alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-15-00165-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TREY BECK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

HAYDEN RUSSELL, DECEASED

V.

DALE BLANTON RUSSELL AND 

LORETTA KINGSLEY,

APPELLEES

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 217TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed, after notice, to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the trial court clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The trial court’s 

judgment was signed on May 8, 2015, and Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s 

record was due on September 8, 2015. On September 9, 2015, this court notified the trial court 

clerk that the record had not been filed. The clerk responded on October 7, 2015, by filing a 

motion for extension of time to file the clerk’s record. In the motion, the clerk stated that the 

reason for the delay in filing was that Appellant had not made a claim of indigence and had failed 

to either pay or make arrangements to pay for the preparing of the clerk’s record. On that same 

date, this court informed Appellant that, pursuant to rules of appellate procedure 37.3(b) and 

42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of full payment to the clerk was provided to 

this court no later than October 19, 2015.

The October 19, 2015 deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither provided proof of 

full payment nor otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). 

Opinion delivered October 21, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 21, 2015

NO. 12-15-00165-CV

TREY BECK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR

OF THE ESTATE OF HAYDEN RUSSELL, DECEASED

Appellant

V.

DALE BLANTON RUSSELL AND LORETTA KINGSLEY,

Appellees

Appeal from the 217th District Court 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-01158-12-02)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4135 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the statue to the memory 

and in honor of Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the District 

of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the statue 

to the memory and in honor of Albert Pike erected 

near Judiciary Square in the District of Columbia, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF STATUE OF ALBERT PIKE. 

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds as follows: 

5 (1) The Supreme Council of the Inspectors6 General of the Thirty-Third Degree of the Ancient 

7 and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry for the 

8 Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of AmerVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:40 Aug 15, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4135.IH H4135

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4135 IH

1 ica supports the removal of the statue to the mem2 ory of Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in 

3 the District of Columbia due to its divisive nature. 

4 (2) The Mayor of the District of Columbia and 

5 the Council of the District of Columbia support the 

6 removal of the Albert Pike statue from its current 

7 location. 

8 (b) REMOVAL.—After non-Federal funds are made 

9 available for this purpose, the Secretary of the Interior 

10 shall remove the statue to the memory and in honor of 

11 Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the District 

12 of Columbia under the ‘‘Joint Resolution Granting permis13 sion for the erection of a monument or statue in Wash14 ington City, District of Columbia, in honor of the late Al15 bert Pike.’’, approved April 9, 1898 (30 Stat. 737). 

16 (c) NO USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—No Federal 

17 funds may be used to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2012039EN.01000602.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Niels Møller v Haderslev Kommune

(Case C-585/10) (1)

(Integrated pollution prevention and control - Directive 96/61/EC - Annex I, subheading 6.6(c) - Installations for the intensive rearing of pigs with more than 750 places for sows - Inclusion or non-inclusion of places for gilts)

(2012/C 39/09)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Niels Møller

Defendant: Haderslev Kommune

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Vestre Landsret — Interpretation of subheading 6.6 of Annex I to Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (OJ 1996 L 257, p. 26) — Facilities intended for intensive poultry and pig farming having over 750 places for sows — Whether or not to include places for gilts (pigs after first heat which have not yet farrowed)

Operative part of the judgment

The expression ‘places for sows’, in subheading 6.6(c) of Annex I to Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that it includes places for gilts (female pigs which have already been serviced, but have not yet farrowed).

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 5.2.2011.

---
Anthony L. VIOLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>				5
<LEGEND>				This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance
Sheet and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
<MULTIPLIER>     1
<CURRENCY>			US Dollars
<PERIOD-START>			JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>			9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>		DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>			SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>  1
<CASH>				       8,233				
<SECURITIES>     0     
<RECEIVABLES> 			2,320,711
<ALLOWANCES>			  7,543	
<INVENTORY>	   		0	
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	2,873,402
<PP&E>			       	14,569,575				
<DEPRECIATION>			7,665,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			10,962,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		6,254,598
<BONDS>				0
<COMMON>				37,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0					
<PREFERRED>			3,400
<OTHER-SE>				2,653,913				
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	10,962,666		
<SALES>				0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>		17,161,818
<CGS>				0
<TOTAL-COSTS>			19,436,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>		0			
<LOSS-PROVISION>		0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		553,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>		(2,827,633)
<INCOME-TAX>			0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		(2,827,633)
<DISCONTINUED>			0
<EXTRAORDINARY>		0			
<CHANGES>				0	
<NET-INCOME>			(2,827,633)
<EPS-PRIMARY>  (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>		(0.83)

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                      Ending
Class            Interest        Principal         Losses            Balance
<S>               <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
A1             10611647.5     107271102.84                0      2156211533.84
A2            53721867.97     410158016.89                0     11120149858.31
AIO           18018073.62                0                0                  0
B              5411560.32                0                0          814385000
M1             7862597.45                0                0         1570888000
M2             4764125.38                0                0          878075000
OC                      0                0                0       234232942.35
P              6945206.51                0                0                  0
R1                      0                0                0                  0
R2                      0                0                0                  0
R3                      0                0                0                  0
R4                      0                0                0                  0
R5                      0                0                0                  0
X1                      0                0                0                  0
X2                      0                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
## TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Austin, Texas



## M A N D A T E

TRIAL COURT NO

. 1328806

COURT OF APPEALS NO. 01-13-00415-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

C

GREETINGS:

Before our COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

, on JULY 29, 2015

, the cause upon appeal to review,

revise or reverse your Judgment between:

JAVIER NOEL CAMPOS

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

CCRA NO. PD-0054-15

was determined; and therein our said COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS made its order in these words:

"This cause came on to be heard on the APPELLANT'S Petition for Discretionary Review, and the same

being inspected, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the Petition for

Discretionary Review be GRANTED

.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is VACATED and the cause is REMANDED to the Court of

Appeals, in accordance with the Opinion of this Court, and that this decision be certified below for observance."

WHEREFORE, We command you to observe the order of our said COURT OF CRIMINAL

APPEALS in this behalf and in all things to have it duly RECOGNIZED, OBEYED AND EXECUTED.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE SHARON KELLER

,

Presiding Judge of our said COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS,

with the Seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin,

on this day Monday, August 24, 2015

.

ABEL ACOSTA

, Clerk

By: Deana Williamson, Deputy Clerk
Carolyn BARNES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7972.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.
Jacques BASTIEN, petitioner, v. GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION.

No. 16-9573.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V
                             (A Limited Partnership)

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. V (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                            /s/Gary Mentesana
                                            ----------------------------------
                                               Gary Mentesana
                                               Principal Executive Officer and
                                               Principal Financial Officer
                                               Arch Street VIII, Inc, as
                                               Managing General Partner of
                                               Boston Financial Qualified
                                               Housing Tax Credits L.P. V


                                                 Date:  November 14, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         14,429
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  58,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,655
<INVENTORY>                                    33,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,803
<PP&E>                                         68,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 45,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          73,309
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9,870
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,889
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,884
<SALES>                                        73,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               73,655
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,314
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,241
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.42
        


</TABLE>
John Harry STEELE, petitioner, v. Willie THOMAS, Warden.

No. 17-8032.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 401 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 401

  To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to release reversionary and 
   reserved interests in certain lands within the Coconino National 
                            Forest, Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

Mr. O'Halleran introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to release reversionary and 
   reserved interests in certain lands within the Coconino National 
                            Forest, Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lowell Observatory Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Observatory.--The term ``Observatory'' means Lowell 
        Observatory of Flagstaff, Arizona.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service.

SEC. 3. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY AND RESERVED INTERESTS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights, if the 
Observatory makes a written request to the Secretary not later than 180 
days after the date of enactment of this Act requesting conveyance of 
the National Forest System land described in subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall convey, without consideration and by quitclaim deed, to 
the Observatory all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the parcel of land described in subsection (b).
    (b) Land Specified.--The parcel of National Forest System land to 
be conveyed under subsection (a) is the land--
            (1) conveyed by the United States to Percival Lowell and 
        his heirs by the Act of May 30, 1910 (36 Stat. 452); and
            (2) described as section 17, Township 21 north of range 7 
        east of the Gila and Salt River base and meridian in Coconino 
        County, Arizona.
                                 <all>
```
#### Carrabelle, Florida, a municipal corporation, and The Gulf Trading Company, a corporation, *Plaintiffs in Er*ror, v. The Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Company, a corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision filed January 25, 1929.

*Fred H. Davis*and *Clyde W.*Atkinson, for Plaintiffs in Error;

*E. Tillman Davis,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by' the Co.urt that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur
Salvador Antonio Damian LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5492.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 27, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 27, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0061. ATLANTA WOMEN'S SPECIALISTS, LLC et al. v. KEITH TRABUE et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 14ev001821
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2890

___________________________

Michael Lindsey, as husband and wife; Marquesa Lindsey, as husband and wife

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc.; John Doe

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas

 ____________

Submitted: March 26, 2024

Filed: April 4, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael and Marquesa Lindsey appeal the district court’s1 denial of their

motion to voluntarily dismiss their action without prejudice. After careful review of

1The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Western District of Arkansas.
the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying the Lindseys’ motion. See Hamm v. Rhone-Poulenc

Rorer Pharms., Inc., 187 F.3d 941, 950 (8th Cir. 1999) (reviewing denial of motion

to voluntarily dismiss for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is effective on June 6, 2018 (the “Effective
Date”), by and between Oragenics, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and Alan Joslyn (the “Executive”) (Company and Executive may be referred to hereinafter individually, as a “Party”
or collectively, as the “Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into that certain Employment
Agreement (the “Agreement”) on June 6, 2016; 
 WHEREAS, the Initial Term of the Agreement (as extended for an
additional twelve (12) months as provided in the Agreement) ends on June 6, 2018 (the “Current Expiration Date”); 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive mutually desire to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional two year period commencing on
the Current Expiration Date and ending on June 6, 2020; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to maintain all of the
terms and conditions of the Agreement and its incorporated exhibits except as modified herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of
the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Recitals. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by reference. 


 

	 	2.	Modification of Section 3 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, the Term (as defined in the Agreement) of the Agreement shall be extended for two
(2) years beginning on the Agreement’s Current Expiration Date and ending on June 6, 2020. 

  

	 	3.	Other Provisions Unaffected. Except as expressly modified and amended herein, all terms, conditions and covenants set forth in the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed and shall remain in full force and effect and
unaffected by this Amendment; provided, however, that to the extent of any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall control. 


 

	 	4.	Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and it shall not be necessary for the parties to execute any of the same counterparts hereof. Counterparts to this Agreement may be
delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf) or other transmission method and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day
and year first written above. 
  

			
	COMPANY
	
	Oragenics, Inc., a Florida corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Sullivan
	Name:	 	Michael Sullivan
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	
	/s/ Alan Joslyn
	Alan Joslyn