alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7062

GENUINE TRUTH BANNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TERRIE WALLACE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (6:23-cv-03256-JD)

Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Genuine Truth Banner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7062 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Genuine Truth Banner seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Banner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Banner has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Banner’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7062 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Renewal of the Market Risk Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is 
publishing this notice to announce the renewal of the Market Risk 
Advisory Committee (MRAC). The Commission has determined that the 
renewal of the MRAC is necessary and in the public's interest, and the 
Commission has consulted with the General Services Administration's 
Committee Management Secretariat regarding the MRAC's renewal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia Lewis, MRAC Designated Federal 
Officer, at 202-418-5862 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5848980928c96a586839186cb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98f9f4fdeff1ebd8fbfeecfbb6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In support of the Commission's mission of 
promoting the integrity, resilience, and vibrancy of the U.S. 
derivatives markets through sound regulation as well as the monitoring 
and management of systemic risk, the MRAC's objectives and scope of 
activities are to conduct public meetings, advise, and submit reports 
and recommendations to the Commission on: (1) Systemic issues that 
impact the stability of the derivatives markets and other related 
financial markets; and (2) the impact and implications of the evolving 
market structure of the derivatives markets and other related financial 
markets. The MRAC will operate for two years from the date of renewal 
unless the Commission directs that the MRAC terminate on an earlier 
date. A copy of the renewal charter will be posted on the Commission's 
website at www.cftc.gov.

    Dated: April 18, 2022.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-08540 Filed 4-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Varian, Inc. for the period ended October 2, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian, Inc.

Date: November 25, 2009



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                           
|G. Edward McClammy                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Varian, Inc.                                     

A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to
Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting: Correction.

# SUMMARY:

On April 11, 2022, the Department of Energy published a notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on May 3-4, 2022 of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board Chairs (87 FR 21108). This document makes a correction to that notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alyssa Harris, EM SSAB Federal Coordinator. U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585. Email:                         *Alyssa.Harris@em.doe.gov*. Telephone: (202) 586-7627.                    

## Corrections

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 11, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-07564, on page 21108, please make the following correction:                    

                        In that notice under                         **ADDRESSES**                        , second column, third paragraph, the meeting address has been changed. The original address was The Carson Center—Myre River Room, 100 Kentucky Avenue, Paducah, KY 42003. The new address is Holiday Inn Paducah Riverfront—River Room, 600 North 4th Street, Paducah, KY 42001. The meeting will still be held in a hybrid format.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, on April 19, 2022.

LaTanya Butler,

Deputy Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-08699 Filed 4-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4208 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit treatment of 

certain non-native, non-indigenous hoofstock born within the borders 

of the United States as an endangered species, a threatened species, 

an essential experimental population, or a nonessential experimental population. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 23, 2019 

Mr. YOHO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit 

treatment of certain non-native, non-indigenous hoofstock 

born within the borders of the United States as an 

endangered species, a threatened species, an essential 

experimental population, or a nonessential experimental 

population. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4208 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN 

2 HOOFSTOCK AS ENDANGERED SPECIES, 

3 THREATENED SPECIES, ESSENTIAL EXPERI4 MENTAL POPULATION, OR NONESSENTIAL 

5 EXPERIMENTAL POPULATION. 

6 Section 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

7 U.S.C. 1532) is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting before the first sentence the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.— 

13 ‘‘(1) A covered hoofstock born within the bor14 ders of the United States shall not be treated as an 

15 endangered species, a threatened species, an essen16 tial experimental population, or a nonessential exper17 imental population under this Act. 

18 ‘‘(2) In this subsection the term ‘covered 

19 hoofstock’ means any barasingha, red lechwe, Ara20 bian oryx, Eld’s deer, Grevy’s zebra, gaur, or 

21 banteng.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.3

                                    AGREEMENT

Between:
                                 Gerald E. Sklar

                                       And

                          American Benefits Group, Inc.

WHEREAS Gerald E. Sklar (hereinafter called "Sklar") is the sole shareholder,
Director and Officer of Trump Oil, Corp. (hereinafter called "Trump");

AND WHEREAS Sklar is a Director and Vice-President of American Benefits Group,
Inc. (hereinafter called "ABFG");

AND WHEREAS Sklar represents to ABFG that Trump is a validly incorporated
Company pursuant to the laws of the Province of Alberta and that it's only
indebtedness is to Sklar in the amount of US $204,584.00, and that American
Benefits Group, Inc. has an indebtedness to Trump for US$204,584.00;

AND WHEREAS Sklar further represents to ABFG that his shares of Trump are
legally transferable to ABFG and that upon ABFG's payment to Sklar of the
consideration noted hereafter the shares will be transferred to ABFG free and
clear of any and all encumbrances whatsoever;

AND WHEREAS ABFG is desirous of purchasing all of the issued and outstanding
shares of Trump upon the terms and conditions hereinafter recited and that ABFG
will assume the indebtedness of Trump to Sklar in the amount of US$204,584.00 in
lieu of Trump forgiving the indebtedness of ABFG in the amount of US$204,584.00.

AND WHEREAS Sklar is desirous of transferring all of the issued an outstanding
shares of Trump to ABFG upon the terms and conditions hereinafter recited.

