alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010346EN.01004001.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2010 — CNOP and CCG v Commission

(Case T-23/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Absence of legal personality of an addressee - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Concepts of undertaking and association of undertakings)

2010/C 346/78

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Conseil national de l'Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) (Paris, France); and Conseil central de la section G de l'Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) (Paris) (represented initially by Y. R. Guillou, H. Speyart van Woerden, T. Verstraeten and C. van Sasse van Ysselt, and subsequently by Y. R.Guillou, L. Defalque and C. Robert, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and É. Gippini Fournier, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6494 of 29 October 2008 in Case COMP/39510 ordering the Ordre national des pharmaciens (ONP), the CNOP and the CCG to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Conseil national de l’Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) and the Conseil central de la section G de l’Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Conseil national de l’Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) and the Conseil central de la section G de l’Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
Release #4131-98 (CFTC
    Docket No. 98-9)

For Release: April 3,
    1998

CFTC FILES
    ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN F. ACKERMANN AND STERLING INVESTMENTS
    OF AMERICA, CHARGING SOLICITATION FRAUD AND UNAUTHORIZED
    TRADING

CFTC Alleges that
    Ackermann Defrauded Clients by Misrepresenting the Potential Profits and
    Risk of Loss Associated with Trading Futures and Options

WASHINGTON -- The
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the filing of a
    three-count administrative complaint against three entities collectively
    known as Sterling Investments, an introducing brokerage firm
    formerly doing business in Ashland, Oregon, and the principal and
    co-founder of those entities, John F. Ackermann, alleging that
    Ackermann and the employees of Sterling Investments committed fraud in the
    solicitation and trading of client accounts.

The registrations of
    Ackermann and Sterling Investments with the CFTC have been suspended since
    September 1996 as a result of unpaid reparations awards assessed against
    Sterling Investments and Ackermann.

The CFTC complaint,
    filed on March 31, 1998, alleges that from January 1994 through May 1995,
    Ackermann and Sterling Investments defrauded clients by materially
    misrepresenting the probability and magnitude of profits and risk of loss
    associated with trading futures and options. Among other things, the
    complaint alleges, Ackermann and Sterling Investments told customers that
    they used a trading strategy known as "writing strangles," which entailed
    the writing of a call option at a strike price above the futures price and
    a put option at a strike price below the futures price, which was a
    conservative strategy.

The complaint further
    alleges that once Ackermann and Sterling Investments employees had
    successfully solicited accounts, Ackermann engaged in unauthorized trading
    in the management of some accounts and that Sterling Investments employed
    unregistered persons to solicit accounts by means of telemarketing via an
    entity called Sterling Marketing Research in 1994.

A public hearing has
    been ordered to determine whether the allegations are true, and, if so,
    what remedial sanctions, if any, are appropriate and in the public
    interest.

Possible sanctions
    include a cease and desist order against Ackermann and Sterling
    Investments, a revocation or suspension of the registration of Ackermann
    and Sterling Investments, a trading prohibition, restitution to customers
    of damages proximately caused by the violations of the respondents, and the
    imposition of civil monetary penalties of not more than the higher of
    $100,000 or triple the monetary gain to the respondents for each violation
    of the Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC regulations committed prior to
    November 27, 1996.

�
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance Sheet and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           11171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1840289
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (7898)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2345196
<PP&E>                                        13914862
<DEPRECIATION>                               (6064367)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11488829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4646571
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         37586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1000
<OTHER-SE>                                      668438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11488829
<SALES>                                       14932303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              14932303
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 16435030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                561063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              561063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2063790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2063790)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2063790)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: January 23, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|---------------------- | ---------------------------
|                       | John P. Manning            
|                       | Principal Executive Officer
Opinion issued December 13, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00842-CR

———————————

EX PARTE JOSHUA JERMAINE NELSON, Appellant

On Appeal from the 458th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 15-DCR-068407

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Joshua Jermaine Nelson, challenges the trial court’s order denying 

his pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction.

We cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal without a timely filed notice 

of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); see also Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 
2

198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1996). A defendant’s notice of appeal is timely if it is filed within thirty days after 

the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or the trial court signs an 

appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); see Bayless v. State, 91 S.W.3d 801, 805 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Ex parte Matthews, 452 S.W.3d 8, 10–11 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2014, no pet.); see also Ex parte Smith, 178 S.W.3d 797, 801 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2005) (“The denial of relief on a pretrial writ of habeas corpus may be appealed 

immediately . . . .”). Here, the trial court signed the order denying appellant’s pretrial 

habeas application on July 31, 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal, therefore, was

due to be filed no later than August 30, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Olivo, 

918 S.W.2d at 522. Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed on September 21, 2018, was

untimely to perfect an appeal of the July 31, 2018 order, and we have no basis for 

jurisdiction over the appeal.

1

 See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; Ex parte Matthews, 462

S.W.3d at 14; Few v. State, 136 S.W.3d 707, 713 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2004, no 

pet.); Green v. State, 999 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref’d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

 

1 The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his appeal was subject to dismissal for lack 

of jurisdiction unless he filed a response showing how this Court has jurisdiction over his 

appeal. Cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not respond.
3

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Bland.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Kenneth WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. Thomas GRIFFIN, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility.

No. 17-8237.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
TREY M., petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 16-7712.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
Yann IANNUCCI, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 17-5422.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3851 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3851

To extend funding for Brand USA through fiscal year 2027, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2019

    Mr. Welch (for himself, Mr. Bilirakis, Ms. Titus, and Mr. Long) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland 
Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend funding for Brand USA through fiscal year 2027, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Travel Promotion, Enhancement, and 
Modernization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TRAVEL PROMOTION FUND.

    Subsection (d) of the Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (22 U.S.C. 2131) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``2020'' and inserting 
        ``2027''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(B), by striking ``2020'' and inserting 
        ``2027''.

SEC. 3. ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION FEE INCREASE.

    Section 217(h)(3)(B)(i)(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1187(h)(3)(B)(i)(I)) is amended by striking ``$10'' and 
inserting ``$17''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      10.2**





**2008
      Director Equity Compensation Package**





On
      June
      26, 2008, the board of directors (the “Board”) of Global Axcess Corp (the
“Company”) approved a new equity compensation package for the members of the
      Board. Each outside director of the Company will receive an annual grant of
      options to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options
      will have an exercise price equal to the market close price on the date of
      grant
      and will be issued to each outside director on the anniversary date of his
      membership on the Board. The options will be exercisable in four equal
      installments, with the first installment to be exercisable on the date of grant
      and the remainder of such options becoming exercisable on each of the three
      successive 12 month periods following the date of grant. The options expire
      five
      years from the date of grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 26, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-26-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-26-2000
<CASH>                                                2663
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        10902
<ALLOWANCES>                                          1610
<INVENTORY>                                          15483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     33527
<PP&E>                                               39434
<DEPRECIATION>                                       12684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1133519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                99715
<BONDS>                                             680874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 2
<OTHER-SE>                                          196694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1133519
<SALES>                                              97376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     97376
<CGS>                                                83852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        83852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (187)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   17822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (4111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (891)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (5002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (5002)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1IEA Income Fund X, L.P.RULE 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund X, L.P. (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 12, 2005        /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ   Dennis J Tietz   President of CCC
Kenneth R. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. Connie HORTON, Warden.

No. 17-7985.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
David HARRIS, et al., appellants, v. Roy COOPER, Governor of North Carolina, et al.

No. 16-166.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Judgment affirmed.