alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Louis SMITH, petitioner, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5649.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 31, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# L_2008309EN.01002101.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 99/2008

of 26 September 2008

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 63/2008 of 6 June 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 63/2008 of 6 June 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 61/2008 of 24 January 2008 amending Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards dinoprostone (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 61/2008 of 24 January 2008 amending Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards dinoprostone (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 R 0061: Commission Regulation (EC) No 61/2008 of 24 January 2008 (OJ L 22, 25.1.2008, p. 8).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 R 0061: Commission Regulation (EC) No 61/2008 of 24 January 2008 (OJ L 22, 25.1.2008, p. 8).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 61/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 27 September 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 257, 25.9.2008, p. 25.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 22, 25.1.2008, p. 8.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2011103EN.01000101.xml

| 19.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 103/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Japan on cooperation in science and technology

The Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Japan on cooperation in science and technology (1), signed on 30 November 2009, has, in accordance with Article 13(1) thereof, entered into force on 29 March 2011.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 90, 6.4.2011, p. 2.

1

---
Corey Allen WIMBLEY, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 17-5663.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2391

OLUDARE OGUNDE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; JANET NAPOLITANO; RON ROSENBERG, 

Director, Arlington Asylum Office,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00484-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: March 13, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oludare Ogunde, Appellant Pro Se. David Moskowitz, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Oludare Ogunde appeals a district court order granting 

the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his 

amended complaint seeking an order declaring that the 

immigration detainer placed upon him by the Department of 

Homeland Security (“DHS”) was unlawful. At the time Ogunde 

filed the amended complaint, he was in the custody of the 

Virginia Department of Corrections. He has since been 

transferred to the custody of Immigration and Customs 

Enforcement of the DHS. Accordingly, because the detainer is no 

longer in effect, the appeal is moot. See Central States, Se. & 

Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transp., Inc., 841 F.2d 92, 93 

(4th Cir. 1988); see also Tucker v. Phyfer, 819 F.2d 1030, 1034 

n.3 (11th Cir. 1987) (“[t]he mootness doctrine usually requires 

a court to dismiss an action in which, because of events 

occurring after the plaintiff filed the suit, any relief the 

court might grant would be of no utility to the plaintiff”).

We dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: November 30, 2005       /s/ Ian M.Herman
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Ian M. Herman
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
Michael SEIBERT, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5479.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/07/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       86,537
COMMITMENTS
  23,590    7,841   10,776   33,926   44,538   68,293   63,155   18,245   23,382

CHANGES FROM 03/31/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,516)
  -1,205   -5,917   -1,599   -1,011    4,065   -3,816   -3,452    1,299      936

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.3      9.1     12.5     39.2     51.5     78.9     73.0     21.1     27.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      133)
      32       23       27       59       59      107       95
```

----

Updated April 10, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 10.18
 THIS PROMISSORY NOTE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. NO SALE OR
DISPOSITION MAY BE AFFECTED EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 144 UNDER SAID ACT OR AN EFFECTIVE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATED THERETO OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE HOLDER, SATISFACTORY TO THE
COMPANY, THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE ACT OR RECEIPT OF A NO-ACTION LETTER FROM
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
  $344,184.50
    
    April 30, 2007
Durham, North Carolina
   Subject to Offset
 Default




---



##### 



Release and Modification
 Right of Prepayment
 Captions
 Collection
 DOLPHIN DIRECT EQUITY PARTNERS, LPBy:
    
    Dolphin Advisors, LLCIts managing general partnerBy:
    
    Dolphin Management Inc.Its managing memberBy:
    
    /s/ Peter E. SalasName:
    
    Peter E. SalasTitle:
    
    President
Younes KABBAJ, petitioner, v. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF TANGIER, et al.

No. 17-5183.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         446,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,200,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,061,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      7,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,061,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,547,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  629,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               394,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             348,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                174,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Xstream Beverage Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Barry Willson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Barry Willson
----------------
Barry Willson
Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6099
WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA99-3745-DKC) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Allen Legg, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Legg v. Maryland , No. CA-99-3745-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/13/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,743
COMMITMENTS
   8,977    4,730    6,382   22,145   24,421   37,505   35,534    9,237   11,209

CHANGES FROM 10/06/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,076)
     319     -720     -158   -1,434     -753   -1,274   -1,632      197      556

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.2     10.1     13.7     47.4     52.2     80.2     76.0     19.8     24.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       70)
       8       18       16       31       30       52       56
```

----

Updated October 16, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4279 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4279

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, as the ``Melinda Gene 
                        Piccotti Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2019

Mr. Keller (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, 
Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Reschenthaler, Ms. Dean, Mr. 
Lamb, Mr. Perry, Mr. Smucker, and Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, as the ``Melinda Gene 
                        Piccotti Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MELINDA GENE PICCOTTI POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 445 Main Street in Laceyville, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Melinda Gene Piccotti Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Melinda 
Gene Piccotti Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012379EN.01000202.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 October 2012 — Hungary v Slovak Republic

(Case C-364/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 259 TFEU - Citizenship of the European Union - Article 21 TFEU - Directive 2004/38/EC - Right to move within the territory of the Member States - President of Hungary - Prohibition on entering the territory of the Slovak Republic - Diplomatic relations between Member States)

2012/C 379/03

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and E. Orgován, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Tokár, D. Maidani and S. Boelaert, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Article 259 TFEU — Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Article 18(1) EC, Article 3(2) TEU, Article 21(1) TFEU and Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77) — Abusive application of European Union law — Prohibition on entering the territory of the Slovak Republic imposed on the President of Hungary when intending to take up the invitation made by a social organisation — Prohibition on entry based, in part, on Directive 2004/38/EC — Application of the provisions of European Union law on the free movement of persons to Heads of State and to other persons representing the Member States

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hungary to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hungary to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4219 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4219

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that an appeal of an 
 order granting a nationwide injunction issued by a district court of 
           the United States shall lie to the Supreme Court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2019

Mr. John W. Rose of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that an appeal of an 
 order granting a nationwide injunction issued by a district court of 
           the United States shall lie to the Supreme Court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPEAL OF ORDER GRANTING A NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION.

    (a)  In General.--Chapter 155 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 2285. Appeal of order granting a nationwide injunction
    ``(a) In General.--In the case that a district court of the United 
States grants a nationwide injunction, the appeal from the order 
granting such injunction shall lie to the Supreme Court.
    ``(b) Definition.--In this section, the term `nationwide 
injunction' means an order issued by a Federal court that purports to 
restrain the enforcement of a Federal statute, regulation, order, or 
similar authority against a non-party, unless the non-party is 
represented by a party acting in a representative capacity pursuant to 
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 155 of 
title 28, United States Code is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 2285 the following:

``2285. Appeal of order granting a nationwide injunction.''.
                                 <all>
```
William D. BONTRAGER, petitioner, v. The COLORADO ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL.

No. 17-8556.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.