T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AT I QU R R AH MAN K HA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71388 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 361- 115 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A t i qurR a hm a n K ha n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of B angl a de s h, pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m a n i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, 

# FI LED JU N 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71388 2 w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, a n dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence, Si ng h v. G on zales , 439 F . 3d 1100, 1105 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , a nd w e de nyi n pa rta nd g r a n ti n p a rtth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatK han est abl i shed changed c ir c u m s ta n c e s e x c u s in g th e u n tim e lyf ilin g o f h is a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C. F. R. § 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 4 ) ; R am adan v. G on zales , 47 9 F . 3d 64 6, 65 0 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( per c u r i a m) . A c c o r d i n g l y , w e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n a s t o K h a n ’ s a s y l u m c l a i m. W e co n cl u d e su b st an t i al ev i d en ce d o es n o tsup p o rtth e ag en cy’ s ad v erse c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n . Se e Si ngh , 43 9 F . 3d at11 10 . S ub st ant i alevi dence does n o t sup p o rt th e a g en cy ’s fin d in g b as ed up o n an y c o n flict b etw ee n K h an ’s te s tim o n ya n dh is m e d ic a l c e rtif ic a te . Se e S in g h v . A s h c r o ft , 362 F . 3d 1164, 1171 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( di sc re pancy had no bear i ng on cr edi bi l i ty bec ause i tw as no tan att em ptt o enh ance pet i t i on er ’ s c l ai m ). S ub st ant i alevi dence al so do es no tsupp ort th e a g e n c y ’ s f

i n d i n g b a s e do n K h a n ’ s i n ab i l i tyt o r e c a l l f o u ro f th e A w a mi L e a gue ’ s “ s i x poi nt s , ” be c aus e thi s l a c k of know l e dge doe s notgo t o the he a rtof h is c la im . See Cosa v. Mukasey , 543 F . 3d 1066, 1070 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . I n a ddi t i on, K han’ s f ai l ure t o corrobo ra t e hi s c l ai m w i th t es t i m on y or a ff i davi t s f rom hi s s i st er s in th e U n ite dS ta te s d o e s n o t s up p o rt th e a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility07- 71388 3 d e te rm in a tio n . Se e G u iv . I NS , 280 F . 3d 1217, 1227 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( w he r e e a c h of the pr of f e r e d r e a s ons f

ora n a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyf i ndi ng f a i l s , c orr obor a t i on i s not re qu i re d). A l though the gove rnm e ntc ont e nds the B I A a l t e rna t i ve l yde ni e d w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a nd C A T r e l i e f on the m e r i t s , thi s a l t e rna t i ve hol di ng “ i s not c o n tr o llin g , b e c au s e its e x p lic it r e a s o n in g r e lie do n a n a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility det erm i nat i on thatw e have det erm i ned i s notsupp ort ed by subst ant i alevi dence. ” See Soto-O larte v . H

older , 5 5 5 F .3 d1 0 8 9 , 1 0 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . A cc o rd in g ly, w e g ra n t th e p etit io n fo r r ev iew w ith re sp ec t t o K h an ’s w i thh ol di ng of re m ov aland C A T cl ai m s, and rem and for the agency t o con si der these cl ai m s t aki ng hi s t es t i m on y a s true because “ i ti s app ar entfr om the re cord b efo re u s th atth e IJ an dB IA h av e l i st edal l p o ssi b l e reaso n s t o sup p o rtan ad v erse c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on, a nd the ya r e i na de qua t e i n l a w ornots upport e d by subst ant i alevi dence. ” Id . a t 1 0 9 5 ; see a l so IN S v. V en tu ra , 537 U . S . 12, 16- 18 (200 2) (percuri am ). T h e p a rtie s s h a ll e a c h b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n th is p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . P E T I T I ON DE NI E D i n p a r t ; GR AN T E D i n p a r t ; RE MAND E D.