alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Duncan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:    April 5, 2007                 /s/ Scott Duncan
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Scott Duncan,
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                       Financial Officer
                                       Pangea Petroleum Corporation
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  SECTION 906
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard J. Westin, Chief Executive Officer of Agemark Corporation (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

      (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
      certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

Dated: January 12, 2004                         /s/  RICHARD J. WESTIN
                                                -----------------------
                                                Richard J. Westin
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------






                                       CERTIFICATION

In connection with the pool's audited  financial  statements for the years ended
December  31,  2003 and 2002  contained  in this Annual  Report (the  "Financial
Statements"),  the undersigned  Simcha Bluth and Randall Shell,  Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer,  respectively, of Pool Management Services,
Inc.,  Commodity Pool Operator and Manager of Moriah Futures Fund, LLC,  certify
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their respective knowledge:

           (1) The Financial  Statements comply with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Financial  Statements fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the pool.

March 30, 2004




                        /s/ Simcha Bluth

                        -------------------------
                        Simcha Bluth, President and Chief
                        Executive Officer

                        /s/ Randall Shell

                        -------------------------
                        Randall Shell, Vice President
                        and Chief
                        Financial Officer

<PAGE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). jl f / Invent o ry NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. F E RNA ND O S AL AZ AR - GA L L AR DO , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50077 D . C . N o. 3: 08 -C R -027 09 -L A B -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a rryA . B urns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d F IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JAN 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSj l f

/ I n v en t or y 09- 50077 2 F e rn a n d o S a la z a r - G a lla r d o ap p e a ls th e s e n te n c e im p o s e d f o llo w in g h is gu i l ty pl eat o b ei ng a deport ed al i en foun d i n the U ni t ed S t at es i n v i ol at i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. S a la z a r - G a lla r d o a lle g e s th a t A lm enda rez- T orres v . U

ni ted Stat es , 5 2 3 U . S. 22 4, 22 7 (19 98 ), w as ef fe ct i vel y overrul ed or l i m i t ed by the do ctri ne of avoi dance of const i tut i on al do ub t , and 8 U . S . C . § 1 32 6(b) i s uncon st i tut i on al . S al az ar G a lla r d o c o n c e d e s th a t h is c o n te n tio n s a r e f o r e c lo s e d b yo u rp r io rd e c is io n s , se e U ni ted Stat es v. G rise l , 48 8 F . 3d 84 4, 84 7 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( en banc) (hol di ng that the dat e of apri or conv i ct i on i s partof the "f ac t " of apri or conv i ct i on for Appr e ndi p u rp o s e s ) ; U

ni ted Stat es v. Sa lazar-L op ez , 50 6 F . 3d 74 8, 75 1 n . 3 (9th C i r. 20 07 ); U n i ted S ta tes v. M

a ci el-V a sq u ez, 458 F . 3d 994, 995- 96 ( 9th C i r . 2006) ( hol di ng tha t8 U . S . C . § 1326( b) ( 2) i s c ons t i tut i ona l ) , and tha the r a i s e s the m t o pr e s e rve th e m f o rp o t e n t i a l f

u tu r e r e v i e w. A FFI R M ED .
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA

October 10, 2014

CHRISTOPHER BURTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2904 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellee's motion for clarification or rehearing is granted. The prior

opinion dated August 29, 2014, is withdrawn and the attached op inion is issued in its

place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

I HEREBY CERTIFY T HE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.

JAMES R. BIRKHOLD, CLERKIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER BURTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2904 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )

Opinion filed October 10, 2014.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

Christopher Burton appeals the postconviction court's order den ying his

motion to correct an illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.800(a). Because Mr. Burton received a mandatory sentence of life without the

possibility of parole for a first-degree murder he committed wh en he was sixteen yearsold, we reverse the portion of the postconviction court's order summarily denying his

motion and remand the case for further proceedings consistent w ith Miller v. Alabama,

132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Toye v. State, 133 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). See

also Baker v. State
, 138 So. 3d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Landrum v. State, 133 So. 3 d

601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

In Toye, this court concluded that Miller applied retroacti vely and certified

conflict with Geter v. State, 115 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (en banc), and

Gonzalez v. State, 101 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Toye

, 133 So. 3d at 547. We

again certify conflict with Gonzalez and Geter, and add to our certification Falcon v.

State, 111 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), review granted, 137 So. 3d 1019 (Fla.

2013).

Reversed and remanded. Conflict certified.

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                                  FORM 10-KSB/A
(Mark One)
[X]  Annual Report  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The  Securities  Exchange
     Act of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1999

[ ]  Transition  Report  Pursuant  to Section  13 or 15(d) of the  Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934

                        Commission File Number: 000-30180

                          FRESH BREATH INDUSTRIES, INC.
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

                          Nevada                       88-0404404
                (State or other jurisdiction of        (I.R.S. Employer
            incorporation or organization)             Identification No.)

              Suite 210, 195 West 2nd Ave., Vancouver, B.C. V5Y1B8
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone no.:  (403) 259-6838

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:  None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:  Common

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed in Section13
or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during  the past 12 months  (or for such  shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent  filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure  will be contained,  to
the best of the  Registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part III of this Form  10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]

         State the issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $  0

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date.

        Class                              Outstanding as of December 31, 1999
  Common Stock, $.001 Par Value                          8,748,000


                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
                                      NONE
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format.       Yes [  ]        No [X]
In Re David M. CAMPBELL, petitioner.

No. 17-5199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
R&R GROUND MAINTENANCE INC., petitioner, v. ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-1238.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Order entered June 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00091-CR

JOHN ALAN SUBLETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-80900-08

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file appellant’s brief as of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of AccelPath, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gilbert SteedleyGilbert SteedleyChief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerDate: March 21, 2014
Mark J. ZIMNY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8316.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4361

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JOHN W. STINSON, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. 

Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:07-cr-00167-1) 

Submitted: October 10, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008 

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Lex A. Coleman, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, OFFICE OF 

THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Lisa G. 

Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

John W. Stinson, Jr., pled guilty to possession of a 

firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

'' 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2000). In his plea agreement, Stinson 

reserved the right to challenge the denial of his motion to 

suppress evidence. We have carefully considered the arguments 

of counsel and the evidence presented to the district court, and 

we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in 

finding that Stinson lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy 

in the residence of his girlfriend and that Stinson was not in 

custody at the time he made his admissions of ownership of the 

gun, and therefore the statements were not taken in violation of 

his Fifth Amendment rights. United States v. Rusher, 966 F.2d 

868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992) (providing standard of review); see

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We affirm the denial 

of the motion to suppress, and therefore affirm Stinson=s 

conviction for the reasons stated by the district court. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
II 

Calendar No. 392 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4018 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2019 

Received 

DECEMBER 18, 2019 

Read the first time 

DECEMBER 19, 2019 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To provide that the amount of time that an elderly offender 

must serve before being eligible for placement in home 

detention is to be reduced by the amount of good time 

credits earned by the prisoner, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOOD CONDUCT TIME CREDITS FOR CERTAIN 

4 ELDERLY NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS. 

5 Section 231(g)(5)(A)(ii) of the Second Chance Act of 

6 2007 (34 U.S.C. 60541(g)(5)(A)(ii)) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘to which the offender was sentenced’’ and inserting 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 4018 PCS

1 ‘‘reduced by any credit toward the service of the prisoner’s 

2 sentence awarded under section 3624(b) of title 18, 

3 United States Code’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

5 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

6 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

7 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

8 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

9 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

10 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro11 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

12 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 392 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4018 

AN ACT 

To provide that the amount of time that an elderly 

prisoner, and for other purposes. the amount of good time credits earned by the placement in home detention is to be reduced by offender must serve before being eligible for 

DECEMBER 19, 2019 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4032 

To require the Corps of Engineers to carry out an assessment of the resiliency 

of the Great Lakes coastline, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. KATKO (for himself, Mr. MORELLE, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. 

BRINDISI, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. KILDEE, 

Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. UPTON, Mr. RUSH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Ms. SLOTKIN, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. MOORE, Ms. 

STEFANIK, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. 

MITCHELL, and Mr. BERGMAN) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Corps of Engineers to carry out an assessment of the resiliency of the Great Lakes coastline, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Coastal 

5 Resiliency Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4032 IH

1 SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDY. 

2 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall carry out an assess3 ment, under section 729 of the Water Resources Develop4 ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), of the resiliency of 

5 the Great Lakes coastline, with a focus on— 

6 (1) areas specifically vulnerable to rising water 

7 levels and severe weather; and 

8 (2) lake conditions that contribute to coastal 

9 erosion, sustained flooding, and damage to critical 

10 infrastructure and residential and commercial prop11 erties. 

12 (b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall consult 

13 with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

14 in determining the scope of the assessment under sub15 section (a). 

16 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

17 of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit 

18 to Congress a report containing— 

19 (1) the results of the assessment carried out 

20 under subsection (a); and 

21 (2) any recommendations resulting from such 

22 assessment, which shall— 

23 (A) take into account watershed sediment 

24 loading; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4032 IH

1 (B) include recommendations to improve 

2 the resiliency of the Great Lakes coastline to 

3 rising water levels and severe weather. 

4 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) GREAT LAKES COASTLINE.—The term 

6 ‘‘Great Lakes coastline’’ means the shoreline along 

7 the five Great Lakes and their connecting channels 

8 in the states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Min9 nesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wis10 consin. 

11 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

12 the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

13 of Engineers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Lenny Curtis ANDERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7368.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2012174EN.01000901.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Lebara Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-520/10) (1)

1

(Taxation - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 2 - Supply of services for consideration - Telecommunications services - Prepaid phonecards displaying information for making international calls - Marketing through a network of distributors)

2012/C 174/11

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lebara Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — Interpretation of Article 2(1) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Phonecards sold by a taxable person residing in a Member State to a distributor residing in another Member State and sold on by that distributor to persons who use them to make telephone calls — Transaction which can be broken down into several parts — Arrangements for charging value added tax

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Point (1) of Article 2 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2003/92/EC of 7 October 2003, must be interpreted as meaning that a telecommunications services operator which offers telecommunications services consisting in selling to a distributor phonecards which display all the information necessary for making international telephone calls by means of the infrastructure provided by that operator and which are resold by the distributor, in its name and on its own behalf, to end users, either directly or through other taxable persons such as wholesalers or retailers, carries out a supply of telecommunications services for consideration to the distributor. On the other hand, that operator does not carry out a second supply of services for consideration, this time to the end user, where that user, having purchased the phonecard, exercises the right to make telephone calls using the information on the card.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
# ICEUS Cocoa (CC)

# ICEUS Coffee (KC)

# CBT Corn (C)

# ICEUS Cotton No. 2 (CT)

# CME Feeder Cattle (FC)

# ICEUS FCOJ-A (OJ)

# CME Lean Hogs (LH)

# CME Live Cattle (LC)

#  CME Class III Milk (DA)

# CBT Oats (O)

# CBT Rough Rice (RR)

# CBT Soybeans (S)

# CBT Soybean Meal (SM)

# CBT Soybean Oil (BO)

# ICEUS Sugar No. 11 (SB)

# CBT Wheat (W)

# KCBT Wheat (KW)

# MGE Wheat (MWE)

# COMEX Copper (HG)

# COMEX Gold (CG)

# NYMEX Palladium (PA)

# NYMEX Platinum (PL)

# COMEX Silver (SI)

# NYMEX Crude Oil (CL)

# NYMEX Gasoline Blendstock (RB)

# NYMEX Heating Oil (HO)

# NYMEX Natural Gas (NG)

# CBT 2 Year Treasury (TU)

# CBT 5 Year Treasury (FB)

# CBT 10 Year Treasury (TY)

# CBT 30 Day Fed Funds (FF)

# CME Eurodollar (ED)

# CME S&P 500 (SP)

# CME S&P 500 E Mini (ES)

# CBT T-Bond (US)