Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Notices 21093 

6See Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin from the 

People’s Republic of China and India: Final Results 

of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 38982 (July 23, 

2021). 

1See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020, 86 FR 55809 (October 

7, 2021) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 1, 2022. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China; 2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 

2005) (Order). 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018, 85 FR 

7731 (February 11, 2020); see also Memorandum, 

‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results 

of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated October 2, 2019. 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

provided such blends meet the intrinsic 

viscosity requirements above. The scope 

includes all PET resin meeting the 

above specifications regardless of 

additives introduced in the 

manufacturing process. The 

merchandise subject to these Orders is 

properly classified under subheading 

3907.60.00.30 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise covered by these Orders is 

dispositive.6

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), 

Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the Orders. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection will 

continue to collect CVD cash deposits at 

the rates in effect at the time of entry for 

all imports of subject merchandise. The 

effective date of the continuation of the 

Orders will be the date of publication in 

the Federal Register of this notice of 

continuation. Pursuant to section 

751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to 

initiate the next sunset reviews of the 

Orders no later than 30 days prior to the 

fifth anniversary of the effective date of 

continuation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These five-year (sunset) reviews and 

this notice are in accordance with 

sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and published pursuant to section 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: April 5, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07721 Filed 4–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to determine that 

the sole respondent under review, Hui 

Zhou Tian Mei Investment Co., Ltd. (aka 

Hui Zhou Tian Mei Furniture Co., Ltd.) 

(Tian Mei), is not eligible for a separate 

rate and is therefore a part of the Chinawide entity. The period of review (POR) 

is January 1, 2020 through December 31, 

2020. 

DATES: Applicable April 11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Krisha Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4037. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 7, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of the 2020 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

wooden bedroom furniture (WBF) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China).1

We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. On 

February 1, 2022, Commerce extended 

the deadline to issue the final results of 

this review until April 5, 2022.2 A full 

description of case events that occurred 

since issuance of the Preliminary 

Results, is in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

wooden bedroom furniture, subject to 

certain exceptions.4 Imports of subject 

merchandise are classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 

9403.50.9080, 9403.90.7005, 

9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041, 

9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 

9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 

7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

Order is dispositive.5

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). For a discussion of the comment 

received, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Review 

Consistent with the Preliminary 

Results, we continue to determine that 

the sole respondent under review, Tian 

Mei, did not establish its eligibility for 

a separate rate and is part of the Chinawide entity. No parties commented on 

this decision. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
21094 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Notices 

1See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 86 FR 

55807 (October 7, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Case 

Brief of Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay 

City, Inc., and IPSCO Tubulars Inc.,’’ dated 

November 8, 2021; and SSV’s Letter, 

‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

Vietnam—Case Brief of SeAH Steel VINA 

Corporation and Pusan Pipe America, Inc.,’’ dated 

November 8, 2021. 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Rebuttal Brief of Maverick Tube Corporation, 

Tenaris Bay City, Inc., and IPSCO Tubulars Inc.,’’ 

dated November 15, 2021; see also SSV’s Letter, 

‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

Vietnam—Rebuttal Brief of SeAH Steel VINA 

Corporation and Pusan Pipe America, Inc.,’’ dated 

November 15, 2021. 

4See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; 

2019–20: Rejection of Case Brief Filed by Maverick 

Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay City, Inc., and 

IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., and Request for 

Resubmission of Its Case Brief,’’ dated March 16, 

2022; and ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam; 2019–20: Rejection 

of Case Brief of SeAH Steel VINA Corporation and 

Pusan Pipe America, Inc., and Request for 

Resubmission of Its Case Brief,’’ dated March 16, 

2022. 

5See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Resubmission of Case Brief,’’ dated March 18, 2022; 

and SSV’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from Vietnam—Redacted Case Brief of SeAH Steel 

VINA Corporation and Pusan Pipe America, Inc.,’’ 

dated March 18, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension 

of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated January 28, 2022. 

review. No earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, Commerce intends to 

instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of 

subject merchandise from Tian Mei that 

entered the United States during the 

POR at the China-wide rate (i.e., 216.01 

percent). If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register for all shipments of subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of this notice, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed 

China and non-China exporters which 

are not under review in this review, but 

which received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter’s existing cash deposit rate; (2) 

for all China exporters of subject 

merchandise that do not have a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

China-wide entity rate (i.e., 216.01 

percent); and (3) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise that do 

not have their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

China exporter(s) that supplied that 

non-China exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties/and or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under the APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: April 5, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Whether Commerce Should 

Extend the Deadline to Issue the Final 

Results 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–07728 Filed 4–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–817] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that certain oil 

country tubular goods (OCTG) from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) 

were sold in the United States at less 

than normal value for the period of 

review (POR) September 1, 2019, 

through August 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable April 11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2924. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 28, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

November 8, 2021, we received case 

briefs from Maverick Tube Corporation, 

Tenaris Bay City, Inc., and IPSCO 

Tubulars, Inc. (collectively, the 

petitioners) and from SeAH Steel VINA 

Corporation (SeAH VINA) and Pusan 

Pipe America, Inc. (Pusan Pipe) 

(collectively, SSV).2 On November 15, 

2021, the petitioners and SSV submitted 

rebuttal briefs.3 On March 16, 2022, 

Commerce rejected the case briefs of the 

petitioners and SSV because they 

contained new factual information after 

the deadline for such information.4 The 

petitioners and SSV submitted redacted 

versions of their case briefs on March 

18, 2022.5 On January 28, 2022, we 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of this review until April 5, 

2022.6

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review, 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1