alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009297EN.01003301.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/33

---

Action brought on 16 October 2009 — Poslovni Sistem Mercator v OHIM — Mercator Multihull (MERCATOR STUDIOS)

(Case T-417/09)

2009/C 297/50

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Poslovni Sistem Mercator, d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: M. Curell Aguila and J. Güell Serra, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mercator Multihull, Inc. (Vancouver, Canada)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 July 2009 in case R 1031/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 July 2009 in case R 1031/2008-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “MERCATOR STUDIOS”, for goods in class 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Slovenian trade mark registrations of the figurative mark “Mercator” registered for services in classes 35, 36, 39, 41 and 42, and for goods in classes 1-6, 8-11, 13-34; Slovenian trade mark registration of the figurative marks “Mercator Slovenska Košarica” registered for goods and services in classes 1-6, 8-11, 13-34, 39, 41, 43 and 44; International registrations of the mark “Mercator”, for goods in classes 1-6, 8-11, 13, 14, 16-18, 20-33, and for services in classes 36, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 40/94 (which became Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal failed to make a global analysis of the relevant factors and instead rejected the opposition on the basis that the services are different, and incorrectly assessed the ground of opposition based on the latter legal provision.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 28, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1999
<CASH>                                       7,369,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,092,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,411,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,503,000
<PP&E>                                     214,287,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             124,983,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             144,789,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,840,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (119,231,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               144,789,000
<SALES>                                    214,147,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           214,147,000
<CGS>                                       67,149,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              117,127,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,818,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,777,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,449,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   104,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,345,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,345,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Manuel YEPIZ, Jose Luis Mejia, Francisco Zambrano, Jesus Contreras, Mariano Meza, Sergio Mejia, Gilberto Carrasco, Ernesto Orozco Mendez, and Rafael Yepiz, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7868.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert C. LAITY, petitioner, v. NEW YORK, et al.

No. 17-1006.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
Gregory Shawn MERCER, petitioner, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al.

No. 17-6071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Edward WIERSZEWSKI, petitioner, v. Alan THIBAULT.

No. 17-550.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rule on Registration and Regulation of Swap Data Repositories 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is proposing a rule to implement New Part 49 of the 

Dodd-Frank Act pertaining to Swap Data Repositories.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) 

On July 21, 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Title VII of 

the Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, establishes a newly-created registered entity, the swap data repository, or 

“SDR,” to collect and maintain data and information related to swap transactions as prescribed by the Commission 

and to make such data and information directly and electronically available to regulators. 

Title VII and Swap Data Repositories 

Title VII directs the Commission to establish registration requirements for SDRs. The Commission has proposed a 

number of registration requirements including the adoption of a new registration form—Form SDR. 

Swap Data Repository Duties 

Dodd-Frank establishes the following SDR Duties: 

• Acceptance of data; 

• Confirmation of data; 

• Recordkeeping requirements; 

• Commission direct electronic access; 

• Real-time reporting obligations; 

• Monitoring, screening and analyzing data; 

• Maintenance of data privacy; 

• Permitting data access to other regulators; and 

• Adoption of emergency procedures; 

Core Principles Governing Swap Data Repositories 

Title VII establishes core principles governing SDRs, which are: 

• Antitrust considerations; 

• Governance arrangements; and 

• Conflicts of interest; 

Additional Duties 

Title VII also provides the Commission with the authority to prescribe additional duties, which in this rulemaking 

are proposed as: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080 

• Verification of the timeliness of off-facility swaps in connection with real-time reporting; 

• System safeguards; 

• Financial resources; 

• Disclosure Requirements; and 

• Non-Discriminatory Access and Fees 

Additional Obligations 

The Commission in implementing the numerous statutory duties under Title VII for SDRs has also proposed the 

following obligations: 

• SDRs must accept all data in their selected asset class(es); 

• SDRs may not use reported data for commercial purposes without consent; 

• SDRs must establish policies and procedures to protect the confidentiality of the data it maintains. 

Effective Date 

The CFTC proposes to make the proposed regulations become effective no earlier than July 15, 2011.
Juan Carlos SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Stu SHERMAN, Warden.

No. 17-5003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Samuel Terraye WINDOM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7277.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Dexter Demetric ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5002.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130575 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130575 COA: 255162 Wayne CC: 03-013276 DAVID MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
# C_2011089EN.01001304.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-353/10) (1)

1

2011/C 89/28

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---
In connection with the CNB Florida  Bancshares,  Inc. (the "Company")  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-Q/A for the period  ending  March 31,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  (the  "Report"),  I, G.
Thomas  Frankland,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
          78o(d)); and


     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                           /s/  G. Thomas Frankland
                                         --------------------------
                                         G. Thomas Frankland
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Benton G. BASKIN, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 17-7600.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Kevin WALKER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7337.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
# C_2014045EN.01000301.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 December 2013 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-118/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Article 108(1) and (2) TFEU - Aid granted by the Republic of Latvia for the purchase of agricultural land - Competence of the Council of the European Union - Existing aid scheme - Accession of the Republic of Latvia to the European Union - Aid granted before accession - Appropriate measures - Two indissolubly connected aid schemes - Change of circumstances - Exceptional circumstances - Economic crisis - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of proportionality)

2014/C 45/04

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Flynn, K. Walkerová and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: É. Sitbon and F. Florindo Gijón, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by D. Kriaučiūnas and L. Liubertaitė, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment — Annulment of Council Decision 2009/991/EC of 16 December 2009 on the granting of State aid by the authorities of the Republic of Latvia for the purchase of agricultural land between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013 (OJ 2009 L 339, p. 34) — Lack of competence — Misuse of powers — Infringement of the principle of sincere cooperation between Member States and institutions — Manifest error of assessment.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
Garrison S. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Jeffrey A. BEARD, et al.

No. 17-8113.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Erick J. HEAD, petitioner, v. Heidi M. LACKNER, Warden.

No. 15-9390.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011186EN.01001002.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/10

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Educa Borras SA

(Case C-370/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative mark EDUCA Memory game - Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national and international word marks MEMORY - Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) - Relative grounds for refusal)

2011/C 186/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ravensburger AG (represented by: H. Harte-Bavendamm and M. Goldmann, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Educa Borras SA

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-243/08 Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the national and international word marks ‘MEMORY’ for goods in Class 28 against Decision R 597/2007-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 April 2008 annulling the decision of the Cancellation Decision, which upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity lodged by the applicant against the figurative mark ‘EDUCA Memory Game’ for goods in Class 28

Ravensburger AG

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
#### EDWARD J. SCHOETTLE COMPANY Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 8742.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 5, 1945.

Decided March 5, 1945.

H. Ober Hess, of Philadelphia, Pa. (William R. Spofford, William A. Wiedersheim, 2d, and (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingcrsoll, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Louise Foster, of Washington, D. C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Robert N. Anderson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Circuit Judge, and FOR-MAN and LEAHY, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed upon its opinion reported at 3 T. C. 712.
Ivan Torrence TATE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7744.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of KIT
digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robin Smyth, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April
30, 2012



| | /s/ Robin Smyth         | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | Robin Smyth             | 
| | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Communications of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003
and 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  July 5, 2006
      -----------------
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner, v. Michael D. LOOS.

No. 17-1042.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion of Association of American Railroads for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.
Torrance BUNCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6896.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.