alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010328EN.01003001.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/30

---

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2010 — Provincie Groningen and Provincie Drenthe v Commission

(Case T-69/09) (1)

1

(Annulment action - ERDF - Decision reducing the financial assistance and ordering the partial repayment of the sums paid - Regional body - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 328/50

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Provincie Groningen and Provincie Drenthe (Netherlands) (represented by: C. Dekker and E. Belhadj, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and W. Roels, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 8355 of 11 December 2008 on the reduction of the aid from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) within the framework of the single programming document for the Groningen-Drenthe region coming under objective 2 — No 97.07.13.003 — granted in accordance with Commission Decision C(1997) 1362 of 26 May 1997.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Provincie Groningen and Provincie Drenthe are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Provincie Groningen and Provincie Drenthe are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC., et al., petitioners, v. John WARREN, et al.

No. 16-1275.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.
Charles BRIDGES, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, et al.

No. 17-36.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# L_2005253EN.01002001.xml

| 29.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/20

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Croatia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union

Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Croatia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 21 December 2004, entered into force on 1 October 2005, in accordance with Article 14 of the Protocol.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 26, 28.1.2005, p. 222 and OJ L 243, 19.9.2005, p. 49.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         7,821
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  58,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,121
<INVENTORY>                                    31,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,328
<PP&E>                                         68,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 45,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          64,408
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9,891
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,044
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,856
<SALES>                                        74,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               74,905
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  27,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,292
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,782
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.53
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010100EN.01001801.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 January 2010 — MINERVA Kulturreisen GmbH v Finanzamt Freital

(Case C-31/10)

2010/C 100/27

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minerva Kulturreisen GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Freital

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the ‘special scheme for travel agents’ in Article 26 of Directive 77/388/EEC (1) apply also to the sale by a travel agent of opera tickets in isolation, without the provision of additional services?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.4

Report of Independent Accountants on
Financial Statement Schedules

To
the Board of Directors of
InsWeb Corporation:

Our
audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated January31, 2001, which report and consolidated financial statements appear in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Sacramento,
California
January 31, 2001

---

QuickLinks
# C_2010113EN.01002402.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/24

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Siegburg (Germany) lodged on 12 February 2010 — Hüseyin Balaban v Zelter GmbH

(Case C-86/10)

2010/C 113/38

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeitsgericht Siegburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hüseyin Balaban

Applicant:

Defendant: Zelter GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Article 6 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, in the selection of workers to be dismissed on operational grounds, allows age groups to be formed in order to ensure a balanced age structure and to ensure that the selection between comparable workers will be made in such a way that the ratio of the number of workers to be selected from the respective age groups to the total number of comparable workers to be dismissed corresponds to the ratio of the number of workers employed in the respective age groups to the number of all comparable workers of the undertaking?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

1

---
II-00685

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Molder <nohtd@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:33 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Molder

14295 SC Hwy 121

Newberry, SC 29108
KIP CR P1 LP, Successor in Title to Crossroads Systems, Inc., petitioner, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

No. 17-708.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-00927

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bruce Wille <Graywolf99@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:59 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bruce Wille

4523 Holiday Breeze Place, NE

Albuquerque, NM 87111
Charles Ray HICKS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 16-9657.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. BANK OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST & SAVINGS ASS’N.

No. 9784.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Jan. 24, 1945.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21,1945.

Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, and Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers and L. N. D. Wells, Jr. Attys., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D. C., and Maurice J. Nicoson, Regional Atty., NLRB, of Los Angeles, Cal., and John P. Jennings, Reg. Atty., NLRB, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Louis Ferrari, of San Francisco, Cal., Edmund Nelson, of Los Angeles, Cal., and G. D. Schilling, of San Francisco, Cal. (Herbert W. Erskine and Kenneth M. Johnson, both of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.

Before WILBUR, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on a petition of the National Labor Relations Board to adjudge the respondent in contempt of a provision of our enforcement decree relating to the reinstatement of an employee named Washer. NLRB v. Bank of America, 9 Cir., 130 F.2d 624. The employee was reinstated but was subsequently discharged for the ostensible reason that he was actively prosecuting a libel suit against the respondent, filed after the entry of the Board’s order and prior to our own decision.

The respondent has answered the petition and the Board has filed a reply. In these pleadings certain controversial *288matters are developed but the controversies are *primarily,*if *not*entirely, concerned with inferences to be drawn from facts themselves not substantially in dispute. Acr cordingly, the matter may appropriately be disposed of on the pleadings.

On the whole showing we are not persuaded that respondent has acted otherwise than in good faith, or that its conduct in discharging the named employee was in contempt of the letter or spirit of our decree.

The petition is accordingly dismissed.
# C_2005237EN.01000101.xml

| 27.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/1

---

Information concerning the extension of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber, 1994

(2005/C 237/01)

At its 34th session (Panamá, 12-16 May 2003), the International Tropical Timber Council decided, under Article 46(2) of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber, 1994 (1), to extend the Agreement for a period of three years with effect from 1 January 2004 until 31 December 2006.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 208, 17.8.1996, p. 1.

1

---
Rebecca KOPRAS, petitioner, v. MARCO MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC.

No. 17-1066.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Jesus SUTTLES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17M92.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
II-00292

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Susan Masterson <suzenfla@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:37 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Susan Masterson

5121 Hidden Harbor Road

Sarasota, FL 34242
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
      Acting Chief Financial Officer of Bancorp International Group, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006
      (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except with
      respect to the modification of the Certification of our Chief Executive Officer
      and Acting Chief Financial Officer attached as Exhibit 31.1 to the Annual Report
      and that information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                November 2, 2007
            /s/
                Thomas MegasChief
                Executive Officer
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,007
<PP&E>                                          25,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,265
<BONDS>                                         18,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
William A. WHITE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9522.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Benjamin Preston FOREMAN, petitioner, v. J.A. TERRIS, Warden

No. 17-6588.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Pierce Carson, President & Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in
the Report.

|Date: May 9, 2011 | By:
      /s/ W. Pierce Carson                        
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                  | W.
      Pierce Carson,                               
|                  | Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Director and
|                  | Principal
      Accounting Officer                    

---
Charlie WILSON, as Executor of the Estate of Debra Wilson, petitioner, v. DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, dba Parkland Health & Hospital System, et al.

No. 17-1223.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Russell S. Slack, President and Principal Executive Officer of IKON Receivables, LLC (the Company) do hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    December 29, 2003





|/s/    RUSSELL S. SLACK                  
|-----------------------------------------
|Russell S. Slack                         
|President and Principal Executive Officer