alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.(A)(2)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I, Michael Latimore, chief financial officer of the Company, certify that:

(1) The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 2, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael Latimore   
|Michael Latimore       
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Joanne STONE, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

No. 17-7692.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: February 23, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | John P. Manning            
|                        | Principal Executive Officer
Robert MARTINEZ, Jr., petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-5184.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
William BOBBITT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1187.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
#### Harry Jones, *Appellant,*v. Walter S. Ross, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*Joseph Higgins,*for Appellant;

*Hardee <& Martin,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, ■ concur.
Themba Bernard SANGANZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8885.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Phillip EALY, petitioner, v. Wendy KNIGHT, Superintendent, Correctional Industrial Facility.

No. 17-5362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 11.0



PAMRAPO BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                                                         |  |                                 |           |                               |   |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --------- | ----------------------------- | - | ---------
|                                                                                         |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, 2005 |           | Six Months EndedJune 30, 2005
|Income available to common stockholders                                                  |  | $                               | 1,965,649 |                               | $ | 3,948,751
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                                 | 4,975,542 |                               |   | 4,975,396
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  | $                               | 0.40      |                               | $ | 0.79     
|Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |  | $                               | 1,965,649 |                               | $ | 3,948,751
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                                 | 4,987,476 |                               |   | 4,988,274
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  | $                               | 0.39      |                               | $ | 0.79
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3765 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that any questionnaire 

used for a decennial census of population contains a question regarding 

citizenship, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2019 

Mr. COMER (for himself and Mr. JORDAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that 

any questionnaire used for a decennial census of population contains a question regarding citizenship, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizens Count Census 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3765 IH

1 SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP STATUS ON CENSUS QUESTION2 NAIRES. 

3 Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub6 section (h); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(g) In conducting the 2020 decennial census and 

10 each decennial census thereafter, the Secretary shall in11 clude in any questionnaire distributed or otherwise used 

12 for the purpose of determining the total population by 

13 States a checkbox or other similar option for respondents 

14 to indicate whether the respondent is a citizen or national 

15 of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 22, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00734

- CR

Brandy Darlene AIELLO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR1259W Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On October 11, 2018 , a ppellant filed a motion for leave to file notice of appeal complaining of the trial court’s denial of her motion to withdraw plea signed on July 9, 2018

. Absent a timely motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due August 8, 2018 , and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due August 23, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1); R. 26.3. Appellant’s notice of appeal is thus late

. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within 30 days from the date this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WH EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of October, 2018

.___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
No. 85-6841.

#### Orgera *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
In Re Ivory Lee ROBINSON, petitioner.

No. 16-9069.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
LARRY DOIRON, INC., et al., petitioners, v. SPECIALTY RENTAL TOOLS & SUPPLY, L.L.P., et al.

No. 17-1420.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF RED RIVER COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 8th 

day of April, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Christopher Neal McGonigal, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00164-CR

Trial Court No. CR01907

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Christopher Neal McGonigal, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 13th day of August, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
# L_2009149EN.01008001.xml

| 12.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/80 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

According to Article 3(2) of the Agreement of 19 October 2005 between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ( 1 ) (hereafter the Agreement), concluded by Council Decision 2006/325/EC ( 2 ), whenever amendments to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ( 3 ) are adopted, Denmark shall notify the Commission of its decision whether or not to implement the content of such amendments. Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 ( 4 ) on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations was adopted on 18 December 2008. Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 provides that subject to transitional provisions in Article 75(2) of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009, Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 shall modify Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 by replacing provisions of that Regulation applicable to matters relating to maintenance obligations. In accordance with Article 3(2) of the Agreement, Denmark has by letter of 14 January 2009 notified the Commission of its decision to implement the contents of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 to the extent that this Regulation amends Regulation (EC) No 44/2001. This means that the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations will be applied to relations between the Community and Denmark with the exception of the provisions in Chapters III and VII. The provisions in Article 2 and Chapter IX of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009, however, are applicable only to the extent that they relate to jurisdiction, recognition, enforceability and enforcement of judgments, and access to justice. In accordance with Article 3(6) of the Agreement, the Danish notification creates mutual obligations between Denmark and the Community. Thus, Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 constitutes an amendment to the Agreement to the extent that it amends Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 and is considered annexed thereto. With reference to Article 3(3) and (4) of the Agreement, implementation of the abovementioned provisions of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 in Denmark can take place administratively under Section 9 of the Danish Law No 1563 of 20 December 2006 on the Brussels I Regulation and therefore does not require the Folketing’s approval. The necessary administrative measures entered into force on the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on 30 January 2009. ( 1 )  
OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 62. ( 2 )  
OJ L 120, 5.5.2006, p. 22. ( 3 )  
OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1. ( 4 )  
OJ L 7, 10.1.2009, p. 1.

---
|  | **Commodity Futures Trading     Commission**     Office of External Affairs (202) 418-5080     Three Lafayette Centre     1155 21st Street, NW     Washington, DC 20581 |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Release: 4913-04****For Release: April 14, 2004**

**CFTC RELEASES A SPANISH-LANGUAGE CONSUMER PROTECTION ADVISORY ON COMMODITY     SCAMS**

**New Spanish-Language Consumer Advisory Warns Customers About Commodity Futures and     Options Scams Being Perpetrated in Today's Commodities Markets**

     WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today     released a Spanish-language version of its Consumer Advisories in an effort to reach     out to America's fastest growing demographic group.    

     The new Spanish-language Consumer Advisory     warns the public about commodity futures and options scams involving foreign currency     (forex), precious metals, false sales solicitations by introducing brokers, and     commodity pool *Ponzi* schemes. While these types of scams are the subjects of     several current CFTC Consumer Advisories, the CFTC is now also warning     Spanish-speaking customers about such abusive practices through its new     Spanish-language customer protection Advisory. The Advisory also instructs customers     how to check if a company or individual they are about to do business with is     registered with the CFTC and provides a list of contacts for the CFTC and other     consumer protection agencies that might be able to assist customers.    

     Recent census data shows that the Hispanic population in the United States has     increased by more than 50 percent since 1990, compared with an increase of only 13.2     percent for the total U.S. population. According to projections, Hispanics will     account for the majority of the nation's population growth for the next 50 years.    

     The CFTC has Spanish-speaking enforcement staff available for those who call its toll-free customer protection hotline at 1-866-366-2382 (or 1-866-FON-CFTC).    
      - The CFTC's Spanish-language Consumer Advisory is available on the CFTC's     website at http://www.cftc.gov/opa/opaconsumeradv0404sp.htm,     and a print version is available from the CFTC's Office of External Affairs at     (202) 418-5080.     

     # # #    

**Media Contacts**     Alan Sobba (202) 418-5080     Dennis Holden (202) 418-5088     Office of External Affairs    

**Staff Contact**     Daniel Nathan     Chief, CFTC Office of Cooperative Enforcement     CFTC Division of Enforcement     (202) 418-5314    

**Related Documents**Spanish-Language Consumer AdvisoryEnglish Translation of the Consumer AdvisoryThis Press Release in Spanish
# L_2011058EN.01008401.xml

| 3.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/84

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 126/2010

of 10 November 2010

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 93/2010 of 2 July 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 93/2010 of 2 July 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2008/915/EC of 30 October 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2008/915/EC of 30 October 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 13caa (Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

| ‘13cab. | 32008 D 0915: Commission Decision 2008/915/EC of 30 October 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise (OJ L 332, 10.12.2008, p. 20).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13cab.

32008 D 0915: Commission Decision 2008/915/EC of 30 October 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise (OJ L 332, 10.12.2008, p. 20).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2008/915/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 November 2010, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 277, 21.10.2010, p. 47.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 332, 10.12.2008, p. 20.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William J. CampbellWilliam J. CampbellChief Executive Officer


May 10, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                       CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P.

                     875 North Michigan Avenue, 41st Floor
                               Chicago, IL 60611


               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 26, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Cabot Industrial
Properties, L.P. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

                                 Very truly yours,

                                 Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P.

                                 By Cabot Industrial Trust, its general partner

                                 /s/ Timothy B. Keith
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Timothy B. Keith
                                 Chief Executive Officer