alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4138 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to deem certain State 

Veterans homes meeting certain health and safety standards as meeting 

conditions and requirements for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. SUOZZI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to deem 

certain State Veterans homes meeting certain health and 

safety standards as meeting conditions and requirements 

for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Veterans Home 

5 Inspection Simplification Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4138 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEEMING CERTAIN STATE VETERANS HOMES AS 

2 MEETING MEDICARE SKILLED NURSING FA3 CILITIES CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 

4 Section 1865(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395bb(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, subject to 

7 paragraph (5),’’ after ‘‘If the Secretary’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(5) In the case of a provider entity described in 

11 paragraph (3)(B) that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

12 inspects as a State home under section 1742 of title 38, 

13 United States Code, and determines meets such standards 

14 as the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall prescribe pursu15 ant to such section, the Secretary of Health and Human 

16 Services shall— 

17 ‘‘(A) treat such provider entity as meeting all 

18 conditions and requirements under sections 1819 

19 and 1861(j) for the period for which such deter20 mination is in effect; and 

21 ‘‘(B) for purposes of subsection (g)(5)(E) of 

22 section 1819 and other related purposes for posting 

23 information on the Nursing Home Compare website 

24 under subsection (i) of such section, in lieu of the 

25 information described in the first sentence of such 

26 subsection (g)(5)(E), use the information described 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4138 IH

1 in the inspections of the Secretary of Veterans Af2 fairs conducted under such section 1742 with re3 spect to such provider entity for such period.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/06/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      497,226
COMMITMENTS
  47,010   32,022   72,995  354,485  369,577  474,490  474,594   22,736   22,632

CHANGES FROM 09/29/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     14,433)
   8,150   -1,895   -2,925    6,181   19,954   11,406   15,134    3,027     -701

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.5      6.4     14.7     71.3     74.3     95.4     95.4      4.6      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      103)
      22       19       31       53       60       92       94
```

----

Updated October 9, 2008
William Hugh WEYGANDT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1344.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
AIRLINE SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION, et al., petitioners, v. LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, et al.

No. 17-1183.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Dorothea J. JOLING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6038.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: July 15, 2011




/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER



David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer and President
# L_2012341EN.01003601.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 182/2012

of 28 September 2012

amending Annex XIX (Consumer protection) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 109/2012 of 15 June 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 109/2012 of 15 June 2012 (1).

| (2) | Regulation (EU) No 954/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EU) No 954/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XIX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XIX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 7f (Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 R 0954: Regulation (EU) No 954/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2011 (OJ L 259, 4.10.2011, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 R 0954: Regulation (EU) No 954/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2011 (OJ L 259, 4.10.2011, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 954/2011 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 September 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 4.10.2012, p. 31.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 259, 4.10.2011, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michael HAMPTON, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden, et al.

No. 16-8608.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xstream Beverage Network,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Theodore
Farnsworth, Chairman and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Theodore Farnsworth
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Theodore Farnsworth,
                                                   Chairman, CEO, principal
                                                   executive officer and
                                                   principal financial officer
                                                   November 20, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Lateef FISHER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9444.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jason C. YOUKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8634.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Edward L. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6153.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Robert MERRILL, petitioner, v. Diane MERRILL.

No. 15-1139.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2006185EN.01000801.xml

| 6.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 185/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 185/8

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union

The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Azerbaijan, to take account of the accession of 10 new Member States to the European Union, which the Council and the Commission decided to conclude on 24 October 2005
   (1), entered into force on 1 November 2005, the last notification of the completion of procedures under Article 5.2 of the Protocol being received on 24 October 2005.

1

---

(1)  See page 3 of this Official Journal,

1

---
David A. HICKS, petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS.

No. 17-8906.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2012076EN.01002601.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/26

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 142/2011

of 2 December 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2011/107/EU of 10 February 2011 amending Decision 2007/756/EC adopting a common specification of the national vehicle register (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/107/EU of 10 February 2011 amending Decision 2007/756/EC adopting a common specification of the national vehicle register (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 37da (Commission Decision 2007/756/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32011 D 0107: Commission Decision 2011/107/EU of 10 February 2011 (OJ L 43, 17.2.2011, p. 33).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32011 D 0107: Commission Decision 2011/107/EU of 10 February 2011 (OJ L 43, 17.2.2011, p. 33).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/107/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2011, p. 85.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 43, 17.2.2011, p. 33.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Eric C. McCARTER, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5681.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          771,342
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,706,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5,561,735
<PP&E>                                          449,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                  237,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                5,846,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,505,433
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          4,826
<OTHER-SE>                                    2,335,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  5,846,088
<SALES>                                       7,338,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              7,338,326
<CGS>                                         6,707,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 6,707,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                633,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .00
        

</TABLE>
Chandra NUNN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5564.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Joseph W. Peine v. Elite Airfreight, Inc., and Advanced Logistics 

Services, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00860-CV

Trial court case number: 2008-61097

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, Elite Airfreight, Inc., has filed an agreed motion to seal the brief of appellant, 

Joseph W. Peine. In the underlying case, the trial court signed an order sealing court records,

including “the transcript of the bill of exception made by Plaintiff” and “the exhibits to that bill 

of exception . . . .” See TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a. Appellee requests that we seal the appellant’s brief, 

which contains references to portions of the record that the trial court ordered sealed. The motion 

includes a certificate of conference stating that the parties agree to the requested relief.

We grant appellee’s motion and direct the Clerk of this Court to seal the Brief for 

Appellant, filed on April 22, 2015. See R.V.K. v. L.L.K., 103 S.W.3d 612, 614 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, no pet.) (noting appellate court ordered clerk to seal parties’ briefs that were 

replete with references to and copies of portions of record ordered sealed by trial court); cf. 

Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Tex., Inc., 206 S.W.3d 791, 794 (Tex. App.—Waco 

2006, no pet.) (Gray, C.J. dissenting) (citing Tindall v. Nationsbank of Tex., N.A., No. 05-97-

01843-CV, 1998 WL 324731, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 22, 1998, no pet.) (not designated 

for publication)) (stating appellate court may seal record on agreed motion when trial court has 

ordered records sealed but dissenting from order sealing brief when record did not indicate that 

trial court sealed records under rule 76a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 9, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  Wasatch  Pharmaceutical,  Inc.  June 30, 1998  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                          0000853465
<NAME>                         Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc.

       

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .00
        


</TABLE>