alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael CHANCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8880.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,221,370
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,700,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 26,651,436
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      92,760,092
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        90,224,000
<LOANS>                                    214,878,735
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,910,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             362,975,409
<DEPOSITS>                                 300,649,262
<SHORT-TERM>                                   880,824
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,816,899
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,593,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             362,975,409
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,539,736
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            6,622,470
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            21,162,206
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,385,614
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,537,193
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,625,013
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  450,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,171,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,467,394
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,467,394
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,873,853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                  6,822,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,893,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,769,867
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,715
<RECOVERIES>                                       569
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,910,720
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           906,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,004,720
<FN> 
<F1>This information is not disclosed in the Form 10-Q.
</FN> 
        

</TABLE>
Shirley A. BOLTON, et al., petitioners, v. CROWLEY, HOGE & FEIN, P.C.

No. 17-1258.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
**Release:
    ����������������
    #4249-99****For
    Release:�������� March 31,
    1999**

**CFTC ISSUES AN ORDER INSTITUTING
    PROCEEDINGS AND ACCEPTS SETTLEMENT OFFER FROM PETER D.
    HOFFMAN**

**CFTC Order Accepting Settlement Finds that Hoffman Committed
    Fraud in Soliciting Customers to Purchase his Trading System by
    Guaranteeing Profits and that He Acted as an Unregistered CTA**
     WASHINGTON � The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
    announced today that it issued an order instituting proceedings and
    simultaneously accepted an offer of settlement from Peter D. Hoffman of
    Colorado Springs, Colorado. Hoffman has never been registered with the CFTC
    in any capacity.
     The CFTC order finds that Hoffman violated sections 4b and 4o of
    the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulation 4.41(a) by
    fraudulently soliciting clients to subscribe to a commodity trading
    advisory service called the Renaissance Trading Program. His print
    advertisements and written promotional material falsely represented that by
    using the Renaissance program, his clients could obtain spectacular trading
    results with no risk. The order further finds that, in soliciting and
    advising clients in connection with the Renaissance Trading Program,
    Hoffman acted as an unregistered commodity trading advisor (CTA) in
    violation of section 4m of the CEA and violated CFTC regulation 4.41(b) by
    failing to disclose that his advertised performance results were
    hypothetical.
     In addition, the CFTC found that Hoffman fabricated trading profits for
    months in which he had not traded and presented false profits for months in
    which he incurred losses. Hoffman also claimed in his promotional material
    to have highly profitable results in his personal trading account,
    including a $13,000 profit on a $15,000 account in less than ten months,
    without disclosing that these results were hypothetical and that the trades
    had never been entered on any contract market.
     Hoffman, without admitting or denying the CFTC findings, consented to the
    entry of the order that:

--���� directs him to cease and desist from
    violating the provisions with which he was charged;

--���� prohibits him from trading on contract
    markets for a period of five years; and

--���� requires him to comply with his undertaking
    never to apply for registration with the CFTC in any capacity and never to
    engage in any activity requiring registration.
     In its order, the CFTC notes that a civil monetary penalty against Hoffman
    would be appropriate in this case, however it does not impose one based
    upon Hoffman's sworn financial statements.
Exhibit 10.8

[Sun Microsystems letterhead]

February 1, 1999

LFI#14771

INPRISE CorporationTim Colling100 Enterprise WayScotts Valley, CA 95066-3249

Dear Mr. Colling:

We understand that Inprise is seeking Sun's permission to distribute
certain files from ***** in conjunction with our SSL technology, which Inprise licensed
for use with its CORBA Object Request Broker ("ORB") product pursuant to the Addendum 1
to the Technology License and Distribution Agreement ("TLDA") dated October 31, 1995,
between Sun Microsystems, Inc. and Inprise Corporation. #14268

Sun hereby authorizes Inprise to bundle the files listed below, in binary
code form, with Suns SSL technology when distributed pursuant to the terms of the
TLDA, including, but not limited to, any export restrictions and Field of Use
limitations.

Authorized Classes from:*****

All other terms of the TLDA remain in full force and effect.
Other than the rights granted in this letter and in the TLDA, no other rights to
classes identified above are granted to Inprise.

Please acknowledge the acceptance of these terms by having a
duly authorized official of Inprise sign in the space provided below.

Sincerely,

/s/ Alan Patty

Alan PattyVice President, Sales

Inprise Corporation hereby accepts the terms of this letter:

|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ Richard LeFaivre
|By                  
|                    
|Richard LeFaivre    
|Name                
|                    
|SVP, R&D            
|Title               
|                    
|2/11/99             
|Date                

|***** |  | Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portions. The
          confidential redacted portions have been filed separately with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission.
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V
                             (A Limited Partnership)

                                   Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits, L.P. V (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                                      /s/Jenny Netzer
                                                      Jenny Netzer
                                                      Executive Vice President
                                                      MMA Financial, LLC

                                                      Date:    August 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2009073EN.01004401.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 9/2009

of 5 February 2009

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2008 of 7 November 2008 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2008 of 7 November 2008 (1).

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71) of Annex VI to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 R 0592: Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 R 0592: Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 February 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 339, 18.12.2008, p. 102.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Antonio PINEDA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8814.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/21/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       87,050
COMMITMENTS
  23,286   11,438   11,745   35,057   40,392   70,088   63,575   16,962   23,476

CHANGES FROM 04/14/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -751)
    -237    3,003     -157       38   -4,051     -356   -1,205     -395      454

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.8     13.1     13.5     40.3     46.4     80.5     73.0     19.5     27.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      30       26       27       62       55      110       93
```

----

Updated April 23, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Garth A. Allred, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date:  July 7, 2008 | By: /s/ Garth A. Allred   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|

Garth A. Allred, 

Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/09/09          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      494,990
COMMITMENTS
  48,105   31,125   78,708  348,511  362,478  475,324  472,311   19,667   22,679

CHANGES FROM 11/03/09 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,535)
   3,265    1,353      183    9,912   10,015   13,360   11,551   -4,826   -3,016

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.7      6.3     15.9     70.4     73.2     96.0     95.4      4.0      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      112)
      29       15       36       53       63       98      101
```

----

Updated November 13, 2009
#### F. A. Powell, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. J. Colin English, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion filed May 18, 1929.

*Clements, Clements &*Craven,.for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Mellor,*for Defendant in Error.

Buford, J.

In this case the plaintiff in error was plaintiff in court below and brought suit against the defendant for Fifteen Hundred ($1500.00) Dollars damages, filing his declaration in three counts. The first count declared upon a promissory note for One Thousand ($1000.00) Dollars with interest and attorney’s fees, this count having been amended to include the claim for attorney’s fees after.it was originally filed. The second count was for money before that time lent by the plaintiff to the defendant. The third count was for interest upon and for the forbearance by the plaintiff to the defendant at his request of divers sums of money and that afterwards in consideration of the premises the defendant promises to pay the same upon request but failed to pay the same when requested so.to do. Trial was had on the declaration and what was termed the first amended plea.

The plea is loosely drawn and does not traverse the allegation of the declaration that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand ($1000.00) Dollars *862at the time of the execution of the note, nor does the plea allege that the consideration for which the defendant became indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand ($1000.00) Dollars had failed. The plea at most only alleges that the inducement which caused the defendant to execute a note evidencing his indebtedness to the plaintiff had failed to materialize.

The plea strictly construed tendered an immaterial issue.

There was a demurrer to the plea which was overruled. This action of the court, however, is not made the basis of an assignment of error.

The record discloses that the probative force and weight of the evidence preponderated in favor of the plaintiff and therefore the motion of the plaintiff to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial should have been granted.

For the reasons stated the judgment should be reversed and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum, J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),   the undersigned, Darren Holm, Chief Executive Officer of China Holdings, Inc.,   (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the   Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in   the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition   and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 6, 2007 

By /s/Darren Holm  ----------------------  Darren Holm  Chief Executive   Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),   the undersigned, Dempsey Mork, Chief Financial Officer of China Holdings, Inc.,   (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the   Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in   the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition   and results perations of the Company.

Date: September 6, 2007 

By /s/Dempsey Mork  ----------------------  Dempsey Mork  Chief   Financial Officer
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Bundesbank
  
    



  Discussions concerning the cross-border guidance and exemptive order.
      
  When
              06/28/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              Cross-Border

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph Cisewski

  Visitor(s)
              Dirk Schrade Roland NeuschwanderBernd Amann

  Organization(s)
              Bundesbank


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Garth COOPER, petitioner, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., et al.

No. 17-1315.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.