alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745379
<NAME> KENAN TRANSPORT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,404
<PP&E>                                          94,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,400
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (301)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.14
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3901 

To amend the Education Sciences and Reform Act of 2002 to include racial 

subgroups in IPEDS data, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Ms. JUDY CHU of California (for herself, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. CASE, Mr. TED

LIEU of California, and Mr. TAKANO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Education Sciences and Reform Act of 2002 

to include racial subgroups in IPEDS data, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Data Counts 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RACIAL SUBGROUPS IN IPEDS DATA. 

7 Section 153(a)(3) of the Education Sciences Reform 

8 Act of 2002 (20 U.S.C. 9543(a)(3)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3901 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘feasible, information’’ and in2 serting the following: ‘‘feasible— 

3 ‘‘(A) information’’; 

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(B) information from the Integrated 

7 Postsecondary Education Data Survey or a suc8 cessor system (whichever includes the most re9 cent data), that is disaggregated by race in a 

10 manner that captures all the racial groups spec11 ified in the American Community Survey of the 

12 United States Census Bureau;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-31802 and 333-31804) pertaining to the (i) USinternetworking,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan and (ii) USinternetworking,
Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of USinternetworking, Inc. of our
report dated February 15, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of USinternetworking, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 27, 2001
Demetrio HERNANDEZ, petition, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9628.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Multicenter Therapeutic Trails 
of X-linked ALD
    Date: July 16, 2001.
    Time: 9:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Governor's House, 1615 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5E03, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16365 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135180 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135180 

 COA: 279883 

Jackson CC: 07-004018-FH 

CHARLES DEAGO BELL,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

 Clerk
Number of Energy Traders Over Position Accountability Levels  

in Selected Energy Markets1

July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009

Trader Category Single Month All‐Month

Combined

Risk Management/Swap 13 13

Commercial/Physical 20 13

Managed Money 28 18

Non‐Commercial 11 4

Total 2 69 46

1 NYMEX WTI Crude oil, NYMEX Natural gas, NYMEX Heating Oil, and NYMEX RBOB Gasoline

2 Total does not foot from above numbers, because three multi‐line traders are classified in two different

trader categories for the single month and two multi‐line traders are classified in two different categories

for the all‐months‐combined.
Gaspar SANTANA-GUZMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### UNDERWOOD LIVESTOCK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5072.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 28, 2010.

Martin G. Crowley, American Legal Services, Fallon, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*587Kurt G. Kastorf, Katherine J. Barton, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Underwood Livestock, Inc. moves for (1) reconsideration of the court’s June 30, 2010 order dismissing its appeal for failure to file a brief, (2) leave to file a supplemental appendix containing the United States Court of Federal Claims’ docket sheet, with supplemental appendix attached, and (3) an extension of time to file its reply brief, with reply brief attached.

Upon consideration thereof,

It is Ordered that:

The motions are granted, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.
II-00390

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Richards <jricha40@wideopenwest.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:47 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Richards

34385 Union Lake Rd.

Clinton Township, MI 48035
# C_2010148EN.01005107.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/51

---

Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Aecops v Commission

(Case T-257/09) (1)

1

2010/C 148/89

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.

1

---
# C_2012355EN.01002301.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — Jurašinović v Council

(Case T-465/09) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Request for access to reports of European Union observers present in Croatia from 1 to 31 August 1995 - Refusal to grant access - Risk of undermining the protection of international relations - Previous disclosure)

2012/C 355/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ivan Jurašinović (Angers, France) (represented by: M. Jarry and N. Amara-Lebret, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially C. Fekete and K. Zieleśkiewicz, subsequently C. Fekete and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

By way of principal claim, annulment of the decision of 22 September 2009 by which the applicant was granted partial access to reports of European Union observers present in the Knin zone of Croatia on from 1 August to 31 August 1995

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ivan Jurašinović to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ivan Jurašinović to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
# C_2009167EN.01002502.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/25

---

Action brought on 27 March 2009 — Kipp v Europol

(Case F-28/09)

2009/C 167/47

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michael Kipp (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer him a permanent post, along with the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the defendant indicated to the applicant that it was unable to offer him a permanent position, along with the complaint decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the applicant’s submissions against the decision of 12 June 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the defendant indicated to the applicant that it was unable to offer him a permanent position, along with the complaint decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the applicant’s submissions against the decision of 12 June 2008;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
II-00905

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Joan Gucken <jgucken@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:10 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Joan Gucken

214 Dudley Ave

Narberth, PA 19072
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed October 6, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00245

- CV

____________ THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER , Appellant

V.

