alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23572-23573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08431]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal

[[Page 23573]]

Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, 
Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the 
Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: April 20, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
April 12, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 5 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2022-52 and CP2022-56.

Joshua J. Hofer,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-08431 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-247 (R46-003).

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 20, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# L_2013231EN.01002401.xml

| 29.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 231/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 231/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 50/2013

of 30 April 2013

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Decision No 377/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2013 derogating temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decision No 377/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2013 derogating temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 21apg (Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘21aph. | 32013 D 0377: Decision No 377/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2013 derogating temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (OJ L 113, 25.4.2013, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘21aph.

32013 D 0377: Decision No 377/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2013 derogating temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (OJ L 113, 25.4.2013, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision No 377/2013/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 25.4.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March  31, 2011  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2011By:
/s/ Stephen RossName:  Stephen RossTitle:  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial

and Accounting Officer)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4071 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 

to provide that concurrent resolutions on the budget include the recommended ratio of the public debt to the estimated gross domestic 

product for each fiscal year covered by the resolution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. TIMMONS (for himself and Mr. PANETTA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide that concurrent resolutions 

on the budget include the recommended ratio of the 

public debt to the estimated gross domestic product for 

each fiscal year covered by the resolution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTENTS OF CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS. 

4 Section 301(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 

5 1974 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para6 graph (6), by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; and’’ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4071 IH

1 at the end of paragraph (7), and by adding after para2 graph (7) the following: 

3 ‘‘(8) the recommended ratio of the public debt 

4 to the estimated gross domestic product.’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITION. 

6 Section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impound7 ment Control Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(12) The term ‘gross domestic product’ means 

10 the gross domestic product of the United States, as 

11 determined by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of 

12 the Department of Commerce.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Meritan DUMEL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 17M59.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

**ChiefExecutive Officer Certification**

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted in connection with AmendmentNo. 1 to the Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the“Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

R. JackDeCrane, the Chief Executive Officer and Richard J. Kaplan, the Chief FinancialOfficer of DeCrane Holdings Co., each certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

2.                                     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of DeCrane Holdings Co.

 
| Date:  October 9, 2003 |                         |
|------------------------|------------------------------|
|                   |                         |
|                   |                         |
|                   | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE    |
|                   | R. Jack  DeCrane             |
|                   | Chief  Executive Officer     |
|                   |                         |
|                   |                         |
|                   | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN  |
|                   | Richard J.  Kaplan           |
|                   | Chief  Financial Officer and |
|                   | Assistant  Secretary         |

 

----
II-00637

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Edward Craig <epcraig@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:02 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Edward Craig

850 West Fifth Ave. Apt 11

Eugene, OR 97402
Duraid Hitham FATHI, petitioner, v. Randall HAAS, Warden.

No. 17-5461.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
FLORIDA, plaintiff, v. GEORGIA.

No. 142, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

The Exceptions to the Special Master Report are set for oral argument in due course.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Harry F. Hixson  Jr., Chief Executive Officer, of Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and





2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Annual Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 28th day of February, 2014.








/s/ HARRYF. HIXSON, JR.Harry F. Hixson, Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
In Re Garvester BRACKEN, petitioner.

No. 16-9150.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Dean George SKELOS.

No. D-2960.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
Anthony VIOLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5887.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
3/11/2015 TDCJ Offender Details TEXAS DEPARTMENT 

### OF :CRIMINAl JUSTICE 

# [E) TDCJ Home 

# IiiNew**Offend(~t·** Search 

# Offender Information Details I Retum to Search list 

# I

SID Number: 07165920 

### TDCJ Number: 01498063 

### Name: ROMERO,JOSE 

### Race: H 

### Gender: M 

### DOB: 1987-12-15 

### Maximum Sentence Date: 2061-01-19 

### Current Facility: WYNNE 

### Projected Release Date: 2061-01-19 

### Parole Eligibility Date: 2012-05-23 

### Offender Visitation Eligible: YES Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays andmultiple times perday on visitation days. 

### Because this information is subject to change, family members and friends are encouraged to call the unitprior to traveling for. a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: 

# Parole Review Information·
Offense History: 

# I Offense Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is· scheduled.

Sentence http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearchloffenderDetail.action?sid=07165920 

### •

1/23/11/2015 TDCJ Offender Details Date Offense Date County Case No. Sentence (YY**~MM** DD)
2006-01-19 INJURY TO CHILD 2007-12-05 BEXAR 2007CR9123B 55-00-00 SBI

Return to Search list

The Texas Department ofCriminal Justice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is complete and accurate, however this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on this site maynot reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, orother information regarding an offender. For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice, at (936) 295-6371 or webadmin@tdcj.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law enforcement in the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use ofthis information is forbidden and subject to criminalprosecution.
New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearchloffenderDetail.action?sid=07165920 2/2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                    PAMRAPO BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                -----------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30, 2000           September 30, 2000
                                                                --------------------------   --------------------------

<S>                                                                      <C>                          <C>
Net income                                                               $ 1,071,581                  $ 3,253,508
                                                                         ============                 ============

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted                    2,618,306                    2,643,858
                                                                         ============                 ============

Basic and diluted earnings per share                                          $ 0.41                       $ 1.23
                                                                         ============                 ============
</TABLE>




                                     -17-
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Shawn Ryan Anthony SHEA, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5567.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ KENNETH D. WALTERKenneth D. WalterChief Financial Officer


May 9, 2008
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00363-CV

PHILIP DEAN LYNCH, Appellant

V.

CACH, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 962831

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 27, 2012. The clerk’s record was 

filed June 12, 2012, and no reporter’s record was taken. 

On August 27, 2012, appellant filed a brief that was not in compliance with the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief failed generally to comply with the rules. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k). The brief was 

stricken and appellant was ordered to file an amended brief. 

On October 29, appellant filed another brief that also failed to comply with the 
2

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. When an appellant files another brief that does not 

comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing 

another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to 

file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellant's brief still fails to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (d), (e), (g), (h), (i) and (k). Accordingly, the appeal is 

ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
Rafael AGOSTO, petitioner, v. Peter MASTRANTONIO, Jr., et al.

No. 17-5609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Eddy Wilmer VAIL-BAILON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7151.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2006333EN.01005201.xml

| 30.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/52

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 123/2006

of 22 September 2006

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 90/2006 of 7 July 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 90/2006 of 7 July 2006 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2006/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on a Community air traffic controller licence (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2006/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on a Community air traffic controller licence (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 66y (Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| | ‘66z. 32006 L 0023: Directive 2006/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on a Community air traffic controller licence (OJ L 114, 27.4.2006, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66z. 32006 L 0023: Directive 2006/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on a Community air traffic controller licence (OJ L 114, 27.4.2006, p. 22).’







  Article 2

The texts of Directive 2006/23/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 23 September 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 289, 19.10.2006, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 114, 27.4.2006, p. 22.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Robert WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. VICTORIA'S SECRET.

No. 17-7284.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.