alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 449 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002, to direct the Assistant Secretary for State and Local Law Enforcement to produce and disseminate 

an annual catalog on Department of Homeland Security training, publications, programs, and services for State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mrs. DEMINGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002, to direct 

the Assistant Secretary for State and Local Law Enforcement to produce and disseminate an annual catalog 

on Department of Homeland Security training, publications, programs, and services for State, local, and tribal 

law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 449 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pathways to Improving 

3 Homeland Security at the Local Level Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ANNUAL CATALOG ON DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

5 SECURITY TRAINING, PUBLICATIONS, PRO6 GRAMS, AND SERVICES FOR STATE, LOCAL, 

7 AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. 

8 Section 2006(b)(4) of the Homeland Security Act of 

9 2002 (6 U.S.C. 607(b)(4)) is amended— 

10 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

11 the end; 

12 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period 

13 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub15 paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(G) produce an annual catalog that sum17 marizes opportunities for training, publications, 

18 programs, and services available to State, local, 

19 and Tribal law enforcement agencies from the 

20 Department and from each component and of21 fice within the Department and, not later than 

22 30 days after the date of each such production, 

23 disseminate the catalog at issue, including by— 

24 ‘‘(i) making such catalog available to 

25 State, local, and Tribal law enforcement 

26 agencies, including by posting such catalog 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 449 IH

1 on the website of the Department and co2 operating with national organizations that 

3 represent such agencies; 

4 ‘‘(ii) making such catalog available 

5 through the Homeland Security Informa6 tion Network; and 

7 ‘‘(iii) submitting such catalog to the 

8 Committee on Homeland Security and the 

9 Committee on the Judiciary of the House 

10 of Representatives and the Committee on 

11 Homeland Security and Governmental Af12 fairs and the Committee on the Judiciary 

13 of the Senate.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Davon McKENZIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5871.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2013345EN.01001901.xml

| 19.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 345/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 345/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 150/2013

of 15 July 2013

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 318/2013 of 8 April 2013 adopting the programme of ad-hoc modules, covering the years 2016 to 2018, for the labour force sample survey provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 318/2013 of 8 April 2013 adopting the programme of ad-hoc modules, covering the years 2016 to 2018, for the labour force sample survey provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 18as (Commission Regulation (EU) No 216/2010) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘18at. | 32013 R 0318: Commission Regulation (EU) No 318/2013 of 8 April 2013 adopting the programme of ad-hoc modules, covering the years 2016 to 2018, for the labour force sample survey provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 (OJ L 99, 9.4.2013, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘18at.

32013 R 0318: Commission Regulation (EU) No 318/2013 of 8 April 2013 adopting the programme of ad-hoc modules, covering the years 2016 to 2018, for the labour force sample survey provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 (OJ L 99, 9.4.2013, p. 11).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 318/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 July 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 99, 9.4.2013, p. 11.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-1611

___________________________ 

Catalina Lux Satin

 Petitioner

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

 Respondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ 

Submitted: November 14, 2023

Filed: November 30, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

 

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Catalina Lux Satin petitions for review of an order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals upholding the decision of an immigration judge (IJ) 

to deny her asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention 

Against Torture (CAT). Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court denies 

the petition.
-2- 

Lux Satin’s challenge to the IJ’s jurisdiction, claiming an invalid Notice to 

Appear under Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), is foreclosed by circuit 

precedent. See Ali v. Barr, 924 F.3d 983, 986 (8th Cir. 2019). 

This court finds no error in the determination that Lux Satin failed to establish 

a nexus between her proposed particular social group (PSG) and the harm she feared 

in Guatemala. See Silvestre-Giron v. Barr, 949 F.3d 1114, 1119 & n.3 (8th Cir. 

2020) (nexus is a factual determination reviewed for substantial evidence and will 

not be reversed unless the record evidence is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find in petitioner's favor). 

Because Lux Satin failed to establish a nexus, the agency did not err in 

denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the 

CAT. See Tino v. Garland, 13 F.4th 708, 710 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (where 

substantial evidence supported determination that noncitizen failed to demonstrate 

nexus between persecution and PSG, failure was dispositive of asylum claim); Guled 

v. Mukasey, 515 F.3d 872, 881-82 (8th Cir. 2008) (noncitizen who does not meet 

well-founded fear standard for asylum cannot meet higher "clear probability of 

persecution" standard for withholding of removal; separate analysis for CAT claim 

is required only when there is evidence noncitizen may be tortured for reasons 

unrelated to asylum and withholding of removal claims).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/07/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      524,244
COMMITMENTS
  63,327   20,015  118,754  316,701  362,407  498,782  501,176   25,462   23,068

CHANGES FROM 11/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     51,683)
   6,035       42   12,550   25,569   31,806   44,154   44,398    7,529    7,285

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.1      3.8     22.7     60.4     69.1     95.1     95.6      4.9      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      123)
      36       13       44       63       67      116      112
```

----

Updated December 10, 2010
#### Ida Studwell and W. F. Studwell, her husband, *Appel*lants, v. Edward F. White, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 20, 1929.

*Price, Price, Neely & Kehoe,*for Appellants;

*Paul C. Taylor,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
```

                                                           EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March 27, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    April 27, 2005                    By: /s/ Lloyd L. Hill
         ----------------------               ----------------------------------
                                           Lloyd L. Hill
                                           *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March 27, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    April 27, 2005                     By:  /s/ Steven K. Lumpkin
         -----------------------                --------------------------------
                                            Steven K. Lumpkin*Chief Financial Officer*
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4349 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4349

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that floor plan 
   financing includes the financing of certain trailers and campers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2019

  Mrs. Walorski (for herself, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, and Ms. Titus) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that floor plan 
   financing includes the financing of certain trailers and campers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Travel Trailer and Camper Tax Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FLOOR PLAN FINANCING APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN TRAILERS AND 
              CAMPERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 163(j)(9)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new flush 
sentence:
                ``Such term shall also include any trailer or camper 
                which is designed to provide temporary living quarters 
                for recreational, camping, or seasonal use and is 
                designed to be towed by, or affixed to, a motor 
                vehicle.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 31, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00586

- CV

NINJA JUMP, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Luz LOBO and Jorge Lobo, Individually, and as next friend of Aaron Joshua Lob o, a minor,

Appellee s

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04073

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Abate Appeal pending finalization of the parties’

written settlement agreement . The parties’ joint motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the

appellant file a motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal within thirty days

from the date of this order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1, 43.2; see Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza,

L.L.C. , 70 S.W.3d 180, 180 (Tex. App.

— Sa n Antonio 2001, no pet.).

I t is so ORDERED on this 31st day of October, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., applicants, v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al.

No. 17A560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

The application for a stay presented to The CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court's October 17, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government's appeal in the United State Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and disposition of the Government's petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.

In light of its decision to consider the case on an expedited basis, we expect that the Court of Appeals will render its decision with appropriate dispatch.

Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would deny the application.
WAIVER
AGREEMENT


 


This
WAIVER AGREEMENT (the “Waiver Agreement”) is entered into as of this 25th day of June, 2018, by and between
Asia Equity Exchange Group, Inc. (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation and Yanru Zhou (the “Purchaser”),
an individual. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Subscription
Agreement (as defined below).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Purchaser entered into that certain Subscription Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2017, for the purchase
and sale of common stock of the Company (the “Subscription Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
the Subscription Agreement provides that the Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to effect the Up-listing no
later than December 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Subscription Agreement provides that in the event the Company does not complete the Up-listing by December 31, 2018, the Purchaser
has the right to request the Company to repurchase all of the shares sold to the Purchaser pursuant to the Subscription Agreement
and pay the Purchaser the full amount of the purchase price in cash (the “Buy-Back”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Purchaser has agreed to waive any and all rights with respect to the Buy-Back pursuant to Section 1.4 of the Subscription
Agreement, in consideration for one thousand ($1,000) US dollars (the “Waiver Consideration”).


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the receipt of valuable consideration, including the payment by the Company to the Purchaser
of the Waiver Consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. Waiver
of the Buy-Back. The Purchaser hereby irrevocably waives any and all rights it may have under Section 1.4 of the
Subscription Agreement. Except as otherwise amended hereby, the Subscription Agreement remains in full force and
effect.


 


2. Governing
Law. This Waiver Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of
New York without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.


 


3. Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Waiver Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one
and the same agreement and each of which shall be deemed an original.


 


4. Miscellaneous.
This Waiver Agreement shall be binding upon the Company and the Purchaser and their respective successors and
assigns.


 




    	 



    	 



    


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Waiver Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	 	Asia
    Equity Exchange Group, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Song Gao
	 	Name:	Song
    Gao
	 	Title:	President
    and CEO
	 	 	 
	 	Yanru Zhou
	 	 	 
	. 	/s/ Yanru Zhou
	 	Name:	Yanru
    Zhou
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000695 27-FEB-2020 07:48 AM
Rafael AGOSTO, petitioner, v. Peter MASTRANTONIO, Jr., et al.

No. 17-5609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Order entered February 1, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01169
- CV
JAMES PHELPS, ET AL. , Appellant s V. EFRAIN GARCIA, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. CC
- 10
- 07686 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant James Phelps’s January 28, 2013 second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant James Phelps to file his brief by February 11, 2013. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of exceptional circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE><CAPTION>
                           ACTV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


                                                     Nine Month Periods                 Three Month Periods
                                                     Ended September 30,                Ended September 30,
                                                          1994            1995            1994            1995
                                                 -------------   -------------    ------------   -------------
<S>                                              <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding..........        7,699,790       9,748,209       8,156,466       9,981,194

Common stock equivalents                                      --                              --               --
                                                 --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
         Total...............................        7,699,790       9,748,209       8,156,466       9,981,194
                                                 =============== =============== =============== ===============

   Net loss before extraordinary gain........        $3,929,357      $5,751,337      $1,361,407      $2,308,521

   Net loss after extraordinary gain.........        $3,407,554      $5,657,220      $1,071,449      $2,308,521
                                                 =============== =============== =============== ===============

Loss per share before extraordinary gain.....           $.51            $.59            $.17            $.23

Loss per share after extraordinary gain......           $.44            $.58            $.13            $.23
                                                 =============== =============== =============== ===============



                                                                         12
</TABLE>