alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07980]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Census Bureau


National Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public virtual meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Census Bureau published a notice in the Federal Register 
of April 7, 2022 giving notice of a virtual meeting of the National 
Advisory Committee (NAC). The document contained incorrect URL meeting 
links in the ``Addresses'' section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shana Banks, Advisory Committee Branch 
Chief, Office of Program, Performance and Stakeholder Integration 
(PPSI), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#32415a535c531c581c50535c59417251575c4147411c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbc8d3dad5da95d195d9dad5d0c8fbd8ded5c8cec895dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>, Department of Commerce, Census 
Bureau, telephone 301-763-3815. For TTY callers, please use the Federal 
Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 7, 2022, in FR Document Number 
2022-07356, on Page 20389, in the first column, correct the ADDRESSES 
caption to read:

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via the WebEx platform at the 
following presentation links:

<bullet> May 5, 2022--
https://uscensus.webex.com/uscensus/onstage/g.php?MTID=e28f8d12408207d3c951d7c7b345a1dd2
<bullet> May 6, 2022--
https://uscensus.webex.com/uscensus/onstage/g.php?MTID=e7dfde37dd4b6aa4f376a2758ee48da9c

    For audio, please call the following number: 1-888-603-9745. When 
prompted, please use the following Password: Census#1 and Passcode: 
8154908#.
    Robert L. Santos, Director, Census Bureau, approved the publication 
of this Notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 8, 2022.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2022-07980 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Scott, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 30, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Interpore International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 7, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Richard L. Harrison                                           
|                   |  |  |  |                                                                      
|                   |  |  |  | Richard L. Harrison Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Steven CIOTTA, petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, Warden.

No. 17-8248.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
ABERDEEN MARKETPLACE, INC., petitioner, v. John NANNI.

No. 17-1444.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
MISSOURI, petitioner, v. Darrell I. BOLDEN.

No. 16-1438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District denied.
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRIC TOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 19 6- CV I N R E J OS E P H P I E R CY P . R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NAL P R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- The cou r t has con si der ed r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f or w r i t of m and am us and m ot i on f ort em po r ar y r el i ef an d i s of t he opi ni on t hatr el i ef s houl d be de ni ed. A c c o rd i n g l y , re l a to r’s p e ti ti o n fo r w ri t o f m a n d a m u s a n d m o ti o n fo r te m p o ra ry r el i ef ar e d eni ed. R el at orshal l p a y a l l c o st s of t hi s or i gi nal pr oceedi ng, f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue.
P E R CU R I AM P A N E L : W A L K E R , G A R D N E R , a n d M C C O Y , J J . DEL I VERE D: J un e 23, 2009
Jimmy CHESSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8398.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.2 (a)
                   AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                                   JACK BERGER

                            EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2000

         3.  Compensation.

         Base salary is increased to $160,000 per year. The effective date of
         this increase is January 1, 2000.

         Further, until the earlier of the Company raising $2 million or March
         17, 2000, Executive will continue to receive the current salary with
         the difference accrued to be paid at the earlier of the two events
         described above.

         Further increases will be at the discretion of the board of directors

         4. Benefits.

         Executive will be entitled to all benefits according to the regular
         policies of the Company except as follows:

         A. Vacation. Executive will be entitled to at least 4 weeks vacation
         each year.

         B. Medical, dental, disability and other group insurance provided by
         the Company to any other employee(s), will be provided to Executive at
         no cost. This includes any coverage of dependents.

         5. Term and Termination.

         The initial term is three years ending December 31, 2000. This Addendum
         adds two years to this initial term which now ends December 31, 2002.

         Nothing in this Addendum is to be interpreted as to reduce any benefit
         due Executive under the original Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of January 1,
2000.

Intraco Systems, Inc.

By: /s/ WALT NAWROCKI
   -------------------------------------
   Walt Nawrocki, CEO

By: /s/ JACK BERGER
   -------------------------------------
   Jack Berger
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 412 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the residence and 

source rules to provide for economic recovery in the possessions of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the residence and source rules to provide for economic 

recovery in the possessions of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Territorial Tax Equity 

5 and Economic Growth Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO RESIDENCE AND SOURCE RULES 

7 INVOLVING POSSESSIONS. 

8 (a) BONA FIDE RESIDENT.—Section 937(a) of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 412 IH

1 (1) by striking the last sentence, and 

2 (2) by amending paragraph (1) to read as fol3 lows: 

4 ‘‘(1) who has a substantial presence (deter5 mined under the principles of section 7701(b)(3)(A) 

6 (applied by substituting ‘122 days’ for ‘31 days’ in 

7 clause (i) thereof) without regard to sections 

8 7701(b)(3)(B), (C), and (D)) during the taxable 

9 year in Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mar10 iana Islands, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands, as 

11 the case may be, and’’. 

12 (b) SOURCE RULES.—Section 937(b) of such Code 

13 is amended— 

14 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

15 end, 

16 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

17 the end and inserting ‘‘, but only to the extent such 

18 income is attributable to an office or fixed place of 

19 business within the United States (determined under 

20 the rules of Section 864(c)(5)),’’, and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

22 paragraphs: 

23 ‘‘(3) for purposes of paragraph (1), the prin24 ciples of section 864(c)(2), rather than rules similar 

25 to the rules in section 864(c)(4), shall apply for purVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:37 Jan 30, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H412.IH H412

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 412 IH

1 poses of determining whether income from sources 

2 without a possession specified in subsection (a)(1) is 

3 effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or 

4 business within such possession, and 

5 ‘‘(4) for purposes of paragraph (2), income 

6 from activities within the United States which are of 

7 a preparatory or auxiliary character shall not be 

8 treated as income from sources within the United 

9 States or as effectively connected with the conduct 

10 of a trade or business within the United States.’’. 

