alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Gregory MOORE, petitioner, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-6394.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
# FILED
September 18, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE MAY 1998 SESSION
STATE OF TENNESSEE, * No. 01C01-9705-CC-00175

Appellant, * Williamson County
vs. * Hon. Henry Denmar k Bell, Judge LONNY D. HAZELWOOD, * (Rule 9, Interlocutory Appeal)

Appellee. *

CONCURRING OPINION I concur in the result r

eached by the majority, I write separately only to express my belief that at most this record demonstrates negligence on the part of the district attorney’s office in making the blood alco hol test results avai lable to the defense in a timely fashion. While this negl igence did in fact depriv e the defendant of the means to conduct a full defense to the cha rges against him, I find n o evidence of bad faith on the part of the pr osecutor’s office as sugges ted by the majority’s reference to State v. Golden , 941 S.W.2d 905 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). Nevertheless, the defendant must not be denied, even through neg ligence, of the ability to defend himself. I therefore concur that the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

______________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Kenneth W. Powell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Titan Trading Analytics Inc. (the Company) , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

a.

the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



b.

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Dr. Kenneth W. Powell





Name:

Dr. Kenneth W. Powell

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:

May 2, 2005

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
# L_2013318EN.01003001.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 128/2013

of 14 June 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 7/2013 of 8 January 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 laying down Implementing Rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 7/2013 of 8 January 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 laying down Implementing Rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 66p (Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32013 R 0007: Commission Regulation (EU) No 7/2013 of 8 January 2013 (OJ L 4, 9.1.2013, p. 36).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32013 R 0007: Commission Regulation (EU) No 7/2013 of 8 January 2013 (OJ L 4, 9.1.2013, p. 36).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 7/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 4, 9.1.2013, p. 36.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Mary COLON, aka Sophia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8760.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three
month period ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,243,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,998,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,215,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   512,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,530,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,192,000
<PP&E>                                       3,507,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,279,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,971,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,998,000
<BONDS>                                      4,983,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,563,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (7,665,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,971,000
<SALES>                                     14,703,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,703,000
<CGS>                                        4,050,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,050,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,025,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                48,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (53,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,319,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,378,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,378,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.24)
        

</TABLE>
CONSENT OF MINTEC INC.

We hereby consent to
the use of our name in connection with the following report and documents, which
are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the
registration statement on Form 40-F of Gammon Gold Inc. (the "Company") being
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:

1. Information relating to the mineral reserve and mineral resource calculations
  for the Ocampo property; and
2. The
  annual information form of the Company dated March 26, 2008, which includes
  reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Ocampo
  property, and the properties described therein.

|Date: March 31, 2008 | MINTEC INC.                   
|-------------------- | ------------------------------
|                     |                               
|                     | By: /s/ Abdullah Arik         
|                     | Name: Abdullah Arik, B.Sc., MS
|                     | Title: Mintec Inc.            



---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with
the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert L. Lee,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Robert L.
Lee_ Robert L. Lee,
President and CEO   Dated:  July
26, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

p0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140517 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140517 

 COA: 295312 

Bay CC: 09-010524-FH 

MICHAEL LLOYD JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATION
|-------------------------

I,   John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2008

| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/   John B. Sawyer         
| |  | John B. Sawyer               
| |  | Chief Operating Officer      
| |  | (Principal Operating Officer)

---
Charles PHILLIP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.

No. 17-5919.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2011085EN.01001901.xml

| 31.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 135/2010

of 10 December 2010

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 123/2010 of 10 November 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 123/2010 of 10 November 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 428/2010 of 20 May 2010 implementing Article 14 of Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards expanded inspections of ships (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 428/2010 of 20 May 2010 implementing Article 14 of Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards expanded inspections of ships (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 56bb (Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘56bc. | 32010 R 0428: Commission Regulation (EU) No 428/2010 of 20 May 2010 implementing Article 14 of Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards expanded inspections of ships (OJ L 125, 21.5.2010, p. 2).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘56bc.

32010 R 0428: Commission Regulation (EU) No 428/2010 of 20 May 2010 implementing Article 14 of Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards expanded inspections of ships (OJ L 125, 21.5.2010, p. 2).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 428/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 December 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 81.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 125, 21.5.2010, p. 2.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michael E. PRINDLE, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-6184.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
**Release: 4540-01****For Release: July 11, 2001**

**CFTC Approves First New Derivatives Clearing      Organization Not Affiliated with a Trading Facility**

**Washington DC** - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission      (Commission) announced on Monday, July 9, 2001, that it approved the      application of EnergyClear Corporation (EnergyClear) for registration as      a derivatives clearing organization (DCO) under the Commodity Exchange      (Act). This is the first new DCO that is not affiliated with a trading      facility to be granted registration by the Commission since the passage      of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA) last December.      DCOs for the existing futures exchanges were grandfathered in under the      CFMA and the Commission has previously approved DCOs affiliated with      OnExchange Board of Trade, Inc. and Brokertec Futures Exchange.    

      EnergyClear, headquartered in Houston, Texas, will provide clearance and      settlement services for over-the-counter energy derivatives contracts      executed on commercial markets exempt under section 2(h) of the Act.      Transactions cleared will be executed only between eligible commercial      entities that are EnergyClear members acting on a principal-to-principal      basis. Contracts initially eligible for clearing involve electricity,      natural gas, and telecommunication bandwidths. EnergyClear Operations LLC      will perform certain self-regulatory functions for EnergyClear.    

      Copies of the Commission's letter granting registration and other      supporting material prepared by Commission staff may be obtained by      contacting the Commission's Office of the Secretariat, Three      Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20581, (202)      418-5100.    

�
# C_2011311EN.01001501.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/15

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-536/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Word sign ‘ROI ANALYZER’)

2011/C 311/22

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor (represented by: W. Göpfert, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2010 in Case T-233/08 MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM, by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2008 dismissing the appeal against the examiner’s decision to refuse registration of the word sign ‘ROI ANALYZER’ as a Community trade mark for certain goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 42 — Distinctive character of the mark

MPDV Mikrolab

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded;

| 2. | MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
# L_2010304EN.01000101.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of India

The Agreement renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of India (1), signed on 30 November 2007, has, in accordance with Article 11 thereof, entered into force on 17 May 2010.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 171, 1.7.2009, p. 19.

1

---
Lee Clinton HOBDY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Philip Andra GRIGSBY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8976.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.