alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005339EN.01005501.xml

| 22.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 339/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 339/55

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 129/2005

of 30 September 2005

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 90/2004 of 8 June 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 90/2004 of 8 June 2004 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 456/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2005 establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 456/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2005 establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (2).

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place with effect from 1 January 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place with effect from 1 January 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in Article 2(5) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32005 D 0456: Decision No 456/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2005 establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 D 0456: Decision No 456/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2005 establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 1).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 52.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Rebecca HILL, et al., petitioners, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Healthcare Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Kansas, et al.

No. 16-1480.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Russell HAMPTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5732.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund X, L.P.
RULE 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund X, L.P. (the“Partnership”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZ
Bret McCULLOUGH, petitioner, v. Mike JABARY.

No. 17-267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Alan F. McIlroy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton
Superior Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
     September 27, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: November 11, 2002



                                    /s/ Alan F. McIlroy

                                    Alan F. McIlroy

                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Keelan HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6234.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Daryl SHARP, petitioner, v. Timothy J. DOLAN, et al.

No. 17-5623.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

 

a)              The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 25, 2010, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | March 24, 2011 |                        | /s/ DAVID ROBERTSON |
|--------|---------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------|
|   |                | David Robertson             |
|   |                | *Chief Financial   Officer* |

 

 

----

** A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to iParty Corp. and will be retained by iParty Corp. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.*

 

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 15, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 15, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0313. PATRICK HENRY NELSON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 02CR00268
Douglas A. NIXON, et al., petitioners, v. BRENT MANNING'S QUALITY PREOWNED, INC., et al.

No. 17-5926.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Albert N. SMALL, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-6561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Bradley B. MILLER, petitioner, v. Andrea PLUMLEE, Judge, District Court of Texas, Dallas County, et al.

No. 16-9012.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.33


 


EXHIBIT A-3 TO FOURTH AMENDMENT OF LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT



 


SECOND ALLONGE


 


This Second Allonge (“Allonge”), dated April 27,
2018, is to the Secured Revolving Promissory Note dated as of December 12, 2016 in the maximum principal amount outstanding at
any time of $1,000,000.00 (as amended by an Allonge dated November 13, 2017, the “Note”) made by Creative
Realities, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Creative Realities, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Conexus World Global,
LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company, jointly and severally (each, and together herein referred to as “Maker”),
payable to the order of Slipstream Communications, LLC, an Anguillan limited liability company (the “Holder”).


 


The Note was issued
pursuant to that certain Loan and Security Agreement by and between, inter alia, Maker and the initial Holder dated as of
August 16, 2016 (as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated as of the First Amendment Effective Date, the Second Amendment
thereto dated as of the Second Amendment Effective Date, the Third Amendment thereto dated as of the Third Amendment Effective
Date, and the Fourth Amendment thereto dated as of the date hereof, and as it may be further amended, restated, supplemented, modified
or otherwise changed from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), and are subject to the terms and conditions thereof.


 


The Note is hereby
amended as follows:


 


(a) The two references
therein to “$1,000,000” are hereby changed to “$2,100,000”; and


 


(b) Section 1(a) of
the Note is hereby amended to insert after the phrase “in cash” the phrase “(except as provided in the Loan Agreement)”.


 


Except as expressly
amended hereby, the Note, including without limitation the default and acceleration provisions thereof, remain in full force and
effect, and Makers hereby confirm their liability thereunder to Holder.


 


[REST OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK]


 






    	 	 	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Second Allonge is executed and attached, or copies attached, to the Note on the date first set forth above.


 


	 	MAKERS
	 	 
	 	CREATIVE REALITIES, INC.
	 	 
	 	CREATIVE REALITIES, LLC
	 	 
	 	CONEXUS WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Richard Mills
	 	Name:	Richard Mills
	 	Title:	CEO


 


	 	HOLDER
	 	 
	 	SLIPSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Alec Machiels
	 	 	Alec Machiels


 


[Signature page to Second Allonge to Secured
Revolving Promissory Note]
Demarcus G. JACKSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-6273.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
William Roy GRUBB, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Francois DE CASSAGNOL, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY BASKETBALL, LLC, et al.

No. 16-1367.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Steve AUSTIN, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-5506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAY 28 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

RODERICK BLAISDELL, 

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 98-1033

v. (D.C. No. 97-D-2170)

GENE ATHERTON and GALE

NORTON,

(D. Colo.)

Respondents - Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner-Appellant, Mr. Roderick Blaisdell, was convicted of several

felonies in Colorado state court. After his conviction, Petitioner filed an
1

 Petitioner has also moved this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

After that motion was filed, Petitioner paid the filing fee for this appeal in full. We

therefore dismiss the Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of

Costs or Fees as moot.

-2-

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in the

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The petition alleges that his

detention is illegal because the statutes he violated do not conform to the

Constitution of the State of Colorado. See R., Vol. I, Doc. 1. Petitioner also

brought motions in the district court to proceed in forma pauperis and for

appointment of counsel. See id., Docs. 2, 3. The district court denied the

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. See id., Doc. 4 at 5. Because the

petition was denied, the court dismissed the motions as moot. See id. The district

court subsequently denied Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration, see id., Doc. 6,

and Motion for a Certificate of Probable Cause (construed as a motion for a

certificate of appealability). See id., Doc. 12. Petitioner asks this court to grant

him a certificate of appealability, arguing that the district court was in error in

dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Petitioner’s Motion for

Certificate of Appealability at 2-3.1

We conclude, for the same reasons set forth in the district court’s Order of

Dismissal dated December 10, 1997, that Petitioner’s constitutional rights have
-3-

not been violated. Accordingly, we DENY Petitioner a certificate of 

appealability, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and DISMISS this appeal.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
Order entered August 16 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 01476

- CV

THE CAPITOL LIFE INS URANCE CO., Appellant

V.

LINDA S. NEWMAN, MET LIFE INVESTORS GROUP , I NC., METLIFE INSURAN CE COMPANY USA, AMERICA N GENERAL LIFE INSUR ANCE COMPANY, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 01615



### O RDER

Before the Court is Appellant’s August 6, 2018 Motion fo r Rehearing.

Th e Court requests that Appellee American General Life Insurance Company file a

response to the motion by AUGUST 30 , 2018

.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Bio-Matrix
Scientific Group Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        | Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                        |                                  
|Date: February 11, 2014 | By:                              
|                        |
David Oquendo RIVAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Amy SANDERS, petitioner, v. Lamar JONES.

No. 17-263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Manuel v. Joliet,* 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 911, 197 L.Ed.2d 312 (2017).
ALL-TAG SECURITY, S.A., et al., petitioners, v. CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 17-519.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999 Broadway
Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                           5,136,000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                          47,363,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 (14,008,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  41,943,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                         25,843,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                      14,100,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    41,943,000
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 2,303,000
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,668,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 630,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     43,000
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 43,000
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        43,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        93.48<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                        93.48<F2>
<FN>
<F1>
Includes $608,000 of restricted cash.
<F2>
Primary EPS and diluted EPS include $93.48 
per Preferred Unit of Limited Partnership Interest.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 185/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 598 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 185

English edition

Legislation

Volume 598 July 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, economic partnership agreements | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, economic partnership agreements

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Dukhan MUMIN, petitioner, v. Scott R. FRAKES, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

No. 17-6157.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.