alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS
E ASTLAND , T EXAS
J UDGMENT

James Doyle Burwell, * From the 70th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. A

- 39,270.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00351

- CR * November 20, 2014

The State of Texas
, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, w e
vacate James Doyle Burwell’s capital murder convictions under counts two and
three of the indictment

. Accordingly, we reverse the judgments of the trial court as to counts two and three, and we render a judgment of acquittal as to those counts.
W e uphold the capital murder convicti on under count one , and w e affirm the judgment of the trial court as to that count

.
Exhibit 13.(a).2
     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Annual Report of chinadotcom corporation (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 20-F”),I, Daniel Widdicombe, chief financial officer of the Company, certify that:
(1) The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
Date: May 7, 2004     /s/Daniel Widdicombe   Daniel Widdicombe Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to chinadotcom corporationand will be retained by chinadotcom corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3798 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3798

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for limitations on 
 copayments for contraception furnished by the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Access to Contraception for 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON COPAYMENTS FOR CONTRACEPTION.

    Section 1722A(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``to pay'' and all that follows through the 
        period and inserting ``to pay--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(A) an amount in excess of the cost to the Secretary for 
        medication described in paragraph (1); or
            ``(B) an amount for any contraceptive item for which 
        coverage under health insurance coverage is required without 
        the imposition of any cost-sharing requirement pursuant to 
        section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 
        300gg-13(a)(4)).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08036]



[[Page 22202]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3211-010]


Power Authority of the State of New York; Notice of Reasonable 
Period of Time for Water Quality Certification Application

    On March 11, 2022, the Power Authority of the State of New York 
submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) 
evidence of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) 
water quality certification filed with New York State Department of 
Environmental Conservation (New York DEC), in conjunction with the 
above captioned project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act 
\1\ and section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,\2\ a state 
certifying agency is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if 
it fails or refuses to act on a certification request within a 
reasonable period of time, which is one year after the date the 
certification request was received. Accordingly, we hereby notify New 
York DEC of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).
    \2\ 18 CFR [4.34(b)(5)/5.23(b)/153.4/157.22].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date that New York DEC Received the Certification Request: March 
11, 2022.
    If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before March 11, 2023, then the agency 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: April 7, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08036 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                             WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
                        1993 MANAGEMENT STOCK OPTION PLAN

THIS AMENDMENT to the WestPoint Stevens Inc. 1993 Management Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan") is made the 9th day of August 2001 by WestPoint Stevens Inc. (the
"Company").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible
employees;

WHEREAS, the Company's Board of Directors has the authority to amend or modify
the Plan at any time and in any respect with certain limitations as stated in
the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as provided herein; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company, acting within its authority, has
approved the amendment of the Plan as provided herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.       Section VII. C. of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as
         follows:

                  VII. C. if the employment of any employee to whom such Option
         shall have been granted shall terminate by reason of the employee's
         retirement (which means normal retirement under the WestPoint Stevens
         Inc. Retirement Plan), voluntary termination for "good reason" (only if
         an employee is party to a written employment agreement with the Company
         or any subsidiary corporation or parent corporation of the Company,
         which provides for termination with "good reason," and such employee
         validly terminated his or her employment for "good reason," as such
         term is defined in the agreement ("Termination For Good Reason")), or
         dismissal by the employer other than for cause (as defined below), such
         option, unless otherwise specified by the Committee in such Option,
         shall immediately become exercisable and such employee shall have the
         right to exercise such Option in respect of any or all of such number
         of Shares as specified by the Committee in such Option, whether or not
         then exercisable at any time up to and including three (3) months after
         the date of such termination of employment by reason of Termination for
         Good Reason or dismissal other than for cause and up to and including
         one (1) year after the date of retirement; and

2.       Except as specified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and
         effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to
execute this Amendment effective on the date first written above.

                               WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

                               By:   /s/ Thomas M. Lane
                                   ----------------------------

                               Title: Senior Vice President & Treasurer
                                      ---------------------------------
Wilbur SENAT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7626.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Freddie WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5043.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2006147EN.01004901.xml

| 1.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 147/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 147/49

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 32/2006

of 10 March 2006

amending Annex VI (Social Security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 118/2005 of 30 September 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 118/2005 of 30 September 2005 (1).

| (2) | Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (2) is incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (2) is incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | The title of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 was amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1390/81 (3) extending it to self-employed persons and members of their families. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The title of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 was amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1390/81 (3) extending it to self-employed persons and members of their families.

| (4) | A new entry shall be made in Annex IIa to Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 with regard to Norway, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

A new entry shall be made in Annex IIa to Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 with regard to Norway,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in adaptation (m), heading ‘ZC. NORWAY’, in point 1 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71) of Annex VI to the Agreement:

| ‘(d) | Special benefits in accordance with the Act of 29 April 2005 No 21 on supplementary allowance to persons with short periods of residence in Norway.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(d)

Special benefits in accordance with the Act of 29 April 2005 No 21 on supplementary allowance to persons with short periods of residence in Norway.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 March 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 399, 22.12.2005, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 1).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 143, 29.5.1981, p. 1.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Quentery GATES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6262.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Saipen Cherdrum WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (the "Company") certifies
to his knowledge that:

      (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
          December 25, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (the "Act"); and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
          Form 10-K.

                                                   /s/ Alfred H. Drewes
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Alfred H. Drewes
                                                   Senior Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   February 25, 2005

The foregoing certification (the "Certification") is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of the Certification has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company in accordance with Rule 12b-11(d) of the Act and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Terrell JOYNER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-5087.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Terry BRIDGES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-8506.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
II-00126

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

unsil delange <udelange@khny.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 11:31 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

unsil delange

15 orlando ave

ardsley, NY 10502
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30198

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO VAZQUEZ-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CR-20030-1

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Vazquez-Gutierrez appeals from his bench-verdict

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

marijuana. He argues that the evidence produced at trial was

insufficient to prove his knowing participation in the

conspiracy. Vazquez-Gutierrez specifically refutes several of

the bases the district court relied upon when issuing the guilty

verdict.

After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to

the Government and deferring to all reasonable inferences drawn
No. 06-30198

-2-

by the trial court, the district court’s finding of guilt is

supported by substantial evidence. See United States v. Turner,

319 F.3d 716, 720-21 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Donald RUNNELS, petitioner, v. Presley BORDELON, Warden.

No. 17-5013.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral Partner.By:/s/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date:May 13, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Standard Management Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Ronald D. Hunter

Ronald D. HunterChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
# C_2012025EN.01002102.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/21

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission

(Case C-289/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Analysis, development, maintenance and support of telematic systems for the monitoring of products subject to excise duty - Rejection of the tender - Failure to state reasons for that rejection)

(2012/C 25/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2010 in Case T-50/05 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 18 November 2004 rejecting the appellant’s tender in a tendering procedure relating to the analysis, development, maintenance and support of telematic systems to control the movement of products subject to excise duty and awarding the contract to another tenderer

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

---