alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Friday, May 6, 2022, via videoconference.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will be conducted by remote means (videoconference) and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging businesses and their investors under the federal securities laws.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

 Dated: April 20, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-08767 Filed 4-20-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/03/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      484,968
COMMITMENTS
  45,964   16,708   94,698  324,364  353,718  465,026  465,124   19,942   19,844

CHANGES FROM 07/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -358)
  -2,997   -2,932   -3,618      774    3,982   -5,841   -2,568    5,483    2,210

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.5      3.4     19.5     66.9     72.9     95.9     95.9      4.1      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      115)
      27       14       33       56       71       98      105
```

----

Updated August 6, 2010
Juan G. SURIEL, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 17-6315.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Todd WESSINGER, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-6446.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2014342EN.01004401.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 136/2014

of 27 June 2014

amending Annex XVIII (Health and safety at work, labour law, and equal treatment for men and women) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

1

| (2) | Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 16jc (Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement is replaced by the following:

‘32013 L 0035: Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC (OJ L 179, 29.6.2013, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2013/35/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 June 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (2).

2

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  OJ L 179, 29.6.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

2

---
Phillip KLINE, petitioner, v. Honorable Daniel BILES, et al.

No. 17-520.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Opinion issued July 30, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00259-CV

———————————

IN RE GUILLERMO PUENTE, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Guillermo Puente, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

challenging a protective order issued in the underlying case.1 At the time the petition 

was filed, relator also had a pending appeal from the same order. See Guillermo 

Puente v. Alicia Marie Puente, No. 01-18-00583-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

 

1 The underlying case is Alicia Marie Puente v. Guillermo Orestes Puente, cause 

number 2018-34059, pending in the 280th District Court of Harris County, Texas, 

the Honorable Barbara J. Stalder presiding.
2

Dist.). Subsequently, on July 30, 2019, our Court affirmed the protective order in the 

appeal. Because relator has an adequate remedy by appeal, we deny the petition for 

writ of mandamus. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) 

(mandamus relief is not available when adequate appellate remedy exists). Any 

pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
# L_2012248EN.01002601.xml

| 13.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 248/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 248/26

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 89/2012

of 30 April 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 15/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 15/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2010/3/EU of 1 February 2010 amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annexes III and VI to Council Directive 76/768/EEC concerning cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2010/3/EU of 1 February 2010 amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annexes III and VI to Council Directive 76/768/EEC concerning cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 L 0003: Commission Directive 2010/3/EU of 1 February 2010 (OJ L 29, 2.2.2010, p. 5).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 L 0003: Commission Directive 2010/3/EU of 1 February 2010 (OJ L 29, 2.2.2010, p. 5).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2010/3/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 29, 2.2.2010, p. 5.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Clarence D. SCHREANE, petitioner, v. David J. EBBERT, Warden.

No. 17-6381.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
LEI KE, petitioner, v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 17-6907.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2010288EN.01002705.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo — Italy) — Assessorato del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale v Seasoft SpA

(Case C-88/10) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/50)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

---
# Official Journal C 188A/27 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5927 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5927 May 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 188A/1 | Directorate-General for Budget — Vacancy notice for a Principal Adviser function (AD 14) Brussels — (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2016/10366 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2016/C 188A/1

Directorate-General for Budget — Vacancy notice for a Principal Adviser function (AD 14) Brussels — (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2016/10366

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2010024EN.01006701.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/67

---

Action brought on 30 November 2009 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (BRICO CENTER Garden)

(Case T-479/09)

2010/C 24/118

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Spain) (represented by: P. López Ronda, G. Macías Bonilla, H.L. Curtis-Oliver and G. Marín Raigal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano Milanofiori (Milan), Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 September 2009 — R 1044/2008-4. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 September 2009 — R 1044/2008-4.

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Bricocenter Italia S.r.l.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘BRICOCENTER Garden’ (Application No 4 935 144) in respect of services in Class 35.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: ATB Norte, SL.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative Community trade marks containing the word elements ‘CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BRICOCENTER’ (No 3 262 623) and ‘ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BRICOCENTER’ (No 989 046) in respect of services in Class 35, 37 and 39.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Opposition Division’s decision annulled and the opposition rejected in its entirety.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 434 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for 

the study of the Emancipation National Historic Trail, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 434 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emancipation National 

3 Historic Trail Study Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EMANCIPATION NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL STUDY. 

5 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(47) EMANCIPATION NATIONAL HISTORIC

9 TRAIL.—The Emancipation National Historic Trail, 

10 extending approximately 51 miles from the 

11 Osterman Building and Reedy Chapel in Galveston, 

12 Texas, along Texas State Highway 3 and Interstate 

13 Highway 45 North, to Freedmen’s Town, then to 

14 Independence Heights and Emancipation Park in 

15 Houston, Texas, following the migration route taken 

16 by newly freed slaves and other persons of African 

17 descent from the major 19th century seaport town 

18 of Galveston to the burgeoning community of Freed19 men’s Town, located in the 4th Ward of Houston, 

20 Texas.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 434 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to proHistoric Trail, and for other purposes. vide for the study of the Emancipation National
Roberto Rene RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6639.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Erick Levon TOWNSEND, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 16-8566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ronnie Lynn KIRKSEY, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 17-6113.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/25/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,298,236
COMMITMENTS
 374,455  113,695  1436173  2461131  2728255  4271759  4278123   26,477   20,113

CHANGES FROM 05/18/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     37,911)
 -31,687   47,753   29,668   37,073  -44,559   35,054   32,862    2,857    5,049

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.7      2.6     33.4     57.3     63.5     99.4     99.5      0.6      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      222)
      39       43       74      131      125      210      204
```

----

Updated May 28, 2010
#### Buck Davis *v.*The State.

1. Estrays.—An indictment is sufficient which, alleging time and place, charges that the accused did “unlawfully, without complying with the laws regulating estrays, take up and use a certain animal coming within the meaning of an estray, to wit, a certain estray dark-bay mare, of the age of nine years, and the value of $50, of the property of some persons to the grand jury unknown, against,” etc.

2. Same—Limitation.—An indictment for unlawfully taking up and using an estray is not barred by limitation after the lapse of one year from the taking up of the animal, if the accused continued to use the animal, in violation of law, until within one year before the indictment was found.

3. Practice in this Court.—When no statement of facts or bill of exception is brought up in the record of a misdemeanor case, this court can only inquire whether the indictment is sufficient, and whether instructions given the jury could.be the law applicable to any legitimate state of proof.

Appeal from the District Court of Bastrop. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Richardson.

*163The indictment was filed December 1, 1874, and laid the time of the offense as January 1st of the same year

*P. Claiborne*and *John Dowell,*for the appellant.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Winkler, J.

In the absence of a statement of facts there is nothing in the record which we are authorized to inquire into further than as to the sufficiency of the indictment, and whether the charge was a proper one under any state of the evidence admissible under the indictment.

No substantial objection is perceived, or has been pointed out, to the indictment. It is deemed sufficient to describe the offense charged as required by the statute creating the offense.

The offense of which the appellant is accused must be regarded in the nature of theft, and that, if he continued to use the estray in violation of law, he continued to be liable to the law for using it in violation of law.

On the face of the indictment the offense does not appear to have been barred at the time the indictment was found. We find no error in the charge of the court as given to the jury, nor in refusing the instructions asked by the defendant. In the absence of any bill of exceptions or statement of facts, we are not required to examine further into the case, it being a misdemeanor.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Glenda DAVILA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6418.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHN CHATMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4799 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed October 5, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. John Chatman, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
CORCEL CORPORATION, INC., petitioner, v. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.

No. 17-47.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Order entered July 20 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00534
- CV
KELLY D. HOLLINGSWOR TH , ET AL. , Appellant s V. WALAAL CORPORATION D /B/A AMBASSADOR CAB, ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 03638



### O RDER Before the Court is appellees’ July 18, 2018 unopposed motion seeking a sixty

- day extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT t he motion to the extent that appellees shall file a brief by August 20, 2018

.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Robert J. CASSINELLI, petitioner, v. Janice R. CASSINELLI.

No. 16-8811.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two for further consideration in light of *Howell v. Howell,* 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1400, 197 L.Ed.2d 781 (2017).