alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08458]

[[Page 23494]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Notice of Public Meeting of the Texas Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Announcement of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 
(Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that the 
Texas Advisory Committee (Committee) will hold a series of meetings via 
Webex platform on the following dates and times listed below. These 
meetings are for the purpose of planning their project investigating 
mental health care in juvenile justice facilities.

DATES: These meetings will be held on:

 Monday, May 2, 2022, from 2:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. CT
 Thursday, May 19, 2022, from 1:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m. CT
 Thursday, June 16, 2022, from 2:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. CT
 Thursday, July 21, 2022, from 2:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. CT

Public Webex Registration Link

 Monday, May 2nd: https://tinyurl.com/svavn92f Thursday, May 19th: https://tinyurl.com/ydfa626y Thursday, June 16th: https://tinyurl.com/5ar9hn2c Thursday, July 21st: https://tinyurl.com/yetkew68

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brooke Peery, Designated Federal 
Officer (DFO) at [email protected] or by phone at (202) 701-1376. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and conference ID number.
    Members of the public are entitled to make comments during the open 
period at the end of the meeting. Members of the public may also submit 
written comments; the comments must be received in the Regional 
Programs Unit within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments 
may be emailed to Brooke Peery (DFO) at [email protected].
    Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be 
available for public viewing prior to and after the meeting at https://www.facadatabase.gov/FACA/FACAPublicViewCommitteeDetails?id=a10t0000001gzkoAAA.
    Please click on the ``Meeting Details'' and ``Documents'' links. 
Records generated from this meeting may also be inspected and 
reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit, as they become available, 
both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of 
this Committee are directed to the Commission's website, https://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above 
email or street address.

Agenda

I. Welcome & Roll Call
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Committee Discussion
IV. Public Comment
V. Adjournment

    Dated: April 15, 2021.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2022-08458 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Jean Denis LOUISSAINT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8697.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., et al., petitioners, v. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Motion of Chris Sevier, et al. for leave to intervene denied. Motion of John Gunter, Jr., et al. for leave to intervene denied.
In Re Michael Allyn KENNEDY, petitioner.

No. 17-5914.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 10.36



AMENDMENT NUMBER SIX

TO THE LICENSE & UPDATE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN LOOKSMART, LTD. AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION



This Amendment Number Six (Amendment Six) to the
License & Update Agreement (as amended to date, the Agreement) is made and entered into effective as of October 1, 2003 (Amendment Effective Date) by and between Microsoft Corporation, a Washington
corporation (Microsoft) and LookSmart, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (LookSmart).



Recitals



WHEREAS, the Agreement is currently set to expire on December 3, 2003;



WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the Agreement through January 15, 2004, on the terms set forth herein;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for such other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged by the parties, the parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:



Amendment



The Agreement shall be
amended to provide:



1. The Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
through 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time) on January 15, 2004.



2. LookSmarts URL
delivery requirements pursuant to the licensing portion of the Agreement shall be reduced on a pro rata basis during the extension of the Agreement.



3. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. All provisions of the Agreement not specifically modified herein
shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment Six may be executed in counterparts, each of which may be an original or faxed copy, and both of which together shall form one instrument.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment Six as of the date set forth
above.



|                      |  |                       |  |                 |  |     |  |                 
|--------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------
|MICROSOFT CORPORATION |  |                       |  | LOOKSMART, LTD.
|                      |  |                       |  |                
|By:                   |  | /s/ Kirk Koenigsbauer |  |                 |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian Cowley

|       |  |                 |  |  |  |        |  |                          
|------ |  | --------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------
|       |  |                 |  | 
|Title: |  | General Manager |  |  |  | Title: |  | SVP, Business Development
|       |  |                 |  | 
|Date:  |  | 10/3/03         |  |  |  | Date:  |  | 10/3/03
# C_2012151EN.01000402.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 March 2012 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-243/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid in favour of the hotel industry in Sardinia - Recovery)

2012/C 151/07

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan and B. Stromsky, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent and P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2008/854/EC of 2 July 2008 on a State aid scheme (C 1/04 (ex NN 158/03 and CP 15/2003)): Misuse of aid measure N 272/98, Regional Act No 9 of 1998 (notified under document number C(2008) 2997) (OJ 2008 L 302, p. 9)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period all the measures necessary to recover from the recipients the aid granted under the aid scheme considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2008/854/EC of 2 July 2008 on a State aid scheme (C 1/04 (ex NN 158/03 and CP 15/2003)): Misuse of aid measure N 272/98, Regional Act No 9 of 1998, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period all the measures necessary to recover from the recipients the aid granted under the aid scheme considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2008/854/EC of 2 July 2008 on a State aid scheme (C 1/04 (ex NN 158/03 and CP 15/2003)): Misuse of aid measure N 272/98, Regional Act No 9 of 1998, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of that decision;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.07.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1989-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         600,819
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  484,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,090,755
<PP&E>                                         8,341,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,195,487)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,374,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          94,829
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,210,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,374,603
<SALES>                                        510,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               518,832
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,073<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                216,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            216,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   216,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21648-21649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5362-000]


