alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6351-01-P

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Technology Advisory Committee 

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announces that on 

December 14, 2020, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., the Technology Advisory Committee 

(TAC) will hold a public meeting via teleconference. At this meeting, the TAC will hear 

presentations from the TAC subcommittees on Distributed Ledger Technology and 

Market Infrastructure and Virtual Currencies. The TAC also plans to vote on a 

recommendation from the Cyber Security subcommittee.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 14, 2020, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 

Members of the public who wish to submit written statements in connection with the 

meeting should submit them by December 21, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place via teleconference. You may submit public

comments, identified by “Technology Advisory Committee,” by any of the following 

methods:

• CFTC website: http://comments.cftc.gov. Follow the instructions for 

submitting comments through the Comments Online process on the 

website.

• Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street 

NW, Washington, DC 20581.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as Mail, above.

Any statements submitted in connection with the committee meeting will be made 

available to the public, including publication on the CFTC website, http://www.cftc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meghan Tente, TAC Designated 

Federal Officer, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 

21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581; (202) 418-5785.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public may listen to the 

meeting by telephone by calling a domestic toll-free telephone or international toll or tollfree number to connect to a live, listen-only audio feed. Call-in participants should be 

prepared to provide their first name, last name, and affiliation. 

• Domestic Toll Free: 877-951-7311

• International Toll and Toll Free: Will be posted on the CFTC’s website, 

http://www.cftc.gov, on the page for the meeting, under Related Links.

• Pass Code/Pin Code: 6754747

The meeting agenda may change to accommodate other TAC priorities. For agenda 

updates, please visit the TAC committee website at:

https://www.cftc.gov/About/CFTCCommittees/TechnologyAdvisory/tac_meetings.html.

After the meeting, a transcript of the meeting will be published through a link on the 

CFTC’s website at: http://www.cftc.gov. All written submissions provided to the CFTC 

in any form will also be published on the CFTC’s website. Persons requiring special 

accommodations to attend the meeting because of a disability should notify the contact 

person above.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section10(a)(2)). 
Dated: November 23, 2020

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Teleconference w/JPMorgan Chase
  
    



  When
              11/18/2010

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVIII. Real Time Reporting

  CFTC Staff
              Gary GenslerCyrus Amir-Mokri

  Visitor(s)
              Jes Staley, JPMorgan Chase

  Organization(s)
              JPMorgan Chase


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO (UNAUDITED), AS DEFINED AND
INCLUDED IN THIS FILING ON PAGES 3 THROUGH 7, FOR THE 6-MONTH PERIOD ENDED 31
JULY 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   0.67
<CASH>                                         310,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         344,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,192
<BONDS>                                      3,970,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,118,456
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,803,171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,966
<SALES>                                          8,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,405
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               385,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             280,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (658,073)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (658,073)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (658,073)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)


</TABLE>
II-00450

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Terry Tedesco <ttedesco49@cox.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Terry Tedesco

3042 E Squaw Peak Circle

Phoenix, AZ 85016
|   | (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the                “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as amended, (the                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                B.                Amrey                Harden                                                              B.                Amrey                HardenPresident                and Chief Executive                Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2012025EN.01000302.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 November 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-281/09) (1)

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 89/552/EEC - Television broadcasting - Advertising spots - Transmission time)

(2012/C 25/04)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and C. Vrignon, Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Intervening party: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (represented by S. Behzadi-Spencer and S. Hathaway, Agents)

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 3(2) and Article 18(2) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23) — Transmission time granted to advertising spots

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by tolerating a situation in which the broadcasting of certain types of advertising, such as advertorials, telepromotion spots, sponsorship credits and micro-ads, on Spanish television channels has a duration which exceeds the maximum limit of 20 % of the transmission time within a clock hour, as laid down in Article 18(2) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 June 1997, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by tolerating a situation in which the broadcasting of certain types of advertising, such as advertorials, telepromotion spots, sponsorship credits and micro-ads, on Spanish television channels has a duration which exceeds the maximum limit of 20 % of the transmission time within a clock hour, as laid down in Article 18(2) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 June 1997, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

---
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

Before 

MULLIGAN, FEBBO, SCHASBERGER 

Appellate Military Judges 

Sergeant SHAQUILLE CRAIG 

United States Army, Petitioner 

v. 

Colonel MARK A. BRIDGES, United States Army, Military Judge 

Respondent 

and 

UNITED STATES 

Real Party in Interest 

ARMY MISC 20180632 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY DISPOSITION AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR 

EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

MULLIGAN, Senior Judge: 

Petitioner seeks extraordinary relief from a ruling of the military judge 

denying petitioner’s motion to compel appointment of an expert consultant to the 

petitioner’s defense team in the form of an attorney learned in the law of capital 

litigation. Petitioner relies on United States v. Gonzalez, 39 M.J. 459, 461 (C.M.A. 

1994), for the test of when appointment of an expert consultant is required. In the 

alternative, petitioner requests this court “appoint an expert consultant as counsel 

for the petitioner.” 

To qualify for the extraordinary relief he seeks, petitioner must demonstrate, 

among other things, “there is no other adequate means to attain relief[.]” Hasan v. 

Gross, 71 M.J. 416, 418 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (citing Cheney v. United States Dist. Court 

for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004). The availability of direct appeal after trial is 

considered an “other adequate means” of relief. See Dew v. United States, 48 M.J. 

639, 648 (Army Ct. Crim. App. 1998). A military judge’s denial of a defense 

request to compel the appointment of an expert consultant is a matter properly 

reviewed on direct appeal. See Gonzalez, 39 M.J. at 459-61.

For the foregoing reasons, and based on the reasoning, logic, and dicta set 

forth in United States v. Hennis, 77 M.J. 7 (C.A.A.F. 2017), the petition is DENIED. 

Petitioner’s request for the appointment of appellate counsel is DENIED as 

moot. 
CRAIG—ARMY MISC 20180632 

2 

Judge SCHASBERGER concurs. 

FEBBO, Judge, concurring: 

 I concur with the reasoning and result of the majority’s disposition of this 

matter. I write separately to clarify that our decision today is based on the criteria 

for the issuance of a writ of mandamus and the unusual nature of appellant’s request 

for an expert consultant. 

 As our superior court has noted, regardless of the ripeness of issues before 

this court, appropriate parties “may most certainly do what is ‘prudent’ and 

‘appropriate’ in the instant case.” Hennis, 77 M.J. at 11. Nothing precludes 

petitioner from requesting appointment of learned counsel as learned counsel—

rather than as an expert consultant—in the future. Whether such a request should be 

granted after 1 January 2019 in light of our superior court’s analysis regarding 

“future capital litigants” is a question not before us today. See id. at 9-10. 

DATE: 14 December 2018 

 FOR THE COURT: 

 MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

 Clerk of Court MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

Clerk of Court 

FOR THE COURT:
Hector MACIAS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7896.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Deandre GRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7296.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

*1548Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3138

___________ John M. Jeffords, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of * Social Security; Brent Jackson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 21, 2005 Filed: October 10, 2005

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John M. Jeffords appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of South Dakota affirming the denial of his request that his disabled child’s benefits be paid directly to him, not through a representative payee. For reversal, Jeffords asserts that he is able to manage his benefit payments because his-2- disability has healed. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. The Social Security Administration (SSA) will make direct payments to a beneficiary if the beneficiary shows that he is mentally and physically able to manage, or direct the management of, benefit payments. See 20 C.F.R. § 416.655 (2005). To support a request for direct payment, a beneficiary may provide a physician’s statement or other evidence, showing that the beneficiary is able to manage or direct the management of his funds. See id. Other than Jeffords’s unsupported assertions, we find no evidence in the record that Jeffords is mentally and physically able to manage his benefit payments. Rather, the evidence reflects the opposite: for example, his treating physician refused to certify that Jeffords could manage his own affairs; his representative payee did not consider Jeffords capable of managing his affairs because he desired to spend more money than he had and frequently pawned items; he accrued credit card debt and had two credit cards cancelled; and he threatened SSA employees and was arrested for an encounter with a previous representative payee. Thus, we conclude the Administrative Law Judge’s decision to deny Jeffords’s request for direct payment is supported by substantial evidence. See Neal v. Barnhart , 405 F.3d 685, 688 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

**In connection with this quarterly report of John W. Henry& Co./Millburn L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (this “Report”), I, Benjamin Weston, Chief Executive Officer andPresident, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006
| By                                    | /s/ BENJAMIN WESTON |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Benjamin Weston                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
EXHIBIT  32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anthony Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


/s/ Anthony Lee
-----------------------
Anthony Lee
Chief Financial Officer
July 25, 2006