alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009297EN.01002301.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/23

---

Action brought on 30 September 2009 — ERGO Versicherungsgruppe v OHIM — DeguDent (ERGO)

(Case T-382/09)

2009/C 297/34

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ERGO Versicherungsgruppe AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde and J. Pause, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DeguDent GmbH (Hanau on Main, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 July 2009 in Case R 44/2008-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 July 2009 in Case R 44/2008-4;

| — | Order the defendant or, in the case of an intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the defendant, the intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant or, in the case of an intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the defendant, the intervener to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: ERGO Versicherungsgruppe AG

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ERGO’ for goods and services in Classes 1 to 45 (Application No 3 292 638)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: DeguDent GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The German word mark No 39 832 880 and the Community trade mark No 1 064 674‘CERGO’ for goods in Class 10, the opposition being brought only against the registration for goods in Classes 5 and 10

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of the first sentence of Article 42(5) in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 64(1) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), since the Board of Appeal did not fully decide on the appeal;

Pleas in law:

1

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Paul H. VOLKMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8614.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2007209EN.01003201.xml

| 9.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 18/2007

of 27 April 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 6/2006 of 27 January 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 6/2006 of 27 January 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2006/340/EC of 8 May 2006 amending Decision 2001/171/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for the purpose of prolonging the validity of the conditions for a derogation for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2006/340/EC of 8 May 2006 amending Decision 2001/171/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for the purpose of prolonging the validity of the conditions for a derogation for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 7d (Commission Decision 2001/171/EC) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32006 D 0340: Commission Decision 2006/340/EC of 8 May 2006 (OJ L 125, 12.5.2006, p. 43).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32006 D 0340: Commission Decision 2006/340/EC of 8 May 2006 (OJ L 125, 12.5.2006, p. 43).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2006/340/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 April 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 92, 30.3.2006, p. 26.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 125, 12.5.2006, p. 43.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Maurice Lovell ANDERSON, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 17-5057.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,421)
<INVENTORY>                                     28,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,111
<PP&E>                                          61,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,853)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,337
<BONDS>                                        205,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,326
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,004)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,692
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,351
<CGS>                                           81,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,319
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,962)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1776
JOHN S. COATES, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94- 2966-L) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John S. Coates, III, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Diane M. Lank, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for partial dismissal, or, in the alternative, forsummary judgment on his complaint alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coates v. Shalala , No. CA-94-2966-L (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

|A PARTNERSHIPOFINCORPORATEDPROFESSIONALS | AMISANO
      HANSON
|---------------------------------------- | --------------------
|                                         | CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-138218) of Sense Technologies Inc., of
our report dated June 12, 2007 relating to the financial statements of Sense
Technologies Inc., which appears in the Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern.



|Vancouver, Canada | AMISANO HANSON     
|----------------- | ---------------------
|July 13, 2007     | Chartered Accountants





750 WEST PENDER STREET, SUITE 604
    TELEPHONE:
    604-689-0188VANCOUVER CANADA
    FACSIMILE:
    604-689-9773V6C 2T7
    E-MAIL:
    amishan@telus.net


---
Frank CAIRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6761.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

*2701Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
David Savoy THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's unaudited financial reports and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,258,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,416,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,563,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,807,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       697,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,807,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,379,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,738,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,904,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (24,413,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (24,413,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (25,057,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.66)

        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          91,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,435
<PP&E>                                       1,000,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 308,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,318,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          365,747
<BONDS>                                        588,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,831
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,318,233
<SALES>                                         73,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,672
<CGS>                                           98,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,204,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,466,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,692,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,692,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,692,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.15)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K&F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dirkson
R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act Of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
-----------------------------
Dirkson R. Charles
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6642

DIVINE SCIENTIFIC ALLAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. HARDY, L.P.N. Nurse; J. RHODES, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-477-AM) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Divine Scientific Allah, Appellant Pro Se. Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The order from which Allah appeals was filed on April 8, 1998, and entered on the district court’s docket on April 9, 1998, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Divine Scientific Allah appeals the district court’s orderdenying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allah v. Hardy , No. CA-97- 477-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R APHAEL C ARR

ASC O, a .k.a . R a fa e l C arra sc o , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50423

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-00730-ODW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Otis D. W

right, II, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 ** B e fore : WALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . R a pha e l C arra s c o a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 1 35-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c o nvic tion for c onspira c y

to distribute

m e tha m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . § 846. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), C arra sc o’ s c ounse l ha s file d 

# FIL ED D EC 16 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f and ha s m ove d to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d C arra sc o the opportunity to filea pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l; the re fore , we a ffirm the se nte n c e . The re c ord re fle c ts tha t C arra sc o ple a de d guilty

only to c onspira c y

to distribute

m e tha m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . § 846. Ac c ordingly , we re m and the c a se to the distric t c ourt with instructions tha t it de l e te from the judgm e nt the re fe re nc e to he roin. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D; RE M ANDE D for c or r e c tion of the judgm e nt.

1 3 - 5 0 4 2 3 2
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Phoenix Partners
  
    



  Discussions concerning SEFs.
      
  When
              01/15/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Mark Wetjen

  Visitor(s)
              Nick StephanJohn Bolton Marcos BrodskyGraham Smith Stuart EveredJustin Lada

  Organization(s)
              Phoenix Partners


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Tac TRAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8747.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.