alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Todd HARWOOD, petitioner, v. Susan Jean KING.

No. 17-260.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF APRIL 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   716347
<ALLOWANCES>                                     12405
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  710427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7412
<OTHER-SE>                                      110978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    716347
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 52431
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  20152
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
<FN>
<F1>THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDE A NONCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit 99.10**

**CONSENT OF RAMON LUNA, Q.P., P. GEO**

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reportand documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated byreference into i) the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the“Company“) and ii) the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No.333-162371) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission:

|   | 1.     | Information relating to the mineral reserve and mineral resource    calculations for the Ocampo property;                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The annual information form of the Company dated March 23, 2011, whichincludes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Ocampo property, and the properties described therein. |

Date: March 23, 2011 

By: /s/ Ramon Luna, Q.P., P. Geo                                                       Ramon Luna, Q.P., P. Geo

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-30442

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LIONEL JOSEPH HENDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:05-CR-60040-2

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lionel Joseph

Henderson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Henderson has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-30442 Document: 00512085826 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
No. 12-30442

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-30442 Document: 00512085826 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
Glenn WINNINGHAM, petitioner, v. Donald BAKER, et al.

No. 17-5580.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Abdullahi Hamu JARA, petitioner, v. STANDARD PARKING, et al.

No. 17-6413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# L_2010062EN.01003301.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 139/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 31/2006 of 10 March 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 31/2006 of 10 March 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2009/108/EC of 3 February 2009 amending Decision 2002/364/EC on common technical specifications for in vitro-diagnostic medical devices (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2009/108/EC of 3 February 2009 amending Decision 2002/364/EC on common technical specifications for in vitro-diagnostic medical devices (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 3 (Commission Decision 2002/364/EC) of Chapter XXX of Annex II to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32009 D 0108: Commission Decision 2009/108/EC of 3 February 2009 (OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 34).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32009 D 0108: Commission Decision 2009/108/EC of 3 February 2009 (OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 34).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2009/108/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 1.6.2006, p. 48.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 34.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Cosmopolitan Land Company, A Corporation, *Appellant,*v. J. L. Drane, Trustee, and J. L. Drane, James M. Curry, Josie Sinclair, J. Reed Curry, C. C. Commander, C. E. Stewart, J. A. Savarese, T. H. Scovell and Hines F. Vaughn, copartners trading and doing business under firm name and style of T. H. Scovell & Sons, Enterprise Properties, Inc., a corporation, J. P. McWilliams, Mrs. J. P. McWilliams, known as Eunice G. McWilliams, Harriet E. Kerr, W. D. Burnett, G. W. Bailey and Harry Bomford, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion filed April 10, 1929.

*C. W. Lawrence, Jr., Herman Biegal*and *Henry E. Williams,*for Appellant;

*Gibbons & Gibbons*and *Lennard O. Boynton,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *526inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said judgment and that the same should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Langley v. Irons Land & Development Co., 94 Fla. 1010, 114 So. R. 769 and authorities there cited, both in the main opinion and in the concurring opinion by Mr. Justice Strum, and it is so ordered. See also Black on Recission and Cancellation, (2nd Ed.) Sec. 419.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Ellis, J., not participating.
Ernest MOON, petitioner, v. Clark SCOTT, Warden.

No. 17-6659.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2013081EN.01001101.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/11

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 211/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 756/2010 of 24 August 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants as regards Annexes IV and V (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 756/2010 of 24 August 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants as regards Annexes IV and V (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 12w (Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 R 0756: Commission Regulation (EU) No 756/2010 of 24 August 2010 (OJ L 223, 25.8.2010, p. 20).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 R 0756: Commission Regulation (EU) No 756/2010 of 24 August 2010 (OJ L 223, 25.8.2010, p. 20).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 756/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 223, 25.8.2010, p. 20.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Progreen Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Telander, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the Company.


/s/ Jan TelanderJan TelanderChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  July 29, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         830,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,883,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,715,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,715,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,715,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               298,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   227,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   227,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   113.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Justin D. TATUM, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 17-5115.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10836

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MENG TUAN WANG,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-21-2-A

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Meng Tuan Wang appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately

1,000 doses of MDMA. He argues that the district court’s denial

of an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a), constituted error because the denial was

based on his failure to admit to relevant conduct. As

examination of the record indicates that there was a sufficient

basis for the district court’s denial of the adjustment for
No. 03-10836

-2-

acceptance of responsibility, that denial did not constitute

reversible error. See United States v. Solis, 299 F.3d 420, 458

(5th Cir. 2002).

Wang contends that the hearsay statements of his codefendant

was insufficiently reliable to be utilized to determine the

quantity of MDMA for which he was accountable. As Wang has

failed to show that the challenged hearsay statements were

unreliable, the district court’s determination of drug quantity

was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Maseratti,

1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Chavez, 947

F.2d 742, 746-47 (5th Cir. 1991).

Wang also asserts that he was deprived of his due process

rights when the district court refused to allow him to call the

probation officer as a witness during the sentencing hearing. As

the information sought to be introduced from the probation

officer was available from law enforcement agents, one of whom

was questioned extensively at the sentencing hearing regarding

that information, any error was harmless. See United States v.

Davidson, 984 F.2d 651, 657 n.11 (5th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment of conviction is

AFFIRMED.
Gregory Shawn MERCER, petitioner, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al.

No. 17-6071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
George A. CHRISTIAN, petitioner, v. Jeorld BRAGGS, Jr., Warden.

No. 17-6720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
George SIDERIS, petitioner, v. RILEY & DEVER, P.C.

No. 17-523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4395 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the removal of 

the record of default from credit history upon obtaining a Federal Direct 

Consolidation Loan that discharges the defaulted loan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 

Ms. STEVENS (for herself and Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

the removal of the record of default from credit history 

upon obtaining a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan that 

discharges the defaulted loan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Slate through 

5 Consolidation Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4395 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RECORD OF DEFAULT FROM CREDIT 

2 HISTORY UPON LOAN CONSOLIDATION. 

3 Section 455(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(g)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘A borrower’’ and inserting the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A borrower’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES.—Upon 

10 obtaining a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan that 

11 discharges the liability on a defaulted loan made, in12 sured, or guaranteed under this title, the Secretary, 

13 guaranty agency, or other holder of the loan shall 

14 request any consumer reporting agency to which the 

15 Secretary, guaranty agency or holder, as applicable, 

16 reported the default of the loan, to remove the 

17 record of the default from the borrower’s credit his18 tory.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 81/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 81 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5826 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 81

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5826 March 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/511 of 25 March 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/512 of 25 March 2015 amending Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom establishing the European Anti-fraud Office | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/511 of 25 March 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/512 of 25 March 2015 amending Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom establishing the European Anti-fraud Office

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.