alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014278EN.01000401.xml

| 20.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/4

---

FINAL ACT

between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, as regards the Association Agreement

The Representatives of

THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM,

THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA,

THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK,

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY,

THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA,

IRELAND,

THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC,

THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN,

THE FRENCH REPUBLIC,

THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA,

THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC,

THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS,

THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA,

THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA,

THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG,

HUNGARY,

THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA,

THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS,

THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA,

THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND,

THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC,

ROMANIA,

THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA,

THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC,

THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND,

THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN,

THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND,

THE EUROPEAN UNION,

THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY,

of the one part, and

UKRAINE,

of the other part,

(hereinafter jointly referred to as ‘the Signatories’),

meeting in Brussels on the twenty-seventh of June in the year two thousand and fourteen,

for the signature of those parts of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’) that were not signed on 21 March 2014,

recall that, at the Summit held in Brussels on 21 March 2014, they have signed the text of the following political provisions of the Agreement:

| 1. | Preamble |
| --- | --- |

1.

Preamble

| 2. | Article 1 |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 1

| 3. | Titles I, II and VII |
| --- | --- |

3.

Titles I, II and VII

The Signatories have proceeded with the signature of the following provisions of the Agreement:

| — | Titles III, IV, V and VI, and the related Annexes and Protocols, |
| --- | --- |

—

Titles III, IV, V and VI, and the related Annexes and Protocols,

and confirm that the Agreement constitutes a single instrument.

The Signatories agree that paragraph 4 of Article 486 of the Agreement relating to the provisional application is applicable to the corresponding parts of the Agreement pursuant to this Final Act.

The Signatories agree that the Agreement shall apply to the entire territory of Ukraine as recognised under international law and shall engage in consultations with a view to determine the effects of the Agreement with regard to the illegally annexed territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and of the City of Sevastopol in which the Ukrainian Government currently does not exercise effective control.

Done at Brussels, this twenty-seventh day of June, in the year two thousand and fourteen.

---
In Re Jeffrey A. WEEKLEY, petitioner.

No. 17-6472.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### Calvin O. Black, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. First National Bank of Brooksville, Florida, J. C. Emerson and Charles Monroe Price, *Defendants in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed February 20, 1929.

*I-Iampton & Green,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Marby, Reaves & Carlton*and *Whitehurst & Whitehurst,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

The defendants in error here, against whom a judgment for $50.00 was rendered in the trial court, could have taken a writ of error to such judgment against them.

The sale of the $23,000.00 collateral note to one of its makers for $5,000.00 under the circumstances shown, was a violation of the rights of the plaintiff in error, the owner of the collateral note, and there is no sufficient showing that plaintiff in error waived, abandoned or forfeited his rights in the premises. The record does not sustain a judgment for only $50.00 in favor of the plaintiff in error and he had a right to a review by writ of error.

Behearing denied.

Terrell, C. J. and Wi-iitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J. concur.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/16/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      105,666
COMMITMENTS
  26,043    5,897   18,406   41,701   56,919   86,149   81,221   19,516   24,444

CHANGES FROM 06/09/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,561)
  -1,388      694    2,181    4,500       49    5,293    2,925   -3,732   -1,364

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.6      5.6     17.4     39.5     53.9     81.5     76.9     18.5     23.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      143)
      40       15       34       59       65      117      104
```

----

Updated June 19, 2009
Raul CORTEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5023.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc. September 30, 1999 financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000853465
<NAME>                              Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc.

<CURRENCY>                          US



<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999

<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1.00

<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .00



</TABLE>
In Re Elmer SCHECKEL, petitioner.

No. 17-6150.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4124 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 

waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits following the divorce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. SCHNEIDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the two-year waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits 

following the divorce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD 

4 FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE’S BENEFITS FOL5 LOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR 

6 RECEIPT OF SPOUSE’S BENEFITS. 

7 (a) WIFE’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

8 202(b)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 402(b)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘divorced wife—’’ 

10 and all that follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:38 Aug 15, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4124.IH H4124

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4124 IH

1 ing ‘‘divorced wife meets the requirements of subpara2 graphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be enti3 tled’’. 

4 (b) HUSBAND’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

5 202(c)(4)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(4)(A)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘divorced husband—’’ and all that 

7 follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and inserting ‘‘divorced 

8 husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 

9 through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled’’. 

10 (c) EXEMPTION FROM DEDUCTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF

11 WORK.—Section 203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 403(b)(2)) is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(2)(A) Except as’’ and all that 

14 follows through ‘‘the benefit to which’’ and inserting 

15 the following: ‘‘(2) In any case in which any of the 

16 other persons referred to in paragraph (1)(B) are 

17 entitled to monthly benefits as a divorced spouse 

18 under subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for any 

19 month, the benefit to which’’; and 

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (B). 

21 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

22 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with 

23 respect to benefits for months after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         355
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         22169
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2007
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     5092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22070
<SALES>                                        10223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10286
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1044)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.88)



</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 195

State of North Dakot a, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Eldrey Marchone Lane, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20220164

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D

. Knudson , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam.

Ashlei A. Neufeld, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND , for plaintiff and appellee ; submitted on brief

. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND , for defendant a nd appellant ; submitted on brief

.1 State v. Lane No. 20220164
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Eldrey Marchone Lane appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of driving under suspension. Lane argues the evidence presented at trial wa s insufficient to support the jury’s verdict

. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affir m under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a) (3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Cole Canyon LOCKHART, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5095.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District denied.
Gary OTTE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-9317 (17A136).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 12, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Release:#3897-96

For Release:March 21, 1996

CFTC Files Statutory Disqualification Action Against CBOT Floor
    Broker, Edgar Clifford Sharp, III, and Simultaneously Accepts His
    Settlement Offer, Which Includes a Two-Year Period of Conditioned
    Registration

Washington -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it has filed a Notice of Intent to Condition, Suspend, Revoke
    or Restrict Registration against Edgar Clifford Sharp, III, a
    registered floor broker at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT). At the same
    time it filed the Notice against Sharp, the CFTC accepted Sharp's offer of
    settlement, which includes a two- year period of conditioned registration
    during which time Sharp will only be allowed to trade for himself, and not
    for customers.

CFTC Settlement Order Includes an Automatic Suspension
    Provision,

Effective If Sharp is Charged with New Disciplinary Offenses

Under the terms of the settlement, during the two-year period of
    conditioned registration, Sharp's registration will be subject to an
    automatic suspension if he is charged with certain disciplinary offenses as
    defined in applicable Commission regulations. The suspension would be in
    effect for six months, or longer, if charges were brought based on the new
    offense.

The CFTC's action was a follow-up to a disciplinary proceeding brought
    by the CBOT charging that Sharp traded ahead of customer orders in three
    separate transactions during an evening Treasury Bond trading session in
    September 1992. To settle the CBOT's proceeding, Sharp had paid
    disgorgement of profits of $41,718.25 plus interest to customers, had paid
    a $40,000 fine, and was suspended from floor trading privileges for 30
    business days.

To settle the CFTC action, Sharp, without admitting or denying the
    allegations in the Notice, consented to a finding that, as a result of his
    alleged trading ahead of customers, he is subject to a statutory
    disqualification from registration under the Commodity Exchange Act.
    The CFTC settlement order against Sharp conditions his registration and
    trading activity for two years, as detailed above. It also requires Sharp
    to obtain a sponsor, in this case two officers of his clearing firm, who
    will provide close supervision of his trading.

# # #

---
Troy I. THOMAS, petitioner, v. Pam BONDI, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

No. 17-5605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4173 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4173

  To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock 
                          Creek National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 2019

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock 
                          Creek National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rock Creek National Park Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF ROCK CREEK PARK AS ROCK CREEK NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Redesignation.--In recognition of its nationally significant 
natural, cultural, and historical resources, and important recreational 
opportunities, Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia, established 
by the Act of September 27, 1890 (26 Stat. 492), is redesignated as 
``Rock Creek National Park''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in section 8104(b), by striking ``Rock Creek Park'' and 
        inserting ``Rock Creek National Park''; and
            (2) in section 8501(a)(3)(B), by striking ``Rock Creek 
        Park'' and inserting ``Rock Creek National Park''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to Rock Creek 
Park in the District of Columbia is deemed to be a reference to Rock 
Creek National Park.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nautilus, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|March 8, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Edward J. Bramson               
|Date          |  |  |  |     |  | Edward J. Bramson,                  
|              |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
NATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT CORP'S., BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         232,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,336,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,073,884
<PP&E>                                          50,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                     885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,716,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,111,177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        186
<COMMON>                                       528,842
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,716,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Kelvin TAYLOR, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-8864.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
Josaia Tawake SARO, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-96.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James Earl MERIDYTH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8332.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.