alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001077634
<NAME>                          MEDIUM4.COM, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         103,364
<SECURITIES>                                 4,159,418
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,654,406
<PP&E>                                       1,276,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,482,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          489,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,784
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,890,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,482,056
<SALES>                                         45,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,872,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,746,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,760,176)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2009090EN.01001701.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2009 — Gebr. Weber GmbH v Jürgen Wittmer

(Case C-65/09)

2009/C 90/26

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gebr. Weber GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Jürgen Wittmer

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the provisions of the first and second subparagraphs of Article 3(3) of Directive 1999/44/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees to be interpreted as precluding a national statutory provision under which, in the event of a lack of conformity of the consumer goods delivered, the seller may refuse the form of remedy required by the consumer when the remedy would result in the seller incurring costs which, compared with the value the consumer goods would have if there were no lack of conformity, and with the significance of the lack of conformity, would be unreasonable (absolutely disproportionate)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the provisions of the first and second subparagraphs of Article 3(3) of Directive 1999/44/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees to be interpreted as precluding a national statutory provision under which, in the event of a lack of conformity of the consumer goods delivered, the seller may refuse the form of remedy required by the consumer when the remedy would result in the seller incurring costs which, compared with the value the consumer goods would have if there were no lack of conformity, and with the significance of the lack of conformity, would be unreasonable (absolutely disproportionate)?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: are the provisions of Article 3(2) and the third subparagraph of Article 3(3) of that directive to be interpreted as meaning that, where the goods are brought into conformity by replacement, the seller must bear the costs of removing the non-conforming consumer goods from a thing into which, in a manner consistent with their nature and purpose, the consumer has incorporated them? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: are the provisions of Article 3(2) and the third subparagraph of Article 3(3) of that directive to be interpreted as meaning that, where the goods are brought into conformity by replacement, the seller must bear the costs of removing the non-conforming consumer goods from a thing into which, in a manner consistent with their nature and purpose, the consumer has incorporated them?

---

(1)  OJ 1999 L 171, p. 12.

1

---
# L_2005306EN.01002801.xml

| 24.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 306/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 306/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 99/2005

of 8 July 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 60/2005 of 29 April 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 60/2005 of 29 April 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 75/2005 of 18 January 2005 amending Annexes I, II and III to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin as regards moxidectin, linear alkyl benzene sulphonic acids with alkyl chain lengths ranging from C9 to C13, containing less than 2,5 % of chains longer than C13 and Acetylisovaleryltylosin (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 75/2005 of 18 January 2005 amending Annexes I, II and III to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin as regards moxidectin, linear alkyl benzene sulphonic acids with alkyl chain lengths ranging from C9 to C13, containing less than 2,5 % of chains longer than C13 and Acetylisovaleryltylosin (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32005 R 0075: Commission Regulation (EC) No 75/2005 of 18 January 2005 (OJ L 15, 19.1.2005, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 R 0075: Commission Regulation (EC) No 75/2005 of 18 January 2005 (OJ L 15, 19.1.2005, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 75/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 239, 15.9.2005, p. 40.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 15, 19.1.2005, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 16, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 16, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0073. IN THE INTEREST OF F. S. G., A CHILD (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20JV66
# L_2005210EN.01004601.xml

| 12.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/46

---

DECISION No 1/2005 OF THE COMMUNITY/SWITZERLAND AIR TRANSPORT COMMITTEE

of 12 July 2005

amending the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport

(2005/612/EC)

THE COMMUNITY/SWITZERLAND AIR TRANSPORT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 23(4) thereof,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   The following shall be inserted after point 4 (Air Safety) of the Annex to the Agreement:

‘5.   Aviation Security

No 2320/2002

Regulation (EC) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 849/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004.

(Articles 1-8, 10-13)’

2.   The following shall be inserted after the inclusion referred to in Article 1(1) of the present Decision:

‘No 622/2003

Commission Regulation (EC) of 4 April 2003 laying down measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2004 of 15 January 2004.’

3.   The following shall be inserted after the inclusion referred to in Article 1(2) of the present Decision:

‘No 1217/2003

Commission Regulation (EC) of 4 July 2003 laying down common specifications for national civil aviation security quality control programmes.’

4.   The following shall be inserted after the inclusion referred to in Article 1(3) of the present Decision:

‘No 1486/2003

Commission Regulation (EC) of 22 August 2003 laying down procedures for conducting Commission inspections in the field of civil aviation security.

(Articles 1-13, 15-18)’

5.   The following shall be inserted after the inclusion referred to in Article 1(4) of the present Decision:

‘No 1138/2004

Commission Regulation (EC) of 21 June 2004 establishing a common definition of critical parts of security restricted areas of airports.’

Article 2

The numbering of point 5 (Others) of the Annex to the Agreement shall be changed to 6.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, and the Official Compendium of Swiss Federal Law. It will enter into force on the first day of the second month following its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2005.

For the Joint Committee

The Head of the Community Delegation

Daniel CALLEJA CRESPO

The Head of the Swiss Delegation

Raymond CRON

---
Yoselin Linet Martinez CAZUN, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-931.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      $3,867,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $2,871,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                ($525,205)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $6,607,676
<PP&E>                                      $4,334,252
<DEPRECIATION>                              ($822,678)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $31,806,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      $11,746,394
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 $5,666,596
<COMMON>                                        $6,888
<OTHER-SE>                                ($2,296,063)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $31,806,663
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           $12,630,568
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              $13,900,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            $2,649,184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          $1,797,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             ($417,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $417,839
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                ($417,839)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Census Bureau

# AGENCY:

Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public virtual meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Census Bureau published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 7, 2022 giving notice of a virtual meeting of the National Advisory Committee (NAC). The document contained incorrect URL meeting links in the “Addresses” section.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Shana Banks, Advisory Committee Branch Chief, Office of Program, Performance and Stakeholder Integration (PPSI),                         *shana.j.banks@census.gov,*                         Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, telephone 301-763-3815. For TTY callers, please use the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of April 7, 2022, in FR Document Number 2022-07356, on Page 20389, in the first column, correct the                     **ADDRESSES**                     caption to read:                

**ADDRESSES**                    : The meeting will be held via the WebEx platform at the following presentation links:                
    - May 5, 2022—

*https://uscensus.webex.com/​uscensus/​onstage/​g.php?​MTID=​e28f8d12408207d3c951d7c7b345a1dd2*
    - May 6, 2022—

*https://uscensus.webex.com/​uscensus/​onstage/​g.php?​MTID=​e7dfde37dd4b6aa4f376a2758ee48da9c*

For audio, please call the following number: 1-888-603-9745. When prompted, please use the following Password: Census#1 and Passcode: 8154908#.

                    Robert L. Santos, Director, Census Bureau, approved the publication of this Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: April 8, 2022.

Sheleen Dumas,

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department.

[FR Doc. 2022-07980 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
Romie David BISHOP, et ux., petitioners, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 17-7009.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with EU-US Financial Regulation Technical Working Group
  
    



  Reporting of all swaps; harmonizing end-user exception with EU
      
  When
              07/11/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVIII. Real Time Reporting

  Organization(s)
              EU-US Financial Regulation Technical Working Group


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Mark Allen KOCH, petitioner, v. CITY OF SARGENT, NEBRASKA.

No. 17-8084.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 14, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Carl Wayne STEWART, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA, et al.

No. 16-9552.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Frank L. AMODEO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8979.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00555-CR

David Galvan, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3012982, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant David Galvan guilty of intentionally causing bodily injury to

a child. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.04(a)(3) (West 2003). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced

by previous felony convictions, at imprisonment for seventy-two years.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the app e al is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of A nders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. S ee also Penson v. Ohio

, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State

, 573

S.W.2d 8 0 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State

, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State

, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State

, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969).2 Appellant also filed a pro se brief. In it, he contends the trial court erred by failing

to instruct the jury on the meaning of reasonable doubt as mandated in Geesa v. State

, 820 S.W.2d

154, 161-62 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The court of criminal appeals overruled this portion of the

G eesa opinion in Paulson v. State

, 28 S.W.3d 570, 573 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The Paulson

opinion also overruled Reyes v. State

, 938 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), in which it was

held that the failure to give the Geesa instruction was automatic reversible error. Appellant was tried

after Paulson was announced. Appellant’s sole pro se point of error is without merit.

We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We find nothing

in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: July 11, 2003

Do Not Publish
Olaoluwa FAPARUSI, petitioner, v. CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 17-1081.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.