alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***Exhibit
32.2***
 
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Andrew
Kaplan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on Form
10-K of Audible Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Audible
Inc.
 
 
 March
      29, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/
      Andrew KaplanAndrew
      KaplanChief
      Financial Officer
Murat AKSU, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-1009.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of California Ventura County denied.
Exhibit 3.1
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          XSTREAM BEVERAGE GROUP, INC.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 78.385, Domestic and Foreign Corporation
Laws of the State of Nevada, the undersigned officers of the corporation certify
that the corporation, by and through its directors and shareholders have adopted
the following Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation

FIRST: ARTICLE IV is amended to read as follows:

                                   ARTICLE IV

         The corporation shall be authorized to issue two classes of shares of
capital stock, to be designated respectively "Common Stock" and "Preferred
Stock". The total number of shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock that the
Corporation shall be authorized to issue is 110 million (110,000,000) shares of
which 100 million (100,000,000) shall be designated Common Stock and ten million
(10,000,000) shall be designated Preferred Stock. The par value of the shares of
Common Stock is One Tenth of One Cent ($0.001) per share. The par value of the
shares of Preferred Stock is One Tenth of One Cent ($0.001) per share.

         The Shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or
more series. The Board of Directors is hereby authorized, by filing a
certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the state of Nevada, to establish
from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series and to fix
the designation, powers, preferences and the rights of the shares of each such
series and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof, including,
but not limited to, the the filing or alteration of the dividend rights,
dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption
(including sinking fund provisions) the redemption price or prices and the
liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued series of shares of Preferred
Stock, or any of them and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any
series subsequent to the issue of the shares of that series, not not below the
number of shares of that series then outstanding. In case the number of shares
of any series shall be decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shall
resume the status they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally
fixing the number of shares of that series.

                                       16
<PAGE>

SECOND: The designation and number of outstanding shares of each class or series
entitled to vote thereon, as a class or series, at the time of adoption,
represented a majority of the voting power of each class or such greater
proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote of
classes or series, or as may be required by the Articles of Incorporation have
voted in favor of the amendment

         Executed this ______ day of May 2004.




/s/ Barry Willson
--------------------------
Barry Willson
Vice Chairman
Everline Gesare NYABWARI, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          12,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    173,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               407,333
<PP&E>                                         636,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 329,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,065,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,096,785
<BONDS>                                        588,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,660,377
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,293,011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,065,950
<SALES>                                      1,531,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,531,344
<CGS>                                        1,019,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,674,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (142,837)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (142,837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        


</TABLE>
Darin A. JONES, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 16-1471.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Decornick MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8973.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jennifer FLETCHER, petitioner, v. Velda DOBSON-DAVIS, Warden.

No. 17-6718.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Tori K. COLLINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5412.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Darwin Jesus MEJIA-GUERRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5746.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4279 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Melinda Gene Piccotti Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4279 EH

1 SECTION 1. MELINDA GENE PICCOTTI POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, 

4 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Melinda Gene Piccotti Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Melinda Gene Piccotti 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4279 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPiccotti Post Office’’. Laceyville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Melinda Gene al Service located at 445 Main Street in
Raymond ALCORTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7709.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# Official Journal C 188A/11 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5011 August 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5011 August 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 188A/01 | Notice to the readers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 188A/01

Notice to the readers

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 188A/02 | Reserve lists — Open competitions — Assistants (AST1) in the secretarial field | 3 |
| 2007/C 188A/03 | Reserve lists — Open competitions — Assistants (AST1) in the secretarial field | 9 |
| 2007/C 188A/04 | Reserve lists — Open competitions — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) | 22 |
| 2007/C 188A/05 | Reserve list — Open competitions — EPSO/AD/69/06 — English-language linguistic administrators (AD5) (conference interpreters) | 25 |
| 2007/C 188A/06 | Reserve lists — Open competition — EPSO/AD/81/06 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) — With main language English | 26 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2007/C 188A/02

