alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1)   | The                Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB for the three and nine months ended                September 30, 2004 (the “Form 10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with                the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of 1934 as amended; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all                material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| /s/ J.                  Scott Tomer                                                       |   |   |        |
| J.                    Scott TomerChief                    Executive                    Officer |

|                                                                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                               |   |   |   |
|  /s/                        John D. Clagg                                     |   |   |        |
| John                        D. ClaggChief                        Financial Officer |   |   |        |

----
# C_2009233EN.01000302.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/3

---

Action brought on 24 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-228/09)

2009/C 233/04

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by including the amount of the ‘opłata rejestracyjna’ (registration charge) within the taxable amount for VAT levied in Poland on the supply, intra-Community acquisition or import of a passenger car, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 78, 79, 83 and 86 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by including the amount of the ‘opłata rejestracyjna’ (registration charge) within the taxable amount for VAT levied in Poland on the supply, intra-Community acquisition or import of a passenger car, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 78, 79, 83 and 86 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; (1)

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The plea advanced in the present case concerns the Republic of Poland’s inclusion of the amount of the registration charge in the taxable amount for VAT when the supply, intra-Community acquisition and import of unregistered passenger cars take place in that Member State.

In the Commission’s view, there is a fundamental similarity between the Polish tax/charge at issue in the present case and the Danish tax/charge in Case C-98/05 De Danske Bilimportører. In that case, the Court held that the relevant tax/registration charge does not fall within the taxable amount for VAT.

De Danske Bilimportører

The Commission takes the view that the operation of the Polish registration charge in the case of successive transactions concerning the same vehicle prior to its registration shows that it is in essence a registration tax/charge, and not a tax on sales as the Republic of Poland maintains. The taxable person can deduct the amount of the registration charge from the amount of tax chargeable. This means that ultimately, through the system of deduction of the tax paid previously, the tax/charge is levied only once.

The Commission does not concur with the Republic of Poland’s argument that the person liable for payment of the registration charge is the seller, the intra-Community acquirer or the importer of the vehicle and not the person in whose name the car is registered.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
In re Jessie D. McDONALD, petitioner.

No. 16-653.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Craig SMALLWOOD, petitioner, v. HAWAII.

No. 15-9568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Hawaii denied.
# L_2004371EN.01005001.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 371/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 371/50

---

DECISION No 29/2004 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 5 November 2004

related to the listing of a Conformity Assessment Body under the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

(2004/868/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Articles 7 and 14,

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Signed in Washington DC, 25 October 2004.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Brussels, 5 November 2004.

On behalf of the European Community

Joanna KIOUSSI

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

| D.A.R.E. Consultancy BV |
| --- |
| Vijzelmolenlaan 7 |
| 3447 GX Woerden |
| Netherlands |
| Tel. (31) 348 430 979 |
| Fax (31) 348 430 645 |

D.A.R.E. Consultancy BV

Vijzelmolenlaan 7

3447 GX Woerden

Netherlands

Tel. (31) 348 430 979

Fax (31) 348 430 645

---
Christopher D. SUDDUTH, petitioner, v. Dave DAVEY, Warden.

No. 16-9730.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16449]



[[Page 34720]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-082)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Astronomical Search for Origins and Planetary Systems 
(ORIGINS); Subcommittee Meeting.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space 
Science Advisory Committee, Astronomical Search for Origins Planetary 
Systems Subcommittee.

DATES: Wednesday, July 11, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursday, July 
12, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Friday, July 13, 2001, 8 a.m. to 12 noon.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference 
Room 6H46, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Anne L. Kinney, Code S, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-
2150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--Space Interferometry Update
--Next Generation Space Telescope Update
--Keck Update
--Education and Public Outreach

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: June 25, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-16449 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AN E DOE, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. UN I T E D S T AT E S DE P AR T ME NT OF H E A L T H A N D H U M A N S E R V IC E S ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 17239 D. C . No . 4 : 1 2 - c v - 0 0 5 3 2 - C KJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona C i ndyK . J or ge ns on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , IK U T A , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a ne D oe appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng he rm ot i on for l eave t o p roce ed anon ym ou sl y. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der the col l at er al order 

# FI LED APR23 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 17239 2 d o c tr in e . D oes I

T hr u X X I I I v . A dv anc e d T

ex t i le C or

p. , 214 F . 3d 1058, 1065- 67 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e r e v ie w f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . I

d. a t1 0 6 9 . W e a f

f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g D o e le a v e to proceed anonym ou sl y w here there w er e i nsuffi ci ent l y “ un usual ” c i rc um st ance s ju s tif y in g a n o n y m ity , a n dw h e r e D o e f a ile dto r e d a c t h e rtru e n a m e in d o c u m e n ts f ile din th e d is tr ic t c o u rt. Id . a t 1 0 6 7 - 6 8 ( ap a rtym a yp r o c e e da n o n y m o u s lyin j udi c i a l pr oc e e di ngs onl y“ i n s pe c i a l c i r c um s t a nc e s w he n the pa rty ’ s ne e d f or a n o n y m ityo u tw e ig h s p r e ju d ic e to th e o p p o s in g p a rtya n dth e p u b lic ’s in te r e s t in kn ow i ng the party’ s i dent i ty” ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng D oe ’ s m ot i on f or r e c o n s id e r a tio n b e c au s e D o e f a ile dto e s tab lis h ab a s is w a rr a n tin g r e c o n s id e r a tio n . See Sch. D ist. N

o. 1J, Mul tno m ah Cnt

y. , O r. v. A Can dS

, Inc. , 5 F . 3d 1255, 1262- 63 (9th C i r. 19 93 ) ( se tt i ng forth st andard of revi ew and g roun ds for r ec on si dera t i on ). AF F I RME D.
Denise Laqua BROOKS, petitioner, v. AMERICAN HOME KEY, et al.

No. 17-5038.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Chris Allen, Managing Director, Evercore Partners

Antonella Amadei, Head of International Relations, London Stock Exchange

Nicolas Bertrand, Head of Equities and Derivatives Markets, London Stock Exchange Group

Magnus Bocker, CEO, Singapore Stock Exchange 

Nicolas Breteau, CEO, Newedge

Doug Cifu, President & COO, Virtu Management

Dave Cox, Vice President, Evercore Partners

Will Eisenbeis, Senior Industry Executive, Welsh Carson

John Eley, President & CEO, Pivot Inc.

John Fay , Global Head of FICC, Newedge

Douglas Friedman, General Counsel, Tradeweb

 James Ginsburg, Managing Partner, Vernon & Park

 Jane Gladstone, Senior Managing Director, Evercore Partners

 David Goone, SVP, Business Development and Sales, ICE

 Richard Gorelick, Chief Executive Officer, RGM

 Alan Guarino, Global Sector Leader - Fintech/Electronic Trading, Korn Ferry

 Hans-Ole Jochumsen, President, NASDAQ OMX

Tom Kloet, CEO, TMX Group

 Kelly Loeffler, Director, Investor and Public Relations, ICE

 Jean-Jacques Louis, SVP-Corporate Strategy, NASDAQ

Scott Murphy, TrueEx 

John Nixon, Executive Director, ICAP 

Eric Noll, Executive Vice President, Transaction Services, NASDAQ OMX

James Pak, Managing Director, Tradeweb

 Scott Patrick, Managing Director, Corporate Advisory, Evercore

 Kenneth Raisler, Partner, Sullivan & Cromwell

 Harpal Sandhu, President & CEO, Integral

 Richard Sandor, Chairman & CEO, Environmental Financial Products

 Ken Schiciano, Managing Director, TA Associates

 Johnathan Short, SVP and General Counsel, ICE

 Cameron Smith, General Counsel, Quantlab

 Jeff Sprecher, President & CEO, IntercontinentalExchange

 Tony Weeresinghe, Head of Global Development/ Founder and CEO, LSEG/Millenium IT

 Cynthia Zeltwanger, Founding Partner, Atlas5 Financial. Former head of Americas for NewEdge
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 383 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to ensure that 

preexisting condition exclusions with respect to enrollment in health 

insurance coverage and group health plans continue to be prohibited. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio (for himself, Mr. TURNER, Mr. KATKO, Mr. GONZALEZ

of Ohio, and Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to ensure that preexisting condition exclusions with respect to enrollment in health insurance coverage and 

group health plans continue to be prohibited. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuing Coverage 

5 for Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 383 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING THE PROHIBITION OF PREEXISTING 

2 CONDITION EXCLUSIONS WITH RESPECT TO 

3 ENROLLMENT IN HEALTH INSURANCE COV4 ERAGE AND GROUP HEALTH PLANS. 

5 Part I of subtitle F of title I of the Patient Protection 

6 and Affordable Care Act is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 1503. SEVERABILITY. 

9 ‘‘If subsection (a) of section 5000A of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b), is 

11 to any extent illegal, unconstitutional, otherwise invalid, 

12 or incapable of being enforced, the validity and enforce13 ability of sections 2701 through 2705 of the Public Health 

14 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg through 300gg–4), as added 

15 by section 1201, shall not be affected.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41877

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE RAMOS-CERDA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-718

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Ramos-Cerda

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2012049EN.01001102.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon v Thomas Dutrueux, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie du Jura

(Case C-495/10) (1)

1

(Directive 85/374/EEC - Liability for defective products - Scope - National rules requiring public healthcare establishments to pay compensation, even when they are not at fault, for damage sustained by a patient as a result of the failure of equipment or products used in the course of treatment)

2012/C 49/17

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon

Applicant:

Defendants: Thomas Dutrueux, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie du Jura

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d’État — Interpretation of Article 13 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ 1985 L 210, p. 29) — Liability of public health establishments towards their patients — Permissibility of a national liability scheme which allows an injured person to obtain compensation, even in the absence of fault, for injury caused by the failure of defective products — Limitation of the liability of the provider of services

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The liability of a service provider which, in the course of providing services such as treatment given in a hospital, uses defective equipment or products of which it is not the producer within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, as amended by Directive 1999/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 1999, and thereby causes damage to the recipient of the service does not fall within the scope of the directive. Directive 85/374 does not therefore prevent a Member State from applying rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, under which such a provider is liable for damage thus caused, even in the absence of any fault on its part, provided, however, that the injured person and/or the service provider retain the right to put in issue the producer’s liability on the basis of the directive when the conditions laid down by the latter are fulfilled.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00250

- CR

GEORGE KRISTOPHER NE VILLE , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016

- 1624

- C1

ABATEMENT ORDER

The appellant’s brief is overdue in this appeal.

We did not rule on Appellant’s Fifth Motion to Extend Time to File Brief on the

Merits. Each previous motion was for very brief periods of time and well just i fied

. We

have waited to rule on the fifth motion until after the date to which an extension was

requested; which was May 28, 2019. We are now a month beyond the date to which the

extension was requested; thus, if the motion had been granted, the brief would,Neville v. State Page 2

nevertheless, be late. Having received no brief, we must abate the appeal.

Accordingly, w e abate this appeal to the trial court to conduct any necessary

hearings within 21 days of the date of this Order pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2), (3).

The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3), if any, are ordered t o be filed within 28 days of

the date of this Order. See id

.

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal abated Order issued and filed July 1 , 2019 [RWR]