alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I, James P. Tolley, the principal accounting officer of Agemark Corporation
(the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:



| |  | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.                                                                                       

|                    |  |                                                                                     
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 29, 2003 |  | /s/ JAMES P. TOLLEY                                                                 
|                    |  |                                                                                     
|                    |  | James P. Tolley
Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

54
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.B., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1426 

[February 21, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos S. Rebollo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 17-791DLC.

Fairuze Sofia of The Sofia Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    such Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Standard
Management Corporation.
 November 24, 2006/s/ Ronald D. Hunter

Ronald D. HunterChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ Daniel K. Calvert

Daniel K. CalvertChief Accounting Officer
Demitres COLEMAN, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-6257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District denied.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4200 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 321 South 1st Street in Montrose, Colorado, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant David Kinterknecht Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4200 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT DAVID KINTERKNECHT POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 321 South 1st Street in 

5 Montrose, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sergeant David Kinterknecht Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant David 

11 Kinterknecht Post Office’’. 

12 (c) REPEAL OF PREVIOUS DESIGNATION.—Section 1 

13 of Public Law 115–366 is hereby repealed, and the des14 ignation made and references deemed in subsections (a) 

15 and (b), respectively, of such section shall have no force 

16 or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PATRICIA GRAHAM, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Renegade Venture
(NEV.) Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2003


/s/  Patricia Graham
------------------------------------------------
    Patricia Graham, Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22237-22238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08054]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy's Subcommittee 
on Technology, Innovation and Partnerships hereby gives notice of the 
scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science 
Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Monday, April 18, 2022, from 11:15 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda is: Subcommittee Chair's Opening 
Remarks; Approval of Minutes from February 11, 2022; and Discussion of 
Technology, Innovation, and

[[Page 22238]]

Partnerships Programmatic Plans and Budget Scenarios.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2340414f424a51634d50450d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6d5d4dad7dfc4f6d8c5d098d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>, 703/292-7000. Meeting information and 
updates may be found at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-08054 Filed 4-12-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                             BGF Industries, Inc.

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                            (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       2000              1999             1998             1997               1996
                                     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>               <C>              <C>              <C>            <C>
Earnings:
     Pretax income(a).......          $ 14,012          $  7,679         $ 25,171         $ 35,382       $    40,026
Add:
     Fixed charges..........            14,405            16,084            4,937            2,619             2,430
     Capitalized interest...                --               (46)            (127)             (32)             (206)
                                      --------          --------         --------         --------       -----------
                                      $ 28,417          $ 23,717         $ 29,981         $ 37,969       $    42,250
                                      ========          ========         ========         ========       ===========

Fixed Charges:
     Interest expense(b)....          $ 14,168          $ 15,817            4,517           2,355              1,993
     Capitalized interest...                --                46              127              32                206
     Portion of rents
          representative of
          interest factor...               237               221              293             232                231
                                      --------          --------         --------         -------        -----------
                                      $ 14,405          $ 16,084         $  4,937         $ 2,619        $     2,430
                                      --------          --------         --------         -------        -----------

Ratio of earnings to fixed
         charges............               2.0               1.5              6.1            14.5               17.4
</TABLE>

(a) Income before taxes and extraordinary loss.

(b) Includes amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount and
    excludes capitalized interest.
George J. PERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5621.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4302 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 14, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To authorize public housing agencies to share certain data 

regarding homeless individuals and families for the provision of housing and services, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4302 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Assistance 

3 Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITED AUTHORITY TO SHARE INFORMATION RE5 GARDING HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAM6 ILIES WITH APPROPRIATE ENTITY WITHIN 

7 CONTINUUM OF CARE. 

8 Section 2 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1437) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(c) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO SHARE INFORMATION

12 REGARDING HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES

13 WITH APPROPRIATE ENTITY WITHIN CONTINUUM OF

14 CARE.—Notwithstanding section 904 of the Stewart B. 

15 McKinney Homeless Assistance Amendments Act of 1988 

16 (42 U.S.C. 3544), a public housing agency may disclose, 

17 to the collaborative applicant of the local Continuum of 

18 Care or designee of the collaborative applicant within 

19 which the jurisdiction of the public housing agency is lo20 cated, information regarding individuals and families who 

