alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HISTORICAL
ANNUAL AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         125,993
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,497,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                   263,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,236,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,297,683
<PP&E>                                         420,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,742,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,399,642
<BONDS>                                         49,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,647,796
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,725,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,742,578
<SALES>                                      4,945,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,945,907
<CGS>                                        4,769,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,769,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               157,780
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,357,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,357,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,357,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LORENZO LOPEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00033

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20150C06037)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the conviction and remand the cause for new t rial, in accordance

with the opinion of the Court. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Sean REILLY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Exhibit 8.1

The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. as of December 31, 2011, including the name of each subsidiary and its country of incorporation.



|    |  |                                           |  |         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | --------
|1.  |  | CEMEX Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                |  | MEXICO  
|2.  |  | CEMEX España, S.A.                        |  | SPAIN   
|3.  |  | CEMEX Construction Materials Florida, LLC |  | USA     
|4.  |  | CEMEX Materials, LLC                      |  | USA     
|5.  |  | CEMEX Agregados, S.A. de C.V.             |  | MEXICO  
|6.  |  | CEMEX Central, S.A. de C.V.               |  | MEXICO  
|7.  |  | CEMEX Concretos, S.A. de C.V.             |  | MEXICO  
|8.  |  | Servicios Cemento CEMEX, S.A. de C.V.     |  | MEXICO  
|9.  |  | CEMEX Finance LLC                         |  | USA     
|10. |  | CEMEX Colombia, S.A.                      |  | COLOMBIA
|11. |  | Assiut Cement Company                     |  | EGYPT   
|12. |  | CEMEX, Inc.                               |  | USA     
|13. |  | CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC |  | USA     
|14. |  | Gulf Coast Portland Cement Co.            |  | USA
Order entered October 26 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00930

- CR

DAVID DEWAYNE WRIGHT JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 14

- 76080

- X



### O RDER

We GRANT court reporter Cherie Williams’ request for extension of time to file record

and ORDER the reporter’s record to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-205906, 333-125994, 333-139484, 333-159749, 333-173494, 333-180095, 333-189391, 333-210402 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-186067, 333-212099, 333-155784, and 333-166526 on Form S-3 of NeoGenomics, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2017 (November 13, 2017 as to the effects of the material weakness) relating to the consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of NeoGenomics, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A .

 

 

 

 

Crowe Horwath LLP

 

Indianapolis, Indiana

November 13, 2017
# C_2009153EN.01004001.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/40

---

Action brought on 2 April 2009 — Eliza v OHIM — Went Computing Consultancy Group (eliza)

(Case T-130/09)

2009/C 153/78

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Eliza Corporation (Beverly, United States) (represented by: R. Köbbing, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Went Computing Consultancy Group BV (Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 February 2009 in case R 1244/2008-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 February 2009 in case R 1244/2008-4; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark “eliza”, for goods and services in classes 9, 37 and 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration of the word mark “ELISE” for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 (1) (which became Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal erred in its holding that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned on the part of the relevant public

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark, OJ L 78, p. 1

1

---
Darren Nolan CLARK, Sr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-7768.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2011211EN.01000701.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/7

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș (Romania)) — Daniel Ionel Obreja v Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș (C-136/10), Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Mureș v SC Darmi SRL (C-178/10)

(Joined Cases C-136/10 and C-178/10) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)

2011/C 211/11

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Daniel Ionel Obreja (C-136/10), Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Mureș (C-178/10)

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș (C-136/10), SC Darmi SRL (C-178/10)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș — Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States — Environmental tax levied on motor vehicles upon first registration in a Member State — Whether national legislation is compatible with Articles 23, 25 and 90 EC — Possible derogation on the basis of Article 174 EC

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax affecting motor vehicles on their first registration in that Member State, if that fiscal measure is so designed as to discourage the putting into service, in that Member State, of second-hand vehicles bought in other Member States, without, however, discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the national market.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
Albert SROUR, petitioner, v. Shelley MIZRAHI-SROUR.

No. 16-9368.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135538 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver DOROTHY SMALL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135538 COA: 275332 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices Van Buren CC: 05-054407-NH STEPHEN T. WYSO NG, M.D. and HEALTHCARE MIDWEST, Defendants-Appellees, and

SOUTH HAVEN COMMU NITY HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question p resented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the pro ceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

M ARKMAN , J., concurs in part and dissents in part and states as follows:

Although I would deny leav e to appeal with regard to the characterization by the Court of Appeals of plainti ff’s two other claims, I believe that the court erred in characterizing as an ordinary-neglig ence claim plaintiff's claim that an x-ray should have been conducted following her appendectomy and before her incision was closed. Because this seems to me a matter significantly beyond common knowledge, Bryant v Oakpointe Villa Nu rsing Ctr, Inc , 471 Mich 411 (2004), I belie ve that this claim sounds in medical malpractice.

