alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 14, 2006



/s/  John B. Sawyer
---------------------------------
     John B. Sawyer
     Chief Operating Officer
    (Principal Operating Officer)
Vernon MADISON, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 17-7505.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/05/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       29,585
COMMITMENTS
   6,796      380    1,419   13,065   19,068   21,279   20,867    8,306    8,718

CHANGES FROM 04/28/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,556)
   1,064      119      -18     -622      451      425      552    1,131    1,004

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.0      1.3      4.8     44.2     64.5     71.9     70.5     28.1     29.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       38)
       9        2        8       22       17       35       25
```

----

Updated May 08, 2009
# C_2010288EN.01004001.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Quinta do Portal v OHIM — Vallegre (PORTO ALEGRE)

(Case T-369/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark PORTO ALEGRE - Earlier national word mark VISTA ALEGRE - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2010/C 288/76)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Sociedade Quinta do Portal SA (Porto, Portugal) (represented by: B. Belchior, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA (Sabrosa, Portugal) (represented by: P. López Ronda and G. Macias Bonilla, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2009 (Case R 1012/2008-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA and Sociedade Quinta do Portal SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sociedade Quinta do Portal SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sociedade Quinta do Portal SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

---
Kenneth David HAAG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7949.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending June 28, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, John Miley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  |  |  |                                  
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID J. PECKER           
|                      |  |  |  | David J. Pecker                  
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer President



|                      |  |  |  |                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  |  |  |                         
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN A. MILEY    
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 



This certification accompanies each
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II-O0160

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kris Muto <kpmdel@comcast.net>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 12:47 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kris Muto

5 Carsdale Ct.

Wilmington, DE 19808
# EUR-Lex - 22008A0315(06) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22008A0315(06)

**Protocol amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Eastern Republic of Uruguay on certain aspects of air services **

*
Official Journal L 073 , 15/03/2008 P. 0031 - 0031 *

Protocol

amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Eastern Republic of Uruguay on certain aspects of air services

THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY,

of the one part, and

THE EASTERN REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY,

of the other part,

(hereinafter referred to as the Parties),

HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between Romania and the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, signed on 31 May 1996 in Bucharest,

HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the European Community and the Eastern Republic of Uruguay on certain aspects of air services, signed in Montevideo on 3 November 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the horizontal agreement),

CONSIDERING the accession of Romania to the European Union, and therefore to the Community, on 1 January 2007,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be inserted in Annex I, point (a) of the horizontal agreement after the entry concerning Portugal:

- "— Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay concerning air services, done at Bucharest on 31 May 1996, hereinafter referred to as the "Uruguay-Romania Agreement" in Annex II;".

Article 2

The following indents shall be inserted in Annex II to the horizontal agreement after the entries concerning the "Uruguay-Portugal Agreement":

(a) at point (a) "Designation":

- "— Article 3 of the Uruguay-Romania Agreement;";

(b) at point (b) "Refusal, revocation, suspension or limitation of authorisations or permissions":

- "— Article 4(1) of the Uruguay-Romania Agreement;";

(c) at point (d) "Taxation of aviation fuel":

- "— Article 9 of the Uruguay-Romania Agreement;";

(d) at point (e) "Tariffs for carriage within the European Community":

- "— Article 8 of the Uruguay-Romania Agreement;".

Article 3

This Protocol shall enter into force when the Parties have notified each other in writing that their respective internal procedures necessary for its entry into force have been completed.

Article 4

This Protocol shall be drawn up in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages. In case of divergence the Spanish text shall prevail over the other language texts.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2009082EN.01003701.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/37

---

Action brought on 6 February 2009 — Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission

(Case F-9/09)

(2009/C 82/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isabel Vicente Carbajosa (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision adopting and publishing the competition notices EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 and the decisions relating to the correction of the pre-selection tests and the written tests and the awarding of marks for the oral tests.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the Commission's decisions publishing and fixing the conditions for admission to and the conduct of the tests in competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decisions publishing and fixing the conditions for admission to and the conduct of the tests in competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08;

| — | Annul the decisions of the selection boards for competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 relating to the correction of the pre-selection tests and the written tests and the awarding of marks for the oral tests; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the selection boards for competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 relating to the correction of the pre-selection tests and the written tests and the awarding of marks for the oral tests;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
Woodrow Andrew CLARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8925.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2007090EN.01009204.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 90/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 90/92

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Argentine Republic relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the course of accession to the European Community

The above Agreement (pursuant to Article XXIV:6 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994) (OJ L 355, 15.12.2006, p. 92) has entered into force on 29 November 2006.

---
Dupree TURNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6365.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Neil GILLESPIE, petitioner, v. REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS.

No. 17-8682.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
---

Exhibit 99.12

Consent of Harold Bent

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of AuRico Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with the following reports and documents,
included in the 2012 Annual Information Form of AuRico Gold Inc., dated April 1, 2013 (the “AIF”):

Section 19 of the NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Kemess Underground Project, British Columbia, Canada

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-177638, File No. 333-175079 and File No. 333-173458 ) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-177404) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this 1st day of April, 2013.

/s/ Harold BentBy: Harold Bent, P.Geo 
        Title: Environmental Manager 
        Company: AuRico Gold Inc

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Derek Schneideman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2004)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) As discussed above, disclosed in this report any change in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
      during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007                 /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Ralph T. O'NEAL, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5717.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II-00947

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

leona klerer <leona@klerer.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

leona klerer

strawberry hill ave

stamford, CT 6902
Thomas BOAZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9068.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.