alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Calls to discuss costs of establishing and operating a SEF
  
    



  See attached.
      
  When
              05/14/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
<PAGE>   1
                                 WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.



Exhibit (11) - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                THREE                             NINE 
                                                             MONTHS ENDED                      MONTHS ENDED     
                                                             SEPTEMBER 30,                     SEPTEMBER 30,    
                                                          -------------------            ----------------------
                                                            1997        1996                1997           1996  
                                                          -------     -------            --------      --------
<S>                                                       <C>         <C>                <C>           <C>
Primary:
Average shares outstanding                                 30,309       31,285             30,727         31,392

Shares issuable under 1995
     Key Employee Stock Bonus Plan                             61           43                 49             57

Net effect of dilutive stock options
     - based on the treasury stock
     method using average market price                        755          497                685            433
                                                          --------     -------           --------       --------

Total                                                      31,125       31,825             31,461         31,882
                                                          =======      =======           ========       ========
 
Income from continuing operations                         $26,520      $22,238           $ 46,173       $ 39,594
Income (loss) from discontinued operations                    390         (526)             2,625         (1,192)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations                     6,138            -              6,138              -
                                                          -------      -------           --------       --------

     Net income                                           $33,048      $21,712           $ 54,936       $ 38,402
                                                          =======      =======           ========       ========


Net income (loss) per common share:
     Continuing operations                                $   .85      $   .70           $   1.47          $1.24
     Discontinued operations                                  .01         (.02)               .08           (.04)
     Gain on sale of discontinued operations                  .20            -                .20              -
                                                          -------      -------           --------       --------
     Net income per common share                          $  1.06      $   .68           $   1.75       $   1.20
                                                          =======      =======           ========       ========
</TABLE>





                                       43
Rodrigo MACIAS-FARIAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PATRICIA GRAHAM, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 30, 2005



                                           /s/  Patricia Graham
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patricia Graham,
                                           Principal Financial Officer
# L_2012116EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 116/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 116/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on scientific and technological cooperation

The Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on scientific and technological cooperation (1), signed on 30 November 2009, has, in accordance with Article 7(2) thereof, entered into force on 29 March 2011.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 159, 17.6.2011, p. 108.

1

---
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FORM OF SHAREHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT 

The undersigned hereby agrees in his capacity as an individual shareholder and as a trustee of the Trusts identified on the signature page
below to vote the shares of Klein Financial, Inc. (“KFI”) Common Stock that are registered in his name, and to take action in his capacity as a trustee to cause each Trust to vote the shares KFI Common Stock that are registered in its
name, in favor of the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Old National Bancorp and KFI, dated [•], 2018 (the “Agreement”). In addition, the undersigned hereby agrees not to make, or take any action to cause any Trust to make,
any transfers of shares of KFI Common Stock with the purpose of avoiding the agreement set forth in the preceding sentence and agrees to cause any transferee of such shares to abide by the terms of this Voting Agreement. 

The undersigned is entering into this Voting Agreement solely in his capacity as a shareholder and as a trustee of the Trusts and,
notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Voting Agreement, nothing in this Voting Agreement is intended or shall be construed to limit or affect the authority of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director, employee,
officer or agent of KFI, or as a trustee of a Trust, if applicable, to act or fail to act in accordance with: the undersigned’s fiduciary duties in such capacity, applicable trust agreements and applicable law. Furthermore, the undersigned
makes no agreement or understanding herein in his or her capacity as a director, employee, officer or agent of KFI. 
 Notwithstanding any
contrary provision herein, this Voting Agreement shall be effective from the date hereof and shall terminate and be of no further force and effect upon the earliest of (a) the consummation of the Merger (as defined in the Agreement), (b) the
termination of the Agreement in accordance with its terms, (c) the taking of such action whereby a majority of the Board of Directors of KFI, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 6.3 of the Agreement, withdraws its
favorable recommendation of the Agreement to its shareholders; (d) the adoption of the Agreement by the shareholders of KFI; or (e) December 31, 2019. 

This Voting Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together
constitute one and the same instrument. 
 Dated this
                 day of
                                        ,
2018. 
  

	
	   

	[insert name]
Release: 3951-96 (Civ 96-2185)

For Release: October 8, 1996

**PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS ISSUED BY ARIZONA COURT IN CFTC ANTI-FRAUD    ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST UNITED METALS TRADING CORP.,**

**WESTERN NATIONAL TRADING AND TWO OF THE FIRMS' OFFICERS**

**Injunctions Stem from an Anti-Fraud Action Against the Defendants    Filed Jointly in Late September****by the CFTC and the Arizona    Corporations Commission**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    today that on October 3, 1996, the Honorable Roger G. Strand of the U.S.    District Court for the District of Arizona entered orders of preliminary    injunction against **United Metals Trading Corporation**, **Western    National Trading**, and **Anthony F. Andrews**, of Scottsdale,    Arizona, and **Marvin C. Pendergraft**, of Phoenix, Arizona.

On September 23, 1996, Judge Rosenblatt entered ***ex parte* and    temporary restraining orders against the four defendants, stemming from a    10-count civil complaint filed jointly by the CFTC and the Arizona    Corporations Commission (ACC). The complaint alleges, among other things,    that the defendants violated the anti-fraud provisions of the *Commodity    Exchange Act* (CEA) and the *Arizona Securities Act* (ASA), by,    among other things, cheating and defrauding customers while acting as an    unregistered commodity pool operator and a futures commission merchant, and    engaging in a "Ponzi" scheme whereby they made false representations of    profit to customers, issued false trading statements, and operated the pool    in a fraudulent or deceptive manner, among other things. (See CFTC    News Release #3944-96, September 25, 1996.)**

**Injunctions Continue the Court's Earlier *Ex Parte* Asset Freeze    Against the Defendants**

**The court's preliminary injunctions 1) prohibit the defendants from    violating the CEA, the ASA, and CFTC regulations, as charged, 2) prohibit    further solicitation of funds, 3) require each defendant to make an    accounting of their assets, and 4) continue the provisions of the court's    September 23, 1996, *ex parte* order freezing the defendants' assets,    prohibiting destruction of books and records, and granting the CFTC access    to such books and records.**

**In the continuing litigation against the defendants, the CFTC and the    ACC are seeking permanent civil injunctions prohibiting the defendants from    violating federal commodities laws and state statutes, in addition to other    remedial relief, including disgorgement and civil monetary    penalties.**

**Defendant Marvin C. Pendergraft, a United Metals director and the    corporate secretary, consented to the entry of the preliminary injunction    and has been cooperating in the Commission's investigation. Defendant    Andrews is a United Metals director and vice president. Both are general    partners of Western National Trading.**

----
William A. OWENS, petitioner, v. Tracy RAY, Warden, et al.

No. 17-8025.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# L_2014211EN.01004502.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/45

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 52/2007 of 8 June 2007 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 266 of 11 October 2007
  )

| 1. | On page 10, recital 2 and Articles 1 and 2: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 10, recital 2 and Articles 1 and 2:

for:

‘1891/2006’,

read:

‘2038/2006’;

| 2. | On page 10, Article 1: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 10, Article 1:

for:

‘
  32006 R 1891
  ’,

32006 R 1891

read:

‘
  32006 R 2038
  ’.

32006 R 2038

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4153 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban 

Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of medical services and facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. GIANFORTE, Mr. 

LUJA ́N, Mr. YOUNG, Ms. MOORE, Mr. BACON, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. 

ESTES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize urban Indian organizations to enter into arrangements for the sharing of medical services and facilities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Access 

5 for Urban Native Veterans Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4153 IH

1 SEC. 2. SHARING ARRANGEMENTS WITH FEDERAL AGEN2 CIES. 

3 Section 405 of the Indian Health Care Improvement 

4 Act (25 U.S.C. 1645) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘urban In6 dian organizations,’’ before ‘‘and tribal organiza7 tions’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (c)— 

9 (A) by inserting ‘‘urban Indian organiza10 tion,’’ before ‘‘or tribal organization’’; and 

11 (B) by inserting ‘‘an urban Indian organi12 zation,’’ before ‘‘or a tribal organization’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# L_2012161EN.01002401.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 18/2012

of 10 February 2012

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 133/2011 of 2 December 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 133/2011 of 2 December 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 of 9 December 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of social security systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 of 9 December 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of social security systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 R 1244: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 of 9 December 2010 (OJ L 338, 22.12.2010, p. 35).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 R 1244: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 of 9 December 2010 (OJ L 338, 22.12.2010, p. 35).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 February 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 76/2011 of 1 July 2011 (3), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 15.3.2012, p. 17.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 338, 22.12.2010, p. 35.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(3)  
  OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 33.

3

---
Daniel J. HALLORAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-872.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2005292EN.01001001.xml

| 8.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 292/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 292/10

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part (1)

With the instruments notifying completion of the procedures required for entry into force of the Euro- Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part, signed in Valencia on 22 April 2002, having been exchanged on 22 July 2005, the Agreement entered into force on 1 September 2005, in accordance with Article 110 thereof.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 265, 10.10.2005, p. 2.

1

---
774.

#### Barge *et al. v.*Irwin.

Action for damages, from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan. August 14, 1907.

Submitted December 17, 1907.

Decided March 30, 1908.

*W. B. .Armisiead,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. W. Ear divide, A. R. Wright,*contra.

Russell, J.

A verdict for the plaintiff was authorized, under the law and the evidence; but the amount of the jury’s finding was greater than authorized by the evidence, there being no evidence to authorize 'the recovery of exemplary damages. It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be affirmed, on condition that the defendant in error reduce the judgment in her favor to the sum of $7.32, the actual damages shown. Upon failure to do this the judgment refusing a new trial is

*Reversed.*