alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [223A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Amendment to the Gaming Compact (Amendment) between the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (Tribe) and the State of South Dakota (State).

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on April 22, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240,                         *paula.hart@bia.gov,*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the                           ( print page 24194)                        Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment permits the Tribe to operate sports wagering within the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, defines terms for sports wagering and requires the Tribe to meet or exceed South Dakota's hardware and software specifications. The Amendment is approved.                

Wizipan Garriott,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Exercising by delegation the authority of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2022-08652 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUVENILE MALE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10015

D.C. No. 4:08-cr-00923-CKJ-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2011

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Appellant L.F. challenges the district court’s disposition for L.F.’s violation

of his probation. L.F. contends that the district court abused its discretion in

ordering L.F. to continue his probation for a period of twelve to eighteen months at

a Montana treatment center located 1,200 miles from his home and family. 

FILED

JAN 20 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We deny Appellee’s January 6, 2011, Emergency Motion Under Ninth 1

Circuit Rule 27-3: To Vacate Oral Argument Scheduled For January 10, 2011,

Because Case Has Become Moot. Because L.F.’s probation was continued for

sixty months and the district court has not determined that L.F. has completed the

treatment program, this appeal is not moot as we can “grant . . . effectual relief . . .

in favor of the appellant.” Mujahid v. Daniels, 413 F.3d 991, 994 (9th Cir. 2005)

(citation omitted). 

2

The district court did not abuse its discretion, as it properly weighed the

requisite factors in deciding that L.F.’s rehabilitative needs could not be served by

placement in local treatment programs. The district court extensively considered

L.F.’s separation from his family and the psychological evaluation in the record. 

In sum, the district court “provide[d] a reasoned basis for why it . . . rejected less

restrictive interventions.” United States v. Juvenile Male, 347 F.3d 778, 788 (9th

Cir. 2003) (citations omitted).1

The district court’s continuation of L.F.’s probation for sixty months

comported with the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act’s requirements. See id. at

784. L.F. was not entitled to any credit for his pretrial detention relative to his

probation, as he was not sentenced to imprisonment. See United States v. Sullivan,

504 F.3d 969, 971 (9th Cir. 2007) (observing that “detention at a community

treatment center, where the defendant is not subject to the control of the Bureau of

Prisons, is not imprisonment”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 
3

Because the district court retained ultimate authority over L.F.’s sentence

and the monitoring of L.F.’s rehabilitative progress, the district court did not

impermissibly delegate authority to the probation officer and the treatment center’s

staff in determining L.F’s compliance with the probation conditions. See United

States v. Stephens, 424 F.3d 876, 882 (9th Cir. 2005); see also United States v.

Rearden, 349 F.3d 608, 619 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.
Anthony SWABY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4153 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4153

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban 
  Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of 
        medical services and facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care Access for Urban Native 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. SHARING ARRANGEMENTS WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES.

    Section 405 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 
1645) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ``urban Indian 
        organizations,'' before ``and tribal organizations''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by inserting ``urban Indian organization,'' 
                before ``or tribal organization''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``an urban Indian organization,'' 
                before ``or a tribal organization''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4153

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban 
  Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of 
        medical services and facilities, and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTS FROM
     EMERALD CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     6,895

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,895
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,895
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,148,698
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,895
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Sandro BALADEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institution Division.

No. 17-6221.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Roosevelt BIGBEE, Jr., petitioner, v. Cherry LINDAMOOD, Warden.

No. 16-9199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Virgil HALL, petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.

No. 16-9699.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.32




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
Transition Agreement
This Amendment No. 1 to Transition Agreement (“Amendment”) is between Patterson Companies, Inc., on behalf of itself, its affiliated and related entities, and any of their respective direct or indirect subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as “Patterson”), and Ann B. Gugino (referred to herein as “Employee”) (Patterson and Employee are collectively referred to herein as “Parties”).
WHEREAS, the Parties previously entered into a Transition Agreement, dated March 1, 2018 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, it was agreed that Employee’s employment with Patterson as Special Advisor would end effective July 31, 2018; and
WHEREAS, Employee has requested that the Separation Date be accelerated to May 25, 2018;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed by and between the Parties as follows:
		
	1.
	The references to “July 31, 2018” set forth in Section I.B. of the Agreement and Section 1.A. of Exhibit A to the Agreement shall be amended and restated to read “May 25, 2018”.


