alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60567 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL THERONE ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus A.K. SHOWERS ET AL., Defendants, A.K. SHOWERS; BARRY SANDERS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:93-CV-342-A

- - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael Therone Anderson, #70771, appeals the bench-trial judgment against him, arguing that the magistrate judge erred in limiting discovery to Anderson’s medical records and disciplinary records and in concluding that Anderson had not proved his excessive-force claim against defendant A. K. Showers by aNo. 95-60567 - 2 - preponderance of the evidence. We have reviewed the record and briefs and AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal. See Anderson v. Major A.K. Showers Et Al. , No. 4:93CV342-B-A (N.D. Miss. Oct. 18, 1995). Anderson has not shown that the magistrate judge abused his discretion in limiting discovery nor that the findings of fact are clearly erroneous. Anderson’s appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); see 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution appellant that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, appellant is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Vernard Jericho PEARSEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6787.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Israel RIVERA-HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 16-9216.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Robert J. CASSINELLI, petitioner, v. Janice R. CASSINELLI.

No. 16-8811.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2012207EN.01004701.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/47

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 67/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex XVI (Procurement) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XVI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 83/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XVI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 83/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011 of 30 November 2011 amending Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of their application thresholds for the procedures for the awards of contract (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011 of 30 November 2011 amending Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of their application thresholds for the procedures for the awards of contract (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in points 2 (Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) and 4 (Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XVI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 1251: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011 of 30 November 2011 (OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 43).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 1251: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011 of 30 November 2011 (OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 43).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 31 March 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 54.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 43.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 423 

For the relief of Robert Feiss. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Robert Feiss. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT. 

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the 

6 sum of $39,709.66 to Robert Feiss of Ojai, California, in 

7 compensation for payments he was entitled to but did not 

8 receive for years 2011 through 2013 under the Primary 

9 Care Incentive Payment Program established under sec10 tion 1833(x) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

11 1395l(x)) and in consideration of the fact— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 423 IH

1 (1) that Robert Feiss has served as an out2 spoken advocate for the health care needs of his pa3 tients through his work as a primary care physician; 

4 and 

5 (2) that, on May 30, 2018, the United States 

6 Court of Federal Claims found that ‘‘It appears 

7 that, through no fault of his own, plaintiff has lost 

8 over $39,000 in government Medicare incentive pay9 ments that he was entitled to by providing Family 

10 Practice services’’ and that ‘‘the evidence strongly 

11 supports plaintiff’s argument that he was providing 

12 Family Practice services and should have been clas13 sified as such, but a coding error denied plaintiff 

14 this status for several years’’. 

15 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM. 

16 The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfac17 tion of any claims that Robert Feiss may have against 

18 the United States arising on the basis of payments owed 

19 for years 2011 through 2013 under the Primary Care In20 centive Payment Program described in section 1(1)(B). 

21 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES. 

22 Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under sec23 tion 1 shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney 

24 for services rendered in connection with the recovery of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 423 IH

1 such sum. Any person who violates this section shall be 

2 fined under title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Monte Zweben, the Chief Executive Officer of Blue Martini Software, Inc. (the Company), and Robert E. Cell, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, to the which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Periodic Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of quarter covered by the Periodic Report and the
results of operations of the Company for that quarter.



Dated: March 25, 2003



/s/    MONTE
ZWEBENMonte Zweben Chief Executive Officer




/s/    ROBERT E.
CELLRobert E. Cell Chief Financial Officer
Release:#3886-96

For Release:January 11, 1996

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ENTERED AGAINST MICHAEL TROPIANO d/b/a ARDMORE
    FINANCIAL SERVICES IN FILING OF JOINT CFTC AND SEC COMPLAINT

Tropiano d/b/a Ardmore Financial Services consents to entry of
    preliminary injunction freezing his assets and enjoining him from further violations of federal commodities and securities laws.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange
    Commission today jointly filed a five-count civil injunctive complaint
    against Michael Tropiano of Haddonfield, New Jersey. Tropiano, a registered
    commodity trading advisor doing business under the name Ardmore Financial
    Services is charged in the complaint with fraud, conversion of customer
    funds, failing to register as a commodity pool operator, and broker-dealer
    registration violations. The charges violate sections 4b(a), 4m, 4o, and
    9(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act, Section 5 and 17(a) of the Securities
    Act of 1993, and Section 10(b) and 15(a) the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Simultaneous with the filing of the
    complaint, Tropiano consented to entry of a preliminary injunction against
    him, enjoining him from further violations of the provisions charged, and
    freezing his assets. The injunction also orders Tropiano to account for
    assets under his control.

The complaint, filed in federal district court in Camden, New Jersey,
    alleges that from 1989 through 1995, Tropiano solicited funds for
    investments in pools ostensibly formed for the purpose of trading commodity
    futures contracts. Tropiano raised approximately $2.9 million from 118
    investors. After initially conducting some futures trading, Tropiano is
    alleged to have ceased trading the funds, and instead, used approximately
    $1.5 million from the investment pools to support his personal expenses.
    According to the complaint, Tropiano, however, continued to raise funds
    from investors by falsely representing that he was engaging in profitable
    trading, and issuing statements containing fictitious trading profits.

Approximately $350,000 of the remaining pool assets and $500,000 of
    Tropiano's personal assets which were purchased with proceeds of investor
    funds, have been frozen under the injunction and are being held in
    constructive trust for the benefit of the investors. The United States
    Attorney in Camden has filed a criminal complaint charging Tropiano with
    mail fraud for the activities that brought about the civil action.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission gratefully acknowledges the
    assistance of the Office of the United States Attorney in Camden, New
    Jersey, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in this matter.

# # # # #

---
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Renegade Venture
     (NEV.) Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date: August 17, 2004


/s/  John B. Sawyer
-----------------------------------
     John B. Sawyer, President
     and COO
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0546

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRUCE DELANEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 20, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve his opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 14 2024

08/14/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0546
Stephanie McGEE, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES STATE HEARING OFFICE, et al.

No. 17-6164.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30280) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-104127) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan of iParty Corp., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-159839) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-167823)  pertaining to the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-139951) pertaining to the offer and sale of iParty Corp. common stock of our report dated March 24, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of iParty Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 25, 2010.

 

 
|                  |   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                  |   |                           |
| Boston, Massachusetts |   |                           |
| March 24, 2011   |   |                           |

 

----
July 10 , 201 2



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JERRY DOHALICK , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 0 1157

- CV V.

MOODY NATIONAL BANK , Appellee

____________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee MOODY
NATIONAL BANK signed September 2 , 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We order the judgment of the court below REVERSED to the extent that the trial court
render ed judgment against appellant JERRY DOHALICK , and we RENDER judgment
that appellee MOODY NATIONAL BANK take nothing from appellant JERRY
DOHALICK

. We order appellee MOODY NATIONAL BANK to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/06/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       76,674
COMMITMENTS
     472    9,845    3,907   62,476   48,595   66,855   62,347    9,819   14,327

CHANGES FROM 06/29/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,227)
      46      255    1,252    1,016      907    2,314    2,414   -1,087   -1,187

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.6     12.8      5.1     81.5     63.4     87.2     81.3     12.8     18.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       2       13        7       20       25       29       38
```

----

Updated July 9, 2010
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/26/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       47,810
COMMITMENTS
   3,115    6,023    5,681   30,160   29,119   38,956   40,823    8,854    6,987

CHANGES FROM 01/19/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,653)
     904     -500    1,320  -13,589  -13,784  -11,365  -12,964   -4,288   -2,689

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.5     12.6     11.9     63.1     60.9     81.5     85.4     18.5     14.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       9        9        9       19       19       33       33
```

----

Updated January 29, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES HILLER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 25 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Kenney Shi LAI, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

No. 17-6450.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/28/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       28,029
COMMITMENTS
   5,731      261    1,437   13,687   18,617   20,854   20,315    7,175    7,714

CHANGES FROM 04/21/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,711)
     658      -26     -187   -1,101      257     -629       45   -1,083   -1,756

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.4      0.9      5.1     48.8     66.4     74.4     72.5     25.6     27.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       39)
      11        1        7       24       18       36       26
```

----

Updated May 1, 2009