alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 414 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 414

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act to include algal blooms in the definition of a major 
                   disaster, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

Mr. Rooney of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act to include algal blooms in the definition of a major 
                   disaster, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Local Communities from 
Harmful Algal Blooms Act''.

SEC. 2. ALGAL BLOOMS.

    Section 102(2) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122) is amended by striking ``or 
drought'' and inserting ``drought, or algal blooms''.
                                 <all>
```
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Donald B. TERRELL.

No. D-3024.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Donald B. Terrell, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# L_2008047EN.01002201.xml

| 21.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 105/2007

of 28 September 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 81/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 81/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 287/2007 of 16 March 2007 amending Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards Ginseng, standardised extracts and preparations thereof (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 287/2007 of 16 March 2007 amending Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards Ginseng, standardised extracts and preparations thereof (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32007 R 0287: Commission Regulation (EC) No 287/2007 of 16 March 2007 (OJ L 78, 17.3.2007, p. 13).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32007 R 0287: Commission Regulation (EC) No 287/2007 of 16 March 2007 (OJ L 78, 17.3.2007, p. 13).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 287/2007 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 September 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 328, 13.12.2007, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 78, 17.3.2007, p. 13.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Taras LaFrance EDWARDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8709.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4068 

To require the United States Commission on Civil Rights to establish advisory 

committees for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, 

Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. SERRANO (for himself, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. SAN

NICOLAS, Mr. SABLAN, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mrs. 

RADEWAGEN, Mr. SOTO, and Ms. PLASKETT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the United States Commission on Civil Rights 

to establish advisory committees for Puerto Rico, the 

Virgin Islands of the United States, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American 

Samoa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Commis5 sion Territorial Equality Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4068 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES FOR 

2 PUERTO RICO, THE VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE 

3 UNITED STATES, GUAM, THE COMMON4 WEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA IS5 LANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA. 

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The 2d sentence of section 

7 3(d) of the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 

8 U.S.C. 1975a(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘and the District 

9 of Columbia’’ and all that follows before the period at the 

10 end, and inserting ‘‘, the District of Columbia, Puerto 

11 Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, Guam, the 

12 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and 

13 American Samoa composed of persons domiciled in that 

14 State, District, or territory’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3(f) of the 

16 Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 U.S.C. 

17 1975a(f)) is amended by— 

18 (1) striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘Government’’ and in19 serting a comma; and 

20 (2) inserting ‘‘Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands 

21 of the United States, Guam, the Commonwealth of 

22 the Northern Mariana Islands, or American 

23 Samoa,’’ after ‘‘States,’’. 

24 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

25 this section shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st fiscal 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4068 IH

1 year that begins after the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Tasheik Ashanti CHAMPEAN, aka Douglas Howell, petitioner, v. Michael RICH, et al.

No. 17-177.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2020397EN.01002901.xml

| 26.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 397/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 397/29

---

Corrigendum to the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on certain aspects of air services

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 264 of 8 October 2011
  )

On page 6, in Annex 1, thirteenth indent:

for:

‘Air Transport Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, signed at The Hague on 23 November 1990, hereinafter referred to as the “Indonesia — Netherlands Agreement” in Annex 2;’,

read:

‘Air Transport Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, signed at The Hague on 23 November 1990, as modified by the Memorandum of Understanding done at The Hague on 19 August 2009, hereinafter referred to as the “Indonesia — Netherlands Agreement” in Annex 2;’.

On page 9, in Annex 2, Part (b) (Refusal, revocation, suspension of limitation of authorisations or permissions), twelfth indent:

for:

‘Articles 3 and 4 of the Indonesia — Netherlands Agreement;’,

read:

‘Article 4 of the Indonesia — Netherlands Agreement;’.

On page 9, in Annex 2, Part (c) (Safety), twelfth indent:

for:

‘Annex IV of the Memorandum of Understanding between the aeronautical authorities of the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands done at The Hague on 19 August 2009;’,

read:

‘Annex IV of the Memorandum of Understanding done at The Hague on 19 August 2009;’.

---
# C_2009090EN.01004101.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/41

---

Action brought on 24 February 2009 — De Britto Patricio-Dias v Commission

(Case F-16/09)

2009/C 90/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jorge de Britto Patricio-Dias (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Massaux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision relating to his appraisal during 2007

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the Appointing Authority’s decision of 21 November 2008 and, so far as necessary, the career development report covering the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Appointing Authority’s decision of 21 November 2008 and, so far as necessary, the career development report covering the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
In Re William SCHEIDLER, petitioner.

No. 17-1454.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Ami Latrice SIMMONS, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 17-8003.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3954 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3954

    To amend title 35, United States Code, to include the exclusive 
economic zone as part of the United States for patent infringement, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2019

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Correa) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 35, United States Code, to include the exclusive 
economic zone as part of the United States for patent infringement, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OF THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) Amendment.--Chapter 10 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 106. Inventions in the exclusive economic zone
    ``Any act occurring on or below the waters of the exclusive 
economic zone of the United States established by Presidential 
Proclamation 5030 of March 10, 1983 (16 U.S.C. 1453 note), including 
activity on the seabed of such zone, that is related to the economic 
exploitation of, or exploration for, natural resources or marine 
scientific research shall be considered an act occurring within the 
United States for the purposes of section 271.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 10 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

        ``106. Inventions in the exclusive economic zone.''.
                                 <all>
```
Glenn J. HOPKINS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-8825.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Tarini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §  1350, as adopted pursuant to §  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 14, 2005
/s/ Robert Tarini
By:_________________________
Robert Tarini, CEO
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Technest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Technest Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Ron D. GLICK, petitioner, v. Angela J. TOWNSEND, et al.

