Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2022 / Notices 22941 

Patidar Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Patidar 

Cash & Carry of South Plainfield, New 

Jersey; Keemat Grocers of Sugarland, 

Texas; KGF World Food Warehouse Inc. 

d/b/a World Food Mart of Houston, 

Texas; Telfair Spices of Sugarland 

Texas; Indian Groceries and Spices Inc. 

d/b/a iShopIndia.com of Milwaukee, 

Wisconsin; Rani Foods LP d/b/a Rani’s 

World Foods of Houston, Texas; 

Tathastu Trading LLC of South 

Plainfield, New Jersey; and Choice 

Trading LLC of Guttenberg, New Jersey. 

Id. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigation (‘‘OUII’’) was named as a 

party. Id. 

On February 10, 2021, the former 

presiding ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 

6) finding all respondents in default. 

OUII supported the motion. On March 

2, 2021, the Commission issued a notice 

determining not to review Order No. 6. 

On May 24, 2021, Meenaxi moved for 

a summary determination of a section 

337 violation by all of the respondents, 

each of whom had previously been 

found in default. On June 16, 2021, OUII 

responded in support of the motion. On 

December 1, 2021, the former presiding 

ALJ granted the motion as an ID (Order 

No. 15). The ID raised a question 

whether at least one of the defaulting 

respondents—Organic Food—had 

properly been served and therefore 

found in default. Order No. 15, at 1, n.1. 

On January 18, 2022, the Commission 

reviewed Order No. 15, and remanded 

the investigation to the ALJ in order to 

‘‘consider whether a default finding is 

appropriate in view of the manner of 

service of documents on’’ Organic Food. 

Notice at 3 (Jan. 18, 2022). The remand 

afforded the ALJ the authority to cure 

defects, if any, as to Organic Food, and 

to identify and cure defects, if any, as 

to other respondents. Id. In view of 

these concerns, the Commission 

reconsidered its decision not to review 

Order No. 6, which, as noted above, 

found all respondents in default. Id. 

On remand, Meenaxi moved for leave 

to amend the complaint and notice of 

investigation to: 

(i) Substitute Organic Food with proposed 

respondent Organic Ingredients Inc. d/b/a 

Namaste Plaza Indian Super Market, with an 

address of 12220 World Trade Dr #200, San 

Diego, California 92128 (‘‘Organic 

Ingredients’’); 

(ii) correct the address of respondent New 

India to 2850 Quimby Road, San Jose, 

California 95148; 

(iii) correct the address of respondent 

Bharat Bazar to 34301 Alvarado Niles Road, 

Union City, California 94587; and 

(iv) supplement the Complaint with 

Exhibits 9–a, 9–b, and 9–c, which address 

Organic Food and/or Organic Ingredients. 

Unopposed Mot. of Compl’t for Leave 

to Amend the Compl. and Notice of 

Investigation at 3–4, 9–10 (Feb. 23, 

2022). 

On March 11, 2022, the CALJ issued 

one of the subject IDs (Order No. 18) 

granting the motion for leave to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. No petitions for review of 

Order No. 18 were filed. The 

Commission has determined not to 

review Order No. 18. 

On March 15, 2020, the CALJ issued 

the second of the two subject IDs (Order 

No. 20) extending the target date to June 

21, 2022, and stating that any remand ID 

will issue no later than May 20, 2022. 

Order No. 20, at 1. No petitions for 

review of Order No. 20 were filed. 

The Commission has determined to 

review Order No. 20 on its own 

initiative. See 19 CFR 210.44. On 

review, the Commission sets the target 

date for completion of the investigation 

to August 31, 2022. As stated in the 

Order Remanding the Investigation, the 

remand ID on summary determination 

of violation shall become final 45 days 

after issuance absent Commission 

review. See Order Remanding the 

Investigation at 4, ¶ 6 (Jan. 18, 2022). 

