alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008186EN.01004101.xml

| 15.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/41

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part

The Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, was signed in Luxembourg on 16 June 2008. The Agreement has been published for the EU in OJ L 169 of 30 June 2008 on page 13, and for Bosnia and Herzegovina in the official gazette of international agreements number 5 of 20 June 2008. By virtue of Article 58 of the Interim Agreement, which states that it will come into force ‘on the first day of the first month following the date of the deposit of the last instrument of ratification or approval’, the Agreement came into force on 1 July 2008.

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/27/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       26,639
COMMITMENTS
   2,809      165    1,608   12,968   16,479   17,384   18,252    9,255    8,386

CHANGES FROM 01/20/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -890)
     168     -465      312   -2,129   -1,802   -1,649   -1,954      759    1,064

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.5      0.6      6.0     48.7     61.9     65.3     68.5     34.7     31.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       35)
       7        3        6       24       19       33       26
```

----

Updated January 30, 2009
#### W. McGeorge Mason, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Kagay Realty Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed March 19, 1929.

*Jennings & Hamilton,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Stephen B. Jennings*and *Daniel A. Stewart,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the. Court *372that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Jerry BROWDY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman AL BAHLUL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1307.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4366 

To require oversight of licenses involving financial services and the Democratic 

People’s Republic of Korea, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 

Mr. RIGGLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require oversight of licenses involving financial services 

and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Korea Banking 

5 Oversight Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OVERSIGHT OF LICENSES INVOLVING FINANCIAL 

7 SERVICES AND THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S 

8 REPUBLIC OF KOREA. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4366 IH

1 thereafter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transmit 

2 to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of 

3 Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, 

4 and Urban Affairs of the Senate a report containing a 

5 copy of any license issued by the Secretary in the pre6 ceding 180 days that authorizes a financial institution to 

7 provide financial services benefitting any person sanc8 tioned pursuant to an applicable Executive Order or the 

9 North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 

10 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9201 et seq.). 

11 (b) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required under 

12 subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but 

13 may contain a classified annex. 

14 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

15 For purposes of this Act: 

16 (1) APPLICABLE EXECUTIVE ORDER.—The 

17 term ‘‘applicable Executive Order’’ has the meaning 

18 given that term under section 3 of the North Korea 

19 Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016 (22 

20 U.S.C. 9202). 

21 (2) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘‘fi22 nancial institution’’ means a United States financial 

23 institution or a foreign financial institution. 

24 (3) FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The 

25 term ‘‘foreign financial institution’’ has the meaning 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4366 IH

1 given that term under section 510.309 of title 31, 

2 Code of Federal Regulations. 

3 (4) UNITED STATES FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.— 

4 The term ‘‘United States financial institution’’ has 

5 the meaning given the term ‘‘U.S. financial institu6 tion’’ under section 510.328 of title 31, Code of 

7 Federal Regulations. 

8 SEC. 4. SUNSET. 

9 The reporting requirement under this Act shall termi10 nate on the date that is the end of the 7-year period begin11 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Stephen L. KASS, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit
23.1
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-60286, 333-77219, 333-30464 and 333-89464) on Form S-8 of Stamford
Industrial Group, Inc. of our report dated March 17, 2008, relating to our audit
of the financial statements, and the financial statement schedule, which appears
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
 
 /s/
McGladrey & Pullen LLP
 McGladrey
& Pullen LLP
 Stamford,
Connecticut
 March 16,
2009
# L_2014256EN.01002501.xml

| 28.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/25

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 48/2014

of 8 April 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes II and XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes II and XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 L 0052: Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 (OJ L 304, 14.11.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 L 0052: Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 (OJ L 304, 14.11.2013, p. 1).’

Article 2

The following indent is added in point 56d (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 L 0052: Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 (OJ L 304, 14.11.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 L 0052: Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 (OJ L 304, 14.11.2013, p. 1).’

Article 3

The texts of Directive 2013/52/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 April 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 14.11.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60426 

Summary Calendar

 

FRANK RAMSEY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JAMES V. ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT,

MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No.2:92-CV-129-S

- - - - - - - - - -

April 9, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Frank Ramsey, #05553, appeals the denial of his petition for

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Ramsey argues that the habitual-offender portion of his

indictment is fatally defective because it was based on a prior

conviction for which his sentence was served in county jail. The

Mississippi Supreme Court held Ramsey’s indictment sufficient

under state law, thus, consideration of Ramsey’s claim is

foreclosed. McKay v. Collins, 12 F.3d 66, 68 (5th Cir. 1994). 
No. 97-60426 

-2-

Ramsey argues that he was denied effective assistance of

counsel because his attorney allowed him to be sentenced based on

the defective indictment. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668,

687-88 (1984).

Ramsey argues for the first time on appeal that his

indictment is fatally defective because the language charging him

as an habitual offender was placed after the phrase “against the

peace and dignity of the state” and that he was denied effective

assistance of counsel because his attorney allowed him to be

