alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/30/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       91,080
COMMITMENTS
  24,691    9,237   13,973   37,155   44,997   75,819   68,207   15,260   22,872

CHANGES FROM 06/23/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,884)
    -380    1,953   -2,254   -2,384   -6,689   -5,019   -6,991   -2,865     -893

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.1     10.1     15.3     40.8     49.4     83.2     74.9     16.8     25.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      134)
      34       20       30       54       56      104       94
```

----

Updated July 6, 2009
Jose Luis RAMIREZ GALVAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7781

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
Release:#3955-96 (Civ. No. 94-1256)

For Release:October 15, 1996

**CALIFORNIA COURT ISSUES PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS AGAINST LIDA    INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA AND WORTH FINANCIAL DATA IN CONNECTION WITH    ILLEGAL OFF-EXCHANGE FUTURES CASE, ALSO INVOLVING TOPWORTH INTERNATIONAL OF    HONG KONG AS A DEFENDANT**

**Lida and Worth Agree to Pay a Total of $900,000 in    Disgorgement**

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    today that U.S. District Court Senior Judge A. Andrew Hauk (Central    District of California) entered consent orders of permanent injunction    against **Lida International Financial Data, Inc.****(Lida)** of San    Gabriel, California, and **Worth Financial Data, Inc. (Worth)**, of San    Francisco, California. The court's action stems from a three-count civil    injunctive action filed on February 28, 1994, jointly by the CFTC and the    California Department of Corporations against Lida, Worth, and Topworth    International, Ltd. (Topworth) -- a Hong Kong corporation. None of the    defendants has ever been registered with the CFTC in any capacity.    (See CFTC News Release #3746-94, March 3, 1994.)

The complaint alleged that, since at least May 1991 to March 1994, the    three defendants violated the off-exchange futures provisions of the    Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and provisions of California commodities law    by offering and selling to the general public illegal off-exchange    commodity futures contracts for the purchase and sale of gold, silver, and    various foreign currencies. On March 1, 1994, the court entered an **ex    parte** restraining order against the defendants, which, among other    things, froze their assets and appointed a receiver.

The permanent injunctive orders require that Lida and Worth disgorge    $800,000 and $100,000 of ill-gotten gains, respectively, and enjoin them    from further violating Federal commodity law, as charged.

**In 1995, Topworth Was Ordered to Disgorge About $5.9 Million of    Ill-Gotten Gains**

On November 6, 1995, the court entered a default order of permanent    injunction against defendant Topworth, prohibiting further violations of    the CEA and ordering Topworth to disgorge $5,947,401.32 to the receiver for    the benefit of customers.

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-15-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 148--Knoxville, Tennessee, Notification 
of Proposed Production Activity CoLinx, LLC (Spherical Roller Bearing 
Kits), Crossville, Tennessee

    CoLinx, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production 
activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in Crossville, 
Tennessee within FTZ 148. The notification conforming to the 
requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on 
April 12, 2022.
    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be 
limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/component(s) and 
specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification 
(summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The 
benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ 
procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's 
website--accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. The proposed finished 
product(s) and material(s)/component(s) would be added to the 
production authority that the Board previously approved for the 
operation, as reflected on the Board's website.
    The proposed finished products are spherical roller bearing kits 
(duty rate 5.8%).
    The proposed foreign-status materials and components include 
plummer block housings, spherical roller bearings (double row), housing 
and adapter sleeves, housing seals, and lubricators (duty rate ranges 
from 2.5% to 5.8%). The request indicates that certain materials/
components are subject to duties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 
1974 (Section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable 
Section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to 
FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe988a84be8a8c9f9a9bd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88eefcf2c8fcfae9eceda6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is May 31, 2022.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information System'' section of the Board's 
website.
    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#155f60747b7c61743b567d707b5561677471703b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aee4dbcfc0c7dacf80edc6cbc0eedadccfcacb80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 13, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08322 Filed 4-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David J. Pecker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: August 12, 2004
Edmond McCLINTON, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 17-8749.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report), I, David Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Mark Brockelman, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. Pecker Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)/s/ MARK J. BROCKELMANMark J. Brockelman Vice President Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer)




Date: August 12, 2005



This certification accompanies each report pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2008223EN.01003601.xml

| 21.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 223/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 223/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 43/2008

of 25 April 2008

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 21/2008 of 14 March 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 21/2008 of 14 March 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 of 26 November 2007 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (Natugrain Wheat TS) as a feed additive (2), as corrected by OJ L 310, 28.11.2007, p. 22, is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 of 26 November 2007 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (Natugrain Wheat TS) as a feed additive (2), as corrected by OJ L 310, 28.11.2007, p. 22, is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 1zzzzd (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1142/2007) of Chapter II of Annex I to the Agreement:

| ‘1zzzze. | 32007 R 1380: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 of 26 November 2007 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (Natugrain Wheat TS) as a feed additive (OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 21), as corrected by OJ L 310, 28.11.2007, p. 22.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1zzzze.

32007 R 1380: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 of 26 November 2007 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (Natugrain Wheat TS) as a feed additive (OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 21), as corrected by OJ L 310, 28.11.2007, p. 22.’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007, as corrected by OJ L 310, 28.11.2007, p. 22, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 April 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 April 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 182, 10.7.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 21.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
LouShonda MYERS, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 17-5590.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2010244EN.01002401.xml

| 16.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 70/2010

of 11 June 2010

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 51/2010 of 30 April 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 51/2010 of 30 April 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2009/959/EU of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2007/230/EC on a form concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2009/959/EU of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2007/230/EC on a form concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 21aa (Commission Decision 2007/230/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32009 D 0959: Commission Decision 2009/959/EU of 14 December 2009 (OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 80).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32009 D 0959: Commission Decision 2009/959/EU of 14 December 2009 (OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 80).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2009/959/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 15.7.2010, p. 19.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 80.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Pecker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986 and 33-8618];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)


Date: March 23, 2007
#### H. C. JONES, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma, v. TOKLAN ROYALTY CORPORATION, a Corporation.

No. 3127.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 27, 1945.

Charles E. Dierker, U. S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Old., for appellant.

I. J. Underwood, of Tulsa, Okl., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and SYMES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed per stipulation.
Khalid A. SHALHOUB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-135.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WING KEI HO and KAREN C. YEH HO

, Appellant s

,

v.

TRUIST BANK

, Appellee.

No. 4D2022

- 2798

[ April 18, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No.

502017CA002390.

Wing Kei Ho and Karen C. Yeh Ho, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Arthur S. Barksdale IV of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Smoak, P.A.,

Orlando, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

M AY

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Steven LEE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-7213.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Juan Francisco Emilio CARBAJAL-VALDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8600.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.