alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 COMMUNITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
             STATEMENT REGARDING: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                                 June 30,                             June 30,
                                                        ---------------------------        -----------------------------
                                                           1998             1997              1998                1997
                                                        ---------         ---------        ----------            -------
     <S>                                                <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>       
     Basic Income Per Common Share (1)
     ---------------------------------

     Net income (in thousands)                          $     589         $     538         $   1,229         $      840
                                                        =========         =========         =========          =========
     Net income per share                               $     .25         $     .24         $     .54         $      .38
                                                        =========         =========         =========          =========
     Weighted average common shares outstanding         2,362,790         2,204,323         2,288,329          2,203,711
                                                        =========         =========         =========          =========

     Diluted Income Per Common Share (2)
     -----------------------------------

     Net income (in thousands)                          $     589         $     538         $   1,229         $      840
                                                        =========         =========         =========          =========
     Net income per share                               $     .17         $     .24         $     .39         $      .38
                                                        =========         =========         =========          =========
     Weighted average common shares outstanding         3,413,865         2,232,525         3,140,337          2,231,988
                                                        =========         =========         =========          =========
</TABLE>

(1)  Basic net income per share has been computed using the weighted average
     number of common shares outstanding during each period presented.

(2)  Diluted net income per share has been computed using the weighted average
     number of common share outstanding and the dilutive effect of stock options
     and warrants outstanding during the period presented.
Juan GODINEZ-MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7770.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata 

DOLLAR TREE DISTRIBUTION, INC. AND 

 AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 

v. Record No. 3023-05-1 PER CURIAM 

 MAY 30, 2006 

STEVEN MICHAEL DURR, SR. 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Robert L. Samuel, Jr.; Williams Mullen, on brief), for appellants. 

 (Karen M. Rye, on brief), for appellee. 

 Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc. and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ 

Compensation Commission finding that Steven Michael Durr, Sr.’s failure to disconnect trailer 

brake air lines before pulling away in the tractor he was operating did not constitute willful 

misconduct pursuant to Code § 65.2-306. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s 

opinion and affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Durr v. 

Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc., VWC File No. 218-97-34 (Nov. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral 

argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2012 —
Commission v Greece**

**(Case C-485/10)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid granted to Ellinika Nafpigeia AE — Incompatibility with the common market — Recovery — Non-execution

1.                     *State aid — Recovery of unlawful aid — Obligation — Duty to implement the Commission Decision immediately and effectively
(Arts 108(2) TFEU and 288 TFEU; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 14(3)) (see paras 27, 36)*

2.                     *State aid — Recovery of unlawful aid — Application of national law — Conditions — Implementation of a procedure enabling the
immediate and effective execution of the Commission decision (Arts 108(2) TFEU and 288 TFEU; Council Regulation No 659/1999,
Art. 14(3)) (see paras 28, 29)*

3.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance with a Commission decision concerning State aid — Duty to recover
the aid granted — Reference period — Period fixed by the unimplemented decision or, subsequently, by the Commission (Arts
108(2)(2) TFEU and 288 TFEU) (see paras 30, 31)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have taken, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Decision 2009/610/EC of 2 July 2008 on aid C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) granted by Greece to Hellenic Shipyards SA (notified under number C(2008) 3118) (OJ 2008 L 225, p. 104). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary in order to implement Commission Decision 2009/610/EC of 2 July 2008 on aid C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) granted by Greece to Hellenic Shipyards SA, and by failing to provide the information listed in Article 19 of that decision to the European Commission, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 to 19 of that decision; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16277]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Announcement of Senior Fellowship Competition

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The agency is soliciting applications for Senior Fellowships 
from scholars or practitioners who conduct research related to the 
peaceful resolution of international conflict. Fellowship entails 
residence at agency in Washington, DC, for up to ten months beginning 
October 1, 2002.

DATES: Application Material Available Upon Request; Receipt Date for 
Return of Applications: September 17, 2001; Notification of Awards: 
April, 2002.

ADDRESSES: For application materials, visit the Institute's website at 
www.usip.org, or contact: United States Institute of Peace, Jennings 
Randolph Program, 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 
20036-3011, (202) 429-6063 (fax), (202) 457-1719 (TTY), 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#701a0200021f1702111d30050319005e1f0217"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8be1f9fbf9e4ecf9eae6cbfef8e2fba5e4f9ec">[email protected]</span></a> (email).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennings Randolph Program, Phone (202) 
429-3886.

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
Bernice J. Carney,
Director, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-16277 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Shane Richard ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5168.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             557
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             200
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,170
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,848
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          5,493
<ALLOWANCE>                                       (69)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,816
<DEPOSITS>                                      11,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                107
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,331
<OTHER-SE>                                       (617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  18,816
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     73
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  136
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   206
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   415
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 155
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              260
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       69
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (544)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (544)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.74)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   69
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
Carl A. COURTRIGHT, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8303.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications







The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Smooth Global (China) Holdings, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Smooth Global (China) Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Smooth Global (China) Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





November 7, 2011
/s/ Xiaojing XuXiaojing Xu (Chief Executive Officer)November 7, 2011
/s/ Hui LiangHui Liang (Chief Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Michael J. Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
      of
      Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the first quarter ended
      March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
      78o(d)); and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      May 10, 2007




/s/ Michael
              J. LoiaconoName:
                Michael J. Loiacono
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer & Chief
                Accounting Officer
SHAKA, aka Timothy L. Malumphy, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7160.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2006147EN.01006301.xml

| 1.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 147/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 147/63

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 40/2006

of 10 March 2006

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 74/2005 of 29 April 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 74/2005 of 29 April 2005 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 1776/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001 to 2005) (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 1776/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001 to 2005) (2).

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2006, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2006,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following sub-indent shall be added in the seventh indent (Council Decision 2000/819/EC) of Article 7(5) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32005 D 1776: Decision No 1776/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 (OJ L 289, 3.11.2005, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 D 1776: Decision No 1776/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 (OJ L 289, 3.11.2005, p. 14).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2006.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 239, 15.9.2005, p. 67.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 289, 3.11.2005, p. 14.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Kurt Robert SMITH, petitioner, v. Joseph P. MEKO, Warden.

No. 17-7460.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010134EN.01005004.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/50

---

Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Berenschot Groep v Commission

(Case T-428/09) (1)

1

2010/C 134/83

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
# C_2011211EN.01002104.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/21

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 10 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-306/10) (1)

1

2011/C 211/42

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---
Michael Ray THOMAS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION.

No. 17-8139.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
McKenzie J. CARSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8446.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
II-00088

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Weingart <rowbair386@gmail.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 7:00 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Weingart

1888 Jewett Rd.

Powell, OH 43065
# C_2011211EN.01000901.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/9

---

Order of the Court of 14 April 2011 — Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission

(Case C-609/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Access to the documents of the Institutions - ‘TACIS programme’ - Contract concluded by the Commission - Termination of the contract - Dispute between the contracting parties - Application for access to documents - Manifest inadmissibility)

2011/C 211/15

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Dieter C. Umbach (represented by: M. Stephani, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 in Case T-474/08 Umbach v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 2 September 2008 refusing the appellant access to certain information included in documents relating to a contract concluded between the appellant and the Commission and concerning assistance with the drafting of an administrative code on behalf of the Russian Federation in the context of the TACIS programme — Application for access concerning the dispute between the appellant and the Commission following the termination of that contract — Infringement of Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

Umbach

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Umbach shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Umbach shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.

1

---
Robert S. CABACOFF, petitioner, v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.

No. 17-924.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Anthony Edward CIAVONE, petitioner, v. Sanford SCHULMAN.

No. 16-9345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
No. 85-1602.

#### Texas *v.*Van Guilder.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT RONALD L. WHISPELL, Petitioner

v.
BUCKHORN VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY FIRE CO. NO. 1, A/K/A BUCKHORN COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. NO. 1., Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 652 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 24th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., petitioner, v. Matteo BRUNOZZI, et al.

No. 16-1527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.