alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013079EN.01000401.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/4

---

Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters

According to Article 3(2) of the Agreement of 19 October 2005 between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) (hereafter the Agreement), concluded by Council Decision 2006/325/EC (2), whenever amendments to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (3) are adopted, Denmark shall notify the Commission of its decision whether or not to implement the content of such amendments.

1

2

3

Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (4) was adopted on 12 December 2012.

4

In accordance with Article 3(2) of the Agreement, Denmark has by letter of 20 December 2012 notified the Commission of its decision to implement the contents of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012. This means that the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 will be applied to relations between the Union and Denmark.

In accordance with Article 3(6) of the Agreement, the Danish notification creates mutual obligations between Denmark and the Community. Thus, Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 constitutes an amendment to the Agreement and is considered annexed thereto.

With reference to Article 3(3) and (4) of the Agreement, implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 in Denmark can take place by amending existing legislation by the decision of Danish Parliament. In accordance with Article 3(5)(b) of the Agreement, Denmark shall notify the Commission of the date upon which such implementing legislative measures enter into force.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 62.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 120, 5.5.2006, p. 22.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1.

4

---
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.3
JOINDER AGREEMENT
This Joinder Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2018, (this “Joinder Agreement”) is a joinder to the Governance Agreement, dated October 6, 2017, by and among TerraForm Power, Inc. (the “Company”), Orion US Holdings 1 L.P. (“Sponsor”) and the other parties party thereto from time to time (the “Governance Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Governance Agreement.
1.The undersigned, having received and reviewed a copy of the Governance Agreement, hereby agrees to be bound by the terms, conditions and other provisions of the Governance Agreement as though it is a “Sponsor Party” under the Governance Agreement, with all attendant rights, duties and obligations stated therein applicable to the “Sponsor Parties” in the same manner as if the undersigned were party to the Governance Agreement as of the date on which it was originally executed.
2.    The undersigned represents and warrants to the Company that it is a Controlled Affiliate of Brookfield.
3.    This Joinder Agreement shall be deemed to be made in and in all respects shall be interpreted, governed by and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to applicable principles of conflicts of law to the extent that the application of the laws of another jurisdiction would be required thereby.
4.    This Joinder Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all the counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. This Joinder Agreement and any signed agreement or instrument entered into in connection with this Joinder Agreement, and any amendments or waivers hereto and thereto, to the extent signed and delivered by facsimile or in electronic format (e.g., “pdf” or “tif”) shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original agreement or instrument and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder Agreement as of the date first written above.
BROOKFIELD BRP HOLDINGS (CANADA) INC.


By:    /s/ Jennifer Mazin    
Name: Jennifer Mazin
Title: Senior Vice President                and Secretary
AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:
TERRAFORM POWER, INC.


By:    /s/ Andrea Rocheleau    
Name: Andrea Rocheleau
Title: General Counsel
ORION US HOLDINGS 1 L.P., by its 
general partner, ORION US GP LLC


By:    /s/ Julian Deschatelets    
Name: Julian Deschatelets
Title: Senior Vice President












[Signature Page to Joinder Agreement]
William B. AOSSEY, Jr., Midamar Corporation, and Jalel Aossey, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-583.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 142/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 142 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4917 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 142

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4917 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 142/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 142/2 | Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons, entitled ‘Permis de Ger’)
   (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 142/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4233 — BP France/Vitogaz/Energaz JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 142/4 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (1) | 5 |
| 2006/C 142/5 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (1) | 14 |
| 2006/C 142/6 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 21 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 142/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 142/2

Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons, entitled ‘Permis de Ger’)
   (1)

(Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons, entitled ‘Permis de Ger’)

2

2006/C 142/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4233 — BP France/Vitogaz/Energaz JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

2006/C 142/4

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (1)

5

2006/C 142/5

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (1)

14

2006/C 142/6

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Servando BENITEZ-REYNOSO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8950.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2012207EN.01003601.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 56/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Implementing Decision 2011/453/EU of 13 July 2011 adopting guidelines for reporting by the Member States under Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Decision 2011/453/EU of 13 July 2011 adopting guidelines for reporting by the Member States under Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 17ka (Commission Decision 2011/C 135/03) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘17kb. | 32011 D 0453: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/453/EU of 13 July 2011 adopting guidelines for reporting by the Member States under Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 48).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘17kb.

32011 D 0453: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/453/EU of 13 July 2011 adopting guidelines for reporting by the Member States under Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 48).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2011/453/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 31 March 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 48.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3876 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3876

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure the solvency of 
  the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund by extending the excise tax on 
                                 coal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2019

   Mr. Scott of Virginia (for himself and Ms. Adams) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure the solvency of 
  the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund by extending the excise tax on 
                                 coal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Black Lung Benefits Disability Trust 
Fund Solvency Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BLACK LUNG DISABILITY TRUST FUND EXCISE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 4121(e)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2018'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2029''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply on and after the first day of the first calendar month beginning 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 60019 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL A. DE GRAFFENRIED , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS, INCORPORATED , Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:14

- CV

- 9

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff

- Appellant Michael A. de Graffenried appeals the grant of summary judgment and the dismissal of his defamation lawsuit against his former employer, Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc. (Smithway). In his pro se lawsuit, de Graffenried alleged that Smithwa y had defamed him by reporting that his employment was terminated because he had refused a drug and alcohol test following a workplace injury. The district court granted summary

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 5, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-60019 Document: 00513706153 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2016No. 16

- 60019

2 judgment because de Graffenried had failed to establish a genuine issue of

ma terial fact regarding the truth of Smithway’s representation , and in Mississippi, truth is an absolute defense to a defamation lawsuit. See Journal Publ’g Co. v. McCullough , 743 So. 2d 352, 360 (Miss. 1999).
Even t hough he disputes some irrelevant factual findings in the district court’s opinion, de Graffenried does not challenge the district court’s analysis of his defamation claim. He does not identify any legal error for review by us, and he does not cite any legal authority to support overturning the grant of summary judgment. Although we appl y less stringent standards to parties proceeding pro se than to parties represented by counsel , and we liberally
construe the briefs of pro se litigants, parties proceeding pro se must still brief
the issues and reasonably comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 28 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995). As de Graffenried has not challenged the district court’s reasons for dismissing his defamation action, he is deemed to have abandoned the sole issue before us. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (holding that, when an appellant fails to identi fy any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the judgment). In light of de Graffenried’s abandonment of his claim, the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-60019 Document: 00513706153 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/05/2016
Mark MARTIN, Arkansas Secretary of State, petitioner, v. Mark MOORE.

No. 17-156.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Julius Michael ENGEL, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5244.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/13/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      132,334
COMMITMENTS
  37,799   23,457   17,820   57,123   65,249  112,743  106,527   19,591   25,807

CHANGES FROM 10/06/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,227)
     560   -2,162      883    1,695    3,616    3,138    2,337    1,089    1,890

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.6     17.7     13.5     43.2     49.3     85.2     80.5     14.8     19.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      44       32       37       60       58      127      112
```

----

Updated October 16, 2009
In Re Robert GLASSGOW, petitioner.

No. 17-5380.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Jon Karl THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6218.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

*434Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         669,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               810,870
<PP&E>                                      16,156,436
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,091,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,875,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,875,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,875,924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,601
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (53,630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACTV,  Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,  2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, Christopher C. Cline, Chief Financial Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |  1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |     |                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2)       | The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of      operations of the Company. |

 

|   | By:      Name:      Title: | */s/* Christopher C. Cline      Christopher C. Cline       Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----