alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Nielson,  certify  that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-K of  Pacific  Magtron
International Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a.    designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and   procedures   and  presented  in  this  report  my  conclusion   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c.    disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.    all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 1, 2006

/s/ Martin Nielson
----------------------------
By: Martin Nielson
    Chief Executive Officer
Richard ROJEM, petitioner, v. Terry ROYAL, Warden.

No. 16-9607.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
CFTC TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)

July 16, 2020

AGENDA

10:00am Opening Remarks

10:20am Panel I: Cybersecurity Subcommittee Presentations

Preliminary cybersecurity lessons learned from Covid-19 pandemic. 

Lead Participants:

 Nina Neer, Director, Technology Operational Risk Management, Credit 

Suisse

 Jason Harrell, Head Of Business and Government Cybersecurity 

Partnerships, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation

CFTC collection, concentration, storage and securing of sensitive information. 

Lead Participants:

 Jerry Perullo, Chief Information Security Officer, ICE 

 Hunter Landrum, Government Affairs, Litigation, and Enforcement, Two 

Sigma Investments

11:05am Panel II: Automated and Modern Trading Markets Subcommittee Presentation

Analysis of the CFTC’s proposed rules on electronic trading risk principles.

Lead Participant:

 Adam Nunes, Head of Business Development, Hudson River Trading

11:50am Break

12:00pm Panel III: Distributed Ledger Technology and Market Infrastructure 

Subcommittee Presentation

Introduction to resiliency and scalability of DLT systems, use-cases, and 

regulatory picture.

Lead Participants:

 Shawnna Hoffman, Global Cognitive Legal Leader, IBM

 Mark Pryor, Chief Executive Officer, The Seam, LLC

 Yesha Yadav, Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School
12:45pm Panel IV: Virtual Currencies Subcommittee Presentations

An overview of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC): CBDC design, regulatory 

treatment, and derivatives market considerations.

Lead Participant:

 Chris Brummer, Georgetown Law Professor and Faculty Director of the 

Institute of International Economic Law

An analysis comparing the volatility of Bitcoin against other assets and the 

impact of Covid-19 on asset price correlation.

Lead Participant:

 Tom Chippas, Chief Executive Officer at ErisX

1:30pm Closing Remarks
# C_2010100EN.01001701.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium), lodged on 15 January 2010 — Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach e.V. v État belge — Service Public Fédéral Finances

(Case C-25/10)

2010/C 100/25

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach e.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: État belge — Service Public Fédéral Finances

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Articles 18 (ex Article 12 EC), 45 (ex Article 39 EC), 49 (ex Article 43 EC) and 54 (ex Article 48 EC) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as prohibiting the legislature of a Member State from adopting or maintaining a rule the purpose of which is to reserve the benefit of taxation at the reduced rate of 7 % to non-profit-making associations, friendly societies or national unions of friendly societies, professional unions and international non-profit-making associations, private foundations and public-interest foundations established in a Member State in which the deceased — a resident of Wallonia — actually resided or where she had her place of work at the time of death, or in which she had previously actually resided or had her place of work?

---
Darrel A. WHITE, petitioner, v. W. JACKSON, et al.

No. 17-8117.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Michael H. WU, et ux., petitioners.

No. 17-1028.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00427

- CR

Jerry CASTILLO , Jr.

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR9484

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s motion for extension of tim e to file brief is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Richard Brown TAUMOEPEAU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5234.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-Olll7

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Luis Prado <Lprado@chelseama.gov>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:07 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Luis Prado

8 Park Lane

Boston, MA 02150
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08003]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice 
is hereby given of a meeting of the FDIC Advisory Committee on 
Community Banking. The Advisory Committee will provide advice and 
recommendations on a broad range of policy issues that have particular 
impact on small community banks throughout the United States and the 
local communities they serve. The meeting is open to the public. Out of 
an abundance of caution related to current and potential coronavirus 
developments, the public's means to observe this meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Community Banking will be via a Webcast live on 
the internet. In addition, the meeting will be recorded and 
subsequently made available on-demand approximately two weeks after the 
event. To view the live event, visit http://fdic.windrosemedia.com.

DATES: Tuesday, May 3, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: To view the recording, visit http://fdic.windrosemedia.com/index.php?category=Community+Banking+Advisory+Committee. If you require 
a reasonable accommodation to participate, please contact 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b1f32283a393237322f220b29343c293a361b3d3f3238753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="307459435152595c59444960425f5742515d70565459531e575f46">[email protected]</span></a> or call 703-562-2096 to make necessary 
arrangements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Committee 
Management Officer of the FDIC at (202) 898-8748.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Agenda: The agenda will include a discussion of current issues 
affecting community banking. The agenda is subject to change. Any 
changes to the agenda will be announced at the beginning of the 
meeting.
    Type of Meeting: This meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Community Banking will be Webcast live via the internet http://fdic.windrosemedia.com. For optimal viewing, a high-speed internet 
connection is recommended.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on April 11, 2022.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08003 Filed 4-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Conrad COOPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5102.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
James A. BRENSON, Jr., petitioner, v. Dave MARQUIS, Warden.

