alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4110 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase a set-aside for the 

Rural Project Initiative of the TIFIA program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Ms. FINKENAUER (for herself and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase a setaside for the Rural Project Initiative of the TIFIA program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Communities 

5 Invest in Infrastructure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF SET-ASIDE. 

7 Section 605(f)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘$2,000,000’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘$3,000,000’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4110 IH

1 SEC. 3. NATIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AND INNO2 VATIVE FINANCE BUREAU. 

3 (a) ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT.—Section 116 of 

4 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(k) ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than 

7 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, and 

8 annually thereafter, the Executive Director shall submit 

9 to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

10 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

11 Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report de12 tailing— 

13 ‘‘(1) the use of funds authorized under section 

14 605(f) of title 23; and 

15 ‘‘(2) the progress of the Bureau in carrying out 

16 the purposes described in subsection (b).’’. 

17 (b) OUTREACH.—Section 116(b)(1) of title 49, 

18 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

19 ‘‘(1) to provide assistance and communicate 

20 best practices and financing and funding opportuni21 ties to eligible entities for the programs referred to 

22 in subsection (d)(1), including by— 

23 ‘‘(A) conducting proactive outreach to com24 munities located outside of metropolitan or 

25 micropolitan statistical areas; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4110 IH

1 ‘‘(B) coordinating with the Department of 

2 Agriculture’s Office of Rural Development, the 

3 Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of 

4 Community Revitalization, and any other agen5 cies that provide technical assistance for rural 

6 communities as determined by the Director;’’. 

7 SEC. 4. TIFIA APPLICATION PROCESS REPORT. 

8 Section 609(b)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

11 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period at the 

12 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(vi) whether the project is located in 

15 a metropolitan statistical area, 

16 micropolitan statistical area, or neither.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2011211EN.01002108.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Salzburg — Austria) — Martin Wohl, Ildiko Veres v Magistrat der Stadt Salzburg, other party to the proceedings: Finanzamt Salzburg-Stadt

(Case C-471/10) (1)

1

2011/C 211/46

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
Glenn Elliott LEONARD, petitioner, v. OREGON, et al.

No. 17-8757.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Vincenzo MILIONE, petitioner, v. CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-1282.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
Release #4224-99 (96 Civ. 7814)

For Release: January 6, 1999

NEW YORK COURT ORDERS DEFENDANTS TO PAY OVER $7.1 MILLION IN CIVIL
    PENALTIES, AND ORDERS RESTITUTION IN EXCESS OF $2.3 MILLION TO CUSTOMERS IN
    CFTC ACTION INVOLVING ILLEGAL FOREIGN CURRENCY FUTURES FRAUD; CFTC Charged
    World Wide Currencies, Inc., United Currencies, Corp., and A+ Currencies
    Int'l, Inc. in 1996 with Fraud in the Offer and Sale of Illegal
    Currency Futures Contracts

WASHINGTON – The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
    announced today that the Honorable Whitman Knapp of U.S. District Court for
    the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment and order
    against World Wide Currencies, Inc. a/k/a Worldwide Currencies,
    Inc., a/k/a Worldwide Currencies Ltd.; United Currencies, Corp.
    a/k/a United Currencies, Inc.; and A+ Currencies Int'l Inc.
    d/b/a International Currencies, Inc. The judgment orders the defendants
    jointly and severally to make restitution to customers in the amount of
    $2,380,797.85 and to pay a civil monetary penalty in the amount of
    $7,142,393.55.

The judgment also permanently enjoins the defendants from violating
    provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations and
    rescinds all contracts entered into by the defendants with their
    customers.

The judgment, entered on December 23, 1998, is the culmination of
    proceedings that began on October 16, 1996, when the CFTC filed a
    four-count injunctive complaint against the defendants (see CFTC News
    Release #3959-96, October 17, 1996). In its anti-fraud action, the CFTC
    alleged that the defendants violated the CEA and CFTC regulations by
    offering and selling illegal currency futures contracts, cheating and
    defrauding customers in connection with the offer and sale of such
    contracts, violating the CFTC's registration requirements, and
    misappropriating customer funds. Shortly after the complaint was filed, the
    court entered an ex parte order, and subsequently a preliminary
    injunction, which, among other things, froze the defendants'
    assets.

# # #
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,982,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,636,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,619,408
<PP&E>                                      11,436,947
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,522,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,534,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          515,977
<BONDS>                                        980,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,037,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,534,219
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,613,298
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,020,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                513,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            513,606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   513,606
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-129987, 333-120295, 333-112070, 333-100228, 333-86436, 333-65986, 333-51408, 333-45634, 333-89653) and Form S-3 No. 333-121327 of LookSmart, Ltd. of our report dated March 14, 2006relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

San Francisco, California 

March 14, 2006
Brigitte CASTILLO, petitioner, v. DORAL PARK COUNTRY CLUB VILLAS, et al.

No. 17-1347.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TransDigm Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 19,
2003



/s/ Gregory RufusName:

Gregory RufusTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
James M. SAYLOR, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 16-1521.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
In Re Allen F. CALTON, petitioner.

No. 17-7886.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Brannon D. TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-8996.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
II-00761

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

J H <JamesBigBass@DSLextreme.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:36 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: PROVE TO THE WORLD THAT YOU ARE NOT WIMPISH PUSSIES! Don’t

let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like "commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in

risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not

be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge

funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: PROVE TO THE WORLD THAT YOU ARE NOT A WIMPISH PUSSY! The CFTC needs to

set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity speculation that serves no productive purpose. I

urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation, but also excessive speculation, which will

require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: PROVE TO THE WORLD THAT YOU ARE NOT A WIMPISH PUSSY! Just say "no" to foreign

exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not

encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

JH

P.O. Box 157

Castaic, CA 91310
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50367

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN MIRANDA-VALENCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-2116-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benjamin MirandaValencia raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Vinod PATEL, petitioner, v. Daniel F. MARTUSCELLLO, Jr.

No. 17-5519.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
NATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT CORP'S., BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,711,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                   121,658
<INVENTORY>                                    112,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,297
<PP&E>                                         271,386
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,005,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,469,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,690
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,005,073
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,684,253
<CGS>                                          619,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,890,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (835,581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (835,581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


                   Consent of KPMG LLP, independent auditors


The Board of Directors
Niku Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-31318) on Form S-8 of Niku Corporation of our report dated February 25,
2000, except as to Note 9, which is as of February 28, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Niku Corporation and subsidiaries as of January
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, which
report appears in the January 29, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Niku
Corporation.

                                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
April 28, 2000
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with MarketAxess
  
    



  Discussions concerning SEFs.
      
  When
              01/22/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF RegistrationGeneral

  CFTC Staff
              Mark Wetjen

  Visitor(s)
              Rick McVeyChuck HoodRon SteinfeldMark Young

  Organization(s)
              MarketAxessSkadden


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with this yearly report on Form 10-KSB of China Elite Information
Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended November 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2009 and as amended by this
Amendment No. 1 thereto on Form 10-K/A (together, the “Report”), I, Li Kin
Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:  October
      9, 2009
              By
              /s/
      Li Kin ShingLi
      Kin ShingPresident,
      Chief Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial Officer
Darcy PASCHALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5504.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jackie Lee O'NEAL, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8516.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.