alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005161EN.01004101.xml

| 23.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 18/2005

of 8 February 2005

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 173/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XX to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 173/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2004/669/EC of 6 April 2004 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to refrigerators and amending Decision 2000/40/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2004/669/EC of 6 April 2004 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to refrigerators and amending Decision 2000/40/EC (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Annex XX to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The following indent shall be added in point 2el (Commission Decision 2000/40/EC):






  ‘— | 32004 D 0669: Commission Decision 2004/669/EC of 6 April 2004 (OJ L 306, 2.10.2004, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

The following indent shall be added in point 2el (Commission Decision 2000/40/EC):

‘—

32004 D 0669: Commission Decision 2004/669/EC of 6 April 2004 (OJ L 306, 2.10.2004, p. 16).’

| 2. | The following point shall be inserted after point 2ex (Commission Decision 2003/287/EC):






  ‘ 2ey. | 32004 D 0669: Commission Decision 2004/669/EC of 6 April 2004 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to refrigerators and amending Decision 2000/40/EC (OJ L 306, 2.10.2004, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The following point shall be inserted after point 2ex (Commission Decision 2003/287/EC):

‘ 2ey.

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2004/669/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 25.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 306, 2.10.2004, p. 16.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Alex Kermith MENDOZA, petitioner, v. David B. LONG, Warden.

No. 16-9581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of DG FastChannel, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2006,as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, inthe capacities and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
| Date: November 28, 2007  |   | By:      | /s/ SCOTT  K. GINSBURG              |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------|------------------------------------------|
|                          |   |     | Scott K. Ginsburg                        |
|                          |   | * * | *Chairman of the Board of Directors and* |
|                          |   | * * | *Chief Executive Officer*                |
| Date: November 28,  2007 |   | By:      | /s/ OMAR A. CHOUCAIR                |
|                          |   |     | Omar A. Choucair                         |
|                          |   | * * | *Chief Financial Officer*                |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0503 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICK DENNIS STROBEL,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 19, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 13 2023

12/13/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0503
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


RULE
      13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934 AND18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      John
      D. Clagg, Chief Financial Officer of YTB International, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Registrant”), in connection with the Registrant’s Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), do hereby
      represent, warrant and certify, in compliance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.





/s/
                John D. ClaggName:
                John D. ClaggTitle:
                Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                November 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.01



CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Joshua Pickus, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Niku Corporation;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report;



3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this Annual Report;



4.  The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;



(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  disclosed in this annual report
any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting;



5.  The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)  all significant deficiencies in
the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and



(b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  | /s/    JOSHUA
PICKUS   
|                     |  | Joshua Pickus          
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Thomas L. LAGIOS, petitioner, v. Kenneth Mitchell GOLDMAN, et al.

No. 15-1418.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
Carlos Juan NEGRON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 15-9507.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2014045EN.01000201.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 December 2013 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-111/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Article 108(1) and (2) TFEU - Aid granted by the Republic of Lithuania for the purchase of agricultural land - Competence of the Council of the European Union - Existing aid scheme - Appropriate measures - Two indissolubly connected aid schemes - Change of circumstances - Exceptional circumstances - Economic crisis - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of proportionality)

2014/C 45/02

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Flynn, B. Stromsky and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: É. Sitbon and F. Florindo Gijón, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and L. Liubertaitė, acting as Agents), Hungary (represented by: G. Koós, M. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Szpunar, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment — Annulment of Council Decision 2009/983/EU of 16 December 2009 on the granting of State aid by the authorities of the Republic of Lithuania for the purchase of State-owned agricultural land between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013 (OJ 2009 L 338, p. 93) — Lack of competence — Misuse of powers — Infringement of the principle of sincere cooperation between Member States and institutions — Manifest error of assessment.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
In Re Benula Virgin BENSAM, petitioner.

No. 17-8013.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2009180EN.01006001.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/60

---

Action brought on 3 June 2009 — ERGO Versicherungsgruppe v OHIM — Société de Développement et de Recherche Industrielle (ERGO)

(Case T-220/09)

2009/C 180/110

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ERGO Versicherungsgruppe (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A Renck, T. Dolde and J. Pause, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Société de Développement et de Recherche Industrielle SAS (Chenôve, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2009 in Case No R 515/2008-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2009 in Case No R 515/2008-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘ERGO’ for goods and services in Classes 3 and 5 (registration application No 3 292 638)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Société de Développement et de Recherche Industrielle SAS

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘URGO’ for goods in Classes 3 and 5 (Community trade mark No 989 863)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 (1)) on the grounds that there was no likelihood of confusion between the two opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
# C_2011311EN.01004301.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Centrotherm Systemtechnik v OHIM — centrotherm Clean Solutions (CENTROTHERM)

(Case T-434/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark CENTROTHERM - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Admissibility of new evidence - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Plea of illegality - Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

2011/C 311/78

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH (Brilon, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht and U. Vormbrock, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and R. Manea, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG (Blaubeuren, Germany) (represented by: O. Löffel, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 August 2009 (Case R 6/2008-4) relating to revocation proceedings between centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG and Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
Enrique P. GOMEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-1191.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
# C_2012319EN.01000701.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2012 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-379/09) (1)

1

(State aid - Exemption from excise duty on diesel used to heat glasshouses - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid - Duty to state reasons - Selective nature - Effect on trade between Member States - Effect on competition - Directive 92/81/EEC - Directive 2003/96/EC - Community framework for State aid for the protection of the environment)

2012/C 319/10

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: F. Arena, G. Palmieri and F. Varrone, avvocati dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/944/EC of 13 July 2009 on State aid schemes C 6/04 (ex NN 70/01) and C 5/05 (ex NN 71/04) implemented by Italy in favour of glasshouse growers (exemption from excise duty on diesel used to heat glasshouses) (OJ 2009 L 327, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
II-00571

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

J Nelson <jnelson522@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

J Nelson

Niantic Community Church / 170 Pennsylvania Avenue

Niantic, CT 06357
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with Annual Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:March
                27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Zhenggang WangName:
            Zhenggang
                WangTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer and Chairman
Kimberly McLAUGHLIN, petitioner, v. Suzan McLAUGHLIN.

No. 17-878.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.