alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1035.

#### TAYLOR, *alias*SAXTON, *v.*THE STATE.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial is not, for any reason assigned, erroneous.

Larceny, from city court of Macon- — -Judge Hodges. February 15, 1908.

Argued March 31,

Decided September 28, 1908.

*Glawson & Fowler,*for plaintiff in error.

*William Brunson, solicitor-general, Roland Ellis,*contra.

Russell, J.

The defendant in the court below was convicted' of the offense of simple larceny. The evidence showed that upon the pretended plea that he needed some money to change a $100 bill, he procured $57 from the prosecutor. There was no intention on the part of the prosecutor to convey the title of the $57 to the defendant, but the defendant merely asked the use of the prosecutor’s money for the purpose of carrying it to another and putting it with other money, so as to make change for a $100 bill. It is plain, from the evidence, that the money was taken by the defendant with no intention of returning it to the prosecutor, but with, the intent to steal. The prosecutor (who seems to have been a. well-meaning, ignorant, country darkey, who had just sold a bale of cotton) was left standing on the street corner to await the return of the defendant. The defendant, however, did not return. *741in a reasonable time, if ever. Even if we were to grant his contention that he did return, but'that the prosecutor had left, the intent to convert the money to his own use is fully apparent, from the testimony that he subsequently saw the prosecutor and had an opportunity of returning the money then, but, instead of doing so, he avoided the prosecutor and hastily removed out of his sight.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Ethan GIPSON, petitioner, v. Warren GRANVILLE, Judge, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 16-9702.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-44146) of Autoweb.com, Inc. of our report dated
January 22, 2001, except for Note 6 as to which the date is April 2, 2001
relating to the financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-K/A. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 14, 2001
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.



/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


San Jose, California
April 30, 2001
Juan LEDESMA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-9652.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5th C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41516 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN LEWIS, also known as L.A.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:97-CR-19-1) August 12, 1998

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Allen Lewis challenges the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to

distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

(b)(1)(A). Speci fically, he argues that the district court erred

(1)in calculating the amount of cocaine base attribu table to him

for sentencing purposes a nd (2)in refusing to make a downward

departure.

First, Lewis contends that the 137.3 grams of cocaine base

attr ibuted to him in the presentence report (“PSR”) included the2

weight of baking soda which ought to have been excluded as waste.

The amount of drugs involved in an offense is a factual

determination reviewed for clear error. See United States v.

Mergerson

, 4 F.3d 337, 345 (5th Cir. 1993), cert

. denied

, 510 U.S.

1198 (1994). Lewis failed to present any evidence at sentencing

t hat the amount of cocaine base attributed to him in the PSR

contained any determinable quantity of baking soda. The district

court did not clearly err in adopting the undisputed findings of

the PSR with respect to t he drug quantity. S ee Fed. R. Crim. P.

32(b)(6)(D).

Because Lewis did not demonstrate clear error in connection

with this finding and failed to demonstrate that the cocaine base

contained baking soda, we need not reach the merits of his argument

that baking soda is an excludable waste product under the

sentencing guidelines.

Second, Lewis argues that the district court erred in failing

to grant a downward departure based on the disparity between the

penalties for crack and powder cocaine. This argument is

foreclosed by the law of this cir cuit. S ee United States v.

Thomas

, 120 F.3d 564, 575 (5th Cir. 1997), cert

. denied

, 118 S.Ct.

721 (1998); United States v. Fonts , 95 F.3d 372, 374-75 (5th Cir.

1996).

Lewis’ appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore

frivolous. Because it is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit  32.01

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Pangea  Petroleum Corp. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

May  15,  2009               By:  /s/  Russell  Ivy
                                  -----------------
                                        Russell  Ivy
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Pangea  Petroleum Corp. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

May  15,  2009                              By:  /s/  Robert  Wilson
                                                 -------------------
                                        Robert  Wilson,
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer
# C_2011211EN.01002107.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 March 2011 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-445/10) (1)

1

2011/C 211/45

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
Joel Marvin MUNT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.

No. 17-7404.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
John J. PAWELSKI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6302.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Timothy Lavar SEWELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8185.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0     
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,779,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,763
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,766,914)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (73,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (73,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  12,517
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 28, 2011 | By     | /s/ Li Kin Shing                   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Li Kin Shing                       |   |
|                               |   | President, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                               |   | and Chief Financial Officer        |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Feb-28-1997
<CASH>                                              35,294
<SECURITIES>                                        86,941
<RECEIVABLES>                                      138,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20,647
<INVENTORY>                                         16,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   277,349
<PP&E>                                             160,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                      58,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     674,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               84,599
<BONDS>                                            162,906
<COMMON>                                               405
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         416,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       674,228
<SALES>                                            158,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   160,698
<CGS>                                              114,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      114,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    22,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     21,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        13,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .34
        


</TABLE>
II-00892

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bonnie Moschel <bmoschel@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bonnie Moschel

3030 W. Grand Ave.,

Chicago, IL 60622
Geraldine MILLS, petitioner, v. Nathan REICHLE.

No. 17-1158.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island denied.
Lena DAVENPORT, petitioner, v. BOROUGH OF HOMESTEAD, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 17-937.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

*1264Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Thomas Bradford WATERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6894.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jonathan Ray THOMAS, petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 17-7903.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34180-34181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 11301-001 Georgia]


Fall Line Hydro Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

June 21, 2001.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for an original major 
license for the Carters Regulation Dam Hydroelectric Project located on 
the Coosawatte Rivery in Murray County, Georgia, and has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed project. In the EA, the 
Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of 
the proposed project and has concluded that approval of the proposed 
project, with appropriate mitigative measure, would

[[Page 34181]]

not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, N.E., Room 2A, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, and may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (please call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16060 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CHURCHILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, L.P. AND PARADIGM CONSULTANTS, LLC,

Petitioners

v.

CHURCHILL CROSSINGS, LLC AND CHURCHILL CROSSINGS PARTNERS,
L.P.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 173 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# C_2011340EN.01000401.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-387/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services - Legislation of a Member State concerning investment funds and real property investment funds - Evidence relating to revenue regarded as distributed - Evidence provided by way of a tax representative - ‘National’ financial institutions and business trustees recognised as tax representatives)

2011/C 340/06

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Mölls, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, Agent.)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Article 49 EC and of Article 36 of the Agreement of 2 May 1992 on the European Economic Area (OJ 1994 L 1, p. 3) — Legislation of a Member State restricting tax representation in respect of investment funds and real property investment funds to business trustees and financial institutions established in that State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force provisions under which only national financial institutions and national business trustees may be appointed as tax representatives of investment funds or real property investment funds, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 EC and Article 36 of the Agreement of 2 May 1992 on the European Economic Area; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force provisions under which only national financial institutions and national business trustees may be appointed as tax representatives of investment funds or real property investment funds, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 EC and Article 36 of the Agreement of 2 May 1992 on the European Economic Area;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          86,766
<SECURITIES>                                     7,326
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,931<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,972
<PP&E>                                          14,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                           272
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,014
<SALES>                                         26,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,330
<CGS>                                           11,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                       754
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,570
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<FN>
<F1>Includes Raw Material Inventory of $2,709.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>