alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Scott D. Peters, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of T REIT, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/     Scott D. PetersScott D. PetersChief Financial Officer
 Date: August 4, 2005
William NEAL, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 17-5258.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 18, 2011
By:
/s/ Zhenggang WangName:
Zhenggang WangTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-21061

Summary Calendar

 

SUSAN CALELLY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

CONROE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; 

FRANCIS GATES; DEBRA WILT; DAVID LUSK;

DORIS LIKE DENIO; TOBY YORK,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-1129

- - - - - - - - - -

August 17, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Susan Calelly appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment dismissing with prejudice her federal claims pursuant to

the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA”),

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans

with Disabilities Act. She argues that these federal claims were

not time-barred, were not barred by her failure to exhaust her

administrative remedies, and were not moot.
No. 98-21061

-2-

A plaintiff must first exhaust the state administrative

remedies before bringing an action in federal court pursuant to the

IDEA. Gardner v. School Bd. Caddo Parish, 958 F.2d 108, 110 (5th

Cir. 1992). A plaintiff may bypass the administrative process by

demonstrating that exhaustion would be futile or inadequate. Id.

at 111-12.

Calelly concedes that she did not exhaust her administrative

remedies, but she argues that she was not aware of her

administrative remedies. The record reflects that Calelly’s

parents, who sought relief on her behalf, understood the applicable

administrative review process: Within one day of the appellees’

refusal to allow Calelly to graduate with her class, Calelly’s

parents requested a due process hearing on her behalf with the

Texas Education Agency. Her parents also acknowledged in this

request that they understood that they could file suit if they were

not satisfied with the conclusion of the due process hearing.

Rather than pursue the due process hearing, however, Calelly’s

parents participated in a mediation session and agreed to dismiss

the pending due process hearing. Because Calelly was aware of the

applicable administrative procedures but chose not to pursue them,

she has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. Hamilton v.

Board of Sch. Comm'rs of Mobile County, Ala., 993 F. Supp. 884, 889

(S.D. Ala. 1996). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Jose M. BEJAR, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

No. 17-32.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Roxann J. FRANKLIN-MASON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1256.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

*1704Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,207,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,310,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,113,000
<INVENTORY>                                 67,150,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           109,917,000
<PP&E>                                     132,426,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              64,474,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             423,515,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,248,000
<BONDS>                                    302,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (39,015,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               423,515,000
<SALES>                                    142,503,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           142,503,000
<CGS>                                       90,823,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,823,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,508,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,018,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,940,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,720,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              9,142,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   578,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Brigitte REYNOLDS, petitioner, v. Anthony STEWART, Warden.

No. 15-9140.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Isaac MARION, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7695.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
KANSAS, petitioner, v. Ramiro GARCIA ;

Kansas, petitioner, v. Donaldo Morales; and Kansas, petitioner, v. Guadalupe Ochoa-Lara.

No. 17-834.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Gerald NELSON, petitioner, v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1181-1061, AFL-CIO, et al.

No. 17-8091.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
II-00094

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bruce O’Brien <obrienb612@gmail.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 12:13 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bruce O’Brien

3316 hoover

Altoona, WI 54720
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAQUALA CHERIEE ARRINGTON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 165

- C R

Appeal from the

142nd District Court

of Midland County, Texas

(TC# CR49794 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jaquala Cheriee Arrington has filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss her own

appeal , stating that she no longer wishes to proceed with her appeal

. 1 The Court grants Appellant’s

motion and dismisses this appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2 (governing voluntary dismissals in

criminal cases).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

November 22, 2019

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Eleventh Court of Appeals.
**Exhibit 15(a).4**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-12958, No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666 on Form S-8 and No. 333-145834 on Form F-3 of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report dated June 30 2007, June30, 2008, as to the effects of the restatements discussed in Notes 2 and 27 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 123R, “Share Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006 and to the restatements discussed in Notes 2 and 27), relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 2 of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

*/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

Atlanta, Georgia 

June 30,2008
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3686 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit a candidate 

for election for Federal office from using amounts contributed to the 

candidate’s campaign to make payments to vendors owned or controlled 

by the candidate or by an immediate family member of the candidate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit a candidate for election for Federal office from 

using amounts contributed to the candidate’s campaign 

to make payments to vendors owned or controlled by 

the candidate or by an immediate family member of 

the candidate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Campaign Spending 

5 Integrity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3686 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF CAMPAIGN FUNDS FOR PAY2 MENTS TO VENDORS OWNED OR CON3 TROLLED BY CANDIDATE OR IMMEDIATE 

4 FAMILY MEMBER. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 313(b) of the Federal 

6 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30114(b)) is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new para8 graph: 

9 ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS TO VENDORS

10 OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY CANDIDATE OR IMME11 DIATE FAMILY MEMBER AS CONVERSION.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of para13 graph (1), a contribution to an authorized com14 mittee of a candidate shall be considered to be 

15 converted to the personal use of the candidate 

16 if the contribution is used to make a payment 

17 to a vendor which is owned or controlled by the 

18 candidate or by an immediate family member of 

19 the candidate. 

20 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF OWNERSHIP

21 AND CONTROL.—For purposes of subparagraph 

22 (A), a vendor shall be considered to be owned 

23 or controlled by a candidate or by an immediate 

24 family member of the candidate if the candidate 

25 or the immediate family member— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3686 IH

1 ‘‘(i) is a member of the board of di2 rectors or similar governing body of the 

3 vendor; or 

4 ‘‘(ii) directly or indirectly owns or 

5 controls 51 percent or more of the voting 

6 shares of the vendor. 

7 ‘‘(C) IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER DE8 FINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘imme9 diate family member’ means, with respect to a 

10 candidate, any of the following: 

11 ‘‘(i) Spouse, and parents thereof. 

12 ‘‘(ii) Sons and daughters, and spouses 

13 thereof. 

14 ‘‘(iii) Parents, and spouses thereof. 

15 ‘‘(iv) Brothers and sisters, and 

16 spouses thereof. 

17 ‘‘(v) Grandparents and grandchildren, 

18 and spouses thereof. 

19 ‘‘(vi) Domestic partner and parents 

20 thereof, including domestic partners of any 

21 individual in clauses (i) through (v).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payments made 

24 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Dwayne BROWN, petitioner, v. Vincent MOONEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat, et al.

No. 17-8515.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Roger C. DAY, Jr., petitioner, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden.

No. 16-9753.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call with Anne Gray, CME
  
    



  Re: Core Principles 2, 9, and 21.
      
  When
              05/07/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              XII. DCM Core Principles

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Wallace

  Visitor(s)
              Anne Gray, CME

  Organization(s)
              CME


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Arnulfo RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8049.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
================================================================================


                            PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report on the Form 10-KSB of The Bralorne  Mining
Company (the  "Company") for the year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I, Jeff Yenyou Zheng,
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Annual  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The  information  contained in this Annual  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


                                                        /s/ "Yenyou Zheng"
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Jeff Yenyou Zheng
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        President and Director

Date:  March 23, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 21891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, May 10, 2022, 11:00 
a.m. to May 11, 2022, 3:00 p.m., National Institute on Alcohol Abuse 
and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, which was 
published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2022, FR Doc. No. 2022-
06714, 87 FR 18374.
    This notice is being amended to change the start and end times of 
the open session on May 10, 2022, from 12:45 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. and 
from 5:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. As such the May 10, 2022, open session will 
now be held from 12:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The meeting is partially 
closed to the public.

    Dated: April 8, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-07910 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
William Jennings Bryant AXSOM, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8175.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Tory Lenard JAMES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5214.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.