		
	2.
	The references to “January 31, 2020” set forth in Sections II.J., III.D. and III.E. of the Agreement and Sections II.J., III.D. and III.E. of Exhibit A to the Agreement shall be amended and restated to read “November 30, 2019”.


		
	3.
	Any capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.


		
	4.
	The Parties further agree that the remainder of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment by their signatures below.
Dated:  April 11, 2018                /s/ Ann B. Gugino        
Ann B. Gugino


Dated:  April 11, 2018                Patterson Companies, Inc.


By:  /s/ Mark S. Walchirk                    Mark S. Walchirk
Chief Executive Officer
Gerod STUKES, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-5989.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 18, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Michael AMALFITANO, petitioner, v. GOOGLE LLC.

No. 17-358.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) In connection with the annual report of Seminis, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Alfonso Romo Garza, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: December 17, 2004 /s/ Alfonso Romo GarzaAlfonso Romo GarzaChief Executive Officer
Exhibit No. 4.2
   Form of Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant Issued to Public in 1987
<PAGE>

                 [Specimen of Redeemable Warrant Certificate of
                       Electronic Control Security Inc.]

                               [SPECIMEN OMITTED]
<PAGE>

            [Reverse of Specimen of Redeemable Warrant Certificate of
                        Electronic Control Security Inc.]

                          [REVERSE OF SPECIMEN OMITTED]
Vernon Lee EVANS, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-5637.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
```
   
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE EUROPE                                  Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/15/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      508,563
COMMITMENTS
  46,297   27,534   80,446  359,245  377,553  485,988  485,533   22,575   23,030

CHANGES FROM 09/08/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,641)
  -1,182      834   10,064   15,258   14,975   24,140   25,873    3,501    1,768

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.1      5.4     15.8     70.6     74.2     95.6     95.5      4.4      4.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      105)
      23       16       31       52       61       91       96
```

----

Updated September 18, 2009
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 10.38


                         Schedule of additional Warrants
        Issued in Connection with Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Date of           Name of                            Warrant           Number of Shares          Expiration
Issuance          Warrant Recipient                  No.               of Common Stock           Date
--------          -----------------                  -------           ----------------          ----------

<S>              <C>                                <C>               <C>                       <C>
8/31/99           Progressive Group                  D-2               150,000                   8/31/2004


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Eric R. Zimmerman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   December 15, 2006 /s/Eric R. Zimmerman     Eric R. Zimmerman  President, Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Audible, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-91107) on Form S-8, (No. 333-45470) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-85286) on Form
S-3 and S-3/A of Audible, Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2003, relating to
the balance sheets of Audible, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Audible, Inc.

Our report dated March 24, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
capital deficiency, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
April 29, 2003
TERMINATION OF LEASE

     THIS TERMINATION OF LEASE ("Termination") is dated as of the 29th day of
June, 1999, but is intended to be effective as of the 30th day of June, 1999
(the "Termination Date"), by and between SLT PROPERTIES, INC. ("Landlord"), and
SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("Tenant").

                                   BACKGROUND

     A. Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated
September 21, 1991 (the "Lease"), wherein Landlord leased to Tenant certain
premises located at 200 Cresson Boulevard, Oaks, Upper Providence Township,
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania (the "Leased Premises").

     B. Landlord and Tenant have agreed to terminate the Lease as of the
Termination Date pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions hereinafter
set forth.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

        1. Termination of Lease. The Lease is and shall be terminated as of the
Termination Date. Lessor hereby terminates all of its right, title and interest
in and to the Lease, and Lessee hereby terminates all of its right, title and
interest in and to the Lease and the leasehold estate in the Leased Premises
created thereby, and the parties acknowledge, confirm and agree that they shall
have no further right or obligation to each other under the Lease.

        2. Binding. This Termination shall be binding upon and shall inure to
the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

        3. Governing Law. This Termination shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties
have executed this Termination the day and year first above written.


                                     SLT PROPERTIES, INC.


                                     By: /s/ Davis Woodward
                                         --------------------------------
                                     Name: Davis Woodward
                                           ------------------------------
                                     Title: Vice President
                                            -----------------------------



                                     SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                     By: /s/ Davis Woodward
                                         --------------------------------
                                     Name: Davis Woodward
                                           ------------------------------
                                     Title: Vice President
                                            -----------------------------