alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 COMMUNITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
             STATEMENT REGARDING: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                                                    September 30,               September 30,
                                               ------------- ---------     ------------------------
                                                 1998          1997          1998           1997 
                                               ---------     ---------     ---------     ----------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>       
Basic Income Per Common Share (1)

Net income (in thousands)                      $     644     $     581     $   1,873     $    1,421
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========
Net income per share                           $     .26     $     .26     $     .80     $      .64
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding     2,457,131     2,205,468     2,344,596      2,204,296
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========

Diluted Income Per Common Share (2)

Net income (in thousands)                      $     644     $     581     $   1,873     $    1,421
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========
Net income per share                           $     .23     $     .26     $     .62     $      .64
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding     2,749,384     2,233,790     3,010,019      2,232,588
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========
</TABLE>

(1)      Basic net income per share has been computed using the weighted average
         number of common shares outstanding during each period presented.

(2)      Diluted net income per share has been computed using the weighted
         average number of common share outstanding and the dilutive effect of
         stock options and warrants outstanding during the period presented.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00220-CR

______________________________

CHARLES HEARNE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20502

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Charles Hearne has filed a notice of appeal from the revocation of his community 

supervision. We have now received the certification of Hearne’s right of appeal as required by 

Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2. That 

certification states that Hearne waived his right of appeal.

Unless a certification, showing that a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we 

must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court’s certification 

affirmatively shows that Hearne has waived his right of appeal, and because the record before us 

does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: February 23, 2010

Date Decided: February 24, 2010

Do Not Publish
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.7



Promissory Note
Amount in $[__________]
Alajuela, Costa Rica            [date]
FOR VALUE RECEIVED ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC. (hereafter, “Borrower”), a company incorporated in the Virgin British Islands, promises to pay [______________], an individual (hereafter, “Lender”), at [___________________], or at such other place as Lender hereof may from time to time designate in writing, the principal sum of [_________________________________] Dollars ($[____________]), with interest accruing on the unpaid principal at the rate of [_______] percent ([__]%) per annum from _____________ until paid. The aforementioned principal sum represents monies owed to [_________________________] for payment on the purchase of chattels.
Principal and interest are payable in yearly installments due on or before the end of the first quarter of every year until paid in full, with the first such payment to be made on or before [______________], and the last payment to be made on or before [______________]. In no event shall interest exceed the maximum amount permitted by law. Any amount collected in excess of the maximum legal rate shall be applied to reduce the principal balance.
Executed in the presence of:
	
				
	WITNESS
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC.

	Name/Address
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	 

	Name/Address
**Release: #4032-97 (3-96-CV-2734-T)**

**For Release: July 1, 1997****TEXAS COURT ISSUES PERMANENT INJUNCTION IN CFTC ACTION AGAINST EUGENE    MORRIS WALTER AND ORDERS HIM TO PAY CUSTOMER RESTITUTION****Federal District Court's Action Stems from CFTC Civil Action Charging    the Defendant with Violating Federal Commodity Law by Providing False    Statements to Commodity Investors and Commingling Funds**    WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced    today that on June 26, 1997, the U.S. District Court for the Northern    District of Texas (Dallas Division) entered a consent order of permanent    injunction and ancillary relief against **Eugene Morris Walter** of    Dallas, Texas, who was charged with fraud in a CFTC enforcement action    filed on September 30, 1996 (CFTC News Release #3947-96, October 1,    1996).    The settlement order enjoins Walter from violating the anti-fraud and    registration provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), as charged,    and requires him to pay restitution to customers totalling more than    $62,000.    The court's order also finds that Walter:

- deliberately misrepresented to his futures and options customers that      their accounts were profitable when they were losing money;  
- misapplied customer funds intended for customer futures and options      trading, and unlawfully commingled customers' funds with each others' and      his own;  
- failed to provide customers with required risk disclosure statements,      transaction confirmations, and account information; and  
- failed to register with the CFTC as a commodity trading advisor and      futures commission merchant, as required.  

Under the terms of the order, Walter may not act as a futures commission    merchant, commodity pool operator, commodity trading advisor, introducing    broker, floor broker, floor trader, as an associated person or registrant    under the CEA. In addition, he may not apply for CFTC registration in any    capacity in the future, solicit customers or participants in connection    with commodity futures or options trading, and violate the registration and    disclosure document requirements of the CEA and CFTC regulations.
Dora L. ADKINS, petitioner, v. HBL, LLC.

No. 17-7663.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 2493

_____________________________
W ILLIAM S ETH F OUNTAIN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Clifton A. Drake , Judge

.

May 24, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 William Seth Fountain, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Clayton Andrew SCHWERS, petitioner, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO, et al.