21 are homeless (as such term is used in section 103 of the 

22 McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

23 11302)) or at risk of homelessness (as such term is used 

24 in section 401 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 11360)), but only— 

25 ‘‘(1) for the purpose of facilitating the identi26 fication, assessment, and linkage of housing and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4302 RFS

1 supportive services for such individuals and families 

2 to ensure continuity of care, to the extent allowable 

3 under State Law; 

4 ‘‘(2) if the public housing agency takes appro5 priate measures to ensure that the privacy of the in6 dividuals and families is protected and that the in7 formation, including any personally identifiable in8 formation, is used only for the purpose described in 

9 paragraph (1); and 

10 ‘‘(3) if the public housing agency takes appro11 priate measures to ensure clients’ information and 

12 confidentiality is protected pursuant to section 

13 41411(c)(4) of the Violence Against Women Act of 

14 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12491(c)(4)), and any regulations 

15 promulgated pursuant to such section.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Trevor BOUTTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1579.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2012161EN.01003201.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 26/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 165/2011 of 19 December 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 165/2011 of 19 December 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 334/2011 of 7 April 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 334/2011 of 7 April 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66he (Commission Regulation (EU) No 185/2010) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 0334: Commission Regulation (EU) No 334/2011 of 7 April 2011 (OJ L 94, 8.4.2011, p. 12).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 0334: Commission Regulation (EU) No 334/2011 of 7 April 2011 (OJ L 94, 8.4.2011, p. 12).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 334/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 15.3.2012, p. 57.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 94, 8.4.2011, p. 12.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Release: 4288-99 (Civ-96-8202-Gonzalez)

For Release: July 19, 1999

FLORIDA FEDERAL COURT ENTERS PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST MICHAEL
    INDIHAR, COMPUTER WAREHOUSE, INC., AND AUTOMATED TRADING SYSTEMS INC., IN
    CFTC ANTI-FRAUD ACTION FILED IN 1996

CFTC Alleged that the Defendants Cheated and Defrauded Florida
    Investors in a Commodity Pool, and Converted Customer Funds to Personal
    Use, Among Other Violations of Federal Commodity Law

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that the Honorable Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr. of the United States
    District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered a final order
    of permanent injunction against Michael Indihar of Jupiter, Florida,
    Computer Warehouse, Inc. (CWI), and Automated Trading Systems,
    Inc. (ATSI), which were both Florida corporations based in Jupiter.

The court's order stems from a seven-count CFTC complaint filed on
    April 1, 1996, against the three above-named defendants and Robert
    Hoffman of Wellington, Florida, alleging that, from July 1995 to April
    1996, they violated the anti-fraud, registration, disclosure, reporting,
    and record keeping provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC
    regulations in the operation of a commodity pool (see CFTC News Release
    3900-96, April 5, 1996). The defendants cheated and defrauded customers by,
    among other things, misrepresenting and/or failing to disclose the
    likelihood of profit and risk of loss associated with trading commodity
    futures, and misrepresenting to customers the performance and track record
    of the defendants' commodity futures trading, the complaint alleged.
    The defendants also acted and operated as a futures commission merchant
    and/or commodity salespersons without being registered with the CFTC.

Without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, Indihar,
    CWI, and ATSI consented to the entry of the order of permanent injunction
    that permanently enjoins them from further violating the provisions of the
    CEA and CFTC regulations as alleged in the complaint. The order does not
    require payment of restitution and does not impose a civil monetary
    penalty, based upon the defendants' sworn representations concerning
    their financial circumstances.

The CFTC is continuing its litigation in this case against Robert P.
    Hoffman.

# # #
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting w/NYSE Liffe US
  
    



  Topic of discussion: Core Principle 9
      
  When
              10/13/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              XII. DCM Core Principles

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Sperling

  Visitor(s)
              Tom CallahanKarl CooperDawn Stump

  Organization(s)
              NYSE Liffe US


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Omar Rashad POUNCY, petitioner, v. Carmen Denise PALMER, Warden.

No. 17-160.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Henry LO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8327.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE, petitioner, v. WYOMING, et al.

No. 17-1164.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.