alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10Q for
the quarter This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1998
[CASH]                                          37,381
[SECURITIES]                                    45,008
[RECEIVABLES]                                   25,833
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                     20,781<F1>
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               141,931
[PP&E]                                          28,954
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 374,124
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           43,704
[BONDS]                                          6,552
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                         11
[COMMON]                                           313
[OTHER-SE]                                     323,325
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   374,124
[SALES]                                         32,588
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                32,847
[CGS]                                           12,603
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   12,603
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                 2,660
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               (269)
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                  3,469
[INCOME-TAX]                                   (1,324)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                              2,145
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     2,145
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .07
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .07
<FN>
<F1>Includes raw material and work in process inventory of $3,154.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Michael LoCASCIO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-6818.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 October 2011 – Commission v Poland**

**(Case C-362/10)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2003/98/EC – Re-use of public sector information – Incorrect transposition of or failure to transpose certain articles within the period prescribed

1.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States – Transposition of a directive without legislative
action – Conditions – Existence of a general legal context ensuring the full application of the directive (Art. 288, third
para., TFEU; European Parliament and Council Directive 2003/98) (see paras 46, 60)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States – Directive intended to create rights for individuals
– Requirements of clarity and legal certainty – Directive 2003/98 – Right to re-use public sector information – No transposition
by statutory or regulatory provision – Not permissible (Art. 288, third para., TFEU; European Parliament and Council Directive
2003/98, Art. 2, paras 1 to 3, 4, 6, 7 and 10) (see paras 50-52, 54-56)*

3.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States – Transposition of a directive without legislative
action – Not permissible in the case of an express requirement for reference to be made to a directive (Art. 288, third para.,
TFEU; European Parliament and Council Directive 2003/98) (see para. 58)*

4.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States – Necessity of full transposition into national law
– Activity referred to by a directive does not exist in a Member State – No effect (Art. 288, third para, TFEU; European Parliament
and Council Directive 2003/98) (see para. 64)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 of Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (OJ 2003 L 345, p. 90). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose into the Polish legal order Articles 2 to 4, 6 to 8, 10 and 11 of Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those articles; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
# L_2004354EN.01002901.xml

| 30.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 354/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 354/29

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of India on customs cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of India on customs cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (1), entered into force on 1 November 2004, the procedures provided for in Article 22 of the Agreement having been completed on 29 October 2004.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p. 25.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lester D. Sears, as Chief Financial Officer of WestPoint Stevens Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2003



/s/ Lester D. Sears                                                                                    Lester D. Sears
                                                                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                            KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA , LLC








To Whom It May Concern:                                            June 27, 2005



The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, Certified Public Accountant, LLC hereby consents to
the inclusion of his report of August 5, 2004, accompanying the audited
financial statements of Sierra Resource Group, Inc., as at December 31, 2002 and
December 31, 2003, in the Form 10KSB.


Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
____________________________
    Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC

















P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452, Fax: (702)
436-4218, e-mail: ktingle@kyletinglecpa.com
EXHIBIT 99.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Donald R. Walsh, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the
Registrant), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the Report):



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald R. Walsh                          
|Name: Donald R. Walsh Date: February 14, 2003
Robert BALTIMORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8633.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Travis Hunter BLANK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5026.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for *194writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit
      32.2




YTB
      International, Inc.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the accompanying Report of YTB International, Inc.
      (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"),
      I, Derek J. Brent, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Registrant,
      hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




Date:11/14/2005




/s/
      Derek J. Brent


Chief
      Financial and Accounting Officer
Lewis E. BENTLEY, petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 17-8545.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 3.5

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                 IA GLOBAL, INC.

         IA GLOBAL, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:


         FIRST:   That the name of the corporation is IA Global, Inc.

         SECOND:  That the Certificate of Incorporation was initially filed
under the name foreignTV.com, Inc. with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware on November 12, 1998.

         THIRD:   That this Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate
of Incorporation amends certain provisions of Article FOURTH as set forth below,
which amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
was declared advisable by the Board of Directors, and was approved at a duly
called annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation pursuant to
Sections 222 and 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

         FOURTH:  That the number of shares of common stock that the Corporation
is authorized to issue shall be increased from 75,000,000 to 150,000,000, such
that the Corporation shall be authorized to issue, following the filing of this
Certificate of Amendment, 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, and 5,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to the Corporation's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be
signed by Mark Scott, the Corporation's Secretary, as of this 17th day of June,
2004.

                               /s/ Mark Scott
                               --------------
                               Mark Scott, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Garfield Neville COATES, aka John Simmons, aka Mark Thomas, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-8447.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Gerald HAND, petitioner, v. Tim SHOOP, Warden.

No. 17-7463.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010051EN.01003502.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/35

---

Action brought on 11 December 2009 — Inovis v OHIM — Sonaecom (INOVIS)

(Case T-502/09)

2010/C 51/68

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Inovis, Inc. (Alpharetta, United States) (represented by: R. Black and B. Ladas, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sonaecom — Serviços de Communicações, S.A. (Maia, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 September 2009 in case R 1691/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 September 2009 in case R 1691/2008-1;

| — | Direct the Board of Appeal of the defendant to register the application for the Community trade mark; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Direct the Board of Appeal of the defendant to register the application for the Community trade mark; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear its own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear its own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “INOVIS”, for goods and services in classes 9, 35, 38 and 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Portuguese trade mark registration of the word mark “NOVIS”, for goods and services in classes 9, 35, 37, 38, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly: (i) ignored the clear differences between the respective goods and services covered by the trade marks concerned, including that it erroneously considered that the earlier mark covered classes 9 and 42, whereas registration for such classes was refused by the Portuguese Trade mark Office, and that, in any event, such registration was not substantiated during the proceedings; (ii) ignored the clear conceptual differences between the trade marks concerned; and (iii) held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
SIK GAEK, INC., petitioner, v. YOGI'S II, INC., et al.

No. 16-1476.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Reginal Brian ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8503.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Allen ELLIOTT, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5334.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,854,279
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,763
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,867,042)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roger R. Robb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 14, 2002





/s/    Roger R. RobbChief Financial Officer
Larry
O'Donnell, CPA, P.C.





Telephone
(303)
745-4545                                                                                           2228 South Fraser Street


Fax (303)
369-9384                                                                                                                                    Unit
I


Email
larryodonnellcpa@comcast.net                                                                       Aurora,
Colorado    80014


www.larryodonnellcpa.com











REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Board of
Directors


Tactical
Air Defense Services, Inc.


Fort
Lauderdale, Florida





I have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc.,
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ (deficiency) equity and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on my audit.





I
conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require
that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.  I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for
my opinion.





In my
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Tactical Air Defense
Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of operations
and its cash flows for for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.





These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has operating and liquidity concerns, has
incurred an accumulated deficit of $38,524,104 through the period ended December
31, 2009. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern. Management's plans as to these matters are also
described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that
may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.




/s/ Larry
O'Donnell, CPA, PC





Larry
O’Donnell, CPA, PC


April 14,
2010
Carlos McKENZIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5082.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Jodi Lynn RICHTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9695.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Kevin A. KEITH, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-8176.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Crawford County denied.