alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dorota VON MAACK, petitioner, v. 1199 SEIU LOCAL.

No. 15-1401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2009267EN.01007801.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/78

---

Action brought on 16 September 2009 — Commission v Association Fédération Club B2A

(Case T-356/09)

2009/C 267/139

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (Étupes, France) (represented by: A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët and N. Bambara, acting as Agents, and E. Bouttier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Association Fédération Club B2A

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | order the Fédération, represented by its President, to pay to the applicant the amount of ... euros ... corresponding to the principal sum of EUR 62 500 and the sum of ... euros ... in late-payment interest falling due on ...; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Fédération, represented by its President, to pay to the applicant the amount of ... euros ... corresponding to the principal sum of EUR 62 500 and the sum of ... euros ... in late-payment interest falling due on ...;

| — | order the Fédération to pay the sum of EUR 7 000 in order to cover the costs incurred by the Commission in recovering its debt; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Fédération to pay the sum of EUR 7 000 in order to cover the costs incurred by the Commission in recovering its debt;

| — | order the Fédération to pay the costs of the present case. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Fédération to pay the costs of the present case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Community, represented by the Commission, concluded a grant contract in respect of a project for the ‘creation and operation of a federation of regional networks of Business Angels for Eastern France’. The project, during which the Commission paid, as an advance, the sum of EUR 62 500 to the defendant, was completed on 30 September 2002.

In that contract, the defendant undertook, inter alia, to provide a final report. Since an incomplete report was provided, the Commission put the defendant on formal notice to produce a report that met the objectives. Since that letter of formal notice and numerous other letters went unanswered by the defendant, the Commission sent a debit note and then an order for recovery of the amount of EUR 62 500 to the defendant.

Since that debt remains unpaid, the Commission is seeking an order that the defendant pay the sum due and the losses suffered in order to cover the entirety of the expenses which the Commission has had to incur in order to recover its debt, submitting that a) the defendant has failed to fulfil its obligations laid down in the contract by failing to submit a full final report and b) payment of the sum of EUR 62 500 by the Commission was made as an advance pending acceptance of the final report.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2198

SUSAN MATOUSEK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
TOWNE BANK NC/VA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv
- 00501

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Susan Neal Matousek , Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Susan Neal Matousek appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) as frivolous and for
failure to state a claim

. * On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief s
. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Matousek ’ s informal brief s do not challenge the bas e s for the district court’s disposition, Matousek has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny the request for appointment of counsel present ed in Matousek’s second supplemental informal brief , deny her petition for initial hearing en banc, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not a id the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction over the appeal because Matousek cannot cure by mere amendment all of the defects identified by the district court. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc ’ y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 623

- 24 (4th Cir. 2015)

.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS GE MONEY BA

NK, Appellant,
v. L ONA GRAV ES, Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-11-00058- CV

Appea l from the County Court at L aw No. 5 of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2010-1722)
MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending befor e the Court is Appellant’s motion for voluntary dismiss al of this a ppeal. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(a) (1). The motion is g rante d, and this appea l is dismiss ed. Costs of appea l are assessed a g ainst Appellant. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(d).

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice May 27, 2011 Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

TERRANCE ADAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 11-0726 (RJL) 

-------------------------------- ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

June <.y~ On May 11,2011, Chimes District of Columbia, Inc., by counsel, filed a motion to 

dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On May 23, 

2011, the Court issued an Order which, among other things, advised plaintiff of his obligation to 

file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff 

that, ifhe failed to file his opposition by June 13,2011, the Court would treat the motion as 

conceded. The Clerk of Court mailed a copy of the Order to plaintiff at his address of record. To 

date, plaintiff neither has notified the Clerk of a change of address, has filed an opposition, nor 

requested additional time to file an opposition. Accordingly, the Court will grant defendant's 

motion and dismiss this action. An Order is issued separately. 

United States District Judge
Yrvens BAIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7494.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3888 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3888

 To required the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration to conduct a study on motor vehicle safety and impaired 
                    driving, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2019

 Mrs. Rodgers of Washington (for herself and Mr. McNerney) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To required the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration to conduct a study on motor vehicle safety and impaired 
                    driving, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Impaired Driving Study Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. NHTSA STUDY ON MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY AND IMPAIRED DRIVING.

    (a) Study.--The Administrator of the National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration shall conduct a study on the ways in which the 
Administration can improve motor vehicle safety, as defined in section 
30102 of title 49, United States Code, to address impaired driving, 
including alcohol, marijuana, and opioid-impaired driving.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, and biannually thereafter, the Secretary of Transportation, 
in cooperation with other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall 
submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate a report on the following:
            (1) A description of the activities undertaken pursuant to 
        subsection (a).
            (2) An update on the progress of the study pursuant to 
        subsection (a).
            (3) The results of the study once it is completed.
                                 <all>
```
II-00206

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Nancy McCollum <mover460@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 5:56 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Nancy McCollum

460 S. 2nd St.

Cottage Grove, OR 97424
SCOTT TIMBER CO., et al., petitioners, v. OREGON WILD, et al.

No. 17-881.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with this yearly report on Form 10-K of China Elite Information Co.,
Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Li Kin
Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:  March
      1 2010
              By
              /s/
      Li Kin ShingLi
      Kin ShingPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3913 

To authorize the Secretary of Education to provide grants for education 

programs on the history of the treatment of Italian Americans during 

World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Education to provide grants 

for education programs on the history of the treatment 

of Italian Americans during World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS FOR EDUCATION PROGRAMS ON THE 

4 HISTORY OF THE TREATMENT OF ITALIAN 

5 AMERICANS DURING WORLD WAR II. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF GRANTS.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education 

8 may provide grants for education programs on the 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3913 IH

1 history of the treatment of Italian Americans during 

2 World War II. 

3 (2) MAXIMUM GRANT AMOUNT.—A grant 

4 awarded under this section may not exceed $50,000. 

5 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—An eligible entity that receives 

6 a grant under this section shall use the grant funds to 

7 develop and implement public awareness education pro8 grams on the history of the treatment of Italian Ameri9 cans during World War II. 

10 (c) APPLICATION.—To be selected to receive a grant 

11 under this section, an eligible entity shall submit an appli12 cation to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and 

13 containing such information as the Secretary may require. 

14 (d) PRIORITY.—In awarding grants under subsection 

15 (a), the Secretary shall give priority to Italian-American 

16 historical and cultural organizations. 

17 (e) ELIGIBLE ENTITY DEFINED.—In this section, the 

18 term ‘‘eligible entity’’ means— 

19 (1) Italian-American historical and cultural or20 ganizations; and 

21 (2) such other entities as the Secretary deter22 mines appropriate. 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3913 IH

1 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For 

2 grants under this section, there is authorized to be appro3 priated $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2020. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
cc: Deangelo Lamont Mitchell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
Charles Anthony BALL, petitioner, v. Mike SLAGLE, Correctional Administrator, Mountain View Correctional Institution.

No. 16-9512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Capital Return Futures
                    Fund 2, L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               0000851786
<NAME>              P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 2, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-2000

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-2000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          3,358,441

<SECURITIES>                    9,484,884

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,843,325

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           894,167

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      11,949,158

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,843,325

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (1,615,907)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,307,600

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (2,923,507)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (39.37)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34275-34276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 72-20]

Notice of Issuance of Amendment to Materials License SNM-2508, 
Department of Energy, TMI-2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has 
issued Amendment 2 to Materials License No. SNM-2508 held by the U.S. 
Department of Energy (DOE) for the receipt, possession, storage and 
transfer of spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage 
installation (ISFSI) located at the Idaho National Engineering and 
Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), within the Idaho Nuclear Technology 
and Engineering Center (INTEC) site in Scoville, Idaho. The amendment 
is effective as of the date of issuance.
    By application dated August 30, 2000, as supplemented May 11 and 
24, 2001, DOE requested an amendment to its ISFSI license to include a 
Safeguards Information Protection Plan per 10 CFR 73.21(h), to be added 
as an Appendix to the existing Physical Protection Plan.
    This amendment complies with the standards and requirements of the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's 
rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as 
required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 
CFR Ch. I, which are set forth in the license amendment.
    In accordance with 10 CFR 72.46(b)(2), a determination has been 
made that the amendment does not present a genuine issue as to whether 
public health and safety will be significantly affected. Therefore, the 
publication of a notice of proposed action and an opportunity for 
hearing or a notice of hearing is not warranted. Notice is hereby given 
of the right of interested persons to request a hearing on whether the 
action should be rescinded or modified.
    The Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(12), an environmental assessment need not be prepared in 
connection with issuance of the amendment.
    The NRC maintains an Agencywide Documents Access and Management 
System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public 
documents. These documents may be accessed through the NRC's Public 
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are 
problems in accessing the documents located in

[[Page 34276]]

ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-
800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by email to [email protected].

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of June 2001.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles L. Miller,
Acting Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material 
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 01-16101 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Burt M. HOFFMAN.

No. D-2995.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 362 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 

functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. RUSH (for himself and Mr. WALBERG) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with 

respect to functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Emergency 

5 Leadership Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRE7 TARIES. 

8 Subsection (a) of section 203 of the Department of 

9 Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended 

10 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 362 IH

1 ‘‘(12) Energy emergency and energy security 

2 functions, including— 

3 ‘‘(A) responsibilities with respect to infra4 structure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, sup5 ply, and emergency planning, coordination, re6 sponse, and restoration; and 

7 ‘‘(B) upon request of a State, local, or 

8 tribal government or energy sector entity, and 

9 in consultation with other Federal agencies as 

10 appropriate, provision of technical assistance, 

11 support, and response capabilities with respect 

12 to energy security threats, risks, and inci13 dents.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2009153EN.01003001.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/30

---

Action brought on 13 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-170/09)

2009/C 153/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Peere and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents)

Applicants:

Defendants: French Republic

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulation and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (1) and, in any event, by failing to notify them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulation and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (1) and, in any event, by failing to notify them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2005/60/EC expired on 15 December 2007. At the date on which the present action was brought, the defendant still had not adopted all the transposing measures necessary or, in any event, had not notified them to the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ L 309, p. 15.

1

---