alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| | Exhibit
  32.2
| | --------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, J. David Brow, the
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of The Electric
Network.com, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of
The Electric Network.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of The Electric Network.com, Inc.

Dated February 17, 2006.

/s/ J. David Brow J. David
Brow

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)

---
Troy CLARK, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5197.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steven BRAUNSTEIN, petitioner, v. Renee BAKER, Warden, et al.

No. 17-6465.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period  ended July 1, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:      August 1, 2007             By: /s/ David L. Goebel
     --------------------------           --------------------------------------
                                          David L. Goebel
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period  ended July 1, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:      August 1, 2007             By: /s/ Steven K. Lumpkin
     ---------------------------         ---------------------------------------
                                         Steven K. Lumpkin
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial and Strategy Officer
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., petitioners, v. Theodore WESBY, et al.

No. 15-1485.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Daryl K. WASHINGTON, et al., petitioners, v. KELLWOOD COMPANY.

No. 17-1345.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Anthony P. RAIMONDO, petitioner, v. Jose Arnulfo ARIAS.

No. 17-648.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ruben RODRIGUEZ-ADORNO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Scott D. CHEEVER, petitioner, v. KANSAS

No. 17-6252.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas denied.
# L_2013219EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Donald
Katz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on Form
10-K of Audible Inc. Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Audible,
Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.









March
      27, 2008
            
            By:
            
            /s/
      Donald R. KatzDonald
      R. KatzChief
      Executive Officer
#### Rosemary Corporation, *Appellant,*v. Guy H. Parker, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion filed May 2, 1929.

*W. Boss Burton,*for Appellant;

No appearance for Appellee.

Buford, J.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in th.e premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said decree insofar as it allows a solicitor’s fee of $264.66 for services in the instant suit and the fur*692ther sum of $1250.00 for the service of a solicitor in defending a condemnation proceeding involving the property described in the mortgage being foreclosed.

There is no allegation in the bill of complaint that would constitute a proper basis for the introduction of evidence to prove the existence of the right to collect attorney’s fees in this suit, either incident to the foreclosure of the mortgage or incident to the condemnation proceedings referred to in the bill of complaint. See Brett v. First National Bank of Marianna and Brooks v. Roberts, decided at this term.

It is contended that the rights of the parties were adjudicated in the condemnation proceedings. There appears to be some reasonable ground for that contention, but, inasmuch as it appears that the condemnation proceedings did not involve all of the lands embraced in the mortgage and the chancellor has construed the judgment and verdict in that proceeding as pertaining only to that part of the security which was involved in the condemnation proceedings and has found by the final decree that there was due the complainant on his mortgage at the time of the foreclosure the sum of $349.78 secured by a lien on that part of the lands embraced in the mortgage and not involved in the condemnation proceedings, together with interest thereon in "the sum of $47.01, and, as there was substantial evidence before the chancellor to sustain this finding, it will not be disturbed.

The decree will be reversed insofar as the same allows attorney’s fees, either for foreclosing the mortgage or for the services of the attorney for the complainant in this suit rendered in the condemnation suit, for the reasons hereinbefore stated. The decree will be affirmed in other respects.

*693Whitfield, P. J., and Strum, J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
# L_2013345EN.01001801.xml

| 19.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 345/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 345/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 149/2013

of 15 July 2013

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 253/2013 of 15 January 2013 amending Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 692/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards adaptations following the revision of the International Standard Classification of Education ISCED in relation to the variables and breakdowns to be submitted (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 253/2013 of 15 January 2013 amending Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 692/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards adaptations following the revision of the International Standard Classification of Education ISCED in relation to the variables and breakdowns to be submitted (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 7c (Regulation (EU) No 692/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32013 R 0253: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 253/2013 of 15 January 2013 (OJ L 79, 21.3.2013, p. 5).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32013 R 0253: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 253/2013 of 15 January 2013 (OJ L 79, 21.3.2013, p. 5).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 253/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 July 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 79, 21.3.2013, p. 5.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 3.1 (b)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              NET PERCEPTIONS, INC.


