alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012194EN.01000601.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/6

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Italy) — Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate v Safilo Spa

(Case C-529/10) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Direct taxation - Conclusion of proceedings pending before the court giving judgment at final instance in tax matters - Abuse of rights - Article 4(3) TEU - Freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty - Principle of non-discrimination - State aid - Obligation to ensure the effective application of European Union law)

2012/C 194/09

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate

Applicants:

Defendant: Safilo Spa

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Taxation of companies — National legislation under which the tax rate applied to company dividends varies according to the location of the company seat — Commercial transaction involving companies with their seat in Italy and companies resident elsewhere — Decision by the tax authorities treating as applicable the tax due in the case of the companies resident outside Italy — Notion of abuse of rights, as defined in Case C-255/02 Halifax and Others [2006] ECR I-1609 — Whether that doctrine applies in the context of non-harmonised domestic taxes such as direct taxes

Halifax and Others

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

European Union law, in particular the principle of the prohibition of abuse of rights, Article 4(3) TEU, the freedoms guaranteed by the FEU Treaty, the principle of non-discrimination, the rules on State aid and the obligation to ensure the effective application of European Union law, must be interpreted as not precluding the application, in a case such as that in the main proceedings relating to direct taxation, of a provision of national law which provides for proceedings pending before the court giving judgment at final instance in tax matters to be concluded in return for payment of a sum equivalent to 5 % of the value of the claim, where those proceedings originate in an application made at first instance more than 10 years before the date of entry into force of that provision and the tax authorities have been unsuccessful at first and second instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  for the fiscal  year ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Scott
M. Thornock, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 13, 2004                        /s/ Scott M. Thornock
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                           Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                           Director
Mary GRACE, et al., petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 17-1431.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Teddy Tonell DAVIS, aka Fresh, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8899.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-01064

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

deborah gorman <xyzdebg@optonline.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:36 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

deborah gorman

445 Broadway

Hastings On Hudson, NY 10706
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA 

October 10, 2014 

CHRISTOPHER BURTON, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-2904 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

BY ORDER OF THE COURT: 

 Appellee's motion for clarification or rehearing is granted. The prior 

opinion dated August 29, 2014, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is issued in its 

place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A 

TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER. 

JAMES R. BIRKHOLD, CLERK
 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

CHRISTOPHER BURTON, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-2904 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed October 10, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; William Fuente, 

Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

LaROSE, Judge. 

Christopher Burton appeals the postconviction court's order denying his 

motion to correct an illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.800(a). Because Mr. Burton received a mandatory sentence of life without the 

possibility of parole for a first-degree murder he committed when he was sixteen years 
old, we reverse the portion of the postconviction court's order summarily denying his 

motion and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with Miller v. Alabama, 

132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Toye v. State, 133 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). See 

also Baker v. State, 138 So. 3d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Landrum v. State, 133 So. 3d 

601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). 

 In Toye, this court concluded that Miller applied retroactively and certified 

conflict with Geter v. State, 115 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (en banc), and 

Gonzalez v. State, 101 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Toye, 133 So. 3d at 547. We 

again certify conflict with Gonzalez and Geter, and add to our certification Falcon v. 

State, 111 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), review granted, 137 So. 3d 1019 (Fla. 

2013). 

Reversed and remanded. Conflict certified. 

 

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
John POLHILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5225.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2012080EN.01001603.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-469/09) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenses excluded from Community financing - Tomato processing and rice storage sectors - Integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes - Principle of proportionality)

2012/C 80/25

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I.K. Chalkias and S. Papaïoannou, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and A. Markoulli, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application of annulment of Commission Decision 2009/721/EC of 24 September 2009 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2009 L 257, p. 28).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Hilario GONZALEZ-ROSALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8403.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IF, Financial Supervisory Commission
LF / 18F., No.7, Sec. 2, Xianmin Blvd., Banqiao Dist., New Taipei City 22041, Taiwan

Tel: +886-2-8968-0899 Fax: +886-2-8969-1215 http ://www.fsc.gov.tw

Mr. Clark Hutchison
Director, Division of Clearing and Risk
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington,DC 20581
October 20", 2023

Dear Mr. Hutchison,

The Taiwan Futures Exchange Corporation (“TAIFEX”), under 17 CFR 39.6, hereby petitions for
the CFTC exemption from the derivatives clearing organization registration. On behalf of the
Financial Supervisory Commission (“FSC”), I take pleasure in informing you that TAIFEX is
subject to extensive and comprehensive Taiwan regulations and is supervised by the FSC through a
combination of laws. The comprehensive Taiwan regulations and combination of laws, taken
together, are consistent with the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (“PFMIs”).

There has been no finding by the FSC of material nonobservance of the PFMIs or other relevant
legal requirements.

The FSC seeks to ensure safe and sound financial markets: Under the same goal we have in
common as the financial market’s regulator, it is increasingly essential to establish close cross-
border collaboration between the regulatory authorities in global financial markets.

In addition, I would like to extend my sincere appreciation for your excellent service in promoting
the resilience and vibrancy of the U.S. financial market. Please do not hesitate to let me know
should you have any questions regarding Taiwan’s financial market regulation and supervision.

Sincerely,

yhng ; Hsin —Lin 4
Wang, Fidiu-Ling on
Director
Futures Trading Division
Securities and Futures Bureau
Financial Supervisory Commission, Taiwan (R.O.C)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc. September 30, 1997 financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                           0000853465
<NAME>                          Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc.

       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                                            0
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.                    

*Date:*                         January 29, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 pm to 2:30 pm.                              ( print page 6640)    

*Agenda:*                         To get updates from the working groups and to discuss the advocates section of the April 2001 DCLG meeting.                    

*Place:*                         National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300 C, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elaine Lee, Acting Executive Secretary, Office of Liaison Activities, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300 C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/594-3194.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-1633  Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          65,959
<SECURITIES>                                    58,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,922
<PP&E>                                          16,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,934
<BONDS>                                        131,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,443
<SALES>                                          3,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,327
<CGS>                                            2,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2006092EN.01002801.xml

| 30.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 7/2006

of 27 January 2006

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2005/323/EC of 21 April 2005 on the safety requirements to be met by the European standards for floating leisure articles for use on or in the water pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2005/323/EC of 21 April 2005 on the safety requirements to be met by the European standards for floating leisure articles for use on or in the water pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 3h (Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘3i. | 32005 D 0323: Commission Decision 2005/323/EC of 21 April 2005 on the safety requirements to be met by the European standards for floating leisure articles for use on or in the water pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 104, 23.4.2005, p. 39).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘3i.

32005 D 0323: Commission Decision 2005/323/EC of 21 April 2005 on the safety requirements to be met by the European standards for floating leisure articles for use on or in the water pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 104, 23.4.2005, p. 39).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2005/323/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 January 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 28.7.2005, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 104, 23.4.2005, p. 39.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---