alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12

                             IKON RECEIVABLES LLC
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Fiscal Year Ended      Fiscal Year Ended
                                                                                     September 30, 2000     September 30, 1999
                                                                                            2000                  1999
<S>                                                                                <C>                    <C>
Earnings
     Income from continuing operations                                                         $ 66,113                $17,574
     Add:
          Fixed charges                                                                          82,431                 14,702
                                                                                               --------                -------
     Earnings, as adjusted                                             (A)                     $148,544                $32,276
                                                                                               ========                =======
Fixed charges
     Other interest expense, including
          Interest on capital leases                                   (B)                     $ 82,431                $14,702
                                                                                               ========                =======
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
     (A) divided by (B)                                                                             1.8                    2.2
                                                                                               ========                =======
</TABLE>
# C_2010024EN.01007803.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/78

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 November 2009 — Soerensen Ferraresi v Commission

(Case F-5/09) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Action for damages - Admissibility - Complaint - Act causing adverse effect)

2010/C 24/148

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ayo Soerensen Ferraresi (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Di Vuolo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Officials — Application for compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant as a result of the decision of 1 February 2003 to retire the applicant on the ground of invalidity.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Ms Soerensen Ferraresi is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Soerensen Ferraresi is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.05.2009, p. 45

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 1, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40298 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD L. CRAIG; ROBIN L. ROSS, also known as Twice R.,
Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-11-1

--------------------

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This court affirmed the convictions and sentences of Richard

L. Craig. United States v. Craig , No. 04-40298 (5th Cir. Dec. 10,

2004) (unpublished). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for
further consideration in light of United States v. Booker , 125 S.

Ct. 738 (2005). S ee Craig v. United States , 125 S. Ct. 18 7 7No. 04-40298 -2-
(2005). We requested and received supplemental letter briefs
addressing the impact of Booker

. Craig argues that his sentence was plainly erroneous under

Booker

. He concedes that our review is for plain error only

because no Sixth Amendment objection was mad e in the district

court. S ee United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.

2005), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005).

There i s no dispute that the first two prongs of the plain

error standard are satisfied; there was Sixth Amendment error and
the error was plain. S ee id. at 520-21. In order to meet the

third prong of t he plain error standard, Craig must demonstrate

“ that the sentencing judge--sentencing under an advisory sc heme

rather than a mandatory one--would have reached a significantly

different result.” Id. at 521.

The distr ict court sentenced Craig at the top of the
guidelines range and there is no indication in the record what the

district court would have done had it known that the guidelines

were advisory. Craig’s argument that the district court would have
given him a lesser sentence because the facts did not support the
sentence enhancement he received is refuted by the record. Given

these circumstances, Craig has not met the third prong of the plain

error standard. S ee id. at 522. Craig’s arguments that the error

was structural and that prejudice should otherwise be presumed are

foreclosed. See United States v. Malveaux , 411 F.3d 558, 560 n.9No. 04-40298 -3-
(5th Cir. 2005), c ert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 126 S. Ct. 194

(2005).

Becau se nothing in the Supreme Court’s B ooker decision
requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case, we
reinstate our judgment affirming Craig’s convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nautilus, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|March 8, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Kenneth L. Fish    
|Date          |  |  |  |     |  | Kenneth L. Fish,       
|              |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In Re Dion Eric SAVAGE, petitioner.

No. 17-5243.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# L_2014211EN.01003501.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 26/2014

of 14 February 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 66nf (Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32013 R 0800: Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 of 14 August 2013 (OJ L 227, 24.8.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32013 R 0800: Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 of 14 August 2013 (OJ L 227, 24.8.2013, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 227, 24.8.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David B. Hills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LookSmart,
Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



Date: March 16, 2005By:

/s/    DAVID B. HILLSName: Title:

David B. Hills Chief Executive
Officer




I, William B. Lonergan, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



Date: March 16, 2005By:

/s/    WILLIAM B. LONERGANName: Title:

William B. Lonergan Chief Financial
Officer
# C_2011089EN.01001503.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-3/09) (1)

1

(State aid - Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding - Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market)

2011/C 89/35

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Righini, C. Urraca Caviedes and V. Di Bucci, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/38/EC of 21 October 2008 on State aid C-20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 50).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,838
<INVENTORY>                                    301,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               499,821
<PP&E>                                         273,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 993,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          150,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                     470,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   993,362
<SALES>                                        524,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               530,633
<CGS>                                          202,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               283,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,496
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,763)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,376)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
In Re David M. CAMPBELL, petitioner.

No. 17-5199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2012207EN.01004501.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 65/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2011 of 21 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2011 of 21 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 1197: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2011 of 21 November 2011 (OJ L 303, 22.11.2011, p. 14).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 1197: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2011 of 21 November 2011 (OJ L 303, 22.11.2011, p. 14).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 303, 22.11.2011, p. 14.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Air Transport Association
  
    



  When
              09/23/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XI. End-user Exception

  CFTC Staff
              Bart ChiltonElizabeth Ritter

  Visitor(s)
              Ryan Stroschein (ATA)Ed Barron (ATA)

  Organization(s)
              Air Transport Association (ATA)


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Andre Lamont RAWLS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5998.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kathryn GILLETTE, petitioner, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al.

No. 17-305.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# L_2012076EN.01002001.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 135/2011

of 2 December 2011

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 101/2011 of 30 September 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 101/2011 of 30 September 2011 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 amending Council Directive 87/372/EEC on the frequency bands to be reserved for the coordinated introduction of public pan-European cellular digital land-based mobile communications in the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 amending Council Directive 87/372/EEC on the frequency bands to be reserved for the coordinated introduction of public pan-European cellular digital land-based mobile communications in the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 87/372/EEC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32009 L 0114: Directive 2009/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 (OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 25).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32009 L 0114: Directive 2009/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 (OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 25).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/114/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2011, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 1.12.2011, p. 39.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 25.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---