alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mrs. Emm Harris, also known as Mrs. R. T. Harris, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The Seaboard Oil Company, a corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 15, 1929.

*Stewart*c& *Ford,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Julian TLartt'idge,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Gtblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Josiah John WEISS, aka Malachi Sivad, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6406.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth D. WalterKenneth D. WalterChief Financial Officer


May 10, 2006
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SY B. GAIBER & CO., SY B. GAIBER, AND MICHAEL R. HEMPEL 

DOCKET NUMBER: 165 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA Docket No. 165 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Sy B. Gaiber & Co., 

Sy B. Gaiber, 

Michael R. Hempel 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during the period from March 30 through November 

4, 1969, while a registered futures commission merchant under the Act, the 

respondent partnership failed to meet minimum financial requirements prescribed 

for futures commission merchants. It also alleges that the respondents made 

false reports to CEA representatives who were attempting to ascertain whether 

the partnership was meeting such requirements. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, March 25, 1970, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/  William J. CampbellWilliam J. Campbell Chief Executive Officer




August 5, 2004
Royce CORLEY, aka Ron Iron, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5079.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Aaron GRAHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6308.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charles Kenneth WALLACE, Sr., petitioner, v. LOUISIANA, et al.

No. 16-9350.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Sylvia FLETES, petitioner, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-328.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 415 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 415

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant to States and local 
   governments easements and rights-of-way over Federal land within 
   Gateway National Recreation Area for construction, operation, and 
  maintenance of projects for control and prevention of flooding and 
                           shoreline erosion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

Mr. Rose of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant to States and local 
   governments easements and rights-of-way over Federal land within 
   Gateway National Recreation Area for construction, operation, and 
  maintenance of projects for control and prevention of flooding and 
                           shoreline erosion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO GRANT EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OVER FEDERAL 
              LANDS WITHIN GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.

    Section 3 of Public Law 92-592 (16 U.S.C. 460cc-2) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Authority To Grant Easements and Rights-of-Way.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior may grant, 
        to any State or local government, an easement or right-of-way 
        over Federal lands within Gateway National Recreation Area for 
        construction, operation, and maintenance of projects for 
        control and prevention of flooding and shoreline erosion.
            ``(2) Charges and reimbursement of costs.--The Secretary 
        may grant such an easement or right-of-way without charge for 
        the value of the right so conveyed, except for reimbursement of 
        costs incurred by the United States for processing the 
        application therefore and managing such right. Amounts received 
        as such reimbursement shall be credited to the relevant 
        appropriation account.''.
                                 <all>
```
Harlan DECOSTE, aka Money King, aka Moneyking_111, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2014154EN.01003801.xml

| 22.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 235/2013

of 13 December 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 657/2013 of 10 July 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 laying down requirements for voice channels spacing for the single European sky (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 657/2013 of 10 July 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 laying down requirements for voice channels spacing for the single European sky (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 66we (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32013 R 0657: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 657/2013 of 10 July 2013 (OJ L 190, 11.7.2013, p. 37).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32013 R 0657: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 657/2013 of 10 July 2013 (OJ L 190, 11.7.2013, p. 37).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 657/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 233/2013 of 13 December 2013 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 190, 11.7.2013, p. 37.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  See page 36 of this Official Journal.

2

---
# L_2013081EN.01002901.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 227/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex XVIII (Health and safety at work, labour law, and equal treatment for men and women) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2012/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 amending Directive 2004/40/EC on minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2012/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 amending Directive 2004/40/EC on minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 16jc (Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XVIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 L 0011: Directive 2012/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 (OJ L 110, 24.4.2012, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 L 0011: Directive 2012/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 (OJ L 110, 24.4.2012, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2012/11/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 110, 24.4.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY.

No. 17-1302.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4130 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4130

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the ceiling on the 
    sum of the annual deductible and the other annual out-of-pocket 
   expenses required to be paid under a high deductible health plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2019

  Mr. Marchant (for himself and Mr. Smith of Missouri) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the ceiling on the 
    sum of the annual deductible and the other annual out-of-pocket 
   expenses required to be paid under a high deductible health plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping HSAs Accessible Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CEILING ON DEDUCTIBLE AND OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES 
              UNDER A HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(c)(2)A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) High deductible health plan.--The term `high 
                deductible health plan' means a health plan which has 
                an annual deductible which is not less than--
                            ``(i) $1,000 for self-only coverage, and
                            ``(ii) twice the dollar amount in clause 
                        (i) for family coverage.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to months in taxable years beginning after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/10/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       26,924
COMMITMENTS
   3,136    1,002    1,462   14,137   15,903   18,735   18,367    8,189    8,557

CHANGES FROM 03/03/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         64)
     289     -739       56     -401    1,048      -57      364      121     -300

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.6      3.7      5.4     52.5     59.1     69.6     68.2     30.4     31.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       36)
       9        3        6       22       16       31       25
```

----

Updated March 13, 2009
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
Quepasa Corporation and Subsidiaries

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements of Quepasa Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3, No. No. 333-40574, and Form S-8, Nos. 333-88271, 333-93637, 333-118645 and 333-146486  of our report dated March 31, 2008, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and comprehensive (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quepasa Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008.



/s/ Berenfeld, Spritzer, Shechter & Sheer LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 31, 2009
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Rudi M. Brewster, Senior United States District Judge **

for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENT DAVIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; SAN

BERNARDINO SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT; STEVE SPEAR,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-55043

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-01262-SVW-SS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 8, 2011

Pasadena, California

Before: B. FLETCHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and R. BREWSTER, 

District Judge.** 

FILED

JUL 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-2-

Kent Davis appeals the district court’s conclusion of law, following a bench

trial, that the sheriff had probable cause to arrest him for willfully resisting,

delaying, or obstructing a peace officer in the discharge of his duties in violation of

Cal. Penal Code §148(a)(1). 

We affirm because the sheriff had probable cause to arrest Davis based upon

Davis’ entire pattern of erratic and defiant conduct. The arrest did not punish mere

speech. The sheriff had legitimate reasons to request the car keys, including, but

not limited to, avoiding damage to the pristine vintage Cadillac during towing;

opening the trunk to check if Davis brought his firearm with him; and preventing

Davis from fleeing the scene with the car. Davis’s behavior gave the police officer

probable cause to believe that Davis obstructed the lawful exercise of authority to

impound the unregistered car. Smith v. City of Hemet, 394 F.3d 689, 696-97 (9th

Cir. 2005) (en banc) (“The acts by Smith include twice refusing to take his hands

out of his pockets, reentering the home once; repeatedly refusing to put his hands

on his head and come down the porch[;] and, finally, refusing to put his hands on

his head and turn around. Each of these acts constituted a violation of § 148(a)(1)

sufficient to warrant the filing of a criminal charge.”); cf. Mackinney v. Nielsen, 69

F.3d 1002, 1006 (9th Cir. 1995) (no probable cause under §148(a)(1) when
-3-

plaintiff “refused to comply for only a few seconds” then “immediately turned

around” to see who ordered him to stop writing on sidewalk). 

AFFIRMED.
Joe Billy RUSSELL, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Steven GRIMM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### The R. E. L. McCaskill Company, a Corporation; McCaskill Investment Company, a Corporation, and R. E. L. McCaskill, *Appellants,*v. James Creary and Susan C. Adams, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of W. F. Creary, Deceased, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 25, 1929.

*W. W. Flournoy,*for Appellants;

*S. K. Gillis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, this day filed, the decree herein is reversed insofar as it decrees recovery of attorney fees. The decree is otherwise affirmed. The cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings.

It is 'so ordered.

*289Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/19/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       31,480
COMMITMENTS
   7,772      122    1,258   12,713   20,878   21,743   22,258    9,737    9,222

CHANGES FROM 05/12/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        310)
     304     -222      133     -332      288      105      199      206      111

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.7      0.4      4.0     40.4     66.3     69.1     70.7     30.9     29.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       8        2        6       25       23       37       29
```

----

Updated May 22, 2009
Adrienne A. BURCH, petitioner, v. BELLAGIO HOTEL AND CASINO, et al.

No. 17-454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kortne MELVIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5850.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.