alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release #4218-98 (CFTC Docket No. 99-3)

For Release: December 22, 1998

CFTC FILES ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AGAINST FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO,
    INC., CHARGING RECORDKEEPING VIOLATIONS

CFTC Alleges that First Options Failed to Promptly Produce and Retain
    Required Records

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it has filed a one-count administrative complaint alleging that
    First Options of Chicago, Inc. (First Options), a registered futures
    commission merchant doing business in Chicago, Illinois, violated
    recordkeeping provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC
    regulations.

The complaint alleges that First Options failed to produce promptly both
    the originals and carbon copies of certain floor order tickets and failed
    to retain the carbon copies as required by the CEA and CFTC
    regulations.

Specifically, the complaint charges that First Options took almost 14
    months to make substantial production of the approximately 150 original
    floor order tickets requested by the CFTC in March 1995, in connection with
    an alleged trade allocation investigation. According to the complaint,
    First Options produced only three carbon copies of the requested order
    tickets. The complaint alleges that First Options violated Section 4g of
    the CEA and CFTC regulations 1.31 and 1.35.

A public hearing has been ordered to determine whether the allegations
    are true, and, if so, what sanctions, if any, are appropriate and in the
    public interest.

Possible sanctions include an order directing First Options to cease and
    desist from violating the CEA and CFTC regulations as charged; revocation,
    suspension or conditioning of First Options’ registration; a trading
    prohibition; and a civil monetary penalty of not more than the higher of
    $100,000 or triple the monetary gain to First Options for each violation of
    the CEA or CFTC regulations.

# # #
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), which this statement
accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 15, 2006

                                         /s/ Ian M.Herman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Ian M.Herman
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Stefan Schwenkedel, fulfilling the functions of principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PrimaCom AG;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.



Date: April 26, 2004


/s/ Stefan Schwenkedel
------------------------------------
Stefan Schwenkedel
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2014

NO. 03-14-00243-CR

Elias Shawn Bihl aka Elias Bihl, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
# L_2013081EN.01001001.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/10

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 210/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 286/2012 of 27 January 2012 amending, in order to include a new textile fibre name, Annex I, and, for the purposes of their adaptation to technical progress, Annexes VIII and IX to Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 286/2012 of 27 January 2012 amending, in order to include a new textile fibre name, Annex I, and, for the purposes of their adaptation to technical progress, Annexes VIII and IX to Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 4d (Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32012 R 0286: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 286/2012 of 27 January 2012 (OJ L 95, 31.3.2012, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32012 R 0286: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 286/2012 of 27 January 2012 (OJ L 95, 31.3.2012, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 286/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 158/2012 of 28 September 2012 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 95, 31.3.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 341, 13.12.2012, p. 8.

2

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Spell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PW Eagle, Inc. and will be retained by PW Eagle, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. 

 

Dated: August 14, 2003
Louis B. GASKIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-5669.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
LING ZHUANG, petitioner, v. APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, et al.

No. 17-8741.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
#### Robert S. Martin and Maude S. Martin, his wife, *Appellants,*v. Lewis Myers, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*Wallace F. Perry,*for Appellants;

No appearance for Appellee.

Per. Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument' of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J.; Buford, J., and Long, Circuit Judge, concur.
Derek WARDLAW, petitioner, v. Ira EDWARDS, et al.

No. 17-5882.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

Sa n Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00126

- CV

IN RE NEWPORT CLASSIC HOMES, L.P. L.L.C.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EN BANC RE CONSIDERATION

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice (dissenting with opinion )

Patricia O. Alvarez (not participating)

Luz Elena D. Chapa (not participating)

Irene Rios, Justice (joining in dissenting opin ion )

A majority of the participating en banc court denies the motion for en banc

reconsideration filed by real party in interest Rafael Lagunes

.

It is so ORDERED on December 12, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014

- CI

- 02113 , styled Rafa el Lagunes v. Newport Classic Ho mes, L.P.,

L.L.C. , pending in the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.
Travis Sentell LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9001.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Tobias O. REED, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-5402.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Virginia for further consideration in light of *Carpenter v. United States,* 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2206, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018).
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Mark Young
  
    



  Discussions concerning product definitions.
      
  When
              06/28/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              II. Definitions

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph CisewskiTerry ArbitScott Reinhart

  Visitor(s)
              Mark Young

  Organization(s)
              Skadden


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, David L. Turney, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DRI Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  C) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): A) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  B) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ David L. Turney David L. Turney  Chief Executive Officer  November 13, 2007  A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., applicants, v. Jeffrey Lynn BORDEN.

No. 17A360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 4, 2017.

Application to vacate the injunction entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on September 29, 2017, presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court granted.

Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, and Justice SOTOMAYOR would deny the application to vacate the injunction.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0896

_____________________________

ROBERT PANN,

Appellant,

v.

JULIAN ULMER,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

J. Lee Marsh, Judge.

December 19, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Robert Pann, pro se, Appellant.
2

Michael Farrar of Michael J. Farrar, P.A., Doral, for Appellee.
# L_2011203EN.01000101.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/1

---

Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing

Following the Council Decision of 20 June 2011
   (1) to approve the said Agreement, the European Union deposited on 7 July 2011 its instrument of approval with the General-Director of the FAO.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 191, 22.7.2011, p. 1.

1

---