alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will 
still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 11, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, May 11, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern 
Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written 
statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of 
meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 11, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-08197 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Kacey CROXTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Eugene K. JONES-EL, petitioner, v. George LOMBARDI, et al.

No. 17M33.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Opinion filed this 7th day of January. 2013.

lii rr

Qnurt cit

.!FiftI! itrict ut xai at Jzt1ta

No. 0$- 12-00704-CV

DARRIUS CUFFIE, Appellant

V.

SECRETARY OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-l202721-A

OPINION

Before Justices Bridges. O’Neill and Murphy

Opinion by Justice ONeill

Appellant’s brief is overdue. By letter dated October 5, 2012. we notified appellant the

time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file his brief and an extension

motion within ten (lays. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief would result in

dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an extension motion, or

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of his appeal.

Accordingly. we dismiss this appeal .See TEX. R. App. P. 38.8 (AX I ): 42.3(b),(c).

i/i /i

MTCH 1L] 0 NElLL

JUSTICE *

I 20704F.P05
nitrt uf Ait1

Fift1! Ohtrirt øf Lrxti at JaI1a

JUDGMENT

Darrius Cuffie, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law

No. I . Dallas County. Texas

No. 05-12 00704-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-i 2-02721 —A.

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.

Secretary of Veteran Affairs, Appellee Justices Bridges and Murphy participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 1)ISMISSED.

It is ORDERFI) that appellee Secretary of Veteran Affairs recover its costs of this

appeal from appellant 1)arrius Cuifie.

Judgment entered this 17th day of January, 2013.

/

/// / I / 1/ t//4/ f 1’

JIIC14AELJ ONEILL

‘JIXSTICE /
Philip Andra GRIGSBY, petitioner, v. J. Thomas MARTEN, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, et al.

No. 16-8948.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Alexsandr SOLONICHNYY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al., petitioners, v. BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 17-178.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Elton GARY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001078799
<NAME> CONVERGE GLOBAL, INC.

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,462                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,462                       0
<PP&E>                                          22,133                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,348)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,247                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,453                       0
<BONDS>                                        391,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         8,918                   2,340
<OTHER-SE>                                   (404,124)                 (2,340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,247                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,870                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               644,468                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,688                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (648,286)                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (649,286)                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (649,086)                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)                       0


</TABLE>
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/30/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       34,702
COMMITMENTS
   6,727    1,650    5,063   14,312   16,244   26,102   22,958    8,600   11,744

CHANGES FROM 06/23/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -942)
    -722      351     -243     -162   -1,968   -1,126   -1,859      184      917

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.4      4.8     14.6     41.2     46.8     75.2     66.2     24.8     33.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
      10        5       16       21       18       40       35
```

----

Updated July 6, 2009
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4244 

To provide for a pathway for chemically synthesized insulin to be approved 

under an abbreviated new drug application submitted under the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a pathway for chemically synthesized insulin 

to be approved under an abbreviated new drug application submitted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Market Access for Ge5 neric Insulin Competition’’ or the ‘‘MAGIC Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4244 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR A PATHWAY FOR APPROVAL OF 

2 CHEMICALLY SYNTHESIZED INSULIN UNDER 

3 AN ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7002(e)(2) of the Patient 

5 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 262 note) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by redesignating 

8 clauses (i) and (ii) as subclauses (I) and (II), respec9 tively, and moving the margins of such subclauses 

10 (as so redesignated) two ems to the right; 

11 (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘such bio12 logical product’’ and inserting ‘‘(i) such biological 

13 product’’; 

14 (3) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 

15 clause (ii) and moving the margin of such clause (as 

16 so redesignated) two ems to the right; 

17 (4) in clause (ii) (as so redesignated), by strik18 ing the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

19 (5) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(B) notwithstanding paragraphs (3) and 

21 (4), the application is submitted under sub22 section (j) of such section for chemically syn23 thesized insulin or any analogue of chemically 

24 synthesized insulin for which the listed drug is 

25 a biological product that is, pursuant to paraVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:11 Sep 10, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4244.IH H4244

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4244 IH

1 graph (4), deemed to be licensed under section 

2 351 of the Public Health Service Act.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply with respect to applications sub5 mitted on or after January 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Kirk Lee ANDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17M19.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

[OJP (OJJDP) Docket No. 1798]


Notice of Charter Renewal of the Federal Advisory Committee on 
Juvenile Justice

AGENCY: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office 
of Justice Programs, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice that the charter of the Federal Advisory Committee on 
Juvenile Justice has been renewed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit the website for the Federal 
Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice at www.facjj.ojp.gov or contact 
Cara Blair, Designated Federal Official (DFO), Office of Juvenile 
Justice and Delinquency Prevention, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#375456455619555b565e4577424453585d19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b282a392a6529272a22390b3e382f2421652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>, 
or telephone at 202-307-5911 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Federal Register Notice notifies the 
public that the Charter of the Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile 
Justice has been renewed in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Section 14(a)(1). The Federal Advisory Committee on 
Juvenile Justice Charter was renewed on February 24, 2022. One can 
obtain a copy of the renewal Charter by accessing the Federal Advisory 
Committee on Juvenile Justice's website at www.facjj.ojp.gov.

Cara Blair,
Designated Federal Official (DFO), Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-08377 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Cecil Leon AIKEN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-5633.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Michael THORNSBURY.

No. D-2984.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
Joseph ORTIZ, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6137.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00031-CV

Brian Paul Hunt, Appellant

v.

MERS, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-05-002951, HONORABLE RHONDA HURLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Brian Paul Hunt appeals from an interlocutory district court order imposing

“death penalty” sanctions against him for discovery abuse in a wrongful-foreclosure suit in which 1

he is a defendant. The order from which Hunt appeals is not a final, appealable judgment, nor 2

has the legislature made this sort of interlocutory order appealable. Cf. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code

Ann. § 51.014(a) (West 2008); Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.3 (sanctions order for abuse of discovery process

“shall be subject to review on appeal from the final judgment”). Assuming that Hunt is intending

The record reflects that Hunt, among other actions, persisted in refusing to respond to the 1

opposing party’s discovery requests despite a district court order compelling him to respond. 

The underlying allegations resemble those in Hunt v. CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc.,

2

No. 03-09-00046-CV, 2010 WL 1508082 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 15, 2010, pet. filed) (mem. op.).

In that case, we affirmed a district court judgment on a jury verdict finding that Hunt and others

conducted a wrongful and fraudulent foreclosure sale of real property in an attempt to subvert

a mortgagee’s lien on the property. The present case involves allegations that Hunt and largely the

same group of participants engaged in a similar scheme to defraud a creditor.
to seek mandamus from the sanctions order, see TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell,

811 S.W.2d 913, 917-19 (Tex. 1991), he has not shown himself entitled to such relief. In his brief,

Hunt does not present any arguments or authorities addressed to the merits of the sanctions order,

but instead purports to challenge appellee’s “standing.” As best we can discern, Hunt’s complaint

is that neither MERS, Inc., the original plaintiff below, nor its successor, Deutsche Bank National

Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee Under the Indenture Relating to IMH Assets Corp.,

Collateralized Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2004-1, has “standing” to sue him because MERS was 3

listed on the deed of trust for the property as the “nominee” and “mortgagee,” not the “lender.”

Hunt’s complaint is without merit.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 20, 2010

Although Hunt identifies MERS as appellee, the district court’s sanctions order identifies 3

Deutsche Bank as the plaintiff.

2
Sororazam BETHUNE, petitioner, v. MTA/LONG ISLAND BUS, et al.

No. 17-8000.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/22/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       46,867
COMMITMENTS
   4,045   14,727    3,309   31,081   22,858   38,435   40,894    8,432    5,973

CHANGES FROM 09/15/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,499)
    -338    1,824   -1,769   -4,102   -6,464   -6,209   -6,409   -1,290   -1,090

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.6     31.4      7.1     66.3     48.8     82.0     87.3     18.0     12.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       33)
       8       11        9       11        9       26       24
```

----

Updated September 25, 2008
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 23, 2005



                                           /s/  John B. Sawyer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John B. Sawyer,
                                           President and COO
Katherine LEGGETT, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Patrick D. Leggett, et al., petitioners, v. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-374.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Demegen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard D. Ekstrom,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard D. Ekstrom

Richard D. Ekstrom
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

December 30, 2002


                                                                         Page 54
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-65986, 333-51408, 333-45634, and 333-89653) and Form S-3 (No. 333-54894) of LookSmart, Ltd. and its Subsidiaries of our report dated January 23, 2002 except as to Note 17 which is as of March 7,
2002 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.





| | /S/ | PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
| | --- | --------------------------




San Francisco,
California


March 13, 2002