alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit 99.15**

 

**CONSENT OF BARTON G. STONE, C.P.G. & PINCOCK, ALLEN & HOLT**

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of our names inconnection with the following report and documents, which are being filed asexhibits to and incorporated by reference into; i) the Annual Report on Form40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the "Company") and ii) the Company's RegistrationStatement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-162371) being filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission:

|   | 1.     | The technical report dated November 25, 2002, entitled "Guadalupe y Calvo    Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua, Mexico," (the "Guadalupe Report"); and                                           |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | 2.     | The Annual Information Form of the Company dated March 23, 2011, which    includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the    Guadalupe Report, and the properties described therein. |

Dated: March 23, 2011

/s/ Barton G.Stone                                                **BARTON G. STONE, C.P.G.**Chief Geologist

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
conjunction with the annual report on Form 10-K of International Fuel
Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”),




I,
Jonathan R. Burst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March
      31, 2009
                
                By:
                /s/Jonathan
      R. BurstJonathan
      R. BurstPrincipal
      executive officer
Isaac GRAY, petitioner, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, et al.

No. 16-9474.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4031 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4031

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
      Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

Mr. Joyce of Ohio (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Huizenga, Mrs. Dingell, 
Mr. Quigley, Mr. Ryan, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. Rush, 
Mr. Kildee, Ms. Moore, Mr. Casten of Illinois, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Katko, 
  Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Gonzalez of 
Ohio, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Collins of New York, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Fudge, 
   Mr. Upton, Mr. Reed, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Gibbs, Mrs. 
Walorski, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Levin of Michigan, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Kind, 
   Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Foster, Mrs. Lawrence, Ms. McCollum, Mr. 
  Moolenaar, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Turner, and Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
      Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Lakes Restoration Initiative 
Act of 2019'' or the ``GLRI Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 118(c)(7)(J)(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1268(c)(7)(J)(i)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``is authorized'' and inserting ``are 
        authorized'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (3) by striking ``this paragraph $300,000,000'' and 
        inserting the following: ``this paragraph--
                                    ``(I) $300,000,000''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(II) $375,000,000 for fiscal year 
                                2022;
                                    ``(III) $400,000,000 for fiscal 
                                year 2023;
                                    ``(IV) $425,000,000 for fiscal year 
                                2024;
                                    ``(V) $450,000,000 for fiscal year 
                                2025; and
                                    ``(VI) $475,000,000 for fiscal year 
                                2026.''.
                                 <all>
```
Keith Deshawn STEPHENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5186.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
      12.1**





**Certification**





I,
      Jeffrey Lymburner, certify that:





1.  I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Northcore Technologies
      Inc.





2.  Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:





a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
      Not applicable;





c)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





d)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
      auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





a)
      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and





b)
      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting.








Dated:  June
                22, 2007
            
            /s/
                Jeffrey LymburnerJeffrey
                LymburnerChief
                Executive Officer
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Rufus Seth WILLIAMS.

No. D-3006.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Rufus Seth Williams, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be *498disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Chad Alan CREWS, aka Chedda, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6898.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Christopher LOCK, et al., petitioners, v. Cindia TORRES, et al.

No. 17-611.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4356 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4356

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to allow certain 
 individuals to terminate contracts for telephone, multichannel video 
    programming, or internet access service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Families of Fallen 
Servicemembers Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS FOR TELEPHONE, MULTICHANNEL VIDEO 
              PROGRAMMING, OR INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE BY CERTAIN 
              INDIVIDUALS UNDER SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

    Section 305A(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 
3956(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Additional individuals covered.--For purposes of this 
        section, the following individuals shall be treated as a 
        servicemember covered by paragraph (1):
                    ``(A) A spouse or dependent of a servicemember who 
                dies while in military service or a spouse or dependent 
                of a member of the reserve components who dies while 
                performing duty described in subparagraph (C).
                    ``(B) A spouse or dependent of a servicemember who 
                incurs a catastrophic injury or illness (as that term 
                is defined in section 439(g) of title 37, United States 
                Code), if the servicemember incurs the catastrophic 
                injury or illness while in military service or 
                performing duty described in subparagraph (C).
                    ``(C) A member of the reserve components performing 
                military service or performing full-time National Guard 
                duty, active Guard and Reserve duty, or inactive-duty 
                training (as such terms are defined in section 101(d) 
                of title 10, United States Code).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 12, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 4356

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to allow certain 
 individuals to terminate contracts for telephone, multichannel video 
    programming, or internet access service, and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT
12.2
  Certification
 
 I,
Tam Nguyen, certify that:
 
 1.  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Northcore Technologies
Inc.
 
 2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in
SEC Release No. 34-47986;
 
 c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Dated:  March
      19, 2008
              /s/
      Tam NguyenTam
      NguyenCorporate
      Controller
Jason BLACK, petitioner, v. John SUTTON, Warden.

No. 17-5009.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2011171EN.01001601.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 18/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1).

| (2) | Council Directive 2008/59/EC of 12 June 2008 adapting Directive 2006/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Directive 2008/59/EC of 12 June 2008 adapting Directive 2006/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 47a (Directive 2006/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 L 0059: Council Directive 2008/59/EC of 12 June 2008 (OJ L 166, 27.6.2008, p. 31).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 L 0059: Council Directive 2008/59/EC of 12 June 2008 (OJ L 166, 27.6.2008, p. 31).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2008/59/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 April 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 7.4.2011, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 166, 27.6.2008, p. 31.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3758 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3758

 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 
       to small transit intensive cities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2019

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Stanton, Mr. Palazzo, 
 and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 
       to small transit intensive cities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Community Transit Improvement 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENTS.

    Section 5336(h)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(3) of amounts not apportioned under paragraphs (1) and 
        (2), 3.0 percent shall be apportioned to urbanized areas with 
        populations of less than 200,000 in accordance with subsection 
        (i);''.
                                 <all>
```
Cesar Paolo UBALDO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6884.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
AMERICAN TRIUMPH LLC, et al., petitioners, v. Allan A. TABINGO.

No. 17-449.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Rene SANCHEZ-GOMEZ, et al.

No. 17-312.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 8, 2017.

Motions of respondents for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
H. R. 4356 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to allow certain individuals to 

terminate contracts for telephone, multichannel video programming, or internet 

access service, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Families of Fallen 

Servicemembers Act’’. 

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS FOR TELEPHONE, MULTICHANNEL VIDEO PROGRAMMING, OR INTERNET ACCESS 

SERVICE BY CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS UNDER 

SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT. 

Section 305A(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 

U.S.C. 3956(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) ADDITIONAL INDIVIDUALS COVERED.—For purposes of 

this section, the following individuals shall be treated as a 

servicemember covered by paragraph (1): 

‘‘(A) A spouse or dependent of a servicemember who 

dies while in military service or a spouse or dependent 

of a member of the reserve components who dies while 

performing duty described in subparagraph (C). 

‘‘(B) A spouse or dependent of a servicemember who 

incurs a catastrophic injury or illness (as that term is 

defined in section 439(g) of title 37, United States Code), 

if the servicemember incurs the catastrophic injury or illness while in military service or performing duty described 

in subparagraph (C). 

‘‘(C) A member of the reserve components performing 

military service or performing full-time National Guard 

duty, active Guard and Reserve duty, or inactive-duty 

training (as such terms are defined in section 101(d) of 

title 10, United States Code).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Christopher WHITE, petitioner, v. Troy STEELE, Warden.

No. 17-5573.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Hoxquelin Gomez HEREDIA, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-661.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.