alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012076EN.01004401.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 157/2011

of 2 December 2011

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2011 of 21 October 2011 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Point 24 (Council Directive 90/219/EEC) of Annex XX to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32009 L 0041: Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (OJ L 125, 21.5.2009, p. 75).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/41/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2011, p. 87.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 125, 21.5.2009, p. 75.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Learn & Protect Homepage
                        Enforcement News
                        Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip or Compliant
                        RED List
                        Office of Proceedings
                        Learning Resources
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


10 Digital Asset Terms You Should Know
    
            Before investing in digital assets, it’s critical to understand the technology and differences between them. Here are 10 key terms to help get you started.
      
    
  PDF
              KeyTerms.pdf224.91 KB


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
#### James A. Welch, *Complainant,*v. Valla T. Lash; and W. T. Lash; John H. Porter; Edgar L. Jones; Dr. J. M. Nixon; J. E. Smith and Daisy Smith, *Defendants,*and Valla T. Lash and W. T. Lash; John H. Porter; Edgar L. Jones; Dr. J. M. Nixon; J. E. Smith and Daisy Smith, *Complainants,*In Cross-Bill v. James A. Welch and J. M. Calhoun, *Defendants,*In Cross Bill.

Division A.

Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied July 5, 1929.

*J. M. Calhoun*and 17. W. *Flournoy,*for Appellant;

*J. M. Sapp,*for Appellee.

*1072Per Curiam.

In December, 1923, H. S. Welch of Bay County, Florida, died leaving a last will and testament in which he bequeathed all his property real and personal to Valla T. Lash, one of the appellees here. In January, 1926, James A. Welch of Bay County, Florida, a reputed son of the testator, filed his bill to set aside the said will of H. S. Welch upon the ground of undue influence, mental incapacity, that the said will was a forgery and that at the time of the execution thereof said James A. Welch was the only surviving heir of H. S. Welch.

On final hearing the chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint and taxed the costs against the complainant. Appeal is taken from the final decree.

The questions raised in this case were fully discussed in Hamilton v. Morgan, 93 Fla. 311, 112 So. R. 80. To discuss them again at this time would serve no useful purpose. The record covers fourteen hundred pages and has at the expenditure of great labor been examined carefully though most of it is irrelevant and immaterial to the issues presented. The finding of the chancellor is amply supported by record and is affirmed on authority of Hamilton v. Morgan, *supra.*

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                             903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,774
<INVENTORY>                                     13,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,972
<PP&E>                                          31,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          526,222
<BONDS>                                            190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                        55,948
<OTHER-SE>                                   (539,435)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,998
<SALES>                                         34,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,422
<CGS>                                           31,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    76
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Sawyer, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 30, 2005



                                            /s/  John B. Sawyer
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John B. Sawyer,
                                            President and COO
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/28/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,096
COMMITMENTS
   7,450    3,322    5,003   17,700   18,127   30,152   26,452    7,944   11,644

CHANGES FROM 07/21/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,993)
     654     -152      650    1,298    1,937    2,602    2,435     -608     -441

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.6      8.7     13.1     46.5     47.6     79.1     69.4     20.9     30.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       8        6       14       24       15       40       32
```

----

Updated July 31, 2009
Livertis RILEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM STATESIDE
FUNDINGS,  INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                         7,781
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,130,391
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,139,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,243
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,268
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,139,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (53,956)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (253,848)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (53,956)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,025)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (204,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (204,348)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, IAN HERMAN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: February 15, 2006



                                           /s/  Ian Herman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ian Herman,
                                           Principal Executive Officer
Joseph FUSCO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 06, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00034-CR

MARCO DANE JOSHUA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-05246-CRF-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Marco Joshua entered a plea of guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled 

substance. The trial court assessed punishment at two years confinement and a $500 fine. 

The trial court suspended imposition of the confinement portion of the sentence and 

placed Joshua on community supervision for four years. The State filed a motion to 

revoke Joshua’s community supervision, and the trial court held a hearing on the motion. 

Joshua pleaded true to violating Condition 1 of his community supervision. The trial 
Joshua v. State Page 2

court revoked Joshua’s community supervision and sentenced Joshua to two years 

confinement. We affirm.

Joshua’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting that she has diligently 

reviewed the appellate record and that, in her opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel informed Joshua of his right to submit a brief 

on his own behalf. Joshua did not file a brief. Counsel's brief evidences a professional 

evaluation of the record for error, and we conclude that counsel performed the duties 

required of appointed counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2008).

In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the 

proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." See Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. at; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal 

is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. 

Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this 

appeal, we determine the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 

824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Counsel's request that she be allowed to withdraw from representation of Joshua 

is granted. Additionally, counsel must send Joshua a copy of our decision, notify Joshua 

of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter 
Joshua v. State Page 3

certifying counsel's compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. 

TEX.R.APP.P. 48.4; see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.22.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed; motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed February 7, 2018

Do not publish 

[CR25]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         862,580
<SECURITIES>                                 2,590,656
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,455,724
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,455,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,455,724
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,689
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                390,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            390,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   390,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   205.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Frederick PEYTON, et al., v. Wayne BURWELL.

No. 16-1283 (R46-001).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 27, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.