alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00442

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Smyth <psmyth48@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:55 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Smyth

48 Buena visa Dr.

Toms River, NJ 08757-6105
# C_2011120EN.01001002.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-304/10) (1)

1

2011/C 120/24

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.09.2010.

1

---
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 – EFIM v Commission**

**(Case T-296/09)**

Competition – Concerted practice – Abuse of a dominant position – Markets for ink cartridges – Decision rejecting a complaint – No Community interest

1.                     *Procedure – Producing evidence – Time-limit – Evidence lodged out of time – Conditions (Rules of Procedure of the General
Court, Art. 48(1)) (see para. 22)*

2.                     *European Union law – Principles – Protection of legitimate expectations – Conditions – Specific assurances given by the administration
(see para. 30)*

3.                     *Competition – Administrative procedure – Examination of complaints – Determination of priorities by the Commission – Taking
into account the Community interest in investigating a case – Discretion of the Commission – Duty to state reasons for a decision
to take no further action – Judicial review – Scope and limits (Arts 81 EC, 82 EC, 85(1) EC and 253 EC; Commission Regulation
No 773/2004, Art. 7(2)) (see paras 38-40, 59)*

4.                     *Competition – Administrative procedure – Examination of complaints – Examination of only those elements of fact and law brought
to the knowledge of the Commission (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC; Commission Regulation No 773/2004, Art. 7(2)) (see para. 41)*

5.                     *Competition – Dominant position – Collective dominant position – Concept – Collective entity – Conditions (Art. 82 EC) (see
para. 71)*

6.                     *Competition – Dominant position – Existence – Large market share – Insufficient evidence (Art. 82 EC) (see para. 79)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C (2009) 4125 of 20 May 2009 rejecting complaint COMP/C‐3/39.391 concerning purported infringements of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC by Hewlett‐Packard, Lexmark, Canon and Epson in the market for ink cartridges. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the European Federation of Ink and Ink Cartridge Manufacturers (EFIM) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders Lexmark International Technology SA to bear its own costs. |
William A. WHITE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8238.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, petitioner, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 17-233.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Shawn ROBERTS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9598.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Christopher L. LAUREANO-PEREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7564.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
    (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0000852447
                                          
<NAME>                                    INSTITUTIONAL EQUITY HOLDINGS, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                              1

 <CURRENCY>                               $US
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                                   41,261
<SECURITIES>                             825,997
<RECEIVABLES>                            380,732
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,249,866
<PP&E>                                   416,782
<DEPRECIATION>                           297,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,239,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    510,894
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 25,300
<OTHER-SE>                              175,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,239,867
<SALES>                                 1,843,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,843,945
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,020,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        4,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      20,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (200,988)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (200,988)
<DISCONTINUED>                          15,047
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                           (185,941)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.07)

        
 

</TABLE>
Katherine S. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 17-7522.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2010209EN.01000901.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Genova (Italy)) — Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-140/09) (1)

1

(State aid - Subsidies paid to a maritime transport undertaking discharging public service obligations - National Law providing for the possibility of making payments on account prior to the approval of an agreement)

2010/C 209/12

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Genova — State aid — Compatibility with Articles 86 to 88 EC of national legislation under which State aid can be paid to maritime transport undertakings responsible for the performance of public service contracts, in the absence of agreements between those undertakings and the administrative authorities and without the prior establishment of precise and stringent criteria capable of ensuring that payment of the aid cannot give rise to distortion of competition

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Under European Union law subsidies paid in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, pursuant to national legislation providing for payments on account prior to the approval of an agreement, constitute State aid if those subsidies are liable to affect trade between Member States and distort or threaten to distort competition, which it is for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
Theodore H. FRANK, et al., petitioners, v. Paloma GAOS, et al.

No. 17-961.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Martin
Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Martin Neilson
Chief Executive Officer
April 20, 2005
Margaret MORRIS-CALDERON, petitioner, v. James RANDI et al.

No. 17-7240.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,495
<PP&E>                                          918,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (840,585)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,739,664
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        1,281
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,110,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,200
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (36,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (36,192)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (36,192)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and the Statements of Revenue and Expenses and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Report on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,220,659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,179,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,096,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,179,666
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,330
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (249,205)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (130,208)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Gregory C. KAPORDELIS, petitioner, v. John B. FOX, Warden.

No. 17-7767.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
# C_2009312EN.01003601.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/36

---

Action brought on 14 October 2009 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE)

(Case T-414/09)

2009/C 312/59

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Milbradt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: JLO Holding Company LLC (Santa Monica, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 July 2009 in case R 609/2008-1 insofar as it made an order for revocation of the Community trade mark No 984 245‘LIVE’ for the goods, soaps, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 July 2009 in case R 609/2008-1 insofar as it made an order for revocation of the Community trade mark No 984 245‘LIVE’ for the goods, soaps, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the word mark ‘LIVE’ for goods in Class 3 (Community trade mark No 984 245)

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: JLO Holding Company LLC

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial revocation of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision and partial revocation of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), on the ground that it was proved that the trade mark at issue in the proceedings had been used in such a way as to preserve the rights of the proprietor for the product group, soups, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3825 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3825

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, as the ``Helen Fabela Chavez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2019

 Mr. Vargas (for himself, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Cook, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. 
   Brownley of California, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Takano, Mrs. Torres of 
    California, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Schiff, Mr. 
Cisneros, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Bera, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Peters, Ms. Speier, 
 Mr. Correa, Mr. Cox of California, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. DeSaulnier, 
   Ms. Hill of California, Mr. Costa, and Mrs. Davis of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, as the ``Helen Fabela Chavez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HELEN FABELA CHAVEZ MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Helen Fabela Chavez Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Helen 
Fabela Chavez Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

FORM DCO
DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATION
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION

COVER SHEET

QC Clearing LLC
Exact name of Applicant as specified in charter

7251 W. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 302, Boca Raton, Florida, 33433
Address of principal executive offices

D1 fthis is an APPLICATION for registration, complete in full and check here.

1 If this is an AMENDMENT to a pending application, list below all items that are being amended and
check here.

Amended office address.

GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name under which business is or will be conducted, if different than name specified above (include

acronyms, if any):

QCEX

2. Ifname of derivatives clearing organization is being amended, state previous derivatives clearing

organization name:

3. Additional contact information:

www.qcex.com N/A
Website URL Main Phone Number

4. List of principal office(s) and address(es) where derivatives clearing organization activities are/will be
conducted:

Office Address

Main Office 7251 W. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 302,Boca Raton, Florida, 33433
Dimas ALFARO-GRANADOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6021.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.