alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Oluwafemi OKEOWO, petitioner, v. HARLEQUIN BOOKS S.A., et al.

No. 16-8497.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify
that to the best of our knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 12, 2005

| |  | 
Tom WylerChief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------



---

---
# L_2009277EN.01003601.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 84/2009

of 3 July 2009

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 71/2009 of 29 May 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 71/2009 of 29 May 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2009/83/EC of 23 January 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as far as the IMO Unique Company and Registered Owner Identification Number Scheme is concerned (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2009/83/EC of 23 January 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as far as the IMO Unique Company and Registered Owner Identification Number Scheme is concerned (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 56bb (Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

‘as amended by:

| — | 32009 D 0083: Commission Decision 2009/83/EC of 23 January 2009 (OJ L 29, 31.1.2009, p. 53).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32009 D 0083: Commission Decision 2009/83/EC of 23 January 2009 (OJ L 29, 31.1.2009, p. 53).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2009/83/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 July 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 232, 3.9.2009, p. 28.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 29, 31.1.2009, p. 53.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Release #4089-97 (CFTC Docket #98-3)
    For Release: December 18, 1997

CFTC FILES COMPLAINT CHARGING NEW YORK CURRENCY RESEARCH CORPORATION
    WITH FAILURE TO PRODUCE BOOKS AND RECORDS

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today
    announced the filing of an administrative complaint on December 17, 1997,
    against New York Currency Research Corporation (New York Currency)
    of New York, New York. New York Currency was registered as a commodity
    trading advisor (CTA) and commodity pool operator (CPO) from January 16,
    1996 until April 3, 1997.

The CFTC complaint alleges that New York Currency violated the Commodity
    Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations by failing to provide to
    representatives of the Commission books and records required to be kept by
    CTAs and CPOs when requested to do so.

Specifically, the administrative complaint alleges that New York
    Currency failed to comply with the CFTC's Division of Enforcement's
    repeated requests for access to the books and records required to be kept
    and to be made available upon demand to any representative of the
    Commission for inspection.

Sanctions available to the CFTC include, a cease and desist order
    prohibiting the respondent from violating federal commodity law and CFTC
    regulations, and a civil monetary penalty of not more than $110,000, or
    triple the monetary gain to the respondent, for each violation of the CEA
    and CFTC regulations. In order to obtain speedy relief, the Commission
    authorized expedited procedures in this matter.
Rogerio Chaves SCOTTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Rogerio Chaves Scotton, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-9028.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Michael Lee WEIBLE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7921.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Lisa WHITNUM-BAKER, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 17-6109.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.
Dora L. ADKINS, petitioner, v. PUBLIC STORAGE.

No. 17-5417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Linda SHAO, petitioner, v. McMANIS FAULKNER, LLP.

No. 17-82.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-7-2006

In Re: Almahdi

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 06-1121

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Almahdi " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1624.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1624
1

HPS-31 (January 2006) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-1121

________________

IN RE: JAMALUD-DIN ALMAHDI,

 Petitioner

_______________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Related to M.D. Pa. No. 05-cv-01067)

_______________

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

January 27, 2006

Before: CHIEF JUDGE SCIRICA, WEIS and GARTH, CIRCUIT JUDGES

(Filed: February 7, 2006)

 

OPINION

 

PER CURIAM.

Pro se Petitioner Jamalud-din Almadhi, a federal prisoner, seeks a writ of

mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the Middle District of

Pennsylvania to reach a decision on his motion to alter or amend judgment filed on

August 5, 2005. We will deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. 

At the time of the filing of the petition for writ of mandamus in this Court,
2

the District Court had not ruled on Almahdi’s motion to alter or amend. However, on

January 17, 2006, the District Court denied this motion. Therefore, this petition for writ

of mandamus will be denied as moot.
Sean MERMER, petitioner, v. Neil McDOWELL, Warden.

No. 17-5881.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.02

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Pungello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of John W. Henry & Co./Millburn
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.


Date: August 12, 2005
-----------------------

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Marcus LESSARD, petitioner, v. Traci CRAVITZ, et al.

No. 17-5690.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST AMERICAN BANK FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,170,409
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          74,632
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,725,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        29,002,727
<LOANS>                                    174,584,682
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,747,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             230,609,148
<DEPOSITS>                                 191,979,063
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,910,738
<LONG-TERM>                                 13,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,022
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,196,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             230,609,148
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,413,361
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              425,453
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,996
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,842,810
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,853,263
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,067,487
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,775,323
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  460,639
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               6,532
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,987,999
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                763,585
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     763,585
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   509,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.52
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,646,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   132,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                132,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,689,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  418,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    15,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,747,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,747,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Curtis T. HOWARD, petitioner, v. Michelle MILLER, Warden.

No. 16-9722.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Robert DENHAM, petitioner, v. Connie HORTON, Warden.

No. 17-6212.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 33.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wealth Minerals Ltd.. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry Pogue, the Acting President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 26, 2006



/s/ Jerry Pogue

Jerry Pogue
Acting President and Chief Executive Officer







---



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wealth Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Kinley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 26, 2006



/s/ Michael W. Kinley

Michael W. Kinley
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40

                           [COMPASS BANK LETTERHEAD]

September 30, 1999

Mr. Steven H. Mikel
President & CEO
Southern Mineral Corporation
1201 Louisiana Street, Suite 3350
Houston, Texas 77002-5609

     RE:  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 19, 1998, by and
          between Southern Mineral Corporation, SMC Ecuador, Inc., SMC
          Production Co., BEC Energy, Inc., Amerac Energy Corporation, Compass
          Bank and First Union National Bank (as subsequently amended, restated,
          and/or supplemented, the "Credit Agreement")

Dear Steve:

Section 2.5 (a) of the Credit Agreement shall be amended to change the date of
September 30, 1999 to October 8, 1999.

Except as expressly provided herein, the Credit Agreement and the other Loan
Documents shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their
respective terms and this letter shall not be construed to:

      (i)   impair the validity, perfection or priority of any lien or security
            interest securing the Obligations;
      (ii)  waive or impair any rights, powers or remedies of the Agent and the
            Lenders under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents; or
      (iii) grant any forbearance periods or extend the term of the Credit
            Agreement or the time for payment of any of the Obligations, except
            as expressly provided herein.

No Event of Default and no Default is waived or remedied by the execution of
this letter by the Lenders, and any such Default or Event of Default heretofore
arising and currently continuing shall continue after the execution and delivery
hereof.  Nothing contained in this letter, nor any past indulgence by the
Lenders, nor any prior waiver or consents or any waivers or consents which may
hereafter be granted nor any other action or inaction on behalf of the Lenders
(i) shall constitute or be deemed to constitute a waiver of any Defaults or
Events of Default which exist or may exist under the Credit Agreement or any
other Loan Document, or (ii) shall constitute or be deemed to constitute an
election of remedies by the Lenders or a waiver of any of the rights or remedies
of the Lenders provided in the Credit Agreement or the other Loan Documents or
otherwise afforded at law or in equity.
<PAGE>

Mr. Steven H. Mikel
September 30, 1999
Page 2


THIS LETTER, THE AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER WRITTEN LOAN DOCUMENTS
REPRESENT, COLLECTIVELY, THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE
CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL
AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES. THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE
PARTIES.

Sincerely,

COMPASS BANK


By:/s/ Dorothy Marchand Wilson
   ---------------------------
       Dorothy Marchand Wilson
       Senior Vice President


FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK

By:  __________________________

Its:  __________________________



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

SOUTHERN MINERAL CORPORATION

/s/ Michael. E. Luttrell
------------------------
Michael E. Luttrell
Vice President & CFO
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51334

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO RAMIREZ-FLORES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:05-CR-228-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario RamirezFlores raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Santiesteban-Hernandez, 469 F.3d 376, 381 (5th Cir. 2006), which

held that a Texas robbery conviction qualified as a crime of

violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, and by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2013325EN.01002002.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — British Telecommunications and BT Pension Scheme Trustees v Commission

(Joined Cases T-226/09 and T-230/09) (1)

1

(State aid - Partial exemption from the obligation to contribute to the Pension Protection Fund - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - State resources - Advantage - Selective nature - Adverse effect on competition - Effect on trade between Member States - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state reasons - Putting into effect of the aid)

2013/C 325/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: British Telecommunications (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Robert, M. Newhouse and T. Castorina, Solicitors, and by J. Holmes, Barrister, and H. Legge QC) (Case T-226/09) and BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd (London) (represented by: J. Derenne and A. Müller-Rappard, lawyers) (Case T-230/09)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and N. Khan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/703/EC of 11 February 2009 concerning the State aid C-55/2007 (ex NN 63/07, CP 106/06) implemented by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Public guarantee in favour of [British Telecommunications] (OJ 2009 L 242, p. 21).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | In Case T-226/09, orders British Telecommunications plc to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

In Case T-226/09, orders British Telecommunications plc to pay the costs;

| 3. | In Case T-230/09, orders BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Case T-230/09, orders BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---