alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013231EN.01001301.xml

| 29.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 231/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 231/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 39/2013

of 15 March 2013

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2011/829/EU of 8 December 2011 amending Decision 2006/771/EC on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2011/829/EU of 8 December 2011 amending Decision 2006/771/EC on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 5cz (Commission Decision 2006/771/EC) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 D 0829: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/829/EU of 8 December 2011 (OJ L 329, 13.12.2011, p. 10).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 D 0829: Commission Implementing Decision 2011/829/EU of 8 December 2011 (OJ L 329, 13.12.2011, p. 10).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2011/829/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 March 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 329, 13.12.2011, p. 10.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 428 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 428

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and 
   Analysis to develop and disseminate a threat assessment regarding 
                   terrorist use of virtual currency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeland Security Assessment of 
Terrorists' Use of Virtual Currencies Act''.

SEC. 2. THREAT ASSESSMENT ON TERRORIST USE OF VIRTUAL CURRENCY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for 
Intelligence and Analysis, as authorized by section 201(b)(1) of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121(b)(1)), shall, in 
coordination with appropriate Federal partners, develop and disseminate 
a threat assessment regarding the actual and potential threat posed by 
individuals using virtual currency to carry out activities in 
furtherance of an act of terrorism, including the provision of material 
support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization. Consistent 
with the protection of classified and confidential unclassified 
information, the Under Secretary shall share the threat assessment 
developed under this section with State, local, and tribal law 
enforcement officials, including officials who operate within State, 
local, and regional fusion centers through the Department of Homeland 
Security State, Local, and Regional Fusion Center Initiative 
established in section 210A of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 
U.S.C. 124h).
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``foreign terrorist organization'' means an 
        organization designated as a foreign terrorist organization 
        under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
        U.S.C. 1189).
            (2) The term ``virtual currency'' means a digital 
        representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, 
        a unit of account, or a store of value.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 29, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 428

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and 
   Analysis to develop and disseminate a threat assessment regarding 
                   terrorist use of virtual currency.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Statia Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Marine, Inc., a Cayman Islands exempted company

Statia Terminals International N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals Corporation N.V., a Netherlands company

Statia Terminals Canada, Incorporated, incorporated under the laws of Nova
Scotia

Point Tupper Marine Services Limited, incorporated under the laws of Nova Scotia

Statia Terminals Antilles N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Saba Trustcompany N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Bicen Development Corporation N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Laboratory Services N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Tugs N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals Delaware, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals New Jersey, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Seven Seas Steamship Company, Inc., a Florida corporation

Seven Seas Steamship Company (Sint Eustatius) N.V., a Netherlands Antilles
company
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6587

RONALD G. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MOSBY G. PERROW, Judge; CLERK OF COURT, Lynchburg City Circuit Court,

Defendant - Appellees.

No. 98-6624

RONALD G. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MOSBY G. PERROW, Judge; CLERK OF COURT, Lynchburg City Circuit Court,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-236-R)
2

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald G. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Appellant, a Virginia inmate,

appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998)

and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinions and find that these

appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss both appeals on the

reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Perrow, No. CA-98-236-R

(W.D. Va. Apr. 14 & 23, 1998). Appellant’s motion for appointment

of counsel, filed in this court, is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Kennett James McELDERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8348.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Marcus TALLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6023.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T DEC 12, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

No. 0 8- 12 80 6

D. C. Dock etNo. 0 7- 21 40 8 C V-JJ O ODALYS PEREZ, an d o th ers si m il arl y

si tu at ed , Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,

ve rs us PALERMO SEAFOOD, INC., a Fl or id a Co rp or at io n d.b .a. Fic o Key W es t Se afo od , JUAN ZIEGGENHIRT, in di vi du al ly, Defen da nt s- App el le es .

App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof F lo rid a (Dece m ber 1 2, 2 00 8 Befo re DUBINA, BLACK an d F AY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.PER CURI AM:

W it h t he pa rti es ’ co ns en t, a m ag is tra te jud ge co nd uc te d abe nc h t ria l o f th is act io n c la im in g m in im

um wage an d o ve rti m e v io la ti on s u nd er the Fai r Lab or St an da rd s Act(“ FLSA”) an d t he Flo rid a Mi ni m um W ag e Act . The d is tri ctco ur t fo un d i n fa vo r of

app el la nt , Odal y s Pe rez ( “ Pere z”), an d e nt ereda jud gm en t fo r

ov ert im e co m

pe ns at io n a ndst atut ory

da m ag es , ret ai ni ng juri sd ic ti on to awardhe r at to rn ey ’s fees . Perez ap pe al s, co nt en di ng th atth e d is tri ctco ur t erredin fai li ng to fin d, i n a dd it io n t o t he ov ert im e v io la ti on s, t ha t t he ap pe ll ees , Pal erm o S eafo od , In c. an d J ua n Zi eg ge nh irt (“ Pal erm o” ), ha d c omm it te d m in im um wage vi ol at io ns . Mo re s pe ci fic al ly, Pere z as se rts th atth e d is tri ctco ur t i m pr op erl y fai le d t o req ui re Pa le rm o t o p ay

Pere z th e v al ue of t he “ ti p c red it ” ta ke n b y Pal erm o fo r al l ho ur s fo r whi ch Pere z was pa idov er t he co ur se of 4 6 wo rkweek s. Per ez as se rts th atsh e is en ti tl edto th e ti p c red itam ou nt be cau se Pal erm o fa il edto m eetth e FLSA co nd it io ns pre ced en t t o a ll owi ng an em pl oyer to de du ctth e ti p c red itfro m th e cas h wag es pa idto a ti pp edem pl oyee. An ap pe ll at e co ur t re vi ews de no vo th e d is tri ctco urt’s i nt erp ret at io n o f a fed eral st atut e, Bur liso n v . McDon al d’ s C or p. , 45 5 F .3d12 42 , 12 45 (11 th Cir

. 20 06 ), as well as adi st ric t co ur t’s i nt erp ret at io n o f a s ta te st atut e. Bla sl an d, Bo uc k & Lee, In c. v . Cit

y o f N. Mi ami , 28 3 F .3d12 86 , 12 94 (11 th Cir . 20 02 ). W e

2li ke wis e rev ie w de no vo a di st ric t co ur t’s co nc lu si on s o f la w. W exl er v. Ander so n , 45 2 F .3d12 26 , 12 30 (11 th Cir . 20 06 ), cer t. d en ie d , 12 7 S . Ct. 9 34 (20 07 ). Afte r rev ie win g t he reco rd , read in g t he pa rti es ’ br ie fs , andha vi ng th e be ne fitof o ral arg um en t, we s ee n o c le ar erro r in th e d is tri ctco ur t’s fi nd in gs of fact or l eg al erro r in it s ap pl ic at io n o f th e la w to th os e fi nd in gs . Accor di ng ly, we affi rm th e d is tri ctco ur t’s jud gm en t. AFFIRMED.

3
DAE HYUCK KO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2008024EN.01005201.xml

| 29.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 24/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 24/52

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and Bosnia and Herzegovina on the re-admission of persons residing without authorisation

The Agreement between the European Community and Bosnia and Herzegovina on the re-admission of persons residing without authorisation entered into force on 1 January 2008, the procedure provided for in Article 22 of the Agreement having been completed on 30 November 2007.

---
# L_2008047EN.01002801.xml

| 21.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 108/2007

of 28 September 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 83/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 83/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2006/139/EC of 20 December 2006 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic compounds for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2006/139/EC of 20 December 2006 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic compounds for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 4 (Council Directive 76/769/EEC) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 L 0139: Commission Directive 2006/139/EC of 20 December 2006 (OJ L 384, 29.12.2006, p. 94).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 L 0139: Commission Directive 2006/139/EC of 20 December 2006 (OJ L 384, 29.12.2006, p. 94).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2006/139/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 September 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 328, 13.12.2007, p. 25.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 384, 29.12.2006, p. 94.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Albert
      W. Weggeman, Jr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment
      No. 1 to the Annual Report of Net Perceptions, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the
      year
      ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Net Perceptions, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: April
                30, 2007
              By:
              */s/
                  Albert W. Weggeman, Jr*Name:
              Albert W. Weggeman, JrTitle:
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 3038 Lower Tribunal No. 2022

- CF

- 010319

_____________________________

J UNIOR A RSTIL , Appellant
,

v.
S TATE OF F L ORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Patricia L. Strowbridge , Judge.
February 20, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

. TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and MIZE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. "Rex" Dimmig , II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire
, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach
, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FI LE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
ANNA'S BAR-B-Q PIT, LTD., et al., petitioners, v. Jessica Lynn RAKER.

No. 17-244.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
Brigitte CASTILLO, petitioner, v. DORAL PARK COUNTRY CLUB VILLAS, et al.

No. 17-1347.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1319 

CA 14-01042 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ALBERTA MACIEJEWSKI AND HENRY 

MACIEJEWSKI, AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS 

OF SELENA MACIEJEWSKI, AN INFANT UNDER THE AGE 

OF 14 YEARS, CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NORTH COLLINS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO, CONGDON, FLAHERTY, O’CALLAGHAN, REID,

DONLON, TRAVIS & FISHLINGER, UNIONDALE (CHRISTINE GASSER OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

FARRELL & FARRELL, HAMBURG (KENNETH J. FARRELL OF COUNSEL), FOR

CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (James H.

Dillon, J.), entered February 24, 2014. The order granted the

application of claimants for leave to serve a late notice of claim. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in

granting claimants’ application for leave to serve a late notice of

claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). “[C]laimant[s]

made a persuasive showing that [respondent] . . . acquired actual

knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim . . . [and

respondent has] made no particularized or persuasive showing that the

delay caused [it] substantial prejudice” (Matter of Hall v MadisonOneida County Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 66 AD3d 1434, 1435 [internal

quotation marks omitted]). Further, inasmuch as “actual notice was

had and there is no compelling showing of prejudice to respondent[],”

claimants’ failure to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay is not

fatal to their application (Matter of Drozdzal v Rensselaer City Sch.

Dist., 277 AD2d 645, 646; see Hall, 66 AD3d at 1435). 

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 I, Andrew Kaplan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on Form 10-K of Audible Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Audible Inc.
 
 
 March 24, 2004

By:

/s/ Andrew KaplanAndrew KaplanChief Financial Officer
Brian PROUT, petitioner, v. Michael CLARKE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 17-6159.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Christopher LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5972.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use in connection with the registration statements on Form S-8
for the 1999 Stock Option Plan, Registration File No. 333-41788, and the 2000
Stock Option Plan, Registration File No. 333-41786, and the 1999 and 2000 Stock
Option Plans, Registration File No. 333-116671, of IA Global, Inc., incorporated
into the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IA Global, Inc., of our report dated
March 15, 2004 relating to the financial statements of IA Global, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended.


                                        /s/ Radin Glass & Co., LLP
                                        Radin Glass & Co., LLP
                                        Certified Public Accountants


New York, New York
December 21, 2006
Travis ROSS, petitioner, v. Mary CARPENTER, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Director of Prison Health Care.

No. 16-9553.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Larry Donnell TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5886.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Kirk A. SIMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6185.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Preet M. SINGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE.

No. 17-437.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 06, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Burt M. HOFFMAN.

No. D-2995.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Burt M. Hoffman, of Stamford, Connecticut, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Opinion issued October 11, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00676-CR

NO. 01-16-00677-CR

———————————

IN RE GEORGE AGUILAR, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, George Aguilar, confined and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition 

for a writ of mandamus to set aside the trial court proceedings “until [a] proper 

hearing can be held” to determine why relator has been confined without a trial date, 

or to dismiss the charges against him for want of prosecution.

1

 

1 The case underlying appellate Cause No. 01-16-00676-CR is The State of Texas v. 

George Aguilar, cause number 1370059, in the 174th District Court of Harris 
2

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

County, Texas, the Honorable Ruben Guerrero presiding. The trial court signed an 

order dismissing the case on February 4, 2016. The case underlying appellate Cause 

No. 01-16-00677-CR is The State of Texas v. George Aguilar, cause number 

1497176, in the 174th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Ruben 

Guerrero presiding.