alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRI Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Turney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ David L. Turney  David L. Turney  Chief Executive Officer  November 13, 2007       A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,985-03

EX PARTE TRACY PAUL TAYLOR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1129515-A IN THE 337TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 and sentenced to

seventy years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Taylor v. State,

No. 01-07-00802-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 26, 2012). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On March 24, 2020, the trial court entered an order designating issues. The district clerk

properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the trial court made findings of fact and

conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary
investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 14, 2021

Do not publish
Triandus TABB, petitioner, v. Jason GARNETT, Chief of Parole, Illinois Department of Corrections.

No. 17-322.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Dora L. ADKINS, petitioner, v. PUBLIC STORAGE.

No. 17-5417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 31, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Charles James MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8565.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Oliver Vaughn DOUCE, petitioner.

No. 17-1038.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Financial Services Forum
  
    



  Liquidity issues; block trading
      
  When
              10/13/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVIII. Real Time Reporting

  Organization(s)
              Financial Services Forum


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Michael LAUER, et al., petitioners, v. SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
James Carl Doron WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5885.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
C.D., E.F., and G.H., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9672.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Kalim A.R. MUHAMMAD, petitioner, v. AT&T, INC., et al.

No. 17-24.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
# C_2010063EN.01004702.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/47

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 January 2010 — Agriconsulting Europe v Commission

(Case T-443/09 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public procurement - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation and for interim measures - Loss of opportunity - Absence of serious and irreparable damage - No urgency)

2010/C 63/83

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Agriconsulting Europe SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and L. Prete, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim relief concerning the tendering procedure EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/Multi relating to short-term services in the exclusive interest of third countries benefiting from European Commission external aid.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Marc PHAM, petitioner, v. Michael KIRKPATRICK, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

No. 17-8590.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00329-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.M., M.M., C.M.,

G.M., AND G.M., CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-106560-18)

February 3, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order is 

affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellants B.D. and P.D. shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.4

                  RATIO OF TOTAL DEBT TO EBITDA (AS DEFINED)
                            (Dollars in Thousands)

                             1997        1998        1999      2000       2001

Total debt                 $ 50,000    $ 45,000    $266,557  $261,601   $413,209
EBITDA (as defined)          24,522      43,547      50,562    54,011     70,955
                           --------    --------    --------  --------   --------

Ratio                           2.0         1.0         5.3       4.8        5.8
                           ========    ========    ========  ========   ========

                                      iv
# L_2010101EN.01002601.xml

| 22.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 101/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 101/26

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 16/2010

of 29 January 2010

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 91/2009 of 3 July 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 91/2009 of 3 July 2009 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Council Recommendation 2008/C 319/03 of 20 November 2008 on the mobility of young volunteers across the European Union (2), |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Council Recommendation 2008/C 319/03 of 20 November 2008 on the mobility of young volunteers across the European Union (2),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in paragraph 8 of Article 4 of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 H 1213: Council Recommendation 2008/C 319/03 of 20 November 2008 on the mobility of young volunteers across the European Union (OJ C 319, 13.12.2008, p. 8).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 H 1213: Council Recommendation 2008/C 319/03 of 20 November 2008 on the mobility of young volunteers across the European Union (OJ C 319, 13.12.2008, p. 8).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 January 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 277, 22.10.2009, p. 15.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 319, 13.12.2008, p. 8.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
April 5, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RALPH O. DOUGLAS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00527-CV V.

THE HONORABLE TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, The Honorable Texas 

Board of Paroles and Pardons, signed June 2, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. The record shows that the judgment is not final. We therefore order the appeal

DISMISSED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.6

                           DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF
                           CHAMPION AEROSPACE, INC.
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Champion Aerospace, Inc., hereby
constitute and appoint Gregory Rufus, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, as attorney-in-fact for each of the undersigned, and in the
name, place and stead of each of the undersigned, to execute on behalf of each
of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2001 pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 and to execute any and all amendments to such report and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents required to be filed in connection
therewith, granting to such attorney full power to act with or without the
others, and to have full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and
on behalf of each of the undersigned, every act whatsoever necessary, advisable
or appropriate to be done in the premises, hereby ratifying and approving the
act of said attorney and any such substitute.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

                       EXECUTED as of December 28, 2001.

        /s/ Douglas W. Peacock
------------------------------------
         Douglas W. Peacock
       Chairman of the Board


        /s/ W. Nicholas Howley
------------------------------------
         W. Nicholas Howley
              President
    (Principal Executive Officer)
           and Director

                                      xi
Jeffery WOOD, et al., petitioners, v. Bryan COLLIER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

No. 16-9450.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 20, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jimmy WHEELER, petitioner, v. C. DAVIS.

No. 17-8231.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Gillette HAWKINS, petitioner, v. Kevin KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

No. 17-8934.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

*2690Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# L_2011058EN.01008001.xml

| 3.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/80

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 122/2010

of 10 November 2010

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 108/2010 of 1 October 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 108/2010 of 1 October 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Recommendation 2010/19/EU of 13 January 2010 on the secure exchange of electronic data between Member States to check the uniqueness of driver cards that they issue (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Recommendation 2010/19/EU of 13 January 2010 on the secure exchange of electronic data between Member States to check the uniqueness of driver cards that they issue (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be inserted after point 36a (Directive 2003/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

‘
  ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE

The Contracting Parties take note of the content of the following acts:

| 36b. | 32010 H 0019: Commission Recommendation 2010/19/EU of 13 January 2010 on the secure exchange of electronic data between Member States to check the uniqueness of driver cards that they issue (OJ L 9, 14.1.2010, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

36b.

32010 H 0019: Commission Recommendation 2010/19/EU of 13 January 2010 on the secure exchange of electronic data between Member States to check the uniqueness of driver cards that they issue (OJ L 9, 14.1.2010, p. 10).’

Article 2

The text of Recommendation 2010/19/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 November 2010, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 332, 16.12.2010, p. 58.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 9, 14.1.2010, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2011124EN.01000101.xml

| 13.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Pakistan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

The Agreement between the European Union and Pakistan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation entered into force on 1 December 2010, the procedure provided for in Article 20 of the Agreement having been completed on 8 October 2010.

---
Exhibit 11

Computation of Earnings per Share



|                                                                                         |                    |                   |                    |                  |   |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ----------------- | ------------------ | ---------------- | - | ---------
|                                                                                         |                    | Three MonthsEnded |                    | Nine MonthsEnded
|                                                                                         | September 30, 2008 |                   | September 30, 2008
|Income available to common stockholders                                                  |                    | $                 | 610,760            |                  | $ | 2,583,457
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |                    |                   | 4,975,542          |                  |   | 4,975,542
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |                    | $                 | 0.12               |                  | $ | 0.52     
|Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |                    | $                 | 610,760            |                  | $ | 2,583,457
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |                    |                   | 4,975,542          |                  |   | 4,975,542
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |                    | $                 | 0.12               |                  | $ | 0.52     



| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |