alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. T. Swinney and M. G. Harrison, *Appellants,*v. Florida Land and Mortgage Company, et al., *Appellees.*

Division A.

Decision filed April 4, 1929.

Petition for rehearing denied May 8, 1929.

*Farr &*Etheridge, for Appellants;

*Thos. W. Butler*and *W. D. Bell,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J. concur.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SS. 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Technest Holdings, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the year period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








**/s/
                Joseph P. Mackin**
            
            **/s/
                Gino M. Pereira****Joseph
                P. Mackin**
            
            **Gino
                M. Pereira****Chief
                Executive Officer**
            
            **Chief
                Financial Officer****Date:
                January 24, 2007**
            
            **Date:
                January 24,
                2007**
Terrance L. VARNER, petitioner, v. Dave DAVEY, Warden.

No. 17-8492.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2010062EN.01002001.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 130/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2008/58/EC of 21 August 2008 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, for the 30th time, Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2008/58/EC of 21 August 2008 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, for the 30th time, Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 67/548/EEC) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 L 0058: Commission Directive 2008/58/EC of 21 August 2008 (OJ L 246, 15.9.2008, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 L 0058: Commission Directive 2008/58/EC of 21 August 2008 (OJ L 246, 15.9.2008, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2008/58/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 28.5.2009, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 15.9.2008, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Cornelius OGUNSALU, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-1333.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Superior Court of California, San Diego County denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

HARJIT BHAMBRA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10580

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-01088-SI-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2013** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Defendant appeals his convictions, secured in two separate trials, for

immigration fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001(a), 1015(a), 1425(a), and tax

fraud, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), (2). We affirm.

FILED

JAN 18 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

1. Defendant’s acquittal on one of the immigration-related charges does not

mean that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions for the other

immigration-related offenses. See United States v. Johnson, 804 F.2d 1078, 1083

(9th Cir. 1986) ("The fact that a jury verdict of guilty on one count of an

indictment is logically incompatible with a verdict of not guilty on another count

does not warrant reversal of the conviction."). The question is whether, viewing

the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact

could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, the essential elements of the crimes

of which the jury convicted Defendant. Id. (citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S.

307, 319 (1979)). Here, ample testimonial and documentary evidence supported

Defendant’s convictions.

2. We reject Defendant’s argument with respect to the tax-related offenses

for the same reasons. Consistency of the verdicts is not required, and there was

ample documentary and testimonial evidence to support Defendant’s tax-related

convictions under the Jackson standard.

3. The admission, in the tax trial, of testimony about Defendant’s

submission of a false vehicle registration was not reversible error. Even assuming

that the district court erred, "[t]his court reverses for nonconstitutional errors in

admitting evidence only if it is more probable than not that the erroneous
3

admission of the evidence materially affected the jurors’ verdict." United States v.

Arambula-Ruiz, 987 F.2d 599, 605 (9th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks

omitted). Here, the jury acquitted Defendant of the charge to which the challenged

testimony was directed, and the evidence that supported the charges of conviction

was overwhelming. Thus, any error that may have occurred was harmless.

AFFIRMED.
(LOGO) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE CORPORATION

July 3, 2000

Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association
Sixth and Marquette
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479
Attention: Option One Series 1999-1
Inv#615

Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, Maryland 21044-3562
Attention: Kimberly Wiggins Option One Mortgage Loan Trust Series 1999-1

Norwest Funding
3601 Minnesota Drive
Suite 200
Bloomington, Mn 55435
Attention: Joan Merrill

Financial Asset Securities Corporation
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich Connecticut 06830
Attention: General Counsel

Financial Security Assurance Inc.
350 Park Avenue
New York, New York  10022
Attention: Jaqueline Waite, Risk Management

Moody's Investors Services
99 Church Street
New York, New York  10007
Attention: The Mortgage Monitoring Department

CORPORATE OFFICES * 3 ADA * IRVINE * CALIFORNIA 92618 * P.O.BOX 57038 * IRVINE
CALIFORNIA 92619-7038 * PHONE 949.790.8100 *  FAXLINE 949.790.8392


Standard & Poor's, a division of the McGraw Hill Companies
25 Broadway, 15th Floor
New York, New York  10004
Attention: Residential Mortgage Group


Fitch Investors Service LP
One State Street Plaza
30th Floor
New York, New York  10004
Attention: Beth Cronin


Pursuant to Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,  dated
and effective as of January 1, 1999, (the "Agreement") among Financial
Asset Securities Corporation, as Depositor, Option One Mortgage Corporation,
as Seller and Servicer, and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association,
as Trustee, I certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year ended April
   28, 2000, and of performance under the aforementioned agreement has been made
   under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
   all of its obligations under the Agreement during the fiscal year ended April
   28, 2000, subject to any matters noted in the servicing report provided under
   Section 3.21 of the Agreement.


William L. O'Neill
Senior Vice President\ Chief Financial Officer
Option One Mortgage Corporation
Victor HERRERA SANTA CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8904.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Carston Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8269.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Arnold FLORES, petitioner, v. CITY OF LAKEWOOD, WASHINGTON, et al.

No. 17-7103.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00751

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard Silver <RSilver999@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Richard Silver

17 Weston Rd.

Lincoln, MA 01773
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, E. Larry Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                   |  |               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|                        |  |  |  |    
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Larry Ryder                                                               
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                   |  | E. Larry Ryder
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President - Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
Torie A. CASH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Justin M. Gurczynski, petitioner, v. United States; and Dwayne M. Williams, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-840.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129592 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129592 

 COA: 260409 
 Ingham CC: 00-075787-FC

AVERELL WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
Antonio STACKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8727.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6641-6642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Social Isolation, Loneliness, Health and the Aging Process.
    Date: January 25, 2001.
    Time: 12 PM to 3 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ramesh Vemuri, Health Scientific Administrator, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute on Aging the 
Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel FTD: Genes, Images and Emotions.
    Date: January 30-31, 2001.
    Time: 7 PM to 5 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Radisson Miyako, 1625 Post Street, San Francisco, CA 
94115.
    Contact Person: Louise L. Hsu, Scientific Review Administrator, 
the Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Effects of

[[Page 6642]]

Stress, the hypothalamic pituitary-adrenal axis and health in aging.
    Date: February 1, 2001.
    Time: 1 PM to 3:30 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Arthur D. Schaerdel, the Bethesda Gateway 
Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-9666.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1639 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Tony Lamont JONES, petitioner, v. Eric D. WILSON, Warden.

No. 17-7495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Deloris PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, et al.

No. 16-8279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,099
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             303
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     68,096
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        111,692
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,765
<DEPOSITS>                                     150,938
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,631
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,224
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 185,765
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,461
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  867
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   121
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,449
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,644
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,781
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,668
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    497
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         497
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                        616
<LOANS-PAST>                                       613
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    169
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,878
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        60
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,963
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,896
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,067
        

</TABLE>
Eli CHABOT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17M2.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Patrick SALVADOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9050.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jose Ismael VENTURA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-41.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Michael Izell SEALS, aka Michael Izell Seals-Brown, petitioner, v. Jeffrey LLOPIS, et al.

No. 17-8029.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Warren Adam TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.

No. 17-1131.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES ex rel. Pram NGUYEN, petitioner, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO.

No. 16-1484.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.