alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 COMMUNITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
            STATEMENT REGARDING:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended    
                                                    ---------------------------       ----------------------
                                                              June 30,                       June 30
                                                       1997              1996           1997          1996    
                                                    ---------         ---------       ---------    ---------
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>             <C>          <C>
Income Per Common Share (1)

Net income (in thousands)                           $     538         $     650       $     840    $   1,380
                                                    =========         =========       =========    =========

Net income per share                                $     .24         $     .29       $     .38    $     .62
                                                    =========         =========       =========    =========

Weighted average common shares outstanding          2,228,602         2,215,507       2,228,079    2,213,589
                                                    =========         =========       =========    =========

Income Per Common Share, Assuming
  Full Dilution (1)

Net income (in thousands)                           $     538         $     650       $     840    $   1,380
                                                    =========         =========       =========    =========

Net income per share                                $     .24         $     .29       $     .38    $     .62
                                                    =========         =========       =========    =========

   Weighted average common shares outstanding       2,228,602         2,215,507       2,228,079    2,213,589
                                                    =========         =========       =========    =========
</TABLE>

(1)    Net income per share has been computed using the weighted average number
       of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each
       year presented.  Common stock equivalents include stock options.
       Warrants have not been included in CFGI's computation of earnings per
       share because the market price of CFGI's common stock has been less than
       the exercise price of the warrants for substantially all of the three
       month reporting period ended June 30, 1997.  See Note F to CFGI's
       consolidated financial statements.





                                      -17-
Kaunda Lopaz MAGEE, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 17-9129.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
William Eugene THOMPSON, petitioner, v. Philip W. PARKER, Warden.

No. 17-7504.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3700 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on the premises 

of any facility of the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Miss RICE of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking 

on the premises of any facility of the Veterans Health 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING IN FACILITIES OF 

4 THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 1715 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘§ 1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the 

8 Veterans Health Administration 

9 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No person (including any vet10 eran, patient, resident, employee of the Department, conVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:35 Jul 19, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3700.IH H3700

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3700 IH

1 tractor, or visitor) may smoke on the premises of any facil2 ity of the Veterans Health Administration. 

3 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 ‘‘(1) The term ‘smoke’ includes— 

5 ‘‘(A) the use of cigarettes, cigars, pipes, 

6 and any other combustion or heating of to7 bacco; and 

8 ‘‘(B) the use of any electronic nicotine de9 livery system, including electronic or e-ciga10 rettes, vape pens, and e-cigars. 

11 ‘‘(2) The term ‘facility of the Veterans Health 

12 Administration’ means any land or building (includ13 ing any medical center, nursing home, domiciliary 

14 facility, outpatient clinic, or center that provides re15 adjustment counseling) that is— 

16 ‘‘(A) under the jurisdiction of the Depart17 ment of Veterans Affairs; 

18 ‘‘(B) under the control of the Veterans 

19 Health Administration; and 

20 ‘‘(C) not under the control of the General 

21 Services Administration.’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

23 (1) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 

24 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3700 IH

1 amended by striking the item relating to section 

2 1715 and inserting the following: 

‘‘1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans Health Administration.’’. 

3 (2) VETERANS HEALTH CARE ACT OF 1992.— 

4 Section 526 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 

5 1992 (Public Law 102–585) is repealed. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section take effect on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting w/ TABB Group (via phone)
  
    



  When
              11/23/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Chris Iacovella

  Visitor(s)
              Kevin McPortland

  Organization(s)
              TABB Group


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on 

Derivatives Clearing 

Presentation to CFTC Market Risk Advisory Committee

July 21, 2020
Record-Setting Exchange Volume 

 -

 200

 400

 600

 800

 1,000

 1,200

 1,400

 1,600

January

March

May

July

September

November

January

March

May

July

September

November

January

March

May

July

September

November

January

March

May

July

September

November

January

March

May

July

September

November

January

March

May

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Millions

The number of futures and options traded on US exchanges reached 1.43 billion 

contracts in March, the highest volume on record

Future Option
Record-Setting Increase in Customer Funds in 

March 
Impact of Volatility on Margin Requirements 

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

Emini S&P

500

Eurostoxx 50 FTSE 200 Nikkei 225 10Y Treasury Bund Gilt WTI Brent Comex Gold

Initial margin requirements for many widely-used futures contracts rose dramatically 

in the first quarter
Rising Margin Requirements – Examples of Per 

Contract IM Changes 

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

E-mini S&P 500 Futures

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Eurostoxx 50 Futures

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

1,800,000

Nikkei 225 Futures
Margin Breaches Escalate 

Based on quarterly disclosures covering 27 clearing services operated by seven CCPs 

(CME, Eurex, ICE, JSCC, LCH, LME, OCC)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Q4 2019 Q1 2020

Number of Margin Breaches

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180

Q4 2019 Q1 2020

Millions

Average Size of Margin Breach
Stanley B. DOREMUS, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration.

