COMMENT 

secretary '.' 

From: 

Sent: 

Andrea Psoras-QEDI [apsoras@qedinternational.com] 

Monday, May 05, 2008 3:08 PM 

To: secretary 

• , 

Subject: CFTC Requests Public Input on Possible Regulation of "Event Contracts" 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Page 1 of35 

C) 

- ·1 

C) ' i 

.- (:::::l 

-q '. 

.. -~ .. (~· 

.... ..: .. ~ 

Washington, DC 20581 f\1 I '' (/) -....,J : : 1 r...····~· c ) :.:S.2 202-418-5000 

202-418-5521, fax 

202-418-5514, 11lY 

questions@cftc. gov 

Dear Commissioners and Secretary: 

:u 

f' \ 

}_:;~ 

:;: ) 

,, 

-·· -f 

l';y 

... c: 

N 

Not everything is a commodity, nor should something that is typically covered by some sort of property 

and casualty insurance suddenly become exchange tradable. Insurance companies for a number of years 

have provided compensation of some sort for random, but periodic events. Where the insurance industry 

wants to off-load their risk at the expense of other commodities markets participants, contributes to sorts 

of moral hazards - which I vigorously oppose. 

If where there is 'interest' to develop these sorts of risk event instruments, to me it seems an admission 

that the insurance sector is perhaps marginal or worse, incompetent or too greedy to determine how to 

offer insurance for events presumably produced by nature. 

Now where there are the weather and earth shaking technologies, or some circles call these weather and 

electro-magnetic weapons, used insidiously unfortunately by our military, our intelligence apparatus, 

and perhaps our military contractors for purposes contrary to that to which our public servants take their 

oath of office to the Constitution, I suggest prohibiting the use of that technology rather than leaving 

someone else holding the bag in the event destruction produced by, and where so-called 'natural' events 

were produced by military contractor technology in the guise of 'mother nature'. * 

Consider Rep Denis Kucinich as well as former Senator John Glenn attempted to have our Congress 

prohibit the use of space based weapons. That class ofweapons includes the 'weather weapons'. 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CH0409F.html as well as other articles about this on the Global 

Research website. 

Respectfully, 

Andrea Psoras 

"CFTC Requests Public Input on Possible Regulation of "Event Contracts" 

Washington, DC- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is asking for public 

5/7/2008 

::0 

r:1 

:> 

I ,.1 

-·· -

·' 

" r·n 

0 
Page 2 of35 

comment on the appropriate regulatory treatment of finanCial agreements offered by markets commonly 

referred to as event, prediction, or information markets. 

During the past several years, the CFTC has received numerous requests for guidance involving the 

trading of event contracts. These contracts typically involve financial agreements that are linked to 

events or measurable outcomes and often serve as information collection vehicles. The contracts are 

based on a broad spectrum of events, such as the results of presidential elections, world population 

levels, or economic measures. 

"Event markets are rapidly evolving, and growing, presenting a host of difficult policy and legal 

questions including: What public purpose is served in the oversight of these markets and what 

differentiates these markets from pure gambling outside the CFTC' s jurisdiction?" said CFTC Acting 

chairman Walt Lukken. "The CFTC is evaluating how these markets should be regulated with the proper 

protections in place and I encourage members of the public to provide their views." 

In response to requests for guidance, and to promote regulatory certainty, the CFTC has commenced a 

comprehensive review of the Commodity Exchange Act's applicability to event contracts and markets. 

The CFTC is issuing a Concept Release to solicit the expertise and opinions of all interested parties, 

including CFTC registrants, legal practitioners, economists, state and federal regulatory authorities, 

academics, and event market participants. 

The Concept Release will be published in the Federal Register shortly; comments will be accepted for 

60 days after publication in the Federal Register." 

Comments may also be submitted electronically to secretary@cftc.gov. All comments received will be 

posted on the CFTC's website. 

* 

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 

A Research Paper Presented To Air Force 2025 

August 1996 

Below are highlights contained within the actual report. Please remember that this 

research report was issued in 1996 - 8 years ago - and that much of what was 

discussed as being in preliminary stages back then is now a reality. 

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national 

security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our 

government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various 

levels. 

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can 

provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such 

operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for 

battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. "The technology is there, waiting 

for us to pull it all together" [General Gordon R. Sullivan, "Moving into the 21st 

Century: America's Army and Modernization," Military Review (July 1993) quoted in 

Mary Ann Seagraves and Richard Szymber, "Weather a Force Multiplier," Military 

Review, November/December 1995, 75]. 

A global, precise, real-time, robust, systematic weather-modification capability 

5/7/2008 
would provide war-fighting CINCs [an acronym meaning "Commander IN Chief' of 

a unified command] with a powerful force multiplier to achieve military objectives. 

Since weather will be common to all possible futures, a weather-modification 

capability would be universally applicable and have utility across the entire spectrum 

of conflict. The capability of influencing the weather even on a small scale could 

change it from a force degrader to a force multiplier. 

In 1957, the president's advisory committee on weather control explicitly recognized 

the military potential of weather-modification, warning in their report that it could 

become a more important weapon than the atom bomb [William B. Meyer, "The 

Life and Times ofUS Weather: What Can We Do About It?" American Heritage 37, 

no. 4 (June/July 1986), 48]. 

Today [since 1969], weather-modification is the alteration of weather phenomena 

over a limited area for a limited period of time. [Herbert S. Appleman, An 

Introduction to Weather-modification (Scott AFB, Ill.: Air Weather Service/MAC, 

September 1969), 1]. 

In the broadest sense, weather-modification can be divided into two major categories: 

suppression and intensification of weather patterns. In extreme cases, it might involve 

the creation of completely new weather patterns, attenuation or control of severe 

storms, or even alteration of global climate on a far-reaching and/or long-lasting 

scale. 

Extreme and controversial examples of weather modification-creation of made-toorder weather, large-scale climate modification, creation and/or control (or 

"steering") of severe storms, etc.-were researched as part of this study ... the 

weather-modification applications proposed in this report range from technically 

proven to potentially feasible. 

Applying Weather-modification to Military Operations 

How will the military, in general, and the USAF, in particular, manage and employ a 

weather-modification capability? We envision this will be done by the weather force 

support element (WFSE), whose primary mission would be to support the warfighting CINCs with weather-modification options, in addition to current forecasting 

support. Although the WFSE could operate anywhere as long as it has access to the 

GWN and the system components already discussed, it will more than likely be a 

component within the AOC or its 2025-equivalent. With the CINC's intent as 

guidance, the WFSE formulates weather-modification options using information 

provided by the GWN, local weather data network, and weather-modification 

forecast model. The options include range of effect, probability of success, resources 

to be expended, the enemy's vulnerability, and risks involved. The CINC chooses an 

effect based on these inputs, and the WFSE then implements the chosen course, 

selecting the right modification tools and employing them to achieve the desired 

effect. Sensors detect the change and feed data on the new weather pattern to the 

modeling system which updates its forecast accordingly. The WFSE checks the 

effectiveness of its efforts by pulling down the updated current conditions and new 

forecast(s) from the GWN and local weather data network, and plans follow-on 

missions as needed. This concept is illustrated in figure 3-2. 

5/7/2008 

Page 3 of35 
GWN 

6-FEEDBACK 

Two key technologies are necessary to meld an integrated, comprehensive, 

responsive, precise, and effective weather-modification system. Advances in the 

science of chaos are critical to this endeavor. Also key to the feasibility of such a 

system is the ability to model the extremely complex nonlinear system of global 

weather in ways that can accurately predict the outcome of changes in the influencing 

variables. Researchers have already successfully controlled single variable nonlinear 

systems in the lab and hypothesize that current mathematical techniques and 

computer capacity could handle systems with up to five variables. Advances in these 

two areas would make it feasible to affect regional weather patterns by making small, 

continuous nudges to one or more influencing factors. Conceivably, with enough 

lead time and the right conditions, you could get "made-to-order" weather 

[William Brown, "Mathematicians Learn How to Tame Chaos," New Scientist (30 

May 1992): 16]. 

The total weather-modification process would be a real-time loop of continuous, 

appropriate, measured interventions, and feedback capable of producing desired 

weather behavior. 

The essential ingredient ofthe weather-modification system is the set of intervention 

techniques used to modify the weather. The number of specific intervention 

methodologies is limited only by the imagination, but with few exceptions they 

involve infusing either energy or chemicals into the meteorological process in the 

right way, at the right place and time. The intervention could be designed to modify 

the weather in a number of ways, such as influencing clouds and precipitation, 

storm intensity, climate, space, or fog. 

5/7/2008 

Page 4 of35 
PRECIPITATION 

" ... significant beneficial influences can be derived through judicious exploitation of 

the solar absorption potential of carbon black dust" [William M. Gray et al., 

"Weather-modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy," Journal of 

Applied Meteorology 15 (April1976): 355]. The study ultimately found that this 

technology could be used to enhance rainfall on the mesoscale, generate cirrus 

clouds, and enhance cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) clouds in otherwise dry areas . 

. . .if we are fortunate enough to have a fairly large body of water available upwind 

from the targeted battlefield, carbon dust could be placed in the atmosphere over that 

water. Assuming the dynamics are supportive in the atmosphere, the rising saturated 

air will eventually form clouds and rainshowers downwind over the land. 

Numerous dispersal techniques [of carbon dust] have already been studied, but the 

most convenient, safe, and cost-effective method discussed is the use of 

afterburner-type jet engines to generate carbon particles while flying through the 

targeted air. This method is based on injection ofliquid hydrocarbon fuel into the 

afterburner's combustion gases [this explains why contrails have now become 

chemtrails]. 

To date, much work has been done on UAVs [Unmanned Aviation Vehicles] which 

can closely (if not completely) match the capabilities of piloted aircraft. If this UAV 

technology were combined with stealth and carbon dust technologies, the result could 

be a UAV aircraft invisible to radar while en route to the targeted area, which could 

spontaneously create carbon dust in any location. 

If clouds were seeded (using chemical nuclei similar to those used today or perhaps 

a more effective agent discovered through continued research) before their downwind 

arrival to a desired location, the result could be a suppression of precipitation. In 

other words, precipitation could be "forced" to fall before its arrival in the 

desired territory, thereby making the desired territory "dry." 

FOG 

Field experiments with lasers have demonstrated the capability to dissipate warm fog 

at an airfield with zero visibility. Smart materials based on nanotechnology are 

currently being developed with gigaops computer capability at their core. They could 

adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given fog seeding situation and even 

make adjustments throughout the process. They might also enhance their dispersal 

qualities by adjusting their buoyancy, by communicating with each other, and by 

steering themselves within the fog. They will be able to provide immediate and 

continuous effectiveness feedback by integrating with a larger sensor network and 

can also change their temperature and polarity to improve their seeding effects 

[J. Storrs Hall, "Overview ofNanotechnology," adapted from papers by Ralph C. 

Merkle and K. Eric Drexler, Rutgers University, November 1995]. As mentioned 

above, UAVs could be used to deliver and distribute these smart materials. 

Recent army research lab experiments have demonstrated the feasibility of 

5/7/2008 

Page 5 of35 
generating fog. They used commercial equipment to generate thick fog in an area 

100 meters long. Further study has shown fogs to be effective at blocking much of 

the UV/IR/visible spectrum, effectively masking emitters of such radiation from IR 

weapons [Robert A. Sutherland, "Results of Man-Made Fog Experiment," 

Proceedings of the 1991 Battlefield Atmospherics Coriference (Fort Bliss, Tex.: 

Hinman Hall, 3-6 December~1991)]. 

STORMS 

The damage caused by storms is indeed horrendous. For instance, a tropical storm 

has an energy equal to 10,000 one-megaton hydrogen bombs [Louis J. Battan, 

Harvesting the Clouds (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1960), 120]. At any 

instant there are approximately 2,000 thunderstorms taking place. In fact 45,000 

thunderstorms, which contain heavy rain, hail, microbursts, wind shear, and lightning 

form daily [GeneS. Stuart, "Whirlwinds and Thunderbolts," Nature on the Rampage 

(Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 1986), 130]. 

Weather-modification technologies might involve techniques that would increase 

latent heat release in the atmosphere, provide additional water vapor for cloud 

cell development, and provide additional surface and lower atmospheric heating 

to increase atmospheric instability. The focus of the weather-modification effort 

would be to provide additional "conditions" that would make the atmosphere unstable 

enough to generate cloud and eventually storm cell development. 

One area of storm research that would significantly benefit military operations is 

lightning modification ... but some offensive military benefit could be obtained by 

doing research on increasing the potential and intensity of lightning. 

Possible mechanisms to investigate would be ways to modify the electropotential 

characteristics over certain targets to induce lightning strikes on the desired targets as 

the storm passes over their location. 

In summary, the ability to modify battlespace weather through storm cell 

triggering or enhancement would allow us to exploit the technological "weather" 

advances. 

SPACE WEATHER-MODIFICATION 

This section discusses opportunities for control and modification of the ionosphere 

and near-space environment for force enhancement. A number of methods have been 

explored or proposed to modify the ionosphere, including injection of chemical 

vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams 

(such as ions, neutral particles, x-rays, MeV particles, and energetic electrons)-

[Peter M. Banks, "Overview of Ionospheric Modification from Space Platforms," in 

Ionospheric Modification and Its Potential to Enhance or Degrade the Performance 

of Military Systems (AGARD Conference Proceedings 485, October 1990) 19-1]. 

It is important to note that many techniques to modify the upper atmosphere have 

been successfully demonstrated experimentally. Ground-based modification 

techniques employed by the FSU include vertical HF heating, oblique HF heating, 

microwave heating, and magnetospheric modification [Capt Mike Johnson, Upper 

5/7/2008 

Page 6 of35 
Atmospheric Research and Modification-Former Soviet Union (U), DST-18205-475-

92 (Foreign Aerospace Science and Technology Center, AF Intelligence Command, 

24 September 1992)]. 

Creation of an artificial uniform ionosphere was first proposed by Soviet 

researcher A. V. Gurevich in the mid-1970s. An artificial ionospheric mirror (AIM) 

would serve as a precise mirror for electromagnetic [EM] radiation of a selected 

frequency or a range of frequencies. 

AJ1iftcial Ionospheric Mirrors 

S'IATION 

ARTIFICIAL WEATHER 

GRO U.ND-IJAS..Iill 

AIM GENERATOR 

121\niZ 

STATION 

While most weather-modification efforts rely on the existence of certain preexisting 

conditions, it may be possible to produce some weather effects artificially, regardless 

of preexisting conditions. For instance, virtual weather could be created by 

influencing the weather inforrilation received by an end user. 

Nanotechnology also offers possibilities for creating simulated weather. A cloud, or 

several clouds, of microscopic computer particles, all communicating with each other 

and with a larger control system could provide tremendous capability. 

Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three 

dimensions, such clouds could be designed to have a wide-range of properties ... 

Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon [if 

power levels WERE sufficient, they would be an effective strike weapon], the 

potential for psychological operations in many situations could be fantastic. 

One major advantage of using simulated weather to achieve a desired effect is that 

unlike other approaches, it makes what are otherwise the results of deliberate 

actions appear to be the consequences of natural weather phenomena. In 

addition, it is potentially relatively inexpensive to do. According to J. Storrs Hall, a 

5/7/2008 

Page 7 of35 
***IMPORTANT UPDATE*** 02SEPOS 

The above link to Maxwell Air Force Base and the Air University was removed by the Air Force on or shortly after 

October 11, 2004, within days after we posted this article. 

A full archive is currently posted by the Federation of American Scientists at the following link: 

http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/es/e-s.htm 

or you can download a complete July 1997 archive at: 

Web Archive Organization 

Last edited by Gnosty on Tue 01 Nov, 2005; edited 4 times in total 

linn DPosted: Mon 22 Nov, 2004 

Veteran Member 

Joined: 25 Dec 2003 

Posts: 200 

Aerosol and Electromagnetic Weapons In The Age Of Nuclear War 

By Amy Worthington 

www .global research .ca 

11-21-4 

North America is now suffering its seventh year of conspicuous and dangerous aerosol and 

electromagnetic operations conducted by the U.S. government under the guise of national security. 

Concerned citizens watch in fear as military tankers discolor the skies with toxic chemicals that 

morph into synthetic clouds. 

We continually witness bizarre meteorological occurrences as powerful electromagnetic devices 

manipulate both the jet stream and individual storm fronts to create artificial weather and climatic 

conditions. Black operations projects embedded within these aerosol missions are documented to 

sicken and disorient select populations with biological test agents and psychotronic mind/mood 

control technologies. 

Part of what is happening in the atmosphere above us involves the Pentagon's secret space weapons 

program, designed for strategic, operational and tactical levels of war. NASA missions will soon be 

transferred to Pentagon control.l The Air Force Space Command declares that, in order to monitor 

and shape world events, it must fight intense, decisive wars with great precision from space.2 Air 

Force Secretary James G. Roche has stated: "Space capabilities are integrated with, and affect every 

link in the kill chain. "3 

A glimpse into new death technologies under construction is in legislation introduced by Ohio 

Congressman Dennis Kucinch. His unsuccessful Space Preservation Act of 2001 was intended to ban 

space deployment of:4 

* electronic, psychotronic and information weaponry 

* high altitude ultra low frequency weapons 

* plasma, electromagnetic, sonic and ultrasonic weapons 
* laser weapons 

* strategic, theater, tactical or extraterrestrial weapons 

. *chemical biological, environmental climate or tectonic weapons 

* chemtrails (this item was stricken from a later version, suggesting duress) 

In their quest to remain top dog in the kill chain, the purveyors of perpetual war have deliberately 

dimmed earth's life-giving sunlight,S and reduced atmospheric visibility with lung-clogging 

particulates and polymers.6 This ecological terrorism has severely compromised public health, 

according to thousands of testimonials. Years of mass appeals to legislators, media and military 

officials for information, and for cessation of catastrophic atmospheric degradation, have fallen on 

deaf bureaucratic ears. Public awareness ofwhat befalls us remains as murky as our skies because 

those "in the know" are muzzled by national secrecy laws and Americans have no authority to 

challenge matters of national security. Left to gather clues, we know this much so far: 

1. At least part of the aerosol project has been dubbed Operation Cloverleaf, 7 probably due to its 

multi-faceted operations, which include: weather modification, military communications, space 

weapons development, ozone and global warming research plus biological weaponry and detection 

testing. 

2. Dumping tons of particulate matter from aircraft has gee-engineered our planetary atmosphere 

into a highly charged, electrically-conductive plasma useful for military projects.8 The air we breathe 

is laden with asbestos-sized synthetic fibers and toxic metals, including barium salts, .aluminum, and 

reportedly, radioactive thorium.9 These materials act as electrolytes to enhance conductivity of 

military radar and radio waves.lO Poisonous on par with arsenic and a proven suppressant of the 

human immune system,ll atmospheric barium weakens human muscles, including those of the 

heart.12 Inhaled aluminum goes directly to the brain and medical specialists confirm that it causes 

oxidative stress within brain tissue, leading to formation of Alzheimer's like neurofibrillary tangles.13 

Radioactive thorium is known to cause leukemia and other cancers.14 

3. Only a small percentage of the military's atmospheric modification projects are visibly obvious. 

What we can't see is equally dangerous. The ionosphere, the earth and its inhabitants are continually 

bombarded with high frequency microwaves used to manipulate the charged atmosphere for weather 

modification, information gathering and for tectonic (earthquake-producing) weaponry.lS 

Independent chemtrail researcher Clifford Carnicom confirms that we are also continuously subjected 

to extremely low electromagnetic frequencies (ELF) pulsing at 4 hertz multiples, frequencies known 

to profoundly affect human biological and mental functioning.16 

4. There is a well-documented biological component to continuously ongoing atmospheric studies in 

which nations and regions are furtively inoculated via specially designed delivery systems with 

combinations of viruses, bacteria, fungi, mycoplasma, desiccated blood cells and exotic biological 

markers so that testmasters can assess human, animal and plant response.17 

5. The multi-organizational megalith perpetrating these bio-chem projects against humanity includes 

the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and its research arm DARPA, plus the Department of Energy 
• (DOE) with its huge network of national labs and universities. Private defense contractors and 

pharmaceutical companies are heavily involved.18 Cooperating governments of other nations and 

probably some United Nations agencies are complicit, since the aerosol projects are global in scope. 

Gross chemical and electromagnetic pollution is only part of the horrific realities we endure. The 

sociopaths who brazenly pervert skies, climate and weather for power and profit are the same 

madmen who have waged four limited nuclear wars since 1991. Radioactive weaponry, declared both 

illegal and immoral by the entire civilized world, has been used by the Pentagon in Desert Storm, the 

Balkans campaign and the on-going occupation-wars.against Afghanistan and Iraq. Few Americans 

understand the extent of carnage inflicted in their name across the planet. 

By scientific definition, the missiles, tank penetrators and bunker busting bombs unleashed against 

Iraq and Afghanistan by U.S. and British forces in the so-called war on terror are nuclear 

weapons.19 Refuse from radioactive weaponry does not disperse, but remains in the atmosphere 

. organotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic to all living flesh for 4.5 billion years. 

Inhabitants of the Pentagon's two newly "liberated" nations are now slowly dying of radiation and 

heavy metal poisoning. Victims of U.S. weaponry used in Afghanistan have a concentration of nondepleted uranium isotopes in their bodies never before seen in civilian populations.20 Tons of 

· depleted and non-depleted uranium contaminating their land, air, food and water guarantee their 

painful demise. Using data from the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA), nuclear 

scientist Leuren Moret calculates that the estimated 2,500+ tons of depleted uranium used against 

Iraq in 1991 and 2003 is sufficient to cause 25 million new cancers.21 Is it a coincidence that the 

population of Iraq, according to the CIA, is 25 million? 

The quarter million U.S. and British fighting forces who have helped the Pentagon deliver this 

holocaust also face inevitable radiological death by slow burn. Rotated into atomic war Z()nes since 

2001, coalition troops have inhaled and ingested millions of tiny invisible ceramic uranium particles 

which emit alpha, beta and gamma radiation as they embed in lungs, kidneys, blood, lymph and 

bone.22 Radiation exposure to a single internalized U-238 (uranium) alpha particle is 50 times the 

allowablewhole body dose for one year under international standards.23 As U-238 decays into 

daughter isotopes, it becomes ever more radioactive, causing cell and organ destruction to escalate 

over time.24 Uranium contamination leads to incapacitating, multi-organ system disorders identical 

to illnesses suffered by thousands of Gulf War I vets. Bodily fluids poisoned with uranium isotopes 

sicken spouses and visit upon offspring a genetic Armageddon.25 

Who knows what a disabled and prematurely dying military population will mean to future stability 

and safety of USA? Yet Senator Chuck Hagel (R- Neb.) now demands that America provide more 

fodder for its atomic battlefields by reinstating the military draft so that "all of our citizens ... bear 

some responsibility and pay some price" in order to "understand the intensity of the challenges we 

face."26 

Despite disingenuous denials that biological harm will result from atomic warfare,27 the Pentagon 

knows full well the gruesome realities of uranium weaponry by virtue of its own voluminous studies 

spanning 60 years. ·Pentagon documents confirm that America's war establishment knowingly 

exposes its own troops to dangerous levels of radiation.28 The resulting illness of those now 

returning from the war zones is already making headlines.29 
Because our military-industrial overlords brazenly poison the very grunts who make their war games 

possible, we must logically conclude there is virtually nothing they would not secretly and sadistically 

do to the rest of us;_ Military officials lie as perniciously about chemtrail operations30 as they do 

about effects ofDU weaponry. If people were to consider the published science regarding chemtrails 

and DU, they would understand that we are all in mortal jeopardy. 

Both the Pentagon's aerosol operations and its limited nuclear wars are deeply interconnected. We 

can trace the beginnings of Operation Cloverleaf right to the Strangelove brain of Dr. Edward Teller, 

father of the hydrogen bomb and proponent of nuking inhabited coast lines to rearrange them for 

economic projects.31 Before he died in 2003, Teller was director emeritus of Lawrence Livermore 

National Laboratory, where plans for nuclear, biological and directed energy weapons are crafted. In 

1997, Teller publicly outlined his proposal to use aircraft to scatter in the stratosphere millions of 

tons of electrically-conductive metallic materials, ostensibly to reduce global warming.32 

Shortly after Teller's presentation, the public began seeing frenetic chemtrailing. In 2000, CBS News 

admitted that scientists were "looking at drastic solutions for global warming, including manipulating 

the atmosphere on a massive scale." CBS confirmed that the plan to load the air with tiny particles 

would "deflect enough sunlight to trigger global cooling."33 

Teller estimated that commercial aircraft could be used to spew these particles at a cost of 33 cents 

a pound.34 This gives credence to a report by an airline manager, forced by a compulsory nondisclosure agreement to remain anonymous, that commercial aircraft have been co-opted to assist 

the military in consummating Project Cloverleaf.35 A 1991 Hughes aircraft patent confirms that 

sunscreen particulate materials can be run through jet engines.36 A science textbook now used in 

some public schools discusses the sunscreen project by showing a large orange-red jet with the 

caption, "Jet engines running on richer fuel would add particles to the atmosphere to create a 

sunscreen." The logo on the plane says "Particle Air."37 The implications of this crucial information 

should not be understated. A program to make America's millions of annual jet flights a source of 

specially designed particulate pollution is serious business. 

Cloverleaf particles and polymers saturating the air we breathe are smaller than 10 microns (PM 10) 

and are invisible to the human eye. By comparison, a human hair is 60 to 100 microns in thickness. 

Scientists and the EPA report that because PM10 and sub-micron pollution particles bypass lung 

filters and enter the blood stream, they cause radical changes in the endocrine and nervous systems. 

38 They can trigger high blood pressure and cause heart attack within two hours of inhalation.39 

They cause the blood to become sticky, making it tougher for the heart to pump and increasing the 

. risk of blood clots and vessel damage.40 Now researchers in Taiwan document "a significant 

increase" in the number of stroke victims when PM10 pollutant levels rise.41 The American Lung 

Association confirms that we are breathing more toxic air than ever.42 No wonder nationwide 

asthma rates have been soaring in recent years.43 

Tiny synthetic filaments called polymers are part of the brew. In 1990, a NATO report detailed how 

high-flying aircraft can modify the atmosphere by spraying polymers to absorb electromagnetic 

radiation.44 U.S. patent number 6315213 describes how cross-linked aqueous polymers dispersed 

into a storm diminish rain.45 
Polymer chemist Dr. R. Michael Castle has studied atmospheric polymers for years. He has found 

. that some of them contain bioactive materials, which can cause "serious skin lesions and diseases 

. when absorbed into the skin."46 He has. identified microscopic polymers comprised of genetically-

. engineered fungal·forms mutated with viruses. He says that trillions of fusarium (fungus)/virus 

mutated spores, which secrete a powerful mico-toxin, are part of the air we breathe.47 Allergies 

anyone? 

We can safely bet that into our particle-enriched air, experimenters are also dumping nanoparticles, 

developed for a variety of military and industrial uses. These engineered carbon molecules, as small 

as one-thousandth the diameter of human hair, display bizarre chemical properties and are known to 

trigger organ damage.48 A recent study at Southern Methodist University found that fish exposed to 

one type of nanoparticle suffered severe brain damage after only 48 hours.49 

The military's aerosol operations have been climate altering to the extreme. Air traffic is a huge 

source of greenhouse pollution. Increasing that traffic exponentially in order to scatter tons of heattrapping metallic particulates and heat-liberating barium salts have undoubtedly led to accelerated 

global warming. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide, have reached a 

record high this year.SO As carbon dioxide levels rise, oxygen levels decrease. 

In. 1996, Scientists for Global Responsibility compiled a report contending that dangerous 

geoengineering, as proposed by Teller and the Global Change Research Coordination Office, would 

be absolutely ineffective in mitigating global warming. The report noted that climate engineering 

research is funded by industry with a vested interest in continued high consumption of fossil fuels. 51 

The hair-brained scheme of particle engineering was contrived to ensure that industry polluters will 

never be forced to decrease their greenhouse gas emissions. But because warming and pollution 

trends have worsened drastically since the aerosol projects began, we must suspect that the 

warming mitigation program is a hoax and that chemtrailing is really intended, among other things, 

to create a series of "hobgoblins." · 

The establishment's modus operandi for maintaining a fierce and lucrative hold upon the collective 

American mind has been defined precisely by satirist H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) who wrote: "The 

whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and thus clamorous to be led to 

safetY, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." 

In The Report from Iron Mountain published in 1967, just as the Pentagon's lucrative Vietnam War 

was being rewed into high gear, establishment braintrusters confirmed that perpetual war is 

absolutely vital for controlling and manipulating the masses. The document even suggested a 

number of options for creating fictitious enemies, noting that perpetual war induces populations to 

give blind allegiance to political authority.52 

Since the 1930s, when the Eastern Establishment, including the Bush family, used its New York 

banks and oil companies to secretly fund Hitler's German Nazi party,53 our controllers have 

employed FEAR, the concept of ENEMY and WAR to keep us in bondage. Chemtrailing is a 

manifestation of the Fourth Reich, an era of corporate fascism ushered in by a powerful military 

juggernaut, which manufactures enemies and unleashes fake terror attacks to scare us into voiceless 

submission. 
Both Saddam Hussein and the al Queda networks have .long been nourished with U.S. government 

and corporate funding and groomed by U.S. military and corporate advisors to play useful roles as 

"enemies. "54 Former German Technology Minister Andreas von Bulow recently confirmed on U.S. 

radio that hijacked planes were ableto fly around the eastern U.S. on 9/11 unimpeded by military 

interdiction because those attacks were part of a carefully-orchestrated "covert operation" designed 

to coerce America into perpetual conflict with the Muslim world.SS 

·Now, a "secret" Pentagon report has been conveniently leaked to the media. It contends that abrupt 

climate change is the most fearful hobgoblin yet. 56 Authored by change agents with ties to the CIA 

and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group, the report contends that abrupt climate change will lead to a 

• global catastrophe of monumental proportions, including nuclear war and natural disasters, as whole 

nations disappear beneath the encroaching sea and survivors fight for dwindling food, water and 

• energy supplies. 

Yetthe Pentagon has been involved for decades in the drastic manipulation of weather, climate and 

atmospheric conditions. The U.S. used a chemical agent dubbed Olive Oil during Operation Popeye to 

induce heavy rains in Vietnam 40 years ago.57 The Air Force document titled "Weather As a Force 

Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025" lists its weaponized agenda for creating abrupt climate 

change including: Storm creation and modification, fog and cloud creation, precipitation 

enhancement, precipitation denial, drought inducement and artificial creation of "space weather." 

This document also states that the military's radical weather modification agenda will "become a part 

of national security policy with both domestic and international applications.''58 

· Weather weapons are now routinely used in war zones. A citizen reporting from Serbia noted that 

during NATO operations in the Balkans, black clouds suddenly materialized out of blue skies, 

hailstones were the size of eggs, and surreal thunder and lightening terrified the people. He reported 

that scientists found that the electromagnetic field over Serbia had been punctured, causing rain 

systems to circumvent the region.59 In addition to manufactured drought, scientists also predict that 

Serbia will suffer 10,000 cancer deaths from DU weaponry used there.60 

According to University of Ottawa Professor Michael Chossudovsky, the military's High-frequency 

Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), operating in Alaska as part of the Strategic Defense 

Initiative, is a powerful tool for weather and climate modification.61 Operated jointly by the U.S. 

Navy and Air Force, HAARP antennas bombard and heat the ionosphere, causing electromagnetic 

frequencies to bounce back to earth, penetrating everything living and dead.62 

HAARP transmissions make holes in the ozone,63 creating yet another hobgoblin. HAARP inventor 

Bernard Eastlund described in his original patent how antenna energy can interact with plumes of 

atmospheric particles, used as a lens or focusing device, to modify weather.64 HAARP is capable of 

triggering floods, droughts and hurricanes, much to the chagrin of both the European Parliament and 

the Russian Duma.65 

HAARP also generates sweeping pulses through the ULF/ELF range.66 In 2000, independent 

researchers monitored HAARP transmissions of 14 hertz. They found that when these signals were 

broadcast at high output levels, wind speeds topped 70 miles per hour. They watched as these same 

transmissions dispersed a huge weather front approaching the west coast from California to British 

Columbia. Although precipitation had been originally forecast, the front was seen shredding apart on 
satellite photos and rain did not materialize.67 The hobgoblin drought can be an enriching and 

empowering tool for certain corporate and governing entities. 

HAARP is not only capable of destabilizing agricultural and ecological system!? anywhere on the 

planet, but its effects can target select regions to affect human physical, mental and emotional 

• responses during non-lethal warfare projects.68 HAARP frequencies beamed at specific targets can 

generate catastrophic earthquakes,69 exactly like the quake last December which killed thousands of 

people in Iran, a nemesis nation according to the Bush administration . 

• The Pentagon's warning about climate catastrophe is surely nothing more than a thinly-veiled 

attempt to prepare the masses for the bizarre atmospheric upheavals we can expect as the military 

continues to brutalize our planet and near space with its grotesque toys. And we ain't seen nothing 

yet. Dr. Eastlund and his ilk have developed plans for solar power satellites designed to modify the 

weather with electromagnetic beam output that dwarfs the present HAARP system. 70 As abrupt 

climate change is increasingly.orchestrated, we will surely need additional fascist agencies, an evergrowing military budget and more poison-particle projects that just happen to ensure population 

reduction as a side benefit. 

Despite visual evidence that every aspect of our physical environment is being manipulated and 

damaged for war games, some Americans cannot accept that dangerous covert operations are being 

conducted by a government they still believe to be a virtuous defender offreedom. Their stumbling 

block is a numbing belief that their own officials would never perpetrate dangerous experimentation 

on humanity since "they have families too." History and the release of declassified government 

documents disprove such naivete. 

Although "they" had families too, the U.S. government and its defense contractors exposed citizens 

of the northwest U.S. to huge and deliberate releases of radioactive iodine 131 from the Hanford 

Nuclear Reservation where plutonium was produced for nuclear bombs. 71 Those Cold War releases 

unleashed radiation illnesses upon thousands of downwinders, some of whom received up to 350 

rads of radiation when a maximum safety dose is set at .025 rads annually.72 Between 1949 and 

1952, radioactive pellets, dust and particles were tested on the hapless citizens of Utah and New 

. Mexico.73 

By 1963, 1,200 nuclear weapons tests conducted at the Nevada test site had exposed every person 

in the U.S. to deadly radioactive fallout, causing millions of fetal deaths, spontaneous abortions, 

stillbirths and birth defects.74 The U.S. government also conducted over 4,000 radiation 

experiments on individual human test subjects without their informed consent. 75 The delayed effects 

of decades of radiation exposure from weapons testing are today demonstrated by a U.S. population 

plagued with epidemic cancer and heart disease, neurological disorders, low fertility, chronic fatigue, 

obesity (thyroid involvement), immune system dysfunction and learning disabilities. Approximately 

half of all pregnancies in the U.S. result in prenatal or postnatal death or an otherwise less than 

healthy baby.76 As military tankers spew white chemical plumes across America at a cost of $3,448 

per hour per t?Jnker,77 we are reminded of Dr. Leonard Cole's 1994 testimony before a Senate 

Committee regarding 45 years of open air testing during which military aircraft sprayed American 

cities with bacteria, fungus and carcinogenic chemicals.78 Between 1962-1973, the U.S. Navy 

conducted hundreds of bio-chem tests known as Operation SHAD (Shipboard Hazard and Defense). 

SHAD projects like Autumn Gold and Copper Head exposed 10,000 navy personnel to aircraft spray 
laden with biological and chemical warfare agents, including sarin nerve gas.79 The cocktails used in 

those genocidal "tests" are now linked to cancer, heart and lung problems suffered by surviving 

guinea pigs. 

We are told that defense officials perpetrated these atrocities so that scientists could learn about 

how to "protect" Americans from attack. So why, in the late 80s, would our "protectors" fall all over 

themselves to supply Saddam Hussein's war machine with 90 shipments of.chemical and biological 

weaponry, including sarin, anthrax, botulism, brucella and West Nile Virus?BO 

It will likely be years before Americans are told what is being tested upon them during our present 

chemtrail/space wars era. The Hanford downwinders did not Jearn until 1986 what had been 

unleashed upon them some 30 years earlier; SHAD victims filed suit in 2003 to learn the extent to 

which they were intentionally exposed to dangerous substances in the 60s. 

To understand how our nation has arrived at this doomsday corruption, we must recall that 

immediately after WWII ended, the U.S. government initiated Operation Paperclip through which a 

large number of German Nazi scientists were imported to the United States. Once issued new 

identities, these death industry pros were employed in U.S. military laboratories to develop a 

dazzling array of secret weaponry projects.81 With congressional funding, the crowning achievement 

of this nexus was the creation of ghastly new bioweapons, including the AIDS virus82 and an 

incapacitating chronic fatigue agent engineered from mycoplasma and brucella.83 

The military is empowered to continue lethal experimentation by devious wording of Section 1520a 

Chapter 32 of U.S. Code Title 50. The law states that the Secretary of Defense may NOT conduct any 

chemical or biological test or experiment on civilian populations, unless such tests are for. medical, 

therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial purposes or for research in general or for 

protection against weapons or for law enforcement purposes, including riot control. So DOD may not 

use us for guinea pigs, unless it is for any "good" reason under the sun! The law states that human 

subjects must give informed consent. But a nasty loophole in Section 1515 of Chapter 32 allows 

informed consent to be suspended by executive order during a period of national emergency, a 

situation under which this nation perpetually labors by deliberate hobgoblin design. 

Few American test rats realize that the Pentagon's boys in Congress have now: 

* appropriated millions of dollars for the manufacture and testing of new "mini nukes" and bunker 

buster bombs.84 

* authorized the DOE to resume nuclear testing in Nevada.BS 

* exempted DOD and DOE from landmark environmental laws in the development of these new 

weapons.86 

America's 70,000 nuclear weapons manufactured since 1945 are not sufficient! As DOE gears up to 

develop and test fourth-generation nukes, numerous reports continue to surface about the agency's 

sordid corruption and mismanagement. DOE's habitual cover-up of site contamination and its 

devious efforts to downplay serious illnesses suffered by many of its nuclear workers are among 

recent scandals.87 
When new "low yield" nuclear weapons (defined as being smaller than 5 kilotons) are tested in 

Nevada, downwinders might like to know that a mini .5 kiloton nuclear warhead would have to · 

burrow 150 feet to eliminate atmospheric fallout. No weapon yet developed can penetrate more than 

· 40 feet into the earth. A tested nuclear warhead that burrows to only 40 feet will throw a million 

· cubic feet of radioactive debris into the atmosphere.88 

·The Pentagon's new nuke era is in the capable hands of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who 

has so ably presided over the pre-emptive nuclear incineration of Middle Eastern Muslims. Rumsfeld 

has never adequately explained why his Department was unable to defend the Pentagon building 

· despite a full hour's notice that hijacked planes were in the air. Should Rumsfeld be replaced due to 

the Pentagon's Iraqi torture scandal, we are assured that his Bush-appointed successor will share his 

have-nuke-will-travel ideology. 

Working closely with Rumsfeld is a coven of pro-nukers, including his advisor Keith Payne, a vocal 

advocate of pre-emptive nuclear war. Payne has written that an "intelligent" nuclear offensive 

launched by the U.S. would result in only 20 million U.S. casualties, "a level compatible with national 

survival and recovery."89 

Now that we have tied together the historical and political realities for which we mindlessly wave our 

flags, we still hope that sufficient nw:nbers of American lab rats will miraculously awaken from their 

collective stupor and take stock of our appalling situation. After all, rodents have a notoriously short 

life span and are always killed when no longer useful to those conducting research. The irony of t.his 

horror story is that we rats are being plundered to finance our own demise. Our national debt of 7.2 

trillion grows by $1.8 billion a day.90 The Pentagon cannot account for $2.3 trillion of its shadowy 

transactions.91 The radioactive operations in Iraq are costing $3.7 billion a month, those in 

Afghanistan $900 million a month.92 No one knows how many $billions are being flushed into 

Operation Cloverleaf ahd other hobgoblin projects. The U.S. spends $11,000 per second on weapons, 

according to calculations of celebrated author William Thomas.93 

So, while we await the great awakening, have a wonderful, barium-dried summer under a synthetic 

tarpaulin of aluminum-white, particle-laden, electrically-charged aviation scum that passes for sky. 

Endure well your respiratory and ocular difficulties while staring at huge oily sun rings and smeary 

sundogs, the patent signature of chemical assault. Don't forget to salute and click your heels when 

you see tanker formations patriotically saturating the atmosphere with such a dense, microparticulate brew that they cast black shadows alongside or ahead ofthemselves. 

As you witness the noxious drama in the skies, remember, it's all just part of the "kill chain." 

NOTES 

1. "USAF Plans to Utterly Dominate, Rule Space," Joel Bleifuss, editor of In These Times.com, 9-14-

.03. 
• 2. Almanac 2000, Journal of the Air Force Association, May 2000, Vol. 83. 

3. Roche's "kill chain" statement was made during his October 2002 speech at.the Conference on the 

Law and Policy Relating to National Security Activities in Outer Space. 

4. "Pentagon Preps for War in Space,"Noah Shachtman, www.wirednews.com , 2-20-04. 

5. "The Theft of Sunlight," Clifford Carnicom, 10-25-03: " ... Measurements show a rapid reduction in 

the transmission of sunlight from a value of 97% on a 'clear day' to the lower level of approximately 

80% during the early stages of heavy aerosol operations .... The absorption and displacement of this 

solar energy into environmental, military, biological and electromagnetic operations represents a 

theft of the natural and divine rights oft he inhabitants of this planet." www.carnicom.com . 

6. "Visibility Standards Changed," Clifford Carnicom, 3-30-01: "It will be noted that in October of 

1997, a change in the reporting system of visibility data was reduced from a former maximum of 40 

miles to a limit of 10 miles. It is a reasonable question to ask as to why that change was made, and 

whether or not it was made in anticipation of ... large scale aircraft aerosol operations over large scale 

geographic regions." www.carnicom.com . 

7. "A Meeting," Clifford Carnicom, 7-26-03. See www.carnicom.com . 

8. "Atmospheric Conductivity," Clifford Carnicom, 7-09-01, www.carnicom.com . 

9. For facts on barium toxicity, see Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, September 

1995. For references on barium related to chemtrails, see www.carnicom.com for the following 

articles: "Barium Tests are Positive," Clifford Carnicom, 5-10-04; "Sub-micron Particulates Isolated," 

Carnicom, 4-26-04; "Barium Affirmed by Spectroscopy," Clifford Carnicom, 11-1-2000; "Electrolysis 

and Barium," Carnicom, 5-27-02; "Rainwater Metals," Carnicom, 7-30-01; "Barium Identification 

Further Confirmed," Carnicom, 11-28-00. 

10. "The Plasma Frequency: Radar Appljcations," Clifford Carnicom, 11-05-01; See 

www.carnicom.com . 

11. "Functional heterogeneity in the process ofT lymphocyte activation; barium blocks several 

modes ofT -cell activation, but spares a functionally unique subset of PHA-activable T cells," Clinical 

Experimental Immunology, Pecanha and Dos Reis, May 1989. 

12. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry {ATSDR) Safety Data Sheet. 

13. Aluminum Toxicity, Barbara Barnett, MD, 11-26-02. See www.emedicine.com . 

14. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, July 1999; For information on thorium in 

chemtrails: "The Methodic Demise of Naturc:il Earth," Dr. Mike Castle, 3-27-04, www.willthomas.net . 

15. Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, 1995; "HAARP: Vandalism in the 

Sky?" Begich and Manning, Nexus Magazine, January 1996. 
16. "Elf Radiation is Confirmed," Clifford Carnicom, 11-17-02; "Elf Disruption & Countermeasures," 

Clifford Carnicom 11-27-02; "A Proposal of Cascading Resonance," Clifford Carnicom, 4-21-03. See 

www.carnicom.com for these and numerous other frequency studies; also "Electromagnetic Waves 

·Linked to Children's Bra in Tumor," Kyodo News Service, 6:..8-03. 

17. Death In the Air, Global Terrorism and ToxicWarfare, Leonard G. Horowitz, Tetrahedron 

·Publishing Group, 2001; "Military Conducting Biological Warfare in Washington," 12-12-97, 

www.rense.com: Probing the Chemtrails Conundrum, William Thomas, Essence Publications, 2000, 

www.willthomas.net . 

18. For a comprehensive list of those involved in Operation Cloverleaf and associated projects, see: 

. "Chemtrails--Top Intel, Military, and Defense Contractors Watching Carnicom.com," rense.com, 1-

12-00. Among agencies most interested in opposition to chemtrail projects is the United States 

Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute associated with Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory. See: "The Monitors of JGI," Clifford Carnicom, March 17, 2003, carnicom.com. 19. The 

Trojan Horse of Nuclear War-- A paper presented at the World Depleted Uranium w,eapons 

Conference at the University of Hamburg, October 16-19, 2003, Dr; Leuren Moret .. Dr. Moret is a 

former staff scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the Lawrence Livermore 

National Laboratory. Her work is highly documented with scientific papers. 

. . 

20. Uranium Medical Research Centre, "Afghan Field Trip #2 Report," November 2002; 

www.umrc.com; also "Astoundingly High Afghan Uranium Levels Spark Alert," Alex Kirby, BBC News 

Online, 5-23~03. 

21. Moret, op. cit. 

22. "Medical Effects of Internal Contamination with Uranium," Dr. Asaf Durakovich, Department of 

Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington D.C. March 1999. Volume 

40, No.1 · 

23. Moret, op. cit. 

24. "Contamination of Persian Gulf War Veterans and Others By Depleted Uranium," Leonard A. 

Dietz, 2-21-99. 

25. Durakovich, op cit; Dietz, op. cit. Moret, op. cit. 

26. "Republican Senator: Bring Back the J?raft," World Net Daily, 4-20-04. 

27. "Pentagon's Uranium Denial," New York Daily News, 4-27-04; "Pentagon: Uranium Didn't harm 

N.Y. Unit," Associated Press, 5-3-04. "Pentagon-Depleted Uranium No Health Risk," Dr. Doug Rokke; 

3-15-03. Dr. Rokke was an U.S. Army DU expert (1991-1995) and he confirms that the Pentagon is 

lying about DU risks. 

28. Documents in which the hazards of uranium and depleted uranium exposure are discussed 

include: U.S. Army Training Manual STP-21-1-SMCT: Soldiers Manual of Common Tasks; "Health 

Effects of Depleted Uranium," David E. McClain, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute 
(AFRRI) Bethesda, Maryland; Marine Corp Memo Concerning DU (unclassified) 9-8-90; US Army 

Training Video, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project video: Depleted Uranium Hazard Awareness, 

1995; "Army Not Adequately Prepared to Deal With Depleted Uranium Contamination," General 

Accounting Office, January 1993; Office of the Secretary of Defense, Memorandum from Bernard 

Rostker to chiefs of all military branches re: Depleted Uranium Ammunition Training, 9-09-97 • 

. 29. "Soldiers Believe Depleted Uranium Cause of Illnesses," Associate Press, 4-9-04; "Poisoned?" 

Juan Gonzalez, New York Daily News, 4-4-04. Other stories in this series are: "Inside Camp of 

Troubles" and "Army to Test N.Y. Guard Unit." 

· 30. "Air.Force Increases Rank of Lie," letter by Walter M. Washabaugh, Colonel, USAF, denying the 

existence of chemtrails, received by e-mail on May 22, 2001 and posted at www.carnicom.com by 

Clifford E Carnicom, May 22 2001. 

31. Begich and Manning, op. cit. p. 51. 

32. Global Warming and Ice Ages: Prospects for Physics~Based Modulation of Global Change, Edward 

Teller and Lowell Wood, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, prepared for invited presentation at 

the International Seminar On Planetary Emergencies, Erice, Italy, August 20-23, 1997; also ''The 

Planet Needs a Sunscreen," Wall Street Journal, 10-17-97. 

33. CBS News Eye on America Report: Cooling the Planet in two parts: 1-15-01 and 1-16-01. 

34. Teller and Wood, op. cit. 

35. "An Airline Manager's Statement," Posted by C. E. Carnicom on behalf of the author, 5-22-00. 

Quote: "The few airline employees who were briefed on Project Cloverleaf were all made to undergo 

background checks, and before we were briefed on it we were made to sign non-disclosure 

agreements which basically state that if we tell anyone what we know we could be 

imprisoned .... They told us that the government was going to pay our airline, along with others, to 

release special chemicals from commercial aircraft .... When we asked them why didn't they just rig 

military aircraft to spray these chemicals, they stated that there weren't enough military aircraft 

available to release chemicals on such a large basis as needs to be done .... Then someone asked why 

all the secrecy. The government reps then stated that if the general public knew that the aircraft 

they were flying on were releasing chemicals into the air, environmentalist groups would raise hell 

and demand the spraying stop. n 

36. US patent 5003186; Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming, Hughes 

·Aircraft Company, issued March 26, 1991. 

37. Secondary school text book: Science I Essential Interactions, published by Centre Point Learning, 

Inc. of Fairfield, Ohio. See "Chemtrail Sunscreen Taught in Schools," William Thomas, 

www.willthomas.com. 

38. "Dirty Air and High Blood Pressure Linked," Reuters Health, 3-31-01; "Bad Air Worsens Heart 

Trouble: Study Blames Particulates for Many Sudden Deaths," Marla Cone, Los Angeles Times, June 

4, 2000. 
39. "Tiny Air Pollutants In the Air May Trigger Heart Attacks," John McKenzie, ABC News 6-21-01, 

· www.abcnews.go.com . 

40. "Air Pollution 'Increases Stroke Risk,"' BBC News, 10-10-2003. 

41. Ibid. 

· 42. "Americans Breathing More Polluted, Toxic Air Than Ever," Natalie Pawelski, CNN Environmental 

Unit, www.cnn.com . 

43. Asthma Statistics, www.getasthmahelo.org: "Asthma Deadly Serious," Spokesman Review, 7-6-

97; www.asthmainamerica.com . 

44. NATO paper: "Modification ofTropospheric Propagation Conditions," May, 1990. 

45. US patent 6,315,213 (Cordani) issued November 13, 2001. 

46. "Chemtrails, Bio-Active Crystalline Cationic Polymers," Dr. Mike Castle, 7-14-93 See 

www.willthomas.net . 

47. Ibid. 

48. "Nanoparticles Toxic in Aquatic Habitat, Study Finds," Rick Weiss, Washington Post, 3-29-04. 

49. Ibid. 

50. "Greenhouse Gas Level Hits Record High," 3-22-04, NewScientist.com. 

51. Climate Engineering: A Critical Review of Proposals, Scientists for Global Responsibility, School of 

Environmental Sciences, UEA, Norwich NR47TJ, November 1996. 

52. Lewin L. C et al. Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace, New 

York: The Dial Press, 1967. 

53. Trading With the Enemy, Charles Higham, Delacorte Press, 1983; Wall Street and the Rise of 

Hitler, Antony Sutton, 1976; "IBM Sued by Holocaust Lawyers --100 other US Firms Targeted for 

Nazi Links," Paterson and Wastel, The Telegraph, UK, 2-18-01; "Ford and GM Scrutinized for Alleged 

Nazi Collaboration," Michael Dobbs, Washington Post, 11-30-98; "How the Bush Family Made Its 

Fortune From the Nazis," John Loftus, 7-2-02, www.rense.com. (John Loftus was a U.S. Department 

of Justice Nazi War Crimes prosecutor.) 

54. This is a "Google project" that can fill volumes. Go to Google and type "CIA and al Queda," then 

"CIA and Saddam." Do the same with "Carlyle Group" for information on the Bush family's shady 

dealings with the "enemy." 

55. Former German Defense Minister Confirms CIA Involvement in 9/11: Alex Jones Interviews 
Andreas von Bulow, 2-17-21, www.aofn.net 

56. "Pentagon Tells Bush: Climate Change Will Destroy Us," Mark Townsend and Paul Harris, The 

. Observer, UK 2-24-04; "Climate Collapse, The Pentagon's Weather Nightmare Could change 

Radically and Fast," David Stipp, Fortune Magazine, 2-9-04. 

57. The Dead Farmer's Almanac, Who Really Controls the Weather? Jim Larranaga, Priority 

Publications, 2001. 

58. Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather In 2025, June 17, 1996. This report was 

produced by direc;tive from the chief of staff of the Air Force. 

59. "Very Weird Weather in Serbia, What's Happening?" Goran Pavlovic, 10-30-03, rense.com. 

60. "The Secret Nuclear War," Eduardo Goncalves, The Ecologist, 3-22-01. 

61. "Washington's New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change," Center 

for Research on Globalization, Professor Michael Chossudovsky, University of Ottawa, January 2001. 

62. "HAARP: Vandalism in the Sky?" Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, Nexus Magazine, December 

1995. 

63. Ibid.; also Castle, op. cit. Dr. Castle presents information on how HAARP punches massive holes 

in the open-air column ozone and how the Air Force then uses toxic chemicals to "patch" the holes it 

has created: Dr. Castle says: "Welsbach seeding and ozone hole remediation sciences utilize 

chemistries that are toxic to humans and the environment." 

64. "HAARP: Vandalism in the Sky?" Begich and Manning; Researcher David Yarrow is quoted as 

saying that Earth's axial spin means that HAARP bursts are like a microwave knife producing a "long 

tear--an incision" in the multi-layer membrane of ionospheres that shield the Earth's surface from 

intense solar radiation. 

65. U.S. HAARP Weapon Development Concerns Russian Duma, Interfax News Agency, 8-10-02. 

66. HAARP Update, Elfrad Group, http://elfrad.org/2000/Haaro2.htm 6-27-00. 

67. "14 Hertz Signal Suppresses Rainfall, Induces Violent Winds," 10-25-00, Newshawk Inc.; "When 

the Army Owns the Weather--Chemtrails and HAARP," Bob Fitrakis, 2-13-02: In this article HAARP 

inventor Bernard Eastlund is quoted on how HAARP can affect the weather: "Significant experiments 

could be performed. The HAARP antenna as it is now configured modulates the auroral electrojet to 

induce ELF waves and thus could have an effect on the zonal winds." Find this article with search 

engine at www.rense.com . 

68. Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Begich and Manning, op. cit. 

69. Ibid. 
70. "Space Based Weather Control: The 'Thunderstorm Solar Power Satellite,' "Michael Theroux. See 

· www.borderlands.com/spacewea.htm . ' ' 

71. "After 12-year Wait for Trial, Downwinders Losing Hope," Spokesman Review, 5..,;18-03; also 

"Hanford Plaintiffs Seek Details," Spokesman Review, 4-2,..04. 

72. "Hanford Put Area At Risk: Spokane, North Idaho Were Exposed to Significant Radiation," 

Spokesman Review," April 22, 1994. 

73. "Sick Century," Eduardo Goncalves, The Ecologist, ll-22-01. 

74. Moret, op. cit. "The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War" contains excellent statistics on the U.S. health 

ramifications of Cold War nuclear weapons testing and includes references to numerous scientific 

papers which document this tremendous damage to the national health. 

75. Undue Risk, Secret State Experiments on Humans, Jonathan D. Moreno, Freeman & Co. 1999: 

Moreno was a senior staff member of the President's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation 

Experiments which completed in 1995 its studies of horrific U.S. government radiation experiments 

conducted since World War II. 

76. Information reported by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Science 

Institute of Medicine in a 2000 study titled: Scientific Frontiers in Developmental Toxicology, Board 

on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. 

77. "Trouble With Tankers/' William Thomas, www.willthomas.net. 

78. Testimony by Dr. Leonard A. Cole before the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, May 6, 

1994; also Clouds of Secrecy, The Army's Germ Warfare Tests Over Populated Areas, Leonard A. 

Cole, Rowman & Littlefield, 1988. 

79. "Secret Germ Warfare Experiments?" CBS News, 5-15-2000; "Pentagon to Reveal Biowarfare 

Tests," CBS News, 9-20-2000; "US Navy Sprayed BioWarfare Chemtrails on Its Own Ships and Men," 

NewsMax.com, 7-8-00; "Sailors: 'We Were Used,' " Florida Tod;;ty, 1-31-03. 

80. Senate Banking Committee Report 103-900 (Riegle Report) issued May 25, 1994. This 551-page 

document contains a comprehensive list of biological and chemical warfare agents shipped to 

Saddam by U.S. companies under purview of the U.S. Commerce Department for use against Iran 

during the Iran-Iraq war in the late 80s during the regime of George Bush Sr. 

81. Moreno, op.cit. "To this day few Americans know about the special top-secret program that 

brought German scientists to the United States a,fter World War II, and fewer still know that their 

number included medical scientists. Code-named Operation Paper Clip ... hundreds of 'specialists' 

... entered the United States under Joint Chiefs' protection, avoiding regular immigration procedures 

and requirements .. .It is hard to escape the conclusion that many of the German recruits were for 

decades important consultants on a myriad of military-medical projects." 

82. Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola, Dr. Len Horowitz, Tetrahedron Inc., 1996. 
83. The Brucellosis Triangle, Donald W. Scott, Chelmstreet Publishers, 1998. 

84. "Bush Signs Bill for New Generation Nuclear Weapons," rense.com, 12-2-'-03. The Energy and 

· Water Development Appropriations Act of 2004 allocates millions for new nuclear weapons and . 

. bolsters readiness for new weapons testing at the Nevada nuclear test site. 

85. Ibid. 

· 86. "House Approves Pentagon Wish List--Bill Includes Military Exemptions From Environmental 

Laws," Nick Anderson, Los Angeles Times, 11-8-03 . 

• 87. "DOE Count of Worker Injuries Inaccurate," Spokesman Review, 3~28-04; also "Book Alleges 

Cover-up at Nuclear Site," Spokesman Review 3-28-04; also DOE Has Record of Broken Promises, 

editorial, 4-11-04. 

88. "Kennedy Warns on Nuclear Tests," Julian Borger in Washington, The Guardian 

www.quardian.co.uk , 4-30-03. 

89. "Rumsfeld's Dr. Strangelove," Fred Kaplan, MSN.com, 5-12-03. 

90. "Bush Drives the Nation Towards Bankruptcy," Peter Eavis, The American Conservative, 2-15-04. 

91. The War on Waste, 1-29-02, cbsnews.com. 

92. "Money for Iraq Fight Running Out," The Australian 2-12-04 These figures are from U.S Army 

Chief of Staff General Peter Schoomaker. 

93. "Fight of the Century," William Thomas, www.willthomas.net. 

Site location of this article: http://qlobalresearch.ca/articles/WOR406A.html 

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global Research's News and Discussion 

Forum , at http://qlobalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php 

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to 

cross-post original Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on 

community internet sites, as long as the text & title of the article are not modified. The source must 

be acknowledged as follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)at www.globalresearch.ca . 

For cross-postings, kindly use the active URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The 

author's copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news sources, check with the 

original copyright holder, where applicable.). For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in 

print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: editor@globalresearch.ca . 

For media inquiries: editor@globalresearch.ca 
-----

i»aulo 

/eteran Member 

loined: 31 Dec 2003 

>osts: 211 

© Copyright belongs to the author, 2004. For fair 

use only/ pour usage equitable seulement. 

http://www. rense.comlqeneral59/aerosolandelectromaq. htm 

(Ci offli~e:) 

DPosted: Mon 25 Apr, 2005 

Earthquakes: 

Natural or Man-Made? 

From: 

http://www.newdawnmaqazine.com/Articles/Earthguakes Natural or Man Made.html 

By Jason Jeffrey 

Precautions against unconventional arms must be intensified as potential terrorists develop chemical 

and biological weapons and electromagnetic methods that could create holes in the ozone layer or 

trigger ·earthquakes or volcanoes. 

-Former US Secretary of Defense William Cohen speaking at the University of Georgia, 1997 

The devastating tsunami created December 26, 2004 by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake that killed more 

than 300,000 people on the shores of the Indian Ocean caught the world off guard. It was the largest 

earthquake since the 9.2 magnitude Good Friday Earthquake off Alaska in 1964, and ties for fourth 

largest since 1900. 

The earthquake that struck the Indonesian island of Sumatra occurred in a location geologists know is 

susceptible to powerful earthquakes. The quake occurred along a "subduction zone," in which the 

Indian tectonic plate is being subducted, or pulled beneath, the Burma tectonic platelet. The overlying 

plate jumped upward more than 4.5 metres, lifting the water above it and setting off the tsunami. 

For some, the finger of blame doesn't point squarely at nature but at top secret military testing in the 

waters of the Indian Ocean. 

The Egyptian weekly magazine AI-Osboa claimed the earthquake that triggered the tsunami "was 

possibly" caused by an Indian nuclear experiment in which "Israeli and American nuclear experts 

participated". 

An Australian researcher, Joe Vialls,1 in his article "Did New York Orchestrate The Asian Tsunami?" 

analyses how easy it would be to deliver "a multi-megaton thermonuclear weapon to the bottom of 

the Sumatran Trench, and then detonate it with awesome effect." 

Days after the disaster, Canadian Professor Michel Chossudovsky wrote an article titled 

"Foreknowledge of A Natural Disaster: Washington was aware that a deadly Tidal Wave was building 
up in the Indian Ocean".2 He noted "the US Navy was fully aware of the deadly tidal wave, because 

the Navy was on the Pacific Warning Centre's list of contacts. Moreover, America's strategic Naval 

base on the island of Diego Garcia had also been notified. Although directly in the path of the tidal 

wave, the Diego Garcia military base reported 'no damage'." 

"With modern communications, the information of an impending disaster could have been sent around 

the world in a matter of minutes, by email, by telephone, by fax, not to mention by live satellite 

television," he adds. 

Others see the catastrophe as a 'sign of the times' in which we live, and a portent of what is to come 

as the Earth and humanity experience even more changes as part of the end of a world cycle. 

Natural Earthquakes 

Natural earthquakes are caused by the movement of tectonic plates over the Earth's mantle. 

Sandwiched between Earth's crust and molten outer core, the vast mantle accounts for 83 percent of 

the planet's volume. It is filled with solid rock but, heated by the core and by its own radioactive 

decay, it circulates like a pot of impenetrable soup. That circulation is the driving force behind the 

surface motion of tectonic plates, which builds mountains and causes earthquakes. 

The destructive power of an earthquake comes from the momentum gathered when two opposing 

"faults" or tectonic plates that may have been locked together for decades, suddenly move apart. The 

result is that solid rock which normally moves only with the passing of geological ages accelerates 

briefly to 8000 kmh, unleashing huge quantities of energy and creating a shaking movement of up to 

a metre a second. 

Most people consider earthquakes to be natural in origin, but what if there was such a thing as manmade eartl:lquakes? Well, there are. There is the official version of what constitutes a man-made 

earthquake, and then there is a body of suppressed research pointing to a more insidious agenda. 

Artificially-Induced Earthquakes 

Officially, there is an area of research devoted to man-made earthquakes. Geologists and 

seismologists agree earthquakes can be induced in five major ways: fluid injection into the Earth, 

fluid extraction from the Earth, mining or quarrying, nuclear testing and through the construction of 

dams and reservoirs. 

In fact, there are officially recorded instances of earthquakes caused by human activity~ 

Geologists discovered that disposal of waste fluids by means of injecting them deep into the Earth 

could trigger earthquakes after a series of quakes in the Denver area occurred from 1962-1965; the 

periods and amounts of injected waste coincided with the frequency and magnitude of quakes in the 

Denver area. The earthquakes were triggered because the liquid, which was injected under very high 

pressure, released stored strain energy in the rocks. 

Man-made earthquakes may seem like something out of the X-Files, and it's probably only a matter of 

time before the idea is picked up by Hollywood. 
The plotline of Hammer of Eden, written by best-selling author Ken Follett, revolves around a terrorist 

group threatening to level San Francisco with a man-made earthquake. When asked ·by Salon 

magazine how real is the idea of a man-made earthquake, Follett replied that, "Some of the 

seismologists told me, 'There's no way this could happen.' But others gave sad little shrugs and said, 

'It's hard to say. Who knows? Maybe. It's within the realm of possibly.'" 

Suppressed Research: 

Tesla Technologies 

Born in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, Nikola Tesla is one of the 20th century's greatest scientists. A 

prodigious inventor of electronic devices and pioneer of free energy, Tesla never gained the 

recognition he deserved because his scientific breakthroughs were deemed too 'sensitive' by the 

corporate and government powers of the day. 

In a book entitled Tesla - The Lost Inventions, a section is headed "Man:..Made Earthquake". It 

discloses Tesla's fascination with the power of resonance and how he experimented with it not only 

electrically but on the mechanical plane as well. In his Manhattan lab, Tesla built mechanical vibrators 

and tested their powers. One experiment got out of hand. 

Tesla attached a powerful little vibrator driven by compressed air to a steel pillar. Leaving it there, he 

went about his business. Meanwhile, down the street, a violent quaking built up, shaking down 

plaster, bursting plumbing, cracking windows, and breaking heavy machinery off its anchorages. 

Tesla's vibrator had found the resonant frequency of a deep sandy layer of subsoil beneath his 

building, setting off a small earthquake. Soon Tesla's own building began to quake. It is reported that 

just as the police broke into his lab, Tesla was seen smashing the device with a sledge hammer, the 

only way he could promptly stop it. 

In a similar experiment, on an evening walk through the city, Tesla attached a battery powered 

vibrator, described as being the size of an alarm clock, to the steel framework of a building under 

construction. He adjusted it to a suitable frequency and set the structure into resonant vibration. 

The structure shook, and so did the earth under his feet. Tesla later boasted he could shake down the 

Empire State Building with such a device. If this claim was not extravagant enough, he went on to 

say a large-scale resonant vibration was capable of splitting the Earth in half. 

An article from the July 11, 1935 issue of the New York American entitled 'Tesla's Controlled 

Earthquakes', stated Tesla's "experiments in transmitting mechanical vibrations through the Earth -

called by him 'the art of telegeodynamics' - were roughly described by the scientists as a sort of 

. controlled earthquake." 

The article quotes Tesla as saying: 

The rhythmical vibrations pass through the Earth with almost no loss of energy. It becomes possible 

to convey mechanical effects to the greatest terrestrial distances and produce all kinds of unique 

effects. The invention could be used with destructive effect in war ... 
The January 1978 edition of Specula magazine ran an article describing an incredibly profound 

phenomenon that could be produced within the Earth by what is called the 'Tesla Effect.' 

According to the article, electromagnetic signals of certain frequencies can be transmitted through the 

Earth to form standing waves in the Earth itself. In certain cases, coherence to this standing wave can 

be induced wherein a fraction of the vast, surging electromagnetic current of the Earth itself feeds 

into and augments the induced standing wave. 

In other words, "much more energy is now present in the standing wave than the ... amount being fed 

in from the Earth's surface." By interferometer techniques, giant standing waves can be combined to 

produce a focused beam of very great energy. This can then be used to produce earthquakes induced 

at distant aiming points. 

Tesla expressed grave concerns about the effects of this technology because it is exactly the type of 

thing that could easily get out of control once it begins vibrating within the Earth - and it could 

actually cause the Earth to vibrate to pieces. 

Another leading Tesla researcher and nuclear engineer, Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden, lecturing at a 

Symposium of the US Psychotronics Association (USPA) in 1981, stated: 

Tesla found that he could set up standing waves ... in the Earth (the molten core), or, just set it up 

through the rocks- the telluric activity in the rocks would furnish activity into these waves and one 

would get more potential energy in those waves than he put in. He called the concept the Tesla 

Magnifying Transmitter (TMT). 

Bearden goes on to explain how TMTs worked: 

They will go through anything. What you do is that you set up a standing wave through the Earth and 

the molten core of the Earth begins to feed that wave (we are talking Tesla now). When you have 

that standing wave, you have set up a triode. What you've done is that the molten core of the Earth 

is feeding the energy and it's like your signal - that you are putting in - is gating the grid of a triode ... 

Then what you do is that you change the frequency. If you change the frequency one way (start to 

dephase it), you dump the energy up in the atmosphere beyond the point on the other side of the 

Earth that you focused upon. You start ionising the air, you can change the weather flow patterns (jet 

streams etc) - you can change all that - if you dump it gradually, real gradually- you influence the 

heck out of the weather. It's a great weather machine. If you dump it sharply, you don't g~t little 

ionisation like that. You will get flashes and fireballs (plasma) that will come down on the surfaces of 

the Earth ... you can cause enormousweather changes over entire regions by playing that thing back 

and forth. 

HAARP: The Pentagon's Ultimate Weapon 

In an Arctic compound 450 kilometres east of Anchorage, Alaska, the Pentagon has erected a 

powerful transmitter designed to beam more than a gigawatt of energy into the upper reaches of the 

atmosphere. Known as Project HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program), the 

experiment involves the world's largest "ionospheric heater," a device designed to zap the skies 
hundreds of kilometres above the Earth with high-frequency radio waves. 

Why irradiate the charged particles of the ionosphere {which when energised by natural processes 

make up the lovely and famous phenomenon known as the Northern Lights)? According to the US 

Navy and Air Force, co-sponsors of the project, "to observe the complex natural variations of Alaska's 

ionosphere." As well, admit the Pentagon, to develop new forms of communications and surveillance 

technologies to enable the military to send signals to nuclear submarines and to peer deep 

underground. 

Ever since the existence of HAARP became public, a number of independent researchers have warned 

the operation has a secret agenda including weather modification, mind control, hi-tech military 

experiments, and the triggering of earthquakes. 

HAARP transmissions may also be used for the detection and monitoring of electromagnetic or 

"plasma" phenomena, precursors of seismic activity and tectonic movement. Researchers believe 

HAARP transmissions are actually being used to activate or trigger exactly the same electromagnetic 

conditions that can cause tectonic movement. 

Jerry Smith in his book HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy, warns many atmospheric 

scientists working on the secretive military project might be unaware of HAARP's grave potential to 

wreak havoc on the Earth. He writes: 

If HAARP is a TMT [Tesla Magnifying Transmitter], and these researchers correctly understand Tesla's 

work, we could be in a lot of trouble. It is quite possible that the scientists working on HAARP do not 

know what they are playing with ... Beyond that their ignorance might be compounded if HAARP is 

indeed a secretive black-ops military project. The military has devised a way of keeping secrets called 

'compartmentalisation' where each unit knows only what it needs to know ... Only the control group 

knows what's going on ... If there is a control group familiar with TMTs directing the actions of 

scientists unschooled in Tesla technology, those lower level operatives could be directed to wreak 

havoc with created weather or manufactured earthquakes .... 

The key technology behind HAARP is the brainchild of scientist Bernard Eastlund. Judging from his 

APTI patent, Tesla was a major inspiration for Eastlund's ionospheric heater. A New York Times story, 

dated December 8, 1915, describes one of Tesla's ideas which are remarkably similar to Eastlund's.3 

In 1966, Professor Gordon J.F. MacDonald was associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and 

Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, a member of the US President's Science 

Advisory Committee, and later a member of the US President's Council on Environmental Quality. 

He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes. 

MacDonald made a revealing comment: "The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of 

environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly 

greater amounts of energy." 

World-renowned scientist MacDonald developed ideas for using the environment as a weapon system 

and he contributed to what was, at the time, only in the wildest dream of a futurist. When he wrote 

his chapter, "How To Wreck The Environment," for the book Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding 
around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice cap melting 

or destabilisation, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain 

wave manipulation using the planet's energy fields. 

He speculated these types of weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually 

undetectable by their victims. Is HAARP one such weapon? 

In her book Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War, renowned scientist and nuclear activist Dr. 

Rosalie Bertell says such electromagnetic weapons "have the ability to transmit explosive and other 

effects such as earthquake induction across intercontinental distances to any selected target site on 

the globe with force levels equivalent to major nuclear explosions." 

Her book explains that pulsed, extremely low frequency (ELF) waves can be used to convey 

mechanical effects and vibrations at great distances through the Earth. 

Such manipulation of the Earth, she states, "has the capability to cause disturbance of volcanoes and 

tectonic plates, which in turn, have an effect on the weather," creating storms and torrential rains 

over an area. Anyone notice the world's weather has been very strange in recent months? 

Beachings and Seismic Tests 

On November 28, 2004, Reuters reported that during a three day·span, 169 whales and dolphins 

beached themselves in Tasmania, an island off the southern coast of mainland Australia. The cause 

for these beachings is not known, but Bob Brown, a senator in the Australian parliament, said "sound 

bombing" or seismic tests of ocean floors to test for oil and gas had been recently carried out near 

the sites of the Tasmanian beachings. 

According to Jim Cummings of the Acoustic Ecology Institute, seismic surveys utilising airguns have 

been taking place in mineral-rich areas of the world's oceans since 1968. Among the areas that have 

experienced the most intense survey activity are the North Sea, the Beaufort Sea (off Alaska's North 

Slope), and the Gulf of Mexico; areas around Australia and South America are also current hotspots of 

activity. 

The impulses created by the release of air from arrays of up to 24 airguns create low frequency sound 

waves powerful enough to penetrate up to 40km below the seafloor. The "source level" of these 

sound waves is generally over 200dB (and often 230dB or more), roughly comparable to a sound of 

at least 140-170dB in air. 

According to the Australian Conservation Foundation, these 200dB - 230dB shots from the airguns 

are fired every 10 seconds or so, from 10 metres below the surface, 24 hours a day, for 2 week 

periods of time, weather permitting. 

These types of tests are known to affect whales and dolphins, whose acute hearing and use of sonar 

is very sensitive. 

On December 24, 2004 there was a magnitude 8.1 earthquake more than 800 kilometres southeast 

of Tasmania near New Zealand, with a subsequent aftershock 6.1 a little later in the morning that 
same day. 

Then on December 26 the magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck leading to the devastating tsunami that 

killed more than 300,000 people. 

On December 27, 20 whales beached themselves 180 kilometres west of Hobart on the southern 

island state of Tasmania. 

Interestingly, the locations of the whale beachings over the previous 30 days correlates with the 

same general area struck by the 8.1 Australian earthquake. The seismic testing also took place in the 

same area. Then two days after the Australian tectonic plate shifted, the 9.0 earthquake shook the 

coast of Indonesia. 

There is strong evidence suggesting oil exploration activities have induced earthquakes in the past, 

although a link is yet to be established in this case. 

A paper "Seismicity in the Oil Field" by Russian academics admit, "Scientists have observed that 

earthquakes can be triggered by human action .... Some geophysicists, including the authors of this 

article, believe that if the natural tectonic regime had been taken into account during the planning of 

hydrocarbon recovery, the earthquakes might have been avoided."4 

This is a sobering admission when we consider that some geologists say the Australian quake was the 

likely trigger for the Indonesian quake. 

Sign of the Times? 

The death and devastation caused by major earthquakes around the world can only worsen in years 

to come, as growing urban development and unprecedented population growth compound the lethal 

effects of natural and, as some researchers claim, man-made seismic hazards. 

With the world's population nearing an estimated 6.5 billion, there are fewer unpopulated places for 

quakes to strike. And with ever more people to accommodate, there is more multistoried construction 

in vulnerable fault zones. 

Frightening and controversial projects like HAARP, with applications ranging from weather 

modification to mind control, should be of great concern to us, all. And most worrying is mounting 

evidence the US military now has the ability to create earthquakes - the ultimate weapon of war. 

Was the earthquake of December 26 man-made or the result of natural forces? There are many who 

believe such events are part of a cyclic period "of earth changes. Strange weather patterns, an 

increase in earthquake activity, and natural disasters across the planet, are anticipated at the end of 

major world cycles. 

Christians often call attention to the Gospel account where Jesus says a sign of the end of the world 

age would be "earthquakes in diverse places" (Matthew 24:7). Many believe this verse refers to the 

times in which we live. 
In traditional Hindu cosmology, we are now nearing the end of the Kali Yuga which is the final and 

most negative of four evolutionary cycles which are Satya Yuga (Golden Age), Treta Yuga (Silver 

Age), Dwapara Yuga (Bronze Age), and Kali Yuga (Iron Age). 

Similarly, the ancient Greeks traced the lineage of mankind through five successive "ages" or "races" 

from the "Golden Age" to the present "Iron Age." 

The Visuddhimagga, a compendium of Theravada Buddhist philosophy, gives further details about the 

recurring cycles that destroy mankind and cleanse the Earth. The text relates there are 64 world 

destruction cycles in which the world perishes seven times by fire, and an eighth time by water. This 

cycle of eight destructions repeats itself seven times, and then at the end of the eighth cycle the final 

destruction is by wind rather than water. Then the cycle of 64 begins anew. 

Man's most ancient traditions tell us these cycles reflect the creative process of the cosmos. The 

memories of a lost 'Golden Age', found in all earthly cultures, point to a time in the distant past when 

harmony and balance prevailed. This harmony is upset during the Iron Age, which is prophesied to 

end amid a proliferation of inverted spiritual values and rampant materialism, accompanied by 

devastating natural disturbances. 

Act of man or act of nature, the recent earthquake and tsunami may indeed be another 'sign of the 

times' signalling the last days of the present world order. We do well to recall the words of the gifted 

French esotericist Rene Guenon: 

This end only appears to be the "end of the world," without any reservation or specification of any 

kind, to those who see nothing beyond the limits of this particular cycle; ... the end now under 

consideration is undeniably of considerably greater importance than many other, for it is the end of a 

whole Manvantara [world age]. .. this end will itself immediately become the beginning of another 

Manvantara ... if one does not stop short of the most profound order of reality, it can be said in all 

truth the "end of a world" never is and never can be anything but the end of an illusion. 

Footnotes: 

1. www.vialls.com 

2. www .qlobalresearch.ca/articles/CH0412C.html 

3. www.rense.com/ufo3/tesla.htm 

4. www .oilfield.slb.com/media/resources/oilfieldreview/ors00/sum00/p2 17. pdf 

The above article, which has been updated, originally appeared in New Dawn No. 57, NovemberDecember 1999. Jason Jeffrey holds an interest in a wide range of subjects including geopolitics, the 

"New World Order", Big Brother, suppressed technology, psychic/spiritual development, ancient 

civilisations and esotericism. He can be contacted at jasonjeffrey33@yahoo.com.au 
__________________________ -~----- _______ ~-~ffl_int!J _______________________________ -----~-------- ____ ____ ____________ __ ____ ___________________ ____ _______ _ ___________________ _ 

---------~-(@1-;~;;;ffi i'aulo 

/eteran Member 

loined: 31 Dec 2003 

>osts: 211 

DPosted: Sat 30 Apr, 2005 

Here is a video by Tom Bearden on Soviet Weather: 

htto: Uwww. public~action .com/911/psyopnews/Extra/5/sovietweather. rm 

---------~---------~----------------- r)!(lfflirl!) - ---------- ---- - -- ----------------- ---------- ------ ---------- rink 

:stablished Member 

loined: 28 Oct 2004 

>osts: 22 

..ocation: SF Bay Area 

inn 

/eteran Member 

loined: 25 Dec 2003 

>osts: 200 

C'IPosted: Sun 01 May, 2005 

On Rense currently is an article ori Chemtrails that links to another site where an airplane mechanic 

wrote in and described how he discovered exactly how the planes are outfitted and supplied without 

everyone knowing it. Once he stumbled into his discovery he was subject to threatening phone calls 

that demonstrated that whoever it was knew what websites he had visited (to investigate what he 

saw) and had complete control of his employment. The link is 

http:Uwww.weatherwars.info/chemtrails 2.htm (the mechanic's email is at the bottom of the main 

text). (We should also ask God to protect this brave man) 

Weather sure is changing. Rain is a weekly occurance here in the Sf Bay Area. We are well past the 

end of the rainy season. Plus there is no evidence of the hobgoblin of global warming here. It's been 

unseasonably cold forever. 

DPosted: Sun 01 May, 2005 

Quote: 

Originally posted by Tink: 

It's been unseasonably cold forever. 

Hi TinkWe've been running about 15 degrees below normal for the last 10 days or so here in central Iowa. 

Today, we actually had snow flurries! One of the farmers I know wryly commented, "Not a bad day, 

for the first of November." 

We're supposed to have another hard frost tonight. Meanwhile, most of the farmers here have 

completed seeding for corn and are starting on soybeans. If this keeps up, there's going to be a lot of 

reseeding to do later on in the month. 

Best regards, 
ll'aulo 

/eteran Member 

Joined: 31 Dec 2003 

>osts: 211 

Linn 

·----·---------------------· --·-------·-····--·-·-----··---·-·· 

DPosted: Thu 02 Jun, 2005 

Hiding behind the clouds of their deceptions? I would say so. It used to be that weather reports where 

about the closest reports of truth Americans received beyond the rest of the mainstream press news, 

but now, I guess they want to clone the weather info alongside the falsification and tag-team 

methods spewed out like their other "worthy news." Look out World Wrestling Association ... you've 

got competitor copy-cats! 

Bill would restrict Weather Service data 

from: 

http :1/www. bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/local/11771045.htm 

Senator pushing measure critics say limits public access 

Dawn Withers 

Knight Ridder Tribune News Service 

WASHINGTON - A tempestuous clash between the National Weather Service and private weather 

companies is prompting an influential senator to intervene to protect AccuWeather, WeatherBank and 

other firms that package forecasts for public use. 

Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., the Senate's third-ranking Republican, is pushing a bill that critics say 

would force the Weather Service to disseminate much of its data only to private companies. 

The bill, these opponents contend, would limit the public's access to user-friendly weather information 

and require that people go to a commercial weather company to get any meaningful interpretation of 

raw climate data. 

But the bill's supporters say the Weather Service could still make information available to the public, 

and they praise the measure for seeking to restrict what they say is unfair government competition. 

Santorum, who faces a tough re-election fight next year, makes little secret that he is in part trying 

to protect the weather companies based in his home state, including AccuWeather. 

"I've got about 1,000 jobs in Pennsylvania and 14 weather companies, believe it or not, in the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania," Santorum told a local radio station recently. "That's how they make 

their money, in providing these services. And we don't think that the Weather Service, which does a 

fine job ... should be doing this job." 

For years, the National Weather Service has coexisted uneasily with weather-packaging companies. 
With its unmatched fleet of buoys, satellites, ·aircraft, upper-air weather balloons and ground sites, 

the Weather Service, generates raw weather data, forecasts and warnings. It also negotiates with 

foreign countries for their climate information. 

Private companies, in turn, take this raw data and, among other services, turn them into the colorful, 

attractive maps and graphs that readers see in newspapers and viewers watch on television. 

But advances in computer graphics and software have enabled the Weather Service to easily package 

its information in a more appealing way and provide tailored weather forecasts through its regional 

offices. These presentations are increasingly available to the public on the Weather Service Web site 

at no charge. 

When the agency rewrote its regulations late last year, after a National Research Council committee's 

recommendation, it got rid of a policy that clearly stated what the Weather Service would do in terms 

of collecting data, and what the private weather companies would do. That, in turn, brought a 

thunderclap of protest from private companies that believed they would face unfair competition from 

the federal agency. 

"The government is trying to do more than us," Steven Root, president of Oklahoma-based 

WeatherBank, said. "When we see competitive threats from the government, it jeopardizes the wellbeing of the entire American weather enterprise." 

Santorum was quick to respond with his bill. The part of his legislation considered most controversial 

says "data, information, guidance, forecasts and warnings shall be issued ... through a set of data 

portals designed" for access by commercial providers. 

It also prohibits Weather Service officials - or officials of its parent agency, the National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration - from disclosing "weather data, information, guidance, forecast or 

warning, or any part thereof, to the public" before the weather data is issued to the public via 

commercial providers. 

Santorum said in a phone interview that the agency would continue providing information to ordinary 

citizens. 

"Of course the public has a right to the information, and what (the bill) says is that the Weather 

Service has a right to disseminate this information," he said. 

But that's not how opponents see it. 

Santorum's bill could prevent the Weather Service from providing daily forecasts or putting content 

on its Web site, and it could prevent academics and the public from scrutinizing the accuracy of the 

agency's data, said John Armstrong, who led the Committee on Partnerships in Weather and Climate 

Services, which looked at the Weather Service's relationship with the private sector. 

"My view is, this bill would not only drastically change the ability of the Weather Service, but would 

also chill issues that relate" to public data and information, Armstrong said. 
Andrea Psoras 

Senior Vice President 

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocate for freedom of information on the Internet, has 

condemned Santorum's bill. 

"It is a terrible precedent for information policy," said staff member Ren Bucholz. "If the rule is, data 

provided by taxpayer money can't be provided to the public but through a private entity, we won't 

have a very useful public agency." 

QED International Associates, Inc. 

US Agent for Rapid Ratings International 

708 Third A venue, 23rd Fl 

New York, NY 10017 

(212) 953-40580 

apsoras@gmail.com 

(646) 709-9629c 

apsoras@qedinternational.com 

http://www.qedintemational.com 

http://www.rapidratings.com