alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      John
      D. Clagg, Chief Financial Officer of YTB International, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Registrant”), in connection with the Registrant’s Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), do hereby
      represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/
      John
      D. Clagg





Name:
      John D. Clagg


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer


Date:
      May
      15, 2007
EXHIBIT 23

                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
Central Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on Form
S-8  (333-87005  and 333-49264) of Central  Bancorp,  Inc. of our report,  dated
April 25, 2002, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Central Bancorp,
Inc. and subsidiary as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related  consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the  three-year  period  ended  March  31,  2002,  which  report is
included herein.




                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
June 26, 2002
975.

#### Cleveland *v.*The State.

Powell, J.

In a prosecution for tlie offense of being intoxicated on a public highway, the burden is upon the State to show that the road in question was in fact a public highway. *Johnson*v. *State,*1 *Ga. App.*195 (58 S. E. 265). This may be shown directly or circumstantially. See *Central Ry. Co.*v. *Ross,*107 *Ga.*74 (32 S. E. 904). There is no evidence of any character in the record as to whether the road upon which the defendant was alleged to have been intoxicated was a public highway or not. . *Judgment reversed.*

*63Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Hartwell — Judge Hodges. December 16, 1907.

Argued February 25,

Decided March 16, 1908.

*A. G. & Julian McCurry,*for plaintiff in error.

*James H. Shelton, solicitor,*contra.
# C_2011232EN.01002601.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (BRICO CENTER)

(Case T-478/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark BRICO CENTER - Earlier Community figurative marks ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE Brico Centro and CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BricoCentro - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2011/C 232/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Spain) (represented initially by P. López Ronda, G. Macias Bonilla, H. Curtis-Oliver and G. Marín Raigal, and subsequently by F. Brandolini Kujman, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Montalto and G. Mannucci, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano, Italy) (represented by: G. Ghidini, M. Mergati and C. Signorini, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 September 2009 (Case R 1009/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between ATB Norte, SL and Bricocenter Italia Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 September 2009 (Case R 1009/2008-4) inasmuch as it upheld the appeal of Bricocenter Italia Srl before the Board of Appeal regarding the services of ‘advertising’, ‘business management’ and ‘business administration’ covered by the Community trade mark application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 September 2009 (Case R 1009/2008-4) inasmuch as it upheld the appeal of Bricocenter Italia Srl before the Board of Appeal regarding the services of ‘advertising’, ‘business management’ and ‘business administration’ covered by the Community trade mark application;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders ATB Norte, SL, Bricocenter Italia and OHIM each to bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ATB Norte, SL, Bricocenter Italia and OHIM each to bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

---
Kenneth PATTON, petitioner, v. NEVADA, et al.

No. 16-6458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Leon ECOURSE-WESTBROOK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6368.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
Exhibit  32.01

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

June  15,  2010                         By:  /s/  Russell  Ivy
                                             -----------------
                                        Russell  Ivy
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

June  15,  2010                         By:  /s/  Robert  Wilson
                                                  -------------------
                                        Robert  Wilson,
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer
Wesley THOMPSON, petitioner, v. Mel COULTER.

No. 16-9685.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Tito ONTIVEROS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8367.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           215,879
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,731,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                     352,000
<INVENTORY>                                      523,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,451,956
<PP&E>                                           497,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                   296,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21,662,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         15,039,521
<BONDS>                                          103,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,117,274
<COMMON>                                          15,151
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,275,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21,662,865
<SALES>                                        9,258,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,258,004
<CGS>                                          6,833,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,688,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 352,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               402,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   22,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                       7,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (125,295)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (125,295)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 31, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00245

- CR

Elias Shawn Bihl aka Elias Bihl , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TO M GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered b y the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appe llant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudicati on of costs

is made.
Exhibit 10.2








 


		1.	Reference is made to the Management Services Agreement ("Agreement") dated 8 May
2018 between Pareteum Corporation ("Pareteum") and Grootzande Management BV ("Manager").



 


		2.	Each of Pareteum and the Manager agree to amend the Agreement (pursuant to clause 16.1 thereof)
by adding to clause 6.1 as follows:



 


		(d)	Pareteum will issue 537,271 common stock of $0.00001 par value each in the capital of Pareteum
to the Manager at par value on "Successful Close" (as defined in clause 1.1), or as soon as practicable thereafter.



 


 




     


    -2-


    

 


EXECUTED
this June 7, 2018:


 



	Pareteum Corporation	Grootzande Management BV
	 	 
	 	 
	By:   /s/ Alexander Korff                      	By:   /s/ Bart Weijermars            
	Alexander Korff, Corporate Secretary	Bart Weijermars / Director
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  annual  report of Pangea  Petroleum  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Scott
Duncan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:    March 31, 2005                         /s/ Scott Duncan
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Scott Duncan,
                                                Chief Financial Officer of
                                                Pangea Petroleum Corporation
# C_2011252EN.01002708.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 March 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-428/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/59

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
# L_2005306EN.01003001.xml

| 24.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 306/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 306/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 100/2005

of 8 July 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 63/2005 of 29 April 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 63/2005 of 29 April 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2005/9/EC of 28 January 2005 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purposes of adapting Annex VII thereto to technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2005/9/EC of 28 January 2005 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purposes of adapting Annex VII thereto to technical progress (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32005 L 0009: Commission Directive 2005/9/EC of 28 January 2005 (OJ L 27, 29.1.2005, p 46).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 L 0009: Commission Directive 2005/9/EC of 28 January 2005 (OJ L 27, 29.1.2005, p 46).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2005/9/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 239, 15.9.2005, p. 46.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 27, 29.1.2005, p. 46.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34697-34698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Fundamental Technologies for the Development of Biomolecular 
Sensors.
    Date: July 24-25, 2001.
    Time: 8 am to 6 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Ramada Inn, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Sherwood Githens, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8068. Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1822.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Fundamental Technologies for the Development of Biomolecular 
Sensors.
    Date: July 26-27, 2001.
    Time: 8 am to 6 pm.

[[Page 34698]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Ramada Inn, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Sherwood Githens, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8068. Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1822.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16355 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Bobby O. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Jacqueline LASHBROOK, Warden.

No. 17-6370.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 12, 2015 520613 

________________________________

In the Matter of HENRY TORRES, 

Petitioner, 

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of 

Special Housing and Inmate 

Disciplinary Programs, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 22, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

__________

Henry Torres, Beacon, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.
-2- 520613 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court