alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1

HANOVER
      FOODS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification
      is intended to accompany the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended August 29, 2004 (the Report) of Hanover Foods Corporation
      (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
      and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002. To the best of our knowledge, each of the undersigned officers
      of the Company does hereby certify that:


| | (1) | The Report
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:October
        13, 2004 | /s/
        John A. Warehime    | 
|----------------------------- | ------------------------------- | 
|                              |                                 | 
|                              | John
        A. Warehime        | 
|                              | Chief
        Executive Officer | 
|                              |                                 | 
|Date:October
        13, 2004 | /s/ Gary
        T. Knisely     | 
|                              |                                 | 
|                              | Gary
        T. Knisely         | 
|                              | Chief
        Financial Officer | 

The foregoing
      certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
      Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.


---
Order entered June 4, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01072-CR

CRAWFORD, JAMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 30096-422

ORDER

The State’s motion to extend the time for filing the State’s brief is GRANTED. The 

brief received by the Court on June 3, 2013 shall be considered filed as of that date.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
# L_2007078EN.01003101.xml

| 17.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/31

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco (1)

On 29 May 2006 and 28 February 2007 respectively, the European Community and the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco notified each other that the procedures necessary for entry into force of the agreement had been completed.

The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 28 February 2007, in accordance with Article 17 thereof.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 29.5.2006, p. 4.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

1:00 p.m., Thursday, April 21, 2022.

# PLACE:

Via Conference Call.

# STATUS:

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Regular Board of Directors meeting.

The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

    - Executive Session

## Agenda

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. FY2021 External Audit

III. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session

IV. Executive Session with External Auditors

V. Executive Session Report from CEO

VI. Executive Session: Report from CFO

VII. Executive Session: General Counsel Report

                    VIII. Executive Session: NeighborWorks CompassTM                     Update                

IX. Executive Session: Possible Chief Information Officer Appointment

X. Action Item Approval of Minutes

XI. Action Item Resolution to Approve FY21 External Audit

XII. Action Item New York City Office Lease

XIII. Action Item Health Insurance Special Delegation of Authority

XIV. Discussion Item March 10 Audit Committee Report

XV. Discussion Item FY22 All-Sources Budget

XVI. Discussion Item Interim CIO Report

XVII. Discussion Item Capital Corporations Update and Grant Request for June

XVIII. Discussion Item DC Office Relocation Budget

XIX. Adjournment

# PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

Everything except the Executive Session.

# PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:

Executive Session.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Lakeyia Thompson, Special Assistant, (202) 524-9940;                         *Lthompson@nw.org.*

Lakeyia Thompson,

Special Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2022-07865 Filed 4-8-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, v. Linda RICHKO

No. 16-538 (R46-016).

Supreme Court of the United States

July 19, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit 99.1


                              BGF Industries, Inc.
                     Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA
                             (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                        Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                               1995         1996          1997         1998        1999
                                        ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -----------
<S>                                         <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income                                  $12,584      $24,030       $21,730      $15,317      $3,739
Depreciation and amortization                 8,223        6,085         6,759        7,399       8,206
Interest                                      2,979        1,993         2,355        4,517      15,817
Taxes                                         7,093       15,996        13,652        9,854       2,272
Extraordinary loss                               --           --            --           --       1,668

                                        ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -----------
EBITDA                                      $30,879      $48,104       $44,496      $37,087     $31,702
                                            =======      =======       =======      =======     =======

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4233 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4233

     To require the Federal banking agencies to increase the risk-
   sensitivity of the capital treatment of certain centrally cleared 
          exchange-listed derivatives, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2019

  Mr. Gooden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Federal banking agencies to increase the risk-
   sensitivity of the capital treatment of certain centrally cleared 
          exchange-listed derivatives, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Options Market Stability Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``depository 
institution'' and ``depository institution holding company'' have the 
meanings given those terms in section 3 of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
    (b) Requirement.--Not later than December 31, 2019, the Board of 
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, and the Comptroller of the Currency shall--
            (1) jointly issue a final rule relating to the notice of 
        proposed rule making entitled ``Standardized Approach for 
        Calculating the Exposure Amount of Derivative Contracts'' (83 
        Fed. Reg. 64660; December 17, 2018); or
            (2) implement relief that allows for the adoption of a 
        methodology for calculating the counterparty credit risk 
        exposure, at default, of a depository institution, depository 
        institution holding company, or affiliate thereof to a client 
        arising from a guarantee provided by the depository 
        institution, depository institution holding company, or 
        affiliate thereof to a central counterparty in respect of the 
        client's performance under an exchange-listed derivative 
        contract cleared through that central counterparty pursuant to 
        the risk-based and leverage-based capital rules applicable to 
        depository institutions and depository institution holding 
        companies under parts 3, 217, and 324 of title 12, Code of 
        Federal Regulations, that reflects the economic value of delta 
        weighting and netting.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009113EN.01004501.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/45

---

Action brought on 26 January 2009 — Soerensen Ferraresi v Commission

(Case F-5/09)

2009/C 113/93

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ayo Soerensen Ferraresi (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Di Vuolo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

An application for compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant as a result of mobbing experienced by the applicant and the decision of the Invalidity Committee to retire the applicant of its own motion on the ground of invalidity.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Order the defendant to pay compensation for the physical harm and the non-material and financial loss suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay compensation for the physical harm and the non-material and financial loss suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11

                           ACTV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        NINE MONTH PERIOD         THREE MONTH PERIOD
                                                       ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,        ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                      1998          1999          1998          1999
                                                      ----          ----          ----          ----
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
     Weighted average shares outstanding ......   19,309,832     35,154,248     23,422,018     41,430,091

     Common stock equivalents .................         --             --             --             --
                                                  ----------   ------------   ------------   ------------
              Total ...........................   19,309,832     35,154,248     23,422,018     41,430,091
                                                  ==========   ============   ============   ============

     Net loss applicable to common shareholders  $(9,869,022)  $(16,407,091)  $ (3,833,484)  $ (3,424,802)
                                                 ============  ============   ============   ============

     Basic and diluted loss per share..........      $(.51)     $(.47)           $(.16)        $(.08)
                                                 ============ ============   ============   ============
</TABLE>
II-00409

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Persico <John Persico@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:41 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Persico

388 Voorhees Ave

Buffalo, NY 14216
Michele DiCOSOLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8430.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries



|                                    |  |               
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Name of Entity                      |  | Jurisdiction  
|BTLookSmart Pty Ltd.                |  | Australia     
|LookSmart (Barbados), Inc.          |  | Barbados      
|LookSmart Holdings (Delaware), Ltd. |  | Delaware      
|LookSmart International Pty Ltd.    |  | Australia     
|LookSmart Netherlands B.V.          |  | Netherlands   
|LookSmart United Kingdom Ltd.       |  | United Kingdom
|WiseNut, Inc.                       |  | Delaware
David NOSAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-1344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Maria Jewel ELINZANO-GONZALES, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-1433.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2011252EN.01000903.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/9

---

Order of the Court of 31 March 2011 — EMC Development AB v European Commission

(Case C-367/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European cement market - Action for annulment of a decision rejecting a complaint against the adoption of a harmonised standard for cement - Procedure for the adoption of the standard - Binding nature of the standard - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)

2011/C 252/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: EMC Development AB (represented by: W.-N. Schelp, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Bourke, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2010 in Case T-432/05 EMC Development v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action seeking the annulment of the Commission's decision of 28 November 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint based on Article 2(2) of Regulation No 17 and concerning alleged concerted practices on the part of European Portland cement producers consisting of the adoption of a European standard for cement (EN 197-1) aimed at excluding from the market products and technologies of competitors

EMC Development

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | EMC Development AB shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EMC Development AB shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4018 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 392
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4018

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2019

                                Received

                           December 18, 2019

                          Read the first time

                           December 19, 2019

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide that the amount of time that an elderly offender must serve 
before being eligible for placement in home detention is to be reduced 
  by the amount of good time credits earned by the prisoner, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOOD CONDUCT TIME CREDITS FOR CERTAIN ELDERLY NONVIOLENT 
              OFFENDERS.

    Section 231(g)(5)(A)(ii) of the Second Chance Act of 2007 (34 
U.S.C. 60541(g)(5)(A)(ii)) is amended by striking ``to which the 
offender was sentenced'' and inserting ``reduced by any credit toward 
the service of the prisoner's sentence awarded under section 3624(b) of 
title 18, United States Code''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 392

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 4018

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide that the amount of time that an elderly offender must serve 
before being eligible for placement in home detention is to be reduced 
  by the amount of good time credits earned by the prisoner, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 19, 2019

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
# L_2012104EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force, between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation on the participation by those States in the work of the committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers as regards the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis

The abovementioned Arrangement (1) was signed in Brussels on 22 September 2011. As the procedures necessary for the entry into force of this Arrangement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein have been completed on 13 March 2012, this Arrangement will enter into force as far as the Principality of Liechtenstein is concerned, in accordance with Article 7 of the Arrangement, on 1 May 2012.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 103, 13.4.2012, p. 4

1

---
Joseph Michael EVENSON, aka Joseph Anderson Evenson, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6391.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Gerquan Bernard BOLTON, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-7233.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Jerad Allen PICKERING, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 17-86.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.