alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4190 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4190

   To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress a report on 
              domestic terrorism, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 16, 2019

  Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress a report on 
              domestic terrorism, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Domestic Terrorism Information Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a 
report that includes, for the period beginning on January 1, 2009, and 
ending on the date of the enactment of this Act, the following:
            (1) The number of individuals arrested by a Federal law 
        enforcement officer pursuant to an investigation of an act of 
        domestic terrorism, the results of each such investigation, and 
        any charges filed pursuant to each such investigation.
            (2) The number of individuals who have been killed by acts 
        of domestic terrorism.
            (3) The methods and strategies that the Department of 
        Justice uses to prevent domestic terrorism.
    (b) Defintion.--In this Act, the term ``domestic terrorism'' has 
the meaning given that term in section 2331 of title 18, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
Michael FYKES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9043.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Deaundra BILLINGSLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., petitioners, v. Patrick L. BOOKER.

No. 17-307.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Pedro HERNANDEZ-QUINTANIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7023.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Philander PHILIPPEAUX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6864.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2006224EN.01001202.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-191/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection area - Alteration without scientific basis)

(2006/C 224/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and A. Caeiros, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Fernandes, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1) — Special protection area — Alteration without scientific basis

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by altering the demarcation of the ‘Moura, Mourão, Barrancos’ Special Protection Area, thereby excluding from it areas providing a habitat for species of wild birds for whose protection that area was designated, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by altering the demarcation of the ‘Moura, Mourão, Barrancos’ Special Protection Area, thereby excluding from it areas providing a habitat for species of wild birds for whose protection that area was designated, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005.

1

---
# Official Journal C 427/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 427 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6310 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 427

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6310 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 427/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10036 — Tata Consultancy Services Netherlands/Postbank Systems) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 427/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10033 — Platinum Compass/OTPP/EDPL) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2020/C 427/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9560 — Gränges/Impexmetal) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 427/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10036 — Tata Consultancy Services Netherlands/Postbank Systems) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 427/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10033 — Platinum Compass/OTPP/EDPL) (
  1
  )

1

2

2020/C 427/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9560 — Gränges/Impexmetal) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 427/04 | Council conclusions on the cybersecurity of connected devices | 4 |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 427/05 | Euro exchange rates — 9 December 2020 | 7 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2020/C 427/06 | National procedure for allocating limited traffic rights in Poland | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 427/04

Council conclusions on the cybersecurity of connected devices

4

European Commission

2020/C 427/05

Euro exchange rates — 9 December 2020

7

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2020/C 427/06

National procedure for allocating limited traffic rights in Poland

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 427/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10068 — Brookfield/Mansa/Polenergia) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 12 |
| 2020/C 427/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10041 — PAI/Addo/ComplEat) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 14 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 427/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10068 — Brookfield/Mansa/Polenergia) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

12

2020/C 427/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10041 — PAI/Addo/ComplEat) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

14

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
---

Exhibit 99.17

Consent of Andrew Witte

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of AuRico Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with the following reports and documents,
included in the 2012 Annual Information Form of AuRico Gold Inc., dated April 1, 2013 (the “AIF”):

Sections 16.8, 20.4.4 & 20.4.5 of the NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Kemess Underground Project, British Columbia, Canada

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-177638, File No. 333-175079 and File No. 333-173458 ) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-177404) of the references to
my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this 1st day of April, 2013.

/s/ Andrew WitteBy: Andrew Witte, P.Eng. 
Title: Senior Geotechnical Engineer 
Company: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure

---
Patrick Neil KINNEY, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 17-6001.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/17/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      210,465
COMMITMENTS
  70,383    7,543   19,916   90,153  146,323  180,452  173,782   30,013   36,683

CHANGES FROM 08/10/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,460)
   4,033   -1,506     -747   -1,036    2,949    2,250      696     -790      764

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.4      3.6      9.5     42.8     69.5     85.7     82.6     14.3     17.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      210)
      79       19       42       62       88      148      146
```

----

Updated August 20, 2010
EXHIBIT 21.1



Subsidiaries of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.



|                                                                    |  |                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Subsidiaries                                                        |  | Country of Organization   
|                                                                    | 
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Asia, Ltd.                |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Japan Holdings Ltd.                                          |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Pacific, Inc.             |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates China, Ltd.               |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates International, Inc.       |  | USA, DE                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates S.A.S.                    |  | France                    
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates GmbH                      |  | Germany                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Italia S.r.l.             |  | Italy                     
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment K.K.                                 |  | Japan, and USA, DE        
|Varian Korea, Ltd.                                                  |  | Korea                     
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Europe B.V.               |  | Netherlands               
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates UK Limited                |  | United Kingdom            
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Austria GesmbH            |  | Austria                   
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (Barbados) Holdings, Ltd. |  | Barbados                  
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (HK) Limited              |  | Hong Kong                 
|Altin Ltd.                                                          |  | Hong Kong                 
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates (Shanghai), Ltd.          |  | Peoples Republic of China
|Varian Precision Instruments Maintenance (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.       |  | Peoples Republic of China
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Overseas Holdings, Ltd.   |  | Cayman Islands            
|Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates PacRim Pte. Ltd.          |  | Republic of Singapore     
|4 Stanley Tucker Drive LLC                                          |  | USA, DE
Kimberly THOMPSON, et vir, petitioners, v. STAR INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 17-5928.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Antonneo R. BOYCE, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-6282.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
M A N D A T E

TO THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT of VICTORIA COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 5th day of

February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Daniel Barron Sr., Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00221-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 12-10-26974-A)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 14th day of May, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund X, L.P. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis
J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital
Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, certify, based on my
knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Registrant.

| |                   |    |  |                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------- | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | November 14, 2002 |    |  |                                                                                                                 
|
|
|
|
| |                   |    |  |                                                                                                                 
|
|
|
|
| |                   | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                                                                                             
| |                   |    |  |                                                                                                                 
| |                   |    |  | Dennis J. Tietz
President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT
      13.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




The
      undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of ADB Systems International
      Ltd.
      (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as
      at, and for the fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2005.




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:**June
                    28, 2006**
            /s/
                Jeffrey LymburnerJeffrey
                LymburnerChief
                Executive Officer
Darren R. VASATURO, petitioner, v. Sasha PETERKA, aka Mira Peterka, et al.

No. 17-462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
#### Realty Holding Corporation, A Florida Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. H. W. Noggle, L. L. Kirkpatrick and C. S. Borders, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed April 25, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied June 4,1929.

*Henry L. Jollay,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Huffaker <& Edwards,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it is considered by the Court that the judgment should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the ease of J. N. Ackley, plain*644tiff in error, v. H. W. Noggle et al, defendants in error, decided at this term of the Court and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Kevin LOWE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6319.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Michael B. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Audrey KING, Executive Director, Coalinga State Hospital.

No. 17-6062.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael Jay HARRIS, petitioner, v. Connie GIPSON.

No. 17-6244.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James R. LOWE, petitioner, v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCE.

No. 16-9534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/23/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,527
COMMITMENTS
  12,223    4,118    4,016   15,444   20,565   31,683   28,699    7,844   10,828

CHANGES FROM 03/16/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        -64)
     427       90       26       55      161      508      277     -572     -341

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.9     10.4     10.2     39.1     52.0     80.2     72.6     19.8     27.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       61)
      15        9       11       28       22       45       42
```

----

Updated March 26, 2010
Enrique JIMENEZ-ROJAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5312.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Jason A. Jenne, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of True Temper Sports, Inc. (the "Company"), state and certify that this
Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in this Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JASON A. JENNEJason A. Jenne Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)March 21, 2008 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks