alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 01­14­00620­CR 

STATE OF TEXAS  §  IN THE 

§ 

V.  §  FIRST COURT 

§ 

BRODERICK RENALDA 

FRENCH 

§  OF APPEALS 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes Broderick Renalda French, Appellant in the above styled and numbered                        

cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief, pursuant to                                  

Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the                              

following: 

1. This case is on appeal from the 176th Judicial District Court of Harris 

County, Texas. 

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. Broderick Renalda

French, and numbered 1394253. 

3. Appellant was convicted of Robbery. 

4. Appellant  was  assessed  a  sentence  of  27 years  imprisonment  TDCJ­ID  on 

July 15, 2014. 

5. Notice of appeal was given on July 15, 2014. 

6. The clerk's record was filed on September 2, 2014; the reporter's record was 

filed on October 23, 2014. 

7. The appellate brief is presently due on January 14, 2015. 

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 30 days from the present date, 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00620-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/11/2015 8:32:37 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/11/2015 8:32:37 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
i.e. March 13, 2015.

9. One extension to file the brief have been received in this cause.

10. Defendant is currently incarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested

extension:

Counsel for Appellant is a sole practitioner who must make appearances in county and

district court most every work day.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED​, Appellant prays that this Court grant

this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other and further relief as

the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

DAVID L. GARZA

102 S. LOCKWOOD

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77011

713/926­4604

713/926­0373 FAX

By: /s/ DAVID L. GARZA

DAVID L. GARZA

STATE BAR NO.: 07731475

david@dlgarza.com

Attorney for Broderick Renalda French
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on February 12, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Harris County, 1201

FRANKLIN, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002, by hand delivery.

/s/ DAVID L. GARZA

DAVID L. GARZA
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NeoGenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:           February 23, 2011

/s/Doug VanOortDouglas VanOortChief Executive OfficerDate:           February 23, 2011

/s/George CardozaGeorge CardozaChief Financial OfficerDate:           February 23, 2011

/s/Jerome J. DvonchJerome J. DvonchDirector of Finance and Principal

Accounting Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2006333EN.01005901.xml

| 30.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/59

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 127/2006

of 22 September 2006

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 54/2006 of 28 April 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 54/2006 of 28 April 2006 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 10d (Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXII to the Agreement:

| | ‘10e. 32005 L 0056: Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘10e. 32005 L 0056: Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p. 1).’







  Article 2

The texts of Directive 2005/56/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 23 September 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 105.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p. 1.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No s . 1D 18

- 3917 1D18

- 3919

_____________________________
D AVID K. M ARTIN II
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. August 16, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R OWE , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appel lant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Mitchell Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach
, for Appellee.
William T. ESREY, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1400.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Christian PRICE, petitioner, v. Brigham SLOAN, Warden.

No. 17-5189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael L. Pungello,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of John W. Henry & Co./Millburn L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 14, 2006
| By                                            | /s/ MICHAEL L.  PUNGELLO |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| Michael L.  Pungello                          |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
**Release: #4550-01****For Release: August 13, 2001**

**CFTC Adopts First Set of Final Rules on Single-Stock      Futures**

**Washington, D.C.** -- In accordance with the Commodity Futures      Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA), the Commodity Futures Trading      Commission (CFTC) has adopted the first set of final rules relating to      the trading of futures contracts based on single securities and      narrow-based security indices (together, security futures products or      SFPs) as its moves ahead with implementation of the CFMA.	  

      Because SFPs are considered to be both securities and futures contracts      under the new law, an entity that wishes to engage in SFP trading      activities must be registered with both the CFTC and the Securities and      Exchange Commission (SEC). However, in order to facilitate active trading      of these new financial products, which had been prohibited by law for      almost two decades, the CFMA directs both agencies to change their      respective rules to permit an entity that is already registered with one      agency to “notice-register” with the other agency, without      unreasonable restraints or requirements, for the limited purpose of      trading SFPs.	  

      Accordingly, with this first set of final rules, the CFTC has amended rule 3.10 to      allow SEC-registered securities broker-dealers (BDs) to notice-register      with the CFTC as futures commission merchants (FCMs) or introducing      brokers (IBs) for the purpose of engaging in SFP trading activities.      Consistent with the delegation of front-line oversight of traditional      FCMs and IBs to an industry self-regulatory organization, the National      Futures Association (NFA), the CFTC has issued a       Notice and Order authorizing the NFA to�process      notice-registration filings by BDs and to maintain records on such      BDs.	  

      The CFTC has also adopted new rule 41.41,      which establishes procedures whereby BDs that notice-register as FCMs or      IBs, or BDs that are exempt from having to register as a floor broker or      floor trader, may apply for orders exempting them from provisions of the      Commodity Exchange Act and certain rules promulgated thereunder. The CFTC      may grant such requests if it determines that the exemption is necessary      or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection      of investors. The new rule also permits security industry self-regulatory      organizations to submit such requests for exemptive orders on behalf of      their members.

      The rule amendments, notice and order, and new rule are being published      in the *Federal Register* and will become effective thirty days      after publication. Copies of these documents can be obtained by      contacting the Office of the Secretariat, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155      21st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5100 or by accessing      the Commodity Futures Trading Commission      website.
# L_2008125EN.01003901.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/39

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros

On 3 May 2007 and 6 March 2008 respectively, the European Community and the Government of the Union of the Comoros notified each other that the procedures necessary for entry into force of the Agreement had been completed.

The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 6 March 2008, in accordance with Article 16 thereof.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00762

- CV

Anthony Chijioke NGWU

, Appellant

v.

Vera Amuche TONI

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 19833

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the final decree of divorce signed by the trial court on August 21, 2018 is AFFIRMED

.

Because Appellant Anthony Chijioke Ngwu is indigent, we do not assess costs against him.

SIGNED July 24, 2019.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
Mark R. CARTER, petitioner, v. Mariana MATIAS.

No. 16-9588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Guillermo VERA, petitioner, v. Connie GIPSON, Warden.

No. 17-8392.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.4

                           DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF
                                   ZMP, INC.
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of TransDigm Holding Company hereby
constitute and appoint Peter B. Radekevich with full power of substitution and
resubstitution as attorney-in-fact for each of the undersigned, and in the
name, place and stead of each of the undersigned, to execute on behalf of each
of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999 pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 and to execute any and all amendments to such report and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents required to be filed in connection
therewith, granting to such attorney full power to act with or without the
others, and to have full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and
on behalf of each of the undersigned, every act whatsoever necessary, advisable
or appropriate to be done in the premises, hereby ratifying and approving the
act of said attorney and any such substitute.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

                       EXECUTED as of December 23, 1999.

/s/ Douglas W. Peacock
--------------------------------------
Douglas W. Peacock
Chairman of the Board and
Executive Vice President
(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ John F. Leary
--------------------------------------
John F. Leary
President
(Principal Operating Officer)



/s/ W. Nicholas Howley
--------------------------------------
W. Nicholas Howley
Executive Vice President and
Director


                                      xxxi
Michael Curtis REYNOLDS, petitioner, v. Timothy STEWART, Warden.

No. 16-9578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ezzat Samy KHALIL, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-8758.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
cc: Hon. William 0. Voy, District Judge, Family Court Division Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk

2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22611-22612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08085]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17385 and #17386; Oklahoma Disaster Number OK-
00155]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
Oklahoma

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Oklahoma dated 04/07/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Straight-Line Winds.
    Incident Period: 03/21/2022.

DATES: Issued on 04/07/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/06/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/06/2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Marshall.
Contiguous Counties:
    Oklahoma: Bryan, Carter, Johnston, Love.
    Texas: Grayson.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      2.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.438
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.880
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.940
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.940
   Available Elsewhere.......................................

[[Page 22612]]

 
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17385 C 
and for economic injury is 17386 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Oklahoma, 
Texas.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-08085 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P