22158 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

this AD, certificated in any category, as 

identified in European Union Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) AD 2022–0030, dated 

February 25, 2022 (EASA AD 2022–0030). 

(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122 

airplanes. 

(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114, 

–115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes. 

(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216, 

–231, –232, and –233 airplanes. 

(4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, 

–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 53, fuselage. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report that 

cracks were found on web horizontal flange 

and inner cap on frame (FR) 68, left-hand 

(LH) and right-hand (RH) sides, at stringer 

(STGR) 22. The FAA is issuing this AD to 

address the cracks on web horizontal flange 

and inner cap on FR 68, LH and RH sides, 

at STGR 22, which could result in reduced 

structural integrity of the fuselage. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Requirements 

Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this 

AD: Comply with all required actions and 

compliance times specified in, and in 

accordance with, EASA AD 2022–0030. 

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022–0030 

(1) Where EASA AD 2022–0030 refers to its 

effective date, this AD requires using the 

effective date of this AD. 

(2) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD 

2022–0030 does not apply to this AD. 

(3) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2022– 

0030 specifies ‘‘Accomplishment on an 

aeroplane of (repetitive) maintenance 

instructions, issued and approved by 

Airbus,’’ for this AD, those instructions must 

have been approved by the Manager, Large 

Aircraft Section, International Validation 

Branch, FAA; or EASA; Airbus SAS’s EASA 

Design Organization Approval (DOA). If 

approved by the DOA, the approval must 

include the DOA-authorized signature. 

(4) Where paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2022– 

0030 specifies if ‘‘discrepancies and/or 

cracks are detected, before next flight, contact 

Airbus for approved corrective action(s) 

instructions and, within the compliance time 

specified therein, accomplish those 

instructions accordingly,’’ for this AD, if 

cracks are detected, the cracks must be 

repaired before further flight using a method 

approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft 

Section, International Validation Branch, 

FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA DOA. 

If approved by the DOA, the approval must 

include the DOA-authorized signature. 

(5) Where paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2022– 

0030 specifies ‘‘the instructions provided by 

Airbus,’’ for this AD, those instructions must 

be approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft 

Section, International Validation Branch, 

FAA; or EASA; Airbus SAS’s EASA DOA. If 

approved by the DOA, the approval must 

include the DOA-authorized signature. 

(i) Additional AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft 

Section, International Validation Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or responsible Flight 

Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the Large Aircraft 

Section, International Validation Branch of 

the certification office, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@

faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the responsible Flight Standards Office. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain instructions 

from a manufacturer, the instructions must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section, 

International Validation Branch, FAA; or 

EASA; Airbus SAS’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 

the DOA, the approval must include the 

DOA-authorized signature. 

(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except 

as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if 

any service information contains procedures 

or tests that are identified as RC, those 

procedures and tests must be done to comply 

with this AD; any procedures or tests that are 

not identified as RC are recommended. Those 

procedures and tests that are not identified 

as RC may be deviated from using accepted 

methods in accordance with the operator’s 

maintenance or inspection program without 

obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided 

the procedures and tests identified as RC can 

be done and the airplane can be put back in 

an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or 

changes to procedures or tests identified as 

RC require approval of an AMOC. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 

50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 

8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; 

internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find 

this EASA AD on the EASA website at 

https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this 

material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products 

Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. This 

material may be found in the AD docket at 

https://www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2022–0457. 

(2) For more information about this AD, 

contact Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, 

Large Aircraft Section, International 

Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th 

Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone 

and fax 206–231–3225; email dan.rodina@

faa.gov. 

Issued on April 7, 2022. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Director, Compliance & Airworthiness 

Division, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07857 Filed 4–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0290; Project 

Identifier AD–2021–01266–T] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a 

new airworthiness directive (AD) for 

certain The Boeing Company Model 

787–8, 787–9, and 787–10 airplanes. 

This proposed AD was prompted by a 

report from Boeing that Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) 

discovered a design issue in the engine 

fuel feed system, which could result in 

fuel flow restrictions to both engines 

when ice that has accumulated in the 

airplane fuel feed system suddenly 

releases into the engines. This proposed 

AD would require revising the existing 

airplane flight manual (AFM) to update 

the limitations on minimum fuel 

temperatures. The FAA is proposing 

this AD to address the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: The FAA must receive comments 

on this proposed AD by May 31, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket at 

https://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating Docket No. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2022 / Proposed Rules 22159 

FAA–2022–0290; or in person at Docket 

Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The AD docket contains this 

NPRM, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

Docket Operations is listed above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tak 

Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO 

Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 

Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206– 

231–3553; email: Takahisa.Kobayashi@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

The FAA invites you to send any 

written relevant data, views, or 

arguments about this proposal. Send 

your comments to an address listed 

under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2022–0290; Project Identifier AD– 

2021–01266–T’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. The most helpful comments 

reference a specific portion of the 

proposal, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. The FAA will consider 

all comments received by the closing 

date and may amend this proposal 

because of those comments. 

Except for Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) as described in the 

following paragraph, and other 

information as described in 14 CFR 

11.35, the FAA will post all comments 

received, without change, to https://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. The 

agency will also post a report 

summarizing each substantive verbal 

contact received about this NPRM. 

Confidential Business Information 

CBI is commercial or financial 

information that is both customarily and 

actually treated as private by its owner. 

Under the Freedom of Information Act 

(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt 

from public disclosure. If your 

comments responsive to this NPRM 

contain commercial or financial 

information that is customarily treated 

as private, that you actually treat as 

private, and that is relevant or 

responsive to this NPRM, it is important 

that you clearly designate the submitted 

comments as CBI. Please mark each 

page of your submission containing CBI 

as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such 

marked submissions as confidential 

under the FOIA, and they will not be 

placed in the public docket of this 

NPRM. Submissions containing CBI 

should be sent to Takahisa Kobayashi, 

Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion 

Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; 

phone and fax: 206–231–3553; email: 

Takahisa.Kobayashi@faa.gov. Any 

commentary that the FAA receives 

which is not specifically designated as 

CBI will be placed in the public docket 

for this rulemaking. 

Background 

The FAA has received a report from 

Boeing that affects certain Model 787– 

8, 787–9, and 787–10 airplanes, with 

RRD Model Trent 1000 engines 

installed. RRD discovered and reported 

to Boeing that a design issue in the 

engine fuel feed system could result in 

fuel flow restrictions to both engines 

when ice that has accumulated in the 

airplane fuel feed system suddenly 

releases into the engines. The sudden 

release of accumulated ice into the 

engine fuel feed system, in combination 

with low fuel temperatures, could cause 

freezing temperatures at the inlet of 

certain engine fuel feed system 

components. This condition, if not 

addressed, could result in fuel flow 

restrictions to both engines, causing a 

potential loss of dual engine thrust 

control and reduced controllability of 

the airplane. 

Explanation of Applicability 

The applicability of this proposed AD 

includes additional designations for 

RRD Model Trent 1000 engines not 

explicitly identified on the model list of 

the FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet 

(TCDS) Number E00076EN, but are 

identified on the EASA TCDS 

EASA.E.036. The parenthetical text 

included in paragraph (c) of this 

proposed AD is an additional identifier 

for RRD Model Trent 1000 engines that 

specifies certain build standards have 

been incorporated on the engine. The 

designation of ‘‘/01’’ identifies RRD 

Model Trent 1000 engines on which 

Service Bulletin 72–G319 has been 

incorporated, and ‘‘/01A’’ identifies 

RRD Model Trent 1000 engines on 

which Service Bulletin 72–G893 has 

been incorporated. 

FAA’s Determination 

The FAA is issuing this NPRM after 

determining that the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements in This 

NPRM 

This proposed AD would require 

revising the existing AFM to update the 

limitations on minimum fuel 

temperatures. 

Compliance With AFM Revisions 

Section 91.9 prohibits any person 

from operating a civil aircraft without 

complying with the operating 

limitations specified in the AFM. FAA 

regulations also require operators to 

furnish pilots with any changes to the 

AFM (14 CFR 121.137) and pilots in 

command to be familiar with the AFM 

(14 CFR 91.505). 

Interim Action 

The FAA considers this proposed AD 

interim action. Boeing is currently 

working with RRD to develop updated 

electronic engine control (EEC) 

software, which will change the engine 

oil temperature amber line indicated in 

the engine indication and crew alerting 

system (EICAS). This change will ensure 

that, before takeoff, the engine oil 

temperature would be warm enough to 

operate the engine with cold fuel. The 

updated EEC software combined with 

the action required by this proposed AD 

will address the unsafe condition 

identified in this AD. Once this software 

is developed, approved, and available, 

the FAA might consider additional 

rulemaking. 

Costs of Compliance 

The FAA estimates that this AD, if 

adopted as proposed, would affect 14 

airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA 

estimates the following costs to comply 

with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Revising the existing AFM .............................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ................. $0 $85 $1,190 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
22160 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

The FAA is issuing this rulemaking 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 

44701: General requirements. Under 

that section, Congress charges the FAA 

with promoting safe flight of civil 

aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 

regulations for practices, methods, and 

procedures the Administrator finds 

necessary for safety in air commerce. 

This regulation is within the scope of 

that authority because it addresses an 

unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 

develop on products identified in this 

rulemaking action. 

Regulatory Findings 

The FAA determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Would not affect intrastate 

aviation in Alaska, and 

(3) Would not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive: 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2022–0290; Project Identifier AD–2021– 

01266–T. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

The FAA must receive comments on this 

airworthiness directive (AD) by May 31, 

2022. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 787–8, 787–9, and 787–10 airplanes, 

certificated in any category, with Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Model Trent 1000– 

A (including –A/01 and –A/01A), Trent 

1000–A2, Trent 1000–AE (including –AE/ 

01A), Trent 1000–AE2, Trent 1000–AE3, 

Trent 1000–C (including –C/01 and –C/01A), 

Trent 1000–C2, Trent 1000–CE (including 

–CE/01A), Trent 1000–CE2, Trent 1000–CE3, 

Trent 1000–D (including –D/01 and –D/01A), 

Trent 1000–D2, Trent 1000–D3, Trent 1000– 

E (including –E/01 and –E/01A), Trent 1000– 

E2, Trent 1000–G (including –G/01 and –G/ 

01A), Trent 1000–G2, Trent 1000–G3, Trent 

1000–H (including –H/01 and –H/01A), Trent 

1000–H2, Trent 1000–H3, Trent 1000–J2, 

Trent 1000–J3, Trent 1000–K2, Trent 1000– 

K3, Trent 1000–L2, Trent 1000–L3, Trent 

1000–M3, Trent 1000–N3, Trent 1000–P3, 

Trent 1000–Q3, or Trent 1000–R3 engines 

installed. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 28, Fuel. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report from 

Boeing that Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & 

Co KG discovered a design issue in the 

engine fuel feed system, which could result 

in fuel flow restrictions to both engines when 

ice that has accumulated in the airplane fuel 

feed system suddenly releases into the 

engines. The sudden release of accumulated 

ice into the engine fuel feed system, in 

combination with low fuel temperatures, 

could cause freezing temperatures at the inlet 

of certain engine fuel feed system 

components. The FAA is issuing this AD to 

address possible fuel flow restrictions to both 

engines, which could result in loss of dual 

engine thrust control and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision 

Within 30 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the existing AFM to 

incorporate the information specified in 

figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD into the 

‘‘Certificate Limitations’’ chapter of the 

applicable Engine Appendix of the existing 

AFM. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1EP14AP22.044</GPH>

Figure 1 to paragraph (g) - Fuel System - Minimum Tank Fuel Temperature 

FUEL SYSTEM 

(REQUIRED BY AD****-**-**) 

The fuel tank temperature limits below must be followed, even when using fuel system 

icing inhibitor: 

• Prior to takeoff, the tank fuel temperature must be at -28 °C or warmer. 

• In-flight, the tank fuel temperature must be maintained at -28 °C or warmer, as well 

as 3 °C above the freezing point of the fuel being used. 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2022 / Proposed Rules 22161 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or responsible Flight 

Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the manager of the 

certification office, send it to the attention of 

the person identified in paragraph (i) of this 

AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the responsible Flight Standards Office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair, 

modification, or alteration required by this 

AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company 

Organization Designation Authorization 

(ODA) that has been authorized by the 

Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make 

those findings. To be approved, the repair 

method, modification deviation, or alteration 

deviation must meet the certification basis of 

the airplane, and the approval must 

specifically refer to this AD. 

(i) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Tak Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO 

Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, 

WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3553; 

email: Takahisa.Kobayashi@faa.gov. 

Issued on March 17, 2022. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Director, Compliance & Airworthiness 

Division, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07903 Filed 4–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0403; Airspace 

Docket No. 22–AEA–6] 

Proposed Revocation of Class E 

Airspace and Proposed Amendment of 

Class E Airspace; Honesdale, PA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

remove Class E airspace in Honesdale, 

PA, as Spring Hill Airport has been 

abandoned, and controlled airspace is 

no longer required. This action would 

also amend Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

for Cherry Ridge Airport, and update the 

airport’s geographic coordinates to 

coincide with the FAA’s database. This 

action would enhance the safety and 

management of controlled airspace 

within the national airspace system. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 31, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to: The U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; 

Telephone: (800) 647–5527, or (202) 

366–9826. You must identify the Docket 

No. FAA–2022–0403; Airspace Docket 

No. 22–AEA–6, at the beginning of your 

comments. You may also submit 

comments through the internet at 

https://www.regulations.gov. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at https://www.faa.gov/air_

traffic/publications/. For further 

information, you can contact the 

Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; 

Telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: 

John Fornito, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 

30337; Telephone (404) 305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This proposed 

rulemaking is promulgated under the 

authority described in Subtitle VII, part 

A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

remove Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at Spring Hill Airport, due to the closing 

of the airport, and amend Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Cherry Ridge 

Airport, Honesdale, PA, to support IFR 

operations in the area. 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this rule by submitting 

such written data, views, or arguments, 

as they may desire. Comments that 

provide the factual basis supporting the 

views and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned regulatory decisions on the 

proposal. Comments are specifically 

invited on the overall regulatory, 

aeronautical, economic, environmental, 

and energy-related aspects of the 

proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2021–0403 and Airspace Docket No. 22– 

AEA–6) and be submitted in triplicate to 

the DOT Docket Operations (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the internet at 

https://www.regulations.gov. 

Persons wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2021–0403; Airspace 

Docket No. 22–AEA–6.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. All 

comments submitted will be available 

for examination in the public docket 

both before and after the comment 

closing date. A report summarizing each 

substantive public contact with FAA 

personnel concerned with this 

rulemaking will be filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

internet at https://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s web page at https://

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

telephone number) between 9:00 a.m. 

and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined between 

8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays, 

at the office of the Eastern Service 

Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 350, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 

30337. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1