alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00281

- CV

J ONATHAN S TICKLAND AND J ACKIE S CHLEGEL , T EXANS FOR V ACCINE F REEDOM , AND T EXANS FOR V ACCINE C HOICE PAC
, Appellants

V

. J ACKIE S CHLEGEL AND T EXANS FOR V

ACCINE C HOICE , Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 17th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 017

- 330567

- 21 )

November 22, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record o n appe al in this case and holds that there
was error in part of the trial court’s orders on the parties ’ motions under the Texas
Citizens Participation Act (TCPA)

. We affirm the trial court’s order denying the
TCPA motion filed by Ja ckie Schlegel, Texa ns f or Vaccine Freedom, and T exans for

Vaccine Choice PAC

. We reverse the trial court’s order denying Jonathan Stickland ’ s

TCPA motion
, render judgment granting his TCPA motion
, and remand th e case tothe trial court to de termine Stic kland ’ s attorney ’ s fees, c o sts , and the potential award

of sa n ctions under the TCPA

. We deny Texans for Vaccine Choice ’ s request for

sanctions.

It is further ordered that Jackie Schlegel, Texans for Vaccine Freedom, and

Texans for Vaccine Choice PAC must pay all costs of this appe al.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A2 0 D0 09 7
. R ONALD W HI TE et a l
. v . ENTERPRI SE HOLDI NGS, INC. et a l
. Ro n al d W h i t e fi l ed th i s ap p l icat i o n fo r di s cret i o n ary rev iew o f t he tri al co urt ’ s
o rd er d en y i n g h i s ren ewed m o t i o n fo r p art i al s u m m ary ju d g m en t

. Th e d en i al o f a
m o ti o n fo r s u m

m ary ju d g m en t , h o wev er, m u s t b e ap p eal ed in acco rd an ce wi t h t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal pro ced u res s et fo rt h i n OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b )

– i n cl ud i n g o b t ai n i n g
a cert i fi cat e o f i m

m ed i at e rev i ew fro m t h e t ri al co u rt

. See OCGA § 9 -1 1 -5 6 (h ); Pa ce Co n s t r

. Co r

p. v. No r t h

p ar k As so cs

. , 2 1 5 Ga. Ap p

. 43 8 , 4 3 9 (4 5 0 SE2 d 8 2 8 ) (1 9 9 4 );

s ee al s o Fi r

s t Na t

. Ba n k o

f At l a n t a v. Fer rel l , 2 3 9 G a. 8 , 9 (2 3 5 SE2 d 5 0 7 ) ( 1 9 7 7 )

. W h i t e’ s fai l u re to fo l lo w t h e req u i red ap p el l at e p ro ced u res dep ri v es u s o f j u ri s d i ct i o n
o v er t h i s ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Pa ce Co n st r

. Co r p

. , 21 5 Ga. Ap p. at 4 3 9 -4 4 0

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. October 23, 2019

10/23/2019
NO. 07-03-0448-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	NOVEMBER 12, 2003

	______________________________

	TONY ORMS

			Appellant

	v.

	ANNETTE JOHNSON

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF ANGELINA COUNTY;

	NO. 12854; HON. BARRY BRYAN, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Tony Orms filed a notice of appeal on September 22, 2003.  However, he did not pay the $125 filing fee required from appellants pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5.  Nor did he file an affidavit pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 relieving appellants of their duty to pay the fee.  By letter from this Court dated October 31, 2003, we informed appellant that “the filing fee of $125.00 has not been received.  Said fee is due to be filed no later than November 10, 2003.  Failure to pay the filing fee may result in the appeal being subject to dismissal.”  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).  October 10th lapsed without the fee being paid.

	Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 

							Per Curiam
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CCC GlobalCom Corporation on form
10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mario H. Hernandez,
Controller/Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
              (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the  information  in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
              respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.


By /s/ Mario H. Hernandez
-------------------------
Mario H. Hernandez
Controller/Principal Financial Officer
August 22, 2003
Jenny RUBIN, et al., petitioners, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al.

No. 16-534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 21, 2017.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             365
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   365
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       565 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,711)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.15


                [SERVICEWARE LETTERHEAD]     [SERVICEWARE LOGO]


                                                                January 19, 2000


Rajiv Enand
526 Salem Heights Drive
Gibsonia, PA 15044


Dear Rajiv:

This letter is to confirm your updated compensation package as Chairman of the
Board for ServiceWare. I have reviewed this and have unanimous consent from the
compensation committee of the board of directors to offer this package to you.

Your base salary shall continue to be $200,000/year. Your exclusive bonus
program for FY2000 shall be based on the company achieving its FY2000
operating plan of $32.5M in revenue. If the company is able to 100% of that
number, you will be given a $50,000 bonus. If the company is able to achieve
between 90% and 100% of that number, you will be given a $25,000 bonus.

Cash compensation and all associated employee benefits available to you shall
be guaranteed through June 30, 2001, at which time they shall cease. For
FY2001, there shall be no bonus program as part of your compensation.


                                        Regards,


                                        /s/ Mark Tapling

                                        Mark Tapling
                                        Chief Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4165 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to publish a report regarding 

veterans who receive benefits under laws administered by the Secretary, 

disaggregated by sex and minority group member status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2019 

Mr. DELGADO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to publish a 

report regarding veterans who receive benefits under laws 

administered by the Secretary, disaggregated by sex and 

minority group member status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Benefits 

5 for Underserved Veterans Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4165 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT REGARDING VETERANS WHO RECEIVE 

2 BENEFITS UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY 

3 THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

6 of Veterans Affairs shall publish a report regarding vet7 erans who receive benefits under laws administered by the 

8 Secretary, including the Transition Assistance Program 

9 under sections 1142 and 1144 of title 10, United States 

10 Code. 

11 (b) DATA.—The data regarding veterans published in 

12 the report under subsection (a)— 

13 (1) shall be disaggregated by— 

14 (A) sex; and 

15 (B) minority group member status; and 

16 (2) may not include any personally identifiable 

17 information. 

18 (c) MINORITY GROUP MEMBER DEFINED.—In this 

19 section, the term ‘‘minority group member’’ has the mean20 ing given that term in section 544 of title 38, United 

21 States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
CHRISTOPHER M. CHARLES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1645

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 16, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Christopher M. Charles, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WOLF and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GSI Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn E. Davis, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Glenn E. DavisGlenn E. DavisPrincipal Financial Officer


April 13, 2010

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Shannon Douglas ROBINSON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5451.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Amber MAURICIO, et al., petitioners, v. Dennis DAUGAARD, Governor of South Dakota, et al.

No. 17-188.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.
# L_2012341EN.01002101.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 169/2012

of 28 September 2012

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2011/251/EU of 18 April 2011 amending Decision 2009/766/EC on the harmonisation of the 900 MHz and 1 800 MHz frequency bands for terrestrial systems capable of providing pan-European electronic communications services in the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2011/251/EU of 18 April 2011 amending Decision 2009/766/EC on the harmonisation of the 900 MHz and 1 800 MHz frequency bands for terrestrial systems capable of providing pan-European electronic communications services in the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 1a (Commission Decision 2009/766/EC) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32011 D 0251: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/251/EU of 18 April 2011 (OJ L 106, 27.4.2011, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32011 D 0251: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/251/EU of 18 April 2011 (OJ L 106, 27.4.2011, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2011/251/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 September 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 106, 27.4.2011, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Dale SNYDER, et al., petitioners, v. ACOR CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000853566
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,123,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,123,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,810,183)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3847 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, as the ‘‘Reverend Curtis West Harris Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3847 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REVEREND CURTIS WEST HARRIS POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located 117 West Poythress Street in Hope5 well, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rev6 erend Curtis West Harris Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Reverend Curtis West 

11 Harris Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for Alford Refrigerated Warehouse, Inc.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001078006
<NAME>                        Alford Refrigerated Warehouse, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          105,075
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,753,890
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,715,745
<PP&E>                          21,422,381
<DEPRECIATION>                  4,044,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,109,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,617,289
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        75,407
<OTHER-SE>                      6,556,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,109,705
<SALES>                         15,712,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                15,712,757
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   14,921,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,793,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,090,828
<INCOME-TAX>                    426,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             664,828
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    664,828
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.09



</TABLE>
# L_2014111DE.01009701.xml

| 15.4.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 111/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 111/97

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 197/2013 vom 8. November 2013 zur Änderung von Anhang II (Technische Vorschriften, Normen, Prüfung und Zertifizierung) des EWR-Abkommens

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 92 vom 27. März 2014
  )

Auf Seite 23, Erwägungsgrund 1:

anstatt:

„Die Richtlinie 2013/2/EU der Kommission vom 7. Februar 2013 zur Änderung von Anhang I der Richtlinie 94/62/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über unerwünschte Stoffe in der Tierernährung (1) ist in das EWR-Abkommen aufzunehmen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Richtlinie 2013/2/EU der Kommission vom 7. Februar 2013 zur Änderung von Anhang I der Richtlinie 94/62/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über Verpackungen und Verpackungsabfälle (1) ist in das EWR-Abkommen aufzunehmen.“

---
Ronald W. RANGEL, petitioner, v. Dwight NEVEN, Warden, et al.

No. 17-6149.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
BLOOMINGDALE'S, INC., petitioner, v. Bernadette TANGUILIG.

No. 16-1503.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.