alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Jeffrey W. Church, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GenVec, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which the report is beingprepared;
b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)]
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Jeffrey W. Church
MEDICAL DEVICE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., fka DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, ex rel. Antoni NARGOL and David Langton, et al.

No. 17-1108.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-00844

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Roylon Mortensen <roylon@opendoor.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:53 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Roylon Mortensen

945 Cedar Way

Ashland, OR 97520
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,
        J.
        Scott Tomer, Chief Executive Officer of YTB International, Inc., a Delaware
        corporation (the “Registrant”), in connection with the Registrant’s Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), do hereby
        represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
 
 
 /s/
        J.
        Scott Tomer
 
 Name:
        J.
        Scott Tomer
 Title:
        Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
        May
        15, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34178-34179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-466-005]


Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership; Notice of 
Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 21, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 15, 2001, Great Lakes Gas Transmission 
Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised 
Sheet No. 29A and Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 50D.
    Great Lakes states that these changes are proposed to be effective 
October 1, 1999 and January 1, 2001, respectively.
    Great Lakes states that these tariff sheets are being filed to 
correct pagination errors that occurred when reserving a range of 
sheets for future use in earlier tariff filings. As a result of those 
errors, the electronic Great Lakes tariff includes the reserved sheets 
as currently effective, with outdated text. The instant filing will 
resolve any inconsistencies in Great Lakes' electronic tariff, and it 
will conform the affected sheets to the Commission's pagination 
requirements.

[[Page 34179]]

    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16057 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

January 27 , 2015.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00056

- CV

IN RE LEONARD A. COL EMAN, JR. , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 247th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 28543



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 20, 2015, relator
, Leonard A. Coleman, Jr.
, filed a petition for
writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004);
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable John Schmude, presiding judge of the 247th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside as void the October 7, 2014 order grant ing temporary orders signed by the associate judge

.2

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Donovan.
First, appellant argues that the district court erred by denying

his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not investigating and presenting mitigation evidence, including testimony from family members who would have testified to appellant's good character. According to appellant, because the district court was not presented with full and accurate information about him, his sentence was "based on impalpable or highly suspect evidence." The district court denied this claim, concluding that appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice considering the serious injuries appellant's drunk driving inflicted on the 20-year-old victim, including brain and facial injuries that left the victim partially blind and significantly disabled for the remainder of his life. We conclude that the district court did not err in this regard.

Second, appellant argues that the district court erred by denying his claim that trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for not challenging the district court's consideration of his illegal alien status in sentencing him. In denying the post-conviction petition, the district court expressly stated that appellant's illegal alien status had no role in fashioning his sentence. Looking at the record as a whole, it appears thatthe sentencing court was most influenced by the victim's significant lifelong injuries. The district court was also aware of appellant's prior felony DUI conviction that resulted in injury to two people. We cannot say on this record that the district court erred by denying this claim."

'Appellant argues that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise any credible issues on appeal or claims related to Fifth Amendment due process violations, cruel and unusual punishment, and equal protection. In this, appellant has raised nothing but bare claims for continued on next page . . .

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

MEI=Saitta

3

MEWFtalg DEMME ErTiEEDEVEffiNI Having considered appellant's claims and concluded that they lack merit, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Karla K. Butko Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk



### . . . continued
relief and therefore no relief is warranted. 

### See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984).

2 To the extent appellant contends that his sentence is excessive and based on his illegal alien status, we note that those claims should have been raised on direct appeal and fall outside the scope of claims permissible in a post-conviction habeas petition challenging a judgment of conviction based upon a guilty plea. 

### See NRS 34.810(1)(a).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A WiU003121121331EMSEMBES
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with DTCC
  
    



  When
              03/13/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XVI. Swap Data Repositories RegistrationXVII. Data RecordkeepingXVIII. Real Time Reporting

  CFTC Staff
              Gary GenslerJacqueline Mesa

  Visitor(s)
              Michael Bodson (DTCC)Alison Wolpert (DTCC)

  Organization(s)
              DTCC


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Tomas GALVAN-FUENTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED SOURCE ONE, INC., petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.

No. 17-1080.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Maximo CORRAL-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8142.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Ernest KAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
II-00703

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Cynthia Mantel <cam721 nj @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:18 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Cynthia Mantel

8 Marlon Pond Rd

Hamilton Sq, NJ 08690
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1998
<CASH>                                       2,848,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,824,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   845,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,946,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,724,000
<PP&E>                                     222,679,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             129,579,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,571,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       54,616,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (108,960,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               152,571,000
<SALES>                                    101,801,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,801,000
<CGS>                                       32,487,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,328,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,582,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,869,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,704,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,756,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,756,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Timothy Raymond CARTER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-1188.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Kinsley Frampton NYCE.

No. D-3023.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Kinsley Frampton Nyce, of Columbus, Ohio, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred form the practice of law in this court.
Richard Dwight BERNARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7920.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
- 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0431 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

FILED 

FEB 08 2022 

BCriNerl Greenwouo 

Clerk of Supreme Cc .,,, 

State of moni r.

M.L.M., ORDER 

A Youth in Need of Care. 

Counsel for the appellant mother of M.L.M. filed a motion and brief asking to be 

allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that she has been unable to find any 

nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. 

Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother responded to counsel's brief 

and objected to counsel's motion. 

The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), 

MCA, and Anders. We have considered the arguments raised by counsel and by the mother 

in her response. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could 

be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

the appellant mother personally. 

DATED this day of February, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0431
SL1 

Justices