alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17
- 00370
- CV

DUANE TERRIS BUSBY APPELLANT

V.

SARAH ELEANOR BUSBY APPELLEE

------------ FROM THE 233RD DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 233

- 622305

- 17

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------ Appellant’s brief was originally due December 27, 2017. On that day, this
court granted his motion for an extension of time to file his brief and ordered the
brief due January 10, 2018. On January 25, 2018, we notified appellant that his
brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
38.6(a). See Tex . R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss th e

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant filed with the court within ten
days a n appellant ’ s brief and a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file an
appellant 's brief and the need fo r an extension

. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3 (b) . We have not received any response.
Because appellant ha s failed to file a brief after having been given an
opportunity to provide a reasonable explanation for the failure, we dismiss the

a ppeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) (1) , 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: PITTMAN, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and BIRDWELL, J.

DELIVERED: March 15, 2018
II-01083

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Larry Watson <oredoc 1 @comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Larry Watson

1430 McCoy Ave NE

Salem, OR 97301
Mark Andrew BERGER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8986.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Supreme Raheem ACKBAR, petitioner, v. Randall WILLIAMS, Warden.

No. 17-8692.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
SEALED APPELANT, petitioner, v. SEALED APPELLEE.

No. 17-7035.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Hughes v. United States,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1765, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1644 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1644

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 30, 2010.
Whereas 2010 marks the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the Veterans 
        History Project by the United States Congress in order to collect and 
        preserve the wartime stories of United States veterans;
Whereas Congress charged the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress 
        to undertake the Veterans History Project and to engage the public in 
        the creation of a collection of oral histories that would be a lasting 
        tribute to individual veterans;
Whereas the Veterans History Project relies on a corps of volunteer 
        interviewers, partner organizations, and an array of civic minded 
        institutions nationwide who interview veterans according to the 
        guidelines it provides;
Whereas these oral histories have created an abundant resource for scholars to 
        gather first-hand accounts of veterans' experience in World War I, World 
        War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Persian Gulf War, and the 
        Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts;
Whereas there are 17,000,000 wartime veterans in the United States whose stories 
        can educate people of all ages about important moments and events in the 
        history of the United States and the world and provide instructive 
        narratives that illuminate the meanings of ``service'', ``sacrifice'', 
        ``citizenship'', and ``democracy'';
Whereas more than 70,000 oral histories have already been collected and more 
        than 8,000 oral histories are fully digitized and available through the 
        website of the Library of Congress;
Whereas the Veterans History Project will increase the number of oral histories 
        that can be collected and preserved and increase the number of veterans 
        it honors; and
Whereas ``National Veterans Awareness Week'' has been recognized by Congress in 
        previous years: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of a ``National Veterans History 
        Project Week'';
            (2) recognizes ``National Veterans Awareness Week'';
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to interview at least 
        one veteran in their families or communities according to guidelines 
        provided by the Veterans History Project; and
            (4) encourages local, State, and national organizations along with 
        Federal, State, city, and county governmental institutions to 
        participate in support of the effort to document, preserve, and honor 
        the service of United States wartime veterans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting w/Constellation Energy (via phone)
  
    



  When
              11/23/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              II. Definitions

  CFTC Staff
              Chris Iacovella

  Visitor(s)
              Lael E. Campbell

  Organization(s)
              Constellation Energy


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, petitioner, v. Cynthia FULLER.

No. 17-959.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael Joseph DERROW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7720.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Nizar Ben Abdelaziz TRABELIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5029.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ELTON LEE BAKER

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 3334

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee s

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 28, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for M arion County

, Lisa D. Herndon , Judge.

Elton L ee Baker, Lowell, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee , State of Florida

.

No Appearance for Other Appellee.

WALLIS , J.

Elton Lee Baker appeals the Marion County trial court's denial of his Emergency

Petit ion for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Baker was convicted and sentenced in Sumter County

to a twenty

- year prison sentence for attempted sexual battery upon a child under twelve

years of age and attempted lewd or lascivious molestation of a ch ild under twelve years2 of age. In his petition, Baker challenged his convictions and sentences on the basis that

the Sta te failed to amend the charging information to reflect his conviction for a lesser

i ncluded offense. Baker also challenged the constitutionality of sections 749.011 and

800.04, Florida Statutes ( 2007), because th ey require no mens rea element.

When a petitioner challenges the validity of his or her conviction or sentence,

jurisdiction i n habeas proceedings lies with the trial court that imp osed the judgment and

sentence. See Sheriff v. Moore , 781 So. 2d 1146 , 1147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Frederick v.

Stat e , 714 So. 2d 1043, 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998 ) ("Habeas petitions directed to trial

issues must be brought in the circuit court for the county where the trial occurred."). T he

State properly concedes that the Marion County court lacked jurisdiction to rule o n the

merits of Baker's petition , which attacked his Sumter County convictions and sentences

.

Accordingly, we quash the trial court's order and remand with instructions to transfer the

petition to Sumter County. See Bush v. State , 945 So. 2d 1207, 1214

– 15 (Fla. 2006).

ORDER QUASH ED ; REMANDED with Instructions.

BERGER , J., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge , concur.
Duquie SIMMONS, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 17-8473.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

|   |                     |                   |                          |   |
|--------|--------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Date: June 8, 2007  |                   |
|   | By:            | /s/ Philippe Van Acker |                          |
|   |                     | Name:        | Philippe Van Acker       |   |
|   |                     | Title:       | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Remedent, Inc. and will be retained by Remedent, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
John GRINOLS, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.

No. 16-9743.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00855-CR

NICOLAS WARREN THOMPSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 177th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 1390979)

After due consideration, the Court grants the motion to dismiss this appeal filed 

by the appellant, Nicolas Warren Thompson. It is therefore CONSIDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed. It is further ORDERED

that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered January 29, 2015.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and 

Huddle.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 20, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 20, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0199. PHILLIPS STAFFING et al. v. JAMES EBERHARDT. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015SUCV421
'i ·.,

Donovan Dwight Simms© c/o 9601 SPUR 591 (NOT A DOMOCILE) Amarillo, Texas Republic [near79107-9606]

To: Court Clerk, Abel Acosta Texas Court of Criminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Re: WR-68,174-03 TP-. (;t/1.-b,::lOS(;,OiiS -G Dear Clerk of Court; March 23, 2015



## RECEIVED

## IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

## MAR 26

## 2015

I am writing this court to ask about the status of my 11.07 application for Writ of Habeas Corpus that was submitted to this**co~rt** by the 230th District Court of Harris County under Trial Court Cause Number .1056045-c, and received by this court on January 14, 2015. If you could, as time permits, please inform me on this status inquiry. Thank you for you time in advance.

encl .•• DDS/AA Cordially, 

# !JpJJJ@J,1)J

# ~**~~**<0 

## © DonovanWight simms ·
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  April 18, 2011





/s/Amir PhilipsName:  Amir PhilipsTitle: Chief Financial Officer
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/27/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       50,369
COMMITMENTS
   3,453   17,540    5,752   31,304   20,101   40,509   43,393    9,860    6,976

CHANGES FROM 10/20/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,492)
   1,683   -7,030      -21   -7,020   -1,022   -5,358   -8,073   -3,134     -419

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.9     34.8     11.4     62.1     39.9     80.4     86.2     19.6     13.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       35)
       9       12       14       12        8       30       27
```

----

Updated October 30, 2009
# L_2008124EN.01003601.xml

| 8.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 168/2007

of 7 December 2007

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 146/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 146/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2007/151/EC of 6 March 2007 amending Decisions 94/741/EC and 97/622/EC as regards the questionnaires for the report on the implementation of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and on the implementation of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2007/151/EC of 6 March 2007 amending Decisions 94/741/EC and 97/622/EC as regards the questionnaires for the report on the implementation of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and on the implementation of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in points 1ca (Commission Decision 94/741/EC) and 1cb (Commission Decision 97/622/EC) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32007 D 0151: Commission Decision 2007/151/EC of 6 March 2007 (OJ L 67, 7.3.2007, p. 7).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 2

The text of Decision 2007/151/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 100, 10.4.2008, p. 92.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 67, 7.3.2007, p. 7.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7087

JACKIE HUGHES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD HUTCHINSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-3103) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jackie Hughes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hughes v. Hutchinson , No. CA00-3103 (D. Md. June 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED