alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22873-22874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08263]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in 
accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and 
following consultation with the Committee

[[Page 22874]]

Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is 
hereby given that the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal 
Advisory Committee's (ASRAC) charter is being renewed. The Committee 
will provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
matters concerning the DOE's Appliances and Commercial Equipment 
Standards Program's (Program) test procedures and rulemaking process. 
Additionally, the renewal of the ASRAC has been determined to be 
essential to conduct business of the Department of Energy's and to be 
in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The 
Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the rules and regulations in 
implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Cymbalsky, ASRAC Designated 
Federal Officer at (202) 287-1692, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f19082839092b19494df959e94df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cfdefeefdffdcf9f9b2f8f3f9b2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Signing Authority: This document of the Department of Energy was 
signed on April 13, 2022, by Miles Fernandez, Acting Committee 
Management Officer, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary 
of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is 
maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance 
with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the 
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to 
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as 
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative 
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on April 13, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08263 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF John S. CARROLL.

No. D-2994.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

John S. Carroll, of Honolulu, Hawaii, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Erika Waldina GUZMAN MEJIA, petitioner, v. HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.

No. 17-362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth D. WalterKenneth D. WalterChief Financial Officer


May 10, 2007
Rosie Tyler LEWIS, petitioner, v. JOLIET POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 17-5945.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# L_2011018EN.01000701.xml

| 21.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 18/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 18/7

---

Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros

The European Union and the Government of the Union of the Comoros signed the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector in Brussels on 31 December 2010.

The Protocol accordingly applies provisionally from 31 December 2010 pursuant to Article 13 thereof.

---
***EXHIBIT
        32.2***
 
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I,
        William H. Mitchell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
        report on Form 10-K of Audible Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006
        fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Audible, Inc.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
  April
                  2, 2007
              
              By:
              
              /s/
                  William H. MitchellWilliam
                  H. MitchellChief
                  Financial Officer
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Pamela Bruce STUART.

No. D-2972.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
Jeffrey Alan WEEKLEY, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5933.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
TYPE:  EX-10.16



                                  EXHIBIT 10.16


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date of           Name of                            Warrant          Number of Shares           Expiration
Issuance          Warrant Recipient                  No.               of Common Stock           Date
<S>               <C>                                <C>              <C>                        <C>
11/16/98          Jerry L. Ruyan                     PL-2              40,000                    11/16/2003
11/05/98          Greg C. Mosher                     PL-3              40,000                    11/05/2003
11/16/98          Stephen D. King                    PL-4              200,000                   11/16/2003
11/16/98          Jerry L. Ruyan                     PL-5              200,000                   11/16/2003
1/22/99           Andrew Green                       PL-6              200,000                   1/22/2004
1/22/99           Andrew Green                       PL-7              200,000                   1/22/2004
2/23/99           Frank W. Terrizzi                  PL-8              50,000                    2/23/2004
2/14/00           Greg C. Mosher                     PL-9              40,000                    11/5/2003
3/18/99           Stephen D. King                    PL2-1             150,000                   3/18/2004
3/18/99           Jeffrey P. Stebbins                PL2-3             150,000                   3/18/2004
</TABLE>
John STANCU, petitioner, v. STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., et al.

No. 17M40.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00329

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF T.M., M.M., C.M.,

G.M., AND G.M., C HILDREN §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 106560

- 18)

February 3 , 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the trial court ’ s order is

affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant s B. D. and P .D. shall bear the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECON D DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
#### Carl W. Lohr, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. City of Jacksonville, a Municipal Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed May 27, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied July 2, 1929.

*914
      *Evan*Evans, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Austin*WIiller, *Gov. Hutchinson, Emmet Safay*and *Harvey Mabry*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there was error in granting the motion of the defendant for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant. There was substantial evidence tending to prove the liability of the defendant to the plaintiff for injuries complained of. Therefore, the judgment should be reversed and it is so ordered. Florida Common Law Practice by Crandall, Sec. 208 and authorities cited; Sec. 4363, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927; 67 Fla. 40.

Reversed.

Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., and Giblin, Cir^'euit Judge concur.

Strum, J., disqualified.
# L_2013291EN.01002901.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 72/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 836/2012 of 18 September 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards lead (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 836/2012 of 18 September 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards lead (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 R 0836: Commission Regulation (EU) No 836/2012 of 18 September 2012 (OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 4).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 R 0836: Commission Regulation (EU) No 836/2012 of 18 September 2012 (OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 4).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 836/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 4.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Keith E. THOMAS, petitioner, v. NORTHSTAR MORTGAGE GROUP, LLC, et al.

No. 17-5764.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 29, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 29, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                        SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (UNAUDITED)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1998 
<CASH>                                         $1,363
<SECURITIES>                                    5,308 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,813 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (152) 
<INVENTORY>                                     2,935 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,668 
<PP&E>                                         14,265 
<DEPRECIATION>                                (7,602) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,519 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,610 
<BONDS>                                         6,517 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                           99 
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,809 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,519 
<SALES>                                         2,367 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,367 
<CGS>                                           1,041 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,041 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,802 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   11 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 69 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (458) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        3 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (461) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (461) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.05) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.05) 
                                               

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60426 Summary Calendar

FRANK RAMSEY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JAMES V. ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No.2:92-CV-129-S

- - - - - - - - - - April 9, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Frank Ramsey, #05553, appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Ramsey argues that the habitual-offender portion of his indictment is fatally defective because it was based on a prior conviction for which his sentence was served in county jail. The Mississippi Supreme Court held Ramsey’s indictment sufficient under state law, thus, consideration of Ramsey’s claim is foreclosed. McKay v. Collins , 12 F.3d 66, 68 (5th Cir. 1994).No. 97-60426 -2- Ramsey argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney allowed him to be sentenced based on the defective indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687-88 (1984). Ramsey argues for the first time on appeal that his indictment is fatally defective because the language charging him as an habitual offender was placed after the phrase “against the peace and dignity of the state” and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney allowed him to be sentenced as a habitual offender based on the defective indictment. This court declines to review these claims. See United States v. Cervantes , 132 F.3d 1106, 1109 (5th Cir. 1998). Ramsey also raises issues concerning extradition, double jeopardy, cruel and unusual punishment, admissibility of evidence, the prosecution’s closing remarks, the sufficiency of the evidence, failure of the affidavit of the foreman to accompany the indictment, and ineffective assistance of counsel. Ramsey failed to argue or discuss these issues in his appellate brief; thus, they are abandoned. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a); Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 525 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
# L_2008047EN.01002101.xml

| 21.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 104/2007

of 28 September 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 394/2007 of 12 April 2007 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto in agricultural products and foodstuffs (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 394/2007 of 12 April 2007 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto in agricultural products and foodstuffs (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 54b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32007 R 0394: Commission Regulation (EC) No 394/2007 of 12 April 2007 (OJ L 98, 13.4.2007, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32007 R 0394: Commission Regulation (EC) No 394/2007 of 12 April 2007 (OJ L 98, 13.4.2007, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 394/2007 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 September 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 328, 13.12.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 98, 13.4.2007, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michael O. BROWN, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 17-5708.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,030,392
<SECURITIES>                                24,404,004
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,353
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,405,816
<PP&E>                                       2,674,164
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,251,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,925,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,809,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,096
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,321,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,925,799
<SALES>                                      1,742,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,742,605
<CGS>                                        1,119,457
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,201,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (13,476,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (13,476,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (13,476,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.85)


</TABLE>
Wayne D. SMITH, petitioner, v. Aziz SHARIAT, et al.

No. 16-8513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.