alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4257 

To require the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to establish an 

Office of Minority and Women Inclusion, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to 

establish an Office of Minority and Women Inclusion, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE OF MINORITY AND 

4 WOMEN INCLUSION AT THE COMMODITY FU5 TURES TRADING COMMISSION; INTERNSHIP 

6 PROGRAM. 

7 Section 2(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 

8 U.S.C. 2(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4257 IH

1 ‘‘(16) OFFICE OF MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLU2 SION.—Within 6 months after the date of the enactment 

3 of this paragraph, the Commission shall comply with sec4 tion 342 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Con5 sumer Protection Act. 

6 ‘‘(17) ANNUAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAM.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Executive Director 

8 shall establish a program to place an appropriate 

9 number of students attending qualified institutions 

10 in a semester-length internship within one of the 

11 Commission’s divisions. 

12 ‘‘(B) FUNDING.—The Commission shall set 

13 aside an appropriate percentage of the funds allo14 cated to the office of the Chairman to enable the se15 lected interns identified in subparagraph (A) to af16 ford living expenses, including rent and a per-diem, 

17 in the metropolitan areas where the Director identi18 fies internship opportunities. 

19 ‘‘(C) QUALIFIED INSTITUTION DEFINED.—In 

20 this paragraph, the term ‘qualified institution’ 

21 means— 

22 ‘‘(i) an 1890 Institution (as defined in sec23 tion 2 of the Agricultural Research, Extension, 

24 and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 

25 7601)); 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4257 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) a 1994 Institution (as defined in sec2 tion 532 of the Equity in Educational Land3 Grant Status Act of 1994 (Public Law 103– 

4 382; 7 U.S.C. 301 note)); 

5 ‘‘(iii) an eligible institution (as defined in 

6 section 1489 of the National Agricultural Re7 search, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 

8 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3361)); or 

9 ‘‘(iv) a Hispanic-serving institution (as de10 fined in section 1404 of the Food and Agri11 culture Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3103)).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
13.2




Certification
Pursuant to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  The
undersigned, being the Corporate Controller of Northcore Technologies Inc. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)
The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
at, and for the fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2007.
  A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
  Dated:March 19, 2008
                /s/ Tam
    NguyenTam
  NguyenCorporate
      Controller
  
 
 This
certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such
incorporation is expressly referenced within.
Exhibit
31.2CERTIFICATION

I, John B.
Sawyer, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft Solutions,
Inc.

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date:    May 21,
2007

| | /s/   
John B. Sawyer John B. SawyerChief Operating Officer(Principal Operating Officer)
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rodney William PITTS, petitioner, v. Frank BISHOP, Jr., Warden, et al.

No. 16-9125.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 125/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 125 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6412 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 125

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6412 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 125/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10167 — Continental/Light control units business of OSRAM Continental) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 125/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10167 — Continental/Light control units business of OSRAM Continental) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 125/02 | Euro exchange rates — 9 April 2021 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 125/02

Euro exchange rates — 9 April 2021

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 125/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10207 — ICG/Dr. Axel Paeger/AMEOS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 125/04 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 125/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10207 — ICG/Dr. Axel Paeger/AMEOS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2021/C 125/04

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jessica Briggle, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00041

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 23274 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jessica Briggle, has adequately indicated h er inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2 5 , 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Cler k
# Official Journal C 341A/16 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 341A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5816 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 341A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5816 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2015/C 341A/1 | Notice of Open Selection Procedure — Web Administrator — Reference: EF-TA-15-03 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2015/C 341A/1

Notice of Open Selection Procedure — Web Administrator — Reference: EF-TA-15-03

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>

                FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<CAPTION>
                                              Three months ended October 31,
                                              ------------------------------
                                                  1997              1996
                                               ----------        ---------- 
Primary
------------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
Net earnings for primary per share amounts     $3,874,000        $2,972,000
                                               ==========        ==========
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                          14,769,783        14,846,856

Add - common equivalent shares
   (determined using the
   "treasury stock" method)                     1,635,480         1,251,770
                                               ----------        ---------- 
Weighted average number of shares
   used in calculation of primary
   earnings per common share                   16,405,263        16,098,626
                                               ==========        ==========

Primary net earnings per common share               $0.24             $0.18
                                                    =====             ===== 

Fully Diluted
------------------------------------------

Net earnings for fully diluted per share
   amounts                                     $3,874,000         $2,972,000
                                               ==========         ==========
Weighted average number of shares
   used in calculation of fully diluted
   earnings per common share                   16,463,782         16,098,626
                                               ==========         ========== 
Fully diluted net earnings per common
   share                                            $0.24              $0.18
                                                   ======              =====
</TABLE>
                                          11
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6538

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DARIO SYLVAN, a/k/a Albert Suriel, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-19, CA-97-664-2) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dario Sylvan, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sylvan , Nos. CR-94-19; CA-97-664-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Maurice Shaundell HOPE, petitioner, v. Larry CARTLEDGE, Warden.

No. 17-417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/29/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      157,338
COMMITMENTS
  45,134   29,225   25,390   67,654   72,952  138,178  127,567   19,160   29,771

CHANGES FROM 06/22/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,497)
   1,379   -1,255   -3,540   -4,820   -1,202   -6,981   -5,997   -4,516   -5,500

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.7     18.6     16.1     43.0     46.4     87.8     81.1     12.2     18.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      47       31       40       52       62      119      120
```

----

Updated July 2, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Marvin J. Winkler, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K of SSP Solutions, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


Dated: September 15, 2003

/S/ MARVIN J. WINKLER
---------------------
Marvin J. Winkler,
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)




<PAGE>


I, Thomas E. Schiff, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K of SSP Solutions, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


Dated: September 15, 2003

/S/ THOMAS E. SCHIFF
--------------------
Thomas E. Schiff,
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/20/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       79,909
COMMITMENTS
   2,747    6,786    4,875   61,268   60,513   68,890   72,174   11,019    7,735

CHANGES FROM 04/13/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,782)
  -3,500   -2,205      603   12,982    7,875   10,085    6,273      697    4,509

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.4      8.5      6.1     76.7     75.7     86.2     90.3     13.8      9.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      13        8       10       31       29       47       44
```

----

Updated April 28, 2010
Avalon BETTS-GASTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-705.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000724

28-OCT-2015

10:16 AM
1 Filed 11/6/14 Bravo Development Group v. Elli CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento)

----

BRAVO DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SHAHRAM ELLI et al.,

Defendants and Appellants. C073762

(Super. Ct. No. 34-2012- 00133552-CU-BT-GDS)

Defendants Shahram Elli and Sourcis, Inc ., timely appealed from an order granting the unopposed motion by plaintiff Bravo De velopment Group LLC for a preliminary injunction. The appeal lies. (Cod e Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(6).) Well after briefing was completed in this ca se and after we sent the parties a letter advising them that we were prepared to re nder a decision in this case, appellants filed a request for dismissal. We grant the request and dismiss the appeal.2 DISPOSITION The appeal is dismissed. Appellants sha ll pay respondent’s costs of this appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1), (2).) We direct the clerk of this court to immediately issue the rem ittitur. (Cal. Rules of Co urt, rule 8.244(c)(2).)

DUARTE , J.

We concur:

ROBIE , Acting P. J.

HOCH , J.
Stephen AGUIAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6629.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Joseph B. MORGENSTERN, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5892.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 9, 2010 | By:  /s/  | B. Keith Johnson                   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                      |                     | B.      Keith Johnson              |
|                      |                     | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                      |                     |                               |
| Date:      August 9, 2010 | By:  /s/  | Steven M. Zagar                    |
|                      |                     | Steven      M. Zagar               |
|                      |                     | Chief      Financial Officer & |
|                      |                     | Principal      Accounting Officer  |

----
Order entered May 27, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00618-CR

JOHN ALLEN ENGLISH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 32068CC

ORDER

The Court DENIES as moot appellant’s May 26, 2015 pro se motion to extend time to 

file a docketing statement. The Court dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction on May 18, 

2015.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE