alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00606

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Daniel Merritt-LeSatz m>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Daniel Merritt-LeSatz

Boulder,
C OURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

RIVER MASCARI

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 27 9

- C R

Appeal from the

210 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 2 0D0 6121 )

O R D E R

On November 1

, 20 1 6

, Brock Benjamin , Appellant’s retained attorney, filed with this

Court a motion to withdraw and appoint counsel. However, before this Court considers this motion, it will be necessary for the trial court to conduct a hearing.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing in order to determine if

the appellant is entitled to court

- appoint ed counsel or if he wishes to proceed pro se. The t rial

court shall enter all necessary orders and/or findings which may include appointing counsel to represent Appellant on appeal. In the event Appellant elects to proceed pro se, the trial court

shall m ak e Appellant aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self

- representation and develop evidence as to whether appellant’s apparent decision to relinquish benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is knowingly and intelligently made under Hubb ard v. State , 739 S.W.2d 341 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987)

The trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas,

on or before November 23

, 201 6 . The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental

clerk’s record conta ining the findings and any order appointing counsel, and forward the same to

this Court on or before December 3 , 201 6 . Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared, certified and filed with this Court on or before December 3 , 201 6.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of November , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes , JJ.
Jerry Lester JACKSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 July 2011 – Commission v Austria**

**(Case C-548/10)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2007/2/EC – Environmental policy – Infrastructure for spatial information in the European Community (INSPIRE) – Exchange and updating of data in electronic format – Incomplete transposition

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 258 TFEU) (see para. 10)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (OJ 2007 L 108, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
II-00845

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mark Medeiros <markscorn@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:52 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mark Medeiros

200 Jessie Lane

Petaluma, CA 94952
Tavares W. SPENCER, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8819.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 11, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Rodney E. CALLAHAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9326.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
# C_2011139EN.01000901.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel — Luxembourg) — Heiko Koelzsch v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

(Case C-29/10) (1)

1

(Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations - Contract of employment - Choice made by the parties - Mandatory rules of the law applicable in the absence of choice - Determination of that law - Notion of the country in which the employee ‘habitually carries out his work’ - Employee carrying out his work in more than one Contracting State)

2011/C 139/14

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heiko Koelzsch

Applicant:

Defendant: État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d’appel — Interpretation of Article 6(2)(a) of the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 (OJ 1980 L 266, p. 1) — Determination of the law applicable to an action for wrongful dismissal in the absence of a choice by the parties to an individual employment contract — Concept of place‘in which the employee habitually carries out his work’ — Employee working in more than one country but returning systematically to one of them

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(2)(a) of the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation in which an employee carries out his activities in more than one Contracting State, the country in which the employee habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract, within the meaning of that provision, is that in which or from which, in the light of all the factors which characterise that activity, the employee performs the greater part of his obligations towards his employer.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Kwame A. ROCKWELL, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
(LOGO)
Marine Midland Mortgage Corporation
2929 Walden Avenue, Depew, New York 14043

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
I 1000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:.

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required  per  section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Officer


Senior Vice President

Title

    3/26/99 Date

Member HSBC Group
Satnam SINGH, petitioner, v. Eric ARNOLD, Acting Warden.

No. 16-9734.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mike Robert SALINAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5086.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
In Re Guy Tobias LeGRANDE, petitioner.

No. 17-6182.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDEN TIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVID ED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

DeShields Grading, Inc., Respondent,

v. Ford Trust; Maurice Andre Smith and Perry S. Luthi, Sr., as co-trustees of Ford Trust dated April 8, 2010; Maurice Andre Smith, Individually; Peggy D. Taylor, Individually; Luthi Mortgage Co., Inc, d/b/a First Palmetto Trust; Investments One, LLC; Reserve Woodfin HOA and Elite Concrete Construction, LLC, Defendants, of whom Luthi Mortgage Co., Inc., d/b/a First Palmetto Trust is Appellant,

and Elite Concrete Construction, LLC, is Respondent.

____________________

__________

__________

__________ Appeal From Spartanburg County Gordon G. Cooper, Master-in-Equity

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-020

Heard April 5, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012

AFFIRMED

David G. Ingalls and Paul A. McKee, III, both of Spartanburg, for Appellant.

John T. Crawford, Jr. and Townes B. Johnson III, both of Kenison, Dudley & Crawford, of Greenville; Nathan A. Earle, of Travelers Rest, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM : Luthi Mortgage Co., d/b/a First Palmetto Trust (First Palmetto) appeals from the master-in-equ ity's order granting priority to Elite Concrete Construction, LLC's and DeShie lds Grading, Inc.'s judgments over First Palmetto's purchase money mortgage. First Palmetto argues its purchase money mortgage has priority or should be equitably subrogated to a previous purchase money mortgage held by a third party. In addition, First Palmetto argues its principal had no notice of any fraudulent subordination of judgments. We affirm the master's decision pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:

1. Priority: S.C. Fed. Sav. Bank v. San-A-Bel Corp. , 307 S.C. 76, 80, 413 S.E.2d 852, 855 (1992) (discussing the rationale for purchase money mortgages); SunTrust Bank v. Bryant , 392 S.C. 264, 268, 708 S.E.2d 821, 823 (Ct. App. 2011) ("[P]urchase money mortgages are accorded priority over all other liens arising through the mortgagor ." (emphasis added)).2. Equitable Subrogation: Dedes v. Strickland , 307 S.C. 155, 158, 414 S.E.2d 134, 136 (1992) ("A party may be equitably subrogated to the rights of an earlier creditor if: (1) the party claiming subrogation has paid the debt owed to the earlie r creditor; (2) the party was not a volunteer but had a direct interest in the discharge of the debt or lien; (3) the party was secondarily liable for the debt or for the discharge of the lien; and (4) no injustice will be done to the other party by the allowance of the equity."); Dodge City of Spartanburg, Inc. v. Jones , 317 S.C. 491, 494, 454 S. E.2d 918, 920 (Ct. App. 1995) ("The party claiming subrog ation must not have actual knowledge of any intervening lien creditors.").

