alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007209EN.01001801.xml

| 9.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 11/2007

of 27 April 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 148/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 148/2006 of 8 December 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1231/2006 of 16 August 2006 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards ceftiofur and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate and trioleate (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1231/2006 of 16 August 2006 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards ceftiofur and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate and trioleate (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 R 1231: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1231/2006 of 16 August 2006 (OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 R 1231: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1231/2006 of 16 August 2006 (OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 1231/2006 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 April 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 89, 29.3.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# C_2009180EN.01005401.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/54

---

Action brought on 19 May 2009 — Matkompaniet v OHIM — DF World of Spices (KATOZ)

(Case T-195/09)

2009/C 180/100

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Matkompaniet AB (Borås, Sweden) (represented by: J. Gulliksson and J. Olsson, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DF World of Spices GmbH (Dissen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2009 in case R 577/2008-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2009 in case R 577/2008-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred both in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance and before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred both in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance and before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark “KATOZ”, for goods in classes 29, 30 and 31

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration of the figurative mark “KATTUS” for goods in classes 29, 30, 31 and 33

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal and partially rejected the application for the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph T. Crowley, the Chief Financial Officer of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that to my knowledge the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that as of the date of this statement, the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is to solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Date: May 13, 2004                         /s/ Joseph T. Crowley
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Joseph T. Crowley
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Catherine THOMPSON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5069.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
### A-pp^k. i If DEC302013 S SEVENTHCOURTOFAPPEALS vc,. ' " & SE\/FMTfrDlST(eiCfPEGGYCULP A-^ptU^xLS •* PoTT£f? COUNT/ 

### Mormu FD2 EvrENmu _^ OF „ Time ^ IbTtfEl K6N(6f?AkU? ^ukCE (sf SAID C0U(cT. 

## Coi^tS WCiyi APPELLATE fcU\l,u^^ pr^( V i. Tk«_ CxArl or^r rezjutrsr^ TWcdockaiuj sJedeW/vl- uj^S> 2.Th* A-ppJLk uUt n*>i be aU* J_* If/^k 4A*. 

### 3. ApO-e.lU!U_ I.S r<LQutej>Uss(k Cx 20 lay -eyC\\&-\Qjs csrf

>^5o \1-1 0

c "*>l o N

^ * e£-H^4 CL6 ° S - o ^J^

til ••* ,t CM
Anna CRANMER, et al., petitioners, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 17-1266.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
LOTHIAN CASSIDY, L.L.C., et al., petitioners, v. LOTHIAN EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT II, L.P., Lead II, et al.

Shoshana Trust, et al., petitioners, v. Michael Raleigh, et al.

No. 17M107.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Steven JOHNSON, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 16-6915.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010317EN.01003002.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2010 — Accenture Global Services v OHIM — Silver Creek Properties (ascensa)

(Case T-244/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark acsensa - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks ACCENTURE and accenture - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

2010/C 317/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Accenture Global Services GmbH (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Niebel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Silver Creek Properties SA (Panama, Panama)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2009 (Case R 802/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Accenture Global Services GmbH and Silver Creek Properties SA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Accenture Global Services GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Accenture Global Services GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 13(a).1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I, Peter Yip, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1) The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Peter Yip          
|Peter Yip              
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Christopher J. McINTYRE, petitioner, v. BP EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, INC., et al.

No. 17-8442.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         16,016
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         309
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               5,150
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    33,429
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         10,419
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           10,322
<LOANS>                                        290,077
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,483
<DEPOSITS>                                     322,472
<SHORT-TERM>                                   5,105
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,600
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     43,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 373,483
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6,179
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              684
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               82
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,945
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,774
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,851
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4,094
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                868
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     570
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   570
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 5.01
<LOANS-NON>                                    612
<LOANS-PAST>                                   358
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,671
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  122
<RECOVERIES>                                   87
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,936
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,936
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.02

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Pungello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of John W. Henry & Co./Millburn
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

                                       16
James SNOW, petitioner, v. Walter NICHOLSON, Warden.

No. 17-1524.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1720 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 17, 2010. 

Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual 

of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred 

Twelfth Congress be printed as a House document, and that 

three thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound 

for the use of the House of Representatives, of which nine 

hundred sixty copies shall be bound in leather with thumb 

index and delivered as may be directed by the Parliamentarian of the House. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2011186EN.01001001.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/10

---

Order of the Court of 18 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (Spain)) — David Montoya Medina v Fondo de Garantia Salarial and Universidad de Alicante

(Case C-273/10) (1)

1

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work - Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector - Entitlement to triennial seniority bonuses - Principle of non-discrimination)

2011/C 186/16

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (Spain)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: David Montoya Medina

Applicant:

Defendants: Fondo de Garantia Salarial and Universidad de Alicante

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Interpretation of Clause 4(4) of the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) — Contracts of employment as a university lecturer and researcher concluded with State universities — Exclusion of certain benefits from fixed-term contracts

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, without any objective justification, restricts the right to receive a seniority bonus to university lecturers on permanent contracts, excluding lecturers on fixed-term contracts where, as regards receipt of that bonus, those two categories of workers are in comparable situations.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---
# L_2008331EN.01002101.xml

| 10.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 331/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 331/21

---

Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters

According to Article 3(2) of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (1), concluded by Council Decision 2006/326/EC (2) (hereafter ‘the Agreement’), whenever amendments to Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (3) are adopted, Denmark shall notify to the Commission of its decision whether or not to implement the content of such amendments.

1

2

3

Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 was adopted on 13 November 2007.

4

In accordance with Article 3(2) of the Agreement, Denmark has by letter of 20 November 2007 notified the Commission of its decision to implement the contents of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007. In accordance with Article 3(6) of the Agreement, the Danish notification creates mutual obligations between Denmark and the Community. Thus, Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 constitutes amendment to the Agreement and is considered annexed thereto.

In accordance with Article 3(4) of the Agreement, the necessary administrative measures will take effect on the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 300, 17.11.2005, p. 55.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 120, 5.5.2006, p. 23.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p. 37.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 324, 10.12.2007, p. 79.

4

---
John Anthony GENTRY, petitioner, v. Joe H. THOMPSON, Judge, Circuit Court of Tennessee, Sumner County.

No. 17M87.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Rupam SALUJA, petitioner, v. ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS OF NEVADA, INC.

No. 16-9569.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Yaakov LICCI, et al., petitioners, v. LEBANESE CANADIAN BANK, SAL.

No. 16-778.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Brian DUTCHER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9610.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Richard Tommy GORDON, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 16-9711.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ruben GALVAN-SALAZAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5388.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*257Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.