Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 127 / Monday, July 2, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 34849

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not

an economically significant rule and

does not concern an environmental risk

to health or risk to safety that may

disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

This rule does not have tribal

implications under Executive Order

13175, Consultation and Coordination

with Indian Tribal Governments. A rule

with tribal implications has a

substantial direct effect on one or more

Indian tribe, on the relationship

between the Federal Government and

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities between the

Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Environment

The Coast Guard has considered the

environmental impact of implementing

this temporary rule and concluded that,

under figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g), of

Commandant Instruction M16475.1C,

this rule is categorically excluded from

further environmental documentation.

A ‘‘Categorical Exclusion

Determination’’ is available in the

docket.

List of Subjects

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation

(water), Reports and record keeping

requirements, Security measures, and

Waterways.

For the reasons discussed in the

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33

CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 165

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;

33 CFR 1.05(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; 49

CFR 1.46.

2. Add temporary § 165.T01–074 to

read as follows:

§ 165.T01–074 Safety Zone: Fireworks

Display, Provincetown, MA.

(a) Location. The safety zone includes

all waters within a five hundred (500)

yard radius of the fireworks barge area

located approximately 800 yards to the

southeast of Provincetown Harbor,

Provincetown, Massachusetts,

approximate position 42°02′00′′ N,

070°10′00′′ W.

(b) Effective date. This section is

effective from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on

July 4, 2001. If the evolution is

cancelled due to inclement weather,

than this section is effective from 8 p.m.

until 10 p.m. on July 5, 2001.

(c) Regulations.

(1) The general regulations governing

safety zones contained in 33 CFR 165.23

apply.

(2) All persons and vessels shall

comply with the instructions of the

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the

designated on-scene patrol personnel.

These personnel comprise

commissioned, warrant, and petty

officers of the Coast Guard. Upon being

hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by

siren, radio, flashing light, or other

means, the operator of a vessel shall

proceed as directed.

Dated: June 18, 2001.

Mark G. VanHaverbeke,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the

Port, Marine Safety Office Providence.

[FR Doc. 01–16588 Filed 6–29–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–7004–3]

National Oil and Hazardous Substance

Pollution Contingency Plan; National

Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Direct final notice of deletion of

the Arcanum Iron & Metal, Superfund

Site from the National Priorities List.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) Region V is publishing a

direct final notice of deletion of the

Arcanum Iron & Metal, Superfund Site

(Site), located near the Village of

Arcanum, Twin Township, Darke

County, Ohio from the National

Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,

promulgated pursuant to section 105 of

the Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is

appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which

is the National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency Plan

(NCP). This direct final notice of

deletion is being published by EPA with

the concurrence of the State of Ohio,

through the Ohio Environmental

Protection Agency because EPA has

determined that all appropriate

response actions under CERCLA have

been completed and, therefore, further

remedial action pursuant to CERCLA is

not appropriate.

DATES: This direct final deletion will be

effective August 31, 2001 unless EPA

receives adverse comments by August 1,

2001. If adverse comments are received,

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of

the direct final deletion in the Federal

Register informing the public that the

deletion will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed

to: Kenneth Glatz, Remedial Project

Manager (RPM),

Glatz.Kenneth@EPA.Gov or Gladys

Beard, State NPL Deletion Process

Manager, Beard.Gladys@EPA.Gov, (SR–

6J), U.S. EPA Region V, 77 W. Jackson,

Chicago, Il 60604.

Information Repositories:

Comprehensive information about the

Site is available for viewing and copying

at the Site information repositories

located at: U.S. EPA Region V Library,

77 W. Jackson, Chicago, IL, 60604 (312)

353–5821, Monday through Friday 8:00

a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; Arcanum Public

Library, 101 North Street, Arcanum,

Ohio (937) 692–8484; Monday through

Thursday 9:00 a.m to 8:00 p.m. and

Friday and Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00

p.m., Ohio Environmental Protection

Agency, 122 S. Front Street, Lozarus

Government Building, Columbus, OH

43215, (614) 644–3020, Monday through

Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth Glatz, Remedial Project

Manager at (321) 886–1434,

Glatz.Kenneth.@EPA.Gov or Gladys

Beard, State NPL Deletion Process

Manager at (312)886–7253,

Beard.Gladys@EPA.Gov or 1–800–621–

8431, (SR–6J), U.S. EPA Region V, 77 W.

Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

II. NPL Deletion Criteria

III. Deletion Procedures

IV. Basis for Site Deletion

V. Deletion Action

I. Introduction

EPA Region V is publishing this direct

final notice of deletion of the Arcanum

Iron & Metal, Superfund Site from the

NPL.

The EPA identifies sites that appear to

present a significant risk to public

health or the environment and

maintains the NPL as the list of those

sites. As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of

the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL

remain eligible for remedial actions if

conditions at a deleted site warrant such

action.

Because EPA considers this action to

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is

taking it without prior publication of a

notice of intent to delete. This action

will be effective August 31, 2001 unless

EPA receives adverse comments by

August 1, 2001 on this notice on this

notice of deletion. If adverse comments

are received within the 30-day public

comment period on this notice of

deletion, EPA will publish a timely

34850 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 127 / Monday, July 2, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

withdrawal of this direct final notice of

deletion before the effective date of the

deletion and the deletion will not take

effect. EPA will, as appropriate, prepare

a response to comments and continue

with the deletion process on the basis of

the notice of intent to delete and the

comments already received. There will

be no additional opportunity to

comment.

Section II of this document explains

the criteria for deleting sites from the

NPL. Section III discusses procedures

that EPA is using for this action. Section

IV discusses the Arcanum Iron & Metal,

Superfund Site and demonstrates how it

meets the deletion criteria. Section V

discusses EPA’s action to delete the Site

from the NPL unless adverse comments

are received during the public comment

period.

II. NPL Deletion Criteria

Section 300.425(e) of the NCP

provides that releases may be deleted

from the NPL where no further response

is appropriate. In making a

determination to delete a release from

the NPL, EPA shall consider, in

consultation with the State, whether any

of the following criteria have been met:

i. Responsible parties or other persons

have implemented all appropriate

response actions required;

ii. All appropriate Fund-financed

(Hazardous Substance Superfund

Response Trust Fund) response under

CERCLA has been implemented, and no

further response action by responsible

parties is appropriate; or

iii. The remedial investigation has

shown that the release poses no

significant threat to public health or the

environment and, therefore, the taking

of remedial measures is not appropriate.

Even if a site is deleted from the NPL,

where hazardous substances, pollutants,

or contaminants remain at the deleted

site above levels that allow for

unlimited use and unrestricted

exposure, CERCLA section 121(c), 42

U.S.C. 9621(c) requires that a

subsequent review of the site be

conducted at least every five years after

the initiation of the remedial action at

the deleted site to ensure that the action

remains protective of public health and

the environment. If new information

becomes available which indicates a

need for further action, EPA may initiate

remedial actions. Whenever there is a

significant release from a site deleted

from the NPL, the deleted site may be

restored to the NPL without application

of the hazard ranking system.

III. Deletion Procedures

The following procedures apply to

deletion of the Site:

(1) The EPA consulted with Ohio on

the deletion of the Site from the NPL

prior to developing this direct final

notice of deletion.

(2) Ohio concurred with deletion of

the Site from the NPL.

(3) Concurrently with the publication

of this direct final notice of deletion, a

notice of the availability of the parallel

notice of intent to delete published

today in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section

of the Federal Register is being

published in a major local newspaper of

general circulation at or near the Site

and is being distributed to appropriate

federal, state, and local government

officials and other interested parties; the

newspaper notice announces the 30-day

public comment period concerning the

notice of intent to delete the Site from

the NPL.

(4) The EPA placed copies of

documents supporting the deletion in

the Site information repositories

identified above.

(5) If adverse comments are received

within the 30-day public comment

period on this notice of deletion, EPA

will publish a timely notice of

withdrawal of this direct final notice of

deletion before its effective date and

will prepare a response to comments

and continue with the deletion process

on the basis of the notice of intent to

delete and the comments already

received.

Deletion of a site from the NPL does

not itself create, alter, or revoke any

individual’s rights or obligations.

Deletion of a site from the NPL does not

in any way alter EPA’s right to take

enforcement actions, as appropriate.

The NPL is designed primarily for

informational purposes and to assist

EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3)

of the NCP states that the deletion of a

site from the NPL does not preclude

eligibility for future response actions,

should future conditions warrant such

actions.

IV. Basis for Site Deletion

The following information provides

EPA’s rationale for deleting the Site

from the NPL:

Site Location

The Arcanum Iron & Metal (AIM) Site

is located in west-central Ohio,

approximately 25 miles northwest of

Dayton, Ohio, in Twin Township, Darke

County, Ohio. The site occupies about

4.5 acres and is just southeast of the

Village of Arcanum, Ohio.

Site History

The AIM Site is zoned for light

industrial or commercial operations.

There is a Federal Lien on 18.341 acres

of property owned by Mr. Harold M.

Shane, which includes the 4.5 acre AIM

Site. The lien is dated August 31, 1989,

and was sent to the Darke County

Recorder in Greenville, Ohio on

September 19, 1989. EPA and the State

of Ohio negotiated a Consent Decree in

places of the lien on the property.

The AIM Site consisted of a lead

battery reprocessing facility from the

early 1960’s until 1982. The AIM facility

processed automobile and industrial

batteries to recover the lead cores. This

process generated by-product plastic,

rubber casings and battery acid. The

battery acid was dumped on the ground.

The plastic and rubber by-products were

recycled. An on-site lead smelter, used

in the lead recovery step, may have

emitted lead-containing particulates

during operations.

During processing, lead oxide sludge

from the batteries was stored on site.

During dry weather the lead oxide

sludge dust was controlled by water

sprays. Run-off from the pile,

contaminated with lead oxide

particulate and soluble lead salts,

flowed to ground surface depressions.

The battery casings were ground and

stockpiled for recycling. The battery

casing chips also contained high

concentrations of lead. During

rainstorms lead particles were washed

into on-site surface ponds.

Approximately 3,200 cubic yards of

battery casing chips were stored in the

Saw Building, and about 800 cubic

yards were in a pile at the southeastern

portion of the Site, near the smelter

building. A drainage pipe connecting

the AIM Site to Sycamore Ditch also

caused contamination of the ditch

sediments.

The battery casing chips, lead oxide

sludge, and contaminated soils were

exposed and represented a continuing

source of contamination at the AIM Site.

Site History

• The earliest date the State of Ohio

has on file regarding the AIM site is

1964, when a fish kill was reported in

Painter Creek caused by contamination

flowing from Sycamore Ditch.

• In 1972, the Ohio EPA personnel

visited the AIM Site in response to

another fish kill in the local watershed,

and determined that the source of the

fish kill came from the AIM Site.

• In October 1973, the Ohio EPA’s

Division of Waste Management and

Engineering made the first of many site

visits to investigate AIM’s operation.

• Over the next ten years, the Ohio

EPA conducted data collection activities

and took legal actions against AIM to

install on-site water treatment and waste

storage systems.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 127 / Monday, July 2, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 34851

• In January 1974, the Ohio EPA

requested that the owner of the AIM Site

apply for a permit to install an acid

treatment system.

• The Ohio EPA was unable to get

AIM to install the treatment system and

adhere to the conditions and restrictions

of the permit.

• In June 1979, the Ohio Attroney

General on behalf of the Ohio EPA

initiated enforcement proceedings

against AIM.

• In October 1979, a Consent Decree

was signed by the site owner to clean up

the site. However, cleanup efforts were

not satisfactorily completed to Ohio

EPA’s satisfaction. Subsequently, AIM

was found to be in contempt of court in

April 1980.

• From April 1980, the Ohio Attroney

General’s office continued to pursue

legal actions for the cleanup of the AIM

Site.

• In September 1980, a Citation and

Notification of Penalty were issued to

AIM for failure to install a treatment

system.

• In April 1982, the Ohio EPA

requested that legal action be taken to

close the AIM facility.

• The AIM Company ceased

operations at the AIM Site in December

1982.

• The processing equipment was

removed from the site by the owner in

January 1983.

• The Site was proposed for listing on

the NPL on December 30, 1982, 47 FR

58476 and was made final on the NPL

on September 8, 1983, 48 FR 40658.

• The owner of the AIM Site had also

operated a downtown Arcanum facility

AIM II as a battery processing plant,

prior to startup of the present AIM

facility location.

• In January and February of 1986

approximately 300 cubic yards of leadcontaminated soils from AIM II were

placed on the AIM Site during an

emergency removal action conducted by

the owner of the two Sites.

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility

Study (RI/FS)

Groundwater investigations at the

AIM Site have shown historical

groundwater contamination of up to 980

parts per billion lead. The 1985

Remedial Investigation (RI) detected

lead in 2 of 8 residential wells and 8 of

15 ground-water monitoring wells

sampled. Concentrations in three

monitoring wells exceeded the interim

primary drinking water standard (50 ug/

l) at the time the Record of Decision

(ROD) was signed on September 26,

1986. However, sampling logs indicated

turbidity in these samples. The same

sampling methodology was used in

1989, and lead was detected in 20 of 22

unfiltered monitoring well samples, but

filtered samples taken during the same

sampling event were found to be mostly

non-detects, indicating that lead

detections were attributable to turbidity.

Based upon groundwater monitoring

from 1995 through 2000 by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),

using low flow purging and sampling

methodology (not used previously) to

minimize turbidity, there is no evidence

of groundwater contamination at the

AIM Site.

Record of Decision Findings

The Record of Decision (ROD) was

signed on September 26, 1986. The

remedy consisted of the excavation,

treatment, and disposal of battery casing

chips and cleaning up leadcontaminated soils to industrial/

commercial cleanup levels. Leadcontaminated sediments in Sycamore

Ditch were excavated, treated on-site,

and disposed of in an off-site U.S. EPAapproved landfill. The office, smelter,

and saw buildings were

decontaminated, demolished and

hauled to a U.S. EPA approved landfill.

All equipment, on-site drums (left by

previous contractors), two flat-bed

trailers, and a 500 gallon tank were

demolished and disposed of along with

the demolition debris. A ROD

Amendment was signed on June 18,

1997, after the completion of a new

human health and ecological risk

assessment. The RI investigations

indicated that there were lead levels

above drinking water standards in

several of the residential wells in the

area. The wells were resampled, post

ROD, using EPA recommended lowflow sampling methods. A risk analysis

was conduced by the USACE using the

results from this study. It indicated that

there was no unacceptable human

health or ecological risk at the site.

Based on the results of the risk analysis

a ROD amendment was issued in June,

1997, removing the ground water

remedy component from the ROD.

The ROD Amendment signed on June

18, 1997, did not specify any remedial

activity for groundwater. Based upon

eight separate groundwater monitoring

events to date: 1985 RI, 1989 site

investigation, plus five sampling events

by the USACE between 1996 and 1998,

and three by the Settling Defendants

(two conducted post RA), there is no

evidence of groundwater contamination

above drinking water standards. The

U.S. EPA in consultation with the Ohio

EPA, concluded that no groundwater

remediation is necessary. All

groundwater monitoring wells have

been abandoned consistent with Ohio

EPA guidelines.

The Consent Decree (CD) with the

Settling Defendants was lodged on

September 11, 1998, in the U.S. District

Court for Southern District of Ohio,

Western Division, Dayton, Ohio, for

remedial design (RD) and remedial

action (RA); and was entered by the

Court on April 12, 1999. On October 19,

1999, the U.S. District Court entered a

separated CD with Mr. Harold Shane,

owner of the AIM Site property.

Characterization of Risk

The AIM Final Remedial Action

Report was approved by EPA on July 26,

2000. The AIM Site remedial action

performed by the AIM Settling

Defendants, resulted in a clean closure.

On December 1, 1999, the U.S. EPA, the

Ohio EPA, and the USACE conducted

the final inspection of the AIM Site. The

Preliminary Close Out Report (PCOR)

was issued in 1999. Since then two

rounds of groundwater sampling have

been completed, the groundwater

monitoring wells have been properly

abandoned, and two post excavation

sampling events for Sycamore Ditch

have confirmed that no contamination

above clean-up levels has been left on

or off the site. A Final Close-out Report

was issued in March 2001.

Response Actions

• The RD/RA Work Plan was

approved by the U.S. EPA on July 14,

1999.

• The Notice of Authorization to

Proceed with RA was issued on July 14,

1999.

• The Pre-Construction Inspection

Meeting was conducted on August 18,

1999.

• The RA construction commenced

on Monday, August 30, 1999.

• The AIM Site was cleared of all

trees and the cleared trees were

disposed of in accordance with State of

Ohio requirements.

• The drums left on-site by previous

contractors, were cleaned, crushed, and

disposed of along with the demolition

debris.

• The office, smelter, and saw

building were decontaminated,

demolished and hauled to a U.S. EPAapproved landfill.

• All equipment, including the flatbed trailers and a 500 gallon tank were

demolished and disposed of along with

the demolition debris from the

buildings.

• No underground storage tanks were

found on-site.

• Post-Excavation Confirmatory Soil

Sampling was conducted to confirm that

all soils with lead contamination above

34852 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 127 / Monday, July 2, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

400 parts per million, had been

excavated and removed from the AIM

Site.

• About 200 cubic yards of leadcontaminated sediments in Sycamore

Ditch were excavated, treated on-site,

and disposed of in an off-site U.S. EPAapproved landfill.

• Over 30,000 tons of treated battery

casing chips, treated lead-contaminated

soils, and construction debris were

hauled off-site to a U.S. EPA-approved

landfill.

• All areas disturbed during the RA

were backfilled with clean backfill and

a minimum of 6 inches of topsoil was

placed over the backfill.

• The Site was regraded to promote

positive drainage and prevent ponding

of water.

• EPA, and the UACE conducted site

inspections on August 18, 1999,

September 22, 1999, October 20, 1999,

and November 17, 1999.

• Air and groundwater monitoring

were performed during the RA.

• The access road (Pop Rite Lane) to

the AIM Site was resurfaced after

completion of the AIM Site RA. The

private road was used by contractor

trucks to transport and dispose of the

battery casing chips, contaminated soils,

demolition debris, as well as to haul

backfill to the AIM Site.

• Restrictive covenants that would

limit land or water use will not need to

be executed since the RA resulted in a

clean up that allows unlimited use and

unrestricted exposure. Cleanup

Standards

A clean closure was implemented at

the AIM Site. No hazardous substances

remain on the AIM Site which present

a health risk.

Five-Year Review—If Applicable

The selected RA utilized permanent

solutions and considered the use of

alternative treatment technologies to the

maximum extent practicable. There is

no health risk from remaining exposure

to lead and therefore, the use of the AIM

Site is not restricted. Consequently, a

five-year review will not be required in

accordance with section 121 of

CERCLA.

Community Involvement

Public participation activities have

been satisfied as required in CERCLA

section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and

CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617.

Documents in the deletion docket which

EPA relied on for recommendation of

the deletion from the NPL are available

to the public in the information

repositories.

V. Deletion Action

The EPA, with concurrence of the

State of Ohio, has determined that all

appropriate responses under CERCLA

have been completed, and that no

further response actions, under

CERCLA, are necessary. Therefore, EPA

is deleting the AIM Site from the NPL.

Because EPA considers this action to

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is

taking it without prior publication of a

notice of intent to delete. This action

will be effective August 31, 2001 unless

EPA receives adverse comments by

August 1, 2001. If adverse comments are

received within the 30-day public

comment period, EPA will publish a

timely withdrawal of this direct final

notice of deletion before the effective

date of the deletion and it will not take

effect and, EPA will prepare a response

to comments and continue with the

deletion process on the basis of the

notice of intent to delete and the

comments already received. There will

be no additional opportunity to

comment.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous

waste, Hazardous substances,

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Superfund, Water

pollution control, Water supply.

Dated: June 20, 2001.

David A. Ullrich,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.

For the reasons set out in this

document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended

as follows:

PART 300—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 300

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,

1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,

3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.

Appendix B—[Amended]

2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300

is amended by removing the entry for

‘‘Arcanum Iron & Metal, Darke County,

OH.’’

[FR Doc. 01–16287 Filed 6–29–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 010112013–1160–05; I.D.

061401A]

RIN 0648–A082

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic

Zone Off Alaska; Correction to the

Emergency Interim Rule; Closure

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Correction to the emergency

interim rule for Steller Sea Lion

Protection Measures for the Groundfish

Fisheries Off Alaska; Final 2001 Harvest

Specifications and Associated

Management Measures for the

Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska;

Closure.

SUMMARY: NMFS amends an emergency

interim rule by removing the 150 metric

ton (mt) of the seasonal allocation of

Pacific halibut prohibited species catch

(PSC) apportioned to the ‘‘shallow water

trawl fishery’’ during June 10 to July 1.

NMFS is also prohibiting directed

fishing by vessels using trawl gear in the

Gulf of Alaska (GOA) for species that

comprise the shallow water species

fishery, except for vessels fishing for

pollock using pelagic trawl gear in those

portions of the GOA open to directed

fishing for pollock. This action is

necessary to preserve limited bycatch

amounts of Pacific halibut while NMFS

reviews the seasonal allocation of GOA

Pacific cod total allowable catch (TAC)

recommended by the North Pacific

Fishery Management Council (Council).

DATES: Tables 24 and 25 to the preamble

are effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local time

(A.l.t.), June 27, 2001, through 2400 hrs,

A.l.t., July 17, 2001. The closure for the

shallow water species fishery by vessels

using trawl gear in the GOA is effective

1200 hrs, A.l.t., June 27, 2001, through

1200 hrs, A.l.t., July 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Furuness, 907–586–7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS

manages the groundfish fishery in the

GOA exclusive economic zone

according to the Fishery Management

Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of

Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North

Pacific Fishery Management Council

(Council) under authority of the

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery

Conservation and Management Act

(Magnuson-Stevens Act). Regulations