alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release:4001-97 (CFTC Docket 93-2)

For Release: March 12, 1997

CFTC ACCEPTS SETTLEMENT OFFER FROM CRAIG W. EFFRON

Settlement Order Revokes Effron's Registration with the CFTC
    and,

Among Other Things, Directs Him to Pay a $100,000 Civil Monetary
    Penalty

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it has issued an order accepting an offer of settlement from Craig W. Effron, a trader on the Commodity Exchange Inc. (COMEX) and
    the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), in connection with a complaint
    filed by the CFTC on October 19, 1992. Effron is registered with the CFTC
    as a floor trader.

The CFTC order finds that Effron violated the Commodity Exchange Act
    (CEA) by aiding and abetting the fraudulent actions of COMEX and NYMEX
    floor brokers with respect to the brokers' handling of their customers'
    orders. The CFTC order further finds that Effron also violated provisions
    of the CEA and the CFTC regulations prohibiting noncompetitive trading;
    fictitious sales, wash sales and accommodation trading; and causing the
    reporting of non-bona fide prices.

The CFTC order finds that Effron, trading for his own account,
    participated in noncompetitive trades with floor brokers. According to the
    CFTC order, Effron's noncompetitive trading assisted the floor brokers in
    cheating and defrauding their customers by trading indirectly opposite, or
    bucketing, their orders, or by trading opposite the orders of a broker
    executing orders for the same floor brokerage firm and thereby obtaining
    better prices for their personal trades.

The CFTC order further finds that Effron accepted, often at a loss,
    trades to assist the floor brokers to resolve errors they had made in
    handling customer orders such as by failing to fill an order at its price.
    According to the CFTC order, on occasion, Effron was repaid for losses he
    incurred accepting broker errors by brokers changing the execution price on
    customer trades to prices beneficial to Effron.

Effron, without admitting or denying the findings in the Commission's
    order, consented to the entry of a CFTC order:

- finding that Effron aided and abetted fraud (section 4b(a) of the
      CEA); engaged in noncompetitive trading, wash sales, fictitious sales and
      accommodation trading (Section 4c(a)(A) of the CEA, and CFTC regulation
      1.38(a); and caused prices to be reported which were not true and bona
      fide (section 4c(a)(B) of the CEA);

- directing him to cease and desist from further violations;

- prohibiting him from trading on a contract market for one year;

- revoking his registration with the Commission; and

- directing him to pay a $100,000 civil monetary penalty.

Effron also agreed to cooperate with the Commission in any ongoing
    proceeding relating to this matter; and not to seek registration with the
    CFTC in any capacity for four years.
<PAGE>   1
                                    FORM OF
                             STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
                             INSTRUMENT OF ACCESSION


         The undersigned, [VALERIE L. BANNER] [RICHARD W. FITZGERALD], as a
condition precedent to becoming the owner or holder of record of FORTY (40)
shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Universal Compression
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Holdings"), and ONE HUNDRED SIXTY (160)
shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Holdings, hereby agrees
to become a stockholder, party to and bound by that certain Stockholders
Agreement, dated as of February 20, 1998, by and among Holdings and certain
stockholders of Holdings. This Instrument of Accession shall take effect and
shall become an integral part of the said Stockholders Agreement immediately
upon execution and delivery to Holdings of this Instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this INSTRUMENT OF ACCESSION has been duly executed
by or on behalf of the undersigned as of the date below written.



                                    Signature:
                                               -------------------------------

                                    Address

                                    For Notice:
                                               -------------------------------

                                               -------------------------------

                                               -------------------------------

                                         Date:
                                               -------------------------------





Accepted:

UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.


By:
    -----------------------------------


Date:
      ---------------------------------
Humberto RODRIGUEZ, Jr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-8592.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Robert C. BROADWAY, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-8537.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Leon GILLS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8938.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/17/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       26,200
COMMITMENTS
   3,248      192    1,577   13,069   16,213   17,894   17,982    8,306    8,218

CHANGES FROM 03/10/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -724)
     112     -810      115   -1,068      310     -841     -385      117     -339

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.4      0.7      6.0     49.9     61.9     68.3     68.6     31.7     31.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       32)
       9        1        6       21       15       30       22
```

----

Updated March 20, 2009
Mahmood KHAN, petitioner, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

No. 17-324.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Timothy M. KIRLIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5978.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 526 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

[Report No. 116–641] 

To provide for the boundary of the Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic 

Park to be adjusted, to authorize the donation of land to the United 

States for addition to that historic park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. VELA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Additional sponsor: Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas 

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 

printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4139 RH

A BILL 

To provide for the boundary of the Palo Alto Battlefield 

National Historic Park to be adjusted, to authorize the 

donation of land to the United States for addition to 

that historic park, and for other purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4139 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY; LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 

4 (a) BOUNDARY.—Section 3(b)(2) of the Palo Alto 

5 Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 (16 U.S.C. 

6 410nnn–1(b)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘consist of approximately’’ 

9 and inserting the following: ‘‘consist of— 

10 ‘‘(i) the approximately’’; 

11 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

12 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(ii) on the date that such land is do15 nated to the United States, the approxi16 mately 166.44 acres of land generally de17 picted on the map entitled ‘PALO ALTO 

18 BATTLEFIELD NATIONAL HISTOR19 ICAL PARK Proposed Boundary Addition, 

20 Fort Brown Unit’, numbered 469/143,589, 

21 and dated April 2018.’’; and 

22 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘map’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘maps’’. 

24 (b) LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—Section 3(b)(3) of the 

25 Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 4139 RH

1 (16 U.S.C. 410nnn–1(b)(3)) is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘after’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Secretary of the In3 terior’’ and inserting ‘‘after the addition of lands to the 

4 historic park boundary, the Secretary of the Interior’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 526 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

[Report No. 116–641] 

A BILL 

To provide for the boundary of the Palo Alto Batother purposes. States for addition to that historic park, and for authorize the donation of land to the United tlefield National Historic Park to be adjusted, to 

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 4.2
  <P>
    AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN UNICO, IN. ("PURCHASER") AND
       INTERNET CONSULTING S/A  ("CONSULTANT") REGARDING
               PURCHASE OF SERVICE RENDERED
  <P>
  Purchaser acknowledges receipt of report Internet studies
  in Brazil and Argentina performed by Consultant in regard
  to Purchases intentions to explore Internet
  opportunities in those countries.  Furthermore, the
  Consultant hereby undertakes to assume current debt
  obligations owed by Purchaser to Park Avenue Capital,
  et al as outlined and agreed to.  Upon the Consultants
  receipt of 845,000 Unico (NASD-OTC: UICO) free trading
  shares of common stock, issued in the name of Mr.
  Benny Blom, the Consultant hereby acknowledges the
  services fully paid.
  <P>
  Signed the 28th  day of February, 2000
  <P>
  Unico, Inc.                      Internet Consulting S/A
  <P>
  /s/ Jay Weppler                  /s/ Benny Blom
  ----------------------           -----------------------
  Jay R. Weppler                       Dr. Benny Blom
  Chairman                             President
  <P>
Tai Chin PREYOR, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5393 (17A130).

Supreme Court of the United States

July 27, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Isaias PEREZ-CARRERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5655

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, and Interim President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth D. WalterKenneth D. WalterVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 10, 2009
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Recorders, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen P. Slay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ STEPHEN P. SLAY    Stephen P. Slay  Chief Financial Officer  May 15, 2007       A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
# L_2014211EN.01003901.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 29/2014

of 14 February 2014