                   __________________________________________

                     Pursuant to Section 242 of the General
                    Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

                   __________________________________________



         Net Perceptions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

         FIRST: The first paragraph of Article IV of the Corporation's Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as set forth below:

         The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be
         designated common stock ("Common Stock") and preferred stock
         ("Preferred Stock"). The number of shares of Common Stock authorized to
         be issued is One Hundred Million (100,000,000), par value $.0001 per
         share, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be
         issued is Five Million (5,000,000), par value $.0001 per share.

         SECOND: The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Net Perceptions, Inc. has caused this Certificate
to be duly executed in its corporate name this 25th day of May, 2000.




                                     Net Perception, Inc.

                                     By:   /s/ Thomas M. Donnelly
                                     -------------------------------
                                           Name:    Thomas M. Donnelly
                                           Title:   Senior Vice President,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer and
                                                    Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6647

LARRY OLIN WEBB,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARTIN J.

MCDADE, Superintendent, Harnett Correctional

Institution,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-361-4)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Olin Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate.

We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Webb

v. Attorney Gen. of North Carolina, No. CA-95-361-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar.

26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Dennis M. SHEPHEARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6795.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-60019

Summary Calendar

MICHAEL A. DE GRAFFENRIED,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:14-CV-9

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Michael A. de Graffenried appeals the grant of 

summary judgment and the dismissal of his defamation lawsuit against his 

former employer, Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc. (Smithway). In his pro se 

lawsuit, de Graffenried alleged that Smithway had defamed him by reporting 

that his employment was terminated because he had refused a drug and 

alcohol test following a workplace injury. The district court granted summary 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-60019 Document: 00513706153 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2016
No. 16-60019

2

judgment because de Graffenried had failed to establish a genuine issue of 

material fact regarding the truth of Smithway’s representation, and in 

Mississippi, truth is an absolute defense to a defamation lawsuit. See Journal 

Publ’g Co. v. McCullough, 743 So. 2d 352, 360 (Miss. 1999).

Even though he disputes some irrelevant factual findings in the district 

court’s opinion, de Graffenried does not challenge the district court’s analysis 

of his defamation claim. He does not identify any legal error for review by us, 

and he does not cite any legal authority to support overturning the grant of 

summary judgment. Although we apply less stringent standards to parties 

proceeding pro se than to parties represented by counsel, and we liberally 

construe the briefs of pro se litigants, parties proceeding pro se must still brief 

the issues and reasonably comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 28 

of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Grant v. Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523, 

524 (5th Cir. 1995). As de Graffenried has not challenged the district court’s 

reasons for dismissing his defamation action, he is deemed to have abandoned 

the sole issue before us. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 

1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th 

Cir. 1987) (holding that, when an appellant fails to identify any error in the 

district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the 

judgment).

In light of de Graffenried’s abandonment of his claim, the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-60019 Document: 00513706153 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/05/2016
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Net Perceptions, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M.
Donnelly, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Thomas M. DonnellyName:
    
    Thomas M. DonnellyTitle:
    
    President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    April 13, 2004
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability under that section, this certification shall not
be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act, except to extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
# Official Journal L 313/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 313 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5731 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 313

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5731 October 2014

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 1150/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 1150/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# L_2008024EN.01005301.xml

| 29.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 24/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 24/53

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Community and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas entered into force on 1 January 2008, the procedure provided for in Article 14 of the Agreement having been completed on 30 November 2007.

---
Fernando Buendia REYES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 17, 2022

No. 04-22-00264-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.M., a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA01970

Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is 

required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was

filed. Id.

The brief of appellee the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (the 

“Department”) was originally due to be filed on August 16, 2022. On August 16, 2022, the 

Department filed a motion for a 30-day extension of time to file its brief. The Department’s

motion is GRANTED IN PART. It is ORDERED that the Department’s brief must be filed no 

later than September 6, 2022. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this

appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on August 17, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT