alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010244EN.01002501.xml

| 16.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/25

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 71/2010

of 11 June 2010

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 51/2010 of 30 April 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 51/2010 of 30 April 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2009/131/EC of 16 October 2009 amending Annex VII to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2009/131/EC of 16 October 2009 amending Annex VII to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 37d (Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32009 L 0131: Commission Directive 2009/131/EC of 16 October 2009 (OJ L 273, 17.10.2009, p. 12).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32009 L 0131: Commission Directive 2009/131/EC of 16 October 2009 (OJ L 273, 17.10.2009, p. 12).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/131/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 11/2010 of 29 January 2010 (3), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 15.7.2010, p. 19.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 273, 17.10.2009, p. 12.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(3)  
  OJ L 101, 22.4.2010, p. 21.

3

---
Tri Q. DU, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY COMMITTEE ON CHARACTER.

No. 17-577.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
# L_2014211EN.01003101.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 21/2014

of 14 February 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 41b (Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘41c. | 32010 R 0913: Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘41c.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, et al., petitioners, v. James OWENS, et al.

No. 17-1236.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these case expressing the view of the United States.
David Matthew SHIPP, petitioner, v. Don WRIGHT, Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services.

No. 17-6003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 3, 2008 

136799 

KENNETH HERSHEY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

 SC: 136799 

 CoA: 285115 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of July 25, 2008, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 3, 2008 

Clerk
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/20/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      131,411
COMMITMENTS
  37,426   19,588   18,223   57,307   67,668  112,956  105,479   18,454   25,931

CHANGES FROM 10/13/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -923)
    -373   -3,869      403      183    2,418      213   -1,048   -1,137      124

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.5     14.9     13.9     43.6     51.5     86.0     80.3     14.0     19.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      163)
      48       27       40       60       59      130      111
```

----

Updated October 23, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In conjunction with the annual report on Form 10-K of International
Fuel Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report),

I, Stuart D. Beath, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       |     |                         | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|Dated: March
 31, 2010 | By: | /s/ Stuart D. Beath     | 
|                       |     |                         | 
|                       |     | Stuart D. Beath         | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer | 

---
Joseph ARUANNO, petitioner, v. Chris CHRISTIE, Governor of New Jersey, et al.

No. 17-5261.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/05/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      520,990
COMMITMENTS
  48,129   24,345   85,944  365,441  389,384  499,514  499,673   21,476   21,317

CHANGES FROM 12/29/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,898)
  -3,038    4,281    6,090   11,383    4,766   14,435   15,137    3,463    2,761

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.2      4.7     16.5     70.1     74.7     95.9     95.9      4.1      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      115)
      29       16       39       56       64      100      107
```

----

Updated January 8, 2010
Marty Tarrell GASTON, petitioner, v. Frank L. PERRY, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

No. 17-5001.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Mazen ABDEL-GHANI, petitioner, v. TARGET CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-5607.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

                               PARTIES:

Geosearch Inc. (hereinafter "Geosearch")
     Tim Gillespie, President, PO Box 5988, Missoula, Mt. 59806
     William C. Crockett, 2292 Courville Trail, Polson, Mt. 59860

United States Antimony Corporation (hereinafter "USAC")
     PO Box 643
     Thompson Falls, Mt. 59873

                               RECITALS

1.   On 8 July 1987, Geosearch entered into a Lease Agreement with Yellow
     Jacket Mines, Inc. of 631 St. Claire Drive, Palo Alto, CA.

2.   On 19 February 1988, Geosearch entered into an Assignment of the Lease
     Agreement by and between Geosearch and Yellow Jacket Mines, Inc to USAC.

3.   On 9 September 1994, Geosearch and USAC entered into a Security Agreement
     regarding a lawsuit filed by Geosearch against USAC, No. CV94-28.

4.   On 9 September 1994. Geosearch and USAC agreed to a Division Order with
     the First State Bank of Thompson Falls, Mt.

                              AGREEMENT

     Now, therefore, it is agreed that USAC will issue 122,926 shares of USAC
common stock
to Tim Gillespie and 122,926 share of USAC common stock to William C. Crockett
for the full
and complete satisfaction of all covenants, royalties, and interest due
Geosearch, Tim Gillespie
and William C. Crockett under the 4 Agreements abovementioned under Recitals:

Dated this _______day of ___________, 1999
Geosearch, Inc                          United States Antimony Corporation

______________________________               /s/ John C. Lawrence
Tim Gillespie                                John C. Lawrence


/s/ William C. Crokett
William C. Crockett
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

t0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144564

GLENN R. UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144564 COA: 298312 Oakland CC: 2010-107861-CB PATRICIA A. SELENT, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

h0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146711

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146711

COA: 311795

Kalamazoo CC: 02

- 000435

- FH

RICHARD ROY VENDEVILLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL LUIS COTA, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Res • ondent. MICHAEL LUIS COTA, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Res iondent.