Y OUNG , J., dissents and states as follows:

For the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals disse nting opinion, I would reverse the Court of Appeals judgment in part and affirm the trial court’s ruling that plaintiff’s complaint sounded in medical malpractice rather th an ordinary negligence.

C ORRIGAN , J., joins the statement of Y OUNG , J.

d0429 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2008

Clerk
Rodney Chase PETTIGREW, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-5226.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District denied.
**LIEBERMAN
      & ASSOCIATES, P.A.**


**CERTIFIED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




**800
      E. Cypress Creek Rd. Suite 200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33334**   **Office (954) 491-0411**  **Fax
      (954) 491-0211**


**Auditing
      ~ Accounting ~ Taxes ~ Condominium Accounting ~ Financial Management ~
      Consulting**






**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




Bancorp
      International Group, Inc.




c/o
      Mr.
      Jay Griffin


Conner
      & Winters, LLP


1700
      One
      Leadership Square


211
      North
      Robinson


Oklahoma
      City, OK 73102-7101




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      10-KSB of Bancorp International Group, Inc. (the "Company") of our report dated
      February 27, 2008 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
      for the year ended December 31, 2007.




Respectfully





Lieberman
      & Associates P.A.


Lieberman
      & Associates, P.A.





April
      2,
      2008





****





**American
      Institute of Certified Public Accountants ▪ Public Company Accounting Oversite
      Board**


**Florida
      Institute of Certified Public Accountants ▪ Certified Fraud Examiners ▪
Community Associations Institute**
II-00534

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

mary williams <bishwake@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:31 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

mary williams

1992 S. 200 E., #424B

Salt Lake city, UT 84115
Shirley A. KINNEMORE, petitioner, v. Matthew MOORE, Jr.

No. 17-5345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Page 1 of 1

MARKET RISK ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

July 13, 2021

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Domestic Toll Free: 1-877-951-7311

Domestic Toll Number: 1-203-607-0666

Passcode: 2513365

AGENDA

Time Item

9:30 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks

• Rostin Behnam, MRAC Sponsor and Acting Chairman, Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)

• Brian D. Quintenz, Commissioner, CFTC

• Dawn DeBerry Stump, Commissioner, CFTC

• Dan M. Berkovitz, Commissioner, CFTC

• Nadia Zakir, MRAC Chair, Executive Vice President and Chief 

Compliance Officer & Global Head of Compliance, Pacific Investment 

Management Company LLC (PIMCO)

10:00 a.m. Report from the Interest Rate Benchmark Reform Subcommittee

• Thomas Wipf, Subcommittee Chairman, Vice Chairman, Institutional 

Securities, Morgan Stanley

10:50 p.m. Report from the CCP Risk and Governance Subcommittee

• Alicia Crighton, Subcommittee Co-Chairman, Global Co-Head of 

Futures and Head of OTC and Prime Clearing Businesses, Goldman 

Sachs, representing the Futures Industry Association

• Lee Betsill, Subcommittee Co-Chairman, Managing Director and Chief

Risk Officer, CME Group

11:55 p.m. Closing Remarks

12:00 p.m. Adjournment
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ED W A RD STEPH EN G O N ZA LES, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. T . E . VA UG HA N, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 55764 D . C. N o . CV - 0 5 - 0 1 6 6 4 - G PS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge P . S c hi a ve l l i , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rE dw a r d S t e phe n G onz a l e s appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d e n y in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab e a s p e titio n . W e d is m is s . G onz a l e s c ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d of P r i s on T e rm s ’ 2002 de c i s i on t o de ny



