alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1999 AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED ON ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,973,988              40,717,517
<SECURITIES>                                 4,935,229              98,579,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                  924,348               4,519,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    286,331                 348,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,845,588             145,890,949
<PP&E>                                       4,469,893              12,340,842
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,470,475               3,077,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,225,852             155,610,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,372,749              11,749,355
<BONDS>                                      1,237,915               3,892,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,136,028                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        10,338                  24,025
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,374,861             138,588,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,225,852             155,610,715
<SALES>                                    159,845,855             317,259,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           171,114,327             339,609,377
<CGS>                                      136,067,182             271,561,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,411,112              59,276,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,253                 261,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,805,532              12,859,221
<INCOME-TAX>                                   740,268               5,272,281
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,065,264               7,586,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,065,264               7,586,940
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04                     .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03                     .31



</TABLE>
# C_2011298EN.01000602.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) — Office of Communications v Information Commissioner

(Case C-71/10) (1)

1

(Public access to environmental information - Directive 2003/4/EC - Article 4 - Exceptions to the right of access - Request for access involving more than one of the interests protected under Article 4(2) of that directive)

2011/C 298/09

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties

Parties

Respondent: Office of Communications

Respondent:

Appellant: Information Commissioner

Appellant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — Interpretation of Article 4(2)(b) and (e) of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (OJ 2003 L 41, p. 26) — Exceptions to the right of access — Request for access involving more than one of the interests protected under Article 4(2) of the directive, the adverse effect on each interest being insufficient in itself to justify refusal of access

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that, where a public authority holds environmental information or such information is held on its behalf, it may, when weighing the public interests served by disclosure against the interests served by refusal to disclose, in order to assess a request for that information to be made available to a natural or legal person, take into account cumulatively a number of the grounds for refusal set out in that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
Matthew Vaughn DIAMOND, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 17-8336.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Zhenggang WangName:
      Zhenggang
      WangTitle:
      Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 11, 2005



/s/ Scott LongScott Long Chief Financial Officer
v

Survey 

1. Who is responsible for DE&I? 

A. HR or Firm Diversity Professionals 

B. The C Suite 

C. Everyone at the Firm 
v

Survey 

2. In the aftermath of George Floyd’s death and the protests, did your firm issue a 

statement (either internal or external)? 

A. Yes 

B. No 
v

Survey 

3. At times, I am not sure what to say or do around issues of race and as a result I have a 

tendency to remain silent. 

A. Agree 

B. Disagree 
v

Survey 

4. Do you consider yourself to be an Ally or an Upstander? An upstander is a person who 

speaks or acts in support of an individual (opposite of a bystander). 

A. Yes 

B. No 
v

Survey 

5. In light of the events in 2020, are you optimistic that we have a meaningful opportunity 

to make real progress around racial equity and inclusion within our industry? 

A. Yes 

B. No
Michael R. HAYNES, petitioner, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION.

No. 17-8161.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3944 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3944

  To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 to 
modify the procedure for communicating certain emergency risks, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2019

Mr. Kevin Hern of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. Mullin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 to 
modify the procedure for communicating certain emergency risks, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION OF RISK.

    Section 3027(d) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 709c(d)) is amended by inserting ``, or when the 
National Weather Service forecasts a possibility that precipitation or 
runoff will exceed,'' after ``when precipitation or runoff exceeds''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 21, 2016

No. 04-16-00503-CV

IN RE ESTATE OF RAMIRO AGUILAR JR., DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2800

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After this court granted appellants a forty-five-day extension, appellants’ brief is 

currently due December 29, 2016. On December 19, 2016, appellants filed a second motion for 

extension of time, asking for additional time in which to file their brief. In the motion, which is 

unopposed, appellants contend they need additional time to file their brief because the clerk’s 

record — which was filed in this court on October 14, 2016, and contains only four documents 

— is incomplete in that it does not include all of the documents requested by appellants for 

inclusion in the clerk’s record. This court cannot determine exactly which documents are 

missing because the clerk’s record does not contain a request for the clerk’s record that would 

show exactly what documents appellants requested and appellants did not provide this court with 

a copy of such request. Appellants also ask that we order the clerk to “re-do” the clerk’s record 

and resubmit it to this court. We assume by “re-do” appellants mean the clerk should file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the documents requested by appellant for inclusion in the 

clerk’s record. 

Accordingly, we ORDER the Bexar County Clerk to: (1) determine the cost of a 

supplemental clerk’s record that includes all documents requested by appellants for inclusion in 

the clerk’s record; (2) send appellants an invoice of said cost within ten days of the date of this 

order; and (3) file the supplemental clerk’s record in this court within thirty days of receipt of 

payment. We ORDER appellants to file a copy of the invoice in this court immediately upon 

receipt. We further ORDER appellants to provide payment to the clerk for the supplemental 

clerk’s record within five days of receipt of the invoice and to file written proof in this court that 

such payment has been made when it is made. We ORDER appellants to file their brief in this 

court on or before thirty days after the date the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the Bexar

County Clerk. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Tyrice G. ROYSTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5205.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2005137EN.01000101.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments

(2005/C 137/01)

The Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments will enter into force on 1 July 2005, the procedures provided for in Article 16 of the Agreement having been completed on 31 May 2005.

---
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.01

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert M. Alderman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of John W. Henry & Co./Millburn
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
   the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2005
------------------------
By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Borland Software Corporation (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Dale L. Fuller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Report and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/S/    DALE L. FULLER

---

DALE L. FULLER

Chief Executive Officer

May 13, 2003



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Y. Brent, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rezconnect
   Technologies, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to make the statements made, in
   light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
   misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by
         others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
         this quarterly report is being prepared;
      2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filling date of
         this quarterly report ("Evaluation Date") ;and
      3. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
   of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
   function):
      1. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         control which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in
         internal controls; and
      2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
   quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
   controls or in other factors that could subsequently affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.


Date August 16, 2004


/s/  Michael Y. Brent
Michael Y. Brent,
Chief Executive Officer, Rezconnect Technologies, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3955 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3955

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
  unique ZIP Code for Silver Cliff, Colorado, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2019

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
  unique ZIP Code for Silver Cliff, Colorado, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Silver Cliff Community Act''.

SEC. 2. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR SILVER CLIFF, COLORADO.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique 
ZIP Code, to be numbered 81249, applicable to the area encompassing 
only Silver Cliff, Colorado.
                                 <all>
```
Damon Dares KEYS, petitioner, v. James FAULK, et al.

No. 17-8736.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
MEETING OF THE CFTC AGRICULTURAL 

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

CFTC Division of 

Enforcement: Overview of 

Self-Reporting

• Vincent McGonagle, Principal 

Deputy Director, Division of 

Enforcement

September 24, 2020

Self Reporting, Cooperation, and 

Remediation:

https://www.cftc.gov/About/CFTCOrganization/SelfR

eportingCooperationandRemediation.html

Enforcement Manual:

https://www.cftc.gov/media/1966/The%2520CFTC%

2520Division%2520of%2520Enforcement%2520-

%2520Enforcement%2520Manual/download
BIC CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. MARKETQUEST GROUP, INC., dba All-In-One.

No. 17-979.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.