alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 222/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 222 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6029 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 222

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6029 August 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1505 of 28 August 2017 amending Annexes I, II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1506 of 28 August 2017 renewing the approval of the active substance maleic hydrazide in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  ) | 21 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1507 of 28 August 2017 amending Decision 2005/37/EC establishing the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) and providing for coordination of technical actions to protect euro coins against counterfeiting | 25 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1505 of 28 August 2017 amending Annexes I, II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1506 of 28 August 2017 renewing the approval of the active substance maleic hydrazide in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  )

1

21

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1507 of 28 August 2017 amending Decision 2005/37/EC establishing the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) and providing for coordination of technical actions to protect euro coins against counterfeiting

25

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Watts-McCaskill Stock Farm, a Corporation, The R.E.L. McCaskill Company, a Corporation, and R. E. L. McCaskill, *Appellants,*v. James Creary and Susan C. Adams, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of W. F. Creary, Deceased, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 25, 1929.

*W. W. Flournoy,*for Appellants;

*S. K. Gillis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, this day filed, the decree herein is reversed insofar as it decrees recovery of attorney fees. The decree is otherwise affirmed. The cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
# C_2009220EN.01002103.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 6 July 2009 — Omalet NV v Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid

(Case C-245/09)

2009/C 220/42

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Omalet NV

Appellant:

Respondent: Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must a national court apply Article 49 EC to a dispute between the Rijksdienst voor Soziale Zekerheid and a principal contractor established in Belgium, where judgment is sought against that principal contractor pursuant to Article 30a(3) of the Law of 27 June 1969 amending the Decree-Law of 28 December 1944 on social security for employed persons (in the version applicable prior to the amendment of that article by Article 55 of the Programme Law of 27 April 2007) as being jointly and severally liable for a portion of the debts of a subcontractor who is unregistered and established in Belgium, or where judgment is sought against that principal contractor because he has not complied with the withholding obligation laid down by Article 30[a](4) of the Law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must a national court apply Article 49 EC to a dispute between the Rijksdienst voor Soziale Zekerheid and a principal contractor established in Belgium, where judgment is sought against that principal contractor pursuant to Article 30a(3) of the Law of 27 June 1969 amending the Decree-Law of 28 December 1944 on social security for employed persons (in the version applicable prior to the amendment of that article by Article 55 of the Programme Law of 27 April 2007) as being jointly and severally liable for a portion of the debts of a subcontractor who is unregistered and established in Belgium, or where judgment is sought against that principal contractor because he has not complied with the withholding obligation laid down by Article 30[a](4) of the Law?

| 2. | (In the alternative):
  Is Article 49 EC incompatible with a rule such as that laid down by Article 30a(3) and (4) of the Belgian Law of 27 June 1969 amending the Decree-Law of 28 December 1944 on social security for employed persons (in the version applicable prior to the amendment [of] that article by Article 55 of the Programme Law of 27 April 2007)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

(In the alternative):

Is Article 49 EC incompatible with a rule such as that laid down by Article 30a(3) and (4) of the Belgian Law of 27 June 1969 amending the Decree-Law of 28 December 1944 on social security for employed persons (in the version applicable prior to the amendment [of] that article by Article 55 of the Programme Law of 27 April 2007)?

---
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/07/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      109,296
COMMITMENTS
   1,949   13,470    7,738   85,880   79,710   95,567  100,918   13,729    8,378

CHANGES FROM 08/31/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,823)
   1,138      690      933    4,972   12,479    7,043   14,102    2,780   -4,279

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.8     12.3      7.1     78.6     72.9     87.4     92.3     12.6      7.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
       5       18       15       21       26       40       49
```

----

Updated September 10, 2010
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/21/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       38,439
COMMITMENTS
   7,066    3,212    5,159   17,300   25,986   29,525   34,357    8,914    4,082

CHANGES FROM 07/14/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,545)
  -7,328   -4,406      251   13,243   10,634    6,166    6,479     -621     -934

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    18.4      8.4     13.4     45.0     67.6     76.8     89.4     23.2     10.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       24)
       9        4        6        9        6       22       13
```