Herndon No„.83955



# FILE JAN 1 8 2022
EUZAB tIC ........._....,c.s:2e.......

_ . __.....-.. ...... , - ;: - :•;. C.:. !r:- -...f.:::,:,ZT BY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 83953

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying peremptory challenge. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Thomas W. Gregory, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a peremptory challenge in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider these appeals. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS these appeals dismissed.'

, J.

Hardesty

Stigh4 1

4 C`di 

### 1 Given this order, this court takes no action on the pro se letters filed on January 3, 2022. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA PM7A 

## 22- 0(

### cc: Thomas W. Gregory, District Judge Michael Luis Cota Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden Douglas County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A aelgts.

, 

### 2

•
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Glenn L. Cooper 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | May 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      29,062,000
<SECURITIES>                                46,731,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,976,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    831,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,302,000
<PP&E>                                       5,542,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,392,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,352,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,355,000
<BONDS>                                      1,561,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,500,000
<COMMON>                                        42,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,897,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,352,000
<SALES>                                      2,666,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,690,000
<CGS>                                        1,026,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,719,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (57,256,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (57,256,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (57,256,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.38)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Voice & Wireless Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark
Haggerty, Chief Executive Officer and Keith Witter, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as stated in
Section 5 of our Certification under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Mark Haggerty, Chairman & CEO

/s/ Keith Witter, Director & CFO
# C_2011252EN.01001101.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/11

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2011 — X Technology Swiss GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-429/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Sign consisting of the partial colouring of a product - Orange colouring of the toe of a sock - Absolute ground for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(b))

2011/C 252/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: X Technology Swiss GmbH (represented by: A. Herbertz and R. Jung, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2010 in Case T-547/08 X Technology Swiss v OHIM, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2008 dismissing the appeal against the examiner’s decision, which refused registration of the sign consisting of the orange colouring of the toe of a sock as a Community trade mark for goods in Class 25 — Distinctive character of a sign consisting of the partial colouring of a product

X Technology Swiss

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | X Technology Swiss GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

X Technology Swiss GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 10.45.1
 Confidential Treatment Requested. Confidential portions of this document have been
redacted and filed separately with the Commission .
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 Non-Negotiable, Non-Transferable, Non-Endorsable
Subject to Quota Purchase Agreement
 For value received and intending to be legally bound, MOBITEC AB (publ) ROBERTO JUVENTINO DEMORE Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the
Commission. Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission. LORENA GIUSTI
DEMORE Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the
Commission. Confidential
material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
 Quota Purchase Agreement




---



##### 



Confidential Treatment Requested. Confidential portions of this document have been
redacted and filed separately with the Commission .
       MAKER AGREES THAT ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF OR ARISING OUT OF THIS NOTE MAY BE
INITIATED AND PROSECUTED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE COURTS LOCATED IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF




---



##### 



Confidential Treatment Requested. Confidential portions of this document have been
redacted and filed separately with the Commission .
 HERRLJUNGA,
COUNTY OF VÄSTRA GÖTALAND, SWEDEN. MAKER CONSENTS TO AND SUBMITS TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
OVER ITS PERSON BY ANY SUCH COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER, WAIVE PERSONAL
SERVICE OF ANY AND ALL PROCESS UPON IT AND CONSENTS THAT ALL SUCH SERVICE OF PROCESS BE MADE BY
REGISTERED MAIL DIRECTED TO MAKER AT ITS ADDRESS SET FORTH ABOVE OR TO THE LAST ADDRESS PROVIDED TO
PAYEES.
 IN ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF OR ARISING OUT OF THIS NOTE, PAYEES AND MAKER WAIVE
(I) THE RIGHT TO INTERPOSE ANY SET-OFF OR COUNTERCLAIM OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH IN THE QUOTA
PURCHASE AGREEMENT OF ANY NATURE OR DESCRIPTION, (II) ANY OBJECTION BASED ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS
OR VENUE, AND (III) ANY CLAIM FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR SPECIAL DAMAGES.
  By:
    /s/ Oliver WelsMOBITEC AB (publ)