alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014058EN.01002301.xml

| 27.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 169/2013

of 8 October 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2012/32/EU of 25 October 2012 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2012/32/EU of 25 October 2012 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes II and XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes II and XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 L 0032: Commission Directive 2012/32/EU of 25 October 2012 (OJ L 312, 10.11.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 L 0032: Commission Directive 2012/32/EU of 25 October 2012 (OJ L 312, 10.11.2012, p. 1).’

Article 2

The following indent is added in point 56d (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 L 0032: Commission Directive 2012/32/EU of 25 October 2012 (OJ L 312, 10.11.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 L 0032: Commission Directive 2012/32/EU of 25 October 2012 (OJ L 312, 10.11.2012, p. 1).’

Article 3

The texts of Directive 2012/32/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 October 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 October 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 312, 10.11.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Henry FIORENTINO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Todd WESSINGER, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-6844.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Qualo Martez LOWERY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6142.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Roberto DIANAS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Marimba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Chmyz, Acting
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company for the periods presented in the
Report.



/s/    ANDREW
CHMYZAndrew Chmyz Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer




March 27, 2003
Ronnie PRICE, et al., petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

No. 16-1523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Robert B. STANFORD, III, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17M55.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
### THE A-ITCDRNEY GENERAL OF' TEXAS

December12. 1975
zhe kkmxable Ivan

Williams cpjnionwo. H-750 gcecutiveDirector Taras -t Machine

ocmnissim Re: Whstherapersa2maybring P. 0. Sax 13226 aiin-cprated mxhizEsinto Austin, Texas 70711 Texasfor his own use and later sellthESUWithoutoMainingall iqortlicense. DearMr. Williams:

Section 8(l)of article

13.17, Taxation

- General,

pmvides that hlopersmshllengageinkusinessto manufacture,ckun,

buy, sell,orrent, lease, tKade,lend,orfumishtoanotk?r,or repair, maintain,

se?xice,

b-ansportwithin the state,

store,oriqxxt,armsiccoinoperatedmachheoraskillorpleasure c~in-cpratimachinewitlxxta license or registratim

certificate

issued mder this Article. An inprta's licenseautkrizes the licensee

to erqageinhsinesstoiqcn-t,tranqmk,

repair,

sell, and deliver, skill or pl easure coin-qxxated machhes,forsaleanddeliverywithinthis stats. Tax. - Gel-I.

art. 13.17,

s 15(3). baphasis

supplied)

p. 3179The Honorable IvanWillies - page two (H-750)

Thestatutemakesclearthatapersonrmstobtainaninporter's licenseif,inbringing~in-operatedmachinesintothestateforhis cwnuseandlaterresellingthem,henmybedeewdtherebytr,be enqaging

inbusiness

to iqn-t, transpcrtor sell suchmachines. h &gaged mbusiness" hasbeendefinedas

inplyinga,ax~t+cuscccvpationorprincipal business,uqmrtmgsansccntinuityofpractice and more thanoccasional participaticm,

or a single act.
. . .York

v. Eotscm,

271 S.W. 2d 347, 349 (Tex.

civ. App. - Fortworth 1954, writ ref'd

n.r.e.1.

abviously,eachcasermstbejudgedanitsparticularfactsandthe regulztinghcamishmldbevigilantto insurethatnotusinesswhichis infactanimporterispennittedtoutilizethe~~asasubterfuge bywhichtoavoidthelicensingrqu&mznt. SeeAttorney General C@nion H-712 (1975). -~~se,webelievethatthe~ssionshouldexamtrethecircunstancesofeveryparticularinportaticaand subsqwnt resale

in order tosatisfyitselfthatnoper~wfroisactuallyengagedinthebusiness ofiqortingisescapingstatutoryregulation. SUMMARY Altbughtheinportationofmin-opzratedma&nes forone'spzrscmluse,togetherwithasubeqent resale, dcesnotnecessarilybring the person withinthelicensing requirarwts

of section

8(l) of article

13.17, Taxation

- General,

eachcase

nut bej~edonitsparticularfacts.

