alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7696 

VICTOR EUGENE VICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-04-1079)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 29, 2005

Before WIDENER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Eugene Vick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Victor Eugene Vick, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) for failure to exhaust state

remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(l) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Vick has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIVE STAR SENIOR LIVING INC., fka Five Star Quality Care, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. Melinda MANDVIWALA.

No. 17-1357.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Curtis Lee SHEPPARD, Jr., petitioner, v. Abel ACOSTA, et al.

No. 17M24.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
# L_2014154EN.01003901.xml

| 22.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 236/2013

of 13 December 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 of 22 November 2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 of 22 November 2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 66wk (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66wl. | 32011 R 1207: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 of 22 November 2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky (OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 35).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66wl.

32011 R 1207: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 of 22 November 2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky (OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 35).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 228/2013 of 13 December 2013 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 35.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  See page 25 of this Official Journal.

2

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4310 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify that employment 

in any position at a nonprofit organization is a public service job for 

purposes of the public service loan forgiveness program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify 

that employment in any position at a nonprofit organization is a public service job for purposes of the public 

service loan forgiveness program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Service Expan5 sion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4310 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPAYMENT PLAN FOR PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOY2 EES. 

3 Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the Higher Education Act 

4 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended— 

5 (1) in clause (i)— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘public library 

7 sciences,’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘, or at an organization 

9 that is described in section 501(c)(3) of the In10 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from 

11 taxation under section 501(a) of such Code; or’’ 

12 and inserting a semicolon; 

13 (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); 

14 and 

15 (3) by inserting after clause (i), the following: 

16 ‘‘(ii) a full time job in any position at 

17 an organization that is described in section 

18 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

19 1986 and exempt from taxation under sec20 tion 501(a) of such Code, without regard 

21 to the mission of such organization; or’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.3
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PATRICIA GRAHAM, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: September 1, 2005



                                            /s/  Patricia Graham
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Patricia Graham,
                                            Principal Financial Officer
The GEO GROUP, INC., petitioner, v. DETENTION WATCH NETWORK, et al.

No. 17-64.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Kendall MARTIN, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-8679.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/29/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,982
COMMITMENTS
   8,878    3,494    8,775   19,733   21,684   37,386   33,953    9,596   13,029

CHANGES FROM 12/22/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        691)
      41      -14      184      -17      -98      208       73      483      618

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    18.9      7.4     18.7     42.0     46.2     79.6     72.3     20.4     27.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
       8       12       17       25       20       45       45
```

----

Updated January 7, 2010
Rodney CLEMONS, petitioner, v. Randy PFISTER, Warden.

No. 17-5055.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                           3,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,346
<PP&E>                                         121,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,478
<BONDS>                                         16,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,038
<COMMON>                                        21,057
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,497
<SALES>                                        191,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,925
<CGS>                                          144,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.58
        

</TABLE>
#### Ocean & Lake Realty Company, a Corporation, and Palm Beach Ocean Realty Company, a Corporation, *Appellants, v*. H. Frances Cragin and Girard Trust Company, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, as Co-Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Charles I. Cragin, deceased, *Appellees.*

Division A.

Opinion filed April 2, 1929.

*Fleming, Hamilton, Diver, Liehliter & Fleming,*for Appellants ;

*453*Wiclemcm & Wideman,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

In July 1925, H. Frances Cragin and Girard Trust Company, as Trustees of the Estate of Charles I. Cragin, sold to Ocean & Lake Realty Company certain lands in Palm Beach County, Florida, for a valuable consideration, a portion of which was in cash and the balance of $896,706.00 was represented by four promissory notes of $224,176.50, each payable in one, two, three, and four years with interest at sis per cent (6%) per annum until paid, the said notes being secured by a mortgage on the lands sold. In October 1925, Ocean and Lake Realty Company, conveyed the said lands to Palm Beach Ocean Realty Company, subject to the said mortgage.

In February, 1927, H. Frances Cragin and Girard Trust Company, as Trustees, filed their bill of complaint against Ocean & Lake Realty Company and Palm Beach Ocean Realty Company, et al, to foreclose the mortgage as here referred to. A demurrer and a plea to the bill were overruled both of which raised the question that Girard Trust Company could not bring suit in this State because it was a foreign corporation and had not qualified to do business in the State of Florida as required by Chapter 8531, Acts of 1921, as amended by Chapter 9287, Acts of 1923, Laws of Florida. Appeal was taken from the order on the demurrer and the plea.

Does Chapter 8531, Acts of 1921, as amended by Chapter 9287, Acts of 1923, Laws of Florida, preclude appellees from coming into the proper forum in this State for the purpose of foreclosing the mortgage as above described, may be stated as the only question of law presented here for our consideration.

Chapter 8531, Acts of 1921, as amended by Chapter 9287, Acts of 1923, prescribes the conditions under which trust *454companies and foreign corporations may transact business in this State. It is urged by appellants that these acts are a complete bar to the appellee bringing this suit because they (appellees) have not complied with the terms thereof. We have examined the basis of appellants contention and we do not think it well grounded. We think further that the questions raised in the instant case are settled and precluded by the decision of this court in Girard Trust Company v. Tampa Shores Development Company, et al., reported in 95 Fla., 1010, 117 So. R. 786.

The decree of the chancellor is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
# L_2013144EN.01002401.xml

| 30.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 144/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 144/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 19/2013

of 1 February 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2011/665/EU of 4 October 2011 on the European register of authorised types of railway vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2011/665/EU of 4 October 2011 on the European register of authorised types of railway vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 37dj (Commission Regulation (EU) No 454/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘37dk. | 32011 D 0665: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/665/EU of 4 October 2011 on the European register of authorised types of railway vehicles (OJ L 264, 8.10.2011, p. 32).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘37dk.

32011 D 0665: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/665/EU of 4 October 2011 on the European register of authorised types of railway vehicles (OJ L 264, 8.10.2011, p. 32).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2011/665/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 February 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 264, 8.10.2011, p. 32.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Rudolph POLSON, petitioner, v. ALABAMA, et al.

No. 17-5986.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2011317EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 317/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 317/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Australia pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the course of their accession to the European Union

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Australia pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the course of their accession to the European Union (1) will enter into force on 1 December 2011.

1

---

(1)  See page 6 of this Official Journal.

1

---
# L_2010062EN.01006301.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/63

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 157/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 116/2009 of 22 October 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 116/2009 of 22 October 2009 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards certain disclosure requirements for medium-sized companies and the obligation to draw up consolidated accounts (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards certain disclosure requirements for medium-sized companies and the obligation to draw up consolidated accounts (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in points 4 (Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC) and 6 (Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC) of Annex XXII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 L 0049: Directive 2009/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 (OJ L 164, 26.6.2009, p. 42).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 L 0049: Directive 2009/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 (OJ L 164, 26.6.2009, p. 42).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/49/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 334, 17.12.2009, p. 19.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 164, 26.6.2009, p. 42.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---