alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006333EN.01001301.xml

| 30.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 103/2006

of 22 September 2006

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 42/2006 of 28 April 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 42/2006 of 28 April 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2005/414/EC of 30 May 2005 amending Annex I to Decision 2003/634/EC approving programmes for the purpose of obtaining the status of approved zones and of approved farms in non-approved zones with regard to viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) and infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) in fish (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2005/414/EC of 30 May 2005 amending Annex I to Decision 2003/634/EC approving programmes for the purpose of obtaining the status of approved zones and of approved farms in non-approved zones with regard to viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) and infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) in fish (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE EFTA STATES AND THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY SHALL TAKE DUE ACCOUNT’ in Part 4.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement, the following indent shall be added in point 55 (Commission Decision 2003/634/EC):

| ‘— | 32005 D 0414: Commission Decision 2005/414/EC of 30 May 2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 29).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 D 0414: Commission Decision 2005/414/EC of 30 May 2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 29).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2005/414/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 23 September 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 86.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 29.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
George CLEVELAND, III, petitioner, v. Daniel D. HALL, Judge, Circuit Court of South Carolina, York County, et al.

No. 17M4.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Herman SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6093.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/20/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       27,529
COMMITMENTS
   2,641      630    1,296   15,096   18,281   19,033   20,206    8,496    7,322

CHANGES FROM 01/13/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -382)
    -334     -355       -3      417      351       80       -6     -463     -376

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.6      2.3      4.7     54.8     66.4     69.1     73.4     30.9     26.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       35)
       6        3        5       24       19       32       26
```

----

Updated January 23, 2009
Release:
      #4367-00
       For Release: February 22, 2000

�

CFTC Transmits Regulatory Changes to
      Congress

Changes Recommended By Staff Report Would Create A
      Flexible Structure That Replaces The Current One-Size-Fits-All Style Of
      Regulation

WASHINGTON--The
      Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) transmitted to Congress today
      a staff report which recommends changes to the regulatory structure that
      the CFTC administers. The report, titled A New Regulatory
      Framework, details changes that will lessen the regulatory
      burdens on United States futures markets by creating a more flexible
      regulatory framework.At the same time, the framework provides the
      over-the-counter markets with greater legal certainty.

The framework, which is still a
      work in progress, outlines three kinds of trading facilities, which would
      be subject to varying levels of Commission oversight. The degree of
      oversight applicable to each kind of facility would depend on the nature
      of the commodities traded and the sophistication of the market's
      participants. The framework is expected to replace the CFTC's
      designed-based rules with flexible "core principles."

The staff recommendations will
      serve as the basis for a notice-and-comment rulemaking, to be issued in
      the near future. During the comment period, the Commission expects to
      hold at least one public hearing to provide a full airing of the
      important public policy issues raised by the new framework. All of the
      staff recommendations can be implemented by the Commission under its
      administrative authority.

In sending the staff
      recommendations to Congress, CFTC Chairman William Rainer
      commented:

> �The proposed
>         framework promotes innovation, maintains the competitive position of
>         United States markets, reduces systemic risk and provides the necessary
>         level of customer protection. It accomplishes these goals while
>         preserving the public interest in maintaining market and price
>         integrity, and deterring market manipulation. As a separate but related
>         goal, the framework complements and is consistent with the unanimous
>         recommendations of the President's Working Group on Financial
>         Markets.

# # #

�

�

�
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      14,331,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,492,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,824,339
<PP&E>                                     107,551,097
<DEPRECIATION>                              44,587,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,787,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,182,535
<BONDS>                                     36,507,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,097,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,787,689
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,984,315
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,550,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,652,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,781,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,781,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,781,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Rigoberto RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 16-9151.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Darrell M. SCHNEIDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6268.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
James T. SAUNDERS-BEY, petitioner, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

No. 17-5900.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/Javelin
  
    



  re: timing of SEFs rule
      
  When
              04/24/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Wallace

  Visitor(s)
              Jamie Cawley, Javelin

  Organization(s)
              Javelin


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
David Alan HESLOP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7484.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
MOUNTAIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC., dba Pregnancy and Family Resource Center, et al., petitioners, v. Xavier BECERRA, Attorney General of California.

No. 17-211.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra,* 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2361, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018).
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 21001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07797]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87 , No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 21001]]

                Memorandum of April 5, 2022

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to an 
                aggregate value of $100 million in defense articles and 
                services of the Department of Defense, and military 
                education and training, to provide assistance to 
                Ukraine and to make the determinations required under 
                such section to direct such a drawdown.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 5, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-07797
Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 14, 2005



/s/  John B. Sawyer
--------------------------------------
     John B. Sawyer, President and COO
Exhibit 11

Computation of Loss per Share



|                                                                                         |  |                                 |           |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | Three MonthsEndedMarch 31, 2010 |          
|Loss available to common stockholders                                                    |  | $                               | (189,700  | )
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                                 | 4,935,542 |  
|Basic loss per share                                                                     |  | $                               | (0.04     | )
|Loss for diluted loss per share                                                          |  | $                               | (189,700  | )
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                                 | 4,935,542 |  
|Diluted loss per share                                                                   |  | $                               | (0.04     | )
Patrick JOSEPH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8978.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT31.01**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Benjamin Weston,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of John W. Henry & Co./Millburn L.P.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 14,2006
| By                                     | /s/ BENJAMIN  WESTON |   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Benjamin Weston                        |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

----
Exhibit 99.11

CERTIFICATION

REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE
15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Gammon Gold Inc. (the
Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Scott Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 7, 2009



/s/ Scott PerryScott PerryChief Financial Officer
Nathan BONDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5996.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.