Kennebec Light and Power District; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    On March 31, 2021, Kennebec Light and Power District, licensee for 
the Lower Mousam Hydroelectric Project No. 5362, filed an application 
for Surrender of License. The Lower Mousam Hydroelectric Project is 
located on the Mousam River in York County, Maine.

[[Page 21649]]

    The license for Project No. 5362 was issued for a period ending 
March 31, 2022. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 5362 is issued to 
the Kennebec Light and Power District for a period effective April 1, 
2022 through March 31, 2023 or until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. 
If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place 
on or before March 31, 2023, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 
18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that the Kennebec Light and Power District is authorized 
to continue operation of the Lower Mousam Hydroelectric Project, until 
such time as the Commission takes final action on the application for 
Surrender of License.

    Dated: April 5, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07731 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
State of TEXAS, plaintiff, v. State of NEW MEXICO.

No. 65, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of River Master for fees and expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $7505.97, for the period July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017, to be paid equally by the parties.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-83-2021]

                    On December 16, 2021, CooperVision Manufacturing PR LLC submitted a                           ( print page 23496)                        notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 7, in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico.                

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 73730, December 28, 2021). On April 15, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: April 15, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-08418 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# L_2012340EN.01004001.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 340/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 340/40

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 103/2012 of 15 June 2012 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 270 of 4 October 2012
  )

On page 2, Article 1(2), in the first paragraph of new point 149, the words ‘supplementing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards preventive health measures for the control of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs’ shall be added after the words ‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1152/2011 of 14 July 2011’.

Echinococcus multilocularis

---
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2474

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Eduardo Hinojosa, also known as Lalo, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 14, 2001 Filed: January 17, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eduardo Hinojosa was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and four counts of delivery of methamphetamine in furtherance of the conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court 1 sentenced Hinojosa to 292 months imprisonment. Hinojosa appeals his conviction, arguing that he is entitled to a new-2- trial because the district court abused its discretion in allowing the cross-examination of a defense witness and admission of impeaching rebuttal evidence. Hinojosa also argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence for obstruction of justice. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. After a careful review of the record, we find that any error in the admission of evidence was harmless. See United States v. Capozzi , 883 F.2d 608, 616 (8th Cir. 1989) ("Reversal is warranted only where an abuse of discretion leads to prejudice." (quoting United States v. Lynch , 800 F.2d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 1986))). Hinojosa's jury trial lasted one week and included testimony from fourteen government witnesses from several law enforcement agencies including the FBI, ATF, DEA, and local law enforcement. We are unpersuaded that the admission of the challenged evidence was prejudicial. Further, we find that the district court did not clearly err in enhancing Hinojosa's sentence for obstruction of justice. See United States v. Anderson , 68 F.3d 1050, 1055 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review). The district court credited the testimony of one of the threatened witnesses, and such credibility determinations are rarely disturbed on appeal. See United States v. Adipietro , 983 F.2d 1468, 1472 (8th Cir. 1993). We are unpersuaded that the district court's determination should be disturbed in this case. Accordingly, we affirm.-3- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4275 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
 Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION PROGRAM 
              REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Review of Comprehensive Management Plan.--Section 121 of the 
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) ensure that the comprehensive conservation and 
        management plan approved for the Basin under section 320 is 
        reviewed and revised in accordance with section 320 not less 
        often than once every 5 years, beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``recommended by a 
        management conference convened for the Basin under section 
        320'' and inserting ``identified in the comprehensive 
        conservation and management plan approved for the Basin under 
        section 320''.
    (b) Definitions.--Section 121(e)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(e)(1)) is amended by striking ``, a 5,000 
square mile''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 121(f) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2001 through 2012 and 
        the amount appropriated for fiscal year 2009 for each of fiscal 
        years 2013 through 2017'' and inserting ``2021 through 2025''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Administrative expenses.--The Administrator may use 
        for administrative expenses not more than 5 percent of the 
        amounts appropriated to carry out this section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Alexander EDWARDS, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17M39.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.