alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

**CONSENT  OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-112578 on Form S-3/A and in RegistrationStatement No. 333-120919 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relatingto the financial statements and financial statement schedule of GenTek Inc. andsubsidiaries (the “Company”) (which expressed an unqualified opinion on thosefinancial statements and financial statement schedule and included anexplanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of (1) Financial AccountingStandards Board’s Interpretation No. 48, “*Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- aninterpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*” as of January 1, 2007which changed the accounting for uncertain tax positions; and (2) therecognition, disclosure and the measurement date provisions of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, *Employer’s Accounting for DefinedBenefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an Amendment of FASBStatements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R*, which changed its method ofaccounting for pension and postretirement benefits and the effectiveness of theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Deloitte & ToucheLLP
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Hoekstra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.  This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.  /s/ Brian Hoekstra Brian Hoekstra Chief Executive Officer July 14, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, John A. Miley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:    August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN A. MILEY                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                         |  |  |  | John A. Miley Chief Financial Officer
II-00727

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Szymanowski <pszymanowski@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:57 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Szymanowski

P.O. Box 74

Curtice, OH 43412
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Optiabse Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  June 30, 2010




/s/Amir Philips

Name:  Amir Philips

Title: Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 

**- 1104** 

STEVEN R. ESTES

,

Petitioner

- Appellant

,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

,

Respondent

- Appellee

.

A ppeal from the United States Tax Court

. ( Tax Ct. No. 16528

- 11 L )

Submitted : Ju ne 26

, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING , and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Steven R. Estes, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Clark, Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Steven R. Estes a ppeals from the tax court ’ s order

upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determi nations

with respect to Estes’ income tax liability for the 2004, 2005,

and 2006 tax years and upholding the Commissioner’s proposed

collection activities. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons s tated

by the tax court. Estes v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , No.

16528

- 11 L (U.S.T.C. Jan. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would

no t aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report of Hanover
Foods Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
1, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, the undersigned, in
my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


         /s/ John A. Warehime
         -----------------------------------------
         John A. Warehime, Chief Executive Officer          Date: April 16, 2003
Ivan Bernabe RODRIGUEZ VAZQUEZ, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-1304.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Elijah BURKE, petitioner, v. George Williams G. FURTADO.

No. 17-7680.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,971
<INVENTORY>                                     22,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,405
<PP&E>                                          28,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,325
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,644
<SALES>                                         22,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,573
<CGS>                                           11,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (278)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,166
<INCOME-TAX>                                       789
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Ernesto CASILLAS-PEREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5306.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,444
<INVENTORY>                                     32,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,350
<PP&E>                                          67,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,859
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,882
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,733
<SALES>                                        232,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,954
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,615
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,718
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4163 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4163

     To reauthorize the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 2019

Mr. Arrington introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT PROGRAM REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10261(a)(23)) is amended by 
striking ``$30,000,000 for fiscal year 2020, and each fiscal year 
thereafter'' and inserting ``$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 
through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0478. MASJID WARITH UD DEEN MOHAMMAD NON-PROFIT

TRUST #4525 et al. v. AHMED S. YOUSEF. 

On January 8, 2019, the trial court entered a final judgment and writ of

possession to Ahmed S. Yousef in this lease dispute. On February 5, 2019, the

defendants, Masjid Warith Ud Deen Mohammad Non-Profit Trust #4525, Zarif

Shamsid Deen, Trustee, and the Islamic Center of Middle Georgia, Inc., filed a notice

of appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. 

Ordinarily, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the

decision or judgment sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The underlying

subject matter of an appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining

the proper appellate procedure. Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d

192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. Under

OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed within

seven days of the date the judgment was entered. Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239

October 22, 2019
Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). The defendants filed their notice of

appeal 28 days after the entry of the trial court order they wish to appeal. Therefore,

the appeal is untimely and is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/22/2019
# L_2006144EN.01002402.xml

| 31.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 144/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 144/24

---

Information concerning the entry into force of an Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and Pakistan pursuant to Article XXVIII of GATT 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to rice provided for in Schedule CXL annexed to the GATT 1994, attached to Council Decision 2004/618/EC

This Agreement entered into force on 1 September 2004.

---
# L_2009130EN.01003001.xml

| 28.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 130/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 130/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 36/2009

of 17 March 2009

amending Annex XVIII (Health and safety at work, labour law, and equal treatment for men and women) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XVIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 105/2008 of 26 September 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XVIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 105/2008 of 26 September 2008 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2008/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 amending Directive 2004/40/EC on minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2008/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 amending Directive 2004/40/EC on minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 16jc (Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XVIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 L 0046: Directive 2008/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 (OJ L 114, 26.4.2008, p. 88).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 L 0046: Directive 2008/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 (OJ L 114, 26.4.2008, p. 88).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2008/46/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 18 March 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 309, 20.11.2008, p. 31.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 114, 26.4.2008, p. 88.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---