The Commission understands that the 

remand ID concerning summary 

determination on violation of section 

337 will issue on or before May 20, 

2022. See Order No. 20, at 1. 

The Commission vote for these 

determinations took place on April 12, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 12, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08185 Filed 4–15–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1140–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection of 

eComments Requested; ATF Citizens 

Academy Application—ATF Form 

3000.12 

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives 

(ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ) will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA). 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for an additional 30 

days until May 18, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and, if so, how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

New Information Collection. 

(2) The Title of the Form/Collection: 

ATF Citizens Academy Application. 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form number: ATF Form 3000.12. 

Component: Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
22942 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2022 / Notices 

Primary: Individuals or households. 

Other: None. 

Abstract: The ATF Citizens Academy 

Application—ATF form 300.12 will be 

used to collect personally identifiable 

information to determine an 

individual’s eligibility to participate in 

the Citizens Academy training program. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: An estimated 750 respondents 

will prepare responses for this 

collection once annually, and it will 

take each respondent approximately 5 

minutes to complete their responses. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated annual public 

burden associated with this collection is 

63 hours, which is equal to 750 (total 

respondents) * 1 (# of response per 

respondent) * .0833333 (5 minutes or 

the time taken to prepare each 

response). 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, Mail Stop 3.E– 

405A, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: April 12, 2022 

Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08161 Filed 4–15–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Judgment Under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

On April 12, 2022, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Judgment with the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of New 

York in a lawsuit entitled United States 

v. Northrop Grumman Systems 

Corporation et al., Civil Action No. 22– 

cv–02101. 

In this action, the United States seeks, 

as provided under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), recovery of response costs 

from Northrop Grumman Systems 

Corporation and Northrop Grumman 

Corporation (collectively ‘‘Grumman’’) 

related to its historical operations at the 

Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve 

Plant, Bethpage, New York, and 

adjacent former facilities owned and 

operated by Grumman’s predecessors 

(‘‘the Sites’’). The proposed Consent 

Judgment resolves the United States’ 

claims against Grumman for the United 

States’ response costs, and related 

contribution claims, at the Sites. 

Under the proposed Consent 

Judgment, the United States will receive 

$35,000,000 from Grumman. Of the 

settlement proceeds, $17,500,000 will 

go to the Department of the Navy’s 

Environmental Restoration account, and 

$17,500,000 will go to the United States 

Treasury. 

The settlement (Section IX) provides, 

in exchange for the above payments, the 

United States releases and covenants 

not to sue or to take administrative 

action against Grumman with respect to 

claims arising from or relating to the 

Sites or the related groundwater 

contamination, including claims for 

response costs and contribution under 

CERCLA or other laws. Further, under 

Section XI, Grumman releases, and 

covenants not to sue the United States 

with respect to claims arising from or 

relating to the Sites or related 

groundwater contamination, including 

claims for response costs and 

contribution under CERCLA or other 

laws. The Consent Judgment more fully 

describes these covenants, and Section 

X identifies certain exceptions to each 

of the above-referenced covenants. 

Under the Consent Judgment, the 

parties will each continue with their 

respective response actions and 

commitments to take response actions to 

address the Sites, as described in 

Section VII of the Consent Judgment. 

Further, the Parties will coordinate and 

cooperate with each other in 

implementing their respective response 

actions to address the Sites, as described 

in Section VII. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Judgment. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States v. Northrop 

Grumman Systems Corp. et al., Civil 

Action No. 22–cv–02101, D.J. Ref. No. 

90–11–3–10336. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Judgment may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

A paper copy of the Consent Judgment 

will be provided upon written request 

and payment of reproduction costs. 

Please mail your request and payment 

to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ— 

ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $4.00 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2022–08209 Filed 4–15–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; 

Reinstatement, With Change, of 

Previously Approved Collection: 

National Inmate Survey in Jails (NIS– 

4J) 

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until June 

17, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Amy Lauger, Supervisory Statistician, 

Institutional Research and Special 

Projects Unit, Bureau of Justice 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES