alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release:#3975-96

For Release:December 2, 1996

NEW YORK FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT DISMISSES ACTION

AGAINST CFTC FILED BY AVCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that on November 22, 1996, the Honorable John G. Koeltl, Federal
    District Court Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    of New York, issued an oral opinion and written order dismissing a lawsuit
    brought against the CFTC by AVCO Financial Corporation (AVCO) of Greenwich,
    Connecticut, which sought to halt a CFTC investigation. AVCO characterizes
    itself as a developer and publisher of a technical analysis software
    program for use in analyzing currency futures, which it markets and sells
    to the public under the name "Recurrence."

In its complaint filed April 19, 1996, AVCO had asked the court to
    enjoin permanently the CFTC's investigation and to quash outstanding
    subpoenas. AVCO contended that the marketing and sale of its "Recurrence"
    currency trading software did not make it a commodity trading advisor, as
    defined in the Commodity Exchange Act, and that any effort to investigate
    the company and subject it to CFTC regulation infringed its right of free
    commercial speech under the First Amendment. Prior to the dismissal, Judge
    Koeltl, on June 5, 1996, had denied AVCO's motion to enjoin preliminarily
    the CFTC's investigation pending a final decision on its complaint.

In its oral opinion, the court granted the CFTC's motion to dismiss
    AVCO's lawsuit on the ground that the doctrine of sovereign immunity barred
    actions to block CFTC investigations. The Court ruled in the alternative
    that AVCO's claims were not yet ready, or "ripe," for adjudication.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         Jerry Engle ("Engle") and First Bank (formerly known as First State
Bank of Morgantown) ("First Bank") hereby amend the Employment Agreement dated
March 3, 1999, between Engle and First Bank to delete Section 3(g)(ii).


Dated: February 11, 2000                    FIRST BANK



                                            By: ________________________
                                                 Frank A. Rogers
                                                 Chairman of the Board




                                            ------------------------
                                                   Jerry Engle
# L_2012361EN.01000901.xml

| 31.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 361/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 361/9

---

Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Madagascar

The European Union and the Government of the Republic of Madagascar signed the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement in Brussels on 6 December 2012.

The Protocol accordingly applies provisionally from 1 January 2013 pursuant to Article 15 thereof.

---
Cody John HOLT, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5529.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  SECTION 906
                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James P. Tolley, the principal accounting officer of Agemark Corporation (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

      (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
      certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

Dated: January 12, 2004                         /s/  JAMES P. TOLLEY
                                                ------------------------------
                                                James P. Tolley
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Accounting Officer)
Thayer GREEN, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 17-6134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
Ricardo BIGIO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6508.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
CONVERGEX GROUP, L.L.C., et al., petitioners, v. Landol FLETCHER.

No. 17-343.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# L_2008309EN.01003001.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 104/2008

of 26 September 2008

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 87/2008 of 4 July 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 87/2008 of 4 July 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 of 24 July 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 of 24 July 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 R 0715: Commission Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 of 24 July 2008 (OJ L 197, 25.7.2008, p. 36).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 R 0715: Commission Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 of 24 July 2008 (OJ L 197, 25.7.2008, p. 36).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 27 September 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 280, 23.10.2008, p. 23.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 197, 25.7.2008, p. 36.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Squire PADGETT, Jr.

No. D-2992.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 13, 2011 

Order 

 

June 13, 2011 

141932(68) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 141932 

v COA: 294054 

Livingston CC: 08-017643-FC 

JEROME WALTER KOWALSKI, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension to 

June 10, 2011 of the time for filing his brief and appendix is considered and it is granted.
# Official Journal C 248/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 248 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6328 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 248

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6328 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 248/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9880 – Permira/Warburg/Tilney/Smith & Williamson) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 248/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9880 – Permira/Warburg/Tilney/Smith & Williamson) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 248/02 | Euro exchange rates — 27 July 2020 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 248/02

Euro exchange rates — 27 July 2020

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Woods Cones, *Appellant,*v. John P. Hendry, Ethel D. Hendry and John H. Treadwell, *Appellees.*

En Banc.

Decision filed March 19, 1929.

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Appellant;

*Treadwell & Treadwell,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Brett v. First National Bank, decided at the present term.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1     SUBSIDIARIES OF APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION



THE COMPANY HAS THE FOLLOWING DOMESTIC WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES:

1.    APPLIEDTHEORY CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION

2.    APPLIEDTHEORY SEATTLE CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION

3.    APPLIEDTHEORY AUSTIN CORPORATION, A TEXAS CORPORATION

4.    APPLIEDTHEORY VIRGINIA CORPORATION, A VIRGINIA CORPORATION

5.    APPLIEDTHEORY GEORGIA CORPORATION, A GEORGIA CORPORATION

6.    TABOR INTERACTIVE, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION

7.    APPLIEDTHEORY NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION
In Re Samuel Allan McCORMICK, petitioner.

No. 17-5257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
EXHIBIT 3(i).3

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               FUNDAE CORPORATION

Pursuant  to  the  provision  of  section  607.1006,   Florida  Statutes,   this
corporation  adopts the  following  articles  of  amendment  to its  articles of
incorporation:

FIRST:   Amendment(s) adopted: (indicate article number(s) being amended , added
         or deleted)

ARTICLE I.   NAME: The name of the corporation shall be: Fundae Corporation. The
principal  place of business of this  corporation  shall be 265 Sunrise  Avenue,
Suite 204, Palm Beach, FL 33480.

To be amended as follows:

ARTICLE I.  NAME:   The  name  of  the  corporation shall be:  cmerun, inc.  The
principal place of business of this corporation shall be 222 Lakeview Ave.,
PMB160-146, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.

SECOND:           If an amendment provides for an exchange, reclassification or
                  cancellation of issued shares, provisions for implementing the
                  amendment if not contained in the amendment itself, are as
                  follows:

                  n/a

THIRD:            The date of each amendment's adoption:       December 2, 1999

FOURTH:           Adoption of Amendment(s) check one:

____X__           The amendment(s) was/were approved by the shareholders.   The
                  number of votes  cast for the amendment(s) was/were sufficient
                  for approval.

________          The amendment(s) was/were approved by the shareholders through
                  voting groups.




<PAGE>



                  The following  statements must be separately provided for each
                  voting group entitled to vote separately on the amendment(s):

                  "The number of votes cast for the amendment(s) was/were
                  sufficient for approval by
                  ----------------------------------------------------------."
                                 (Voting Group)

________          The  amendment(s)  was/were  adopted by the board of directors
                  without  shareholder  action  and  shareholder  action was not
                  required.

________          The amendment(s) was/were adopted by the incorporators without
                  shareholder action and shareholder action was not required.

         Signed this 2nd day of December, 1999.


BY:      /s/A. Rene Dervaes
         -----------------------------------------
         A. Rene Dervaes, President/Director
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:      April 13, 2010   |   |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |                                  |   |   |   |
| By:    | /s/ Sandrine      Crisafulli     |   |   |   |
|   | Sandrine      Crisafulli              |   |   |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer          |   |   |   |

----
Reymundo MONTOYA-ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5889.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75529, 333-87738, 333-103032,333-113430 and 333-123329) of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. of our report dated December 8, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

December 13, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.53


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made as of July 27, 1999 by
and between CAFE ODYSSEY, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), and
RONALD K. FULLER (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an Employment
Agreement dated as of March 17, 1997 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment
Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements
contained herein, the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:

1.       Executive's Base Salary shall be $250,000 as of September 1, 1999.
         Executive shall be paid a monthly bonus of $4,167 on each of July 30
         and August 30. Executive shall be paid $12,500 on June 30, reflecting
         the accrual of such monthly bonus from April 1, 1999.

2.       Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its
         entirety as follows:

                  3.1 Termination of Employment. Executive's employment under
         this Agreement may be terminated by the Company or Executive at any
         time for any reason; provided, however, that if Executive's employment
         is terminated by the Company during the term of this Agreement for a
         reason other than for Cause, or if Executive terminates his employment
         for "Good Reason" (as defined in Section 3.2(b) below), he shall
         continue to receive his Base Salary, Base Bonus, Incentive Bonus (the
         annual amount of which shall equal the sum of the Incentive Bonus
         payments made to Executive for the four quarters preceding termination)
         and the benefits listed in Sections 2.2 and 2.4 above for a period of
         two (2) years from the date of termination. The termination shall be
         effective as of the date specified by the party initiating the
         termination in a written notice delivered to the other party, which
         date shall not be earlier than the date such notice is delivered to the
         other party. This Agreement shall terminate in its entirety immediately
         upon the death of Executive. Except as expressly provided to the
         contrary in this section or applicable law, Executive's rights to pay
         and benefits shall cease on the date his employment under this
         Agreement terminates.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the date set forth above.

CAFE ODYSSEY, INC.


By       s/ Stephen D. King                              s/ Ronald K. Fuller
         ---------------------                          ----------------------
         Chairman of the Board                          RONALD K. FULLER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1636

RAYMOND R. HENDERSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

VASCO, INC.; ABBOTT'S AUTO SERVICE; EXPEDITED SHIPPING 

SOLUTIONS; SUBCONTRACTING CONCEPTS, INC.; TECH PARTS 

EXPRESS; QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE WAREHOUSE, INC.; FACTORY PARTS; 

UCI WAREHOUSE, CORP.; LABOR FINDERS OF VIRGINIA, INC.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:12-cv-00244-HEH)

Submitted: September 25, 2012 Decided: October 11, 2012

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond R. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond R. Henderson appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing this action for want of subject matter 

jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Henderson v. Vasco, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-00244-HEH 

(E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 85-1655.

#### Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. *v.*Superior Court of California, County of San Deigo (San Diego Asbestos Litigation Plaintiffs, Real Parties in Interest).

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4218 

To provide that Poland may be designated as a program country under 

the Visa Waiver Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2019 

Mr. QUIGLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that Poland may be designated as a program 

country under the Visa Waiver Program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Poland Visa Waiver 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POLAND MADE ELIGIBLE FOR THE VISA WAIVER 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Notwithstanding any provision of section 217 of the 

9 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187), the 

10 Secretary of Homeland Security may designate Poland as 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4218 IH

1 a program country under the visa waiver program estab2 lished by that section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 11

Computation of Earnings per Share



|                                                                                         |  |                                |            |   |                              |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ---------- | - | ---------------------------- | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | Three MonthsEndedJune 30, 2009 |            |   | Six MonthsEndedJune 30, 2009 |  
|(Loss) available to common stockholders                                                  |  | $                              | (3,590,580 | ) |                              | $ | (3,152,980 | )
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                                | 4,935,542  |   |                              |   | 4,935,542  |  
|Basic (loss) per share                                                                   |  | $                              | (0.73      | ) |                              | $ | (0.64      | )
|(Loss) for diluted (loss) per share                                                      |  | $                              | (3,590,580 | ) |                              | $ | (3,152,980 | )
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                                | 4,935,542  |   |                              |   | 4,935,542  |  
|Diluted (loss) per share                                                                 |  | $                              | (0.73      | ) |                              | $ | (0.64      | )