alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001077670
<NAME> TRANSDIGM INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                       371
<INVENTORY>                                     32,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,982
<PP&E>                                          51,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,085
<BONDS>                                        250,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,156
<OTHER-SE>                                   (220,115)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,833
<SALES>                                        150,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,457
<CGS>                                           82,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,972
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,779
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,779
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-100228, 333-86436, 333-65986, 333-51408,
333-45634, and 333-89653) and Form S-3 (No. 333-87076) of LookSmart, Ltd. of our report dated January 23, 2003, except as to Note 19, which is as of March 14, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears
in this Form 10-K/A.



|/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP       
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|San Francisco, California August 1, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,862,510
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          92,127
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               605,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,027,702
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         200,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           189,241
<LOANS>                                     57,776,525
<ALLOWANCE>                                    427,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,175,450
<DEPOSITS>                                  54,034,156
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            294,055
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,465,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       715,632
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,666,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              72,175,450
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,187,729
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               85,157
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                66,650
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,339,536
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             518,203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             689,074
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          650,462
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   19,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                559,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,201
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     124,453
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   124,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.84
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   139,539
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               404,385
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      549
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,960
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              427,796
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           427,796
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Roger Charles DAY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
William Harris JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8809.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2011103EN.01000701.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Marishipping and Transport BV

(Case C-11/10) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Common Customs Tariff - Customs duties - Relief - Pharmaceutical substances - Composition - Restrictions)

2011/C 103/10

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicant:

Defendant: Marishipping and Transport BV

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) — Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1) — Pharmaceutical substances exempted from customs duties — Substance not presented in its pure form — Restrictions

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Part One, Section II, C, 1(i) of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulations (EC) Nos 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001 and 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002, must be interpreted as meaning that a pharmaceutical substance listed in Annex 3 of Part Three of Annex I, to which other substances have been added, in particular pharmaceutical substances, no longer qualifies for the duty-free treatment which would have applied if such a substance had been in its pure form.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Christopher EVERSON, petitioner, v. John ARMSTRONG, et al.

No. 17-7650.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### O. C. Heath, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion filed March 9, 1929.

*331
      *J. M. Calhoun,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred II. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Roy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Buford, J.

In this case the plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment charging him with the larceny of a red and white pided heifer yearling, an animal of the bovine species.

There was no conflict in the testimony except as to the identity of the animal. There was no evidence of concealment.

One set of witnesses testified positively to the identity of this young animal, which was unmarked, as being the property of Mrs. Tyre. The other set of witnesses testified just as positively identifying the animal as the property of Heath. It appears to us that one set of witnesses was mistaken as to the identity of the animal and, so far as the record shows, such mistake was an honest one.

So far as is disclosed by the record whe'n the evidence was all in the jury at best could only guess which set of witnesses was correct in the identification of the animal. This Court has repeatedly held that a person should not be convicted upon guesswork or suspicion. Human liberty should not be forfeited by conviction under evidence which is not sufficient to convince a fair and impartial mind of the guilt of the accused to a moral certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt.

Because of the unconvincing quality of the evidence in this case, justice demands that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Ellis, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs in the result.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

TECHNEST HOLDINGS, INC.



I, Gino M. Pereira, Chief Financial Officer, Technest Holdings, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Technest Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [intentionally omitted];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and to the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: April 14, 2005

/s/ Gino M. Pereira
By:_________________________________________
Gino M. Pereira, CFO
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2011262EN.01004401.xml

| 6.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 262/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 262/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 77/2011

of 1 July 2011

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex IX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2010 of 10 November 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex IX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 120/2010 of 10 November 2010 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2010/16/EU of 9 March 2010 amending Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the exclusion of a certain institution from the scope of application (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2010/16/EU of 9 March 2010 amending Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the exclusion of a certain institution from the scope of application (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IX to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 L 0016: Commission Directive 2010/16/EU of 9 March 2010 (OJ L 60, 10.3.2010, p. 15).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 L 0016: Commission Directive 2010/16/EU of 9 March 2010 (OJ L 60, 10.3.2010, p. 15).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2010/16/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 July 2011, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 July 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 77.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 60, 10.3.2010, p. 15.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Manuel CHACON-LARA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5793.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# L_2008047EN.01003301.xml

| 21.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 113/2007

of 28 September 2007

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex IX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 87/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex IX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 87/2007 of 6 July 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 211/2007 of 27 February 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards financial information in prospectuses where the issuer has a complex financial history or has made a significant financial commitment (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 211/2007 of 27 February 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards financial information in prospectuses where the issuer has a complex financial history or has made a significant financial commitment (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 29ba (Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004) of Annex IX to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32007 R 0211: Commission Regulation (EC) No 211/2007 of 27 February 2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 24).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32007 R 0211: Commission Regulation (EC) No 211/2007 of 27 February 2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 24).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 211/2007 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 September 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 328, 13.12.2007, p. 32.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 24.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Viola ADKINS, petitioner, v. Vinaya KODURI.

No. 17-5577.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jose Luis RIVERA-CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9059.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Robert J. RICE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1437.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

BRUNO DIPASQUALE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2266 ) 2D17-2267 LISETTE DIPASQUALE, ) ) CONSOLIDATED Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 24, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge. Raymond J. Rafool and David R. Hazouri of Rafool, LLC, Miami, for Appellant. Cynthia B. Hall of Silveri & Ball, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Bruno DiPasquale appeals from the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Lisette DiPasquale and from the order denying his motion to modify the parties' partial marital settlement agreement (PMSA). We affirm without prejudice to Mr. DiPasquale asserting the arguments he has raised in this- 2 -

appeal in a subsequent petition for modification. Cf. Dogoda v. Dogoda, 233 So. 3d 484, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("In cases involving an MSA, the effective date of the agreement establishes the date to which a trial court should look in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances was contemplated by the parties.").

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# EUR-Lex - 22007A0825(07) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22007A0825(07)

**Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning a Cooperation Programme for Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Romania **

*
Official Journal L 221 , 25/08/2007 P. 0052 - 0057 *

20070723

Joint declarations and statements by the present contracting parties and the new contracting parties to the Agreement

--------------------------------------------------
Keith SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5818.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.45
 Confidential Treatment Requested. Confidential portions of this document have been redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 Non-Negotiable, Non-Transferable, Non-Endorsable
Subject to Quota Purchase Agreement
 For value received and intending to be legally bound, MOBITEC AB (publ) Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission ROBERTO JUVENTINO DEMORE Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission LORENA GIUSTI DEMORE Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission
 Quota Purchase Agreement




---



##### 



MAKER AGREES THAT ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF OR ARISING OUT OF THIS NOTE MAY BE
INITIATED AND PROSECUTED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE COURTS LOCATED IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF HERRLJUNGA,
COUNTY OF VÄSTRA GÖTALAND, SWEDEN. MAKER CONSENTS TO AND SUBMITS TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
OVER ITS PERSON BY ANY SUCH COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER, WAIVE PERSONAL
SERVICE OF ANY AND ALL PROCESS UPON IT AND CONSENTS THAT ALL SUCH SERVICE OF PROCESS BE MADE
 2




---



##### 



BY
REGISTERED MAIL DIRECTED TO MAKER AT ITS ADDRESS SET FORTH ABOVE OR TO THE LAST ADDRESS PROVIDED TO  PAYEES.
 IN ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF OR ARISING OUT OF THIS NOTE, PAYEES AND MAKER WAIVE
(I) THE RIGHT TO INTERPOSE ANY SET-OFF OR COUNTERCLAIM OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH IN THE QUOTA
PURCHASE AGREEMENT OF ANY NATURE OR DESCRIPTION, (II) ANY OBJECTION BASED ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS
OR VENUE, AND (III) ANY CLAIM FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR SPECIAL DAMAGES.
  By:

/s/
Oliver Andreas WelsMOBITEC AB (publ) 3