alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4226 

To provide that certain guidance related to the citizenship of children of 

Federal employees and members of the Armed Forces shall have no 

force or effect, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 

Mr. GALLEGO (for himself, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. MOORE, Mr. CROW, Mr. COHEN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

Mr. CORREA, and Mr. TED LIEU of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that certain guidance related to the citizenship 

of children of Federal employees and members of the 

Armed Forces shall have no force or effect, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Children 

5 of Public Servants and Service Members Abroad Act of 

6 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4226 IH

1 SEC. 2. NULLIFYING GUIDANCE. 

2 The policy guidance entitled ‘‘Defining ‘Residence’ in 

3 Statutory Provisions Related to Citizenship’’ issued by the 

4 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on August 28, 

5 2019, or any other substantially similar policy guidance, 

6 memorandum, or action by the U.S. Citizenship and Im7 migration Services shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3733 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3733

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System the 
areas included in Indian Peninsula Unit FL-92 and Cape San Blas Unit P-
                             30 in Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2019

   Mr. Dunn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System the 
areas included in Indian Peninsula Unit FL-92 and Cape San Blas Unit P-
                             30 in Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              OF AREAS COMPRISING INDIAN PENINSULA UNIT FL-92 AND CAPE 
              SAN BLAS UNIT P-30, FLORIDA.

    The areas comprising John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Indian Peninsula Unit FL-92 and Cape San Blas Unit P-30 in 
Florida immediately before the enactment of this Act are not part of 
such system, and maps relating to such units are hereby removed from 
the maps referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 405 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 405

 To permit the District of Columbia and each of the territories of the 
 United States to provide and furnish statues honoring their citizens 
 for placement in Statuary Hall in the same manner as statues honoring 
  citizens of the States are provided for placement in Statuary Hall.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit the District of Columbia and each of the territories of the 
 United States to provide and furnish statues honoring their citizens 
 for placement in Statuary Hall in the same manner as statues honoring 
  citizens of the States are provided for placement in Statuary Hall.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUES OF CITIZENS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND 
              TERRITORIES IN STATUARY HALL.

    (a) In General.--Section 1814 of the Revised Statutes of the United 
States (2 U.S.C. 2131) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ``For purposes of this section, the term `State' includes 
American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the 
United States Virgin Islands, and the term `citizen' includes a 
national of the United States, as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment Relating to Procedures for Replacement of 
Statues.--Section 311 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 
2001 (2 U.S.C. 2132) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(f) For purposes of this section--
            ``(1) the term `State' includes American Samoa, the 
        District of Columbia, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
        Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the 
        United States Virgin Islands; and
            ``(2) in the case of the District of Columbia, the Council 
        of the District of Columbia shall be treated as the legislature 
        and the Mayor of the District of Columbia shall be treated as 
        the Governor.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2012309EN.01003201.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 147/2012

of 13 July 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Directive 2011/84/EU of 20 September 2011 amending Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annex III thereto to technical progress (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Directive 2011/84/EU of 20 September 2011 amending Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annex III thereto to technical progress (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 L 0084: Council Directive 2011/84/EU of 20 September 2011 (OJ L 283, 29.10.2011, p. 36).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 L 0084: Council Directive 2011/84/EU of 20 September 2011 (OJ L 283, 29.10.2011, p. 36).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2011/84/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 July 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 283, 29.10.2011, p. 36.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Advisory: 38-97    For Release: July 30, 1997

    CFTC DISCONTINUES OFF-EXCHANGE TASK FORCE**Washington...**The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission)    has discontinued its staff Off-Exchange Task Force. Any correspondence    concerning matters which have been pending before the Off-Exchange Task    Force should henceforth be addressed to Daniel R. Waldman, General Counsel,    CFTC, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.,    20581. The Commission also is undertaking a study of the role of staff    no-action letters and the principles by which the staff should be guided in    issuing them.
# L_2012270EN.01003401.xml

| 4.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 111/2012

of 15 June 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 95/2012 of 30 April 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 95/2012 of 30 April 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2011/314/EU of 12 May 2011 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/314/EU of 12 May 2011 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | Decision 2011/314/EU repeals with effect from 1 January 2012 Commission Decision 2006/920/EC (3) which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2011/314/EU repeals with effect from 1 January 2012 Commission Decision 2006/920/EC (3) which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 37k (Commission Decision 2006/920/EC) of Annex XIII shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32011 D 0314: Commission Decision 2011/314/EU of 12 May 2011 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the “operation and traffic management” subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ L 144, 31.5.2011, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/314/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 June 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 248, 13.9.2012, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 144, 31.5.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 359, 18.12.2006, p. 1.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854663
<NAME> RMI TITANIUM
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                             534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,397
<INVENTORY>                                     71,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,351
<PP&E>                                         132,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,406
<BONDS>                                         63,880
<COMMON>                                           158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,307
<SALES>                                         79,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,724
<CGS>                                           81,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,706)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   432
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,372)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)
        

</TABLE>
Benjamin Preston FOREMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8478.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                             578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   578
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          389,227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,199
<OTHER-SE>                                    (397,848)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       578
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10384 (Summary Calendar)

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
JEREMIAH POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:94-CR-126-A)

- - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Jeremiah Powell appeals his convictio n for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He contends that district

court impermissibly limited the scope of cross-examination and that

the eviden ce was insufficient to support his conviction. Our
review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us
that no reversible error was committed. The court's limitation of repetitive cross-examination did no t rise to the level of plain2

error. S ee United States v. Coleman , 997 F.2d 1101, 1105 (5th Cir.
1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 893 (1994). The evidence was
sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Powell guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt. S ee United States v. Pennington , 20 F.3d 593,
597 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
# L_2014211EN.01004802.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/48

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 93/2013 of 3 May 2013 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 291 of 31 October 2013
  )

| 1. | On page 59, in Article 3: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 59, in Article 3:

for:

‘No .../... of ... (2) (incorporating Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 into the Agreement)’,

2

read:

‘No 228/2013 of 13 December 2013 (2)’ ;

2

| 2. | On page 59, footnote 2: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 59, footnote 2:

for:

| ‘(2) | Not yet published in the Official Journal.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(2)

read:

| ‘(2) | OJ L 154, 22.5.2014, p. 25.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(2)

---
Mario Ponce RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-615.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Derick PHILLIP, et al., petitioners, v. Paul SCINTO, Sr.

No. 16-1545.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
XIAO-YING YU, petitioner, v. MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, et al.

No. 17-213.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Sean ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# L_2009277EN.01003401.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 82/2009

of 3 July 2009

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 10/2009 of 5 February 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 10/2009 of 5 February 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 120/2009 of 9 February 2009 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 120/2009 of 9 February 2009 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 2 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72) of Annex VI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 R 0120: Commission Regulation (EC) No 120/2009 of 9 February 2009 (OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 29).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 R 0120: Commission Regulation (EC) No 120/2009 of 9 February 2009 (OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 29).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 120/2009 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 July 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 73, 19.3.2009, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 29.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michael T. JACKSON, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 17-5156.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              294,329
<SECURITIES>                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                       10,425,089
<ALLOWANCES>                        720,000 
<INVENTORY>                         22,370,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    33,999,591
<PP&E>                              2,332,530 
<DEPRECIATION>                      642,307 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      37,486,212 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               22,163,811 
<BONDS>                             0 
<COMMON>                            5,679 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0 
<PREFERRED>                         1 
<OTHER-SE>                          6,208,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        6,214,593 
<SALES>                             54,799,005 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    54,799,005 
<CGS>                               36,245,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       14,904,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    88,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,699,412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,646,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                        680,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0 
<DISCONTINUED>                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0 
<CHANGES>                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                        (966,992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.21)
        

</TABLE>