alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-01173

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Simone Morgen <smorgen@juno.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 7:49 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Simone Morgen

38 West Tulane Road

Columbus, OH 43202
Joel Christopher HOLMES, petitioner, v. DON KENNEDY PROPERTIES, LLC.

No. 17-7403.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
# L_2005192EN.01008802.xml

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/88

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the general principles for the participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in Community programmes

The Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the general principles for the participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in Community programmes (1), signed in Brussels on 22 November 2004, entered into force on 29 June 2005, in accordance with Article 10 of the Agreement.

1

---

(1)  See page 23 of this Official Journal.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15706]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-079]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Solar System Exploration Subcommittee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science 
Advisory Committee, Solar System Exploration Subcommittee.

DATES: Wednesday, July 18, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursday, July 
19, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Friday, July, 20, 2001, 8:30 a.m. 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference 
Room 7H46, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Bergstralh, Code S, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-
1588

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Solar System Program Update
--Space Science Update
--Mars Program
--Outer Planets Program
--Planetary Data System
--Astrobiology Report

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-15706 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
**Exhibit 15(a).2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-12958, 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666; and Form F-3 No. 333-145834) of CDC Corporation (formerly chinadotcom corporation) of our report dated June 20, 2006 (except for the restatement describedin note 2, as to which the date is July 2, 2007) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CDC Corporation included in the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) of CDC Corporation for the year ended December 31,2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young 

Hong Kong 

September 9, 2008
Christopher B. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9432.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*79Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2009244EN.01001301.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/13

---

Action brought on 6 August 2009 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (NATURALLY ACTIVE)

(Case T-307/09)

2009/C 244/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd (Ryde, United Kingdom) (represented by M. Cover, Solicitor)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 May 2009 in case R 27/2009-2 and declare that the Community trade mark concerned can proceed to publication and registration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 May 2009 in case R 27/2009-2 and declare that the Community trade mark concerned can proceed to publication and registration; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘NATURALLY ACTIVE’ for goods and services in classes 3, 5, 16, 18, 35 and 44

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that the phrase ‘Naturally Active’ was normal in the English language and was therefore a laudatory term that could be easily understood by the general public, thus having no inherent distinctiveness; infringement of Article 7(3) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 7(3) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal: (i) was incorrect to find that the trade mark concerned had not become distinctive through use; and (ii) appears to have not given due weight to the objective evidence provided by the applicant and therefore did not have good and adequate reasons for their finding in relation to this legal provision; infringement of Article 7(2) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 7(2) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal was wrong to apply the test for this legal provision, in relation to their findings for Article 7(3) of Council Regulation 40/94, to all Member States of the EU, instead of applying the relevant test only to Member States which are predominantly English speaking.

Pleas in law:

---
Nathan Sebastien ACKERMANN, petitioner, v. CVS PHARMACY.

No. 17-1126.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Maryland, Montgomery County denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1630]



[[Page 6639]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee G--Education.
    Date: February 20-22, 2001.
    Time: 9:00 AM to 12:00PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Harvey P. Stein, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8137, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-7841.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1630 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
William CRITTENDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8039.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
DeShaun MALONE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 15-9487.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


RULE
      13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      J.
      Scott Tomer, Chief Executive Officer of YTB International, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Registrant”), in connection with the Registrant’s Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), do hereby
      represent, warrant and certify, in compliance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.




/s/ J.
                Scott TomerName:
                J. Scott TomerTitle:
                Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                May 15, 2008
II-00430

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

john cevasco <johncevasco@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:53 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

john cevasco

596 millers falls rd.,p.o.box 78

Northfield, MA 1360
Charles Vernon HERBERT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1088.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Joseph Dario KAMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7591.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2010134EN.01003502.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/35

---

Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Hansen v European Commission

(Case T-6/09) (1)

1

(Action for damages - Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) - Directive 96/29/Euratom - Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2010/C 134/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bent Hansen (Aarslev, Denmark) (represented by: I. Anderson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White and M. Patakia, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for compensation for damage suffered as a result of the Commission’s alleged failure to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that the Kingdom of Denmark adopted the legislative and administrative provisions enabling it to comply with Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation (OJ 1996 L 159, p. 1) and applied those provisions to workers involved in the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the action |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action

| 2. | Orders Mr Bent Hansen to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bent Hansen to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

t1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143595 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143595 

 COA: 298061 

Macomb CC: 2009-005649-FH 

CHARLES WILLIAM MALONE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SecureD Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
King T. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 19, 2003


                                                /s/ King T. Moore
                                                -----------------
                                                King T. Moore
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George A. McQuain, the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the third quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 10, 2010
              
              /s/
      George A. McQuainName:
      George A. McQuainTitle:
      President and Chief Executive Officer
Cheryl WENZEL, et al., petitioners, v. ESTATE OF James Franklin PERRY, et al.

No. 17-871.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Ravenwood Bourne, Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, FotisGeorgiadis, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





Date:
      January 27, 2011
                /s/ Fotis GeorgiadisFotis GeorgiadisChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)
# C_2009069EN.01004602.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/46

---

Action brought on 13 January 2009 — Gruber v OHIM (Run the globe)

(Case T-12/09)

(2009/C 69/102)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Alexander Gruber (Ulm, Germany) (represented by T. Kienle and M. Krinke, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 November 2008 (Case R 1779/2007-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 November 2008 (Case R 1779/2007-1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Run the globe’ for services in Class 41 — Application No 5 154 521

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (1), as the registered mark has the necessary distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---