Reserve lists — Open competitions — Assistants (AST1) in the secretarial field

3

2007/C 188A/03

Reserve lists — Open competitions — Assistants (AST1) in the secretarial field

9

2007/C 188A/04

Reserve lists — Open competitions — Lawyer-linguists (AD7)

22

2007/C 188A/05

Reserve list — Open competitions — EPSO/AD/69/06 — English-language linguistic administrators (AD5) (conference interpreters)

25

2007/C 188A/06

Reserve lists — Open competition — EPSO/AD/81/06 — Lawyer-linguists (AD7) — With main language English

26

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32

                  1999 BROADWAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1999 Broadway Associates
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.



Date: August 14, 2003                              /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Michael L. Ashner
                                                   Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 14, 2003                              /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Thomas Staples
                                                   Chief Financial Officer







                                    20 of 20
Andrew JOHNSON, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 17-5155.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 23, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Nautilus, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|March 16, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Edward J. Bramson
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Edward J. Bramson,                  
|               |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
David Wayne WILSON, petitioner, v. David SWAN, et al.

No. 17-6058.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Loras L. STEINES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES' BUREAU OF HEARINGS, et al.

No. 17M68.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
#### Coleman Davis, Ted Truitt and R. V. Helms, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Opinion filed May 27, 1929.

W. *T. Bludworth,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Fred II. .Davis¡*Attorney General, and *II. E. Garter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted' of the larceny of a cow. The contention made in their behalf is that there was no evidence of “taking and carrying away.” There was, however, sufficient evidence to show that the cow was butchered at the place where she was shot, and the operations necessary to prepare the beef for market. *988almost completed, when the plaintiffs in error were discovered and ran away. The judgment of conviction is affirmed on authority of Driggers v. State, 118 So. R. 20.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
In Re Taryn CHRISTIAN, petitioner.

No. 17-6613.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Maurice A. MOSES, Sr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institution Division.

No. 17-6727.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS
                ------------------------------------------------
                    BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                    -----------------------------------------

Leased Automobiles

     The Registrant leases an automobile for each of its executive officers,
subject to certain lease "cap" limitations that vary by executive officer. The
Registrant reimburses the executive officer for all fuel, maintenance and
repairs costs for the leased automobile, and the Registrant insures the
automobile under its insurance programs. The Registrant also reimburses the
executive officer (by way of a "gross-up" payment) for taxes on imputed income
for personal use of the automobile.

Reimbursement for Financial and Tax Counseling

     The Registrant reimburses its President and Chief Executive Officer for up
to $15,000 (per year) of out-of-pocket expenses incurred to obtain financial
advice, estate planning advice, tax advice and/or tax return preparation. The
Registrant reimburses each of its other executive officers for up to $6,500 (per
year) of out-of-pocket expenses incurred to obtain financial advice, estate
planning advice, tax advice and/or tax return preparation.

Reimbursement for Annual Medical Examination

     The Registrant reimburses each of its executive officers for up to $1,000
(per year) of out-of-pocket expenses incurred for an annual medical examination.

Personal Use of Aircraft

     The President and Chief Executive Officer and his direct reports are
authorized, subject to certain requirements and limitations, to use the
Registrant's fractionally-owned aircraft for personal travel.
Jonathan HAAR, et ux., petitioners, v. Alice H. ALLEN, et al.

No. 17-6767.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Shirley A. KINNEMORE, petitioner, v. Matthew MOORE, Jr.

No. 17-5345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Edwena R. HEGNA, et al., v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-306 (R46-006).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 16, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
Jody Lee DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5955.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with BlackRock
  
    



  Pre-trade and post-trade transparency
      
  When
              08/10/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVIII. Real Time Reporting

  Organization(s)
              BlackRock


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
JARED LUCAS BROWN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FIL ED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 0875

Opinion filed April 1, 2015.

Amended Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Jared Lucas Brown, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respond ent.

PER CURIAM.

T he petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.