alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ricardo Enriquez SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-7018.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Nathan Deveron BRANNAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6986.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
II-00742

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

P. B. Jnr. <tao4us@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

P.B. Jnr.

425 Woodhaven Drive

Monroeville, PA 15146-1315
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George A. McQuain, the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the first quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 5, 2010





/s/ George A. McQuainName:
      George A. McQuainTitle:
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
II-00383

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Constance Lane <clane@esedona.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:06 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Constance Lane

130 Castle Rock Road

Sedona, AZ 86351
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 30,
2006 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-K.
 /s/ Eric J. Foss

Eric J. FossPresident andChief Executive OfficerFebruary 27, 2007
Benjamin David RETTIG, petitioner, v. UTAH.

No. 17-7927.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

*1564Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Utah denied.
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Trustees of Fidelity Investment Trust and the Shareholders of Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Series International Value Fund, and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund: 

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Series International Value Fund, and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (the “Funds”), each a fund of Fidelity Investment Trust, as of and for the year ended October 31, 2016, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), we considered the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting, including controls over safeguarding securities, as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Open Meeting of the Commission – Thursday, November 10, 2022 

AGENDA

1. Call to Order and Welcome 

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Rostin Behnam 

Commissioner Kristin N. Johnson 

Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero 

Commissioner Summer K. Mersinger 

Commissioner Caroline D. Pham 

3. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Reporting and Information Requirements for 

Derivatives Clearing Organizations 

a. Staff Presentation 

- Clark Hutchison, Division of Clearing and Risk (DCR) 

- Eileen A. Donovan, DCR 

- Parisa Nouri, DCR 

- August A. Imholtz III, DCR 

b. Motion

c. Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion 

d. Vote 

4. Notice of Proposed Order and Request for Comment on an Application for a Capital 

Comparability Determination Submitted on behalf of Nonbank Swap Dealers subject to 

Regulation by the Mexican Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores 

a. Staff Presentation 

- Amanda Olear, Market Participants Division (MPD) 

- Thomas J. Smith, MPD 

- Rafael Martinez, MPD 

- Carmen Moncada-Terry, MPD 

- Natalie Markman Radhakrishnan, Office of International Affairs

b. Motion

c. Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion 

d. Vote 

5. Chairman and Commissioners’ Closing Remarks 

6. Adjournment
Barbara DARBY, petitioner, v. David J. SHULKIN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17-7450.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00963

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dorotha Russell <dmruss61 @comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:39 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dorotha Russell

5055 W Panther Creek Drive

The Woodlands, TX 77381
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert
M. Van Patten, Interim Chief Financial Officer of YTB International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Registrant”), in
connection with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), do hereby
represent, warrant and certify, in compliance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





/s/ Robert M. Van PattenName:  Robert
      M. Van PattenTitle:    Interim
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:    May
      17, 2010
# C_2011080EN.01000903.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/9

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Franssons Verkstäder AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Lindner Recyclingtech GmbH

(Case C-290/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action before the General Court against a decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Time-limit allowed for bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility due to delay - Appeal clearly unfounded)

2011/C 80/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Franssons Verkstäder AB (represented by: O. Öhlén, advokat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Lindner Recyclingtech GmbH

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 May 2010 in Case T-98/10 Franssons Verkstäder v OHIM in which the General Court dismissed an action brought by the proprietor of Community design No 253778-0001 (chaffcutters) against decision R 690/2007-3 of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 October 2009 annulling the decision of the Invalidity Division which rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by Lindner Recyclingtech — Time-limit allowed for bringing proceedings — Clear inadmissibility

Franssons Verkstäder

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Franssons Verkstäder AB shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Franssons Verkstäder AB shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
Juliet ARVAKHI, petitioner, v. Ben CARSON, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

No. 16-9355.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Khalil DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9590.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3890 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to provide funds to address 

motor vehicle safety and impaired driving, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. BUCSHON (for himself and Mrs. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to provide funds 

to address motor vehicle safety and impaired driving, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combatting Impaired 

5 Driving Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY AND IMPAIRED DRIVING. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of 

8 Transportation shall provide funding for grants, pilot pro9 gram activities, demonstration projects, and innovative so10 lutions to improve motor vehicle safety, as defined in secVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:28 Jul 30, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3890.IH H3890

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3890 IH

1 tion 30102 of title 49, United States Code, to address im2 paired driving, including alcohol, marijuana, and opioid3 impaired driving. 

4 (b) FUNDING AMOUNT.—There is authorized to be 

5 appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection (a), 

6 amounts as follows: 

7 (1) $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2021. 

8 (2) $9,000,000 for fiscal year 2022. 

9 (3) $9,000,000 for fiscal year 2023. 

10 (4) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2024. 

11 (5) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128246 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128246 

 COA: 258490 

Gratiot CC: 04-004721-FC 

KIMBERLY LYNN MOFFETT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

l1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
EXHIBIT
21

SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE COMPANY

|                                                |  |               
|----------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Name                                            |  | Formation     
|                                                |  | Jurisdiction  
|                                                |  |               
|GenTek Financial Services Ltd.                  |  | Barbados      
|GenTek Holding, LLC                             |  | Delaware      
|General Chemical
  Performance Products LLC     |  | Delaware      
|Fini
  Enterprises, Inc.                        |  | Texas         
|General Chemical
  LLC                          |  | Delaware      
|Inmobiliara
  GenTek, S.A. de C.V.              |  | Mexico        
|General Chemical
  West LLC                     |  | Delaware      
|Waterside Urban
  Renewal Corporation           |  | New Jersey    
|General Chemical
  Canada Holdings Inc.         |  | Delaware      
|General Chemical
  Performance Products Ltd.    |  | Ontario       
|Reheis, Inc.                                    |  | Delaware      
|Reheis Holdings
  Inc.                          |  | Delaware      
|Ilminster Company                               |  | Ireland       
|Reheis Ireland                                  |  | Ireland       
|Alembic
  Manufacturing Ltd.                    |  | United Kingdom
|GenTek
  Technologies Marketing Inc.            |  | Delaware      
|Balcrank
  Products Inc.                        |  | Delaware      
|GT Technologies
  Europe GmbH                   |  | Germany       
|Defiance, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware      
|Defiance
  Precision Products Inc.              |  | Ohio          
|Defiance Precision
  Products Management LLC    |  | Delaware      
|Defiance Precision
  Products Manufacturing LLC |  | Delaware      
|Defiance Testing
  & Engineering Services, Inc. |  | Michigan      
|Binderline Draftline,
  Inc.                    |  | Michigan      
|Defiance Kinematics
  Inc.                      |  | Delaware      
|DTA Development, LLC                            |  | Michigan      
|Hy-Form
  Products, Inc.                        |  | Michigan      
|Toledo
  Technologies Inc.                      |  | Delaware      
|Toledo
  Technologies Management LLC            |  | Delaware      
|Toledo
  Technologies Manufacturing LLC         |  | Delaware      
|1279597 Ontario
  Inc.                          |  | Ontario       
|Sandco Automotive Ltd.                          |  | Ontario       
|Noma Holding Inc.                               |  | Delaware      
|Noma Corporation                                |  | Delaware      
|Noma
  Technologies Limited Partnership         |  | Massachusetts 
|Noma Delaware
  Inc.                            |  | Delaware      
|Noma Company                                    |  | Nova Scotia   
|Printing
  Developments, Inc.                   |  | Delaware      
|Vigilant
  Networks LLC                         |  | Delaware      
|Vigilant Networks
  Canada Inc.                 |  | Ontario       

---
Larry Demetrius PEARSON, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 16-9673.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Abdi Razaq Abshir OSMAN and Mohamed Abdi Jama, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8055.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Rafael JIMENEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9550.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2012073EN.01000902.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/9

---

Order of the Court of 10 November 2011 — Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission, the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA)

(Case C-626/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 4(1)(b) and (2), first indent - Protection of private life and integrity of the individual - Protection of commercial interests - Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 - Executive agencies - Competence to handle confirmatory requests regarding applications for access to documents - Principle of transparency - ‘Overriding public interest’ - Errors of law)

2012/C 73/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès (represented by: C. Joséphidès and H. Joséphidès, dikigorio)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Rozet and M. Owsiany-Hornung, Agents), The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet, Agent))

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 in Case T-439/08 Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by the applicant seeking annulment, first, of the decision of EACEA of 1 August 2008 relating to an application for access to documents concerning the allocation of a Jean Monnet centre of excellence to the University of Cyprus and, second, of Commission Decision C(2007) 3749 of 8 August 2007 relating to an individual decision to allocate subsidies in the context of the lifelong learning programme, a Jean Monnet sub-programme — Infringement of the right of access to documents and of the principle of transparency — Errors of law

Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mrs Agapiou Joséphidès is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mrs Agapiou Joséphidès is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.

1

---
# L_2005036EN.01001201.xml

| 9.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/12

---

Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2005 of the EC-Switzerland Joint Committee of 1 February 2005 replacing tables III and IV(b) of Protocol 2

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 29 of 2 February 2005
  )

In the contents on the cover and on page 42 in the title and at each reference in the text:

for:

‘Protocol 2’,

read:

‘Protocol No 2’.

---
Exhibit 13.(a).1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 20-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 20-F/A”), I, Steven Chan, acting chief executive officerof the Company, certify that:(1) The Form 20-F/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: October 11, 2005     /s/ Steven Chan     Acting Chief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.