alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/31/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       99,473
COMMITMENTS
     811   12,780    6,805   80,908   67,231   88,524   86,816   10,949   12,657

CHANGES FROM 08/24/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,253)
       0   -1,993    3,765    3,274    4,850    7,039    6,622   -2,786   -2,369

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.8     12.8      6.8     81.3     67.6     89.0     87.3     11.0     12.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
       4       21       15       22       23       40       47
```

----

Updated September 3, 2010
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4315 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit a candidate 

for election to the office or Representative in Congress or Senator from 

accepting contributions from any political committee other than an authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a leadership 

PAC. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself and Mr. PHILLIPS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit a candidate for election to the office or Representative in Congress or Senator from accepting contributions from any political committee other than an 

authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a leadership PAC. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No PAC Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4315 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS 

2 FROM PACS BY CANDIDATES FOR REP3 RESENTATIVE OR SENATOR. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 315 of the Federal Elec5 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30116) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(k) PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN POLIT8 ICAL COMMITTEES.— 

9 ‘‘(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FROM

10 PACS.—A candidate for election for the office of 

11 Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resi12 dent Commissioner to, the Congress, may not accept 

13 a contribution with respect to the election from any 

14 political committee other than an authorized com15 mittee of the candidate. 

16 ‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF LEADERSHIP PAC.—A 

17 candidate for election for the office of Senator or 

18 Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commis19 sioner to, the Congress may not establish a leader20 ship PAC (as defined in subparagraph (B) of section 

21 304(i)(8)).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur24 ring after 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Release #3991-97 (CV97-0777RSWL)

For Release: February 12, 1997

***EX PARTE* ASSET FREEZE ORDER ISSUED BY CALIFORNIA COURT IN CFTC    ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST CARL J. HERMANS OF NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA,    D/B/A/ CALIFORNIA TRADERS GROUP**

**Order Freezes Defendant's Assets and Protects Books and    Records**

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    today that on February 6, 1997, the Honorable Harry L. Hupp of the U.S.    District Court for the Central District of California entered an **ex    parte** asset freeze order against

**Carl J. Hermans** of North Hollywood, California, doing business as    **California Traders Group.** Hermans has never been registered with the    Commission in any capacity. The court's order freezes the defendant's    assets and prohibits the defendant from destroying books and records and    from denying CFTC representatives access to such records.

The court's action stems from a five-count CFTC civil complaint filed on    February 5, 1997, alleging that Hermans aided and abetted the fraud and    registration violations of **Edward W. Schroeder**, an unregistered    commodity pool operator of Santa Monica, California. Schroeder, in a    separate CFTC complaint filed on July 1, 1996, is charged with defrauding    more than 40 commodity pool customers of over $3 million. This action is    currently in litigation in the Central District of California. (See    CFTC News Release 3925-96, July 16, 1996.)

The CFTC's complaint against Hermans charges that he agreed to "launder"    the assets of Schroeder's commodity pool through an entity controlled by    Hermans in order to conceal Schroeder's pool assets and his continuing    unlawful activities. The complaint further alleges that Hermans violated    the *Commodity Exchange Act* (CEA) by collecting more than $100,000    from investors while operating as an unregistered commodity pool operator,    failing to provide prospective investors with the disclosure documents    required by law, and failing to operate a commodity pool as a separate    entity.

**Hearing Scheduled for February 14th**

A hearing on a preliminary injunction is set for February 14, 1997,    before Judge Hupp. In its litigation against the defendants, the CFTC is    seeking preliminary and permanent civil injunctions, in addition to other    remedial relief, including, cease and desist orders, an accounting,    disgorgement of unlawfully obtained benefits, restitution to customers, and    civil penalties in the amount not more than the higher of $110,000 or    triple the monetary gain to the defendant for each violation of the CEA or    CFTC regulations.

# # #
Carroll Andrew YOUNG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6372.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2012161EN.01002101.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 15/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 129/2010 of 10 December 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 129/2010 of 10 December 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2011/59/EU of 13 May 2011 amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annexes II and III to Council Directive 76/768/EEC relating to cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2011/59/EU of 13 May 2011 amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annexes II and III to Council Directive 76/768/EEC relating to cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 L 0059: Commission Directive 2011/59/EU of 13 May 2011 (OJ L 125, 14.5.2011, p. 17).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 L 0059: Commission Directive 2011/59/EU of 13 May 2011 (OJ L 125, 14.5.2011, p. 17).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2011/59/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 85, 31.3.2011, p. 13.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 125, 14.5.2011, p. 17.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2010181EN.01001101.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 181/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 181/11

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 43/2010

of 30 April 2010

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 3/2010 of 29 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 3/2010 of 29 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2009/786/EC of 26 October 2009 releasing the United Kingdom from certain obligations to apply Council Directive 66/402/EEC in respect of Avena strigosa Schreb. (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2009/786/EC of 26 October 2009 releasing the United Kingdom from certain obligations to apply Council Directive 66/402/EEC in respect of Avena strigosa Schreb. (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 78 (Commission Decision 2008/462/EC) under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE EFTA STATES AND THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY SHALL TAKE DUE ACCOUNT’ in Chapter III of Annex I to the Agreement:

| ‘79. | 32009 D 0786: Commission Decision 2009/786/EC of 26 October 2009 releasing the United Kingdom from certain obligations to apply Council Directive 66/402/EEC in respect of Avena strigosa Schreb. (OJ L 281, 28.10.2009, p. 5).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘79.

32009 D 0786: Commission Decision 2009/786/EC of 26 October 2009 releasing the United Kingdom from certain obligations to apply Council Directive 66/402/EEC in respect of Avena strigosa Schreb. (OJ L 281, 28.10.2009, p. 5).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2009/786/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 101, 22.4.2010, p. 9.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 281, 28.10.2009, p. 5.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned  executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify to
the best of their  knowledge that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date:    March 28, 2003       By: /s/Lawrence P. Calvert
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name: Lawrence P. Calvert
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer




Date:    March 28, 2003       By: /s/Ronald J. Pence
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name: Ronald J. Pence
                                  Title:   President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kentucky  National  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be retained by Kentucky
National Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
INTHEMATrEROFTHE ESTATE OF

IvIELVIN DONJONES NO. PRI4-02191-1 

### § § 

### § 

### § § § IN THE PROBATE COURT NO. ONE
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS


### NOTICE OFAPPEAL TOTHE HONORABLEJUDGE OF SAID COURT: COj\,lES NOW', Demetdcc Deckard, on behalf of his deceased wife, IVlargaret Jones, Appellant, and gh'es this, his notice of appeal f1'0111 the Judgment Declaring Heirship and Order of No Administration in the above styled and numbered cause, which judgment was signed onJanuary 28, 2015. Appeal shall be to the Court ofAppeals, Fifth District ofTexas, Dallas, Texas.

----- .•..**~~~** Respectf\llly submitted, 

### lsi Faith S. Johnson Faith S. Johnson State Bar No. 18367550 5201 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suitc 500 Irving, Texas 75039 972-401-3100 972-401-3105 (fax) fjassociates@att.net Counsel for Appellant

NOliec 

## orApp",,1 1\,1',(' J of:< FILED 3/6/20153:08:39 PM

JOHN F. WARREN

COUNTY CLERK DALLAS COUNTY

ACCEPTED 05-15-00334-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 3/11/2015 11:19:05 AM

LISA MATZ CLERKCERTIFICATE OFSERVICE This is to certify that I have mailed a true 

### copy oftltis notice ofappeal to all counsel ofrecord by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on this
___ clay of :March 

### 2015. 

### lsi Faith S. Jolmsoll Faith S. Johnson**--.---~----** ..--.-- NOfice of Appl'nl P;lge 20(2
# L_2012076EN.01002901.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 145/2011

of 2 December 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 42ed (Commission Decision 2010/409/EU) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘42ee. | 32010 R 1169: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation (OJ L 327, 11.12.2010, p. 13).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘42ee.

32010 R 1169: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation (OJ L 327, 11.12.2010, p. 13).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2011, p. 85.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 327, 11.12.2010, p. 13.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Adolph Jerry RUIZ, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 17-6041.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
Hector ARIAS, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-5706.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
George E. KERSEY, petitioner, v. BECTON DICKINSON & CO., et al.

No. 17-8643.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.2
**Certification pursuant to**
**Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**
I, Edward J. Puisis, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending April 1, 2005 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: May 16, 2005      /s/ Edward J. Puisis    Edward J. Puisis
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al., petitioners, v. Teresa GRAHAM, as Personal Representative of Faye Dale Graham, Deceased.

No. 17-415.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4292 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4292

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of 
 district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2019

 Mr. Meadows introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of 
 district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nationwide Injunction Abuse 
Prevention Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS TO 
              PROVIDE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief
    ``(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no United States 
district court shall issue any order providing for injunctive relief, 
except in the case of such an order that is applicable only to--
            ``(1) the parties to the case before such district court; 
        or
            ``(2) in the Federal district in which the order is 
        issued.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kaleil Isaza Tuzman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 2, 2011


/s/ Kaleil Isaza TuzmanKaleil Isaza TuzmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0715 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSHUA MEECH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 25 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 18 2023

08/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0715