alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

600 CA 16-01331 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JOSEPH SKITZKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MELISSA NEAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MELISSA NEAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
FERON POLEON, LLP, AMHERST (KELLY A. FERON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

KELLY L. BALL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BUFFALO.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Dennis E. Ward, J.), entered November 20, 2015. The order, among other things, granted plaintiff exclusive use and occupancy of real property located at 766 Auburn Avenue, Buffalo, and adjourned the cross motion of defendant for financial relief.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the fourth ordering paragraph is unanimously dismissed and the order is otherwise affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order in this divorce action that, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion seeking a temporary order of exclusive possession of the marital residence ( see Domestic Relations Law § 234). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that she was a source of domestic strife, which required police intervention on one occasion, and that, after the commencement of the action, she purchased a home in proximity to the marital residence ( see Annexstein v Annexstein , 202 AD2d 1062, 1062; see also Amato v Amato , 133 AD3d 695, 696). We therefore conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff exclusive possession of the marital residence ( see generally Iuliano v Iuliano , 30 AD3d 737, 737-738). “In any event, the most expedient and best remedy for any perceived inequities in a temporary order of exclusive occupancy, like any other pendente lite order, is to press for an early trial” ( Annexstein , 202 AD2d at 1062 [internal quotation marks omitted]).
Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court did not deny her cross motion for temporary financial relief but instead adjourned the matter, and thus her contention regarding that requested relief is not properly before us ( see Matter of Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v Board of-2- 600 CA 16-01331 Stds. & Appeals of City of N.Y. , 38 AD2d 979, 979). Defendant’s remaining contention with respect to the order is without merit.

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# L_2011044EN.01000101.xml

| 18.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 44/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas will enter into force on 1 March 2011, the procedure provided for in Article 14 of the Agreement having been completed on 18 January 2011.

---
II-00868

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

James Barrett <maestrojeb@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:31 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

James Barrett

1148 S Ceylon St

Aurora, CO 80017-4505
Kimberly A. REATH, petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

No. 17-5443.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Theodore Farnsworth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Xstream Beverage Network, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Xstream
Beverage Network, Inc.

November 22, 2004

                                               By: /s/ Theodore Farnsworth
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Theodore Farnsworth, CEO,
                                                   principal executive officer
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, John A. Miley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Media Operations, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |
# L_2011318EN.01004901.xml

| 1.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/49

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 109/2011

of 30 September 2011

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 89/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 89/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2011/142/EU of 3 March 2011 amending Decision 97/80/EC laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Directive 96/16/EC on statistical surveys of milk and milk products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/142/EU of 3 March 2011 amending Decision 97/80/EC laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Directive 96/16/EC on statistical surveys of milk and milk products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 22 (Commission Decision 97/80/EC) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32011 D 0142: Commission Decision 2011/142/EU of 3 March 2011 (OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 66).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32011 D 0142: Commission Decision 2011/142/EU of 3 March 2011 (OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 66).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/142/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 61.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 66.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 04-30341

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

SHANNON A. DARDAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal

Service; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-3802-K

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Sophia A. Dardar(“Dardar”) appealsthe district court’s order granting defendants’

motion to dismiss and alternatively for summary judgment. We find that the appellant does not have

standing to sue under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000(e), because she hasfailed to establish a genuine issue
-2-

of materialfact disputing herstatus as an independent contractor of the United States Postal Service.

Mares v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 1066, 1067-69 (5th Cir. 1985). Similarly, we find her claims for

intentionalinfliction ofemotionaldistress are barred bythe sovereign immunityafforded to the United

States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C. § 2680. Finally, we agree with the

district court’s assessment that only the Federal Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over

appellants breach of contract claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1346.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
Christopher STODDART, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-8555.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3847 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, as the ‘‘Reverend 

Curtis West Harris Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. MCEACHIN (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mrs. LURIA, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, Mr. CLINE, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. BEYER, Mr. 

GRIFFITH, Ms. WEXTON, and Mr. CONNOLLY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, as the ‘‘Reverend Curtis West Harris Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVEREND CURTIS WEST HARRIS POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located 117 West Poythress Street in HopeVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:36 Jul 27, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3847.IH H3847

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3847 IH

1 well, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rev2 erend Curtis West Harris Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Reverend Curtis West 

7 Harris Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# L_2010101EN.01002301.xml

| 22.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 101/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 101/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 13/2010

of 29 January 2010

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 145/2009 of 4 December 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 145/2009 of 4 December 2009 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | Directive 2009/45/EC repeals Council Directive 98/18/EC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Directive 2009/45/EC repeals Council Directive 98/18/EC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of point 56f (Council Directive 98/18/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32009 L 0045: Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (OJ L 163, 25.6.2009, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/45/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 January 2010, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 January 2010.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 62, 11.3.2010, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 163, 25.6.2009, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 144, 15.5.1998, p. 1.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Samuel Jay BUCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8465.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         663,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,004,628
<PP&E>                                      17,471,632
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,982,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,493,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,493,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,493,896
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               685,260
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  531,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   152,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Release: #4233-99 (CFTC Docket No. SD 99-2)

For Release: January 28, 1999

CFTC FINDS THAT ANTHONY MYSKOWSKI, A FLOOR BROKER AT THE COFFEE SUGAR
    COCOA EXCHANGE, IS SUBJECT TO STATUTORY DISQUALIFICATION AND ISSUES ORDER
    ON CONSENT RESTRICTING MYSKOWSKI'S REGISTRATION

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it filed a Notice of Intent to Suspend, Revoke or Restrict
    Registration (Notice) against Anthony Myskowski, of Bridgewater,
    New Jersey, a registered floor broker who is a member of the Coffee Sugar
    Cocoa Exchange (CSCE), and simultaneously accepted Myskowski's offer
    of settlement.

The CFTC's Notice alleges that Myskowski was charged by the CSCE
    in 14 disciplinary actions, two of which alleged serious violations,
    including trading ahead of an active customer buy order, misallocating a
    customer order, and engaging in noncompetitive and prearranged trading. The
    two serious violations resulted in $15,500 in sanctions. The Notice further
    alleges that the disciplinary proceedings constitute good cause under
    section 8a(3)(M) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) to revoke, suspend or
    restrict Myskowski's floor broker registration as authorized under section
    8a(4) of the CEA.

Myskowski, without admitting or denying the charges in the Notice,
    consented to the entry of a Commission order which restricts his
    registration for two years, during which time, among other things, he will
    be prohibited from directly or indirectly trading on behalf of customers
    and be required to have a sponsor.

# # #