alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6615

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CRAIG MAURICE HARRIS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:12

- cr
- 00120

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : October 31, 2017 Decided: November 7, 2017

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.
Craig Maurice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Donald Russell Pender, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Ca rolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Craig Maurice Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2012) motion and seeks to appeal the district court’s order di smissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. * Harris makes no argument a s to the denial
of relief on his § 3582 (c)(2) motion. T herefore , Harris has waived appellate review of that
order. See United States v. Winfield , 665 F.3d 107, 111 n.4 (4th Cir. 2012) (stating argument not raised in opening brief considered waived). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying § 3582(c)(2) relief. United States v. Harris , No. 5:12

- cr
00120

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 9, 2017)

. The district court’ s order dismissing Harris’ § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
denia l of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484

- 85 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal with respect to the § 2255 motion . We dispense with oral argument because the

* Because both orders were entered on the same day and Harris’ notice of appeal does not specify which order he seeks to appeal, we look to the arguments raised in his informal brief.3 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Ronald PHILLIPS, applicant, v. Charlotte JENKINS, Warden.

No. 17-5310 (17A105).

Supreme Court of the United States

July 25, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2012102EN.01002901.xml

| 5.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/29

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2012/C 102/10

OJ C 37 of 10.2.2012

History of previous publications:

History of previous publications:

| | OJ C 335 of 16.11.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 335 of 16.11.2011

| | OJ C 264 of 8.9.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 264 of 8.9.2011

| | OJ C 189 of 29.6.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 189 of 29.6.2011

| | OJ C 140 of 11.5.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 140 of 11.5.2011

| | OJ C 121 of 19.4.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 121 of 19.4.2011

| | OJ C 94 of 26.3.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 94 of 26.3.2011

---
#### Cocoa Bank & Trust Company of Cocoa, Florida, a Florida Banking Corporation, *Appellant,*v. Bertie Lee Thompson, a femme sole, et al., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 15, 1929.

*214*Shepard & Wahl,*for Appellant;

*Walsh, Beckham, Farley & Ellis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and agrument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Shannon RILEY, petitioner, v. Christian PFEIFFER, Warden.

No. 17-5779.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2011171EN.01003501.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 35/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 adapting for the first time the Annexes to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods to scientific and technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 adapting for the first time the Annexes to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods to scientific and technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 13c (Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 L 0061: Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 (OJ L 233, 3.9.2010, p. 27).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 L 0061: Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 (OJ L 233, 3.9.2010, p. 27).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2010/61/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 April 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 7.4.2011, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 233, 3.9.2010, p. 27.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2012049EN.01000101.xml

| 22.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 49/1

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Seychelles

On 13 July 2011, the European Union notified the Republic of Seychelles of the completion by the Council, on behalf of the European Union, of the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the above Protocol, signed at Brussels on 18 January 2011.

Likewise, the Republic of Seychelles notified on 11 November 2011 the European Union of the completion of its conclusion procedures.

The Protocol accordingly entered into force on 11 November 2011 pursuant to Article 14 thereof.

---
Release #4130-98
    (CFTC Docket No. 98-10)

For Release: April
    2, 1998

CFTC FILES
    ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AGAINST CMB CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORP., GRACE HSU,
    AND ALLEN TSUI, CHARGING FRAUD BY UNAUTHORIZED TRADING AND FAILURE TO
    DISCLOSE TRADING RISKS, AMONG OTHER VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL COMMODITY LAW AND
    CFTC REGULATIONS

WASHINGTON -- The
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today the filing of a
    three-count administrative complaint against CMB Capital Management
    Corporation (CMB) of Flushing, New York, its president, Grace
    Hsu also of Flushing, and another individual, Allen Tsui of
    Jamaica, New York, alleging violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the
    Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations. CMB is registered with
    the CFTC as an Introducing Broker, and both Hsu and Tsui are currently
    registered as Associated Persons.

Specifically, the
    CFTC complaint, filed on March 31, 1998, charges the respondents with fraud
    for failing to disclose material information about margin calls,
    misrepresenting the reasons the customers were required to change their
    clearing futures commission merchant, failing to disclose the risks of
    futures trading, and trading customer accounts without
    authorization.

The CFTC complaint
    alleges that from December of 1996 through June of 1997, CMB, Hsu, and Tsui
    solicited customers without providing them the required risk disclosures,
    or by providing the required risk disclosure documents in a language that
    the customers could not read.

Further, the CFTC
    complaint alleges that in 1997, Hsu and CMB engaged in a series of
    unauthorized trades, resulting in losses to CMB clients of more than
    $145,000.

A Public
    Hearing Has Been Ordered

A public hearing
    has been scheduled to determine whether the allegations are true and, if
    so, to determine what sanctions, if any, are appropriate and in the public
    interest.

Possible sanctions
    include cease and desist orders prohibiting further violations of
    provisions of the CEA and CFTC regulations as charged; revocation,
    restriction or suspension of registration; a trading prohibition;
    restitution; and civil monetary penalties of not more than the higher of
    $110,000 or triple the monetary gain to the respondent for each violation
    of the CEA or CFTC regulations.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4297 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to treat attendance at 

an institution of higher education the same as work for the purpose 

of determining eligibility to participate in the supplemental nutrition 

assistance program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. GOMEZ (for himself, Mr. AGUILAR, Ms. BASS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. 

