alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November      16, 2009    |   | /s/ Bennet P.      Tchaikovsky               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   | Bennet      P. Tchaikovsky                        |   |
|                                                |   | Chief      Financial Officer                      |   |
|                                                |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of PBS Holding, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick D. Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Patrick D. Matthews

Patrick D. Matthews

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

PBS Holding, Inc.

May 14, 2007
Luis ORTEGA-ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

[Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft Letterhead]

 

August 6, 2004

 

Patrick J. Kelvie

American Restaurant Group, Inc.

4410 El Camino Real, Suite 201

Los Altos, California  94022

 

Re:          American Restaurant Group, Inc.

 

Dear Patrick:

 

As you know, we are counsel tocertain of the beneficial owners of the 111⁄2% Senior Secured Notes due 2006(collectively, the “Secured Notes”) issued by American Restaurant Group, Inc.and guaranteed by certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”),including:  (i) Credit Suisse FirstBoston International; (ii) QVT Financial LP; (iii) Third Point ManagementCompany L.L.C.; (iv) Northeast Investors; (v) Aragorn Capital, L.P.;(vi) Stanfield Capital Partners LLC; (vii) Delaware Investments; (viii)JMB Capital Partners; and (ix) Lonestar Capital Management, LLC(collectively, the “Holders”).  In theaggregate, the Holders currently beneficially own in excess of 61% of theoutstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes.

 

Reference is made to theForbearance Agreement, dated June 1, 2004, by and among the Company, itssubsidiaries, and certain beneficial owners of the Secured Notes (the“Forbearance Agreement”).  TheForbearance Agreement expired by its terms at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) on July31, 2004.  Further reference is made tothe letter addressed to Robert J. Moore, Esq., dated July 30, 2004, pursuant towhich the Holders agreed to forbear from exercising any remedies with respectto certain existing events of default under the indenture pursuant to which theSecured Notes were issued.

 

This letter will confirm thatthe Holders agree to forbear from exercising any remedies with respect tocertain existing events of default under the indenture pursuant to which theSecured Notes were issued until 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on September 3, 2004,as such events of default are described in the Forbearance Agreement.  The forbearance described in the precedingsentence shall terminate immediately upon written notice to the Company if theCompany fails to perform any of the obligations set forth on Exhibit “A” heretoby the date set forth for each such obligation, as determined by the Holders intheir sole discretion.

 

Please do not hesitate tocontact me if you have any questions regarding the foregoing.

 
| Very truly  yours, |
|--------------------|
|               |
|               |
| Matthew M.  Weber  |

 
| cc:    | William  Taves      |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Robert J.  Moore    |
|   | Thomas  Kreller     |
|   | Andrew  Miller      |
|   | Thomas  Thompson    |
|   | Gregory M.  Petrick |

 

----
II-00748

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Don Comstock <loosearrow@centurytel.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Don Comstock

PO. Box 565, 130 Cleborn st.

Lake City, CO 81235
William SYKES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5  U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Novel Technologies for Noninvasive Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cancer.                    

*Date:*                         February 23, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8 am to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Conference Room J, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lalita D. Palekar, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8066, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-7575.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-1628  Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 09-cv-02997-MSK-BNB WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff,
v. KEN SALAZAR, in his capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHI BITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for th e same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. DATED this 11 th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Call with Edison Electric Institute
  
    



  Discussions concerning product definitions.
      
  When
              06/26/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              II. Definitions

  CFTC Staff
              Scott Reinhart Terry Arbit

  Visitor(s)
              Aaron Trent

  Organization(s)
              Edison Electric Institute


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135329(25) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, KELLEY DENK, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135329 

 COA: 276746 

Macomb CC: 04-004281-NH 

JEFFREY C. MARDEROSIAN, D.D.S., and 

PROFESSIONAL ENDODONTICS, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's February 19, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
#### REDMON v. SQUIER, Warden.

No. 10903.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 14, 1945.

Danial Jay Redmon, in pro. per.

J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and Guy A. B. Dovell, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The appellant’s petition is based on the claim that the trial court acted in excess of its jurisdiction in imposing a sentence on count II of the indictment for the reason that this charge does not define any Federal offense. Furthermore, the petitioner contends he was not represented by counsel, knew nothing of legal procedure and that he entered his plea believing he was charged *606with a single offense in violation of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, 18 U.S. C.A § 408.

The lower court found that petitioner had intelligently waived his right to assistance of counsel, that he understood and was not misled as to the offense charged against him, and that he entered pleas of guilty to both counts. On appeal, this court will not disturb such findings. O’Keith v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 146 F.2d 231; Michener v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 141 F.2d 171.

