alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 217A/1 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 217A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 631 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 217A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 631 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2020/C 217 A/01 | Corrigendum to the Call for expression of interest – Auditors in the fields of (i) mathematics and statistics – (ii) data science, digital audit, data and network analysis, data and text mining, process automation and process mining – Temporary staff (grades AD 5–AD 9) ( OJ C 185 A, 4.6.2020 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2020/C 217 A/01

Corrigendum to the Call for expression of interest – Auditors in the fields of (i) mathematics and statistics – (ii) data science, digital audit, data and network analysis, data and text mining, process automation and process mining – Temporary staff (grades AD 5–AD 9) ( OJ C 185 A, 4.6.2020 )

( OJ C 185 A, 4.6.2020 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Jesse HARROD, petitioner, v. A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden.

No. 17-6029.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte Rogelio Villegas Dominquez, * From the 32nd District Court

 of Nolan County

Trial Court No. 12318.

No. 11-19-00223-CR * November 21, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### Henry Pitts, *Appellant,*v. Richard M. Smith, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 20, 1929.

*R. P. Reese,*for Appellant;

*E. D. Beggs,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there ■ is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, 'concur.
Shane C. BUCZEK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9161.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

Exhibit 99.11

CONSENT OF EXPERT

I, Jarek Jakubec, hereby consent to (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled NI 43-101 Technical
Report for the Kemess Underground Project, British Columbia, Canada" dated April
1, 2013 (the Report) and the technical information in the Report related to
the project economics and mineral reserves in the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of AuRico Gold Inc. (the Company)
and (ii) the use of my name in the AIF and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, incorporating by
reference the Companys AIF and the incorporation by reference into the Form F-3
(File No. 333-189227) of the Company and any Registration Statement on Form S-8
of the Company filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
of the Companys AIF and Annual Report on Form 40-F.

|Dated March 3, 2014 | By: /s/ Jarek
      Jakubec
|------------------- | ---------------------------
|                    | Jarek
      Jakubec        

---
The HONORABLE LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, United States District Judge 1

for the District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1867

___________

Richard Mathis; Doyle Mathis; *

Scot Mathis; Leona Mathis, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of South Dakota.

Internal Revenue Service, United States *

of America, ex rel. the Internal * [UNPUBLISHED]

Revenue Use Service, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 3, 1997

 Filed: January 6, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard, Doyle, Scot, and Leona Mathis (Mathises) appeal from the district

court&s adverse grant of summary judgment in their action asserting a wrongful levy 1
-2-

claim pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7426. After reviewing the record and the parties& briefs,

we conclude the district court correctly determined the Mathises lacked standing to

maintain this action. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Lazaro SOLIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6684.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Eugene Darryl McKNIGHT, petitioner, v. Lance MOORE, Warden.

No. 17-6539.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laserscope on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Eric M. Reuter, President and Chief Executive Officer of Laserscope,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2005fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Laserscope.     Date: November 9, 2005 By: /s/ Eric M. Reuter         Eric M. Reuter    President and Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 401/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 401 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6412 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 401

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6412 November 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1968 of 9 November 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 authorising Latvia to introduce a special measure derogating from point (a) of Article 26(1) and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1969 of 27 October 2021 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Call to Action – Environmental protection in all policies’ pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021) 7742) | 3 |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1970 of 10 November 2021 on a common European data space for cultural heritage | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1968 of 9 November 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 authorising Latvia to introduce a special measure derogating from point (a) of Article 26(1) and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1969 of 27 October 2021 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Call to Action – Environmental protection in all policies’ pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021) 7742)

(notified under document C(2021) 7742)

3

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1970 of 10 November 2021 on a common European data space for cultural heritage

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2022 / Notices 23855 

Joaquin Altoro, 

Administrator, Rural Housing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08515 Filed 4–20–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–XV–C 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–35–2021] 

Approval of Subzone Status; All Ways 

Pacific LLC, Dayton, New Jersey 

On March 2, 2021, the Executive 

Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones 

(FTZ) Board docketed an application 

submitted by the State of New Jersey 

Department of State, grantee of FTZ 44, 

requesting subzone status subject to the 

existing activation limit of FTZ 44, on 

behalf of All Ways Pacific LLC, in 

Dayton, New Jersey. 

The application was processed in 

accordance with the FTZ Act and 

Regulations, including notice in the 

Federal Register inviting public 

comment (86 FR 13282, March 8, 2021). 

The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 

application and determined that it 

meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant 

to the authority delegated to the FTZ 

Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 

400.36(f)), the application to establish 

Subzone 44O was approved on April 18, 

2022, subject to the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations, including Section 

400.13, and further subject to FTZ 44’s 

407.5-acre activation limit. 

