alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009073EN.01004601.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/46

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 11/2009

of 5 February 2009

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 129/2008 of 5 December 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 129/2008 of 5 December 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2008/386/EC of 23 April 2008 modifying Annex A to Decision 2006/679/EC concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system and Annex A to Decision 2006/860/EC concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2008/386/EC of 23 April 2008 modifying Annex A to Decision 2006/679/EC concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system and Annex A to Decision 2006/860/EC concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in points 37i (Commission Decision 2006/679/EC) and 37j (Commission Decision 2006/860/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 D 0386: Commission Decision 2008/386/EC of 23 April 2008 (OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 D 0386: Commission Decision 2008/386/EC of 23 April 2008 (OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 11).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2008/386/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 February 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 25, 29.1.2009, p. 36.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 11.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### A. T. Strano, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Carr & Carr, Inc., *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion filed February 6, 1929.

*McCoy & Finch,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Wideman & Wideman,*for Defendant in Error.

Buford, J.

In this case a real estate broker brought suit to recover the amount of commissions alleged to be due him from the defendant. The declaration upon which trial was had contained eight counts. The first two counts were special counts on the contract. The remaining counts were the common counts. There was a judgment for the plaintiff to which writ of error was taken. The evidence fails to support the verdict under either count of the declaration. This Court, in Wiggins, Administrator, v. Wilson et al., 55 Fla. 346, 45 So. R. 1011, enunciated the rule applicable to suits based on contract like that involved here in the following language:

> *151A broker employed to *find a purchaser*to be entitled to compensation must either *produce to the owner*a customer who is able, ready and willing to buy *on the terms prescribed by the owner,*or else take from the customer a binding contract of purchase within such prescribed terms.

This rule has been adhered to 'in this jurisdiction up to the present time and is conceded to be the correct rule by a majority of the courts of final jurisdiction.

The only one of the common counts under which the plaintiff might have hoped to maintain his action was count 4, which was in the following language:

> And in a like sum for work and labor and the services of the plaintiff by it done and bestowed in and about the business of the defendant at his request on the 5th day of August, 1925.

It appears to be settled beyond all question of controversy that to maintain an action under this count it must be shown that he who is to be charged either accepted the service rendered or was benefited thereby, or had agreed to pay the plaintiff for such service as was rendered.

The evidence fails to show that the parties sought to be charged, the defendant in this ease, accepted the labor and services alleged to have been rendered or that he profited or was benefited thereby, or that he had agreed to pay the plaintiff for such labor and service as was proven to have been rendered.

To have met the necessity of proving that the defendant had agreed to pay for the services alleged to have been rendered, it would have been necessary for the plaintiff to have made proof of the facts required under the rule as enunciated in Wiggins, Administrator, v. Wilson et al., *supra.*

*152It appearing that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict under either count of the declaration, the judgment should be reversed and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum, J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Carlos Alberto REGUERO-MENDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Luciano Solis-Ruiz, petitioner, v. United States; Camille Diane Armstrong, petitioner, v. United States; Michael Medina, petitioner, v. United States; Mario Gonzalez-Zavala, petitioner, v. United States; and Brenda Vianet Martinez-Montes, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-6316.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Ri'Cha ri SANCHO, petitioner, v. ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR.

No. 16-8655.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Alber I. SAID, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 17-8204.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
OMNIA ITALIAN DESIGN, INC., petitioner, v. STONE CREEK, INC.

No. 17-731.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| **T**erry **A**misano Ltd.
**Amisano    Hanson**
**K**evin **H**anson, CA
**C**hartered    **A**ccountants**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
 

We hereby consent to the use, in the Form 10-KSB for EmpyreanCommunications, Inc., of our report dated April 15, 2003 relating to theDecember 31, 2002 financial statements of Empyrean Communications, Inc., whichappears in such Form.
      
