alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VERTICALBUYER, INC.
            (INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE)

This certifies that ----------

is the registered owner of ----------------

fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock, $.001 par value each of

                               VERTICALBUYER, INC.

    Transferable  on the books of the Corporation in person or by  attorney upon
surrender of this  Certificate  duly endorsed or assigned.  This Certificate and
the shares represented hereby  are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware,
and to the Certificate of Incorporation  and By-laws of the Corporation,  as now
or hereafter amended.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the
Transfer Agent

     WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile  signatures
of its duly authorized officers.

Dated: ----------------

                                  VERTALBUYER, INC.
/s/ Leslie Kent                    CORPORATE SEAL          /s/ Tim Rosen
----------------                       1999                --------------------
   Secretary                         DELAWARE                 President

                                                                 Countersigned:
                                         Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co., Inc.
                                                                 Transfer Agent

                                                           AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE



<PAGE>


     The following  abbreviations,  when used in the  inscription on the face of
this  certificate,  shall be  construed  as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN -  as joint tenants with right of
         survivorship and not as tenants
         in common and not as community property

UNIFORM GIFTS TO MINORS ACT

(Custodian)                       (Minor)
under the Uniform Gifts of Minors Act of  the State of ------------------

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto:

Please insert social security
or other identifying number: -----------------

(Insert name and address, including zip code):

----------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------- shares

of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint

----------------------------------------------------

to transfer the said shares on the books of the within named Corporation
with full power of substitution in the premises.



DATED: -------------                  ---------------------------------------


     NOTICE:  The signature to this  assignment must correspond with the name as
it is  written  upon the face of the  Certificate  in every  particular  without
alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.


SIGNATURE GUARANTEE:

<PAGE>
# C_2012025EN.01001901.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret, Denmark) — Partrederiet Sea Fighter v Skatteministeriet

(Case C-505/10) (1)

(Directive 92/81/EEC - Excise duties on mineral oils - Exemption - Concept of ‘navigation’ - Fuel used for an excavator affixed to a vessel and operating independently of the vessel’s engine)

(2012/C 25/31)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Højesteret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Partrederiet Sea Fighter

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Højesteret — Interpretation of Art. 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 12) — Exemption for mineral oils used as fuel for the purposes of navigation — Concept of ‘for the purposes of navigation’ — Mineral oils used as fuel for an excavator which is affixed to a vessel but having its own separate motor and fuel tank and thus operating independently of the vessel’s propulsion motor.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils, as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994, must be interpreted as meaning that mineral oils supplied for use in an excavator which is affixed to a vessel but which, because it has its own separate motor and fuel tank, operates independently of the vessel’s propulsion engine, are not exempt from excise duties.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 11

- 1398

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

QUINTRELL REYNOS,

Appellant

PRESENT: McKEE, Chief Judge , SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO,

FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, J ORDAN, HARDIMAN,

GREENAWAY, JR.

, VANASKIE, and NYGAARD*, Circuit Judges

AMENDED ORDER

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en ban c in the above

captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. T he Clerk of

this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The

opinion and judgment entered May 22, 2012 are hereby vacated.

By the Court,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

Chief Judge

Date d : June 22, 2012

DWB/cc:

Joseph T. L abrum, III, Esq.

Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq.

Megan S. Scheib, Esq.

William J. Winning, Esq.

____________________________

*Judge Nygaard’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only.
John MULLARKEY, Jr., petitioner, v. Kevin KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

No. 17-1597.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Bryon JONES, petitioner, v. Brenda PAPILLON.

No. 17-5275.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Iowa denied.
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

Power of Attorney 
 I,
Qin Wu, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification Card No.440102195312273247, and a holder of 37.5% of the entire registered capital in Guangzhou Cornerstone Capital Management Co., Ltd., (the “Cornerstone Capital”) (the
“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize Guangzhou Cornerstone Corporate Consulting Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of
Attorney: 
 The WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters
concerning My Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders’ meetings of Cornerstone Capital; 2) exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China
and Cornerstone Capital’s Articles of Association, including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the
executive director and/or director, supervisor, the chief executive officer and other senior management members of Cornerstone Capital. 

Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, the WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to
execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to
which I am a party. 
 All the actions associated with My Shareholding conducted by the WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the
documents related to My Shareholding executed by the WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by the WFOE. 

The WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any
other person or entity at its own discretion and without giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent. 
 This Power of Attorney is
coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as I am a shareholder of Cornerstone Capital. 

During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all the rights associated with My Shareholding, which have been authorized to WFOE
through this Power of Attorney, and shall not exercise such rights by myself. 
 This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese and English;
in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail. 

