alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.34


 


	EXHIBIT
    A-2 TO FOURTH AMENDMENT OF LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


SECOND
ALLONGE


 


This
Second Allonge (“Allonge”), dated April 27, 2018, is to the Amended and Restated Secured Term Promissory Note, dated
as of August 16, 2016 in the principal amount of $3,000,000.00 (as amended by an Allonge dated November 13, 2017, the “Note”)
made by Creative Realities, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Creative Realities, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and
Conexus World Global, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company, jointly and severally (each, and together herein referred to
as “Maker”), payable to the order of Slipstream Communications, LLC, an Anguillan limited liability company (the “Holder”).


The
Note was issued pursuant to that certain Loan and Security Agreement by and between, inter alia, Maker and the initial
Holder dated as of August 16, 2016 (as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated as of the First Amendment Effective Date,
the Second Amendment thereto dated as of the Second Amendment Effective Date, the Third Amendment thereto dated as of the Third
Amendment Effective Date, and the Fourth Amendment thereto dated as of the date hereof, and as it may be further amended, restated,
supplemented, modified or otherwise changed from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), and are subject to the
terms and conditions thereof.


 


The
Note is hereby amended as follows:


 


(a)       Inserting
in the preamble immediately after the phrase “the principal amount of $3,000,000 (USD)” the phrase “plus all
PIK”; and


 


(b)
Section 1(a) of the Note is hereby amended to insert after the phrase “in cash” the phrase “(except as provided
in the Loan Agreement)”.


 


Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note, including without limitation the default and acceleration provisions thereof, remain in
full force and effect, and Makers hereby confirm their liability thereunder to Holder.


 


[REST
OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 



     

     


    




  


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Allonge is executed and attached, or copies attached, to the Note on the date first set forth above.


 





	 	MAKERS
	 	 
	 	CREATIVE REALITIES, INC.
	 	CREATIVE REALITIES, LLC
	 	CONEXUS WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Richard Mills
	 	Name:	Richard Mills
	 	Title:	CEO
	 	 	 
	 	HOLDER


SLIPSTREAM
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC



	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Alec Machiels
	 	 	Alec Machiels



  


 


[Signature
page to Second Allonge to Amended and Restated Secured Term Promissory Note]
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2701-061]


Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P.; Notice of Reasonable Period of 
Time for Water Quality Certification Application

    On March 10, 2022, Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. submitted to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) evidence of its 
application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality 
certification filed with New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation (New York DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned 
project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act \1\ and section 
5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,\2\ a state certifying agency 
is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if it fails or 
refuses to act on a certification request within a reasonable period of 
time, which is one year after the date the certification request was 
received. Accordingly, we hereby notify New York DEC of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).
    \2\ 18 CFR [4.34(b)(5)/5.23(b)/153.4/157.22].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date that New York DEC Received the Certification Request: March 9, 
2022.
    If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before March 9, 2023, then the agency 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: April 7, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08032 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use in connection with the registration statements on Form S-8
for the 1999 Stock Option Plan, Registration File No. 333-41788, and the 2000
Stock Option Plan, Registration File No. 333-41786, and the 1999 and 2000 Stock
Option Plans, Registration File No. 333-116671, of IA Global, Inc. formerly
Medium4.com, Inc, incorporated into the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IA Global,
Inc., of our report dated April 14, 2006 relating to the financial statements of
IA Global, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and for the years then
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.


                                        /s/ Sherb & Co. LLP
                                        Sherb & Co., LLP
                                        Certified Public Accountants


New York, New York
December 21, 2006
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: July 15, 2011




/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER



David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer and President
# EUR-Lex - 22007A0825(08) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 22007A0825(08)

**Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Iceland consequent on the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union **

*
Official Journal L 221 , 25/08/2007 P. 0058 - 0061 *

20070723

JOINT DECLARATION ON THE TIMELY RATIFICATION OF THE AGREEMENT ON THE PARTICIPATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND ROMANIA IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

The Present Contracting Parties and New Contracting Parties stress the importance of timely ratification or approval of the Agreement on the Participation of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the European Economic Area by the Present Contracting Parties and the New Contracting Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements in order to ensure the good functioning of the European Economic Area.

--------------------------------------------------
Clarence Bernard BUCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9520.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Sloan STANLEY, petitioner v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-7943.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

*1703Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
Derrick Earl STEILMAM, petitioner, v. Reginald D. MICHAEL, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-8145.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
# L_2005346EN.01003001.xml

| 29.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 346/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 346/30

---

Information concerning the entry into force of Council Decision 2005/953/EC on the conclusion of an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and Thailand pursuant to Article XXVIII of GATT 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to rice provided for in EC Schedule CXL annexed to GATT 1994

This agreement entered into force on the date of the signature, 21 December 2005.

---
Richard Anthony WILFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6892.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

*2708Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2010113EN.01002801.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/28

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 22 February 2010 — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança

(Case C-95/10)

2010/C 113/43

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Strong Segurança, SA

Appellant:

Respondent: Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 47 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 directly applicable in the domestic legal order as from 31 January 2006, in the sense that it confers on individuals a right on which they can rely in proceedings against organs of the Portuguese authorities? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 47 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 directly applicable in the domestic legal order as from 31 January 2006, in the sense that it confers on individuals a right on which they can rely in proceedings against organs of the Portuguese authorities?

1

| 2. | If so, is that principle applicable, despite the provision contained in Article 21 of that Directive, to contracts which have as their object services referred to in Annex II B? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, is that principle applicable, despite the provision contained in Article 21 of that Directive, to contracts which have as their object services referred to in Annex II B?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).

1

---
Norman Douglas DIAMOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9663.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 23, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., petitioner, v. Doris ALBRECHT, et al.

No. 17-290.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Robert L. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES.

No. 17-7235.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board, June 26, 2001, 8 am to June 26, 2001, 5 pm, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building 45, Conference Room D, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 26, 2001, FR 66:21000.                

The meeting location will change to the Neuroscience Center, Conference Room D, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: June 22, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-16362  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II-00057

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ruth Milas <pillpusher57@hotmail. corn>

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 12:05 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ruth Milas

710 15th St. N.

Moorhead, MN 56560
Release #4281-99 (CFTC Docket # 99-13)

For Release: June 28, 1999

CFTC INSTITUTES ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST AND ACCEPTS OFFER
    OF SETTLEMENT FROM ROSS R. GODRES OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO

CFTC Finds that Godres Defrauded Investors By Concealing Losses
    Resulting From the Trading of Precious Metal Futures Contracts on Behalf of
    a Commodity Pool, and Orders Restitution to Defrauded Investors, Among
    Other Sanctions

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that it issued
    an order instituting administrative proceedings against and
    simultaneously accepting an offer of settlement from Ross R. Godres,
    of Lafayette, Colorado. Godres has never been registered with the CFTC in
    any capacity.

The CFTC order finds that Godres violated the anti-fraud provisions of
    the Commodity Exchange Act (sections 4b(a)(i), 4b(a)(ii) and 4o(1)) by
    fraudulently concealing from commodity pool participants losses he had
    sustained trading precious metals futures on behalf of the pool and by
    making verbal misrepresentations and sending sporadic falsified statements
    to participants that their investments were secure and still intact.

According to the CFTC order, Godres founded Navco Precious Metals
    Fund, Ltd. (Fund), a Colorado limited partnership, as a commodity pool
    in May 1993. Godres began trading precious metal futures contracts on
    behalf of the Fund's five participants in June 1993. The order finds
    that, within a year, Godres lost almost all of the Fund's assets of
    over $60,000 unsuccessfully trading futures. The CFTC's order also
    finds that Godres violated CFTC regulation 4.13(b)(2)(i) by failing to
    provide pool participants with regular and accurate monthly statements for
    the Fund.

Godres, without admitting or denying the CFTC's findings, consented
    to the entry of the order that:

-- directs him to cease and desist from further violations of the
    provisions of the CEA and CFTC regulations with which he was charged;

-- permanently prohibits him from trading on contract markets;

-- orders him to pay a total of $60,750 as restitution, plus
    pre-judgment interest, to the pool participants over a five-year
    period;

-- requires him to liquidate all futures and options positions held by
    him or on his behalf, or in which he has any beneficial interest; and

-- requires him to comply with his undertakings, including that he never
    apply for registration or seek exemption from registration with the CFTC in
    any capacity, and never engage in any activity requiring registration or
    exemption from registration, or act as an agent or officer of any person
    registered, exempted from registration or required to be registered with
    the Commission.

# # #
Alexander GRAHAM-SULT, et al., petitioners, v. Nicholas P. CLAINOS.

No. 17-1465.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Edgar Eugene FOXX, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2009153EN.01004301.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/43

---

Action brought on 17 April 2009 — Four Ace International v OHIM (skiken)

(Case T-156/09)

2009/C 153/84

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Four Ace International Ltd (represented by G. Uphoff, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 6 February 2009 — served on 11 February 2009 — in Case R 519/2008-4 concerning the application for Community trade mark No 5819371 and amend it so as to enable registration to proceed in respect of the following goods and services: Class 39 — travel arrangement and Class 41 — education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 6 February 2009 — served on 11 February 2009 — in Case R 519/2008-4 concerning the application for Community trade mark No 5819371 and amend it so as to enable registration to proceed in respect of the following goods and services: Class 39 — travel arrangement and Class 41 — education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘skiken’ for services in Classes 35, 39, 41 and 43

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused in part

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1)), since the trade mark applied for has the requisite distinctive character and there is no need for it to be allowed to remain available.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**INSWEB CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hussein A. Enan,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN                                |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| **Hussein  A. Enan**                               |
| Chairman of the  Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated:  March 29, 2006                        |

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William D.Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ WILLIAM D. GRIFFIN  |
|------------------------------|
| **William  D. Griffin**      |
| Chief Financial  Officer     |
| Dated:  March 29, 2006  |

 

----