As to the sufficiency of the indictment, we áre in accord with the lower court’s conclusion of law that the sufficiency of the indictment is not open to challenge on habeas corpus. Batson v. Squier, 9 Cir., 146 F.2d 264.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 211 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 211

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 17, 2009.
Whereas the purpose of National Women's History Month is to increase awareness 
        and knowledge of women's involvement in history;
Whereas as recently as the 1970s, women's history was rarely included in the 
        kindergarten through grade 12 curriculum and was not part of public 
        awareness;
Whereas the Education Task Force of the Sonoma County (California) Commission on 
        the Status of Women initiated a ``Women's History Week'' celebration in 
        1978 centered around International Women's History Day, which is 
        celebrated on March 8th;
Whereas in 1981, responding to the growing popularity of women's history 
        celebrations, Congress passed a resolution making Women's History Week a 
        national observance;
Whereas during this time, using information provided by the National Women's 
        History Project, founded in Sonoma County, California, thousands of 
        schools and communities joined in the commemoration of National Women's 
        History Week, with support and encouragement from governors, city 
        councils, school boards, and Congress;
Whereas in 1987, the National Women's History Project petitioned Congress to 
        expand the national celebration to include the entire month of March;
Whereas educators, workplace program planners, parents, and community 
        organizations in thousands of American communities, under the guidance 
        of the National Women's History Project, have turned National Women's 
        History Month into a major local learning experience and celebration;
Whereas the popularity of women's history celebrations has sparked a new 
        interest in uncovering women's forgotten heritage;
Whereas the President's Commission on the Celebration of Women in American 
        History was established to consider how best to acknowledge and 
        celebrate the roles and accomplishments of women in American history;
Whereas the National Women's History Museum was founded in 1996 as an 
        institution dedicated to preserving, interpreting, and celebrating the 
        diverse historic contributions of women, and integrating this rich 
        heritage fully into the Nation's teachings and history books;
Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes March 2009 as National Women's 
        History Month; and
Whereas the theme of National Women's History Month for 2009 is women taking the 
        lead to save our planet: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Women's History Month; 
        and
            (2) recognizes and honors the women and organizations in the United 
        States that have fought for and continue to promote the teaching of 
        women's history.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
| Company                                                                 |   | Country of Formation                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Capital      Future Developments Limited                                |   | British      Virgin Islands           |
| Zhejiang      Yong Xin Digital Technology Company, Limited              |   | People’s      Republic of China |
| Yiwu      Yong Xin Communication Limited                                |   | People’s      Republic of China |
| Hangzhou      Wang Da Electronics Company, Limited                      |   | People’s      Republic of China |
| Hangzhou      Sanhe Electronic Technology, Limited                      |   | People’s      Republic of China |
| Shanghai      Joy & Harmony Electronic Development Company, Limited |   | People’s      Republic of China |

----
# C_2009141EN.01005201.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/52

---

Action brought on 9 April 2009 — Trelleborg v Commission

(Case T-148/09)

2009/C 141/107

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trelleborg AB (Trelleborg, Sweden) (represented by: J. Joshua, Barrister and E. Aliende Rodríguez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul in part Article 1 of the contested decision insofar as it relates to the applicant and in any event at least insofar as it finds the commission of any infringement by the applicant prior to 21 June 1999; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in part Article 1 of the contested decision insofar as it relates to the applicant and in any event at least insofar as it finds the commission of any infringement by the applicant prior to 21 June 1999;

| — | reduce the fine imposed on the applicant in Article 2 so as to correct the manifest errors in the decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

reduce the fine imposed on the applicant in Article 2 so as to correct the manifest errors in the decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 Final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA in Case COMP/39406 — Marine Hoses insofar as it holds it liable for participation in a single and continuous infringement in the marine hose sector in the EEA, which consisted of allocating tenders, fixing prices, fixing quotas, fixing sales conditions, geographic market sharing, and the exchange of sensitive information on prices, sales volumes and procurement tenders. Furthermore, it seeks the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

The applicant puts forward two pleas in law in support of its claims.

First, it submits that the Commission’s power to impose fines for any period before 21 June 1999 is time barred under Article 25(1) of Regulation 1/2003 as the applicant argues that the Commission made manifest error in fact and law in finding that the applicant had committed a single and continuous infringement.

Second, it claims that the Commission has no legitimate interest in making a declaratory finding of infringement for the first period which had come to an end in May 1997.

---
Joseph DICKINSON, Jr., petitioner, v. David PIERCE, Warden, et al.

No. 16-9535.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Dorothy SLADE, petitioner, v. CITY OF MARSHALL, TEXAS, et al.

No. 15-9794.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Napolean WATKINS, petitioner, v. Robert NAPEL, Warden.

No. 17-7658.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.