Vancouver, Canada
"*Amisano Hanson*"
April 12, 2004**Chartered **A**ccountants 
 

750 West    Pender Street, Suite 604
Telephone:  604-689-0188
Vancouver Canada
    Facsimile:  604-689-9773
V6C 2T7
    E-MAIL:  amishan@telus.net** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Drew D. MANNS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Rown WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9011.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF John Wesley LOCKLAIR, III.

No. D-2963.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Disbarment ordered entered.
Darlene COLEMAN, petitioner, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY.

No. 16-8683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Curtis F. LEE, petitioner, v. ING GROEP, N.V., et al.

No. 17-5676.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until November 20, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
STACEY O. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

JOANN KIRKLAND-JONES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2507

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 11, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John "Jay" Gontarek, Judge.

Frederick J. Gant, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Janis L. Burke, Fort Walton Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
1999 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-8-1999

Taj Mahal Travel v. Delta Airlines

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-5652

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Taj Mahal Travel v. Delta Airlines" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 5.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/5
 OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

P. DOUGLAS SISK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TELEPHONE 

 CLERK 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT215-597-2995 

 21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

 601 MARKET STREET 

 PHILADELPHIA 19106-1790 

 January 8, 1999 

West Publishing Co. 

 

Commerce Clearing House, Inc. 

U.S. Law Week 

 

Re: Taj Mahal Travel, Inc. V. Delta Airlines, Inc. 

 Docket No. 97-5652 

 D.C. No. 97-cv-0088 

 

Dear Publishers: 

 The following corrections should be made to the published slip 

opinion which was filed on 

July 24, 1997, in the above-entitled case. 

 On page 20 of the slip opinion, seven lines into the second full 

paragraph, please delete 

the "n.2," and close the parentheses after "Op. at 7." 

 

 

 Very truly yours, 

 P. Douglas Sisk, CLERK 

 By:________________________ 

 Lenore R. Benoit 

 Case Manager 

 Direct Dial: 597-4495 

 

 

cc: Gianni Donati, Esq. 

 Stacy A. Fols, Esq. 

 Francis P. Newell, Esq.
# L_2009304EN.01000601.xml

| 19.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/6

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 95/2009

of 25 September 2009

amending Annex VII (Recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex VII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 127/2008 of 5 December 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex VII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 127/2008 of 5 December 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 279/2009 of 6 April 2009 amending Annex II to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 279/2009 of 6 April 2009 amending Annex II to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 R 0279: Commission Regulation (EC) No 279/2009 of 6 April 2009 (OJ L 93, 7.4.2009, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 R 0279: Commission Regulation (EC) No 279/2009 of 6 April 2009 (OJ L 93, 7.4.2009, p. 11).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 279/2009 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 25, 29.1.2009, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 7.4.2009, p. 11.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 13.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of Wealth Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







­­­­/s/ Gary Freeman



Name: Gary Freeman

Title: Chief Executive Officer

October 28, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 31.3



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Monte Zweben, the Chief Executive Officer of Blue Martini Software, Inc. (the
Company), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Blue Martini Software, Inc; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 24, 2004



/s/ Monte ZwebenMonte ZwebenChief Executive Officer
Timothy L. FELIX, Jr., petitioner, v. WISCONSIN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE DIVISION.

No. 16-9456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Brandon Rachon BEACHEM, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, on Behalf of Heather Marie THOMAS.

No. 17-8656.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Richard Leo WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5312.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Robert ANDERSON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-295.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/James Cawley, Javelin
  
    



  Topic of discussion: made available to trade review period
      
  When
              05/14/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Wallace

  Visitor(s)
              James Cawley, Javelin

  Organization(s)
              Javelin


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERSTATE LAND INVESTORS II L.P. FOR THE 9 MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,450,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,494,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          229,285
<BONDS>                                        212,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,052,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,494,977
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   103
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### George McPherson, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed April 24, 1929.

*II. H. McDonald*and *Zack II. Douglas,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the.State. .

*636Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Wi-iitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.