alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Building Materials Corporation of America (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William W. Collins, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and John
F. Rebele, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|/s/WILLIAM W. COLLINSName: William W. Collins
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President               |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005                                                                                     |  | 
|/s/JOHN F. REBELEName: John F. Rebele
Title: Senior Vice President and
          Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005                                                                                     |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
#### Peninsular Naval Stores Company, a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. I. K. Watkins and C. B. Harrison, *Appellees.*

Division A.

Decision filed May 13, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied May 18,1929.

*McCollum (& Howell,*for Appellant;

No appearance for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. j.. and Ellts and Brown, J. J. concur.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/22/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      146,967
COMMITMENTS
  36,731   21,932   23,316   70,481   77,191  130,529  122,440   16,439   24,527

CHANGES FROM 12/15/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,885)
    -468    2,750    2,546    2,182   -2,048    4,259    3,247   -1,374     -363

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.0     14.9     15.9     48.0     52.5     88.8     83.3     11.2     16.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      173)
      49       26       52       59       66      133      131
```

----

Updated December 28, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1989-B,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         68,933
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  283,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,880
<PP&E>                                         8,646,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,743,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,347,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,781
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,175,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,347,661
<SALES>                                        519,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               527,455
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  407,457<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                49,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            49,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   49,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/23/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       57,147
COMMITMENTS
   4,827    7,957    3,314   38,701   41,847   46,842   53,118   10,305    4,029

CHANGES FROM 03/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -20,162)
  -3,883    1,005   -2,998  -12,559  -16,906  -19,440  -18,899     -722   -1,263

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.4     13.9      5.8     67.7     73.2     82.0     92.9     18.0      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
      11       12        8       17       17       34       31
```

----

Updated March 26, 2010
Eddie Matthew MOSLEY, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 17-6053.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Donald Keith BURTON, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-6004.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
Ricky MOORE, petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden.

No. 17-6055.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18
             UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMTROL Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Larry T.
Guillemette, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to Title 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  May 14, 2004                    By: /s/LARRY T. GUILLEMETTE
                                          --------------------------------------
                                           Larry T. Guillemette,
                                           Executive Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Treasurer
Donta NEWTON, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-6478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Arthur Kyle LANGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6422.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Thomas F. BELLO.

No. D-2987.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
#### Florida Asphalt Block Paving Company, a Florida Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Robert Lee Davis, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion filed March 26, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied May 10, 1929.

*391*Hampton, Bull & Pencke, Shackleford & Brown*and *H. O. Tillman,*for Plaintiff in Error ;

*Palmer, Dickenson, Shurely & Lake,*for Defendant in Error.

PeA’Curiam.

Motion was made in this case to strike the transcript of record from the files upon the theory that there was no bill of exceptions contained in the transcript of the record and that the purported bill of exceptions-was presented and signed after the adjournment of the Court and without an order having been made extending the time beyond the adjournment of the Court in which a bill of exceptions could be made up and presented.

The record supplemented by a certificate from the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County shows that the judgment was entered at the Fall Term of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County on the 29th day of March, 1927, and that the Court adjourned on the 2nd day of May, 1927. A motion for a new trial was pending when that term of the Court adjourned. That the Spring term of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County convened on May 3rd, 1927, and adjourned October 31st, 1927. The motion for new trial was denied on the 11th day of May, 1927, and the bill of exceptions was presented and signed on the 8th day of June, 1927. Judgment did not become effective until the motion for new trial was denied and, therefore, *392without an order extending the time for the making up and presenting of a bill of exceptions, it was proper for the same to be made up and presented at any time during the term of the court at which the motion for new trial was denied. See Worrell v. Ford, 90 Fla. 571; 107 So. R. 183.

The motion to strike is denied.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it is thereupon ordered by the Court that if within thirty days after the mandate of this Court is filed in the Circuit Court the plaintiff, Robert Lee Ilavis, shall enter a remittitur in the sum of $3,000.00 then the said judgment of the Circuit Court shall stand affirmed for the remainder of the amounts awarded in said judgment; otherwise, the said judgment shall be reversed for a new trial.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Brown, J., dissents.
AMENDMENT NO. 2  TO REVOLVING CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
  BACKGROUND
    Definitions
 Amendment
  Leverage Ratio




---



##### 



Fiscal Quarter Ending:
    
    Leverage Ratio:September 30, 2008
    
    
    3.50 to 1.0December 31, 2008
    
    
    3.50 to 1.0March 31, 2009
    
    
    4.25 to 1.0June 30, 2009
    
    
    3.00 to 1.0September 30, 2009
    
    
    3.00 to 1.0December 31, 2009
    
    
    3.00 to 1.0March 31, 2010 and each fiscal quarter ending thereafter
    
    
    2.50 to 1.0
 Conditions of Effectiveness
 Representations, Warranties and Covenants
      Effect on the Loan Agreement
  2




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Cost and Expenses
 Headings
 Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures
  3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Lender and as AgentBy:
    /s/ John TrieuName:
    John TrieuTitle:
    Vice PresidentDRI CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Stephen P. SlayName:
    Stephen P. SlayTitle:
    CFO & SecretaryDIGITAL RECORDERS, INC.By:
    /s/ Stephen P. SlayName:
    Stephen P. SlayTitle:
    VP & SecretaryTWINVISION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.By:
    /s/ Stephen P. SlayName:
    Stephen P. SlayTitle:
    VP & Secretary
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John F. Craven, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. Pecker Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)/s/ JOHN F. CRAVENJohn F. Craven Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)


Date: October 1, 2007

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Anne Marie HANKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-522.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2007304EN.01005601.xml

| 22.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/56

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 71/2007

of 29 June 2007

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 74/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 74/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement in the implementation and development of the Internal Market. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement in the implementation and development of the Internal Market.

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this cooperation to continue beyond 31 December 2006, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this cooperation to continue beyond 31 December 2006,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Article 7 of Protocol 31 to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The words ‘years 2004, 2005 and 2006’ in paragraph 6 shall be replaced by the words ‘years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007’. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The words ‘years 2004, 2005 and 2006’ in paragraph 6 shall be replaced by the words ‘years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007’.

| 2. | The words ‘year 2006’ in paragraph 7 shall be replaced by the words ‘years 2006 and 2007’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The words ‘year 2006’ in paragraph 7 shall be replaced by the words ‘years 2006 and 2007’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2007.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 245, 7.9.2006, p. 45.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Leonard Joseph BENTZ, Jr., petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 16-8580.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854709
<NAME> DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,432
<INVENTORY>                                     34,826
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,575
<PP&E>                                          59,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,716
<BONDS>                                        125,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,149
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,035
<SALES>                                         59,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,227
<CGS>                                           38,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (731)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,009)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00610

- CV

LAREDO MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION

,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS

,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CVQ

- 00

- 1077

- D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presidi ng



### O R D E R

A ppellant's motion to supplement brief is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on June 24, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___ ______________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,985-03

EX P ARTE TRACY P AUL TAYLOR, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1129515-A IN THE 337TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant wa s convicted of ag g rava ted sexual assault of a c hild under 14 and sente nced to seventy y ear s’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his convictions. Taylor v. State , No. 01-07-00802- CR (Tex. Ap p .—Houston [1st Dist.] J an. 26, 2012). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On March 2 4 , 2 020, the trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues. The district cler k proper ly forwa

rded this application to this Court u n d er T ex as Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and

co n cl u s i ons of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evident i ar yinvestiga tion and make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. T h e t rial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: April 14, 2021 Do not publish