alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 78/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.078.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 78 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5516 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.078.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 78

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5516 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 078/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2012/C 078/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 078/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2012/C 078/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 11

PAMRAPO BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                                                         |  |                                  |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ---------
|                                                                                         |  | Three MonthsEnded March 31, 2007
|Income available to common stockholders                                                  |  | $                                | 1,225,732
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                                  | 4,975,542
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  | $                                | 0.25     
|Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |  | $                                | 1,225,732
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                                  | 4,981,275
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  | $                                | 0.25
Jeffrey Alonzo SIMMS, petitioner, v. UNITED HEALTH CARE COMMUNITY PLAN.

No. 16-9153.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ronald C. ALFRED, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8120.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
# L_2012207EN.01003901.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 59/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 55a (Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 L 0017: Directive 2009/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 (OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 101).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 L 0017: Directive 2009/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 (OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 101).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/17/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 101.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Ruth NEELY, Judge, Town of Pinedale Municipal Court, Wyoming, petitioner, v. WYOMING COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS.

No. 17-195.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.
# Official Journal C 65/19 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5219 March 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 65

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5219 March 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Council |
| 2009/C 065/01 | Common Military List of the European Union (adopted by the Council on 23 February 2009) (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 3 March 2008) (CFSP) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Council

2009/C 065/01

Common Military List of the European Union (adopted by the Council on 23 February 2009) (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 3 March 2008) (CFSP)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1999
<CASH>                                           3,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     68,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,537
<PP&E>                                         150,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,735
<BONDS>                                         12,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,038
<COMMON>                                        21,057
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,810
<SALES>                                        144,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,160
<CGS>                                          106,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,339
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.32


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 4.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                                MONSANTO COMPANY
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

     1.   Article I thereof is amended and restated to read as follows:

                                ARTICLE I: NAME

The name of the Corporation shall be Pharmacia Corporation.

     2.   The first sentence of Article IV thereof is amended to read as
follows:

The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall
have authority to issue is 3,010,000,000 shares, to be divided into two classes
consisting of (a) ten million (10,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value
$.01 per share (hereinafter designated "Preferred Stock"), and (b) three
billion (3,000,000,000) shares of common stock of a par value of $2 per share
(hereinafter designated "Common Stock").

     3.   The last sentence of the first paragraph of Article IV, Section I
thereof is deleted.

     4.   Article IV, Section I(b) is amended and restated to read as follows:

<PAGE>   2
          (b) Whether the shares of such series shall have voting rights, in
     addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of
     such voting rights;

IV.  These amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
     Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

V.   These amendments shall become effective as of 4:00 p.m. on March 31, 2000.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 423 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 423

                    For the relief of Robert Feiss.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Robert Feiss.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $39,709.66 to Robert 
Feiss of Ojai, California, in compensation for payments he was entitled 
to but did not receive for years 2011 through 2013 under the Primary 
Care Incentive Payment Program established under section 1833(x) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(x)) and in consideration of the 
fact--
            (1) that Robert Feiss has served as an outspoken advocate 
        for the health care needs of his patients through his work as a 
        primary care physician; and
            (2) that, on May 30, 2018, the United States Court of 
        Federal Claims found that ``It appears that, through no fault 
        of his own, plaintiff has lost over $39,000 in government 
        Medicare incentive payments that he was entitled to by 
        providing Family Practice services'' and that ``the evidence 
        strongly supports plaintiff's argument that he was providing 
        Family Practice services and should have been classified as 
        such, but a coding error denied plaintiff this status for 
        several years''.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

    The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any 
claims that Robert Feiss may have against the United States arising on 
the basis of payments owed for years 2011 through 2013 under the 
Primary Care Incentive Payment Program described in section 1(1)(B).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1 shall be 
paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in 
connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, IAN HERMAN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2007


/s/  Ian Herman
---------------------------------
     Ian Herman,
     Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4276 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4276

   To establish a minimum staffing level of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection officials along the northern border, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2019

Mr. Higgins of New York (for himself, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Peterson, Mrs. 
   Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Welch, and Ms. Slotkin) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
  Security, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish a minimum staffing level of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection officials along the northern border, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Border Officers Utilization for 
National Defense Act of 2019'' or the ``BOUND Act''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION STAFFING ALONG THE 
              NORTHERN BORDER.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall 
ensure that not fewer than the maximum number of U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection officers deployed along the international border 
between the United States and Canada (referred to in this Act as the 
``northern border'') at any time between January 1, 2016, and such date 
of enactment are always deployed along the northern border, including 
at ports of entry along the northern border.
    (b) Limitation on Transfers.--The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection may not transfer any U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection officer away from an assignment along the northern border, 
including at ports of entry along the northern border, if such transfer 
would reduce the number of such officers assigned to the northern 
border below the level required under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Demetrius Allen McDUFFIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5719.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Xavier Jammal PINCKNEY, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### State of Florida, *Appellant,*v. City of Hollywood, a Municipal Corporation, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Decision filed January 11, 1929.

*A. W. Clutch,*for Appellant;

*William II. Ilawkins,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

*19See opinion in the ease of City of Venice, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee, filed October 23, 1928.

Terrell, C. J. and Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield and Ellis, J. J., dissent
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2019

No. 04-18-00481-CR

Dorothy A. HOLLOWAY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR0541

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on May 20, 2019. No further extensions.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Walter Javier SALGADO-ROSALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6040.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.