alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_116746.htm


Exhibit 4.2


 


BIOLARGO, INC.


2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD


 


Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms defined in the BioLargo, Inc. (“BioLargo”) 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) will have the same meanings in this Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award and the electronic representation of this Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award established and maintained by BioLargo or a third party designated by BioLargo (this “Notice”).


 


Name:


 


Address:


 


You (the “Participant”) have been granted an award of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) to acquire Shares of BioLargo’s Common Stock under the Plan subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, this Notice and the attached Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), including any applicable country-specific provisions in any appendix attached hereto (the “Appendix”), which constitutes part of the Agreement.


 


	
			Grant Number:

				 
	 	 
	
			Number of RSUs:

				 
	 	 
	
			Date of Grant:

				 
	 	 
	
			Vesting Commencement Date:

				 
	 	 
	
			Expiration Date:

				
			The earlier to occur of: (a) the date on which settlement of all RSUs granted hereunder occurs and (b) the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Date of Grant. This RSU expires earlier if Participant’s Service terminates earlier, as described in the Agreement.

			
	 	 
	
			Vesting Schedule:

				
			[Insert applicable vesting schedule]

			



 


By accepting (whether in writing, electronically or otherwise) the RSUs, Participant acknowledges and agrees to the following:


 


Participant understands that Participant’s employment or consulting relationship or Service with BioLargo or a Parent or Subsidiary or Affiliate is for an unspecified duration, can be terminated at any time (i.e., is “at-will”), except where otherwise prohibited by applicable law and that nothing in this Notice, the Agreement or the Plan changes the nature of that relationship. Participant acknowledges that the vesting of the RSUs pursuant to this Notice is subject to Participant’s continuing Service as an Employee, Director or Consultant. Participant acknowledges that the Vesting Schedule may change prospectively in the event that Participant’s service status changes between full- and part-time status and/or in the event that Participant is on a leave of absence, in accordance with BioLargo’s policies relating to work schedules and vesting or as determined by the Committee. Participant also understands that this Notice is subject to the terms and conditions of both the Agreement and the Plan, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Participant has read both the Agreement and the Plan. By accepting the RSUs, Participant consents to electronic delivery as set forth in the Agreement.


 


	
			PARTICIPANT

				
			BIOLARGO, INC.

			



	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Signature:

				 	 	
			By:

				
			 

			
	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Print Name:

				
			 

				 	
			Its:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT NO. 4.1

                           SPECIMEN STOCK CERTIFICATE

Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware

     ALPHATECH, INC.

     Total Authorized Issue 30,000,000 Shares Par Value $0.0001 each Common
     Stock, 1,000,000 shares Par Value $0.0001 each Preferred Stock

This is to certify that                          is the owner of fully paid and
non-assessable                                 shares of the above corporation
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly
endorse. Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly
authorized officers.

Dated _________

                Secretary                      President



                                       48
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3680 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3680

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee as the ``Paula Robinson 
            and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2019

 Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. David P. 
Roe of Tennessee, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Cooper, 
 Mr. Green of Tennessee, and Mr. John W. Rose of Tennessee) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee as the ``Paula Robinson 
            and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAULA ROBINSON AND JUDY SPRAY MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Paula Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paula 
Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Edbert Neal WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Michelle SMITH, Warden.

No. 17-6204.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
FORM OF EXTENSION OF TERM
OF EMPLOYMENT PERIOD
MEMORANDUM




		
	To:
	     


		
	From:
	Patricia Smith Lawler,


EVP/Human Resources Division
		
	Re:
	Extension of Employment Period


		
	Date:
	June ___, 2018


The Board of Directors of BankFinancial Corporation (the “Company”) and its Human Resources Committee have completed their annual review of your Employment Agreement with the Company dated                     , and have determined to offer to amend your Employment Agreement to extend the term of the “Employment Period” as referenced in Section 2(a) of your Employment Agreement to                     .
If you are agreeable to amending your Employment Agreement as provided above, please sign and date this document in the space indicated below and return it to me by no later than _________________. 
If you do not sign and return this document to me by such date, the term of your Employment Period and the Anniversary Date applicable to your Employment Agreement will remain unchanged. 


		
	Name:
	     




		
	Signature:
	     




		
	Date:
Roger FRENCH, petitioner, v. Karla STARR, Judge, CRIT Tribal Appellate Court, et al.

No. 17-197.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### H. D. Finlay, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Santa Rosa Truck Growers Association, a co-partnership, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed February 19, 1929.

*McGeaohy á Bryan,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*M. F. Caldwell, Jr., Philip D. Beall*and *John M. Coe,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of thé record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Long, Circuit Judge, concur.
In Re Roy WILLIAMS, petitioner.

No. 17-7606.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Gary Don ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5157.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Shawn M. THOMAS, petitioner, v. MAHONING COUNTY JAIL, et al.

No. 17-5602.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A of our
report included herein dated March 20, 2000, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Medsearch Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries.





Kempisty & Company
Certified Public Accountants PC
New York, NY
March 30, 2000
Danny Paul BIBLE, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

No. 17-9559 (17A1412).

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2011328EN.01005601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/56 |

---

DECISION No 41/2011 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 14 November 2011

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annexes on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Telecommunication Equipment

(2011/826/EU)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Articles 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | The Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘US access to the EC market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility and on the Sectoral Annex on Radio and Telecommunication Terminal Equipment. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment B is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 3. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Bodies indicated in Attachments A and B have been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James SANFORD

Signed in Washington, 8 November 2011

On behalf of the European Union

Fernando PERREAU DE PINNINCK

Signed in Brussels, 14 November 2011

---

Attachment A

US Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘US access to the EC market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility and of the Sectoral Annex on Radio and Telecommunication Terminal Equipment

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | MiCOM Labs | | 440 Boulder Court, Suite 200 | | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | | United States | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | Nemko USA, Inc | | 802 N. Kealy Avenue | | Lewisville, Texas 75057-3136 | | United States | |

---

Attachment B

EU Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | Intertek Semko AB | | Box 1103 | | SE-164 22 KISTA | | Sweden | |

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6130

CHRISTOPHER CORNELIUS TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES M. TURPIN, Dr., Physician at Marion

Correctional Institution; EMIDIO J. FELICIONE,

Doctor at Central Prison; ELLA MARKLAND, M.D.,

Doctor at Marion Correctional Institution;

NURSE CONDREY, a Registered Nurse at Marion

Correctional Institution; THE UTILIZATION

REVIEW BOARD, Board of Doctors at Central

Prison (names unknown); JOHN MORGAN; P. A.

CREENSHAW, Physician at Central Prison,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-283-MU-1)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Cornelius Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Cornelius Taylor appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v.

Turpin, No. CA-02-283-MU-1 (W.D.N.C. filed Dec. 30, 2002, entered

Jan. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
John PRICKETT, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7373.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
ALDMYR SYSTEMS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Stephen A. FRIEDMAN, et al.

No. 17-144.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THIS PERIOD ENDED  03/31/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,200
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           320
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.5




Grant Thornton LLP                                               [COMPANY LOGO]
Chartered Accountants
Management Consultants





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the use of our report dated September 17, 2003 to the Directors
of Gammon Lake Resources Inc. in the 40F form




                                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                                        ------------------------
Halifax, Nova Scotia                                          Grant Thornton LLP
December 18, 2003                                          Chartered Accountants










P.O. Box 426
Suite 1100, Cogswell Tower
2000 Barrington Street
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 2P8
T (902) 421-1734
F (902) 420-1068
E Halifax@GrantThornton.ca
W www.GrantThornton,ca





Canadian Member of Grant Thornton International
Emilio ESTRADA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1233.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581

TO: Rostin Behnam, Chairman

Kristin N. Johnson, Commissioner

Christy Goldsmith Romero, Commissioner 

Summer K. Mersinger, Commissioner 

Caroline D. Pham, Commissioner

FROM: Dr. Brett M. Baker 

Acting Inspector General

DATE: November 14, 2023

SUBJECT: Inspector General’s Assessment of the Most Serious Management 

and Performance Challenges Facing the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission FY 2023

The Reports Consolidation Act of 2000 (RCA) requires the Inspector General to 

summarize the “most serious management and performance challenges facing the 

agency” and briefly assess the Agency’s progress in addressing those challenges. 

Management challenges are “programs or management functions, within or across 

agencies, that have greater vulnerability to waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement 

(such as issues identified by the Government Accountability Office as high risk or 

issues identified by an Inspector General) where failure to perform well could seriously 

affect the ability of an agency to achieve its mission or goals.” This memorandum fulfills 

our duties under the RCA. 

To complete our assessment, we relied on data contained in the CFTC financial 

statement audit and Agency Financial Report, representations by agency management, 

and our knowledge of industry trends and CFTC operations. We introduced a new 

process this year, providing the management challenges to CFTC management, and 

including their response in the report you are receiving today. Therefore, in addition to 

the management challenges, we are providing management’s statements regarding 

prior actions to address them, as well as planned future actions. The resulting product 

provides greater transparency and shows what OIG and the agency can accomplish 

when it works together to achieve the common goal of improved agency performance 

at all levels. We thank the dedicated staff and management who provided a timely 

response.
2

Attached is a copy of the final management challenges. Please call me with any 

questions at (202) 557-6466. 

Cc:

David Gillers, Chief of Staff 

Tamika Bent, Chief Counsel

Yevgeny Shrago, Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor

Scott Lee, Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor

Chris Lucas, Chief of Staff Counsel

Meghan Tente, Chief of Staff

Jeffery Sutton, Executive Director

Robert Schwartz, General Counsel

Ian McGinley, Director, Division of Enforcement

Christina McGlosson, Acting Director, Whistleblower Office

John Rogers, Acting Chief Planning Officer and

Acting Chief, Business Operations

David Frederickson, Strategic Planning Officer

Michael Smith, Senior Program Analyst, 

Strategic Planning

Judith A. Ringle, Deputy Inspector General and Chief Counsel

Miguel A. Castillo, Assistant Inspector General for Auditing
# L_2013081EN.01001601.xml

| 21.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 216/2012

of 7 December 2012

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2010/347/EU of 19 June 2010 amending Decision 2004/388/EC on an Intra-Community transfer of explosive document (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2010/347/EU of 19 June 2010 amending Decision 2004/388/EC on an Intra-Community transfer of explosive document (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 2 (Commission Decision 2004/388/EC) of Chapter XXIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32010 D 0347: Commission Decision 2010/347/EU of 19 June 2010 (OJ L 155, 22.6.2010, p. 54).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32010 D 0347: Commission Decision 2010/347/EU of 19 June 2010 (OJ L 155, 22.6.2010, p. 54).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2010/347/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 155, 22.6.2010, p. 54.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2007179EN.01005501.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/55

---

Information relating to the entry into force of an Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada on the conclusion of GATT Article XXIV:6 negotiations

The above Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada (OJ L 169, 29.6.2007) has entered into force on 25 June 2007.

---
Terry R. CHAPMAN, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-471.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Randall Stewart HILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5786.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.