WITNESSTH THAT:

1.    The Preamble of this Agreement is integral to this Agreement, forms part
      of the Agreement and that any and all Representations made by either party
      in the Preamble are binding in all respects upon the party making such
      Representations.

2.    ABFG shall pay to Sklar the amount of US One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars in
      consideration for which Sklar shall transfer all of the issued and
      outstanding shares of Trump to ABFG free and clear of any and all
      encumbrances whatsoever.

3.    From the date hereof through to and including the date on which ABFG
      advises Sklar that ABFG stands in the Registrar of Trump as the sole
      shareholder thereof Sklar agrees that Trump shall carry out no business
      activities of any kind or nature whatsoever and shall not incur any
      liability of any description.

4.    Upon Sklars' receipt of the consideration noted in paragraph 2 herein
      Sklar shall immediately and without fail cause the records of Trump to
      reflect the transfer of Sklar's shares to Trump.

5.    This Agreement shall take effect on January 1, 1998.

WHEREFIRE THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THESE PRESENTS AND AGREE TO BE BOUND
BY THE TERMS HEREOF THIS 28th DAY OF DECEMBER, 19997,


/s/ Gerald E Sklar                               /s/ Titus D`Souza
-------------------------                        --------------------------
Gerald E. Sklar                                      Witness


/s/ Jerry G Mikolajczyk
-----------------------------
American Benefits Group, Inc.


                                       48
Mohammed QUADIR, petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.

No. 17-6412.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 370/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 370 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6419 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 370

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6419 October 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1828 of 7 October 2021 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Stop (((5G))) – Stay Connected but Protected’ pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021) 7293) | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/1829 of the European Central Bank of 7 October 2021 amending Guideline (EU) 2017/2335 on the procedures for the collection of granular credit and credit risk data (ECB/2021/47) | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1828 of 7 October 2021 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Stop (((5G))) – Stay Connected but Protected’ pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021) 7293)

(notified under document C(2021) 7293)

1

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/1829 of the European Central Bank of 7 October 2021 amending Guideline (EU) 2017/2335 on the procedures for the collection of granular credit and credit risk data (ECB/2021/47)

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Steve AUSTIN, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-5506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
John T. BEYERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6353.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
James Daniel SPORISH, petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 16-8944.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Lawrence NISKEY, petitioner, v. Elaine C. DUKE, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security.

No. 17-5957.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
conjunction with the annual report on Form 10-K of International Fuel
Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”),




I, Stuart
D. Beath, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


March
      31, 2009
                  
                  By:
                  /s/Stuart
      D. BeathStuart
      D. BeathPrincipal financial
      and accounting officer
Donald L. THEELER, petitioner, v. MONTANA.

No. 16-8637.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
----

**Exhibit 99.12**

**CONSENT OF MARK G. STEVENS, C.P.G**

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reportand documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated byreference into i) the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the“Company”) and ii) the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No.333-162371) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission:

|   | 1.     | The technical report dated November 25, 2002 entitled “Guadalupe y Calvo    Gold-Silver Project, Chihuahua, Mexico,” (the “Guadalupe Report”); and                                                           |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | 2.     | The Annual Information Form of the Company dated March 23, 2011, which    includes reference to the undersigned's name in connection with information    relating to the Guadalupe Report, and the properties described therein. |

Date: March 23, 2011 

By: /s/ Mark G. Stevens                                         Mark G. Stevens(former employee of Pincock Allen & Holt) 

 

----
In Re Robert GLASSGOW, petitioner.

No. 17-5380.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
----

|   |        |
|--------|--------|
|   |   |

Grant Thornton LLP Chartered Accountants Management Consultants 

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

We consent to the use in Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Reporton Form 40-F of Gammon Lake Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005of our Auditors' Report dated September 10, 2005 relating to the consolidatedbalance sheet of Gammon Lake Resources Inc. as at July 31, 2005 and theconsolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for the yearended July 31, 2005 before the effects of the adjustments for the corrections ofthe error described in Note 16(a). 

We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any proceduresto the adjustments for the correction of the error described in Note 16(a) and,accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance aboutwhether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Thoseadjustments were audited by KPMG LLP. 

|                              |                                                 |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Halifax, Canada     April 2, 2007 | Grant Thornton    LLP     Chartered Accountants |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4408 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4408

To amend section 242 of title 18, United States Code, to forbid the use 
of chokeholds by persons subject to that provision's prohibitions, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2019

Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Bass, Ms. Lee of 
California, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Kelly of 
 Illinois, Ms. Norton, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Serrano, 
    Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Rush, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. 
 Velazquez, Ms. Moore, Mr. Evans, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Ms. Omar, Ms. 
Scanlon, Mr. Richmond, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. 
  Jayapal, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Cicilline, and Ms. Pressley) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 242 of title 18, United States Code, to forbid the use 
of chokeholds by persons subject to that provision's prohibitions, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eric Garner Excessive Use of Force 
Prevention Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. CHOKEHOLDS AS CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

    Section 242 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following: ``For the purposes of this section, the 
application of any pressure to the throat or windpipe which may prevent 
or hinder breathing or reduce intake of air is a punishment, pain, or 
penalty.''.
                                 <all>
```