alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-60428,333-79357, 333-79369, 333-79375, 333-79365, 333-80647, 333-69622, 333-73302, 333-100786, 333-117894, 333-128992, 333-128993) on Form S-8 of our reports datedFebruary 24, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule ofThe Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and subsidiaries and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year endedDecember 31, 2005./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPNew York, New York
Lawrence REED, Jr., petitioner, v. Eric ARNOLD, Warden, et al.

No. 17-7753.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Shawn La Velle ROLLINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5296.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 402 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 

Win Oil Company, Incorporated, for purposes of economic development 

by removing the Federal reversion interest in that land, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. O’HALLERAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal 

land owned by Win Oil Company, Incorporated, for purposes of economic development by removing the Federal 

reversion interest in that land, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flagstaff Federal Re5 version Relief Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 402 IH

1 SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, FLAG2 STAFF, ARIZONA. 

3 (a) GENERAL REMOVAL OF INTEREST.—Any rever4 sionary interest of the United States pursuant to the Act 

5 of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292, chapter 278), shall no 

6 longer be subject to the reversionary interest described in 

7 that Act. 

8 (b) REMOVAL OF INTEREST IN PARTICULAR PAR9 CEL.—The reversionary interest is removed in the parcel 

10 of land located in the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, and 

11 owned by Win Oil Company, Incorporated, which land is 

12 more particularly described in the deed recorded in 

13 Coconino County, Arizona, on November 11, 1998, as doc14 ument number 98–44431. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3875 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3875

To prohibit Federal funding from being used for the purchase or use of 
         facial recognition technology, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2019

  Ms. Tlaib introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit Federal funding from being used for the purchase or use of 
         facial recognition technology, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING FEDERAL FUNDING FOR FACIAL RECOGNITION 
              TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) In General.--No Federal funds may be used for the purchase or 
use of facial recognition technology.
    (b) Facial Recognition Technology Defined.--In this Act, the term 
``facial recognition technology'' means technology which facilitates or 
otherwise enables an automated or semi-automated process that assists 
in identifying an individual based on the physical characteristics of 
the individual's face, or that logs characteristics of an individual's 
face, head, or body to infer emotion, associations, activities, or the 
location of an individual.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect on the date that is 
30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Dustin John HIGGS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6085.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charles POINTER, petitioner, v. ALLIED BARTON SECURITY COMPANY.

No. 17-8027.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with David Wright
  
    



  Discussions concerning the cross-border guidance and exemptive order.
      
  When
              06/27/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              Cross-Border

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph Cisewski

  Visitor(s)
              David Wright

  Organization(s)
              IOSCO


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
LIVINGSTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS, petitioner, v. GENOA CHARTER TOWNSHIP.

No. 17-914.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Richardson Osaigbovo EDIONSERI, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-1068.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3896 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3896

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that only citizens or 
  nationals of the United States may operate trains within the United 
                    States that originate in Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2019

Mr. Lipinski (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that only citizens or 
  nationals of the United States may operate trains within the United 
                    States that originate in Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of American Jobs in 
Cross-Border Rail Operations With Mexico Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The country of Mexico prohibits Americans from serving 
        as crews on railroad trains in Mexico.
            (2) The rail safety laws and regulations of Mexico, and the 
        requirements for certification of Mexican railroad operating 
        crews, are far less stringent than those of the United States.
            (3) A reciprocal restriction on Mexican nationals crewing 
        trains in the United States will protect the work and jobs of 
        American rail workers, protect the safety of Americans living 
        and working in proximity to railroad tracks in the United 
        States that are used for cross-border rail operations with 
        Mexico, and promote otherwise fair and equitable labor 
        conditions.

SEC. 3. CREW REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAINS ORIGINATING IN MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 20169. Crew requirements for trains originating in Mexico
    ``Trains originating in Mexico may only be operated in the United 
States by crews comprised entirely of citizens or nationals of the 
United States.''.
    (b) Regulations Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue 
such regulations as are necessary to carry out the amendments made by 
this Act.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for subchapter II 
of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

``20169. Crew requirements for trains originating in Mexico.''.
                                 <all>
```
II-00270

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bruce Burns <burnsb319@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bruce Burus

11441 N IH-35 #19105

Austin, TX 78753
Robert BONCZEK, petitioner, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES NATIONAL ROOFING INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, et al.

No. 17M102.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Wesley HARSHAW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8383.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Vanessa M. SMITH, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF GEORGIA, COBB COUNTY.

No. 17-7705.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-00778

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tim Duda <timduda@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:25 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Tim Duda

340 Queen Anne Court

San Antonio, TX 78209
Jamie LaBRANCHE, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

No. 17-7936.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          78,075
<SECURITIES>                                    11,590
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,790<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,828
<PP&E>                                          21,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,753
<BONDS>                                          7,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         47
<COMMON>                                           298
<OTHER-SE>                                     314,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,559
<SALES>                                         84,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,258
<CGS>                                           38,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (594)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    318
<INCOME-TAX>                                       455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (137)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (137)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
<FN>
<F1>Includes Raw Material and Work in Process Inventory of $2,929.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Paul Hawran, Principal Financial and Accounting Officerof Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge: 

 

1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report, and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual report. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned has set hishand hereto as of the 17th day of March, 2008.
Gregory WARREN, petitioner, v. Robert FISCHL, et al.

No. 16-9388.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 31, 2017

No. 04-16-00586-CV

NINJA JUMP, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Luz LOBO and Jorge Lobo, Individually, and as next friend of Aaron Joshua Lobo, a minor,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-04073

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice 

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

Irene Rios, Justice

The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Abate Appeal pending finalization of the parties’ 

written settlement agreement. The parties’ joint motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the 

appellant file a motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal within thirty days 

from the date of this order. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1, 43.2; see Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, 

L.L.C., 70 S.W.3d 180, 180 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, no pet.).

It is so ORDERED on this 31st day of October, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court
Samuel Luis GUTIERREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8169.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Frederick C. CASHNER, petitioner, v. John J. WIDUP, et al.

No. 17-8241.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
In Re Dexter ROGERS, petitioner.

No. 17-87.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.