alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. Cl. 

::J 

0 

'--

(9 -

cu 

·-(.) 

~ ... . c 

::J 

0 cu 

1-< 

0 c ....---( 

. .-( 

~ ·- (.) LL 

c: ~ 

~ 

~ 

c: co 0 

. .-( 

N 

r..L.j 

A. > 

..c 

~ 

(.) 

!.... 

> (/) co 

rJj 

~ 
• Founded in 1983 

• 26 offices across the United 

States 

• International offices in 

China, India, Israel and the 

U.K 

• 13,000+ clients and 1,350+ 

employees 

• 50% of VC-backed U.S. 

companies and VCs 

worldwide are clients 

......... --:::r ,..,..__,__._ --- _; ------- ..,.,/· ........ ~ - - - -- - -- -- -:..// 

.....,_ _____________ / 

2 
SVB> Financial Group 

.s. CONOMY 

• 12.1 million jobs - 11% of 

total private sector" 

employment 

• $3 trillion in revenues - 21% 

of U.S. GDP 

• Transformative technologies 

and industries 

• How we live and work 

• How we treat and ctue 

diseases 

• How we entertain 

ourselves 

• Energy independence 

and environmental 

sustainability 

• U.S. exports and global 

competitiveness 

• U.S. productivity 

• Corporate growth 

3 
Key Attributes of Venture Capital Funds - - ,...._..... .. . -· -· - . -~-..~.~L-·---~·~· ... -·c.l<.;:_~~-o.J ·-~ ,_ -- ,. ---~·- __ -__ ,..... ___ ., __ ....._ ~to..........:. 

1. Long Term Investment Horizon 

2. Limited Use of Leverage 

3. Investments in Private Companies 

4. Non-Controlling Investments 

SVB> Financial Group 

" 1 0+ year fund term 

., No redemptions absent extraordinary circumstances 

.. Company investments are held for years 

Fund borrowing generally limited to short-term 

needs 

.. Debt not used to financially engineer returns 

• Capital-intensive companies require debt ( cleantech) 

"' Primarily invest in privately-held companies 

., Public market investments are rare (PIPE 

investments) 

Minority ownership over time 

"Investments alongside management (not buyout) 

4 
L0
# C_2011120EN.01000903.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/9

---

Order of the President of the Court of 3 January 2011 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-246/10) (1)

1

2011/C 120/19

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
Torey Michael ADAMCIK, petitioner, v. IDAHO.

No. 17-1373.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Mohsen KHOSHMOOD, petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Mohsen Khoshmood, petitioner, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration.

No. 17-7937.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Darryl DUNSMORE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7673.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
Marvin Frank HALL, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-9744.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April      30, 2010 |                         |         |
|---------------------|------------------------------|--------------|
|                | /s/ Robin Smyth              |    |
|                | Robin      Smyth             |         |
|                | Chief      Financial Officer |         |

----
Anthony BOYD, petitioner, v. Jefferson DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-962.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Arthur v. Dunn,* 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2185, 198 L.Ed.2d 252 (2017) ( *1287SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
Earnest Cassell WOODS, II, petitioner, v. Darrell ADAMS, et al.

No. 17-8122.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXH31.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Derek J. Brent, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rezconnect
Technologies, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
   information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within
   those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
   is being prepared;
   2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filling date of this
   quarterly report ("Evaluation Date") ;and
   3. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
   of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
   Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
   4. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
   control which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
   5. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
   and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could subsequently affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date May 24, 2004


                          /s/  Derek J. Brent
                          -------------------
                          Derek J. Brent,
                          Chief Financial Officer, Rezconnect Technologies, Inc.
Clifford WOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7432.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

           I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc., as amended;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. and I have done the following:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. is made known
     to us by others within Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc., particularly
     during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s board of directors (or persons performing similar functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
     have identified for Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s auditors any
     material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


7/15/04                    /s/ Carter M. Fortune
Date                       ------------------------------------------
                           Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*1042Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2010 – Baena Grupo v OHIM – Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Seated
figure)**

**(Case T-513/09)**

Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a seated figure – Earlier Community figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002

Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Comparison between the overall impression produced by the contested design and that produced by the previous design (Council
Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1) and 25(1)(b)) (see paras 21-26)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2009 (Case R 1323/2008-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel, on the one hand, and José Manuel Baena Grupo, SA, on the other. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: | Community registered design No 000426895‐0002 for the following goods: ‘ornamentation for T-shirts, ornamentation for caps, ornamentation for stickers, ornamentation for printed material including advertising material’ |
| Proprietor of the Community trade mark: | José Manuel Baena Grupo, SA |
| Applicants for the declaration of invalidity: | Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel |
| Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: | Figurative Community mark No 1312651 for goods in Classes 25, 28 and 32 of the Nice Classification |
| Decision of the Cancellation Division of the Designs Department: | Application upheld; design declared invalid |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Contested decision annulled; pursuant to the power conferred under Article 60(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs, appeal determined on its merits and Community design declared invalid |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 14 October 2009 (Case R 1323/2008‐3); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by José Manuel Baena Grupo, SA, and orders Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel to bear their own costs. |
null

31.382448
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of T REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge,that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                /s/    Scott D. Peters   Scott D. Peters   *Chief Financial Officer*   Date: March 10, 2006     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provide to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general information language in such filing.
Thomas LEONARD, petitioner, v. TEXAS; and Thomas Leonard, petitioner, v. Texas.

No. 17-7731.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District denied.
II-01029

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Nathaniel Jungbluth <nathaniel_jungbluth@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:59 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Nathaniel Jungbluth

2468 S. Ogden St.

Denver, CO 80210
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Kenneth W. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of Titan Trading Analytics Inc. certify that;

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Titan Trading Analytics Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 26, 2006

By:

/s/ Dr. Kenneth W. Powell





Name:

Dr. Kenneth W. Powell

Title:

Chief Financial Officer

Date:

April 26, 2006
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders Pacific Magtron International Corp.

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-3 (No.  333-82918)  and  Form S-8 (No.  333-38994)  of our
report  dated March 6, 2001,  except for Note 17 which is as of March 14,  2002,
relating  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of Pacific
Magtron  International  Corp.  appearing in the Company's  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

MARCH 29, 2002
Cordell FELIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8318.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed Cooperative Research and Development 
Agreement (CRADA) negotiation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating entering 
into a cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the 
National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association to develop a CD-ROM database 
of U.S. aggregates operations, based on the information included in the 
USGS National Atlas. The interative CD-ROM will allow users to search 
and correlate aggregates operations with a broad array of geographical, 
geologic, environmental, infrastructure, and political features.
    Inquiries: If any other parties are interested in similar 
activities with the USGS, please contact: Valentin V. Tepordei, USGS 
National Center, MS 983, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., Reston, VA 20192, 
Tel. 703-648-7728.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is submitted to meet the USGS 
requirements stipulated in the Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

P. Patrick Leahy,
Associate Director for Geology, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
[FR Doc. 01-16273 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
Aaron L. STRIBLING, petitioner, v. K. BROCK, et al.

No. 17-7968.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.