UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.  20549  FORM

10-K/A  X. ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011  . TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to _____________  Commission File No. 000-29735 ___________________________  TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC.  Nevada88-0455809(State or other jurisdiction(IRS Employerof Incorporation)Identification Number)123 West Nye Lane, Suite 517Carson City, Nevada 89706(Address of principal executive offices)(775) 888-6744(Issuers Telephone Number)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:   None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:   $.001 par value common stock  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes .No X.  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes .No X.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X.No .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes .No X.  Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large accelerated filer.Accelerated filer.Non-accelerated filer. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting companyX.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes .No X.  The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $6,291,857 based upon the closing price of our common stock which was $.0022 on June 30, 2011.  Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each person or group who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock on June 30, 2011 amounting to approximately 138,303,209 shares have been excluded in that such persons or groups may be deemed to be affiliates.  This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.    As of July 27, 2012, there were  6,000,000,000 shares of our common stock outstanding.  Documents Incorporated by Reference: None  2    Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc.  Annual Report on Form 10-K  Table of Contents  Part IPageItem 1. Business5Item 2. Properties10Item 3. Legal Proceedings10Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures11Part IIItem 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities12Item 6. Selected Financial Data15Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations15Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk18Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data19Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure20Item 9A. Controls and Procedures20Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures20Item 9B.  Other Information20Part IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance26Item 11. Executive Compensation28Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters29Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence30Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services30Part IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules31Signatures32   3   Forward Looking Statements  This Annual Report on Form 10-K and all other reports filed by Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation (TADS or the Company), from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC and collectively the Filings) contain or may contain forward looking statements and information that are based upon beliefs of, and information currently available to, the management of TADS as well as estimates and assumptions made by TADS management. The forward-looking statements and associated risks set forth in this Annual Report include or relate to, among other things, (a) our growth strategies, (b) anticipated trends in our industry, (c) our ability to obtain and retain sufficient capital for future operations, and (d) our anticipated needs for working capital. These statements may be found under Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations and Business, as well as in this Annual Report generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under Risk Factors and matters described in this Annual Report generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report will in fact occur.  The forward-looking statements herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions described herein. The assumptions are based on judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any such assumption could prove to be inaccurate and therefore there can be no assurance that the results contemplated in forward-looking statements will be realized. In addition, as disclosed elsewhere in the Risk Factors section of this prospectus, there are a number of other risks inherent in our business and operations which could cause our operating results to vary markedly and adversely from prior results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Management decisions, including budgeting, are subjective in many respects and periodic revisions must be made to reflect actual conditions and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter marketing, capital investment and other expenditures, which may also materially adversely affect our results of operations. In light of significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included in this prospectus, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved.  Some of the information in this annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Any statement in this prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus that is not a statement of an historical fact constitutes a forward-looking statement. Further, when we use the words may, expect, anticipate, plan, believe, seek, estimate, internal, and similar words, we intend to identify statements and expressions that may be forward- looking statements. We believe it is important to communicate certain of our expectations to our investors. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Many factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. You are accordingly cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Important factors that may cause our actual results to differ from such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the risk factors discussed herein.  Although TADS believes that the expectations reflected in the forward looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, management does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with TADS consolidated financial statements and the related notes filed herewith.  4   PART I  Item 1. Description of Business  Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. (TADS or the Company) is a Nevada public corporation that offers air-combat training, aircraft maintenance training and other Aerospace/Defense services to the United States and Foreign militaries and agencies. The Company is currently a developmental stage company with uncertain viability and current revenue generating business operations limited to agreements with a joint-venture partner, Tactical Air Support, Inc.  The Companys executive offices are located at 123 West Nye Lane, Suite 517, Carson City, Nevada, 89706 and the Companys phone number is (775) 888-6744.  TADS Corporate History  TADS was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 9, 1998 under the name Natalma Industries, Inc. Originally, TADS operated as a junior mining company engaged in the exploration of mining properties. We were unsuccessful in locating a joint venture partner to assist us in the development of our mining claims. As a result, TADS was unable to pay for and perform the exploration and development required in its agreement with the owners of its properties and lost our rights to the mining claims. Our management at the time, therefore determined that it was in the best interest of our shareholders that we seek potential operating businesses and business opportunities with the intent to acquire or merge with another business, which led to the purchase substantially all of the assets of AeroGroup Incorporated on December 15, 2006 (the AeroGroup Acquisition). The complete terms of the AeroGroup Acquisition were disclosed in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2006. AeroGroup Incorporated originally commenced its operations and business plan as a contractor of military flight training as AeroGroup International Corporation in January 2002, and eventually merged with and acquired AeroGroup Incorporated.  Current Business Operations  As a result of the U.S. Base Foreclosure Act, the overall downsizing of the armed forces of the U.S. and its foreign allies, and the advanced age of the U.S. military air fleet, there was insufficient equipment and personnel to meet demands for combat air training and air refueling training. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and various regional conflicts and terrorists acts, have only added to this crisis. The private-sector is now being asked to fill a role once the exclusive domain of the military, and the capabilities of civilian contractors are well recognized, and are frequently proven superior and more efficient than public-sector contractors. In addition, due to the escalating wild fires in the Western U.S., and the financial and environmental costs associated with this crisis, fire-fighting preparedness and capability have become a top priority at both the State and Federal levels of government. Again, the private sector is being asked to provide services that were previously the domain of the public-sector.  In order to meet present and future military, environmental, and financial threats, the United States and its allies has been forced to continue to commit billions of dollars to training, preparedness, and execution. These needs cannot be met without the support of the private-sector. We believe that there is currently no other private-sector contractor which has the potential capabilities to adequately fulfill these diverse and urgent demands, and we believe that TADS, through its current management and business contacts and relationships, has the potential ability to negotiate future contracts and business relationships in order to provide access to the aircraft, personnel, and operational skills necessary to claim a portion of this rapidly growing and highly-profitable market for diverse air support services. Although the Company believes it has the potential ability to negotiate such future contracts and business relationships, the Company does not currently have any such active contracts and it cannot be assured that it will be awarded any such contracts in the future.  We are currently pursuing and negotiating for the acquisition of maintenance and air training contracts, as both a prime contractor and as sub-contractor through certain teaming agreements, with both the United States Department of Defense and various foreign militaries, but for security purposes, cannot disclose the countries with which we are engaged in discussions or bids. We believe that our most likely future revenues will come from foreign military training, both air and maintenance. The contracts that we are pursuing can be executed with or without planes or other physical assets, but the acquisition of planes and equipment would greatly enhance our ability to capture more and larger contracts.  As disclosed below, we are currently engaged in litigation to secure certain aircraft and parts that we believe have been improperly interfered with by third parties.   Although we believe we will prevail in the acquisition of such assets, we are currently exploring other opportunities to acquire military aircraft and other military assets in order to further our business strategy.  Air Combat Training  Air combat training exercises are currently conducted by the training commands of the United States Air Force, United States Navy, and of most of our NATO and foreign allies. We believe neither the U. S. Department of Defense (the DoD) nor its allies have sufficient personnel, support equipment, or access to foreign enemy type aircraft, to meet current demand. In many instances our European allies have neither the facilities nor the extensive airspace required for fighter combat training or fighter bomber training that we hope to provide.  TADS believes it will be able to provide the armed forces of the U.S. and its allies with a vast array of training services and support functions including, but not limited to air combat instruction and tactical training, actual aggressor simulated combat, classroom instruction, and airspace scheduling, fueling, aircraft spare parts support, aircraft maintenance and aircraft maintenance training.  5   Air combat simulation exercises are currently conducted by the training commands of the United States Air Force, United States Navy, and of most of our NATO, and foreign allies. We believe neither the DoD nor its allies have sufficient training and support equipment and personnel to meet current demand. In many instances, our European allies have neither the facilities nor the extensive airspace required for fighter combat training or fighter bombing training that TADS believes it can provide.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Our current proposed flight training services focus on two major components; initial qualification flight training and advanced flight training, both of which consist of ground, and in air flight training. In addition, we are preparing to perform other flight training support services as described herein.  Initial Qualification Flight Training  Initial qualification flight training consists of the training of military pilots that have only recently become qualified in their aircraft and of more experienced pilots returning for recurrency training. Initial qualification flight training involves aircraft specific flight theory, flight maneuvers, aerodynamics and emergency in flight procedures as they relate to combat in a specific aircraft. Pilots and other crew members are also trained in cockpit resource management, which focuses on division of duties between pilot and co-pilot and utilization of resources within the aircraft cockpit to complete the flight plan and address emergencies. Initial qualification training involves many hours of classroom instruction in aircraft systems operations, air-to-air flight maneuvers, tactics, formation flying, instrument training and air-to-ground tactics. In flight instruction is generally provided only once the pilot has shown proficiency in ground instruction and flight simulator instruction.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Advanced  Flight Training  Advanced flight training focuses on combat and other advanced maneuvers and is conducted after the pilot completes initial qualification training and returns to a full service training facility where he is provided refresher or upgrade training to sharpen his or her combat skills. We intend to focus the training venue on approved overseas customers and NATO customers who would use our accessible facilities and ranges to qualify, in some cases, and re-qualify in other cases in specific combat skills like air-to-air, air-to-ground, electronic countermeasure training, air-refueling training, and other advanced maneuvers.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  U.S. Military Training  A crucial component to aerial combat training involves training against actual foreign adversary aircraft which are typically Russian, ex-Soviet bloc, or Chinese. However, because the U.S. military has little to no access to enemy aircraft, the status-quo has been to use aged U.S. military aircraft operating as the adversarial or Red Air aircraft. The status-quo leaves much to be desired because aged U.S. military aircraft do not possess the flying characteristics or capabilities of sophisticated enemy combat aircraft, nor do they emit the same electronic, radar signature, or visual signals.  Through its past and present relationships with companies licensed by the U.S. Department of Justice (BATF) to import foreignweapons of war, TADS believes it can provide unique Red Air aggressor aircraft.  These are the aircraft that are the actual fighter aircraft currently used substantially many of the former Soviet bloc countries and non-allied nations.  In connection with contracts to provide adversary combat aircraft to the U.S. military, TADS believes it can supply various support services such as adversary pilots, spare parts, service and maintenance of the adversary aircraft, tactical training, actual aggressor simulated combat, and classroom instruction.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  6   Foreign Air Combat Training  Unlike the training of the U.S. military, air combat training of foreign allied militaries typically entails air combat training techniques and strategies using U.S. military aircraft such as the F-16, which such foreign militaries have already purchased. Although a commercial endeavor, it has been a strategic decision of the U.S. government to supply U.S. fighter aircraft to its allies. However, the ability and resources of the U.S. military to thereafter train the foreign purchasers of its aircraft is extremely limited and sub-par.  As a result, there is a backlog of allied countries that have purchased F-16s and other U.S. fighter aircraft, and that have immediate and ongoing need for air combat training. TADS believes they are able to offer to foreign militaries actual combat training from highly experienced U.S. fighter pilots, classroom training, and parts, service, and maintenance protocols for their aircraft. TADS also believes it has the capability to either train on foreign soil and foreign military bases to fulfill multi-year contracts, or to provide a turn-key solution by hosting foreign militaries on U.S. soil, and therein provide not only pilots, training protocols, and parts, service, and maintenance, but also the air-bases, bombing ranges, fueling services, housing requirements, etc.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Tactical Air Support, Inc.  Merger Agreement  On May 20, 2010, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent (the LOI) with Tactical Air Support, Inc., a Nevada corporation (TAS).TAS is a highly regarded Aerospace/Defense Services contractor founded by a group of former Navy, Marine, and Air Force Weapons School Instructors to provide the military and commercial sectors with the highest possible quality of aviation, maintenance and consulting support. Pursuant to the terms of the LOI and subject to further negotiation, the Company agreed to acquire 100% of the equity interest of TAS such that following the transaction, TAS would become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In exchange, the existing shareholders of TAS would be issued 45.75% of post-transaction issued and outstanding shares of the Companys common stock. A copy of the LOI was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 21, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  On December 10, 2010, the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary TAS Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation (TAS Sub), and TAS entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement or Merger). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, TAS was to exchange 100% of their equity interest with TAS Sub in exchange for 25,197,795 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock (the Preferred Shares). The Preferred Shares were to be designated with the Nevada Secretary of State prior to the closing of the Merger Agreement, and were to be convertible into a total of 2,519,779,500 shares of the Companys Common Stock and maintain voting rights equal to the number of shares of Common Stock convertible thereunder. Following the closing of the Merger Agreement which, according to the Merger Agreement was to occur on or before January 31, 2011 unless mutually extended by all parties (the Closing), TAS was to merge with and into TAS Sub and the merged entity was to continue the existing business operations of TAS as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Closing was subject to several closing conditions that were to be satisfied prior to Closing, with such conditions outlined in the Merger Agreement. A copy of the Merger Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 10, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  On February 1, 2011, the parties to the Merger Agreement entered into an Amendment to the Merger Agreement to provide for an extension of the Closing Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement) until April 31, 2011. A copy of the Amendment to the Merger Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 2, 2011and incorporated herein by reference. As of the date of this filing, the Merger Agreement had not closed prior to the termination period and the proposed Merger Agreement has since expired.  Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano Joint Venture Services Agreement  On or about May 2, 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture Services Agreement (the JV Agreement) with TAS relating to the capital lease and operation of an Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano aircraft (the Tucano). Pursuant to the terms of the JV Agreement, the Tucano was leased in the name of TAS under a capital lease, with TAS maintaining full control of the Tucano and responsibility for all associated operational, administrative, maintenance and insurance costs related to the operation of the Tucano. The Company delivered $80,280.00 as a security deposit (the Deposit) under the lease of the Tucano, with TAS required to compensate the Company with an interest payment equal to one percent (1%) of the Deposit payable monthly. In addition, the Company is entitled to thirty percent (30%) of the operating profit received by TAS relating to work performed with the Tucano. A copy of the JV Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 10, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  As of the date of this Form 10-K, the Tucano has been deployed under a revenue-producing contract through a U.S. government contract issued to TAS and has generated total revenues of approximately $70,000 for providing 2 days of training support for the U.S. Army ground forces, and is currently being considered for additional U.S. government contracts.  7   Previously, as outlined above, the parties entered into a Merger Agreement related to the proposed merger between the parties. Although the Merger had not closed prior to the termination period and the related agreement has since expired, in the event the parties are able to finalize and close the Merger while the Tucano continues to be employed under the JV Agreement, subject to further agreement between the parties, such JV Agreements shall be terminated and the Tucano shall continue to be employed by the combined entity.  Additional Tactical Air Support, Inc Arrangements  On or about June 2, 2011, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent (the Aircraft LOI) with TAS relating to the proposed acquisition (the Acquisition) of certain aircraft (the Aircraft). A copy of the Aircraft LOI was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  Subject to further Definitive Agreements (as defined in the Aircraft LOI) and pursuant to the terms of the Aircraft LOI, in the event the parties are able to complete the Acquisition of the Aircraft, the Aircraft is to be purchased in the name of TAS, with TAS maintaining full control of the Aircraft and responsibility for all associated operational, administrative, maintenance and insurance costs related to the operation of the Aircraft. Subject to further Definitive Agreements and pursuant to the terms of the Aircraft LOI, the Company shall be responsible for the acquisition of necessary funding related to the Acquisition and shall receive the right to receive fifty percent (50%) of all future profits derived from the operation, sale, lease or any other use of the Aircraft. Previously, as outlined above, the parties entered into a Merger Agreement related to the proposed merger between the parties. Although the Merger had not closed prior to the termination period and the related agreement has since expired, in the event the parties are able to finalize and close the Merger while the Aircraft continues to be employed under the Definitive Agreements, subject to further agreement between the parties, such Definitive Agreements shall be terminated and the Aircraft shall continue to be employed by the combined entity.  