alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


Official Journal C 202A/30 A


| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| Official Journal of the European Union | | C 202A |
| European flag | | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 50 30 August 2007 |

---

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Notice No | Contents | page |
| | V   Announcements | |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES | |
| | European Parliament | |
| 2007/C 202A/01 | [Recruitment Notices: guide for candidates in Procedures organised by the European Parliament](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.CA.2007.202.01.0001.01.ENG.xhtml) | 1 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 202A/02 | [Notice to candidates with electronic access to this text](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.CA.2007.202.01.0004.01.ENG.xhtml) | 4 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 202A/03 | [Recruitment Notice PE/109/S](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.CA.2007.202.01.0005.01.ENG.xhtml) | 5 |
| | | |

---

NOTICE TO READERS

| | |
| --- | --- |
| BG | Настоящият брой на Официален вестник е публикуван единствено на английски, немски и френски език. |
| CS | Toto číslo Úředního věstníku vychází pouze v angličtine, francouzšině a němčině. |
| DA | Dette EU-Tiende offentliggøres udelukkende på engelsk, fransk og tysk. |
| DE | Dieses Amtsblatt wird nur in Deutsch, Englisch und Französisch veröffentlicht. |
| EL | Η παρούσα Επίσημη Εφημερίδα εκδίδεται μόνο στη γερμανική, την αγγλική και τη γαλλική γλώσσα. |
| EN | This Official Journal is only published in English, French and German. |
| ES | El presente Diario Oficial se publica únicamente en las lenguas alemana, francesa e inglesa. |
| ET | Käesolev Euroopa Liidu Teataja number ilmub ainult iglise, prantsuse ja saksa keeles. |
| FI | Tämä virallisen lehden numero julkaistaan ainoastaan englannin, ranskan ja saksan kielellä. |
| FR | Le présent Journal officiel est uniquement publié en langues allemande, anglaise et française. |
| GA | Tá an Iris Oifigiúl seo á foilsiú i mBéarla, i bhFraincis agus i nGearmáinis amháin. |
| HU | A Hivatalos Lapnak ez a száma kizárólag német, angol és francia nyelven jelenik meg. |
| IT | La presente Gazzetta ufficiale è pubblicata solo in lingua tedesca, inglese e francese. |
| LT | Šis Oficialusis leidinys leidžiamas tik anglų, prancūzų ir vokiečių kalbomis. |
| LV | Šis Oficiālais Vēstnesis ir publicēts tikai angļu, franču um vācu valodā. |
| MT | Dan il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ser ikun ippubblikat biss bl-Ingliż, bil-Franċiż u bil-Ġermaniż. |
| NL | Dit Publicatieblad verschijnt uitsluitend in het Duits, het Engels en het Frans. |
| PL | Niniejszy Dziennik Urzędowy jest publikowany jedynie w językach niemieckim, angielskim i francuskim. |
| PT | O presente Jornal Oficial é apenas publicado nas línguas alemã, inglesa e francesa. |
| RO | Prezentul Jurnal Oficial este publicat numai în limbile engleză, franceză şi germană. |
| SK | Tento úradný vestník vychádza iba v angličtine, francúzštine a nemčine. |
| SL | Ta Uradni list je objavljen samo v angleškem, francoskem in nemškem jeziku. |
| SV | Detta nummer av Europeiska unionens officela tidning utkommer endast på engelska, franska och tyska. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| EN | |
# L_2006245EN.01000801.xml

| 7.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/8

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 61/2006

of 2 June 2006

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 9/2006 of 27 January 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 9/2006 of 27 January 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2005/513/EC of 11 July 2005 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 GHz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (WAS/RLANs) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2005/513/EC of 11 July 2005 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 GHz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (WAS/RLANs) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5cr (Commission Decision 2005/50/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘5cs. | 32005 D 0513: Commission Decision 2005/513/EC of 11 July 2005 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 GHz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (WAS/RLANs) (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5cs.

32005 D 0513: Commission Decision 2005/513/EC of 11 July 2005 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 GHz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (WAS/RLANs) (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 22).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2005/513/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 June 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 92, 30.3.2006, p. 31.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 22.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
David P. RACHEL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6675.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/14/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      508,390
COMMITMENTS
  72,846   17,387  117,418  300,542  358,809  490,806  493,614   17,584   14,776

CHANGES FROM 12/07/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,854)
   9,519   -2,628   -1,336  -16,159   -3,598   -7,976   -7,562   -7,878   -8,292

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.3      3.4     23.1     59.1     70.6     96.5     97.1      3.5      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      118)
      42       10       43       60       63      112      107
```

----

Updated December 17, 2010
Terrance MILAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6125.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Durham Tropical Land Corporation, a Corporation, *Ap*pellant, v. Sun Garden Sales Company, a Corporation, J. F. Gowell, S. H. L. Newcombe, and C. E. Zimmerman, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed July 19, 1928.

Petition for rehearing denied March 2, 1929.

*Whitaker, Himes & Whitaker,*for Appellant ;

*Mabry, Reaves & Carlton,*for Appellees

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *1085the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Joseph JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
#### Mrs. A. S. Weinstein, joined by her husband, A. S. Weinstein, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. C. L. Farrell, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 15, 1929.

*Kay, Adams, Ragland*c§ *Kiorz,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*McWilliams, Perry <& Upchurch,*and *George C. Bedell,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, con*210sidered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said ■ judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Sylvester TOYER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6708.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Quepasa Corporation and Subsidiary on Form S-8, Nos. 333-88271, 333-93637, 333-118645 and 333-146486 of our report dated March 23, 2009 on the consolidated financial statements of Quepasa Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and for the year then ended appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of Quepasa Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.











/s/ SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.

Boca Raton, Florida

March 31, 2009
Certificate	 	_________Shares
	No.
    C- ___	 	 


 


Incorporated
in the State of Nevada


December
23, 1985


 


SIGMA
LABS, INC.


 


SERIES
C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK


(See
the reverse of this certificate for information on how to obtain a copy of the


rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions of each class or series of shares)


 


THIS
CERTIFIES that ________________________is the record holder of ______________shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of
Sigma Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, transferable only on the share register of the corporation, in person or by duly authorized
attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned.


 


This
certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation
and the Bylaws of the corporation and any amendments thereto, to all of which the holder of this certificate by acceptance hereby
assents.


 


WITNESS
the signatures of its duly authorized officers this ______ day of ___________, 201_


 


	 	 	 
	John
    Rice, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	 	Nannette
    Toups, Secretary


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


THE
CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE,
PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS
OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE MADE TO THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION AT ITS PRINCIPAL
BUSINESS OFFICE.


 


SIGMA
LABS, INC.


 





 



 


	PLEASE
                                         INSERT SOCIAL

                                                                                SECURITY
                                         OR OTHER

                                                                                IDENTIFYING
                                         NUMBER OF

                                                                                ASSIGNEE
	 	






	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 







 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, _________________________________hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto





 


PLEASE
PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE


________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________Shares of the Preferred Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint ________________________ Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power
of substitution in the premises.


 


	Dated:___________
    20___	 	 
	 	Signature:	
    X ____________________________
	Signature(s)
    Guaranteed:	 	 
	 	Signature:	X ____________________________


 


THE
SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Jacques Patrick WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 17-5701.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit denied.
Michael Joseph DERROW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9113.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Gabrielle GOODWIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

No. 16-1083.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4068 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4068

 To require the United States Commission on Civil Rights to establish 
 advisory committees for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United 
  States, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and 
                            American Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

 Mr. Serrano (for himself, Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico, Mr. San 
 Nicolas, Mr. Sablan, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Radewagen, 
 Mr. Soto, and Ms. Plaskett) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the United States Commission on Civil Rights to establish 
 advisory committees for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United 
  States, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and 
                            American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Commission Territorial 
Equality Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES FOR PUERTO RICO, THE 
              VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES, GUAM, THE 
              COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND 
              AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) Establishment.--The 2d sentence of section 3(d) of the Civil 
Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975a(d)) is amended by 
striking ``and the District of Columbia'' and all that follows before 
the period at the end, and inserting ``, the District of Columbia, 
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, Guam, the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa 
composed of persons domiciled in that State, District, or territory''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3(f) of the Civil Rights 
Commission Act of 1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975a(f)) is amended by--
            (1) striking ``or'' after ``Government'' and inserting a 
        comma; and
            (2) inserting ``Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the 
        United States, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
        Islands, or American Samoa,'' after ``States,''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the 1st day of the 1st fiscal year that begins after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Benny STEWART, petitioner, v. Tom GREEN, Warden, et al.

No. 16-9100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Alex VOLINO, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-8325.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                                     June 30,                       June 30,
                                                            --------------------------    ---------------------------
                                                               2001            2000           2001           2000
                                                            -----------    -----------    -----------     -----------
                                                                 (In thousands, except share and per share data)

<S>                                                         <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Average common shares outstanding....................         8,912,501      6,072,588      8,868,572       6,106,169

Average common stock equivalents of warrants
   and options outstanding - based on the treasury
   stock method using market price...................            65,199         21,673         63,803          31,932
                                                            -----------    -----------    -----------     -----------

Average diluted common shares outstanding............         8,977,700      6,094,261      8,932,375       6,138,101
                                                            ===========    ===========    ===========     ===========

Net income...........................................       $     2,804    $     1,586    $     5,365     $     3,221

Basic earnings per common share......................              0.31           0.26           0.60            0.53

Diluted earnings per common share....................              0.31           0.26           0.60            0.52
</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

423 

CA 11-02265 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

GERTRUDE A. LANE AND GEORGE A. LANE, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TEXAS ROADHOUSE HOLDINGS, LLC, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (JONATHAN H. BARD OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

RICHARD J. SARDANO, PC, LIVERPOOL (JOHN E. HEISLER, JR., OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered May 3, 2011 in a personal injury

action. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment

dismissing the complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging that a

“dangerous and defective condition” on defendant’s property caused

Gertrude A. Lane (plaintiff) to slip and fall. Defendant appeals from

an order denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the

complaint. We reject the contention of defendant that it met its

initial burden on the motion by establishing as a matter of law that

plaintiffs were unable to identify what caused plaintiff to fall 

“ ‘without engaging in speculation’ ” (Smart v Zambito, 85 AD3d 1721,

1722). “It is well established . . . that ‘[a] moving party must

affirmatively [demonstrate] the merits of its cause of action or

defense and does not meet its burden by noting gaps in its opponent’s

proof’ ” (Dodge v City of Hornell Indus. Dev. Agency, 286 AD2d 902,

903, quoting Orcutt v American Linen Supply Co., 212 AD2d 979, 980;

see Brown v Smith, 85 AD3d 1648, 1649). “Although [mere] conclusions

based upon surmise, conjecture, speculation or assertions are without

probative value . . ., a case of negligence based wholly on

circumstantial evidence may be established if the plaintiffs show[ ]

facts and conditions from which the negligence of the defendant and

the causation of the accident by that negligence may be reasonably

inferred” (Seelinger v Town of Middletown, 79 AD3d 1227, 1229

[internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, although plaintiff was

unable to identify the specific source of her fall at her deposition
-2- 423 

CA 11-02265 

due to the onset of unrelated mental status issues, plaintiffs 

“submitt[ed] evidence establishing that she fell in the immediate

vicinity of [several uneven and unsteady pavement blocks of which

defendant had actual notice], thereby rendering any other potential

cause of her fall ‘sufficiently remote or technical to enable [a] jury

to reach [a] verdict based not upon speculation, but upon the logical

inferences to be drawn from the evidence’ ” (Nolan v Onondaga County,

61 AD3d 1431, 1432).

We have considered the remaining contentions of the parties and

conclude that they are without merit, or need not be addressed in

light of our determination.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court