p. 3180, l'bs

Homrable IvanWilliams -page three (H-750)

p. 3181
# L_2012207EN.01004001.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 60/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2011/15/EU of 23 February 2011 amending Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2011/15/EU of 23 February 2011 amending Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 55a (Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 L 0015: Commission Directive 2011/15/EU of 23 February 2011 (OJ L 49, 24.2.2011, p. 33).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 L 0015: Commission Directive 2011/15/EU of 23 February 2011 (OJ L 49, 24.2.2011, p. 33).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2011/15/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 49, 24.2.2011, p. 33.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# EUR-Lex - 22007A0530(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22007A0530(01)

**Agreed minutes between the European Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil **

*
Official Journal L 138 , 30/05/2007 P. 0012 - 0012 *

Agreed minutes

between the European Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil

Negotiations under Article XXVIII of GATT 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to poultry provided for in EC Schedule CXL annexed to GATT 1994.

In the negotiations between the European Community (hereinafter "EC") and the Federative Republic of Brazil (hereinafter "Brazil") under Article XXVIII of GATT 1994 for the modification of concessions with respect to poultry provided for in EC Schedule CXL annexed to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994), the Delegations of the Commission of the European Communities and Brazil reached the Agreement outlined below.

The Delegations of the Commission of the European Communities and Brazil will submit this Agreement for approval to their respective authorities.

1. Bound Rates of Duty: the bound rate of duty for items 02109020 (currently 02109939), 160231 and 16023219 shall be EUR 1300/tonne, EUR 1024/tonne and EUR 1024/tonne respectively.

2. Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs): the EC shall open the following annual TRQs:

(a) for item 02109020 (salted) a quota of 264245 tonnes, of which 170807 tonnes shall be allocated to Brazil. The in-quota rate shall be 15,4 % ad valorem;

(b) for item 160231 (turkey) a quota of 103896 tonnes, of which 92300 tonnes shall be allocated to Brazil. The in-quota rate shall be 8,5 % ad valorem;

(c) for item 16023219 (cooked) a quota of 250953 tonnes, of which 79477 tonnes shall be allocated to Brazil. The in-quota rate shall be 8 % ad valorem.

3. Imports under the TRQs referred to in paragraph 2 shall take place on the basis of certificates of origin issued in a non-discriminatory way by the competent authorities in Brazil.

4. The concessions contained in the present Agreement shall be subject to the modalities eventually agreed to in the DDA of WTO.

5. The quota volumes allocated among the countries with principal supplying interest and substantial interest shall follow the general principles of GATT Article XIII. The concessions that may result from the application of such principles shall not be less favourable than those negotiated under the present Agreement.

6. The two Parties commit themselves to implement the provisions of this Agreement as soon as possible in accordance to their internal procedures.

7. At the request of either Party to the present Agreement, consultations shall take place in relation to the implementation of the present Agreement.

Done at Brussels on the twenty-ninth day of May in the year two thousand and seven.

For the European Community

+++++ TIFF +++++

For the Federative Republic of Brazil

+++++ TIFF +++++

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2005137EN.01000103.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments

(2005/C 137/03)

The Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments will enter into force on 1 July 2005, the procedures provided for in Article 17 of the Agreement having been completed on 13 May 2005.

---
# L_2012270EN.01003901.xml

| 4.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 116/2012

of 15 June 2012

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2012 of 30 April 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2012 of 30 April 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 of 3 February 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator also taking into consideration the expansion of the Union emission trading scheme to EEA-EFTA countries (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 of 3 February 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator also taking into consideration the expansion of the Union emission trading scheme to EEA-EFTA countries (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 21as (Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0100: Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 of 3 February 2012 (OJ L 39, 11.2.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0100: Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 of 3 February 2012 (OJ L 39, 11.2.2012, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 June 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 248, 13.9.2012, p. 35.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 39, 11.2.2012, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                             Statia Terminals Group N.V.



