alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael BOSTON, petitioner, v. G.R. JOHNSON, Warden, et al.

No. 17-8019.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# L_2005333EN.01005101.xml

| 20.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/51

---

DECISION No 1/2005 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN RELATION TO CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT, CERTIFICATES AND MARKINGS BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND AUSTRALIA

of 11 November 2005

related to giving effect to the listing of a conformity assessment body under the Sectoral Annex on automotive products

(2005/916/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on mutual recognition between the European Community and Australia and in particular Article 12,

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to giving effect to the listing of a conformity assessment body or bodies under a Sectoral Annex,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The conformity assessment body in the Annex is added to the list of conformity assessment bodies in Section II of the Sectoral Annex on automotive products. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the conformity assessment body indicated in the Annex has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Signed in Canberra, 11 November 2005.

On behalf of Australia

Brian PHILLIPS

Signed in Brussels, 21 October 2005.

On behalf of the European Community

Andra KOKE

---

ANNEX

Germany conformity assessment body added to the list of conformity assessment bodies in Section II of the Sectoral Annex on automotive products

| DEKRA Automobil GmbH |
| --- |
| Technology Center |
| Automobil Test Center |
| Senftenberger Straße 30 |
| D-01998 Klettwitz |
| Tel. (49-35754) 73 44 500 |
| Fax (49-35754) 73 45 500 |

Technology Center

Automobil Test Center

Senftenberger Straße 30

D-01998 Klettwitz

Tel. (49-35754) 73 44 500

Fax (49-35754) 73 45 500

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0136 IN THE MATTER OF: M.L.R.M.R., Respondent and Appellant.
**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Jan Hansen Barry is granted an extension of time to and including June 22 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 4 2021

05/04/2021
Dominic Xavier McDONALD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Adem ALBRA, petitioner.

No. 16-9641.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 31.2
 Principal Financial Officers Certifications
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC; and
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 Date: May 3, 2010
    
    /s/ Thomas N. Hund

Thomas N. HundExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Celia D. CHEE-WAH, petitioner, v. Henry MAURER, et al.

No. 17-48.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Lisa BELYEW, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, BUTTE COUNTY, et al.

No. 17-7244.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
Thomas R. OKRIE, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 17-34.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Michael B. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Debbie PHILIPS.

No. 16-9617.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
George SNELSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Keishan H. ENIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6340.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
Christine M. LUCAS, petitioner, v. Carrie WARD, et al.

No. 17-6522.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit





EXHIBIT 4.2



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
OF COMSCORE, INC.


comScore, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:


FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment (the “Amendment”) of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring the Amendment to be advisable and submitting the Amendment at a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for consideration thereof.  


SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolutions of the Board, an annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held on May 30, 2018, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute and the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation were voted in favor of approval of the Amendment.


THIRD: That Section A.1 of Article IV of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended and restated in full as follows:


A. Capital Stock.


1. This Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock, to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.”  The total number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue is One Hundred and Fifty-Five Million (155,000,000) shares.  One Hundred and Fifty Million (150,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share.


FOURTH: That the Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by an authorized officer of the Corporation this 30th day of May, 2018.


	
	
	By:       /s/ Carol A. DiBattiste

	Name:  Carol A. DiBattiste

	Title:    Corporate Secretary
# C_2009090EN.01003402.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/34

---

Action brought on 17 February 2009 — hofherr communikation v OHIM (NATURE WATCH)

(Case T-77/09)

2009/C 90/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: hofherr communikation GmbH (Innsbruck, Austria) (represented by S. Warbek, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 December 2008 in case R 1410/2008-1 and allow registration of the trade mark applied for; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 December 2008 in case R 1410/2008-1 and allow registration of the trade mark applied for; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the legal costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the legal costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “NATURE WATCH” for goods and services in classes 9, 39, 41 and 43 — international registration No WOO 957 541

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal to register the mark applied for as a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that the trade mark applied for is a descriptive one and, furthermore, that the trade mark applied for lacks distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1st Quarter 2000 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000853086
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,286
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                   416
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7
<PP&E>                                         46,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          872
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,402
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,968
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (18)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                534
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   534
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Juan Martin TORRES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy's Subcommittee on Technology, Innovation and Partnerships hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE:

Monday, April 18, 2022, from 11:15 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The agenda is: Subcommittee Chair's Opening Remarks; Approval of Minutes from February 11, 2022; and Discussion of Technology, Innovation, and                               ( print page 22238)                            Partnerships Programmatic Plans and Budget Scenarios.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-08054 Filed 4-12-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, June 27, 2001, 1 p.m. to June 29, 2001, 5 p.m. Nat. Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, South Campus, Building 101, Conference Room B, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 7, 2001, FR 66: 30742.                

The meeting will be held on July 15, 2001 from 7 p.m. to July 18, 2001 at 5 p.m. at the Hawthorne Suites, Meredith Drive, Durham, NC. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-16345  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Ricky D. WEBSTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5830.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
In Re Nina Eva HAJDA, petitioner.

No. 16-1537.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 23

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-112578 on FormS-3/A and in Registration Statement No. 333-120919 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated March 17, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of GenTek Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (whichexpressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financialstatement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption(1) Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Interpretation No. 48, “*Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- aninterpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*” as of January 1, 2007which changed the accounting for uncertain tax positions; (2) the recognitionand disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards(“SFAS”) No. 158, *Employer’s Accounting forDefined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an Amendment of FASBStatements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)* as of December 31, 2006, whichchanged its method of accounting for pension and postretirement benefits; and(3) SFAS No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*,as of January 1, 2006, which changed its method of accounting for stock-basedcompensation) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte& Touche LLP
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

POM OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AND CITY

OF PHILADELPHIA

APPEAL OF: PENNSYLVANIA GAMING

CONTROL BOARD :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 11 EAP 2023

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: July 21, 2023

AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2023

, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See

42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (limiting this Court’s jurisdiction to “appeals from final orders of the

Commonwealth Court entered in any matter which was originally commenced in the

Commonwealth Court”); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1) (defining a final order as one that “disp oses

of all claims and of all parties”) ; Pa.R.Civ.P. 232(a) (“A discontinuance or nonsuit shall

not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a counterclaim theretofore filed.”). Cf.

Melvin v. Doe , 836 A.2d 42, 44 n.4 (Pa. 2003) (“[A]n order denying a motion for summary

judgment does not terminate the liti gation, and thus is not an appealable order.”).

The Application for Leave to File Answer to Jurisdictional Statement Nunc Pro

Tunc is DISMISSED as moot.
Douglas M. MANTICH, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 16-9419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
Keshawn CARTER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-5066.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 December 2010 – Longevity Health Products v OHIM – Gruppo Lepetit (RESVEROL)**

**(Case T-363/09)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark RESVEROL – Earlier international word mark LESTEROL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 23, 32-33)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2009 (Case R 1204/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Gruppo Lepetit SpA and Longevity Health Products, Inc. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Longevity Health Products, Inc. |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark RESVEROL for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 – Application No 5244512 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Gruppo Lepetit SpA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National trade mark registrations of the mark LESTEROL for goods in Class 5 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc., to pay the costs. |
Sharon BOLTON, petitioner, v. CITY OF HATTIESBURG, MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-1155.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.