No. 17-8319.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8553
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COURTNEY LODIAN FULLER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-89-14) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Courtney Lodian Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting inpart and denying in part Appellant's motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fuller , No. CR-89-14 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 16, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 16, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0073. IN THE INTEREST OF F. S. G., A CHILD (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 20JV66
# L_2005161EN.01001301.xml

| 23.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 6/2005

of 8 February 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 163/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 163/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2004/61/EC of 26 April 2004 amending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC, 86/363/EEC and 90/642/EEC as regards maximum residue levels for certain pesticides prohibited for use in the European Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2004/61/EC of 26 April 2004 amending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC, 86/363/EEC and 90/642/EEC as regards maximum residue levels for certain pesticides prohibited for use in the European Community (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in points 38 (Council Directive 86/362/EEC), 39 (Council Directive 86/363/EEC) and 54 (Council Directive 90/642/EEC) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 L 0061: Commission Directive 2004/61/EC of 29 April 2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 81).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 L 0061: Commission Directive 2004/61/EC of 29 April 2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 81).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2004/61/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 5.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 81.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated

*1

---
Exhibit 10.71



April 30, 2004



Thanh Tran

Vice President Enterprise Business Unit

100 Enterprise Way

Scotts Valley, CA 95066-3249



Re: Extension of the Microsoft Corporation Open Tools License Agreement



Dear Thanh,



Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) and Borland Software Corporation (then Inprise Corporation) (Borland) entered into the Microsoft Corporation Open Tools License Agreement effective as of March
2, 1999 as amended from time to time (Agreement). The Agreement was originally extended to March 2, 2004 and is now set to expire on May 2, 2004. Since Borland needs additional time to review Microsofts proposed amendment to the
Agreement, which would extend the Agreement until August 2, 2004.



Pursuant to this letter agreement, Microsoft and Borland agree to extend the term of the Agreement until May 17, 2004. Neither party will be obligated to make any payments to the other party as a result of this extensions. Extension of the
Agreement beyond May 17, 2004 will be subject to agreement between the parties.



Please signify Borlands agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning where indicated below.



| |  |                                                        
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Best Regards,                                          
| | 
| |  | /s/ DAVID BURGGRAAF                                    
| | 
| |  | David Burggraaf                                        
| |  | Product Unit Manager                                   
| | 
| |  | ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY BORLAND:                 
| | 
| |  | /s/ THANH TRAN                                         
| |  | By:                                                    
| | 
| |  | Thanh Tran                                             
| |  | Name:                                                  
| | 
| |  | Vice President/General Manager/Enterprise Business Unit
| |  | Title:                                                 
| | 
| |  | April 29 / 04                                          
| |  | Date:
# L_2009232EN.01002201.xml

| 3.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 232/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 232/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 66/2009

of 29 May 2009

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2009 of 24 April 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 50/2009 of 24 April 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2008 of 20 August 2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 as regards common technical requirements and administrative procedures applicable to commercial transportation by aeroplane (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2008 of 20 August 2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 as regards common technical requirements and administrative procedures applicable to commercial transportation by aeroplane (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 66a (Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 R 0859: Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2008 of 20 August 2008 (OJ L 254, 20.9.2008, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 R 0859: Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2008 of 20 August 2008 (OJ L 254, 20.9.2008, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 859/2008 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 May 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 25.6.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 254, 20.9.2008, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Motion Granted in Part; Order filed January 2 9 , 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00263

- CR

____________ LEONARD CHARLES HICK S , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1373854



### ORDER
Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. On September 19, 2014, appellant filed a brief in which the names of the child victims appear. Appellant’s brief does not comply with article 57.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requiring child victim’s identifying information to be kept
confidential.
On January 21, 2015, the State filed a motion to seal appellant’s brief. Themotion is granted in part. Appellant’s brief is str uck and has been removed from

this court’s website. Appellant is ordered to file an amended brief redacting the victim’s identifying information replacing it with pseudonyms or initials pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.10. Appellant’s amende d brief is due on or
before February 6 , 2015.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4049 

To provide that the head of a Federal agency may not prohibit State or 

local uniformed law enforcement officers from wearing or using body 

cameras on joint operations with Federal law enforcement officers, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. BEYER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that the head of a Federal agency may not 

prohibit State or local uniformed law enforcement officers from wearing or using body cameras on joint operations with Federal law enforcement officers, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Allowing Body Cam5 eras in Joint Task Forces Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4049 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF BODY CAMERAS IN JOINT LAW ENFORCE2 MENT OPERATIONS PERMITTED. 

3 The head of a Federal agency may not— 

4 (1) prohibit State or local uniformed law en5 forcement officers from wearing or using body cam6 eras on joint operations with Federal law enforce7 ment officers; or 

8 (2) otherwise condition participation in such a 

9 joint operation on State or local uniformed law en10 forcement officers refraining from wearing or using 

11 body cameras. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
James Aren DUCKETT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8388.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Douglas Cornell JACKSON, petitioner, v. Joseph BOUCHARD.

No. 17-8351.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Johnson D. KOOLA, petitioner, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

No. 17-7108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.