alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4140 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a foreign official from 

demanding a bribe, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2019 

Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself, Mr. CURTIS, Mr. MALINOWSKI, and Mr. HUDSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a foreign 

official from demanding a bribe, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Extortion Pre5 vention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF DEMAND FOR BRIBE. 

7 Section 201 of title 18, United States Code is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

10 following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4140 IH

1 ‘‘(4) The term ‘foreign official’ means any offi2 cer or employee— 

3 ‘‘(A) of a foreign government or any de4 partment, agency, or instrumentality thereof; 

5 ‘‘(B) of a public international organization; 

6 or 

7 ‘‘(C) any person acting in an official ca8 pacity for or on behalf of any such government 

9 or department, agency, or instrumentality, or 

10 for or on behalf of any such public international 

11 organization. 

12 ‘‘(5) The term ‘public international organiza13 tion’ means— 

14 ‘‘(A) an organization that is designated by 

15 Executive order pursuant to section 1 of the 

16 International Organizations Immunities Act (22 

17 U.S.C. 288); or 

18 ‘‘(B) any other international organization 

19 that is designated by the President by Execu20 tive order for the purposes of this section, effec21 tive as of the date of publication of such order 

22 in the Federal Register’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(f) Whoever, being a foreign official or person se25 lected to be a foreign official, otherwise than as provided 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4140 IH

1 by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly 

2 or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, 

3 or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally 

4 or for any other person or entity, in return for— 

5 ‘‘(1) being influenced in the performance of any 

6 official act; or 

7 ‘‘(2) being induced to do or omit to do any act 

8 in violation of the official duty of such official or 

9 person, 

10 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more 

11 than two years or both.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Charles H. CASEY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1251.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# L_2018116DE.01005901.xml

| 7.5.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 116/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 116/59

---

Berichtigung des Protokolls zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft und dem Fürstentum Liechtenstein über den Beitritt des Fürstentums Liechtenstein zu dem Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft über die Kriterien und Verfahren zur Bestimmung des zuständigen Staates für die Prüfung eines in einem Mitgliedstaat oder in der Schweiz gestellten Asylantrags, unterzeichnet in Brüssel am 28.2.2008

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160 vom 18. Juni 2011
  )

Artikel 8 Absatz 2

(Seite P/CE/CH/FL/ACCESSION/ASYLUM/de 13)

(ABl. L 160 vom 18. Juni 2011, Seite 42)

Anstatt:

„(2)   Dieses Protokoll tritt einen Monat nach dem Tag in Kraft, an dem der Verwahrer den Vertragsparteien mitgeteilt hat, dass die letzte Ratifizierungs- oder Genehmigungsurkunde hinterlegt wurde.“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Dieses Protokoll tritt am ersten Tag des Monats nach dem Tag in Kraft, an dem der Verwahrer den Vertragsparteien mitgeteilt hat, dass die letzte Ratifizierungs- oder Genehmigungsurkunde hinterlegt wurde.“

---
# L_2008257EN.01003101.xml

| 25.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 68/2008

of 6 June 2008

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 52/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 52/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2007/756/EC of 9 November 2007 adopting a common specification of the national vehicle register provided for under Articles 14(4) and (5) of Directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2007/756/EC of 9 November 2007 adopting a common specification of the national vehicle register provided for under Articles 14(4) and (5) of Directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 37d (Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘37da. | 32007 D 0756: Commission Decision 2007/756/EC of 9 November 2007 adopting a common specification of the national vehicle register provided for under Articles 14(4) and (5) of Directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC (OJ L 305, 23.11.2007, p. 30).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘37da.

32007 D 0756: Commission Decision 2007/756/EC of 9 November 2007 adopting a common specification of the national vehicle register provided for under Articles 14(4) and (5) of Directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC (OJ L 305, 23.11.2007, p. 30).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2007/756/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 June 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 June 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 223, 21.8.2008, p. 50.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 305, 23.11.2007, p. 30.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Alex CONSTANTOPES.

No. D-2961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
# L_2007218EN.01001401.xml

| 23.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 218/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 218/14

---

DECISION No 2/2007 OF THE EC-SWITZERLAND JOINT COMMITTEE

of 26 July 2007

rectifying the Swiss domestic reference price of whole-milk powder

(2007/572/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Economic Community, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 22 July 1972, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, as amended by the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products signed in Luxembourg on 26 October 2004, and its Protocol No 2, and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas for the implementation of Protocol No 2 to the Agreement, internal reference prices are fixed for the Contracting Parties by the Joint Committee,

Whereas the actual Swiss domestic reference price of whole-milk powder had to be rectified,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Swiss domestic reference price of whole-milk powder, stated as 653,33 CHF per 100 kg net in Table III of Decision No 1/2007 of the EC-Switzerland Joint Committee (1), is replaced by the reference price of 586,90 CHF per 100 kg net.

The difference in Table III between the Swiss and the EC reference price is correspondingly adjusted to 232,60 CHF per 100 kg net.

The applied basic amount as from the entry into force, stated as 269,00 CHF per 100 kg net in Table IV, is replaced by the amount of 209,00 CHF per 100 kg net.

The applied basic amount as from three years after the entry into force, stated as 254,00 CHF per 100 kg net in Table IV, is replaced by 198,00 CHF per 100 kg net.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

It shall have legal effect as of 1 February 2007.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2007.

For the Joint Committee

The Chairman

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 35, 8.2.2007, p. 29.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4191 

To exclude from consideration as income under the housing assistance programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development amounts 

received by a family from the Department of Veterans Affairs for servicerelated disabilities of a member of the family, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 16, 2019 

Mr. CARBAJAL (for himself, Mr. SMUCKER, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, and Mr. CISNEROS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To exclude from consideration as income under the housing 

assistance programs of the Department of Housing and 

Urban Development amounts received by a family from 

the Department of Veterans Affairs for service-related 

disabilities of a member of the family, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home for the Brave 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4191 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF VETERANS DISABILITY BENEFITS 

2 FROM INCOME. 

3 The Department of Housing and Urban Development 

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 3531 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 15. EXCLUSION OF VETERANS DISABILITY BENEFITS 

7 FROM INCOME. 

8 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

9 amounts received by any member of a household or family 

10 as disability compensation under chapter 11 of title 38, 

11 United States Code, or dependency and indemnity com12 pensation under chapter 13 of such title, shall not be con13 sidered as income of such household or family for purposes 

14 of— 

15 ‘‘(1) determining the eligibility of such family 

16 or household for assistance under any program for 

17 housing assistance administered by the Secretary; 

18 ‘‘(2) the amount of benefits payable to or on 

19 behalf of such family or household under such pro20 gram; or 

21 ‘‘(3) the amount of rent paid by such family or 

22 household for occupancy of a dwelling unit assisted 

23 under any such program.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM POWER PLUS
CORPORATION QUARTER 1 OF FISCAL 1998 PERIOD ENDED 30 APRIL 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.37
<CASH>                                       1,749,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  367,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,651,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,446,631
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,625,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,722,177
<BONDS>                                      4,810,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,519,548
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,400,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,625,510
<SALES>                                      2,739,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,738,518
<CGS>                                        1,327,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,327,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,565,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             220,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,615,956)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,615,956)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,615,956)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
<FN>
<F1>FACE AMOUNT IS $6-MILLION.
<F2>AMOUNT OF EQUITY VALUE ARISING FROM CONVERTIBLE FEATURE OF L-T DEBT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Lawrence MADRID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8735.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/15/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      115,815
COMMITMENTS
  34,688   21,853   14,914   49,653   56,032   99,255   92,799   16,560   23,016

CHANGES FROM 09/08/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,575)
   2,512    3,125    1,501    3,423    3,789    7,436    8,415    2,139    1,160

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.0     18.9     12.9     42.9     48.4     85.7     80.1     14.3     19.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      46       30       35       61       63      124      115
```

----

Updated September 18, 2009
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Randell Ray Bowers, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CR24773.

Vs. No. 11-17-00257-CR * September 19, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Michael A. PAYNE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-8553.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 3 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

THELMA PATTERSON,

Appellant,

v.

KENNETH L. SPEARS; LOLA FAYE

DENTON,

Appellees.

No. 97-6261

(D.C. No. 96-CV-1325)

(Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Thelma Patterson was sued in bankruptcy court by Ken Spears, the trustee

of her daughter’s bankruptcy estate, and by Washita State Bank, one of her

daughter’s creditors. The bankruptcy court issued its final order, determining,

inter alia, that Native Elm, a mobile home park that Ms. Patterson claimed to

own, was her daughter’s corporate alter ego and therefore part of the bankruptcy

estate. Patterson then appealed to the District Court for the Western District of
- 2 -

Oklahoma. The district court affirmed several elements of the order below, but

reversed and remanded the bankruptcy court’s determination of Native Elm’s alter

ego status. Patterson now appeals the district court’s affirmance of the

bankruptcy court.

We must dismiss Patterson’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. For appellate

jurisdiction to lie, the district court must have entered a final order. See 28

U.S.C. § 158(d); In re Buckner, 66 F.3d 263, 265 (10th Cir. 1995). It has not

done so. 

The district court determined that the bankruptcy court applied an incorrect

legal standard to determine whether Native Elm was the daughter’s alter ego, and

reversed and remanded for “consideration of whether [Patterson’s daughter] used

Native Elm as part of a design or scheme to perpetrate a fraud.” Appellant’s App.

at 74. “A district court order reversing the bankruptcy court and remanding for

significant further proceedings is not final and appealable under 28 U.S.C. §

158(d).” Buckner, 66 F.3d at 265. The proceedings on remand, involving

complex determinations of fact, are more than “mere ‘ministerial’ computations

involving little judicial discretion,” and therefore constitute “significant further

proceedings.” Id. (quoting Rubner & Kutner, P.C. v. United States Trustee (In re

Lederman Enters., Inc.), 997 F.2d 1321, 1323 (10th Cir. 1993)). Hence, no final,

appealable order has yet been entered, and we are without jurisdiction.
- 3 -

DISMISSED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
Abuwi M. WAHEED, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-5547.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    William J. CampbellChief Executive Officer




November 12, 2003
# L_2009025EN.01003301.xml

| 29.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 127/2008

of 5 December 2008

amending Annex VII (Mutual recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex VII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex VII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 755/2008 of 31 July 2008 amending Annex II to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 755/2008 of 31 July 2008 amending Annex II to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 R 0755: Commission Regulation (EC) No 755/2008 of 31 July 2008 (OJ L 205, 1.8.2008, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 R 0755: Commission Regulation (EC) No 755/2008 of 31 July 2008 (OJ L 205, 1.8.2008, p. 10).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 755/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 December 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1) or on the date of entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 142/2007 of 26 October 2007, whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 223, 21.8.2008, p. 47.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 205, 1.8.2008, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al.

No. 17-1270.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Trump v. Hawaii,* 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2392, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018).