alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Jonathan R. Burst, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of International Fuel Technology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained inSEC Release 34-47986]; and(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                  March 30, 2007 By:  /s/ *Jonathan R. Burst*    Jonathan R. Burst    Principal executive officer
Bogar AGUDO-MONROY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9057.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 22A/31 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 22A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5031 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 22A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5031 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 022A/01 | NOTICE TO READERS | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 022A/01

NOTICE TO READERS

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 022A/02 | Reserve lists — Open competitions — Linguistic administrators (Senior Conference Interpreters — A*9) | 3 |
| 2007/C 022A/03 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/33/05 — Linguistic administrators (Conference interpreters — AD5) for Bulgarian (BG) | 5 |
| 2007/C 022A/04 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/34/05 — Linguistic administrators (Conference interpreters — AD5) for Romanian (RO) | 6 |
| 2007/C 022A/05 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/35/05 — Linguistic administrators (AD5) for the Bulgarian language (BG) in the field of translation | 7 |
| 2007/C 022A/06 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/36/05 — Linguistic administrators (AD5) for the Romanian language (RO) in the field of translation | 11 |
| 2007/C 022A/07 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/42/05 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) having as their main language Polish (PL) | 15 |
| 2007/C 022A/08 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/43/06 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) with main language Bulgarian (BG) | 16 |
| 2007/C 022A/09 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/44/06 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) with main language Romanian (RO) | 18 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2007/C 022A/02

Reserve lists — Open competitions — Linguistic administrators (Senior Conference Interpreters — A*9)

3

2007/C 022A/03

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/33/05 — Linguistic administrators (Conference interpreters — AD5) for Bulgarian (BG)

5

2007/C 022A/04

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/34/05 — Linguistic administrators (Conference interpreters — AD5) for Romanian (RO)

6

2007/C 022A/05

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/35/05 — Linguistic administrators (AD5) for the Bulgarian language (BG) in the field of translation

7

2007/C 022A/06

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/36/05 — Linguistic administrators (AD5) for the Romanian language (RO) in the field of translation

11

2007/C 022A/07

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/42/05 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) having as their main language Polish (PL)

15

2007/C 022A/08

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/43/06 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) with main language Bulgarian (BG)

16

2007/C 022A/09

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/44/06 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) with main language Romanian (RO)

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Sean Michael RYAN, petitioner, v. Willie SMITH, Warden.

No. 17-8470.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Leroy CHARLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5956.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 24, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Miley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ John A. Miley


John A. Miley
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2002
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

As of December 31, 2006, the following were the Registrant's significant
operating subsidiaries:


Name:   Global Hotline, Inc.

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   100.0% by IA Global, Inc.


Name:   Inforidge Co Ltd

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   100.0% by Global Hotline, Inc.


Name:   IA Partners Co Ltd

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   100.0% by Global Hotline, Inc.

Name:   SG Telecom, Inc.

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   100.0% by Global Hotline, Inc.
Release: #4205-98 (CFTC Docket # 97-1)

For Release: November 17, 1998

�

CFTC ALJ FINDS GRAIN LAND COOPERATIVE ENTERED INTO
    ILLEGAL OFF-EXCHANGE FUTURES CONTRACTS

Orders Grain Land to Cease and Desist From Violating
    the Commodity Exchange Act

WASHINGTON � On November 6, 1998, in the first litigated decision
    in a case brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
    concerning "hedge-to-arrive" contracts, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
    George H. Painter issued an Initial
    Decision finding that Grain Land Cooperative (Grain Land), a
    Minnesota agricultural cooperative, in marketing "Flex HTA" contracts,
    violated section 4(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by offering to
    enter into, and entering into, illegal futures contracts with its members.
    The ALJ ordered Grain Land to cease and desist from violating the CEA. The
    CFTC's one-count administrative complaint, CFTC Docket No. 97-1, was filed
    on November 13, 1996 (see CFTC News Release
    3965-96, November 13, 1996).

Following a hearing, the ALJ found that the CFTC's Division of
    Enforcement successfully demonstrated that Grain Land's contracts were
    illegal futures contracts. The ALJ found that "the contractual terms of
    respondent's Flex HTA contracts, consistent with the way they were
    marketed, readily allowed a producer to unilaterally and unequivocally
    avoid delivery for any reason." Because of such delivery flexibility, the
    ALJ concluded, "the Flex HTA contracts come up short as a cash forward
    contract." In concluding that the Flex HTA contracts are futures contracts,
    ALJ Painter noted that the contracts "when viewed as a whole, served the
    same function as exchange-traded futures contracts; providing participants
    with an opportunity to assume or shift the risk of price changes in an
    underlying commodity without the forced burden of delivery." ALJ
    Painter also found that "the Flex HTA contract was offered as a means to
    provide producers with something that was not otherwise available through
    Grain Land's other merchandising contracts or other local elevators.
    Quite simply, the Flex HTA contract provided an opportunity for producers
    to obtain futures positions financed by Grain Land."

The decision will become final 15 days from the entry of the ALJ's
    order, unless an appeal is filed with the Commission. If the decision is
    appealed, or if the Commission chooses to review the decision on its own
    initiative, the decision does not become final and the sanctions do not
    take effect pending the outcome of the Commission's review.
Clarence Bernard BUCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9520.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10414

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT B. SPEAKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CR-164-4-A

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert B. Speaks appeals his sentence for his guilty-plea

conviction of mail fraud and aiding and abetting for his

participation in a scheme to fraudulently induce victims to

purchase computer systems equipped with automatic telephone

dialers. Speaks argues that the district court erred in

sentencing him to 13 months in prison under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1
No. 02-10414 

-2-

because the loss amount was not reduced for the computers still

in the victims’ possession. 

We review the district court’s calculation of loss for clear

error. See United States v. Randall, 157 F.3d 328, 330 (5th Cir.

1998). The district court need only make a reasonable estimate

of the loss, given the available information. Id. at 330-31.

The district court’s refusal to lower the loss amount for

the value of the computers was not clear error. As explained in

the presentence report (PSR), the loss amount should not have

been reduced for the computer systems because they were

worthless. They appeared to be used, assembled with inexpensive

hardware, partly or completely inoperable, or had software

problems, and did not come with a warranty or with customer or

technical support. The information given to the probation

officer in preparing the PSR was properly considered since it

constituted “available information” relevant to a determination

of the equipment’s resale value. See id. Therefore, the

district court’s refusal to reduce the loss amount based on the

“value” of the computers was not clear error because the

computers had no value.

Speaks also contends that Beneficial Finance, the lender,

benefitted doubly by “writing off” the victims’ losses and by

being awarded restitution. However, Speaks had the burden of

proving an offset. See United States v. Sheinbaum, 136 F.3d 443,

449 (5th Cir. 1998). He did not present any evidence that
No. 02-10414 

-3-

Beneficial Finance had “written off” the bad loans. Nor did

Speaks offer any evidence to dispute the district court’s

statement that, when Beneficial Finance gets its money back, it

will have to reimburse the Government. The district court’s

rejection of this loss-calculation argument was not clear error. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ J.S.T. CORPORATION, Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

ROBERT BOSCH LLC, RO BERT BOSCH, SISTEMAS AUTOMATRICE S, S.A. DE C.V., FOXCONN INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Intervenors

______________________

2019

- 2308

______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 1043.

_______________ _______

Decided: July 10, 2020

______________________

J ONATHAN M ASSEY , Massey & Gail LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by C HRISTOPHER L AURENCE M AY ; K ENNETH G OLDMAN , San Francisco, CA; K EITH S CALA , Myers Bradford, Washington, D C. Case: 19-2308 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 07/10/2020J

. S

. T

. CORPORATION v. ITC 2

C LINT A. G ERDINE , Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by D OMINIC L. B IANCHI , W AYNE W. H ERRINGTON , S IDNEY A. R OSENZWEIG

.

M ARK S. D AVIES , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors . Also represented by J ORDAN C OYLE , C HRISTOPHER J. H IGGINS , K ATHERINE M. K OPP ; A LEXANDRA B URSAK , M ATTHEW R. S HAHABIAN , New York, NY; M ICHAEL C HOW , Irvine, CA; B AS DE B LANK , Menlo Park, CA.

______________________
Before L OURIE , S CHALL , and D YK , Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

. J.S.T Corporation (“JST”) appeals a determination bythe United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) finding no violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1337. Specifically , JST argues that the Commission erred in finding claims 2, 4, and 9

– 10 of U.S. Patent No. 7,004,766 to be not infringed and invalid.
We agree with the Commission’s construction of “first holes” “to require that the first (elongated) holes at the periphe ry of the tine plate in the longitudinal direction must be closer to the periphery of the tine plate than any second hole

. ” J.A. 38. Because it is undisputed that the accused products do not infringe under this construction , we affirm the Commission’s fi nding of noninfringement.
We also agree with the Commission’s construction of “contact legs” to include legs that connect to ground and affirm the Commission’s holding that the asserted claims were anticipated by the Tyco Docking Station Connector

. AFFIRMED Case: 19-2308 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 07/10/2020
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/15/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      144,083
COMMITMENTS
  37,199   19,183   20,771   68,299   79,239  126,270  119,193   17,813   24,890

CHANGES FROM 12/08/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,295)
      74    3,284    1,428    2,982       -4    4,484    4,707     -189     -413

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.8     13.3     14.4     47.4     55.0     87.6     82.7     12.4     17.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      47       28       46       55       68      124      128
```

----

Updated December 18, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4047 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4047

    To require certain Federal financial regulators to carry out an 
 independent study of their regulated entities' processes for allowing 
      third parties to access consumer-authorized financial data.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

  Mr. Meeks introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require certain Federal financial regulators to carry out an 
 independent study of their regulated entities' processes for allowing 
      third parties to access consumer-authorized financial data.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open Banking Study Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. CONSUMER-AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DATA STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Comptroller of the 
Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the National 
Credit Union Administration shall, jointly, carry out a study of their 
regulated entities' processes for allowing third parties to access 
consumer-authorized financial data.
    (b) Report.--Not later than the end of the 1-year period beginning 
on the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal agencies required to 
carry out a study under subsection (a) shall submit a report to the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate 
containing--
            (1) a description of all findings and determinations made 
        in carrying out the study required under subsection (a); and
            (2) administrative and legislative recommendations that 
        would encourage consumer-authorized financial data sharing and 
        aggregation consistent with the agencies' safety and soundness, 
        consumer protection, and cybersecurity standards, and all 
        applicable laws and regulations.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2014310EN.01008301.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/83

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 111/2014

of 16 May 2014

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (1).

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in paragraph 4 of Article 9 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 R 1295: Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 221).
  Liechtenstein shall be exempted from the participation in, and the financial contribution to, this programme.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 R 1295: Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 221).

Liechtenstein shall be exempted from the participation in, and the financial contribution to, this programme.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2014.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 221.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Loran COLE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8540.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.