alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Clearing Member Risk Management 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The goal of the proposed rulemaking is to facilitate customer access to clearing and to bolster risk management at 

the clearing member level. 

How would the proposed rulemaking affect risk management programs of clearing members? 

The proposed rulemaking would require swap dealers, major swap participants, and futures commission merchants 

that are clearing members to: (1) establish credit and market risk-based limits based on position size, order size, 

margin requirements, or similar factors; (2) use automated means to screen orders for compliance with the riskbased limits; (3) monitor for adherence to the risk-based limits intra-day and overnight; (4) conduct stress tests of 

all positions in the proprietary account and all positions in any customer account that could pose material risk to the 

futures commission merchant at least once per week; (5) evaluate their ability to meet initial margin requirements at 

least once per week; (6) evaluate their ability to meet variation margin requirements in cash at least once per week; 

(7) evaluate their ability to liquidate positions they clear in an orderly manner, and estimate the cost of the 

liquidation at least once per month; and (8) test all lines of credit at least once per quarter. 

What registrants are covered by the proposed regulations? 

The proposed regulations would apply to swap dealers, major swap participants, and futures commission merchants 

that are clearing members. 

By when must comments on the rules be submitted? 

Comments on the rules must be submitted within sixty (60) days of the publication of the proposal in the Federal 

Register. 

Do the proposed risk management procedures allow clearing members to have flexibility in 

developing procedures that meet their needs? 

Yes. The Commission recognizes that an individual firm must have the flexibility to implement specific policies and 

procedures unique to its circumstances. The proposed regulations would establish the general elements to be 

included in the design and testing of a swap dealer’s, major swap participant’s, or futures commission merchant’s 

risk management program. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
# L_2004255EN.01004001.xml

| 31.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 255/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 255/40

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Turkish Republic on precursors and chemical substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances

The Agreement between the European Community and the Turkish Republic on precursors and chemical substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, which the Council decided to conclude on 16 December 2002
   (1), enters into force on 1 August 2004, the procedures provided for in Article 12 of the Agreement having been completed on 24 June 2004.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 7.3.2003, p. 30.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16222]



[[Page 34444]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. P-2060-005, P-2084-020, P-2320-005 and P-2330-007]


Carry Falls Upper Raquette River Middle Raquette River Lower 
Raquette River; Notice of Meetings

June 22, 2001.
    a. Date and Times of Meetings: July 30, 2001, 1 pm to 5 pm; July 
31, 2001, 9 am to 5 pm.
    b. Place: St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Reservation, Community Building, 
Route 37, Hogansburg, Franklin County, New York.
    c. FERC Contact: James T. Griffin at (202) 219-2799; e-mail 
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94fef5f9f1e7baf3e6fdf2f2fdfad4f2f1e6f7baf2f1f0bae1e7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7319121e16005d14011a15151a1d33151601105d1516175d0600">[email protected]</span></a>.
    d. Purpose of the Meetings: To discuss issues arising under Section 
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act with respect to the 
proposed re-licensing of the following Erie Boulevard Hydropower L.P. 
Projects: Carry Falls Project No. 2060-005, Upper Raquette River 
Project No. 2084-020, Middle Raquette River Project No. 2320-005, and 
Lower Raquette River Project No. 2330-007.
    e. Proposed Agenda:
    July 30: Site visit to Raymondville, Norfolk, East Norfolk, 
Norwood, and Higley hydroelectric developments, all located on the 
Raquette River in St. Lawrence County, New York.
    July 31: section 106 issues discussion.
    f. All local, state, and Federal agencies, Indian Tribes, and 
interested parties, are hereby invited to attend this meeting as 
participants.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16222 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2009180EN.01005502.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/55

---

Action brought on 25 May 2009 — Heinrich Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH& Co. v OHIM (Representation of a curved band with dotted lines)

(Case T-202/09)

2009/C 180/103

Language in which the application was lodged: Gemran

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Heinrich Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH& Co. (Essen, Germany) (represented by C. Rauscher, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 April 2009 in Case R 224/2007-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 April 2009 in Case R 224/2007-4; and

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a curved band with dotted lines for goods in Classes 10 and 24 (International Registration designating the European Community, No W 0881226)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of protection

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1)) in finding the mark to be devoid of any distinctive character

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
In Re Eric DRAKE, petitioner.

No. 17-7349.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
H. Res. 1 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 6, 2009. 

Resolved, That Lorraine C. Miller of the State of Texas, 

be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives; That Wilson S. Livingood of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Sergeant at Arms of the 

House of Representatives; That Daniel P. Beard of the State 

of Maryland be, and is hereby, chosen Chief Administrative 

Officer of the House of Representatives; and That Father 

Daniel P. Coughlin of the State of Illinois, be, and is hereby, 

chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Central Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on Form
S-8 (333-71165, 333-87005 and 333-49264) of Central Bancorp, Inc. of our report,
dated May 9,  2001,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Central
Bancorp,  Inc.  and  subsidiary  as of March 31, 2001 and 2000,  and the related
consolidated  statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2001, which
report is included herein.




                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
August 9, 2001
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO. 2-02-396-CV

JOSEPH ANTHONY BOYKINS 	APPELLANT

	V.

KIMBERLY LOREN BOYKINS 	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 322ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On November 27, 2002 and December 13, 2002, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and DAY, J.

[DELIVERED JANUARY 16, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1

                             Certificate Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Bancorp International Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 30, 2001 and
2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Thomas Megas, President (Principal Executive Officer) and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and


         2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered by the Report.



April 28, 2006



/s/Thomas Megas
------------------------------
Thomas Megas
Chief Executive Officer
President
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Chairman of Board of Directors
Deshawn Tyrell MASON, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 16-9280.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
Michael David MELTON, petitioner, v. Kelly D. PHILLIPS.

No. 17-1095.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2013189EN.01001602.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2013 — Trelleborg Industrie and Trelleborg v Commission

(Joined Cases T-147/09 and T-148/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for marine hoses - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price-fixing, market-sharing and the exchange of commercially sensitive information - Concept of continuing or repeated infringement - Limitation period - Legal certainty - Equal treatment - Fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement)

2013/C 189/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Trelleborg Industrie SAS (Clermont-Ferrand, France) (Case T-147/09); and Trelleborg AB (Trelleborg, Sweden) (Case T-148/09) (represented by: J. Joshua, Barrister, and E. Aliende Rodríguez, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, V. Bottka and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39406 — Marine hoses), in so far as that decision concerns the applicants, and, in the alternative, for annulment or a substantial reduction in the fine imposed on them in that decision

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1(g) and (h) of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39406 — Marine hoses), in so far as it applies to the period from 13 May 1997 to 21 June 1999; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1(g) and (h) of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39406 — Marine hoses), in so far as it applies to the period from 13 May 1997 to 21 June 1999;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
Aaron RAMOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8184.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**SUBSIDIARIES      LIST**

**As      of December 31, 2005**

| Entity                Name(Indentations                Indicate Control) |   |  Jurisdiction                of Incorporation or Formation |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Capital                Future Development Limited                        |   | British                Virgin Islands                           |
| Zhejiang                Yong Xin Digital Technology Company Limited      |   | Peoples                Republic of China                        |
| Hangzhou                Wang Da Electronics Company Limited              |   | Peoples                Republic of China                        |
| Yiwu                Yong Xin Telecommunication Company Limited           |   | Peoples                Republic of China                        |
|                                                                     |   |                                                            |
|                                                                     |   |                                                            |
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Bloomberg
  
    



  Discussions concerning SEFs.
      
  When
              02/14/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF RegistrationGeneral

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph CisewskiScott Reinhart Paul Hayeck

  Visitor(s)
              Dan DoctoroffGreg BabyakChris Iacovella

  Organization(s)
              Bloomberg


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
afom_ex1036.htm

EXHIBIT 10.36
  
  
  	 
	1

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	2

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	3

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	4

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	5

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	6

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	7

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	8

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	9

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	10

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	11

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	12

	 

	 


  
  
  
  	 13
Jeremy BRUNS, et ux., petitioners, v. Rhonda BRYANT, et al.

No. 17-1017.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Thomas M. UTTERBACK, petitioner, v. TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, et al.

No. 17-1190.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011252EN.01000901.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/9

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Dendermonde — Belgium) — Wamo BVBA v JBC NV, Modemakers Fashion NV

(Case C-288/10) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair commercial practices - National legislation prohibiting announcements of price reductions or announcements suggesting such reductions)

2011/C 252/15

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van Koophandel te Dendermonde

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wamo BVBA

Applicant:

Defendants: JBC NV, Modemakers Fashion NV

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van Koophandel te Dendermonde — Interpretation of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22) — National legislation prohibiting announcements of price reductions or announcements suggesting such reductions during certain periods preceding sales in specified sectors.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as precluding a national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a general prohibition of announcements of price reductions or announcements suggesting such reductions during the period preceding sales, in so far as the provision pursues objectives relating to consumer protection. It is for the national court to determine whether that is the situation in the case in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3856 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reform asylum procedures 

related to safe third countries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2019 

Mrs. LESKO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reform 

asylum procedures related to safe third countries, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SAFE THIRD COUNTRY. 

4 Section 208(a)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ each place 

7 it appears and inserting ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Se8 curity’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3856 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘removed, pursuant to a bilat2 eral or multilateral agreement, to’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘removed to’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Monzelle L. STEPTOE, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-7017.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Joseph Alvin ROYSTER, petitioner, v. Tim SHOOP, Warden.

No. 17-8088.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Daniel M. DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9668.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.