alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 182

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Heather Renee Faith Hoffman, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20240095

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, 

the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
1

State v. Hoffman

No. 20240095

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Heather Hoffman appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury 

convicted her of murder, a class AA felony. Hoffman argues the district court 

abused its discretion by denying her Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., motion for 

judgment of acquittal because there is insufficient evidence to support her 

conviction. After reviewing the record, we conclude the court did not abuse its 

discretion by denying Hoffman’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and 

substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. 

Daniel J. Crothers 

Lisa Fair McEvers 

Jerod E. Tufte 

Douglas A. Bahr
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0002936 29-SEP-2016 08:13 AM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

a0831 

# Order

Clerk 

### September 9, 2015

150260(31)

SC: 150260

In re Guardianship of GBH, Minor COA: 322245

Manistee CC: 13

- 014865

- AV

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 26, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED JUNE 26, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-2000
<CASH>                                      15,361,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,764,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,103,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,789,000
<PP&E>                                     125,771,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              73,399,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,216,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,952,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (153,584,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,216,000
<SALES>                                    153,605,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           153,605,000
<CGS>                                       51,947,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              133,195,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,922,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,520,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,968,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   201,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,767,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               3,474,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,241,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Quintlin Renard Jimerson, Appellant

No. 06-18-00201-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F14989). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Quintlin Renard Jimerson, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 21, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# L_2006289EN.01000801.xml

| 19.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/8

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 78/2006

of 7 July 2006

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 46/2006 of 28 April 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 46/2006 of 28 April 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1822/2005 of 8 November 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 as regards nitrate in certain vegetables (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1822/2005 of 8 November 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 as regards nitrate in certain vegetables (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 54zn (Commission Regulation (EC) No 466/2001) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32005 R 1822: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1822/2005 of 8 November 2005 (OJ L 293, 9.11.2005, p. 11).
  The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purpose of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
  The word “, Norway” shall be inserted after the word “Netherlands” in Article 3b(1) and after the word “Ireland” in the first subparagraph of Article 3b(2).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32005 R 1822: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1822/2005 of 8 November 2005 (OJ L 293, 9.11.2005, p. 11).

The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purpose of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:

The word “, Norway” shall be inserted after the word “Netherlands” in Article 3b(1) and after the word “Ireland” in the first subparagraph of Article 3b(2).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 1822/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 94.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 293, 9.11.2005, p. 11.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Randy Laverne MARSHALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 45TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BE XAR COUNTY, GREETING S:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on October 22, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgm ent between

In the Interest of M.J.W., J.A., and C.A., Appellant

V.

No. 04

- 14

- 00330

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2012

- PA

- 02053

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating the parental rights of Jessica B.W. is AFFIRMED.

It is further ORDERED that no costs be assessed because appellant is indigent.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe th e order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District o f Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on December 30, 2014

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynth ia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 14

- 00330

- CV

In the Interest of M.J.W., J.A., and C.A.

v.

(NO. 2012

- PA

- 02053 IN 45TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FE E CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD
REPORTER'S RECORD
REPORTER'S RECORD
FILING $42.50 $73.50 $1,684.86

$195.00 INDIGENT
INDIGENT
INDIGENT
INDIGENT RESPONDENT
BEXAR COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE

, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COU RT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this December 30, 2 014

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
Sue Ann EASTERLING, petitioner, v. TENSAS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 16-1534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Peter A. BECK, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-1278.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County denied.
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. HAWAII, et al.

No. 17-965.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 13, 2018.

Motion of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument denied.
Exhibit 32.1 - Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Communications of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003
and 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 10, 2006
      -----------------
Randy R. SMITH, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-7615.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
YTB International, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Report of YTB  International,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Derek J. Brent,  Chief  Financial and  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Date: 06/20/2005
/s/ Derek J. Brent


-------------------------------------------------

[Signature] Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
QCL QUAD CODE CY LIMITED 

(CY)

QHL QUAD CODE HOLDING 

LIMITED (CY) 

UBO Holdings

QCL QUAD CODE USA 

CORPORATION (USA)

QCX LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY (USA)

100%

QC TECH LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY (USA)

QC CLEARING LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY (USA)

100% 100%

100%

100%

QCEX Corporate Organizational Chart DCO Exhibit A-7a
II-01155

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

jim crowle <jccrowle@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:49 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

jim crowle

27319 126th pl

kent, WA 98030/8916
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16460]



[[Page 34717]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701-TA-362 and 731-TA-707-710 (Review)]


Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and 
Pressure Pipe From Argentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in these subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on 
certain seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure 
pipe from Argentina, Brazil, and Germany would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The International 
Trade Commission also determines \2\ that revocation of the antidumping 
duty and countervailing duty orders on certain seamless carbon and 
alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe from Italy would not be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Dennis M. Devaney dissenting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on July 3, 2000 (65 FR 
41090) and determined on October 5, 2000, that it would conduct full 
reviews (65 FR 63889, October 25, 2000). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
January 4, 2001 (66 F.R. 806). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, 
on May 1, 2001, and all persons who requested the opportunity were 
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on June 26, 2001. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 3429 (June 2001), entitled Certain 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from 
Argentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy: Investigations Nos. 701-TA-362 
and 731-TA-707-710 (Review).

    Issued: June 26, 2001.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16460 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 19, 2001.
    Time: 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institute of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Peter J. Sheridan, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1513, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4636352e23342f2227062b272f2a68282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4636352e23342f2227062b272f2a68282f2e68212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16349 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2198

SUSAN MATOUSEK, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

TOWNE BANK NC/VA, 

Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00501-RAJ-LRL) 

Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Susan Neal Matousek, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III, TROUTMAN 

SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Susan Neal Matousek appeals the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) as frivolous and for 

failure to state a claim.

*

 On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

Appellant’s briefs. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Matousek’s informal briefs do not 

challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Matousek has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) 

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We deny the request for appointment of counsel presented in Matousek’s

second supplemental informal brief, deny her petition for initial hearing en banc, and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

 * We have jurisdiction over the appeal because Matousek cannot cure by mere 

amendment all of the defects identified by the district court. See Goode v. Cent. Va. 

Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015).
Brian GRACO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7571.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Adaucto CHAVEZ-MEZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5639.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to file Volume II of joint appendix under seal granted.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.