alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Phone call with Skadden
  
    



  Disscussion of extraterritoriality with respect to data reporting.
      
  When
              06/08/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Irina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Rachel Kaplan Reicher

  Organization(s)
              Skadden


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
John Henry YABLONSKY, petitioner, v. Daniel PARAMO, Warden.

No. 16-8771.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2011252EN.01005101.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/51

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2011 — Kalmár v Europol

(Case F-83/09) (1)

1

(Staff case - Europol staff - Dismissal - Request for annulment - Payment of remuneration - Effect of judgment ordering annulment)

2011/C 252/109

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Kalmár (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: D. C. Coppens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Europol (represented by: D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decisions of Europol of 4 and 24 February 2009 concerning the applicant’s dismissal and his suspension for the period of notice. In addition, application for compensation for the non-material harm suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of 4 February 2009 whereby the Director of Europol terminated Mr Kalmár’s fixed-term contract, the decision of 24 February 2009 whereby the Director of Europol relieved him of the duty to serve his period of notice, and the decision of 18 July 2009 rejecting his complaint; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of 4 February 2009 whereby the Director of Europol terminated Mr Kalmár’s fixed-term contract, the decision of 24 February 2009 whereby the Director of Europol relieved him of the duty to serve his period of notice, and the decision of 18 July 2009 rejecting his complaint;

| 2. | orders Europol to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 5 000 in damages; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Europol to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 5 000 in damages;

| 3. | dismisses the action for the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

dismisses the action for the remainder;

| 4. | orders Europol to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Mr Kalmár. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders Europol to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Mr Kalmár.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 80.

1

---
Andre David LEFFEBRE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5714.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4337 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4337

     To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to prohibit the 
 enforcement of certain policies of homeowners associations regarding 
                    real property of servicemembers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2019

Mr. DesJarlais introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to prohibit the 
 enforcement of certain policies of homeowners associations regarding 
                    real property of servicemembers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Property Rights for Patriots Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN POLICIES OF HOMEOWNERS 
              ASSOCIATIONS REGARDING REAL PROPERTY OF SERVICEMEMBERS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Title III of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 
(50 U.S.C. 3950 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 308 as section 309; and
            (2) by inserting after section 307 the following new 
        section 308:

``SEC. 308. ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES OF HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS.

    ``(a) Prohibition.--No homeowners association may seek to enforce a 
policy--
            ``(1) that restricts the right of a member of the 
        association to lease the real property of that member; and
            ``(2) against a servicemember--
                    ``(A) whose residence is that real property;
                    ``(B) during a period of military service of the 
                servicemember of not less than 90 days.
    ``(b) Misdemeanor.--A person who knowingly violates this section, 
or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 
18, United States Code, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or 
both.
    ``(c) Homeowners Association Defined.--In this section, the term 
`homeowners association' has the meaning given that term in section 
528(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 
528(c)(1)).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the beginning of 
such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 308 and 
inserting the following new items:

``308. Enforcement of policies of homeowners associations.
``309. Extension of protections to dependents.''.
                                 <all>
```
Glenn T. ZAMZOW, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 17-5114.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

*502Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4153 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4153

  To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban 
  Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of 
        medical services and facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2019

  Mr. Khanna (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Ms. Haaland, Mr. Gianforte, Mr. 
   Lujan, Mr. Young, Ms. Moore, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Tonko, and Mr. Estes) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban 
  Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of 
        medical services and facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care Access for Urban Native 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. SHARING ARRANGEMENTS WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES.

    Section 405 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 
1645) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ``urban Indian 
        organizations,'' before ``and tribal organizations''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by inserting ``urban Indian organization,'' 
                before ``or tribal organization''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``an urban Indian organization,'' 
                before ``or a tribal organization''.
                                 <all>
```
Neil WALKER, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 17-8805.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
Victor G. BAXTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6081.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                   [BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC. LETTERHEAD]


December  27, 2000



Laurent Pacalin
2161 Avy Avenue
Menlo Park, CA 94025

Re:    Employment Terms

Dear Laurent,

Blue Martini Software, Inc. ("BMS") is pleased to offer you the position of Vice
President of Marketing Officer on the terms as described in your offer letter
dated December 27, 2000. In addition to the letter referenced, your employment
includes the following term:

 .    If you are terminated from BMS without cause at any time in your
     employment, you will be eligible to receive a severance payment equal to 6
     months of your base salary at the time of termination and BMS will pay
     health benefits for you and your dependents for 6 months on the same terms
     as then provided to employees of the Company. If you resign from BMS at any
     point, a severance payment will not be paid. This severance payment will be
     your only benefit or payment upon termination, and you will not be entitled
     to any additional stock vesting upon termination of employment for any
     reason. "Cause" shall mean the occurrence of one or more of the following:
     (i) your conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or
     dishonesty; (ii) your participation in a fraud or act of dishonesty against
     the Company; (iii) your intentional and material damage to the Company's
     property; or (iv) a material breach by you of this Agreement, the Company's
     written policies, or the Employee Proprietary Information and Inventions
     Agreement that is not remedied by you within fourteen (14) days of written
     notice of such breach from the Board. It shall be a condition to your
     receipt of such severance that you enter into a release agreement
     acceptable to the Company. We look forward to your favorable reply and to a
     productive and enjoyable working relationship.

Very truly yours,

/s/ MONTE ZWEBEN

Monte Zweben
Blue Martini Software, Inc.

I accept the employment terms stated in this letter, and expect to commence
employment on December 30, 2000

/s/ LAURENT PACALIN
----------------------------------
Laurent Pacalin
Date:  December 29, 2000
EXHIBIT 13.1

               CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection  with the annual report of Wealth Minerals Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form  20-F for the  fiscal  year  ending  November  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Gary
Freeman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



//s// Gary Freeman

Name: Gary Freeman
Title: President and CEO
September 24, 2004
NUMBER 13-22-00288-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BUNNETT & CO., INC., ENERGY FEEDS

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, AND 

WILLIAM E. BUNNETT, Appellants,

v.

NATURAL SODA LLC AND

ENIRGI GROUP CORPORATION Appellees. 

On appeal from the 200th District Court 

of Travis County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina 

Appellants Bunnett & Co., Inc., Energy Feeds International, and William E. Bunnett 

perfected an appeal in appellate cause number 13-22-00288-CV from a judgment entered 

by the 200th District Court of Travis County, Texas, in trial court cause number D-1-GN-
2

15-005653 on June 22, 2017.1 On September 6, 2022, appellants and appellees, Natural 

Soda LLC and Enirgi Group Corporation, filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal in this 

Court. The motion states that the parties have reached a settlement agreement and that 

the parties desire that we: (1) reverse the trial court’s June 22, 2017 judgment; (2) 

“[r]ender judgment dismissing all claims by all parties with prejudice to the refiling of 

same”; and (3) “order that each party bear their own costs of the appeal.”

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss 

the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a). The joint motion is granted, and we reverse the trial court’s June 22, 2017 

judgment and render a judgment dismissing all claims by all parties with prejudice to the 

refiling of same. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against 

the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). The supersedeas bond filed by 

Sure Tec Insurance is released and all obligations thereon are discharged.

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

15th day of September, 2022.

1 This case is before this Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a 

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
# EUR-Lex - 22008A0630(01)R(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22008A0630(01)R(01)

**CORRIGENDUM: - Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part **

*
Official Journal L 233 , 30/08/2008 P. 0006 - 0395 *

Council Decision

of 16 June 2008

concerning the signing and conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part

(2008/474/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and Article 300(3), first sentence thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) Pending the entry into force of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, signed in Luxembourg on 16 June 2008, it is necessary to approve the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement).

(2) The commercial provisions contained in the Agreement are of an exceptional nature, connected with the policy implemented within the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Process and will not constitute, for the European Union, any precedent in the commercial policy of the Community with regard to third countries other than those of the Western Balkans.

(3) The Agreement should therefore be signed and approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, the Annexes and Protocols annexed thereto, and the joint declaration and the declaration by the Community attached to the Final Act, are hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The texts referred to in the first paragraph are attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered, on behalf of the Community, to sign the Agreement and to deposit the instrument of approval provided for in Article 58 of the Agreement.

Done at Luxembourg, 16 June 2008.

For the Council

The President

D. Rupel

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIODS ENDED JUNE
30, 1998 AND 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                 <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                1,810,396     12,355,309
<SECURITIES>                                  0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                           780,913      5,763,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0              0
<INVENTORY>                             204,719         77,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      3,735,728     20,425,383
<PP&E>                                3,665,803      4,471,865
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,235,197      1,938,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       10,567,369     29,055,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,336,408      3,913,531
<BONDS>                               3,742,576      4,679,462
<COMMON>                              1,994,686      4,128,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0              0
<PREFERRED>                               8,460              0
<OTHER-SE>                           (3,549,899)    16,334,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         10,567,369     29,055,288
<SALES>                                 756,660        854,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        756,660        854,507
<CGS>                                   123,389         80,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         4,884,475      7,425,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,123,728      5,439,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      463,977        521,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (5,773,588)             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (5,773,588)   (12,487,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0              0
<CHANGES>                                     0              0
<NET-INCOME>                         (6,035,538)   (12,982,289)
<EPS-BASIC>                               .35            .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .35            .36



</TABLE>
Fuad NDIBALEMA, petitioner, v. Fatu KANKOLONGO.

No. 17-5880.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont denied.
David D. DOVE, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 17-6231.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

*1280Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2013225EN.01008203.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/82

---

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2013 — Daniel Swarovski v OHIM — Swarovski (Dabiel Swarovski Privat)

(Case T-55/09) (1)

1

2013/C 225/184

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

1

---
Kevin Wendell CHURCH, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-6210.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.