Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices 34255

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of June, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–39,298; Accuride Corp.,

Columbia, TN

TA–W–38,793; U.S. Intec. Inc., Corvallis,

OR

TA–W–39,232; Timber Tech, Inc., Libby,

MT

TA–W–38,794 & A; Eric Scott Leathers

Limited, Ste. Genevieve, MO and

Farmington, MO

TA–W–38,668; Motor Appliance Corp.,

Washington, MO

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–39,054; Consolidated Loose Leaf,

Inf., New York NY

TA–W–39,111; Price Pfister, Injection

Molding Dept. Pacoima, CA

TA–W–38,868; PACCAR, Inc.,

Chillicothe, OH

TA–W–39,383; Tridelta Industries, Inc.,

Mentor, OH

TA–W–38,627; Clinton Imperial China,

Inc., Clinton, IL

TA–W–39,192; Epic Component Co.,

New Boston, MI

TA–W–39,350; Madill Equipment USA,

Kalama, WA

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–38,582; Dalil Fashions, Inc.,

Edison, NJ

TA–W–39,116; Environmental

Analytics, Inc., Nassau Bay, TX 

TA–W–38,828; Genicom Corp,

Document Solutions Co., Div.,

Waynesboro, VA

TA–W–39,155; Fiera, Inc., Miami, FL

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–38,900; Borg Warner Air/Fluid

Systems Corp., Water Valley, MS

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location of each

determination references the impact

date for all workers of such

determination.

TA–W–38,947; Falcon Shoe

Manufacturing, Lewiston, ME:

March 20, 2000.

TA–W–39,′243; D and J Apparel, Inc.,

Albermarle, NC: May 1, 2000.

TA–W–38,995; Penn Metal Stamping,

Inc., St., Marys, PA: March 27,

2000.

TA–W–38,805; Lenox Crystal, Mt.

Pleasant, PA: February 28, 2000.

TA–W–39,308; Blue Cast Denim Co.,

Inc., El Paso, TX: May 8, 2000.

TA–W–38,176; The Fashion Group,

Lafayette, TN: April 17, 2000.

TA–W–38,852; Lucia, Inc., WinstonSalem, NC: March 2, 2000.

TA–W–38,955; Shepard/Justin, New

Bedford, MA: June 16, 2000.

TA–W–39,044; Khan-Lucas Lancaster,

Columbia, PA: March 23, 2000.

TA–W–39,043; Pete’s 807 Cutting

Services, Inc., Hialeah, FL: March

25, 2000.

TA–W–38,635; Georgia Pacific Corp.,

Kalamazoo, MI: January 19, 2000.

TA–W–39,030; Novo Kniting Co.,

Mansfield, OH: April 13, 2001.

TA–W–38,628; Crown Hosiery, Hickory,

NC: January 11, 2000.

TA–W–39,058; Garden State Cutting Co.,

Passaic, NJ: March 28, 2000.

TA–W–38,866; Global d/b/a,

Appalachian furniture Works,

Belington, WV: February 28, 2000.

TA–W–38,952; Keystone Thermometrics

Corp., St. Mary’s, PA: March 16,

2000.

TA–W–38,888; Geneva Steel, Provo UT,

Including Workers at Ainge

Enterprises, Inc., Provo, UT: March

7, 2000.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter caled (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of June, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) That imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–04607; U.S. Intec, Inc.,

Corvallis, OR

NAFTA–TAA–04690; Rue Logging, Inc.,

South Fork, CO

34256 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices

NAFTA–TAA–04792; Novo Knitting Co.,

Mansfield, OH

NAFTA–TAA–04522; Motor Appliance

Corp., Washington, MO

NAFTA–TAA–04924; Madill Equipment

USA, Kalama, WA

The investigation revealed that the

criteria for eligibility have not been met

for the reasons specified.

