alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 13, 2015 520264 

________________________________

In the Matter of JASON SMITH,

Petitioner,

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of 

Special Housing and Inmate

Disciplinary Programs,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: June 8, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Jason Smith, Sonyea, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating

a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to

challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this

Court that the determination at issue has been administratively

reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from

petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge

has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of

this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to

which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see
-2- 520264 

Matter of Ramos v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision,

123 AD3d 1215, 1216 [2014]). We note that petitioner has no

right to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the

disciplinary determination (see Matter of Herring v Prack, 118

AD3d 1200 [2014]). 

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without

costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $305. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
In Re ALLAH, petitioner.

No. 16-9467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
II-00538

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rita Rofe <rita.rofe@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:28 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rita Rofe

46 Wilton St.

Princeton, NJ 8540
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94680; File No. SR-PEARL-2022-04]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX PEARL Options Fee 
Schedule To Increase the Monthly Fees for MIAX Express Network Full 
Service Port

April 11, 2022.
    On February 15, 2022, MIAX PEARL LLC (``MIAX Pearl'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend the MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule to 
increase the monthly fees for the MIAX Express Network Full Service 
(``MEO'') Ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ On 
February 25, 2022, the proposed rule change was published for comment 
in the Federal Register and, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the 
Act,\4\ the Commission: (1) Temporarily suspended the proposed rule 
change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the 
Act \5\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule 
change.\6\ On March 30, 2022, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule 
change (SR-PEARL-2022-04).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94286 (February 18, 
2022), 87 FR 10860.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08060 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# L_2011171EN.01000801.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/8

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 11/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 102/2007 of 28 September 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 102/2007 of 28 September 2007 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | Directive 2009/142/EC repeals Council Directive 90/396/EEC (3) which is incorporated into the Agreement and is therefore to be repealed under the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Directive 2009/142/EC repeals Council Directive 90/396/EEC (3) which is incorporated into the Agreement and is therefore to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of point 2 (Council Directive 90/396/EEC) of Chapter V of Annex II to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32009 L 0142: Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels (OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 10).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2009/142/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 April 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 47, 21.2.2008, p. 16.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 10.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 196, 26.7.1990, p. 15.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2108
CHRISTINE EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusTECHNOLOGIES APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and DIAGNOSTIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3373-AW) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Christine Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Wayne Taylor, Thomas Hermann Strong, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Christine Evans appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment against her in her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-5 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Technological Applications , No. CA-96-3373-AW (D. Md. Jul. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jerome BLYDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6205.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
FIREEYE, INC., et al., v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY.

No. 16-744 (R46-018).

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 22, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10409 Conference Calendar

__________________
GEORGE LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAVID WILLIAMS, Sheriff, Tarrant County, TX; ELGIN, Officer, Greenbay Facility, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94CV00532

- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lopez challenges the district court's dismissal of his complaint as frivolous. An in forma pauperissuit may be dismissed as frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 32- 33 (1992). We review such a dismissal for an abuse of discretion. Denton , 504 U.S. at 33. In determining whether the district court abused its discretion by dismissing Lopez'sNo. 95-10409 -2- complaint without affording him an opportunity to amend, we consider whether Lopez's "allegations may pass section 1915(d) muster" with additional factual development. Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 10 (5th Cir. 1994). To prevail on a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must show that the defendant deprived him of a right secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States while acting under color of state law. Manax v. McNamara , 842 F.2d 808, 812 (5th Cir. 1988). A defendant "must be either personally involved in the acts causing the deprivation of a person's constitutional rights, or there must be a causal connection between an act of the [defendant] and the constitutional violation sought to be redressed." Lozano v. Smith, 718 F.2d 756, 768 (5th Cir. 1983). Lopez does not allege any personal involvement by Sheriff Williams, nor does he implicate a jail policy or custom. Although Lopez successfully alleges Officer Elgin's personal involvement, his allegations indicate, at most, that Elgin was negligent. A state official's negligent act which causes an unintended loss of property does not implicate the Due Process Clause. Simmons v. Poppell , 837 F.2d 1243, 1244 (5th Cir. 1988). Lopez raises for the first time on appeal claims under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and article 6252-19 of the "Texas State Claims Act." These issues are not purely legal and cannot be addressed by this court. Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,971
<PP&E>                                         343,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,412
<BONDS>                                        137,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,244
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,837
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                       592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,831
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

                                   CONSENT OF
                               FARBER & HASS, LLP
                    INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Remedent USA, Inc.
Xavier de Cocklaan 42
9831 Deurle, Belgium

We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this  Amendment to the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A, of our report dated July 13, 2003, except Note 2
as to which the date is December 30, 2004, relating to the financial  statements
of Remedent USA, Inc. as of March 31, 2003 and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the two years then ended.

Farber & Hass LLP


/s/ Farber & Hass

Dated:  January 20, 2005
Camarillo, California
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0155

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

C.L.,

 A Youth.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Elizabeth Best, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 29 2021

09/29/2021
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Patrick D. Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PBSHolding, Inc, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PBS Holding, Inc;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

March 31,2006

 
| /s/ Patrick D. Matthews |   |
|-------------------------|--------|

 

ChiefExecutive Officer, Chief Financial Officer

 

PBSHolding, Inc.

 

----
Michael David SCOTT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8767.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2012300EN.01000402.xml

| 5.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/4

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of San Marino

2012/C 300/06

On 3 August 2012, the Republic of San Marino notified the European Union of the completion of its ratification procedures.

Likewise, on 29 August 2012, the European Union notified the Republic of San Marino of the completion of the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the above Monetary Agreement, signed at Brussels on 27 March 2012.

The Monetary Agreement accordingly entered into force on 1 September 2012 pursuant to Article 13 thereof.

---
William Lewis Dontars MEEKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7239.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xstream Beverage Network,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Ronald Ratner, CEO
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Ronald Ratner
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Ronald Ratner, Chairman, CEO,
                                                   President, principal
                                                   executive officer and
                                                   principal financial and
                                                   accounting officer
                                                   August 16, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.