alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014342EN.01004601.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/46

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 138/2014

of 27 June 2014

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2013/793/EU of 19 December 2013 amending Decision 2007/506/EC in order to prolong the validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to soaps, shampoos and hair conditioners (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2013/793/EU of 19 December 2013 amending Decision 2007/506/EC in order to prolong the validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to soaps, shampoos and hair conditioners (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

1

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 2y (Commission Decision 2007/506/EC) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32013 D 0793: Commission Decision 2013/793/EU of 19 December 2013 (OJ L 349, 21.12.2013, p. 104).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32013 D 0793: Commission Decision 2013/793/EU of 19 December 2013 (OJ L 349, 21.12.2013, p. 104).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2013/793/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 June 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (2).

2

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  OJ L 349, 21.12.2013, p. 104.

1

(2)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

2

---
Ronnie Joseph JOHNSON and Joseph Granson Pritchard, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6079.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TransDigm Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 28,
2004



/s/ Gregory RufusName:

Gregory RufusTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant
Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2012049EN.01000301.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-271/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Free movement of capital - Scope - Open pension funds - Limitation on the investment of capital assets outside the Member State concerned - Proportionality)

2012/C 49/04

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Dowgielewicz, M. Szpunar, M. Jarosz and P. Kucharski, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Article 56 EC — Pension funds forming part of a national system of compulsory affiliation and based on the capitalisation system — National rules limiting and discouraging the investment by such funds of capital assets outside Poland

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court (Third Chamber):

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining in force Articles 143, 136(3) and 136a(2) of the Law of 28 August 1997 on the organisation and operation of pension funds (Ustawa o organizacji i funkcjonowaniu funduszy emerytalnych), as amended, in that they limit investments by Polish open pension funds in the other Member States, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining in force Articles 143, 136(3) and 136a(2) of the Law of 28 August 1997 on the organisation and operation of pension funds (Ustawa o organizacji i funkcjonowaniu funduszy emerytalnych), as amended, in that they limit investments by Polish open pension funds in the other Member States, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


Audible,
Inc.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-91107, 333-110210, and 333-138397) on Form S-8, (Nos. 333-45470, 333-119610,
333-120588, and 333-132938) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-85286 and 333-147858) on
Forms S-3 and S-3/A of Audible, Inc. of our report dated March 27,
2008, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, the
financial statement schedules and internal control over financial reporting,
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.





Our
report on the consolidated financial statements includes an explanatory
paragraph that states the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB No.
109.” effective January 1, 2007.








/s/
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





New York,
New York


March 27,
2008
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4090 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4090

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the use of official 
                       time by Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2019

Mr. Rooney of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the use of official 
                       time by Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Do Your Job Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF OFFICIAL TIME.

    (a) In General.--Section 7131 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7131. Elimination of official time
    ``Any activities performed by an employee relating to the business 
of a labor organization shall be performed during the time the employee 
is in a non-duty status.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 71 of 
title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 7131 and inserting the following:

``7131. Elimination of official time.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2013345EN.01001601.xml

| 19.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 345/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 345/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 147/2013

of 15 July 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October 2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October 2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 66ne (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66nf. | 32012 R 0965: Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October 2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 296, 25.10.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66nf.

32012 R 0965: Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October 2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 296, 25.10.2012, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 July 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 296, 25.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

A.B., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1426

[ February 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Carlos S. Rebollo , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 791DL C

.

Fairuze Sofia of T he Sofia Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40749

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DEREK E. BANKS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:18-CR-116-1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derek E. Banks has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Banks has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40749 Document: 00514883305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
No. 18-40749

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40749 Document: 00514883305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
Blueprint





 







Exhibit 10.2


 



AMENDMENT TO



AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, dated April 19, 2010 (the
“Employment
Agreement”), by and between ChromaDex, Inc., a
California corporation (and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ChromaDex
Corporation) (the “Company”) and Frank L. Jaksch, Jr.
(“Executive”),
is entered into as of June 22, 2018 by and among the Company and
Executive. Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined in
this Amendment shall have the meanings as ascribed to them in the
Employment Agreement.


 



RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have
previously entered into the Employment Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive
desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth
herein.


 



AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and the promises and covenants contained herein and in
the Employment Agreement, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:


 

1. Section
2(a) of the Employment Agreement. The first two sentences of
Section 2(a) (Specific
Positions) of the Employment Agreement are hereby deleted in
their entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“Commencing
as of June 22, 2018, Employee shall serve as the Executive Chairman
of Employer. Employee shall perform such duties as are customarily
associated with the position of Executive Chairman and such other
duties, commensurate with Employee’s position, as are
assigned to Employee from time to time by the Board of Directors of
Employer (the “Board”).”


 

2. Exhibit
A to the Employment Agreement. Exhibit A to the Employment
Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.


 

3. Effect
of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this
Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in
full force and effect.


 

4. Choice
of Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.


 

5. Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in two counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, all of which together shall contribute
one and the same instrument.


 


 


[Signature
page follows]


 




 








 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the date first written
above.


 


 


	
 

	

 



ChromaDex, Inc.


 


 


By: /s/ Mark Friedman


     
Name: Mark Friedman


     
Title: General Counsel & Secretary


 


 



Executive


 


/s/
Frank L. Jaksch,
Jr.



Frank L. Jaksch, Jr.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

As of April 3, 2005, the following were the Registrant's significant operating
subsidiaries:

Name:   Rex Tokyo Co Ltd

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   60.5%



Name:   Fan Club Entertainment Co Ltd

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   67.0%



Name:   Timothy World Co Ltd

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   60.0% by Rex Tokyo Co Ltd



Name:   Collobration Co Ltd.

Country of Organization:   Japan

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   100.0% by Rex Tokyo Co Ltd



Name:   IA Global Acquisition Co

Country of Organization:   US

Percent Ownership by Registrant:   95.0%
Arthur BELL, petitioner, v. Bonita HOFFNER, Warden, et al.

No. 17-6328.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2014310EN.01006801.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/68

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 100/2014

of 16 May 2014

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2013/131/EU of 4 March 2013 establishing the user's guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2013/131/EU of 4 March 2013 establishing the user's guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 1ead (Commission Decision 2011/832/EU) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘1eae. | 32013 D 0131: Commission Decision 2013/131/EU of 4 March 2013 establishing the user's guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 76, 19.3.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1eae.

32013 D 0131: Commission Decision 2013/131/EU of 4 March 2013 establishing the user's guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 76, 19.3.2013, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2013/131/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 17 May 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 19.3.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            Certification Pursuant to



                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350



      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of PrimaCom AG, a stock
corporation organized under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany (the
"Company"), for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such
officer's knowledge that:



     1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.


Dated: March 31, 2005                           /s/ Hans-Werner Klose
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Hans-Werner Klose




Dated: March 31, 2005                           /s/ Wolfgang Preuss
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Wolfgang Preuss
Arthur ARMSTRONG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.

No. 16-8824.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Edward JEFFERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8734.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.