  
 1 

Strictly Confidential 








 
			
	Qin Wu
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Qin Wu

		
	Date:	 	October 12, 2017


  

			
	Mingqi Huang
		
	Witness:	 	 /s/ Mingqi Huang

		
	Date:	 	October 12, 2017


  
 2 

Strictly Confidential
---

Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Gammon Gold Inc. (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rene
Marion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|March 30, 2010 | /s/ Rene
      Marion              
|-------------- | -----------------------------------
|               | Rene Marion                        
|               | President & Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Gammon Gold Inc. and will be retained by Gammon Gold
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Gammon Gold Inc. (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott
Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|March 30, 2010 | /s/ Scott
      Perry  
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Scott Perry            
|               | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Gammon Gold Inc. and will be retained by Gammon Gold
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward West, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this 10-K/A of LookSmart, Ltd.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29,
2008



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/s/    EDWARD WEST                 
|Edward West Chief Executive Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department



## 83 **KA 08-00281** PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CARL GOOSSENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

JOHN E. TYO, SHORTSVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THOMAS E. MORAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (ERIC R. SCHIENER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Robert B. Wiggins, J.), rendered January 9, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]). We reject defendant’s contention that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256). Although defendant’s further contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal, defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review ( see People v Davis , 45 AD3d 1357, lv denied 9 NY3d 1005; People v Jones , 42 AD3d 968). Contrary to defendant’s contention, this case does not fall within the rare exception to the preservation requirement set forth in People v Lopez (71 NY2d 662, 666), “inasmuch as nothing in the plea colloquy casts significant doubt on defendant’s guilt or the voluntariness of the plea” ( People v Lewandowski , 82 AD3d 1602, 1602; see Jones , 42 AD3d 968). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his further contention that County Court failed to afford him sufficient time to retain a new attorney ( see People v La Bar , 16 AD3d 1084, lv denied 5 NY3d 764; People v Morgan , 275 AD2d 970, lv denied 96 NY2d 761) and, in any event, defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review ( see CPL 470.05 [2]). Finally, the challenge by defendant to the court’s suppression ruling is also encompassed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v Kemp , 94 NY2d 831, 833; People v**-2- 83 KA 08-00281** 

Bell , 89 AD3d 1518).

Entered: February 17, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Andrew P. Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of Audible, Inc. (the
Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 of the
Registrant (the Report):



| |                                                                                                                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)]
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

By: /s/ Andrew P. Kaplan
Name: Andrew P. Kaplan
Date: March 28, 2003
Frank E. VENNES, Jr., petitioner, v. Gary HANSEN.

No. 17-6022.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Joseph D. MAURIZIO, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6046.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# L_2012309EN.01000301.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/3

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 125/2012

of 13 July 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2012 of 15 June 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2012 of 15 June 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Acrylamide) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Acrylamide) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 0366: Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 12).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 0366: Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 12).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 July 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 4.10.2012, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 12.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/06/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       29,492
COMMITMENTS
   3,235      626    1,866   15,397   18,846   20,498   21,338    8,994    8,154

CHANGES FROM 12/30/08 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -637)
     468       -4      112   -1,068     -572     -488     -465     -149     -172

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.0      2.1      6.3     52.2     63.9     69.5     72.4     30.5     27.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       8        3        9       23       18       35       30
```

----

Updated January 9, 2009
# L_2005339EN.01003701.xml

| 22.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 339/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 339/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 125/2005

of 30 September 2005

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 86/2005 of 10 June 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 86/2005 of 10 June 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/2005 of 2 February 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1917/2000 with regard to the transmission of data to the Commission (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/2005 of 2 February 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1917/2000 with regard to the transmission of data to the Commission (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Point 16a (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1917/2000) of Annex XXI to the Agreement shall be amended as follow:

| 1. | the following indent shall be added:






  ‘— | 32005 R 0179: Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/2005 of 2 February 2005 (OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 6).’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

the following indent shall be added:

‘—

32005 R 0179: Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/2005 of 2 February 2005 (OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 6).’;

| 2. | the following adaptation shall be added:






  ‘(h) | Liechtenstein is exempted from providing the data required in Article 32(1)(a).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

the following adaptation shall be added:

‘(h)

Liechtenstein is exempted from providing the data required in Article 32(1)(a).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 179/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 268, 13.10.2005, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 6.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Sean LEE, petitioner, v. Gene BEASLEY, Warden.

No. 17-8897.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
John Lee FUTRELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-391.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Kinsley Frampton NYCE.

No. D-3023.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.