alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-OlO07

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Andrew Kasehagen <andykasehagen@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:12 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Andrew Kasehagen

9908 Phmkett Dr., NW

Albuquerque, NM 87114
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3943 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow accelerated depreciation of certain qualified film and television and live theatrical productions 

in Puerto Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2019 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow accelerated depreciation of certain qualified film and television 

and live theatrical productions in Puerto Rico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Film, Tel5 evision, and Theatre Production Act of 2019’’. 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3943 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCELERATED DEPRECIATION FOR CERTAIN 

2 QUALIFIED FILM AND TELEVISION AND LIVE 

3 THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS IN PUERTO 

4 RICO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 181(d)(3)(A) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(in7 cluding Puerto Rico)’’ after ‘‘United States’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

10 13201 of Public Law 115–97. 

11 (c) CROSS REFERENCE.—For application of acceler12 ated depreciation to qualified film or television productions 

13 and qualified live theatrical productions (as defined in sec14 tion 181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amend15 ed by this section), see section 168(k)(2)(A) of the Inter16 nal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# L_2007209EN.01001701.xml

| 9.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/17

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 10/2007

of 27 April 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 147/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 147/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 956/2006 of 28 June 2006 amending Regulation (EEC) No 94/92, as regards the list of third countries from which certain agricultural products obtained by organic production must originate to be marketed within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 956/2006 of 28 June 2006 amending Regulation (EEC) No 94/92, as regards the list of third countries from which certain agricultural products obtained by organic production must originate to be marketed within the Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 54b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 R 0956: Commission Regulation (EC) No 956/2006 of 28 June 2006 (OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 41).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 R 0956: Commission Regulation (EC) No 956/2006 of 28 June 2006 (OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 41).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 956/2006 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 April 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 89, 29.3.2007, p. 17.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 41.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Henry J. DuLAURENCE, III, petitioner, v. Arthur G. TELEGEN, et al.

No. 17-7919.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Brazil Regional Prospective Observational Research in Tuberculosis (RePORT) (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         May 6, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cynthia L. De La Fuente, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2740,                         *delafuentecl@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 5, 2022. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-07657 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Cas e No. 5D 2 024

- 0762 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 000462 -A

_____________________________ R ICHARD L UMAN , II , Appellant,

v. S TAT E OF F LORIDA , Ap pellee.

_____________________________ 3.800 A ppeal from t he Circuit Court for Citrus County

. Joe l D

. Fritton , J udge

. Richar d L uman , II , Cro ss City , pro se . N o A ppearance for Appe llee

. June 25, 2024
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . W ALLIS , S OUD , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL DWAYNE BAGNALL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 109 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

The lower court erred in failing to grant a new trial based upon a serious Brady 

violation.
#### Kyle DAVENPORT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 9830.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 17, 1945.

Writ of Certiorari Denied April 23, 1945.

See 65 S.Ct. 1027.

H. H. Chitwood and R. C. Boyce, both of Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.

Horace Frierson, Jr., U. S. Atty., of Nashville, Tenn., for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and no reversible error appearing from the record, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court entered June 16, 1944, from which the appeal was taken, be and the same is inwall things affirmed.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4031 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4031 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Restora3 tion Initiative Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘GLRI Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE REAU5 THORIZATION. 

6 Section 118(c)(7)(J)(i) of the Federal Water Pollu7 tion Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1268(c)(7)(J)(i)) is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘is authorized’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘are authorized’’; 

11 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert12 ing a semicolon; 

13 (3) by striking ‘‘this paragraph $300,000,000’’ 

14 and inserting the following: ‘‘this paragraph— 

15 ‘‘(I) $300,000,000’’; and 

16 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(II) $375,000,000 for fiscal 

18 year 2022; 

19 ‘‘(III) $400,000,000 for fiscal 

20 year 2023; 

21 ‘‘(IV) $425,000,000 for fiscal 

22 year 2024; 

23 ‘‘(V) $450,000,000 for fiscal year 

24 2025; and 
3 

•HR 4031 EH

1 ‘‘(VI) $475,000,000 for fiscal 

2 year 2026.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4031 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

tiative, and for other purposes. to reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Ini-
Justin PULLMAN, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7876.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Augustina BALU, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-6.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Order entered December 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01147-CV

THE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER DALLAS AND NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS, 

INC., Appellant

V.

LARRY SHAWN D/B/A FIX MY PHONE BILL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06156

ORDER

On November 16, 2018, we granted appellant an extension of time to pay for the 

appellate record and ordered appellant to file, no later than December 17, 2018, written 

verification it had paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk's and reporter's fees. To date, 

however, appellant has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file the requested 

verification no later than January 10, 2019. We caution appellant that failure to provide written 

verification it has paid the reporter's fee may result in the appeal being submitted without the 

reporter's record and failure to provide verification it has paid the clerk's fee may result in 

dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),(c).

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Bruce E. MACK, petitioner, v. Jon HUSTON, et al.

No. 16-6844.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Deborah Elizabeth GOUCH-ONASSIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5375.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Anthony PAGLIACCETTI, petitioner, v. Theresa DelBAISO, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.

No. 17-5089.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2010246EN.01001403.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-6/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/46/EC - Company law Annual and consolidated accounts of companies - Failure to transpose or to communicate national transposition measures)

2010/C 246/24

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. de Schietere de Lophem, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: M. Jacobs and J.-C. Halleux, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (OJ 2006 L 224, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.03.2010.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3863 

To deauthorize the New London Harbor Waterfront Channel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2019 

Mr. COURTNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To deauthorize the New London Harbor Waterfront Channel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEW LONDON HARBOR WATERFRONT CHAN4 NEL, CONNECTICUT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The portion of the project for 

6 navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, 23-foot 

7 Waterfront Channel, authorized by section 1 of the River 

8 and Harbor Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 333) described 

9 in subsection (b) is no longer authorized beginning on the 

10 date of enactment of this Act. 

11 (b) AREA DESCRIBED.—The area described in this 

12 subsection is generally the portion of the Federal navigaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:29 Jul 30, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3863.IH H3863

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3863 IH

1 tion project lying between and around the two piers at 

2 State Pier New London, specifically described as that 

3 area— 

4 (1) beginning at a point N691970.24, 

5 E1180372.61; 

6 (2) running southeasterly about 47.69 feet to a 

7 point N691951.68, E1180416.54; 

8 (3) running southeasterly about 948.57 feet to 

9 a point N691179.20, E1180967.05; 

10 (4) running northeasterly about 304.20 feet to 

11 a point N691263.78, E1181259.26; 

12 (5) running northwesterly about 955.59 feet to 

13 a point N692046.26, E1180710.74; 

14 (6) running northeasterly about 100.00 feet to 

15 a point N692103.66, E1180792.62; 

16 (7) running southeasterly about 989.80 feet to 

17 a point N691293.17, E1181360.78; 

18 (8) running southeasterly about 93.23 feet to a 

19 point N691216.82, E1181414.30; 

20 (9) running southwesterly about 411.08 feet to 

21 a point N690982.28, E1181076.69; 

22 (10) running northwesterly about 198.95 feet to 

23 a point N691144.29, E1180961.23; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3863 IH

1 (11) running northwesterly about 1014.23 feet 

2 to the point described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2007166EN.01002601.xml

| 20.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/26

---

Reply from European Union to United States Treasury Department — SWIFT/Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme

(2007/C 166/10)

The European Union acknowledges receipt of your letter of 28th June containing representations regarding the processing and protection of personal data subpoenaed from SWIFT within the United States under the Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme.

th

We welcome these unilateral representations and the opportunity your Department has given the European Union to have its views and concerns duly reflected in the representations.

Once SWIFT and the financial institutions making use of its services have completed the necessary arrangements to respect EC law, in particular through the provision of information that personal data will be transferred for commercial purposes to the United States and, as regards SWIFT, the respect of the ‘Safe Harbour’ principles, subject to lawful access by the US Treasury Department, SWIFT and the said financial institutions will be in compliance with their respective legal responsibilities under European data protection law.

The representations provide for oversight by an eminent European to be appointed in consultation with the Treasury Department. We will now begin the process of identifying appropriate candidates so that this work can begin in the first semester of 2008. The Commission will make contact with your staff to agree practical details concerning this oversight work.

We thank you for your cooperation in this matter, which shows the strength of our shared commitment to civil liberties, the fight against terrorism and the smooth functioning of the international financial system.

Yours sincerely,

For the Commission

Vice-President Frattini

Image

For the Council of the European Union

Federal Minister of Finance Peer Steinbrück

Image

---
# C_2011340EN.01001401.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/14

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 August 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Greece

(Case C-346/10) (1)

1

2011/C 340/24

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---