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

NAFTA–TAA–04856; Fiera, Inc., Miami,

FL

NAFTA–TAA–04691; Intex Corp.,

Career Apparel, Greensboro, NC

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–04776; Southern Tees,

Inc., Rockingham, NC: April 12,

2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04809; Technotrim,

Stockton, CA: April 10, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04672; Bakka

International, El Paso, TX,

Including Temporary Employees of

DSI Teamstaff II Employed at

Bakka International, El Paso, TX:

March 13, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04805; Access

Electronics, Inc., Gurness, IL: April

23, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04843; D and J Apparel,

Inc., Albemarle, NC: May 1, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04488; Crown Hosiery,

Hickory, NC: January 11, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04737; Badger

Sportswear, Inc., Fairmont, NC:

April 5, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04826; Krupp Hoesch

Suspensions, Hamilton, OH: April

30, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04918; Aavid

Thermalloy, LLC, Dallas, TX: May

25, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04800; Magnetek, Inc.,

Madison, AL: May 25, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04797; Epic Components

Co., New Boston, MI: April 24, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04853; Telect, Inc.,

Liberty Lake, WA: May 10, 2000.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of June, 2001.

Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal

business hours or will be mailed to

persons who write to the above address.

Dated: June 18, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–16162 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of June, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) that a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) that sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) that increases of imports of articles

like or directly competitive with articles

produced by the firm or appropriate

subdivision have contributed

importantly to the separations, or threat

thereof, and to the absolute decline in

sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–38,823; API Gettys, Inc.,

Including Leased Workers of QPS

and Ranstand, Racine, WI

TA–W–39,248; Nypro Oregon, Corvallis,

OR

TA–W–39,267; Johnstown Babbitting

and Machine Co., Seward, PA

TA–W–38,728; Equistar Chemical L.P.,

Port Arthur, TX

TA–W–38,843 & A; Venture Lane,

Hackensack, NJ and Brand Mills,

LTD, Hackensack, NJ

TA–W–38,950; Delfield Co., Mt.

Pleasant, MI

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–39,201; Flexfab Horizons

International LLC, Hastings, MI

TA–W–38,330; Volunteer Leather,

Milan, TN

TA–W–38,142; Bush Brothers and Co.,

Blytheville, AR

TA–W–39,229; Perfect Fit Industries,

Tell City, PA

TA–W–39,097; Vastar Resource, Inc.,

Houston, TX

TA–W–38,674; York International Corp.,

Portland, OR

TA–W–39,277; UFE, Inc., River Falls, WI

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–39,256; Nortel Networks, Simi

Valley, CA

TA–W–39,166; Imperial Home Decor

Croup, Plattsburgh, NY

TA–W–38,828; Genicom Corp,

Document Solutions Co., Div.,

Waynesboro, VA

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–38,996; Kellwood New England

Region, Brockton, MA

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location of each

determination references the impact

date for all workers of such

determination.

TA–W–39,316; Ametek, Inc., Lamb

Electric Div., Graham, NC: May 10,

2000

TA–W–39,107; Crown Equipment, Plant

1 Rotator Div., New Bremen, OH:

April 16, 2000

TA–W–39,039; Fashion International

Scranton, PA: February 24, 2001

TA–W–38,968; Lincoln Brass Works,

Inc., Waynesboro, TN: March 23,

2000

TA–W–38,918; Bakka International, El

Paso, TX Including Temporary

Employees of DSI Teamstaff II

Employed at Bakka International,

El Paso, TX: March 13, 2000

TA–W–38,831; Shoe Doctor, Inc., Dover,

New Hampshire: February 21, 2000

TA–W–38,971; The William Carter Co.,

Harlingen, TX: March 23, 2000

TA–W–39,174; Lady Hope Dress,

Kulpmont, PA: April 17, 2000

TA–W–39,077; Nucor Bearing Products,

Wilson, NC: April 6, 2000

TA–W–39,287; Rubbermaid Cleaning

Products, Greenville, NC: April 10,

2000

TA–W–38,892; Crest Uniform Co., New

York, NY: February 24, 2000