alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012164EN.01000101.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs

The Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), signed in Brussels on 14 July 2011, has entered into force on 1 April 2012.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 30.3.2012, p. 3.

1

---
Kenneth Scott GORDON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6223.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

** **

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, IndependentAuditors**

** **

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30280) pertaining to the iPartyCorp. 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan and the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-104127) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1998Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan of iParty Corp. of our reportdated February 24, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsof iParty Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 27, 2003.

 
|                 | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                 |                      |
|                 |                      |
| Boston Massachusetts |                      |
| March 24, 2004       |                      |

 

----
Obie D. WEATHERS, III, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-9446.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

*316On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration on in light of *Moore v. Texas,* 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1039, 197 L.Ed.2d 416 (2017).
EXHIBIT 31.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Nigel P. Ekern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Net Perceptions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: March 31, 2005
                                        By: /s/ Nigel P. Ekern
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Name: Nigel P. Ekern
                                            Title: Chief Administrative Officer
Kevin COSTIGAN, petitioner, v. Christopher S. PORRINO, Attorney General of New Jersey.

No. 17-5909.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Shawn Keith HOTT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6258.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Edward Bialla, James J. Kennedy, Benjamin R. Brown, Guisseppe Cavagnaro and Hannah Bialla, *Appellants,*v. Nieuport B. Estes and M. O. Blackwell, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion filed April 3, 1929.

*Giles & Gurney,*for Appellants;

*H. B. S. Hammond*and *H. M. Jarvis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

The bill of complaint was filed in the court below seeking to rescind the purchase and sale of certain property and to require cancellation of a certain mortgage and the return by the appellees to the appellants of certain monies paid as part of the purchase price of the property involved.

*458The suit was brought upon the theory that the complainants in the court below were entitled to relief prayed because of misrepresentations made in regard to the location of the property.

There was a demurrer to the bill of complaint. The demurrer was sustained and, the complainants refusing to plead further, the bill was dismissed and from such order appeal was taken.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Hirshman et al, v. Hodges-Ohara & Russell Co., 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. R. 550, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Richard A. BRUMMEL, petitioner, v. TOWN OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD TOWN BOARD, et al.

No. 17-6228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
Eric A. BLOOM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-359.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the annual report of Quepasa Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael D. Matte, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |     |                                                                       
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                                       
|Date: March 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ MICHAEL D. MATTE                                                  
|                     |     | Michael D. Matte
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
In Re John V. COLEN, petitioner.

No. 17-7158.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0262. HUMBERTO ANTONIO MEJIA v. ANA GLADYS PARADA.

On February 17, 2021, the trial court entered a final judgment and decree of

divorce in this case. On March 19, 2021, Humberto Antonio Mejia filed an

application for discretionary review of the trial court’s order. Mejia’s application was

docketed as Case No. A21D0261. On March 20, 2021, Mejia filed a second

application, seeking review of the same trial court order, which was docketed as Case

No. A21D0262. 

As an initial matter, this application is duplicative of Mejia’s prior application

in Case No. A21D0261. 

Moreover, to be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App.

582, 583 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, see Gable

v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011), and we cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). In Case No.

A21D0262, Mejia filed the application 31 days after entry of the trial court’s order,

making it untimely. 

April 06, 2021
For these reasons, Case No. A21D0262 is hereby DISMISSED. Any future

filings in this matter should be made in Case No. A21D0261. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/06/2021
Taajwarr O. HIVES, petitioner, v. BISK EDUCATION, INC.

No. 17-6188.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2013291EN.01001201.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 59/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2012 of 12 July 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 692/2008, as regards type-approval requirements for motor vehicles fuelled by hydrogen and mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas with respect to emissions, and the inclusion of specific information regarding vehicles fitted with an electric power train in the information document for the purpose of EC type-approval (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2012 of 12 July 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 692/2008, as regards type-approval requirements for motor vehicles fuelled by hydrogen and mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas with respect to emissions, and the inclusion of specific information regarding vehicles fitted with an electric power train in the information document for the purpose of EC type-approval (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 45zu (Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008) of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0630: Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2012 of 12 July 2012 (OJ L 182, 13.7.2012, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0630: Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2012 of 12 July 2012 (OJ L 182, 13.7.2012, p. 14).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 630/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 182, 13.7.2012, p. 14.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2011328EN.01000101.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products reached on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products reached on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (1), signed in Brussels on 15 April 2011, have been completed on 9 November 2011. Consequently, this Agreement will enter into force, in accordance with its paragraph 18, second subparagraph, on 1 January 2012.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 327, 9.12.2011, p. 1.

1

---
Opinion filed January 10, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-18-00249-CV

__________

APPROXIMATELY 4.11 GRAMS OF METHAMPHETAMINE, 

APPROXIMATELY 5.33 GRAMS OF COCAINE, AND $1,056.00 

IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellants

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 350th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10749-D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Donnie Ray Carrion filed a pro se notice of appeal in this cause. His brief was 

originally due to be filed in this court on or before November 7, 2018. On November 

26, 2018, this court notified Carrion by letter that his brief was past due, and on this 

court’s own motion, we extended the deadline to December 17, 2018. In the 

November 26 letter, the clerk of this court informed Carrion that the failure to timely 
2

file an appellate brief by the December 17 due date “may result in dismissal of the 

appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). As of this date, Carrion has not 

filed a brief, nor has he requested an extension of time in which to file his brief. 

Based upon Carrion’s failure to prosecute this appeal in a timely manner, we 

conclude that this appeal should be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 

42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 

PER CURIAM

January 10, 2019

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating. 

 1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Douglas Alan WILLIS.

No. D-3008.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Douglas Alan Willis, of Crest Hill, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
The PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al., petitioners, v. THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, et al.

No. 17-1136.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
### NUMBER 13

- 23

- 00 372

- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

EMILIO MIGUEL MACEDO

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria C ounty, Texas.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Silva and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal. The

motion was signed by both counsel and the appellant. We find the motion meets the

requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney

must sig n a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).2 Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted. Without passing on the merits of the

case, t he appeal is hereby dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request,

no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

5th day of October, 2023.
Robert Brian PARKER, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 17-5546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/14/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      151,503
COMMITMENTS
  12,552   22,466   31,732   91,648   85,275  135,932  139,473   15,571   12,030

CHANGES FROM 12/07/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,272)
   2,595      635   -1,466      307    5,727    1,436    4,896      836   -2,624

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.3     14.8     20.9     60.5     56.3     89.7     92.1     10.3      7.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       91)
      22       27       36       25       32       70       80
```

----

Updated December 17, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
SSP Solutions, Inc.



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (registration statement nos. 333-90574 and 333-101959)
and in the registration statement on Form S-8 (registration statement no.
333-73204) of our report dated March 28, 2003 relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of SSP Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
the year then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report
appears in amendment no. 2 to the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K
of SSP Solutions, Inc.

         Our report dated March 28, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states the Company has incurred recurring operating losses, used cash in
operating activities, is in default on certain debt obligations, and has an
accumulated deficit and a working capital deficiency which raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



         /S/ HASKELL & WHITE LLP


Irvine, California
September 15, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACTV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher C. Cline,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                   By:    /s/  Christopher C. Cline
                                          --------------------------
                                   Name:  Christopher C. Cline
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/27/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      483,455
COMMITMENTS
  53,848   31,540   77,728  327,687  349,712  459,263  458,980   24,192   24,475

CHANGES FROM 10/20/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,184)
   1,009     -380   -5,695   16,687   14,178   12,001    8,103    3,183    7,081

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.1      6.5     16.1     67.8     72.3     95.0     94.9      5.0      5.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      114)
      28       20       38       51       61       99      102
```

----

Updated October 30, 2009
Saul C. TOUCHET, petitioner, v. ESTIS WELL SERVICE, L.L.C., et al.

No. 17-346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of Seafarers' Rights International for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Global Maritime Ministries, Inc. New Orleans for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Lyle Eugene WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5739.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.