alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Release: 4197-98    (Civ-97-01478-ACK)**

**For Release: October 20,    1998**

**�**

**HAWAII COURT FINDS THAT BRIEN    SULLIVAN, A DEFENDANT IN A 1997 CFTC ENFORCEMENT ACTION, DEFRAUDED    CUSTOMERS IN CONNECTION WITH MANAGED ACCOUNTS AND A COMMODITY POOL HE    CONTROLLED**

**Court Orders Sullivan to Pay a    $100,000 Civil Monetary Penalty and**

**to Make Restitution of    $317,193.84 to Defrauded Customers**

**WASHINGTON- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission    (CFTC) announced today that on September 28, 1998, the Honorable Judge    Allan Kay of the U.S. District Court, Hawaii District, granted the CFTC's    motion for summary judgment against Brien Sullivan of Honolulu, Hawaii,    doing business as Brien Sullivan Capital Management and as Lava Trading.    Sullivan has never been registered with the CFTC.**

The court's action stems from a five-count CFTC    complaint filed on October 23, 1997, alleging that since January 1994,    Sullivan engaged in a fraudulent scheme whereby he defrauded commodity pool    investors in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC    regulations (see CFTC News Release 4067-97, October 23, 1997).

**Sullivan Violated Federal Commodity Law by Engaging    in Fraudulent Scheme, Court Finds**

In his decision, Judge Kay found that Sullivan violated    the CEA and CFTC's regulations by defrauding investors in individual    accounts that he managed and in a commodity pool that he controlled.    Specifically, the court found that Sullivan fraudulently induced customers    to trade in commodity options, by falsely claiming he was a successful    trader and that there was minimal risk in futures trading. The court also    found that Sullivan failed to disclose that he was siphoning off investors'    funds for his own benefit and knowingly sent out false account    statements.

In granting the CFTC's motion, the court issued an order    permanently enjoining Sullivan from violating the CEA and CFTC regulations,    imposing civil penalties amounting to $100,000, and requiring restitution    to customers of $317,193.84.

�

# # #
Manoj Kumar JHA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5104.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 
 I, Kevin A. Polis, certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10Q-SB of Gaofeng Gold Corporation
  2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report;
  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;
  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this Annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  Dated: May 13, 2004
 /s/Kevin A. Polis
 Kevin A. Polis
 sole remaing officer director
#### MINNTOLE v. JOHNSTON.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb 19, 1945.

Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied April 23, 1945.

See 65 S.Ct. 1018.

Alfred Minntole, in pro. per.

No other appearances.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner-appellant prays for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and for appointment by this court of counsel to assist in his appeal from a dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (28 U.S.C.A. § 832) should have been made in the district court which denied- the writ of habeas corpus (Waley v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 234); and petitioner does not show that such leave was asked in the court below.

 Moreover, a proposed appeal record presented with the petition shows two concurrent sentences of fifteen years on counts for bank robbery under 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b (a) (b); also two concurrent sentences of twelve years on counts for bank robbery accompanied by kidnapping under 12 U.S.C.A. § 588c, which two twelve-year sentences were ordered to be consecutive to the two fifteen-year sentences. Execution of the twelve-year sentences was suspended with probation for five years to begin on release from imprisonment under the fifteen-year sentences. We have *945already held under the same statute that the fifteen-year sentences are valid notwithstanding a consecutive sentence for an aggravated degree of the same offense but for a shorter term. Coy v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 136 F.2d 818. Petitioner has not yet served the fiftceu-ycar sentences. By the petition to this court and from the proposed appeal record it appears that the district court rightly denied the writ of habeas corpus and that the proposed appeal would be without merit; also that leave to appeal in forma pauperis would have been denied by the district court.

Petition denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Cherokee Banking Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis  W.  Burnette, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  the  Report fully complies with the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     (2)  To  the  best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results  of  operation  of  the  Company.


/s/  Dennis  W.  Burnette
---------------------------------------
Dennis  W.  Burnette
President  /  Chief  Executive  Officer


                                      *****

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Cherokee Banking Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A.
R.  Roberts, III, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (3)  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  the  Report fully complies with the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     (4)  To  the  best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results  of  operation  of  the  Company.


/s/  A.  R.  Roberts,  III
---------------------------------------
A.  R.  Roberts,  III
Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,253
<INVENTORY>                                    319,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,956
<PP&E>                                         985,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                (309,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,142,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,676
<BONDS>                                      1,075,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           346
<OTHER-SE>                                    (489,417)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,142,696
<SALES>                                      1,268,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,268,763
<CGS>                                          975,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  975,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,011
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,402
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
David Andrew DIEHL, aka David A. Diehl, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8214.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 10, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, May 10, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information, please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: April 11, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-08195 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Gerald BROWN, petitioner, v. Scott LEWIS, Warden.

No. 17-8520.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3713 

To amend title 28, United States Code, provide an additional place for 

holding court for the Western District of Washington, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, provide an additional 

place for holding court for the Western District of Washington, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACE FOR HOLDING COURT FOR 

4 THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. 

5 Section 128(b) of title 28, United States Code, is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘Mount Vernon,’’ after ‘‘Tacoma,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Julian BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17M123.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,995,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               39,395,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   352,000
<INVENTORY>                                 68,383,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           113,484,000
<PP&E>                                     138,326,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              69,231,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             421,757,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       73,422,000
<BONDS>                                    287,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (27,187,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               421,757,000
<SALES>                                     72,610,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,610,000
<CGS>                                       45,839,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,839,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,410,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,968,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,926,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   637,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,289,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,289,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         307,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,790,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,661,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,790,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          254,100
<BONDS>                                      7,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,316,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,790,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               685,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               448,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
Richard Harold ANDERSON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17M127.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Yosef Gavriel TIRAT-GEFEN, petitioner, v. Celia Batista ALMEIDA.

No. 17-1192.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interstate Land Investors II Limited
Partnership, on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey K. Harpel, General Partner and Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Limited Partnership.

|                                                                                                                                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Jeffrey K. Harpel                                                                                                                                  |  | 
|                                                                                                                                                       |  | 
|Jeffrey K. Harpel
ISC Realty Corporation,
General Partner andPrincipal Executive Officer,
Principal FinancialOfficer of the Registrant
August 13, 2003 |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interstate Land Investors II Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Interstate Land Investors II Limited Partnership and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2006086EN.01001901.xml

| 24.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 86/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 86/19

---

Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada on the processing of Advance Passenger Information and Passenger Name Record Data (1)

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada on the processing of Advance Passenger Information and Passenger Name Record Data, signed in Luxembourg on 3 October 2005, have been completed on 22 March 2006. According to Art. 9 of the Agreement, it entered into force on that same day.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 82, 21.3.2006, p. 15.

1

---
Mohammad MANSOORI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-119.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Timothy FILSON, Warden, et al., petitioners, v. Paul L. BROWNING.

No. 17-1390.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Anka V. MISCEVIC, petitioner, v. ESTATE OF M.M., et al.

No. 17-1493.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.