alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE GOLDEN NORTHWEST
ALUMINUM, INC. FINANCIAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     65,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,831
<PP&E>                                         132,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,593
<BONDS>                                        195,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     29,663
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,631
<SALES>                                        444,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,174
<CGS>                                          429,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  429,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,656)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
TEXAS, petitioner, v. Charles KLEINERT.

No. 17-299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

*643Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Israel BEN-LEVI, petitioner, v. Kelli HARRIS, et al.

No. 17-5523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.15


                    SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS ISSUED (GFP SERIES)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                              NUMBER OF
DATE OF                                                       WARRANT         SHARES OF      EXERCISE
ISSUANCE             NAME OF WARRANT RECIPIENT                NO.            COMMON STOCK     PRICE
--------             -------------------------                -------        ------------    --------
<S>                 <C>                                      <C>            <C>              <C>
      11/3/99        Gulfstream Financial Partners            GFP-13            250,000       $  2.00
                     2401 PGA Boulevard, Suite 190
                     Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
      11/3/99        Blake Capital Partners, LLC              GFP-14            250,000       $  2.00
      12/2/99        Gulfstream Financial Partners            GFP-14(2)         500,000       $  1.50
      12/1/99        Henry Fong, Jr.                          GFP-15a            50,000       $ 1.625
      12/1/99        Lauren Fong                              GFP-15b            50,000       $ 1.625
      12/1/99        Benjamin Private School                  GFP-15c            50,000       $ 1.625
                     Fed I.D.:  59-1536502
      12/1/99        Barry Hollander                          GFP-15d            50,000       $ 1.625
      12/1/99        Gulfstream Financial Partners, LLC       GFP-15e           150,000       $ 1.625
      12/2/99        Blake Capital Partners                   BCP-1             500,000       $  1.50
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                     THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of
January 11, 2000, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
("Employer") and K.C. Breen ("Executive").


                                    RECITALS

A)   On March 31, 1998 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and
     between Employer and Executive.

B)   On March 31, 1999, a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and
     entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

C)   On October 1, 1999, a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and
     entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

D)   Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set
     forth hereinbelow:


                                    AGREEMENT

1.       Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides:

         3.1 TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence
         on April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31, 2000 unless sooner
         terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.

      is hereby amended, effective January 11, 2000, to provide as follows:

         3.1 TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence
         on April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31, 2001 unless sooner
         terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.


2.   All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain
     unaltered and fully effective.

Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.

<PAGE>

EXECUTIVE                                        EMPLOYER
                                                 PRICESMART, INC.

K.C. Breen                                       By: /s/ Kurt May

/s/ K. C. Breen                                      Name: Kurt May

                                                 Its: Chief Operating Officer
# L_2013061EN.01000101.xml

| 5.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 61/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 61/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), signed in Brussels on 26 June 2012, will enter into force on 1 April 2013.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 10, 15.1.2013, p. 3.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4130 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the ceiling on 

the sum of the annual deductible and the other annual out-of-pocket 

expenses required to be paid under a high deductible health plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. MARCHANT (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Missouri) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the ceiling on the sum of the annual deductible and 

the other annual out-of-pocket expenses required to be 

paid under a high deductible health plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping HSAs Acces5 sible Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4130 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CEILING ON DEDUCTIBLE AND OUT-OF2 POCKET EXPENSES UNDER A HIGH DEDUCT3 IBLE HEALTH PLAN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(2)A) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(A) HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN.— 

7 The term ‘high deductible health plan’ means a 

8 health plan which has an annual deductible 

9 which is not less than— 

10 ‘‘(i) $1,000 for self-only coverage, and 

11 ‘‘(ii) twice the dollar amount in clause 

12 (i) for family coverage.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply with respect to months in taxable 

15 years beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

16 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Sheila LYONS, DVM, petitioner, v. The AMERICAN COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SPORTS MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION.

No. 17-353.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace.

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Meeting of the Board of Directors: Chair's Report; Vice Chair's Report; President's Report; Approval of Minutes; USIP Key Current Initiatives:                         *Russia and Ukraine; China and Taiwan*; and                         *Security Sector Reform*; Reports from USIP Board Committees: Governance and Compliance; Strategy and Program; Audit and Finance; Security and Facilities; and Talent and Culture.                    

# DATES:

Friday, April 22, 2022 (10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.).

# ADDRESSES:

                        Virtual Board Meeting Information: Join by video:                         *https://usip-org.zoomgov.com/​j/​1611994200?​pwd=​NlkyZTVWdDNzNC8rS0lFQlN3QU12dz09*; Meeting ID:161 199 4200; Passcode: 392468.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Megan O'Hare, 202-429-4144,                         *mohare@usip.org*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Open Session—Portions may be closed pursuant to subsection (c) of section 552b of title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.

*Authority:*22 U.S.C. 4605(h)(3).                

Dated: April 15, 2022.

Rebecca Fernandes,

Director of Accounting.

[FR Doc. 2022-08468 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-P
Cordell MINOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8873.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7298

EDWARD L. MOSES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT HAM; BELINDA DUDLEY; MICHAEL A. HARDEE;

MICHAEL J. LAMM; FINESSE G. COUCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:07-ct-03082)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward L. Moses, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edward L. Moses, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing his civil rights claim regarding

the grievance procedure under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. Moses v. Ham, No. 5:07-ct-03082 (E.D.N.C. filed

Aug. 15, 2007; entered Aug. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Paris M. WHEDBEE, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-6100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Donald Ray MIDDLEBROOKS, petitioner, v. Tony MAYS, Acting Warden.

No. 17-5592.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4912

_____________________________

JOSEPH M. WIPPEL,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 

APPEALS COMMISSION,

Appellee.

___________________________

On appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals

Commission.

Frank E. Brown, Chairman.

December 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Wippel filed an appeal to the Reemployment Assistance 

Appeals Commission (RAAC) after he received two contradictory 

notifications concerning his application for reemployment 

assistance. RAAC dismissed the appeal as untimely, and Wippel 

now appeals that dismissal. RAAC concedes error, stating that it 

should not have dismissed the appeal if it was untimely due to 

overlapping agency orders. We accept this concession, and 

remand for a determination as to whether Wippel filed a belated 

appeal to RAAC due to confusion stemming from these orders. 

See Ellis v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 73 So. 3d 887, 890 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2011). 

REVERSED and REMANDED.
2

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Joseph M. Wippel, pro se, Appellant.

Norman Blessing, General Counsel, and Cristina Velez, 

Appellate Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals 

Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 428 

To direct the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and 

Analysis to develop and disseminate a threat assessment regarding terrorist use of virtual currency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Miss RICE of New York (for herself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To direct the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for 

Intelligence and Analysis to develop and disseminate a 

threat assessment regarding terrorist use of virtual currency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeland Security 

5 Assessment of Terrorists’ Use of Virtual Currencies Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 428 IH

1 SEC. 2. THREAT ASSESSMENT ON TERRORIST USE OF VIR2 TUAL CURRENCY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary 

5 of Homeland Security for Intelligence and Analysis, as au6 thorized by section 201(b)(1) of the Homeland Security 

7 Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121(b)(1)), shall, in coordination 

8 with appropriate Federal partners, develop and dissemi9 nate a threat assessment regarding the actual and poten10 tial threat posed by individuals using virtual currency to 

11 carry out activities in furtherance of an act of terrorism, 

12 including the provision of material support or resources 

13 to a foreign terrorist organization. Consistent with the 

14 protection of classified and confidential unclassified infor15 mation, the Under Secretary shall share the threat assess16 ment developed under this section with State, local, and 

17 tribal law enforcement officials, including officials who op18 erate within State, local, and regional fusion centers 

19 through the Department of Homeland Security State, 

20 Local, and Regional Fusion Center Initiative established 

21 in section 210A of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

22 (6 U.S.C. 124h). 

23 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

24 (1) The term ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ 

25 means an organization designated as a foreign terVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:45 Jan 18, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H428.IH H428

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 428 IH

1 rorist organization under section 219 of the Immi2 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

3 (2) The term ‘‘virtual currency’’ means a digital 

4 representation of value that functions as a medium 

5 of exchange, a unit of account, or a store of value. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Spencer Dean BLACKKETTER, petitioner, v. Brigitte AMSBERRY, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution.

No. 17-5993.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert Elijah Lamar MINCEY, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-5792.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Motion Granted; Order filed October 22, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00229-CR

____________

ORLEAN AYERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 597938

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this 

Court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1969).

The Harris County District Clerk provided appellant with a copy of the 

clerk’s record on July 10, 2013. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed on 
2

October 1, 2013. Appellant has requested a copy of the supplemental clerk’s 

record. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

We hereby direct the Judge of the 176th District Court to afford appellant an 

opportunity to view the supplemental clerk’s record in accordance with local 

procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the supplemental clerk’s record filed 

October 1, 2013, to appellant within fifteen days of the date of this order; that the 

clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the 

supplemental clerk’s record to appellant is made; and that appellant file any 

supplemental pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief with this court within thirty 

days of that date.

PER CURIAM
# L_2013291EN.01003101.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 74/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2011/63/EU of 1 June 2011 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2011/63/EU of 1 June 2011 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 6a (Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 L 0063: Commission Directive 2011/63/EU of 1 June 2011 (OJ L 147, 2.6.2011, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 L 0063: Commission Directive 2011/63/EU of 1 June 2011 (OJ L 147, 2.6.2011, p. 15).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2011/63/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1) or on the day of entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No .../... of ... (2) [incorporating Directive 2009/30/EC into the Agreement], whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 2.6.2011, p. 15.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

2

---
**EXHIBIT
      99.1**




**Certification**





I,
      Duncan Copeland, certify that:





1.  I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Northcore Technologies
      Inc.





2.  Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report.





Dated:  October
                5, 2007
            /s/
                Duncan CopelandDuncan
                CopelandChief
                Executive Officer










6