alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-01221

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ford, Mildred Y. <mford@CFTC.gov>

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 1:52 PM

OTCDefinitions <OTCDefinitions@CFTC.gov>

FW: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

..... Original Message .....

From: Pat Pickren [mailto:patpickren@hotmail.com]

Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:22 AM

To: dfadefinitions

Subject: Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Pat Pickren

2412 Avenue A Ter NW

Winter Haven, FL 33880
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal                               ( print page 23573)                            Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.                    

# DATES:

Date of notice: April 20, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on April 12, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 5 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-52 and CP2022-56.                

Joshua J. Hofer,

Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022-08431 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, LP
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000853086
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         822
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,070
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12
<PP&E>                                         62,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 44,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,241
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   44,753
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,072
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (123)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                999
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### C. H. Brooks, Jean Brooks, his wife, F. S. Scott, S. C. Randall and J. C. Stauffer, *Appellants,*v. Edgar A. Roberts, John T. Bize, H. S. Hampton, D. H. Laney, C. E. Ransom, Jr., and his wife, Agnes Ransom, H. R. Speckman and his wife, Alice Speckman, *Appellees.*

Division A.

Opinion filed March 19, 1929.

*Thomas A. Cunniff,*for Appellants;

*Paul Game,*for Appellees.

Ellis, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, which was made subsequently to the enactment óf Chapter 11890 Laws of Florida 1927, was deferred until the final hearing and the appellees appeared by counsel and filed a brief.

. The decree appealed from is erroneous in so far as it allows a solicitor’s fee -of $3,100.13. There was no evidence to show that the complainants had agreed to pay their solicitor such sum for his services in the cause. See H. J. Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, decided at the present term. -In other respects the decree should be affirmed.

It is ordered that the Chancellor may take the testimony of the complainants as to the amount of solicitor’s fees agreed by them to be paid by them to their solicitor for his services and amend the decree rendered by substituting such amount so proven for the sum allowed in the decree from which the appeal was taken.

*375Terrell, C. J., and Brown, J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Strum, J., absent on account of illness.
Exhibit
32

Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
GenTek Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
William E. Redmond, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas
B. Testa, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|    |                         | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|/s/ | William E. Redmond, Jr. | 
|    |                         | 
|    | William E. Redmond, Jr. | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | March 20, 2007          | 
|    |                         | 
|/s/ | Thomas B. Testa         | 
|    |                         | 
|    | Thomas B. Testa         | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer | 
|    | March 20, 2007          | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      12,902,355
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,131,064
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,048,243
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     122,699,029
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       118,769,000
<LOANS>                                    273,728,883
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,039,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             445,403,822
<DEPOSITS>                                 365,614,105
<SHORT-TERM>                                25,806,796
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          7,298,491
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,649,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             445,403,822
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,592,076
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,093,945
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               421,728
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,107,749
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,178,131
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,626,174
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,481,575
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,103,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,697,403
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,697,403
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,084,972
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.62
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,667,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,232,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,016,627
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,000,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   22,073
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,039
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,038,966
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           407,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,631,966


</TABLE>
CORDIS CORPORATION, petitioner, v. Jerry DUNSON, et al.

No. 17-257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with BlackRock
  
    



  Participants discussed the impact of Dodd-Frank on BlackRock.
      
  When
              08/05/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              All

  CFTC Staff
              Bart Chilton, Elizabeth Ritter

  Visitor(s)
              Joanne Medero (BlackRock)Barbara Novick (BlackRock)

  Organization(s)
              BlackRock


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4200 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4200

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 321 South 1st Street in Montrose, Colorado, as the ``Sergeant David 
                      Kinterknecht Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT DAVID KINTERKNECHT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 321 South 1st Street in Montrose, Colorado, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant David Kinterknecht Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
David Kinterknecht Post Office''.
    (c) Repeal of Previous Designation.--Section 1 of Public Law 115-
366 is hereby repealed, and the designation made and references deemed 
in subsections (a) and (b), respectively, of such section shall have no 
force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Wilbert Joseph LEWIS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5853.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.
Mark James ASAY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9033 (17A191).

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the *42Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TERRANCE ADAMS, Plaintiff,
v. CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### ) Civil ActionNo. 11-0726 (RJL)



## -------------------------------- ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
June

# <.y~ On May 11,2011, Chimes District ofColumbia, Inc., by counsel, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. On May 23, 2011, the Court issued an Order which, among other things, advised plaintiffofhis obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff that, ifhe failed to file his opposition by June 13,2011, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. The Clerk ofCourt mailed a copy ofthe Orderto plaintiffat his address ofrecord. To date, plaintiffneither has notified the Clerk ofa change ofaddress, has filed an opposition, nor requested additional time to file an opposition. Accordingly, the Court will grant defendant's motion and dismiss this action. An Order is issued separately.

United States District Judge
Timothy BELL, petitioner, v. Gregory SCOTT.

No. 17-5409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Jerald HAMMANN, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 17-489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
TEXAS, petitioner, v. Jerry HARTFIELD.

No. 17-394.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District denied.
# L_2012040EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 40/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and Ukraine

The Agreement renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and Ukraine, signed on 4 July 2002
   (1) and renewed on 7 October 2003
   (2) and 9 March 2011
   (3), has, in accordance with Article 12 thereof, entered into force on 21 December 2011.

1

2

3

---

(1)  
  OJ L 36, 12.2.2003, p. 32.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 267, 17.10.2003, p. 25.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 79, 25.3.2011, p. 3.

3

---
APPLE INC., petitioner, v. Robert PEPPER, et al.

No. 17-204.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Motion of ACT The App Association for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
Release:#3971-96

For Release:November 27, 1996

**CFTC SEEKS SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND PRODUCTION OF    RECORDS RELATED TO LONDON FINANCIAL, INC. OF JUPITER, FLORIDA, AND TWO    INDIVIDUALS**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    today that it has filed two proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the    District of Columbia to compel **Curtis McNair Arnold**, **Katherine    Arnold**, and **London Financial, Inc.** -- all of Jupiter, Florida,    to comply with subpoenas *ducestecum* and subpoenas *adtestificandum* served upon them. None of the    respondents is currently registered with the Commission.

The application in the first proceeding seeks to enforce subpoenas    issued to Curtis Arnold and to London Financial, Inc., a Florida    corporation of which Curtis Arnold is the sole principal. The subpoenas    require the production of certain financial records and other documents    relating any commodity trading and advisory service activities by Curtis    Arnold and London Financial, Inc. The subpoenas also required Curtis Arnold    to appear before the Commission's staff to give investigative    testimony.

The application in the second proceeding seeks to enforce subpoenas    issued to Katherine Arnold, Curtis Arnold's mother, to provide testimony    and certain financial records related to any commodity pool operator    activities by her.

Both proceedings have been assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge    Patrick Attridge of the United States District Court. Judge Attridge set    the hearing on the applications for December 17, 1996.

----
Humberto DELGADO, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-6067.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.