alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 31, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          57,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  795,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               911,000
<PP&E>                                         280,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,616,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,327,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (55,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,616,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               839,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,397,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (601,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (601,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (601,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officers of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that as of the
date of this statement, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all in material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Date:    May 14, 2003                    /s/ Donna M. Coughey
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Donna M. Coughey
                                         President & Chief Executive Officer


Date:    May 14, 2003                    /s/ Michael J. Sexton
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Michael J. Sexton
                                         Acting Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. and will be
retained by Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Steven A. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 17-8832.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
Gary Lee CHUTE, petitioner, v. NIFTY-FIFTIES, INC., et al.

No. 17-5064.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the qualified Justice is of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court."

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice KENNEDY, Justice THOMAS, Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, Justice, ALITO, Justice SOTOMAYOR and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# L_2011171EN.01001301.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 15/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 791/2010 of 6 September 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 791/2010 of 6 September 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 R 0791: Commission Regulation (EU) No 791/2010 of 6 September 2010 (OJ 237, 8.9.2010, p. 10).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 R 0791: Commission Regulation (EU) No 791/2010 of 6 September 2010 (OJ 237, 8.9.2010, p. 10).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 791/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 April 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 7.4.2011, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 237, 8.9.2010, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., petitioner, v. OJMAR US, LLC.

No. 17-1443.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sense Technologies Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Dated: July 11, 2007 | /s/
      Bruce E. Schreiner              
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                     | Bruce E. Schreiner                        
|                     | President and Principal Accounting Officer

---
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of DRI
Corporation; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.
 /s/ David L. TurneyDavid L. TurneyChief Executive OfficerDecember 6, 2010
Robert Ira PEEDE v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8491.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, respecting the denial of certiorari.

In his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner Robert Peede contended that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his capital sentencing proceedings because his trial counsel did not present certain mitigating evidence concerning his mental health and difficult childhood. The District Court granted habeas relief on the basis that counsel's performance was deficient and that there was a reasonable probability that Peede would have received a different sentence had counsel introduced the mitigating evidence. On appeal from that decision, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed. In its view, Peede could not establish that he was prejudiced by any deficiency of counsel because the "new mitigation evidence ... posed a doubled-edge-sword dilemma" in that "the new information could have hurt as much as it helped." *Peede v. Attorney General* , 715 Fed.Appx. 923, 931 (2017). The Eleventh Circuit further noted that it "ha[s] repeatedly ruled that [such so-called *2361double-edged] post-conviction evidence is usually insufficient to warrant habeas relief." *Id.* , at 931-932.

Such a blanket rule foreclosing a showing of prejudice because the new evidence is double edged flatly contradicts this Court's precedent. See *Rompilla v. Beard* , 545 U.S. 374, 393, 125 S.Ct. 2456, 162 L.Ed.2d 360 (2005) ; *Wiggins v. Smith* , 539 U.S. 510, 534, 123 S.Ct. 2527, 156 L.Ed.2d 471 (2003) ; *Williams v. Taylor* , 529 U.S. 362, 398, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). As I recently emphasized in dissent from the denial of certiorari in *Trevino v. Davis* , 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1793, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018), "[w]here ... new evidence presented during postconviction proceedings includes both mitigating and aggravating factors, a court still must consider all of the mitigating evidence alongside all of the aggravating evidence." *Id.* , at ----, 138 S.Ct., at --- -. That is, "new evidence must not be evaluated in isolation," regardless of whether it is considered to be double edged. *Ibid* .

Considering the posture of this case, under which our review is constrained by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254(d)(1)-(2), I cannot conclude the particular circumstances here warrant this Court's intervention. That said, the Eleventh Circuit's consideration of Peede's claim is deeply concerning. The ultimate question at issue in a case like this is whether "there is a reasonable probability that [the jury] would have struck a different balance." *Wiggins* , 539 U.S., at 537, 123 S.Ct. 2527. A truncated consideration of new mitigating evidence that simply dismisses it as double edged does nothing to further that inquiry.
John J. JACOBS, Jr., petitioner, v. Emilio ESTEFAN.

No. 17-8574.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            EXHIBIT 11.1  
                              DAY RUNNER, INC.

         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES


                                                                      Three Months Ended September 30,
                                                                        1997                1996
                                                                ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>                  <C>   

Net Income                                                          $ 4,352,000           $3,848,000
                                                                    ===========           ==========
                                            
Weighted average shares outstanding                                   5,756,000            6,317,000

Additional shares from assumed exercise of options
  and warrants                                                        1,561,000            1,310,000

Shares assumed to be repurchased under the
   treasury stock method                                               (812,000)            (726,000)

NQ tax benefit                                                         (249,000)            (191,000)
                                                                       --------            --------- 
                                                                
Total                                                                 6,256,000            6,710,000
                                                                      =========            =========
  
FULLY DILUTED:

Weighted average shares outstanding                                   5,756,000            6,317,000

Additional shares from assumed exercise of options
   and warrants                                                       1,561,000            1,310,000

Shares assumed to be repurchased under the
   treasury stock method                                               (729,000)            (708,000)

NQ tax benefit                                                         (281,000)            (198,000)
                                                                       --------             -------- 
 
Total                                                                 6,307,000             6,721,000
                                                                      =========             =========
 
EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Primary                                                              $     0.70            $      0.57
                                                                     ==========            ===========
 
Fully diluted                                                        $    0.69             $      0.57
                                                                     ==========            ===========
</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-5697

_____________________________

ROGER OWENS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Martin A. Fitzpatrick, Judge.

May 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Release #4006-97 (CFTC Docket 95-6)

For Release: March 19, 1997

**CFTC SETTLES COMPLAINT AGAINST TWO CME FLOOR BROKERS --**

**TIMOTHY SCOTT FOX AND JAMES MICHAEL GARRITY -- CHARGED**

**IN 1995 IN CONNECTION WITH PORK BELLY FUTURES TRADING**

**Garrity and Fox Consent to a CFTC Administrative Order Making**

**Findings and Imposing Sanctions, Including Restitution to Customers**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today theissuance of an order accepting offers of settlement from **James Michael Garrity** ofPalatine, Illinois, and **Timothy Scott Fox** of Glenview, Illinois, both registeredfloor brokers on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), in connection with a three-countCFTC administrative complaint filed on February 14, 1995 (see CFTC News Release #3820-95,February 15, 1995).

The CFTC order finds that on September 17, 1991, Garrity and Fox, in the course offilling orders for customers in pork belly futures, willfully deceived those customers inviolation of the anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by causingactual price quotations to be deleted from the CME's Time-and-Sales record of pricechanges for transactions executed on the floor of the exchange. 

The CFTC order further finds that on September 17, 1991, Garrity cheated and defraudedcustomers by executing a trade for his personal account ahead of, and at a better pricethan, 13 executable orders he held and later filled for customers. 

Finally, the order finds that Garrity failed to retain original source documents uponwhich he recorded trade information for the required five-year period.

Garrity and Fox, without admitting or denying the findings of violations made in theCFTC order, have consented to the entry of the order, which among other things:

directs Garrity and Fox to cease and desist from further such violations of the CEA andthe CFTC regulations thereunder;

directs Garrity and Fox to pay restitution to customers of $2,616 and $7,280,respectively, plus interest, from September 17, 1991 to the date of payment;

prohibits any trading by Garrity for 45 days and by Fox for 30 days; and

restricts the floor broker registrations of Garrity for 24-months and Fox for 30-months by, among other things:

--

prohibiting their execution of transactions without close supervision by appropriatesponsors;

--

prohibiting them from trading for their personal accounts during the period ofsupervision; and

--

providing for automatic suspension of their CFTC floor broker registrations if they arecharged with serious disciplinary offenses by the exchange or other self-regulatoryorganizations.

# # #
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify
that to the best of my knowledge:

1.        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Tom Wyler
Tom Wyler
Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2006



---

---
Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, petitioner, v. Carlton BAPTISTE.

No. 16-978.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Richard Allen CULBERTSON, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration.

No. 17-773.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 25, 2018.

Amy Weil, Esquire, of Atlanta, Georgia, is invited to brief and argue this case, as *2043*amicus curiae,* in support of the judgment below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998      
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998      
<CASH>                         143370           
<SECURITIES>                   0                
<RECEIVABLES>                  14623743         
<ALLOWANCES>                   499902           
<INVENTORY>                    0                
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               0                
<PP&E>                         0                
<DEPRECIATION>                 0                
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 15266230         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          0                
<BONDS>                        0                
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          2584508          
<PREFERRED>                    0                
<COMMON>                       0                
<OTHER-SE>                     12681722         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   15266230         
<SALES>                        0                
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               392600           
<CGS>                          0                
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  63100            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0                
<LOSS-PROVISION>               73398            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             52446            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                203656           
<INCOME-TAX>                   0                
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            203656           
<DISCONTINUED>                 0                
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0                
<CHANGES>                      0                
<NET-INCOME>                   203656            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .00               
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .00               
        



</TABLE>