alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***EXHIBIT
31.1***
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Donald
Katz, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Audible, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 March 29,
      2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/
      Donald KatzName:
      Donald KatzTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
      Directors(Principal
      Executive Officer)
**Release:
    ��������������������
    #4298-99 (E.D.N.Y CV 97 4973 (SJ) (RL))****For release:
    ����������������
    August 5, 1999**

**New York Court Bars Oscar A. Klitin and Klitin
    Associates II, L.P. from the Futures Industry and Orders Klitin to Disgorge
    Misappropriated Investors' Funds In CFTC Enforcement Action; Injunction
    Stems from a 1997 CFTC Action Charging Fraud**

WASHINGTON -- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced
    today that U.S. District Court Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr. of the Eastern
    District of New York entered a consent order of
    permanent injunction against **Oscar A. Klitin** of Great
    Neck, New York, and **Klitin Associates II, L.P.**, a New York
    Limited Partnership operated by Klitin as a commodity pool.

The court's order, entered on August 4, 1999, stems from a three-count
    complaint filed by the CFTC on August 26, 1997 against Klitin and Klitin
    Associates II., L.P. (see CFTC News Release #4044-97 August 28, 1997). The complaint charged
    the defendants with, among other things, fraudulently operating a commodity
    pool by misappropriating more than $200,000 in customer funds and by
    misrepresenting the pool's financial condition to pool participants.
     Without admitting or denying the charges in the CFTC complaint, Klitin
    consented to the entry of the order which, among other things:
     1) permanently enjoins the defendants from further violations of the
    Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations;

2) orders Klitin to disgorge $115,772.86 (including prejudgment interest
    totaling $31,983.17); and

3) prohibits the defendants from soliciting or accepting new clients or
    participants for commodity futures or options trading, acting in any
    capacity that requires registration with the Commission, and from trading
    on any contract market subject to Commission regulation.

By entry of a consent order on March 3, 1999, Judge Johnson appointed
    the National Futures Association as the court's Monitor and directed it to
    make an interim distribution to the investors in Klitin Associates II, L.P.
    of the more than $100,000 that was frozen in a Klitin Associates II, L.P.
    account by a court order issued on the filing of the Commission's
    complaint.

# # #
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22011-22012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Projects Approved for Minor Modifications

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a 
previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
during the period set forth in DATES.

DATES: March 1-31, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, 
telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69c998f9a9384b685849495d8989382"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03696c7a6f667143707161602d6d6677">[email protected]</span></a>. Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above 
address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists previously approved 
projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 or to Commission Resolution Nos. 2013-11 and 
2015-06 for the time period specified above:

[[Page 22012]]

Minor Modification Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

    1. Sunset Golf Club LLC, Docket No. 20220317, Oneida Township, 
Huntington County, Pa.; modification approval to change the consumptive 
use mitigation method; Approval Date: March 18, 2022.
    Authority: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806 and 808.

    Dated: April 8, 2022.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-07884 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Donald Leonard STURGIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8186.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

appealed to the Supreme Court:

 

1. Eric Lisann

 v. Elizabeth Lisann

 Record No. 0120-22-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Chaney on

 August 8, 2023

2. Tadashi D. Guest

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0672-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Judge Ortiz on

 August 8, 2023

3. Jason Lamont Burford

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1275-22-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Athey on

 August 8, 2023

4. Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Authority

 v. Zero Links Markets, Inc., T/A Vinoshipper.com

 Record No. 0973-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Judge Raphael on

 August 15, 2023

5. Navy Federal Credit Union

 v. Deloris B. Lentz

 Record No. 1115-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Judge White on

 August 15, 2023

6. Darren Thornton, s/k/a/ Darren Lamar Thornton

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0652-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Judge Chaney on

 August 22, 2023

7. Prasad Salunkhe, et al.

 v. Christopher Customs, LLC, et al.

 Record No. 1195-22-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Athey on

 August 22, 2023

8. Bryan Temple Smith

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0169-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Judge Raphael on

 September 5, 2023
9. Silfredo Castillo Canales

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0775-22-4

 Opinion rendered by Senior Judge Clements on

 September 5, 2023

10. Silfredo Castillo Canales

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1037-22-4

 Opinion rendered by Senior Judge Clements on

 September 5, 2023

11. Dilliraj Bista

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0904-21-4

 En banc opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on

 September 12, 2023

12. John Randolph Hooper

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0752-22-1

 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales on

 September 19, 2023

13. Jeffrey Douglas Cheripka

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1153-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Senior Judge Petty on

 September 19, 2023
 The following case in which the Court of Appeals issued a published opinion has been 

disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Danjuan Antonio McBride

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1354-21-4

Opinion rendered by Judge Lorish

 on October 4, 2022

Judgment of Court of Appeals reversed and final judgment entered for

 the Commonwealth (220715)
 On October 19, 2023 the Supreme Court issued a published order in the following case, 

which had been appealed from this Court

1. Heath Nicholas Moison

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1038-21-1

 Memorandum opinion rendered by Judge Athey on August 2, 2022

 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed but portion of opinion deciding

 proffered testimony provided appellant with an alibi vacated 

 (220536)
Juan VIRAMONTES-SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8665.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


Report on Futures Industry Response to September 11th
    Links
          PDF

    Staff Reports
 Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**AMERICAN RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section1350)**

 

 

Pursuant tothe requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

 

1.             Ralph S. Roberts isthe Chief Executive Officer of American Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

2.             William G. Taves isthe Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

 

3.             Each of theundersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(A)                              TheCompany’s Form 10-Q/A accompanying this Certification, in the form filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the“Exchange Act”); and

 

(B)                                Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certifications are subject tothe limitations and qualifications set forth in the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A and to the following qualifications: (i) because we wererequired to change our independent accountants, our new independent accountantshave not yet completed a reaudit of the Company’s prior results, and havetherefore been unable to review the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form10-Q/A in accordance with the requirement of SAS 71, although such a review isrequired by Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X, (ii) because the financialstatements have not been reviewed in accordance with SAS 71, they are deficientand do not comply with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commissionpromulgated thereunder, and (iii) when such review is concluded by theCompany’s new independent accountants, accounting errors or inaccuracies mightbe discovered by such new auditors and require correction.

 
| Dated:  November 15, 2002 |   |                    |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                           |   |                    |
|                           |   |                    |
|                           |   | /s/ Ralph S. Roberts    |   |
|                           |   | Ralph S. Roberts        |
|                           |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                           |   |                    |
|                           |   |                    |
|                           |   | /s/ William G. Taves    |   |
|                           |   | William G. Taves        |
|                           |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Eric J. Buss, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of Life Time Fitness, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theCompany’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 30, 2015
James Edward MWAIPUNGU, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2005037EN.01000201.xml

| 12.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/2

---

Information about the signature of a decision of the Management entities under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the European Community on the coordination of energy-efficient labelling programmes for office equipment on the revision of Annex C part II, defining monitor specifications

(2005/C 37/02)

The decision of the Management entities under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the European Community on the coordination of energy-efficient labelling programmes for office equipment, to amend Annex C part II defining monitor specifications (1), was signed by the US EPA on 29 December 2004 and by the European Commission on 14 January 2005.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 20, 22. 1. 2005, p. 24.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18
             UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMTROL Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Albert
D. Indelicato, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 5, 2004                 By: /s/ ALBERT D. INDELICATO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Albert D. Indelicato,
                                           President, Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Director
Angel GUZMAN, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-5572.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

*2024Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.
Michael Thorvald LAURSEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5154.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.