# FI LED JU N 07 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 55764 2 h i m p a r o l e d e p r i v e dh i m o f du e p r o c e s s b e c au s e i tw a s n o ts up p o rt e db y“ s o me e v id e n c e ,” a n dr e lie do n s ta tic f a c to r s a n do th e ra lle g e d lyim p e rm is s ib le f a c to r s . A f t e rbr i e f i ng w a s c om pl e t e d i n thi s c a s e , thi s c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f i c a t e of ap p e a lab ility( “C O A ” ) is r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e th e d e n ia l o f p a r o le . See H

a yw a rd v . M a rs h a ll , 6 0 3 F. 3 d5 4 6 , 5 5 4 - 5 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) ( e n b a n c ) . N o w th e Sup r e me C o u rt h a s h e ldth a t th e o n lyf e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p a r o le c o n te x t is pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, not w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S. C t . 85 9, 86 3 (20 11 ) ( per c uri am ). B ec ause G on za l es ra i se s no p roce du ra l c ha l l e nge s r e ga r di ng hi s pa r ol e he a r i ng, aC O A c a nnoti s s ue , a nd w e di s m i s s the ap p e a l f o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) . F urthe r , be c aus e G onz a l e s ha s notha s m a de as ubs t a nt i a l s how i ng of the d e n ia l o f ac o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t, w e d e c lin e to c e rtif yh is r e m a in in g c la im s . Id . W e de nyG onz a l e s ’ r e que s tf ora ddi t i ona l br i e f

i ng. DI S MI S S E D.
Barry J. BLUEFELD, petitioner, v. Barry S. COHEN, et al.

No. 17-7891.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#EmpowerInnovation2020

Tuesday, November 17, 2020 

9:00 a.m. (EDT) Opening Remarks

Shivon Kershaw, Senior Innovation and Education Advisor, LabCFTC

9:05 a.m. Tech Talk: BSA Regulatory Reform: The Role of Innovation and the Value 

of BSA Data 

Learn how FinCEN’s Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Regulatory Reform efforts are 

supporting responsible industry innovation and developing comprehensive 

quantitative analytics on the value of BSA data.

• Facilitator: LaSharn Dozier, Strategic Communications Specialist, LabCFTC

• Erik Kiefel, Acting Office Director, Office of Strategic Policy, Policy Division, 

FinCEN 

9:35 a.m. Panel Discussion: Meeting The Digital Demand Through Regulation

Transformation and constant innovation are at the heart of government functions. 

Hear from those working on transformative policy as they share their innovation 

agenda for their agencies and those they regulate.

• Moderator: Bianca Gomez, Senior Financial Innovation Counsel, LabCFTC 

• Kavita Jain, Deputy Associate Director of Innovation Policy, Federal Reserve 

Board 

• Matt Williams, Managing Director, Information Systems, National Futures 

Association

Agenda-at-a-glance
 

#EmpowerInnovation2020

10:35 a.m. Special Presentation: LabCFTC SPCA Competition “Project Streetlamp” 

Announcement 

Brian Trackman, LabCFTC Senior Counsel, will announce the winner of 

LabCFTC’s inaugural Science Prize Competition and the first-ever CFTC Innovator 

Award recipient. The winner will present an overview of its award-winning AI tool. 

11:00 a.m. Panel Discussion: Digital Assets, Derivatives and DeFi

Creating opportunity from disruption has proven to be the new mantra for 2020. 

Hear from this panel of industry thought-leaders on what we can expect in the 

derivatives markets and how innovation and tech will play a role for the future. 

• Moderator: Shivon Kershaw, Senior Innovation and Education Advisor, 

LabCFTC

• Sydney Schaub, General Counsel, Gemini

• Sunayna Tuteja, Managing Director, Head of Digital Assets & DLT, TD 

Ameritrade

• Julie Winkler, Chief Commercial Officer, CME 

12:00 p.m. Tech Talk: Innovation and Risk 

CipherTrace will discuss the risks and opportunities within the global 

cryptocurrency ecosystem and how innovation can help banks, law enforcement, 

regulators, and digital asset businesses mitigate these risks and enhance these 

opportunities.

• Moderator: Jorge Herrada, Senior Technology Advisor, LabCFTC

• Stephen Ryan, Chief Operating Officer and Co-Founder, CipherTrace 

12:30 p.m. Panel Discussion: The Future of Innovation 

This panel of global tech leaders will discuss what they see for the future of the 

financial services industry, partnerships with policymakers and the role innovation 

plays in their everyday discussions. 

• Moderator: Melissa Netram, Chief Innovation Officer and Director, LabCFTC 

• Usman Ahmed, Head of Global Public Policy and Research, PayPal Inc.

• Behnaz Kibria, Senior Policy Counsel, Google

• Nicole Sandler, Head of Digital Policy, Barclays 

1:30 p.m. Closing Remarks 

Shivon Kershaw, Senior Innovation and Education Advisor, LabCFTC
Anthony BROOKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5273.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.