alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

|                                                        |  |                        
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Name                                                    |  | Formation
 Jurisdiction
|                                                        |  |                        
|GenTek Financial Services
 Ltd.                         |  | Barbados               
|GenTek Holding, LLC                                     |  | Delaware               
|General Chemical Performance Products LLC               |  | Delaware               
|Fini Enterprises, Inc.                                  |  | Texas                  
|General Chemical LLC                                    |  | Delaware               
|General Chemical West LLC                               |  | Delaware               
|Waterside Urban Renewal Corporation                     |  | New Jersey             
|General Chemical Canada Holdings Inc.                   |  | Delaware               
|General
 Chemical Performance Products Ltd.             |  | Ontario                
|Reheis Holdings Inc.                                    |  | Delaware               
|Ilminster
 Company                                      |  | Ireland                
|Reheis Ireland                                          |  | Ireland                
|Reheis Overseas                                         |  | Ireland                
|GenTek Technologies Marketing Inc.                      |  | Delaware               
|Balcrank Products Inc.                                  |  | Delaware               
|GT Technologies Europe GmbH                             |  | Germany                
|GT Technologies, Inc.                                   |  | Delaware               
|GT
 Technologies do Brazil Componentes Automotivos Ltda |  | Brazil                 
|Binderline
 Draftline, Inc.                             |  | Michigan               
|1279597
 Ontario Inc.                                   |  | Ontario                
|Sandco Automotive Ltd.                                  |  | Ontario                
|Gentoma Holding Inc.                                    |  | Delaware               
|Gentoma Corporation                                     |  | Delaware               
|Cabletech
 Global Limited Partnership                   |  | Massachusetts          
|Gentoma Delaware Inc.                                   |  | Delaware               
|Gentoma
 Company                                        |  | Nova Scotia            
|Printing Developments, Inc.                             |  | Delaware               

---
RODERICK HAYGOOD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1047

_________________________/

Opinion filed September 26, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Roderick Haygood, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal

Appeals, Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2011311EN.01001401.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/14

---

Order of the Court of 9 June 2011 — Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) v European Commission, Métropole télévision (M6), Canal +, French Republic, France Télévisions

(Case C-451/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Article 86(2) EC - Public service broadcasting - Decision not to raise objections - Proof - Economic efficiency of the undertaking)

2011/C 311/20

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, Agents), Métropole télévision (M6), Canal + (represented by: E. Guillaume, avocat), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, Agents), France Télévisions (represented by: J.-P. Gunther and A. Giraud, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 July 2010 in Joined Cases T-568/08 and T-573/08 TF1 and M6 v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the appellant’s action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 3506 final of 16 July 2008 relating to the proposed grant, by the French Republic, of capital funding of EUR 150 million to France Télévisions SA — Infringement of the rules relating to the burden of proof and the taking of evidence — Infringement of Article 106(2) TFEU — Concept of ‘service of general economic interest’ — No serious difficulties

TF1 and M6

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) is ordered to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) is ordered to pay the costs;

| 3. | Canal + and the French Republic are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Canal + and the French Republic are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John F. Craven, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)/s/ JOHN F. CRAVENJohn F. CravenChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)


Date: July 3, 2007

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Christopher EVANS, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 17-5407.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mark Gregory HANDY, Sr., petitioner, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Jr., Warden.

No. 16-9717

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).(2)

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In
connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify
that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 10, 2005

| |  | /s/ Danny Lustiger
Name:  Danny Lustiger
Title: Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# L_2006185EN.01001501.xml

| 6.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 185/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 185/15

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union

The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Georgia, to take account of the accession of 10 new Member States to the European Union, which the Council and the Commission decided to conclude on 21 February 2005
   (1), entered into force on 1 March 2005, the last notification of the completion of procedures under Article 5.2 of the Protocol being received on 21 February 2005.

1

---

(1)  See page 10 of this Official Journal

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of NetScout Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anil K. Singhal, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/S/    ANIL K.
SINGHAL                         
|Anil K. Singhal                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                                               
|May 27, 2011
Jose E. RAMOS, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 17-8518.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.
Order filed July 22, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01132-CV

____________

JOHNNY COLLUMS AND TINA COLLUMS, Appellants

V.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1007240

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed January 8, 2014. Our review has determined 

that relevant items have been omitted from the clerk's record. The record does not 

contain documents necessary to demonstrate the judgment being appealed is final.

Accordingly, we issue the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). 

The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before August 1, 2014, containing the following:
1. Appellant’s motion for partial nonsuit of claims against Stockman Motor, 

Inc. d/b/a Select Ford Mercury filed on or about August 16, 2013; and 

2. The order granting a non-suit of claims against Stockman Motor, Inc. 

d/b/a Select Ford Mercury signed on or about August 21, 2013.

If any omitted item is not part of the case file, the county clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of income filed as
part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000853971
<NAME> STANDARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           241,713
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          77
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,016
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      547
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 265,878
<CASH>                                           4,411
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              65,047
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          17,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 506,481
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                323,863
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   2,582
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  5,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,722
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,997
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,042)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   506,481
<PREMIUMS>                                       8,418
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             14,371
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 677
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   5,138
<BENEFITS>                                      16,302
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,723
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (890)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of GenTek Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), William E. Redmond, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas B. Testa, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ | William E. Redmond, Jr.William E. Redmond, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerApril 12, 2007 | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    |                                                                                     | 
|    |                                                                                     | 
|/s/ | Thomas B. TestaThomas B. TestaChief Financial OfficerApril 12, 2007                 | 
|    |                                                                                     | 
|    |                                                                                     | 
|    |                                                                                     | 



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the annual report of Semitool, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Larry A. Viano, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








Dated:  December
      14, 2009
            
            By:
            /s/ Larry A.
      VianoLarry A.
      VianoVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO 

DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT 

This Eighth Amendment (“Amendment”) is made effective as of the date of the last signature below, between Biosense Webster, Inc.
(“Biosense”) with an address at 33 Technology Drive, Irvine, California 92618 and Stereotaxis, Inc. (“Stereotaxis”) with an address at 4320 Forest Park Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63108. 

WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into the Development Alliance and Supply Agreement, effective May 7, 2002 (as amended, the “Amended
Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Amended Agreement to extend the term. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Article II.A. (Existing Daughter Products) in the Sixth Amendment shall be amended and restated as follows: 


“Subject to the terms and conditions of the Amended Agreement, Biosense’s rights to Distribute worldwide the Existing Daughter
Products on an exclusive basis are hereby extended through December 31, 2015 and thereafter on a nonexclusive basis through December 31, 2022.” 
  

	 	2.	Article II.B. (Japan) in the Sixth Amendment shall be amended and restated as follows: 


“Notwithstanding Section II.A. above, Biosense’s exclusive rights to Distribute each of the Existing Daughter Products in Japan will
be extended to the later of December 31, 2017 or five years after the date of approval of the applicable Existing Daughter Product for sale in Japan, and the non-exclusive rights to Distribute each of the Existing Daughter Products in Japan
will be extended through December 31, 2022.” 
  

	 	3.	For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties acknowledge that (i) the Compatible CARTO System, as referenced in Section 3.2.2.1 of the Amended Agreement, has been completed and that any additional iterations of
Compatible CARTO Systems would be subject to mutual agreement of the Parties and documented in a purchase order and (ii) the exclusivity set forth in Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 expired on December 31, 2015. 


 

	 	4.	Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, all capitalized terms in this Amendment will have the definitions afforded them in the Agreement. 








	 	5.	Except as set forth in this Amendment, the agreement is unaffected and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. If there is a conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement or any earlier
amendment, the terms of this Amendment will prevail. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their
duly authorized representatives. 
  

			
	BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC.	  	STEREOTAXIS, INC.
		
	 By: /s/ Biren Mehta
	  	 By: /s/ David Fischel

		
	 Name: Biren Mehta
	  	 Name: David Fischel

		
	 Title: VP, Business Development
	  	 Title: CEO

		
	 Date: 6/19/2018
	  	 Date: 6/15/2018