alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-82-2021]

On December 10, 2021, LCY Electronic Materials Inc., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 75, in Casa Grande, Arizona.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 72576, December 22, 2021). On April 11, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: April 11, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-08000 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 12/31/98 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

 [PUBLISH] 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-8415

 

D. C. Docket No. 1:92-cv-103-JEC

ALEJANDRO ESCARENO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NOLTINA CRUCIBLE AND REFRACTORY CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants,

CARL NOLTE SOHNE GMBH,

 Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(December 31, 1998)

Before COX, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

The issue in this case is whether the Fulton County, Georgia, Probate Court properly

appointed an administrator over the estate of Alejandro Escareno (“Escareno” or “Plaintiff”), the

deceased Plaintiff in this products liability suit. The Plaintiff contends that pursuant to O.C.G.A.

§ 15-9-31 the Georgia Probate Court acted within its jurisdiction when it appointed Philip P.

Grant (“Grant”) as administrator of Escareno’s estate. The district court denied the Plaintiff’s

motion to substitute Grant as a party pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a) on the ground that the

probate court lacked jurisdiction to appoint an administrator because Escareno, a Mexican

resident, did not have any property in Fulton County, nor did he have a cause of action against a

Fulton County defendant. See O.C.G.A. § 15-9-31.

To decide this case, we are required to determine the precise requirements of § 15-9-31

for the administration of the estate of a non-resident of Georgia. Because this statute allows for

differing interpretations and there are no controlling precedents under Georgia law, we certified

the following question to the Supreme Court of Georgia:

Whether the appointment of Grant as administrator of Escareno’s

estate was proper under § 15-9-31(2) based upon either the

pending cause of action in Fulton County against a foreign

defendant or the presence of a case file in Escareno’s counsel’s

office.

On November 23, 1998, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued an opinion answering our

question in the affirmative. In light of the Supreme Court of Georgia’s opinion, attached hereto

as an appendix, we vacate the district court’s order denying Escareno’s motion to substitute

Grant as administrator of Escareno’s estate, and the district court’s order of dismissal, and

remand this case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of

Georgia.
3

VACATED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PATRICIA GRAHAM, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Renegade Venture
(NEV.) Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 Date: November 14, 2003


                                            /s/  Patricia Graham
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Patricia Graham,
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
Gerald Lamont OLDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6061.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         346,303
<SECURITIES>                                 1,798,609
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,766
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,163,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,380
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,123,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,163,789
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (5,209)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (42.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         118,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  507,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    174,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,368
<PP&E>                                         262,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,393,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          639,747
<BONDS>                                        805,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,667,478
<OTHER-SE>                                   (127,594)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,393,049
<SALES>                                      2,834,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,834,900
<CGS>                                        1,895,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,616,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            118,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,952
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
Daniel COLBY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8976.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4258 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4258

  To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court 
 Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official guests of the 
   Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2019

Mr. Stanton (for himself and Mr. Steube) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court 
 Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official guests of the 
   Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reauthorizing Security for Supreme 
Court Justices Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION AUTHORITY OF MARSHAL OF THE SUPREME COURT AND 
              SUPREME COURT POLICE.

    Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding 
                subparagraph (A), by striking ``any State'' and 
                inserting ``any location''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) by striking ``violation of federal or 
                        state law'' and inserting ``violation of 
                        Federal or State law''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``regulation under federal 
                        or state law'' and inserting ``regulation under 
                        Federal or State law''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2);
                    (B) by striking ``Additional Requirements'' and all 
                that follows through ``Duties under'' and inserting 
                ``Authorization To Carry Firearms--Duties under''; and
                    (C) by striking ``any State'' and inserting ``any 
                location''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40002 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MURPHY JOHN FRANK, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-49-2

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Murphy John Frank argues that the district court erred in increasing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4) because the firearms involved in his offense were not stolen prior to his commission of the offense. Frank also argues that the rule of lenity should be applied in construing the language contained in § 2K2.1(b)(4).No. 97-40002 - 2 -

Frank’s base offense level was properly determined under § 2K2.1(a)(6). Therefore, the district court did not err in applying the adjustment authorized by § 2K2.1(b)(4). See § 2K2.1, comment. (n.12); United States v. Armstead , 114 F.3d 504, 509 (5th Cir. 1997). Frank has not shown that the rule of lenity should be applied in construing the language of § 2K2.1(b)(4) because he has not demonstrated that the wording of the guideline is ambiguous. See United States v. Singleton , 946 F.2d 23, 24 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
# C_2006166EN.01002001.xml

| 18.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/20

---

Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with the Republic of Croatia on its participation in the programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality

(2006/C 166/06)

On 31 May 2006 the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission, on behalf of the European Community, and the Government of the Republic of Croatia on its participation in the Community framework strategy on gender equality

The full text in English of the Memorandum of Understanding can be found on the following web page:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/croatia/index.htm

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/croatia/index.htm

---
# L_2013318EN.01003201.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 130/2013

of 14 June 2013

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 112/2013 of 7 February 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) as regards the 2014 list of target secondary variables on material deprivation (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 112/2013 of 7 February 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) as regards the 2014 list of target secondary variables on material deprivation (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 18ic (Commission Regulation (EU) No 62/2012) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘18id. | 32013 R 0112: Commission Regulation (EU) No 112/2013 of 7 February 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) as regards the 2014 list of target secondary variables on material deprivation (OJ L 37, 8.2.2013, p. 2).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘18id.

32013 R 0112: Commission Regulation (EU) No 112/2013 of 7 February 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) as regards the 2014 list of target secondary variables on material deprivation (OJ L 37, 8.2.2013, p. 2).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 112/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 37, 8.2.2013, p. 2.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4349 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that floor plan 

financing includes the financing of certain trailers and campers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 

Mrs. WALORSKI (for herself, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, and Ms. TITUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that floor plan financing includes the financing of certain 

trailers and campers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel Trailer and 

5 Camper Tax Parity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4349 IH

1 SEC. 2. FLOOR PLAN FINANCING APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN 

2 TRAILERS AND CAMPERS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 163(j)(9)(C) of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following new flush sentence: 

6 ‘‘Such term shall also include any trailer or 

7 camper which is designed to provide temporary 

8 living quarters for recreational, camping, or 

9 seasonal use and is designed to be towed by, or 

10 affixed to, a motor vehicle.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# L_2009277EN.01003901.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 87/2009

of 3 July 2009

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 72/2009 of 29 May 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 72/2009 of 29 May 2009 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 13ca (Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

| ‘13caa. | 32006 L 0118: Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (OJ L 372, 27.12.2006, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13caa.

32006 L 0118: Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (OJ L 372, 27.12.2006, p. 19).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2006/118/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 July 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 232, 3.9.2009, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 372, 27.12.2006, p. 19.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Gregory LOTT, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-5627.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.