On July 22, 2011, the Company entered into a Binding Letter of Intent (the Services LOI) with TAS in connection with certain government services contracts TAS is currently seeking (the Services Contracts).  Subject to further definitive agreements and pursuant to the terms of the Services LOI, in the event TAS is awarded the Services Contracts, the Company will receive the right to thirty percent (30%) of all future net profits derived from the Services Contracts.  In connection with the Services LOI and Services Contracts, the Company has provided TAS funding codified by a secured promissory note issued to the Company by TAS in the amount of Three Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Dollars (US$315,000 and the Note). The Note maintains zero interest, a maturity date of October 22, 2011 and is secured by and convertible into 100,000 shares of TASs pledged, issued and outstanding common stock at the Companys option, which represents a ten percent (10%) ownership interest in TAS. A copy of the Note has been attached as an exhibit to the previously filed Form 8-K, and is hereby incorporated by reference. As of the date of this filing, the Note is currently in default, but the Company has not yet exercised its option to acquire the 10% ownership interest in TAS. Previously, as outlined above, the parties entered into a Merger Agreement related to the proposed merger between the parties. Although the Merger had not closed prior to the termination period and the related agreement has since expired, in the event the parties are able to finalize and close the Merger while the Services LOI continues to be in effect, subject to further agreement between the parties, such Services LOI shall be terminated and parties shall continue to work together under the combined entity.  AeroTech Corporation-Acquisition Agreement  On or about July 12, 2012, the Company and AeroTech Corporation, a Florida corporation (AeroTech) entered into an Acquisition Agreement (the Acquisition Agreement). A copy of the Acquisition Agreement has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2012, the terms of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Through the acquisition of AeroTech, the Company will acquire AeroTechs existing business and assets including, but not limited to, five separate teaming agreements, a sole source justification and approval from the United States Army, and AeroTechs pre-transaction management team.  Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company will acquire 100% of the equity interest in AeroTech in exchange for the issuance of Five Million shares of the Companys Series C Preferred Stock to be issued to AeroTechs existing shareholders upon closing. A copy of the Companys Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 31, 2011 outlining the rights, preferences and privileges of the Series C Preferred Stock has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2012, the terms of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Following the closing of the Acquisition Agreement which, according to the Acquisition Agreement shall occur on or before August 11, 2012 unless mutually extended by all parties (the Closing), AeroTech will continue its existing business operations as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The Closing is subject to certain closing conditions that must be satisfied prior to Closing, with such conditions outlined in Section 4 of the Acquisition Agreement, including, but not limited to, the appointment and retainment of AeroTechs existing management to the post transaction entity including: (i) Colonel Scott Patterson to be appointed to the position of Chief Operating Officer; and (ii) Mark Daniels, to be appointed to the position of President. Such appointments shall be subject to subsequent employment agreements with each respective individual, to be executed and finalized upon Closing.   8   Customers and Competition  The capabilities of companies which provide similar services are limited. Typically, our competitors operate a small number of older-generation aircraft. They therefore generally neither have the aircraft required to fulfill the current contracts in the awards process, and nor do they have the infrastructure necessary should they be awarded a contract. TADS believes that its ability to procure, support, and maintain military aircraft and ground-threat support equipment, either though itself or by partnering with similar service providers, gives it a distinct advantage over the competition.  We are dependent on a small, limited pool of customers for our services. The Companys aerial training and air refueling services will only be requested, if at all, by United States and allied military agencies with specific needs, and by contractors for these services who sub-contract to us.  The contract procurement process is lengthy and the government military organizations and the State and Federal agencies that are our primary target customers are often delayed and cautious when issuing contracts such as those we pursue. These customers have strict regulations and policies with respect to procuring services from private-sector companies for fulfillment of their contracts. In addition, unless no other competitors are available, the contracts we target are generally required to request bids before awarding contracts. While we believe, based on our experience, very few other entities are currently able to provide most of these services, no assurance can be made that new entities with more resources than us will enter into this business.  The Companys business is dependent on our ability to bid for, negotiate, secure, and perform under specialized government and agency contracts. We have in the past been awarded a number of service contracts, and we are in various stages of discussions for the awarding of additional service contracts related to our services described herein, although no assurances can be given that these discussions will lead to the awarding of additional contracts.  Government Approval, Regulation and Licensing  In order to own and operate military aircraft and to enter into government contracts we are required to have certain government licenses and permits. Our proposed business is heavily regulated. All of our operations involve intense government approval and oversight. Prior to awarding contracts other than on a bid for service basis, military agencies are required to publish their proposed award of a contract with details of such contract. During this time period, other persons may submit objections or counter bids on these contracts.  Our potential aircraft operations will also be subject to all regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration that relate to civil experimental aircraft, and will be subject to special airworthiness standards and operating procedures of the Federal Aviation Administration. Additionally, our pilots, instructors and mechanics also must generally be appropriately certified to perform their duties by the Federal Aviation Administration and are required to comply with strict recurrency flight and ground training rules along with medical certification for pilots.  In addition to the foregoing, government agencies will require that we have and maintain a proper safety program, an approved spare parts program and an approved aircraft inspection maintenance program, each of which must be sufficient to support the contracts that we undertake to perform and each of which must be continually kept current.  Additionally, we could be subject to rules of foreign governments with respect to operations of our aircraft over their territories.   Intellectual Property  We maintain several patent applications to a number of procedures that related to the methods of conversion of military aircraft for use by civilian entities in training military personnel. These patents, which were acquired through the AeroGroup Acquisition, are as follows:  AircraftPatentF-16 FalconPat. Pend. 60805870KfirPat. Pend. 60805885A-4 SkyhawkPat Pend. 60805877MiG 29Pat Pend. 60805888  We are required to renew such patent applications and, as of the date of this filing, such applications have lapsed without renewal; however, we believe it can be renewed when needed. No assurance can be made that we will be awarded patents or that they will not be challenged. Moreover, no assurance can be made that competitors will not utilize similar procedures to privatize military aircraft.   Employees  As of December 31, 2011, we have two full time employees. In addition, we hire independent contractor labor for executive management, legal, accounting and other administrative functions, on an as needed basis.   9   WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION  You are advised to read this Form 10-K in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC.  In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K that we file from time to time.  You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain information about obtaining access to the Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers at its website http://www.sec.gov.  Item 2. Description of Properties  The Companys executive offices are located at 123 West Nye Lane, Suite 517, Carson City, Nevada, 89706 and the Companys phone number is (775) 888-6744. We believe that all our properties have been adequately maintained, are generally in good condition, and are suitable and adequate for our business.  Item 3. Legal Proceedings  Mr. Charlie Searock (Searock), a former executive officer of our company, has brought a laws suit in the District Court of the 336 th Judicial District of Grayson County, Texas against us and seven other defendants on February 6, 2007, on claims of breach of an employment agreement between Searock and International Tactical Training Center, Inc. (ITTC). (Charles J. Searock, Jr., vs. Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., International Tactical Training Center, Inc., Mark Daniels, Victor Miller, John Farley, Gary Fears, Jamie Goldstein, and Joel Ramsden, Cause No.07-0322-336). ITTC and the Company are the only two corporate defendants named in the Searock lawsuit. Of the six individuals named as defendants, three are former ITTC management.   Searock asserts that the Company is liable for ITTCs breach of employment agreement because he alleges that the Company acquired ITTCs assets, and that ITTC was a former subsidiary of AeroGroup, Inc., an entity not named as a defendant in the Searock lawsuit. In addition to his claim for breach of the ITTC employment contract, Searock also asserts theories of tort liability against the defendants.   The Company denies any liability to Searock on his claim for breach of the ITTC employment contract and denies Searock has any factual basis to impose liability on the Company under any of his theories of tort liability. Specifically, the Company denies that it acquired, owns or controls ITTCs former assets. The Company believes that this claim is without merit and is working towards resolution of the same.  On October 25, 2010, Searock was awarded a default judgment of $1,248,962 including accrued interest, jointly and severally against TADS and the other defendants, all of whom who failed to appear for trial, and an award of exemplary damages of $2,000,000 against TADS. Searock claims that TADS and the other defendants were given notice of the trial, however it is TADS assertion and the assertion of the other defendants that none one of the defendants, including TADS, ever received notice of the trial, were unaware of the trial, and that the judgment is without merit. TADS is currently in the process of appealing the judgment in the Texas Appellate Court based upon not having received notice, and although no assurances can be given, the Company believes that the judgment will be vacated by the Court.  On or about July 3, 2012, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the Daniels Settlement Agreement) with Mark Daniels (Daniels), the Companys former Chief Executive Officer. A copy of the Daniels Settlement Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Pursuant to the terms of the Daniels Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to settle its litigational claims against Daniels related to the litigation action entitled Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., et. al v. Mark Daniels, et. al, in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida through the removal of Daniels from the action. As consideration for the removal of Daniels from the action: (i) Daniels agreed to the rescission, cancellation, waiver and termination in full of all Company obligations relating to a promissory note issued by the Company to Daniels on or about April 15, 2009 with a current balance of approximately $221,000 including all principle and accrued interest; and (ii) Daniels is required to deliver a Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) cash payment to the Company within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the execution of the Daniels Agreement.  August 3, 2010 certain individuals including Alexander Baranov/Glovatsky and Victor Miller filed an improper and frivolous Involuntary Chapter 7 Petition (the New Petition) against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, in an effort to circumvent the legitimate court process, in direct violation of the Court Order issued by Judge Paul Hyman on May 14, 2010.  The Company immediately requested an emergency Motion to Dismiss the New Petition based upon its contention that:  · The New Petition violated the Court Order;  · A majority of the new petitioners were currently involved in civil litigation with TADF; and  · All of the claims of the new petitioners were either without merit, being contested, or were frivolous and improper.   10   On August 10, 2010, at an Emergency Hearing to Dismiss the fraudulent and improper Petition, the Federal Bankruptcy judge dismissed the Petition, as had been anticipated and previously disclosed by the Company, and, moreover, due to the egregious actions of the petitioners, reserved the right of the US Federal Bankruptcy Court to:  · Impose sanctions upon the petitioners, and  · Impose punitive sanctions upon the petitioners if it is determined that the actions of the petitioners violated the Court Order previously issued by U.S. Federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Hyman.  Although no assurances can be given, the Company believes that at the request of the Company, sanctions will be imposed upon the petitioners, and that it will be determined that the petitioners violated the Court Order issued by Judge Hyman.   As disclosed in our past filings, Sichenzia & Ross LLP (Sichenzia) had been pursuing a claim against the Company for unpaid services dating back to early 2007. The Company recently learned that Sichenzia obtained a judgment against the Company in the amount of $21,471.87 in the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York on April 3, 2008. We believe that this claim is without merit and are working towards resolution of the same.  As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company is not a party to any pending litigation or legal proceeding that is not described herein or in the ordinary course of business. To our knowledge, no such proceedings exist or are threatened other than those described herein.  Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures  Not Applicable.   11   PART II  Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters  (a) Market Information  The common stock of the Company, $.001 par value, is currently traded over the counter and is listed on the OTC Pink Sheets under the symbol "TADF" The availability of historical trading prices of our common stock is limited, with periods of little or no trading activity. The following table sets forth the available approximate range of high and low closing prices for the common stock of the Company during the periods indicated. The quotations presented are adjusted to reflect splits in our common stock and reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions in the common stock.  2011LowHighFirst Quarter0.00090.0025Second Quarter0.00090.0050Third Quarter0.00090.0039Fourth Quarter0.00050.00172010LowHighFirst Quarter0.00110.003Second Quarter0.00250.0308Third Quarter0.00350.0084Fourth Quarter0.00190.005  On July 24, 2012, the closing quotation for our common stock was $0.001 per share. As reflected by the high and low prices on the foregoing table, the trading price of the common stock of the Company can be volatile with dramatic changes over short periods. The trading price may reflect imbalances in the supply and demand for shares of the Company, market reaction to perceived changes in the industry in which the Company sells products and services, general economic conditions, and other factors. Investors are cautioned that the trading price of the common stock can change dramatically based on changing market perceptions that may be unrelated to the Company and its activities.   (b) Approximate number of equity security holders  As of July 25, 2012, there were approximately 222 holders of record of our common stock.  This number excludes the shares of our common stock owned by stockholders holding stock under nominee security position listings.  (c) Dividends  We have never declared or paid a cash dividend and do not foresee paying one in the near future.  Any future decisions regarding dividends will be made by our board of directors.  We currently intend to retain and use any future earnings for the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends, subject to the approval of our stockholders.  Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.  (d) Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans  The Company does not currently maintain any stock option plan, whether approved by shareholders or otherwise, however, the Company does, on occasion issue equity or options as compensation to consultants and employees. Additional detailed information relating to stock and option grants during 2011 can be found below in Item 11, Executive Compensation and Item 5(e) Recent sales of unregistered securities, the provisions of which are incorporated herein.  (e) Recent sales of unregistered securities.  Issuance of Convertible Debentures  First Quarter of 2011  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $40,833.16 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 54,444,213 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  12   On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $30,000.00 to Michael Cariello as consideration for unpaid salary.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $13,384.59 to the Gary Fears Trust as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 17,846,113 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $50,000.00 to the Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal fees as of 1/1/2011 to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 66,666,667 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $176,108.00 to GFMB, LLC as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three quarters, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 234,754,123 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $25,000.00 to the DB Family Trust as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 33,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Debenture in a principle amount of $110,000.00 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and is Non-Convertible.  Second Quarter of 2011  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $39,500.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 26,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $6,692.09 to the Gary Fears Trust as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 4,461,393 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $15,000.00 to Brad Hacker as consideration for accrued accounting fees.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $75,000.00 to Jamie Goldstein pursuant to indemnification demanded by Goldstein and accepted by the Company in connection with certain litigation related to Company business.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  Third Quarter of 2011  On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $39,000.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary and expenses during Q-2/2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 31,200 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00125 per share.  On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $25,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal fees as of 7/1/2011 to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00125 per share.   13   Fourth Quarter of 2011  On October 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $15,500.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary and expenses during Q-3/2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 20,666,.667 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On October 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $1,500.00 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for loans to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On November 22, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $25,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for certain unpaid legal fees as of November 22, 2011.  The Convertible Debenture is due and payable as of January 31, 2012, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 33,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  Issuance of Stock  Common Stock  The Company issued 10,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Air Support Systems, LLC in May 2011 pursuant to the terms of a lease agreement between the Company and Air Support Systems, LLC executed on May 18, 2010, for which the Common Stock had previously not been issued. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The shares were valued at $15,000.  The Company issued 174,978,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Chris Clark on November 11, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock that were to be originally issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in July of 2011 (as further described below) and subsequently assigned to Chris Clark. All 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted at a conversion price of $0.4572 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 25,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Peter Maffitt on November 11, 2011, for compensation for his services for 2011 as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.  The Shares were valued at $25,000.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Series A Preferred Stock  The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Alexis Korybut in April, 2011 pursuant to an Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Korybut. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The shares were valued at $100,000.  Series B Preferred Stock  The Company issued a total of 1,333,332 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Cornucopia, Ltd. in April of 2011 at a purchase price of $0.30 per share for a total consideration of $400,000, subject to the terms of certain securities purchase agreements between the Company and Cornucopia, Ltd. The terms and conditions of the securities purchase agreement and related issuance of Series B Preferred Shares is outlined below in Item 9B. Other Information.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares. The rights, preferences and privileges of the Series B Preferred Shares are outlined in the Certificate of Designation designating the Preferred Stock, which was attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2011 and is hereby incorporated by reference  The Company agreed to issue a total of 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Cornucopia, Ltd. in July of 2011 at a purchase price of $0.4572 per share for a total consideration of $200,000, subject to the terms of certain securities purchase agreements between the Company and Cornucopia, Ltd. The terms and conditions of the securities purchase agreement and related issuance of Series B Preferred Shares are outlined below in Item 9B. Other Information.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Warrants  In April, 2011, in connection with a securities purchase agreement with Cornucopia, Ltd., the Company issued Cornucopia: (a) Series A-100 warrant to purchase up to 533,333,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.00075 for a one year period; and (b) Series A-101 warrant to purchase up to 800,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of the lesser of: (A) $0.0025 or (B) a fifty percent (50%) discount to the average closing price of the Common Stock for the thirty (30) trading days prior to exercise of the A-101 warrant. As of the date of this filing, both the Series A-100 and Series A-101 warrants issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. have expired with no exercise of such warrants and no issuance of any shares of Common Stock.  14   Conversion of Notes and Exercise of Warrants  The Company issued 29,897,993 shares of restricted Common Stock to John Brannigan on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to the Gary Fears Trust on April 1, 2010 and subsequently assigned to John Brannigan. The entire principle amount of $32,078.26 and accrued interest of $5,294.23 was converted at a conversion price of $0.00125 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 53,632,146 shares of restricted Common Stock to Kristen Zankl on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 and subsequently assigned to Kristen Zankl. The principle amount of $35,000.00 and accrued interest of $5,224.11 of the convertible promissory note was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 52,161,224 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to the Gary Fears Trust on January 1, 2010 and subsequently assigned to GFMB, LLC. The principle amount of $30,057.66 and accrued interest of $5,850.13 of the convertible promissory note was converted at a conversion price of $0.0006884 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 51,868,815 shares of restricted Common Stock to Suncrest Industries, LLC on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to GFMB, LLC on December 30, 2010 and subsequently assigned to Suncrest Industries, LLC. The principle amount of $36,200.00 and accrued interest of $2,713.51 of the convertible promissory note was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 52,642,513 shares of restricted Common Stock to the Estella A. Korybut Irrevocable Trust on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to Alexis Korybut on July 1, 2010 and subsequently assigned to the Estella A. Korybut Irrevocable Trust. The entire principle amount of $33,954.68 and accrued interest of $2,293.43 was converted at a conversion price of $0.0006884 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 193,107,580 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC on December 13, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a $176,108.00 convertible promissory note originally issued to GFMB, LLC on December 31, 2010. A principle amount of $130,000.00 together with accrued interest of $14,830.68 was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 14,717,768 shares of restricted Common Stock to John Brannigan on December 13, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a $176,108.00 convertible promissory note originally issued to GFMB, LLC on December 31, 2010. A principle amount of $9,908.00 together with accrued interest of $1,130.33 was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company reasonably believes that all of the issuances of securities described above were deemed to be exempt from registration in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.  Each investor had a pre-existing relationship with the Company and/or represented that it had the financial wherewithal, knowledge and sophistication to invest in the securities of the Company.  In addition, each recipient represented that they are acquiring the securities as an investment only and not with a view towards distribution of the same to the public.  We made available to each investor with disclosure of all aspects of our business, including providing the investor with press releases, access to our auditors, and other financial, business, and corporate information.  Finally, all securities issued were either restricted with an appropriate restrictive legend on certificates for shares, notes and warrants issued stating that the securities (and underlying shares) have not been registered under the Securities Act and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without an effective registration or an exemption therefrom, or were issued pursuant to an exemption provided under Rule 144.  Item 6. Selected Financial Data  Not Applicable.  Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report.  This report contains forward-looking statements that are not historic in nature, particularly those that utilize terminology such as may, will, should, expects, anticipates, estimates, believes, or plans or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements based on current expectations and assumptions.  15   The forward-looking events discussed in this report, the documents to which we refer you and other statements made from time to time by us or our representatives, may not occur, and actual events and results may differ materially and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us.  For these statements, we claim the protection of the bespeaks caution doctrine.  All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Critical Accounting Policies  Our critical and significant accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are disclosed in the Notes to the Financial Statements.  These policies have been consistently applied in all material respects and address such matters as revenue recognition and depreciation methods.  The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles, generally accepted in the United States of America, with no need for managements judgment in their application.  There are also areas in which managements judgment in selecting any viable alternative would not produce a materially different result.  See our audited financial statements and notes thereto which contain accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting principles, generally accepted in the United States of America.  Results of Operations  Revenues  Year
Ended December 3120112010Total Sales$0$0  We had no revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 or for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Net Profit (Loss).  Year
Ended December 3120112010Net Profit (Loss)($1,540,099)($1,330,332)  For the year ended December 31, 2011, we sustained net losses of $1,540,099 as compared with a net loss of $1,330,332 for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The increase in net loss is attributed to increased costs associated with general and administrative expenses and an element of compensatory stock issuance.  Retirement of Certain Debts  In May, 2011, the Company retired a non-convertible debenture issued to Jamie Goldstein on January 1, 2011 in the entire amount of $110,000 through the issuance of a cash payment to Mr. Goldstein.  In May, 2011, the Company retired $6,000 of a $25,000 Convertible Debenture issued to Dwight Barnell on January 1, 2011 through the issuance of a cash payment to Mr. Barnell.   16   Liquidity and Capital Resources  As at December 31, 2011, the Company had total assets of $0. There were liabilities of $2,220,946 comprised of $200,000 in accounts payable and $2,020,946 in long term debentures. Assets of $0 and liabilities of $2,220,946 resulted in a working capital deficiency of $2,220,946. The Company reported total stockholders deficit of $1,905,648 at December 31, 2011. We anticipate that our current cash on hand of $0 as of December 31, 2011 is not sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements without additional funding.  The Company has funded its operations and met its capital expenditures requirements primarily through cash generated from contributions from the issuance of convertible debt securities and short-term promissory notes. We do not have any financing commitments and no assurance can be made that we will be obtaining financing at the times and terms needed. Therefore, there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern. In addition, we will need substantial additional capital during the next 12 months on order to complete our business plan.  During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company believes that it will expend funds on the following:  · Expenses related to the acquisition of potential contracts;  · Leasing and refurbishment of certain military aircraft and equipment;  · Leasing and refurbishment of training facilities to fulfill potential contracts; and  · Hiring of additional employees and independent contractors to fulfill potential contracts.  Total current judgments outstanding against the Company described more fully in Part II; Item 1. Legal Proceedings total approximately $2,025,000 plus accrued interest. Considering the overall current legal proceedings described more fully in Part II; Item 1. Legal Proceedings and those specific to the acquisition of assets under the M&M Agreement described above in Part I.; Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations; Overview and Plan of Operation; Current Asset Status, the Company has and expects to continue to expend significant funds on legal expenses.  Legal expenses have been a burden upon the liquidity of the Company since early 2010, and continue to be so, although we believe a portion of these expenses will be greatly reduced in the coming year as the litigation is anticipated to be resolved within that time frame. Considering the importance of some of the current litigation to the Company, although it is an expense that we would prefer not to incur, our management believes that it is a necessary expense and we believe we can obtain financing to continue to fund the litigation.  In connection with the Searock judgments against the Company, it is the Companys position that it will be overturned on appeal in light of both the evidence and the fact that the Company did not receive proper notice of impending litigation and was not able to present any defense, and as such, until such time as final determinations by the courts have been made, we do not expect these judgments against the Company to affect our liquidity.  Need for Additional Capital  As indicated above, management does not believe that the Company has sufficient capital to sustain its current and execute its proposed operations without raising additional capital.  Accordingly, we expect that we will require additional funding through additional equity and/or debt financings.  However, other than the Cornucopia financing agreement, there can be no assurance that any additional financing will become available to us, and if available, on terms acceptable to us.  Any financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that may impact our ability to conduct our business or raise additional funds on acceptable terms.  If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, we may have to delay, scale back or discontinue our expansion plans.  In the event we are unable to raise additional capital we will not be able to sustain any growth or continue to operate.  As of the date of this report, we are currently have in place a financing agreement with Cornucopia to provide up to $1 million in funding, of which $600,000 has hereto date been delivered to the Company in order to (i) help satisfy our immediate liquidity needs, and (ii) lease certain military aircraft that we believe will begin to generate revenue and earnings such that it will cover a material portion of our broader and future liquidity needs. Considering the approximately $2,025,00 plus accrued interest in judgments against us, the additional $600,000 in potential financing will not completely satisfy our current liquidity needs. We are also pursuing a number of contracts that we believe will generate revenues and earnings to cover any outstanding liquidity shortfall. In addition, although we can make no guarantees, we believe that the current M&M litigation for the related aircraft and parts will be settled in our favor, and that the acquisition of said assets will greatly change the liquidity prospects of the Company due to either putting such aircraft to work on contract or by selling the assets at a significant premium to the price that the Company will have paid for such assets.  Effects of Inflation  Inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our business in the foreseeable future. However, our management will closely monitor the price change and continually maintain effective cost control in operations.   17   Off Balance Sheet Arrangements  We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, and results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.  Going Concern  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern.  We have had substantial operating losses for the past years and are dependent upon outside financing to continue operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. It is managements plan to raise necessary funds from shareholders to satisfy the expense requirements of the Company.  Forward-Looking Statements  The Company, from time to time, may publish forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological development, new products, research and development activities and similar matters. The Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the Company's actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in any of the Company's forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company's business include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the failure to obtain additional borrowed and/or equity capital on favorable terms for acquisitions and expansion; (b) adverse changes in federal and state laws, or other matters affecting the Company's business; (c) the demand for the Company's products and services; and (d) other risks detailed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.  This Form 10-K contains and incorporates by reference certain "forward-looking statements" with respect to results of operations and businesses of the Company. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-K, including those regarding market trends, the Company's financial position, business strategy, projected costs, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. In general, such statements are identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases including, but not limited to, "intended, will, should, may, expect, anticipate, estimates, projects" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology.  Forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current expectations. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Because forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty, the Company's actual results could differ materially. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations are disclosed hereunder and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements represent the Company's judgment as of the date of this Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements. The Company disclaims, however, any intent or obligation to update its forward-looking statements.  Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk  Not applicable.   18   Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  CONTENTS  PageReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  2010 & 2011F-1Balance SheetF-3Statements of OperationsF-4Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)F-5Statements of Cash FlowsF-6Notes to Financial StatementsF-7   19   MALCOLM L. POLLARD, Inc. 4845 W. LAKE ROAD, # 119 ERIE, PA 16505 (814)838-8258  FAX (814838-8452   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Board of Directors Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries   We have audited the accompany consolidated  balance sheet of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2010 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  We conduct our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion  The Company has not generated significant revenues or profits to date. This factor, among others, raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The Companys continuation as a going concern depends upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to conduct its operations and its ability to obtain additional sources of capital and financing.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2010 , the results of its operations, changes in stockholders equity,  and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting standards.  Malcolm L. Pollard, Inc. Erie, Pennsylvania  May 9, 2011 except for the matter referred in Footnote 9 to the Audited Financial Statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which is July 25, 2012.  /s/ Malcolm L. Pollard, Inc.  F-1    HAMILTON PC ================================================================================================= 2121 S. ONEIDA ST., SUITE 312 DENVER, CO 80224 P: (303) 548-8072 F: (888) 466-4216 ED@HAMILTONPCCPA.COM  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc  We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2011, and the related statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended. We also audited the adjustments described in Note 9 that were applied to restate the 2010 financial statements to correct a misstatement. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2010, were audited by other auditors.  Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated May 12, 2011.  We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2011, and the result of its operations and its cash flows for periods then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc suffered recurring losses from operations which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  Hamilton, PC  /s/ Hamilton, PC Denver, Colorado August 20, 2012  F-2    TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSDecember 31,
2011
$December 31,
2010
$ASSETSCurrent Assets:Cash298168Loans Receivable315,000165,000Total Current Assets315,298165,168Property and Equipment, net--TOTAL ASSETS315,298165,168LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent Liabilities:Accounts payable200,000154,500Short-Term Debentures, including accrued interest--Total Current Liabilities200,000154,500Long-Term Debentures, including accrued interest2,020,9461,543,503TOTAL LIABILITIES2,220,9461,698,003COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY:Preferred stock, Series A-$.001 par value;

1,000,000

 shares authorized; -
1,000,000 and -0- shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively1,000-Preferred stock, Series B-$.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; -
1,333,332 and -0- shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively1,333-Preferred stock, Series C-$.001 par value;

10,000,000

 shares authorized; -
-0- shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively--Common stock-$.001 par value;

6,000,000,000

 shares authorized; -
3,645,884,592, and 2,987,935,294 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively3,645,8852,984,443Additional paid-in-capital36,003,66935,425,158Accumulated deficit(41,557,535)(39,942,436)TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY(1,905,648)(1,532,835)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY315,298165,168   F-3    TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSYear EndedDecember 31, 2011December 31, 2010REVENUES$$Operating costsGeneral and administrative, including compensatory element of stock issuance of $726,948 for the year ended December 31, 20111,315,8641,158,818TOTAL COSTS1,315,8641,158,818OPERATING LOSS(1,315,864)(1,158,818)OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:Interest expense(224,235)(171,514)OtherTOTAL OTHER EXPENSES(224,235)(171,514)NET LOSS(1,540,099)(1,330,332)Legal Settlement(75,000)(88,000)NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS(1,615,099)(1,418,332)Loss per common share - basic and diluted--Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic and diluted3,204,069,8532,071,721,049  F-4


|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 |             |                    |       |                            |   |            |   |              |   |             | 
|------------------------------------------------------ | ------------ | --------------- | - | --------------- | ----------- | ------------------ | ----- | -------------------------- | - | ---------- | - | ------------ | - | ----------- | 
|TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  
|CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY       
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 |            
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 | Deficit     |                   
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 | Accumulated |                    | Total
|                                                       | Common Stock | Preferred Stock |   | Additional Paid |             | During Development |       | Stockholders
(Deficiency)
|                                                       |              | Shares          |   | Amount          |             | Shares             |       | Amount                     |   | in Capital |   | Stage        |   | Equity     
|Balance -December 31, 2009                             |              | 1,428,730,286   | $ | 1,428,730       |             | -                  | $     | -                          | $ | 35,733,183 | $ | (38,524,104) | $ | (1,362,191)
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 |             |                    |       |                            |   |            |   |              |   |            
|Stock issued for services to consultants and employees |              | 107,152,512     |   | 107,153         |             | -                  |       | -                          |   | -          |   | -            |   | 107,153    
|Issuance of common stock upon conversion of debentures |              | 1,452,052,496   |   | 1,448,560       |             | -                  |       | -                          |   | (308,025)  |   | -            |   | 1,140,535  
|Net loss                                               |              | -               |   | -               |             | -                  |       | -                          |   | -          |   | (1,418,332)  |   | (1,418,332)
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 |             |                    |       |                            |   |            |   |              |   |            
|Balance -December 31, 2010                             |              | 2,987,935,294   |   | 2,984,443       |             | -                  |       | -                          |   | 35,425,158 |   | (39,942,436) |   | (1,532,835)
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 |             |                    |       |                            |   |            |   |              |   |            
|Stock issued for services to consultants and employees |              | 107,152,512     |   | 107,153         |             | -                  |       | -                          |   | 619,141    |   | -            |   | 726,294    
|Issuance of common stock upon conversion of debentures |              | 550,796,786     |   | 554,290         |             | 2,333              |       | 2,333                      |   | (40,630)   |   | -            |   | 515,993    
|Net loss                                               |              | -               |   | -               |             | -                  |       | -                          |   | -          |   | (1,615,099)  |   | (1,615,099)
|                                                       |              |                 |   |                 |             |                    |       |                            |   |            |   |              |   |            
|Balance -December 31, 2011                             |              | 3,645,884,592   | $ | 3,645,885       |             | 2,333              | $     | 2,333                      | $ | 36,003,669 | $ | (41,557,535) | $ | (1,905,648)

F-5     TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSYear EndedDecember 31,December 31,20112010CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet (loss)$(1,615,099)$(1,418,332)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Impairment of Fixed Asset88,000Bad Debt ReserveStock-based compensation726,294365,775Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Loan Receivable(150,000)(165,000)Accounts payable45,500136,122Accrued liabilities--Net Cash Used in Operating Activities(993,305)(993,435)CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIESNet Cash Used in Investing Activities-CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Proceeds from Related Parties993,435960,403Proceeds from sale of common stock-33,200Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities993,435993,603Increase (Decrease) in cash130168Cash - Beginning of period168-Cash - End of period$298$168Interest paid$-$-Taxes paid$-$-   F-6     TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC  NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  NOTE 1 - COMPANY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:  General  TADS Corporate History  TADS was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 9, 1998 under the name Natalma Industries, Inc. Originally, TADS operated as a junior mining company engaged in the exploration of mining properties. We were unsuccessful in locating a joint venture partner to assist us in the development of our mining claims. As a result, TADS was unable to pay for and perform the exploration and development required in its agreement with the owners of its properties and lost our rights to the mining claims. Our management at the time, therefore determined that it was in the best interest of our shareholders that we seek potential operating businesses and business opportunities with the intent to acquire or merge with another business, which led to the purchase substantially all of the assets of AeroGroup Incorporated on December 15, 2006 (the AeroGroup Acquisition). The complete terms of the AeroGroup Acquisition were disclosed in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2006. AeroGroup Incorporated originally commenced its operations and business plan as a contractor of military flight training as AeroGroup International Corporation in January 2002, and eventually merged with and acquired AeroGroup Incorporated.  Current Business Operations  As a result of the U.S. Base Foreclosure Act, the overall downsizing of the armed forces of the U.S. and its foreign allies, and the advanced age of the U.S. military air fleet, there was insufficient equipment and personnel to meet demands for combat air training and air refueling training. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and various regional conflicts and terrorists acts, have only added to this crisis. The private-sector is now being asked to fill a role once the exclusive domain of the military, and the capabilities of civilian contractors are well recognized, and are frequently proven superior and more efficient than public-sector contractors. In addition, due to the escalating wild fires in the Western U.S., and the financial and environmental costs associated with this crisis, fire-fighting preparedness and capability have become a top priority at both the State and Federal levels of government. Again, the private sector is being asked to provide services that were previously the domain of the public-sector.  In order to meet present and future military, environmental, and financial threats, the United States and its allies has been forced to continue to commit billions of dollars to training, preparedness, and execution. These needs cannot be met without the support of the private-sector. We believe that there is currently no other private-sector contractor which has the potential capabilities to adequately fulfill these diverse and urgent demands, and we believe that TADS, through its current management and business contacts and relationships, has the potential ability to negotiate future contracts and business relationships in order to provide access to the aircraft, personnel, and operational skills necessary to claim a portion of this rapidly growing and highly-profitable market for diverse air support services. Although the Company believes it has the potential ability to negotiate such future contracts and business relationships, the Company does not currently have any such active contracts and it cannot be assured that it will be awarded any such contracts in the future.  Air Combat Training  Air combat training exercises are currently conducted by the training commands of the United States Air Force, United States Navy, and of most of our NATO and foreign allies. We believe neither the U. S. Department of Defense (the DoD) nor its allies have sufficient personnel, support equipment, or access to foreign enemy type aircraft, to meet current demand. In many instances our European allies have neither the facilities nor the extensive airspace required for fighter combat training or fighter bomber training that we hope to provide.  TADS believes it will be able to provide the armed forces of the U.S. and its allies with a vast array of training services and support functions including, but not limited to air combat instruction and tactical training, actual aggressor simulated combat, classroom instruction, and airspace scheduling, fueling, aircraft spare parts support, aircraft maintenance and aircraft maintenance training.  F-7   Air combat simulation exercises are currently conducted by the training commands of the United States Air Force, United States Navy, and of most of our NATO, and foreign allies. We believe neither the DoD nor its allies have sufficient training and support equipment and personnel to meet current demand. In many instances, our European allies have neither the facilities nor the extensive airspace required for fighter combat training or fighter bombing training that TADS believes it can provide.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Our current proposed flight training services focus on two major components; initial qualification flight training and advanced flight training, both of which consist of ground, and in air flight training. In addition, we are preparing to perform other flight training support services as described herein.  Initial Qualification Flight Training  Initial qualification flight training consists of the training of military pilots that have only recently become qualified in their aircraft and of more experienced pilots returning for recurrency training. Initial qualification flight training involves aircraft specific flight theory, flight maneuvers, aerodynamics and emergency in flight procedures as they relate to combat in a specific aircraft. Pilots and other crew members are also trained in cockpit resource management, which focuses on division of duties between pilot and co-pilot and utilization of resources within the aircraft cockpit to complete the flight plan and address emergencies. Initial qualification training involves many hours of classroom instruction in aircraft systems operations, air-to-air flight maneuvers, tactics, formation flying, instrument training and air-to-ground tactics. In flight instruction is generally provided only once the pilot has shown proficiency in ground instruction and flight simulator instruction.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Advanced  Flight Training  Advanced flight training focuses on combat and other advanced maneuvers and is conducted after the pilot completes initial qualification training and returns to a full service training facility where he is provided refresher or upgrade training to sharpen his or her combat skills. We intend to focus the training venue on approved overseas customers and NATO customers who would use our accessible facilities and ranges to qualify, in some cases, and re-qualify in other cases in specific combat skills like air-to-air, air-to-ground, electronic countermeasure training, air-refueling training, and other advanced maneuvers.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  U.S. Military Training  A crucial component to aerial combat training involves training against actual foreign adversary aircraft which are typically Russian, ex-Soviet bloc, or Chinese. However, because the U.S. military has little to no access to enemy aircraft, the status-quo has been to use aged U.S. military aircraft operating as the adversarial or Red Air aircraft. The status-quo leaves much to be desired because aged U.S. military aircraft do not possess the flying characteristics or capabilities of sophisticated enemy combat aircraft, nor do they emit the same electronic, radar signature, or visual signals.  Through its past and present relationships with companies licensed by the U.S. Department of Justice (BATF) to import foreignweapons of war, TADS believes it can provide unique Red Air aggressor aircraft. These are the aircraft that are the actual fighter aircraft currently used substantially many of the former Soviet bloc countries and non-allied nations.  In connection with contracts to provide adversary combat aircraft to the U.S. military, TADS believes it can supply various support services such as adversary pilots, spare parts, service and maintenance of the adversary aircraft, tactical training, actual aggressor simulated combat, and classroom instruction.  F-8   Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Foreign Air Combat Training  Unlike the training of the U.S. military, air combat training of foreign allied militaries typically entails air combat training techniques and strategies using U.S. military aircraft such as the F-16, which such foreign militaries have already purchased. Although a commercial endeavor, it has been a strategic decision of the U.S. government to supply U.S. fighter aircraft to its allies. However, the ability and resources of the U.S. military to thereafter train the foreign purchasers of its aircraft is extremely limited and sub-par.  As a result, there is a backlog of allied countries that have purchased F-16s and other U.S. fighter aircraft, and that have immediate and ongoing need for air combat training. TADS believes they are able to offer to foreign militaries actual combat training from highly experienced U.S. fighter pilots, classroom training, and parts, service, and maintenance protocols for their aircraft. TADS also believes it has the capability to either train on foreign soil and foreign military bases to fulfill multi-year contracts, or to provide a turn-key solution by hosting foreign militaries on U.S. soil, and therein provide not only pilots, training protocols, and parts, service, and maintenance, but also the air-bases, bombing ranges, fueling services, housing requirements, etc.  Although not a requirement, it is probable that in order to be awarded any such contract, the Company would need to acquire, through either lease or purchase, certain military aircraft to be deployed in any related contract.  The purchase of any such military aircraft could require significant additional funding, typically an asset-based funding, which funding the Company does not currently have in place, nor can guarantee that it will be able to acquire.  Going Concern and Management's Plan  The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate the continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, as shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations since inception and has a significant working capital deficiency as of December 31, 2011 of approximately $41,218,000.  On December 15, 2006, TADS acquired substantially all of the assets of Aero and assumed certain contracts in exchange for the assumption by TADS of certain liabilities of Aero. Management believes the Company can raise adequate capital for the Companys required working capital needs for 2010. Management also believes that it still needs substantial capital in order to carry out its business plan, which is to become a civilian provider of outsourced military aviation services which includes fighter jet pilot training, maintenance training, aerial fire-fighting, disaster relief services, and other aerial services. No assurance can be given that the Company can obtain the required estimated additional working capital, or if obtained, that such funding will not cause substantial dilution to stockholders of the Company. Being a development stage company, the Company is subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new enterprise and the marketing of a new product, many of which risks are beyond the control of the Company. All of the factors discussed above raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts that might be necessary as a result of the above uncertainty.  NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  Basis of Presentation  In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented and the condensed consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2011. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the SEC rules and regulations.  Financial Reporting  The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Revenues and expenses are reported on the accrual basis, which means that income is recognized as it is earned and expenses are recognized as they are incurred.   F-9   Use of Estimates  The Companys significant estimates include accrued expenses and stock based transactions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While the Company believes that such estimates are fair when considered in conjunction with the financial statements taken as a whole, the actual amounts of such estimates, when known, will vary from these estimates. If actual results significantly differ from the Companys estimates, the Companys financial condition and results of operations could be materially impacted.  Cash and Cash Equivalents  Cash and cash equivalents include all interest-bearing deposits or investments with maturities of three months or less.  Concentration of Credit Risk  Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company maintains cash balances at one financial institution, which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC insured institution insures up to $250,000 on account balances. The amounts that are not insured by FDIC limitations are held in short-term securities.  Fair value of financial instruments  The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for accounts payable and accrued expenses, debenture and loans payable approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.  Impairment of long  lived assets and long- lived assets to be disposed of  The Company accounts for the impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with FASB ASC 360 Property, Plant and Equipment.  ASC 360 requires write-downs to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets carrying amount.  As of December 31, 2011, the property and equipment held by the Company have been reviewed, and it was determined that the value had been impaired 100%.  Revenue Recognition  Revenue for services and goods is recognized monthly as provided pursuant to the terms of contracts or purchase orders, which have prices that are fixed and determinable. The Company assesses the clients ability to meet the contract terms, including meeting payment obligations, before entering into the contract. Deferred revenue results from customers who are billed for monitoring in advance of the period in which the services are provided, on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis.  The Company follows Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 (SAB 104), which requires the Company to defer certain revenue and expenses. The capitalized costs and deferred revenues related to the installation are then amortized over the life of an average customer relationship, on a straight line basis. If the customer is discontinued prior to the expiration of the original expected life, the unamortized portion of the deferred installation revenue and related capitalized costs are recognized in the period the discontinuation becomes effective. In accordance with EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, the service contracts that include both installation and video streaming are considered a single unit of accounting.  Property and Equipment  Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for major betterments and additions are capitalized while replacement, maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the lives of the respective assets, are currently charged to expense. Any gain or loss on disposition of assets is recognized currently in the statement of income.  Earnings (loss) per share  Earnings (loss) per share is computed in accordance with FASB ASC 260, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss), after deducting preferred stock dividends accumulated during the period, by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and other potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. The outstanding warrants for years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively are anti-dilutive and therefore are not included in earnings (loss) per share.   F-10   Accounting for stock-based compensation  In accordance with FASB ASC 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation, a public entity measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service.  In addition, a public entity is required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of liability instruments based on its current fair value. The fair value of that award has been re-measured subsequently at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period.  For the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not grant any stock options.  Non- Employee Stock Based Compensation  The cost of stock based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines enumerated in FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.  Common stock purchase warrants  The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants in accordance with FASB ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging.  Based on the provisions of ASC 815-40, the Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the company), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).  Income Taxes  The Company accounts for income taxes using FASB ASC 740-10, "Income Taxes," which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the quarter in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company does not expect that this interpretation will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.  FASB ASC 740-10 also provides guidance about how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. Under ASC 740-10, a tax position could be effectively settled on completion of examination by a taxing authority if the entity does not intend to appeal or litigate the result and it is remote that the taxing authority would examine or re-examine the tax position. The Company does not expect that this interpretation will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.  NOTE 3 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS  ASU 2011-05  Presentation of comprehensive income  ASU 2011-05 was the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income,by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders equity. Instead, the new guidance now requires entities to present all nonowner changes in stockholders equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements.  All entities that report OCI items will be impacted by the changes in this ASU. The components of OCI have not changed, nor has the guidance on when OCI items are reclassified to net income; however, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.  The amendments to ASC 220, Comprehensive Income,included in ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, are effective for fiscal years and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (that is, the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012 for calendar-year entities) for public entities and for interim and annual periods thereafter. The amended guidance must be applied retrospectively and early adoption is permitted.   F-11   ASU 2011-04  Amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs  The amendments in ASU 2011-04 do not modify the requirements for when fair value measurements apply; rather, they generally represent clarifications on how to measure and disclose fair value under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement,including the following revisions:  · The concepts of highest and best useand valuation premiseare relevant only for measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and do not apply to financial assets and liabilities.  · An entity should measure the fair value of an equity-classified financial instrument from the perspective of the market participant that holds the instrument as an asset.  · An entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities whose market risk (that is, interest rate risk, currency risk, or other price risk) and credit risk are managed on the basis of the entitys net risk exposure may apply an exception to the fair value requirements in ASC 820 if certain criteria are met. The exception allows such financial instruments to be measured on the basis of the reporting entitys net, rather than gross, exposure to those risks.  · Premiums or discounts related to the unit of account are appropriate when measuring fair value of an asset or liability if market participants would incorporate them into the measurement (for example, a control premium). However, premiums or discounts related to size as a characteristic of the reporting entitys holding (that is, a blockage factor) should not be considered in a fair value measurement.  The amendments to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, included in ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, are effective prospectively for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 (that is, the quarter ending March 31, 2012 for calendar-year entities). Early adoption is not permitted for public entities  ASU 2011-03  Reconsideration of effective control for repurchase agreements  The amendments to ASC 860-10included in ASU 2011-03, simplified the accounting for financial assets transferred under repurchase agreements (repos) and similar arrangements, by eliminating the transferors ability criteria from the assessment of effective control over those assets as well as the related implementation guidance.  Currently under ASC 860-10-40-24 a transferor must meet four criteria to maintain effective control of securities transferred in a repo and to therefore account for the transfer as a secured borrowing rather than a sale. One of these criteria states that the transferor must be able to either repurchase or redeem the transferred securities on substantially the agreed terms, even if the transferee is in default. This criterion is satisfied only if the transferor has cash or collateral sufficient to fund substantially the entire cost of purchasing replacement securities.  The amendments in ASU 2011-03 remove this criterion and related implementation guidance from the Codification, thereby reducing the criteria that transferors must satisfy to qualify for secured borrowing accounting and, as a result, likely reducing the number of transfers accounted for as sales.  The amendments to ASC 860-10, Transfers and Servicing, included in ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements, are effective for both public and nonpublic entities prospectively for new transfers and existing transactions modified as of the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (that is, the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012 for calendar-year entities). Early adoption is not permitted.  ASU 2011-02 - FASB amends creditor troubled debt restructuring guidance This bulletin discusses ASU 2011-02, which was issued by the FASB to provide creditors with additional guidance in evaluating whether a restructuring of debt is a troubled debt restructuring. The new guidance does not amend the guidance for debtors. It is generally effective for public entities in the quarter ended September 30, 2011.  ASU 2011-01 - Troubled debt restructuring disclosures for public-entity creditors deferred  The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20,which temporarily defers the date when public-entity creditors are required to provide the new disclosures for troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The deferred effective date will coincide with the effective date for the clarified guidance about what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, which the Board is currently deliberating. The clarified guidance is expected to apply for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011.  When providing the new disclosures under ASU 2010-20, public entities would be required to retrospectively apply the clarified guidance on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the year in which the proposed clarified guidance is adopted.  F-12    Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.  NOTE 4  SALE OF STOCK  Issuance of Convertible Debentures  First Quarter of 2011  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $40,833.16 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 54,444,213 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $30,000.00 to Michael Cariello as consideration for unpaid salary.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $13,384.59 to the Gary Fears Trust as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 17,846,113 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $50,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal fees as of 1/1/2011 to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 66,666,667 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $176,108.00 to GFMB, LLC as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three quarters, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 234,754,123 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $25,000.00 to the DB Family Trust as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 33,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On January 1, 2011, the Company issued a Debenture in a principle amount of $110,000.00 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and is Non-Convertible.  Second Quarter of 2011  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $39,500.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 26,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $6,692.09 to the Gary Fears Trust as consideration for a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 4,461,393 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $15,000.00 to Brad Hacker as consideration for accrued accounting fees.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  On April 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $75,000.00 to Jamie Goldstein pursuant to indemnification demanded by Goldstein and accepted by the Company in connection with certain litigation related to Company business.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share.  F-13    Third Quarter of 2011  On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $39,000.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary and expenses during Q-2/2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 31,200 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00125 per share.  On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $25,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal fees as of 7/1/2011 to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00125 per share.  Fourth Quarter of 2011  On October 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $15,500.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary and expenses during Q-3/2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 20,666,.667 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On October 1, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $1,500.00 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for loans to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  On November 22, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $25,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for certain unpaid legal fees as of November 22, 2011.  The Convertible Debenture is due and payable as of January 31, 2012, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 33,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.00075 per share.  Issuance of Warrants  In April, 2011, in connection with a securities purchase agreement with Cornucopia, Ltd., the Company issued Cornucopia: (a) Series A-100 warrant to purchase up to 533,333,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.00075 for a one year period; and (b) Series A-101 warrant to purchase up to 800,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of the lesser of: (A) $0.0025 or (B) a fifty percent (50%) discount to the average closing price of the Common Stock for the thirty (30) trading days prior to exercise of the A-101 warrant. As of the date of this filing, both the Series A-100 and Series A-101 warrants issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. have expired with no exercise of such warrants and no issuance of any shares of Common Stock.  Issuance of Stock  The Company issued 10,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Air Support Systems, LLC in May 2011 pursuant to the terms of a lease agreement between the Company and Air Support Systems, LLC executed on May 18, 2010, for which the Common Stock had previously not been issued. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The shares were valued at $15,000.  The Company issued 29,897,993 shares of restricted Common Stock to John Brannigan in August, 2011 in consideration for the conversion of a Convertible Promissory Note, initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on April 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $32,078.26 and accrued interest of $5,294.23, for a total consideration of $37,372.49. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 53,632,146 shares of restricted Common Stock to Kristen Zankl in August, 2011 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $35,000.00 and accrued interest of $5,224.11, for a total consideration of $40,224.11, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 with a principle amount of $150,000.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 51,868,815 shares of restricted Common Stock to Suncrest Industries, LLC in August, 2011 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $36,200.00 and accrued interest of $2,713.51, for a total consideration of $38,913.51, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to GFMB, LLC on January 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $176,108.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 52,161,224 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC in August, 2011 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $30,057.66 and accrued interest of $5,850.13, for a total consideration of $35,907.79, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on January 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $51,008.96. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.   F-14   The Company issued 52,585,772 shares of restricted Common Stock to Estella A. Korybut Irrevocable Trust in August, 2011 in consideration for the conversion of a Convertible Promissory initially issued to Alexis Korybut on July 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $33,954.68 and accrued interest of $2,293.43, for a total consideration of $36,239.11.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 174,978,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Chris Clark on November 11, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock that were to be originally issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in July of 2011 (as further described below) and subsequently assigned to Chris Clark. All 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted at a conversion price of $0.4572 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 25,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Peter Maffitt on November 11, 2011, for compensation for his services for 2011 as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.  The Shares were valued at $25,000.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 193,107,580 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC on December 13, 2011, in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $130,000.00 and accrued interest of $14,830.68, for a total consideration of $144,830.68, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to GFMB, LLC on January 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $176,108.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 14,717,768 shares of restricted Common Stock to John Brannigan on December 13, 2011, in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $9,908.00 and accrued interest of $1,130.33, for a total consideration of $11,038.33, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to GFMB, LLC on January 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $176,108.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Series A Preferred Stock  The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Alexis Korybut in April, 2011 pursuant to an Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Korybut. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The shares were valued at $100,000.  Series B Preferred Stock  The Company issued a total of 1,333,332 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Cornucopia, Ltd. in April of 2011 at a purchase price of $0.30 per share for a total consideration of $400,000, subject to the terms of certain securities purchase agreements between the Company and Cornucopia, Ltd. The terms and conditions of the securities purchase agreement and related issuance of Series B Preferred Shares is outlined below in Item 9B. Other Information.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares. The rights, preferences and privileges of the Series B Preferred Shares are outlined in the Certificate of Designation designating the Preferred Stock, which was attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2011 and is hereby incorporated by reference  The Company agreed to issue a total of 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Cornucopia, Ltd. in July of 2011 at a purchase price of $0.4572 per share for a total consideration of $200,000, subject to the terms of certain securities purchase agreements between the Company and Cornucopia, Ltd. The terms and conditions of the securities purchase agreement and related issuance of Series B Preferred Shares are outlined below in Item 9B. Other Information.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Conversion of Notes and Exercise of Warrants  The Company issued 29,897,993 shares of restricted Common Stock to John Brannigan on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to the Gary Fears Trust on April 1, 2010 and subsequently assigned to John Brannigan. The entire principle amount of $32,078.26 and accrued interest of $5,294.23 was converted at a conversion price of $0.00125 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 53,632,146 shares of restricted Common Stock to Kristen Zankl on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 and subsequently assigned to Kristen Zankl. The principle amount of $35,000.00 and accrued interest of $5,224.11 of the convertible promissory note was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 52,161,224 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to the Gary Fears Trust on January 1, 2010 and subsequently assigned to GFMB, LLC. The principle amount of $30,057.66 and accrued interest of $5,850.13 of the convertible promissory note was converted at a conversion price of $0.0006884 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  F-15    The Company issued 51,868,815 shares of restricted Common Stock to Suncrest Industries, LLC on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to GFMB, LLC on December 30, 2010 and subsequently assigned to Suncrest Industries, LLC. The principle amount of $36,200.00 and accrued interest of $2,713.51 of the convertible promissory note was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 52,642,513 shares of restricted Common Stock to the Estella A. Korybut Irrevocable Trust on August 24, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a convertible promissory note originally issued to Alexis Korybut on July 1, 2010 and subsequently assigned to the Estella A. Korybut Irrevocable Trust. The entire principle amount of $33,954.68 and accrued interest of $2,293.43 was converted at a conversion price of $0.0006884 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 193,107,580 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC on December 13, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a $176,108.00 convertible promissory note originally issued to GFMB, LLC on December 31, 2010. A principle amount of $130,000.00 together with accrued interest of $14,830.68 was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 14,717,768 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB, LLC on December 13, 2011. The shares were issued in consideration for the conversion of a portion of a $176,108.00 convertible promissory note originally issued to GFMB, LLC on December 31, 2010. A principle amount of $9,908.00 together with accrued interest of $1,130.33 was converted at a conversion price of $0.00075 for the issuance of the shares. No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Increase in Authorized Shares  On August 5, 2011, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State increasing the Companys authorized shares of Common Stock to 6,000,000,000.  NOTE 5  COMMITMENTS:  Compensation Agreements  On April 24, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Alexis C. Korybut. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Korybut will be employed in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will receive an annual salary of $120,000, a one-time issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock and additional benefits as outlined in the agreement. A copy of the agreement has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 28, 2011and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On December 1, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Jamie Goldstein. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Goldstein shall provide various financial and strategic consulting services to the Company in consideration for a one-time fee of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company.  On December 1, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with GFMB, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, GFMB shall provide various strategic consulting services to the Company in consideration for a one-time fee of 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company.  Lease Agreement  On May 18, 2010, the Company signed a lease agreement with Air Support Systems, LLC. The Lease Option Agreement with Air Support Systems, LLC gives TADS the right to enter into exclusive one-quarter renewable leases for any or all of the four IL-76 and IL-76 supertanker aircraft, under a fee arrangement that allocates 50% of the operating profits each to TADS and Air Support Systems, respectively.   F-16   Legal Proceedings  Mr. Charlie Searock (Searock), a former executive officer of our company, has brought a laws suit in the District Court of the 336 th Judicial District of Grayson County, Texas against us and seven other defendants on February 6, 2007, on claims of breach of an employment agreement between Searock and International Tactical Training Center, Inc. (ITTC). (Charles J. Searock, Jr., vs. Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., International Tactical Training Center, Inc., Mark Daniels, Victor Miller, John Farley, Gary Fears, Jamie Goldstein, and Joel Ramsden, Cause No.07-0322-336). ITTC and the Company are the only two corporate defendants named in the Searock lawsuit. Of the six individuals named as defendants, three are former ITTC management.   Searock asserts that the Company is liable for ITTCs breach of employment agreement because he alleges that the Company acquired ITTCs assets, and that ITTC was a former subsidiary of AeroGroup, Inc., an entity not named as a defendant in the Searock lawsuit. In addition to his claim for breach of the ITTC employment contract, Searock also asserts theories of tort liability against the defendants.   The Company denies any liability to Searock on his claim for breach of the ITTC employment contract and denies Searock has any factual basis to impose liability on the Company under any of his theories of tort liability. Specifically, the Company denies that it acquired, owns or controls ITTCs former assets. The Company believes that this claim is without merit and is working towards resolution of the same.  On October 25, 2010, Searock was awarded a default judgment of $1,248,962 including accrued interest, jointly and severally against TADS and the other defendants, all of whom who failed to appear for trial, and an award of exemplary damages of $2,000,000 against TADS.   Searock claims that TADS and the other defendants were given notice of the trial, however it is TADS assertion and the assertion of the other defendants that none one of the defendants, including TADS, ever received notice of the trial, were unaware of the trial, and that the judgment is without merit. TADS is currently in the process of appealing the judgment in the Texas Appellate Court based upon not having received notice, and although no assurances can be given, the Company believes that the judgment will be vacated by the Court.  On or about July 3, 2012, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) entered into a Settlement Agreement (the Agreement) with Mark Daniels (Daniels), the Companys former Chief Executive Officer. A copy of the Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to settle its litigational claims against Daniels related to the litigation action entitled Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., et. al v. Mark Daniels, et. al, in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida through the removal of Daniels from the action. As consideration for the removal of Daniels from the action: (i) Daniels agreed to the rescission, cancellation, waiver and termination in full of all Company obligations relating to a promissory note issued by the Company to Daniels on or about April 15, 2009 with a current balance of approximately $221,000 including all principle and accrued interest; and (ii) Daniels is required to deliver a Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) cash payment to the Company within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the execution of the Agreement.  August 3, 2010 certain individuals including Alexander Baranov/Glovatsky and Victor Miller filed an improper and frivolous Involuntary Chapter 7 Petition (the New Petition) against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, in an effort to circumvent the legitimate court process, in direct violation of the Court Order issued by Judge Paul Hyman on May 14, 2010.  The Company immediately requested an emergency Motion to Dismiss the New Petition based upon its contention that:  · The New Petition violated the Court Order;  · A majority of the new petitioners were currently involved in civil litigation with TADF; and  · All of the claims of the new petitioners were either without merit, being contested, or were frivolous and improper.  On August 10, 2010, at an Emergency Hearing to Dismiss the fraudulent and improper Petition, the Federal Bankruptcy judge dismissed the Petition, as had been anticipated and previously disclosed by the Company, and, moreover, due to the egregious actions of the petitioners, reserved the right of the US Federal Bankruptcy Court to:  · Impose sanctions upon the petitioners, and  · Impose punitive sanctions upon the petitioners if it is determined that the actions of the petitioners violated the Court Order previously issued by U.S. Federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Hyman.  Although no assurances can be given, the Company believes that at the request of the Company, sanctions will be imposed upon the petitioners, and that it will be determined that the petitioners violated the Court Order issued by Judge Hyman.  As disclosed in our past filings, Sichenzia & Ross LLP (Sichenzia) had been pursuing a claim against the Company for unpaid services dating back to early 2007. The Company recently learned that Sichenzia obtained a judgment against the Company in the amount of $21,471.87 in the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York on April 3, 2008. We believe that this claim is without merit and are working towards resolution of the same.  F-17    As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company is not a party to any pending litigation or legal proceeding that is not described herein or in the ordinary course of business. To our knowledge, no such proceedings exist or are threatened other than those described herein.  NOTE 6 - OTHER EVENTS:  AeroTech Corporation-Acquisition Agreement  On or about July 12, 2012, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) and AeroTech Corporation, a Florida corporation (AeroTech) entered into an Acquisition Agreement (the Acquisition Agreement). A copy of the Acquisition Agreement has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2012, the terms of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Through the acquisition of AeroTech, the Company will acquire AeroTechs existing business and assets including, but not limited to, five separate teaming agreements, a sole source justification and approval from the United States Army, and AeroTechs pre-transaction management team.  Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company will acquire 100% of the equity interest in AeroTech in exchange for the issuance of Five Million shares of the Companys Series C Preferred Stock to be issued to AeroTechs existing shareholders upon closing. A copy of the Companys Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 31, 2011 outlining the rights, preferences and privileges of the Series C Preferred Stock has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2012, the terms of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Following the closing of the Acquisition Agreement which, according to the Acquisition Agreement shall occur on or before August 11, 2012 unless mutually extended by all parties (the Closing), AeroTech will continue its existing business operations as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The Closing is subject to certain closing conditions that must be satisfied prior to Closing, with such conditions outlined in Section 4 of the Acquisition Agreement, including, but not limited to, the appointment and retainment of AeroTechs existing management to the post transaction entity including: (i) Colonel Scott Patterson to be appointed to the position of Chief Operating Officer; and (ii) Mark Daniels, to be appointed to the position of President. Such appointments shall be subject to subsequent employment agreements with each respective individual, to be executed and finalized upon Closing.  A copy of the Merger Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  Tactical Air Support, Inc.  Merger Agreement  On May 20, 2010, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent (the LOI) with Tactical Air Support, Inc., a Nevada corporation (TAS). TAS is a highly regarded Aerospace/Defense Services contractor founded by a group of former Navy, Marine, and Air Force Weapons School Instructors to provide the military and commercial sectors with the highest possible quality of aviation, maintenance and consulting support. Pursuant to the terms of the LOI and subject to further negotiation, the Company agreed to acquire 100% of the equity interest of TAS such that following the transaction, TAS would become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In exchange, the existing shareholders of TAS would be issued 45.75% of post-transaction issued and outstanding shares of the Companys common stock. A copy of the LOI was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 21, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  On December 10, 2010, the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary TAS Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation (TAS Sub), and TAS entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement or Merger). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, TAS was to exchange 100% of their equity interest with TAS Sub in exchange for 25,197,795 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock (the Preferred Shares). The Preferred Shares were to be designated with the Nevada Secretary of State prior to the closing of the Merger Agreement, and were to be convertible into a total of 2,519,779,500 shares of the Companys Common Stock and maintain voting rights equal to the number of shares of Common Stock convertible thereunder. Following the closing of the Merger Agreement which, according to the Merger Agreement was to occur on or before January 31, 2011 unless mutually extended by all parties (the Closing), TAS was to merge with and into TAS Sub and the merged entity was to continue the existing business operations of TAS as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Closing was subject to several closing conditions that were to be satisfied prior to Closing, with such conditions outlined in the Merger Agreement. A copy of the Merger Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 10, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  On February 1, 2011, the parties to the Merger Agreement entered into an Amendment to the Merger Agreement to provide for an extension of the Closing Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement) until April 31, 2011. A copy of the Amendment to the Merger Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 2, 2011and incorporated herein by reference. As of the date of this filing, the Merger Agreement had not closed prior to the termination period and the proposed Merger Agreement has since expired.   F-18   Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano Joint Venture Services Agreement  On or about May 2, 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture Services Agreement (the JV Agreement) with TAS relating to the capital lease and operation of an Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano aircraft (the Tucano). Pursuant to the terms of the JV Agreement, the Tucano was leased in the name of TAS under a capital lease, with TAS maintaining full control of the Tucano and responsibility for all associated operational, administrative, maintenance and insurance costs related to the operation of the Tucano. The Company delivered $80,280.00 as a security deposit (the Deposit) under the lease of the Tucano, with TAS required to compensate the Company with an interest payment equal to one percent (1%) of the Deposit payable monthly. In addition, the Company is entitled to thirty percent (30%) of the operating profit received by TAS relating to work performed with the Tucano. A copy of the JV Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 10, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  As of the date of this Form 10-K, the Tucano has been deployed under revenue-producing contract through a U.S. government contract issued to TAS, and is currently being considered for additional U.S. government contracts.  Previously, as outlined above, the parties entered into a Merger Agreement related to the proposed merger between the parties. Although the Merger had not closed prior to the termination period and the related agreement has since expired, in the event the parties are able to finalize and close the Merger while the Tucano continues to be employed under the JV Agreement, subject to further agreement between the parties, such JV Agreements shall be terminated and the Tucano shall continue to be employed by the combined entity.  Additional Tactical Air Support, Inc. Arrangements  On or about June 2, 2011, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent (the Aircraft LOI) with TAS relating to the proposed acquisition (the Acquisition) of certain aircraft (the Aircraft). A copy of the Aircraft LOI was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.  Subject to further Definitive Agreements (as defined in the Aircraft LOI) and pursuant to the terms of the Aircraft LOI, in the event the parties are able to complete the Acquisition of the Aircraft, the Aircraft is to be purchased in the name of TAS, with TAS maintaining full control of the Aircraft and responsibility for all associated operational, administrative, maintenance and insurance costs related to the operation of the Aircraft. Subject to further Definitive Agreements and pursuant to the terms of the Aircraft LOI, the Company shall be responsible for the acquisition of necessary funding related to the Acquisition and shall receive the right to receive fifty percent (50%) of all future profits derived from the operation, sale, lease or any other use of the Aircraft. Previously, as outlined above, the parties entered into a Merger Agreement related to the proposed merger between the parties. Although the Merger had not closed prior to the termination period and the related agreement has since expired, in the event the parties are able to finalize and close the Merger while the Aircraft continues to be employed under the Definitive Agreements, subject to further agreement between the parties, such Definitive Agreements shall be terminated and the Aircraft shall continue to be employed by the combined entity.  On July 22, 2011, the Company entered into a Binding Letter of Intent (the Services LOI) with TAS in connection with certain government services contracts TAS is currently seeking (the Services Contracts).  Subject to further definitive agreements and pursuant to the terms of the Services LOI, in the event TAS is awarded the Services Contracts, the Company will receive the right to thirty percent (30%) of all future net profits derived from the Services Contracts.  In connection with the Services LOI and Services Contracts, the Company has provided TAS funding codified by a secured promissory note issued to the Company by TAS in the amount of Three Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Dollars (US$315,000 and the Note). The Note maintains zero interest, a maturity date of October 22, 2011 and is secured by and convertible into 100,000 shares of TASs pledged, issued and outstanding common stock at the Companys option, which represents a ten percent (10%) ownership interest in TAS. A copy of the Note has been attached as an exhibit to the previously filed Form 8-K, and is hereby incorporated by reference. AS of the date of this filing, the Note is currently in default, but the Company has not yet exercised its option to acquire the 10% ownership interest in TAS. Previously, as outlined above, the parties entered into a Merger Agreement related to the proposed merger between the parties. Although the Merger had not closed prior to the termination period and the related agreement has since expired, in the event the parties are able to finalize and close the Merger while the Services LOI continues to be in effect, subject to further agreement between the parties, such Services LOI shall be terminated and parties shall continue to work together under the combined entity.  NOTE 7  NOTES RECEIVABLE  On July 22, 2011, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) entered into a Binding Letter of Intent (the LOI) with Tactical Air Support, Inc., a Nevada corporation (Tac-Air) in connection with certain government services contracts Tac-Air is currently seeking (the Services Contracts).  Subject to further definitive agreements and pursuant to the terms of the LOI, in the event Tac-Air is awarded the Services Contracts, the Company will receive the right to thirty percent (30%) of all future net profits derived from the Services Contracts.  In connection with the LOI and Services Contracts, the Company has provided Tac-Air funding codified by a secured promissory note issued to the Company by Tac-Air in the amount of Three Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Dollars (US$315,000 and the Note). The Note maintains zero interest, a maturity date of October 22, 2011 and is secured by and convertible into 100,000 shares of Tac-Airs pledged, issued and outstanding common stock at the Companys option, which represents a ten percent (10%) ownership interest in Tac-Air. A copy of the Note has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2011, and is hereby incorporated by reference.  F-19   NOTE 8  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS  Employment Agreements  On May 15, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Alexis C. Korybut. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Korybut will be employed in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will receive an annual salary of $180,000, a one-time issuance of 3,000,000 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock and additional benefits as outlined in the agreement. A copy of the employment agreement has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K, and is hereby incorporated by reference.  New Convertible Debenture Issuances Q1/2012  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $29,444.45 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary from Q4/2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 58,890,900 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $10,000 to Brad Hacker as consideration for accounting services for fiscal year 2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $41,528.22 to the Katherine M. OConnor Trust as consideration for funding the purchase of aircraft to be sold to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 83,056,440 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $35,375.89 to Sopwith, LLC as consideration for funding the purchase of aircraft to be sold to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 70,751,780 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  On February 29, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $57,804.38 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for loans to the Company in Q1/2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 115,608,760 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  On March 31, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $20,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal services for Q1-2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  On March 31, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $65,458.60 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for (i) unpaid salary from Q1/2012, (ii) out-of-pocket expenses, and (iii) a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 130,917,200 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share.  New Convertible Debenture Issuances Q2/2012  On April 15, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $11,000.00 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for loans to the Company in Q2/2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 36,666,667 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share.  On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $54,000.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary from Q2/2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 180,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share.  On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $40,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal services for Q2/2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 133,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share.  F-20   On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $72,448.49 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for accrued and unpaid vacation from August 17, 2007 through June 30, 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 241,494,967 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share.  New Share Issuances Q1/2012  The Company issued 35,711,416 shares of restricted Common Stock to The Bingham Law Group in February, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $1,783.56, for a total consideration of $26,783.56, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to The Bingham Law Group on July 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $25,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 82,136,063 shares of restricted Common Stock to The Bingham Law Group in February, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $50,000.00 and accrued interest of $6,542.47, for a total consideration of $56,542.47, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to The Bingham Law Group on January 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $50,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  New Share Issuances Q2/2012  The Company issued 349,956,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Alan Nisselson, Responsible Officer & Authorized Person of MarketXT Holdings, Corp, in April, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of 874,913 shares of Series B Preferred stock issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in May, 2011, at the request of Cornucopia, Ltd.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 102,073,059 shares of restricted Common Stock to Kristen Zankl in May, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $5,613.70, for a total consideration of $30,613.70, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on July 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $218,570.50.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 351,131,324 shares of restricted Common Stock to Richard Applegate in May, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $86,000.00 and accrued interest of $19,311.12, for a total consideration of $105,311.12, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on July 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $218,570.50.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 255,785,205 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB LLC in May, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $64,000.00 and accrued interest of $12,235.56, for a total consideration of $76,735.56, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on October 15, 2010 with a principle amount of $110,00.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 549,838,758 shares of restricted Common Stock to Lightning Equity Group LLC in May, 2012 in consideration for (i) the conversion of a principle amount of $65,000.00 and accrued interest of $15,512.52, for a total consideration of $80,514.42, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 with a principle amount of $150,000.00, and (ii) the conversion of a principle amount of $70,700.00 and accrued interest of $13,737.11, for a total consideration of $84,437.11, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on October 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $146,142.51.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 370,801,658 shares of restricted Common Stock to the Dylan Scott Goldstein Irrevocable Trust in May, 2012 in consideration for (i) the conversion of a principle amount of $19,762.32 and accrued interest of $6,393.25, for a total consideration of $26,155.57, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Joint Strategy Group LLC on September 3, 2009 with a principle amount of $19,762.32, and (ii) the conversion of a principle amount of $75,000.00 and accrued interest of $10,084.93, for a total consideration of $85,084.93, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Jamie Goldstein on April 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $75,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 103,634,703 shares of restricted Common Stock to Northern Capital Group, LLC in June, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $6,090.41, for a total consideration of $31,090.41, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 with a principle amount of $150,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  New Share Issuances Q3/2012  The Company issued 53,550,680 shares of restricted Common Stock to The Bingham Law Group in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $1,775.34, for a total consideration of $26,775.34, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to The Bingham Law Group on November 22, 2011 with a principle amount of $25,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.   F-21   The Company issued 43,447,410 shares of restricted Common Stock to Cornucopia, Ltd. In July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of 108,619 shares of Series B Preferred stock initially issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in May, 2011.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 12,656,256 shares of restricted Common Stock to Maria Idiaquez Meneses in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $3,500.00 and accrued interest of $296.88, for a total consideration of $3,796.88, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 10,848,219 shares of restricted Common Stock to Evelyn Saldana Rodriguez in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $3,000.00 and accrued interest of $254.47, for a total consideration of $3,254.47 of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 21,696,438 shares of restricted Common Stock to Greisy Tejada Lujan in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $6,000.00 and accrued interest of $508.93, for a total consideration of $6,508.93, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 10,848,219 shares of restricted Common Stock to Juliana Hoyas Castelar in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $3,000.00 and accrued interest of $254.47, for a total consideration of $3,254.47 of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Conversion of Notes and Exercise of Warrants Q1/2012  On February 14, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to The Bingham Law Group on July 1, 2011 in a principle amount of $25,000.00, together with accrued interest of $1,783.56, for a total amount of $26,783.56, was converted by The Bingham Law Group at a conversion price of $0.00075 into 35,711,416 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On February 14, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to The Bingham Law Group on January 1, 2011 in a principle amount of $50,000.00, together with accrued interest of $6,542.47, for a total amount of $56,542.47, was converted by The Bingham Law Group at a conversion price of $0.0006884 into 82,136,063 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  Conversion of Notes and Exercise of Warrants Q2/2012  On May 21, 2012, $25,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $5,613.70, for a total amount of $30,613.70, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on July 1, 2010 in a principle amount of $218,570.50, was converted by Kristen Zankl at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 102,073,059 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, $86,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $19,311.12, for a total amount of $105,311.12, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on July 1, 2010 in a principle amount of $218,570.50, was converted by Richard Applegate at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 351,131,324 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, $64,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $12,235.56, for a total amount of $76,735.56, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on October 15, 2010 in a principle amount of $110,000.00, was converted by GFMB LLC at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 255,785,205 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, $65,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $15,512.52, for a total amount of $80,514.42, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 in a principle amount of $150,000.00, was converted Lightening Equity Group LLC at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 268,381,735 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, $70,700.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $13,737.11, for a total amount of $84,437.11, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on October 1, 2010 in a principle amount of $146,142.51, was converted by Lightening Equity Group LLC at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 281,457,023 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Joint Strategy Group LLC on September 3, 2009 in a principle amount of $19,762.32, together with accrued interest of $6,393.25, for a total amount of $26,155.57, was converted by the Dylan Scott Goldstein Irrevocable Trust at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 87,185,220 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  F-22   On May 21, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Jamie Goldstein on April 1, 2011 in a principle amount of $75,000.00, together with accrued interest of $10,084.93, for a total amount of $85,084.93, was converted by the Dylan Scott Goldstein Irrevocable Trust at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 283,616,438 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On June 20, 2012, $25,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $6,090.41, for a total amount of $31,090.41, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 in a principle amount of $150,000.00, was converted by Northern Capital Group, LLC at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 103,634,703 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  Conversion of Notes and Exercise of Warrants Q3/2012  On July 6, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to The Bingham Law Group on November 22, 2011 in a principle amount of $25,000.00, together with accrued interest of $1,775.34, for a total amount of $26,775.34, was converted by The Bingham Law Group at a conversion price of $0.0005 into 53,550,680 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On July 6, 2012, $3,500.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $296.88, for a total amount of $3,796.88, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00, was converted by Maria Idiaquez Meneses at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 12,656,256 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On July 6, 2012, $3,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $254.47, for a total amount of $3,254.47, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00, was converted Evelyn Saldana Rodriguez at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 10,848,219 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On July 6, 2012, $6,000.00 of principle together with accrued interest of $508.93, for a total amount of $6,508.93, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00, was converted by Greisy Tejada Lujan at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 21,696,438 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On July 6, 2012, $3,000.00 of principle together with accrued interest of $254.47, for a total amount of $3,254.47, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00, was converted by Juliana Hoyas Castelar at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 10,848,219 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  Conversion of Preferred Stock Q1/2012  No Preferred stock was converted in Q1/2012  Conversion of Preferred Stock Q2/2012  On April 18, 2012, 874,913 out of 1,333,332 shares of Series B Preferred stock issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in May, 2011, was converted by Cornucopia, Ltd. on behalf of Alan Nisselson, Responsible Officer & Authorized Person of MarketXT Holdings, Corp into 349,956,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  Conversion of Preferred Stock Q3/2012  On July 6, 2012, 108,619 out of 1,333,332 shares of Series B Preferred stock issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in May, 2011, was converted by Cornucopia, Ltd. into 43,447,410 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  Retirement of Notes and Exercise of Warrants Q3/2012  On July 3, 2012, pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement between the Company and Mark Daniels, a promissory note issued to Daniels on April 15, 2009 in the principle amount of $159,878.00, including accrued interest of $61,761.09, for a total amount of $221,639.09, was definitively retired in its entirety.  The Company has no further obligation with respect to said promissory note.  Notes Receivable  On February 2, 2012, the Company made an additional loan to Tac-Air in the amount of fifty thousand dollars (US$50,000).   F-23   NOTE 9  PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENTS AND RESTATEMENT OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING  The previously issued financial statements for 2010 have been restated. The calculation for average weighted shares outstanding has been adjusted to reflect the issuance date of shares issued in 2010. The effect of the correction is as follows:  As Previously StatedAs CorrectedNumber of Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding2,208,332,7902,071,721,049   F-24   Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  Not applicable.  Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures  (A) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information that would be required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2011.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2011, and as of the date that the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was completed, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to satisfy the objectives for which they are intended.  (B) Managements report on internal controls over financial reporting.  The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act). Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2011, the Companys internal control over financial reporting was ineffective based on the COSO criteria, due to the following material weakness listed below.  Insufficient segregation of duties in our finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel.  During the year ended December 31, 2011, the company internally performed all aspects of our financial reporting process, including, but not limited to, access to the underlying accounting records and systems, the ability to post and record journal entries and responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements.  Due to the fact these duties were performed oftentimes by the same people, a lack of review was created over the financial reporting process that might result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets, calculations, or assumptions used to compile the financial statements and related disclosures as filed with the SEC.  These control deficiencies could result in a material misstatement to our interim or annual financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.  Insufficient corporate governance policies.  Our corporate governance activities and processes are not always formally documented.  Specifically, decisions made by the board to be carried out by management should be documented and communicated on a timely basis to reduce the likelihood of any misunderstandings regarding key decisions affecting our operations and management.  We intend to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make the necessary improvements to remediate these deficiencies and we intend to consider the results of our remediation efforts and related testing as part of our next year-end assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.   This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only managements report in this annual report.  (C) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.  There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ending 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  Item 9B. Other Information.  Increase in Authorized Shares  On August 5, 2011, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State increasing the Companys authorized shares of Common Stock to 6,000,000,000.   20   Designation of Preferred Stock  On April 25, 2011, the Company approved of a Certificate of Designation to be filed with the Nevada Secretary of State designating 1,000,000 shares of its authorized but undesignated preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock and 5,000,000 shares of its authorized but undesignated preferred stock as Series B Preferred Stock. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into one hundred shares of Common Stock and maintains a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into multiplied by thirty. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into four hundred shares of Common Stock, maintains a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into, provides for a 12% annual coupon payment, is collateralized by the Aircraft and provides for an optional right of participation by the holder in the Companys operating profits through the redemption and retirement of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock. A copy of the Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State designating the rights, preferences, powers, privileges and restrictions, qualifications and limitations of the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2011 and has been incorporated in its entirety by reference.  On May 31, 2011, the Company approved of a Certificate of Designation to be filed with the Nevada Secretary of State designating 10,000,000 shares of its authorized but undesignated preferred stock as Series C Preferred Stock. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into four hundred shares of Common Stock and maintains a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock each share of Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into.  A copy of the Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State designating the rights, preferences, powers, privileges and restrictions, qualifications and limitations of the Series C Preferred Stock has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety by reference. As of the date of this Form 10-K, no shares of Series C Preferred Stock are issued or outstanding.  Cornucopia Financing  As disclosed in our Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2011, on April 1, 2011, the Company entered into a binding letter of intent with Cornucopia, Ltd. (Cornucopia) in connection with a proposed financing arrangement.  Pursuant to the terms of the letter of intent and subject to further negotiation and final agreements and documentation Cornucopia has agreed to provide the Company up to One Million Dollars (US$1,000,000) in financing as follows:  a. Initial Financing Terms.  Cornucopia shall provide an initial financing of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$400,000 and the Initial Financing) through the sale and issuance by the Company of shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the Series B Preferred Stock) to be designated upon execution of the Definitive Agreements. The Initial Financing and number of shares of Preferred Stock: (i) shall be convertible into 533,333,200 shares of the Companys restricted common stock, par value $0.001 (the Common Stock); (ii) shall maintain a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock the Preferred Stock is convertible into; (iii) shall provide for a 12% annual coupon payment; (iv) shall be collateralized by certain Company assets to be agreed upon by the parties in the Definitive Agreements; (v) shall provide for a right of participation in the Companys operating profits to be agreed upon by the parties in the Definitive Agreements; and (vi) shall include (A) a warrant to purchase up to 533,333,200 shares of Common Stock and (B) a warrant to purchase up to 800,000,000 shares of Common Stock  b. Subsequent Financing Terms.  Cornucopia shall provide a subsequent financing amount of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$600,000 and the Subsequent Financing), as required by and requested by the Company, subject to Cornucopia approval which shall not be unreasonably withheld, through the sale and issuance by the Company of additional shares of Preferred Stock. The Subsequent Financing and shares of Preferred Stock: (i) shall be convertible into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to a fifty percent (50%) discount to the average closing price of the Companys Common Stock for the thirty (30) day period prior to each Subsequent Financing; (ii) shall maintain a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock the Subsequent Financing Preferred Stock is convertible into; (iii) shall provide for a 12% annual coupon payment; (iv) shall be collateralized by certain Company assets to be agreed upon by the parties in the Definitive Agreements; and (v) shall provide for a right of participation in the Companys operating profits to be agreed upon by the parties in the Definitive Agreements.  In April of 2011, the Company and Cornucopia entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the SPA) for the initial round of the US$1,000,000 financing under the LOI. Pursuant to the terms of the SPA, Cornucopia agreed to provide the Company US$400,000 in financing through the sale and issuance by the Company of a total of 1,333,332 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in two separate tranches. The Company received the initial financing tranche of US$200,000 through the sale of 666,666 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.  In April of  2011, the Company received the second financing tranche of US$200,000 from Cornucopia under the terms of the SPA. Pursuant to the terms of the SPA, the Company agreed to issue Cornucopia an additional 666,666 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the T2 Shares). The T2 Shares: (i) are convertible into 266,666,400 shares of the Companys restricted common stock, par value $0.001 (the Common Stock); (ii) maintain a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock the T2 Shares are convertible into; (iii) provide for a 12% annual coupon payment; (iv) are collateralized by certain Company assets; and (v) provide for an optional right of participation by Cornucopia in the Companys operating profits through the redemption and retirement of a portion of the T2 Shares.   21   On July 22, 2011, the Company and Cornucopia entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the Second SPA) wherein Cornucopia purchased an additional 437,445 shares of Series B Preferred Stock under the Subsequent Financing for a total purchase price of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$200,000). The rights, preferences and privileges of the Preferred Stock are outlined in the Certificate of Designation designating the Preferred Stock, which was attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2011 and is hereby incorporated by reference.  Consulting / Employment Agreements  On April 24, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Alexis C. Korybut. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Korybut will be employed in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will receive an annual salary of $120,000, a one-time issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock and additional benefits as outlined in the agreement. A copy of the agreement has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 28, 2011and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On December 1, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with JSG, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, JSG shall provide various consulting services to the Company in consideration for a one-time fee of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company.  A copy of the agreement has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On December 1, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with GFMB, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, GFMB shall provide various consulting services to the Company in consideration for a one-time fee of 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company. A copy of the agreement has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  Subsequent Events- Recent sales of unregistered securities  Issuance of Convertible Debentures  First Quarter of 2012  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $29,444.45 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary accrued during the fourth quarter of 2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 58,890,900 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $10,000 to Brad Hacker as consideration for accounting services for fiscal year 2011.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $41,528.22 to the Katherine M. OConnor Trust as consideration for funding the purchase of aircraft to be sold to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 83,056,440 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On January 1, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $35,375.89 to Sopwith, LLC as consideration for funding the purchase of aircraft to be sold to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 70,751,780 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On February 29, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $57,804.38 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for loans to the Company during the first quarter of 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 115,608,760 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.   22   On March 31, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $20,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal services accrued during the first quarter of 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On March 31, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $65,458.60 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for (i) unpaid salary accrued during the first quarter of 2012, (ii) out-of-pocket expenses, and (iii) a loan to the Company.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 130,917,200 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  Second Quarter of 2012  On April 15, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $11,000.00 to Jamie Goldstein as consideration for loans to the Company during the second quarter of 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 36,666,667 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $54,000.00 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for unpaid salary accrued during the second quarter of 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 180,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $40,000.00 to The Bingham Law Group as consideration for unpaid legal services accrued during the second quarters of 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 133,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture in a principle amount of $72,448.49 to Alexis Korybut as consideration for accrued and unpaid vacation from August 17, 2007 through June 30, 2012.  The Convertible Debenture has a term of three years, an interest rate of 12%, and has full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  The principle amount is convertible into 241,494,967 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0003 per share. A copy of the debenture has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  Conversion of Notes, Preferred Stock and Exercise of Warrants  First Quarter of 2012  The Company issued 35,711,416 shares of restricted Common Stock to The Bingham Law Group in February, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $1,783.56, for a total consideration of $26,783.56, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to The Bingham Law Group on July 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $25,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 82,136,063 shares of restricted Common Stock to The Bingham Law Group in February, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $50,000.00 and accrued interest of $6,542.47, for a total consideration of $56,542.47, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to The Bingham Law Group on January 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $50,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  23   Second Quarter of 2012  The Company issued 349,956,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Alan Nisselson, Responsible Officer & Authorized Person of MarketXT Holdings, Corp, in April, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of 874,913 shares of Series B Preferred stock issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in May, 2011, at the request of Cornucopia, Ltd.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 102,073,059 shares of restricted Common Stock to Kristen Zankl in May, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $5,613.70, for a total consideration of $30,613.70, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on July 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $218,570.50 and subsequently assigned to Kristen Zankl.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 351,131,324 shares of restricted Common Stock to Richard Applegate in May, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $86,000.00 and accrued interest of $19,311.12, for a total consideration of $105,311.12, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on July 1, 2010 with a principle amount of $218,570.50 and subsequently assigned to Richard Applegate.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 255,785,205 shares of restricted Common Stock to GFMB LLC in May, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $64,000.00 and accrued interest of $12,235.56, for a total consideration of $76,735.56, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on October 15, 2010 with a principle amount of $110,000.00 and subsequently assigned to GFMB, LLC.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  On May 21, 2012, $65,000.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $15,512.52, for a total amount of $80,514.42, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 in a principle amount of $150,000.00, was converted Lightening Equity Group LLC at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 268,381,735 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, $70,700.00 of principle, together with accrued interest of $13,737.11, for a total amount of $84,437.11, of a Convertible Promissory Note issued to the Gary Fears Trust on October 1, 2010 in a principle amount of $146,142.51, was converted by Lightening Equity Group LLC at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 281,457,023 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Joint Strategy Group LLC on September 3, 2009 in a principle amount of $19,762.32, together with accrued interest of $6,393.25, for a total amount of $26,155.57, was converted by the Dylan Scott Goldstein Irrevocable Trust at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 87,185,220 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  On May 21, 2012, a Convertible Promissory Note issued to Jamie Goldstein on April 1, 2011 in a principle amount of $75,000.00, together with accrued interest of $10,084.93, for a total amount of $85,084.93, was converted by the Dylan Scott Goldstein Irrevocable Trust at a conversion price of $0.0003 into 283,616,438 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company.  The Company issued 103,634,703 shares of restricted Common Stock to Northern Capital Group, LLC in June, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $6,090.41, for a total consideration of $31,090.41, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to the Gary Fears Trust on May 19, 2010 with a principle amount of $150,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  Third Quarter of 2012  The Company issued 53,550,680 shares of restricted Common Stock to The Bingham Law Group in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $25,000.00 and accrued interest of $1,775.34, for a total consideration of $26,775.34, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to The Bingham Law Group on November 22, 2011 with a principle amount of $25,000.00.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 43,447,410 shares of restricted Common Stock to Cornucopia, Ltd. In July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of 108,619 shares of Series B Preferred stock initially issued to Cornucopia, Ltd. in May, 2011.