alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013009EN.01000802.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 November 2012 — European Commission v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS, Wendel Investissement SA, Lagardère SCA and Lagardère SCA v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS, European Commission, Wendel Investissement SA

(Joined Cases C-553/10 P and C-554/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Merger of undertakings in the book publishing market - Annulment of the decision to approve an investment company as the purchaser of the assets sold - Significance of a trustee’s possible lack of independence)

2013/C 9/11

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, A. Bouquet and S. Noë, acting as Agents), Lagardère SCA (represented by: A. Winckler, F. de Bure and J.-B. Pinçon, avocats)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (represented by: O. Fréget, M. Struys and L. Eskenazi, avocats), Wendel Investissement SA (represented by: M. Trabucchi, F. Gordon and C. Baldon, avocats), Lagardère SCA (represented by: A. Winckler, F. de Bure and J.-B. Pinçon, avocats), European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, A. Bouquet and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeals brought against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 in Case T-452/04 Éditions Jacob v Commission by which the General Court annulled Commission Decision D(2004)203365 of 30 July 2004 relating to the approval of Wendel Investissement as purchaser of the assets sold in accordance with Commission Decision 2004/422/EC of 7 January 2004 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP) — Significance of the trustee’s possible lack of independence — Distortion of the facts — Infringement of the obligation to state reasons

Éditions Jacob

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission and Lagardère SCA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Éditions Odile Jacob SAS; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission and Lagardère SCA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Éditions Odile Jacob SAS;

| 3. | Orders Wendel Investissement SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Wendel Investissement SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 12.2.2011.

1

---
***EXHIBIT
        32.1***
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I,
        Donald
        Katz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on
        Form
        10-K of Audible Inc. Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in
        all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Audible,
        Inc.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
  
  April
                    2, 2007
              
              By:
              
              /s/
                  Donald R. KatzDonald
                  R. KatzChief
                  Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60346

Summary Calendar

JORGE ULISES ALANIZ-HUETE,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A098 685 484

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Ulises Alaniz-Huete (Alaniz), a native and citizen of Nicaragua, 

petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), 

which dismissed his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of a motion to 

reopen his in absentia removal proceeding. He argues that the in absentia 

removal order was improper because an incomplete address was used to serve 

the notice and it was not his fault that the file contained an incomplete address.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-60346 Document: 00512553283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2014
No. 13-60346

As the BIA determined, the notice to appear (NTA), which was personally 

served on Alaniz and which he signed, contains the address to which the 

hearing notice was mailed. The NTA advised Alaniz of his obligation to apprise 

the court of his full mailing address, and he was also advised of the 

consequences of his failure to appear at a hearing. The record is devoid of 

evidence that indicates that Alaniz attempted to notify the immigration court 

that the address on the NTA was incomplete or incorrect. Alaniz therefore did 

not comply with his obligation to keep his address current and his failure to do 

so precludes him from obtaining relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii)

(providing for rescission of a removal order only when failure to appear was

through no fault of the alien); Gomez-Palacios v. Holder, 560 F.3d 354, 360-61

(5th Cir. 2009) (affirming the BIA’s denial of an appeal from an in absentia 

removal when the alien failed to comply with his obligation to provide current 

address information). The BIA’s ruling therefore was not an abuse of 

discretion. See § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii); Gomez-Palacios, 560 F.3d at 358. The 

petition for review is DENIED.

2

 Case: 13-60346 Document: 00512553283 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2014
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 415 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant to States and local 

governments easements and rights-of-way over Federal land within Gateway National Recreation Area for construction, operation, and maintenance of projects for control and prevention of flooding and shoreline 

erosion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. ROSE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant to States 

and local governments easements and rights-of-way over 

Federal land within Gateway National Recreation Area 

for construction, operation, and maintenance of projects 

for control and prevention of flooding and shoreline erosion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 415 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO GRANT EASEMENTS AND 

2 RIGHTS-OF-WAY OVER FEDERAL LANDS 

3 WITHIN GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION 

4 AREA. 

5 Section 3 of Public Law 92–592 (16 U.S.C. 460cc– 

6 2) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(j) AUTHORITY TO GRANT EASEMENTS AND

8 RIGHTS-OF-WAY.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte10 rior may grant, to any State or local government, an 

11 easement or right-of-way over Federal lands within 

12 Gateway National Recreation Area for construction, 

13 operation, and maintenance of projects for control 

14 and prevention of flooding and shoreline erosion. 

15 ‘‘(2) CHARGES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

16 COSTS.—The Secretary may grant such an easement 

17 or right-of-way without charge for the value of the 

18 right so conveyed, except for reimbursement of costs 

19 incurred by the United States for processing the ap20 plication therefore and managing such right. 

21 Amounts received as such reimbursement shall be 

22 credited to the relevant appropriation account.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Peter Carl BORMUTH, petitioner, v. JACKSON COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

No. 17-7220.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Javier SOTELO CANTU, petitioner, v. C.R. FISCHER & SONS, INC., et al.

No. 17-6327.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 23048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 11, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
214-413-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Wednesday, May 11, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Conchata Holloway. For more information, please contact Conchata 
Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 
Commerce St., MC 1005, Dallas, TX 75242 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 11, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-08198 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; T Cells and Aging.                    

*Date:*                         May 26, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anita H. Undale, Ph.D., MD, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7428,                         *anita.undale@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 12, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-08206 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Bailey Joe MILLS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9676.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*179Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Amendment to the Annual Report of Remedent USA, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we, Robin List,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Stephen F. Ross,
Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  respectively  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Robin List                                  /s/ Stephen F. Ross
-----------------------                         --------------------------
Robin List,                                     Stephen F. Ross,
Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Financial Officer
January 7, 2005                                 January 7, 2005
Jorge MALDONADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8946.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011252EN.01002706.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Amares (Portugal)) — Cristiano Marques Vieira v Companhia de Seguros Tranquilidade SA

(Case C-299/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/57

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
# L_2007090EN.01009302.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 90/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 90/93

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and Uruguay relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the course of accession to the European Community

The above Agreement (pursuant to Article XXIV:6 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994) (OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 11) has entered into force on 18 December 2006.

---
EX 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lucien R. Paquette, certify that:



1.

I have received this annual report of Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2002 of The Bralorne Mining Company, the registrant;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, other than financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c.

presented in this annual report our conclusion about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regards to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:

June 9, 2004

/s/Lucien R. Paquette



Lucien R. Paguette,

Chief Financial Officer



Chief Accounting Officer

Secretary Treasurer and Director
Francis V. LORENZO, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 17-1077.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00443

- CV

SHERRY GRAYNED APPELLANT

V.

CITIBANK, N.A. APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----- -------

On December 9, 2011 , we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that

payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Ap pellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: January 1 9 , 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Wasatch  Pharmaceutical,  Inc.  March 31, 1997  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000853465
<NAME>                                Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc.

       

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           0
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .00
        


</TABLE>
Thurin G. BENNER, petitioner, v. Karolyn B. JOHNSON.

No. 17-5322.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.