alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, William G. Taves, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of American Restaurant Group, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b)            [omitted]

 

c)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d)            disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2004 |                    |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|               |                    |
|               | /s/ William G. Taves    |   |
|               | William G. Taves        |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Oscar Virgilio PERDOMO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7214.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, M. L. (Chip) Fontenot, President and Chief Executive Officer of WestPoint Stevens Inc., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of WestPoint Stevens Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2003                               /s/ M. L. Fontenot	
                                                                         M. L. (Chip) Fontenot
                                                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
Gregorio GONZALEZ-LONGORIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6259.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for rehearing granted. The order entered May 14, 2018, denying the petition for writ of certiorari vacated. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgement vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
John JONES BEY, petitioner, v. INDIANA, et al.

No. 17M15.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Ronnie BOWLING, petitioner, v. Randy WHITE, Warden.

No. 17-7688.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Steven M. JACOB, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, et al.

No. 16-9420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.
Order entered August 13 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00414
- CR No. 05
- 15
- 00415
- CR
EMAJIN TREVON JACKSO N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F14
- 58177
- X , F 14
- 58178
- X



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS court reporter Jan Cherie Williams to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit nos. 30, 31, 32, and 52.
We DIREC T the Clerk to send copies of this order to Jan Cherie Williams, official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 6, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use in connection with the the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 333-41788, 333-41786, 333-116671, 333-146677 and 333-153357) and
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-40124, 333-57060, 333-127205, 333-127449, 333-140541,
333-145841, 333-145927, 333-148751, 333-152225 and 333-152618) of IA Global,
Inc., formerly Medium4.com, Inc., incorporated into the Annual Report on Form
10-K of IA Global, Inc., of our report dated October 31, 2008, relating to
Australian Secured Financial Limited financial statements for the year ended
June 30, 2008.


                                    /s/ Bentleys MRI Brisbane Partnership
                                        Bentleys MRI Brisbane Partnership
                                        Certified Public Accountants



BRISBANE QLD
December 23, 2008
#### R. H. Helton, alias Jack Helton, *Appellant,*v. Lewis-Hendry & Company, a corporation, *Appellee.*

Division A.

Decision filed April 4, 1929.

*G. B. Parkhill*and *PL. 8. Glazier,*Solicitors for Appellant.

*Jones & Smiley, Solicitors*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
Timothy M. SHILLING, petitioner, v. James R. WALSH.

No. 17-8082.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the use in connection with the registration statements on Form S-8
for the 1999 Stock Option Plan, Registration File No. 333-41788, and the 2000
Stock Option Plan, Registration File No. 333-41786, of IA Global,Inc. formerly
Medium4.com, Inc, incorporated into the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IA
Global,Inc., of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the financial
statements of IA Global, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and for
the year then ended December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ Radin Glass & Co., LLP
                                        Radin Glass & Co., LLP
                                        Certified Public Accountants


New York, New York
April 14, 2003
Piper A. ROUNTREE, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7425.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2011030EN.01003802.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2010 — Fédération internationale des logis v OHIM (Shade of brown)

(Case T-329/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a shade of brown - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 30/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fédération internationale des logis (Paris, France) (represented by: initially, C. Champagner Katz, and subsequently B. Brisset, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2009 (Case R 202/2009-1) concerning an application for registration of a shade of brown as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Fédération internationale des logis to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Fédération internationale des logis to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
David Theodore WARD, Jr., petitioner, v. Keith DEVILLE, Warden.

No. 17-7980.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
In Re Glen Dale SPIVEY, petitioner.

No. 17-8258.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1999 and the Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the year-to-date period ended September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          56,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,763
<INVENTORY>                                      7,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,699
<PP&E>                                       1,227,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,059,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,802
<BONDS>                                        461,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,178
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           494
<OTHER-SE>                                     450,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,059,499
<SALES>                                         41,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               606,045
<CGS>                                           41,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,770
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (4,455)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,871
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, LP
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000853086
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         822
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,030
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12
<PP&E>                                         63,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 44,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,241
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   44,753
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,072
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (123)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                999
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Mark Q. TAYLOR, Jr., petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 16-9748.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
DAKOTAS AND WESTERN MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, petitioner, v. FIRST AGENCY, INC., et al.

No. 17-1008.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

*1297Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Bruce Charles TOLLEFSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF AUGUST 25 , 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD77660 Elaina Marie Fulton vs. Jeffrey Jay Fulton

WD77695 Kristine Rohr

- Sheil vs. Brendon B. Sheil

WD77717 Consolidated with WD77695

WD77808 Braulio C. Gomez vs. State of Missouri

WD77857 Justin Berry as Next Friend of J.S.B. and O.R.B.

WD78488 In the Interest of: N.M. and D.M. Juvenile Officer vs. S.M. (Mother)

and E.M. (Father)

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------------------- --

WD77581 State of Missouri vs. Jason J. Brior
Stanley J. CATERBONE, petitioner, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al.

No. 17-8399.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Release: #3871-95

For Release: October 31, 1995

**CFTC FILES SIX-COUNT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AGAINST**

**GARY K. BIELFELDT, CARLOTTA BIELFELDT, AND BIELFELDT & CO**

**Complaint Alleges Violations of CFTC&39;s Speculative Limits for**

**Corn Futures Trading, and Filing False Reports with the CFTC, Among    Other Things**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today    announced the filing of a six-count administrative complaint against **Gary K. Bielfeldt** and **Carlotta Bielfeldt** of Peoria, Illinois,    and **Bielfeldt & Co.**, of Peoria and Chicago, Illinois.

The CFTC complaint alleges that from October 8, 1993, to November 19,    1993, Gary Bielfeldt violated the CFTC's speculative limits for corn    futures trading.

Specifically, the complaint charges Gary Bielfeldt, who has been    registered as a floor broker with the CFTC since January 1, 1982, with    violating the speculative limits in two ways:

- by acting pursuant to an express or implied agreement or      understanding with his daughters, Linda Bielfeldt and Karen Gray, and      several business and social acquaintances (count 1); and
- by controlling the trading in the commodity futures trading accounts      of Carlotta Bielfeldt, his wife, who has never been registered with the      CFTC in any capacity (count 2).

The remaining counts of the complaint (counts 3-6) charge the    respondents with reporting violations: Gary Bielfelt is charged, as a    controlling person of Bielfeldt & Co., a futures commission    merchant (FCM) in which he owns 95 percent of the stock and for which he    acts as the managing partner, with filing false reports with the CFTC    by:

- filing a false CFTC Form 102 in that the Form 102 filed by Bielfeldt      & Co. on November 8, 1993, identified Carlotta Bielfeldt as a      reportable trader, but failed to reflect the fact that Gary Bielfeldt      controlled the trading in her accounts; and
- filing false 01 Reports that failed to combine the net positions of      the accounts controlled by Gary Bielfeldt with the positions of the      accounts of Carlotta Bielfeldt controlled by Gary Bielfeldt.

Finally, Gary Bielfeldt is charged with failing to update his CFTC Form    40 to accurately reflect his control of the accounts of Carlotta    Bielfeldt.

Carlotta Bielfeldt is charged with making a false statement of a    material fact to the CFTC in that she signed a CFTC Form 40 that failed to    identify Gary Bielfeldt as controlling her account. Bielfeldt & Co.    is charged with filing a false CFTC Form 102 and false 01 Reports with the    CFTC.

A public hearing is to be held within 30 days to determine whether the    allegations are true and, if so, what sanctions, if any should be imposed.    Possible CFTC sanctions include: civil penalties of up to $100,000 or    triple the monetary gain against each respondent for each violation of the    Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC regulations; trading prohibitions;    suspension or revocation of registrations; and cease and desist orders.

# # #

----