alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEC and CFTC Joint Open Meeting

Thursday, October 22, 2020

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Chairmen’s Opening Remarks

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton

CFTC Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

3. Joint Final Rule: Customer Margin Rules Relating to Security Futures

Presentation on Rule

Clark Hutchison, Director, CFTC Division of Clearing and Risk

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

CFTC Vote

SEC Vote

4. Request for Comment: Portfolio Margining of Uncleared Swaps and NonCleared Security-Based Swaps

Presentation on Request for Comment

Brett Redfearn, Director, SEC Division of Trading and Markets 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

SEC Vote

CFTC Vote

5. Adjournment
Kevin JOHNSON, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 16-9466.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
James OWENS, petitioner, v. Stephen DUNCAN, Warden, et al.

No. 17-5325.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Sheldon D. SIMMONS, petitioner, v. Ryan E. GARRETT, et al.

No. 17-8187.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1

Filed 6/30/21 In re J.S. CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or 

ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re J.S., a Person Coming Under 

the Juvenile Court Law.

CONTRA COSTA CHILDREN AND 

FAMILY SERVICES BUREAU,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

D.G. AND R.R.,

Defendants and Appellants.

 A160549

 (Contra Costa County

 Super. Ct. No. J1800636)

On July 6, 2020, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of 

defendants D.G. (mother) and R.R. (father) with respect to their shared son, 

J.S., and ordered adoption as J.S.’s permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 

§ 366.26.) After filing notices of appeal, counsel for both mother and father

filed no-issue statements pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 and 

In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835. By separate communications, we 

notified mother and father that their respective counsel had filed briefs 

indicating there were no arguable issues on appeal, and we invited them to 

file supplemental letters setting forth any issues they believed should be 

reviewed by this court. Father filed a letter asking to be given “another 
2

chance,” but identifying no error by the juvenile court. Mother did not file a 

supplemental letter. 

An appealed-from judgment or order is presumed correct. 

(Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 544, fn. 8.) It is therefore 

an appellant’s burden to raise claims of reversible error or other defect and to 

present argument and authority on each point made. If an appellant fails to 

do so, the appeal may be dismissed. (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at 

p. 994.)

While we appreciate father’s statement that he loves his son and that it 

would be a “dream come true” to be with J.S. again, we must conclude that 

neither parent has made a showing that there is an arguable issue that 

would merit further briefing with respect to the juvenile court order on 

appeal. Under such circumstances, dismissal is appropriate. (In re Phoenix 

H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at pp. 844, 846.)

DISPOSITION

Because no claim of error or other defect has been raised in this matter,

the appeals are dismissed as abandoned. (In re Phoenix H., supra, 47 Cal.4th 

at pp. 844–846; In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994.)

BROWN, J.

WE CONCUR:

POLLAK, P. J.

STREETER, J.

In re J.S. (A160549)
# L_2005239EN.01005501.xml

| 15.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/55

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 67/2005

of 29 April 2005

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2004/110/EC of 9 December 2004 adapting for the sixth time to technical progress Council Directive 96/49/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2004/110/EC of 9 December 2004 adapting for the sixth time to technical progress Council Directive 96/49/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 42b (Council Directive 96/49/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 L 0110: Commission Directive 2004/110/EC of 9 December 2004 (OJ L 365, 10.12.2004, p. 24).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 L 0110: Commission Directive 2004/110/EC of 9 December 2004 (OJ L 365, 10.12.2004, p. 24).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2004/110/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 28.7.2005, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 365, 10.12.2004, p. 24.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                             Interpore International
                      Computations of Net Income Per Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Three months ended March 31,
                                                                              ----------------------------
                                                                               1997                 1996
                                                                              ------               ------
<S>                                                                           <C>                  <C>           
Net income                                                                    $  259               $  175
                                                                              ======               ======
Calculation of shares used in computing net income per share:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                                6,955                6,963
     Weighted average convertible preferred stock                                 77                  240
     Common share equivalents outstanding                                        284                  306
                                                                              ------               ------
Shares used in computing net income per share                                  7,316                7,509
                                                                              ======               ======

Net income per share                                                          $  .04               $  .02
                                                                              ======               ======
</TABLE>


                                       15
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                             CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

         CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the
"Trust"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation
of Maryland that:

         FIRST:  The Trust hereby amends its Declaration of Trust as currently
                 in effect by:

               (a)  deleting the final sentence of the first paragraph of
                    Article 5, Section 1 therefrom in its entirety;

               (b)  deleting Article 5, Section 3 therefrom in its entirety and
                    inserting in lieu thereof the following:

                    "The resignation, removal or death of any or all of the
                    Trustees shall not terminate the Trust or affect its
                    continuity. During a vacancy, the remaining Trustee or
                    Trustees may exercise the powers of the Board hereunder. Any
                    vacancy on the Board for any cause, including by an increase
                    in the number of Trustees or the resignation or removal of
                    any Trustee, shall be filled by a majority of the remaining
                    Trustees, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining
                    Trustee. Any Trustee elected to fill a vacancy as provided
                    herein shall hold office until the next annual meeting of
                    shareholders. A Trustee elected at an annual meeting of
                    shareholders to fill a vacancy shall have the same remaining
                    term as that of his or her predecessor."; and

               (c)  deleting Article 5, Section 11 therefrom in its entirety.

         SECOND: The amendment to the Declaration of Trust of the Trust as set
forth above has been duly advised by the Board of Trustees and approved by the
shareholders of the Trust as required by law.

         THIRD: The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Trust
acknowledges these Articles of Amendment to be the trust act of the Trust and as
to all matters and facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer acknowledges that to the best of his knowledge,
information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all material
respects and that this statement is made under the penalties for perjury.

                                    * * * * *




<PAGE>

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trust has caused these Articles to be
signed in its name and on its behalf by its Chief Executive Officer and attested
to by its Secretary on this 31st day of January, 2002.

ATTEST:                                  CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST

/s/ Susan McClintock                     By: /s/ Timothy B. Keith
--------------------                        --------------------
Susan McClintock                             Timothy B. Keith
Assistant Secretary                          Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         July 26, 2001.                              ( print page 34701)    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Hyatt Regency Hotel, 100 Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert H. Stretch, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6912.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 22, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-16333  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 199

In the Interest of E.E.J.

- C., a child

L.J.J., Petitioner and Appellant

v. D.D.C., mother, Respondent and Appellee and E.E.J.

- C., child; and B.D.Q., father, Respondents

No. 20230091

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel E

. Gast , Jud icial Referee

. AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Erica L. Chisholm, Wahpeton, ND , for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

K yle R. Craig, Minot, ND , for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.1 Interest of E.E.J.

- C. No. 20230091

Per Curiam

. [¶1] L.J.J. appeals from a juvenile court order denying her petition for guardianship of E.E.J.C., a child. L.J.J. argues the court erred in finding the child was not in need of protection. After reviewing the record, the court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2 )

. [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Jeffrey Richard MARTINSON, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-7407.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Yaski ROMERO, petitioner, v. Neil McDOWELL, Warden.

No. 17-5726.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2011058EN.01007301.xml

| 3.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/73

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 116/2010

of 10 November 2010

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 81/2010 of 2 July 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 81/2010 of 2 July 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2009/141/EC of 23 November 2009 amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum levels for arsenic, theobromine, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. and Abrus precatorius L. (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2009/141/EC of 23 November 2009 amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum levels for arsenic, theobromine, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. and Abrus precatorius L. (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 33 (Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter II of Annex I to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 L 0141: Commission Directive 2009/141/EC of 23 November 2009 (OJ L 308, 24.11.2009, p. 20).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 L 0141: Commission Directive 2009/141/EC of 23 November 2009 (OJ L 308, 24.11.2009, p. 20).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/141/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 November 2010, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 277, 21.10.2010, p. 34.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 308, 24.11.2009, p. 20.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Dean D. Durbin, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DAVID J.
PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)/s/    DEAN D.
DURBINDean D. DurbinChief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (principal financial officer)


Date: February 19, 2009

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Edmund ZAGORSKI, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 16-7576.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Erick GELHAUS, petitioner, v. ESTATE OF Andy LOPEZ, By and through Successors in Interest, Rodrigo LOPEZ and Sujay Cruz, et al.

No. 17-1354.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Motion of Peace Officers' Research Association of California, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of California State Sheriffs' Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Force Litigation Consulting LLC, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2474

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Nebraska.

*

Eduardo Hinojosa, also known as Lalo, * [UNPUBLISHED]

* 

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 14, 2001

 Filed: January 17, 2002 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

 

Eduardo Hinojosa was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to

distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and four

counts of delivery of methamphetamine in furtherance of the conspiracy, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court1

 sentenced Hinojosa to 292 months

imprisonment. Hinojosa appeals his conviction, arguing that he is entitled to a new
-2-

trial because the district court abused its discretion in allowing the cross-examination

of a defense witness and admission of impeaching rebuttal evidence. Hinojosa also

argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence for obstruction of justice.

For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

After a careful review of the record, we find that any error in the admission of

evidence was harmless. See United States v. Capozzi, 883 F.2d 608, 616 (8th Cir.

1989) ("Reversal is warranted only where an abuse of discretion leads to prejudice."

(quoting United States v. Lynch, 800 F.2d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 1986))). Hinojosa's jury

trial lasted one week and included testimony from fourteen government witnesses

from several law enforcement agencies including the FBI, ATF, DEA, and local law

enforcement. We are unpersuaded that the admission of the challenged evidence was

prejudicial.

Further, we find that the district court did not clearly err in enhancing

Hinojosa's sentence for obstruction of justice. See United States v. Anderson, 68 F.3d

1050, 1055 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review). The district court credited the

testimony of one of the threatened witnesses, and such credibility determinations are

rarely disturbed on appeal. See United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d 1468, 1472 (8th

Cir. 1993). We are unpersuaded that the district court's determination should be

disturbed in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.