alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.6


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                             EARTHGRAINS FINANCING I

                  This  Certificate  of Trust of  Earthgrains  Financing  I (the
"Trust") is being executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the  undersigned,
as trustees,  to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12
Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

                  1.       Name.  The name of the business trust  formed  hereby
is Earthgrains Financing I.

                  2.  Delaware  Trustee.  The name and  business  address of the
trustee  of  the  Trust  in the  State  of  Delaware  is The  Bank  of New  York
(Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, DE 19711.

                  3.  Effective  Date.  This   Certificate  of  Trust  shall  be
effective upon filing.

                  In witness  whereof,  the undersigned  have duly executed this
Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

                                                The Bank of New York (Delaware),
                                                as Delaware trustee

                                                By: /S/ Michael Santino
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Michael Santino
                                                Senior Vice President

                                                 /S/ Michael A. Salamone
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael A. Salamone
                                                Trustee

                                                 /S/ Mark H. Krieger
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Mark H. Krieger
                                                Trustee
Order entered May 27 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00618

- CR

JOHN ALLEN ENGLISH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Ca use No. 32068CC



### O RDER

The Court DENIES as moot appellant’s May 26, 2015 pro se motion to extend time to

file a docketing statement. The Court dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction on May 18,

2015.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
Dwayne WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-8647.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Jose Federico ALMEIDA-OLIVAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Eric Lehman HILTON, petitioner, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 17-6016.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jose GUTIERREZ-YANEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6764.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2016090EN.01001502.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2016 — DF v Commission

(Case T-782/14) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Secondment in the interest of the service - Expatriation allowance - Condition set out in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Recovery of undue payments))

(2016/C 090/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: DF (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. von Zwehl, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and T. Bohr, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2014, DF v Commission (F-91/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:228), seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

DF

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders DF to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DF to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---
Michael J. BIESTEK, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration.

No. 17-1184.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4333 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4333

 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to provide certainty for futures 
       customers and market participants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2019

Ms. Spanberger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to provide certainty for futures 
       customers and market participants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAINTY FOR FUTURES CUSTOMERS AND MARKET PARTICIPANTS.

    Section 20(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 24(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (4);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) that cash, securities, or other property of the 
        estate of a commodity broker, including the trading or 
        operating accounts of the commodity broker and commodities held 
        in inventory by the commodity broker, shall be included in 
        customer property, subject to any otherwise unavoidable 
        security interest, or otherwise unavoidable contractual offset 
        or netting rights of creditors (including rights set forth in a 
        rule or bylaw of a derivatives clearing organization or a 
        clearing agency) in respect of such property, but only to the 
        extent that the property that is otherwise customer property is 
        insufficient to satisfy the net equity claims of public 
        customers (as such term may be defined by the Commission by 
        rule or regulation) of the commodity broker.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 6, 2000 (except with respect to the
matters discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, which
are indicated to have occurred subsequent to March 6, 2000, as to which the
date is March 20, 2000) included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-91403 and 333-31510.

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Vienna, Virginia
March 20, 2000
# C_2016260EN.01003801.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-426/10 to T-429/10, T-438/12 to T-441/12) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for prestressing steel - Price fixing, market sharing and the exchange of commercially sensitive information - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Economic unit - Direct participation in the infringement - Secondary liability of parent companies - Succession of undertakings - Complex infringement - Single and continuous infringement - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Principle of non-retroactivity and principle that penalties must be lawful - Mitigating circumstances - Ability to pay - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons - Request for reconsideration - No change in the factual circumstances - Letter of rejection - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 260/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (Gijón, Spain) (Cases T-426/10 and T-440/12); Trefilerías Quijano, SA (Los Corrales de Buelna, Spain) (Cases T-427/10 and T-439/12); Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL (Santander, Spain) (Cases T-428/10 and T-441/12) (represented by: in Cases T-426/10 to T-429/10, F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, and, in Cases T-438/12 to T-441/12, initially by F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, and subsequently by F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: in Cases T-426/10, T-427/10, T-429/10 and T-438/12 to T-441/12, V. Bottka, F. Castillo de la Torre and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents, and by L. Ortiz Blanco and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers, and, in Case T-428/10, by V. Bottka and F. Castillo de la Torre, and by L. Ortiz Blanco and A. Lamadrid de Pablo)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment and variation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing Steel), as amended by Commission Decision C(2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and Commission Decision C(2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011, and also by the letter of 25 July 2012 from the Director-General of the Directorate-General for Competition of the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA, Trefilerías Quijano, SA, Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL and Global Steel Wire, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA, Trefilerías Quijano, SA, Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL and Global Steel Wire, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.

1

---
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Communication Regarding Anti-Manipulation Rulemaking
  
    



  Comment received concerning scienter standard for anti-manipulation rule.
      
  When
              09/27/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XXIII. Anti-Manipulation

  CFTC Staff
              Dan M. Berkovitz

  Visitor(s)
              Steven Senderowitz (Winston & Strawn)


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
AMENDMENT TO APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           1995 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


         The  Applebee's  International,  Inc. 1995 Equity  Incentive  Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

         Section 5 of the Plan is amended by adding the  following  new  Section
5.9.

         5.9  Repricing  of Options.  The Company  may not  reprice,  replace or
regrant an outstanding Option either in connection with the cancellation of such
Option or by amending an Award  Agreement  to lower the  Exercise  Price of such
Option.





                                  Approved by the Board of Directors on
                                  March 7, 2003.



                                  ---------------------------------

                                  Robert T. Steinkamp, Secretary
Sonoko TAGAMI, petitioner, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

No. 17-1293.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/24/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      447,080
COMMITMENTS
  52,040   24,854   78,352  301,566  330,890  431,958  434,096   15,122   12,984

CHANGES FROM 08/17/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -18,272)
   9,041     -838   -1,692  -23,105  -15,289  -15,756  -17,819   -2,516     -453

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.6      5.6     17.5     67.5     74.0     96.6     97.1      3.4      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      119)
      28       15       33       63       72      104      108
```

----

Updated August 27, 2010
# Official Journal C 166E/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 166E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4918 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 166E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4918 July 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2006/C 166E/1 | Common Position (EC) No 8/2006 of 23 Febrruary 2006 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels and repealing Council Directive 82/714/EEC | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2006/C 166E/1

Common Position (EC) No 8/2006 of 23 Febrruary 2006 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels and repealing Council Directive 82/714/EEC

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Dary Gail RIEDLINGER, petitioner, v. CITY OF EVERETT, WASHINGTON.

No. 17-6378.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
Michael D. DARBY, petitioner, v. Theodore A. McKEE, et al.

No. 17-5368.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, petitioner, v. M.M., a Minor, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Audrey MEYERS, et al.

No. 16-1171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4153 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2020 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of medical services and facilities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4153 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Access 

3 for Urban Native Veterans Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SHARING ARRANGEMENTS WITH FEDERAL AGEN5 CIES. 

6 Section 405 of the Indian Health Care Improvement 

7 Act (25 U.S.C. 1645) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘urban In9 dian organizations,’’ before ‘‘and tribal organiza10 tions’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (c)— 

12 (A) by inserting ‘‘urban Indian organiza13 tion,’’ before ‘‘or tribal organization’’; and 

14 (B) by inserting ‘‘an urban Indian organi15 zation,’’ before ‘‘or a tribal organization’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                        99
<INVENTORY>                                      5,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,619
<PP&E>                                         112,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,488
<BONDS>                                         56,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,643
<SALES>                                          3,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,169
<CGS>                                           15,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    78
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (237)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                217
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       217
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Stephen MICHUDA, petitioner, v. BENSON, Warden.

No. 17-5561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Marcus L. HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ross William ULBRICHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-950.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-12-00739- CV Hills boro Ind ependent School District, Appellant v. RobertScott, in his O ff

icial Capacity as Com m ission er of the Texas Education Agency, Appellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. D-1 -GV-1 1-0 0171 5, H ONO RAB LE RHO NDA HURLEY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant has filed an unopp osed motion to dismiss this appea l. We g rant the motion and dismi ss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: June 20, 2014