alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Exchange Group
  
    



  When
              05/01/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              XII. DCM Core Principles

  CFTC Staff
              Jill SommersMarcia BlaseMike OttenKevin Batteh

  Visitor(s)
              Dawn StumpSteve HumenikKirk Smith

  Organization(s)
              NYSE LiffeEris ExchangeOneChicago


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Paul BEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6713.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Sadonnie Marquis KITCHEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7521.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011232EN.01001102.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/11

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy)) — Danilo Debiasi v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

(Case C-613/10) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2011/C 232/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Danilo Debiasi

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma — Interpretation of Art. 13, section A, of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p.1) — Deduction of input tax — Public or private health establishments engaged in an exempt activity — National legislation excluding the deduction of tax referring to the purchase of goods or services used in the said exempt activities

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy) by decision of 7 July 2010 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.03.2011.

---
TMBC, LLC, petitioner, v. Robert McKEAGE, et al.

No. 17-1120.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Walter PAYTON, petitioner, v. KANSAS, et al.

No. 17-7170.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Troy NEWMAN, petitioner, v. NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, et al.

No. 17-482.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 3, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the year-to-date period ended April 3, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-3-1997
<CASH>                                          31,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,300
<INVENTORY>                                      6,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,920
<PP&E>                                       1,165,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                 247,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,092,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,134
<BONDS>                                        518,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,175
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,092,340
<SALES>                                         12,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,756
<CGS>                                           13,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,154
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,763
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,080)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009267EN.01006602.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/66

---

Action brought on 14 August 2009 — Concord Power Nordal v Commission

(Case T-317/09)

2009/C 267/120

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Concord Power Nordal GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: C. von Hammerstein, C.-S. Schweer and C. Wünschmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision of 12 June 2009 (ref: CAB D(2009)) in so far as it concerns the gas pipeline project Ostseepipeline-Anbindungsleitung (‘OPAL’); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision of 12 June 2009 (ref: CAB D(2009)) in so far as it concerns the gas pipeline project Ostseepipeline-Anbindungsleitung (‘OPAL’);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, which is responsible for the NORDAL gas pipeline project, objects to a letter from the Commission to the German energy regulatory authority, the Bundesnetzagentur, of 12 June 2009 in which the Commission requests the Bundesnetzagentur to make certain amendments to the exemption granted in respect of OPAL pursuant to Article 22 of Directive 2003/55/EC. (1) The applicant complains that the Commission failed to object fundamentally to the exemption from regulation granted in respect of some of OPAL’s transportation capacity to the Czech Republic.

1

In support of its claim, the applicant puts forward five pleas in law.

First, the applicant complains that OPAL does not satisfy the requirements of Article 22(1) of Directive 2003/55/EC, as it is not an interconnector, does not enhance competition or security of supply, does not amount to an extraordinary investment risk and infringes the unbundling requirement. In that respect, it is also submitted that the exemption will be detrimental to competition and to the effective functioning of the internal market and of the regulated system.

Second, the applicant submits that the conditions attached to the grant of the exemption are not capable of preventing harm to competition, or enforceable.

Further, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 82 EC, of its fundamental rights (namely the freedom of enterprise and of ownership) and of the principle of Community loyalty.

---

(1)  Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 57).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  SECTION 1350
                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert Fallah, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Key Command International Corp., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31,
2004 (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Key Command
International Corp.



Dated:  June 7, 2005                             /s/ Robert Fallah
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Robert Fallah
                                                 Chief  Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Key Command International Corp.
and will be retained by Key Command International Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MICHAEL RINKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2068

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Jackie L. Fulford , Judge.

Michael Rinkins, pro se, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
In Re Gary BAILEY, petitioner.

No. 16-9379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Theodora Ann MORSETTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6981.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-O0181

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Leslie Schockner <leslieschockner@gmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 11:24 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Leslie Schockner

4316 SE Fieldcrest Drive

Milwaukie, OR 97222
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6130

CHRISTOPHER CORNELIUS TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES M. TURPIN, Dr., Physician at Marion Correctional Institution; EMIDIO J. FELICIONE, Doctor at Central Prison; ELLA MARKLAND, M.D., Doctor at Marion Correctional Institution; NURSE CONDREY, a Registered Nurse at Marion Correctional Institution; THE UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD, Board of Doctors at Central Prison (names unknown); JOHN MORGAN; P. A. CREENSHAW, Physician at Central Prison, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-283-MU-1) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Cornelius Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Cornelius Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Turpin , No. CA-02-283-MU-1 (W.D.N.C. filed Dec. 30, 2002, entered Jan. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 364 

To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi refugees, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian 

and Iraqi refugees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Accountability 

5 for Emigres and Refugees Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘SAFER 

6 Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SYRIAN AND IRAQI 

8 REFUGEES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Prior to admitting to the United 

10 States as a refugee under section 207 of the Immigration 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 364 IH

1 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157) a covered alien, the 

2 Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the 

3 Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the 

4 Director of National Intelligence, shall ensure that the 

5 covered alien— 

6 (1) has taken and passed a lie detector test, as 

7 determined by the Secretary; 

8 (2) has submitted to the Secretary biometric 

9 identification information, including DNA, which the 

10 Secretary has compared against all relevant data11 bases and determined that the covered alien has no 

12 known history of engaging in terrorist activity (as 

13 such term is defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) of 

14 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

15 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv))); and 

16 (3) does not pose a threat to the national secu17 rity of the United States based on a background 

18 check that the Secretary conducts, which includes a 

19 review of the covered alien’s interactions on and 

20 posting of material to the Internet (including social 

21 media services), and for purposes of which, the alien 

22 has submitted to the Secretary such information as 

23 the Secretary determines necessary. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 364 IH

1 (b) COVERED ALIEN.—The term ‘‘covered alien’’ 

2 means an alien applying for admission to the United 

3 States as a refugee who— 

4 (1) is a national of Iraq or Syria; 

5 (2) has no nationality and whose last habitual 

6 residence was in Iraq or Syria; or 

7 (3) has been present in Iraq or Syria at any 

8 time on or after March 1, 2011. 

9 (c) SUNSET.—This Act shall cease to have effect on 

10 the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# L_2006031DE.01002701.xml

| 3.2.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 31/27 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Berichtigung des Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und der Regierung der Ukraine über den Handel mit bestimmten Stahlerzeugnissen

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 232 vom 8. September 2005)

Nachfolgende Berichtigung betrifft nur die im Amtsblatt veröffentlichte Fassung, nicht die unterzeichnete Fassung des Abkommens.

Seite 50, Anhang II:

| 1. | Dritte Überschrift:
anstatt
:
„SB Profilerzeugnisse
SB1. (Träger)“ muss es heißen
:
„SA3. (Sonstige Flacherzeugnisse)“. | anstatt | : | „SB Profilerzeugnisse
SB1. (Träger)“ | muss es heißen | : | „SA3. (Sonstige Flacherzeugnisse)“. |
| -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------- | -------------- | - | ----------------------------------- |
| anstatt | : | „SB Profilerzeugnisse
SB1. (Träger)“ | | | | | |
| muss es heißen | : | „SA3. (Sonstige Flacherzeugnisse)“. | | | | | |

| 2. | Vierte Überschrift:
anstatt
:
„SB2. (Walzdraht)“ muss es heißen
:
„SB Profilerzeugnisse
SB1. (Träger)“. Der dieser Überschrift voranstehende KN-Code 7225 40 90 00 wird nicht fett gedruckt und schließt unmittelbar an die vorausgehende Zahlenreihe an. | anstatt | : | „SB2. (Walzdraht)“ | muss es heißen | : | „SB Profilerzeugnisse
SB1. (Träger)“. |
| -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | - | ------------------ | -------------- | - | -------------------------------------- |
| anstatt | : | „SB2. (Walzdraht)“ | | | | | |
| muss es heißen | : | „SB Profilerzeugnisse
SB1. (Träger)“. | | | | | |

| 3. | Fünfte Überschrift:
anstatt
:
„SA3. (Sonstige Flacherzeugnisse)“ muss es heißen
:
„SB2. (Walzdraht)“. | anstatt | : | „SA3. (Sonstige Flacherzeugnisse)“ | muss es heißen | : | „SB2. (Walzdraht)“. |
| -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------- | -------------- | - | ------------------- |
| anstatt | : | „SA3. (Sonstige Flacherzeugnisse)“ | | | | | |
| muss es heißen | : | „SB2. (Walzdraht)“. | | | | | |

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KHALIL MAXIMILIAN WASHINGTON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2794

[ January 20, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 013313

- CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven

Ocksri der, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed. S ee S t. Louis v. State , 985 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Armstrong v. State , No. 1D20

- 498, 2020 WL 6126973, at *1 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 19, 2020) (explaining that the trial court did not violate a defendant ’ s Sixth Amendment rights in departing from the statutory maximum
sentence, because section 775.084, Florida Statutes, authorize d the court to impose an enhanced sentence on the basis of the defendant’s prior felony convictions, and not based on findings of fact )

.

W ARNER
, C ONNER and F ORST
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Kerry BROOKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8006.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.