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 12,656,256 shares of restricted Common Stock to Maria Idiaquez Meneses in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $3,500.00 and accrued interest of $296.88, for a total consideration of $3,796.88, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00 and subsequently assigned to Maria Idiaquez Meneses.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 10,848,219 shares of restricted Common Stock to Evelyn Saldana Rodriguez in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $3,000.00 and accrued interest of $254.47, for a total consideration of $3,254.47 of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00 and subsequently assigned to Evelyn Saldana Rodriguez.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  24    The Company issued 21,696,438 shares of restricted Common Stock to Greisy Tejada Lujan in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $6,000.00 and accrued interest of $508.93, for a total consideration of $6,508.93, of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00 and subsequently assigned to Greisy Tejada Lujan.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company issued 10,848,219 shares of restricted Common Stock to Juliana Hoyas Castelar in July, 2012 in consideration for the conversion of a principle amount of $3,000.00 and accrued interest of $254.47, for a total consideration of $3,254.47 of a Convertible Promissory Note initially issued to Alexis Korybut on October 1, 2011 with a principle amount of $15,500.00 and subsequently assigned to Juliana Hoyas Castelar.  No registration rights were issued in connection with these shares.  The Company reasonably believes that all of the issuances of securities described above were deemed to be exempt from registration in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.  Each investor had a pre-existing relationship with the Company and/or represented that it had the financial wherewithal, knowledge and sophistication to invest in the securities of the Company.  In addition, each recipient represented that they are acquiring the securities as an investment only and not with a view towards distribution of the same to the public.  We made available to each investor with disclosure of all aspects of our business, including providing the investor with press releases, access to our auditors, and other financial, business, and corporate information.  Finally, all securities issued were either restricted with an appropriate restrictive legend on certificates for shares, notes and warrants issued stating that the securities (and underlying shares) have not been registered under the Securities Act and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without an effective registration or an exemption therefrom, or were issued pursuant to an exemption provided under Rule 144.  Notes Receivable  On February 2, 2012, the Company made an additional loan to Tac-Air in the amount of fifty thousand dollars (US$50,000).  Employment Agreements  On May 15, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Alexis C. Korybut. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Korybut will be employed in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will receive an annual salary of $180,000, a one-time issuance of 3,000,000 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock and additional benefits as outlined in the agreement. A copy of the employment agreement has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K, and is hereby incorporated by reference.  Settlement Agreement with Mark Daniels  On or about July 3, 2012, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the Daniels Settlement Agreement) with Mark Daniels (Daniels), the Companys former Chief Executive Officer. A copy of the Daniels Settlement Agreement was attached to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Pursuant to the terms of the Daniels Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to settle its litigational claims against Daniels related to the litigation action entitled Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., et. al v. Mark Daniels, et. al, in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida through the removal of Daniels from the action. As consideration for the removal of Daniels from the action: (i) Daniels agreed to the rescission, cancellation, waiver and termination in full of all Company obligations relating to a promissory note issued by the Company to Daniels on or about April 15, 2009 with a current balance of approximately $221,000 including all principle and accrued interest; and (ii) Daniels is required to deliver a Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) cash payment to the Company within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the execution of the Daniels Settlement Agreement.  We have no other information to disclose that was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, but was not reported.   25   PART III  Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act  Board of  Directors and Officers  As of the date of this report, our executive officers and directors, the positions held by them, and their ages are as follows:  NameAgePositionAlexis Korybut46Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerMichael Cariello51Director, Chief Operating Officer and SecretaryPeter C. Maffitt68Director  Alexis C. Korybut, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Mr. Korybut brings to the Company a wealth of corporate,administrative, and financial management experience in both the domestic and international arenas, having achieved success at some of the most respected firms in the financial services industry such as Salomon Brothers and Smith Barney where he worked with both private and public companies to raise capital through the international debt and equity markets  Mr. Korybut has also been the Managing Partner of Plumtree Capital Management LLC, a public-venture fund management firm since 2005, and the Managing Partner of Plumtree Consulting Group LLC, a firm offering consulting services to high-growth public companies, since 2008.  From 1999 through 2004, Mr. Korybut was President of Sterling Financial Group of Companies, Inc, a Florida-based financial services firm with offices throughout the United States, Europe, and Latin America. His management expertise and strategic guidance enabled Sterling Financial to be recognized in 2002 and 2003 by Inc. Magazine as the 8th and 26th fastest growing privately-held company in the United States, respectively, and as the number one fastest growing privately-held company in the State of Florida over the same period.  Mr. Korybut received a BA from Georgetown University in 1988 and an MBA in finance from the University of Michigan Business School in 1994. In addition to his native English, Mr. Korybut speaks French, Spanish, and Portuguese.  Mike Ratso Cariello, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary  Mr. Cariello is one of the most renowned pilots to have served in the U.S. military in recent decades.  He has flown civilian and military aircraft for over 30 years, and has accumulated over 9,000 flight-hours, mostly in high performance jet fighters such as, F/A-18, F-16, A-4 Skyhawk.  Mr. Cariello has a distinguished career having served in the U.S. Marine Corp for over 14 years. He retired from the Marine Corps in 1998 following his 3 year appointment as Adversary Officer at the Top Gun Fighter Weapons School for the Navy and Marine Corps.  Mr. Cariello has also served as the 767 Program Manager and Pilot for Blackwater, Inc., one of the largest U.S. Defense contractors in Iraq from July 2005 through December 2007.  He has also been a qualified 767 Captain for American Airlines since 2000, flying internationally to Europe and South America from Miami, Florida. Mr. Cariellos reputation and his experience in all facets of air combat training and adversary programs has brought a level of professionalism and credibility to the Company that has been recognized and lauded by our past, current, and potential customers.  Peter C. Maffit, Director  Mr. Maffitt is a member of our Board of Director and an executive with over 30 years of experience in the corporate, government, and military sectors, with an emphasis on new business development and fund-raising in the international sector including the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. Mr. Maffitt is a published author including publications in the U.S. Foreign Service Journal. Mr. Maffitt is 62 years old, a graduate of Yale University, speaks Spanish, French, Russian, and Mandarin, and for the past seven years has been providing consulting services to domestic companies engaged in international business.  Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings  Except as set forth herein, no Officer or Director of the Company has, during the last five years: (i) been convicted in or is currently subject to a pending a criminal proceeding; (ii) been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to any federal or state securities or banking laws including, without limitation, in any way limiting involvement in any business activity, or finding any violation with respect to such law, nor (iii) has any bankruptcy petition been filed by or against the business of which such person was an executive officer or a general partner, whether at the time of the bankruptcy of for the two years prior thereto.  26    Family Relationships  There is no family relationship among any of our officers or directors.  Director Compensation  The Directors of the Company may receive stock compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors, and are entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board of Directors meetings. Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board.  Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance  Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors, executive officers, and stockholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our common stock.  Executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.  To our knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us for the year ended December 31, 2011, not all Section 16(a) reports required to be filed by our executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% stockholders were filed on a timely basis.   27   Item 11. Executive Compensation  Set forth below is information concerning the compensation paid for services in all capacities to our President and Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.


|                        |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|----------------------- | ---- | ---------- | --------- | ------------ | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ---------
|Name and Position       | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards | Option Awards($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (4) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total
($)
|                        |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|Alexis Korybut          | 2011 | 120,000    | -         | 1,000,0001   | -                | -                                          | -                                               | -                          | 120,000  
|Chief Executive Officer |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|Chief Financial Officer | 2010 | 120,000    | -         | 75,000       | -                | -                                          | -                                               | -                          | 195,000  
|Chairman, Director      |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|and former VP           |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|                        |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|Michael Cariello        | 2011 | -0-        | -         | -            | -                | -                                          | -                                               | -                          | -        
|Chief Operating Officer |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|Secretary and Director  | 2010 | 120,000    | -         | -            | -                | -                                          | -                                               | -                          | 120,000  
|                        |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|Peter Maffit            | 2011 | -          | -         | 25,000,000   | -                | -                                          | -                                               | -                          | -        
|Director                |      |            |           |              |                  |                                            |                                                 |                            |          
|                        | 2010 | -          | -         | -            | -                | -                                          | -                                               | -                          | -        

(1) Pursuant to the Employment Agreement dated April 24, 2011 between the Company and Mr. Alexis Korybut, Mr. Korybut was issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into a total of  100,000,000 shares of Common Stock and maintain a number of votes equal to the product of: (a) the number of shares of Common Stock each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into on the record date of such vote multiplied by (b) thirty (30).  Option/SAR Grants in Fiscal Year 2011  None.  Employment Agreements  On April 24, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Alexis C. Korybut. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Korybut will be employed in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will receive an annual salary of $120,000, a one-time issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock and additional benefits as outlined in the agreement. A copy of the agreement has been attached as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 28, 2011and has been incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.  On May 15, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Alexis C. Korybut. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Korybut will be employed in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will receive an annual salary of $180,000, a one-time issuance of 3,000,000 shares of the Companys Series A Preferred Stock and additional benefits as outlined in the agreement. A copy of the employment agreement has been attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K, and is hereby incorporated by reference.  28   Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.  The following table presents information about the beneficial ownership of our shares of common stock as of December 31, 2011 by: (i) each person or entity who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our share of common stock; and (ii) each of our directors and each of our named executive officers and all directors and executive officers as a group.  Name And AddressNumber Of Shares
Beneficially OwnedPercentage OwnedMichael Cariello(1)50,000,0001.37%Alexis Korybut(2)88,303,2092.42%Peter Maffitt(3)25,000,0000.05%GFMB, LLC(4)193,107,5805.29%Mark Daniels Irrevocable Trust III(5)291,521,9217.99%All directors, officers and 5% shareholders as a group647,932,71017.12%  (1) The address is 10907 Carrolwood Drive, Tampa, Florida 33618.  (2) The address is 123 West Nye Lane, Suite 517, Carson City, Nevada 89706.  (3) The address is 2001 Kirby Dr., Suite 1007, Houston, Texas 77019  (4) The address is 2402 Venetian Way, Boynton Beach, Florida 33426.  (5) The address is 4521 PGA Blvd., Suite 350, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33418.  The following table presents information about the beneficial ownership of our shares of Series A Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2011 by: (i) each person or entity who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our share of Series A Preferred Stock; and (ii) each of our directors and each of our named executive officers and all directors and executive officers as a group.  Name And AddressNumber Of Shares
Beneficially OwnedPercentage OwnedAlexis Korybut(2)1,000,000100%All directors, officers and 5% shareholders as a group1,000,000100%  (1) The address is 123 West Nye Lane, Suite 517, Carson City, Nevada 89706. The 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into a total of  100,000,000 shares of Common Stock and maintain a number of votes equal to the product of: (a) the number of shares of Common Stock each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into on the record date of such vote multiplied by (b) thirty (30).  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC.  The number of shares and the percentage beneficially owned by each individual listed above include shares that are subject to options held by that individual that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days from the date of this report and the number of shares and the percentage beneficially owned by all officers and directors as a group includes shares subject to options held by all officers and directors as a group that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days from the date of this report.  29   Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.  On May 18, 2010 the Company signed a lease agreement with Air Support Systems, LLC. As consideration for the lease option, TADS issued Air Supports Systems, LLC a one-time up-front fee consisting of 10,000,000 shares of the Companys restricted common stock. The lease provides TADS an exclusive one year period in which to lease and utilize the aircraft in exchange for: (i) a fee equal to fifty (50%) percent of the operating profits of any contract, where operating profits equals the gross cash receipts derived from a contract minus the direct expenses of operating said contract; (ii) a fee equal to fifty (50%) percent of the fee paid to TADS in connection with any off-loaded fuel for which TADS is paid in connection with a contract for air-to-air refueling; and (iii) TADS and Air Support Systems, LLC shall agree upon a minimum monthly, quarterly, or annual fee amount, as the case may be, on a case-by-case basis, relevant to the type and terms of the particular aircraft under lease and the related contract. A copy of the Lease Option Agreement was attached as an exhibit to our Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on May 24, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference. Gary Fears is the Managing Member of Air Support Systems, LLC and, as disclosed herein, maintains convertible promissory notes issued by the Company.  Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services  Audit Fees  For the year ended December 31, 2011, Hamilton P.C., the Companys current principal accountants, billed the Company $16,000 for fees for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements and $3,000 for the 10-Q for the third quarter of 2011.  We paid Malcolm Pollard C.P.A., P.A., our former auditor, auditor fees of $2,500 for review fees for each of the first two quarters of the 2011 10-Qs and $20,500 for the 2010 10-K audit and review of the 2009 10-K.  Audit-Related Fees  For the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, none of the Companys past or present auditors provided the Company with any assurances or related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Companys financial statements and are not reported above under "Audit Fees."  Tax Fees  For the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Hamilton PC, none of the Companys past or present auditors provided professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.  All Other Fees  For the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, none of the Companys past or present auditors provided services related to the preparation and filing of the Companys filings, the creation of pro forma financial statements and other related matters.  Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies  The Company currently does not have an audit committee.  The Company Board of Directors currently approves in advance all audit and non-audit related services performed by the Companys principal accountants.   30   Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.  ExhibitTitle3 (i)Articles of Incorporation and amendments thereto. (Attached as an exhibit to our First Amended Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 filed with the SEC on May 10, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).3 (ii)Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State designating the rights, preferences, powers, privileges and restrictions, qualifications and limitations of the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock.3.2Bylaws (Attached as an exhibit to our Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on May 27, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).10.1Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut in the principal amount of $15,500.00 dated October 1, 2011.10.2Convertible Promissory Note issued to Jamie Goldstein in the principal amount of $1,500.00 dated October 1, 2011.10.3Convertible Promissory Note issued to The Bingham Law Group in the principal amount of $25,000.00 dated November 22, 2011.10.4Consulting Agreement between Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and JSG, LLC dated December 1, 2011.10.5Consulting Agreement between Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and GFMB, LLC dated December 1, 2011.10.6Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut in the principal amount of $29,444.45 dated January 1, 2012.10.7Convertible Promissory Note issued to Brad Hacker in the principal amount of $10,000.00 dated January 1, 2012.10.8Convertible Promissory Note issued to Katherine M. OConnor Trust in the principal amount of $41,528.22 dated January 1, 2012.10.9Convertible Promissory Note issued to Sopwith, LLC in the principal amount of $35,375.89 dated January 1, 2012.10.10Convertible Promissory Note issued to Jamie Goldstein in the principal amount of $57,804.38 dated February 29, 2012.10.11Convertible Promissory Note issued to The Bingham Law Group in the principal amount of $20,000.00 dated March 31, 2012.10.12Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut in the principal amount of $65,458.60 dated March 31, 2012.10.13Convertible Promissory Note issued to Jamie Goldstein in the principal amount of $11,000.00 dated April 15, 2012.10.14Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut in the principal amount of $54,000.00 dated June 30, 2012.10.15Convertible Promissory Note issued to The Bingham Law Group in the principal amount of $40,000.00 dated June 30, 2012.10.16Convertible Promissory Note issued to Alexis Korybut in the principal amount of $72,448.49 dated June 30, 2012.10.17Employment Agreement between Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and Alexis Korybut dated May 15, 2012.31.1Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1Certification of the Principal Executive Officer  pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   31   SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  TACTICAL AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC. Date:

August 16, 2012  /s/ Alexis C. Korybut By: Alexis C. Korybut Its: Chief Executive Officer   In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.   SignatureTitleDate/s/ Alexis C. KorybutCEO, President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 16, 2012Alexis C. Korybut(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ Michael CarielloDirector, Secretary and Chief Operating OfficerAugust 16, 2012Michael Cariello/s/ Peter C. MaffitDirectorAugust 16, 2012Peter C. Maffit    32