alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT F OR FUL L -TEXT PUB L I CATI ON File Na me: 13a0358n.06
No. 13-5318
UNI TED STATES COURT OF A PPEAL S FOR THE SI XTH CI RCUI T
MI CHAEL

TI MMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. BI L L OL DHAM; SHEL BY COUNTY; SERGEANT C. AL L EN, Off icer ; OFF I CER J

. PORTER; OFFI CER D. MAY; CCS SERVI CES; J OHN AN D J ANE DO ES, Def endants-A

ppellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DI STRI CT OF TEN

NESSEE

Be fore : MARTI

N and SUTTON , Circuit J udg es; HOOD , District J udg e. *

PER CURI AM. This matter is b ef o re t he court upon initial consideration to deter mine whether this appeal wa s taken fr om an appe alable or der. The documents befor e the court indicate that Michae l Timmons filed a civil rig hts complaint ag ainst Shelby County , Tenne ssee, and sever al of its police office rs. During the course of the litigation, Timmons filed a motion to reque st the issuance of a subpoena. On J anuar y 17, 2013, the

m agis trate judge denied the motion without prejudice for Timmons’s failure to consul t wi t h opposing counsel befor e filing the motion, pursuant to L ocal Rule 7.2(a)

. There afte r, Timmons filed

an o t her motion to reque st the issuance of a subpoena, which the mag istrate judge construed as a

rene wa l o f h i s p re v ious motion, and a motion to alter or amend the J anuar y 17, 2013, order

. On

The Honora

ble J oseph M

. Ho od, United States District J udg e for the Easter n District of * Kentucky , sitti ng by

desig nation.No. 13-5318 - 2 - Fe bruar y 21, 2013, the mag istrate judge denied Tim m o n s ’s re n ewed motion for the issuance of a subpoena without prejudice beca use he still failed to adher e to the local rules before fi l i n g t he motion. The mag istrate judge deter mined that the motion to alter or amend was prema ture beca use Timmons’s subpoena motion had been denied without prejudice

. On Marc h 5, 2013, Timmons filed a notice of

appea l from the F ebrua

ry 21, 2013, order

. The Fe bruar

y 21, 2013, order did not dispose of all of the claims or parties involved in this action and did not direc t entry of a final appea lable judgme nt under Fe dera l Rule of Civil Procedur e 54(b). See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. W etzel , 424 U.S. 737, 742–45 (1976); Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. , 782 F.2d 58, 59–60 (6th Cir. 1986). Nor was the Fe bruar y 21, 2013, o rd er an immediately appea lable “collate ral order ” under th e d o c tr in e a nn o u n c e d in Cohen v. Bene

ficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Finally , the district court has not enter ed its final decision during the pendenc y of this appea l. There fore , appellate jurisdiction cannot be invoked over this interlocutory appea l from the district court’s partial decision. See Gillis v. U.S. Dep’ t of Healt h & Hu ma n Servs. , 759 F.2d 565, 569 ( 6th Cir. 1985). I t is ordere d that the appe al is dismis sed.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, petitioner, v. 24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., et al.

No. 16-689.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
John B. JEAN-PIERRE, petitioner, v. Angela SCHWERS, et al.

No. 17-272.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Jason L. BECKHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8546.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         7211268
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24713375
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1354329
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               37588596
<PP&E>                                         20255549
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 87487460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31258810
<BONDS>                                        27922454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       88314
<OTHER-SE>                                     22529628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   87487460
<SALES>                                        94767244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               94767244
<CGS>                                          43415502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  79495908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2826175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12948071
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5276302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7671769
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7671769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.91
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,962
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              99
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     64,808
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,593
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,220
<LOANS>                                        151,198 
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,435
<DEPOSITS>                                     226,362
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,676
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,029
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 255,435
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,496
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,015
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   178
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,689
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,948
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,048
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,641
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      130
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,139
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         741
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.59
<LOANS-NON>                                        939
<LOANS-PAST>                                       130
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,396
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       45
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,489
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,489
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Thomas NGUYEN, petitioner, v. Eduador LOPEZ, et al.

No. 16-9674.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2005242EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/4

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement for cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan

(2005/C 242/03)

The Agreement for cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1), entered into force on 1 August 2004.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 269 of 21.10.2003, p. 9.

1

---
#### NORRIS v. SANFORD, Warden.

No. 11185.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

March 6, 1945.

*944Fred J. Norris, in pro. per.

M. Neil Andrews, U. S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner alleges (1) that he never had a hearing; (2) that the indictment was never read to him; (3) that he was without counsel; (4) that he was induced, coerced and intimidated into pleading guilty; (5) that false promises were made to him; and (6) that he was not permitted to obtain an attorney.

The record shows by a preponderance of the evidence that each and every allegation made by petitioner is without foundation of fact. His counsel explained to him each and every charge as contained in the two indictments. Moreover, petitioner and his counsel went over his case, at his request, with the trial judge, consuming more than one hour. Thereafter, petitioner entered pleas of guilty to each of the two indictments.

No error was committed by the trial court in discharging the writ and remanding petitioner into the custody of the respondent.

Affirmed.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/17/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       64,048
COMMITMENTS
   5,597   21,042   11,581   40,153   24,804   57,331   57,427    6,717    6,621

CHANGES FROM 11/09/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,185)
   1,241   -1,715    2,208      708    3,158    4,157    3,651       28      534

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.7     32.9     18.1     62.7     38.7     89.5     89.7     10.5     10.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       31)
       9        9       10       12        9       27       23
```

----

Updated December 8, 2009
Edmond N. GAUDELLI, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-148.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/06/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       48,581
COMMITMENTS
   3,417   18,802    5,642   30,795   17,338   39,854   41,782    8,727    6,799

CHANGES FROM 09/29/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,427)
      44    4,296    2,271    2,525     -803    4,840    5,764      587     -337

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.0     38.7     11.6     63.4     35.7     82.0     86.0     18.0     14.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       33)
       7       12       13       12        8       29       25
```

----

Updated October 9, 2008
Opinion issued June 27, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 0 0713
- CV

——————————— WILLIAM FORSSBERG , Appellant

V. LISA HOWARD , Appellee

On Appeal from the 507th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015
- 75176

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, William Forssberg, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s August 20, 2019 order in this suit to modify the parent

- child relationship. On August 24, 2021, the appeal was abated , and the Court remanded the case to the trial court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court clerk was directed2

to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the ordered findings of fact and conclusions of law on or before September 14, 2021. Despite the Court’s order, no supplemental clerk’s record was filed. However, on November 4, 2022, appellee, Lisa Howard , filed an “affidavit” with the Clerk of this Court representing that she ha d “received the full amount of outstanding child support and medical supported arrearages owed” by appellant and that the parties had entered “into a settlement agreement resolving all pending issues between the parties.” We construe the affidavit as a moti on to dismiss the appeal as
moot

. No other party has filed a notice of appeal , and no opinion has issued. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1 (a)(1), (c). The motion does not include a certificate of conference stating that appell ee conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with appell ant regarding the relief requested in the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have pa ssed, and no party has expressed opposition to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, the Court reinstates the appeal to the Court’s active docket, grants the motion , and dismiss es the appeal as moot

. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 43.2(f)

. We dismiss a ny other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris

.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-610
In Re: OTTO WITHERSPOON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-91-288-2) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Otto Witherspoon, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Otto Witherspoon brought this pet ition for mandamus relief seeking an order compelling the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to rule on his petition under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(c)(ii) for disclosure of the proceedings of thegrand jury. In the alternative, Witherspoon seeks a writ of prohibition preventing his further prosecution. Because the district court docket sheet reflects that Witherspoon's petition was grantedon August 6, 1996, we conclude that Witherspoon has already received the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus or prohi bition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Henry DuLAURENCE, III, petitioner, v. Arthur G. TELEGEN, et al.

No. 16-8680.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Release: #4162-98
    (1-98-CV-1594, N.D. Georgia)

For Release: July
    1, 1998

GEORGIA
    DISTRICT COURT ISSUES PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST CHRISTOPHER C. SCHAFER
    IN CFTC'S CIVIL ANTI-FRAUD ACTION; SCHAFER IS ORDERED TO PAY RESTITUTION TO
    DEFRAUDED INVESTORS

CFTC Civil
    Action Charged Schafer with Defrauding Customers by Providing False
    Statements and Commingling Funds, Among Other Violations of Federal
    Commodity Law

WASHINGTON -- The
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today that on June
    26, 1998, the Honorable Clarence Cooper, U.S. District Judge for the
    Northern District of Georgia, entered a consent order of permanent
    injunction against Christopher C. Schafer of Alpharetta,
    Georgia.

In the order, which stems from a
    two-count CFTC injunctive complaint filed on June 4, 1998 (see CFTC News
    Release #4158-98, June 16, 1998), Schafer admits liability for fraudulent
    actions taken in connection with commodity customers and has agreed to make
    restitution to customers.

Specifically, the order finds that
    from January 1993 through April 1996, Schafer solicited, accepted, and
    received at least $253,785 from at least 12 customers to trade commodity
    futures. The order finds that in handling such funds he violated the
    Commodity Exchange Act's anti-fraud provisions by fraudulently reporting
    and issuing false statements to customers regarding purported profits
    earned, when, in fact, the accounts had incurred significant
    losses.

Finally, the order finds that
    Schafer commingled customer funds with those of his own and acted as a
    futures commission merchant (FCM) without being registered as an FCM with
    the CFTC. The order permanently enjoins Schafer from committing further
    violations of the CEA and CFTC regulations, as charged, from seeking CFTC
    registration, and from acting in any capacity which requires registration
    or from engaging in any commodity futures-related activity.

NFA Appointed Monitor to
    Disburse Funds to Investors

The order directs Schafer to make
    continuing repayments, based upon his income, of all customer losses. The
    payments will be made to the National Futures Association (NFA), acting as
    Monitor, amounting to approximately $250,000, plus post-judgment interest.
    That amount is subject to adjudication of differences between Schafer and
    two customers about the amount of their losses. The NFA, as Monitor, is
    charged with disbursing those funds to customers under terms in the
    order.
Exhibit 10.1


 






    1


     


    

 






    2


     


    

 






    3


     


    

 






    4


     


    

 






    5


     


    

 






    6


     


    

 


7
Exhibit 15.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements  (Form S-8 File No. 333-10840; Form S-8 File No. 333-12814; Form S-8 File No. 333-13186; Form S-8 File No. 333-91650; Form S-8 File No. 333-122128; S-8 File No. 333-137644; Form S-8 File No. 333-139688; Form S-8 File No. 333-148774;) pertaining to Optibase Ltd. of our report, dated April 17, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Optibase Ltd., included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererTel-Aviv, Israel
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERApril 17, 2011
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854094
<NAME> CENTRAL NEWSPAPERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          66,458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,468
<INVENTORY>                                     10,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,852
<PP&E>                                         575,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 296,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,808
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,920
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,028
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,129
<SALES>                                        193,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,035
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4059 

To take certain lands in California into trust for the benefit of the Agua 

Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To take certain lands in California into trust for the benefit 

of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANDS TO BE TAKEN INTO TRUST. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The approximately 2,560 acres of 

5 land owned by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indi6 ans, numbered 16, 21, 27, and 29 and generally depicted 

7 as ‘‘BLM Exchange Lands (2,560 Acres)’’ on the map ti8 tled ‘‘ACBCI/BLM LAND EXCHANGE’’ is hereby taken 

9 into trust for the benefit of the Agua Caliente Band of 

10 Cahuilla Indians. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4059 IH

1 (b) LANDS PART OF RESERVATION.—Lands taken 

2 into trust by this section shall be part of the Tribe’s res3 ervation and shall be administered in accordance with the 

4 laws and regulations generally applicable to property held 

5 in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe. 

6 (c) GAMING PROHIBITED.—Lands taken into trust 

7 by this section for the benefit of the Agua Caliente Band 

8 of Cahuilla Indians shall not be eligible for gaming under 

9 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 

10 seq.). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS