alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010209EN.01001101.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/11

---

Appeal brought on 18 January 2010 by Paul Inge Hansen against the judgment delivered on 17 November 2009 in Case T-295/09 Paul Inge Hansen v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-26/10P)

()

2010/C 209/15

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Paul Inge Hansen (represented by: P. Löfqvist, advokat, and C. von Quitzow, Juris doktor)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

The Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the action by order of 6 May 2010.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4190 

To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress a report on domestic 

terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 16, 2019 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress a 

report on domestic terrorism, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Domestic Terrorism 

5 Information Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON DOMESTIC TERRORISM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General 

9 shall submit to Congress a report that includes, for the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4190 IH

1 period beginning on January 1, 2009, and ending on the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act, the following: 

3 (1) The number of individuals arrested by a 

4 Federal law enforcement officer pursuant to an in5 vestigation of an act of domestic terrorism, the re6 sults of each such investigation, and any charges 

7 filed pursuant to each such investigation. 

8 (2) The number of individuals who have been 

9 killed by acts of domestic terrorism. 

10 (3) The methods and strategies that the De11 partment of Justice uses to prevent domestic ter12 rorism. 

13 (b) DEFINTION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘domestic ter14 rorism’’ has the meaning given that term in section 2331 

15 of title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Jon HUSTED, Ohio Secretary of State, petitioner, v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.

No. 16-980.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
# Official Journal L 265I/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 265I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6016 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 265I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6016 October 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1858 of 16 October 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea | 1 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1859 of 16 October 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea | 5 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1860 of 16 October 2017 amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1858 of 16 October 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

1

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1859 of 16 October 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

5

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1860 of 16 October 2017 amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

8

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# L_2011318EN.01003801.xml

| 1.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 100/2011

of 30 September 2011

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2010/166/EU of 19 March 2010 on harmonised conditions of use of radio spectrum for mobile communication services on board vessels (MCV services) in the European Union (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2010/166/EU of 19 March 2010 on harmonised conditions of use of radio spectrum for mobile communication services on board vessels (MCV services) in the European Union (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5czf (Commission Decision 2008/671/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘5czg. | 32010 D 0166: Commission Decision 2010/166/EU of 19 March 2010 on harmonised conditions of use of radio spectrum for mobile communication services on board vessels (MCV services) in the European Union (OJ L 72, 20.3.2010, p. 38).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘5czg.

32010 D 0166: Commission Decision 2010/166/EU of 19 March 2010 on harmonised conditions of use of radio spectrum for mobile communication services on board vessels (MCV services) in the European Union (OJ L 72, 20.3.2010, p. 38).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2010/166/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 50.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 72, 20.3.2010, p. 38.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4286 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit to businesses 

for certain virtual training expenses related to elementary and secondary 

school students, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a credit to businesses for certain virtual training expenses related to elementary and secondary school students, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virtual Apprenticeship 

5 Tax Credit Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR VIRTUAL TRAINING EXPENSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart D of part IV of sub8 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4286 IH

1 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 

2 section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 45T. VIRTUAL TRAINING CREDIT. 

4 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—For purposes of sec5 tion 38, the virtual training credit determined under this 

6 section for the taxable year is an amount equal to 30 per7 cent of the qualified virtual training expenses paid or in8 curred by the taxpayer during such taxable year. 

9 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The amount of the credit deter10 mined under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer 

11 for any taxable year shall not exceed $2,500. 

12 ‘‘(c) QUALIFIED VIRTUAL TRAINING EXPENSES.— 

13 For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualified virtual 

14 training expenses’ means expenses related to developing 

15 or expanding an industry-recognized virtual apprentice16 ship program for elementary and secondary school stu17 dents. 

18 ‘‘(d) DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT.—No deduction 

19 or credit shall be allowed under any other provision of this 

20 chapter with respect to the amount of the credit deter21 mined under this section.’’. 

22 (b) CREDIT MADE PART OF GENERAL BUSINESS

23 CREDIT.—Subsection (b) of section 38 of the Internal 

24 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘plus’’ at 

25 the end of paragraph (31), by striking the period at the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4286 IH

1 end of paragraph (32) and inserting ‘‘, plus’’, and by add2 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(33) the virtual training credit determined 

4 under section 45T.’’. 

5 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 for subpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 

7 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 45T. Virtual training credit.’’. 

9 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         600,458
<SECURITIES>                                 2,407,334
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,010,022
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,010,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,959,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,010,022
<SALES>                                        221,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,583
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   164,761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   118.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

                        [LETTERHEAD OF GLENMOUNT, LLC]

February 18, 2000

Mr. David Maimberg
Chairman
Fieldworks, Incorporated
7631 Anagram Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344

Dear David:

As you know, Glenmount, LLC ("Glenmount") has provided services to FieldWorks,
Incorporated ("FieldWorks") during the initial three-month period of the
Management Services Agreement, dated as of November 20, 1999 (the "Agreement"),
that exceed the scope and nature of the services contemplated by the monthly
and closing fees specified in the Agreement. In addition, Glenmount has arranged
for Industrial-Works Holding Co., LLC ("IWHC") to provide a commitment letter
to FieldWorks with respect to the purchase of up to 3,000,000 shares of
preferred stock.

