alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 21886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07870]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 22-11]


Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment; Aeneas Exporting 
LLC, Complainant v. Honeybee International Inc., and All America 
Shipping, Respondent

    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by Aeneas Exporting LLC, hereinafter 
``Complainant'', against Honeybee International Inc. and All America 
Shipping, hereinafter ``Respondents''. Complainant alleges that 
Respondents are California corporations and an ocean common carrier, 
non-vessel-operating common carrier, ocean freight forwarder, and ocean 
transportation intermediary.
    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) 
and 41104(a)(3), 46 CFR 545.4, and ``Fraud and Coercion'' regarding the 
receipt, handling, storing, and delivery of vehicles and assessment of 
charges and fees. The full text of the complaint can be found in the 
Commission's Electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/22-11/.
    This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law 
Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding 
shall be issued by April 10, 2023, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by October 24, 2023.

    Served: April 8, 2022.
William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07870 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
# L_2006065EN.01004701.xml

| 7.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/47

---

DECISION No 33/2005 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 16 February 2006

related to the listing of a Conformity Assessment Body under the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)

(2006/182/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Articles 7 and 14,

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Signed in Washington, 6 February 2006.

James C. SANFORD

On behalf of the United States of America

Signed in Brussels, 16 February 2006.

Andra KOKE

On behalf of the European Community

---

Attachment A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

| IMQ — Istituto Italiano del Marchio di Qualità |
| --- |
| Via Quintiliano, 43 |
| I-20138 MILANO |
| Tel.: +39 02 5073 392 |
| Fax: +39 02 5099 1509 |

IMQ — Istituto Italiano del Marchio di Qualità

Via Quintiliano, 43

I-20138 MILANO

Tel.: +39 02 5073 392

Fax: +39 02 5099 1509

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES HILLER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 25 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 INTERSTATE LAND INVESTORS II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James Christopher Boone, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Interstate Land Investors II Limited Partnership; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ James Christopher BooneJames Christopher BoonePresident
ISC Realty Corporation,
General Partner and Principal Executive Officer,
of the Registrant
Date:  November 15,  2004
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-10840; 333-12814;
333-13186; 333-91650; 333-122128; 333-137644; 333-139688; 333-148774) pertaining to
Optibase Ltd. of our report, dated April 14, 2008 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of V. Box communication Ltd., included in the Annual Report (Form
20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.               
| |                                           
| | Brightman
 Almagor & Co.                  
| | Certified
 Public Accountants             
| | A Member
 Firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

June 26, 2008

---

---
# L_2007266EN.01001201.xml

| 11.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 53/2007

of 8 June 2007

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 44/2007 of 27 April 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 44/2007 of 27 April 2007 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2006/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the regulation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 3, Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988) (codified version) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2006/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the regulation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 3, Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988) (codified version) (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | Directive 2006/93/EC repeals Council Directive 92/14/EEC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Directive 2006/93/EC repeals Council Directive 92/14/EEC (3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of point 66e (Council Directive 92/14/EEC) in Annex XIII to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32006 L 0093: Directive 2006/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the regulation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 3, Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988) (codified version) (OJ L 374, 27.12.2006, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2006/93/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 209, 9.8.2007, p. 80.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 374, 27.12.2006, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 76, 23.3.1992, p. 21.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
FIRST RESORT, INC., petitioner, v. Dennis J. HERRERA, et al.

No. 17-1087.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jason Bradley THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5031.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2007304EN.01005101.xml

| 22.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/51

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 67/2007

of 29 June 2007

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 74/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 74/2006 of 2 June 2006 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) (2).

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place with effect from 1 January 2007, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place with effect from 1 January 2007,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in paragraph 5 of Article 7 of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 D 1639: Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) (OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 D 1639: Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) (OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2007.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Alan SEATTER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 245, 7.9.2006, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Collins O. NYABWA, petitioner, v. Pam LYCHNER, Warden.

No. 17-8463.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jean COULTER, petitioner, v. James P. COULTER.

No. 17-1311.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# L_2005306EN.01004101.xml

| 24.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 306/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 306/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 105/2005

of 8 July 2005

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 39/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 39/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5j (Directive 98/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘5k. | 32003 L 0098: Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 90).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5k.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2003/98/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 28.7.2005, p. 36.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 90.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Alexis C. Korybut, the CEO and President of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement on May 13, 2011.





/s/ Alexis C. Korybut


Alexis C. Korybut


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and will be retained by Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 19, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Filed 3/20/14 J.M. v. L.H. CA4/2 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION TWO 

J.M., 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

v. 

L.H., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 E053375 

 (Super.Ct.No. TED006074) 

 OPINION 

 APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Mark Ashton Cope, 

Judge. Dismissed. 

 L.H., in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. 

 No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 

 L.H. (Mother) and J.M. (Father) share a daughter, A.H. The central issue in 

Mother’s and Father’s litigation is child custody. The family court determined Mother 

is a vexatious litigant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391, subd. (b).) In April 2011, the trial court 

denied Mother’s request to file a motion. Mother contends the family court erred by 

denying her request to file a motion. We dismiss the appeal as moot. 
2

PROCEDURAL HISTORY 

 On March 4, 2010, Mother was deemed a vexatious litigant. In April 2011, 

Mother requested permission to file new litigation. Specifically, Mother wanted to file 

a motion to quash and dismiss the vexatious litigant finding. On April 27, 2011, the 

Assistant Presiding Judge of the Superior Court denied Mother’s request to file the 

motion. Mother’s notice of appeal concerns the ruling made on April 27, 2011. On 

January 10, 2014, the trial court vacated the finding Mother is a vexatious litigant.1, 2

DISCUSSION 

 Mother contends the family court erred in 2011 by denying her permission to file 

a motion to quash or dismiss the vexatious litigant finding. “When no effective relief 

can be granted, an appeal is moot and will be dismissed. [Citation.]” (In re Jessica K.

(2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1313, 1315-1316.) The finding that Mother is a vexatious 

litigant has been vacated by the trial court. We can offer Mother no further relief in 

regard to her motion. If we reversed the matter and directed the trial court to file the 

motion and hold a hearing, there would be no vexatious litigant finding to quash or 

dismiss. Accordingly, we dismiss Mother’s appeal as moot. 

 1 In a separate order, we took judicial notice of the January 10, 2014, minute 

order in Riverside County Superior Court case No. TED006074. (Evid. Code, § 452, 

subd. (d).) 

2 The minute order reflects the court vacated the vexatious litigant finding made 

on “3/04/09.” We infer this is a typographical error, as the vexatious litigant finding 

was originally entered on March 4, 2010—not 2009. 
3

DISPOSITION 

 Mother’s appeal is dismissed as moot. The parties are to bear their own costs on 

appeal. 

 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

MILLER 

J. 

We concur: 

RAMIREZ 

 P. J. 

RICHLI 

 J.