alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Ravenwood Bourne, Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, FotisGeorgiadis, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





Date:
      January 27, 2011
              /s/ Fotis GeorgiadisFotis GeorgiadisChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Amilcar LINARES-MAZARIEGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9319.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
EXH32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the report of Rezconnect Technologies, Inc. (the
         "Company) on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 filed
         herewith (the "Report") I, Derek J. Brent, Chief Financial Officer, of
         the Company, certify, that to the best of my knowledge:

              1.the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
              (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of the
              Company.

         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
         required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
         Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
         1934, as amended.

         Dated: as of May 24, 2004

                                         /s/ Derek J. Brent
                                         ------------------
                                         Derek J. Brent, Chief Financial Officer
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify
that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 10, 2005

| |  | /s/ Uzi Breier
Name: Uzi Breier
Title: Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on Form
10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2003, I, Dennis LaLumandiere, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Laserscope, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended
June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the six months ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Laserscope.

|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dennis LaLumandiere
Dennis LaLumandiere
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by section 906, has been provided to Laserscope and will be
retained by Laserscope and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-961.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 22, 2018.

Brian L. Mizer, Johnathan D. Legg, Lauren-Ann L. Shure, Appellate Defense Counsel, Air Force Legal Ops. Agency, Joint Base Andrews, MD, Eugene R. Fidell, New Haven, CT, Stephen I. Vladeck, Austin, TX, Mary J. Bradley, Christopher D. Carrier, Defense Appellate Division, Army Legal Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA, for Petitioners.

Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Dana J. Boente, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Brian H. Fletcher, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Joseph F. Palmer, Danielle S. Tarin, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

*It is so ordered.*
# L_2006092EN.01003101.xml

| 30.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 9/2006

of 27 January 2006

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 148/2005 of 2 December 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 148/2005 of 2 December 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2004/915/EC of 27 December 2004 amending Decision 2001/497/EC as regards the introduction of an alternative set of standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2004/915/EC of 27 December 2004 amending Decision 2001/497/EC as regards the introduction of an alternative set of standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 5ed (Commission Decision 2001/497/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32004 D 0915: Commission Decision 2004/915/EC of 27 December 2004 (OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p. 74).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32004 D 0915: Commission Decision 2004/915/EC of 27 December 2004 (OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p. 74).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2004/915/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 January 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 53, 23.2.2006, p. 46.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p. 74.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
James H. CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8103.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Capital Return Futures
                    Fund 2, L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000851786
<NAME>              P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 2, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          6,062,572

<SECURITIES>                    25,904,269

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                31,966,841

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  31,966,841

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,423,075

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      30,543,766

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    31,966,841

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,993,233

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,129,153

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    1,864,080

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   14.31

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

s0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146145

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146145

COA: 306336

Oakland CC: 2011-235544-FH

WILLIE DAVIS McCALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Lisa A. BIRON, petitioner, v. Jody UPTON, Warden.

No. 17-5163.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TERRANCE L. McCLOUD

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3176

[ January 31, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Marina Garcia

- Wood , Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 21816CF10A

.

Terrance L. McCloud, Crawfordville, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2012287EN.01000502.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 July 2012 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-562/10) (1)

1

(Action for failure to fulfil obligations - Article 56 TFEU - German legislation regarding care insurance - Benefits in kind for assistance at home are unavailable where the person reliant on care is temporarily staying in another Member State - Lower level of exportable cash benefits - Failure to reimburse hire costs of care equipment in other Member States)

2012/C 287/08

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F.W. Bulst and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 56 TFEU — National legislation regarding care insurance limiting entitlement to a care allowance to six weeks where an insured person stays temporarily in another Member State, excluding reimbursement of hire costs of care equipment and providing that care-related benefits in kind supplied in the Member State of stay are not reimbursed at the same rate as those supplied in Germany

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0136

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.L.R.M.R.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Jan Hansen 

Barry is granted an extension of time to and including June 22, 2021, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 4 2021

05/04/2021
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3954 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to include the exclusive economic 

zone as part of the United States for patent infringement, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2019 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself and Mr. CORREA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to include the exclusive economic zone as part of the United States for 

patent infringement, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN EXCLUSIVE ECO4 NOMIC ZONE OF THE UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 10 of title 35, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3954 IH

1 ‘‘§ 106. Inventions in the exclusive economic zone 

2 ‘‘Any act occurring on or below the waters of the ex3 clusive economic zone of the United States established by 

4 Presidential Proclamation 5030 of March 10, 1983 (16 

5 U.S.C. 1453 note), including activity on the seabed of such 

6 zone, that is related to the economic exploitation of, or 

7 exploration for, natural resources or marine scientific re8 search shall be considered an act occurring within the 

9 United States for the purposes of section 271.’’. 

10 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

11 The table of sections for chapter 10 of title 35, United 

12 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing new item: 

‘‘106. Inventions in the exclusive economic zone.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

GSI GROUP INC. SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                        |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary                                              |  | Place of Incorporation
|                                                        | 
|GSI Group Corporation                                   |  | Michigan              
|GSI Group Japan Corporation                             |  | Japan                 
|GSI Group Singapore Pte. Ltd.                           |  | Singapore             
|GSI Limited Holdings Corporation                        |  | New Brunswick, Canada 
|GSI Group GmbH                                          |  | Germany               
|GSI Limited Holdings II Corporation                     |  | New Brunswick, Canada 
|GSI Group Limited UK                                    |  | United Kingdom        
|GSI Lumonics SARL                                       |  | France                
|Westwind Air Bearings Limited UK                        |  | United Kingdom        
|GSI Group Precision Technologies (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.     |  | China                 
|General Scanning Securities Corporation                 |  | Massachusetts         
|MicroE Systems Corp.                                    |  | Delaware              
|MES International Inc.                                  |  | Delaware              
|GSI Lumonics Asia Pacific Ltd.                          |  | Hong Kong             
|Excel Technology, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware              
|Cambridge Technology, Inc.                              |  | Massachusetts         
|The Optical Corporation                                 |  | California            
|Control Laser Corporation (d/b/a Baublys Control Laser) |  | Florida               
|Synrad, Inc.                                            |  | Washington            
|Continuum Electro-Optics, Inc.                          |  | Delaware              
|Photo Research, Inc.                                    |  | Delaware              
|Quantronix Corporation                                  |  | Delaware              
|Excel Laser Technology                                  |  | India                 
|Excel Technology Asia Sdn. Bhd                          |  | Malaysia              
|Excel Technology Europe GmbH                            |  | Germany               
|Excel Technology Lanka (Pvt.) Ltd.                      |  | Sri Lanka             
|Excel Technology Japan Holding Co., Ltd.                |  | Japan                 
|D. (Green Electronics), Ltd.                            |  | United Kingdom        
|Excel Technology Italy Srl                              |  | Italy                 
|Baublys Control Laser GmbH                              |  | Germany               
|Excel Technology France S.A.S.                          |  | France                
|Excel Technology Japan K.K.                             |  | Japan
# C_2014253EN.01002801.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/28

---

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Unicid v Commission

(Case T-305/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 253/40

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Union nationale interprofessionnelle cidricole (Unicid) (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Ledoux and B. Néouze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, subsequently by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 concerning State aid No 561/2008, on the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---