FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEV EN T HC IRC U IT FEB RUARY 23, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 13366 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 4 - 0 0 4 9 6 - C R - T - 2 7 - E AJ U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s J O H N B A R R I O S , a .k .a . D J L o o p s , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( F e b r u ar y 23, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , C A RN E S an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: O n M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 0 5 , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t a c c e p te d ap p e lla n t’s p le a o f g u ilty toTh eGo vernment a rgue s th at w elac k ju

ri sdic tio n toentertain t

hisa pp e al be c a

us e 1 a p p e ll ant’ s s enten c e s w eren o t b e lo wth eGuide lin e s s enten c eran g e . Un it e d St ate s v . M artin e z, No . 0 5- 12 70 6 ( de c ide d Jan ua ry 9, 20 05 ) ( 11 th C ir . 2 00 5) fo re c los e s this a rgument. 2 tw o c o u n ts o f

a th ir te e n - c o u n t in d ic tm e n t: C o u n t O n e , c o n s p ir a c y to p o s s e s s w ith i nt entt o d i stri bu t e M ethyl enedi ox ym etham ph et am i ne (“ M D M A ”) , kn ow n as

“ e c s t a s y , ” i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . § 846, a nd C ountF i ve , pos s e s s i on w i th i nt e nt t o di s tr i but e M D M A , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . § 841( a ) ( 1) . O n J une 7, 2005, the c o u r t, h a v in g d e te r m in e d th a t ap p e lla n t is a c a r e e ro f f e n d e ru n d e rU .S .S .G . § 4 B 1 .1 , s e n te n c e d h im to c o n c u rr e n t p r is o n te r m s o f 1 5 1 m o n th s . H e n o w ap p e a ls hi s s e nt e nc e s a s unr e a s onabl e on tw o gr ounds . F i r s t , the c our ts houl d notha ve tre at ed hi m as a c ar ee r off ender because hi s pre vi ou s off ense s ( on w hi ch hi s c ar ee r o f f e n d e rs t a tu s w a s b a s e d ) o v e rr e p r e s e n t e d h i s p r o p e n s i ty f o rr e c i d i v i s m; m o r e o v e r , ap p r o p r ia te c o n s id e r a tio n o f th e s e n te n c in g p u rp o s e s o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 3553( a ) r e qui r e d a l e s s e rs e nt e nc e . S e c ond, i n de t e r m i ni ng hi s s e nt e nc e r a nge un der the G ui del i nes, the courtshou l d h ave r educed hi s off ense l evel un der U . S . S . G . § 3B 1. 2 be c a us e he w a s l e s s c ul pabl e tha n hi s c o- c ons pi r a t or s . W e f i nd 1 n o m eri ti n ei th er g ro u n d an d th erefo re affirm ap p el l an t ’ s sen t en ces. I n de t e r m i ni ng w he the ra s e nt e nc e i s unr e a s onabl e , w e f i r s tde t e r m i ne w hether the di stri ctcourtcorr ec t l y det erm i ned the se nt ence ra ng e the G ui del i nes p r e s c r ib e s . U n ite d S ta te s v . C r a w f o r d , 4 0 7 F .3 d 1 1 7 4 , 1 1 7 8 - 7 9 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) .These c onvictions werehanded down by threeFlorida

circuit courts – in Brow ard, 2 Seminole, and Ora

ng e counties. 3 G i ve n appe l l a nt ’ s c r i m i na l r e c or d – w hi c h i s e xt e ns i ve – w e c oul d notf a ul tthe c our tf ortr e a t i ng appe l l a nta s a c a r e e rof f e nde runde rU . S . C . G . § 4B 1. 1. A nd, s in c e U n ite d S ta te s v . J e te r , 3 2 9 F .3 d 1 2 2 9 , 1 2 3 0 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) , in s tru c ts th a t a c a r e e rof f e nde rm a y notr e c e i ve a r ol e a dj us tm e ntunde rU . S . S . G . § 3B 1. 2, the courtcom m i tt ed no error i n ref usi ng t o adj ustappel l ant ’ s off ense l evel do w nw ar d f orhi s r ol e i n the c r i m i na l a c t i vi ty . I n s um , the c our tc orr e c t l y appl i e d the G u i d el i n es. O nc e w e c onc l ude tha tthe G ui de l i ne s w e r e c orr e c t l y appl i e d, w e de t e r m i ne w h e th e rth e c o u r t c o n s id e r e d th e s e n te n c in g p u rp o s e s o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) ( 2 ) . A pp el l antsa ys thata proper consi dera t i on of tho se pu rposes w ou l d h ave y i el ded l e s s e rs e nt e nc e s tha n the one s he r e c e i ve d. W e a r e notpe r s ua de d. W hen w e t ake i nt o acc ou ntthati ncl ud ed i n app el l ant ’ s c ri m i nal hi st ory w er e c o n v ic tio n s f

o rth r e e d ru g - r e la te d o f

f e n s e s –p o s s e s s io n o f

c o c a in e , tr a f

f ic k in g in p h e n e th y la m in e s , a n d d e a lin g in M D M A ; th a t ap p e lla n t c o m m itte d th e C o u n ts 2 On e a n d F i v e o f

f e n s e s wh i l e s e r v i n g s e n t e n c e s o f p r o b a t i o n f

o rth e l a tt e rtwo o f f e n s e s ; a n d th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t o b v io u s ly c o n c lu d e d th a t th e s e n te n c e s it ha nde d dow n s e r ve d the s pe c i f i c de t e rr e nc e purpos e s of § 3553( a ) ( 2) ( A ) , ( B ) , a nd (C ) – es p ec iall y ( C ), th e n ee d to p ro tect th e p u b li c f ro m th e d ef

en d an t’ s4

p ro n o u n ce d p ro p en sity to co m m itcr im in al ac ts, w e m u st co n clu d e th at ap p ellan t’ s se nt ence s, w hi ch ar e a tthe bo tt om of the pres cr i bed G ui del i nes s ent ence ra ng e, ar e no tun re as on abl e. AF F I RME D.