amending Annex XV (State Aid) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2013 of 29 November 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 as regards its period of application (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2013 of 29 November 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 as regards its period of application (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 1j (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008) of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32013 R 1224: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2013 of 29 November 2013 (OJ L 320, 30.11.2013, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32013 R 1224: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1224/2013 of 29 November 2013 (OJ L 320, 30.11.2013, p. 22).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1224/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2014.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 320, 30.11.2013, p. 22.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2005198EN.01003601.xml

| 28.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 198/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 198/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 39/2005

of 11 March 2005

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication Services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 105/2004 of 9 July 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 105/2004 of 9 July 2004 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2004/411/EC of 28 April 2004 on the adequate protection of personal data in the Isle of Man (2), as corrected by OJ L 208, 10.6.2004, p. 47, is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2004/411/EC of 28 April 2004 on the adequate protection of personal data in the Isle of Man (2), as corrected by OJ L 208, 10.6.2004, p. 47, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5eh (Commission Decision 2003/821/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘5ei. | 32004 D 0411: Commission Decision 2004/411/EC of 28 April 2004 on the adequate protection of personal data in the Isle of Man (OJ L 151, 30.4.2004, p. 48), as corrected by OJ L 208, 10.6.2004, p. 47.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5ei.

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2004/411/EC, as corrected by OJ L 208, 10.6.2004, p. 47, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 March 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 376, 23.12.2004, p. 35.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 151, 30.4.2004, p. 48.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2013081EN.01003001.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 228/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex XIX (Consumer protection) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2011/141/EU of 1 March 2011 amending Decision 2007/76/EC implementing Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws as regards mutual assistance (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2011/141/EU of 1 March 2011 amending Decision 2007/76/EC implementing Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws as regards mutual assistance (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 7fa (Commission Decision 2007/76/EC) of Annex XIX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 D 0141: Commission Decision 2011/141/EU of 1 March 2011 (OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 63).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 D 0141: Commission Decision 2011/141/EU of 1 March 2011 (OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 63).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/141/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 63.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

428 

CA 15-01458 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ. 

 

MICHAEL JABCZYNSKI AND BRENDA JABCZYNSKI, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ADVANCED DRYING AND RESTORATION, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, 

AND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

DEFENDANT.

 

MCCABE, COLLINS, MCGEOUGH, FOWLER, LEVINE & NOGAN, LLP, BUFFALO

(TAMARA HARBOLD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

PETER D. CLARK, FREDONIA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County

(Deborah A. Chimes, J.), entered November 19, 2014. The order granted

plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the jury verdict, directed judgment as

a matter of law that a contract existed between plaintiff Michael

Jabczynski and defendant Advanced Drying and Restoration, and granted

plaintiffs a new trial on the issues of breach of contract, proximate

cause and damages. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this breach of contract action, Advanced Drying

and Restoration (defendant) appeals from an order granting plaintiffs’

motion to set aside the jury verdict, directing judgment as a matter

of law on the issue that a contract existed between defendant and

plaintiff Michael Jabczynski, and ordering a new trial on the issues

of breach, proximate cause, and damages. We affirm.

“[W]hile the existence of a contract is a question of fact, the

question of whether a certain or undisputed state of facts establishes

a contract is one of law for the courts” (Resetarits Constr. Corp. v

Elizabeth Pierce Olmsted, M.D. Center for the Visually Impaired

[appeal No. 2], 118 AD3d 1454, 1455 [internal quotation marks

omitted]). Moreover, “ ‘[i]t is well settled that a motion to set

aside a verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence invokes the

court’s discretion’ . . . , and ‘that discretion is at its broadest

[where, as here,] it appears that the unsuccessful litigant’s

evidentiary position was particularly strong compared to that of the

victor’ ” (Pellegrino v Youll, 37 AD3d 1064, 1064; see CPLR 4404 [a]). 
-2- 428 

CA 15-01458 

Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court did not abuse its

discretion in setting aside the verdict inasmuch as the evidence

adduced at trial, including the signed agreement between the parties,

established as a matter of law the existence of an enforceable

contract (see generally Resetarits Constr. Corp., 118 AD3d at 1455).

Entered: May 6, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court