alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

I, Mr. Scott M. Thornock, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Nicklebys.com, Inc.

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with respect to the fiscal year ended  December 31,
2003, covered by this annual report.

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, presented in
this annual report.

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing  and  maintaining   disclosure  controls  and  procedures  for  the
registrant and have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
and procedures as of December 31, 2003 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   Presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's  other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

     a.   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
controls  that  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: April 13, 2004                       By: /s/ Scott M. Thornock
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Scott M. Thornock, Chief Executive
                                              Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
                                              Secretary and Director
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: June 23-24, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, 
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Nisan Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental & 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 668, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2405, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7d9dec4d6d999d5dfd6c3c3d6d4dfd6c5ceced6f7d9dedf99d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b6b1abb9b6f6bab0b9acacb9bbb0b9aaa1a1b998b6b1b0f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 18, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08521 Filed 4-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Donald Thomas WETHERALL, petitioner, v. Cecilia REYNOLDS, Warden.

No. 17-5966.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Anthony ALLEN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-8525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Yann IANNUCCI, petitioner, v. Mark SWITALSKI, Judge, 16th Circuit Court of Michigan.

No. 17-5423.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 31, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John F. Craven, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKER David J. Pecker Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)/s/ JOHN F. CRAVEN John F. Craven Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)


Date: November 14, 2007

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Suran WIJE, petitioner, v. Ann STUART, et al.

No. 17-6206.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Juan Alberto NUNEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8803.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John C. PARKINSON, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

No. 17-1098.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

*2651Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
SEALED APPELLANT, petitioner, v. SEALED APPELLEE.

No. 17M130.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
# Official Journal C 185A/28 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 185A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4828 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 185A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4828 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 185A/2 | Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/30/05 to constitute a reserve pool of lawyer linguists (AD6) having as their main language Czech | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2005/C 185A/2

Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/30/05 to constitute a reserve pool of lawyer linguists (AD6) having as their main language Czech

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aztar Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended July 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul E. Rubeli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert M. Haddock, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|PAUL E. RUBELI    |                                                  
|----------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|Name:             | Paul E. Rubeli                                   
|Title:            | Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             | August 12, 2003                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|ROBERT M. HADDOCK |                                                  
|Name:             | Robert M. Haddock                                
|Title:            | President and
Chief Financial Officer            
|Date:             | August 12, 2003                                  
|                  |                                                  

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aztar Corporation and will be retained by Aztar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4342 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4342

    To direct the Secretary of Education to conduct a study on the 
 feasibility of a single certification for certain programs under the 
                     Higher Education Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2019

 Ms. Finkenauer (for herself, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Fitzpatrick, 
and Mr. McKinley) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Education to conduct a study on the 
 feasibility of a single certification for certain programs under the 
                     Higher Education Act of 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``RETAIN Teachers Act'' or the 
``Reducing Extra Teaching Authentication Impacting New Teachers Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT ON SINGLE CERTIFICATION FORM.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall conduct a study on the 
feasibility of developing a single certification form that borrowers 
may use to electronically submit information with respect to--
            (1) TEACH Grants under subpart 9 of part A of title IV of 
        the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070g et seq.);
            (2) loan forgiveness under section 428J of the Higher 
        Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078-10);
            (3) loan cancellation under section 460 of the Higher 
        Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087j); and
            (4) public service loan forgiveness under section 455(m) of 
        the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall submit a report to 
Congress that includes--
            (1) the results of the study required under subsection (a); 
        and
            (2) recommendations with respect to using a single 
        certification form that borrowers may use to electronically 
        submit information with respect to the programs specified in 
        paragraphs (1) through (4) of such subsection.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4021 

To prohibit a Federal agency from using a facial recognition technology 

without a Federal court order, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. HAALAND, and 

Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit a Federal agency from using a facial recognition 

technology without a Federal court order, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Facial, Analysis, Com5 parison, and Evaluation Protection Act of 2019’’ or the 

6 ‘‘FACE Protection Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY. 

8 (a) RESTRICTION.—A Federal agency may not apply 

9 facial recognition technology to any photo identification 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4021 IH

1 issued by a State or the Federal Government or any other 

2 photograph otherwise in the possession of a State or the 

3 Federal Government unless the agency has obtained a 

4 Federal court order determining that there is probable 

5 cause for the application of such technology. 

6 (b) PROHIBITION ON SHARING INFORMATION.—Any 

7 information obtained using facial recognition technology 

8 under a Federal court order may not be shared with any 

9 other Federal agency or entity that has not been granted 

10 permission for such use by a Federal court order. 

11 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 (1) FACIAL RECOGNITION.—The term ‘‘facial 

13 recognition’’ means an automated or semi-automated 

14 process that assists in identifying or verifying an in15 dividual based on the physical characteristics of an 

16 individual’s face geometry. 

17 (2) FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY.—The 

18 term ‘‘facial recognition technology’’ means any 

19 computer software or application that performs fa20 cial recognition. 

21 (3) FEDERAL AGENCY.—The term ‘‘Federal 

22 agency’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

23 102 of title 40, United States Code. 

24 (4) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

25 the several States, the District of Columbia, each 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4021 IH

1 commonwealth, territory or possession of the United 

2 States, and each federally recognized Indian Tribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3952 

To amend the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act 

of 1998 to establish a waiver from the matching requirement for certain 

grants under the specialty crop research initiative. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2019 

Ms. SCHRIER (for herself and Mr. COX of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 to establish a waiver from 

the matching requirement for certain grants under the 

specialty crop research initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER UNDER SPECIALTY CROP RESEARCH 

4 INITIATIVE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 412(g)(3) of the Agricul6 tural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 

7 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7632(g)(3)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3952 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘An enti2 ty’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subparagraph (C), an 

3 entity’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(C) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive 

7 the matching funds requirement under subpara8 graph (A) with respect to a grant made under 

9 this section if the Secretary determines that— 

10 ‘‘(i) the research conducted using 

11 grant funds— 

12 ‘‘(I) will benefit a specific spe13 cialty crop; and 

14 ‘‘(II) are likely to be applicable to 

15 agricultural commodities generally, in16 cluding specialty crops; or 

17 ‘‘(ii)(I) the grant involves scientifically 

18 important research; and 

19 ‘‘(II) the recipient of such grant is 

20 unable to satisfy such matching funds re21 quirement.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to grants awarded on 

24 or after October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit
      23.2**




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-60286, 333-77219, 333-30464, 333-42964, 333-89464 and 333-104468)
      of Net Perceptions, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2006 relating to the
      financial statements, which appears in this Form 10‐K.






/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP


Charlotte,
      North Carolina


March
      29,
      2007
# C_2010024EN.01006401.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/64

---

Action brought on 26 November 2009 — Matkompaniet v OHIM — DF World of Spices (KATOZ)

(Case T-473/09)

2010/C 24/113

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Matkompaniet AB (Borås, Sweden) (represented by: J. Gulliksson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DF World of Spices GmbH (Dissen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 September 2009 in case R 1023/2008-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 September 2009 in case R 1023/2008-2;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the proceedings before it. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the proceedings before it.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “KATOZ”, for goods in classes 29 and 30

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration of the figurative mark “KATTUS”, for goods in classes 29 and 30

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

---
Kevin Lyndel MASSEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9376.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.