alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mime-ex1027_1265.pptx.htm






 Mimecast Limited - FY19 ExCo Incentive Plan Design Metrics & Weighting 80% Revenue / 20% Adjusted EBITDA Awards are interpolated between achievement percents (e.g., 100.2% achievement results in award of 102%). Each metric is capped at 200% of award quarterly; overall quarterly award payments are capped at 100% with any overachievement earned to be reconciled at year end. If the full year metric target is achieved, then any quarters that were paid at less than 100% will be paid out at target for that missed quarter and included in the Q4 award. Maintain FY18 payout scale with updated FY19 financial objectives Exhibit 10.27 Revenue - 80% of Incentive Revenue ($M) XXXXXXXXXX Achievement 96% 97% 98% 99% 100% 101% 102% 103% 104% 105% Award 20% 85% 95% 97.5% 100% 110% 125% 150% 175% 200% Adjuest EBITDA - 20% of Incentive EBITDA ($M) XXXXXXXXXX Achievement 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% 115% 120% 125% 130% 135% Award 20 85 90 95 100 110 120 145 160 175 190 200    FY19 TargetFY19 Target
Willard CLAYTOR, et al., petitioners, v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.

No. 17-1193.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
# C_2012243EN.01001602.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2012 — Comercial Losan v OHIM — McDonald’s International Property (Mc. Baby)

(Case T-466/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Mc. Baby - Earlier Community figurative mark Mc Kids. always quality. always fun! - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 243/30

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Comercial Losan, SLU (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd (Wilmington, Delaware, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2009 (Case R 1706/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd and Comercial Losan, SLU.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Comercial Losan, SLU to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Comercial Losan, SLU to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
# C_2011355EN.01001703.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Dufour v ECB

(Case T-436/09) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Decision 2004/258/EC - ECB’s databases used for the preparation of reports on staff recruitment and mobility - Refusal of access - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Meaning of ‘document’ - Action for damages - Premature)

2011/C 355/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Julien Dufour (Jolivet, France) (represented by: I. Schoenacker Rossi and H. Djeyaramane, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: initially K. Laurinavicius and S. Lambrinoc, then S. Lambrinoc and P. Embley, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: B. Weis Fogh and S. Juul Jørgensen, Agents); Republic of Finland (represented by: initially J. Heliskoski, H. Leppo and M. Pere, then J. Heliskoski and H. Leppo, Agents); and Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, K. Petkovska and S. Johannesson, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and C. ten Dam, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of the decision of the Board of Directors of the European Central Bank, notified to the applicant by letter of the President of the ECB of 2 September 2009, refusing to grant the applicant access to the databases used for the compilation of reports on its staff recruitment and mobility and, second, delivery up to the applicant of the databases in question, and, finally, a claim for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the refusal of his application for access

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Board of Directors of the European Central Bank (ECB) notified to Mr Julien Dufour by letter of the President of the ECB of 2 September 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Board of Directors of the European Central Bank (ECB) notified to Mr Julien Dufour by letter of the President of the ECB of 2 September 2009;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the ECB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Dufour; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the ECB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Dufour;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Gene Transfer for Heart, Lung, and Blood Diseases.                    

*Date:*                         July 18, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 pm to 2:30 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne P Clark, NIH, NHLBI, DEA, Review Branch, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7202, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301/435-0310.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 22, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-16337  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Health Care Services, Inc. d/b/a Groves Security Solutions and All Occupants of 829 Yale Street, Houston, TX

A ppellate case number: 01

- 21

- 0 0 0 30

- CV

Trial court case number: 1150005

Trial court: Cou nty Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Relator

, Health Care Services, Inc. d/b/a Groves Security Solutions and All Occupants of 829 Yale Street, Houston, TX , has filed an emergency motion for temporary relief asking this Court to stay trial court proceedings while their original proceeding is pending in this Court. See

T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52

. 10

. We deny relator ’s request for emergency temporary relief.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

______ /s/ Sherry Radack

________________________________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __ January 15, 2021

____
|
|

|              |  |  | EXHIBIT
      31.1
|------------- |  |  | ------------------
|              |  |  |                   
|CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore Li,
  certify that:

1.  
  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Magtron International
  Corp.;

2.  
  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based
  on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
  in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
  presented in this report;

4.  
  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
  and have:

a.
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
  during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.  
  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
  procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness
  of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
  by this report based on such evaluation;

c.
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
  control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
  case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
  to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting; and

5.  
  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
  of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):

a.
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
  or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
  likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
  summarize and report financial information; and

b.
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
  other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
  controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 30,
  2004

|By: | /s/ Theodore S. Li           
|--- | -----------------------------
|    |                              
|    | Theodore S. Li               
|    | Chief Executive Officer/Chief
|    | Financial Officer            

|
|
|
EXHIBIT 32-1
                                                                   -------------
                             YTB International, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Report of YTB International,  Inc. (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"),
I, Michael Y. Brent,  Director and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Registrant,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

This  Certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Registrant  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Date: 08/25/2005


/s/ Michael Y. Brent
    Director and Chief Executive Officer


-------------------------------------------------
 [Signature]
AMEREN CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-819.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2009282EN.01006101.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/61

---

Action brought on 2 October 2009 — Annco v OHIM — Freche et fils (ANN TAYLOR LOFT)

(Case T-385/09)

2009/C 282/113

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Annco, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: G. Triet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Freche et fils associés SARL (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the appeal well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal well founded;

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2009 in case R 1485/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2009 in case R 1485/2008-1;

| — | Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2009 in case R 1485/2008-1, in favour of the registration of the Community trade mark concerned for classes 18 and 25, in addition to class 35; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2009 in case R 1485/2008-1, in favour of the registration of the Community trade mark concerned for classes 18 and 25, in addition to class 35;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The mark “ANN TAYLOR LOFT”, for goods and services in classes 18, 25 and 35

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: French trade mark registration of the mark “LOFT” for goods in classes 18 and 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Allowed the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned; infringement of Article 75 of Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly relied on evidence and reasons on which the applicant was not given the opportunity to comment.

Pleas in law:

---
Ryan A. FREEBURG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7255.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Dale E. ALSAGER, petitioner, v. BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, et al.

No. 16-1515.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
II-00508

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Frances Saykaly <francsayka@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Frances Saykaly

520 East 72nd Street

New York City, NY 10021
# C_2013071EN.01002703.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/27

---

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2013 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

(Joined Cases T-447/09 and T-449/09) (1)

1

2013/C 71/43

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Keith KING, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 17-7890.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
# C_2009113EN.01004001.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/40

---

Action brought on 13 March 2009 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM — Maclean (Archer Maclean’s Mercury)

(Case T-106/09)

2009/C 113/80

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Archer Maclean (Banbury, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare non-conformity of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 January 2009 in case R 1266/2007-1 with Council Regulation 40/94; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare non-conformity of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 January 2009 in case R 1266/2007-1 with Council Regulation 40/94;

| — | Declare that Community trade mark application No 4 290 227 for classes 9 and 28 falls within the prohibition contained in Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that Community trade mark application No 4 290 227 for classes 9 and 28 falls within the prohibition contained in Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94; and

| — | Order OHIM and, as appropriate, the intervener in the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM and, as appropriate, the intervener in the proceedings to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Archer Maclean’s Mercury’, for goods in classes 9, 16 and 28 — application No 4 290 227

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration of the word mark ‘Merkur’ for goods and services in classes 6, 9, 28, 35, 37, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that there were no visual, phonetic or conceptual identity similarities between the trade marks concerned, as well as that there was no identity of goods for classes 9 and 28, and therefore no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
Catherine MORALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.