Dated: April 18, 2022. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08528 Filed 4–20–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Visiting Committee on Advanced 

Technology 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST)’s 

Visiting Committee on Advanced 

Technology (VCAT or Committee) will 

meet on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, from 

8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, and 

Wednesday, June 15, 2022, from 8:30 

a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 

DATES: The VCAT will meet on 

Tuesday, June 14, 2022, from 8:30 a.m. 

to 5:00 p.m. and Wednesday, June 15, 

2022, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1EN21AP22.133</GPH>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 22 05

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Heid y Caro li na Orti z-Bo ni ll a
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

v.
Lore tt a E. Ly

nc h, At to rn ey

Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: May 13, 2 01 6 Fil ed : M ay

17 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, ARNOLD, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Gua te m al an ci ti zen Heid y C a r o l i na Orti z-Bo ni ll a pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an
or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s (BIA) up ho ld in g an im m ig rat io n jud ge ’s (IJ ’s) de ni al of he r m ot io n to reo pe n. W e fin d no ab us e of di sc ret io n in th e de ni al of th e m ot io n to reo pe n. See Vale nc ia v. Hol de r, 65 7 F.3 d 74 5, 74 8 ( 8 t h C i r

. 20 11 ) (ab us e of di sc ret io n oc cu rs whe n BIA of fers no rat io na l ex pl an at io n fo r it s de ci si on ,de pa rts fro m es ta bl is he d po li ci es wit ho ut ex pl an at io n, ig no res or di st or ts ev id en ce in

reco rd , or rel ie s on le ga l erro r or im pe rm is si bl e fact or s; di sc us si ng req ui rem en ts fo r
m ot io n to reo pe n ba se d on in effe ct iv e as si st an ce of co un se l); se e al so Alv a-Are ll an o
v. Ly nc h, 81 1 F.3 d 10 64 , 10 66 -6 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 16 ) (m ot io ns to reo pe n are di sf av or ed du e to st ro ng pu bl ic in te res t in br in gi ng li ti ga ti on to cl os e, an d be cau se gr an ti ng th em
can cau s e e n d l e s s pr ol on ga ti on of pr oc eed in gs ). The pe ti ti on fo r rev ie w i s de ni ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Shigali B. JONES, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-5277.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
----

EXHIBIT 99.7**NOTICE TO U.S. SHAREHOLDERS REGARDING U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATION**
Comments by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference 

In the United States, reporting standards for auditorsrequire the addition of an explanatory paragraph when the financial statementsare affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on thecompany's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described inNote 1 to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated March15, 2006 (included in exhibit 99.2 to this form 40-F) is expressed in accordancewith Canadian reporting standards which do not permit a reference to such eventsand conditions in the auditors' report when these are adequately disclosed inthe financial statements. 

Chartered Accountants Halifax, Canada March 15, 2006
FENG LI, petitioner, v. Joseph MATAL, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.

No. 17-761.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
 
 I, Albert
W. Weggeman, Jr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Stamford Industrial Group,
Inc.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
     Date:
      March 16, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Albert W. Weggeman,
      JrName:
                  Albert
      W. Weggeman, JrTitle:
                  President and Chief Executive
      Officer
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/10/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       88,882
COMMITMENTS
  23,824   10,780   12,199   35,067   42,602   71,091   65,581   17,791   23,301

CHANGES FROM 02/03/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,000)
   1,418    1,568      691      747       82    2,856    2,341    1,144    1,660

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.8     12.1     13.7     39.5     47.9     80.0     73.8     20.0     26.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      131)
      32       23       32       61       56      114       96
```

----

Updated February 13, 2009
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
conjunction with the annual report on Form 10-K of International Fuel
Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”),





I,
Jonathan R. Burst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  March
      31, 2008
            By:
            /s/Jonathan R.
      BurstJonathan R. BurstChief Executive Officer
----

Action brought on 1 June 2004 by Hans-Martin Tillack against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-193/04)

(2004/C 251/36)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 June 2004 by Hans-Martin Tillack, Brussels, represented by Ian S. Forrester, QC, Thierry Bosly, Christoph Arhold, Nathalie Flandin, Justus Herrlinger and Juliette Siaens, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In March 2004, the applicant's office and home were searched by the Belgian authorities following an official complaint of the Antifraud Unit of the European Commission (OLAF), accusing the applicant of bribery of an EU official.

The applicant submits that OLAF's decision must be declared void, since it was taken in breach of essential procedural requirements and it infringed the fundamental right of the protection of journalistic sources.

The applicant alleges that in breach of Article 11(7) of Regulation 1073/1999 (1), the OLAF Supervisory Committee was not informed prior to the complaints to the national authorities. During the entire internal OLAF investigation, the applicant has never been heard. Moreover, the decision was void in that it was based on the wrong legal basis. OLAF acted in the context of an internal OLAF investigation which aims to cover alleged breaches of applicable rules by officials although the applicant is neither an official nor a servant of any Community organ.

Furthermore, the applicant submits that OLAF's decision infringed the fundamental right of protection of journalistic sources, as part of freedom of the press, since the national authorities were asked to search the applicant's home and office in order to identify his informants within the Commission.

As far as his application for damages is concerned, the applicant alleges that OLAF's complaints to the national authorities and its various public accusations of the applicant constituted maladministration which caused significant injury to the applicant's professional and personal reputation.

----

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25.12.1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (OJ L 136 of 31.5.1999, p. 1).

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 10, 2022

No. 04-22-00345-CR

Steven Xzavier MEDINA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR4174

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief originally was due to be filed on August 8, 2022. On August 10, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion requesting a forty-five-day extension of time to file the brief. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED, and appellant is ORDERED to file his brief no later than 

September 22, 2022. Appellant is advised that further requests for an extension of time to 

file the brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17406 and #17407; ARKANSAS Disaster Number AR-00121]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Arkansas dated 04/20/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         03/30/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 04/20/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/20/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/20/2023.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Washington *Contiguous Counties:* Arkansas: Benton, Crawford, Madison Oklahoma: Adair The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.438Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.880Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.940Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.940Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17406 C and for economic injury is 17407 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # is Arkansas, Oklahoma. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-08794 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P