alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00833

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marianne Bongolan <mbongolan@gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:01 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Marianne Bongolan

69 Wiman Ave

Staten Island, NY 10308
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, I, Eric M. Reuter,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Laserscope, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
               September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and
        (2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
               for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Laserscope.



Date:  November 13, 2002               By:   /s/  Eric M. Reuter
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Eric M. Reuter
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2010113EN.01001701.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/17

---

Appeal brought on 1 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-298/06: gencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-51/10 P)

2010/C 113/25

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Case T-298/2006 |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Case T-298/2006

| — | Refer the case back to the General Court |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the General Court

| — | Order OHMI to bear the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHMI to bear the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant claims that the Court of First Instance violated Article 7 (1) (c) CTMR (1) in the it applied erroneous legal criteria in determining that the Appellant's mark was not registrable.

1

The Appellant further claims that the Court of First Instance violated Article 7 (1) (c) CTMR or Article 76 CTMR, or both of these provisions, in not taken proper account of the practice of OHMI as regards registration of marks consisting of numerals or indication the content of publications.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark

1

OJ L 11, p. 1

---
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Rene SANCHEZ-GOMEZ, et al.

No. 17-312.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Motion of respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez for appointment of counsel granted, and Ellis M. Johnston, III, Esquire, of San Diego, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez in this case.
William L. VAUGHN, petitioner, v. James M. HOLLOWAY, Warden.

No. 17-7661.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Michael Alexander RIVERA, petitioner, v. INFERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles County.

No. 17-8128.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Zbigniew ROZBICKI, petitioner, v. CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL.

No. 17-1401.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Order filed July 22, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01132

- CV

____________ JOHNNY COLLUMS AND T INA COLLUMS , Appellant s
V.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1007240



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed January 8, 2014 . Our review has determined
that relevant item s ha ve been om itted from the clerk's record. The record does not
contain documents necessary to demonstrate the ju dgment being appealed is final

. Accordingly, we issue the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c).
The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on
or before August 1, 2014 , containing the following:1. Appellant’s motion fo r partial nonsuit of claims against Stockman Motor,

Inc. d/b/a Select Ford Mercury filed on or about August 16, 2013; and
2. The order granting a non

- suit of claims against Stockman Motor, Inc. d/b/a Select Ford Mercury signed on or about August 21, 2013

. If any omitted item is not part of the case file, the county clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Charles Russell RHINES, petitioner, v. SOUTH DAKOTA.

No. 17-8791.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLYOD'S OF LONDON, petitioner, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of Omni National Bank, et al.

No. 17-1451.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-01132

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Earle Kasregis <ekasregis@roadrunner.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Earle Kasregis

223 Roxbury Notch Rd.

Roxbury, ME 4275
Tito Lamont ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Justin ANDREWS, Warden.

No. 17-8547.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Vardan ABRAMYAN, petitioner, v. David BAUGHMAN, Warden.

No. 17-7530.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Joan LaRae CARRAFA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-8147.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Jonathan Perez DUENAS, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-8484.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Call with NFA
  
    



  Discussions concerning registration process and requirements.
      
  When
              07/27/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              I. Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph CisewskiTerry ArbitScott Reinhart

  Visitor(s)
              Thomas Sexton

  Organization(s)
              NFA


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Santiago RIOS, petitioner, v. Scott LEWIS, Warden.

No. 17-7470.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

*1298Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Richard BROWN, Warden, petitioner, v. Dentrell BROWN.

No. 17-887.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

           BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V
                         (A Limited Partnership)


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. V (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.




                                       /s/Gary Mentesana
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Gary Mentesana
                                       Principal Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
                                       Arch Street VIII, Inc, as
                                       Managing General Partner of
                                       Boston Financial Qualified
                                       Housing Tax Credits L.P. V


                                       Date:  November 14, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTION

Notice is hereby given of the following option grant (the "Option") to purchase shares of the Common Stock of Borland Software Corporation (the "Corporation"):

Optionee:

Grant Date:

Vesting Commencement Date:

Exercise Price:  $ _________ per share

Number of Option Shares:  __________ shares

Expiration Date:



|Type of Option: |  | Incentive Stock Option    
|--------------- |  | --------------------------
|                |  | Non-Statutory Stock Option

Exercise Schedule:  The Option shall become exercisable for twenty-five percent (25%) of the Option Shares upon Optionee's completion of one (1) year of Service measured from the Vesting Commencement Date and shall become exercisable for the balance of the Option Shares in a series of thirty-six (36) successive equal monthly installments upon Optionee's completion of each additional month of Service over the thirty-six (36) month period measured from the first anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date.  In no event shall the Option become exercisable for any additional Option Shares after Optionee's cessation of Service.

Optionee understands and agrees that the Option is granted subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Borland Software Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan").  Optionee further agrees to be bound by the terms of the Plan and the terms of the Option as set forth in the Stock Option Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.  Optionee hereby acknowledges the receipt of electronic delivery of the official prospectus for the Plan.  A copy of the Plan is available upon request made to the Corporate Secretary at the Corporation's principal offices.

Employment At Will.  Nothing in this Notice or in the attached Stock Option Agreement or in the Plan shall confer upon Optionee any right to continue in Service for any period of specific duration or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing or retaining Optionee) or of the Optionee, which rights are hereby expressly reserved by each, to terminate Optionee's Service at any time for any reason, with or without cause.

Definitions.  All capitalized terms in this Notice shall have the meaning assigned to them in this Notice or in the attached Stock Option Agreement.

DATED: __________________



|BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
|----------------------------
|                            
|By:                         
|                            
|                            
|Title:                      
|                            
|                            
|                            
|OPTIONEE                    
|                            
|Signature:                  
|                            
|                            
|Address:                    
|                            
|                            
|                            

ATTACHMENTSStock Option Agreement
Timothy L. DuFOUR, petitioner, v. Tom McGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 16-9597.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,239,047
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,604,959
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,211,226
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,202,452
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,142,493
<LOANS>                                     58,196,277
<ALLOWANCE>                                    968,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,754,097
<DEPOSITS>                                  68,307,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,946,777
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,324,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       423,364
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,752,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              84,754,097
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,584,020
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              244,488
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,828,508
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             649,956
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             725,600
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,102,907
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   75,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                765,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                486,831
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     309,542
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   309,542
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.64
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   233,895
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               914,266
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   29,334
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,593
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              968,525
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           968,525
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Katherine S. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 17-7522.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William ROBINSON, et al., petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, et al.

No. 17-1448.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Karl R. Wyss, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Thermadyne Capital Corp. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2002

                                        /s/      Karl R. Wyss
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Karl R. Wyss
                                        Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                        Executive Officer of the Company