alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23526-23527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Transfer of ARPA-H to NIH

    Notice is hereby given that I have transferred the Advanced 
Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) to the National Institutes 
of Health (NIH) as authorized by title II of division H of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law 117-103, and pursuant 
to the notification to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate on March 30, 2022.
    The transfer is subject to the following condition:
    <bullet> The Director, ARPA-H will report directly to the Secretary 
Delegation of Authority.
    I have delegated to the Director, NIH, the following authorities 
vested in me as the Secretary of Health and Human Services, for the 
purpose of carrying out section 301 and title IV of the PHS Act with 
respect to advanced research projects for health to:
    <bullet> Administer the functions, personnel, missions, activities, 
authorities, and funds of ARPA-H
    <bullet> Support activities with funds provided under the heading 
`Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health' under title II of 
division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law 
117-103, that shall not be subject to the requirements of section 
406(a)(3)(A)(ii) or 492 of the PHS Act.
    <bullet> Make or rescind appointments of scientific, medical, and 
professional personnel without regard to any provision in title 5, 
United States Code, governing appointments under the civil service 
laws.
    The delegation is subject to the following conditions:
    <bullet> The authority delegated to the Director, NIH, herein shall 
transfer to the Director, ARPA-H, upon appointment of the Director, 
ARPA-H, or naming of an acting Director, ARPA-H.
    <bullet> NIH may not subject ARPA-H to NIH policies.
    I have affirmed and ratified any actions taken by the Director, 
NIH,

[[Page 23527]]

Director, ARPA-H, or Acting Director, ARPA-H, which involved the 
exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective 
date of the delegation.
    This delegation of authority does not impact any other delegations 
of authority within NIH or in any other U.S. Department of Health and 
Human Services Operating Division or Staff Division. The transfer and 
delegation became effective upon the date of signature.

    Dated: April 15, 2022.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2022-08456 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40749 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DEREK E. BANKS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:18

- CR

- 116

- 1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derek E. Banks has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Banks h a s not filed a response. We h ave reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 21, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40749 Document: 00514883305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2019No. 18

- 40749

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTE D, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40749 Document: 00514883305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,441,319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,727,444
<PP&E>                                      45,382,342
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,125,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,984,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          492,926
<BONDS>                                      2,336,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,154,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,984,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,915,234
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,491,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (685,515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (685,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (685,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32. 2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies
that to the best of my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2004

| | /s/ Zvi Halperin                
| | --------------------------------
| | Name: 
  Zvi Halperin           
| | Title: Chief
  Financial Officer

---

---
# L_2010343EN.01000101.xml

| 29.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 343/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 343/1

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters

The Agreement between the European Union and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters (1) signed in Brussels on 30 November 2009 and in Tokyo on 15 December 2009, will enter into force on 2 January 2011, in accordance with Article 31 of the Agreement.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 39, 12.2.2010, p. 20.

1

---
Robert David KAHRE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9129.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Dennis Eugene Allen, Appellant

No. 06-13-00176-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Red 

River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR01916). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Dennis Eugene Allen, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 13, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2014

No. 04-14-00647-CR

Edward HERNANDEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10559

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Eddie Hernandez pled nolo contendere to 

possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and was sentenced to ten years in 

prison in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On July 29, 2014, the trial 

court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Hernandez filed 

a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this 

court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) 

certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, 

establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended 

by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a 

written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its 

permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately 

reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Hernandez does not have a right to appeal. We 

must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not 

been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d). 

This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), 

unless an amended trial court certification showing that Hernandez has the right to appeal is 
made part of the appellate record by October 20, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No.
333-112578 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-120919 on Form S-8
of our reports dated March 16, 2006 (which reports express an unqualified
opinion and include explanatory paragraphs related to the retroactive change in
the classification of cash flows from discontinued operations and the adoption
of fresh-start reporting), relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of GenTek Inc. and subsidiaries and managements report on
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GenTek Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2005.

Parsippany,
New JerseyMarch 16, 2006

---
Richey L. ANDREW, petitioner, v. Sharon COSTER, et al.

No. 17-8713.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
 Gregory C. Case 
 Aon
Corporation 
 United States 
 June 25, 2018 

International Assignment: Chicago, Illinois to London, England 

Dear Greg, 
 This letter serves to amend your international
assignment letter dated effective July 1, 2016 governing the terms of your international assignment from Chicago, Illinois to London, England (your “International Assignment Letter”). 

Pursuant to this letter, the term of your international assignment shall be extended an additional one year, through June 30, 2019. 

Except as otherwise expressly modified herein, the terms of the International Assignment Letter, and your acknowledgment and acceptance thereof, shall
continue in full force and effect. 
 Please confirm acceptance of the terms and conditions of this letter by signing below and returning a copy of the
signed letter to me. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Anthony R. Goland

	Anthony R. Goland
	Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Gregory C. Case

	Gregory C. Case
# L_2013291EN.01002801.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 71/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 835/2012 of 18 September 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Cadmium) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 835/2012 of 18 September 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Cadmium) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0835: Commission Regulation (EU) No 835/2012 of 18 September 2012 (OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0835: Commission Regulation (EU) No 835/2012 of 18 September 2012 (OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 835/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
John G. BERGDOLL, petitioner, v. Robert TORRES, Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State, et al.

No. 17-1450.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
Jose M. BEJAR, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

No. 17-32.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2006090EN.01003501.xml

| 28.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 90/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 90/35

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation in the audiovisual field, establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the Community programmes MEDIA Plus and MEDIA Training (1)

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation in the audiovisual field, establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the Community programmes MEDIA Plus and MEDIA Training, signed in Luxembourg on 26 October 2004, having been completed on 27 February 2006, this Agreement will enter into force, in conformity with its Article 13, on 1 April 2006.

---

(1)  See page 23 of this Official Journal.

1

---
Sally D. VILLAVERDE, petitioner, v. Greg SMITH, Warden, et al.

No. 16-8090.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal L 38/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 38 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 643 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 38

English edition

Legislation

Volume 643 February 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/122 of 2 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 760)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/123 of 2 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 761)

   (
  1
  ) | 63 |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/124 of the European Central Bank of 29 January 2021 amending Decision (EU) 2019/1311 on a third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (ECB/2021/3) | 93 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/122 of 2 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 760)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 760)

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/123 of 2 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 761)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 761)

1

63

*

Decision (EU) 2021/124 of the European Central Bank of 29 January 2021 amending Decision (EU) 2019/1311 on a third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (ECB/2021/3)

93

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 22-13]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by International Express Trucking, Inc., hereinafter “Complainant”, against ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., hereinafter “Respondent”. Complainant alleges that Respondent is an ocean carrier company with an office in Norfolk, Virginia.

                    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) and 46 CFR 545.4 and 545.5 with regard to assessing demurrage and/or detention charges against containers. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *https://www2.fmc.gov/​readingroom/​proceeding/​22-13/​.*

This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding shall be issued by April 13, 2023, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by October 27, 2023.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-08376 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
# L_2016017EN.01002301.xml

| 26.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 17/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 17/23

---

Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2011 (2011/293/EU) of the EU-Morocco Association Council of 30 March 2011 with regard to the amendment of Annex II of Protocol 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, containing the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for the product manufactured to obtain originating status

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 141 of 27 May 2011
  )

On page 113, Annex, HS heading ‘ex 8401’, third column:

for:

‘Manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product’,

read:

‘Manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product (12)

---

(12)  This rule shall apply until 31.12.2005.’.

12

---
Antwan Roshax GRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5761.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Brady Lavick ADAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8550.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00066

- CR

Orlando Gonzales
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 290th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019CR7846

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
August 12 , 2021