alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated  Statement of Income as part
of the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q/A and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                         0000853102
<NAME>                                        Day Runner, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         14,800
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                    8,396
<INVENTORY>                                    42,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               95,562
<PP&E>                                         43,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 26,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                200,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28,502
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           14
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,985
<SALES>                                        148,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,512
<CGS>                                           78,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                       853
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,251
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10



</TABLE>
Opinion issued February 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-01010-CV

———————————

HALDOR TOPSOE, INC., Appellant

V.

ORION ENGINEERED CARBONS, LLC AND ORION ENGINEERED 

CARBONS GMBH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2019-69832

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Haldor Topsoe, Inc., has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this 

appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending 

motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal period ended December 31,
2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 31, 2008
    /s/ John C. AbbottName:
    John C. AbbottTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
**Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2012 – Mojo Concerts and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie v Commission**

**(Case T-90/09)**

State aid – Action for annulment – Investment of the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy’ complex – Decision finding that there was no State aid – Applicants not individually concerned – Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision closing an aid proceeding – Competitor of the aid recipient – Right to bring an action – Conditions (Arts 88(2) EC and 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 30-34)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6018 final of 21 October 2008 on the investment made by the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy’ complex (State aid C 4/2008 (ex N 97/2007, ex CP 91/2007)). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mojo Concerts BV and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, the Gemeente Rotterdam and Ahoy’ Rotterdam NV. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | The Kingdom of the Netherlands is ordered to bear its own costs. |
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of China 3C Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenggang
      Wang ,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Zhenggang WanZhenggang
                WangChairman
                of the Board and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




__________________




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to China 3C Group and will be retained by
      China 3C Group and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John F. Craven, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986, 33-8618 and 33-8760];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ JOHN F. CRAVENJohn F. CravenChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)


Date: May 24, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,581
<PP&E>                                           5,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,120)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,748
<OTHER-SE>                                   (151,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (142,499)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  365,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (412,352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (412,352)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dennis LaLumandiere, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laserscope; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: November 8, 2004      /s/ Dennis LaLumandiere     Dennis LaLumandiere Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 2 0 A0 4 78

. MASJ I D W ARI TH UD D EEN MOHAMMAD NON-PROFI T TRUST # 4 5 2 5 et a l . v . AHMED S. YOUSEF.

On J an u a ry 8, 20 1 9 , t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered a fi n al ju d g m en t an d wri t o f
p o s s es s i o n t o Ah m ed S. Yo u s ef i n t hi s l eas e d i s p u t e. On Fe b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 , t h e d efe n d an t s , M as

ji d W ari t h Ud Deen M o ham m ad No n -Pro fi t Tru s t # 4 5 2 5 , Zari f Sh am s i d Deen , Tru s t ee, an d t h e Is l am i c Cen ter o f Mi d d l e Geo rg i a, In c., fi l ed a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Ord i n ari l y , a n o t i ce o f a p p e a l m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e d eci s i o n o r j u d gm en t so u g h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e un d erl y i n g

s u b ject m at t er o f an ap p eal
, h o wev er, co n t ro ls o v er t h e rel i ef s o u g h t in d et erm i n i n g
t h e p ro p er ap p el l at e pro ced u re. Reb ich v

. M i l e s , 2 64 Ga. 46 7 , 4 6 7 -4 6 8 (4 4 8 SE2 d
1 9 2 ) (1 99 4 ). Th e u n d erl y i n g s u b ject m at t er here i s a di s p o s s es s ory ju d g m en t

. Un d er OCGA § 4 4 -7 -5 6 , an ap p eal fr o m a d i sp o ss es s o ry ju dg m en t m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h in

s ev en day s o f t h e d at e t h e ju d gm en t was en t ered

. Ra y M. W r i g h t , In c. v. Jo n es , 2 3 9 October 22, 2019Ga. Ap p

. 5 2 1 , 5 2 2 -5 2 3 (5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6 ) (1 9 9 9 ). Th e d efen d an t s fi l ed t h ei r n o t i ce o f

ap p eal 2 8 d ay s aft er t h e en t ry o f t h e t ri al co urt o rd er t h ey w i s h to ap p eal

. Th erefo re,
t h e ap p eal i s u nt i m el y an d i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct io n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/22/2019
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2015

No. 04-14-00680-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.P., et al, children,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02655

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants Christopher Morales and Joseph Medina’s briefs were originally due on 

January 6, 2015. Appellants filed their first request for an extension of time, requesting an 

additional twenty days. Appellants motions are GRANTED. Appellants’ briefs are due to be 

filed with this court no later than January 26, 2015. Absent extenuating circumstances, no 

further extensions will be given.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
INDPENDENT FIDUCIARY INCOME LIMITS IN PTES 

The general rule for individual exemption requests involving a financial institution 

serving as the Qualified Independent Fiduciary is that less than 1% of the financial 

institution's deposits and less than 1% of its outstanding loans (both in dollar amounts) 

are attributable to the deposits and loans of the party in interest and its affiliates. 

If an individual is to serve as the Qualified Independent Fiduciary, less than 1% of his/her 

annual income (generally measured on the basis of the prior year's income) may be 

derived from the party in interest and its affiliates. Fixed, non-discretionary retirement 

income would not be included for purposes of this test. 

If a firm is to serve as the Qualified Independent Fiduciary, less than 1% of that firm's 

annual income (generally measured on the basis of the prior year's income) may come 

from business derived from the party in interest and its affiliates./5/ 

/51 While in certain cases the department has permitted an independent fiduciary to 

receive as much as 5% of its annual income from the party in interest and its affiliates, 

these cases have involved unusual circumstances, and the general standard of 

independence remains a 1% test. Exemption Procedures Under Federal Pension Law, 

DOL, available at 

http://www.dol.gov/ebsalpublications/exemption procedures.html#section7 

1% (or less) 2% 3% 5% >5°/o 

• 2007-04 • 2008-04 • 2001-46 • 2009-11 none 

• 2005-04 • 2003-01 • 2006-19 

• 2004-08 • 2001-46 • 2006-03 

• 2004-07 • 2005-11 

• 2002-20 • 2005-08 

• 99-30 • 2004-19 

• 99-16 • 2004-12 

• 95-85 • 2004-10 

• 95-43 • 2004-05 

• 94-53 • 2003-38 

• 93-71 • 2003-36 

• 92-81 • 2003-10 

• 91-53 • 2003-07 

• 90-89 • 2000-48 

• 98-52 

• 98-35 

• 98-28 

• 97-56 

• 97-35 

• 97-32 

• 96-88 

• 96-76 
• 95-39 

" • 94-51 

• 93-20 

• 91-10 

• 91-08 

• 90-60 

• 88-92
Dervanna H.A. TROY-McKOY, petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 17-8207.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
Kevin Leon MORMON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7995.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2009073EN.01005901.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/59

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 20/2009

of 5 February 2009

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 59/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 59/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 10f (Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXII to the Agreement:

| ‘10fa. | 32008 D 0627: Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities (OJ L 202, 31.7.2008, p. 70).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘10fa.

32008 D 0627: Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities (OJ L 202, 31.7.2008, p. 70).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2008/627/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 February 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 223, 21.8.2008, p. 60.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 202, 31.7.2008, p. 70.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---

Joint Declaration by the Contracting Parties to Decision No 20/2009 incorporating Commission Decision 2008/627/EC into the Agreement

‘Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities deals in several articles with preliminary equivalence decisions for third countries. The incorporation of this Decision is without prejudice to the scope of the EEA Agreement.’

---
Michael J. RILEY, petitioner, v. Sean MEDEIROS, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk.

No. 17-7836.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Jason SZYDLEK, petitioner, v. Melinda K. BRAMAN, Warden.

No. 17-5465.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Tae H. CHON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-8334.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.