alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/01/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      494,479
COMMITMENTS
  37,775   44,135   81,487  352,520  347,199  471,782  472,820   22,697   21,659

CHANGES FROM 11/24/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,292)
    -835    7,076    3,893   11,733    3,517   14,792   14,486    2,500    2,806

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.6      8.9     16.5     71.3     70.2     95.4     95.6      4.6      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      109)
      23       21       36       56       60       97      101
```

----

Updated December 4, 2009
***Exhibit
31.2***
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Andrew
Kaplan, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Audible, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 March
      29, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/
      Andrew KaplanName:
      Andrew KaplanTitle:
      Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00280-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.O., A CHILD

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013EM503255

Honorable Eric Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 8, 2018

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court signed the Order in Suit for Modification of Support Order and to Confirm 

Support Arrearage on January 22, 2018. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, 

motion to modify the judgment, motion for reinstatement, or request for findings of fact and 

conclusions of law, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on February 21, 2018. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on March 8, 

2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time, and the 

notice of appeal was filed on April 26, 2018. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace 

period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
04-18-00280-CV

- 2 -

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, “once the 

period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no 

longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id.

We, therefore, ordered appellant to show cause in writing on or before June 21, 2018 why 

this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Although appellant filed a pro se 

motion to modify judgment in this court on June 18, 2018, that motion was not responsive to our 

order. Further, a motion to modify judgment must be filed in the trial court. See TEX. R. CIV. P.

329b(a).

Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Phillip James OSTRANDER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-943.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
David E. ZANDERS, Jr., petitioner, v. U.S. BANK.

No. 16-9454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 23, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
----

|   |  |
|--------|--|

Grant Thornton LLP Chartered Accountants Management Consultants 

Consent of Independent Accountants 

We consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 40-F ofGammon Lake Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 of our Auditors'Report dated September 10, 2005 relating to the consolidated balance sheet ofGammon Lake Resources Inc. as at July 31, 2005 and the consolidated statementsof operations and deficit and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2005 beforethe effects of the adjustments for the corrections of the error described inNote 16(a) to the amended December 31, 2005 consolidated financial statements.

We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any proceduresto the adjustments for the correction of the error described in Note 16(a) tothe amended December 31, 2005 consolidated financial statements and,accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance aboutwhether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Thoseadjustments were audited by KPMG LLP. 

|            |                       |
|-----------------|-----------------------|
| Halifax, Canada | Grant Thornton LLP    |
| April 2, 2007   | Chartered Accountants |

Suite 1100 Cogswell Tower 2000 Barrington Street Halifax, NS B3J 3K1 **T** (902) 421-1734 **F**(902) 420-1068 **E** Halifax@GrantThornton.ca **W** www.GrantThornton.ca Canadian Member of Grant Thornton International 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            ============

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE ACT
           ------------------------------------------------

     I, Derick Sinclair, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Natalma
Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of Natalma Industries, Inc. as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report.

4.  As the sole officer and director of Natalma Industries, Inc., I
am solely responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
Natalma Industries, Inc.. and have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
     ensure that material information relating to Natalma
     Industries, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries,
     is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual
     report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of Natalma Industries, Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within
     90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
     (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions
     about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
     procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to our
auditors and the audit committee of our Board of Directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) that there were no deficiencies in the design or operation of
   internal controls which could adversely affect our ability to
   record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
   advised there are no material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b) there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involves
   management or other employees who have a significant role in our
   internal controls.

6. I have indicated in this annual report that there were no
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     March 29, 2004           /s/ Derick Sinclair
                              ----------------------------------------
                              Derick Sinclair, Chief Executive Officer,
                              Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
                              of the Board of Directors
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not prec e dent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R.

47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

September 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 04-30341

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

SHANNON A. DARDAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal

Service; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-3802-K

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Sophia A. Dardar (“Dardar”) appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’

motion to dismiss and alternatively for summary judgment. We find that the appellant does not have

standing to sue under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000(e), because she has failed to establish a genuine issue-2-

of material fact disputing her status as an independent contractor of the United States Postal Service.

Mares v. Marsh

, 777 F.2d 1066, 1067-69 (5th C ir. 1985). Similarly, we find her claims for

intentional inflict

ion of emotional distress are barred by the sovereign immunit y afforded to the United

States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C. § 2680. Finally, we agree with the

district court’s assessment that only the Federal Co urt of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over

appellants breach of contract claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1346.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4204 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4204

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to inter in national cemeteries individuals who 
supported the United States in Laos during the Vietnam War era, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 23, 2019

    Mr. Costa (for himself, Mr. Young, Mr. Cook, and Mr. Langevin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to inter in national cemeteries individuals who 
supported the United States in Laos during the Vietnam War era, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Special Guerrilla Unit (SGU) 
Veterans Service Recognition Expansion Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR INTERNMENT IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2402(a)(10) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
        or''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) who--
                            ``(i) the Secretary determines served 
                        honorably with a special guerrilla unit or 
                        irregular forces operating from a base in Laos 
                        in support of the Armed Forces of the United 
                        States at any time during the period beginning 
                        February 28, 1961, and ending May 7, 1975; and
                            ``(ii) at the time of the individual's 
                        death--
                                    ``(I) was a citizen of the United 
                                States or an alien lawfully admitted 
                                for permanent residence in the United 
                                States; and
                                    ``(II) resided in the United 
                                States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall have 
effect as if included in the enactment of section 251(a) of title II of 
the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 2018 (division J of Public Law 115-141; 132 Stat. 
824).
                                 <all>
```
This Promissory Note constitutes a Schedule to the Quota Purchase Agreement entered in July 22,2009 by and among the abovementioned parties, and forms an integral part of the Quota PurchaseAgreement.As a result of the execution of the First Amendment to the Quota Purchase Agreement entered into inAugust 31, 2009 by and among the abovementioned parties, among others, this Promissory Note shallreplace for all legal purposes the promissory note issued by the Purchaser on behalf theBeneficiary and Lorena Giusti Demore on July 22, 2009 and shall constitute a Schedule to theAmendment to the Quota Purchase Agreement, representing an integral part of the Quota PurchaseAgreement as of its execution, as amended.The promissory note issued on July 22, 2009 on behalf of the Beneficiary and Lorena Giusti Demoreis hereby expressly revoked, becoming null and void.São Paulo, August 31, 2009.      By:  /s/ Marcelo Duarte   **MOBITEC EMPREENDIMENTOS E PARTICIPAÇÕES LTDA.**   **p. Marcelo Duarte**
Release #4271-99 (98 Civ. 5588)

