alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009153EN.01005102.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/51

---

Action brought on 7 April 2009 — Časta v Commission

(Case F-40/09)

2009/C 153/99

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Radek Časta (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Tahotná, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

First, an application for annulment of EPSO’s decision not to admit the applicant to the oral tests in open competition EPSO/AD/107/07-LAW on account of the fact that the condition relating to 3 years’ experience in a senior management post was not met. Secondly, an application for an order that the defendant pay the applicant a sum in respect of the material and non-material harm suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the appointing authority’s decision No R/45715/08 of 22 December 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the appointing authority’s decision No R/45715/08 of 22 December 2008;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 20 000, in respect of the material and non-material harm suffered, plus interest for late payment from 9 June 2008 until 15 days after the judgment has acquired the binding authority of a judgment which has become definitive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 20 000, in respect of the material and non-material harm suffered, plus interest for late payment from 9 June 2008 until 15 days after the judgment has acquired the binding authority of a judgment which has become definitive;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
Darryl BURTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8964.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael William JECZALIK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7380.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4150 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the importation or 

transportation of child sex dolls, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2019 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

CARTER of Georgia, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. FLORES, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. SPANO, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. OLSON) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the importation or transportation of child sex dolls, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jurists United to Stop 

5 Trafficking Imitation Child Exploitation Act of 2019’’ or 

6 the ‘‘JUSTICE Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 The Congress finds as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4150 IH

1 (1) There is a correlation between possession of 

2 the obscene dolls, and robots, and possession of and 

3 participation in child pornography. 

4 (2) The physical features, and potentially the 

5 ‘‘personalities’’ of the robots are customizable or 

6 morphable and can resemble actual children. 

7 (3) Some owners and makers of the robots have 

8 made their children interact with the robots as if the 

9 robots are members of the family. 

10 (4) The robots can have settings that simulate 

11 rape. 

12 (5) The dolls and robots not only lead to rape, 

13 but they make rape easier by teaching the rapist 

14 about how to overcome resistance and subdue the 

15 victim. 

16 (6) For users and children exposed to their use, 

17 the dolls and robots normalize submissiveness and 

18 normalize sex between adults and minors. 

19 (7) As the Supreme Court has recognized, ob20 scene material is often used as part of a method of 

21 seducing child victims. 

22 (8) The dolls and robots are intrinsically related 

23 to abuse of minors, and they cause the exploitation, 

24 objectification, abuse, and rape of minors. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4150 IH

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF IMPORTATION OR TRANSPOR2 TATION OF CHILD SEX DOLLS. 

3 Section 1462 of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (a), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) in paragraph (b), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (3) by inserting after paragraph (c) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(d) any child sex doll; or’’; and 

12 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘In this section, the term ‘child sex doll’ means an 

14 anatomically-correct doll, mannequin, or robot, with the 

15 features of, or with features that resemble those of, a 

16 minor, intended for use in sexual acts.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

SSE Team

▪ Corli Le Roux, Senior Specialist (panelist)

▪ Anthony Miller, Chief Coordinator

▪ Lisa Remke, Deputy Coordinator

Date: 19 July 2023

CFTC Second Convening on Voluntary Carbon Markets

Exchanges and Carbon Markets
www.SSEinitiative.org www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

Overview of UN SSE

 UN Partnership Programme founded in 2009, organised by UNCTAD, the UN Global 

Compact, UNEP FI and the PRI

 Mission: to provide a global platform for exploring how exchanges can enhance 

performance on ESG issues and encourage sustainable investment, including the 

financing of the UN Sustainable Development Goals

o 133 partner exchanges, Regulator Working Group, topic-specific Advisory 

Groups

o Operates through an integrated programme of evidence-based analysis, 

facilitating a network and forum for multi-stakeholder consensus-building, and 

providing technical assistance and advisory services

 Work streams:

o Climate Action (including Net Zero and Carbon Markets)

o ESG Disclosure

o Gender Equality

o Training through SSE Academy
www.SSEinitiative.org www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

Our work in carbon markets

 Released Market Monitor on VCMs at COP27 in 

November 2022

 Established Advisory Group on Carbon Markets

o 89 members from 56 organisations from 39 

countries

 Currently under development:

o How exchanges can maximize the opportunities 

of carbon markets - an action framework to 

guide exchanges

o To be released at World Investment Forum, Abu 

Dhabi, 17 October 2023
www.SSEinitiative.org www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

The state of play

 Growing exchange involvement seen across carbon market value chain

o Entry points include government mandates, growing environmental market 

offering, primary market and secondary market (spot and derivatives), 

technology solutions

o Seen to have potential to contribute to scale, liquidity, integrity

 Guidance aims to support exchanges to strengthen or explore carbon market 

offering

o Covers compliance and voluntary markets

o Reviews typical and anticipated challenges

o Provides framework for potential actions
www.SSEinitiative.org www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

Anticipated guidance areas

SSE Action Framework for maximizing benefits of carbon markets
www.SSEinitiative.org www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

Looking forward

 Consensus building: Engagement with exchanges and other stakeholders to 

continue

 Knowledge sharing: Exchange-related carbon market database under 

development

 Training: in talks with partners on delivering training to exchanges and regulators 

in 2023 on carbon markets
www.SSEinitiative.org | info@SSEinitiative.org | @SSEinitiative 

Thank you!
# L_2012295EN.01002401.xml

| 25.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/24

---

Corrigendum to Information on the date of entry into force of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Seychelles

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 14 August 2008
  )

On page 64, first paragraph:

for:

‘On 28 February 2007 and 24 July 2008 respectively, ...’,

read:

‘On 28 February 2007 and 2 November 2007 respectively, ...’;

on page 64, second paragraph:

for:

‘The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 24 July 2008, ...’,

read:

‘The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 2 November 2007, ...’.

---
#### A. M. Alfonso, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed February 21, 1929.

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment of conviction on a charge of the statutory offense of unlawful carnal intercourse with an unmarried person of previous chaste character, who at the time of such intercourse is under the age of eighteen years. At the trial there was no direct and positive evidence that the prosecuting witness was unmarried at the time of the alleged carnal intercourse with her, and the evidence from which such an inference might be drawn, is very indefinite.

The court charged the jury as follows:

> The State is required under the laws of this State to prove every material allegation of the information to your satisfaction and beyond a reasonable doubt. The material allegations in the information are that within Dade County and within two years before the filing of the affidavit — the particular day does not make any difference — that this defendant had carnal sexual intercourse with this prosecuting witness, Irma Richardson, and that she was of previous chaste character and under the age of eighteen years. Those are the essentials in the case that you must believe the State has *256proved to your satisfaction. If you believe that she is under the age of eighteen years, if you believe that she was of previous chaste character, and if you believe further that this man had sexual intercourse with her within two years before the filing of the indictment or information, then it would be your duty to convict him. If you have a reasonable doubt upon any of those points you should give him the benefit of that doubt and acquit him.

This charge wholly omits as an ingredient of the statutory offense charged, the essential element that the person with whom the defendant is alleged to have had unlawful carnal intercourse was unmarried at the time the offense was committed; and as this omission was not corrected by any other charge given, it was harmful error, particularly in view of other matters shown by the record including the indefinite nature of the evidence as to whether the prosecuting witness was married or unmarried at the time the alleged offense was committed upon her by the defendant.

The judgment of conviction is reversed for a new trial.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh                       
|                        |  |  |  | Donald R. Walsh                           
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer                   
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                      
|                        |  |  |  | Lawrence Rychlak                          
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 12, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-12806

 

D. C. Docket No. 07-21408 CV-JJO

ODALYS PEREZ,

and others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PALERMO SEAFOOD, INC.,

a Florida Corporation

d.b.a. Fico Key West Seafood,

JUAN ZIEGGENHIRT,

individually,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

 

(December 12, 2008

Before DUBINA, BLACK and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

With the parties’ consent, a magistrate judge conducted a bench trial of this

action claiming minimum wage and overtime violations under the Fair Labor

Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Florida Minimum Wage Act. The district court

found in favor of appellant, Odalys Perez (“Perez”), and entered a judgment for

overtime compensation and statutory damages, retaining jurisdiction to award her

attorney’s fees. Perez appeals, contending that the district court erred in failing to

find, in addition to the overtime violations, that the appellees, Palermo Seafood,

Inc. and Juan Zieggenhirt (“Palermo”), had committed minimum wage violations.

 More specifically, Perez asserts that the district court improperly failed to

require Palermo to pay Perez the value of the “tip credit” taken by Palermo for all

hours for which Perez was paid over the course of 46 work weeks. Perez asserts

that she is entitled to the tip credit amount because Palermo failed to meet the

FLSA conditions precedent to allowing an employer to deduct the tip credit from

the cash wages paid to a tipped employee.

An appellate court reviews de novo the district court’s interpretation of a

federal statute, Burlison v. McDonald’s Corp., 455 F.3d 1242, 1245 (11th Cir.

2006), as well as a district court’s interpretation of a state statute. Blasland, Bouck

& Lee, Inc. v. City of N. Miami, 283 F.3d 1286, 1294 (11th Cir. 2002). We

2
likewise review de novo a district court’s conclusions of law. Wexler v. Anderson,

452 F.3d 1226, 1230 (11th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 934 (2007).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we see no clear error in the district court’s findings of

fact or legal error in its application of the law to those findings. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s judgment.

 AFFIRMED.

3
# L_2010062EN.01005501.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/55

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 152/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2009 of 22 October 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2009 of 22 October 2009 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (Recast) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (Recast) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | Directive 2009/42/EC repeals Council Directive 95/64/EC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Directive 2009/42/EC repeals Council Directive 95/64/EC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of point 7b (Council Directive 95/64/EC) of Annex XXI to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32009 L 0042: Directive 2009/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (Recast) (OJ L 141, 6.6.2009, p. 29).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/42/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 334, 17.12.2009, p. 15.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 141, 6.6.2009, p. 29.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 320, 30.12.1995, p. 25.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2008182EN.01001901.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 182/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 182/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 28/2008

of 14 March 2008

amending Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex IV to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 132/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex IV to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 132/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2006/770/EC of 9 November 2006 amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2006/770/EC of 9 November 2006 amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 20 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003) of Annex IV to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32006 D 0770: Commission Decision 2006/770/EC of 9 November 2006 (OJ L 312, 11.11.2006, p. 59).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32006 D 0770: Commission Decision 2006/770/EC of 9 November 2006 (OJ L 312, 11.11.2006, p. 59).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2006/770/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 March 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 100, 1.2.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 312, 11.11.2006, p. 59.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2017

s0123

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2017

153808(93)(94)(95)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153808

COA: 320559

Wayne CC: 13-008885-FH

REGINALD DESHAWN WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion to 

amend are GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 7, 

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Phillip A. DUNNAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8675.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-00556

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Margaret Wessels <margaretwess@hotmail. corn>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:51 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Margaret Wessels

58 Primrose Street

Aptos, CA 95003