alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0248

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DILLON PATRICK PIERCE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 17, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 12 2024

03/12/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0248
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,925

EX PARTE JEFFREY EUGENE ROBINSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2006-1221-C2 IN THE 54th DISTRICT COURT

FROM McLENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while

intoxicated and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his plea was rendered involuntary due to the ineffective

assistance of his counsel. Specifically, Applicant contends that counsel improperly advised him to

plead guilty in exchange for an eight year sentence when one of his prior driving while intoxicated

offenses listed for purposes of elevating the punishment range was not a final conviction as defined
 The Applicant’s plea agreement reads as follows: 1

8 YEARS IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, AND A FILE OF $0.00, THE STATE

NEITHER OPPOSES NOR RECOMMENDS THAT THE COURT

GRANT PROBATION IN THIS MATTER.

under Section 49.09(d) of the Texas Penal Code. 

1

The trial court has determined, based upon the record, that Applicant did plead guilty in

exchange for an eight year sentence when one of his prior driving while intoxicated offenses listed

for purposes of elevating the punishment range was not a final conviction. The record further

reflects that there were no other prior driving while intoxicated offenses available which were not

listed on the indictment. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1985).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 2006-1221-C2 in the 54th Judicial District

Court of McLennan County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of

McLennan County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Parole Division.

Delivered: June 4, 2008

Do Not Publish
***Exhibit
32.1***
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Donald
Katz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on Form
10-K/A of Audible Inc. Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Audible
Inc.
 
 April 29,
      2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/
      Donald KatzDonald
      KatzChief
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JULY 4, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                        SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (UNAUDITED)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-04-1999
 <CASH>                                           2,428
<SECURITIES>                                      3,091
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (524)
<INVENTORY>                                       1,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8,569
<PP&E>                                            6,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,945)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,340
<BONDS>                                           1,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             20
<OTHER-SE>                                        6,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10,026
<SALES>                                           4,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4,232
<CGS>                                             1,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.01)


</TABLE>
[LOGO] MINERA KORIPAMPA



Wealth Minerals Ltd
# 1901 -1177 West Hastings St.
Vancouver, B.C.,
WE 3K2 Canada

Dear Sirs:

                                 AMATA PROPERTY

This letter will serve as good and sufficient confirmation that all license fees
payable to the applicable agency of the Government of Peru relating to the Amata
Property are current and in good standing.

Further,  all Peruvian  environmental  laws and regulations,  including but not:
limited to the  environmental  regulations for Exploration,  approved by Supreme
Decree  039-9-EM  and its  amendments,  the Mine Closure Law, Law #28090 and its
amendments  and  regulations  as well as all provisions in relation to community
relations and surface rights are currently in compliance.

Yours truly

Minera Koripampa Del Peru S.A Per


Carlos Ballon
General Manager


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                MINERA KORIPAMPA
# L_2006156EN.01001402.xml

| 9.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/14

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and Japan pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and Japan pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 (OJ L 347, 30.12.2005) has entered into force on 21 December 2005.

---
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: October 30, 2014 518080 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

YVONNE A. FELDSTEIN,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

__________

Yvonne A. Feldstein, New York City, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Dawn

A. Foshee of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed October 4, 2013, which ruled that claimant was

disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits

because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the

Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily

left her employment as a medical secretary at a physician's

office without good cause. Claimant quit the job after five

days, complaining to the physician that the office manager was

"very bossy, loud [and] intimidating." It is well settled,

however, that an employee's inability to get along with a

supervisor does not constitute good cause for leaving his or her

employment (see Matter of Markaj [Commissioner of Labor], 119

AD3d 1267, 1267 [2014]; Matter of Bielak [Commissioner of Labor],

105 AD3d 1226, 1226 [2013]). Moreover, the physician stated that

the office manager was "firm" but had never behaved in a rude or
-2- 518080 

demeaning way, and claimant's vague testimony to the contrary

created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter

of Crandall-Mars [Commissioner of Labor], 47 AD3d 1179, 1180

[2008]; Matter of Micara [Commissioner of Labor], 307 AD2d 568,

569 [2003]). 

Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
# L_2007209EN.01004501.xml

| 9.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 25/2007

of 27 April 2007

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 155/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 155/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2006/90/EC of 3 November 2006 adapting for the seventh time to technical progress Council Directive 96/49/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2006/90/EC of 3 November 2006 adapting for the seventh time to technical progress Council Directive 96/49/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 42b (Council Directive 96/49/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 L 0090: Commission Directive 2006/90/EC of 3 November 2006 (OJ L 305, 4.11.2006, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 L 0090: Commission Directive 2006/90/EC of 3 November 2006 (OJ L 305, 4.11.2006, p. 6).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2006/90/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 April 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 89, 29.3.2007, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 305, 4.11.2006, p. 6.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PETER J. ROSATO, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4367

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 11, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

Peter J. Rosato, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

p0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148067(16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148067

COA: 314109

Saginaw CC: 11-036750-FC

SENARCHI DEVONTE BUFORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 28, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ended March  31, 2009  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  Date: June
      29, 2009By:
              /s/ Stephen
      RossName:  Stephen
      RossTitle:  Chief
      Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Remedent, Inc. and will be retained by
Remedent, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Angelo Michael MELENDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5125.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Remedent, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robin List, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philippe Van Acker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 
|      /s/ Robin List             |      /s/ Philippe Van Acker       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Robin List                                                                                                           | Philippe Van Acker                                                                       |  
Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

 
July 14, 2005

July 14, 2005

 
 

 

 

 

  |
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Communications of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003
and 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 10, 2006
      -----------------
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00023

- CV

ASTIN REDEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC , Appellant

v.

CITGO PETROLEUM CORP

. , Appellee

From the County Court at Law No

. 1 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 4975

- B

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation on July 31, 2014. The parties jointly

objected to the referral O rder. The objection is sustained and the suspension of the

appeal is lifted. A ny deadline that began to run and had not expired by the date of this

Order sustaining the objection to mediation will begin anew as of the date of th is Order

.
Any document filed by a party after the date of th e mediation referral Order and prior

to the date of this Order will be deemed filed on the same day, but after, the date of this

Order.Astin Redevelopment Group, LLC v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. Page 2 PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Objection sustained, suspension of appeal lifted Order issued and filed September 4, 2014
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM J. CAMPBELLWilliam J. CampbellChief Executive Officer


November 10, 2008



| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

STEVEN M. FERGUSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50554

D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00909-R

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 14, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Steven M. Ferguson appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 121-month sentence and $15,000 fine imposed on resentencing

following his jury-trial convictions for various fraud, tax, obstruction, and financial

offenses under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1341, 1503, 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), 1957, and 2314; and

FILED

OCT 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
26 U.S.C. § 7201. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in

part and vacate in part. 

Ferguson contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure Rule 32(i)(3)(B) by failing to resolve alleged factual disputes at

sentencing. This claim fails. Because the arguments that Ferguson raised at

sentencing did not contradict any factual assertions in the presentence report, they

did not invoke the district court’s fact-finding responsibility under Rule 32. See

United States v. Petri, 731 F.3d 833, 840-41 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 681

(2013). Moreover, any error was harmless because the record reflects that the

disputed facts had no effect on the sentence imposed. See United States v.

Saeteurn, 504 F.3d 1175, 1179 (9th Cir. 2007) (Rule 32(i)(3)(B) claims “are

confined to factual disputes which affected the temporal prison term of the

sentence the district court imposed.”).

Ferguson next contends that the court erred by orally imposing a $15,000

fine despite its finding that Ferguson was unable to pay a fine. The government

concedes that no fine should be imposed in this case. See U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(a).

Accordingly, we vacate the fine as orally imposed and hold that the corrected

written judgment, which waives all fines, shall control. 

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part.

2 13-50554
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Quepasa Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Abbott                                                  
|John Abbott
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 4, 2010