alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Irene Colvin, *Appellant,*v. J. Boyd Enwer et al., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion filed January 28, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied February 20, 1929.

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Appellant.

*Burket & Fish*and *Treadwell & Treadwell,*for Appellees.

Whitfield, P. J.

It appears that E. J. Colvin, a married man, after being seized and possessed of described lands in Florida, became insane and the property was conveyed to others by the guardian of the insane owner, the wife not in any way conveying or relinquishing her dower rights and was not a party to the court proceedings under which the guardian of the insane husband conveyed the lands. The insane husband having died, his widow brought suit to have her dower interest in the lands awarded to her. A demurrer *49to the bill of complaint was overruled. The defendants in effect pleaded that E. J. Colvin resided in Missouri, was there adjudged insane and a guardian for him was duly appointed; that the guardian was by the County Judge of DeSoto County, Florida, duly authorized to sell the lands and did sell and convey the lands in the manner required by law. The plea was sustained on argument and complainant appealed.

Under the statute a widow is “entitled to dower in * * * all the lands, tenements and herediments of which her husband died seized and possessed, or had before conveyed whereof she had not delinquished her right of dower as provided by law, which * * shall be and enure to her proper use and behoof in and during the term of her natural life.” Section 3629, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920, Sec. 5493, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927.

The statutes provide that where inappropriate judicial proceedings a guardian of a lunatic shall be duly authorized to make a deed of conveyance of a lunatic’s real estate to a purchaser, “such deed shall be effective to convey all the right, title and interest of said lunatic in and to said real estate”. Sees. 3991-3997, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920; Secs. 5913-5919, Comp. Laws 1927.

While under the statute a guardian may by deed duly authorize convey all the right, title and interest of a lunatic in his lands, such deed of conveyance does not of itself convey the dower rights of a wife of the lunatic if he be a married man. And in the absence of proper proceedings to relinquish or bar the dower rights of the wife of a lunatic, they are not affected by the mere conveyance of the lunatic’s right, title and interest in his lands. See Davis v. Hutton, 127 Ind. 481, 26 N. E. R. 187; 19 C. J. 521; Williams v. Courtney, 77 Mo. 587. See also Roan v. Holmes, 32 Fla. *50295, 13 So. R. 339; Pingree v. DeHaven, 90 Fla. 42, 105 So. R. 147.

Reversed.

Strum and Buford, JJ., concur.

Terrell, C. J. and Ellis and Brown, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Michael NORWOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5227.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*231Justice ALITO and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony Lee,  certify that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-K/A of  Pacific
Magtron International Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a.    designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and   procedures   and  presented  in  this  report  my  conclusion   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c.    disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.    all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: July 25, 2006

/s/ Anthony Lee
---------------------------
By: Anthony Lee
    Chief Financial Officer
# L_2008339EN.01010801.xml

| 18.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 339/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 339/108

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 117/2008

of 7 November 2008

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 104/2008 of 26 September 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 104/2008 of 26 September 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 540/2008 of 16 June 2008 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 336/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code within the Community, as regards format of forms (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 540/2008 of 16 June 2008 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 336/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code within the Community, as regards format of forms (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 56u (Regulation (EC) No 336/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32008 R 0540: Commission Regulation (EC) No 540/2008 of 16 June 2008 (OJ L 157, 17.6.2008, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32008 R 0540: Commission Regulation (EC) No 540/2008 of 16 June 2008 (OJ L 157, 17.6.2008, p. 15).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 540/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 November 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committe (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 309, 20.11.2008, p. 30.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 157, 17.6.2008, p. 15.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2008025EN.01001001.xml

| 30.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/10

---

DECISION No 1/2007 OF THE EC-THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA STABILISATION AND ASSOCIATION COUNCIL

of 20 December 2007

amending Protocol 2 (on steel products) of the EC-the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Stabilisation and Association Agreement

(2008/82/EC)

THE STABILISATION AND ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 7 of Protocol 2 to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement establishes a double-checking system, without quantitative limits, for the import into the Community of steel products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 7 of Protocol 2 to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement establishes a double-checking system, without quantitative limits, for the import into the Community of steel products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

| (2) | Significant progress has been made in the necessary restructuring and conversion programme for the steel industry in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Significant progress has been made in the necessary restructuring and conversion programme for the steel industry in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

| (3) | The need for an administrative procedure for the rapid provision of information on the trend in trade flows in order to increase transparency and to avoid possible diversion of trade has disappeared. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The need for an administrative procedure for the rapid provision of information on the trend in trade flows in order to increase transparency and to avoid possible diversion of trade has disappeared.

| (4) | Consequently, there is no longer a need for a double-checking system, without quantitative limits, for the import into the Community of steel products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Consequently, there is no longer a need for a double-checking system, without quantitative limits, for the import into the Community of steel products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

| (5) | Protocol 2 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Protocol 2 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Article 7 of Protocol 2 to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, and Annex I to the said Protocol 2, shall be deleted.

