alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9


                                 AMENDMENT TO
                              TRANSIT GROUP, INC.
                           1998 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     THIS AMENDMENT, is made this 16/th/ day of May, 2001, by TRANSIT GROUP,
INC. (the "Corporation"), to the Corporation's 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the
"1998 Plan").

                               R E C I T A L S:
                               - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has deemed it advisable
to amend the 1998 Plan as set forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS DECLARED that, effective May 16, 2001, the 1998 Plan
shall be and is hereby amended as follows:

     1.  Section 4(a) of the 1998 Plan shall be amended by deleting Section 4(a)
and inserting the following Section 4(a) in lieu thereof:

         "4.  Shares of Stock Subject to the Plan; Award Limitations.
              ------------------------------------------------------

              (a)   Subject to adjustments as provided in this Section 4, the
         number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards
         shall be the sum of (i) 32,000,000 plus (ii) one percent (1%) of the
         total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock determined as of
         December 31 for each year that the Plan is in effect. Such shares shall
         be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares of the Corporation
         or shares purchased on the open market. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
         the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued
         pursuant to Incentive Options shall be 32,000,000 shares."

     2.  Except as specifically amended herein, all other provisions of the 1998
Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed on behalf of Transit Group,
Inc. as of the day and year first above written.


                                                   TRANSIT GROUP, INC.


                                                   By: /s/ Philip A. Belyew
                                                       ---------------------
                                                       Philip A. Belyew


ATTEST:


/s/ James G. Overley
------------------------
James G. Overley


              [CORPORATE SEAL]
# L_2006053EN.01005001.xml

| 23.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 53/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 53/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 150/2005

of 2 December 2005

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2005/23/EC of 8 March 2005 amending Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level training of seafarers (2), is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2005/23/EC of 8 March 2005 amending Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level training of seafarers (2), is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 56j (Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32005 L 0023: Commission Directive 2005/23/EC (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 L 0023: Commission Directive 2005/23/EC (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 14).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2005/23/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 339, 22.12.2005, p. 30.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 14.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Release: #4164-98 (97 Civ.
    3119)

For Release: July 8,
    1998

NEW YORK COURT FINDS THAT AVCO
    FINANCIAL CORP. AND ANTHONY VARTULI DEFRAUDED OVER 1,000 CUSTOMERS IN
    CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF FUTURES TRADING COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND DIRECTS
    THEM TO DISGORGE $4.1 MILLION

WASHINGTON - The Commodity Futures
    Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today that the Honorable John F. Keenan
    of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a
    two-week bench trial earlier this year, issued a decision on June 30, 1998,
    against AVCO Financial Corp. (AVCO) and its president Anthony
    Vartuli, both of Greenwich, Connecticut.

In its decision, the court found
    AVCO and Vartuli liable for fraudulently promoting their futures trading
    software and directed them to disgorge $4.1 million in ill-gotten gains.
    The judge also found that AVCO and Vartuli gave commodity trading advice
    through their software and thus were required to be registered with the
    CFTC as commodity trading advisors.

Judge Keenan dismissed the charges
    brought against a third defendant, J. Michael Gent, of Tunnel Hill,
    Georgia, the developer of the trading program, finding insufficient
    evidence of his control of AVCO and of his participation directly in the
    fraudulent conduct.

The court found that AVCO and Vartuli violated the
    Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and the CFTC's regulations by fraudulently
    soliciting customers to purchase their software program through false
    representations that the program had generated large profits,
    overwhelmingly picked winning trades, involved little or no risk of loss,
    and had a profitable track record in actual commodity futures trading.
    Judge Keenan found that these false representations were made "in
    connection with" futures trading within the meaning of the CEA and that
    customers relied on these misrepresentations in purchasing the defendants'
    program, resulting in $4.1 million in sales revenue for the defendants. The
    court also found that AVCO met the statutory definition of a "commodity
    trading advisor" and provided personalized trading advice.

The court indicated that it would permanently
    enjoin AVCO and Vartuli from future violations of the CEA and Commission
    regulations, directed AVCO and Vartuli to disgorge $4.1 million dollars in
    ill-gotten customer fees, and imposed a civil monetary penalty of $5,000 on
    both AVCO and Vartuli.

CFTC Director of Enforcement Geoffrey Aronow
    commented:

"This court's carefully-reasoned decision
      reaffirms the Commission's statutory mandate to pursue those who provide
      fraudulent commodities trading advice for profit, whatever the media they
      choose to use to transmit their misinformation. Whether people get their
      advice face-to-face, by telephone, by fax, or by computer, they must
      always be on guard against promises that seem too good to be
      true."
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Conference call with FIX Protocol Ltd.
  
    



  Discussion of swap product classification and identifications issues.
      
  When
              05/19/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Irina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Jim Northey (FIX)

  Organization(s)
              FIX


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Lavada CARREON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6926.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
(LOGO)

KPMG
Financial Services
757 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017

Independent Auditors' Report

The Board of Directors
North American Mortgage Company:

We have examined management's  assertion about North American Mortgage Company's
(the Company)  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998 included in the
accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express  an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the Company's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the Company has  complied in all
material respects with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year ended December 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

March 25, 1999
Anthony Raymond LESCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8944.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with ICE eConfirm
  
    



  Discussion of data reporting.
      
  When
              10/25/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVII. Data Recordkeeping

  CFTC Staff
              Irina LeonovaDavid Taylor

  Visitor(s)
              Tara Collier

  Organization(s)
              ICE eConfirm


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Marty C. STACY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5814.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 10, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, et al., petitioners, v. GREATER BALTIMORE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY CONCERNS, INC.

No. 17-1369.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Manuel De Jesus VARELA, aka De Jesus Isaguires-Varela, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8618.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7101

ROBERT LINDSEY, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-1467-2) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 29, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lindsey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Lindsey Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lindsey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21.1



List of Subsidiaries



|                                    |  |               
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Name of Entity                      |  | Jurisdiction  
|BTLookSmart Pty Ltd.                |  | Australia     
|LookSmart (Barbados), Inc.          |  | Barbados      
|LookSmart Germany GmbH              |  | Germany       
|LookSmart Holdings (Delaware), Ltd. |  | Delaware      
|LookSmart International Pty Ltd.    |  | Australia     
|LookSmart Japan K.K.                |  | Japan         
|LookSmart Netherlands B.V.          |  | Netherlands   
|LookSmart United Kingdom Ltd.       |  | United Kingdom
|WiseNut, Inc.                       |  | Delaware
# L_2007328EN.01004902.xml

| 13.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/49

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 64/2006 of 2 June 2006 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 245 of 7 September 2006
  )

On page 13, in Article 1 of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 64/2006 the number of the point introduced ‘37’ is replaced by the number ‘36a’.

---
Floyd Dewaine SCOTT, petitioner, v. J. PALMER, et al.

No. 17-7704.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Florida Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held in Sunrise CAP Office, Florida. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Friday, July 27, 2001 and Saturday, July 28, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Ferree at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7973. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held Friday, July 27, 2001 from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. and Saturday, July 28, 2001 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., at Sunrise CAP Office, 7771 W Oakland Park Boulevard, Suite 225, Sunrise, Florida 33351. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 10 minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7973, or write Nancy Ferree, CAP Office, 7771 W. Oakland Park Blvd., Rm. 225, Sunrise, FL 33351, or e-mail                     *firstcapsfl@mindspring.com.*                     Due to limited conference space, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Nancy Ferree. Ms. Ferree can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7973, or e-mail                     *firstcapsfl@mindspring.com.*

The agenda will include the following: various IRS issue updates and reports by the CAP sub-groups. 

# Note:

Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

Dated: June 22, 2001. 

John J. Mannion, 

Director, Program Planning Quality. 

[FR Doc. 01-16415 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Standard Management Corporation.
 May 15,
2006

/s/ Ronald D. Hunter

Ronald D. HunterChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ Michael B. Edwards

Michael B. EdwardsChief Financial Officer