alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto (unaudited), as defined and
included in this filing on pages 3 through 7, for the 9-month period ended 31
October 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   0.67
<CASH>                                         173,344
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,192
<BONDS>                                      4,050,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,118,456
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,002,248)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,663
<SALES>                                          8,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,244
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               504,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             360,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (857,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (857,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (857,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
# L_2008154EN.01003001.xml

| 12.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 15/2008

of 1 February 2008

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 169/2007 of 7 December 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 169/2007 of 7 December 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2006/799/EC of 3 November 2006 establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2006/799/EC of 3 November 2006 establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | Decision 2006/799/EC repeals Commission Decision 2001/688/EC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2006/799/EC repeals Commission Decision 2001/688/EC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of point 2d (Commission Decision 2001/688/EC) of Annex XX to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32006 D 0799: Commission Decision 2006/799/EC of 3 November 2006 establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers (OJ L 325, 24.11.2006, p. 28).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2006/799/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 February 2008, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 2008.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 124, 8.5.2008, p. 37.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 325, 24.11.2006, p. 28.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 242, 12.9.2001, p. 17.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 1, 2010

0928 

# Order

October 1, 2010

140933

RONALD THORNE, a le gally incapacitated person, by MARGARET ANN WILSON, Guardian and Conservator, Plaintiff-Appellant, and

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, Intervening Plaintiff, v SC: 140933 COA: 281906 Macomb CC: 2 006-002549-NO GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., d/b/a FARMER JACK, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applicati on or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere re statements of their application papers.

The Michigan Association for Justice and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel,
Inc. are invited to file briefs amicus curiae . Other persons or gro ups interested in the determination of the issues presented in th is case may move the Co urt for permission to
file briefs amicus curiae.

M ARKMAN , J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the Court’s order that oral ar gument be heard on the application in this case. I write separately only to request that the parties a ddress, at least, the following issues: (1) specifically, the m eans by which to distinguish under these facts between an ordinary negligence and a prem ises liability claim, see James v Alberts, 464 Mich 12 (2001); and (2) specifically, whether, a nd in what manner, the “open and obvious” doctrine operates in the contex t of each of these claims.

C ORRIGAN , J., joins the statement of M ARKMAN , J.
II-00330

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Earl Gernert <vzezun8h@verizon.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 1:47 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Earl Gernert

7022 D 1 Hanover Pkwy

Greenbelt, MD 20770
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SPONSOR AGREEMENT 

WHEREAS, WGC USA Asset Management Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sponsor”) and World Gold Trust (formerly,
World Currency Gold Trust) (the “Trust’), a Delaware statutory trust organized in series (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”), have heretofore entered into an Amended and Restated Sponsor Agreement
(“Agreement”), dated as of October 14, 2016 as amended November 28, 2017; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the
Agreement (“Amendment”) to list on Schedule A thereto a new series of the Trust. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
agreements and obligations set forth herein and for other good and valuation consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, each of the Sponsor and the Trust, both for itself and on behalf of each Fund set for on
Schedule A, hereby amend the Agreement and agree as follows: 
 Schedule A. Schedule A is hereby amended by listing a new series
thereon, with such new series underlined in such amended schedule, as follows: 
 “Schedule A 

The Trust will pay to the Sponsor as compensation for the Sponsor’s services rendered to each Fund, a fee, computed daily at an annual rate based on the
average daily net assets of each Fund in accordance with the following fee schedule: 
  

					
	 Fund
	  	Rate	 
	 SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust
	  	 	0.33	% 
	 SPDR® Gold MiniSharesSM Trust
	  	 	0.18	%” 

  
  

[Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and
delivered as of June 12, 2018. 
  

			
	World Gold Trust
	
	By: Delaware Trust Company, its Trustee
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan R. Halpern
	Name:	 	Alan R. Halpern
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	WGC USA Asset Management Company, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Gregory S. Collett
	Name:	 	Gregory S. Collett
	Title:	 	Vice President


  
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  

Signature Page – Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Sponsor Agreement
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of Blue Martini Software, Inc.

As of December 31, 2004



A table of the direct
and indirect subsidiaries of Blue Martini Software, Inc. is set forth below, indicating as to each the state or jurisdiction of organization.



|                                                   |  |                             
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of the Subsidiary                             |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|The Cybrant Corp.                                  |  | Delaware                    
|Blue Martini Overseas LLC                          |  | Delaware                    
|Blue Martini Software International Holdings, Inc. |  | Delaware                    
|Blue Martini Software Pty Ltd                      |  | Australia                   
|Blue Martini Software International                |  | Cayman Islands              
|Blue Martini Software Canada Corp. (liquidated)    |  | Canada                      
|Blue Martini Software SRL                          |  | France                      
|Blue Martini Software GmbH                         |  | Germany                     
|Blue Martini Software (HK) Limited                 |  | Hong Kong                   
|Blue Martini Software Italy SRL (in liquidation)   |  | Italy                       
|Blue Martini Software KK                           |  | Japan                       
|Blue Martini Software BV                           |  | The Netherlands             
|Blue Martini Software AB (liquidated)              |  | Sweden                      
|Blue Martini Software Limited                      |  | United Kingdom
#### Realty Securities Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, *Appellant,*v. C. B. Chinn and W. Gordon Dean, *Appellees.*

En Bane.

Decision filed February 22, 1929.

*Paul C. Taylor,*for Appellant;

*Hudson & Cason,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and 'adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Gustavo A. PERALTA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9460.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 14, 2015 

# Order

April 14, 2015

148079 ( 64 )

LISA TYRA

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

ORGAN PROCUREMENT AGENCY OF

MICHIGAN, d/b/a GIFT OF LIFE MICHIGAN

, Defendant

- Appell ant,

and

STEVEN COHN, M.D., and WILLIAM

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

DILLIP SAMARA PUNGAVAN, M.D., and JOHN

DOE,

Defendants. SC: 148079

COA: 298444

Oakland CC: 2009

- 103111

- NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to file a late

supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief submitted on April 6, 2015, is

accepted for filing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 25, 2001.
    Time: 2 pm to 3 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6120 Executive Blvd, Suite 400C, Bethesda, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ali A Azadegan, DVM, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NIDCD, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, (301) 496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16351 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 10.1

 

HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Hospitality Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $50,000 for services as a Trustee, plus a fee of $1,250 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,250 fees are paid if a Board meeting and one or more Board committee meetings, or two or more Board committee meetings, are held on the same date. The annual fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $15,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.

 

·                  The Lead Independent Trustee receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $12,500 for serving in this role.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 3,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
II-00689

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Margery Coffey <margerycoffey@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:27 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Margery Coffey

205 Farley Ave.

Rosalie, NE 68055
Jack FERRANTI, petitioner, v. Kathy LANE, Warden.

No. 16-9720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*185Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23
                              =========





CLYDE BAILEY P.C.
Certified Public Accountant
10924 Vance Jackson #404
San Antonio, Texas 78230
(210) 699-1287 (ofc.)
(888) 699-1287 - (210) 691=2911 (fax)



Member: American Institute of CPA's
        Texas Society of CPA's

February 6, 2004

I consent to the use of my report dated February 6, 2004, in the
Form 10K-SB on the financial statements of Natalma Industries, Inc.,
dated December 31, 2003 and 2001, included herein and to the
reference made to me.

/s/ Clyde Bailey
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2010 – Calestani and Lunardi v Agenzia delle Entrate – Ufficio di Parma**

**(Joined Cases C‐292/09 and C-293/09)**

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility

1.                     *Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Jurisdiction of the national court – Establishing and assessing
the facts of the dispute – Need to make an order for reference and relevance of the questions referred – Assessment by the
national court (Art. 234 EC) (see paras 18-19)*

2.                     *Preliminary rulings – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context
(Art. 234 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23) (see paras 20-29)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma – Interpretation of Article 13B(c) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) – Exemption of supplies of goods used wholly for an exempted activity or excluded from the right to deduction – National legislation precluding the exemption. |

**Operative part**

The references for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy), by decisions
of 9 and 17 June 2009, are manifestly inadmissible.
Kenneth BENBOW, Mark Pray, and Alonzo Marlow, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8529.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.