alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joe JEFFERSON, et al., petitioners, v. Clyde Allen RIFE.

No. 17-314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Gareic Jerard HANKSTON, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17M12.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, petitioner, v. COUGAR DEN, INC.

No. 16-1498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Chad DALE, et al., petitioners, v. Clyde Allen RIFE.

No. 17-310.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Roland I. KEHANO, Sr., petitioner, v. Francis X. SEQUEIRA.

No. 17M122.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Release: 4307-99

For Release: August 26, 1999

CFTC FILES ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AGAINST CARGILL INC., CHARGING
    THAT CARGILL OFFERED TO ENTER AND ENTERED INTO ILLEGAL AGRICULTURAL OPTION
    CONTRACTS

CFTC Alleges that Cargill's Premium Offer Contract Violates the
    Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it has filed a one-count administrative complaint alleging
    that Cargill, Inc. (Cargill), a Delaware corporation headquartered in
    Wayzata, Minnesota, offered to enter into and entered into illegal
    agricultural trade option contracts in violation of section 4c(b) of the
    Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulation 32.2.

The CFTC complaint alleges that from January 1998 to the present,
    Cargill's commercial grain marketing program offered certain grain
    contracts, called Premium Offer Contracts (POCs), that operate as call
    options. The terms of Cargill's POC are set forth in an addendum to
    Cargill's standard grain contracts. Under the POC, Cargill pays a
    non-refundable premium to a producer, which is added to the nearby grain
    delivery price, in exchange for the producer's "firm offer" to sell Cargill
    grain for deferred delivery if, at a specified date, the futures price is
    at or above a specified strike price. Because Cargill's POC does not
    mandate delivery of the agricultural commodity unless certain conditions
    occur, the complaint charges that Cargill's POC is a commodity option
    that is prohibited by the CEA and CFTC regulations. In addition,
    Cargill's offer and sale of the POC does not comply with the rules
    permitting the offer and sale of agricultural trade options because Cargill
    has not registered as an agricultural trade option merchant, and has not
    complied with the other requirements of rule 32.13, and because the call
    options sold by producers to Cargill were not combined with a long put
    option position as required by the rules.

A public hearing has been ordered to determine whether the allegations
    are true, and, if so, what sanctions, if any, are appropriate and in the
    public interest.

# # #
GRAMERCY ADVISORS, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. Shahid R. KHAN, et al.

No. 17-18.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/07/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       28,919
COMMITMENTS
  11,839    6,180    5,574    4,036   13,610   21,449   25,364    7,470    3,555

CHANGES FROM 06/30/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,903)
     266      708      621    1,008     -243    1,895    1,086        8      817

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    40.9     21.4     19.3     14.0     47.1     74.2     87.7     25.8     12.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       23)
      10        5        6        7        5       21       12
```

----

Updated July 10, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Scott, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        April 15, 2005
Cherie BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5595.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009312EN.01004502.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/45

---

Action brought on 26 October 2009 — Gagalis v Council

(Case F-89/09)

2009/C 312/75

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spyridon Gagalis (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the defendant's decision refusing to reimburse the applicant 75 % of all the costs relating to a thermal cure pursuant to Article 73 of the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the defendant's decision of 9 December 2008, transmitted to the applicant on 22 December 2008, refusing to reimburse him 75 % of all the costs relating to a thermal cure pursuant to Article 73 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decision of 9 December 2008, transmitted to the applicant on 22 December 2008, refusing to reimburse him 75 % of all the costs relating to a thermal cure pursuant to Article 73 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | annul the decision of 15 July 2009, transmitted to the applicant on 17 July 2009, rejecting his complaint concerning the reimbursement of 75 % of all the costs relating to a thermal cure pursuant to Article 73 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 15 July 2009, transmitted to the applicant on 17 July 2009, rejecting his complaint concerning the reimbursement of 75 % of all the costs relating to a thermal cure pursuant to Article 73 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the Council to pay the applicant and additional amount of EUR 1 551,38 with interest for delayed payment; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the applicant and additional amount of EUR 1 551,38 with interest for delayed payment;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
Gregory CARTER, petitioner, v. Blaine LAFLER, Warden.

No. 17-8329.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Tyran M. ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9536.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
Leo D. GRAHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5762.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Corey Louis HINES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5784.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# L_2007266EN.01000701.xml

| 11.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/7

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 49/2007

of 8 June 2007

amending Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex IV to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 151/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex IV to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 151/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2005/89/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2005/89/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 24 (Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IV to the Agreement:

| ‘25. | 32005 L 0089: Directive 2005/89/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment (OJ L 33, 4.2.2006, p. 22).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘25.

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2005/89/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 89, 29.3.2007, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 33, 4.2.2006, p. 22.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Adrian SALAZAR, petitioner, v. SOUTH SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 17-386.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
General WAITERS, petitioner, v. Thomas GRIFFIN, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

No. 17-5662.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
II-00670

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Laura Taffany <laurataffany4@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:43 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Laura Taffany

475 Camino Don Emilio

Santa Fe, NM 87507
Release: 4305-99 (CFTC Docket No. 93-2) For Release: August 23, 1999 CFTC ACCEPTS SETTLEMENT OFFER FROM MICHAEL SINGER IN CASE INVOLVING TRADE
PRACTICE FRAUD Settlement Agreement Revokes Singer’s Registration, Prohibits Him
From Trading For Five Years, and Imposes a $75,000 Civil Monetary Penalty,
Among Other Sanctions WASHINGTON--The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today
the issuance of an order accepting an
offer of settlement from Michael Singer, a floor trader on the New York
Board of Trade, in connection with a complaint alleging trade practice fraud
filed by the CFTC on October 19, 1992 (See CFTC News Release #3574-92, October
19, 1992). The CFTC order, filed on August 23, 1999, finds that Singer, a registered
floor broker, violated the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by cheating and
defrauding his customers in the handling of their orders while trading on the
Coffee, Sugar & Cocoa Exchange. The CFTC order further finds that Singer
violated provisions of the CEA and the CFTC's regulations prohibiting
noncompetitive trading; bucketing of customer orders, price changes, fictitious
sales, wash sales and accommodation trades; and causing the reporting of
non-bona fide prices. According to the CFTC's order, Singer noncompetitively executed trades
with other brokers and local traders to enable Singer to bucket his own
customer orders; illegally took the opposite side of his customers' orders;
illicitly offset two customer orders opposite the same floor trader at
advantageous prices to that trader; benefited from changes to execution prices
on customer orders while trading for himself; and aided and abetted another
floor broker to indirectly bucket that broker's customers' orders. Singer, without admitting or denying the findings, consented to the entry of
the order: bona fide           Singer also agreed never to apply for registration or claim exemption from
registration with the CFTC or to act in any capacity requiring registration or
for which exemption from registration may be claimed. The litigation continues as to the remaining respondents found liable by the
CFTC's Administrative Law Judge in his Initial Decision issued on May 5,
1999, which is now on appeal to the Commission. # # #
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          96,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,814,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,812,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,435,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,000
<BONDS>                                      7,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,929,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,435,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,367,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               906,900 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             334,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   126,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
Floyd G. ELMORE, petitioner, v. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.

No. 17-22.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM J. CAMPBELLWilliam J. CampbellChief Executive Officer


Date: August 8, 2007
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELLINA KNIGHT
, Appellant,

v.

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, MANA SERIES 2007

- A2
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2757

[ May 17, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry J. Stone

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 09

- 48729

.

Thomas P. Murphy of T. P. Murphy's Law, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

James H. Wyman of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Coral Gables, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN
, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# L_2010032EN.01000101.xml

| 4.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 32/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 32/1

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and of the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty

The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, adopted at Geneva on 20 December 1996, will enter into force with respect to the European Union on 14 March 2010.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,692
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           5,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,128
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,239
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   116
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>