3. Notice: First Sav. Bank v. McLean , 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) (noting an issue not argued in the brief is deemed abandoned and precludes consideration on appeal).

AFFIRMED

.
PLEICONES, ACTING CHIEF JUST ICE, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.
**Exhibit 14.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-83962) of CEMEX, S.A.B. deC.V., (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-86090) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., and (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.333-128657) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. of our reports dated April 22, 2016,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 Annual Report on Form 20-Fof CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. 

KPMG Cardenas Dosal, S.C. 

 

/s/ Luis Gabriel Ortiz Esqueda 

 

Monterrey, N.L., México 

April 22, 2016
Sobhy Fahmy Amin ISKANDER, petitioner, v. Dean BORDERS, Warden.

No. 16-9603.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Rhonda MEISNER, petitioner, v. ZYMOGENETICS, INC., et al.

No. 17-1022.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

SUBSIDIARIES OF DECRANE HOLDINGS CO.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

SUBSIDIARIES OF DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC.

AEROSPACE DISPLAY SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

AUDIO INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arkansas corporation.

AVTECH CORPORATION, a Washington corporation.

CARL F. BOOTH & CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

COLTECH, INC., a Texas corporation.

CUSTOM WOODWORK & PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

DAH-IP HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DAH-IP INFINITY, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT FURNITURE CO., LP, a Texas limited partnership.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT INTERNATIONAL SALES, INC., a Barbados corporation.

DETTMERS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation.

ERDA, INC., a Wisconsin Corporation.

FLIGHT REFUELING, INC., a Maryland corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a UK company.

INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM INTERIORS, INC., a Florida corporation.

PATRICK AIRCRAFT TANK SYSTEMS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PATS AIRCRAFT AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation.

PATS SUPPORT, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PATS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PCI NEWCO, INC., a Delaware Corporation.

PPI HOLDINGS, INC., a Kansas corporation.

PRECISION PATTERN, INC., a Kansas corporation.

THE INFINITY PARTNERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership.

TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS EUROPE S.A., a Swiss company.

TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

TRI-STAR TECHNOLOGIES, a California general partnership.
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
# L_2005110EN.01007801.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 110/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 110/78

---

DECISION No 2/2005

of 30 March 2005

of the Committee established under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the EC and the Swiss Confederation on amending Chapter 3 of Annex 1

(2005/352/EC)

THE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Mutual Recognition in relation to Conformity Assessment (the Agreement) signed on 21 June 1999, and in particular Article 10(4)(e) and 18(2) thereof;

Whereas by means of Ordinance of EDI of 27 March 2002 on the safety of toys (RO 2002 1082) as last amended on 2 October 2003 (RO 2003 3733), the Swiss Confederation has amended its legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions relating to toys in such a way that those provisions can be deemed equivalent under Article 1(2) of the Agreement to the corresponding European Community legislation;

Whereas Chapter 3, (Toys), of Annex 1 should be amended to reflect this;

Whereas according to Article 10(4)(e) and 18(2), the Committee may modify Annex 1 to this Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | Chapter 3, Toys, Annex I, Section I, to the Agreement is amended in accordance with the provisions set out in the Annex to this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by the Co-Chairs or other persons authorised to act on behalf of the Parties. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the latter of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Done at Bern, 30 March 2005.

On behalf of the Swiss Confederation

Heinz HERTIG

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2005.

On behalf of the European Community

Joanna KIOUSSI

---

ANNEX

AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT

In Annex 1, Product Sectors, Chapter 3, (Toys), Section I, (Legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions), ‘Provisions covered by Article 1(1)’ is deleted and replaced by ‘Provisions covered by Article 1(2)’.

In Annex 1, Product Sectors, Chapter 3, Toys, Section I, in the list headed ‘Switzerland’, the Swiss legal references should be deleted and replaced by the following list:

| | ‘Federal Law of 9 October 1992 on foodstuffs and commodities (RO 1995 1469) as last amended on 21 March 2003 (RO 2003 4803) |
| --- | --- |

‘Federal Law of 9 October 1992 on foodstuffs and commodities (RO 1995 1469) as last amended on 21 March 2003 (RO 2003 4803)

| | Ordinance of 1 March 1995 on commodities (RO 1995 1643) as last amended on 15 December 2003 (RO 2004 1111) |
| --- | --- |

Ordinance of 1 March 1995 on commodities (RO 1995 1643) as last amended on 15 December 2003 (RO 2004 1111)

| | Ordinance of EDI of 27 March 2002 on the safety of toys (RO 2002 1082) as last amended on 2 October 2003 (RO 2003 3733)’. |
| --- | --- |

Ordinance of EDI of 27 March 2002 on the safety of toys (RO 2002 1082) as last amended on 2 October 2003 (RO 2003 3733)’.

---
FROST-TSUJI ARCHITECTS, petitioner, v. HIGHWAY INN, INC., et al.

No. 17-1025.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.