alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Dowling Co., a corporation, and Will Townsend, *Appellants,*v. Jesse Hires, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Decision filed February 20, 1929.

*Wm. Hunter*and *McKay, Withers & Ramsey,*for Appellants ;

*W. J. Wallace,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, ‘and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said decree in that the injunction covers land that the complainant had not been in actual possession of for the statutory period, it is, therefore, considered *251ordered and decreed that the said decree is reversed and the cause is'remanded with directions to enter an appropriate injunction decree covering the lands of which the complainant had been in actual possession for the statutory period at the time the suit was instituted.

It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whiteield, Ellis, Brown and Bueord, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: April 20, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
April 13, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 131 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2022-53, CP2022-57.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-08454 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) the
Financial Statements of American Media Operations Inc. For the fiscal quarter
ended December 27, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
(b) Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-27-1999
<CASH>                                6,138
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        11,273
<ALLOWANCES>                          1,036
<INVENTORY>                           9,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     36,034
<PP&E>                               38,192
<DEPRECIATION>                        6,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,152,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               103,175
<BONDS>                             680,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  2
<OTHER-SE>                          207,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,152,388
<SALES>                             230,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    230,189
<CGS>                               195,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       195,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   44,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (9,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (2,665)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (12,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      (2,581)
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (15,076)
<EPS-BASIC>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In conjunction with the annual report on Form 10-K of International
Fuel Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report),

I, Jonathan R. Burst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       |     |                         | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|Dated: March
 31, 2010 | By: | /s/ Jonathan R. Burst   | 
|                       |     |                         | 
|                       |     | Jonathan R. Burst       | 
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer | 

---
Victor GRESHAM, et al., petitioners, v. Lori SWANSON, Attorney General of Minnesota.

No. 17-676.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Mike JABARY, petitioner, v. Bret McCULLOUGH, et al.

No. 17-5689.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Shanelle JOSEPH, petitioner, v. CITY OF CEDAR HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 17-5037.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARONEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,158,000
<SECURITIES>                                   916,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,562,000
<PP&E>                                       5,547,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,599,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,426,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,554,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,402,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,426,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,174,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             127,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,452,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,452,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,452,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 241/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 241 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6321 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 241

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6321 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 241/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply | 1 |
| 2020/C 241/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 241/03 | Euro exchange rates — 20 July 2020 | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 241/01

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

1

2020/C 241/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

2

European Commission

2020/C 241/03

Euro exchange rates — 20 July 2020

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 241/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9885 – HAL Investments/De Drie Eiken) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 241/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9885 – HAL Investments/De Drie Eiken) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Daniel Ray DOSENBERRY, petitioner, v. Carmen Denise PALMER, Warden.

No. 17-6019.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, a corporation, Appellant, v. National Construction Company, a Florida corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 20, 1929.

Huber, *Clements & Blackwell,*for Appellant;

*Baker, Baker & Rutherford,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the order appealed from herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                                           ****CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED:
                                               OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED
                                               SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION

                     Oracle / Intershop Reseller Agreement

                          Summary of Principal Terms


Parties:                 Oracle Deutschland GmbH
                         Intershop Communications GmbH

Date:                    October 15, 1998; extended through ****

Type of Agreement        Alliance Member (Reseller)

Products:                Oracle run time products sold as application specific
                         full use licenses. An application-specific full use
                         license is a restricted type of license sold by a
                         Solution Provider in conjunction with its Application
                         Package. Application Specific Full Use licenses may
                         only be used by the end-user to execute the Alliance
                         Member's application program.

Intershop Applications:  Intershop Merchant and Hosting Editions and their
                         upgrades.

Royalty payable          Intershop or its Distributor will pay ****% of the list
                         price (without a discount) to Oracle. Intershop will
                         give 90 days' notice to Oracle of any change in the
                         Intershop price list.

Quarterly Reports        Intershop will provide quarterly sales and royalty
                         reports to Oracle.

Limitations              The use of the Oracle product is currently restricted
                         to 2 CPUs (but can be any machine, not just
                         workgroup servers)

Modifications            The Oracle programs may be used in conjunction with an
                         Intershop application that has been modified or
                         customized provided the customizations and
                         modifications remain within the scope of the Intershop
                         application. For example, if the Alliance Member's
                         application is defined as a financial application,
                         which manages accounts payable, accounts receivable,
                         and generates invoices, the application could not be
                         modified to include a customized order entry module, or
                         a shipping and receiving module.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6777

ROGER LEE HARRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:15-cv-00031-REP-RCY)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Lee Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Harrell seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate 

judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Harrell that 

failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Harrell has waived 

appellate review by failing to file objections. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Roger BRYNER, petitioner, v. CITY OF CLEARFIELD, UTAH, et al.

No. 17-7806.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.
# CA2006181EN.01003301.xml

| 3.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 181/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 181/33

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

(1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/24/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/24/05

ADMINISTRATORS

ADMINISTRATORS

(SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS — A*9)

(SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS — A*9)

Of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovenian And Slovakian Citizenship

(2006/C 181 A/09)

| BARTOS | Csaba |
| --- | --- |
| DREIMANE | Sandra |
| HATVANI | Csaba |
| KUCZYNSKA | Bogna |
| ROZMANIS | Aivars |

BARTOS

Csaba

DREIMANE

Sandra

HATVANI

Csaba

KUCZYNSKA

Bogna

ROZMANIS

Aivars

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17402 and #17403; South Carolina Disaster Number 
SC-00078]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of South 
Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of South Carolina dated 04/19/2022. Incident: 
Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 04/05/2022 through 04/06/2022.

DATES: Issued on 04/19/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/20/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/19/2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Allendale, Bamberg.
Contiguous Counties:
    South Carolina: Barnwell, Colleton, Hampton, Orangeburg.
    Georgia: Burke, Screven.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      2.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.438
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.880
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.940
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.940
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17402 C 
and for economic injury is 17403 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # is Georgia, South 
Carolina.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-08723 Filed 4-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/01/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       82,619
COMMITMENTS
   2,360    9,017    4,492   68,224   57,505   75,076   71,014    7,543   11,605

CHANGES FROM 05/25/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,529)
    -548      865      855    5,887    4,572    6,194    6,292     -665     -763

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.9     10.9      5.4     82.6     69.6     90.9     86.0      9.1     14.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       4       13       10       21       26       32       42
```

----

Updated June 4, 2010
Bryan SEDLAK, petitioner, v. Barry SMITH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Houtzdale, et al.

No. 17-6200.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0715

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOSHUA MEECH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 25, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 18 2023

08/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0715
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75529, 333-87738, 333-103032, 333-113430, 333-123329, 333-132060 and 333-133167) of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. of our report datedNovember 24, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

November 24, 2009