alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999 Broadway
Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1


<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      4,268,000 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                     49,845,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             16,885,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             40,668,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                    25,466,000
<COMMON>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 13,768,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               40,668,000
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            4,849,000
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               3,676,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         (1,215,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (33,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (33,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (33,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (71.74)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (71.74)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>
Includes $475,000 of restricted cash.
<F2>
Primary EPS and diluted EPS include ($47.83) per Preferred Unit of Limited
Partnership Interest.
</FN>



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6325

TITUS MIL-QUIGLESS COTTEN, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. MARVIN POLK, Warden of Central Prison, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-hc-02119-H) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Titus Mil-Quigless Cotten, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Titus Mil-Quigless Cotten seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 23, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on February 25, 2008. *Because Cotten failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of iParty Corp (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat to his knowledge, on the date hereof the Company’s annual report on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 26, 2009, filed on the date hereofwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 23,  2010 | /s/ DAVID ROBERTSON       |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                             | David Robertson           |
|                             | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Dean D. Durbin, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)/s/ DEAN D. DURBINDean D. DurbinChief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer(principal financial officer)


Date: January 9, 2009

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 10.22


                                Musicmaker.com
                              1831 Wiehle Avenue
                                   Suite 128
                            Reston, Virginia  20190
                    Phone (703) 904-4110  Fax (703) 904-4117


December 31, 1999



To: Devarajan S. Puthkarai

From:  Mark Fowler

RE: Loan against future bonus and expenses.


Raju:

Please review and sign the statement below with reference to your loan
outstanding to musicmaker.com.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Devarajan S. Puthukarai, at December 31, 1999, have an advance of $81,519,
payable over three years, beginning January 1, 2000.

This note bears interest at 8% per annum.



/s/ Devarajan S. Puthukarai                 January 1, 2000
----------------------------                ---------------
Devarajan S. Puthukarai                          Date

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 703-904-4110.

Sincerely,


/s/ Mark A. Fowler
------------------
Mark A. Fowler, CPA
CFO & Vice President, Finance and Administration
musicmaker.com
Willie BASSETT, Jr., petitioner, v. Connie HORTON, Warden.

No. 17-8657.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Ariel ACEVEDO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6484.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# L_2014154EN.01002001.xml

| 22.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 223/2013

of 13 December 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2009/135/EC of 3 November 2009 allowing temporary derogations to certain eligibility criteria for whole blood and blood components donors laid down in Annex III to Directive 2004/33/EC in the context of a risk of shortage caused by the Influenza A(H1N1) pandemic (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, expired on 30 June 2010 and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2009/135/EC of 3 November 2009 allowing temporary derogations to certain eligibility criteria for whole blood and blood components donors laid down in Annex III to Directive 2004/33/EC in the context of a risk of shortage caused by the Influenza A(H1N1) pandemic (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, expired on 30 June 2010 and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | For practical reasons, the acts listed under the heading
  ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’
  in Chapter XIII of Annex II shall be renumbered. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

For practical reasons, the acts listed under the heading
  ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’
  in Chapter XIII of Annex II shall be renumbered.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The text of point 15zk (Directive 2009/135/EC) is deleted. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The text of point 15zk (Directive 2009/135/EC) is deleted.

| 2. | Under the heading
  ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’
  points 16 (Commission Communication 310/86) to 18 (Commission Decision 2010/453/EU) are renumbered points 1 to 3. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Under the heading
  ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’
  points 16 (Commission Communication 310/86) to 18 (Commission Decision 2010/453/EU) are renumbered points 1 to 3.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 288, 4.11.2009, p. 7.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 17, 2014

p0917

Order 

Clerk

September 17, 2014

148311

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148311

COA: 312518

Bay CC: 12-010076-FH

DUSTIN JOHN KOSIK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Vernice ROBINSON, petitioner, v. Kenneth ROMANOWSKI, Warden.

No. 17-5867.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2011311EN.01001302.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/13

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania)) — Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău v Lilia Druțu

(Case C-438/10) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first indent of the Rules of Procedure - Internal impositions - Article 110 TFEU - Introduction of a pollution tax on first registration of motor vehicles)

2011/C 311/19

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bacău

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău

Applicants:

Defendant: Lilia Druțu

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Curtea de Appel Bacău Comercială, Contencios Administrativ și Fiscal — Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States — Environmental tax on motor vehicles on first registration in a Member State — Compatibility of national legislation with Article 110 TFEU — Discrimination compared with second-hand vehicles already registered in that Member State and not subject to that tax on subsequent sale and new registration

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a Member State from introducing a pollution tax on motor vehicles on first registration in that Member State if that fiscal measure is set up in such a way as to discourage the placing on the market in that Member State of second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States without discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of a similar age and condition on the national market.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/24/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       26,944
COMMITMENTS
   4,238      730    1,667   13,119   17,102   19,024   19,499    7,920    7,444

CHANGES FROM 03/17/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        743)
     990      538       90       50      889    1,130    1,517     -386     -774

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    15.7      2.7      6.2     48.7     63.5     70.6     72.4     29.4     27.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
      12        3        8       23       20       37       30
```

----

Updated March 27, 2009
Neville McGARITY, aka Wraith, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### Harry A. Johnston, *Appellant,*v. Geo. W. Harvey Realty Company, a Florida corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*Wideman & Wideman*and *Manley P. Caldwell,*for Appellant ;

*Henry P. Lilienthal*and *John Dickinson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *229the order appealed from herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Btjford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Carl VAN PUTTEN, petitioner, v. David J. EBBERT, Warden.

No. 16-9726.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Carlos CAMACHO-SANTIAGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4299 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 553
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4299

                          [Report No. 116-669]

  To reauthorize through 2024 the National Geological and Geophysical 
                 Data Preservation Program Act of 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2019

Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Tonko, and Mr. Lowenthal) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

                           December 18, 2020

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
    [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on 
                          September 12, 2019]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize through 2024 the National Geological and Geophysical 
                 Data Preservation Program Act of 2005.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Data Preservation Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA 
              PRESERVATION PROGRAM ACT OF 2005.

    Subsection (k) of the National Geological and Geophysical Data 
Preservation Program Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15908(k)) is amended by 
striking ``2006 through 2010'' and inserting ``2020 through 2024''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 553

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4299

                          [Report No. 116-669]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To reauthorize through 2024 the National Geological and Geophysical 
                 Data Preservation Program Act of 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 18, 2020

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
[Cite as State v. Jones , 2018-Ohio-562.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio, :

Plaintiff-Appellee, :

v. : No. 17AP-759 (C.P.C. No. 05CR-2681) Keith L. Jones, : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. :

D E C I S I O N

Rendered on February 13, 2018

On brief: Ron O'Brien , Prosecuting Attorney, and Barbara A. Farnbacher , for appellee.

On brief: Keith L. Jones , pro se.

APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

TYACK, J. {¶ 1} Keith L. Jones is appealing from the trial court's failure to give him relief from what he asserts is a void judgment. He sets forth three assignments of error: [I.] THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT'S [sic] SENTENCING JOURNAL ENTRY DID NOT CONFORM TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS.

[II.] THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE CRIMINAL RULES UPON SENTENCING APPELLANT ON EACH COUNT OF CONVICTION.

[III.] THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY SENTENCING APPELLANT TO TEN YEARS OF COMMUNITY CONTROL.No. 17AP-759 2

{¶ 2} Jones was indicted in 2005. He was charged with seven crimes. {¶ 3} In 2007, Jones entered into a plea agreement under the terms of which he pled guilty to two of the charges and the remaining five charges were dismissed. {¶ 4} Jones did not appear at his sentencing hearings more than once which delayed his sentencing to December 2009. When he was finally sentenced, he was granted community control but was informed that if he violated the terms of his community control, he would be expected to serve ten years in prison. {¶ 5} Rather than successfully completing his community control, he absconded. He eventually was apprehended and admitted in open court that he had violated the terms of his community control. The ten-year sentence was enforced and he began serving his terms of imprisonment. {¶ 6} Jones appealed the enforcement of his sentence. The sentence was affirmed by this court. {¶ 7} Jones continued to contest his sentence in both state and federal courts, including more appeals to this appellate court. {¶ 8} The most recent appeal also fails for several reasons. The documents Jones filed in the trial court must be considered an untimely petition for postconviction relief. {¶ 9} Further, Jones presents no new facts, just his ongoing disagreement with the results of his prior appeals. As a result, the doctrine of res judicata should be applied. What he is arguing has already been decided. {¶ 10} In short, none of Jones's assignments of error has any merit. All three assignments of error are overruled. The judgment of the Franklin County Court of

Common Pleas is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

BRUNNER and HORTON, JJ., concur.