alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4149 

To prohibit the closure, consolidation, or elimination of offices of the 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2019 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Ms. TLAIB) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committees on Agriculture, Transportation and Infrastructure, 

and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the closure, consolidation, or elimination of 

offices of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recognizing the Envi5 ronmental Gains In Overcoming Negligence Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘REGION Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4149 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGIONAL AND PROGRAM OFFICES OF THE ENVI2 RONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 

3 No office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 

4 including any region, regional office, or program office, 

5 shall be closed, consolidated, or eliminated using funds 

6 made available in any appropriations Act for any fiscal 

7 year. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: February 15, 2006



                                           /s/  John B. Sawyer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John B. Sawyer,
                                           President and COO
In Re Nancy GLEIS, petitioner.

No. 16-8716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: June 24, 2011By:
/s/ Guy De VreeseName:  Guy De VreeseTitle:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CCC GlobalCom  Corporation  on form
10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Paul E. Licata,  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report complies with the  requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
              (d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

         (2)  the  information  in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
              respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.


By  /s/ Paul E. Licata
-----------------------
Paul E. Licata
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
ALLIED AVIATION SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 17-442.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
# L_2006289EN.01002801.xml

| 19.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 89/2006

of 7 July 2006

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 67/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 67/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (2), as corrected by OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 50, is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (2), as corrected by OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 50, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 18a (Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘18b. | 32004 L 0052: Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 124), as corrected by OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 50.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘18b.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2004/52/EC, as corrected by OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 50, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 245, 7.9.2006, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 124.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
JUNNE KYOO KOH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6432.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2012270EN.01003001.xml

| 4.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 108/2012

of 15 June 2012

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 94/2012 of 30 April 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 94/2012 of 30 April 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2010/368/EU of 30 June 2010 amending Decision 2006/771/EC on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2010/368/EU of 30 June 2010 amending Decision 2006/771/EC on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 5cz (Commission Decision 2006/771/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 D 0368: Commission Decision 2010/368/EU of 30 June 2010 (OJ L 166, 1.7.2010, p. 33).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 D 0368: Commission Decision 2010/368/EU of 30 June 2010 (OJ L 166, 1.7.2010, p. 33).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2010/368/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 June 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 248, 13.9.2012, p. 32.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 166, 1.7.2010, p. 33.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
David OPALINSKI, et al., petitioners, v. ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.

No. 16-1456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Bharanidharan PADMANABHAN, petitioner, v. William KASSLER, et al.

No. 16-1319.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Bill Thomas Alexander LENNAN, petitioner, v. Gerald JANDA, Warden.

No. 17M41.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,785,283
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,406,005
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,059,926
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,498,842
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,413,000
<LOANS>                                     54,601,059
<ALLOWANCE>                                    877,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              77,095,459
<DEPOSITS>                                  64,686,466
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,600,856
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,352,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       415,103
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,040,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              77,095,459
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,273,553
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              709,375
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,982,928
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,890,975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,977,043
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,005,885
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  162,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,992,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,317,571
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     838,089
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   838,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.44
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    86,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               705,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   60,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    70,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              877,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           877,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Torrey Twane McNABB, petitioner, v. Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 19, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In Re Melvin MANNING, petitioner.

No. 16-9226.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Roland Donell ROSS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8792.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Carl W. STONE, Jr., petitioner, v. Shawn EMMONS, Warden, et al.

No. 17-5514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/24/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       82,454
COMMITMENTS
  21,774   13,383    8,967   35,354   38,370   66,095   60,720   16,358   21,734

CHANGES FROM 02/17/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,688)
  -1,583     -519   -4,567   -3,563   -3,714   -9,714   -8,800    1,026      112

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.4     16.2     10.9     42.9     46.5     80.2     73.6     19.8     26.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      129)
      27       23       30       57       54      103       95
```

----

Updated February 27, 2009
Johnnie DOGGINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5459.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: September 1, 2005                      /s/ Ian M.Herman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ian M. Herman
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Jose Jesus MEDINA, petitioner, v. Anthony HEDGPETH, Warden.

No. 17-5937.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2011226EN.01000101.xml

| 1.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 226/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 226/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of an Agreement in the form of a Protocol between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan establishing a dispute settlement mechanism applicable to disputes under the trade provisions of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part

The Agreement in the form of a Protocol between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan establishing a dispute settlement mechanism applicable to disputes under the trade provisions of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 11 February 2011
   (1), has entered into force, by virtue of Article 23 of the Protocol, on 1 July 2011.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 177, 6.7.2011, p. 1.

1

---
Lewis F. CARTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-602.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4207

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for enhanced 
   penalties for certain unlawful discharges of a firearm on or near 
                    schools, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 23, 2019

Mr. Weber of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for enhanced 
   penalties for certain unlawful discharges of a firearm on or near 
                    schools, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Victims of School 
Shootings Act''.

SEC. 2. SCHOOL SHOOTINGS.

    Section 924(a)(4) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Whoever violates'' and inserting ``(A) 
        Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, whoever 
        violates''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Whoever violates section 922(q)(3) and thereby causes 
        harm to or the death of a person through the use of a firearm, 
        shall--
                    ``(i) for killing, or if death results to any 
                person from any other conduct prohibited by this 
                section, be punished by death or by imprisonment for 
                any term of years or for life, be fined under this 
                title, or both;
                    ``(ii) for assault resulting in serious bodily 
                injury, be imprisoned for not more than 30 years or 
                fined under this title, or both; or
                    ``(iii) for attempting or conspiring to commit an 
                offense with the intent to cause the death of any 
                person, be imprisoned for not more than 20 years or 
                fined under this title, or both.''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF ``SCHOOL'' REVISED TO INCLUDE INSTITUTIONS OF 
              HIGHER EDUCATION.

    Section 921(a)(26) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(26) The term `school' means--
                    ``(A) a school which provides elementary or 
                secondary education, as determined under State law; or
                    ``(B) for purposes of section 922(q)(3), a college, 
                university, or other postsecondary institution.''.
                                 <all>
```
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Stacy Enid Lebow SIEGEL.

No. D-3013.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.
Robert R. ACEVEDO, petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD.

No. 17-5696.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.