alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-60088

Summary Calendar

SALAH ATIA, also known as Rodberg,

Petitioner

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A212 904 238

Before BENAVIDES, HIGGINSON, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Salah Atia, a native and citizen of Syria, petitions this court for review 

of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his 

appeal of the denial of his applications for asylum and protection under the 

Convention Against Torture (CAT). Atia argues that the BIA’s denial of 

asylum based on his religion and opposition to military conscription is not 

supported by substantial evidence and neither is its denial of his claim for CAT 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 31, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-60088 Document: 00514704714 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2018
No. 18-60088

2

protection. Atia also asserts that the IJ and BIA failed to adjudicate his claim 

for withholding of removal.

Atia did not argue before the BIA that the IJ failed to adjudicate his 

withholding of removal claim. As a threshold matter, the IJ specifically

concluded that Atia had not met the standard for withholding. In any event, 

because he did not exhaust his contentions that the IJ and BIA did not 

sufficiently address withholding, we lack jurisdiction to consider this claim. 

See Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 320 (5th Cir. 2009); Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 

F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004). 

We review for substantial evidence the determination that an alien is 

not eligible for relief. Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Under that standard, we may not reverse the factual findings of the BIA unless 

the evidence compels it, i.e., the evidence must be so compelling that no 

reasonable factfinder could conclude against it. Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 

536-37 (5th Cir. 2009).

Our review of the briefs and record satisfy us that substantial evidence 

supports the conclusion that Atia was not entitled to asylum or withholding of 

removal based on any of his claims of persecution. See Chen v. Gonzales, 470 

F.3d 1131, 1136-38 (5th Cir. 2006); Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 307 (5th 

Cir. 2005); Milat v. Holder, 755 F.3d 354, 361 (5th Cir. 2014). Finally, 

regarding Atia’s entitlement to protection under the CAT, the record evidence 

would not compel a reasonable person to reach a different conclusion than that 

of the IJ and BIA. See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 354-55 (5th 

Cir. 2002).

PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

 Case: 18-60088 Document: 00514704714 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          35,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,189
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     71
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 71
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        71
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of T REIT, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Annual Report on
    Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
    December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                           



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DIANA M. LAING     
| |                        
| | Diana M. Laing         
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 22, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document. The signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to T REIT, Inc. and
will be retained by T REIT, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Crystal V.L. RIVERS, petitioner, v. Joseph A. SANZONE, et al.

No. 17-7316.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
**Exhibit 10.20**

February 21, 2008 

Mr. Michael R. Dougherty 

Dear Mr. Dougherty, 

This letter (this “Third Amendment”) will amend that certain letter agreement datedOctober 24, 2002, between you and Adolor Corporation (the “Company”) (the “Letter Agreement”), as amended January 26, 2004 (the “First Amendment”), as amended December 14, 2006 (the “SecondAmendment”) a copy of the Letter Agreement, the First Amendment and the Second Amendment are appended to this letter as Exhibit A. The Letter Agreement, First Amendment, Second Amendment and this Third Amendment shall together constitute the“Agreement”). 

Effective the date hereof, your target bonus shall be 55%. 

Except as set forth in this Third Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED 

THIS 22nd DAY of February, 2008 

/s/    M. R.Dougherty                 

Michael R. Dougherty
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Elissa Adams v. Allstate County Mutual Insurance

Appellate case number: 01-19-00451-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-69348

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, Allstate County Mutual Insurance, has objected to mediation. The Court’s 

mediation order date June 26, 2019 is withdrawn.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Sarah B. Landau_____

Acting individually 

Date: __July 11, 2019____
# C_2010179EN.01002703.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/27

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 3 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland)) — Virallinen syyttäjä v Malik Gataev, Khadizhat Gataeva

(Case C-105/10 PPU) (1)

(2010/C 179/45)

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Penny Perfect, am the Chief Executive Officer of AlphaTrade.com, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Annual Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 5, 2007



                               By: /s/ Penny Perfect
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Penny Perfect
                                   Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman,
                                   and Director
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1638]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission
* * * * *

DATE & TIME: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

DATE & TIME: Thursday, January 25, 2001 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes. Advisory Opinion 2000-40: 
Representative Jim McDermott.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-1638 Filed 1-16-01; 2:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3904 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to repeal wage requirements 

applicable to laborers and mechanics employed on Federal-aid highway 

and public transportation construction projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Ms. FOXX of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition 

to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to repeal 

wage requirements applicable to laborers and mechanics 

employed on Federal-aid highway and public transportation construction projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Highway Trust Fund 

5 Reform Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREVAILING RATE OF WAGE REQUIREMENTS. 

7 (a) REPEALS.—The following provisions are repealed: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3904 IH

1 (1) Section 113 of title 23, United States Code 

2 (and the item relating to such section in the analysis 

3 for chapter 1 of such title). 

4 (2) Section 5333(a) of title 49, United States 

5 Code. 

6 (b) APPLICABILITY.— 

7 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subject to paragraph 

8 (2), the amendments made by this section shall take 

9 effect on the 31st day following the date of enact10 ment of this Act. 

11 (2) EXISTING CONTRACTS.—The amendments 

12 made by this section shall not affect any contract in 

13 existence on the date of enactment of this Act or 

14 made pursuant to an invitation for bids outstanding 

15 on such date of enactment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report of Rezconnect Technologies, Inc (the "Company") on
form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 filed herewith (the "Report")
I, Derek J. Brent, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Dated: as of December 6, 2002


/s/ Derek J. Brent
---------------------------------------
Derek J. Brent, Chief Financial Officer
# L_2006053EN.01003801.xml

| 23.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 53/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 53/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 142/2005

of 2 December 2005

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 110/2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 110/2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2005/435/EC of 9 June 2005 providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Pisum sativum, Vicia faba and Linum usitatissimum not satisfying the requirements of Council Directives 66/401/EEC or 2002/57/EC respectively (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2005/435/EC of 9 June 2005 providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Pisum sativum, Vicia faba and Linum usitatissimum not satisfying the requirements of Council Directives 66/401/EEC or 2002/57/EC respectively (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 41 (Commission Decision 2005/310/EC) in Part 2 of Chapter III of Annex I to the Agreement:

| ‘42. | 32005 D 0435: Commission Decision 2005/435/EC of 9 June 2005 providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Pisum sativum, Vicia faba and Linum usitatissimum not satisfying the requirements of Council Directives 66/401/EEC or 2002/57/EC respectively (OJ L 151, 14.6.2005, p. 23).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘42.

32005 D 0435: Commission Decision 2005/435/EC of 9 June 2005 providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Pisum sativum, Vicia faba and Linum usitatissimum not satisfying the requirements of Council Directives 66/401/EEC or 2002/57/EC respectively (OJ L 151, 14.6.2005, p. 23).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2005/435/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 339, 22.12.2005, p. 6.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 151, 14.6.2005, p. 23.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Robert Alan LILLIE, petitioner, v. Carlos HERNANDEZ, Warden.

No. 17-7314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of North Carolina, Alamance County denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                         101,592                  29,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,629,426               2,697,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (60,000)                (75,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,275,042               1,159,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,004,401               3,861,581
<PP&E>                                       1,926,920               1,892,767
<DEPRECIATION>                               (916,172)               (703,944)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,358,338               5,515,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,837,872               3,613,923
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          500,000                 500,000
<PREFERRED>                                      1,073                   1,386
<COMMON>                                         2,250                   2,250
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,022,153)             (1,011,970)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,358,338               5,515,025
<SALES>                                     11,499,236               9,069,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,499,236               9,069,668
<CGS>                                        8,084,386               6,545,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,636,743               9,034,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             530,178                 609,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                332,315               (574,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   108,000                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            224,315               (574,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   224,315               (574,691)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08                  (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07                  (0.28)



</TABLE>
Yosef Gavriel TIRAT-GEFEN, petitioner, v. Celia Batista ALMEIDA.

No. 17-1192.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
#### YOUNG v. SANFORD, Warden.

No. 11249.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 9, 1945.

Louis David Young, in pro. per., for appellant.

M. Neil Andrews, U. S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, in habeas corpus proceedings, challenged the validity of his confinement. The court below discharged the writ and remanded him to the custody of the warden.

For these reasons, we think the order of the court was correct: The grounds for relief set forth in the petition related, with a single exception, to alleged irregularities and improprieties in the arrest and treatment of appellant prior to his trial, and in the procurement of evidence to be used against him. It is settled that such matters must be urged by way of defense upon the trial and by appeal; they do not constitute grounds for release by habeas corpus.1 The single jurisdictional ground is that appellant was denied counsel for his defense. The court below found as a fact that appellant was advised of his right to counsel when his case was called for trial, and that he expressly made an intelligent waiver of that right before entering the plea of guilty upon which sentence was imposed. This finding, *being*supported *by*the record, settles the matter.2

Affirmed.

1

 Harkrader v. Wadley, 172 U.S. 148, 19 S.Ct. 119, 43 L.Ed. 399; Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.S. 309, 35 S.Ct. 582, 59 L.Ed. 909; Vermillion, v. Zerbst, 5 Gir., 97 F.2d 347; Price v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 125 F.2d 806; Scott v. Aderhold, 10 Cir., 110 F.2d 797; Graham v. Squier, 9 Cir., 132 F.2d 681; Burall v. Johnson, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 614.

2

**Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461; Adams v. United States *ex*rel. McCann, 317 U. S. 269, 63 S.Ct. 236, 87 L.Ed. 268, 143 A.L.R. 435; Adkins v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 120 F.2d 471; Johnson v. Sanford, D.C., 30 F.Supp. 716, 5 Cir., 112 F.2d 739.