alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
Lee,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


/s/ Anthony Lee
-----------------------
Anthony Lee
Chief Financial Officer
May 1, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     EMERALD CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     9,049
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         9,049
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,049
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,049
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,049
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,173)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 17, 2014

p0917 

# Order

Clerk September 17, 2014

148311

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148311

COA: 312518

Bay CC: 12

- 010076

- FH

DUSTIN JOHN KOSIK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 10.31





AGREEMENT





This agreement (Agreement) is made as of January 24, 2002,
by and between Kenneth Hegemann (an individual) and Remedent USA, Inc. (the Company):





1.  Repayment of
Liabilities to Individual and Related Parties





The parties hereby agree to the full satisfaction of the
amounts due to individual and related parties, as listed in Exhibit I, with the issuance of shares of common stock in the Company at a price of $0.50/share, except as below:





* Satisfaction of $63,000 of the indebtedness to individual shall be repaid in cash at a rate to be determined at a future date.





Exhibit I





Due to Related PartiesKH/RI personal credit card

26,245Advance from CRA Labs (KH)

23,063Advance from KH

63,000


112,308Accrued PayrollKH/RI/RH payroll/payroll taxes

384,362


384,362Accrued InterestKH/RI on accrued payroll

35,933CRA Labs on advances

2,947


38,880$
535,550










1




---




In witness whereof, the undersigned hereby execute this agreement as of the date
first above written.





Kenneth J. HegemannBy:

/s/    KENNETH J. HEGEMANN





Remedent USA, Inc.By:

/s/     REBECCA INZUNZA




2
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/25/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,837
COMMITMENTS
   8,949    5,156    5,575   20,290   21,670   34,815   32,401    8,023   10,436

CHANGES FROM 08/18/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,732)
     799    1,743     -661    2,754    1,526    2,892    2,608   -1,160     -876

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.9     12.0     13.0     47.4     50.6     81.3     75.6     18.7     24.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       63)
       8       19       19       30       25       51       52
```

----

Updated August 28, 2009
Jesus BERRIOS, petitioner, v. ALLIED MANOR ROAD LLC.

No. 17-5951.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# L_2011262EN.01005301.xml

| 6.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 262/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 262/53

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 82/2011

of 1 July 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 56/2011 of 20 May 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 56/2011 of 20 May 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 of 5 July 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 of 5 July 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32010 R 0590: Commission Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 of 5 July 2010 (OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32010 R 0590: Commission Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 of 5 July 2010 (OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 July 2011, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 July 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2011, p. 38.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
George HIRMIZ, petitioner, v. NEW HARRISON HOTEL CORP.

No. 17-8363.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### The State of Florida, ex rel. Paul L. Eddy, et al, *Relators,*v. W. E. Bell, *Respondent.*

Division B.

Opinion filed April 8, 1929.

*EE. O. Brown*for Bealtors;

*W. D. Bell,*for Bespondent.

*502Per Curiam.

An alternative writ of mandamus was issued by this Court commanding the respondent to deliver up office records it appearing that realtor Eddy had been commissioned as respondent’s successor. A return in effect averred that the commission to relator Eddy was not founded on a certificate of election, and that the commission had been recalled by the Governor. This return was stricken and an application for a rehearing was filed. Pending its consideration the relator moved for a peremptory writ and the respondent presented an amended return showing that respondent has been commissioned by the Governor to the same office claimed by the relator Eddy. As the relator Eddy and the respondent each has a commission from the Governor to fill the same office for the same period of time, mandamus cannot be invoked to control the possession of the office records, since a clear right in the relator Eddy to have the records or a clear duty of the respondent Bell to deliver the records to Eddy, do not appear, and conflicting claims of title to the office cannot be adjudicated in mandamus. In this situation the alternative writ of -mandamus should be and it is hereby dismissed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Nathaniel HARPER, petitioner, v. Venerio M. SANTOS, et al.

No. 17-5788.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Dean D. Durbin, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. Pecker Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)




/s/ DEAN D. DURBINDean D. Durbin Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer)




Date: February 14, 2008



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Jennifer STRANG, petitioner, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY GENERAL RETIREMENT PLAN, et al.

No. 17-528.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Robert FRASCARELLI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION.

No. 17-5809.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Rebecca Golden BRASWELL, petitioner, v. Derral ADAMS, Acting Warden.

No. 17-5596.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 16, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2011318EN.01003901.xml

| 1.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 101/2011

of 30 September 2011

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 79/2011 of 1 July 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2010/146/EU of 5 March 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection provided by the Faeroese Act on processing of personal data (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2010/146/EU of 5 March 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection provided by the Faeroese Act on processing of personal data (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5ek (Commission Decision 2008/393/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘5el. | 32010 D 0146: Commission Decision 2010/146/EU of 5 March 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection provided by the Faeroese Act on processing of personal data (OJ L 58, 9.3.2010, p. 17).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘5el.

32010 D 0146: Commission Decision 2010/146/EU of 5 March 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection provided by the Faeroese Act on processing of personal data (OJ L 58, 9.3.2010, p. 17).’.

Article 2

The text of Decision 2010/146/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 50.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 58, 9.3.2010, p. 17.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Brandon HOFFMAN, petitioner, v. Chae HARRIS, Warden.

No. 17-5878.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2009177EN.01000701.xml

| 8.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/7

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on drug precursors and substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances

The Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on drug precursors and substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances (1), will enter into force on 11 July 2009, the procedures provided for in Article 12 of the Agreement having been completed on 12 May 2009.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 28.2.2009, p. 8.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,833
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,654     
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,879
<PP&E>                                         338,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,805
<BONDS>                                        138,899
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,213
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                       284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
Guy Bordes AGNANT, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5873.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128618 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ROYAL McGUIRE, Personal Representative Stephen J. Markman, of the ESTATE OF MINNIE McGUIRE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128618 COA: 248309 Oakland CC: 2002-043598-FH HARRY J. WASVARY, M.D., Defendant-Appellee,

and

WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of November 9, 2005, the appli cation for leave to ap peal the January 25, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abey ance pending the decisions in Woodard v Custer (Docket Nos. 12494-95) and Hamilton v Kuligowski (Docket No. 126275). On order of the Cour t, the consolidated cases havi ng been decided on July 31, 2006, 476 Mich 545 (2006), th e application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the ques tion presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
# C_2012250EN.01000202.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2012 — BNP Paribas, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA (BNL) v European Commission

(Case C-452/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - State aid - Scheme for the realignment of the value of assets for tax purposes - Banking sector - Taxation of capital gains - Substitute tax - Selectivity)

2012/C 250/03

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellants: BNP Paribas, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA (BNL) (represented by: R. Silvestri, G. Escalar and M. Todino, avvocati)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 in Case T-335/08 BNP Paribas and BNL v Commission, by which that Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/711/EC of 11 March 2008 on State aid C 15/07 (ex NN 20/07) implemented by Italy on the tax incentives in favour of certain restructured banks (OJ 2008 L 237, p. 70).

BNP Paribas and BNL

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-335/08 BNP Paribas and BNL v Commission [2010] ECR II-3323 to the extent that it infringed Article 107(1) TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-335/08 BNP Paribas and BNL v Commission [2010] ECR II-3323 to the extent that it infringed Article 107(1) TFEU;

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by BNP Paribas and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by BNP Paribas and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL);

| 3. | Orders BNP Paribas and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA (BNL) and the European Commission to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders BNP Paribas and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA (BNL) and the European Commission to bear their own costs;

| 4. | Orders BNP Paribas and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA (BNL) to pay the costs incurred before the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders BNP Paribas and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA (BNL) to pay the costs incurred before the General Court of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.

1

---
Abdullah JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, Warden.

No. 16-8458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 7, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Joseph E. KLUG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6007.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.