CARBAJAL, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. 

CORREA, Mr. COSTA, Mr. COX of California, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. HARDER of California, Ms. HILL of 

California, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MOORE, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, 

Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. OMAR, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 

POCAN, Mr. ROUDA, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SOTO, 

Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. THOMPSON

of California, Mr. VELA, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mrs. TORRES of California, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Mr. KHANNA, and Mr. LOWENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to treat 

attendance at an institution of higher education the same 

as work for the purpose of determining eligibility to 

participate in the supplemental nutrition assistance program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4297 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhance Access To 

3 SNAP Act of 2019’’ or ‘‘EATS Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

5 Section 6 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 

6 U.S.C. 2015) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (e)(4) by striking ‘‘employed’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘attending an institution of higher 

9 education (as defined in section 102 of the Higher 

10 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)) or em11 ployed, in the aggregate,’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (o)(2)(A) by striking ‘‘work’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘attending an institution of higher 

14 education (as defined in section 102 of the Higher 

15 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)) or work, 

16 in the aggregate,’’. 

17 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 This Act shall take effect on January 2, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
----

**Exhibit 99.4**

| **KPMG LLP
 **Chartered Accountants
 
Suite 1500 Purdy's Wharf Tower I
Telephone (902) 492-6000
1959 Upper Water Street
Telefax (902) 429-1307
Halifax NS B3J 3N2
www.kpmg.ca
Canada
 
To the Board of Directors of Gammon Lake Resources Inc. 

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of: 
-  Our auditors' report dated April 2, 2007  on the consolidated balance sheets of Gammon Lake Resources Inc. ("the  Company") as at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated statements of  operations and deficit and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 and  the five month period ended December 31, 2005. Our Comments by Auditors for US Readers  on Canada-US Reporting Differences, dated April 2, 2007. Our auditors' report on reconciliation  to United States GAAP dated April 2, 2007, prepared under Item 17 of Form  20-F. Our auditors' report on reconciliation  to United States GAAP dated April 4, 2007, prepared under Item 18 of Form  20-F. Our Report on Independent Registered  Public Accounting Firm dated April 2, 2007 on management's assessment of the  effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2007  and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April  2, 2007 each of which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of the  Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. 
Chartered Accountants Halifax, Canada June 1, 2007**** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TransDigm Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Nicholas Howley, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 29, 2005



/s/    W. NICHOLAS
HOWLEYName:

W. Nicholas HowleyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of income filed as
part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period Ended June
30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           231,377
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          64
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,049
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      550
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 252,573
<CASH>                                           3,876
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              64,714
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          16,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 492,857
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                311,763
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   2,438
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  5,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,403
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,758
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   492,857
<PREMIUMS>                                       7,129
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,391
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 456
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   4,545
<BENEFITS>                                      12,227
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,159
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,118)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    267
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,870
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Nicholas SPATAFORE, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 17-345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Exhibit 10.1(c)








Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2010





SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


Hooker Furniture Corporation




Through December 31, 2009, our non-employee directors were compensated on a calendar-year basis.  For 2010, the Board of Directors adopted a recommendation from the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to align non-employee director compensation with each director’s terms of service, which typically begins with the election of directors at the Company’s annual meeting. The Board has approved compensation for non-employee directors for the five-month transition period from January 1, 2010 to the annual shareholders meeting to be held June 8, 2010. Compensation for the annual period following the June 8, 2010 annual meeting will be approved promptly after the annual meeting. Our non-employee directors will be paid the following cash compensation for the five-month transition period:




·
$8,333 retainer for service on the Board; plus




·
$3,542 for serving on the Audit Committee and $1,667 for serving on each of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees; and




·
an additional $2,083 for the Chair of the Audit Committee,




·
$1,667 for the Chair of the Compensation Committee and $1,250 for the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.




In addition, directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings or performing their duties as directors.




Non-employee directors also receive an annual grant of restricted stock under the Company’s stock incentive plan. The number of shares of restricted stock awarded to each non-employee director is determined by dividing fifty percent of the total annual fees payable to that director by the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the award date (the average of the high and low market price of the stock on the day prior to the grant date), and rounding to the nearest whole share. The restricted stock becomes fully vested, and the restrictions applicable to the restricted stock lapse, on the third anniversary of the grant date, or if earlier, when the director dies or is disabled, the annual shareholders meeting following the director’s attainment of age 75, or a change in control of the Company.




On January 15, 2010, each non-employee director of the Company received an award of restricted shares of Company common stock for the five month-month transition period as set forth in the table below:




Outside Director

Restricted

Stock Grant

(# of shares)W. Christopher Beeler, Jr.


591John L. Gregory, III


533Mark F. Schreiber


541David G. Sweet


541Henry G. Williamson, Jr.


625
Anselmo GOMEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5778.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
William RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5137.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.