April 16, 2002


United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza

Washington, D.C. 20549

         Re:  Arthur Andersen LLP - Regulation S-X, Article 3,
              Note 3T Requirements
              FORM 10-K FOR STATIA TERMINALS GROUP N.V (PENDING LIQUIDATION)
              --------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's (the
"Commission") recently promulgated Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation
S-X regarding requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") audit clients as
set forth in Release No. 33-8070, effective March 18, 2002, this letter serves
to advise the Commission that Statia Terminals Group N.V. has, as of the date
hereof, received written representations from Andersen that:

          (1)     Andersen's audit of the financial statements contained in our
                  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
                  2001 (to which this letter is filed as Exhibit 99.1) was
                  performed subject to Andersen's quality control system for the
                  U.S. accounting and auditing practice; and

          (2)     to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
                  conducted in compliance with professional standards, there
                  were appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on
                  the audit; availability of national office consultation to
                  conduct the relevant portions of the audit; and availability
                  of personnel at non-U.S. affiliates of Andersen to conduct the
                  relevant portions of the audit.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       STATIA TERMINALS GROUP N.V.


                                       By: /s/ James F. Brenner
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               James F. Brenner
                                               Vice President and Treasurer
                                               (Principal Financial and
                                               Accounting Officer)
----

|   | **KPMG LLP**                     |                     |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   | **Chartered Accountants**        |                     |
|   | Suite 1500 Purdy's Wharf Tower I |                     |
|   | 1959 Upper Water Street          | Telephone (902) 492-6000 |
|   | Halifax NS B3J 3N2               | Telefax (902) 429-1307   |
|   | Canada                           | www.kpmg.ca              |

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors of Gammon Lake Resources Inc. 

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form40-F/A of our auditors' report dated March 16, 2006 except as to note 16 (a)which is as of April 2, 2007 on the restated consolidated financial statementswhich is contained in this Annual Report on Form 40-F/A Amendment No. 1 for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants 

Halifax, Canada April 2, 2007 

 

----
#### H. Clay Abney, Jr., Mary Caruthers Nichols, a married woman joined by her husband, G. R. Nichols, and G. R. Nichols in his own right, *Appellants,*v. F. T. Hurner, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion filed April 24, 1929.

*241Decision filed February 19, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied April 24, 1929.

*Henry E. Williams,*for Appellants;

No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having beén seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Long, Circuit Judge, concur.

Opinion filed April 24, 1929.

Long (Circuit Judge) :

The bill in this cause prays that the defendant be enjoined from disposing of certain described lands; that the deed conveying said lands to defendant be decreed to be *242void; that the deed executed by defendant to lands exchanged for lands mentioned and described in complainant’s deed be canceled; and that certain notes and mortgages executed by complainants be also canceled. On May 2, 1927 the defendant filed his answer admitting the execution of the instruments but denying in detail and specifically the several allegations of the bill. The court appointed a master to take testimony and fixed the time for the taking of such testimony at 60 days, subsequently extending such time until October 31, 1927. No testimony was taken and the cause was set down for final hearing on the bill and answer. The time for taking testimony was fixed on the suggestion of complainant and the court subsequently indulged the complainant further by the extension of such time.

The answer most certainly denies every material allegation of the bill, and also incorporates a counter claim, as is admitted by complainant’s brief.

If it was necessary to file an answer to paragraph fifteen of the bill alleging this counter claim in.order that the cause should have been at issue, then the complainants who had several months in which to avail themselves of this rule, should not, upon the final hearing, be heard to complain; nor can they complain of the negligence of their counsel which the law visits upon them.

The motion to dismiss was properly denied because the defendant had acquired, as appears from the answer, a substantial right in the cause and would have been seriously prejudiced by a dismissal.

The denial of the motion to extend the time for taking testimony was within the discretion of the chancellor, and as there does not appear to be an abuse of such discretion the petition for rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur.