alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antoni o, Texas** 

January 26, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00680

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.P., et al, children,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02655

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellants Christopher Morales and Joseph Medina’s briefs were originally due on

January 6, 2015. Appellants filed their first request for an extension of time, requesting an

additional twenty days. Appellants motions are GRANTED. Appellants’ briefs are due to be

filed with this court no later than January 26, 2015

. Absent extenuating circumstances, no

further extensions will be given.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CORDIS CORPORATION, petitioner, v. Michael BARBER, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Stacey Elliot, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. David Garry, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Geanice Grant, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Helen Hall, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Walter Herbert, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Wanda Holden, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Thelma Lesch, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Charles Henry Lewis, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Lisa Oehring, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Heather Quinn, et al.; Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. David Resovsky, et al.; and Cordis Corporation, petitioner, v. Leslie-Elaine Sutton, et al.

No. 17-332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     EMERALD CAPITAL INVESTMENT INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     13,130

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         13,130
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,130
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,640,465
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,627,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,130
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               13,356
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,356)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
# L_2011318EN.01003501.xml

| 1.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 97/2011

of 30 September 2011

amending Annex X (Services in general) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex X to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 102/2010 of 1 October 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex X to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 102/2010 of 1 October 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2010/425/EU of 28 July 2010 amending Decision 2009/767/EC as regards the establishment, maintenance and publication of trusted lists of certification service providers supervised/accredited by Member States (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2010/425/EU of 28 July 2010 amending Decision 2009/767/EC as regards the establishment, maintenance and publication of trusted lists of certification service providers supervised/accredited by Member States (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 1b (Commission Decision 2009/767/EC) of Annex X to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32010 D 0425: Commission Decision 2010/425/EU of 28 July 2010 (OJ L 199, 31.7.2010, p. 30).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32010 D 0425: Commission Decision 2010/425/EU of 28 July 2010 (OJ L 199, 31.7.2010, p. 30).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2010/425/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 332, 16.12.2010, p. 52.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 199, 31.7.2010, p. 30.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Edward MESQUITI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5164.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 06, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Frances Sugarman, a free dealer, *Appellant,*v. Sherman Parker, Norma Parker, his wife, J. B. Phelps, Whitphel Properties, Inc., and Miami Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, Trustee, *Appellees.*

En Bane.

Decision filed April 15, 1929.

*H. V. Whitehurst,*for Appellant;

No appearance for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having’ heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *550decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur

Strum, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the annualperiod ended December 25, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March  25, 2005 | /s/ SAL  PERISANO                                    |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Sal Perisano                                         |
|                  | *Chairman  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### Peace Creek Drainage District, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. C. V. Turner, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed April 4, 1929.

*487*Oliver & Marshall,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Johnson, Bosarge & Allen,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record discloses no final judgment and therefore the writ of error is withorit foundation and should be dismissed.

The bill of exceptions is without force and effect as it appears to have been made up and presented after the expiration of the time allowed in an order made during the term of the court at which motion for new trial was made, and denied. It*does not appear to have been made up in pursuance of a final judgment.

The order of the court made after adjournment of the term extending the time in which to make up and present bill of exceptions was without authority of law.

The writ of error is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
# C_2011089EN.01001306.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 3 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-398/10) (1)

1

2011/C 89/30

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6554
DAVEY JAMES REEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-227-AM) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davey James Reedy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court dismissed Appellant's complaint because he failed to allege that he suffered a deprivation of a constitutional right. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealedis neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Robert N. PRESTON, et al., petitioners, v. R. Alexander ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor.

No. 17-1328.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00266-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.Z.V., A CHILD 

 

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court 

Deaf Smith County, Texas 

Trial Court No. DR-2017G-102, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding 

 

July 31, 2018 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant Rakeena Laverne Ladd has filed an unopposed motion seeking 

voluntary dismissal of this appeal. The Court finds the motion complies with the 

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the 

motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be 

entitled.

As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The 

appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will 

issue forthwith. The parties have not presented an agreement for assessment of costs. 

Therefore, costs are assessed against appellant. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

Per Curiam
# L_2013334EN.01000102.xml

| 13.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 334/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 334/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas will enter into force on 1 January 2014, the procedure provided for in Article 14(1) of the Agreement having been completed on 27 November 2013.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4377 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4377

  To extend the authorization for the Wheeling National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2019

Mr. McKinley (for himself and Mr. Tonko) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the authorization for the Wheeling National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION EXTENDED.

    Section 157(i) of Public Law 106-291 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 114 Stat. 
967) is amended by striking ``2021'' and inserting ``2026''.
                                 <all>
```
Charles MOMAH, petitioner, v. Jeffrey A. UTTECHT, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.

No. 17-6502.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Release: #4194-98 Docket No. 98-4

For Release: September 28, 1998

CFTC ACCEPTS SETTLEMENT OFFER OF TERRY A. DIRKSEN ARISING
FROM MARKETING OF SO-CALLED "HEDGE-TO-ARRIVE" CONTRACTS

CFTC Order Accepting
Settlement Offer Finds that Dirksen Aided and Abetted and is Liable as a
Controlling Person for Fraud in Violation of the Commodity Exchange
Act

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
today that it issued an order accepting an offer of settlement from Terry
Allan Dirksen of Clarinda, Iowa, in connection with a complaint filed by
the CFTC on December 22, 1997 (see CFTC News Release #4090-97, December 22,
1997). Dirksen was a co-owner and principal of both Competitive Strategies
for Agriculture, Ltd. (CSA-Iowa) and CSA Investor Services, Inc.
(CSA-IB), a registered introducing broker. Dirksen also was a registered
associated person of CSA-IB.

The CFTC order as to Dirksen, issued on September 24, 1998, finds that
Dirksen aided and abetted fraud violations and that Dirksen also is liable for
CSA-Iowa's and CSA-IB's fraud violations as a controlling person of
those entities. Dirksen, without admitting or denying the findings, consented
to the entry of the order:

-- directing him to cease and desist from further violations; and

-- directing him to pay a $10,000 civil monetary penalty.

Under the settlement, Dirksen also agreed not to seek CFTC registration in
any capacity, or to engage in any activity requiring such registration, for a
three-year period.

In a prior order filed on August 24, 1998, accepting an offer of settlement
from CSA-Iowa, CSA-IB, and Lee D. Amundson, the CFTC found that from mid-1993
through mid-1995, those respondents violated the anti-fraud provisions of the
Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in their market consulting and advisory services
to agricultural producers in Nebraska (see CFTC News Release #4182-98, August
25, 1998).

Specifically, the CFTC order found that they recommended that Nebraska
clients use so-called hedge-to-arrive contracts (HTAs) that permitted rolling
between crop years, and fraudulently represented to Nebraska clients that their
strategies concerning such contracts were risk-free due to the ability to
"roll out" of a losing HTA position during unfavorable market
conditions. The CFTC order also found that those respondents failed to disclose
the material risks that: 1) the futures market might move so adversely that the
producer might not be able to "roll out" of the HTAs profitably; and
2) in a period of rising prices, the contracting elevator might not be willing
or financially able to permit producers to roll indefinitely.

# # #
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4436 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4436

            To authorize a National Poverty Research Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2019

  Mr. Pocan (for himself, Ms. Norton, and Ms. Jayapal) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To authorize a National Poverty Research Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Poverty Research Center 
Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL POVERTY RESEARCH CENTER.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services 
shall award, every 5 years, one or more 5-year grants or cooperative 
agreements with institutions of higher education (as defined in section 
101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) to 
operate one or more National Poverty Research Centers.
    (b) Research.--
            (1) In general.--National Poverty Research Centers shall 
        perform poverty policy research, poverty policy research 
        training, and poverty policy research dissemination.
            (2) Collaboration.--National Poverty Research Centers shall 
        coordinate formal networks in order to facilitate a 
        sustainable, nationwide infrastructure of poverty policy 
        researchers and to better inform public policies that seek to 
        reduce poverty and its effects in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Daisy Frederick, Respondent, 

v. 

Daniel Lee McDowell, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2022-001480 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Marlboro County 

Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2024-MO-012 

Heard May 2, 2024 – Filed May 22, 2024 

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY 

GRANTED 

R. Hawthorne Barrett, of Turner Padget Graham & Laney, 

PA, of Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Robert Brian Critzer, of Wyche, PA, of Columbia; Kaye 

Gorenflo Hearn, of Wyche, PA, of Conway; and Eric Marc 

Poulin and Roy T. Willey, IV, both of Poulin, Willey, 

Anastopoulo, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent. 
 

 

PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' 

decision in Frederick v. McDowell, Op. No. 2022-UP-303 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 

20, 2022). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      | Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                      |                                  
|Date: January 8, 2016 | By:                              
|                      |