alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Raymond Eugene PEYTON, petitioner, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al.

No. 17-8042.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3963 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow exclusion of gain 

or loss on like-kind exchanges of virtual currency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow exclusion of gain or loss on like-kind exchanges of virtual 

currency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may cited as the ‘‘Virtual Value Tax Fix 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR LIKE-KIND EXCHANGES OF VIR7 TUAL CURRENCY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1031 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new subsection: 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3963 IH

1 ‘‘(i) SPECIAL RULE FOR VIRTUAL CURRENCY.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this sec3 tion, the exchange of virtual currency for virtual cur4 rency of like kind shall be treated in the same man5 ner as the exchange of real property for real prop6 erty of like kind. 

7 ‘‘(2) TERMINATION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

8 apply with respect to any exchange completed after 

9 December 31, 2024.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply with respect to exchanges com12 pleted after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Jose RIOS-MORALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8341.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Anthony Vikey Omar PRICE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5268.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32(b)

In connection with the CNB Florida  Bancshares,  Inc. (the "Company")  Quarterly
Report  on Form  10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  (the  "Report"),  I, G.
Thomas  Frankland,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
          78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                               /s/  G. Thomas Frankland
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               G. Thomas Frankland
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
II-00202

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Morris <rkmpro@hotmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 6:16 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Morris

baltan rd

bethesda, MD 20816
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Fitness Determination of Mountain Bird, Inc. d/b/a/ Salmon Air

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2001-6-18) Docket OST-00-
8059.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is proposing to find that 
Mountain Bird, Inc. d/b/a Salmon Air is fit, willing, and able, to 
provide commuter air service under 49 U.S.C. 41738.

RESPONSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-00-8059 and addressed to the Department of Transportation 
Dockets, PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and 
should be served on all persons listed in Attachment A to the order. 
Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than July 5, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Delores King, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2343.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
Robert S. Goldner,
Special Counsel, Office of Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 01-16085 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Deqwon Saquod LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7959.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Joshua HOLMAN, petitioner, v. Jennifer SACHSE, Warden.

No. 17-7693.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Cargill
  
    



  Discussion regarding Dodd-Frank requirements for capital and margin
      
  When
              03/24/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              V. Capital & Margin

  CFTC Staff
              Thelma Diaz

  Visitor(s)
              Sue CochranJon Hixson

  Organization(s)
              Cargill


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Rhonda GITTENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7950.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 14.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.: 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13970) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (ii) the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-83962) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-86090) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and (iv) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128657) of CEMEX, S.A.B. deC.V., of our reports dated June 29, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income and changes instockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the related statement of cash flows as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of changes in financial position as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. 

Our report dated June 29, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements described in the preceding paragraph contains an explanatory paragraph that statesthat the Company’s ability to fulfill its short and long-term debt obligations that mature in 2009 is dependent on successfully completing their refinancing, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern; theconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.

/s/ Celin Zorrilla Rizo 

Monterrey, N.L., Mexico 

June 30, 2009
Opinion filed March 18, 2021



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _

_____ 

### No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 02 2

- C V

_____ _

_____



### CHRISTOPHER PERRICONE , Appellant

V.

KATIE BETH PERRICONE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 29 th District Court Palo Pinto County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C49295

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant

, Christopher Perricone

, ha s filed in this court a n unopposed motion

to di smis s this appeal. In the motion, Appellant state s that the parties to this appeal have resolved their dispute, and he asks that this appeal be dismissed

. Appellant has certified that counsel for Appellee does not oppose the motion. I n accordance with Appellant’ s request, we dismiss th is appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a)(1)

.2 Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and th e appeal is

dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

March 18, 2021

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trott er , J., and Williams, J.
Lee EAKINS, petitioner, v. Mark WILSON, et al.

No. 17-7123.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until March 13, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
MIRENA MDL, et al., petitioners, v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al.

No. 17-1037.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### In re SNOW.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Feb. 9, 1945.

Cecil Snow in pro. per.

No other appearances were entered.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Cecil Snow, who is incarcerated in the federal penitentiary at Alcatraz, claiming that he has served his sentences, sought release by petition for habeas corpus to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The 'petition was dismissed. He sought to appeal in forma pauperis. The District Court denied his application, certifying that “the appeal is so frivolous as to show that it was not taken in good faith”. The right to proceed in forma pauperis is denied by the act of Congress (28 U.S.C.A. § 832) where such a certificate is made by the District Court. To overcome this obstacle to his appeal he seeks a review of the action of the District Court in making such certificate. He asks that he be allowed to pursue this review in this couft in forma pauperis.

The statute is plain. It has been uniformly interpreted to deny the privilege of proceeding on appeal without the payment of costs to cases where there is no merit. Where the appeal is so devoid of merit in the opinion of the trial court as to justify his certificate of a lack of good faith in the appeal, there is no provision for a review of his action in so certifying. The result is that he must pay -the costs required by law on such appeal. It follows that the attempt to review the certificate of the trial judge is futile. His application to this court for leave to proceed here in forma pauperis must also be based upon some merit in the application. There is none, for the reason stated.

Furthermore, there is no merit in this proposed appeal from the denial of release on the petition for habeas corpus. The petition for writ of habeas corpus was based upon the claim that a larceny of government property used by or belonging to the Postoffice Department (18 U.S.C.A. § 313) and a larceny of mail matter therein (18 U.S.C.A. § 317) following a burglarious entry, constitutes but one offense for larceny and one offense for such entry (18 U.S.C.A. § 315) and, consequently, he need not serve the five year sentence imposed upon him for the theft of mail matter.

This court has already decided the question and has held that the offenses for which appellant has been sentenced are separate and distinct offenses. O’Brien v. Squier, 133 F.2d 123, 124; referring to 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 313-317, we there said: “The *1007purposes of the two sections are different, § 313 *being*designed to protect the property of the Post Office Department, and § 317 being designed to protect the individual items constituting the mails. Consequently, the offense charged in the first count was separate and distinct from that charged in the third count, and the sentences imposed thereunder are valid.” See also, Morgan v. Devine, 237 U.S. 632, 35 S.Ct. 712, 59 L.Ed. 1153; see also, Snow v. Roche, 9 Cir., 143 F.2d 718.

Application denied.
Lunch PHILENTROPE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7996.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

          - [NARA-2022-037]

# AGENCY:

Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

# ACTION:

Notice of federal advisory committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

We are announcing an upcoming National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC) meeting in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and implementing regulations.

# DATES:

The meeting will be on April 27, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT.

# ADDRESSES:

This meeting will be a virtual meeting. See supplementary procedures below.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Heather Harris Pagán, ISOO Senior Program Analyst, by telephone at 202.357.5351 or by email at                         *NISPPAC@nara.gov.*                         Contact ISOO at                         *ISOO@nara.gov*                         and the NISPPAC at                         *NISPPAC@nara.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This virtual meeting is open to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulations at 41 CFR 101-6. The Committee will discuss National Industrial Security Program policy matters.

*Procedures:*                     Members of the public must register in advance through the                           ( print page 21221)                        Event Services link                     *https://ems8.intellor.com/​?do=​register&​t=​1&​p =841483*                     if you wish to attend. NISPPAC members, ISOO employees, and speakers should send an email to                     *NISPPAC@nara.gov*                     for the appropriate registration information instead of registering with the above link.                

Tasha Ford,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-07681 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 193 

Expressing support for National Facial Protection Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2009 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for National Facial Protection Month. 

Whereas 5,000,000 teeth are knocked out each year during 

sports activities; 

Whereas an athlete participating in contact sports has a 10 

percent chance of sustaining a significant oral-facial injury each season; 

Whereas studies indicate that approximately one third of all 

dental injuries and approximately 19 percent of head and 

face injuries are sports-related; 

Whereas an athlete is 60 times more likely to sustain damage 

to the teeth when not wearing a protective mouth guard; 

Whereas emerging evidence supports that youth athletes 

wearing full facial protection during baseball, softball, 

hockey, and lacrosse can significantly reduce their risk of 

oral-facial trauma; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 193 IH 

Whereas the Task Force on Community Preventive Services 

found that there is insufficient evidence, due to a lack of 

available research data, to support intervention programs 

to encourage the use of helmets, facemasks, and mouth 

guards to reduce oral-facial trauma in contact sports; 

Whereas the Task Force on Community Preventive Services 

has recommended additional research on the effectiveness 

of intervention programs to encourage the use of helmets, 

facemasks, and mouth guards; and 

Whereas April would be an appropriate month to designate 

as ‘‘National Facial Protection Month’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for National Facial Pro3 tection Month; 

4 (2) declares it is critical— 

5 (A) to raise awareness about the impor6 tance of using proper dental and facial protec7 tion during sporting activities; and 

8 (B) to conduct additional research to study 

9 the effectiveness of intervention programs to en10 courage use of helmets, facemasks, and mouth 

11 guards; 

12 (3) calls on sports health care professionals, 

13 parents, and coaches to— 

14 (A) educate athletes about the importance 

15 of protective equipment and encourage the use 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 193 IH 

1 of all protective devices to ensure the athlete’s 

2 safety; and 

3 (B) recommend using protective equipment 

4 that meets the standards of the National Oper5 ating Committee on Standards for Athletic 

6 Equipment (NOCSAE) and is clearly identified 

7 as being in compliance; and 

8 (4) requests the President to issue a proclama9 tion calling upon the people of the United States to 

10 observe National Facial Protection Month with ap11 propriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS