alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                       AMENDMENT TO FULFILLMENT AGREEMENT

     Reference is made to that certain Fulfillment Agreement (the "Fulfillment
Agreement") dated July 8, 1999, by and between Taymark, a division of Taylor
Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation with its principal place of business at
4875 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 ("Taymark") and iParty
Corp., a Delaware corporation then having its principal place of business at 41
East 11th Street, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10003, and now having its
principal place of business at 1457 VFW Parkway, West Roxbury, MA 02132
("iParty"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have
the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Fulfillment Agreement.

     WHEREAS, the parties to the Fulfillment Agreement desire to amend the
Fulfillment Agreement and extend the term thereof;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained
and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, Taymark and iParty hereby agree to amend the Fulfillment
Agreement and extend its term as follows:

     1.   AMENDMENT.

SECTION 2.1

     Section 2.1 of the Fulfillment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the
     provisions contained in that section and inserting the following:

               This Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof and shall
               terminate (unless terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of
               Section 11 hereof) on the earlier occurring of (a) the effective
               date of a superceding license agreement between the parties; or
               (b) May 31, 2003.

     2.   EFFECTIVENESS. This Amendment to Fulfillment Agreement is effective as
of December 31, 2002.

     3.   COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts.

                  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

<Page>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the 31st day of December, 2002.

IPARTY CORP.                              TAYMARK, A DIVISION OF
                                          TAYLOR CORPORATION


By:     /s/ Patrick Farrell               By:     /s/ Jonathan Staruck
    -------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Name:       Patrick Farrell               Name:       Jonathan Staruck
      -----------------------------             --------------------------------
Title:      President                     Title:      General Manager
       ----------------------------              -------------------------------

                                        2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R ON NI E OWE N, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 30023 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 0 9 8 - F VS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on F r e d L . V an S i c kl e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dF I S H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R o n n ie O w e n ap p e a ls f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t an dc h a lle n g e s h is gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on and 36- m onth s e nt e nc e f ori de nt i tythe f

t , i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . § 1028( a ) ( 3) . P ur s uantt o A n de r s v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ),



# FI LED JAN 02 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 30023 2 O w e n’ s c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng tha tthe r e a r e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d O w e n the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a n s w e r in g b r ie f

h a s b e e n f

ile d . O w e n w a iv e dh is r ig h t to ap p e a l h is c o n v ic tio n . H e a ls o w a iv e dth e r ig h t to appe a l hi s s e nt e nc e , w i th the e xc e pt i on of hi s r i ghtt o c ha l l e nge the a m ountof r e s t i tut i on. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U . S . 75, 80 ( 1988) , di s c l os e s no a r guabl e gr ounds f orr e l i e f a s the a m ountof r e s titu tio n o r d e r e db yth e d is tr ic t c o u rt. W e th e r e f o r e a f f irm a s to th a t is s u e . W e d is m is s th e r e m a in d e ro f th e ap p e a l in lig h t o f

th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . See U ni ted States v . W

at s on , 58 2 F . 3d 97 4, 98 8 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. O w en ’ s m o t i o n fo r ap p o i n tm en to f su b st i tu t e co u n sel i s DE NI E D. A F F IR M E D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
# L_2014310EN.01003501.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 82/2014

of 16 May 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2013/196/EU of 24 April 2013 amending Implementing Decision 2012/715/EU establishing a list of third countries with a regulatory framework applicable to active substances for medicinal products for human use and the respective control and enforcement activities ensuring a level of protection of public health equivalent to that in the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2013/196/EU of 24 April 2013 amending Implementing Decision 2012/715/EU establishing a list of third countries with a regulatory framework applicable to active substances for medicinal products for human use and the respective control and enforcement activities ensuring a level of protection of public health equivalent to that in the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 15qb (Commission Implementing Decision 2012/715/EU) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 D 0196: Commission Implementing Decision 2013/196/EU of 24 April 2013 (OJ L 113, 25.4.2013, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 D 0196: Commission Implementing Decision 2013/196/EU of 24 April 2013 (OJ L 113, 25.4.2013, p. 22).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision 2013/196/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 17 May 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 25.4.2013, p. 22.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
SYPNOSYS, INC., petitioner, v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION.

No. 16-1288.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
# L_2014211EN.01003801.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 28/2014

of 14 February 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 66ua (Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66ub. | 32013 R 0409: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (OJ L 123, 4.5.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66ub.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 228/2013 of 13 December 2013 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 123, 4.5.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 154, 22.5.2014, p. 25.

2

---
Larry Lee SMITH, petitioner, v. Patti WACHTENDORF, Warden.

No. 17M34.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Pamela MORELAND, petitioner, v. LYNCHBURG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES.

No. 17-5617.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Harold L. WILBORN, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 16-1469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2014256EN.01004101.xml

| 28.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 62/2014

of 30 April 2014

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 421/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in view of the implementation by 2020 of an international agreement applying a single global market-based measure to international aviation emissions (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 421/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in view of the implementation by 2020 of an international agreement applying a single global market-based measure to international aviation emissions (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21al (Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0421: Regulation (EU) No 421/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 (OJ L 129, 30.4.2014, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0421: Regulation (EU) No 421/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 (OJ L 129, 30.4.2014, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 421/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 129, 30.4.2014, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**Exhibit      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

*Jonathan      LaBarre*

|                                   |            |                                                                                                                                             |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |       |                                                                                                                                        |
| Date: March              29, 2007 | By:   | * /s/              Jonathan              LaBarre               * |
|                                   | Name:           |  Jonathan LaBarre                                                                                                                           |
|                                   | Title:          |  Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                               |
|                                   |            |                                                                                                                                             |
|                              |            |
|                                   |            |

----
Morgan Joseph LANGAN, petitioner, v. Margaret DOWNIE, et al.

No. 16-9437.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4186 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the credit for 

electricity produced from certain renewable resources and the investment 

credit for certain qualified investment credit facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 13, 2019 

Ms. STEFANIK (for herself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the credit for electricity produced from certain renewable 

resources and the investment credit for certain qualified 

investment credit facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewable Electricity 

5 Tax Credit Equalization Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4186 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED INVEST2 MENT CREDIT FACILITIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 48(a)(5)(C)(ii) of the In4 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol5 lows: 

6 ‘‘(ii) which is placed in service after 

7 2008 and the construction of which begins 

8 before January 1, 2018 (January 1, 2020, 

9 in the case of any facility which is de10 scribed in paragraph (1) of section 45(d) 

11 or January 1, 2025, in the case of any fa12 cility which is described in paragraph (2), 

13 (3), (4), (6), (7), (9) or (11) of section 

14 45(d)), and’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to facilities the construction of 

17 which begins after December 31, 2017. 

18 SEC. 3. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF PRODUCTION 

19 CREDITS FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES. 

20 (a) EXTENSION OF CREDIT.—Paragraphs (2), (3), 

21 (4), (6), (7), (9), and (11) of section 45(d) of the Internal 

22 Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking 

23 ‘‘January 1, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2025’’. 

24 (b) FULL CREDIT ALLOWED FOR CERTAIN FACILI25 TIES.—Section 45(b)(4)(A) of such Code is amended by 

26 inserting ‘‘and the construction of which began before the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4186 IH

1 date of the enactment of the Renewable Electricity Tax 

2 Credit Equalization Act’’ after ‘‘subsection (d)’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

4 (1) EXTENSION.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply to facilities the construc6 tion of which begins after December 31, 2017. 

7 (2) ALLOWANCE OF FULL CREDIT.—The 

8 amendment made by subsection (b) shall apply to fa9 cilities the construction of which begins on or after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60346 Summary Calendar

JORGE ULISES ALANIZ

- HUETE , Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A 098 685 484

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Ulises Alaniz

- Huete (Alaniz), a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) , which dismissed his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of a motion to reopen his in absentia removal proceeding. He argues that the in absentia removal order was improper because an incomplete address was used to serve the notice and it was not his fault that the file contained an incomplete address.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 7, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60346 Document: 00512553283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2014N o. 13

- 60346

As the BIA determined, the notice to appear (NTA), which was personally served on Alaniz an d which he signed , contains the address to which the hearing notice w as mailed. The NTA advised Alaniz of his obligation to apprise the court of his full mailing address, and he was also advised of the consequences of his failure to appear at a hearing. T he record is devoid of evidence that indicates that Alaniz attempted to notify the immigration court
that the address on the NTA was incomplete or incorrect

. Alaniz therefore did not comply with his obligation to keep his address current and his failure to do so precludes him from obtaining relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii) (providing for rescission of a removal order only when failure to appear was through no fault of the alien) ; Gomez

- Palacios v. Holder, 560 F.3d 354, 3 60

- 61 (5th Cir. 2009) (affirming the BIA’s denial of an appeal from an in absentia removal when the alien failed to comply with his obligation to provide current address information). T he BIA ’s ruling therefore was not an abuse of
discretion. See § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii); Gomez

- Palacios , 560 F.3d at 3 58

. The petition for review is DENIED.

2 Case: 13-60346 Document: 00512553283 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2014
Dennis HALL, petitioner, v. Steven RIVARD, Warden.

No. 17-6031.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jaylan Rochard WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-6333.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District denied.
Jerome BROOKS, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 17-8687.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.