alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00932

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Connie May <connie@thearkl.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:56 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Connie May

2222 First Ave NE

Cedar Rapids, IA 52402
Curtis R. MOFFETT, Jr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5791.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-5111
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NELSON ROSADO, a/k/a Day-Day, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-335-MJG) Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: July 3, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry D. McKnett, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Paul M. Tiao, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Nelson Rosado pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base. He was sentenced to a term of seventy-two months’ imprisonment. Rosado appealed, and subsequently filed a motion to remand requesting that his case be returned to the district court for resentencing in accordance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Rosado contends that the appellate waiver set forth in his plea agreement was modified by comments made by the district court during the plea colloquy and sentencing hearing. The United States’ silence in the face of those comments, he asserts, operated to alter the plea agreement and permit him to appeal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that this contention is without merit. Next, Rosado argues that the district court sentenced him in violation of Booker by treating the guidelines as mandatory. Our review discloses that any Sixth Amendment error arising from Rosado’s sentence is harmless. See United States v. Rodriguez , 433 F.3d 411, 416 (4th Cir. 2006). Holding Rosado accountable for the fifty grams of cocaine base set forth in the indictment to which he pled guilty, the resulting guideline range would still be higher than the seventy-two month sentence imposed. Thus Rosado was not prejudiced by the alleged Bookererror. We accordingly grant the Government’s motion to dismiss. We deny Rosado’s motion to remand and dispense with oral argument- 3 - because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          28,043
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,368,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                   297,000
<INVENTORY>                                    679,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,863,366
<PP&E>                                       2,787,878
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,236,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,020,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,317,026
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           800
<OTHER-SE>                                     395,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,020,885
<SALES>                                     37,327,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,327,166
<CGS>                                       36,799,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,799,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (371,439)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               215,040
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             371,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                156,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                   203,550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            181,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   181,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.02
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24167-24168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08576]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--RFA-IP22-001, Research on the 
Epidemiology, Prevention and Control of Influenza and Other Respiratory 
Viruses in India and RFA-IP22-004, US Platform to Measure Effectiveness 
of Seasonal Influenza, COVID-19 and other Respiratory Virus Vaccines 
for the Prevention of Acute Illness in Ambulatory Settings.
    Dates: June 29-30, 2022.
    Times: 10:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Room 1080, 8 Corporate Square Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, National Center for HIV, Viral 
Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop US8-
1, Atlanta, Georgia

[[Page 24168]]

30329-4027, (404) 718-8833, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#367177585253444559587655525518515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5314123d373621203c3d133037307d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-08576 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6370

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SCOTT WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00036-RDB-1)

Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Scott Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his postjudgment 

motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 1:09-cr00036-RDB-1 (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2019). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

deny Wilson’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Gregory BACON, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-5666.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
**EX 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. §1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVoice & Wireless Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the periodended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Haggerty, Chief Executive Officerand Jeff Etten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                          | /s/ Mark Haggerty                       |   |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  November 11, 2002 | Mark Haggerty, Chief  Executive Officer |
|                          |
|                          |
|                          | /s/ Jeff Etten                          |   |
|                          | Jeff Etten, Chief Financial  Officer    |
|                               |                                         |        |  |

 

 

----
# L_2008047EN.01006901.xml

| 21.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/69

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 131/2007 of 28 September 2007 amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms
   (1)

| 1. | In recital 3, ‘1 January 2007’ is replaced by ‘1 January 2008’. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In recital 3, ‘1 January 2007’ is replaced by ‘1 January 2008’.

| 2. | In Article 1(1) the phrase ‘... and in the programmes referred to in the ninth, tenth and eleventh indents as from 1 January 2007.’, is replaced by ‘, in the programmes referred to in the ninth and tenth indents as from 1 January 2007 and in the programme referred to in the eleventh indent as from 1 January 2008.’ |
| --- | --- |

2.

In Article 1(1) the phrase ‘... and in the programmes referred to in the ninth, tenth and eleventh indents as from 1 January 2007.’, is replaced by ‘, in the programmes referred to in the ninth and tenth indents as from 1 January 2007 and in the programme referred to in the eleventh indent as from 1 January 2008.’

| 3. | In Article 2, the second subparagraph shall read as ‘It shall apply from 1 January 2007.’ |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Article 2, the second subparagraph shall read as ‘It shall apply from 1 January 2007.’

---

(1)  See page 67 of this Official Journal.

1

---
Melvin McGREGOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8604.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0064 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. RONALD ALAN HUMMEL,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 2 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2020

08/26/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0064
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17
                                   EXHIBIT C
                                   ---------

                                PROMISSORY NOTE
                                ---------------


$     332,500.00                                            San Jose, California
 -------------------------
----------------------------------------
                                                               December 30, 1999


          For value received, the undersigned promises to pay Top Tier Software,
Inc. a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), at its principal office the
                                  -------
principal sum of $332,500.00 with interest from the date hereof at a rate of
8.5% per annum, compounded semiannually, on the unpaid balance of such principal
sum. Such principal and interest shall be due and payable five (5) years after
the date hereof.

          If the undersigned's employment or consulting relationship with the
Company is terminated prior to payment in full of this Note, this Note shall be
immediately due and payable.

          Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United
States of America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME
WITHOUT INTEREST OR PENALTY.

          Should suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note, such
sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees.
The makers and endorsers have severally waived presentment for payment, protest,
notice of protest and notice of nonpayment of this Note.

          This Note, which is full recourse, is secured by a pledge of certain
shares of Common Stock of the Company and is subject to the terms of a Pledge
and Security Agreement between the undersigned and the Company of even date
herewith.

         EMPLOYEE                            /s/: David Blumstein
                                             -----------------------------------
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 10(b)

                                 REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL



I, Sandra M. DaDalt, in my capacity as counsel to Sun Life of Canada (U.S.)
Variable Account D (the "Account") have reviewed this Post-Effective
Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Account which is being filed
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 under the Securities Act of 1933. Based
on my review of this Post-Effective Amendment and such other material
relating to the operations of the Account as I deemed relevant, I hereby
certify as of the date of filing this Post-Effective Amendment, that the
Post-Effective Amendment does not contain disclosure which would render it
ineligible to become effective pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485.

I hereby consent to the filing of this representation as part of this
Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Account.

                                         /s/ SANDRA M. DADALT
                                         -----------------------
                                         Sandra M. DaDalt, Esq.

April 7, 2000
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Marimba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
initially filed with the SEC on March 28, 2003 and amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed with the SEC on the date hereof (as amended, the Report), I, Richard C. Wyckoff, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)  The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.



|              
|--------------
|April 25, 2003
|              



|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marimba, Inc. and will be retained
by Marimba, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Thomas O'NEIL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4163 

To reauthorize the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2019 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant 

Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT 

4 PROGRAM REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

6 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

7 10261(a)(23)) is amended by striking ‘‘$30,000,000 for 

8 fiscal year 2020, and each fiscal year thereafter’’ and in9 serting ‘‘$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 

10 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6777** 

ROGER LEE HARRELL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:15

- cv - 00031

- REP

- RCY )

Submitted : September 9 , 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Roger Lee Harrell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roger Lee Harrell seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012) . The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Harrell that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive a ppellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Harrell has waived appellate review by fai ling to file objections . Accordingly, we deny a certificat e of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decision al process.
DISMISSED
In Re Ramsey RANDALL, petitioner.

No. 17-5512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Jorge Marc GONZALEZ-BETANCOURT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.