alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010113EN.01001802.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/18

---

Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-200/07 to T-202/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (222)

(Case C-55/10 P)

2010/C 113/28

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: D. Rzążewska, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-200/07 to T-202/07; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-200/07 to T-202/07;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 7(1)(c) of the Community trade mark regulation (1) by applying incorrect legal criteria when finding that the trade marks belonging to the appellant do not qualify for registration.

1

The appellant further pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 7(1)(c) or 76 of the Community trade mark regulation, or both of those provisions, by not taking due account of OHIM’s practice relating to the registration of signs consisting of figures or indicating the content of a publication.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
# L_2006289EN.01003801.xml

| 19.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 95/2006

of 7 July 2006

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 71/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 71/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 317/2006 of 22 December 2005 establishing for 2005 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 317/2006 of 22 December 2005 establishing for 2005 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 4ac (Commission Regulation (EC) No 912/2004) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

| ‘4ad. | 32006 R 0317: Commission Regulation (EC) No 317/2006 of 22 December 2005 establishing for 2005 the “Prodcom list” of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (OJ L 60, 1.3.2006, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4ad.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 317/2006 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 245, 7.9.2006, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 60, 1.3.2006, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT NO.5 TO LETTER OF INTENT


 


mPhase Technologies, Inc.


688 New Dorp Lane,


Staten Island, New York 10306-4933


 


June 21, 2018


 


Scepter Commodities, LLC


9841 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 390


Gaithersburg, MD 20878


 


Attention: Anshu Bhatnagar


 


Re:      Amendment
No. 5 to Letter of Intent (“LOI”)


 


Dear Anshu:


 


This Amendment No.5 (the
“Amendment”) to our LOI Intent dated December 29, 2017, as amended on February 15, 2018, March 31, 2018, April 3, 2018
and May 30, 2018 hereby amends the LOI as follows:


 


1.         The
date on or before which we, mPhase Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) will complete its outstanding reports with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) shall be July 15, 2018


 


2.         All
other terms shall remain intact.


 


THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK


SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW


 






    	 		 



     


    

 


 


Please indicate your acceptance of the terms outlined in this Amendment.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


	/s/ Martin Smiley	 	 


Martin Smiley


CFO and General Counsel of mPhase Technologies, Inc.


on behalf of the Sellers.


 





	 /s/ Ronald Durando	 	 
	Ronald Durando 	 	 
	President and CEO	 	 
	mPhase Technologies, Inc.	 	 


 


Accepted and Agreed To:





	/s/ Anshu Bhatnager	 	 
	Anshu Bhatnager	 	 
	Scepter Commodities LLC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 22-11]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by Aeneas Exporting LLC, hereinafter “Complainant”, against Honeybee International Inc. and All America Shipping, hereinafter “Respondents”. Complainant alleges that Respondents are California corporations and an ocean common carrier, non-vessel-operating common carrier, ocean freight forwarder, and ocean transportation intermediary.

                    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) and 41104(a)(3), 46 CFR 545.4, and “Fraud and Coercion” regarding the receipt, handling, storing, and delivery of vehicles and assessment of charges and fees. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *https://www2.fmc.gov/​readingroom/​proceeding/​22-11/​.*

This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding shall be issued by April 10, 2023, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by October 24, 2023.

Served: April 8, 2022.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-07870 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000852220
<NAME> ALLSTATE FINANCIAL CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1911073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 44670422
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4790451
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              45029181
<PP&E>                                         1269599
<DEPRECIATION>                                  837546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                47990355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         22784928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         40000
<OTHER-SE>                                    20204527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  47990355
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6023681
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5031086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5458000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              859155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5324560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (1970087)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3354473)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3354473)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.44)
        


</TABLE>
II-00565

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Niskanen <adsthere@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:41 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Niskanen

4295 Sunbeam Rd.

Jacksonville, FL 32257
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
the consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of income filed as
part of the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q/A and is qualified in its entireby by
reference to such quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000853102
<NAME>                                         Day Runner, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         25,253
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  57,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                    8,654
<INVENTORY>                                    44,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              130,191
<PP&E>                                         42,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                 24,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                236,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36,899
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           14
<OTHER-SE>                                     79,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  236,911
<SALES>                                       112,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              112,296
<CGS>                                          58,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  58,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               43,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,491
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             5,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5,699
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.45



</TABLE>
# C_2011311EN.01001301.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/13

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova — Romania) — Administrația Finanțelor Publice a Municipiului Târgu-Jiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu v Claudia Norica Vijulan

(Case C-335/10) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph of the Rules of Procedure - Domestic taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax levied at the time of registration of motor vehicles)

2011/C 311/18

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Craiova

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Administrația Finanțelor Publice a Municipiului Târgu-Jiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

Applicants:

Defendant: Claudia Norica Vijulan

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Curtea de Apel Craiova — Registration of second-hand cars previously registered in other Member States — Environmental tax levied on motor vehicles at the time of their first registration in a given Member State — Compatibility of the national legislation with Art. 110 TFEU — Temporary exemption for vehicles having certain characteristics

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax levied on motor vehicles at the time of their first registration in that Member State, where that tax measure is designed to discourage putting second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States into circulation in that Member State, without discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of comparable age and use on the domestic market.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 09.10.2010.

1

---
II-Ol060

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kalmon Kaufer <kjtal 1 @gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kalmon Kaufer

9811 E. Sutton Dr.

Scottsdale, AZ 85260-4430
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of IKON Receivables, LLC and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,538,059<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,635,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,267,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     363,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,635,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>

<FN>
<F1>Includes Net Investments in leases of $1,484,435 and other accounts
receivable.
<F2>Not required as the Registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>

</TABLE>
William Nathaniel WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. Marc DIAMOND.

No. 17-8218.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
DERIVATIVES- TITLE VII Dodd Frank Act 

Background- The Dodd-Frank Act (DF A) imposes broad-based changes on the use of derivatives by 

the fmancial services sector, including their growing use by community banks. It is possible that DF A 

implementing regulations could negatively impact community banks that use swaps (derivatives). 

Uses of Derivatives by Community Banks (swaps)- Community banks' use low-risk, plain vanilla 

interest rate swaps either to hedge their own risks or serve the needs of their customers related to loans. 

In serving their customer's loan needs, a community bank swap typically is designed to convert a 

variable rate loan into fixed-rate financing. These swaps are "customized" to match the underlying loan 

for GAAP accounting purposes. The customization could include a specific notional or dollar amount; 

tying the loan to a specific index; establishing monthly payment terms or other basic aspects. Because 

the swaps are customized, they are not yet accepted by the exchanges and therefore trade in the Over-

'T't..e ~"-+e~ fQ'T'r<\ ~arK1 e+ 1.11 -vVUlH 1. 1._ 1. v J J.H L. 

Concerns Regulators' Proposals 

• Capital and Margin - Regulatory agencies are erroneously concluding that all OTC swaps are 

automatically "riskier" than swaps accepted on exchanges. Regulators have cited the example of 

AIG and their use of credit default swaps (CDS) to justifY this position. However, community 

banks do not use CDS swaps, which are insurance products. Community banks use low-risk 

interest rate swaps (IRS), similar to the "plain-vanilla" IRSs cleared by the exchanges. 

• The regulators propose to prohibit the repledging of initial margin (rehypothecation) pledged 

from the cow..mwity baP..k to a mid-level swap dealer from that swap dealer to the counterparty on 

the other side of the swap transaction. 

• The prohibition on rehypothecation means mid-level swap dealers serving community banks would 

have to have their own capital and margin for each swap arranged for community banks. This 

results in pools of"dead" capital, costly capital that is not economically productive. The result will 

be that those who serve the community bank market will exit the market leaving community banks 

without access to the OTC swaps market. Many customers will leave community banks and opt for 

the services of larger financial players. 

• The prohibition of rehypothecation, in the absence of an exchange that accepts community bank 

interest rate swaps, is the death knell for community bank access to the swaps market and needs to 

be adjusted to focus on the truly risky swaps in the OTC market instead of on all swaps. 

• Origination of Loans Exemption -The regulators propose to exenipt the swaps that banks arrange 

in connection with the "origination" of loans for their customers from causing banks to be 

considered as swap dealers. This exemption is too narrow as swaps may be implemented before or 

after loan origination. Without broader flexibility, community banks could be considered swap 

dealers.