alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION
|-------------------------

I,  GORDON HAMILTON, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2008

| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/   Gordon Hamilton        
| |  | Gordon Hamilton,             
| |  | Chief Executive Officer      
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

---



2

2

---
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, petitioner, v. David F. BANDIMERE.

No. 17-475.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Loras L. STEINES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

No. 17M58.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Ha ley and Senior Judge Coleman

TOWN OF COEBURN AND VIRGINIA MU NICIPAL GROUP SELF-INSURANC E ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0610-06-3 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 17, 2006 WESLEY R. SIGMON

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (John R. Sigmond; Penn, Stua rt & Eskridge, on brief), for appellants. (D. Allison Mullins; Lee & Phipps, P. C., on brief), for appellee.

The Town of Coeburn and its insurer (hereina fter referred to as “employer”) contend the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred when it found that (1) Wesley R. Sigmon proved his back injury and resulting disa bility were causally related to his compensable April 20, 2005 injury by accident; (2) the evid ence proved Eric Br yant was in a supervisory capacity over Sigmon; (3) Sigmon proved employer had actual notice of the accident thereby satisfying the requirements of Code § 65.2-600; and (4) employer fa iled to prove any prejudi ce associated with Sigmon’s failure to provide written notice of the acci dent within thirty days of its occurrence.

We have reviewed the record and the commission ’s opinion and hold that th is appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s award for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Sigmon v. Coeburn (Town of) , VWC File No. 224-03-48 (May 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and su mmarily affirm because the facts and legal

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the Cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                          BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (1)
                                  (unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                        SEPTEMBER 30,         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                     --------------------  --------------------
                                                                       1997       1996       1997       1996
                                                                     --------  ----------  --------  ----------
<S>                                                                  <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>
Net income (loss)                                                    $ 1,518    $(14,310)  $ 1,597    $(36,119)
Accretion attributable to warrants relating to the manditorily                                                
 redeemable convertible preferred stock                                 (383)          -      (383)          -
                                                                     -------    --------   -------    -------- 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders                   $ 1,135    $(14,310)  $ 1,214    $(36,119)
                                                                     =======    ========   =======    ========
Weighted average shares outstanding:
  Common stock                                                        38,200      36,319    37,659      36,293
  Common stock issuable upon exercise of options                     
      and warrants                                                       901           -     1,405           -  
                                                                     -------    --------   -------    --------   
Weighted average common shares and equivalents                        39,101      36,319    39,064      36,293
                                                                     =======    ========   =======    ========
Net income (loss) per share                                            $0.03    $  (0.40)    $0.03    $  (1.00)
                                                                     =======    ========   =======    ========
</TABLE>
                                                                                

       (1) This exhibit should be read in conjunction with "Note 2 - Net
           Income (Loss) Per Share" of the "Notes to Condensed Consolidated
           Financial Statements".
Henry A. THOMAS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8613.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Mark James SIMON, petitioner, v. Josie GASTELO, Warden.

No. 17-5857.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2009328EN.01004101.xml

| 15.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/41

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending Annex 11 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products

The Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending Annex 11 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products (1), which the Council decided to conclude on 19 October 2009
   (2), entered into force on 1 December 2009, with the last notification of completion of procedures under Article 2 of that Agreement having been received on 30 November 2009.

1

2

---

(1)  
  OJ L 352, 31.12.2008, p. 23.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 288, 4.11.2009, p. 22.

2

---
# L_2008257EN.01003601.xml

| 25.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 72/2008

of 6 June 2008

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 52/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 52/2008 of 25 April 2008 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2008 of 11 April 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2008 of 11 April 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 R 0331: Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2008 of 11 April 2008 (OJ L 102, 12.4.2008, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 R 0331: Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2008 of 11 April 2008 (OJ L 102, 12.4.2008, p. 3).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 331/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 June 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 June 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 223, 21.8.2008, p. 50.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 102, 12.4.2008, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Steven Vernon BIXBY, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 17-5598.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Common Pleas of South Carolina, Abbeville County denied.
Marvin B. SMITH, III, et ux., applicants, v. HSBC BANK, et al.

No. 17A293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Application for stay addressed to Justice SOTOMAYOR and referred to the Court denied.
# L_2008024EN.01005303.xml

| 29.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 24/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 24/53

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the facilitation of the issuance of visas entered into force on 1 January 2008, the procedure provided for in Article 15 of the Agreement having been completed on 20 November 2007.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Barbra E. Kocsis,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of John W. Henry & Co./Millburn L.P.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006                       |                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                          |
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                               |                       |  |  |

 

1

----
Sidney BENDER, petitioner, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al.

No. 17-186.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4111 

To authorize State opioid response grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. GIBBS (for himself and Mr. RYAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize State opioid response grants, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combating Meth and 

5 Cocaine Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE OPIOID RESPONSE GRANTS. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Assistant Secretary for 

8 Mental Health and Substance Use may award opioid re9 sponse grants to States. 

10 (b) PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ACTIVITIES.—A 

11 State may use the funds awarded through a grant under 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4111 IH

1 subsection (a) to carry out prevention and treatment ac2 tivities with respect to opioid use disorders, which may in3 clude— 

4 (1) education regarding opioid use disorders; 

5 (2) treatment (including the provision of medi6 cation) for opioid use disorders; 

7 (3) behavioral health services for individuals in 

8 opioid treatment programs; 

9 (4) referral to treatment services for individuals 

10 with an opioid use disorder; 

11 (5) recovery support for individuals with an 

12 opioid use disorder; 

13 (6) medical screening associated with such 

14 treatment; and 

15 (7) preventing or treating the abuse of 

16 psychostimulants, such as cocaine or methamphet17 amine. 

18 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

19 authorized to be appropriated $500,000,000 for each of 

20 fiscal years 2020 through 2024 for the purpose of carrying 

21 out this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William J. CampbellChief Executive Officer




November 5, 2004
Tracy Lynn BRUNKEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8877.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Juan PASILLAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9013.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Lindsey Kent SPRINGER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8312.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
---



Exhibit 99.6



KPMG LLPChartered AccountantsSuite 1500 Purdys Wharf Tower I1959 Upper Water Street
    Telephone (902) 492-6000Halifax NS B3J 3N2
    Telefax (902) 492-1307Canada
    www.kpmg.ca


COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR US READERS ON CANADA  US REPORTING
DIFFERENCES

To the Board of Directors of Gammon Gold Inc.

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require
the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph):

-that refers to the audit report of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. Our report to the shareholders dated March 29,
2010, except as to paragraphs 3 through 4 of the accompanying restated
Managements Report on Internal Control of Financial Reporting, which are as of
May 13, 2010 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which
do not require a reference to the audit report on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting in the financial statement auditors report. Our report
expresses our opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 because of the effect
of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control
criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company did not
maintain effective controls over the foreign currency translation of future
income taxes arising on the acquisition of an entity in a foreign jurisdiction.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Halifax, Canada

March 29, 2010 except as to note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements, which is as of May 13, 2010

KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a
      member firm of the KPMGnetwork of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG
      International Cooperative(KPMG International), a Swiss entity.KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.


---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4200 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4200

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 321 South 1st Street in Montrose, Colorado, as the ``Sergeant David 
                      Kinterknecht Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 20, 2019

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 321 South 1st Street in Montrose, Colorado, as the ``Sergeant David 
                      Kinterknecht Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT DAVID KINTERKNECHT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 321 South 1st Street in Montrose, Colorado, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant David Kinterknecht Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
David Kinterknecht Post Office''.
    (c) Repeal of Previous Designation.--Section 1 of Public Law 115-
366 is hereby repealed, and the designation made and references deemed 
in subsections (a) and (b), respectively, of such section shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```