alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00232

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ruth Klamecki <wdndrs80@hotmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 1:14 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ruth Klamecki

18461 HILLVIEW DRIVE

Los Gatos, CA 95030
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07613]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 25, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Gwen A. Henson, New Orleans, Louisiana; to retain voting shares 
of The H. Pat Henson Company, Maysville, Oklahoma, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of Farmers and Merchants Bank, 
Maysville, Oklahoma, and the Peoples State Bank, Blair, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2022.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-07613 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Kamaldeep Kaur SANDHU, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-1267.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Eddie MITCHELL, petitioner, v. Johnnie DENMARK, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al.

No. 15-9513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### John WITHEROW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig FARWELL and Nevada Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 08-16594.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*689Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 14, 2010.

John Witherow, Indian Springs, NV, pro se.

Heather D. Procter, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner John Witherow appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253,1 and we affirm.

Witherow contends that the district court erred by determining that he has no federally recognized liberty interest in the application of good time credits to his life sentence. Witherow’s due process rights were not violated because the state of Nevada has not created a liberty interest in the application of good time credits to a life sentence. *See Hunt v. Warden,*111 Nev. 1284, 903 P.2d 826, 827 (1995); *see also Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 557, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). Thus, the Nevada Supreme Court’s order rejecting this claim was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the Nevada Department of Corrections’ failure to deduct earned good time credits from Witherow’s lifetime term of imprisonment violated due process.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 15, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11114 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
NELSON SANDOVAL HERNANDEZ, ADRIANA TERESA SANCHEZ GUTIERREZ, Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-396-M-5

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: * Nelson Sandoval Hernandez (Hernandez) appeals his conviction for conspiring to possess over five kilograms of cocaine with the
intent to distribute, while Adrian a Teresa Sanchez Gutierrez
(Gutierrez) appeals her convictions for the same drug conspiracy
and for conspiring to launder monetary instruments with the

procee ds of the drug conspiracy. Gutierrez contends that the
evidence was insufficient to support e ither of her convictions.
After reviewing the record and the arguments of counsel, we holdNo. 03-11114 -2-
that a rational trier of fact could have found that the evidence
established the essential elements of the o ffenses beyond a
reasonable doubt.
Gutierrez and Hernandez also contend that the district court
erred in denying their challenge to the jury panel, which was made
pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 (1986). Their
conclusional assertion that the Government’s proffered race-neutral

reasons for striking minority jurors were pretextual is
insufficient to overcome the deference given to the d istrict court’s decision to accept those explanations. See United States

v. De La Rosa , 911 F.2d 985, 991 (5th Cir. 1990). The judgments of
conviction are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Fritz L. LaPorte, in his capacity as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MAKO Surgical Corp., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  (i)
     the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and(ii)
     the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MAKO Surgical Corp.
    May 5, 2011
     
     /s/ Fritz L. LaPorteFritz L. LaPorte
Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of MAKO Surgical Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.    25


---
YTB International, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Report of YTB International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Michael Y. Brent, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Date: 08/01/2005


/s/ Michael Y. Brent
    Director and Chief Executive Officer


-------------------------------------------------

[Signature]
<PAGE> 1

<TABLE>

                                                                                              Exhibit 11.1

                                                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended                        Six Months Ended
                                                                June 30                                   June 30
                                                           ------------------                        ----------------

                                                       1998                 1997                 1998                1997
                                                    ----------           ----------           ----------          ----------
                                                                 (Dollars in thousands except per share data)
<S>                                                 <C>                  <C>                  <C>                 <C>
DILUTED:

Average common shares outstanding                   $5,168,111           $3,555,319           $5,137,471          $3,278,905
Average common stock equivalents of
  warrants and options outstanding-
  based on the treasury stock method
  using market price                                   427,725              320,315              423,958             302,475
                                                    ----------           ----------           ----------          ----------

                                                     5,595,836            3,875,634            5,561,429           3,581,380
                                                    ==========           ==========           ==========          ==========

Net income                                          $    1,077           $      700           $    1,704          $    1,301

Diluted earnings per common share                   $     0.19           $     0.18           $     0.31          $     0.36
                                                    ==========           ==========           ==========          ==========
</TABLE>
Jason Lee HARRIS, petitioner, v. Karen A. MULLINS, et al.

No. 17-7366.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 383 V

Filed: May 20, 2013

Not for P ublication

*************************************

STEPHEN J. HUJARSKI, *

*

Petitioner

, *

* Attorneys’ Fees & Costs Decision

v. * Based on Stipulation

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

John R. Liber, II

, Cleveland

, OH, for petitioner

. Chrysovalantis P. Kefalas , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On May 20, 2013 , the parties filed a stipulation in which they agreed on an appropriate

amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner’s counsel asserts that

petitioner did not incur a ny costs in pursuit of his petition.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master's action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Clai ms's website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade sec rets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identi fy and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public ac cess.2

Petitioner informally provided respondent with a draft a pplication for attorneys’ fees and

c osts. Respondent reviewed petitioner’s application. Following informal discussions, petitioner

now requests $25,855.82 in at torneys’ fees and costs. Respondent does not object to the amount.

The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $25,855.82

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a

check payable jointly to petitioner and Thrasher Dinsmore & Dolan in the amount of $25,855.82

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2013 /s/ Laura D. Millman by /s/ Nora Beth Dorsey

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3847 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3847

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, as the ``Reverend 
               Curtis West Harris Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVEREND CURTIS WEST HARRIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Reverend Curtis West Harris Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Reverend 
Curtis West Harris Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3847

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, as the ``Reverend 
               Curtis West Harris Post Office Building''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                      7,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,341
<PP&E>                                          17,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,489
<BONDS>                                          3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           54,015
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,598)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,440
<SALES>                                         17,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,922
<CGS>                                            9,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (49)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (49)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (49)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Peter J. DUART, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 17-7842.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
Frederick J. GREDE, Not Individually but as Liquidation Trustee of the Sentinel Liquidation Trust, petitioner, v. FCSTONE, LLC.

No. 17-1086.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
II-00980

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

keith prince <keithp@techlineinc.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:29 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

keith prince

4747 46th Ave. N.E.

Seattle, WA 98105
Gwenda F. TOWNSEND, petitioner, v. CITY OF BELOIT, WISCONSIN.

No. 15-9353.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
Michael SHORT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8104.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  annual  report of Pangea  Petroleum  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
B. Pollock,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:    March 31, 2005                            /s/ Charles B.  Pollock
                                                       -------------------
                                                   Charles B.  Pollock,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   Pangea Petroleum Corporation