alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41142 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. T R E N T B R E W E R , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- C R - 246- 12 B ef ore R E AV L E Y , D AV IS, an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Tr e ntBr e w e rs e e ks t o a ppe alt he 3 60 - m o nt h se nt e nc e he r e c e ive d af t e rhe p le a d e dg u iltyto co n s p ir a c yto p o s s e s s w ith in te n t t o d is tr ib u te co c a in e , in v io la tio n o f 2 1 U .S .C . § 8 4 6 . In h is w r itt e n p le a a g r e e m e n t, B r e w e rw a iv e dh is ri gh t t o a p p ea lh i s sen ten ce on allgro u n d s, e xc ep t he rese rv ed the ri gh t t o ap pe al( a) a ny puni shm en t im po s e d i n e xc e s s o f t he s t at ut o r y m ax i m um a nd (b) a c l ai m o f i ne f

fe c t ive as s i s t anc e o f c o uns e l t hat af fe c t s t he va l i di t y o f

t he United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

21, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 41142

2 w aive ri t s e l f. H e ar gue s t hatt he a ppe alw aive ri s no te nf o r c e ab l e b e c aus e t he G o ve r nm e ntb r e ac he d t he pl e a ag r e e m e ntw he n i tr e c o m m e nde d a ts e nt e nc i ng t hatB r ew ernotbe given a t hre e- l eve lr educ t i on f orac c ept ance of

r es ponsibi l i t y. T h i s c ou rtpr e t e r m it s the i s s ue w he t he rthe G overnm en tbreached t h e pl ea agr ee m entand f

i nds t hatB r ew er ’ s c hal l enge t o hi s se nt enc e i s unavai l i ng. G iv e n B r e w e r ’ s u s e o f a c e ll p h o n e in v io la tio n o f ja il r u le s , t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n otcl earl y err w h en i tden i ed h i m a t h ree- l evelreducti on f or acc eptan ce of r e s p o n s ib ility . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. G on zal es , 1 9 F .3d 9 8 2 , 9 8 3 (5t h C ir. 1 9 9 4 ); U . S . S . G . § 3E 1. 1, com m en t . ( n . 1(b) ) . N or h as B rew er rebu t t ed t h e presum pti on th a t h is s e n te n c e , a t t h e b o tt o m o f th e g u id e lin e s ra n g e o f im p r is o n m e n t, is r e a s o n a b le . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. A lon zo , 4 3 5 F .2d 5 5 1 , 5 5 4 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). AF F I RMED.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aztar Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Robert M. Haddock, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Neil A. Ciarfalia, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|ROBERT M. HADDOCK |                                                             
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:             | Robert M. Haddock                                           
|Title:            | Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             | October 27, 2006                                            
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|                  |                                                             
|NEIL A. CIARFALIA |                                                             
|Name:             | Neil A. Ciarfalia                                           
|Title:            | Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President and Treasurer       
|Date:             | October 27, 2006                                            
|                  |                                                             

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aztar Corporation and will be retained by Aztar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Dan LOU, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-1458.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
# L_2010317EN.01004401.xml

| 3.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 317/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 317/44

---

Corrigendum to Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro on security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 260 of 2 October 2010
  )

On page 5, signatures:

for:

‘
  For Montenegro

The Minister for Foreign Affairs

Image 1

For the European Union

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
  ’,

Image 2

read:

‘
  For the European Union

Image 3

For Montenegro
  ’.

Image 4

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 411 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 411

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the source rules 
   to provide for economic recovery in the possessions of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the source rules 
   to provide for economic recovery in the possessions of the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Territorial Tax Parity Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO SOURCE RULES INVOLVING POSSESSIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 937(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``, but only to the extent such income is 
attributable to an office or fixed place of business within the United 
States (determined under the rules of Section 864(c)(5))'' before the 
period at the end.
    (b) Source Rules for Personal Property Sales.--Section 865(j)(3) of 
such Code is amended by inserting ``, 932,'' after ``931''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130575 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130575 

 COA: 255162 

Wayne CC: 03-013276

DAVID MICHAEL WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 11.0



PAMRAPO BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                                                         |  |                                  |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ---------
|                                                                                         |  | Three MonthsEnded March 31, 2005
|Income available to common stockholders                                                  |  | $                                | 1,983,102
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                                  | 4,975,248
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  | $                                | 0.40     
|Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |  | $                                | 1,983,102
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                                  | 4,989,972
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  | $                                | 0.40
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                      11,536
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                8,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 2,599
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      16,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                              15,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              37,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  35,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                37,041
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             2,564
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          1,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
Brian KENNER, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-73.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.01

                             INTERPORE INTERNATIONAL

                      Computations of Net Income Per Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three months ended              Nine months ended
                                                                  September 30,                  September 30,
                                                              ---------------------         -----------------------
                                                               1997           1996           1997             1996
                                                              ------         ------          ------          ------
<S>                                                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income                                                    $  577         $  127          $  856          $  419
                                                              ======         ======          ======          ======
Calculation of shares used in computing 
  net income per share:
   Weighted average common shares outstanding                  6,998          7,035           6,974           7,010
   Weighted average convertible preferred stock                   76            122              77             192
   Common share equivalents outstanding                          332            273             271             320
                                                              ------         ------          ------          ------
Shares used in computing net income per share                  7,406          7,430           7,322           7,522
                                                              ======         ======          ======          ======

Net income per share                                          $  .08         $  .02          $  .12          $  .06
                                                              ======         ======          ======          ======
</TABLE>
Jacobi P. MALONE, petitioner, v. Robert HINMAN, Individually and in His Official Capacity, et al.

No. 17-80.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6**  **59 1** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,

v. KENNETH TERRELL DALTON, a/k/a Kenneth Dalton, a/k/a Pookie , Defendant

– Appell ant
.

Appeal from the Unite d States District Court for the We st ern District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5 : 03

- c r - 0000 4

- RLV

- 13 )

Submitted : Ju ly 2 7 , 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON a nd KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth Terrell Dalton , Appellant Pro Se
. Amy Elizabeth Ray , Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Terrell Dalton appeals the district court ’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006 ) motion for reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the re asons stated by the district court. United States v. Dalton , No. 5:03

- cr 00004

- RLV

- 13 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         7,631
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,723
<INVENTORY>                                    28,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,697
<PP&E>                                         58,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                 42,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          65,186
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9,913
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,615
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,164
<SALES>                                        72,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               72,486
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                   686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,209
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.27


</TABLE>
Jeffrey A. MARTINOVICH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5643.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

INSWEB CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of InsWeb Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark P. Guthrie, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/MARK P. GUTHRIEMark P. Guthrie
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 25, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
II-O0810

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ross and Nancy Miller <rossnancymiller@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:10 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ross and Nancy Miller

1725 NW Jenne Avenue

Portland, OR 97229
John T. WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17M116.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Larry Egan BOATWRIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8016.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51408, 333-45634, and 333-89653) and Form S-3
(No. 333-54894) of LookSmart, Ltd. and Subsidiaries of our report dated
January 24, 2001 except as to the first, second, and fourth paragraphs of Note
15 which are as of February 20, 2001 relating to the financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 24, 2001 relating to the financial
statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                             /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 15, 2001