alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Shekhar Wadekar/s/  Bruce WarwickShekhar Wadekar
Chief Executive OfficerBruce Warwick
Principal Financial OfficerDate: October 13, 2011Date: October 13, 2011
**Exhibit99.1**

** **

**AMERICAN RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

Pursuant to therequirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

 

1.             Ralph S. Roberts isthe Chief Executive Officer of American Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

2.             William G. Taves  is the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany.

 

3.             Each of theundersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(A)                              TheCompany’s Form 10-Q/A accompanying this Certification, in the form filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the“Exchange Act”); and

 

(B)                                Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertifications are subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth inthe accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A and to the followingqualifications: (i) because we were required to change our independentaccountants, our new independent accountants have not yet completed a reauditof the Company’s prior results, and have therefore been unable to review theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A in accordance with the requirementof SAS 71, although such a review is required by Rule 10-01(d) of RegulationS-X, (ii) because the financial statements have not been reviewed in accordancewith SAS 71, they are deficient and do not comply with the requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations of theSecurities and Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder, and (iii) when suchreview is concluded by the Company’s new independent accountants, accountingerrors or inaccuracies might be discovered by such new auditors and requirecorrection.

 

 
| Dated:  November 15, 2002 |                    |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                           |                    |
|                           |                    |
|                           | /s/ Ralph S. Roberts    |   |   |
|                           | Ralph S. Roberts        |   |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                           |                    |
|                           |                    |
|                           | /s/ William G. Taves    |   |   |
|                           | William G. Taves        |   |
|                           | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
# C_2011160EN.01000902.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/9

---

S Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2011 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-305/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Rail transport - Directive 2005/47/EC - Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector - Agreement between sectoral social partners at European level - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2011/C 160/08

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Peere and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for failure to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt and/or notify, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions provided for by Council Directive 2005/47/EC of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector (OJ 2005 L 195, p. 15)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/47/EC of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/47/EC of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
NeoGenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                              March
      29, 2010
                              /s/ Doug VanOortDouglas
      VanOortChief
      Executive
Officer





Date:
                            March
      29, 2010
                            /s/ George CardozaGeorge
      CardozaChief
      Financial
Officer





Date:
                            March
      29, 2010
                            /s/ Jerome J. DvonchJerome
      J. DvonchDirector
      of Finance and Principal
                              Accounting
      Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                             129
<SECURITIES>                                       255
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                       392
<INVENTORY>                                        409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,093
<PP&E>                                           8,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,727
<SALES>                                          1,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,475
<CGS>                                              882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    62
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (614)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (883)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not required to be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21220-21221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07681]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2022-037]


National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee 
(NISPPAC); Meeting

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives 
and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing an upcoming National Industrial Security 
Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC) meeting in accordance with 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act and implementing regulations.

DATES: The meeting will be on April 27, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 
p.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be a virtual meeting. See supplementary 
procedures below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Harris Pag[aacute]n, ISOO 
Senior Program Analyst, by telephone at 202.357.5351 or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16585f4546465755567877647738717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eea0a7bdbebeafadae808f9c8fc0898198">[email protected]</span></a>. Contact ISOO at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c554f53535c727d6e7d327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81c8d2cecec1efe0f3e0afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a> and the NISPPAC at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0aea9b3b0b0a1a3a08e819281ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="337d7a6063637270735d5241521d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This virtual meeting is open to the public 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) 
and implementing regulations at 41 CFR 101-6. The Committee will 
discuss National Industrial Security Program policy matters.
    Procedures: Members of the public must register in advance through 
the

[[Page 21221]]

Event Services link https://ems8.intellor.com/?do=register&t=1&p 
=841483 if you wish to attend. NISPPAC members, ISOO employees, and 
speakers should send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df91968c8f8f9e9c9fb1beadbef1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="652b2c3635352426250b0417044b020a13">[email protected]</span></a> for the appropriate 
registration information instead of registering with the above link.

Tasha Ford,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-07681 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2013108EN.01000201.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA, Axa France IARD, Emerson Network, Climaveneta SpA

(Case C-543/10) (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Interpretation of Article 23 - Jurisdiction clause in a contract concluded between the manufacturer and the initial buyer of goods - Contract forming part of a chain of contracts transferring ownership - Whether that clause may be relied on against the sub-buyer of the goods)

2013/C 108/02

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Refcomp SpA

Applicant:

Defendants: Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA, Axa France IARD, Emerson Network, Climaveneta SpA

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation — Interpretation of Article 5(1) and 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Dispute between the sub-buyer of goods and the manufacturer — Scope of the jurisdiction clause in a chain of contracts under Community law

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a jurisdiction clause agreed in the contract concluded between the manufacturer of goods and the buyer thereof cannot be relied on against a sub-buyer who, in the course of a succession of contracts transferring ownership concluded between parties established in different Member States, purchased the goods and wishes to bring an action for damages against the manufacturer, unless it is established that that third party has actually consented to that clause under the conditions laid down in that article.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 12.2.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Borland Software Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael F. Sullivan, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL F. SULLIVAN    
|Michael F. Sullivan        
|Principal Financial Officer
|                           
|August 14, 2006            

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
Henry Johan MEDRANO, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-8056.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Nicholas STANISHIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5404.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-00267

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Georgia Locker <jslocker@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:15 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Georgia Locker

713 Duke Square

Fort Collins, CO 80525
# C_2010063EN.01003701.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/37

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 8 January 2010 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie, other party: T. Kahveci

(Case C-7/10)

2010/C 63/58

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie

Applicant:

Other party: T. Kahveci

Other party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 [of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey] be interpreted as meaning that the family members of a Turkish worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State cannot invoke that provision once that worker has acquired the nationality of the host Member State while retaining his Turkish nationality? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 [of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey] be interpreted as meaning that the family members of a Turkish worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State cannot invoke that provision once that worker has acquired the nationality of the host Member State while retaining his Turkish nationality?

| 2. | In answering the first question is the time at which the Turkish worker concerned acquired the nationality of the host Member State of relevance? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In answering the first question is the time at which the Turkish worker concerned acquired the nationality of the host Member State of relevance?

---
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Nicklebys.com,  Inc.
(the "Company"),  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce
A. Capra,  President  and  Chairman of the Board of  Directors  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Date:  March 31, 2003                     /s/ Bruce A. Capra
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          President and Chairman of the Board
                                          of Directors