alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     55,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,385
<PP&E>                                         129,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,217
<BONDS>                                         14,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,038
<COMMON>                                        21,057
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,584
<SALES>                                         58,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,538
<CGS>                                           43,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.23
        

</TABLE>
Maria SALDANA-FOUNTAIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-1389.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Decornick MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8973.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
James J. HAYES, petitioner, v. LBBW ASSET MANAGEMENT INVESTMENTGESELLSCHAFT MBH, et al.

No. 17-390.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Table of Contents

# 1

# 2

# 3

# 4

# 5

# 6

# 7a

# 7b

# 7c

# 7d

# 7e

# 8a

# 8b

# 8c

# 8d

# 8e

# 9a

# 9b

# 9c

# 9d

# 9e

# 10a

# 10b

# 10c

# 10d

# 10e

# 11a

# 11b

# 11c

# 11d

# 11e

# 12a

# 12b

# 12c

# 12d

# 12e

# 13a

# 13b

# 13c

# 13d

# 13e

# 14a

# 14b

# 14c

# 14d

# 14e

# 15a

# 15b

# 15c

# 15d

# 15e

# 16

# 17

# 18

# Sheet1
# C_2010080EN.01002201.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/22

---

Action brought on 29 January 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-49/10)

2010/C 80/37

Language of the case: Slovene

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and B. Rous Svete)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that, by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2008/1/EC (1) or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions, that existing installations operate in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10 and 13, Article 14(a) and (b) and Article 15(2) not later than 30 October 2007, without prejudice to specific Community legislation, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (‘the IPPC Directive’); |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that, by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2008/1/EC (1) or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions, that existing installations operate in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10 and 13, Article 14(a) and (b) and Article 15(2) not later than 30 October 2007, without prejudice to specific Community legislation, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (‘the IPPC Directive’);

1

| — | an order that the Republic of Slovenia should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Republic of Slovenia should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

On the basis of the answer given by the Republic of Slovenia to the reasoned opinion, the European Commission finds that a great many installations in Slovenia still operate without valid permits, which amounts to infringement of Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC.

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 24, p. 8.

1

---
Amber GASCHO, et al., petitioners, v. GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.

No. 17-1342.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |    
|Date: February 22, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.  
|                        |  |     |  | Paul B. Toms, Jr.      
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Hector Manuel AVILA-LUNA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8966.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Jesus JIMENEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5971.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.25


 


EHAVE, INC.


2020 Winston Park Drive, Suite
201


Oakville, Ontario, Canada L6H
6X7


 


October 11, 2017


 


[name]


[address]


[address]


 


Re: Ehave, Inc. private placement


 


Gentlemen:


 


This letter evidences
the receipt by Ehave, Inc. (the “Company”) of $______ from the undersigned investor. It is your intention, as evidenced
by our communications and memorialized in this letter, that said amount shall automatically convert into the appropriate amount
of securities in the Offering (defined below) upon the receipt of fully executed documents (the “Transaction Documents”),
including without limitation, a completed accredited investor questionnaire and customary investor representations in compliance
with a private offering to be made pursuant to certain exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


 


The terms and conditions
of your investment shall be set forth in the Transaction Documents and shall be substantially similar to the terms and conditions
of the securities sold by the Company in an upcoming proposed offering in which Andrew Garrett, Inc. will serve as placement agent
(the “Offering”), which currently contemplated terms are described in the Term Sheet with Andrew Garrett Inc. attached
hereto, except that you will be entitled to 120% warrant coverage and shall not be entitled to appoint a member(s) to the Company’s
board of directors. If the Offering is not consummated for any reason by December 31, 2017, the Company agrees to memorialize the
amount you paid as a secured promissory note (the “Note”) that matures on January 31, 2018. In addition, following
provisions will apply: (a) you will be entitled to additional warrant coverage of 10% for each month that the initial closing of
the Offering does not close after December 31, 2017; (b) the terms of the warrants will be the same as the to warrants in the Offering;
and (c) at the maturity date of the Note, you have the option to convert the principal amount plus interest into common stock of
the Company at $0.075 per share.


 


Please indicate your
acknowledgment and agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below.


 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


INVESTOR:


 





 



 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Ehave, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By: Prateek Dwivedi
	 	    Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94679; File No. SR-PEARL-2022-03]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX PEARL Options Fee 
Schedule To Adopt a Tiered-Pricing Structure for Certain Connectivity 
Fees

April 11, 2022.
    On February 1, 2022, MIAX PEARL LLC (``MIAX Pearl'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend the MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule to 
adopt a tiered-pricing structure for certain connectivity fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ On 
February 22, 2022, the proposed rule change was published for comment 
in the Federal Register and, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the 
Act,\4\ the Commission: (1) Temporarily suspended the proposed rule 
change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the 
Act \5\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule 
change.\6\ On March 30, 2022, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule 
change (SR-PEARL-2022-03).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94258 (February 15, 
2022), 87 FR 9659.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08073 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (974)
<INVENTORY>                                     23,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,802
<PP&E>                                          73,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,088)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,609
<BONDS>                                        166,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,842
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,486)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,024
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,605
<CGS>                                          108,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,310)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Melvin VALENTINE, Jr., petitioner, v. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, et al.

No. 16-8264.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NUMBER 13-19-00376-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

RIGOBERTO OLIVAREZ SILVA JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Rigoberto Olivarez Silva Jr., attempts to appeal a conviction for evading 

arrest. The trial court has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On September 18, 2019, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On October 17, 2019, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s 

response does not establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is 

incorrect, or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

JAIME TIJERINA,

Justice

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

31st day of October, 2019.
# L_2005239EN.01003201.xml

| 15.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 56/2005

of 29 April 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1481/2004 of 19 August 2004 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1481/2004 of 19 August 2004 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 54b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 R 1481: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1481/2004 of 19 August 2004 (OJ L 272, 20.8.2004, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 R 1481: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1481/2004 of 19 August 2004 (OJ L 272, 20.8.2004, p. 11).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 1481/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 28.7.2005, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 272, 20.8.2004, p. 11.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 21870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-81-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 75--Phoenix, Arizona, Authorization of 
Production Activity Chang Chun (Arizona) LLC (Specialty Chemicals for 
Microchip Production), Casa Grande, Arizona

    On December 9, 2021, Chang Chun (Arizona) LLC submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ 75, in Casa Grande, Arizona.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 72576, December 22, 2021). On 
April 8, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: April 8, 2022.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07905 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02997-MSK-BNB

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEN SALAZAR, in his capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Interior,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 11th day of February, 2010.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge