alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Scott D. Peters, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of T REIT, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/     Scott
D. PetersScott D. PetersChief Financial Officer
 Date: May 13, 2005
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 May 2011 – Commission v Sweden**

**(Case C-479/10)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 1999/30/EC – Pollution control – Limit values for concentrations of PM10 in ambient air

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 258 TFEU; Council Directive 1999/30, Art. 5(1))

**Re**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Article 5(1) of Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air (OJ 1999 L 163, p. 41) – PM10 particles exceeding limit values in ambient air in zones SW 2 and SW 4 in 2005, 2006 and 2007 and in zone SW 5 in 2005 and 2006. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by exceeding the limit values for concentrations of PMlO in ambient air from 2005 to 2007 in zones SW 2 and SW 4 and in 2005 and 2006 in zone SW 5, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
Doyle PALMER, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, Warden.

No. 16-9458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2011063EN.01000702.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Malta

(Case C-351/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2000/60/EC - Articles 8 and 15 - Status of inland surface water - Establishment and making operational of monitoring programmes - Failure - Submission of summary reports on those monitoring programmes - Failure)

2011/C 63/13

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and K. Xuereb, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: S. Camilleri, D. Mangion, P. Grech and Y. Rizzo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 8 and 15 of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1) — Obligation to establish and make operational programmes for the monitoring of the status of surface waters — Obligation to submit summary reports regarding the programmes for the monitoring of surface waters

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in failing, firstly, to establish monitoring programmes on the status of inland surface water and make them operational in accordance with Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, and, secondly, to submit summary reports on the monitoring programmes on the status of inland surface water in accordance with Article 15(2) of that directive, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 8 and 15 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in failing, firstly, to establish monitoring programmes on the status of inland surface water and make them operational in accordance with Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, and, secondly, to submit summary reports on the monitoring programmes on the status of inland surface water in accordance with Article 15(2) of that directive, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 8 and 15 of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 07.11.2009.

1

---
Rodney S. MASON, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 16-9621.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40455

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAUL SILVA-SALDANA, also known as Juan Manuel Lopez-Morales

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:06-CR-1119-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Saul Silva-Saldana raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The

appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
II-00098

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Wesley Smart <smartguy47@verizon.net>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 8:39 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Wesley Smart

15713 Blaine Ave.

Bellflower, CA 90706
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS I N RE VOL T MANAGE MENT CORPORATI ON REL ATOR § § § § § § No . 0 8- 09 -0 00 55 -C V

An Or i gi n al P ro ce ed i n g in Mandamus

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US Re lator , V olt

Mana g e me nt C or

po ra tio n, se e ks a

wr it o f m and amus a g a ins t th e Ho no ra ble Willi am Mo od

y , Jud g e of

the 34 th D ist

ri c t Co ur t of El Pa so County . M and amus wi ll l ie on ly to corr ect a clea r abuse of discre tion. W

alker v . Pack

er , 8 2 7 S . W . 2 d

8 3 3 , 8 4 0 (T ex . 1 9 9 2 )( o ri g. proce eding ). More over, the re must be no other adequate re medy

at law. Id . Ba sed on the petition and rec ord bef

ore us, we are unable to conc lude that Relator is entitled to the re lief reque sted. Acc ording ly , we de ny mandamus re lief. SeeT EX .R.A PP .P. 52.8(a).

Marc h 5, 2009 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C . J. , M c C l ur e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ.
II-00079

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Anne Nahn <acnahn@charter.net>

Monday, December 6, 2010 2:55 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Anne Nahn

2409 Middleton Beach Road

Madison, WI 53562
Exhibit 32.2










CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Yearly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K /A for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Hacker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Registrant



Date: January 9, 2012

Sierra Resource Group, Inc.



By: /s/ Brad HackerBrad HackerChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(LOGO) HIBERNIA
Member FDIC


March 31, 1999

Norwest Bank
Attn: Peter Gobell
11000 Brokenland Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044

RE: 1998 Annual Certification

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance  with our Sale and  Servicing  Agreement,  Hibernia  National Bank
certifies the following for the year of 1998.

1. That all hazard, flood, or other casualty insurance and FHA or other mortgage
insurance premiums, taxes, ground rents, assessments and other charges have been
paid.

2. That the  requirements of the 1984 Tax Reform Act concerning the reporting of
mortgage  interest  received,  and the  abandonment  and foreclosure of mortgage
properties have been met.

3.  That all  required  interest  rate and  payment  changes  have  been made in
accordance with the terms of each ARM and GPARM that we service.

4. That all active  borrowers with mortgages  insured under FHA Section 23S have
been recertified.

5. That none of the  principal  officers  has been removed from the fidelity and
errors and omissions coverage.

6. That information  pertaining to delinquent and foreclosed  mortgages has been
reported to the appropriate credit bureaus as required.


Hibernia  National Bank maintains a Blanket Bond insurance policy and an Errors,
Omissions,  and  Mortgage  Impairment  policy with Lloyds of London.  Limits and
deductibles  are within  the  guidelines  recommended  by the  American  Bankers
Association.

Enclosed is Hibernia  Corporation's  1998 Annual  Report,  which was prepared by
Ernst and Young,  Certified  Public  Accountants,  New Orleans,  Louisiana.  The
annual  report  includes  the   consolidated   operating   results  of  Hibernia
Corporation and its major subsidiary, Hibernia National Bank of Louisiana.

Ernst and Young also  conducted an independent  audit of our Mortgage  Servicing
operations  in  accordance  with the  requirements  of the Uniform  Single Audit
Program for Mortgage Bankers. A certification of the audit is enclosed.

Hibernia National Bank's servicing portfolio now contains  approximately  54,755
mortgage loans totaling over $4.1 billion.

We have enclosed a contact list to assist you in  contacting  key members of our
staff if you have any questions or concerns about your portfolio.  As members of
the Hibernia team, we look forward to continuing to serve you in the future.

Very truly yours,

James T. Dean
Senior Vice President/Servicing Manager
Mortgage Loan Servicing Department

JTD:jam
Enclosures
# C_2012373EN.01000402.xml

| 1.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/4

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2012 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-491/09) (1)

1

(EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Premiums in the ovine and caprine meat sector - On-the-spot inspections)

2012/C 373/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by M. Muñoz Pérez; subsequently by S. Martínez-Lage Sobredo and finally by A. Rubio González, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/721/EC of 24 September 2009 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2009 L 257, p. 28).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
Aaron RAISER, petitioner, v. TRI-CITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, et al.

No. 17-882.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
agreement.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


Amendment to


Master Services Agreement


Call Handling Services


 







 


 


THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made effective as of this 22  day of November, 2015 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with offices at 1701 JFK Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2838 ("Comcast") and Support.com, with offices at 900 Chesapeake Drive, 2nd Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063 ("Vendor").  This Amendment amends and modifies the Master Services Agreement – Call Handling Services dated October 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used by not defined herein shall be given their meanings in the SOW or Agreement.







The parties, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree to amend the Agreement as follows:







With respect to all Vendor personnel providing any Services for Comcast’s Xfinity Home (“XH”) service under any SOW, Vendor agrees that the Background Check, described in Section 4.9 of the Agreement, shall be performed prior to the date such personnel provide the Services and annually on or about the anniversary of such date.   Vendor shall not assign personnel to provide XH Services hereunder if the results of any of the Background Checks performed, or Vendor’s actual knowledge, indicate that such personnel may pose a threat to Comcast’s property, employees, subscribers, subscribers’ property or Confidential Information or such personnel would be otherwise unsuitable for assignment.  Vendor shall maintain a list of all Vendor personnel who provide XH Services and such list shall include the Background Check status and date of last Background Check for each Vendor personnel.  This detailed list shall be made available to Comcast for review upon request.  In addition, Vendor shall provide Comcast with an annual letter of attestation stating that Vendor is in full compliance with Background Check criteria set forth herein.







Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.  To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.




 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.




 



	
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

	
SUPPORT.COM, INC.


 


	
BY:        /s/ Jennifer Yohe Wagner

	
BY:         /s/ Roop K. Lakkaraju


	  	  
	
NAME:    Jennifer Yohe Wagner

	
NAME:    Roop K. Lakkaraju


	  	  
	
TITLE:   Senior Vice President Procurement

	
TITLE:   EVP, CFO & COO


	  	  
	
DATE:   5/12/2016

	
DATE:      5/23/2016
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34179-34180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-457-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 21, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 14, 2001, Northern Border Pipeline Company 
(Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective July 16, 2001:

First Revised Sheet Number 202
First Revised Sheet Number 301

    Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to revise 
Northern Border's FERC Gas Tariff to permit Northern Border to have the 
ability, from time to time, to contract for off-system pipelines' 
services without prior Commission approval. Northern Border also 
requests that the Company grant Northern Border a waiver of the 
``shipper must hold title to the gas'' policy. Northern Border is 
making this tariff filing to be consistent with the Commission's policy 
findings as Docket No. CP95-218, et al. (Texas Eastern).
    Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been sent to 
all of Northern Border's contracted shippers and interested state 
regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the

[[Page 34180]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests 
must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16056 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M