alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 10 a.m. The starting time has been changed to 2 p.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

# STATUS:

Meeting open to the public.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-16397  Filed 6-26-01; 10:55 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.2

INSWEB CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of InsWeb Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William D. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/WILLIAM D. GRIFFINWilliam D. Griffin
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: March 25, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.44.1
 Confidential Treatment Requested. Confidential portions of this document have been
redacted and filed separately with the Commission .
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 MOBITEC EMPREENDIMENTOS E PARTICIPAÇÕES LTDA Confidential material redacted and filed
separately with the Commission. Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission. ROBERTO JUVENTINO
DEMORE Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the
Commission. Confidential
material redacted and filed separately with the Commission. LORENA GIUSTI DEMORE Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission. Confidential material redacted and filed
separately with the Commission.




---



##### 



Confidential Treatment Requested. Confidential portions of this document have been
redacted and filed separately with the Commission .
  pro solvendo
   By:
    /s/ Marcelo DuarteMOBITEC EMPREENDIMENTOS E PARTICIPAÇÕES LTDA.p. Marcelo Duarte
AdministratorBy co-signature to the issuer:/s/ Oliver Andreas WelsMOBITEC AB (publ)Oliver Andreas Wels
Allah BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5673.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
In Re Osvaldo BENITEZ, petitioner.

No. 17-8650.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Arutyun DEMIRCHYAN, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-1135.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

131281 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ROY WALLER, Personal Representative Stephen J. Markman, of the Estate of Jesse Waller, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131281 COA: 266288 Ingham CC: 04-001581-NH ALAN ATKINSON, D.O., and PULMONARY & CRITICAL CARE CONSULTANTS, P.C., SPARROW HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., and DAVID YOUNG, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Washington v Sinai Hosp ital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolv e an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l1025 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2006

Clerk
# L_2006087EN.01007501.xml

| 24.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/75

---

Information concerning the entry into force of Council Decision 2005/798/EC (1) on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and the United States of America on matters related to trade in wine

This Agreement entered into force on the date of signature, 23 November 2005.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 301, 18.11.2005, p. 14.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors VII (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors VII and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors VII and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.














/s/ Michael R. Burwell


_____________________________


Michael R. Burwell, General Partner


May 16, 2011
Brendan DASSEY, petitioner, v. Michael A. DITTMAN.

No. 17-1172.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
ALVOID HARTLEY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5037

Opinion filed December 9, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Alvoid Hartley, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We treat petitioner’s motion for extension of time as a petition alleging 

ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for purposes of exercising our jurisdiction. 

However, we find that petitioner has failed to establish good cause to extend the time 

for filing such a petition. See Chance v. State, 65 So. 3d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). 

Accordingly, we deny relief and dismiss this proceeding. 

VAN NORTWICK, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Ramon HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ, aka Ramon Hernandez, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

Jose Armando Ramos, aka Jose Marquez-Ramos, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-6065.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in *1983light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2108

CHRISTINE EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TECHNOLOGIES APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DIAGNOSTIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-96-3373-AW)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Christine Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Wayne Taylor, Thomas

Hermann Strong, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Christine Evans appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment against her in her action under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-5 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Technological Applications, No.

CA-96-3373-AW (D. Md. Jul. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Marquist Theobles WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5015.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Fraud Center
                        Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip or Complaint
                        RED List
                        Office of Proceedings
                        Learning Resources
                        Materiales Antifraude en Español
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


Dodd-Frank Act

  
VII. DCO Core Principle Rulemaking, Interpretation & GuidanceThe webpage you are looking for has been moved to:



http://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/DoddFrankAct/Rulemakings/DF_7_DCORules/index.htm

Please update your bookmarks.  Thank you.


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                RATIO OF EBITDA (AS DEFINED) TO INTEREST EXPENSE

                         1996      1997      1998      1999      2000

EBITDA (as defined)   $17,213   $24,522   $43,547   $50,562   $54,011
Interest expense        4,510     3,463     3,175    22,722    28,563
                      -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Ratio                     3.8       7.1      13.7       2.2       1.9
                      =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
Gregory BIRMINGHAM, petitioner, v. PNC BANK, N.A.

No. 17-5039.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 23, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
# C_2010080EN.01001301.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/13

---

Action brought on 8 January 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-8/10)

2010/C 80/22

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. de Schietere de Lophem, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2006/46/EC lapsed on 5 September 2008. At the date the present action was commenced, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not informed the Commission of those measures.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 224, p. 1.

1

---
David Ryan UNRUH, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9619.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
SUBWAY RESTAURANTS, INC., petitioner, v. Matthew WARCIAK.

No. 17-1593.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 25, 2018.

*2693Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### J. Heilbron *v.*The State.

1. Practice.—Additional instructions desired should be presented to the court in the very language in which they are intended to be given.

*5382. Same.—In misdemeanors this court will not, as a general rule, notice errors which are not assigned. *Goode*v. *The State, ante,*p. 520, is referred to by the court for its rules of practice in misdemeanors.

Appeal from the County Court of Titus. Tried below before the Hon. J. F. Wilkinson, County Judge.

No brief for the appellant.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Ector, P. J.

Heilbron, the defendant, was tried at the last May term of the county court of Titus county, for an aggravated assault committed on W. E. Tracy, on April 25, 1877, in a court of justice, then and there being in session in Titus county. The information under which he was tried was in proper form, and was based on a good affidavit. The jury found the defendant guilty as charged in the information, and assessed his punishment at a fine of $100.

The court in its charge to the jury submitted the law applicable to the case. If any additional instructions were asked by the defendant’s counsel, they are not shown by the record; nor does it show that any exceptions were taken to the charge.

One of the grounds set forth in defendant’s motion for a new trial is ‘ ‘ that the court failed and refused to charge-subdivisions and chapter — of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when required by defendant’s counsel.”

We are not enlightened as to what part of the Code of Procedure the defendant’s counsel asked to be given in charge to the jury. Such an instruction, if asked, was properly refused. Counsel desiring additional instructions given to the jury should present them to the court in the very language in which he wants them given.

*539In cases of misdemeanor, errors not assigned, as a general rule, will not be noticed by us. See the opinion by this court in the case of *Goode*v. *The State,*delivered during the present term, *ante,*p. 520, for the rules of practice followed and observed by the court of appeals.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of YTB
      International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) does hereby certify that:





1.  The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.









/s/ J.
                Scott TomerName:
                J. Scott TomerTitle:
                Director and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                August 14, 2007
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4133 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to direct a study on soil health 

of Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself and Mr. CURTIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to direct a study 

on soil health of Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Study on Improving 

5 Lands Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY. 

7 The Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the 

8 Secretary of the Interior, shall direct the National Acad9 emies of Science to study and report on the state of soil 

10 health on Federal lands in the United States. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4133 IH

1 SEC. 3. DUTIES. 

2 The National Academies of Science shall determine 

3 the parameters by which to measure soil health, includ4 ing— 

5 (1) soil organic matter and other measure6 ments; 

7 (2) soil qualities that lead to the sequester of 

8 carbon; and 

9 (3) soil qualities that support strong ecosystems 

10 and resilient environments. 

11 SEC. 4. DATABASE. 

12 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination 

14 with the Secretary of the Interior and the National Acad15 emies of Science, shall— 

16 (1) commence a study on the state of soil 

17 health on Federal lands that determines impacts 

18 such as grazing, wildfire, recreation, invasive species, 

19 and other relevant impacts on soil health on Federal 

20 lands; and 

21 (2) create a database of the information col22 lected during the study. 

23 SEC. 5. REPORT TO CONGRESS. 

24 (a) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days 

25 after the commencement of the study under section 4, and 

26 annually thereafter, the Secretary of Agriculture shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4133 IH

1 evaluate the progress of that study and report any short2 term findings to the Committee on Natural Resources and 

3 the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representa4 tives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Re5 sources and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

6 Forestry of the Senate. 

7 (b) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later 

8 than 2 years after the commencement of the study under 

9 this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the 

10 Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on 

11 Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Com12 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Com13 mittee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Sen14 ate a report summarizing the results of the study together 

15 with any recommendations for legislative or regulatory ac16 tion to improve soil health, increase carbon sequestration, 

17 and improve community benefits of soil health programs 

18 on Federal lands. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS