alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Agenda for Joint SEC-CFTC Roundtable to Discuss Issues 

Related to Capital and Margin for Swaps and Security-Based 

Swaps

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

December 10, 2010

1:00 p.m. Opening Statements by CFTC and SEC Staff

1:15 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Panel One: Margin

• Margin methodologies and margin 

requirements for uncleared swaps (including 

initial and variation margin).

• Portfolio margining.

• Margin and end-users.

• Requirements for form and location of 

collateral including issues related to portfolio 

margining.

• Legacy swap agreements, such as preexisting swaps and security-based swaps.

3:00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Break

3:15 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Panel Two: Capital

• Establishing capital requirements for jointly 

registered entities, including broker-dealers, 

futures commission merchants, swap dealers, 

security-based swap dealers, major swap 

participants, and major security-based swap 

participants. 

• Non-financial firms registered as swap 

entities.

• Methods for computing regulatory capital, 

including models (proprietary and 

standardized) and standard haircuts.

• Capital requirements for legacy swap 

positions.

• Capital requirements for major swap 
participants and major security-based swap 

participants.

5:00 p.m. Roundtable concludes
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  March 13, 2013





/s/ Amir PhilipsName:  Amir PhilipsTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Steve MEREDITH, petitioner, v. KANSAS

Barbara Annemarie Hill, petitioner, v. Kansas; Joseph V. Donaldson, petitioner, v. Kansas; Kevin Addison Hirschberg, petitioner, v. Kansas; Thomas Burdick, petitioner, v. Kansas; Bryan Eugene Brown, petitioner, v. Kansas; Djuan R. Richardson, petitioner, v. Kansas; and Willie J. Scuderi, petitioner, v. Kansas.

No. 17-7301.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas denied.
Dawn NGUYEN, petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1054.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Sean Patrick ESTY, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Oliver Michael PRYOR, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5329.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION v. STEADYMED LTD.

No. 17-1137(R46-030).

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Russell ELLIS, petitioner, v. T.G. WERLICH, Warden.

No. 17-5336.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Raymond O. LEECH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5505.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jesus MALDONADO-FRANCO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3975 

To amend the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act to modernize 

verification of contact lens prescriptions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. RUSH (for himself and Mr. BURGESS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act 

to modernize verification of contact lens prescriptions, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Contact Lens Prescrip5 tion Verification Modernization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 4 of the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers 

8 Act (15 U.S.C. 7603) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3975 IH

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and 

2 (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; 

3 (B) by moving such redesignated subpara4 graphs 2 ems to the right; 

5 (C) by striking ‘‘A seller may’’ and insert6 ing ‘‘(1) SELLERS GENERALLY.—A seller may’’; 

7 and 

8 (D) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) ONLINE SELLERS.—An online seller of 

11 contact lenses shall provide a method that enables 

12 an individual to electronically transmit, in accord13 ance with HIPAA privacy regulation (as defined in 

14 section 1180(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 1320d–9(b)(3))), a copy of a contact lens 

16 prescription for such individual. 

17 ‘‘(3) ENCRYPTION REQUIRED.—Any protected 

18 health information (as defined for purposes of the 

19 HIPAA privacy regulation) that an online seller 

20 sends pursuant to this section by email shall be 

21 encrypted.’’; 

22 (2) in subsection (c)(6), by striking ‘‘and tele23 phone number’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘, tele24 phone number, and email address’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3975 IH

1 (3) in subsection (g), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting the following: ‘‘but does not 

3 include a call made using an artificial or prerecorded 

4 voice.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Jerad ROSS, petitioner, v. Leslie FLEMING, Warden.

No. 17-7384.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Johnny MORGAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9655.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2012343EN.01001302.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — DEI v Commission

(Case T-421/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Greek markets for the supply of lignite and wholesale electricity - Decision establishing the specific measures to correct the anti-competitive effects of an infringement of Article 86(1) EC, in conjunction with Article 82 EC, identified in an earlier decision - Article 86(3) EC - Annulment of the earlier decision)

2012/C 343/19

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P. Anestis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou and A. Antoniadis, Agents, and by A. Oikonomou, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, Agents, and by M. Marinos, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 6244 final of 4 August 2009 establishing the specific measures to correct the anti-competitive effects of the infringement identified in the Commission Decision of 5 March 2008 on the granting or maintaining in force by the Hellenic Republic of rights in favour of DEI for the extraction of lignite.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2009) 6244 final of 4 August 2009 establishing the specific measures to correct the anti-competitive effects of the infringement identified in the Commission Decision of 5 March 2008 on the granting or maintaining in force by the Hellenic Republic of rights in favour of Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) for the extraction of lignite; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2009) 6244 final of 4 August 2009 establishing the specific measures to correct the anti-competitive effects of the infringement identified in the Commission Decision of 5 March 2008 on the granting or maintaining in force by the Hellenic Republic of rights in favour of Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) for the extraction of lignite;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by DEI, in addition to bearing its own; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by DEI, in addition to bearing its own;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
Collins O. NYABWA, petitioner, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA.

No. 17-8464.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Emery M.L. YOUNG, petitioner, v. Tim PEREZ, et al.

No. 17-5314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan Margerison,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        April 15, 2005
Enrique HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9740.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Jotham Rafael SIMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7361.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7188

ANDR’E F. JONES-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STAN G. HOLLBERRY; DONNA MAYNE, Director;

JANET WURIE, Nurse Practitioner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (CA-05-390)

Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: November 18, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andr’e F. Jones-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andr’e F. Jones-El appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones-El v.

Hollberry, No. CA-05-390 (E.D. Va. July 8, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Borland Software Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth R. Hahn, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ KENNETH R. HAHN    
|Kenneth R. Hahn        
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|November 8, 2005       



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Audible, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-91107) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-45470) on Form S-3 of Audible, Inc. of our
report dated March 26, 2002, relating to the balance sheets of Audible, Inc. as
of December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December
31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Audible, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 2002
II-00182

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

B. Dirnbach <bdirnbac@gmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 11:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

B. Dirnbach

6350 Lancaster Avenue

Philadelphia, PA 19151
James E. Slayton, CPA
2858 West Market Street
Suite C
Fairlawn, Ohio 44333

To Whom it May Concern:

The firm of James E. Slayton, Ceritified Public Accountant consents to the
inclusion of my report of February 9, 2000, on the Financial Statements of
California Software Corporation on years ending December 31, 1999 and
December 31, 2000, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near
future to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Professionally,

/s/James E. Slayton, CPA
Ohio License ID # 04-1-15582
David GOETHEL, et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al.

No. 17-75.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC., petitioner, v. ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

No. 17-1409.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
 /s/ ERIK E. PRUSCHErik E. PruschPrincipal Financial Officer
   53
Eric C. BURGIE, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 17-5252.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Reginald Eugene GRIMES, Sr., petitioner, v. Lidia SABRI, et al.

No. 16-9719.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4034 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4034

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 602 Pacific Avenue in Bremerton, Washington, as the ``John Henry 
                     Turpin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

  Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Ms. 
Herrera Beutler, Mr. Newhouse, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Ms. Jayapal, 
  Ms. Schrier, Mr. Smith of Washington, and Mr. Heck) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 602 Pacific Avenue in Bremerton, Washington, as the ``John Henry 
                     Turpin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN HENRY TURPIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 602 Pacific Avenue in Bremerton, Washington, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John Henry Turpin Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Henry 
Turpin Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Darryl Lamont JEFFERSON, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8439.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Richard Arthur SCHMIDT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5254.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.