alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011318EN.01003701.xml

| 1.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 99/2011

of 30 September 2011

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2009/884/EC of 30 November 2009 amending Decision 2007/116/EC as regards the introduction of additional reserved numbers beginning with ‘116’ (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2009/884/EC of 30 November 2009 amending Decision 2007/116/EC as regards the introduction of additional reserved numbers beginning with ‘116’ (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 5cx (Commission Decision 2007/116/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 D 0884: Commission Decision 2009/884/EC of 30 November 2009 (OJ L 317, 3.12.2009, p. 46).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 D 0884: Commission Decision 2009/884/EC of 30 November 2009 (OJ L 317, 3.12.2009, p. 46).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2009/884/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 50.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 317, 3.12.2009, p. 46.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE
RECEIVEDELECTRIC NETWORK.COM, unconditionally promises to pay to or to the order ofIFG TRUST SERVICES INC.on demand at Vancouver, BC the sum of $50,000.00 (Fifty Thousand
Dollars) in US Funds, bearing 8% interest per annum.

The principal of
this Promissory Note shall be paid in US dollars without set-off or
counterclaim.

IFG Trust
Services Inc.waives presentment, protest and notice
of any kind in the enforcement of this Promissory Note.

Made at Vancouver, BC this 19thday of January, 2006.

ELECTRIC NETWORK.COM

|Per: |  | /s/ John Veltheer           
|---- |  | ----------------------------
|     |  | (Authorized Signing Officer)

IFG TRUST SERVICES
INC.

|Per: |  | /s/ Dan MacMullin           
|---- |  | ----------------------------
|     |  | (Authorized Signing Officer)

---
# C_2011173EN.01000902.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/9

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Köln — Germany) — Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Melanie Klintz

(Case C-312/10) (1)

1

2011/C 173/19

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.

1

---
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, J. David Brow, Secretary, Treasurer and director of The Electric Network.com, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Electric Network.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Electric Network.com, Inc.

Dated: March 31, 2005
| /s/ J. David Brow |
|-------------------|

J. David Brow

Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4325 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4325

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to clarify treatment of privileged 
     information after disclosure to the Commodity Futures Trading 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2019

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to clarify treatment of privileged 
     information after disclosure to the Commodity Futures Trading 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVILEGE RETENTION.

    Section 8 of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 12) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections 
        (i) and (j), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Sharing Privileged Information With Other Authorities.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    ``(A) Foreign law enforcement authority.--The term 
                `foreign law enforcement authority' means any foreign 
                authority that is empowered under foreign law to 
                detect, investigate, or prosecute potential violations 
                of law.
                    ``(B) Privilege.--The term `privilege' includes any 
                applicable work-product privilege, attorney-client 
                privilege, governmental privilege, or other privilege 
                recognized under Federal, State, or foreign law.
            ``(2) Privileged information provided by the commission.--
        The Commission shall not be considered to have waived any 
        privilege by transferring information to or permitting that 
        information to be used in accordance with subsection (e).
            ``(3) Nondisclosure of privileged information provided to 
        the commission.--The Commission shall not be compelled to 
        disclose privileged information obtained from any foreign 
        futures authority, or foreign law enforcement authority, if the 
        authority has in good faith determined and represented to the 
        Commission that the information is privileged.
            ``(4) Nonwaiver of privileged information provided to the 
        commission.--The entities listed in subsection (e) shall not be 
        considered to have waived any privilege by transferring 
        information to or permitting information to be used by the 
        Commission.''.
                                 <all>
```
Edward Robert STEINER, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; Edward Robert Steiner, petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; and Edward Robert Steiner, petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5921.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
In Re Joseph DICKEY, petitioner.

No. 17-6203.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                            Dated, November 12, 2007
                            /s/ Ian M. Herman
                            ---------------------------
                            Ian M. Herman
                            Chief Executive Officer
Marcus Dorrell BYRD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6555.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 441 

To require FERC to examine certain hydropower licences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. BABIN (for himself and Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require FERC to examine certain hydropower licences. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commonsense Flood 

5 Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXAMINATION OF LICENSES FOR CERTAIN 

7 PROJECTS LOCATED IN DISASTER AREAS. 

8 Not later than one year after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

10 shall examine each license issued by the Commission under 

11 part I of the Federal Power Act for the following projects: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 441 IH

1 (1) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

2 project numbered 2305. 

3 (2) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

4 project numbered 12362. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```
 
 
NATURAL GAS ICE HENRY HUB - ICE OTC                                  Code-023391
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/15/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Contracts of 2,500  MMBTU'S)                        OPEN INTEREST:    4,330,899
COMMITMENTS
 396,450   68,429  1579112  2321139  2660783  4296701  4308324   34,198   22,575

CHANGES FROM 06/08/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,002)
   7,337   14,291   74,302  -85,862  -92,312   -4,223   -3,719   -1,779   -2,283

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.2      1.6     36.5     53.6     61.4     99.2     99.5      0.8      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      216)
      39       35       72      129      126      205      201
```

----

Updated June 18, 2010
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  February 23, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                     
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                         | Marc N. Teal, Chief
Financial Officer



69
Muhannad SALIM, petitioner, v. Read A. RICHARDSON, Warden.

No. 17-6009.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# L_2012349EN.01000201.xml

| 19.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/2

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Russian Federation relating to the administration of tariff-rate quotas applying to exports of wood from the Russian Federation to the European Union and the Protocol between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on technical modalities pursuant to that Agreement

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Russian Federation relating to the administration of tariff-rate quotas applying to exports of wood from the Russian Federation to the European Union and the Protocol between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on technical modalities pursuant to that Agreement (1), signed in Geneva on 16 December 2011, is provisionally applied as from 22 August 2012, by virtue of the accession of the Russian Federation to the WTO on that date.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 57, 29.2.2012, p. 3.

1

---
**EX 99.2**

** **

DISCLOSUREUNDER ITEM 4 OF FORM 10-QSB REQUIRED BY ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

 

Under the supervision andwith the participation of our management, including our chief executive officerand chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosurecontrols and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c)promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”), within 90 days of the filing date of this report. Basedon their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal accountingofficer concluded that [identify registrant]’s disclosure controls andprocedures are effective.

 

Therehave been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to thedate of the evaluation referenced above.

 
| Dated:  November 11, 2002 | /s/  Keith Witter  |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      | Keith  Witter, Chairman |
|                      | Audit  Committee        |

 

----
Monica E. EWING, et vir, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, et al.

No. 17-123 (R46-004).

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 25, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Saja Ilene FEATHERSTONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6610.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Paul D. GIBBS, petitioner, v. Willie SMITH, Warden.

No. 17-6535.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Iskender KAPLLANI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6141.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE, et al., petitioners, v. Beryl A. HOWELL, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, et al.

No. 17-409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Motion of Jennifer Low for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,563
<PP&E>                                          41,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,755,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          637,051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,495
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,812,605
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  497,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (385,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                  ARONEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The following reflects the information used in calculating the number of shares
in the computation of net loss per share for each of the periods set forth in
the Statements of Operations.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            AVERAGE                     LOSS
                                                          DAYS                               SHARES                     PER
                                        SHARES         OUTSTANDING   SHARES X  DAYS       OUTSTANDING       LOSS       SHARE
<S>                                     <C>            <C>           <C>              <C> <C>             <C>          <C>
      QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998:
                                        15,459,166         11           170,050,826
                                        15,460,684         71         1,097,708,564
                                        15,465,729          1            15,465,729
                                        15,467,281          7           108,270,967
                                                           90         1,391,496,086   /90  15,461,068     (4,911,000)   (0.32)


      QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999:     16,379,309          3            49,137,927
                                        16,415,664         50           820,783,200
                                        22,415,664         14           313,819,296
                                        22,463,211         21           471,727,431
                                        22,474,987          1            22,474,987
                                        22,494,671          1            22,494,671
                                                           90         1,700,437,512   /90  18,893,750     (3,175,000)   (0.17)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1.1


Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

Board of Directors
International Fuel Technology, Inc.
St. Louis, Missouri

The audit referred to in our report dated April 7, 2000, (except for Note 12,
dated November 15, 2000) relating to the financial statements of International
Fuel Technology, Inc., which is referred to in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, include
the audit of the accompanying financial statement schedule. This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based upon our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
January 3, 2001
Steven E. ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-6352.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.