alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jennifer SMITH, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8598.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Ruben SANDIA, petitioner, v. WALMART STORES.

No. 17-8566.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

*2659Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Janio VICO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-684.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Winfred MILNER, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-6994.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
George HORNBERGER, petitioner, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., et al.

No. 17-29.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3227

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Antoine Williams,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo

____________

 Submitted: June 2, 2014

Filed: June 5, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Antoine Williams appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after he 1

pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Northern District of Iowa.
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the

appeal waiver in Williams’s plea agreement should not be enforced, and that the

district court erred in denying a downward-variance motion and recommending that

Williams’s sentence run consecutively to sentences imposed in his pending state

criminal cases. Williams has filed a pro se brief challenging his sentence and arguing

that his counsel was ineffective. 

We decline to consider Williams’s ineffective-assistance arguments on direct

appeal. See United States v. McAdory, 501 F.3d 868, 872-73 (8th Cir. 2007). As to

the remaining arguments asserted in this appeal, we enforce the appeal waiver. See

United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Finally,

having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988),

we find no non-frivolous issues outside the scope of the waiver. 

Accordingly, we decline to consider Williams’s ineffective-assistance

arguments on direct appeal, we dismiss this appeal based upon the appeal waiver in

Williams’s plea agreement, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
Jesus RAMIREZ-HIDALGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7793.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
# L_2008124EN.01003101.xml

| 8.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 164/2007

of 7 December 2007

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 145/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 145/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 653/2007 of 13 June 2007 on the use of a common European format for safety certificates and application documents in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and on the validity of safety certificates delivered under Directive 2001/14/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 653/2007 of 13 June 2007 on the use of a common European format for safety certificates and application documents in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and on the validity of safety certificates delivered under Directive 2001/14/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 42e (Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘42ea. | 32007 R 0653: Commission Regulation (EC) No 653/2007 of 13 June 2007 on the use of a common European format for safety certificates and application documents in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and on the validity of safety certificates delivered under Directive 2001/14/EC (OJ L 153, 14.6.2007, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘42ea.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 653/2007 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 100, 10.4.2008, p. 89.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 153, 14.6.2007, p. 9.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Terry ROYAL, Warden, petitioner, v. Patrick Dwayne MURPHY.

No. 17-1107.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERSTATE LAND INVESTORS II L.P. FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          (1,104)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,450,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,488,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          223,326
<BONDS>                                        202,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,062,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,488,389
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    61
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,709)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

TECHNEST HOLDINGS, INC.



I, Robert Tarini, Chief Executive Officer, Technest Holdings, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Technest Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [intentionally omitted];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and to the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: April 14, 2005

/s/ Robert Tarini
By:_________________________________________
Robert Tarini, CEO, Director
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2008053EN.01004901.xml

| 27.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 53/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 53/49

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters recording the common understanding renewing and modifying the Agreement on international cooperation on research and development activities in the domain of intelligent manufacturing systems (IMS) between the European Community and Australia, Canada, the EFTA countries of Norway and Switzerland, the Korea, Japan and the United States of America (1).

The aforementioned Agreement, in accordance with its point 7(2), has entered into force between the European Community and Japan, Korea, Norway and the United States of America on 4 January 2008.

---

(1)  See page 21 of this Official Journal.

1

---
Judson WITHAM, petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, et al.

No. 17-8216.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 15d-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Harry G. Kozee, Vice PresidentFinance, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer of IKON Receivables, LLC, the senior officer
in charge of securitization of the depositor/the senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of IKON Receivables, LLC; and all reports containing distribution information filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report;



2.
Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the governing documents of the issuer is included in these reports; and



4. Except as disclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its servicing obligations and minimum servicing standards.



Date: February 6, 2004



|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|/s/    HARRY G. KOZEE                                                                                 
|                                                                                                      
|Harry G. Kozee Vice President  Finance, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting
Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of


Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





Date:
      April 15, 2009
                
                
                /s/
      William Yan Sui HuiWilliam
      Yan Sui Hui, Chief Executive
Officer
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with TriOptima
  
    



  When
              10/28/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVI. Swap Data Repositories Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Jill SommersMarcia BlaseMike Otten

  Visitor(s)
              Raf PritchardErik Ulfhielm

  Organization(s)
              TriOptima


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Stacia CROMARTIE, petitioner, v. ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 17-8256.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund X, L.P.
RULE 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundX, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(3)) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004 /s/ DENNIS J TIETZDennis J TietzPresident of CCC(Chief Executive Officer)
Robert Gene BAILEY, petitioner, v. Joseph GARDNER, et al.

No. 17-8577.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Christopher SHANAHAN, et al., petitioners, v. Alexander LORA.

No. 15-1205.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of *Jennings v. Rodriguez,* 583 U.S ----, 138 S.Ct. 830, 200 L.E.2d 122 (2018).