alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RONNIE OWEN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30023

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00098-FVS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Ronnie Owen appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty-plea conviction and 36-month sentence for identity theft, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1028(a)(3). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

FILED

JAN 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30023

Owen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Owen the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed. 

Owen waived his right to appeal his conviction. He also waived the right to

appeal his sentence, with the exception of his right to challenge the amount of

restitution. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as the amount of

restitution ordered by the district court. We therefore affirm as to that issue. We

dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

Owen’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Sargent K. MAJOR, petitioner, v. WYOMING.

No. 17-5851.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-26,465-04

IN RE OSB ORN ERNIE WILS ON, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1189748C IN THE 209 DISTRICT COURT th F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 209 District Court o f Ha rr i s County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the

t h application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ri s County

. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s applicatio n an d that the 180-day time fra me set out in T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5) has not e x pired shall also be submitt ed with the re sponse. This application for leave to file a writ of m andamus shall be held in abey ance until R espondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Aug ust 28, 2019 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11715]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)), 
and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated April 5, 2022, I hereby 
determine that an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine. I further determine that the emergency 
requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export 
Control Act or any other provision of law.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $100 million in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military 
education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated. April 5, 2022.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-08261 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4258 

To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court 

Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official guests of the 

Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Mr. STANTON (for himself and Mr. STEUBE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the 

Supreme Court Police to protect the Justices, employees, 

and official guests of the Supreme Court outside of the 

Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reauthorizing Security 

5 for Supreme Court Justices Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4258 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION AUTHORITY OF MARSHAL OF THE SU2 PREME COURT AND SUPREME COURT PO3 LICE. 

4 Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (2), in the matter pre8 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘any 

9 State’’ and inserting ‘‘any location’’; and 

10 (B) in paragraph (3)— 

11 (i) by striking ‘‘violation of federal or 

12 state law’’ and inserting ‘‘violation of Fed13 eral or State law’’; and 

14 (ii) by striking ‘‘regulation under fed15 eral or state law’’ and inserting ‘‘regula16 tion under Federal or State law’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (b)— 

18 (A) by striking paragraph (2); 

19 (B) by striking ‘‘ADDITIONAL REQUIRE20 MENTS’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Duties 

21 under’’ and inserting ‘‘AUTHORIZATION TO

22 CARRY FIREARMS—Duties under’’; and 

23 (C) by striking ‘‘any State’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘any location’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. Franklin David BARKER.

No. 17-115 (R46-019).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 14, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Tyson TIMBS, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 17-1091.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana granted.
Thomas POE, petitioner, v. Lloyd RAPELJE, Warden.

No. 17-5035.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
YA'SHUA AMEN SHEKHEM EL BEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-5974.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
3/11/2015 TDCJ Offender Details 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF :CRIMINAl JUSTICE [E) TDCJ Home Iii New Offend(~t· Search 

Offender Information Details 

I Retum to Search list I 

SID Number: 07165920 

TDCJ Number: 01498063 

Name: ROMERO,JOSE 

Race: H 

Gender: M 

DOB: 1987-12-15 

Maximum Sentence Date: 2061-01-19 

Current Facility: WYNNE 

Projected Release Date: 2061-01-19 

Parole Eligibility Date: 2012-05-23 

Offender Visitation Eligible: YES 

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times 

per day 

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family 

members and 

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for. a visit. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: 

Scheduled Release Type: 

Scheduled Release 

Location: 

Parole Review Information· 

Offense History: 

I Offense 

Offender is not scheduled for release at 

this time. 

Will be determined when release date is 

scheduled. 

Will be determined when release date is· 

scheduled. 

Sentence 

http://offender .tdcj .state. tx.us/OffenderSearchloffenderDetai l.acti on?si d=07165920 

• 

1/2 
3/11/2015 TDCJ Offender Details 

Date Offense Date County Case No. Sentence (YY ~MMDD) 

2006-01-19 INJURY TO CHILD 2007-12-05 BEXAR 2007CR9123B 55-00-00 SBI 

Return to Search list 

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is 

complete and accurate, however this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on 

this site may not reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, or other 

information regarding an offender. 

For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, at (936) 

295-6371 or webadmin@tdcj.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law 

enforcement in the interest of public safety. Any unauthorized use of this information is forbidden and 

subject to criminal prosecution. 

New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page 

http://offender .tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearchloffenderDetai l.acti on?si d=07165920 2/2
RODERICK HAYGOOD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14-1047

_________________________/

Opinion filed September 26, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. Mark W. Moseley

, Judge.

Roderick Haygood

, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal

Appeals, Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Johnny Mike TORRES, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-5798.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [9748-01-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held virtually and in-person on May 17 and 18, 2022 at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Headquarters located at 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460. The CHPAC advises EPA on science, regulations and other issues relating to children's environmental health.

# DATES:

May 17, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and May 18, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will take place virtually and in-person. If you want to listen to the meeting or provide comments, please email                         *nguyen.amelia@epa.gov*                         for further details.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Amelia Nguyen, Office of Children's Health Protection, U.S. EPA, MC 1107T,                               ( print page 22882)                            1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-4268, or                         *nguyen.amelia@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the public. An agenda will be posted to                     *https://www.epa.gov/​children/​childrens-health-protection-advisory-committee-chpac.*

*Access and Accommodations:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Amelia Nguyen at 202-564-4268 or                     *nguyen.amelia@epa.gov.*

Amelia Nguyen,

Biologist, Office of Children's Health Protection.

[FR Doc. 2022-08225 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Kevin Donavon ATKINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1379.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Timothy James ULTSCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5765.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2013315EN.01000101.xml

| 26.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 315/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 315/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of Part IV (trade matters) of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other (Guatemala)

Pending the completion of the procedures for the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other, signed at Tegucigalpa on 29 June 2012, Part IV thereof concerning trade matters shall, in accordance with its Article 353(4), be applied on a provisional basis between the European Union and Guatemala as from 1 December 2013. By virtue of Article 3(1) of the Council Decision 2012/734/EU (1) on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement, Article 271 shall not be provisionally applied.

1

---

(1)  Council Decision 2012/734/EU of 25 June 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other, and the provisional application of Part IV thereof concerning trade matters (OJ L 346, 15.12.2012, p. 1).

1

---
Gracshawn THOMAS, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-8940.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

*2644Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Summit County denied.
James Bernard JONES, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8110.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2012309EN.01001001.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/10

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 130/2012

of 13 July 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2012 of 15 June 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2012 of 15 June 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2011/274/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘energy’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/274/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘energy’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 37dg (Commission Decision 2011/275/EU) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘37dh. | 32011 D 0274: Commission Decision 2011/274/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘energy’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘37dh.

32011 D 0274: Commission Decision 2011/274/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘energy’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/274/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 July 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 4.10.2012, p. 37.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4310 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4310

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify that employment in 
 any position at a nonprofit organization is a public service job for 
purposes of the public service loan forgiveness program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2019

  Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify that employment in 
 any position at a nonprofit organization is a public service job for 
purposes of the public service loan forgiveness program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Service Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. REPAYMENT PLAN FOR PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES.

    Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or'' after ``public library 
                sciences,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``, or at an organization that is 
                described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue 
                Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 
                501(a) of such Code; or'' and inserting a semicolon;
            (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (i), the following:
                            ``(ii) a full time job in any position at 
                        an organization that is described in section 
                        501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
                        and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) 
                        of such Code, without regard to the mission of 
                        such organization; or''.
                                 <all>
```