alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22614-22615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11683]


Secretary of State's Determination Under the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to the Philippines To 
Support Counterterrorism Operations

ACTION: Determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State Department is publishing a determination signed 
November 9, 2020 by the Secretary of State regarding the provision of 
military assistance to the Philippines to support counterterrorism 
operations.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Below is the ``Determination Under Section 
506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to Provide Military 
Assistance to the Philippines to Support Counterterrorism Operations.''

[[Page 22615]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AP22.039


Stanley L. Brown,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-08110 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John A. Miley, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
D. Troy SHIPP, petitioner, v. ESTATE OF Christian KING, et al.

No. 16-1069.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Abel FLORES GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 17-8444.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three
month period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,007,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,812,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   534,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,090,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,370,000
<PP&E>                                       4,481,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,788,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,318,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,966,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,979,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,318,000
<SALES>                                      8,986,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,986,000
<CGS>                                        2,809,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,809,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,106,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,082,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,082,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,082,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Preston Louis STEVENSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Daniel MALAK, petitioner, v. Thomas GRIFFIN, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

No. 17-5103.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit
10.1


 


AMENDMENT
#3


 


TO
THE $550,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED JANUARY 16, 2018


 


The
parties agree that the $550,000 Fixed Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) by and between Indoor Harvest Corp.
(the “Borrower”) and Tangiers Global, LLC (the “Lender”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


	1.	Payment.
    The Lender shall make a payment to the Borrower of $101,750 of Consideration ($92,500 in cash and $9,250 in an OID) under
    the Note on or before June 13, 2018. 
	 	 
	2.	Use
    of Proceeds. The Company covenants that it will within, 1.5 month(s) of the Effective Date of this Consideration,
    it shall use approximately $92,500 of the proceeds in the manner set forth below (the “Use of Proceeds”):
	 	 
	 	$54,000
    G&A, $20,000 accounting and legal, $7,000 annual shareholder meeting and $10,000 misc.
	 	 
	3.	Independent
    Transactions. The Borrower understands and agrees that the Note sets forth the terms for a series of independent transactions
    in which the Lender may elect to make a payment of Consideration to the Borrower with each payment of Consideration creating
    a separate obligation of the Borrower to the Lender with the terms set forth in the Note. Accordingly, the Maturity Date of
    each payment of Consideration, and the repayment terms for each payment of Consideration, are as set forth in the Note.
	 	 
	4.	The
    Borrower confirms that it has not undertaken any capital raise, whether through debt or equity, with any other party since
    the Effective Date of the Note.


 


ALL
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


Please
indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated June 13, 2018 by signing below:





 


	/s/
    Annette Knebel	 	/s/
    Justin Ederle
	Indoor
    Harvest Corp.	 	Tangiers
    Global, LLC
	 	 	 
	By:	Annette
    Knebel	 	By:	Justin
    Ederle
	Its:	Chief
    Financial Officer	 	Its:	Managing
    Member
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Quepasa Corporation on Form S-8, Nos. 333-167795 and 333-146486 of our report dated February 7, 2011 on the consolidated financial statements of Quepasa Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the two years in the period ending December 31, 2010, appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of Quepasa Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.














/s/ Salberg & Company, P.A.





SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.


Boca Raton, Florida


February 7, 2011
Gordon Leroy HALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9483.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011252EN.01005002.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/50

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 February 2011 — Barbin v Parliament

(Case F-68/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - 2006 promotion exercise - Enforcement of a judgment of the Tribunal - Comparative examination of the merits - Principle of equal treatment - Half-time parental leave)

2011/C 252/107

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Florence Barbin (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, C. Burgos, J.F. de Wachter, R. Ignătescu and K. Zejdová, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the European Parliament’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 12 for the 2006 promotion exercise

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Barbin to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Barbin to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220 of 12.09.09, p. 43.

1

---
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/Pat McCarty, ICAP
  
    



  Re: Core Principle 9
      
  When
              05/07/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              XII. DCM Core Principles

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Wallace

  Visitor(s)
              Pat McCarty, ICAP

  Organization(s)
              ICAP


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
SECOND AMENDMENT TO $80,000 PROMISSORY NOTE
                      ORIGINALLY DUE AUGUST 29, 1996


$42,834.61                              DUE DATE: AUGUST 29, 1996
                              REVISED DUE DATE:  DECEMBER 15, 1996


     On or before the 15th day of December, 1996, for value received, the
undersigned promises to pay to the order of Standard Management Corporation
the sum of Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Four Dollars and Sixty-
One Cents ($42,834.61), at 9100 Keystone Crossing, Indianapolis, Indiana
46240, or at such other place as the holder hereof may direct in writing,
with interest thereon at the rate of Prime plus One Percent (1%) per annum
as established from time to time by Bank One Indianapolis, N.A., 111
Monument Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204, from the date of this
instrument until maturity, and Prime plus One Percent (1%) per annum after
maturity until paid, with attorneys' fees and costs of collection, and
without relief from valuation and appraisement laws.

     This note shall be payable in two installments at the rate of Twenty
Thousand Dollars ($20,000) each on October 15, 1996 and December 15, 1996.
Each installment payment shall be first credited to accrued interest and
the balance to principal.  The entire unpaid principal balance and accrued
interest shall be payable on December 15, 1996.

     The maker(s) and indorser(s) jointly and severally waive demand,
presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of nonpayment or
dishonor of this note, and each of them consents to extensions of the time
of payment of this note.

     No delay or omission on the part of the holder hereof in the exercise
of any right or remedy shall operate as a waiver thereof, and no single or
partial exercise by the holder hereof of any right or remedy shall preclude
other or further exercise thereof or of any other right or remedy.

     Signed and delivered at Indianapolis, Indiana this 8th day of October,
1996.

Signature:  /S/ RAMESH H. BHAT

Printed:  Ramesh H. Bhat

Address:  2710 Lake Avenue
          Ft. Wayne, Indiana  46805
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Hendrik Van Alphen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed Amendment No. 1 to this annual report on Form 20-F of Wealth Minerals Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 14, 2008



/s/ Hendrik Van Alphen

Hendrik Van Alphen
President and Chief Executive Officer
In Re Harold B. MASON, Petitioner.

No. 17-8811.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Randell Ray Bowers

, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CR2477 3

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 25 7

- CR * September 19 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
LookSmart, Ltd. - Form 10-K/A-1 - September
16, 2013



Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification of Principal
Financial Officer



I, Lori House, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment
No. 1 to Annual Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Amendment
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



| | Date: | September 16, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Lori House               
| | ----- | ------------------ | ------ | -----------------------------
| |       |                    | Name:  | Lori House                   
| |       |                    | Title: | Principal Accounting Officer 
| |       |                    |        | (Principal Financial Officer)



This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of LookSmart, Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

Administration for Children and Families, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Administration for Children and Families published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 22, 2022 concerning a request for information on technical assistance needs and priorities on implementation and coordination of early childhood development programs in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Moushumi Beltangady at                         *Moushumi.beltangady@acf.hhs.gov*                         or 202-260-3613.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 22, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-05962 (Vol. 87, No. 55) on page 16195, in the first column, final line, correct the                     **Dates**                     caption to read:                

# DATES:

Send comments on or before May 20, 2022.

Kathleen D. Hamm,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Early Childhood Development, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

[FR Doc. 2022-07840 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Jesus O. BENITEZ, Jr., petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 17-5628.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied.