UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORLANDO DIVISION

COMMODITY FUTURES 

TRADING COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 6:20-cv-1657-CEM-RMN

HIGHRISE ADVANTAGE, LLC, 

BULL RUN ADVANTAGE, LLC, 

GREEN KNIGHT INVESTMENTS, 

LLC, KING ROYALTY LLC, 

SR&B INVESTMENT 

ENTERPRISES, INC., AVINASH 

SINGH, RANDY ROSSEAU, 

DANIEL COLOGERO, HEMRAJ 

SINGH, and SURUJPAUL 

SAHDEO,

Defendants.

___________________________________ 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came before the Court and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court's Order filed on 

November 27, 2023, at (Doc. 190), Default Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and 

against Defendants Avinash Singh and Highrise Advantage, LLC in the following amounts:

a. $25,558,594.00 in restitution; and

b. $76,675,782.00 in a civil monetary penalty.

Case 6:20-cv-01657-CEM-RMN Document 191 Filed 11/28/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 2331
2

c. Defendants Avinash Singh and Highrise Advantage, LLC shall pay 

restitution and the civil monetary penalty in the manner set forth in the Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 187 at 20–25).

Accordingly, this case is closed. 

Any motions seeking an award of attorney's fees and/or costs must be filed 

within the time and in the manner prescribed in Local Rule 7.01, United States 

District Court Middle District of Florida. 

Date: November 28, 2023

ELIZABETH M. WARREN,

CLERK

s/A.C, Deputy Clerk

Case 6:20-cv-01657-CEM-RMN Document 191 Filed 11/28/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2332
- 3 - 

CIVIL APPEALS JURISDICTION CHECKLIST

1. Appealable Orders: Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction conferred and strictly limited by statute:

(a) Appeals from final orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1291: Only final orders and judgments of district courts, or final 

orders of bankruptcy courts which have been appealed to and fully resolved by a district court under 28 U.S.C. Section 158, 

generally are appealable. A final decision is one that “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do 

but execute the judgment.” Pitney Bowes, Inc. V. Mestre, 701 F.2d 1365, 1368 (11th Cir. 1983). A magistrate judge’s report 

and recommendation is not final and appealable until judgment thereon is entered by a district court judge. 28 U.S.C. Section 

636(c).

(b) In cases involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a judgment as to fewer than all parties or all claims is not a final, 

appealable decision unless the district court has certified the judgment for immediate review under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), 

Williams v. Bishop, 732 F.2d 885, 885-86 (11th Cir. 1984). A judgment which resolves all issues except matters, such as 

attorneys’ fees and costs, that are collateral to the merits, is immediately appealable. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 

486 U.S. 196, 201, 108 S. Ct. 1717, 1721-22, 100 L.Ed.2d 178 (1988); LaChance v. Duffy’s Draft House, Inc., 146 F.3d 832, 

837 (11th Cir. 1998).

(c) Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(a): Appeals are permitted from orders “granting, continuing, modifying, 

refusing or dissolving injunctions or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions...” and from “[i]nterlocutory 

decrees...determining the rights and liabilities of parties to admiralty cases in which appeals from final decrees are allowed.” 

Interlocutory appeals from orders denying temporary restraining orders are not permitted.

(d) Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b) and Fed.R.App.P.5: The certification specified in 28 U.S.C. Section 

1292(b) must be obtained before a petition for permission to appeal is filed in the Court of Appeals. The district court’s 

denial of a motion for certification is not itself appealable.

(e) Appeals pursuant to judicially created exceptions to the finality rule: Limited exceptions are discussed in cases including, 

but not limited to: Cohen V. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,546,69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949); 

Atlantic Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Blythe Eastman Paine Webber, Inc., 890 F. 2d 371, 376 (11th Cir. 1989); Gillespie v. 

United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148, 157, 85 S. Ct. 308, 312, 13 L.Ed.2d 199 (1964).

2. Time for Filing: The timely filing of a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Rinaldo v. Corbett, 256 F.3d 1276, 1278 (11th 

Cir. 2001). In civil cases, Fed.R.App.P.4(a) and (c) set the following time limits:

(a) Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1): A notice of appeal in compliance with the requirements set forth in Fed.R.App.P. 3 must be filed in 

the district court within 30 days after the entry of the order or judgment appealed from. However, if the United States or an 

officer or agency thereof is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed in the district court within 60 days after such entry. 

THE NOTICE MUST BE RECEIVED AND FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT NO LATER THAN THE LAST 

DAY OF THE APPEAL PERIOD - no additional days are provided for mailing. Special filing provisions for inmates are 

discussed below.

(b) Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(3): “If one party timely files a notice of appeal, any other party may file a notice of appeal within 14 days 

after the date when the first notice was filed, or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a), whichever period ends 

later.”

(c) Fed.R.App.P.4(a)(4): If any party makes a timely motion in the district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of 

a type specified in this rule, the time for appeal for all parties runs from the date of entry of the order disposing of the last 

such timely filed motion.

(d) Fed.R.App.P.4(a)(5) and 4(a)(6): Under certain limited circumstances, the district court may extend the time to file a notice 

of appeal. Under Rule 4(a)(5), the time may be extended if a motion for an extension is filed within 30 days after expiration 

of the time otherwise provided to file a notice of appeal, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Under Rule 

4(a)(6), the time may be extended if the district court finds upon motion that a party did not timely receive notice of the entry 

of the judgment or order, and that no party would be prejudiced by an extension.

(e) Fed.R.App.P.4(c): If an inmate confined to an institution files a notice of appeal in either a civil case or a criminal case, the 

notice of appeal is timely if it is deposited in the institution’s internal mail system on or before the last day for filing. Timely 

filing may be shown by a declaration in compliance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1746 or a notarized statement, either of which 

must set forth the date of deposit and state that first-class postage has been prepaid.

3. Format of the notice of appeal: Form 1, Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a suitable format. See 

also Fed.R.App.P. 3(c). A pro se notice of appeal must be signed by the appellant.

4. Effect of a notice of appeal: A district court loses jurisdiction (authority) to act after the filing of a timely notice of appeal, except for 

actions in aid of appellate jurisdiction or to rule on a timely motion of the type specified in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4).

Case 6:20-cv-01657-CEM-RMN Document 191 Filed 11/28/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 2333