alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**- 1"'**

### fp-o**IS CO** ***'**

## Cathy

# <^k<<&.**^^**

# <?0&**ITtzsw ^zJ&i^q** **DOCUMENT SCANNED** **AS FILED** **2012C206825 -0073** 

### NO.**2012-CI-06825 CATHY** **GIDDINGS Plaintiff** **vs. RALPH** **CURTIS, M.D.** **Defendant**

### IN**THE DISTRICT** **COURT**

### 73rd**JUDICIAL DISTRICT** **BEXAR COUNTY,** **TEXAS FINAL** **SUMMARY JUDGMENT** 

## CAME**ON TO** **BE HEARD** **Defendant, RALPH** **CURTIS, M.D.'s** **No-evidence Motion** **for Summary** **Judgment. Plaintiff,** **CATHY GIDDINGS** **appeared pro** **se and** **Defendant appeared** **by and** **through counsel.** **The Court,** **having reviewed** **the motion** 

## and**having considered** **the arguments** **presented to** **the Court,** **hereby GRANTS** **the motion.** 

### IT**IS ORDERED** **Plaintiff, CATHY** **GIDDINGS take** **nothing by** **way of** **her claims** 

### and**causes of** **action against** **Defendant, RALPH** **CURTIS, M.D.** **IT IS** **FURTHER ORDERED** **that all** **costs of** **court be** **taxed against** **Plaintiff.**

### All**relief requested** **in this** **case and** **not expressly** **granted is** **denied. This** **judgment finally** **disposes of** **all parties** **and claims** **and is** **appealable. SIGNED** **and ENTERED** **this _26_** **day of** **January, 2015.** **HON. JUDGE** 

# .6**DOCUMENT SCANNED** **AS FILED** **APPROVED AS** **TO FORM** **AND SUBSTANCE:** **Cathy Giddings** **107 Whisper** **Way Boerne,** **Texas 78006** **Telephone: (830)** **357-0820 Telephone:** **(210)209-7296 BY:** **CATHY GIDDINGS** **PLAINTIFF PRO** **SE**

### EVANS,**ROWE HOLBROOK,** **P.C. 10101** **Reunion Place,** **Suite 900** **San Antonio,** **Texas 78216** **Telephone: (210)** **340-6555 Telecopier:** **(210) 340-6664** **BRETT B.** **ROWE State** **Bar No.** **17331750 MATTHEW** **M. EDWARDS** **State Bar** **No. 24032034** **ATTORNEYS FOR** **DEFENDANT**
CAUSE NOS. 07-16-00411-CR & 07-16-00412-CR

LUIS DANIEL AYALA § IN THE COURT OF

§

v. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE THE PETITION FOR

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

To the Honorable Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals:

COMES NOW Luis Daniel Ayala, Petitioner, and files this motion to extend 

the time to file his PDR to November 4, 2017.

I.

The court of appeals overruled the petitioner’s motion for rehearing on 

September 5, 2017. No prior motion has been filed to extend time for a PDR.

II.

The reason for this request is as follows: Undersigned counsel represents 

many other clients on appeal and parole revocation proceedings, and has not until 

now had time to prepare the PDR in this case.

WHEREFORE, the Petitioner prays the Court grant an extension of time to 

file his PDR to November 4, 2017.

PD-1104-17

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/5/2017 8:24 PM

Accepted 10/6/2017 10:47 AM

DEANA WILLIAMSON

CLERK

 FILED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 10/6/2017 DEANA WILLIAMSON, CLERK 
2

Respectfully submitted,

/s JOHN BENNETT

John Bennett

Post Office Box 19144

Amarillo, Texas 79114

(806) 282-4455

Fax: (806) 398-1988

State Bar Number 00785691

Email: AppealsAttorney@gmail.com

Attorney for the petitioner

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above Motion has been served on 

Chris Strowd, Esq., Deaf Smith County Assistant Criminal District Attorney, email 

to him at cstrowd@gmail.com, and on Stacy Soule, Esq., State Prosecuting 

Attorney, by email to her at information@spa.texas.gov, both on October 5, 2017.

/s JOHN BENNETT

John Bennett
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4385 

To amend section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act to adjust the renewable 

fuel obligation to account for the full volume of gasoline and diesel 

produced by small refineries that are exempt under paragraph (9), and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2019 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BOST, Mr. 

LAHOOD, Mr. KINZINGER, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Mr. COMER, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. BACON, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, and 

Mr. WATKINS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act to adjust 

the renewable fuel obligation to account for the full volume of gasoline and diesel produced by small refineries 

that are exempt under paragraph (9), and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Refinery Exemp5 tion Fairness Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4385 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCOUNTING FOR FULL VOLUME OF GASOLINE 

2 AND DIESEL PRODUCED BY EXEMPTED 

3 SMALL REFINERIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 211(o)(3) of the Clean 

5 Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(3)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C)— 

7 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (B) in clause (ii), by striking the period at 

10 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

12 clause: 

13 ‘‘(iii) to account for the full average 

14 annual volume of gasoline and diesel pro15 duced during the previous three calendar 

16 years by small refineries exempt under 

17 paragraph (9).’’; and 

18 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub19 paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(D) CALCULATION METHOD.—For pur21 poses of subparagraph (C)(iii), the Adminis22 trator shall calculate the full average annual 

23 volume of gasoline and diesel produced during 

24 the previous three calendar years by small re25 fineries exempt under paragraph (9) by— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4385 IH

1 ‘‘(i) determining the total volume of 

2 gasoline and diesel produced during the 

3 previous three calendar years by such 

4 small refineries; and 

5 ‘‘(ii) dividing such total volume by 

6 three.’’. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub8 section (a) applies to the renewable fuel obligation under 

9 section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)) 

10 beginning with calendar year 2020. Section 211(o) of such 

11 Act, as in effect before the amendment made by subsection 

12 (a), shall continue to apply with respect to calendar years 

13 before calendar year 2020. 

14 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec15 tion and the amendment made by this section shall be con16 strued to set or require a minimum number of exemptions 

17 for small refineries under section 211(o) of the Clean Air 

18 Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)) with respect to any calendar 

19 year. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P., et al., petitioners, v. MORGAN-LARSON, LLC, et al.

No. 17-441.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
 /s/ TOD NIELSEN

Tod NielsenChief Executive Officer
Keith DOUGHERTY, petitioner, v. Chief McKEE, et al.

No. 16-9425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
# Official Journal C 42/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.042.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 42 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5515 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.042.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 42

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5515 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 042/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2012/C 042/02 | Commission Decision of 14 February 2012 setting up the Commission expert group on policy needs for data on crime and repealing Decision 2006/581/EC | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 042/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2012/C 042/02

Commission Decision of 14 February 2012 setting up the Commission expert group on policy needs for data on crime and repealing Decision 2006/581/EC

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2012/C 042/03 | Extension of the period of validity of the lists of suitable candidates | 11 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 042/04 | Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons | 13 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2012/C 042/03

Extension of the period of validity of the lists of suitable candidates

11

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 042/04

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

13

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
ISLAND PACIFIC ACADEMY, INC., v. Laura GABRIEL.

No. 17-491 (R46-007).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Elmer Howard WHISENANT, Jr., petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-1293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
# C_2004228EN.01000601.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-321/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany): Finanzamt Rendsburg v Detlev Harbs (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 25 - Common flat-rate scheme for farmers - Leasing of part of a farm)

(2004/C 228/11)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-321/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Finanzamt Rendsburg and Detlev Harbs on the interpretation of Article 25 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), R. Silva de Lapuerta and K. Lenaerts, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 July 2004, in which it ruled:

Article 25 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment is to be interpreted as meaning that a farmer who has leased and/or let on a long-term basis some of the material assets of his farming business but continues to farm with the rest of his assets and who, in respect of the continued farming activity, is subject to the common flat-rate scheme provided for in Article 25 may not treat the income from such a lease and/or letting as being taxable under that scheme. The turnover from that arrangement must be taxed under the normal scheme or, where appropriate, the simplified scheme of value added tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

1

---
Andrew B. AAMES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-1139.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gregory BIRMINGHAM, petitioner, v. PNC BANK, N.A.

No. 17-5039.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Joe F. Ogburn, the chief
financial officer of RSI Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 12, 2005


/s/ Joe F. Ogburn
-----------------------------------------------------
Joe F. Ogburn
Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to RSI Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by RSI Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Release: #4311-99 (Civ. 3:99-CV-378)**

**For Release: September 9, 1999**

**Tennessee Court Enters Consent Order of Permanent Injunction Against    Richard G. Belz, Andrew E. Cafferky and Related Companies of Knoxville,    Tennessee, in CFTC Enforcement Action Charging Commodity Pool Fraud; Order    Requires Defendants to Disgorge $596,000, Plus Post-Judgment Interest, to    Defrauded Investors**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    the entry of a consent order of permanent injunction on September 3, 1999,    in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee enjoining    **Richard G. Belz d/b/a Safetrak Group, Ltd., Andrew E. Cafferky,** and    **Blue Chip Information Corporation** from violating the anti-fraud,    registration, and recordkeeping provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act    (CEA) and Commission regulations, and requiring disgorgement of defendants'    ill-gotten gains from their unlawful scheme.

The CFTC complaint, which was filed on July 19, 1999, alleges that, from    1994 through 1997, Belz, Cafferky, and Blue Chip fraudulently solicited    persons to invest almost $600,000 in a commodity pool called Safetrak    Group, Ltd. During that time, Belz and Cafferky, as unregistered pool    operators, deceived Safetrak participants by grossly misrepresenting the    profitability of pool investments, the trading activity of the pool, and    the total amount of funds in the pool, according to the complaint. These    deceptions masked Safetrak's trading losses of over $137,000 and the    misappropriation of over $459,000 in investor funds, the complaint further    charges.

**Belz**, **Cafferky**, and **Blue Chip**, without admitting or    denying the CFTC's allegations in the complaint, consented to the entry of    a permanent injunction that, among other things:

1) finds that the defendants committed the violations as alleged in the    CFTC's complaint and enjoins them from further such violations of the CEA    and CFTC regulations;

2) prohibits them from acting as unregistered commodity pool operators    (CPOs) or unregistered associated persons of CPOs;

3) permanently bans them from seeking registration with the CFTC or    acting in any capacity requiring CFTC registration and from trading on any    futures market on behalf of themselves or others; and

4) requires **Belz**, **Cafferky**, and **Blue Chip**, jointly    and severally, to disgorge $596,000, plus post-judgment interest, to    defrauded investors by making annual payments based on a percentage of    their future income over a five-year period.

# # #
Corry D. SEARLES, petitioner, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al.

No. 16-9729.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Johnny Scott WARREN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6840.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
SSP Solutions, Inc.

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 (registration statement no. 333-90574) and in the
registration statement on Form S-8 (registration statement no. 333-73204) of our
report dated March 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of SSP
Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and
the related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December
31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of SSP Solutions, Inc., and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectuses that are a part of
those registration statements.

/s/ Haskell & White LLP
Haskell & White LLP

Irvine, California
April 15, 2003
Linda SHAO, petitioner, v. McMANIS FAULKNER, LLP, et al.

No. 17-256.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Motion of Mothers of Lost Child for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2014342EN.01002301.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 124/2014

of 27 June 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 487/2013 of 8 May 2013 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 487/2013 of 8 May 2013 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

1

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zze (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 R 0487: Commission Regulation (EU) No 487/2013 of 8 May 2013 (OJ L 149, 1.6.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 R 0487: Commission Regulation (EU) No 487/2013 of 8 May 2013 (OJ L 149, 1.6.2013, p. 1).’

32013 R 0487

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 487/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 June 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (2).

2

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  OJ L 149, 1.6.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through April 1, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Wharton, M.D., M.P.H., Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-8, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, telephone (404) 639-8755, or fax (404) 471-8347.

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-08575 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P