alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V
 ( A Limited Partnership )
 
 
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. V (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/Kenneth J. Cutillo
 Kenneth J. Cutillo
 Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
 Arch Street VIII, Inc., as
 Managing General Partner of
 Boston Financial Qualified
 Housing Tax Credits L.P. V
 
 Date:      August 16, 2010
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Marcellus WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Steve LARKINS, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center.

No. 17-5641.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dale L. Fuller, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Borland Software Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  November 9, 2004 |                                    
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------
|                        | /s/  DALE L. FULLER                
|                        |                                    
|                        | Dale L. Fuller                     
|                        | President & Chief Executive Officer
George CABOT, petitioner, v. Michael MELVIN, Warden.

No. 17-8296.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### Chester A. CRUM v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF KANSAS.

No. 3128.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 27, 1945.

No appearance for either party.

Before PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and SYMES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Leave to file petition for writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON
FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1999
<CASH>                                       3,029,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,802,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    72,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,031,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,579,000
<PP&E>                                     213,138,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             124,717,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,099,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       52,339,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (124,403,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,099,000
<SALES>                                    310,536,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           310,536,000
<CGS>                                       97,742,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              171,943,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,180,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,573,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,340,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,460,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,460,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# L_2006096EN.01000902.xml

| 5.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 96/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 96/9

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark extending to Denmark the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national and Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention

The aforementioned Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark, which the Council concluded on 21 February 2006, entered into force on 1 April 2006, the notifications concerning the completion of the procedures in accordance with Article 11 of the Agreement having been carried out on 23 February 2006.

---
Jean COULTER, petitioner, v. James P. COULTER.

No. 17-1311.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Tremell ARMSTEAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7941.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Hughes v. United States,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1765, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018).
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3817 

To cancel the registration of all uses of the pesticide paraquat, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2019 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Ms. CLARKE of New York, and Mr. DANNY K. 

DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To cancel the registration of all uses of the pesticide 

paraquat, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Against 

5 Paraquat Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION OF PARAQUAT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

8 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3817 IH

1 U.S.C. 136d(b)), effective on the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act— 

3 (1) paraquat shall be deemed to generally cause 

4 unreasonable adverse effects to humans in part due 

5 to its acute systemic toxicity and for being a known 

6 neurotoxin which causes Parkinson’s disease; 

7 (2) the Administrator of the Environmental 

8 Protection Agency shall cancel the registration of all 

9 uses of paraquat; and 

10 (3) following such cancellation, the Adminis11 trator shall, in accordance with section 408(l)(2) of 

12 the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 

13 U.S.C. 346a(l)(2)), revoke any tolerance or exemp14 tion that allows the presence of paraquat or any pes15 ticide chemical residue that results from its use, in 

16 or on food. 

17 (b) USE OF EXISTING STOCKS.—Notwithstanding 

18 section 6(a) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

19 Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136d(a)), effective on the date 

20 of the enactment of this Act, the continued sale and use 

21 of existing stocks of paraquat is prohibited. 

22 (c) REREGISTRATION.—Effective on the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environ24 mental Protection Agency may not reregister paraquat 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3817 IH

1 under section 4 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

2 Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136a–1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 31, 2017

No. 04-17-00310-CV

YATES ENERGY CORPORATION, EOG Resources, Inc., Jalapeno Corporation, ACG3 

Mineral Interests, Ltd., Glassell Non-Operated Interests, Ltd., and Curry Glassell,

Appellants

v.

BROADWAY NATIONAL BANK, TRUSTEE OF THE MARY FRANCES EVERS 

TRUST,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PC2618

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. Time is extended to 

November 17, 2017. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of October, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Anthony DRAPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8828.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

*2638Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
James CHELMOWSKI, petitioner, v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC.

No. 17-5307.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         501,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               570,649
<PP&E>                                      15,670,172
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,299,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,941,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,941,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,941,122
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               749,546
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  745,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,839)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40914

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL ANGEL ALVAREZ-GALVAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-96-CR-335-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 21, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Angel Alvarez-Galvan (Alvarez) appeals from his jury

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute in

excess of 50 kilograms of marijuana, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(C), and 846. He argues that the evidence was not

sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed

Galvan’s sufficiency challenge, and the arguments and authorities

convince us that no reversible error was committed. The evidence

was not insufficient to support his conviction. See United

States v. Jaramillo, 42 F.3d 920, 922-23 (5th Cir. 1995).
No. 

-2-

AFFIRMED.
In Re Ricardo MARTINELLI, petitioner.

No. 17-131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 10.1(c)

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2006

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS



|                                                                              |  |                    |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | -------
|Name and Principal Position                                                   |  | Fiscal 2008 Salary
|Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President            |  | $                  | 297,420
|                                                                              | 
|E. Larry Ryder, Executive Vice President  Finance and Administration         |  |                    | 240,000
|                                                                              | 
|Michael P. Spece, Executive Vice President  Merchandising and Design         |  |                    | 240,000
|                                                                              | 
|C. Scott Young, President and Chief Executive Officer  Bradington-Young, LLC |  |                    | 259,056
|                                                                              | 
|Raymond T. Harm, Senior Vice President  Sales                                |  |                    | 214,200

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hooker Furniture Corporation has not yet approved the
bonus potential for the executive officers of the Company or a specific performance goal under the Companys annual bonus program for the fiscal year ending February 3, 2008.
# L_2006176EN.01011002.xml

| 30.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 176/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 176/110

---

Information of the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Republic of Chile concerning amendments to the Agreement on Trade in Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Drinks annexed to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part

The Republic of Chile has notified its approval of the adoption of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Republic of Chile concerning amendments to the Agreement on Trade in Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Drinks annexed to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part.

This Agreement therefore enters into force on 24 April 2006
   (1).

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 54, 24.2.2006, p. 29.

1

---
Freddie Coufax SWAGGERTY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7458.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 11.01

                             Interpore International
                      Computations of Net Income Per Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three months ended 
                                                                  March 31,
                                                             ------------------
                                                              1998        1997
                                                             ------      ------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>   
Net income                                                   $  840      $  259
                                                             ======      ======
Shares used in computing net income per share - basic:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding               7,107       6,963

Effect of dilutive securities:
     Weighted average convertible preferred stock                33          77
     Common share equivalents outstanding                       356         276
                                                             ------      ------
Shares used in computing net income per share - diluted       7,496       7,316
                                                             ======      ======

Net income per share - basic                                 $   12      $  .04
                                                             ======      ======
Net income per share - diluted                               $  .11      $  .04
                                                             ======      ======
</TABLE>

                                       17
#### FIDELITY-PHILADELPHIA TRUST COMPANY, Alleged Trustee and Transferee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Samuel T. BODINE, Alleged Transferee and Donee, v. SAME.

Nos. 8747, 8748.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 12, 1945.

Decided Feb. 14, 1945.

H. Ober Hess, of Philadelphia, Pa. (William R. Spofford and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.

Helen Goodner, of Washington, D. C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, A. F. Prescott, and Irving R. Panzer, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before PARKER and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges, and BARD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court, 3 T.C. 670, as against the trustee is affirmed on authority of Baur v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 145 F.2d 338; Fidelity Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 141 F.2d 54. We think, also, that as against the beneficiary of the trust it should be affirmed. See Commissioner v. Hart, 3 Cir., 106 F.2d 269, 271. It is not necessary to discuss the latter *291proposition at length, since the judgment against the trustee renders the judgment against the beneficiary unimportant in this case.

Affirmed.
Fitzroy WRIGHT, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-5496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
Lyle Roger HARRISON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-8322.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
Juan J. MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5132.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.