LAURENCE BOLTON AND MICHAEL BOLTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF MARILYN BOLTON, DECEASED , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 10855



### ORDER

On July 29, 2019 , appellant filed an unopposed motio n to abate this appeal for 90 days . The motion states the parties have reached a tentative settlement agreement and ask s that the appeal be abated. The motion is GRANTED

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s2 active docket until January 4, 2021 . The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to reinstate or motion
dismiss t he appeal. The court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer
# C_2009102EN.01002102.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/21

---

Action brought on 13 February 2009 — Rintisch v OHIM — Bariatrix Europe (PROTI SNACK)

(Case T-62/09)

2009/C 102/34

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bernhard Rintisch (Bottrop, Germany) (represented by: A. Dreyer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bariatrix Europe Inc. SAS (Guilherand Granges, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 December 2008 in case R 740/2008-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 December 2008 in case R 740/2008-4; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “PROTI SNACK”, for goods in classes 5, 29, 30 and 32 — application No 4 992 145

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 39 702 429 of the word mark “PROTI” for goods in classes 29 and 32; German trade mark registration No 39 608 644 of the figurative mark “PROTIPOWER” for goods in classes 29 and 32; German trade mark registration No 39 549 559 of the word mark “PROTIPLUS” for goods in classes 29 and 32; German trade mark registration No 39 629 195 of the trade word “PROTITOP” for goods in classes 29, 30 and 32

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to provide an assessment on the merits of the opposition; Infringement of Article 74(2) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal refused to exercise its discretion or at least failed to state how it exercised such discretion; Misuse of power as the Board of Appeal failed to take into account documents and evidence submitted by the applicant.

Pleas in law:

---
Shawntanna Lemarus THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7604.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Walter Leroy MOODY, Jr., petitioner.

No. 17-8530 (17A1139).

Supreme Court of the United States

April 19, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Timothy D. KOONS, Kenneth Jay Putensen, Randy Feauto, Esequiel Gutierrez, and Jose Manuel Gardea, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion of petitioners for leave to file supplemental volume of joint appendix under seal granted.
Divna MASLENJAK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

*810Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
Ricardo RUBIO-GARCIA v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9554.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.19

                                                    LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

         This  agreement  amends the  Promissory  Note dated  September 29, 1997
("Note")  executed by  SEMITOOL,  INC  ("Borrower")  in favor of Bank of America
National  Trust  and  Savings  Association,  doing  business  as  Seafirst  Bank
("Bank"),  regarding a loan in the maximum  principal  amount of  $10,000,000.00
(the  "Loan").  For mutual  consideration,  Borrower and Bank agree to amend the
above loan documents as follows:

         1.       Interest Rate.  The Adjusted LIBOR Rate margin as shown in 
Exhibit A, Article 1 to the note is changed to 1.75%

         2. Other Terms. Except as specifically amended by this agreement or any
prior amendment,  all other terms,  conditions,  and definitions of the Note and
all other security agreements,  guaranties, deeds of trust, mortgages, and other
instruments  or agreements  entered into with regard to the Loan shall remain in
full force and effect.

         DATED October 2, 1997.


Bank:                                           Borrower:

SEAFIRST BANK                                   SEMITOOL, INC

By     /s/Joe Poole                             By: /s/Raymon F. Thompson
-------------------                             -------------------------------
Title    VP                                       Raymon F. Thompson, President
In Re Roy WILLIAMS, petitioner.

No. 17-7606.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.