11 (c) SOURCE RULES FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY

12 SALES.—Section 865(j)(3) of such Code is amended by 

13 inserting ‘‘, 932,’’ after ‘‘931’’. 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7512

DANIEL LEVERN STALEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MRS. SIMPSON, ICS Program Manager; K. HILL, Inmate Grievance Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:07-cv-02753-PMD) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 2, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Levern Staley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Levern Staley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Staley that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Staley failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Staley has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
IRWIN NATURALS, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

No. 17-91.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
# C_2010100EN.01003001.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Vicenza — Sezione distaccata di Schio (Italy) lodged on 15 February 2010 — Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA

(Case C-87/10)

2010/C 100/45

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Ordinario di Vicenza

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Electrosteel Europe SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Edil Centro SpA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 44/01 (1) — and, in any event, Community law — which lays down that, in the case of the sale of goods, the place of performance of an obligation is the place where, under the contract, the goods were delivered or should have been delivered, be interpreted as meaning that the place of delivery, relevant for the purposes of determining the court having jurisdiction, is the place of final destination of the goods covered by the contract or the place in which the seller is discharged of his obligation to deliver, in accordance with the substantive rules applicable to the individual case, or is that rule open to a different interpretation?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001, L 12, p. 1).

1

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

s ko/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. MANU E L NA VA R R O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 05- 55209 D. C . No s . C V- 0 3 - 0 1 3 0 9 - DO C C R - 0 2 - 0 0 0 0 9 - DO C ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a vi d O . C a rt e r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry11, 2010 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T R O T T , a n d B Y B E E , C ir c u it J u d g e s . F eder al pri soner M anuel N avarro appeal s f rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s order d e n y i n g h i s 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 5 mo t i o n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 25 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSs k o/ Res ea r ch 05- 55209 2 N av arro co n t en d s th ath i s tri al att o rn ey w as i n effecti v e fo r fai l i n g t o ad v i se hi m of hi s r i gh tt o app ea l . B ec ause N avarro has notshow n thata r at i on al defe nd antw ou l d w antt o app ea l , or thathe re as on abl y dem on stra t ed t o cou nsel that h e w a s in te r e s te d in ap p e a lin g , h e h a s f a ile d to s h o w th a t h e is e n title d to r e lie f . Se e R oe v . Flor e s - O r tega , 5 2 8 U .S . 4 7 0 , 4 8 0 ( 2 0 0 0 ) ; se e al so Stri cklan d v. W as hi ngton , 46 6 U . S . 66 8, 68 7-88 (198 4). N avarro al so cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y f ai l i ng t o h ol d an evi dent i ary heari ng on thi s i ss ue. B as ed on the re cord avai l abl e t o the di stri ct c ourt , i nc l udi ng tr i a l c ouns e l ’ s de c l a r a t i on, a nd the tr a ns c r i pt s of the pl e ac ol l oquy a n d th e O c to b e r7 , 2 0 0 2 h e a r in g , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in r e s ol vi ng N a va rr o’ s c l a i m s w i thouthol di ng ahe a r i ng. W he r e , a s he r e , “ the m ot i on and the fi l es and records of the ca se concl usi vel y s ho w thatthe pri soner i s e nt i t l ed to n o r e lie f

,” a n e v id e n tia ryh e a r in g is n o t r e q u ir e d . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 5(b). W e c ons true N a va rr o’ s a ddi t i ona l a r gum e nt s a s am ot i on t o e xpa nd the c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility . S o c o n s tru e d , th e m o tio n is d e n ie d . See 9 th C ir . R . 2 2 - 1 ( e ) ; s e e al

s o Hi i v ala v . W

ood , 19 5 F . 3d 10 98 , 11 04 -05 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( per curi am ). AF F I RME D.
# C_2010100EN.01002001.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 22 January 2010 — Landwirtschaftliches Unternehmen e.G. Sondershausen v BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

(Case C-37/10)

2010/C 100/30

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Landwirtschaftliches Unternehmen e.G. Sondershausen

Applicant:

Defendant: BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the provisions of the second and third sentences of Paragraph 5(1) of the Flächenerwerbsverordnung (Land Purchase Regulation), implementing Paragraph 4(3)(1) of the Ausgleichsleistungsgesetz (Law on compensation in respect of the expropriation of private property in the former GDR), infringe Article 87 EC?

---
Ronnie Keith WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7924.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

*2575Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# L_2006092EN.01002301.xml

| 30.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 4/2006

of 27 January 2006

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 131/2005 of 21 October 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 131/2005 of 21 October 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1646/2004 of 20 September 2004 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin (2), as corrected by OJ L 374, 22.12.2004, p. 76, is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1646/2004 of 20 September 2004 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin (2), as corrected by OJ L 374, 22.12.2004, p. 76, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 R 1646: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1646/2004 of 20 September 2004 (OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 5), as corrected by OJ L 374, 22.12.2004, p. 76.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 R 1646: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1646/2004 of 20 September 2004 (OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 5), as corrected by OJ L 374, 22.12.2004, p. 76.’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1646/2004, as corrected by OJ L 374, 22.12.2004, p. 76, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 January 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 14, 19.1.2006, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 5.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Christopher Lee DUCKETT, petitioner, v. Robert MARSH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Benner Township, et al.

No. 17-8723.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Daniel E. AYER, Sr., petitioner, v. Michael A. ZENK, Warden.

No. 16-7908.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 17, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.