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 January 2008.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2007.

For the Stabilisation and Association Council

The President

Antonio MILOŠOSKI

---
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Standard Management Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we Ronald
D. Hunter and Paul B. (Pete) Pheffer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Standard Management Corporation, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Standard
Management Corporation. August 13, 2004/s/ Ronald D. HunterRonald D. HunterChairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Paul B. (Pete) PhefferPaul B. (Pete) PhefferPresident and Chief Financial Officer
LOGO



August 23, 2004



Dr. Fred B. Caffey

300 Old Liberty Drive

Martinsville, VA 24112



Dear Fred:



In accordance with our telephone conversation of August 23, 2004, please consider the following as an addendum to our existing lease, which is scheduled to renew on
October 31, 2004.



Addendum

August 23, 2004



Addendum to lease dated March 14, 1994 subsequently amended September 12, 2003 by and between Fred B. Caffey of Martinsville, Virginia herein referred to Lessor and Hooker Furniture Corporation of
Martinsville, Virginia herein referred to Lessee. All portions of said lease will be continued on a month-to-month basis beginning November 1, 2004. Either party has the right to cancel with a 90 day notice to the other party. Lessor
leases his property known as Caffey Warehouse located at 71 Gallagher Road off Highway 58 East of Martinsville to the Lessee, the rent being $22,500 per month and the rate being $.18 per square foot per month. The rent is due and payable on the
first of each month to the Lessor at 407 Starling Avenue, Martinsville, Virginia 24112.



Please sign and retain a copy for your files and sign and forward the second copy to my attention using the enclosed, self-addressed envelope.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Edwin L. Ryder                                 
|Edwin L. Ryder Hooker Furniture Corporation,
Lessee



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Fred B. Caffey, Lessor
|Fred B. Caffey, Lessor    



P.O. Box 4708,
Martinsville, Virginia 24115    276-632-2133    www.hookerfurniture.com
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Marco HERNANDEZ-LARA.

No. 16-617.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Beckles v. United States,* 580 U.S ----, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017.).
Ricky Ernest PEEPLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8863.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Darron J. JONES, petitioner, v. FNU CRANFORD.

No. 17-5286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mark J. Brockelman, certify that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Richard Bryan ARMAS, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 17-8536.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Doyle Burwell, * From the 70th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. A-39,270.

Vs. No. 11-12-00351-CR * November 20, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we 

vacate James Doyle Burwell’s capital murder convictions under counts two and 

three of the indictment. Accordingly, we reverse the judgments of the trial court as 

to counts two and three, and we render a judgment of acquittal as to those counts. 

We uphold the capital murder conviction under count one, and we affirm the 

judgment of the trial court as to that count.
# L_2009277EN.01003101.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 80/2009

of 3 July 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 45/2003 of 16 May 2003 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 45/2003 of 16 May 2003 (1).

| (2) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 71/2009 of 29 May 2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 71/2009 of 29 May 2009 (2).

| (3) | Commission Directive 2008/67/EC of 30 June 2008 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (3) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Directive 2008/67/EC of 30 June 2008 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (3) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 L 0067: Commission Directive 2008/67/EC of 30 June 2008 (OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 L 0067: Commission Directive 2008/67/EC of 30 June 2008 (OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 16).’

Article 2

The following indent shall be added in point 56d (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 L 0067: Commission Directive 2008/67/EC of 30 June 2008 (OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 L 0067: Commission Directive 2008/67/EC of 30 June 2008 (OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 16).’

Article 3

The text of Directive 2008/67/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 July 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 193, 31.7.2003, p. 14.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 232, 3.9.2009, p. 28.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 16.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18
             UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMTROL Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Albert D.
Indelicato, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to Title 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:


     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: August 13, 2004                          By: /s/ALBERT D. INDELICATO
      ----------------                         ----------------------------
                                               Albert D. Indelicato,
                                               President, Chairman of the Board,
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Director