alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 4280** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. LARRY SHANE KING , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00454

- JAB

- 1 )

Submitted : December 10, 2015 Decided: December 30, 2015

Before MOTZ and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Lisa S. Costner, LISA S. COSTNER, P.A., Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Shane King appeals the district court ’s judgment sentencing him to 151 months of imprisonment pursuant to his conviction for conspiring to manufacture quantities of a mixture and substance containing a dete ctable amount of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (2012). King’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) , certifying that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. In accordance with Ande rs , we have reviewed the record in this case, as well as King’ s pro se supplemental brief, and have found no meritorious issues. Before accepting King’ s guilty plea, the district court conducted a thorough plea colloquy, satisfying the requirements of Fed . R. Crim. P. 11 and ensuring that King’ s plea was knowing, voluntary, and supported by an independent factual basis. See United States v. DeFusco , 949 F.2d 114, 116 (4th Cir. 1991). The district court made no significant procedural error at sentencing, see Gall v. United
States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007), and King has not rebut ted our appellate presumption that his within

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Louthian , 756 F.3d 295, 306 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 421 (2014). Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’ s criminal judgment. This court requires that counsel inform King , in3 writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If King requests that a petition b e filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel ’ s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on King . We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CCC GlobalCom  Corporation  on form
10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Paul E. Licata,  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

              (1)    the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
                     or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2)    the  information  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
                     material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                     operations of the Company.


By  /s/ Paul E. Licata
--------------------------
Paul E. Licata
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         754,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,667,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,423,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,423,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,423,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               380,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                235,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   117.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4345 

To provide for the acquisition of non-Federal land for inclusion in the Fort 

Monroe National Monument in the State of Virginia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 

Mrs. LURIA (for herself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. WITTMAN, and Mr. 

MCEACHIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the acquisition of non-Federal land for inclusion in the Fort Monroe National Monument in the 

State of Virginia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Monroe National 

5 Monument Land Acquisition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map 

9 prepared by the National Park Service entitled 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4345 IH

1 ‘‘Fort Monroe National Monument Proposed Land 

2 Conveyance’’, numbered 250/154572A, and dated 

3 July 2019. 

4 (2) MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘Monument’’ 

5 means the Fort Monroe National Monument in the 

6 State. 

7 (3) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘non-Fed8 eral land’’ means the approximately 44 acres of land 

9 in the State depicted on the map as ‘‘Commonwealth 

10 of Virginia Land (Fee) Proposed for Conveyance to 

11 the NPS’’ and ‘‘Commonwealth of Virginia Interest 

12 (Easement) Proposed for Conveyance to the NPS’’. 

13 (4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

14 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di15 rector of the National Park Service. 

16 (5) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

17 of Virginia. 

18 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF NON-FEDERAL LAND FOR THE 

19 FORT MONROE NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the State offers to convey to 

21 the United States the non-Federal land— 

22 (1) the Secretary shall accept the offer; and 

23 (2) on conveyance to the United States of the 

24 non-Federal land, the non-Federal land shall be 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4345 IH

1 added to, and administered by the Secretary as part 

2 of, the Monument. 

3 (b) CORRECTIONS.—The Secretary and the State 

4 may, by mutual agreement— 

5 (1) make minor boundary adjustments to the 

6 non-Federal land to be conveyed under subsection 

7 (a); and 

8 (2) correct any minor errors in the map. 

9 (c) RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.—As part of the con10 veyance of the non-Federal land to the United States 

11 under subsection (a), the State may reserve and retain the 

12 rights of the State under any leases in existence on the 

13 non-Federal land on the day before the date of the convey14 ance. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose                           ( print page 23528)                        confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; MOST4 Osteoarthritis Study.                    

*Date:*                         May 16, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joshua Jin-Hyouk, Park Scientific Review, Officer Scientific Review Branch, NIA (National Institute on Aging), GWY BG, Rm 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208,                         *joshua.park4@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 14, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-08394 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2010234EN.01001501.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-363/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/444/EEC - Plant protection products - Application for authorisation to place on the market - Data protection)

2010/C 234/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Parpala and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. López-Medel Bascones, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 13 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1) — Data accompanying the application — Data use and protection — Confidentiality

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by maintaining in force Article 38 of Ley 43/2002 de sanidad vegetal (Law 43/2002 on plant health) of 20 November 2002, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by maintaining in force Article 38 of Ley 43/2002 de sanidad vegetal (Law 43/2002 on plant health) of 20 November 2002, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
McArthur BAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8818.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat to his knowledge, on the date hereof the Company’s annual report on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 26, 2009 filed on the date hereofwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 23, 2010 | /s/ SAL PERISANO            |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                      | Sal Perisano                |
|                      | *Chairman of the Board and* |
|                      | *Chief Executive Officer*   |

 

----
Agustin Sergio DELEON GARZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6187.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
F5 CAPITAL, petitioner, v. Petros PAPPAS, et al.

No. 17-388.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 431 

To repeal the corporate average fuel economy standards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal the corporate average fuel economy standards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CAFE Standards Re5 peal Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEALING THE CORPORATE AVERAGE FUEL 

7 ECONOMY STANDARDS. 

8 Chapter 329 of title 49, United States Code, and the 

9 item relating to such chapter in the analysis of chapters 

10 for subtitle VI of such title, are repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/25/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       77,090
COMMITMENTS
   2,908    8,152    3,637   62,337   52,933   68,882   64,722    8,208   12,368

CHANGES FROM 05/18/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -19,881)
     505   -1,625      106  -15,705  -15,854  -15,094  -17,373   -4,787   -2,508

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.8     10.6      4.7     80.9     68.7     89.4     84.0     10.6     16.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       3       13       10       21       26       32       41
```

----

Updated May 28, 2010
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM J. CAMPBELLWilliam J. CampbellChief Executive Officer




November 9, 2005
Corey Jawan ROBINSON, petitioner, v. Joseph McFADDEN, Warden.

No. 17-8672.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
          THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY
          PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
          REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,014,980
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      588,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        346,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,219,785
<PP&E>                                           2,856,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                     859,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,025,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,013,903
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,437,493
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               520
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,574,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,025,950
<SALES>                                          1,534,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,534,295
<CGS>                                              434,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,877,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   493,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,167,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,167,623)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,167,623)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.42)
                                               


</TABLE>
Larry Lee SMITH, petitioner, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH.

No. 17M8.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.