alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dennis SICA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9696.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Jerald HAMMANN, petitioner, v. 1-800 IDEAS, INC., et al.

No. 17-1418.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b)
Certifications







The
undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Smooth Global
(China) Holdings, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Smooth Global (China) Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Smooth Global
(China) Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





April
      15, 2010
            /s/ Zheng
      ShuyingZheng
      Shuying (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
    Officer)








---
Daniel Edward LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8696.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Deon DINKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8497.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2012295EN.01000501.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — (United Kingdom) — Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs

(Case C-591/10) (1)

1

(Second and Sixth VAT Directives - Input tax - Refund of excess - Payment of interest - Procedures)

2012/C 295/07

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others

Applicants:

Defendant: Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — Interpretation of Article 8 and Annex A, point 13, of the Second Council Directive 67/228/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes — Structure and procedures for application of the common system of value added tax (OJ, English Special Edition, Series I, Chapter 1967 p.16) — Interpretation of Article 11C(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Repayment of overpaid input tax — Interest rate applicable

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

European Union law must be interpreted as requiring that a taxable person who has overpaid value added tax which was collected by the Member State contrary to the requirements of European Union legislation on value added tax has a right to reimbursement of the tax collected in breach of European Union law and to the payment of interest on the amount of the latter. It is for national law to determine, in compliance with the principles of effectiveness and equivalence, whether the principal sum must bear ‘simple interest’, ‘compound interest’ or another type of interest.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.

1

---
cc: Hon. William 0. Voy, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2
Larry BROOKS, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE.

No. 17-63.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2009312EN.01002903.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 29 October 2009 — Novácke chemické závody v Commission

(Case T-352/09 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of enforcement of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2009/C 312/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novácke chemické závody, a.s. (Nováky, Slovakia) (represented by: A. Černejová, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and N. von Lingen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of enforcement of the Commission decision of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium-based reagents for the steel and gas industries), in so far as it concerns the applicant

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 99.2

                      [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]

                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


To the Board of Directors of
GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.


We have examined management's assertion about GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Inc.'s
("GPMF") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
GPMF's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about GPMF's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on GPMF's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that GPMF complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 29, 2000
Los Angeles, California
<PAGE>

                   [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING LETTERHEAD]


                             MANAGEMENT ASSERTION


As of and for the period ended December 31, 1999, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
                                                           --------------
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period,
----------------------------------------
GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amount of $50,000,000 and $20,000,000, respectively.



/s/ Dennis Tussey
-----------------
Dennis Tussey
Senior Vice President
Loan Administration
March 28, 2000
# C_2011063EN.01001202.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif — Luxembourg) — Tankreederei I SA v Directeur de l’administration des contributions directes

(Case C-287/10) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Free movement of capital - Tax credit for investments - Grant linked to the physical use of the investments on national territory - Use of inland navigation vessels used in other Member States)

2011/C 63/22

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tankreederei I SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Directeur de l’administration des contributions directes

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal administratif de Luxembourg — Interpretation of Articles 49 EC and 56 EC — Tax credits for investments — Legislation under which such a credit is granted only if the investment is made in an establishment situated in national territory and physically used in that territory — Company engaged in international shipping activities which is established and taxable in Luxembourg but has made an investment consisting of the acquisition of an asset used primarily outside of the national territory — Obstacle to the freedom to provide services and the free movement of capital

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU is to be interpreted as precluding a provision of a Member State pursuant to which the benefit of a tax credit for investments is denied to an undertaking which is established solely in that Member State on the sole ground that the capital goods, in respect of which that credit is claimed, are physically used in the territory of another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.08.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Kenneth W. Powell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Titan Trading Analytics Inc., certify that;

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Titan Trading Analytics Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 2, 2005

By:

/s/ Dr. Kenneth W. Powell





Name:

Dr. Kenneth W. Powell

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:

May 2, 2005
Roy Franklin ECHOLS, Jr., petitioner, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED.

No. 17-8226.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Michael PALMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8562.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
# C_2006076EN.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/1

---

Entry into force of Decision No 1/2005 of the EU-Morocco Association Council of 4 August 2005 derogating from the provisions concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation laid down in the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States and the Kingdom of Morocco (OJ L 206, 9.8.2005, p. 8)

(2006/C 76/01)

The Free Trade Agreement between the Kingdom of Morocco and Turkey entered into force on 1 January 2006.

The conditions of article 2 of Decision No 1/2005 of the EU-Morocco Association Council have been thereby fulfilled and the decision is therefore applicable as of 1 January 2006.

---
Adan CASILLAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5081.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Raheem WILCOX, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 17-1395.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Ronald Alex STEVENSON, petitioner, v. Robert LeGRAND, Warden, et al.

No. 17-5167.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
HOMES FOR AMERICA, INC., petitioner, v. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P.

No. 17-1519.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GenTek Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), William E. Redmond, Jr., as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Andrew P. Hines, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|    |                           | 
|--- | ------------------------- | 
|/s/ | William E.
  Redmond, Jr.
|    |                           | 
|    | William E.
  Redmond, Jr.
|    | Chief Executive
  Officer
|    | March 16,
  2006         
|    |                          
|/s/ | Andrew P.
  Hines        
|    |                           | 
|    | Andrew P.
  Hines        
|    | Chief
  Financial Officer
|    | March 16,
  2006         

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Zachary R.E. RUSK, petitioner, v. Paul WARNER.

No. 17-5295.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Robert William STONE, Jr., petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-6902.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Bradley B. MILLER, petitioner, v. Virginia T. DUNN.

No. 17-6836.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 13, 2004



/s/ Scott LongScott LongChief Financial Officer
Jose M. NON, petitioner, v. COMCAST, INC., dba Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC, et al.

No. 17-1371.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David L.Dyckman, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ThermadyneHoldings Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1) theaccompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  November 9, 2005

 
|   | By:    | /s/ David L. Dyckman         |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                         |
|   |   | David L. Dyckman             |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|   |   |                         |

 

----
# C_2010063EN.01005201.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/52

---

Action brought on 15 December 2009 — Michail v Commission

(Case F-100/09)

2010/C 63/91

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christos Michail (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Meidani, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant's decision rejecting the applicant's application under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations by reason of the harassment of which the applicant claims to have been a victim.

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision dated 9 March 2009, rejecting the application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision dated 9 March 2009, rejecting the application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order against the Commission to pay compensation for non-material damage amounting to EUR 30 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order against the Commission to pay compensation for non-material damage amounting to EUR 30 000;

| — | Costs order against the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

Costs order against the European Commission.

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual  Report of China Holdings Group, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dempsey K. Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  August 10, 2011
By  /s/ Dempsey K. Mork
-----------------------------
     Dempsey K. Mork
     Chief Executive and Financial Officer
    (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Quisi BRYAN, petitioner, v. Charlotte JENKINS, Warden.

No. 16-9680.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.