No. 17-6553.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2009328EN.01004001.xml

| 15.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/40

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation, as contracting parties of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to their accession to the European Union

The Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation, as contracting parties of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to their accession to the European Union (1), which the Council decided to conclude on 27 November 2008
   (2), entered into force on 1 June 2009, with the last notification of completion of procedures under Article 7 of that Protocol having been received on 5 May 2009.

1

2

---

(1)  
  OJ L 124, 20.5.2009, p. 53.

1

(2)  
  Ibid. p. 51.

2

Ibid

---
Anthony Clark ODOM, petitioner, v. Jerry B. ADGER, et al.

No. 17-1558.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Release:#3996-95

For Release:March 20, 1996

**CFTC FILES ENFORCEMENT ACTION ALLEGING FRAUD AGAINST**

**R&W TECHNICAL SERVICES LTD. AND TWO INDIVIDUALS, ALL OF    TEXAS**

**CFTC Charges the Respondents with Fraudulently Soliciting Customers    in**

**Connection with the Sale of their Commodity Futures Trading System,    and**

**Operating as Unregistered CTAs, Among other Charges**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    today that on March 19, 1996, it filed a four-count administrative    complaint against **R&W Technical Services, Ltd.**, of Houston,    Texas, a limited liability company that sells computerized commodity    futures trading systems, and two individuals: **Gregory M. Reagan**, of    Sugarland, Texas; and **Marshall L. Worsham**, of Houston. None of the    defendants has ever been registered with the CFTC.

The complaint charges the respondents with committing fraud in    connection with their solicitation of individuals to purchase futures    trading systems, including the ***CurrencyMaster*** and the ***Master Suite*** systems. The basic ***CurrencyMaster***    trading system sold for $3,495, and the ***Master Suite*** trading    system sells for approximately $13,500. Both systems are advertised to give    trading signals in various financial futures contracts. The respondents are    also charged with acting as commodity trading advisors (CTAs) without being    registered with the CFTC, fraudulent advertising, and failure to produce    required books and records, all violations of the *Commodity Exchange    Act* and CFTC regulations.

According to the complaint, since at least April 1993, R&W has    been soliciting customers to purchase its trading systems using a variety    of misrepresentations and omissions of material fact in their    advertisements and promotional materials. For example, the solicitations    allegedly presented to potential investors include a track record of    trading profits of $583,350 that purportedly resulted from the use of the    ***Master Suite*** trading system for seven years. Solicitations    also claimed, the complaint alleges, that the ***CurrencyMaster***    system generates 323 percent net profits trading just one contract at a    time and consistently generated triple-digit profits, year in and year out,    for six years from 1987 to 1992.

Contrary to respondents' representations regarding the success rate of    their trading systems, the complaint alleges that the representations of    profit were not based on any real trading by the respondents, that the    respondents had not actually made the represented profits from the trading    system, and that R&W has never had an account to trade commodity    futures.

A public hearing is to be held to determine whether the allegations are    true and, if so, what sanctions, if any, should be imposed. Possible CFTC    sanctions include: civil penalties of up to $100,000 or triple the monetary    gain against each respondent for each such violation; trading prohibitions;    restitution to customers; and cease and desist orders.

# # #

----
CLYDE BAILEY, P.C.
----------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Certified Public Accountant
                                       10924 Vance Jackson #404
                                       San Antonio, Texas 78230
                             (210) 699-1287(ofc.)(888) 699-1287
                                           (210) 691-2911 (fax)
Member:  American Institute of CPA's and Texas Society of CPA's





November 12, 2001


I consent to the use, of my report dated January 25, 2001, in
the Form 10SB, on the financial statements of Synreal Services
Corp., dated December 31, 2000, included herein and to the
reference made to me.



/s/ Clyde Bailey
# EUR-Lex - 22005A1220(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22005A1220(01)

**Protocol amending the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a tariff quota for the imports of sugar and sugar products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 333 , 20/12/2005 P. 0045 - 0048 *

Protocol

amending the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a tariff quota for the imports of sugar and sugar products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia into the Community

THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY,

hereinafter referred to as "the Community",

of the one part, and

THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA,

of the other part,

Whereas:

(1) The Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, (hereinafter referred to as the "SAA") was signed in Luxembourg on 9 April 2001 and entered into force on 1 April 2004.

(2) Negotiations have taken place to alter the preferential arrangements in the SAA with regard to imports of sugar and sugar products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia into the Community.

(3) Appropriate amendments to the SAA should be adopted,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The SAA is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 27 shall be amended as follows:

(a) the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following:

"1. The Community shall abolish the custom duties and charges having equivalent effect on imports of agricultural products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, other than those of heading Nos 0102, 0201, 0202, 1701, 1702 and 2204 of the Combined Nomenclature.";

(b) the following subparagraph shall be added to paragraph 2:

"The Community shall apply duty-free access on import into the Community for products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia of headings 1701 and 1702 of the Combined Nomenclature, within the limit of an annual tariff quota of 7000 tonnes (net weight)."

2. In the table in Annex I to Protocol 3, the references to products falling under heading 1702 of the Combined Nomenclature shall be deleted.

Article 2

This Protocol shall form an integral part of the SAA.

Article 3

This Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date of signature.

Article 4

This Protocol shall be drawn up in duplicate in each of the official languages of the contracting parties, each of these texts being equally authentic.

Done at Brussels, 21 November 2005.

For the European Community

For the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 21.1

Statia Terminals International N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals Corporation N.V., a Netherlands company

Statia Terminals Canada, Incorporated, incorporated under the laws of Nova
Scotia

Point Tupper Marine Services Limited, incorporated under the laws of Nova Scotia

Statia Terminals Antilles N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Saba Trustcompany N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Bicen Development Corporation N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Laboratory Services N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Tugs N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals Delaware, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals New Jersey, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Seven Seas Steamship Company, Inc., a Florida corporation

Seven Seas Steamship Company (Sint Eustatius) N.V., a Netherlands Antilles
company