alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit 99.13**

**CONSENT OF GLENN R. CLARK & ASSOCIATES LIMITED**

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reportand documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated byreference into i) the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the“Company”) and ii) the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No.333-162371) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission:

|   | 1.     | Information relating to the mineral reserve and mineral resource    calculations for the El Cubo property;                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | 2.     | The technical report dated October 15, 2009 titled “El Cubo Gold Silver    Mine, Guanajuato, Mexico” (the “Guanajuato Report”); and                                                                                                            |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | 3.     | The annual information form of the Company dated March 23, 2011, which    includes reference to the undersigned’s name in connection with information    relating to the El Cubo property and the Guanajuato Report, and the    properties described therein. |

Date: March 23, 2011 

GLENN R. CLARK & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 

By: /s/ Glenn R. Clark                                                       Glenn R. Clark, P. Eng.President, Glenn R. Clark & Associates 

 

----
# National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day, 2022

On April 9, 1942, tens of thousands of American and Filipino prisoners of war began what would become known to history as the Bataan Death March. Thousands died during the march, but the indomitable spirit of those prisoners was never broken. Eighty years later, our Nation continues to honor their courage and recognize the more than half a million service members who sacrificed their own freedom as prisoners of war to ensure that our Nation and the values of freedom and democracy always prevail.

Former prisoners of war stand among the bravest of our Nation. They fought valiantly and served with honor—and under often agonizing conditions as prisoners, they demonstrated incredible personal courage, love of country, and devotion to duty. Through their extraordinary sacrifices and selflessness, they helped ensure freedom for millions of people. They are heroes.

I join all Americans in expressing our deepest gratitude to every service member who has endured being a prisoner of war and to their families, caregivers, and survivors. Their service—knowing all the risk and danger it could bring—is a credit to their character and to our Nation. On this day and every day, we remember the hardships of captivity they survived in service to our Nation. We also remember all the brave women and men who died as prisoners in foreign lands during our Nation's past wars, and we grieve with those at home who prayed for their loved ones' return. Their faith, love of family, and devotion to our Nation inspire us all, and we will always remember their sacrifices.

Today, our brave men and women in uniform carry on the rich legacy of our former prisoners of war—unrelenting in battle, unwavering in loyalty, unmatched in decency, and prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice on behalf of our Nation.

May God bless our former prisoners of war and their families, and may God protect our troops.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 9, 2022, as National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day. I call upon Americans to observe this day by honoring the service and sacrifice of all former prisoners of war as our Nation expresses its eternal gratitude for their sacrifice. I also call upon Federal, State, and local government officials and organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-sixth.

[FR Doc. 2022-08080

Billing code 3395-F2-P
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., dba Sprint PCS, petitioner, v. PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC.

No. 17-430.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 06, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Ronald Fay SCHERMERHORN, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-9496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Eric R. Zimmerman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending March 28, 2008 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.May 7, 2008                                                   /s/ Eric R. Zimmerman   Eric R. Zimmerman   President and Chief Executive Officer
Carlos E. MOORE, petitioner, v. Dewey P. BRYANT, Governor of Mississippi.

No. 17-23.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, IAN HERMAN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 23, 2005



                                           /s/  Ian Herman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ian Herman,
                                           Principal Executive Officer
UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, petitioner, v. Sharline LUNDGREN, et vir.

No. 17-387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 8, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington granted.
# F ourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 17, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00264

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.M. , a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA01970

Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental

rights. The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is

required to be brought to final dispositio n within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was

filed. Id.

The brief of appellee the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (the

“Department”) was originally due to be filed on August 16, 2022. On August 16, 2022, the

Department filed a motion for a 30

- day extension of time to file its brief. The Department’s

motion is GRANTED IN PART. It is ORDERED that the Department’s brief must be filed no

later than September 6, 2022

. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this

appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

It is so ORDER ED on August 17, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
James E. COOKE, petitioner, v. DELAWARE.

