alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014248DE.01002902.xml

| 22.8.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 248/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 248/29

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 238/2013 vom 13. Dezember 2013 zur Änderung von Anhang XX (Umweltschutz) des EWR-Abkommens

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 154 vom 22. Mai 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 154 vom 22. Mai 2014

Auf Seite 42, Erwägungsgrund 2:

anstatt:

| „(2) | Der Beschluss der Kommission vom 5. September 2013 ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(2)

Der Beschluss der Kommission vom 5. September 2013 ...“

muss es heißen:

| „(2) | Der Beschluss 2013/447/EU der Kommission vom 5. September 2013 ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(2)

Der Beschluss 2013/447/EU der Kommission vom 5. September 2013 ...“

,

auf Seite 42, Erwägungsgrund 3:

anstatt:

„Der Beschluss der Kommission vom 5. September 2013 ...“

muss es heißen:

„Der Beschluss 2013/448/EU der Kommission vom 5. September 2013 ...“.

---
Terry Ryan NICHOLS, aka Buster, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6503.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Yolanda SANCHEZ-OCHOA, et al., petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-289.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re ALLAH, petitioner.

No. 16-9467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

For purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  the  undersigned,  Buck A. Mickel,  the chief
executive officer of RSI Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge:

(i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the  Company for the quarter  ended
November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  January 12, 2004


/s/ Buck A. Mickel
Buck A. Mickel
President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to RSI Holdings,  Inc. and will be retained by RSI  Holdings,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           99000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5909000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (1630000)
<INVENTORY>                                    5596000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10475000
<PP&E>                                         2853000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1785000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13007000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13867000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2066000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13007000
<SALES>                                        6193000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6193000
<CGS>                                          3926000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3926000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3462000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1327000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1327000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7497** 

STEPHEN RICHARD BROWN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv - 00007

- RAJ

- TEM )

Submitted : February 25 , 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Stephen Richard Brown , Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, Senior Assistant Attorney General , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stephen Richard Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district cou rt denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); se e Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of th e denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4324 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand to all firearms the requirement that Federal firearms licensees report sales of 2 or more handguns 

to the same unlicensed person within 5 consecutive business days. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. 

MURPHY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CICILLINE, and Mr. LOWENTHAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand to all 

firearms the requirement that Federal firearms licensees 

report sales of 2 or more handguns to the same unlicensed person within 5 consecutive business days. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multiple Firearm Sales 

5 Reporting Modernization Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4324 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF FEDERAL FIREARM LICENSEE MUL2 TIPLE SALES REPORTING REQUIREMENT TO 

3 ALL FIREARMS. 

4 Section 923(g)(3)(A) of title 18, United States Code, 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘pistols, or revolvers, or any com6 bination of pistols and revolvers totalling two or more,’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘firearms’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Demetrius HOLMES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5893.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       7,377
<SECURITIES>                                                   171
<RECEIVABLES>                                                3,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 1,004
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                       3,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                               3,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              11,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  10,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                11,389
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             2,102
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          1,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,086
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0


</TABLE>
# C_2012025EN.01001001.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Romania) — Circul Globus București (Circ & Variete Globus București) v Uniunea Compozitorilor și Muzicologilor din România — Asociația pentru Drepturi de Autor — UCMR — ADA

(Case C-283/10) (1)

(Approximation of laws - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3 - Concept of ‘communication of a work to a public present at the place where the communication originates’ - Dissemination of musical works in the presence of an audience without paying the collective management organisation the appropriate copyright fee - Entry into contracts, with the authors of the works, for copyright waiver - Scope of Directive 2001/29)

(2012/C 25/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Circul Globus București (Circ & Variete Globus București)

Defendant: Uniunea Compozitorilor și Muzicologilor din România — Asociația pentru Drepturi de Autor — UCMR — ADA

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Interpretation of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10) — Dissemination of musical works in the presence of an audience without paying the collective management organisation the appropriate copyright fee — Entry into contracts, with the authors of the works, for copyright waiver — Concept of ‘communication of a work to a public present at the place where the communication originates’ — Scope of Directive 2001/29

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society and, more specifically, Article 3(1) thereof, must be interpreted as referring only to communication to a public which is not present at the place where the communication originates, to the exclusion of any communication of a work which is carried out directly in a place open to the public using any means of public performance or direct presentation of the work.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

---
# Official Journal C 228/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 228 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5924 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 228

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5924 June 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 228/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 228/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 228/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8080 — Maxburg II/VREP/Norafin) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 228/03 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |
| 2016/C 228/04 | Publication of an application for approval of a minor amendment in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 228/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8080 — Maxburg II/VREP/Norafin) (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 228/03

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

2016/C 228/04

Publication of an application for approval of a minor amendment in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# L_2007328EN.01001801.xml

| 13.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 79/2007

of 6 July 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 47/2007of 8 June 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 47/2007of 8 June 2007 (1).

| (2) | Council Regulation (EC) No 1991/2006 of 21 December 2006 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs (2), as corrected by OJ L 27, 2.2.2007, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Regulation (EC) No 1991/2006 of 21 December 2006 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs (2), as corrected by OJ L 27, 2.2.2007, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 54b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 R 1991: Council Regulation (EC) No 1991/2006 of 21 December 2006 (OJ L 411, 30.12.2006, p. 18), as corrected by OJ L 27, 2.2.2007, p. 11.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 R 1991: Council Regulation (EC) No 1991/2006 of 21 December 2006 (OJ L 411, 30.12.2006, p. 18), as corrected by OJ L 27, 2.2.2007, p. 11.’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 1991/2006, as corrected by OJ L 27, 2.2.2007, p. 11, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 266, 11.10.2007, p. 4.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 411, 30.12.2006, p. 18.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XB962


Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of open public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the proposed schedule and agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee (MAFAC). 
The members will discuss and provide advice on issues outlined under 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 10 and 11, 2022, from 8:30 a.m. to 
5 p.m., and May 12, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Old San Juan Hotel, 
100 Brumbaugh Street, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901; 787-721-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Lovett, MAFAC Assistant 
Director; 301-427-8034; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#773f121e131e593b1801120303371918161659101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="733b161a171a5d3f1c05160707331d1c12125d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As required by section 10(a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, notice is hereby given 
of a meeting of MAFAC. The MAFAC was established by the Secretary of 
Commerce (Secretary), and, since 1971, advises the Secretary on all 
living marine resource matters that are the responsibility of the 
Department of Commerce. The complete charter and summaries of prior 
meetings are located online at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ocs/mafac/.

Matters To Be Considered

    This meeting time and agenda are subject to change.
    The meeting is convened to hear presentations and updates and to 
discuss policies and guidance on the following topics: NOAA and NMFS 
priorities; national seafood strategy; aquaculture development; the 
NOAA Climate, Ecosystems, and Fisheries Initiative; offshore wind 
development and survey mitigation; and budget outlook. MAFAC will 
receive a report from its Recreational Electronic Reporting Task Force 
and an overview of outcomes from the recent National Saltwater 
Recreational Fisheries Summit. MAFAC will discuss various 
administrative and organizational matters, and meetings of 
subcommittees and working groups will be convened.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Heidi Lovett; 301-427-8034 by April 29, 2022.

    Dated: April 18, 2022.
Jennifer Lukens,
Director for the Office of Policy, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-08559 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### William J. Serpas and D. H. Miller, *Appellants,*v. Swan Nelson and Edith Nelson, His Wife, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed January 31, 1929.

*Swearingen*c6 *Rosenthal,*for Appellants;

*Mitchell D. Price*and *Robert J. Boone,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Michael Curtis REYNOLDS, petitioner, v. Timothy STEWART, Warden.

No. 16-9578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Terrell RANDALL, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-5722.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.