alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

Computation of Earnings per Share



|                                                                                         |  |                                |           |                              |   |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | --------- | ---------------------------- | - | ---------
|                                                                                         |  | Three MonthsEndedJune 30, 2008 |           | Six MonthsEndedJune 30, 2008
|Income available to common stockholders                                                  |  | $                              | 963,098   |                              | $ | 1,972,697
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                                | 4,975,542 |                              |   | 4,975,542
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  | $                              | 0.20      |                              | $ | 0.40     
|Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |  | $                              | 963,098   |                              | $ | 1,972,697
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                                | 4,975,542 |                              |   | 4,975,542
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  | $                              | 0.20      |                              | $ | 0.40
Drew Justice WINDSOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8882.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      11,220
<SECURITIES>                                                   140
<RECEIVABLES>                                                1,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    95
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                         126
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              13,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  12,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                13,045
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             2,146
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             (359)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          1,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,822
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0


</TABLE>
Kelly David SHAMBAUGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5816.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Tessa CHILDRESS, aka Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress, petitioner, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 17-8548.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2862571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   197277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3061316
<PP&E>                                        36345644
<DEPRECIATION>                                   23141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40823997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           162233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    39911954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40823997
<SALES>                                        2740941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3057278
<CGS>                                          2268136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2268136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2521731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 535547
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             535547
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    535547
<EPS-BASIC>                                      10.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.68


</TABLE>
Louis ROBERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7383.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Release: #4282-99 (CFTC Docket No. 99-8)

For Release: June 29, 1999

CFTC ACCEPTS SETTLEMENT OFFER OF SELWYN "SY" GAIBER

#### CFTC Settlement Order Finds that Gaiber Acted as an Unregistered CTA
    and Failed to Deliver Disclosure Documents and to Disclose His Past
    Performance Record

WASHINGTON � The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
    announced today that it issued an order
    accepting an offer of settlement from Selwyn "Sy" Gaiber of Indian Wells,
    California, in connection with a complaint filed by the CFTC on March 4,
    1999 (see CFTC News Release #4242-99, March 5, 1999).

The CFTC order, issued on June 23, 1999, finds that Gaiber violated
    section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by failing to register as
    a commodity trading advisor (CTA). The order further finds that Gaiber also
    violated certain regulations governing the conduct of CTAs.

More specifically, the CFTC order finds that from January 1997 through
    December 1997, Gaiber furnished commodity trading advice to more than 15
    members of the Bulls and Bears Club, a private investment club
    Gaiber co-founded. The order finds that he was required to register as a
    CTA, and by failing to do so, he violated section 4m(1) of the CEA. As
    alleged, the order finds that Gaiber held weekly investment seminars at the
    club where he provided commodity trading advice and described specific
    trading strategies to both club members and non-members. He also
    recommended trades to club members, either individually or in small groups,
    while they were present at the club, according to the order. Finally, the
    order finds that, pursuant to discretionary trading authority, he directed
    the trading in the commodity trading accounts of seven of the members and
    the account of a commodity pool formed by some of the club members.

In addition, the order further finds that Gaiber violated CFTC
    regulations by entering into agreements with prospective clients to direct
    such clients' commodity interest accounts, without delivering to them
    any documents disclosing the risks associated with managed commodity
    accounts or the record of his performance in directing the trading of
    commodity accounts.

Gaiber, without admitting or denying the findings, consented to the
    entry of the order that: 1) directs him to cease and desist from violating
    section 4m(1) of the CEA and sections 4.31, 4.34 and 4.35 of CFTC
    regulations; 2) prohibits him, for three years, from trading on or subject
    to the rules of any contract market; and 3) requires him to comply with
    certain undertakings, including never to apply for registration with the
    CFTC in any capacity, never to engage in any activity requiring such
    registration, and never to act as an agent or officer of any person
    registered or required to be registered with the CFTC.

In the order, the CFTC notes that a civil monetary penalty against
    Gaiber would be appropriate in this case, but does not impose such a
    penalty based upon Gaiber's demonstrated financial condition.

# # #
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1491

EDDIE BRADFORD LEE, “Managing Trustee” of

Silver Will (Company) Trust, Flax Trust,

Rainbow Trust,D&J Trust, Highlander Trust,

Road To Freedom Trust, Tree Trust, HFS Trust,

Cornerstone Trust; WILLIAM SANFORD GADD,

Executive Trustee of Silver Will (Company)

Trust, Flax Trust, Rainbow Trust,D&J Trust,

Highlander Trust, Road To Freedom Trust, Tree

Trust, HFS Trust, Cornerstone Trust; KATHY

CAROL MOORE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE MEMBERS OF SILVER

WILL,

Plaintiffs,

HENRY BELL, JR.; ALVIN BOWMAN; ALBERT L.

CALLOWAY; LEE CHANG; JACK ELMORE CLINE; E.

DANE EDWARDS; GERALD B. GABRIEL; CHARLES H.

HOLMES; RAYMOND J. IRRER; SANDRA W. LITTLE;

BOBBY L. MAYHEW; LESIA WHITLEY MAYHEW; JUANITA

D. RICHARDSON; LARTHA L. RICHARDSON; DANA

WILLIAM SISK; ROBERT H. SISK; JAMES BENTON

STEWART; ROGER BERSET; WILLIAM LEO PUTNAM;

BETTY C. NIBLOCK; MICHAEL CASTLEBURY; TRACY

CASTLEBURY; TIM CASTLEBURY; MARK CASTLEBURY;

BLAKE M. MCWHIRTER; JAMES WILLIS VANNOY;

DANIEL THOMAS SAVET; KAREN DIANE SABET,

Parties in Interest,
* Judge Ervin did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

2

versus

DAVID A. MCCLELLAN; BECKY RICE; DAN PAULSON;

JULIA MUELLER; H. BRENT MCKNIGHT; WILLIAM J.

WILLIAMSON; WACHOVIA BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA,

N.A.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-355-3-P)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998

Before ERVIN,* MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Bradford Lee, William Sanford Gadd, Kathy Carol Moore,

Appellants Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Donald Bruce Tobin,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; James

Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte,

North Carolina; Ellen M. Gregg, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE,

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss their civil complaint alleging that

Defendants violated their constitutional rights by seizing their

assets without a proper warrant. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v.

McClellan, No. CA-97-355-3-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheet and the  Consolidated  Statement of Income filed as
part of the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q and is  qualified in its entirety by
reference to such quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000853102
<NAME>                                         Day Runner, Inc.      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         11,955
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                   11,143
<INVENTORY>                                    36,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65,086
<PP&E>                                         23,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 79,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,190
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           13
<OTHER-SE>                                     62,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   79,666
<SALES>                                       116,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              116,914
<CGS>                                          55,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  55,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               43,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (49)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                17,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                    7,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.88
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of NetScout Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Sommers, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    DAVID P.
SOMMERS
|David P. Sommers       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|May 27, 2011
Cary Michael LAMBRIX, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5153.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40676 

Summary Calendar

 

STEVEN HANES; GWYN HANES; CLAY HANES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DAN GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; ASCS,

AGRICULTURAL, STABILIZATION, CONSERVATION SERVICE,

FARM SERVICE AGENCY,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________

STEVEN HANES; GWYN HANES; CLAY HANES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DAN GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; 

CAROLYN A. BURCHETT, Individually and in her

official capacity as Director of National 

Appeals Division ASCS, now FSA,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:95-CV-76

USDC No. 5:97-CV-190

--------------------

August 18, 2000

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
No. 99-40676

-2-

Steven Hanes, Gwyn Hanes, and Clay Hanes, proceeding pro se,

request leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of

the district court’s dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)

of their complaint. This court previously denied without

prejudice the appellants’ motion for leave to proceed IFP,

instructing appellants that they were required to file affidavits

to show that they are unable to pay the filing fee and that they

were required to show that they would present a nonfrivolous

issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th

Cir. 1982). The appellants have failed to make the required

showing. Accordingly, the appellants’ motion for leave to

proceed IFP is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 

MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Synthesis and Distribution of Drugs of Abuse and 
Related Compounds.
    Date: May 9, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marisa Srivareerat, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Office of Extramural Policy, 
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, 
MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1258, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5934382b302a38772a2b302f382b3c3c2b382d19373031773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="701d11021903115e0302190611021515021104301e19185e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 11, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08086 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>