No. 17-9083.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

*2696Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
# L_2014154EN.01002401.xml

| 22.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 226/2013

of 13 December 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2012/4/EU of 22 February 2012 amending Directive 2008/43/EC setting up, pursuant to Council Directive 93/15/EEC, a system for the identification and traceability of explosives for civil uses (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2012/4/EU of 22 February 2012 amending Directive 2008/43/EC setting up, pursuant to Council Directive 93/15/EEC, a system for the identification and traceability of explosives for civil uses (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 5 (Commission Directive 2008/43/EC) of Chapter XXIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32012 L 0004: Commission Directive 2012/4/EU of 22 February 2012 (OJ L 50, 23.2.2012, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32012 L 0004: Commission Directive 2012/4/EU of 22 February 2012 (OJ L 50, 23.2.2012, p. 18).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2012/4/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 50, 23.2.2012, p. 18.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2701-061]

                    On March 10, 2022, Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) evidence of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (New York DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act [1]                                          and section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,[2]                                          a state certifying agency is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if it fails or refuses to act on a certification request within a reasonable period of time, which is one year after the date the certification request was received. Accordingly, we hereby notify New York DEC of the following:                

*Date that New York DEC Received the Certification Request:*                     March 9, 2022.                

If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before March 9, 2023, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: April 7, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR [4.34(b)(5)/5.23(b)/153.4/157.22].                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-08032 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# L_2013291EN.01005801.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/58

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 92/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2011 of 24 February 2011 on the information to be provided before the establishment and modification of a functional airspace block (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2011 of 24 February 2011 on the information to be provided before the establishment and modification of a functional airspace block (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 66u (Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66ua. | 32011 R 0176: Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2011 of 24 February 2011 on the information to be provided before the establishment and modification of a functional airspace block (OJ L 51, 25.2.2011, p. 2).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66ua.

32011 R 0176: Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2011 of 24 February 2011 on the information to be provided before the establishment and modification of a functional airspace block (OJ L 51, 25.2.2011, p. 2).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 176/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No .../... of ... (2) [incorporating Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 into the EEA Agreement], whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 51, 25.2.2011, p. 2.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

2

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK MARC COOLEY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

R. LEUNG, P # 8556; E. LUDTKE, 

P # 9044, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16268 

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01138-RLH-NJK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2017**

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Frederick Marc Cooley appeals pro se from a jury verdict for defendants in 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging unlawful search and seizure. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a 

district court’s formulation of the jury instructions, Jones v. Williams, 297 F.3d 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 5 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-16268 

930, 934 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in formulating the jury 

instructions, which fairly and adequately stated the law, covered the issues 

presented at trial, and were not misleading. See id. (setting forth requirements for 

jury instructions); Brewer v. City of Napa, 210 F.3d 1093, 1097 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(rejection of theory-of-the-case instruction is not error where party is able to argue 

his or her theory to the jury and the theory is adequately covered by the other 

instructions).

We reject as without merit Cooley’s allegations that the district court 

improperly interrupted his closing arguments.

AFFIRMED.
# L_2009145EN.01004201.xml

| 10.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 145/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 145/42

---

DECISION No 2/2009 OF THE ACP-EC COMMITTEE OF AMBASSADORS

of 16 February 2009

on the appointment of the Director of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise (CDE)

(2009/435/EC)

THE ACP-EC COMMITTEE OF AMBASSADORS,

Having regard to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (1), as revised by the Agreement amending the said Partnership Agreement, signed in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005 (2), and in particular Article 2(7) of Annex III thereto,

Whereas:

| (1) | The previous Director of the CDE, who was appointed on 1 March 2005 for a term of office ending on 28 February 2010, tendered his resignation with effect from 23 August 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The previous Director of the CDE, who was appointed on 1 March 2005 for a term of office ending on 28 February 2010, tendered his resignation with effect from 23 August 2007.

| (2) | At the end of its proceedings, a joint selection committee established by both sides proposed the appointment of Mr Mabousso THIAM (Senegal) as Director of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise for the remainder of the current term of office, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

At the end of its proceedings, a joint selection committee established by both sides proposed the appointment of Mr Mabousso THIAM (Senegal) as Director of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise for the remainder of the current term of office,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Without prejudice to any subsequent decisions that the Committee might have to take, under its prerogatives, Mr Mabousso THIAM is hereby appointed Director of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise with effect from 1 March 2009, for a term of office ending on 28 February 2010.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2009.

For the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors

The Chairman

M. VICENOVÁ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 27.

2

---
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., applicants, v. HAWAII, et al.

No. 17A550.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

The application for a stay presented to Justice KENNEDY and by him referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court's October 20, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government's appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government's petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.

In light of its decision to consider the case on an expedited basis, we expect that the Court of Appeals will render its decision with appropriate dispatch.

Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would deny the application.
Gary I. STUART, Jr., petitioner, v. Oliva STUART.

No. 16-9626.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.