event that the Borrower’s signature is delivered by facsimile transmission, PDF, electronic signature or other similar
electronic means, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the Borrower with the same force and effect as
if such signature page were an original thereof.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Allonge is executed as of the date written above.


 


THE GREATER CANNABIS COMPANY, INC.


 





	By:	/s/
    Wayne Anderson	 
	Name:	Wayne
    Anderson	 
	Title:	CEO
Kenneth B. VICTORIA, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5316.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.6


 


PROCACCIANTI CONVERTIBLE FUND, LLC


 


ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST


 


As used herein, the
following capitalized terms have the following meanings:


 


	“Assignor”	Procaccianti Convertible Fund, LLC
	 	 
	“Assignee”	Procaccianti Hotel REIT, Inc. 
	 	 
	“Assigned Interest”	51.0% Class B Membership Interests in the Company 
	 	 
	“Company”	Procaccianti Convertible Fund, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
	 	 
	“Operating Agreement”	Operating Agreement of the Company, as amended from time to time and in effect on the date hereof


 


This Assignment includes
all rights in and claims to any Company profits and losses, undistributed dividends or distributions of any kind, and any other
benefits of any nature allocable, under the Operating Agreement to the Assigned Interest hereby assigned arising on and after the
date hereof.


 


Assignor agrees with,
and represents and warrants to Assignee that Assignor owns the Assigned Interest free and clear of any liens, charges or encumbrances.


 


Provided that there
is no cost or expense to Assignor, Assignor agrees to execute and deliver such further instruments and to take such further actions
as may be reasonably necessary to transfer the Assigned Interest to Assignee.


 


Assignee accepts all the right, title and interest
transferred by Assignor pursuant to this Assignment of Membership Interest. Assignee assumes and agrees to observe, perform and
be bound by all the terms and provisions of the Operating Agreement. Assignee agrees to be bound by the terms of any notes, mortgages,
leases or other documents required in connection therewith and any other agreements relating to the Company to the extent of its
interest in the Company.


 


[Reminder of Page Intentionally Blank]


 




    	 	 	Page
                                         1
                                         of 2



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Assignment and Assumption Agreement on the 29th day of March 2018.


 


	 	ASSIGNOR:
	 	 
	 	Procaccianti Convertible Fund, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James A. Procaccianti 
	 	 	James A. Procaccianti, Manager
	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE:
	 	 
	 	Procaccianti Hotel REIT, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James A. Procaccianti
	 	 	James A. Procaccianti, President


 




    	 	 	Page
                                         2
                                         of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4323 

To provide for the rescheduling of marijuana into schedule III of the 

Controlled Substances Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself and Mr. GAETZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the rescheduling of marijuana into schedule 

III of the Controlled Substances Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marijuana 1–to–3 Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SECTION 1. RESCHEDULING OF MARIJUANA. 

7 Notwithstanding section 201 and subsections (a) and 

8 (b) of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

9 U.S.C. 811, 812) respecting the scheduling of controlled 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4323 IH

1 substances, the Attorney General of the United States 

2 shall, by order not later than 60 days after the date of 

3 enactment of this section, transfer marijuana (for pur4 poses of this Act given the same meaning given the term 

5 ‘‘marihuana’’ in section 102 of such Act) from schedule 

6 I of such Act to schedule III of such Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary S. Hirstein, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of International Fuel Technology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained inSEC Release 34-47986]; and(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s internal controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s discloure control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.           March 14, 2006 By:      /s/ *Gary S. Hirstein*           Gary S. Hirstein                  Principal financial and accounting officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                           DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF
                           TRANSDIGM HOLDING COMPANY
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of TransDigm Holding Company, hereby
constitute and appoint Gregory Rufus, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, as attorney-in-fact for each of the undersigned, and in the
name, place and stead of each of the undersigned, to execute on behalf of each
of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2001 pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 and to execute any and all amendments to such report and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents required to be filed in connection
therewith, granting to such attorney full power to act with or without the
others, and to have full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and
on behalf of each of the undersigned, every act whatsoever necessary, advisable
or appropriate to be done in the premises, hereby ratifying and approving the
act of said attorney and any such substitute.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

                       EXECUTED as of December 28, 2001.

        /s/ Douglas W. Peacock                       /s/ William Hopkins
----------------------------------------      ---------------------------------
          Douglas W. Peacock                      William Hopkins, Director
        Chairman of the Board



         /s/ W. Nicholas Howley                      /s/ Muzzafar Mirza
----------------------------------------      ---------------------------------
          W. Nicholas Howley                     Muzzafar Mirza, Director
 President and Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)



            /s/ Stephen Berger                        /s/ John W. Paxton
----------------------------------------      ---------------------------------
        Stephen Berger, Director                  John W. Paxton, Director



          /s/ Thomas R. Wall, IV
----------------------------------------
      Thomas R. Wall, IV, Director
Stuart J. BOYKIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6291.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

*438Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Erin S. THOMAS, petitioner, v. WEST VIRGINIA.

No. 16-1018.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
---

---

EXHIBIT 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 File No. 333-10840; Form S-8 File No.
333-12814; Form S-8 File No. 333-13186; Form S-8 File No. 333-91650; Form S-8 File No.
333-122128) of Optibase Ltd. of our report, dated January 31, 2006, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Optibase Ltd., included in the Annual
Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

|                 |                                 
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|April 12, 2006   | A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---
SEVENTH AMENDMENT

                         APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


     THIS  SEVENTH  AMENDMENT is adopted  this 30th day of  November,  2006,  by
Applebee's International, inc. a Delaware corporation.

     WHEREAS,  Applebee's  International,   Inc.  (the  "Company")  adopted  the
Applebee's  International,  Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), with
the Plan intended to qualify as an "employee  stock purchase plan" under Section
423 of the Internal Revenue Code;

     WHEREAS, the Plan permits eligible employees of the Company to purchase the
common stock of the Company at a discount from its trading price on NASDAQ;

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  reserved  the  right to amend the Plan from time to
time, subject to certain restrictions specified in Section 15.2 of the Plan; and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  now  desires  to  amend  the  Plan  in  the  manner
hereinafter set forth.

     NOW THEREFORE, effective as of the date provided below, the Plan is amended
as follows:

     1. The first two  sentences of Section 7.2 are replaced  with the following
three sentences:

     "The aggregate  number of shares  originally  available for offer under the
Plan was two hundred  thousand  (200,000),  which has been adjusted from time to
time pursuant to Section 15.3 and  increased  from time to time by amendments to
the Plan. If this  amendment is approved by the requisite  vote of the Company's
stockholders  in accordance  with the Company's  bylaws no later than  November,
2007, then effective January 1, 2007,  500,000  additional shares shall be added
to the number of shares available for offer under this Plan."

     2. The provisions of this Amendment are effective as of the dates set forth
herein. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Company has executed this Amendment as of the 30th
day of November, 2006.


                                    APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                    "Company"


                                    By: /s/ Becky Tilden
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                    Title: Vice President/General Counsel
                                          --------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2021

t0323 

# Order

Clerk March 26, 2021

158934 & (22)(27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158934

COA: 344555

Macomb CC: 2005

- 000797

- FH

JACOB PLANTE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of July 29, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the November 26,

2018 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People

v Betts (Docket No. 148981). On order of the Court, the parties having filed a joint

motion to remand this case to the Macomb Circuit Court, the motion is considered, and it

is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and

without costs. We REMAND this case to the circuit court for any further necessary

proceedings. The motion to hold this case in abeyance is DENIED as moot

.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP21-340-000; RP21-794-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Motion of ANR Pipeline Company to Withdraw Tariff 
Filing RP21-340-000, et al.
    Filed Date: 04/12/2022.
    Accession Number: 20220412-5177.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/27/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-818-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Negotiated Rate, 
Conforming IW Agreement 4.11.22 to be effective 4/11/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/12/22.
    Accession Number: 20220412-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/25/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 13, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08371 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
ESTATE OF E. Wayne HAGE, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Derek Edward BENEDICT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5953.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Henry E. GOSSAGE, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 17-484.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 06, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David THOMAS SINGLETON, petitioner, v. Keith COOLEY, Warden.

No. 17-5294.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2011171EN.01000701.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/7

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 10/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 62/2010 of 11 June 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 62/2010 of 11 June 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2009/108/EC of 17 August 2009 amending, for the purposes of adapting it to technical progress, Directive 97/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of two or three-wheel motor vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2009/108/EC of 17 August 2009 amending, for the purposes of adapting it to technical progress, Directive 97/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of two or three-wheel motor vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 45x (Directive 97/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter I of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 L 0108: Commission Directive 2009/108/EC of 17 August 2009 (OJ L 213, 18.8.2009, p. 10).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 L 0108: Commission Directive 2009/108/EC of 17 August 2009 (OJ L 213, 18.8.2009, p. 10).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/108/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 244, 16.9.2010, p. 8.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 213, 18.8.2009, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Darron BREWER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-6660.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.