alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
James L. BROOKS, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.; and James L. Brooks, petitioner, v. City of Overland Park, Kansas.

No. 17-288.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
 
 
 I, Jonathan LaBarre, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Stamford Industrial Group,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  Date:
      March 16, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Jonathan
      LaBarreName:
                    Jonathan
      LaBarreTitle:
                    Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
      and Secretary
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/17/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       91,142
COMMITMENTS
  23,357   13,902   13,535   38,918   42,083   75,809   69,520   15,333   21,622

CHANGES FROM 02/10/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,260)
    -467    3,122    1,335    3,850     -519    4,719    3,939   -2,459   -1,679

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.6     15.3     14.8     42.7     46.2     83.2     76.3     16.8     23.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      36       21       34       63       55      115      101
```

----

Updated February 20, 2009
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date:July 25, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Interstate Land Investors II Limited Partnership, (the
Limited Partnership) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey K. Harpel, General Partner and Principal Executive
Officer, Principal Financial Officer of the Limited Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Limited Partnership. /s/ Jeffrey K. HarpelJeffrey K. HarpelSenior Vice President,ISC Realty Corporation,General Partner and Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer of the RegistrantMay 11, 2004
Darryl DUNSMORE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7673.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Deloris PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, et al.

No. 16-8138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Andrew Charles JACKSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5644.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) As discussed above, disclosed in this report any change in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
      during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: December 21, 2006                 /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
2 CROOKED CREEK, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. TREASURER OF CASS COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

No. 17-169.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Exhibit 4.1 


 


 Alaia Capital, LLC 


 10 Corbin Drive 


 Darien, Connecticut 06820 


 


 May 25, 2018 


 


 Alaia Market Linked Trust, Series 6-2 


 Defined Preservation 50 Fund 


 c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee 


 2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor 


 Brooklyn, New York 11217 








	 Re: 	
 Defined Preservation 50 Fund (the “Trust”) 












 


 Ladies and Gentlemen: 


 


 We have examined Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-222802) for the above captioned Trust.  We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator. 


 


 You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 


 


 



	
 

	
 Very truly yours, 

	   
	   	   	   
	
 

	
 Alaia Capital, LLC 

	   
	
 

	
   

	
 

	   
	   	 By: 	 /s/ Oscar Loynaz 	   
	   	   	
 Name: Oscar Loynaz 

	   
	   	   	
 Title:  Managing Director
# L_2010062EN.01000901.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/9

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 124/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 132/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 132/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1).

| (2) | Annex IV to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 81/2009 of 3 July 2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IV to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 81/2009 of 3 July 2009 (2).

| (3) | Commission Decision 2008/591/EC of 30 June 2008 on the Ecodesign Consultation Forum (3) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Decision 2008/591/EC of 30 June 2008 on the Ecodesign Consultation Forum (3) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 6 (Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘7. | 32008 D 0591: Commission Decision 2008/591/EC of 30 June 2008 on the Ecodesign Consultation Forum (OJ L 190, 18.7.2008, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘7.

32008 D 0591: Commission Decision 2008/591/EC of 30 June 2008 on the Ecodesign Consultation Forum (OJ L 190, 18.7.2008, p. 22).’

Article 2

The following point shall be inserted after point 26 (Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IV to the Agreement:

| ‘26a. | 32008 D 0591: Commission Decision 2008/591/EC of 30 June 2008 on the Ecodesign Consultation Forum (OJ L 190, 18.7.2008, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘26a.

32008 D 0591: Commission Decision 2008/591/EC of 30 June 2008 on the Ecodesign Consultation Forum (OJ L 190, 18.7.2008, p. 22).’

Article 3

The text of Decision 2008/591/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 100, 10.4.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 277, 22.10.2009, p. 32.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 190, 18.7.2008, p. 22.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
ArviR2L Jkkiit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0328

FILED

STATE OF MONTANA, APR le 2021

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUAN ANASTASIO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

On March 31, 2021, Defendant and Appellant Juan Anastasio Rodriguez filed a

petition for rehearing of this Court's March 16, 2021 decision in State v. Rodriguez, 2021

MT 65, 403 Mont. 360, P.3d . The State has responded in opposition.

Under M. R. App. P. 20, this Court will consider a petition for rehearing only if the

opinion "overlooked some fact material to the decision," if the opinion "overlooked some

question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case," or if the

opinion "conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court. M. R.

App. P. 20(1)(a)(i-iii).

Rodriguez asserts rehearing is warranted in this case because the Court's plain error

analysis of the trial testimony of Ladonna Maxwell "fail[ed] to account for the effect her

mixed testimony likely had on the jury" and because the Court erred in determining he had

not "presented sufficient record-based inefficacy to warrant reversal based on ineffective

assistance of counsel."

Having reviewed Rodriguez's petition and the State's response, the Court concludes

rehearing is not warranted under M. R. App. P. 20. Regarding the testimony of Maxwell,

Rodriguez simply rehashes the same arguments regarding cautionary instructions he

previously made. This Court squarely addressed and rejected those arguments in its

Opinion, noting we were not "firmly convinced" it was necessary to exercise plain error

04/20/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0328
review regarding a cautionary instruction as Rodriguez did not object to Maxwell's

testimony at trial. Rodriguez, ¶ 21. In addition, Rodriguez again only cites to "persuasive"

federal authority for his contention a cautionary instruction should have been given but

fails to address how the Court not following non-binding federal authority could mean its

Opinion "conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addresser by the Court as

required by M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a)(iii). Regarding Rodriguez's ineffective assistance of

counsel argument, we noted there was an insufficient record to determine "why" counsel

did not cross-examine Jean McAllister on false reporting and therefore his claims were not

appropriate for resolution on direct appeal. Rodriguez, IN 35-36. Rodriguez's new

arguments in his petition do nothing to change this fact. Once again, Rodriguez fails to

demonstrate the Court's Opinion either "overlooked some fact material to the decisioe or

"conflict[ed] with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court. M. R. App.

P. 20(1)(a)(i, iii). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED.

The Clerk of this Court shall provide a copy of this Order to Juan Anastasio

Rodriguez and to all counsel of record.

`7"

DATED this-0 day of April, 2021.

Chief Justice

/4-(-?-7„

Justics61.—
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 855

- C R
NICOLAS WARREN THOMPSON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 177th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 1 390979 )
After due consideration, the Court grants the motion to dismiss this appeal filed by the appellant, Nicolas Warren Thompson

. It is therefore CONSIDERED , ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed

. It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered January 29 , 20 1 5

. Judgment rendered by pan el consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

.
# L_2010181EN.01001501.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 181/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 181/15

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 47/2010

of 30 April 2010

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 9/2010 of 29 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 9/2010 of 29 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2006/78/EC of 29 September 2006 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purposes of adapting Annex II thereto to technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2006/78/EC of 29 September 2006 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purposes of adapting Annex II thereto to technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 L 0078: Commission Directive 2006/78/EC of 29 September 2006 (OJ L 271, 30.9.2006, p. 56).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 L 0078: Commission Directive 2006/78/EC of 29 September 2006 (OJ L 271, 30.9.2006, p. 56).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2006/78/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 101, 22.4.2010, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 271, 30.9.2006, p. 56.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,   Gordon Hamilton, Chief Executive Officer of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:   August 12, 2008 |  | /s/   Gordon Hamilton  
|                        |  | Gordon Hamilton        
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

---
Jorge Luis SERRANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5815.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                   Exhibit 11
                   HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                   --------------------------------
                                   August 31,           September 1,
                                     1997                   1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                <C>                  <C>         
PRIMARY

Earnings:

  Net Earnings                     $ 1,527,000           $ 1,251,000

Preferred stock dividends           (    8,000)           (    8,000)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Net earnings applicable to
    common stock                     1,519,000             1,243,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------

SHARES

Weighted average number of
     shares outstanding                719,496               721,935
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Net earnings per share --
     primary                       $      2.11           $      1.72
----------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


                                       21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                  280,071
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         4,385,210
<ALLOWANCES>                            160,088
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      4,805,995
<PP&E>                                  513,723
<DEPRECIATION>                          304,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        5,071,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,764,302
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  4,826
<OTHER-SE>                            2,302,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          5,071,990
<SALES>                              10,826,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     10,826,719
<CGS>                                 9,795,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        10,943,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,147,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (89,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (36,050)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (53,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (53,222)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.01)


</TABLE>