alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011108EN.01000201.xml

| 28.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/2

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 (1), signed in Brussels on 28 July 2010 and provisionally applicable since 1 January 2011, have been completed on 7 March 2011. Consequently, this Agreement will enter into force, in accordance with its Article 9, second paragraph, on 1 May 2011.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 291, 9.11.2010, p. 10.

1

---
Mohamed Osman MOHAMUD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5126.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011013EN.01001501.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-48/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Environment - Directive 2008/1/EC - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Conditions for the authorisation of existing installations - Obligation to ensure the operation of such installations in accordance with the requirements of the directive)

2011/C 13/24

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (OJ 2008 L 24, p. 8) — Installations which may have an effect on emissions into the air, water or soil and on pollution — Conditions for the authorisation of existing installations

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | declares that, by having failed to take the necessary measures to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions, that existing installations operate in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10 and 13, Article 14(a) and (b) and Article 15(2) of the directive not later than 30 October 2007, without prejudice to specific European Union legislation, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by having failed to take the necessary measures to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions, that existing installations operate in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10 and 13, Article 14(a) and (b) and Article 15(2) of the directive not later than 30 October 2007, without prejudice to specific European Union legislation, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of that directive;

| 2. | orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
# L_2012207EN.01002601.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/26

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 46/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 10/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 10/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Implementing Directive 2011/38/EU of 11 April 2011 amending Annex V to Directive 2004/33/EC with regards to maximum pH values for platelets concentrates at the end of the shelf life (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Directive 2011/38/EU of 11 April 2011 amending Annex V to Directive 2004/33/EC with regards to maximum pH values for platelets concentrates at the end of the shelf life (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 15v (Commission Directive 2004/33/EC) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32011 L 0038: Commission Implementing Directive 2011/38/EU of 11 April 2011 (OJ L 97, 12.4.2011, p. 28.)’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32011 L 0038: Commission Implementing Directive 2011/38/EU of 11 April 2011 (OJ L 97, 12.4.2011, p. 28.)’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Directive 2011/38/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 16.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 97, 12.4.2011, p. 28.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Ryan HARVEY, et al., petitioners, v. UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, et al.

No. 17-1301.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q OF BORLAND
INTERNATIONAL, INC. THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          82,501
<SECURITIES>                                     1,725
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,545
<PP&E>                                         110,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       281,368
<OTHER-SE>                                    (132,186)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,208
<SALES>                                         70,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,944
<CGS>                                           12,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (3,250)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (936)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (23,948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (23,948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.76)
        

</TABLE>
Carolann BRACEWELL, et al., petitioners, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 17-584.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1349

FRANCIS WOUKOP YOMI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOUIS DEJOY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Adam B. Abelson, Magistrate Judge. (1:21-cv-02709-ABA)

Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Woukop Yomi, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1349 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Francis Woukop Yomi appeals several orders of the magistrate judge entered in his 

civil action in which he alleged claims for race, color, and national origin discrimination 

and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 

2000e-17.

1

 Specifically, Yomi challenges the magistrate judge’s orders granting the 

defendant an extension of time to respond to the complaint, denying his motions for default 

judgment, dismissing his complaint and amended complaint, and denying reconsideration.2

 

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we discern no reversible error in the magistrate 

judge’s orders. See Feminist Majority Found. v. Hurley, 911 F.3d 674, 685 (4th Cir. 2018)

(reviewing de novo dismissal of complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Robinson v. 

Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (reviewing for abuse of discretion 

denial of reconsideration motion); White v. Gregory, 1 F.3d 267, 270 (4th Cir. 1993) 

(reviewing for abuse of discretion denial of motion for default judgment).

Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s orders. Yomi v. DeJoy,

No. 1:21-cv-02709-ABA (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2022; filed May 17, 2022 & entered May 18, 

1 The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. The Honorable Beth P. Gesner, United States Magistrate 

Judge, initially presided over this case, and the case was reassigned to the Honorable Adam 

B. Abelson, United States Magistrate Judge, upon Judge Gesner’s retirement.

2 In his informal brief, Yomi also mentions the magistrate judge’s order denying his 

renewed motion for the appointment of counsel. But Yomi does not contest the correctness 

of that order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) 

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1349 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

2022; Mar. 1, 2023; May 30, 2023; Dec. 8, 2023; Mar. 12, 2024). We also deny Yomi’s 

motion to recuse Judge Abelson. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1349 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
#### Samuel N. Sutter and wife, Bertha D. Sutter, *Appellants,*v. Hugh Shutt, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*223
      *Snedigar, Miller, McKay é Baya,*for Appellants;

*W. Dmis Hamilton*and *George T. Mann,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Joshua CONLAN, aka Joco, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5599.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/06/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    3,978,886
COMMITMENTS
 546,336   88,117  1223629  2190828  2657310  3960793  3969056   18,093    9,830

CHANGES FROM 03/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    110,110)
   3,102   19,607   37,694   79,868   60,312  120,664  117,613  -10,554   -7,503

