alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of operations 
filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period 
Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           368,658
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          52
<MORTGAGE>                                         397
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    2,334
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 395,442
<CASH>                                           3,164
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              68,594
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          19,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 669,396
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                437,748
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,677
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 26,024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,646
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   669,396
<PREMIUMS>                                       5,277
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             21,926
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 287
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,420
<BENEFITS>                                       5,945
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,544
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,694
<INCOME-TAX>                                       779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II-00198

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Carol Baldwin <baldwin.c@att.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 7:06 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Carol Baldwin

1329 W 8th Street

Corona, CA 92882
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
NeoGenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                  April
      13, 2009
                  
                  /s/Robert P.
      GaspariniRobert
      P. GaspariniPresident
      and Chief Science OfficerDate:
                  April
      13, 2009
                  
                  /s/Steven C.
      JonesSteven
      C. JonesActing
      Principal Financial OfficerDate:
                  April
      13, 2009
                  
                  /s/Jerome J.
      DvonchJerome
      J. DvonchDirector
      of Finance and Principal
                    Accounting
      Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
John Michael WOODRUFF, petitioner, v. Kayla CROCKETT, et al.

No. 17-7923.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-50024 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ERIKA MADERA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-1653-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appo i n ted to represent Erika Madera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and U n ited States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Madera has n o t filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-50024 Document: 00512420192 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013No. 13-50024

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-50024 Document: 00512420192 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
# C_2011252EN.01001001.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/10

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA

(Case C-369/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Community word mark MEMORY - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c))

2011/C 252/18

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ravensburger AG (represented by: H. Harte-Bavendamm and M. Goldmann, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Educa Borras SA

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-108/09 Ravensburger v OHIM, by which the Court dismissed the action brought against Decision R 305/2008-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 January 2009, dismissing the appeal brought against the Cancellation Division’s decision which declares the word mark ‘MEMORY’ invalid, in respect of goods in Classes 9 and 28, in the context of the application for a declaration of invalidity filed by Educa Borras

Ravensburger

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
Zuleyka Jeanette COLON-RIVERA, aka Mia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9021.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
E.F., a Minor, By and Through His Parents, Eric FULSANG, et ux., et al., petitioners, v. NEWPORT MESA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 16-1533.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*170On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE-1,* 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 988, 197 L.Ed.2d 335 (2017).
Leonard HERRINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         117,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,020,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,268,420
<PP&E>                                         131,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,561,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,930,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,449,324
<OTHER-SE>                                   (231,207)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,561,813
<SALES>                                        671,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               971,420
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (680,114)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,619)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,619)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,619)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.009)
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 525 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4135 

[Report No. 116–640] 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the statue to the memory 

and in honor of Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the District 

of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Additional sponsors: Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. RUSH, and Mr. 

LOWENTHAL

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on July 30, 2019] 

2 

•HR 4135 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the statue 

to the memory and in honor of Albert Pike erected 

near Judiciary Square in the District of Columbia, and 

for other purposes. 

3 

•HR 4135 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF STATUE OF ALBERT PIKE. 

4 (a) REMOVAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting 

5 through the Director of the National Park Service, shall re6 move the statue to the memory and in honor of Albert Pike 

7 erected near Judiciary Square in the District of Columbia 

8 under the ‘‘Joint Resolution Granting permission for the 

9 erection of a monument or statue in Washington City, Dis10 trict of Columbia, in honor of the late Albert Pike.’’, ap11 proved April 9, 1898 (30 Stat. 737). 

12 (b) RELOCATION.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

13 donate the statue to a museum or other similar entity, as 

14 determined appropriate by the Secretary, to ensure its pres15 ervation and interpretation in an indoor setting. The re16 cipient of the statue may not store, display, or exhibit the 

17 statue outside. 

Union Calendar No. 525 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4135 

[Report No. 116–640] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove 

trict of Columbia, and for other purposes. Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the Disthe statue to the memory and in honor of Albert 

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5






625 WESTPORT PKWY., GRAPEVINE, TX. 76051  P: 817 424 2000  F: 817 424 2002




May 31, 2018


Mr. Daniel A. DeMatteo
625 Westport Parkway
Grapevine, Texas 76051
RE:    Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement
Dear Dan:
This letter agreement (this “Amendment”) amends the Executive Employment Agreement dated May 10, 2013, as amended March 1, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”) between you (“Executive”) and GameStop Corp. (the “Company”) as follows:
The reference to “$400,000” in Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby changed to “$500,000,” effective May 31, 2018.
For the avoidance of doubt, your bonus opportunity for fiscal year 2018 will be determined as a weighted average of: (i) for the portion of fiscal year 2018 preceding the date of this Amendment, your target annual bonus opportunity as in effect prior to the Amendment, and (ii) for the remaining portion of fiscal year 2018 commencing on the date of this Amendment, your target annual bonus opportunity as determined based upon the salary increase described herein. 
Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged.
To confirm your agreement with the foregoing, please countersign this Amendment in the space below provided.
GAMESTOP CORP.
	
			
	By:
	 
	/s/ Shane S. Kim

	Name:
	 
	Shane S. Kim

	Title:
	 
	Interim CEO






Agreed on May 31, 2018:


	
	
	/s/ Daniel A. DeMatteo

	Daniel A. DeMatteo
***Exhibit 31.2******CERTIFICATIONS***I, Larry T. Guillemette, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AMTROL Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 34-47986 and Release 34-49313);  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: August 11, 2005 By:  /s/LARRY T. GUILLEMETTE    Larry T. Guillemette    Executive Vice President, Chief
Martin RUBIO-MUNOZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5612.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with ISO
  
    



  Discussion of LE implementation issues.
      
  When
              05/03/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Andrei KirilenkoIrina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Karla McKenna (ISO)

  Organization(s)
              ISO


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000