alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-00-0556-CR

NO. 07-00-0557-CR

NO. 07-00-0558-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 22, 2000

______________________________

VINCENTE DWIGHT MCCRAY, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

NOS. B3255-99-07CR, B3256-99-07CR AND B3257-99-07CR;

 HONORABLE JACK R. MILLER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Vincente Dwight McCray, acting pro se, has filed a purported appeal of

his conviction of March 15, 2000, for the offense of delivery of cocaine and the resulting
2

punishment of three years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Department of

Criminal Justice. We have received non-certified copies of appellant’s judgment and

sentence in the case in which he was convicted and non-certified copies of dismissals in

two other cases which may have been the result of a plea bargain agreement. 

We have not received a clerk’s or reporter’s record in these matters, nor has any

brief been filed. We note that on the same day and time that appellant filed his notice of

appeal, he also filed a letter indicating that he wished to cancel “the request for an appeal.”

Because we have no record, we are unable to determine the current status of the

purported appeal. However, since it appears that a notice of appeal was filed, this state

of affairs requires us to abate the appeals to the trial court for a hearing as provided by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8 (b). Accordingly, the appeals are abated and the

causes remanded to the 64th District Court of Swisher County.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given

of, and conduct, a hearing to determine:

1. Whether appellant has abandoned his appeals.

2. Whether appellant is presently indigent, and if so, whether counsel

should be appointed to represent him. If it be determined that an attorney

should be appointed, the name, address, and State Bar of Texas

identification number of the attorney appointed.

3. If appellant is not indigent, what steps need to be taken to ensure that

appellant will promptly obtain the services of an attorney to pursue the

appeal.

 
3

4. Whether appellant has been deprived of diligent appeals by ineffective

assistance of counsel or for any other reason.

5. If appellant is indigent, what steps need to be taken to ensure that a reporter’s

record and clerk’s record are available to appellant.

 

6. If any other orders are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of

appellant’s appeals. 

In support of its determinations, the trial court will prepare and file written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental

reporter’s record. The supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record shall be

submitted to the clerk of this court no later than January 25, 2000.

It is so ordered. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Quantrell GRACE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7412.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011186EN.01000301.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-305/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad - Recovery)

2011/C 186/04

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, assisted by D. Del Gaizo and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the prescribed time-limit, the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004: Direct tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad (notified under document No C(2004) 4746) (OJ 2005 L 335, p. 39)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed time-limits, all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries all the aid granted under the aid scheme declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004 [on direct] tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed time-limits, all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries all the aid granted under the aid scheme declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004 [on direct] tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that decision;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
**Exhibit 15(a).2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-12958,No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666 on Form S-8 and No. 333-145834 on Form F-3 of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated June 20, 2006 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the restatement of the previously issued consolidated financial statements because of correction of misstatements, and our report is dated July 2, 2007 as to the effects of this restatement), relating to the consolidated financialstatements of China.com Inc. and its subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 

Hong Kong 

June 30, 2008
Gregory Leroy PACKER, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-7264.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
James COTTON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7872.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

*1316Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
John S. BARTH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1254.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3347; Amendment #1]

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated June 18, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include Grimes and Harrison Counties in the State of Texas as disaster areas caused by Tropical Storm Allison occurring on June 5, 2001 and continuing.

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in Marion and Washington Counties in the State of Texas; and Caddo Parish in the State of Louisiana may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not listed here have been previously declared.

                    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing                           ( print page 33988)                        applications for physical damage is August 8, 2001, and for loans for economic injury is March 8, 2002.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.)

Dated: June 19, 2001.

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-15915 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Anthony S. MINA, petitioner, v. CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 16-9514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                       Exhibit 8

                             PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             PERCENTAGE      JURISDICTION OF     NAME UNDER WHICH
                   NAME                         OWNED         INCORPORATION      BUSINESS IS DONE
-------------------------------------------  ----------  ----------------------  ----------------
<S>                                          <C>         <C>                     <C>
Ross Systems, Inc.                              100%            Delaware               Ross

Pivotal Corporation                             100%        British Columbia         Pivotal

IMI Global Holdings Ireland Limited              51%             Ireland               IMI

Platinum China Holdings Inc.                    100%     British Virgin Islands      Platinum

CDC Software Asia Pacific Limited               100%         Cayman Islands        CDC Software

Praxa Limited                                   100%            Australia             Praxa

PK Information Systems Pty Ltd.                 100%            Australia              PKIS

Ion Global (BVI) Limited                        100%     British Virgin Islands     Ion Global

Software Galeria, Inc.                           51%           New Jersey        Software Galeria

MEZZO Business Databases Pty Limited            100%            Australia             IncNet

R.N.R. International Marketing Group            100%            Australia        Mezzo Marketing
(Australia) Pty Limited (now known as Mezzo                                         Australia
Marketing Australia Pty Ltd)

China.com Inc.                                   81%         Cayman Islands         China.com

Palmweb Inc.                                    *81%         Cayman Islands          Newpalm

Group Team Investments Limited                  *81%     British Virgin Islands       Go2joy

chinadotcom Portals Limited                     *81%     British Virgin Islands    bj.china.com

TTG Asia Media Pte Limited                      *81%      Republic of Singapore        TTG
</TABLE>

*subsidiaries held through our 81% owned subsidiary, China.com Inc., which is
listed on the Growth Enterprise Market of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong
Limited
David LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6857.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with Amendment No.1 to Annual Report of China 3C Group and its
      subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), the undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Weidong HuangName:
            Weidong
                HuangTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer
# C_2012331EN.01002303.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/23

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2012 — Bredenkamp and Others v Commission

(Case T-145/09) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Zimbabwe - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

(2012/C 331/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: John Arnold Bredenkamp (Harare, Zimbabwe) and the other applicants whose names appear on the annex to this order (represented by: D. Vaughan QC, P. Moser, Barrister, and R. Khan, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel, T. Scharf and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defandant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by E. Jenkinson, I. Rao and F. Penlington and subsequently by E. Jenkinson, I. Rao and C. Murrell, acting as Agents, and D. Beard QC, and by the Council of the European Union (represented by M. Bishop and R. Szostak, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 77/2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (OJ 2009 L 23, p. 5), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 173/2010 of 25 February 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (OJ 2010 L 51, p. 13) in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on this action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by John Arnold Bredenkamp, Alpha International (PVT) Ltd, Breco (Asia Pacific) Ltd, Breco (Eastern Europe) Ltd, Breco (South Africa) Ltd, Breco (UK) Ltd, Breco Group, Breco International, Breco Nominees Ltd, Breco Services Ltd, Corybantes Ltd, Echo Delta Holdings, Masters International Ltd, Piedmont (UK) Ltd, Raceview Enterprises, Scottlee Holdings (PVT) Ltd, Scottlee Resorts Ltd, Timpani Exports Ltd and Tremalt Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by John Arnold Bredenkamp, Alpha International (PVT) Ltd, Breco (Asia Pacific) Ltd, Breco (Eastern Europe) Ltd, Breco (South Africa) Ltd, Breco (UK) Ltd, Breco Group, Breco International, Breco Nominees Ltd, Breco Services Ltd, Corybantes Ltd, Echo Delta Holdings, Masters International Ltd, Piedmont (UK) Ltd, Raceview Enterprises, Scottlee Holdings (PVT) Ltd, Scottlee Resorts Ltd, Timpani Exports Ltd and Tremalt Ltd.

| 3. | The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Council of the European Union shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Council of the European Union shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.

---
# C_2009267EN.01006902.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/69

---

Action brought on 24 August 2009 — Fédération Internationale des Logis v OHIM (Brown convex square)

(Case T-329/09)

2009/C 267/126

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fédération Internationale des Logis (Paris, France) (represented by C. Champagner Katz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2009 in Case R 0202/2009-1 and allow registration of the trade mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2009 in Case R 0202/2009-1 and allow registration of the trade mark applied for;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Mark representing a brown convex square for the goods and services in Classes 3, 18, 24, 43 and 44 — Application No 6468722

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application for registration

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the representation of a special and specific square with convex edges in a particular and specific brown colour is distinctive with respect to the goods and services for which registration was sought, in so far as those elements give the mark a particular appearance for those goods and services.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Theodore  S. Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Theodore S. Li
----------------------------------
Theodore S. Li
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION** **PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** **AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive
        Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
        purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
        that
        to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the Company
                  at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This
        Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission.
  Date:
        August 3 ,
        2007
  By: /s/
        Michael J. Salameh
 Michael
        J.
        Salameh
 Chief
        Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 6641)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Biobehavioral Bases of CHD Risk and Management.                    

*Date:*                         February 22, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         9 AM to 12:30 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Washington National Airport Hilton, 2399 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Louise P. Corman, Review Branch, NIH, NHLBI, Rockledge Building II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 7180, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0270.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Disease Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-1637  Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M