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.7      2.2     30.8     55.1     66.8     99.5     99.8      0.5      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      212)
      44       32       72      125      119      200      195
```

----

Updated April 9, 2010
# L_2012349EN.01000202.xml

| 19.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/2

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in parts and components of motor vehicles between the European Union and the Russian Federation

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in parts and components of motor vehicles between the European Union and the Russian Federation (1), signed in Geneva on 16 December 2011, is provisionally applied as from 22 August 2012, by virtue of the accession of the Russian Federation to the WTO on that date.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 57, 29.2.2012, p. 15.

1

---
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/22/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       70,890
COMMITMENTS
     426    9,425    1,760   60,646   47,582   62,832   58,767    8,058   12,123

CHANGES FROM 06/15/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -19,485)
       0     -955   -1,672  -10,841  -10,304  -12,513  -12,931   -6,972   -6,554

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.6     13.3      2.5     85.5     67.1     88.6     82.9     11.4     17.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       2       13        7       19       23       28       36
```

----

Updated June 25, 2010
Neelam UPPAL, petitioner, v. THE HEALTH LAW FIRM.

No. 17-517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Motion of respondent for attorney's fees and sanctions denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 21





VARIAN, INC.





SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Fiscal Year 2002





Subsidiary

State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or OrganizationJEMSY

FranceVarian (Shanghai) International Trading Co. Ltd.

ChinaVarian A.G.

SwitzerlandVarian AB

SwedenVarian Argentina, Ltd.

DelawareVarian Australia Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaVarian Australia, LLC

DelawareVarian B.V.

The NetherlandsVarian Belgium N.V.

BelgiumVarian Canada Inc.

CanadaVarian Deutschland GmbH

GermanyVarian Gessellschaft mbH

AustriaVarian Holdings (Australia) Pty. Limited

AustraliaVarian Iberica S.L.

SpainVarian India Pvt. Ltd.

DelawareVarian Industria E. Comercio Limitada

BrazilVarian Instruments of Puerto Rico, Inc.

DelawareVarian J.M.B.S., S.A.S.

FranceVarian Limited

United KingdomVarian S.A.

FranceVarian S.A.

MexicoVarian S.p.A.

ItalyVarian Technologies Asia, Ltd.

DelawareVarian Technologies China, Ltd.

DelawareVarian Technologies Japan, Ltd.

DelawareVarian Technologies Korea, Ltd.

Korea





All of the above subsidiaries are included in the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The names of certain consolidated subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
#### J. A. Cantor and L. A. Tuttle, doing business under the name and style of The Cantor-Tuttle Company, *Appellants,*v. H. F. Galloway, *Appellee.*

Division A.

Opinion filed February 21, 1929.

*259
      *Swearingen*c§ *Rosenthal,*for Appellants;

*Samthers, Kluttz & Huch,*for Appellee.

Terrell, C. J.

This suit was brought in the circuit Court of Dade County to enforce specific performance of a contract for a ninety-nine year lease. A demurrer to the bill was sustained, the bill was dismissed and appeal was taken from that order.

The terms of the alleged contract were embraced in a letter dated February 27, 1925, addressed to the appellant and signed by appellee. In Daubmyre v. Hunter, 86 Fla. 326, 98 So. R. 69, .this Court indicated some of the essentials of a contract to lease or sell lands among others it must be definite as to essential terms and provisions. If there was, in fact, a contract for the lease in the instant case an examination of the record discloses that it was lacking in some of the material elements of such a contract as defined in Daubmyre v. Hunter, *supra.*

In this view of the case the decree of the chancellor must be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Bobbie Ray EDWARDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9039.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2013279EN.01000101.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 279/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/1

---

Information on the entry into force of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community

The European Union and the Gabonese Republic signed, on 6 June 2007, in Brussels, a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community (1).

1

The European Community notified on that same day that it had completed the necessary internal procedures to conclude the agreement. The Gabonese Republic notified on 11 June 2007.

The Protocol accordingly entered into force on 11 June 2007 pursuant to Article 17 thereof.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 109, 26.4.2007, p. 3.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.17
                         INTERPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

              SCHEDULE OF PARTIES TO FORM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            Name                                 Title                               Date
            ----                                 -----                               ----
<S>                    <C>                                                     <C>
David C. Mercer        Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer         July 31, 2000
Joseph A. Mussey       President and Chief Operating Officer                  July 31, 2000
Richard L. Harrison    Sr. Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer   July 31, 2000
Maxwell R. Simmonds    Sr. Vice President, Sales and Marketing                July 31, 2000
Edwin C. Shors, Ph.D   Vice President, Research and New Technology            July 31, 2000
Philip A. Mellinger    Vice President, Product Development                    July 31, 2000
R. Park Carmon         Vice President, Operations                             August 30, 2000
</TABLE>

                                      28
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7298
EDWARD L. MOSES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT HAM; BELINDA DUDLEY; MICHAEL A. HARDEE; MICHAEL J. LAMM; FINESSE G. COUCH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:07-ct-03082) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward L. Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edward L. Moses, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights claim regarding the grievance procedure under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Moses v. Ham , No. 5:07-ct-03082 (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 15, 2007; entered Aug. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED