alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4035 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4035

 To prohibit the use of premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
          Corporation as an offset for other Federal spending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

    Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Holding, and Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
          Corporation as an offset for other Federal spending.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pension and Budget Integrity Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF PREMIUMS AS AN OFFSET.

    (a) In General.--In the Senate and the House of Representatives, 
for purposes of determining points of order under the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) or any concurrent resolution 
on the budget, any provision that increases, or extends the increase 
of, any single-employer pension program premiums payable to the Pension 
Benefit Guaranty Corporation shall not be counted in estimating the 
level of budget authority, outlays, or revenues--
            (1) in the Senate, for any bill, joint resolution, 
        amendment, amendment between the Houses, conference report, or 
        motion; or
            (2) in the House of Representatives, for any bill or joint 
        resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon.
    (b) Rules of Senate and House of Representatives.--Congress adopts 
the provisions of this section--
            (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate 
        and the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such is 
        deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, and 
        supersede other rules only to the extent that they are 
        inconsistent with such rules; and
            (2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of 
        either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the 
        procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and 
        to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that 
        House.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David B. Hills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



Date: March 16, 2007By:

/s/    DAVID B. HILLS


Name:

David B. HillsTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


I, John Simonelli, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



Date: March 16, 2007By:

/s/    JOHN SIMONELLI


Name:

JOHN SIMONELLITitle:

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Lawrence MATTISON, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-8868.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Gabriel MIRABAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8405.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brian ALEXIS, petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU of INVESTIGATION, et al.

No. 17-1125.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

August 16, 2024 SC-2024-0429 Ex parte John Wilson Johnson PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: John Wilson Johnson v. State of Alabama) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CC-90-1004.61; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0791.

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on August 16, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Bryan, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
# L_2007328EN.01002501.xml

| 13.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/25

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 83/2007

of 6 July 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 48/2007 of 8 June 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 48/2007 of 8 June 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2006/140/EC of 20 December 2006 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include sulfuryl fluoride as an active substance in Annex I thereto (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2006/140/EC of 20 December 2006 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include sulfuryl fluoride as an active substance in Annex I thereto (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 12n (Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 L 0140: Commission Directive 2006/140/EC of 20 December 2006 (OJ L 414, 30.12.2006, p. 78).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 L 0140: Commission Directive 2006/140/EC of 20 December 2006 (OJ L 414, 30.12.2006, p. 78).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2006/140/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 266, 11.10.2007, p. 6.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 414, 30.12.2006, p. 78.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Standard Management Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we Ronald
D. Hunter and Michael B. Edwards, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer of Standard Management Corporation, respectively hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief,
that:

(1)        such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of Standard Management Corporation.



August 12, 2005

/s/ Ronald D. Hunter
-----------------------------------
Ronald D. Hunter
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President





/s/ Michael B. Edwards
-----------------------------------
Michael B. Edwards
Interim Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005024EN.01000101.xml

| 29.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/1

---

Information concerning the extension of the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 1986

(2005/C 24/01)

At its 91st session (Madrid, 29 November – 2 December 2004), the International Olive Oil Council decided, under the provisions of the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives (1986) (1) as amended by the 1993 Protocol extending the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives (2), to extend the Agreement for twelve months until 31 December 2005.

st

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 214, 4.8.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 298, 3.12.1993, p. 37.

2

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Yearly Report of Relocate411.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending November 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Darrell Lerner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Darrell Lerner
--------------------------
Darrell Lerner
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

February 26, 2004
Edward J. REINHART, petitioner, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et al.

No. 17-5454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Ginger M. BREITZMAN, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 17-8010.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
Abubakar Hussein AHMED, petitioner, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al.

No. 17-8586.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SYNETIC
INC.'S 9/30/97 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          75,002
<SECURITIES>                                    11,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                       789
<INVENTORY>                                      5,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,236
<PP&E>                                          40,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,492
<BONDS>                                        165,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,896
<SALES>                                         14,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,833
<CGS>                                            8,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,191    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,102-01

EX PARTE JOHN ANDREW RAMOS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2009CR7094-W1

IN THE 399 DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY TH

Per curiam. Yeary, J., not participating.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded nolo contendere to online

solicitation of a minor and was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that the statute under which he was convicted was found to be

unconstitutional, therefore he is actually innocent. This Court has held that when a statute is held

to be unconstitutional, that does not mean that someone convicted under the statute is actually
2

innocent. Ex parte Fournier, WR-82,102-01 __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 28, 2015).

However, Applicant is still entitled to relief. This Court, in Ex parte Lo, held

unconstitutional the online solicitation of a minor statute for which Applicant was convicted. Ex

parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant filed this habeas application based on

the Lo decision and asks that his conviction be set aside. The State recommends that relief be

granted in this cause. We agree. 

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 2009CR7094 in the 399 District Court of th

Bexar County is set aside and the cause is remanded so the trial court can dismiss the indictment.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: December 16, 2015

Do not publish
Raul MAGALLANES-FLORES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 10.9**

 

October 26, 2002 

 

Addendum to lease dated March 14, 1994 by and between Fred B. Caffey, ofMartinsville, Virginia herein referred to as “Lessor” and Hooker Furniture Corporation, of Martinsville, Virginia, herein referred to as “Lessee.” All portions of the said lease will be reactivated starting November 1, 2002 andending October 31, 2003. The only exception will be Article Two listed below: 

 

Article Two 

 

Term, Rent, and Option 

 

Lessor leases his property known as Caffey Warehouse located at 71 Gallagher Road off Highway 58 East of Martinsville to Lessee. The rent being $22,500 per month the rate being 18 cents per square foot per month. The rent us due andpayable on the first of each month to lessor at 407 Starling Avenue, Martinsville, Virginia 24112. Lessee has option to renew with a 90 day notice to Lessor.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00408-CR

EX PARTE LAJUANA 

TISHA KRICK

------------

FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Lajuana Tisha Krick filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s 

denial of her amended motion for personal recognizance bond. This court 

subsequently received a copy of the trial court’s judgment convicting Krick of 

second degree aggravated assault and sentencing her to five years’ confinement 

pursuant to a plea bargain. Therefore, Krick’s appeal of the denial of her 

amended motion for personal recognizance bond is moot. See Martinez v. State, 

826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (citing Danziger v. State, 786 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

S.W.2d 723 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990), for the proposition that when an applicant for 

habeas corpus relief has been convicted of the underlying offense and is no 

longer subject to pretrial confinement, the petition is moot and we do not reach 

the merits thereof); see also Ex parte Sabur, Nos. 02-02-00305-CR, 02-02-

00306-CR, 02-02-00307-CR, 02-02-00308-CR, 2003 WL 862727, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth Mar. 6, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication) (dismissing appeal of denial of relief in pretrial application for writ of 

habeas corpus in cause number 02-02-00308-CR because judgment had already 

been rendered in that cause number). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.2 See

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 19, 2011

 

2We do not condone counsel’s delay in filing appellant’s brief nor his failure 

to amend appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal with her signature despite 

assuring our clerks’ office that he had taken steps to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.2(a). The trial court’s judgment indicates that almost a year’s confinement 

was credited to appellant’s five-year sentence as a result of her remaining 

incarcerated while she awaited his action.
lO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

RE: WR-82,030-01

^P0%

•1 ' tS&SP^B=? PITNEY SOWIiS

^u, ir $0Q.406 £jj.f? 0006557438 JAN 13 2015

S3 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78 701
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Borland Software Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth R. Hahn, as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

|/s/    KENNETH R. HAHN 
|-----------------------
|                       
|Kenneth R. Hahn        
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 9, 2004         

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.
Benita DINKINS-ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5757.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Daniel AVILA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-8332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-61036 and 333-89943)
pertaining to the InsWeb Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option Plan, Senior Executive Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
January 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of InsWeb Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Sacramento,
California
March 23, 2004

---

QuickLinks
Gabriel Joseph BROWN, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-8882.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.