This letter will confirm our mutual agreement to supplement the Agreement, as
set forth below, to compensate Glenmount for these additional services.

In consideration of the foregoing, FieldWorks hereby agrees (a) to promptly pay
Glenmount $30,000 as additional compensation for the initial three-month
period of the Agreement, (b) to extend the $10,000 per month fee to Glenmount
for each month during the balance of the term of the Agreement, and (c) to pay
an additional fee equal to 4% of the purchase price of any securities issued by
FieldWorks to IWHC (other than the 4,250,000 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock, the warrant and the 500,000 warrant shares issued pursuant to
the Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of November 20, 1999), payable on the date
any such securities are purchased by IWHC.

If the terms of this letter are acceptable, please sign below and return a copy
of this letter to us.

Sincerely,

Michael E. Johnson

/s/ Michael E. Johnson
Managing Director

The undersigned confirms and agrees with the terms of the foregoing letter.

FIELDWORKS, INCORPORATED

By: /s/ David Malmberg
    ---------------------------
    David Malmberg
    Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 444 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 444

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the period of 
eligibility for the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment program of 
                  the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the period of 
eligibility for the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment program of 
                  the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reduce Unemployment for Veterans of 
All Ages Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PERIOD OF ELIGIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 3103 of title 38, United States Code, is 
repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 31 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 3103.
                                 <all>
```
TING XUE, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 16-1274 (R46-005) (OT 2017).

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 97-31293

_______________

JOHN MCCORKLE and VIRGIE MCCORKLE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

VERSUS

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al.,

Defendants,

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS,

Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

_______________

No. 98-30068

_______________

JOHN MCCORKLE and VIRGIE MCCORKLE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al.,

Defendants,

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2042-S)

_________________________

August 19, 1999
 

* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

Before JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and STAGG,* District Judge:

PER CURIAM:**

In these two consolidated appeals, we have carefully

considered the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, the

applicable law, and the oral arguments of counsel. We conclude

that there is no reversible error either in the summary judgment

granted in favor of plaintiffs on the issue of liability (which the

city appeals) or in the amount of damages (which the plaintiffs

appeal). 

AFFIRMED.
#### James L. Frazee, *Appellant,*v. San Jose Estates, a corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 20, 1929.

*E. M. Johns*and *James L. Frazee,*for Appellant;

*Cooper,*Knight, *Adair, Cooper*c& *Osborne, George A. Pierce*and *W. M. Toomer,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-60286, 333-77219, 333-30464 and 333-89464) of Stamford Industrial
      Group, Inc. (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 17, 2008 relating to our
      audits of the financial statements of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. and CRC
      Acquisition Co., LLC (the “Predecessor Company”) appearing in the Annual Report
      on Form 10-K of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. for the year ended December
      31,
      2007.





/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen LLP


McGladrey
&
Pullen
      LLP


Stamford,
      Connecticut


March
      17,
      2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, State Office, Sacramento, California.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Section 601 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), the Bureau of Land Management will be holding a public hearing to gather comments on the suitability for noncoal mining of public land in eastern Genesee Valley. Specifically, 2.9 square miles of federal land administered by the U. S. Forest Service located within Sections 25 and 36, Township 26 N, Range 11 E, and Sections 30 and 31, Township 26 N, Range 12 E, MDB&M, Plumas County, California.

The hearing will be held in the Taylorsville Grange Hall, located at 4322 Main Street, Taylorsville, Plumas County, California, on Wednesday, July 25, 2001, from 7 to 8:30 p.m. All public comments will be recorded and the transcript will become part of the record. Comments provided by members of the general public will be reviewed and considered in rendering a final determination of this noncoal mining land suitability petition.

In addition, an informational meeting will also be held two weeks prior to the public hearings at the Taylorsville Grange Hall, on Wednesday, July 11, 2001, from 5 to 8 p.m. The purpose of this meeting is to provide the public with information regarding important details of the SMCRA, Section 601 petition process and relevant facts and issues pertaining to the case.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Modesto Tamondong (Mining Engineer) US DOI BLM-CASO (916) 978-4372

David Lawler (Geologist) US DOI BLM-CASO (916) 978-4365 

Lee Ann Taylor (Public Affairs Officer) USDA USFS-PNF (530) 283-7850 

Dated: June 11, 2001.

Sean Hagerty,

Acting Deputy State Director—Minerals. 

[FR Doc. 01-16217 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
O. John BENISEK, et al., appellants, v. Linda H. LAMONE, Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, et al.

No. 17-333.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 13, 2017.

Motion of appellants to expedite consideration of jurisdictional statement denied.
Kevin PENASS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6224.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.