alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BLOCK MORTGAGE FINANCE, INC.
                    ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1999-1

                  MASTER SERVICER ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                 March 30, 2000


      Pursuant to the  provisions  of Section 8.16 of the Pooling and  Servicing
Agreement  dated as of January 1, 1999, by and between BLOCK  MORTGAGE  FINANCE,
INC., as Depositor,  COMPANION MORTGAGE CORPORATION,  as Seller, BLOCK FINANCIAL
CORPORATION,  as Master Servicer, and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, as Trustee
(the "PSA"),  I, Bret G. Wilson,  Vice President of the Master Servicer,  hereby
certify as follows:

      (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar  year  and of  performance  under  the  PSA  has  been  made  under  my
supervision;

      (ii) to the best of my  individual  knowledge  based on such  review,  the
Master  Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under the PSA for such
year; and

      (iii)the Master Servicer's  short-term  commercial paper is rated is A1 by
Standard & Poor's and P-1 by Moody's.

Capitalized  terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
set forth in the PSA.


                               BLOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                               By: /s/ Breg G. Wilson
                                    Bret G. Wilson, Vice President
Zoran ZUZA, petitioner, v. OFFICE OF THE HIGH REPRESENTATIVE, et al.

No. 17-1166.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Confidential portions of this document have been redacted and
omitted pursuant to a Request for Confidential Treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The redacted and omitted portions are indicated with
the notation “*” and have been filed separately with the SEC.


 


FOURTH AMENDMENT


 


This Fourth Amendment, effective as of the
date set forth above the signatures of the parties below (the “Effective Date”), amends the Exclusive Patent License
Agreement dated April 15, 2011 by and between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“M.I.T.”), a Massachusetts
corporation having its principal office at 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, and Enumeral Biomedical Corp.,
a Delaware Corporation having its principal place of business at 200 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 2000, Cambridge, MA 02140 (“COMPANY”),
as amended by the First Amendment effective March 8, 2013, the Second Amendment effective July 16, 2014, and by the Third Amendment
effective April 15, 2015 (the “LICENSE AGREEMENT”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meaning given such terms in the LICENSE AGREEMENT.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
promises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree to modify the LICENSE AGREEMENT as follows:


 


1.     Section
3.1(k) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“(k)      In
the aggregate, COMPANY or an AFFILIATE shall enter into at least * sublicenses and/or CORPORATE PARTNER agreements for the development
of LICENSED PRODUCTS and/or DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS by *.”


 


2.     Section
3.1(m) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“(m)      By
*, COMPANY or an AFFILIATE or its SUBLICENSEE or CORPORATE PARTNER shall file an IND on a THERAPEUTIC PRODUCT.”


 


3.     The
remaining terms and conditions of the LICENSE AGREEMENT remain intact.


 




     


     


    

  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Fourth Amendment to be executed under seal by their duly authorized representatives.


 


The Effective Date of this Fourth Amendment is: April 14,
2016.


 


	MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF	 	ENUMERAL BIOMEDICAL CORP.
	TECHNOLOGY	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ John H. Turner, Jr.	 	By: 	/s/ Arthur H. Tinkelenberg, Ph.D.
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	John H. Turner, Jr.	 	Name: 	Arthur H. Tinkelenberg, Ph.D.
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	Associate Director	 	Title: 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	Technology Licensing Office
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986):

Bahrain, 

Iraq, 

Kuwait, 

Lebanon, 

Libya, 

Oman, 

Qatar, 

Saudi Arabia, 

Syria, 

United Arab Emirates, 

Yemen, Republic of.

Dated: June 22, 2001.

Barbara Angus,

International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 01-16416  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
Marvin Wilbert POWELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9485.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2011130EN.01001501.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2011 — Ifemy’s v OHIM — Dada & Co Kids (Dada & Co. kids)

(Case T-50/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Dada & Co. kids - Earlier national word mark DADA - Relative ground for refusal - Absence of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 130/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ifemy’s Holding GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H.-G. Augustinowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dada & Co. Kids Srl (Prato, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2008 (Case R 911/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ifemy’s Holding GmbH and Dada & Co. Kids Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ifemy’s Holding GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ifemy’s Holding GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
II-00991

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jeanie Johnson <radicalvantage@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:22 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jeanie Johnson

3221 Village Ct. #1

Janesville, WI 53546-1504
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Derek J. Brent, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rezconnect
   Technologies, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to make the statements made, in light of
   the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
   respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by
         others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
         this quarterly report is being prepared;

      2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filling date of
         this quarterly report ("Evaluation Date") ;and

      3. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
   committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
   equivalent function):

4. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
   control which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and 5. Any
   fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
   who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

 6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
   quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
   controls or in other factors that could subsequently affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.


Date August 16, 2004


/s/  Derek J. Brent
Derek J. Brent,
Chief Financial Officer, Rezconnect Technologies, Inc.
# C_2011311EN.01001002.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — European Air Transport SA v Collège d’environnement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

(Case C-120/10) (1)

1

(Air transport - Directive 2002/30/EC - Noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports - Noise level limits that must be observed when overflying built-up areas near an airport)

2011/C 311/13

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: European Air Transport SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Collège d’environnement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d’État — Interpretation of Articles 2(e), 4(4) and 6(2) of Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports (OJ 2002 L 85, p. 40) — Limits on noise levels to be complied with by aircraft over-flying urban territories located near an airport — Concept of ‘operating restrictions’ — Restrictions adopted in connection with aircraft which are marginally compliant — Whether it is possible to impose such restrictions on the basis of the noise level as measured on the ground — Effect of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(e) of Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports must be interpreted as meaning that an ‘operating restriction’ is a prohibition, absolute or temporary, that prevents the access of a civil subsonic jet aeroplane to a European Union airport. Consequently, national environmental legislation imposing limits on maximum noise levels, as measured on the ground, to be complied with by aircraft overflying areas located near the airport, does not itself constitute an ‘operating restriction’ within the meaning of that provision, unless, in view of the relevant economic, technical and legal contexts, it can have the same effect as prohibitions of access to the airport in question.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
BAIS YAAKOV OF SPRING VALLEY, et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 21648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9690-000]


Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC, Eagle Creek Water Resources, LLC, 
Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC; Notice of Authorization for Continued 
Project Operation

    On March 31, 2020, Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC, Eagle Creek Water 
Resources, LLC, and Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC, (collectively 
referred to as Eagle Creek) co-licensees for the Rio Hydroelectric 
Project No.9690, filed an application for a new major license. The Rio 
Hydroelectric Project is located on the Mongaup River in Sullivan and 
Orange Counties, New York
    The license for Project No.9690 was issued for a period ending 
March 31, 2022. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No.9690 is issued to 
Eagle Creek for a period effective April 1, 2022 through March 31, 2023 
or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other 
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new 
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before March 
23, 2023, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an 
annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed 
automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless 
the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Eagle Creek is authorized to continue operation of 
the Rio Hydroelectric Project, until such time as the Commission takes 
final action on the application for a new major license.

    Dated: April 5, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07732 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
David Isaac SOLOMON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9622.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
|   | (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the                “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as amended, (the                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Jerry K.                Wages                                                          Jerry                K. WagesExecutive                Vice President and                Chief Financial                Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
II-00132

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Katherine Tweedale <kt_48320@yahoo.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 10:24 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Katherine Tweedale

16445 Collinson

Eastpointe, MI 48021-3023
DiMario PICKFORD, petitioner, v. Gerald JANDA, Warden.

No. 16-6810.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ronald TINGLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7982.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Ronald CHAPPELL, petitioner, v. Donald MORGAN, Warden.

No. 17-6901.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.