alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
IEA Income Fund X, L.P.
RULE 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
          I, John Kallas, certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundX, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
          2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
          4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
               (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
               (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
               (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
          5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
               (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
               (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ JOHN KALLASJohn KallasVice President andChief Financial Officer of CCC
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 2 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

SUNNI MUSLIM COMMUNITY OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JAHAD ALI; HASSAN LATIF; DONNIE RUSSELL; DAVID MARQUEZ; BARON HALL; individually and on behalf of those similarly situated throughout the Colorado Department of Corrections, Plaintiffs, and ABRON ARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 98-1137 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, in his official capacity and individually; RANDY HENDERSON, in his official capacity and individually; JACK LAUGHLIN, in his official capacity and individually; FRANK MILLER, in his official capacity and individually; JOE PAOLINO, in his official capacity and individually; and other defendants Jane and John Does to be named in the body of this action being sued individually and in their official capacity; ROBERT CANTWELL, in his official capacity and individually; MARY WEST, in her official capacity and individually; RICK SOARES, in his official capacity and individually, (D.C. No. 95-M-1590) (D. Colo.)* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

1 Because only Plaintiff Arrington signed the notice of appeal, he is the only proper appellant before this court. See 10th Cir. R. 3.1 (“Every notice of appeal must be signed by the appellant or by counsel for the appellant.”); Smith v. Romer , No. 96-1211, unpub. op., 1997 WL 57093 at *1 n.1 (10th Cir., Feb. 11, 1997). 2 Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BALDOCK , EBEL , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. **

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in a prisoner civil rights action, see Fed R. Civ. P. 56, wherein Plaintiffs unsuccessfully claimed that certain policies and practices of the Colorado Department of Corrections restricted their freedom of religion. On appeal, Plaintff-Appellant Abron Arrington, appearing pro se, raises the same grounds for relief that he did in the district court. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 1 We have reviewed the briefs on appeal, the district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, and the entire record before us. Based upon our review of the record, we find no merit in any of Plaintiff’s claims and affirm substantially3

for the reasons set forth in the district court’s order, a copy of which is attached hereto.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock Circuit JudgeAttachment not available electronically.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,280
<INVENTORY>                                    353,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               528,037
<PP&E>                                       1,023,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 343,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,302,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          372,046
<BONDS>                                      1,075,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           350
<OTHER-SE>                                    (434,312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,302,287
<SALES>                                      1,211,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,211,882
<CGS>                                          904,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  904,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,173
<DISCONTINUED>                                   8,763
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,936
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.75
        

</TABLE>
Vien-Phuong Thi HO, petitioner, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al.

No. 17-278.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4196 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4196

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include child development 
 and early learning as community services under the Federal work-study 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 20, 2019

    Mr. Castro of Texas (for himself, Mr. Cole, and Ms. Spanberger) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include child development 
 and early learning as community services under the Federal work-study 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY SERVICES.

    Section 441(c)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087-51(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``literacy training'' and 
inserting ``child development and early learning (including Head Start 
programs and Early Head Start programs carried out under the Head Start 
Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.), literacy training''.
                                 <all>
```
Aldo CASTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5471.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Teon Jamell WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Brad PERRITT, Superintendent, Lumberton Correctional Institution.

No. 17-5030.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4046 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to provide for 

certain changes to the semiannual report of the Attorney General to 

Congress regarding actions taken under that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. MEADOWS (for himself, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, and Mr. HARRIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and 

in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to provide for certain changes to the semiannual report 

of the Attorney General to Congress regarding actions 

taken under that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FISA Reform Act of 

5 2019’’. 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4046 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHANGES TO THE SEMIANNUAL REPORT OF THE 

2 ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

3 Section 601(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveil4 lance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1871(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

6 striking ‘‘the Permanent Select Committee on Intel7 ligence of the House of Representatives, the Select 

8 Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the 

9 Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Rep10 resentatives and the Senate’’ and inserting the fol11 lowing: ‘‘the Speaker and minority leader of the 

12 House of Representatives and the majority leader 

13 and minority leader of the Senate’’; 

14 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

15 end; 

16 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at 

17 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(6) the identity of any person targeted for an 

20 order under this Act who is [associated with a can21 didate for President of a major party (as defined in 

22 section 9002(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

23 1986)].’’. 

Æ 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Kallys ALBERT, Sr., petitioner, v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., et al.

No. 17-5269.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
David MARRERO, petitioner, v. Donna SMITH, Warden.

No. 17-5870.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1679/2004

of 27 September 2004         

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

Pursuant to Article 2(2) and Article 3 of abovementioned Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87, Community import and producer prices are fixed each fortnight for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses and apply for two-weekly periods. Pursuant to Article 1b of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 of 17 March 1988 laying down detailed rules for the application of the arrangements for the import into the Community of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (2), those prices are determined for fortnightly periods on the basis of weighted prices provided by the Member States. Those prices should be fixed immediately so the customs duties applicable can be determined. To that end, provision should be made for this Regulation to enter into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1b of Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 for a fortnightly period shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 September 2004.

It shall apply from 29 September to 12 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 27 September 2004 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

----
# L_2013081EN.01003401.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 232/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 461/2012 of 31 May 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1165/98 concerning short-term statistics and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1503/2006, (EC) No 657/2007 and (EC) No 1178/2008 as regards adaptations related to the removal of the industrial new orders variables (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 461/2012 of 31 May 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1165/98 concerning short-term statistics and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1503/2006, (EC) No 657/2007 and (EC) No 1178/2008 as regards adaptations related to the removal of the industrial new orders variables (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in points 2 (Council Regulation (EC) No 1165/98) and 2c (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1503/2006) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0461: Commission Regulation (EU) No 461/2012 of 31 May 2012 (OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 26).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0461: Commission Regulation (EU) No 461/2012 of 31 May 2012 (OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 26).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 461/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 26.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.  This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.  /s/ Mark Scott Mark Scott Chief Financial Officer July 14, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,808
<SECURITIES>                                    46,508
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,619<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,469
<PP&E>                                          31,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 517,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,489
<BONDS>                                        130,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           343
<OTHER-SE>                                     330,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   517,977
<SALES>                                         76,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,211
<CGS>                                           28,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,314
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<FN>
<F1>Includes raw material and work-in-process inventory of $5,615.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
DLD-248 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 14-1811

___________

IN RE: TERRELL GEE,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of Delaware

(Related to D. Del. Civ. No. 1-11-cv-00416)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

May 8, 2014

Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 16, 2014)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Terrell Gee filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling 

the District Court to rule on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reason that 

follows, we will deny the mandamus petition.

Gee filed a habeas corpus petition in 2011, which the District Court dismissed as 

time-barred on April 3, 2014. Prior to that disposition, the matter had been pending 

without action for two years. Gee prepared and mailed his mandamus petition before the 
2

District Court acted on his habeas petition, but the mandamus petition was docketed 

shortly after the District Court’s decision. The Clerk notified Gee that a decision had 

been issued regarding his habeas petition, but Gee did not seek to withdraw his

mandamus petition.

As the District Court has already done what Gee asks this Court to order it to do –

rule on his habeas petition – Gee’s mandamus petition is moot. See In re Surrick, 338 

F.3d 224, 230 (3d Cir. 2003) (noting that “the central question of all mootness problems 

is whether changes in circumstances that prevailed at the beginning of the litigation have 

forestalled any occasion for meaningful relief”) (quotation marks omitted). We will 

therefore deny the mandamus petition.