No. 17-5241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Borland Software Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Tod Nielsen, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ TOD NIELSEN            
|Tod Nielsen                
|Principal Financial Officer
|                           
|November 21, 2006          

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Benjamin CARTER, petitioner, v. HALLIBURTON CO., et al.

No. 17-1060.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3831 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3831

To repeal the Act entitled ``An Act to confer jurisdiction on the State 
 of North Dakota over offenses committed by or against Indians on the 
                   Devils Lake Indian Reservation''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2019

Mr. Armstrong introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Act entitled ``An Act to confer jurisdiction on the State 
 of North Dakota over offenses committed by or against Indians on the 
                   Devils Lake Indian Reservation''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to confer jurisdiction on the State of 
North Dakota over offenses committed by or against Indians on the 
Devils Lake Indian Reservation'', approved May 31, 1946 (60 Stat. 229), 
is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Anthony WHITEWATER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8308.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
II-00607

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Christine Murphy <chrismurphy 1031 @gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:35 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Christine Murphy

17225 Five Points

Redford, MI 48240-2156
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amended Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Margerison, Chief Executiver Officer of the Company , certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        April 14, 2004
Leonel MARIN-TORRES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8621.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Release: #4259-99
     For Release: April 29, 1999

TENNESSEE DISTRICT COURT ENTERS ASSET FREEZE ORDER AGAINST EDWIN JAY
    SHELDON, APPLIED CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC., AND CHARLES EDWARD POWELL IN
    CFTC ENFORCEMENT ACTION ALLEGING COMMODITY POOL FRAUD;CFTC Alleges that the
    Fraud Netted More than $500,000 from at Least 30 Individuals

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today the filing of a five-count complaint on April 28, 1999, in the U.S.
    District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee seeking emergency
    relief against Edwin Jay Sheldon, of Little Falls, New Jersey; Applied Capital Management, LLC. (ACM), a New Jersey limited liability
    company registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and a
    commodity trading advisor; and Charles Edward Powell, of Birmingham,
    Alabama. Sheldon is registered with the CFTC as an associated person and a
    principal of ACM, and Powell has never been registered with the CFTC.

On the same day the complaint was filed, the Honorable R. Allan Edgar
    entered a statutory restraining order against Sheldon, ACM, and Powell,
    freezing the defendants' assets, prohibiting the destruction of books and
    records, and requiring that books and records be made available to the CFTC
    for inspection. The court's restraining order remains in effect until
    further order of the court.

The CFTC's complaint alleges that Sheldon, ACM, and Powell fraudulently
    solicited at least 30 individuals in Tennessee to invest more than $500,000
    in Fair Haven Futures Fund, LLC. (FHFF), a commodity pool operated
    by ACM. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the antifraud,
    registration, and disclosure and reporting requirements of the Commodity
    Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.

Specifically, the complaint charges that the defendants violated the CEA
    by, among other things:

-- Misrepresenting the profit potential of commodity futures
      transactions; -- Misrepresenting the amount of investor funds that would be invested
      in commodity futures contracts; -- Sending false account statements and reports to investors that
      reported profits when, in fact, defendants lost almost all investor
      money; -- Violating the disclosure and reporting provisions of the CEA
      applicable to commodity pools; and -- Making false statements in reports filed under the CEA.


In its continuing litigation against the defendants, the CFTC is seeking
    an order of permanent injunction, an accounting, disgorgement of all
    ill-gotten gains, restitution to the defrauded investors, and civil
    monetary penalties of not more than $110,000 per violation or triple the
    defendants' monetary gain.

# # #
# C_2012025EN.01002202.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/22

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium) — Richard Lebrun and Marcelle Howet v Belgian State

(Case C-538/10) (1)

(Articles 92(1), 103(1), 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Examination of the conformity of a national provision with both European Union law and the national constitution - National legislation granting priority to an interlocutory procedure for the review of constitutionality - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Requirement of link with European Union law - Clear absence of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2012/C 25/38)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Court of First Instance, Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Richard Lebrun and Marcelle Howet

Defendant: Belgian State

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Court of First Instance, Liège — Interpretation of Articles 6 TEU, 267 TFEU and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Prior obligation on national courts to refer matter to Constitutional Court where it supposes that national legislation may be in conflict with fundamental rights — Compliance with European Union law of the national provision requiring such a prior reference — Right of national courts to review compliance of national law with international treaties where the Constitutional Court has declared the national legislation at issue compatible with the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution

Operative part of the order

It is clear that the Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 5.2.2011.

---
Josue Marquez AREVALO, petitioner, v. Randy L. WHITE, Warden.

No. 17-8711.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18
             UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMTROL Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Albert
D. Indelicato, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 11, 2005                      By: /s/ ALBERT D. INDELICATO
                                            ------------------------
                                            Albert D. Indelicato,
                                            President, Chairman of the Board,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Director

                                       27
Donnell McCLOUD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8706.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.