alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013291EN.01005301.xml

| 31.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/53

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 87/2013

of 3 May 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 665/2012 of 20 July 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 454/2011 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘telematics applications for passenger services’ of the trans-European rail system (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 665/2012 of 20 July 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 454/2011 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘telematics applications for passenger services’ of the trans-European rail system (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 37dj (Commission Regulation (EU) No 454/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32012 R 0665: Commission Regulation (EU) No 665/2012 of 20 July 2012 (OJ L 194, 21.7.2012, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32012 R 0665: Commission Regulation (EU) No 665/2012 of 20 July 2012 (OJ L 194, 21.7.2012, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 665/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 May 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 194, 21.7.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Johnny Dekeon EDWARDS, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 17-5942.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2008223EN.01006001.xml

| 21.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 223/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 223/60

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 59/2008

of 25 April 2008

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 171/2007 of 7 December 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 171/2007 of 7 December 2007 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 10f (Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXII to the Agreement:

| ‘10g. | 32007 L 0036: Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (OJ L 184, 14.7.2007, p. 17).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘10g.

32007 L 0036: Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (OJ L 184, 14.7.2007, p. 17).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2007/36/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 April 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 April 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 124, 8.5.2008, p. 39.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 184, 14.7.2007, p. 17.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES, LLC, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1105.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Veronica Denise DALE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8784.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, petitioner, v. Rafael Antonio LARIOS-REYES.

No. 17-58.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Raj SINGH, et al. petitioners, v. Tammy FERNANDES.

No. 17-8532.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
Order entered December 11, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00006-CR

No. 05-15-00007-CR

No. 05-15-00008-CR

No. 05-15-00009-CR

GARY WAYNE BARNES SR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F80-16530-J, F81-01027-J, F81-01105-J, F81-02518-J

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s November 9, 2015 motion to not accept the Anders brief 

filed by counsel.

Appellant also filed a “requested motion for an extension of time to file a pro se brief.” 

By letter dated December 1, 2015, the Court gave appellant until January 28, 2016 to file his pro 

se response. As that date has not yet passed, we DENY as premature the request for an extension 

of time to file the pro se response.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Gary Wayne Barnes, Sr., Nanette 

Hendrickson, and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Valarian BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8823.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Joseph W. Peine v. Elite Airfreight, Inc., and Advanced Logistics

S ervices , Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 8 6 0

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 08

- 610 9 7

Trial court: 189 th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, Elite Airfreight, Inc., ha s filed an agreed motion to seal the brief of a ppellant, Joseph W. Peine

. In the underlying case, the trial court s igned an order sealing court records, including “ the transcript of the bill of exception made by Plaintiff” and “the exhibits to that bill of exception

. . . . ” See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 76a. Appellee request s that we seal the appellant’ s brief, which contains references to portions of the record that the trial court ordered sealed. The motion includes a certificate of conference stating that the parties agree to the requested relief.

W e grant appellee ’ s motio n and direct the Clerk of this Court to seal the Brief for Appellant , filed on April 22, 2015. See R.V.K. v. L.L.K. , 103 S.W.3d 612, 614 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet

. ) (noting appellate court ordered clerk to seal parties ’ briefs that were replete w ith references to and copies of portions of record ordered sealed by trial court ) ; cf.
Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Tex., Inc. , 206 S.W.3d 791 , 794 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2006, no pet.) (Gray, C. J. dissenting) (citing Tindall v. Nationsbank of Tex., N .A. , No. 05

- 97

- 01843

- CV, 1998 WL 324731, at * 1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas June 22, 1998, no pet.) (not designated for publication) ) ( stating appellate court may seal record on agreed motion when trial court has ordered records sealed but dissenting from order seali ng brief when record d id not indicate that trial court sealed records under rule 76a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_

/ s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 9, 2015
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.39



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$1,575,000                                                  Kirkland, Washington
                                                                  March 14, 2000

         For value received, the undersigned promises to pay Rosetta
Inpharmatics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), at its principal
office the principal sum of $1,575,000 with interest from the date hereof at a
rate of 6.35% per annum, compounded semiannually, on the unpaid balance of such
principal sum. Such principal and interest shall be due and payable on March 14,
2004.

