alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010063EN.01004101.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/41

---

Action brought on 14 January 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-24/10)

2010/C 63/64

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Karanasou Apostolopoulou and G. Braun)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings, or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings, or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2006/46 into domestic law expired on 5 September 2008.

---

(1)  OJ No L 224 of 16.8.2006, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,437,789
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,690,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 37,257,013
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     93,330,277
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,469,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,138,568
<DEPOSITS>                                 136,527,209
<SHORT-TERM>                                   865,908
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,730,832
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,799,940
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,214,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             152,138,568
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,379,754
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,971,452
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               294,214
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,645,420
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,279,763
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,314,265
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,331,155
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  116,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               9,171
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,506,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,037,056
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,037,056
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,203,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                      12.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.98
<LOANS-NON>                                     25,010
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,427,420
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  102,981
<RECOVERIES>                                    28,687
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,469,126
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,469,126
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Aviation Administration


Permanent Closure of the Public-Use of East Hampton Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of closure of the public-use of East Hampton Airport 
(HTO).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA received written notice on January 20, 2022 from the 
Town of East Hampton, followed by an amended request on February 17, 
2022, advising that effective May 17, 2022, the Town will be closing 
the public-use East Hampton Airport (HTO), East Hampton, New York.

DATES: The closure of the public-use airport is effective as of May 17, 
2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mahendra Raghubeer, Manager, Safety 
and Standards Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, 1 Aviation 
Plaza, Jamaica, NY 11434 Tel: 718-553-3352, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7a68286d1d7d7a7818686c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86c7e3e7b0b6b6c6e0e7e7a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HTO is a general aviation airport in the 
National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). The Town of East 
Hampton has owned and operated HTO for several decades. HTO previously 
received federal grants-in-aid for airport development and was subject 
to statutory grant assurances, but the Town is no longer contractually 
obligated to continue operating HTO as a public use airport. On January 
20, 2022, and amended on February 17, 2020, the Town of East Hampton 
notified the FAA that it seeks to deactivate HTO on May 17, 2022 as a 
public-use airport and activate a new private-use airport, at the same 
location, on May 19, 2022. Section 46319 of title 49 of the United 
States Code (49 U.S.C. 46319) provides that a public agency (as defined 
in 49 U.S.C. 47102) may not permanently close an airport in the NPIAS 
without providing written notice to the FAA Administrator at least 30 
days before the date of the closure. In this case, the public-use 
airport will be closed. The FAA recognizes the correspondence received 
on January 20, 2022 from the Town of East Hampton, followed by the 
amended request on February 17, 2022, meets that requirement. The FAA 
is publishing the Town of East Hampton's notice to close the public-use 
of HTO in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 46319(b).

    Issued in Jamaica, New York on April 11, 2022.
David A. Fish,
Director, Eastern Region Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-08059 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,440
<SECURITIES>                                    45,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,434<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,333
<PP&E>                                          33,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 514,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,332
<BONDS>                                        130,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           319
<OTHER-SE>                                     334,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   514,913
<SALES>                                        118,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,925
<CGS>                                           43,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<FN>
<F1>Includes raw material and work-in-process inventory of $5,333.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
In Re Dominic DORSEY, et al., petitioners.

No. 17-5683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Vance NORTON, et al., petitioners, v. UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF the UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, et al.

No. 17-855.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
James Fidel SOTOLONGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8615.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jimmy Eugene RHODES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8667.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
II-00763

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Leda Jahnke <letaj 53 @gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:35 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Leda Jahnke

6731 Tower Drive

Lena, WI 54139
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting w/ TABB Group
  
    



  Participants discussed the pending SEF proposal.
      
  When
              12/06/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Scott O'MaliaChris Iacovella

  Visitor(s)
              Larry Tab-TABB GroupKevin McPartland-TABB Group

  Organization(s)
              TABB Group


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
# L_2007094EN.01007002.xml

| 4.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 94/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 94/70

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters

The Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) signed in Brussels on 19 October 2005 will enter into force on 1 July 2007 in accordance with Article 12(2) of the Agreement.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 62.

1

---
# L_2005322EN.01003101.xml

| 9.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/31

---

DECISION No 4/2005

of 25 October 2005

of the Committee established under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on mutual recognition in relation to the listing of a conformity assessment body under the sectoral chapter on motor hehicles

(2005/875/EC)

THE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment, and in particular Article 10(4)(a) and 11 thereof,

Whereas the Committee is to take a decision to list a conformity assessment body or bodies under a sectoral chapter of Annex 1 to the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The conformity assessment body in the Annex is added to the list of Swiss conformity assessment bodies under the sectoral chapter for motor vehicles in Annex 1 to the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the conformity assessment body indicated in the Annex has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for the purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Done at Bern, 25 October 2005.

On behalf of the Swiss Confederation

Heinz HERTIG

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2005.

On behalf of the European Community

Andra KOKE

---

ANNEX

Swiss conformity assessment body added to the list of conformity assessment bodies under the sectoral chapter for motor vehicles in Annex 1 to the Agreement

| Montena emc sa |
| --- |
| Route de Montena 75 |
| CH-1728 Rossens |
| Tel. (41) 26 411 93 33 |
| Fax +(41) 26 411 93 30 |
| Contact person: Mr Jacques Ding |
| E-mail: jacques.ding@montena.com |

Montena emc sa

Route de Montena 75

CH-1728 Rossens

Tel. (41) 26 411 93 33

Fax +(41) 26 411 93 30

Contact person: Mr Jacques Ding

E-mail: jacques.ding@montena.com

---
# C_2013046EN.01002601.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/26

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2012 — Cuallado Martorell v Commission

(Case F-96/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Open competition - Non-admission to the oral test following results obtained in written tests - Requests for review - Specific right of candidates to have access to certain information concerning them - Purpose and scope - Right of access to corrected written tests - None)

2013/C 46/46

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eva Cuallado Martorell (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Díez Lorenzo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Action seeking, first, annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the oral test in Open Competition EPSO/AD/130/08 and to deny her access to the corrected written tests and, secondly, annulment with retroactive effect of the reserve list published following the competition tests.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Ms Cuallado Martorell. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Ms Cuallado Martorell.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010, p. 54.

1

---
IQ PRODUCTS COMPANY, petitioner, v. WD-40 COMPANY.

No. 17-986.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

*2621Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

**In connection with this quarterly report of John W. Henry& Co./Millburn L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (this “Report”), I, Michael L. Pungello, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006
| By                                           | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Michael L. Pungello                          |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Mark A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN, petitioner, v. Jason MITCHELL.

No. 16-9647.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.