alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010051EN.01002202.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/22

---

Appeal brought on 18 December 2009 by Vladimir Ivanov against the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) delivered on 30 September 2009 in Case T-166/08 Ivanov v Commission

(Case C-532/09 P)

2010/C 51/36

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Vladimir Ivanov (represented by: R. Rollinger, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare the appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the appeal admissible;

| — | declare the appeal well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the appeal well founded;

| — | annul the order of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the order of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2009;

| — | decide the case in accordance with the application initiating the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

decide the case in accordance with the application initiating the proceedings;

| — | order the opposing party to pay the costs of both instances. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opposing party to pay the costs of both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant relies on three grounds in support of his appeal:

By his first ground, which is made up of two parts, the appellant claims that the Court of First Instance should not have used abuse of process to justify the inadmissibility of his action for non-contractual liability, since the very limited scope of abuse of process extends only to exceptional cases in which the object of the action for damages is payment of a sum identical to that which the appellant would have obtained if he had succeeded in an action for annulment. In the present case, the action for damages brought by the appellant is entirely independent, the appellant wishing to render the Commission non-contractually liable for the conduct adopted in his regard, rather than to achieve a financial situation identical to that which he would have had in the event of the annulment of the Commission decisions.

In that context, the appellant claims, moreover, that the Court was not entitled to raise abuse of process of its own motion, since the burden of proof for abuse of process rests on the defendant.

By his second ground, the appellant claims that the Court erred in law by requiring a finding of unlawful conduct on the part of the Commission as a precondition for it to be rendered non-contractually liable, although unlawful conduct of the Community institution is no longer one of the grounds in the most recent case-law of the Court on which the institutions can be rendered liable.

By his third ground, the appellant claims, lastly, that, in ruling that an action for annulment was more appropriate than an action for damages, the contested order adversely affected his right to an effective remedy, as recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
Francisco TEMBLADOR-SANDOVAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5016.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

JUNE 27, 2023 AGENDA 

 

10:15 a.m. Opening Remarks 

• Commissioner Summer Mersinger

• Chairman Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Kristin Johnson

• Commissioner Christy Goldsmith-Romero

• Commissioner Caroline Pham 

 

10:45 a.m. Panel 1: The State of the Metals Markets

An update on the state of the metals markets since the presentation at the EEMAC 

meeting in September, with a specific focus on copper. 

Lead Participants:

• Derek Sammann, The CME Group

11:30 a.m. Panel 2: Mitigation Credits 

A discussion exploring mitigation credits and how the CFTC could provide 

technical assistance in the creation of markets. 

Lead Participants:

• Michael Rolband, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

12:30 p.m. Panel 3: Kick-off of Subcommittees

An introduction of the subcommittee members, including newly appointed SGE 

and representative members, and an outline of the potential issues and topics to be 

addressed in the subcommittee reports. 

1:15 p.m. Closing Remarks 

1:30 p.m. Adjourn Meeting
Joshua ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8251.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IKON RECEIVABLES, LLC AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      26,694,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              731,823,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             791,187,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    622,948,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,698,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               791,187,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,849,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,573,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,702,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,574,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         17,574,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                17,574,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with AFR
  
    



  Discuss implementation of cross-border guidance.
      
  When
              07/29/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              Cross-Border

  CFTC Staff
              Eric JuzenasWarren GorlickMark Fajfar

  Visitor(s)
              Marcus Stanley (AFR)

  Organization(s)
              Americans for Financial Reform (AFR)


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2477

_____________________________

DAMANTA JAMAR MURPHY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John Jay Gontarek, Judge.

May 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Damanta Jamar Murphy, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Reginald HART, petitioner, v. AMAZON.COM, INC.

No. 16-1549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mark Joseph HARVEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Paul Kenneth PRIDGEON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5135.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3810 

To modify the penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection 

Act of 1993. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2019 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To modify the penalties for violations of the Telephone 

Consumer Protection Act of 1993. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deter Obnoxious, Ne5 farious, and Outrageous Telephone Calls Act of 2019’’ or 

6 the ‘‘DO NOT Call Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE TELEPHONE 

8 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 1993. 

9 (a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3810 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 227 of the Commu2 nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227) is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(i) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para6 graph (2), any person who willfully and knowingly 

7 violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more 

8 than 1 year, fined under title 18, United States 

9 Code, or both. 

10 ‘‘(2) AGGRAVATED OFFENSE.—Any person who 

11 willfully and knowingly violates this section shall be 

12 imprisoned for not more than 3 years, fined under 

13 title 18, United States Code, or both if— 

14 ‘‘(A) the person has previously been con15 victed under this subsection; 

16 ‘‘(B) the offense involved initiating more 

17 than— 

18 ‘‘(i) 100,000 calls in a 24-hour period; 

19 ‘‘(ii) 1,000,000 calls in a 30-day pe20 riod; or 

21 ‘‘(iii) 10,000,000 calls in a 1-year pe22 riod; 

23 ‘‘(C) the person committed the offense 

24 with the intent to use the calls in furtherance 

25 of a felony or conspiracy to commit a felony; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3810 IH

1 ‘‘(D) the offense caused loss to 1 or more 

2 persons aggregating $5,000 or more in value 

3 during any 1-year period. 

4 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub5 section— 

6 ‘‘(A) the term ‘call’ includes a message or 

7 other communication; and 

8 ‘‘(B) the term ‘initiate’, with respect to a 

9 call, includes the act of sending, making, or 

10 transmitting a call, message, or other commu11 nication, as applicable.’’. 

12 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND13 MENT.—Section 227(e)(5)(B) of the Communica14 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)(B)) is 

15 amended, in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘sec16 tion 501’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (i)’’. 

17 (b) INCREASED PENALTIES FOR PROVISION OF INAC18 CURATE CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.—Sec19 tion 227(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

20 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)) is amended— 

21 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking 

22 ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’; and 

23 (2) in subparagraph (B), in the first sentence, 

24 by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
II-O0301

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ted fishman <ted 10000@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ted fishman

790 Villa Teresa Way

San Jose, CA 95123
Patricia Monet CONNER, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 17-6940.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Glenn SUNKETT, petitioner, v. Martin BITER, Warden.

No. 17-7690.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00241

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Alice Vlietstra <alice@successfulrelating.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 11:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Alice Vlietstra

3042 Andover Drive

St. Louis, MO 63121
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amended Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Satoru
Hirai, former Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company , certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Satoru Hirai
                                        Satoru Hirai
                                        Former Chief Operating Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        April 14, 2004
Exhibit 13.(a).2
     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of chinadotcomcorporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Form 20-F/A”), I, Daniel Widdicombe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Amendment No. 2 to the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Amendment No. 2 to the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
Date: May 7, 2004          /s/ Daniel Widdicombe   Daniel Widdicombe   Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to chinadotcom corporationand will be retained by chinadotcom corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Eric Wilton BURTON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5028.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Divison One denied.
Susan Elise PROPHET, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5250.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Francisco Javier GASCA-RUIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5218.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-41788, 333-41786, 333-116671, 333-146677 and 333-153357) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-40124, 333-57060,
333-127205, 333-127449, 333-140541, 333-145841, 333-145927, 333-148751, 333-152225 and 333-152618) and
Form S-1 (File No. 333-163612) of IA Global, Inc., of our report dated July 14, 2010 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, of IA Global, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010 and 2009
and for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the transition period for the three months ended March
31, 2008, and for the year ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in this annual report on Form
10-K of IA Global, Inc.   /s/ Sherb & Co., LLP Sherb & Co., LLP Certified Public Accountants  New York, New York July 14, 2010
Fouad FARAJ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8375.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Mark LONG, et al., petitioners, v. SOUTH DAKOTA.

No. 17-1168.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.
Robert Lynn PRUETT, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5127.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.