alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1(c)

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2005

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS



|                                                                              |  |             |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | -------
|Name and Principal Position                                                   |  | 2006 Salary
|Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                       |  | $           | 288,768
|                                                                              | 
|Douglas C. Williams, President and Chief Operating Officer                    |  |             | 279,456
|                                                                              | 
|E. Larry Ryder, Executive Vice President  Finance and Administration         |  |             | 232,872
|                                                                              | 
|Michael P. Spece, Executive Vice President  Merchandising and Design         |  |             | 232,872
|                                                                              | 
|C. Scott Young, President and Chief Executive Officer  Bradington-Young, LLC |  |             | 251,505

For fiscal year 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hooker Furniture Corporation
approved the bonus potential for each executive officer of the Company and the specific performance goal under the Companys annual bonus program. Each executive officers bonus potential for fiscal 2006 will be equal to a specified
percentage of the amount by which the Companys pre-tax earnings for fiscal 2006 exceed a specified threshold amount.
# C_2009312EN.01004501.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/45

---

Action brought on 19 October 2009 — Rossi Ferreras v Commission

(Case F-85/09)

2009/C 312/74

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Francisco Rossi Ferreras (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002;

| — | Order the Commission of the Commission of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the Commission of the European Communities.

---
Manuel Leon SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-5169.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41262

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCO ANTONIO MARTINEZ-MORENO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-546

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marco Antonio Martinez-Moreno (Martinez) appeals following

his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation.

Martinez was sentenced to a 40-month term of imprisonment and a

three-year term of supervised release. 

Martinez argues that the district court erred in increasing

his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) for a

drug trafficking offense based on his prior California cocaine

conviction. The Government concedes the error and asserts that
No. 06-41262

-2-

this court should vacate Martinez’s sentence and remand for

resentencing. 

The documents pertaining to Martinez’s California cocaine

conviction are ambiguous as to the statute of conviction. The

charging document, which merely tracks the statutory language,

indicates that Martinez was convicted under CAL. HEALTH & SAFETY

CODE § 11352(a). Section 11352(a) encompasses acts that are not

included in the definition of a “drug trafficking offense” in the

context of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B). See United States v.

Gutierrez-Ramirez, 405 F.3d 352, 359 (5th Cir. 2005), cert.

denied, 126 S. Ct. 217 (2005). Accordingly, Martinez’s sentence

is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Martinez also challenges the constitutionality of the

treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) as sentencing factors rather than elements of

the offense that must be found by a jury. Martinez’s

constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although he contends

that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a

majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 

S. Ct. 298 (2005). Martinez properly concedes that his argument
No. 06-41262

-3-

is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review. 

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR

RESENTENCING.
# L_2008124EN.01001701.xml

| 8.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/17

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 155/2007

of 7 December 2007

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 140/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 140/2007 of 26 October 2007 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 703/2007 of 21 June 2007 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards Dihydrostreptomycin and Streptomycin (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 703/2007 of 21 June 2007 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards Dihydrostreptomycin and Streptomycin (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32007 R 0703: Commission Regulation (EC) No 703/2007 of 21 June 2007 (OJ L 161, 22.6.2007, p. 28).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 703/2007 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 December 2007, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2007.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 100, 10.4.2008, p. 66.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 161, 22.6.2007, p. 28.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3917 

To prohibit the use of funds for the 2026 World Cup unless the United 

States Soccer Federation provides equitable pay to the members of the 

United States Women’s National Team and the United States Men’s 

National Team. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. HAALAND, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. RUSH, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. WILD, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. 

RYAN, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, 

Ms. TLAIB, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. ROSE of 

New York, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Ms. NORTON, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. 

COHEN, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. MENG, Mr. MORELLE, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. FRANKEL, Ms. ESCOBAR, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. ESHOO, 

Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. CRIST, Ms. SHALALA, Mr. 

SIRES, Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Mr. BERA, Mr. PETERS, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. MOORE, Mr. CARBAJAL, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. 

AGUILAR, Ms. WEXTON, Ms. DELBENE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. WILSON

of Florida, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for the 2026 World Cup unless 

the United States Soccer Federation provides equitable 

pay to the members of the United States Women’s NaVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:12 Jul 31, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6652 E:\BILLS\H3917.IH H3917

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3917 IH

tional Team and the United States Men’s National 

Team. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Give Our Athletes 

5 Level Salaries Act’’ or the ‘‘GOALS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR 2026 WORLD 

7 CUP. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed9 eral funds may be appropriated or otherwise made avail10 able to provide support for the 2026 World Cup, including 

11 support for a host city, a participating State or local agen12 cy, the United States Soccer Federation, the Confed13 eration of North, Central American and Caribbean Asso14 ciation Football (CONCACAF), or the Fe ́de ́ration Inter15 nationale de Football Association (FIFA), until the date 

16 on which the United States Soccer Federation agrees to 

17 provide equitable pay to the members of the United States 

18 Women’s National Team and the United States Men’s Na19 tional Team. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Eric Zachary ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Clarke DUCART, Warden.

No. 17-7657.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009141EN.01003303.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/33

---

Action brought on 27 April 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-149/09)

2009/C 141/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and J. Sénéchal, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 amending Council Directive 77/91/EEC as regards the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital (1), or, as the case may be, by failing to inform the Commission of those provisions, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 amending Council Directive 77/91/EEC as regards the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital (1), or, as the case may be, by failing to inform the Commission of those provisions, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2006/68/EC expired on 15 April 2008. However, at the time the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, as the case may be, had not informed the Commission thereof.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 264, p. 32.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3, numbers 333-154157 and 333-32966, and Form S-8,numbers 333-118320, 333-43080, 333-76849 and 333-73666), of our report dated October 1, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of GSI Group Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

October 1, 2010 

Boston, Massachusetts
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

                Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-61036 and 333-89943) pertaining to the InsWebCorporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option Plan, Senior ExecutiveNonstatutory Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ourreport dated January 21, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of InsWeb Corporation included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 
|                   |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
| Sacramento, California |                      |
| March 23, 2005    |                      |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          65,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      471
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,428
<PP&E>                                       1,117,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,183,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,651
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,287,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,183,889
<SALES>                                         53,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,584
<CGS>                                          370,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (112)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (319,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (319,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (319,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE:

Monday, April 18, 2022, from 1:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The agenda is: NSB Chair's Opening Remarks; Action Item—McMurdo Pier Project; Presentation and Discussion; and Vote.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-08052 Filed 4-12-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 31.1
                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Alan Margerison, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

     b)  [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5,
         2003)]; and

     c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date: February 3, 2004                  /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Dennis DETERS, petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION.

No. 17-107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Marcia WILSON, petitioner, v. HAWAII, et al.

No. 17-1199.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.