alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6538

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARIO SYLVAN, a/k/a Albert Suriel,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-94-19, CA-97-664-2)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dario Sylvan, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Sylvan, Nos. CR-94-19; CA-97-664-2

(M.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Release: 4150-98

For Release: June 2, 1998

CFTC CHARGES JOSEPH J. MARCHIANO, HARTFORD FINANCIAL
    GROUP, INC., KERI L. STEWART, GLENN R. TAUBMAN, AND GARY V. VALLETTA IN
    FLORIDA FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT WITH VIOLATIONS OF A COMMISSION ORDER AND
    REGISTRATION PROVISIONS

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    (CFTC) announced today that on June 1, 1998, it filed an injunctive action
    in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against
    Joseph J. Marchiano, Hartford Financial Group, Inc. (Hartford), Keri L.
    Stewart, Glenn R. Taubman, and Gary V. Valletta. The action seeks to
    enforce a November 22, 1996 Commission order that, among other things,
    required Marchiano to pay a civil monetary penalty and alleges violations
    of the Commission order and various registration requirements.

The three-count complaint alleges that Marchiano has
    been acting as an Associated Person (AP) and as a principal of Hartford, a
    registered introducing broker (IB) located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
    without being registered. Marchiano, who was a respondent in an earlier
    Commission enforcement proceeding, In the Matter of American Futures
    Group, Inc., George J. Perk, Thomas G. Reeves and Joseph J. Marchiano,
    CFTC Docket No. 95-15, entered into a settlement in which he agreed to,
    among other things, withdrawal of his registration for a period of one
    year, imposition of a $10,000 civil monetary penalty to be paid on or
    before January 2, 1997, prohibition from acting as a principal of a
    registrant, and imposition of conditions on any future registration he
    might obtain. To date, Marchiano has not paid the $10,000 civil monetary
    penalty and has further violated the Commission order by acting as an AP
    and as a principal of Hartford.

The listed principals of Hartford -- Stewart, Taubman,
    and Valletta -- knew, or acted in a manner to avoid knowing, that Marchiano
    was prohibited from acting as an AP or as a principal of a registrant by
    the Commission order. Furthermore, by enabling Marchiano to control
    Hartford without registration, they aided and abetted Marchiano and
    Hartford's registration violations.

Accordingly, the CFTC filed the complaint in federal
    district court charging Marchiano, Hartford, Stewart, Taubman, and Valletta
    with registration violations. In addition, the complaint charges Marchiano
    with violating the Commission order by failing to pay his civil monetary
    penalty and acting as an AP and principal of Hartford.
Tina ALEXANDER, et al., petitioners, v. AMERIPRO FUNDING, INC., et al.

No. 16-1395.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 10(b)

                                 REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL



I, Sandra M. DaDalt, in my capacity as counsel to Sun Life of Canada (U.S.)
Variable Account F (the "Account") have reviewed this Post-Effective
Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Account which is being filed
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 under the Securities Act of 1933. Based
on my review of this Post-Effective Amendment and such other material
relating to the operations of the Account as I deemed relevant, I hereby
certify as of the date of filing this Post-Effective Amendment, that the
Post-Effective Amendment does not contain disclosure which would render it
ineligible to become effective pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485.


I hereby consent to the filing of this representation as part of this
Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Account.

                                         /s/ SANDRA DADALT
                                         -----------------------
                                         Sandra DaDalt, Esq.

April 6, 2000
Antonio FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. Charlotte JENKINS, Warden.

No. 17-5808.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Carolyn LAZAR, petitioner, v. Mark G. KRONCKE, in His Capacity as Administrator of the Estate of George Thomas Kroncke.

No. 17-521.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

*2648Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Wendell C. HELFRICK, petitioner, v. Benjamin WRIGHT, Warden.

No. 16-8874.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARONEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRE BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,613,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,468,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,489,000
<PP&E>                                       5,559,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,758,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,201,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,463,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,347,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,201,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,466,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,466,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,466,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 299/16 N

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 299 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5016 November 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 299

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5016 November 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/21/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      155,998
COMMITMENTS
  10,548   21,670   30,192   93,726   84,548  134,466  136,410   21,532   19,588

CHANGES FROM 12/14/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,495)
  -2,004     -796   -1,540    2,078     -727   -1,466   -3,063    5,961    7,558

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.8     13.9     19.4     60.1     54.2     86.2     87.4     13.8     12.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       86)
      20       25       30       28       31       70       72
```

----

Updated December 27, 2010
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-126054, 333-46936, and 333-79643 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Nautilus, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48), and the effectiveness of Nautilus, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Nautilus, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP   
|                               
|Portland, Oregon March 16,
2009
Jon HUSTED, Ohio Secretary of State, petitioner, v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.

No. 16-980.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Joint motion of the parties to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Kelvin ESTEEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Robert Owen ARRINGTON, petitioner, v. Eric SELLERS, Warden.

No. 16-9752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph T. Crowley, the Chief Financial Officer of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that to my knowledge the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that as of the date of this statement, the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is to solely comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Date:    February 9, 2005                   /s/ Joseph T. Crowley
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joseph T. Crowley
                                            Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
In Re John Peyton ALEXANDER, petitioner.

No. 17-7902.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Donald Scott JONES, petitioner, v. Randall WILLIAMS, Warden.

No. 17-6600.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Peter BARCLAY, petitioner, v. OREGON, et al.

No. 17-5431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Melvin MARTINEZ-LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  March 17, 2000



Goldman, Sachs & Co.
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004


Re:      Underwriting Agreement for Franklin Auto Trust 2000-1, dated March 17,
2000 the "Underwriting Agreement") among FCC Receivables Corp., Franklin
Receivables LLC, Franklin Capital Corporation ("Franklin Capital") and Goldman,
Sachs & Co. (the "Underwriter").

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, Franklin Capital has
undertaken certain financial obligations with respect to the indemnification of
the Underwriter with respect to the Registration Statement, and the Prospectus
described in the Underwriting Agreement.  Any financial obligations of Franklin
Capital under the Underwriting Agreement, whether or not specifically
enumerated in this paragraph, are hereinafter referred to as the "Joint and
Several Obligations;" provided, however, that "Joint and Several Obligations"
shall mean only the financial obligations of Franklin Capital under the
Underwriting Agreement (including the payment of money damages for a breach of
any of Franklin Capital's obligations under the Underwriting Agreement, whether
financial or otherwise) but shall not include any obligations not relating to
the payment of money.

         As a condition of its execution of the Underwriting Agreement, the
Underwriter has required the undersigned, Franklin Resources, Inc. ("Franklin
Resources"), the parent corporation of Franklin Capital, to acknowledge its
joint and several liability with Franklin Capital for the payment of the Joint
and Several Obligations under the Underwriting Agreement.

         Now, therefore, the Underwriter and Franklin Resources do hereby agree
that:

1.       Franklin Resources hereby agrees to be absolutely and unconditionally
jointly and severally liable with Franklin Capital to the Underwriter for the
payment of the Joint and Several Obligations under the Underwriting Agreement.







<PAGE>   2
2.       Franklin Resources may honor its obligations hereunder either by
direct payment of any Joint and Several Obligations or by causing any Joint and
Several Obligations to be paid to the Underwriter by Franklin Capital or
another affiliate of Franklin Resources.

         Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have their
respective meanings as set forth in the Underwriting Agreement.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.


                                        By: Jennifer J. Bolt
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Name: Jennifer J. Bolt
                                            Title: Vice President


GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.


By: /s/ GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.
    ----------------------------
    Name:
    Title:






                                      -2-
#### Charles R. Murphy, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Ocala Community Hotel Company, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*Anderson & Anderson,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Hampton & Greene,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument' of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court *230that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Ken Jermaine FOWLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### Bob Brown *v.*The State.

1. Disorderly House.—An information is sufficient which, alleging time and place, charges that the accused “did unlawfully keep a disorderly house, said house being then and there kept for the purpose of public prostitution, and as a common resort for prostitutes,” etc.

2. Same. —See evidence held to make a *prima facie*case sufficient to support. a verdict of conviction for keeping a disorderly house.

Appeal from the County Court of Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. C. C. Cummings, County Judge.

The charging clause of the information is set out in the first head-note.

One witness testified that for several months the accused had lived at the Waco Tap House, in Fort Worth, Tarrant county. Witness never saw the accused do anything about the house except to take the place of his barkeeper whenever the latter went out; but never saw any one but the *190accused do that. The house had the general reputation of being a common resort for lewd women; that he always saw such women there, and always saw the accused there. The house was generally called a “ dance-house,” but witness never saw the accused exercise authority in regulating the dancing, though he sometimes saw him talking to the guests.

Another witness stated that the house was reputed to be a place where a man could go and dance with prostitutes for partners.

A third witness stated that the reputation of the house was that of a house of public prostitution.

The defense introduced no witnesses.

The verdict was guilty, and assessed a fine of $225.

Accused moved for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, but both motions were overruled.

*Walton, Green & Hill,*for the appellant,

cited *Stephanes*v. *The State,*21 Texas, 206.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

White, J.

The appellant was tried and convicted for keeping a disorderly house. The complaint and the information based upon it stated the offense as defined in the-Code. Pasc. Dig., Arts. 2027, 2028. The accused lived at the house and kept a bar there and the evidence certainly established a *prima facie*case against him, which he did not attempt to rebut. The case of *Couch*v. *The State,*24 Texas, 559, is similar in many respects. There are no questions raised in the case which are considered well taken, or of sufficient importance to require a reversal. Most of them have frequently been passed upon and settled by the supreme court and by this court. See *Cora Morris*v. *The State,*38 Texas, 603; *Mary Sylvester*v. *The State,*42 *191Texas, 496; *Ada Thompson*v. *The State,*1 Texas Ct. of App. 56, and *Jennie Thompson*v. *The State,*decided at the present term, *ante, p.*82.

The information charged that the offense was *unlawfully*committed, and, therefore, met and obviated the objection which was otherwise held good in the case of *Stephanes*v. *The State,*21 Texas, 206.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
# L_2012322EN.01000101.xml

| 21.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/1

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the application of certain provisions of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and the 2001 Protocol thereto

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the application of certain provisions of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and the 2001 Protocol thereto (1), signed in Brussels on 19 December 2003, will enter into force on 1 January 2013, in accordance with Article 6 of the Agreement.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 26, 29.1.2004, p. 3.

1

---
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/13/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       69,127
COMMITMENTS
   6,247    8,991    4,272   48,286   52,638   58,805   65,901   10,322    3,226

CHANGES FROM 04/06/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,514)
   1,065      240    1,111      139    4,513    2,315    5,864     -801   -4,350

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.0     13.0      6.2     69.9     76.1     85.1     95.3     14.9      4.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       51)
      15       12       11       20       21       40       39
```

----

Updated April 16, 2010