For Release: May 27, 1999

New York Court Orders Defendants to Pay Over $8.1 Million in Civil
    Monetary Penalties and Orders Restitution of More Than $2.7 Million to
    Customers in CFTC Illegal Foreign Currency Futures Fraud Action

CFTC's 1998 Anti-Fraud Enforcement Action Alleged that the Defendants
    Cheated and Defrauded Customers Out of Over $3.5 Million

WASHINGTON � The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
    announced today that on May 11, 1999, the Honorable Allen G. Schwartz of
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final
    judgment and order against New York Currency Exchange Corp, New
    York Currency Research Corp. (both located in New York, New York), and
    Michael T. Matejka, president of both corporations, ordering the
    defendants to jointly and severally pay $2,701,486 in restitution to
    customers and to pay a civil monetary penalty of $8,104,458.

The judgment also permanently enjoins the defendants from violating the
    provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations alleged
    in the CFTC complaint filed against the defendants on August 6, 1998, and
    rescinds all contracts entered into by the defendants with their
    customers.

The judgment is a culmination of proceedings stemming from the 1998 CFTC
    complaint, which alleged that the defendants violated the anti-fraud,
    registration, and various other provisions of the CEA and CFTC regulations
    by cheating and defrauding customers, offering and selling illegal foreign
    currency futures contracts, commingling and converting customer funds,
    bucketing customer orders, and operating as an unregistered futures
    commission merchant. Shortly after the complaint was filed, the court
    entered an ex parte order, and subsequently a preliminary
    injunction, which, among other things, froze the defendants' assets
    (see CFTC News Releases #4177-98, August 12, 1998, and #4089-97, December
    18, 1997).

# # #
Michael OTTOGALLI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________

No. 18-60170

__________

CASMIRO CRUZ TELLEZ, 

also known as Casimiro Cruz, also known as Casimiro Cruz Tellez,

Petitioner,

Versus

WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

_______________________

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A042 214 710

_______________________

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(B), there is a genuine issue of material fact 

as to the petitioner’s claim of United States citizenship. IT IS ORDERED that

the petitioner’s motion to transfer the petition for review to the United States

 * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 9, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-60170 Document: 00515110098 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2019
No. 18-60170

2

District Court for the Western District of Texas for review of his citizenship 

claim is GRANTED. The appeal is DISMISSED. This order is not to be construed as a comment on citizenship or any other issue.

 Case: 18-60170 Document: 00515110098 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/09/2019
In Re Thomas SHEPPARD, petitioner.

No. 17-5571.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4134 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy 

Act of 1977 to provide for an additional goal of the Agriculture Advanced 

Research and Development Authority (AGARDA) to enhance the role 

of agriculture in innovative sustainability solutions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, 

and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 to provide for an additional goal of the Agriculture Advanced Research and 

Development Authority (AGARDA) to enhance the role 

of agriculture in innovative sustainability solutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sustainable Agricul5 ture Research Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4134 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL GOAL OF AGARDA TO ENHANCE ROLE 

2 OF AGRICULTURE IN INNOVATIVE SUSTAIN3 ABILITY SOLUTIONS. 

4 Section 1473H(b)(2) of the National Agricultural Re5 search, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 

6 U.S.C. 3319k(b)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub10 paragraph (E); and 

11 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(D) to enhance the role of agriculture in 

14 innovative voluntary resilience solutions in the 

15 United States through the development of agri16 cultural technologies that address— 

17 ‘‘(i) the impact of extreme weather on 

18 crop production; 

19 ‘‘(ii) the expansion of the potential for 

20 long-term carbon storage through agri21 culture; 

22 ‘‘(iii) increased economic and practical 

23 feasibility for renewable and sustainable 

24 energy on farms and in the agriculture in25 dustry; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4134 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) increased adoption of voluntary 

2 conservation practices that sequester car3 bon and build on-farm climate resilience; 

4 and’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS