alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 37 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 37

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 
 Kissimmee River and its tributaries in the State of Florida for study 
 for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 
 Kissimmee River and its tributaries in the State of Florida for study 
 for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kissimmee River Wild and Scenic 
River Study Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

    Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(__) Kissimmee river, florida.--(A) The segment from the 
        southern shore of Lake Kissimmee to its confluence with Lake 
        Okeechobee.''.

SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT.

    Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(__) Study and report.--Not later than 3 years after the 
        date of completion of the Kissimmee River restoration project 
        by the Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water 
        Management District, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
        complete the study of the Kissimmee River, as described in 
        subsection (a)(_), and submit a report describing the results 
        of that study to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and 
        Natural Resources of the Senate.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009167EN.01002101.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/21

---

Action brought on 25 May 2009 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (OLYMP)

(Case T-204/09)

2009/C 167/41

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Dönch and M. Eck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Bellido, S.A. (Manzanares, Ciudad Real, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 March 2009 in case R 598/2008-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 March 2009 in case R 598/2008-2; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘OLYMP’ for goods in class 25

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: Spanish trade mark registration of the figurative mark ‘OLIMPO’ for goods in class 25

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community trade mark concerned invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that there was a likelihood of confusion, due to the fact that the concerned trade marks are not visually, aurally or conceptually similar.

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3976 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3976

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 12711 East Jefferson Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Aretha 
                    Franklin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARETHA FRANKLIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 12711 East Jefferson Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Aretha Franklin Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Aretha 
Franklin Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3976

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 12711 East Jefferson Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Aretha 
                    Franklin Post Office Building''.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RONALD L. WHISPELL,

 Petitioner

 v.

BUCKHORN VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY

FIRE CO. NO. 1, A/K/A BUCKHORN

COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO.

NO. 1.,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 652 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Timothy D. WOULARD, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-8511.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In Re Leroy SINGLETON, petitioner.

No. 17-223.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# L_2007266EN.01002301.xml

| 11.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 59/2007

of 8 June 2007

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 36/2007 of 27 April 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 36/2007 of 27 April 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2007/64/EC of 15 December 2006 establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to growing media (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2007/64/EC of 15 December 2006 establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to growing media (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 2d (Commission Decision 2001/688/EC) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

| ‘2da. | 32007 D 0064: Commission Decision 2007/64/EC of 15 December 2006 establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to growing media (OJ L 32, 6.2.2007, p. 137).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2da.

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2007/64/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 209, 9.8.2007, p. 65.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 32, 6.2.2007, p. 137.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40063 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RODOLFO CARRANZA

- DIAZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 6

- 58

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Rodolfo Carranza

- Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carranza

- Diaz h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40063 Document: 00512539855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 40063

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40063 Document: 00512539855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         472,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               623,166
<PP&E>                                      14,575,043
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,340,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,857,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,857,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,857,738
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               507,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  469,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,490)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of AIRFUND II International Limited
Partnership  Liquidating  Trust (the "Trust"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September  30,  2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  the  Principal  Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Wayne  E.  Engle
                    ---------------------
                    Wayne  E.  Engle
                    Vice  President  (Chief  Financial  Officer)
Equis  Corporation, as Manager of the Trust, under a Liquidating Trust Agreement
dated  as  of  July  18,  2002,  Wilmington  Trust  Company,  as Trustee and not
Individually

                                    November  14,  2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7621

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN DALEY STRASSINI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (3:97-cr-00054; 3:98-cr-00220; 3:03-cv-00550)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided:November 27, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Daley Strassini, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Elise Eady, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Daley Strassini seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of

appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days

after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

November 7, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on September 8,

2006.* In the notice of appeal, Strassini stated that he did not

receive notice of the district court’s order denying his § 2255

motion until August 25, 2006, and the district court determined

that his appeal was therefore timely. Under Rule 4(a)(6), however,

the district court may only reopen an appeal period if the motion
- 3 -

to reopen is filed within the earlier of 180 days after the entry

of the order appealed, or within seven days after the appellant’s

receipt of notice of the entry of the order. In this case,

Strassini’s notice of appeal, construed as a motion to reopen the

appeal period, was not filed within 180 days of the entry of the

district court’s order, and was filed nine days after Strassini

received notice of that order. The district court therefore

incorrectly concluded that Strassini’s notice of appeal was timely,

as the court did not have authority to reopen the appeal period.

Because Strassini failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Araceli GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8380.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interstate Land Investors II Limited
Partnership, on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey K. Harpel, General Partner and Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Limited Partnership.

|                                                 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Jeffrey K. Harpel                            |  | 
|                                                 |  | 
|Jeffrey K. Harpel                                |  | 
|ISC Realty Corporation,                          |  | 
|General Partner and Principal Executive Officer, |  | 
|Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant    |  | 
|May 15, 2003                                     |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interstate Land Investors II Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Interstate Land Investors II Limited Partnership and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

11
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

               DAY RUNNER RESTATED 401(k) PLAN AND TRUST AGREEMENT



WHEREAS,  Day Runner,  Inc. (the "Employer")  heretofore adopted the Day Runner,
Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS, the Employer reserved the right to amend the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan to add direct enrollment;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended,  effective as of October 1, 1999, as
follows:


1.       Section  4.1(a) of the Plan is hereby  amended by adding the  following
         paragraph to the end of said section:

         "Notwithstanding  the  foregoing,  any  Employee,  upon first  becoming
         eligible to  participate in the Plan pursuant to Section 3.1, who fails
         to affirmatively  make any deferral election  (including an election to
         contribute  zero percent (0%) of his  Compensation  to the Plan) within
         the time  prescribed  by the  Administrator,  shall be  deemed  to have
         elected to contribute three percent (3%) ("deemed elective deferral) of
         his  Compensation  on a pre-tax  basis to the Plan.  The  Administrator
         shall  provide to each  Employee  a notice of his right to receive  the
         amount  of the  deemed  elective  deferral  in cash  and his  right  to
         increase or decrease the elective  deferral.  The  Administrator  shall
         also provide each such  Employee a reasonable  period to exercise  such
         rights before the date on which the cash is currently available."


2.       Except  as  hereinabove  amended,  the  provisions  of the  Plan  shall
         continue in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Employer,  by its duly authorized  officer,  has caused
this Amendment to be executed on the 30th day of August, 1999.



                                                DAY RUNNER, INC.



                                                By: /s/  JAMES E. FREEMAN, Jr.