alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert McDANIELS, petitioner, v. Richard J. KIRKLAND, Warden

No. 16-8599.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In Re Ernest Franklin CLARK, petitioner.

No. 17-5711.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification**

To the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each  of the undersigned officers does hereby certify, that to the best of his knowledge:

|   | (a)  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the      registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (b)       | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the registrant.                                                                          |

  

/s/ David Reese  David Reese  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

/s/ Christopher C. ClineChristopher C. ClineChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

August 13, 2002 

----
Mayner J. POPE, petitioner, v. Alicia GUNS, et al.

No. 16-1270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2011063EN.01001601.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/16

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf) — KMB Europe BV v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-193/10) (1)

1

(The first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - MP3 Media Player - Heading 8521 - Video recording or reproducing apparatus)

2011/C 63/29

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Dusseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KMB Europe BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and the statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 (OJ 2006 L 301, p. 1) — MP3 Media Player — Apparatus with a limited capacity to reproduce still images and videos whose principal function is the reproduction of sound — Classification under heading 8519 (‘Sound recording or sound reproducing apparatus’) or under heading 8521 (‘Video recording or reproducing apparatus’) of the Combined Nomenclature.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Heading 8521 of the Combined Nomenclature in the version of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and the statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 must be interpreted as meaning that MP3 media players, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, in relation to which the referring court finds that the principal function characterising all such apparatus is the recording and reproduction of sound, are excluded from that heading.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 3, 2012 

Order 

 

August 3, 2012 

145387 (154)(155) 

STAND UP FOR DEMOCRACY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 145387 

v COA: 310047 

SECRETARY OF STATE and BOARD OF 

STATE CANVASSERS, 

Defendants, 

and 

CITIZENS FOR FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY, 

 Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________ 

 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion to supplement the record is DENIED as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         193,192
<SECURITIES>                                   234,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               442,465
<PP&E>                                          15,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                     417,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   471,882
<SALES>                                         21,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,899
<CGS>                                            9,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (42,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,482)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.78)


</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00363

- CV

PHILIP DEAN LYNCH , Appellant

V. CACH, L

. L

. C

. , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 962831



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 27 , 201 2 . The clerk’s record w as filed June 12 , 2012 , and no reporter’s record was taken.

On August 27 , 2012, appellant filed a brief that was not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief failed generally to comply with the rules.
See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k). The brief was stricken and appellant was ordered to file an amended brief.

On October 29 , appellant filed another brief that also failed to comply with the2

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. When an appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, t he Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to
file a bri ef, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Appellant's brief still fails to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (d), (e), (g), (h), (i) and (k). Accordingly, the appeal is
ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 11, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be held Wednesday, May 11, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: April 11, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-08197 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Ora E. O’Brien and George W. O’Brien, her husband, *Appellants,*v. Albert R. Borrill, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*Gordon B. Broome*and if. *C. Nicholas,*for Appellants;

if. *Pierre Branning, J. B. B. Clemons*and *Cecil C. Curry,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *225the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 405 

To permit the District of Columbia and each of the territories of the United 

States to provide and furnish statues honoring their citizens for placement in Statuary Hall in the same manner as statues honoring citizens 

of the States are provided for placement in Statuary Hall. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To permit the District of Columbia and each of the territories of the United States to provide and furnish statues 

honoring their citizens for placement in Statuary Hall 

in the same manner as statues honoring citizens of the 

States are provided for placement in Statuary Hall. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUES OF CITIZENS OF DIS4 TRICT OF COLUMBIA AND TERRITORIES IN 

5 STATUARY HALL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814 of the Revised Stat7 utes of the United States (2 U.S.C. 2131) is amended by 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 405 IH

1 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For pur2 poses of this section, the term ‘State’ includes American 

3 Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Common4 wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Common5 wealth of Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin Is6 lands, and the term ‘citizen’ includes a national of the 

7 United States, as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Im8 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)).’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT RELATING TO PRO10 CEDURES FOR REPLACEMENT OF STATUES.—Section 311 

11 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 

12 U.S.C. 2132) is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing new subsection: 

14 ‘‘(f) For purposes of this section— 

15 ‘‘(1) the term ‘State’ includes American Samoa, 

16 the District of Columbia, Guam, the Commonwealth 

17 of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Common18 wealth of Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin 

19 Islands; and 

20 ‘‘(2) in the case of the District of Columbia, the 

21 Council of the District of Columbia shall be treated 

22 as the legislature and the Mayor of the District of 

23 Columbia shall be treated as the Governor.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# L_2009277EN.01004001.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 88/2009

of 3 July 2009

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 72/2009 of 29 May 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 72/2009 of 29 May 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1784/2006 of 4 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the use of processing agents (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1784/2006 of 4 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the use of processing agents (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 21aa (Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 R 1784: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1784/2006 of 4 December 2006 (OJ L 337, 5.12.2006, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 R 1784: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1784/2006 of 4 December 2006 (OJ L 337, 5.12.2006, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2006 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 July 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 232, 3.9.2009, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 337, 5.12.2006, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                       124
<INVENTORY>                                      4,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,651
<PP&E>                                         130,746
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,410
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           292
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,191
<SALES>                                         12,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,693
<CGS>                                            5,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    70
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    49
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                       401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (42)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4375 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4375

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to enter into an agreement 
    with the National Academy of Engineering to conduct a study on 
                  seismicity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2019

  Mr. Rouda (for himself and Mr. Garamendi) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to enter into an agreement 
    with the National Academy of Engineering to conduct a study on 
                  seismicity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pipeline Seismic Safety Study Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING STUDY ON SEISMICITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall enter into an 
agreement with the National Academy of Engineering under which the 
National Academy of Engineering shall conduct a study to--
            (1) evaluate the current Federal requirements for pipeline 
        design and siting relating to seismicity, land subsidence, and 
        landslides; and
            (2) identify any deficiencies in industry practices related 
        to such requirements.
    (b) Notice Required.--Upon completion of the study required under 
subsection (a), the National Academy of Engineering shall transmit 
notice of the completion of such study to the Office of the Law 
Revision Counsel.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 90 days after the 
completion of the study required under subsection (a), the National 
Academy of Engineering shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, and the Committee 
on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 
containing the results of the study required under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Martin O. NICKERSON, Jr., petitioner, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.

No. 17-240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.