No. 16-9342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
A-pp^k. i If DEC 302013

S SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

vc,. ' " & SE\/FMTfrDlST(eiCfPEGGYCULP

A-^ptU^xLS •* PoTT£f? COUNT/

Mormu FD2 EvrENmu

_^ OF

„ Time ^

IbTtfEl K6N(6f?AkU? ^ukCE (sf SAID C0U(cT.

Coi^tS WCiyi APPELLATE fcU\l,u^^ pr^( V

i. Tk«_ CxArl or^r rezjutrsr^ TWcdockaiuj sJedeW/vl- uj^S>

2.Th* A-ppJLk uUt n*>i be aU* J_* If/^k 4A*.

3. ApO-e.lU!U_ I.S r<LQutej>Uss(k Cx 20 lay -eyC\\&-\Qjs csrf

>^5o

\
1-1

0

c

"*>l

o

N

^

* e£-H^4

CL6 °

S - o

^J ^

til

••*,t

CM
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3819 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the continued implementation of the Climate and Health program by the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself and Ms. SHALALA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the continued implementation of the Climate and Health 

program by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Climate and Health 

5 Protection Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3819 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLIMATE 

2 AND HEALTH PROGRAM. 

3 Part B of title III of the Public Health Service Act 

4 is amended by inserting after section 317T (42 U.S.C. 

5 247b–22) the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 317U. CLIMATE AND HEALTH PROGRAM. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through 

8 the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Pre9 vention, shall continue to implement the Climate and 

10 Health program carried out by the National Center for 

11 Environmental Health (or successor program) for the fol12 lowing purposes: 

13 ‘‘(1) To translate climate change science to in14 form States, local health departments, and commu15 nities. 

16 ‘‘(2) To create decision support tools to build 

17 capacity to prepare for climate change. 

18 ‘‘(3) To serve as a credible leader in planning 

19 for the public health impacts of climate change. 

20 ‘‘(b) WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS.—In 

21 the case of the establishment of any successor program 

22 to the Climate and Health program referred to in sub23 section (a), the Secretary, acting through the Director of 

24 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall sub25 mit to Congress a written notification of any transfer or 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3819 IH

1 reprogramming of funds to establish such a successor pro2 gram. 

3 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be 

5 appropriated to carry out the program referred to in 

6 subsection (a) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2020 and 

7 each fiscal year thereafter. 

8 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—None of the funds made 

9 available under paragraph (1) may be transferred or 

10 reprogrammed by the Secretary to carry out another 

11 program administered by the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Jasmine RICKS, petitioner, v. QUALITY CARRIERS, INC., et al.

No. 16-119.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2009167EN.01000502.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/5

---

Action brought on 13 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-172/09)

2009/C 167/09

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and K. Gawlik, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not bringing into force all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of the adoption of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not bringing into force all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of the adoption of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and the EC Treaty;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2005/60/EC expired on 15 December 2007. On the day on which the action was brought, meanwhile, the defendant still had not brought into force all the provisions needed for the purpose of transposing the directive and in any event had not informed the Commission of them.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 309, p. 15.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3856 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3856

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reform asylum 
  procedures related to safe third countries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2019

  Mrs. Lesko introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reform asylum 
  procedures related to safe third countries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAFE THIRD COUNTRY.

    Section 208(a)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Attorney General'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``Secretary of Homeland Security''; and
            (2) by striking ``removed, pursuant to a bilateral or 
        multilateral agreement, to'' and inserting ``removed to''.
                                 <all>
```
FINAL EXIT NETWORK, INC. petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 16-1479.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Exhibit 10.65 Loan Agreement  Translated From Japanese  Mizuho Bank, Ltd.  Date of Agreement December 27, 2007  I (the Borrower) do hereby consent to the terms and conditions set forth on the back of this form and within the separate Bank Transaction Agreement and agree to accept a loan from Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (the Bank) according to the borrowing specifications listed to the right.  Borrower
        Address
        11F Nishishinjuku Showa Bldg.
1-13-12 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023
Tel: 03-5909-1561  Fax: 03-5909-1562Name
        Hideki Anami, President & CEO                  Loan transaction Seal  Transaction seal for
Global Hotline, Inc.                                                   savings account used for repayment
  Seal of Consent  (Loan Transaction Seal)  [Consent to special agreement concerning application of floating interest rate]  The Borrower consents to the Special Agreement Concerning Application of Floating Interest Rate found on the back of this form, and the standard interest rate and spread for the money borrowed from the Bank in accordance with the borrowing specifications listed to the right shall be as follows. In cases where the loan is paid back in equal installments with interest, the Borrower also agrees that the amount of the installment will vary according to the interest rate on each repayment date.  Standard interest rate (place a circle beside the applicable rate)  ○
        Short-term prime rateLong-term prime lending rate (3 years or less) linked to the short-term prime rateLong-term prime lending rate (more than 3 years) linked to the short-term prime rate
  Annual spread: 0.500%
Joe WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5233.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of T REIT, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/      scott d. petersScott D. PetersChief Financial Officer
 Date: April 1, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provide to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general information language in such filing.