         If the undersigned's employment or consulting relationship with the
Company is terminated prior to payment in full of this Note, this Note shall be
within ninety (90) days of such termination. Further, in the event the
undersigned has had the opportunity prior to March 14, 2004 to sell, transfer,
hypothecate or otherwise liquidate shares of stock obtained pursuant to that
certain Early Exercise Notice and Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement between
the Company and the undersigned dated as of March 14, 2000 (the "AGREEMENT",
that portion of the this Note equal to the proceeds (net of any federal or state
income tax liability) of any such liquidation shall become immediately due and
payable and shall be paid in full; provided, however, that the foregoing shall
not apply to a transfer made pursuant to 3(b)(vi) of the Agreement.

         Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States
of America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME WITHOUT
INTEREST OR PENALTY.

         Should suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note, such
sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees.
The makers and endorsers have severally waived presentment for payment, protest,
notice of protest, and notice of nonpayment of this Note.

         This Note, which is full recourse, is secured by a pledge of certain
shares of Common Stock of the Company and is subject to the terms of a Pledge
and Security Agreement between the undersigned and the Company of even date
herewith.


                                                     ___________________________
                                                     Mark Boguski, M.D., Ph.D.
# L_2012207EN.01003701.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 57/2012

of 30 March 2012

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 27/2012 of 10 February 2012 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2011/275/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘infrastructure’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/275/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘infrastructure’ subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 37df (Commission Regulation (EU) No 201/2011) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘37dg. | 32011 D 0275: Commission Decision 2011/275/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the “infrastructure” subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 53).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘37dg.

32011 D 0275: Commission Decision 2011/275/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the “infrastructure” subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 53).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/275/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 31 March 2012, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2012.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 21.6.2012, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 53.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### S. Castiglioni, *Appellant,*v. Phil H. Miller and D. A. Kinsey, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed January 25, 1929.

*Edward S. Bridges,*for Appellant;

No appearance for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordred and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                  ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CCC GlobalCom  Corporation  on form
10QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Paul E. Licata,  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
              (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the  information  in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
              respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.


By /s/  Paul E. Licata
-----------------------
Paul E. Licata
Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6994

JIMMY D. MEGGS, JR., a/k/a Jimmy D. Meggs

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden of Turbeville,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

JON OZMINT, Director,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(8:10-cv-01774-TLW)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 16, 2012

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy D. Meggs, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III,

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy D. Meggs, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Meggs v. Knowlin, No. 8:10-cv-01774-TLW (D.S.C. filed July 12, 

2011, entered July 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
John CUTONILLI, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-399.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Rodney REED, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-1093.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Victor BAXTER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-5707.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/21/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       29,741
COMMITMENTS
   5,073      287    1,623   14,787   18,360   21,483   20,270    8,257    9,470

CHANGES FROM 04/14/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -427)
     167       92     -118      -33   -1,823       16   -1,849     -443    1,422

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    17.1      1.0      5.5     49.7     61.7     72.2     68.2     27.8     31.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       39)
      10        2        7       25       20       36       28
```

----

Updated April 23, 2009
Jermaine Lamont WOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5927.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRI Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen P. Slay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen P. Slay  Stephen P. Slay  Chief Financial Officer  November 13, 2007       A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
Alex Ricardo SALDANA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-8469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 25, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Brian M. BURMASTER, petitioner, v. J.C. HOLLAND, Warden.

No. 17-451.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
SPECIALTY FERTILIZER PRODUCTS, LLC, petitioner, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-1243.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
# C_2012300EN.01000401.xml

| 5.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/4

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra

2012/C 300/05

On 23 February 2012, the Principality of Andorra notified the European Union of the completion of its ratification procedures.

Likewise, on 29 February 2012, the European Union notified the Principality of Andorra of the completion of the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the above Monetary Agreement, signed at Brussels on 30 June 2011.

The Monetary Agreement accordingly entered into force on 1 April 2012 pursuant to Article 13 thereof.

---
Rosa OROZCO, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-6628.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
Andrew COX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5984.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.