alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF INPRISE CORPORATION
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THE AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO
INCLUDE THE OPERATIONS OF VISIGENIC SOFTWARE, INC. FOR THE PERIOD THEN ENDED.
THE AMOUNTS SHOWN ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          81,381
<SECURITIES>                                     1,754
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,858
<INVENTORY>                                      1,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,014
<PP&E>                                         217,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           462
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   235,430
<SALES>                                        113,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,556
<CGS>                                           18,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               187,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   860
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (83,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (83,692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (83,692)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.89)
         

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 11




WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.


EXHIBIT (11) - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     THREE                   SIX
                                                 MONTHS ENDED           MONTHS ENDED
                                                    JUNE 30,              JUNE 30,
                                             ----------------------  ------------------
                                               1997         1996       1997      1996
                                             --------     --------   --------   -------
<S>                                          <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>     
Primary:
Average shares outstanding                     30,865     31,380      30,932     31,446

Shares issuable under 1995
      Key Employee Stock Bonus Plan                36         50          42         64

Net effect of dilutive stock options
      - based on the treasury stock
      method using average market price           736        447         678        403
                                             --------   --------    --------   --------

Total                                          31,637     31,877      31,652     31,913
                                             ========   ========    ========   ========

Income from continuing operations            $ 10,678   $  9,096    $ 19,653   $ 17,356
Income (loss) from discontinued operations      1,102       (382)      2,235       (666)
                                             --------   --------    --------   --------

      Net income                             $ 11,780   $  8,714    $ 21,888   $ 16,690
                                             ========   ========    ========   ========


Net income (loss) per common share:
      Continuing operations                  $    .34   $    .28    $    .62   $    .54
      Discontinued operations                     .03       (.01)        .07       (.02)
                                             --------   --------    --------   --------
      Net income per common share            $    .37   $    .27    $    .69   $    .52
                                             ========   ========    ========   ========
</TABLE>



                                      22
# C_2010346EN.01002202.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/22

---

Order of the Court of 2 September 2010 — Mehmet Salih Bayramoglu v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-28/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Irregular form of order sought - Clear inadmissibility)

2010/C 346/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mehmet Salih Bayramoglu (represented by: A. Riza QC)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: C. Karamarcos and N. Görlitz, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and E. Finnegan, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2009 in Case T-110/09 Bayramoglu v Parliament and Council, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible an action for annulment of Council Decision 2004/511/EC of 10 June 2004 concerning the representation of the people of Cyprus in the European Parliament in case of a settlement of the Cyprus problem — Action brought out of time

Bayramoglu

Parliament and Council

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Bayramoglu shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Bayramoglu shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Ismael MIRANDA-ZARCO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8831.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
              BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V
                             (A Limited Partnership)


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. V (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.




                                     /s/Gary Mentesana
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Gary Mentesana
                                     Principal Executive Officer and
                                     Principal Financial Officer
                                     Arch Street VIII, Inc, as
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Boston Financial Qualified
                                     Housing Tax Credits L.P. V

                                     Date:   February 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Survey Results

1. Who is responsible for DE&I?

2/23/2021 v

A. HR or Firm Diversity Professionals 3/36 ( 8%)

B. The C Suite 3/36 ( 8%)

C. Everyone at the Firm 24/36 ( 67%)

No Answer 6/36 ( 17%)
Survey Results

2. In the aftermath of George Floyd’s death and the protests, did your firm issue a statement 

(either internal or external)? 

2/23/2021 v

A.Yes 24/36 ( 66%)

B.No 6/36 ( 17%)

No Answer 6/36 ( 17%)
Survey Results

3. At times, I am not sure what to say or do around issues of race and as a result I have a 

tendency to remain silent.

2/23/2021 v

A. Agree 8/36 ( 22%)

B. Disagree 22/36 ( 61%)

No Answer 6/36 ( 17%)
Survey Results

4. Do you consider yourself to be an Ally or an Upstander? An upstander is a person who 

speaks or acts in support of an individual (opposite of a bystander).

2/23/2021 v

A. Yes 29/36 ( 81%)

B. No 0/36 ( 0%)

No Answer 7/36 ( 19%)
Survey Results

5. In light of the events in 2020, are you optimistic that we have a meaningful opportunity 

to make real progress around racial equity and inclusion within our industry?

2/23/2021 v

A. Yes 27/36 ( 75%)

B. No 2/36 ( 6%)

No Answer 7/36 ( 19%)
Brian William SCHUMAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Marcus ZANDERS, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 17-166.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of *Carpenter v. United States* , 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2206, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018).
Charles MOLNAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5249.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Carlos VAZQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5318.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,020,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,463,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   756,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,128,000
<PP&E>                                      75,174,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,188,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,546,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,725,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,273,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               169,546,000
<SALES>                                    140,011,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           140,011,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              132,352,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,519,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,140,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (66,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,206,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,206,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
II-O0910

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

James Cooke <jc@james-cooke.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:08 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

James Cooke

302 12th Street SW

Albuquerque, NM 87102
YTB International, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the  accompanying  Report of YTB  International,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Derek J. Brent,  Chief  Financial and  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Date: 05/23/2005
/s/ Derek J. Brent


-------------------------------------------------

[Signature] Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Harpushpindar SINGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8164.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
James Melvin SMITH, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-8477.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 11.  Earnings Per Share Schedule

      Calculation of net income under the modified treasury stock method:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE          NINE
                                                                 MONTHS        MONTHS
                                                               ----------    ----------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>      
        Primary
                       Average common stock outstanding         6,395,867     5,106,537
                       Common stock equivalents                 1,148,500     1,148,500
                                                               ----------    ----------
                                                                7,544,367     6,255,037
                                                               ==========    ==========

                      Net income applicable to common stock    $  848,336    $1,371,541
                      Assumed interest expense reduction               18        61,671
                                                               ----------    ----------
                                                               $  848,354    $1,433,212
                                                               ==========    ==========

                          Net income per share                 $      .11    $      .23
                                                               ==========    ==========

        Fully diluted
                       Average common stock outstanding         6,401,690     6,055,537
                       Preferred stock                             18,750        18,750
                       Common stock equivalents                 1,185,681     1,185,681
                                                               ----------    ----------
                                                                7,606,121     7,259,968
                                                               ==========    ==========

                      Net income applicable to common stock    $  848,336    $1,371,541
                      Preferred stock dividends                     1,291        90,135
                      Assumed interest expense reduction             --            --
                                                               ----------    ----------

                                                               $  849,627    $1,461,676
                                                               ==========    ==========

                          Net income per share                 $      .11    $      .20
                                                               ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 15, 2019

No. 04-19-00226-CR

Jose Trinidad GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0458

The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due to be filed with this court on July 29, 2019. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 35.1. On August 9, 2019, court reporter David R. Zarate filed a notification of late 

record. He advised the court that he has been unable to complete the record because of the size 

of the record and his other duties. He estimates the size of the record to be 1,500 pages and 

requests an extension of time to file the record until October 11, 2019.

The reporter’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED 

IN PART. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in a regular appeal to thirty days). The 

reporter’s record is due on August 28, 2019. See id.

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by August 28, 2019, any requests for 

additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The 

report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks 

for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages 

edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The 

report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems 

the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the 

extended date. A preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is 

attached to this order. 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Deshawn Kenneth JAMES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6295.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
DeCarlo WORTH, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-7922.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.
Lisa Anne HENRY, et al., petitioners, v. Brian WEISS, Liquidation Trustee of the Walldesign Liquidating Trust, Successor in Interest to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Walldesign, Inc.

No. 17-1210.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.