----

Updated July 24, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                              /s/ William J. Campbell
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2002
Jonathan FLOYD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9066.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Antwan R. CRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5331.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2010143EN.01001801.xml

| 10.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 143/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 143/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 25/2010

of 12 March 2010

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2010 of 29 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2010 of 29 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2009/9/EC of 10 February 2009 amending Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for veterinary use (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2009/9/EC of 10 February 2009 amending Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for veterinary use (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 15p (Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 L 0009: Commission Directive 2009/9/EC of 10 February 2009 (OJ L 44, 14.2.2009, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 L 0009: Commission Directive 2009/9/EC of 10 February 2009 (OJ L 44, 14.2.2009, p. 10).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/9/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 13 March 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 March 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 101, 22.4.2010, p. 11.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 44, 14.2.2009, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Shahram MALEKPOUR, petitioner, v. Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of Transportation.

No. 17-6131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# L_2009232EN.01002801.xml

| 3.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 232/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 232/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 71/2009

of 29 May 2009

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2009 of 24 April 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2009 of 24 April 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 298/2009 of 8 April 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 298/2009 of 8 April 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32009 R 0298: Commission Regulation (EC) No 298/2009 of 8 April 2009 (OJ L 95, 9.4.2009, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32009 R 0298: Commission Regulation (EC) No 298/2009 of 8 April 2009 (OJ L 95, 9.4.2009, p. 16).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 298/2009 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 May 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 25.6.2009, p. 31.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 95, 9.4.2009, p. 16.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Laura C. Farley and William E. Farley, her husband, *Appellants,*v. Beachland Development Company, a corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*C. P. Diamond,*for Appellant's;

*Jas. O. Watson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the.Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 2, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00435-CV

OLUWAYEMISI ADEOYE AND ANTHONY ADEOYE, Appellants 

V.

EAGLEWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 458th District Court 

Fort Bend County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 14-DCV-212484 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed May 7, 2018 denying 

appellants’ motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. Generally, appeals may be 

taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 

(Tex. 2001). Appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of 

interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction. CMH 

Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011); Fleming & Associates, L.L.P. v. 

Kirklin, 497 S.W.3d 458, 460 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, pet. denied). 
2

Because there is no specific statutory authorization, an interlocutory appeal is not 

permitted in this situation. See In re Conner, 458 S.W.3d 532, 535 (Tex. 2015) 

(granting mandamus relief after finding relator had no adequate remedy by appeal 

to challenge the denial of a motion to dismiss).

On June 19, 2018, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a 

response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before July 5, 2018. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response was filed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby.
#### A. B. Christie, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed May 28, 1929.

*Akerman & Akerman*and *Palmer, Dickenson, Shurley & Lake,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted for rape in the Circuit Court of Orange County. A judgment of life imprisonment was imposed and writ of error taken to this Court. A full statement of the case will be found in Christie v. State, 94 Fla. 469, 114 So. R. 450.

This Court is reluctant to reverse the finding of a jury when approved by the trial court but in this case the record has been carefully examined and the testimony is so contradictory in its terms and much of it so inconsistent with reason and out of harmony with the conduct of normal human beings we are impelled to the conclusion that in *986reaching its verdict the.jury was influenced by considerations outside the record. The testimony of the alleged victim of the assault as to material facts in the former trial is also at variance with her testimony as to the- same facts in the instant trial. A discussion of the assignments of error would serve no useful purpose. The judgment is reversed and a new trial awarded.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Buford, j. J., concur.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., dissent.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/24/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       26,720
COMMITMENTS
   2,375    1,612    1,129   14,594   15,242   18,099   17,983    8,622    8,737

CHANGES FROM 02/17/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -746)
    -531      554     -814      332     -898   -1,013   -1,159      267      413

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.9      6.0      4.2     54.6     57.0     67.7     67.3     32.3     32.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       33)
       7        3        5       23       16       30       24
```

----

Updated February 27, 2009
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-60286, 333-77219, 333-30464, 333-42964, 333-89464 and 333-104468)
      of Net Perceptions, Inc. (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 29, 2007
      relating to our audits of the financial statements of Net Perceptions, Inc.
      and
      CRC Acquisition Co., LLC (the “Predecessor Company”) appearing in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Net Perceptions, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
      2006.





/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen LLP


McGladrey
      & Pullen LLP


Stamford,
      Connecticut


March
      29,
      2007