alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4162 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the period 

under which an election must be made for entitlement 

to educational assistance under the All-Volunteer Educational Assistance Program of Department of Veterans 

Affairs, to phase out the use of such program, and 

for other purposes. 
2 

•HR 4162 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Bill Planning Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERIOD FOR ELECTION TO RECEIVE BENEFITS 

7 UNDER ALL-VOLUNTEER EDUCATIONAL AS8 SISTANCE PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF 

9 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3011 of title 38, United 

11 States Code, is amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘Any such 

13 election shall be made at the time the individual ini14 tially enters on active duty as a member of the 

15 Armed Forces’’ and inserting ‘‘Any such election 

16 shall be made during the 90-day period beginning on 

17 the day that is 180 days after the date on which the 

18 individual initially enters initial training’’; and 

19 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘that such 

20 individual is entitled to such pay’’ and inserting 

21 ‘‘that begin after the date that is 270 days after the 

22 date on which the individual initially enters initial 

23 training’’. 
3 

•HR 4162 EH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

3 of enactment of this Act. 

4 SEC. 3. PHASE OUT OF ALL-VOLUNTEER EDUCATIONAL AS5 SISTANCE PROGRAM. 

6 Subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 3011 of title 38, 

7 United States Code, as amended by section 1, is further 

8 amended by striking ‘‘after June 30, 1985’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘during the period beginning July 1, 1985, and ending 

10 September 30, 2029’’. 

11 SEC. 4. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

12 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

13 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

14 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

15 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

16 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

17 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro18 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

19 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 12, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4162 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend 

purposes. phase out the use of such program, and for other gram of Department of Veterans Affairs, to the All-Volunteer Educational Assistance Profor entitlement to educational assistance under the period under which an election must be made
Michael E. MOCKOVAK, petitioner, v. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, et al.

No. 17-201.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 October 2011 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C-601/10)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directives 92/50/EEC and 2004/18/EC – Public service contracts – Additional land registry and town planning services – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Acknowledgement of its failure by the
Member State concerned – No effect (Art. 258 TFEU) (see para. 28)*

2.                     *Approximation of laws – Procedures for the award of public service contracts – Directives 92/50 and 2004/18 – Derogations
from common rules – Restrictive interpretation – Existence of exceptional circumstances – Burden of proof (European Parliament
and Council Directive 2004/18, Art. 31(4)(a); Council Directive 92/50, Art. 11(3)(e)) (see paras 32-33)*

3.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 258 TFEU) (see para. 40)*

4.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification
– Not permissible (Art. 258 TFEU) (see para. 41)*

**Re**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 8 and 11(3) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) and of Articles 20 and 31(4) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) – Award of a contract without prior publication of a contract notice – Contract relating to additional land-registry and town-planning services – Municipalities of Vasilika, Kassandra, Egnatia and Arethousa. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by awarding, by means of a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, public contracts for additional land registry and town planning services which do not appear in the initial contract concluded by the municipalities of Vasilika, Kassandra, Egnatia and Arethousa, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 8 and 11(3) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, as amended by Directive 97/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1997, and Articles 20 and 31(4) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Scott, Chief
Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
                                        September 3, 2009
# L_2011234EN.01000101.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the ‘Youth in Action’ programme and in the action programme in the field of lifelong learning (2007 to 2013)

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the ‘Youth in Action’ programme and in the action programme in the field of lifelong learning (2007 to 2013) (1), signed in Brussels on 15 February 2010, having been completed on 31 January 2011, the Agreement has entered into force on 1 March 2011, in accordance with its Article 5.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 87, 7.4.2010, p. 9.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, John A. Miley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                       |  |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN A. MILEY                 
|                        |  |  |  |                                       | 
|                        |  |  |  | John A. Miley Chief Financial Officer
Clayvin HERRERA, petitioner, v. WYOMING.

No. 17-532.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Wyoming, Sheridan County granted.
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Kinley, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Wealth Minerals Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 15, 2007



/s/ Michael Kinley

Michael Kinley
  Chief Financial Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00371

- CR

M ARVIN R ODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On App eal from the 396th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1432306D )

July 21, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

This appeal is on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals.

This court has again considered the recor d on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgme nt. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By / s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
Ong VUE, petitioner, v. Janet DOWLING, Warden.

No. 17-7742.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2011269EN.01001501.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Paderborner Brauerei Haus Cramer KG v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

(Case C-196/10) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Headings 2203 and 2208 - Malt beer base intended for use in the production of a mixed drink)

2011/C 269/23

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paderborner Brauerei Haus Cramer KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, as amended by Commission Regulations (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001 (OJ 2001 L 279, p. 1) and (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002 (OJ 2002 L 290, p. 1) — Malt beer base with an alcoholic strength by volume of 14 % obtained from brewed beer which has been specially clarified and subjected to ultrafiltration and which is to be used in the making of a mixed beer drink — Classification under heading 2203 or heading 2208 of the Combined Nomenclature?

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2587/91 of 26 July 1991, must be interpreted as meaning that a liquid described as a ‘malt beer base’, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, with an alcoholic strength by volume of 14 % and obtained from brewed beer which has been clarified and then subjected to ultrafiltration, by which the concentration of ingredients such as bitter substances and proteins has been reduced, must be classified under heading 2208 of the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to that regulation, as amended.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
Anthony HATTON, et ux., petitioners, v. Ernest Joseph ATENCIO, Surviving Father of Ernest Marty Atencio, et al.

No. 16-1475.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Louis Jeffrey MOORE, Jr., petitioner, v. Kim HOLLAND, Warden.

No. 17-5367.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Josephat MUA and Francoise Vandenplas, petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEMNITY EXCHANGE.

No. 16-9727.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioners allowed until October 23, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,642
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,133
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,545
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,901
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,926
<LOANS>                                        265,617
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,321
<DEPOSITS>                                     262,049
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,179
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,175
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 322,321
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,502
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  793
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,295
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,841
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,268
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,027
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  87
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,212
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,212
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,719
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,556
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,855
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                        25
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,976
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,315
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,661
        

</TABLE>
Ron MORRIS, petitioner, v. Randall S. KNUTSON.

No. 17-7620.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [2231A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compact between the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation and the State of South Dakota.

# DATES:

The extension takes effect on April 15, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation and the State of South Dakota have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact to October 15, 2022. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compact.

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2022-08078 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P