alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release : #4139-98 (CFTC Docket No. 98-13)

For Release: April 28, 1998

CFTC FILES ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST

TODD ALAN THOMAS OF FLORIDA ALLEGING FRAUD

IN SOLICITING COMMODITY OPTION CUSTOMERS

Respondent Charged with Fraud by Misrepresentation and
    Omission of Material Facts in Connection with the Solicitation and
    Maintenance of Commodity Option Transactions

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that on April 27, 1998, it filed a one-count administrative complaint
    alleging that Todd Alan Thomas of Boca Raton, Florida violated the
    anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations by
    fraudulently soliciting customers to purchase commodity options.

The CFTC complaint alleges that Thomas made false, deceptive, and
    misleading statements in radio and television infomercials and in telephone
    solicitations of customers to purchase commodity options.

More specifically, the CFTC complaint alleges that Thomas fraudulently
    misrepresented that customers who purchase options on futures contracts
    will profit from seasonal and other existing and known supply and demand
    forces that affect the prices of certain commodities in the cash market.
    The complaint further alleges that Thomas made fraudulent
    misrepresentations, and omitted to disclose material facts, such that
    he:

� exaggerated the likelihood of profit from trading commodity
    options;

� minimized the risk of loss involved in trading commodity options;
    and

� overstated Thomas' performance record in trading commodity
    options.

The complaint alleges that at least 90 percent of the accounts opened by
    Thomas since late 1992 lost money. The complaint further alleges that
    losses in Thomas' unprofitable accounts totaled approximately $1.3 million,
    while Thomas received at least $871,000 in commissions.

The CFTC's complaint initiates a public administrative proceeding to
    determine if the allegations in the complaint are true and, if so, what
    sanctions should be imposed.
Santiago SOLANO-HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9187.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rosales Mireles v. United States,* 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1897, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018), and for consideration of the question whether the case is moot.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

WILLIE MCCLELLAN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 212 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Michael STOREY, petitioner, v. CITY OF ALTON, ILLINOIS.

No. 17-8783.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 402 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 402

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
Win Oil Company, Incorporated, for purposes of economic development by 
  removing the Federal reversion interest in that land, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

Mr. O'Halleran introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
Win Oil Company, Incorporated, for purposes of economic development by 
  removing the Federal reversion interest in that land, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flagstaff Federal Reversion Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

    (a) General Removal of Interest.--Any reversionary interest of the 
United States pursuant to the Act of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292, 
chapter 278), shall no longer be subject to the reversionary interest 
described in that Act.
    (b) Removal of Interest in Particular Parcel.--The reversionary 
interest is removed in the parcel of land located in the City of 
Flagstaff, Arizona, and owned by Win Oil Company, Incorporated, which 
land is more particularly described in the deed recorded in Coconino 
County, Arizona, on November 11, 1998, as document number 98-44431.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF NAUTILUS, INC.**

Nautilus, Inc., a Washingtoncorporation 

Nautilus International Holdings, S.A., a Swiss corporation 

Nautilus International, S.A., a Swiss corporation 

Nautilus Switzerland, S.A., a Swiss corporation

Nautilus International GmbH, a German corporation 

Nautilus Fitness UK Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation 

Nautilus Fitness Italy S.r.l., an Italiancorporation 

Nautilus Fitness Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation 

Nautilus (Shanghai) Fitness Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation
# C_2011298EN.01000903.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 July 2011 — Mediaset SpA v European Commission, Sky Italia Srl

(Case C-403/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Subsidies granted by the Italian Republic to promote the purchase of digital decoders - Non-inclusion of decoders for the reception solely of television programmes broadcast by satellite - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market)

2011/C 298/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mediaset SpA (represented by: K. Adamantopoulos, dikigoros, G. Rossi, avvocato, E. Petritsi, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Martenczuk and B. Stromsky, Agents), Sky Italia Srl (represented by: F. González Díaz, abogado and F. Salerno, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2010 in Case T-177/07 Mediaset SpA v Commission dismissing an action for the annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2006) 6634 final of 24 January 2007 declaring incompatible with the common market subsidies granted by Italy, in 2004 and 2005, to enable consumers to purchase or to rent interactive digital decoders capable of receiving programmes using digital or cable terrestrial technology on the ground that those subsidies exclude decoders capable of receiving programmes using satellite television broadcasting technology (Aid No C 52/2005, ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004)

Mediaset SpA

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mediaset SpA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission and of Sky Italia Srl. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mediaset SpA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission and of Sky Italia Srl.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
Leodius CLARK, petitioner, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 17-8468.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
                                    Exhibit 27

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-K AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                            7,287
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    36,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      1,542
<INVENTORY>                                                      36,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 87,008
<PP&E>                                                           60,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   24,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  127,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            34,600
<BONDS>                                                           3,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                         41,248
<OTHER-SE>                                                       45,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    127,990
<SALES>                                                         175,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                180,501
<CGS>                                                            88,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    89,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 24,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  1,310
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   7,280
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      2,475
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               4,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      4,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.35
        


</TABLE>
Jennifer Louise VANMETER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5736.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011211EN.01002102.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/21

---

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 10 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-227/10) (1)

1

2011/C 211/40

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
Carlos Maurice SINCLAIR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Krzysztof DOROZ, petitioner, v. TECT UTICA CORPORATION.

No. 17M14.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 File No. 333-10840; Form S-8 File No.
333-12814; Form S-8 File No. 333-13186; Form S-8 File No. 333-91650; Form S-8 File No.
333-122128; S-8 File No. 333-137644; Form S-8 File No. 333-139688; Form S-8 File No.
333-148774;) pertaining to Optibase Ltd. of our report, dated June 26, 2009, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Harmonic Video Networks Ltd. (formerly Scopus Video Networks Ltd.), included in the
Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Brightman
Almagor Zohar & Co.Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.Certified Public Accountants
A member firm of Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu

June 29, 2009



---

---
Pharaoh E. BROOKS, petitioner, v. Eric ARNOLD, Warden.

No. 17-5752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with DeutscheBank
  
    



  Execution; delayed reporting for blocks
      
  When
              09/01/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVIII. Real Time Reporting

  Organization(s)
              DeutscheBank


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Luis Alberto RUIZ-DOMINGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7261.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rosales-Mireles v. United States,* 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1897, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018).
# C_2009129EN.01000202.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/2

---

Action brought on 29 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-41/09)

2009/C 129/03

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and W. Roels, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | rule that, by applying a reduced rate of VAT to the supply, importation and intra-Community acquisition of certain live animals, in particular horses, which are not normally intended for the preparation or production of foodstuffs for human or animal consumption, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of, in conjunction with Annex H to, the Sixth VAT Directive, (1) and under Articles 96, 97, 98 and 99(1) of, in conjunction with Annex III to, the VAT Directive; (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that, by applying a reduced rate of VAT to the supply, importation and intra-Community acquisition of certain live animals, in particular horses, which are not normally intended for the preparation or production of foodstuffs for human or animal consumption, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of, in conjunction with Annex H to, the Sixth VAT Directive, (1) and under Articles 96, 97, 98 and 99(1) of, in conjunction with Annex III to, the VAT Directive; (2)

1

2

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission takes the view that the Netherlands Wet op de omzetbelasting (Law on turnover tax) breaches the provisions of Articles 96, 97, 98 and 99(1) of, in conjunction with Annex III to, the VAT Directive by applying a reduced rate of VAT to the supply of certain live animals (in particular, horses) even in cases where those animals are not intended for the preparation or production of foodstuffs. More specifically, the Commission is of the opinion that live animals — and, in particular, horses — which are not normally intended for use as foodstuffs do not come under Category 1 of Annex III to the VAT Directive.

According to settled case-law, Category 1 of Annex III to the VAT Directive must, in the same way as any other provision concerning the reduced rates of VAT, be subject to strict interpretation. Furthermore, in the light of the wording of Category 1 of Annex III to the Directive, the reduced rate applies to foodstuffs.

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              10,168
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,654
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              30,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                      28,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      42,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          40,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        42,403
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,506
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                            42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,839
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,839
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
Terance Martez GAMBLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-646.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.