alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                              BGF Industries, Inc.

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                        2002           2001         2000          1999         1998
                                     -----------    ----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
<S>                                  <C>            <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS:
     Pretax  income  (loss) (a) ...  $  (129,012)   $   (4,946)   $  13,932    $   7,597    $   25,171
Add:
     Fixed charges ................       14,239        14,504       14,405       16,084         4,937
     Capitalized interest .........           --          (227)          --          (46)         (127)
                                     -----------    ----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
                                     $  (114,773)   $    9,331    $  28,337    $  23,635    $   29,981
                                     -----------    ==========    =========    =========    ==========

FIXED CHARGES:
     Interest expense(b) ..........  $    13,926    $   13,972    $  14,168    $  15,817         4,517
     Capitalized interest .........           --           227           --           46           127
     Portion of rents
          representative of
          interest  factor(c) .....          313           305          237          221           293
                                     -----------    ----------    ---------    ---------    ----------
                                     $    14,239    $   14,504    $  14,405    $  16,084    $    4,937
                                     ===========    ==========    =========    =========    ==========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
         Charges ..................         (8.1)x         0.6x         2.0x         1.5x          6.1x
</TABLE>

(a) Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary loss.

(b) Includes amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount and
excludes capitalized interest.

(c) One-third of rental expense.
Javier TORRES, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5863.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY ADMINISTRATION, INC., et al., petitioners, v. John HUBANKS, et al.

No. 17-1161.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
DUQUESNE LIGHT HOLDINGS, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 17-1151.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jose CONEJO-RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5874.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2007090EN.01009203.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 90/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 90/92

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and Malaysia pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994

The above Agreement (OJ L 335, 1.12.2006, p. 40) has entered into force on 30 October 2006.

---
Marvin Burnett JONES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8652.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,634,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,580,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,881,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,067,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,004,000
<PP&E>                                       2,786,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,787,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,902,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,455,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,250,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,902,000
<SALES>                                      6,793,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,793,000
<CGS>                                        4,158,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,158,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,617,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               132,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             155,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,181,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,183,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,181,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Philip F. SMITH, petitioner, v. Scott R. FRAKES, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

No. 17-5648.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Kap Sun BUTKA, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 16-790.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES USED IN CALCULATION (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEAR ENDED
                                                              DECEMBER 31, 1997
                                                              -----------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
  Shares outstanding at beginning of period.................       9,750,000
  Weighted average shares issued during the year ended
     December 31, 1997 (60,000 shares)......................           6,248
                                                                 -----------
                                                                   9,756,248
                                                                 ===========
Net loss available to common stockholders...................     $(6,057,000)
                                                                 ===========
Basic and diluted loss per common share.....................     $     (0.62)
                                                                 ===========
</TABLE>

---------------
(1) For a description of basic and diluted loss per share, See Note B of the
    Notes to the Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form
    10-K.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15
                                   EXHIBIT C
                                   ---------

                                PROMISSORY NOTE
                                ----------------

$633,332.70                                                 San Jose, California
 ----------
_________________________
                                                              February 19, 2000

         For value received, the undersigned promises to pay Top Tier Software,
Inc. a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), at its principal office the
                                  -------
principal sum of $633,332.70 with interest from the date hereof at a rate of
8.5 % per annum, compounded semiannually, on the unpaid balance of such
principal sum. Such principal and interest shall be due and payable five (5)
years after the date hereof.

         If the undersigned's employment or consulting relationship with the
Company is terminated prior to payment in full of this Note, this Note shall be
immediately due and payable.

         Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States
of America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME WITHOUT
INTEREST OR PENALTY.

         Should suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note, such
sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees.
The makers and endorsers have severally waived presentment for payment, protest,
notice of protest and notice of nonpayment of this Note.

         This Note, which is full recourse, is secured by a pledge of certain
shares of Common Stock of the Company and is subject to the terms of a Pledge
and Security Agreement between the undersigned and the Company of even date
herewith.

         EMPLOYEE                            /s/ Shai Agassi
                                             ----------------------------
# L_2009162EN.01002201.xml

| 25.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 44/2009

of 24 April 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 29/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 29/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2008/42/EC of 3 April 2008 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annexes II and III thereto to technical progress (2), as corrected by OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 52, is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2008/42/EC of 3 April 2008 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annexes II and III thereto to technical progress (2), as corrected by OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 52, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 L 0042: Commission Directive 2008/42/EC of 3 April 2008 (OJ L 93, 4.4.2008, p. 13), as corrected by OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 52.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 L 0042: Commission Directive 2008/42/EC of 3 April 2008 (OJ L 93, 4.4.2008, p. 13), as corrected by OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 52.’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2008/42/EC, as corrected by OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 52, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 25 April 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 April 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 28.5.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 4.4.2008, p. 13.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/09/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      104,105
COMMITMENTS
  27,431    5,203   16,225   37,201   56,869   80,856   78,297   23,249   25,808

CHANGES FROM 06/02/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,050)
  -2,240     -780    3,882    3,662    3,117    5,304    6,219    3,746    2,831

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.3      5.0     15.6     35.7     54.6     77.7     75.2     22.3     24.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      39       13       35       56       64      115      102
```

----

Updated June 12, 2009
AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, petitioner, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 17-117.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Peter A. PROSTYAKOV, petitioner, v. MASCO CORPORATION.

No. 17-268.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,491
<PP&E>                                         117,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,767
<BONDS>                                         18,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        788
<COMMON>                                        21,057
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,036
<SALES>                                         55,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,892
<CGS>                                           42,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                       848
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,527
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
        

</TABLE>
Release: 4040-97For Release: August 1, 1997U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISMISSES FIRST AMENDMENT CHALLENGE TO COMMODITY
    TRADING ADVISOR REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT
    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today that on
    July 29, 1997, the Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior Judge of the U. S.
    District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, issued a six-page
    Opinion and Order dismissing a declaratory judgment action brought by
    Commodity Trend Service, Inc. (CTS) against the CFTC raising First
    Amendment challenges to the commodity trading advisor (CTA) registration
    requirement contained in the Commodity Exchange Act (Act).
    CTS's declaratory judgment action arose from a CFTC investigation
    instituted to determine whether CTS or its principals are violating the Act
    or CFTC regulations by engaging in fraud and acting as unregistered CTAs.
    The CFTC responded by requesting the Court to dismiss CTS's action.
    Characterizing CTS's complaint as an effort to "jump the gun with a
    preemptive judicial strike," Judge Shadur ruled that CTS's constitutional
    challenge was not ripe in the absence of any administrative actions having
    been taken by the CFTC against CTS. The Court stated: "No need is seen here
    to risk the issuance of an advisory opinion, which would be the result if
    no Article III 'case' or 'controversy' emerges as a result of the
    Commission's ongoing investigation."
    In addition, the Court separately concluded that CTS could not mount a
    facial challenge to the Act's CTA registration requirement because "facial
    challenges on First Amendment grounds�.�.�.�do not
    apply to commercial speech." On the basis of the CFTC's "persuasive"
    arguments, Judge Shadur dismissed CTS's action in its entirety.
    Copies of Judge Shadur's July 29, 1997 Opinion and Order are available
    through the CFTC's Office of Public Affairs (202) 418-5080.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4304 

To amend title 51, United States Code, to allow the Administrator of the 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration to accept in-kind consideration for certain leases, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. PALAZZO (for himself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. GUEST, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. HILL of California, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and 

Mr. FOSTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To amend title 51, United States Code, to allow the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to accept in-kind consideration for certain leases, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NASA Enhanced Use 

5 Lease Authority Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4304 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED USE LEASE AUTHORITY. 

2 (a) EXPANSION OF IN-KIND CONSIDERATION FOR

3 CERTAIN LEASES.—Section 20145(b)(1) of title 51, 

4 United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraph 

5 (B) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Notwithstanding sub7 paragraph (A), the Administrator may accept 

8 in-kind consideration for leases entered into for 

9 the purpose of— 

10 ‘‘(i) developing renewable energy pro11 duction facilities; 

12 ‘‘(ii) maintaining, constructing, modi13 fying, or improving facilities on real prop14 erty under the jurisdiction of the Adminis15 trator; 

16 ‘‘(iii) carrying out aeronautical and 

17 space research, development, testing, and 

18 evaluation activities; or 

19 ‘‘(iv) the provision of services to the 

20 Administration, including launch services 

21 and payload processing services.’’. 

22 (b) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 20145(f) 

23 of title 51, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

24 the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(3) CAPTURING THE VALUE OF IN-KIND CON26 SIDERATION.—Information with respect to— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4304 IH

1 ‘‘(A) the value and nature of in-kind con2 sideration; and 

3 ‘‘(B) controls in place that ensure that the 

4 Administration takes advantage of such consid5 eration.’’. 

6 (c) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Section 20145 of title 

7 51, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following: 

9 ‘‘(h) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in 

10 subsection (b)(2), the Administrator may not obligate 

11 funds under this section.’’. 

12 (d) EXPIRATION OF LEASE AUTHORITY.—Section 

13 20145(g) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by 

14 striking ‘‘December 31, 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

15 31, 2029’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Joseph IBANEZ, et al., petitioners, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-1399.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     CCC GLOBALCOM CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     1,101,378

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,101,378
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  430,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,546,060
<PP&E>                                         122,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (27,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,106,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          635,107
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       31,693
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,431,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,106,092
<SALES>                                        625,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               625,636
<CGS>                                          440,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  902,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (282,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (282,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (282,278)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>