sentenced as a habitual offender based on the defective

indictment. This court declines to review these claims. See

United States v. Cervantes, 132 F.3d 1106, 1109 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Ramsey also raises issues concerning extradition, double

jeopardy, cruel and unusual punishment, admissibility of

evidence, the prosecution’s closing remarks, the sufficiency of

the evidence, failure of the affidavit of the foreman to

accompany the indictment, and ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Ramsey failed to argue or discuss these issues in his appellate

brief; thus, they are abandoned. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a); Grant v.

Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523, 525 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
James G. WHEELER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5660.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Arthur Brennan MALLOY, petitioner, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA, et al.

No. 16-8495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Phyllis E. BANKS, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 17M56.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4184 

To require the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision 

Agency for the District of Columbia and the Director of the District 

of Columbia Pretrial Services Agency to reside in the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 13, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Court Services and Offender 

Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia and 

the Director of the District of Columbia Pretrial Services 

Agency to reside in the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RESIDENCY REQUIRE4 MENT FOR DIRECTOR OF COURT SERVICES 

5 AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY AND 

6 DIRECTOR OF PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY. 

7 (a) DIRECTOR OF CSOSA.—Section 11233(b)(1) of 

8 the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4184 IH

1 Improvement Act of 1997 (sec. 24–133(b)(1), D.C. Offi2 cial Code) is amended by striking the period at the end 

3 of the second sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘, ex4 cept that as a condition of appointment, the Director shall 

5 be a resident of the District of Columbia.’’. 

6 (b) DIRECTOR OF PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY.— 

7 Section 23–1304(b), District of Columbia Official Code, 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘Columbia.’’ and inserting ‘‘Co9 lumbia and who shall be a resident of the District of Co10 lumbia.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply with respect to each individual who 

13 is first appointed to serve as the Director of the Court 

14 Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District 

15 of Columbia or the Director of the District of Columbia 

16 Pretrial Services Agency (as the case may be) on or after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

No. 16-920.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Susan Luckfield certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Net Perceptions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005
                                              By: /s/ Susan Luckfield
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  Name:  Susan Luckfield
                                                  Title: Controller
Lawrence HUMPHREY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6235.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Veterans Affairs
 
 
 The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, that the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans will conduct a virtual meeting on May 9-11, 2022. The meetings will begin and ends as follows: Date
Time
LocationMay 9, 2022
10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST)
See WebEx link and call-in information below.May 10, 2022
10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. (EST)
See WebEx link and call-in information below.May 11, 2022
10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. (EST)
See WebEx link and call-in information below.
 The meeting sessions are open to the public. The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs regarding the needs of women Veterans with respect to health care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and activities administered by VA designed to meet such needs. The Committee makes recommendations to the Secretary regarding such programs and activities. The agenda will include updates from VA's Administrations and Staff Offices, as well as briefings on other issues impacting women Veterans. No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee to Ms. Shannon L. Middleton at 
                    *00W@mail.va.gov*
                     no later than May 2, 2022. Any member of the public who wishes to observe the virtual meeting may use the following WebEx link: 
                    *https://veteransaffairs.webex.com/​veteransaffairs/​j.php?​MTID=​m51ab4e28ba8610ac7926152b23d57b4b.*
                     To join by phone: 1-404-397-1596 (toll free); meeting number: 2760 037 3217; password: bmBDMUP$555. Dated: April 13, 2022. Jelessa M. Burney, Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 2022-08248 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4356 

AN ACT 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to allow certain individuals to terminate contracts for telephone, 

multichannel video programming, or internet access service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4356 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Families 

3 of Fallen Servicemembers Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS FOR TELEPHONE, 

5 MULTICHANNEL VIDEO PROGRAMMING, OR 

6 INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE BY CERTAIN IN7 DIVIDUALS UNDER SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL 

8 RELIEF ACT. 

9 Section 305A(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief 

10 Act (50 U.S.C. 3956(a)) is amended by adding at the end 

11 the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(4) ADDITIONAL INDIVIDUALS COVERED.—For 

13 purposes of this section, the following individuals 

14 shall be treated as a servicemember covered by para15 graph (1): 

16 ‘‘(A) A spouse or dependent of a service17 member who dies while in military service or a 

18 spouse or dependent of a member of the reserve 

19 components who dies while performing duty de20 scribed in subparagraph (C). 

21 ‘‘(B) A spouse or dependent of a service22 member who incurs a catastrophic injury or ill23 ness (as that term is defined in section 439(g) 

24 of title 37, United States Code), if the service25 member incurs the catastrophic injury or illness 
3 

•HR 4356 EH

1 while in military service or performing duty de2 scribed in subparagraph (C). 

3 ‘‘(C) A member of the reserve components 

4 performing military service or performing full5 time National Guard duty, active Guard and 

6 Reserve duty, or inactive-duty training (as such 

7 terms are defined in section 101(d) of title 10, 

8 United States Code).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 12, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4356 

AN ACT 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to 

or internet access service, and for other purposes. for telephone, multichannel video programming, allow certain individuals to terminate contracts
Rodney MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7635.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.