alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Brian Cox

Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 2:14 PM

To: Banwo, Adedayo; Radhakrishnan, Ananda; Mesa, Jacqueline H.; Fajfar, Mark; Aron, David; Jain, 

Vivek

Cc: Anmol Chandan; j.b.golden

Subject: RE: MFX Solutions, Inc.

All:

Thanks again for taking the time to meet with us today. It was very helpful for us to go through these 

issues with you as we try to navigate the new environment and find a way to keep our facility viable.

You all certainly have a tough job in implementing the statute while trying to avoid unintended 

consequences. As Jeff said, I hope we can continue the conversation. Certainly if you have ideas you 

would like to bounce off us please let us know as we perhaps can have a different perspective than a 

typical financial institution. Just a note on that score based on something Mark mentioned regarding 

our being a non-profit: Since we currently operate at breakeven and are a cooperative I think we could 

fairly easily convert to official non-profit status if that were a way to avoid some of the clearing and 

collateral rules that might make our model not work. Not sure if a non-profit exemption would be 

possible but perhaps worth considering.

All the best,

Brian 

Brian Cox

President

MFX Solutions, Inc.

1050 17th St. NW, Suite 550

Washington, DC 20036

www.mfxsolutions.com
Othon ROBLEDO-CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8108.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7811
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAMONA MARIA DIFAZIO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-94-2) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ramona Maria DiFazio, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant attempts to appeal from an order that has not yet been entered in the district court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because this court may exercise jurisdiction onlyover final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541(1949). There is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order in this case. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               135,748
<SECURITIES>                                         2,666,578
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       20,001,598<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<COMMON>                                             000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<OTHER-SE>                                           19,777,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         20,001,598<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     286,667<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     464,245<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,679,146)<F5>
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (24.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>

<F1>Included in Total Assets:  Investments in Local Limited  Partnerships,
net of  $17,019,151,  Restricted cash of $137,257 and Other assets of $42,864
<F2>Included in Total  Liabilities and Equity:  Accounts  payable to affiliates
of $33,313,  Accounts  payable and accrued  expenses of $53,655 and Deferred
revenue of $137,257
<F3>Included in Total Revenue: Investment of $132,157 and Other of $154,510
<F4>Included  in Other  Expenses:  General and  administrative  of $258,032,
Asset  management  fees of $188,516 and  Amortization  of $17,697
<F5>Included in Net Loss: Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships
 of $1,501,568
</FN>


</TABLE>
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda

Teleconference

June 9, 2021

10:00 am – 12:00 pm Eastern Time

10:00-

10:10 am

10 mins

Welcome and Opening Remarks

• Dawn D. Stump, CFTC Commissioner and AAC Sponsor

• Rostin Behnam, CFTC Acting Chairman

• Brian Quintenz, CFTC Commissioner

• Dan Berkovitz, CFTC Commissioner 

10:10-

10:40 am 30 mins

Presentation of Final Report of the Subcommittee to Evaluate 

Commission Policy with Respect to Implementation of Amendments 

to Enumerated Agricultural Futures Contracts with Open Interest 

(Ag-OI) 

• Joseph Janzen, Subcommittee Chair, University of Illinois

10:40-

11:15 am 35 mins

Global Markets for Agricultural Derivatives: Products & Trends

• Owain Johnson, Global Head of Research and Product Development,

CME Group

• Fred Seamon, Executive Director of Agricultural Commodity Research

and Product Development, CME Group

• Will Acworth, Senior Vice President, Publications, Data and

Research, Futures Industry Association

11:15-

11:55 am 40 mins

Perspectives on the Pandemic, Recovery and the Importance of 

Agricultural Risk Management Part I: Agricultural Processors & 

Merchants

• Christian Edmiston, Director of Sourcing and Risk Management,

Land O’Lakes

• David Rossen, Global Hedging Manager – Cotton, Louis Dreyfus

• Dhamu Thamodaran, (Retired) Executive Vice President, Chief

Strategy Officer & Chief Commodity Hedging Officer, Smithfield Foods

• Christa Lachenmayr, CFTC Moderator

11:55-

12:00 pm 5 mins Closing Comments from Commissioners

12:00 pm Meeting Adjourns
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-3520 of Wells  Financial  Corp. on Form S-8 (filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on April 12, 1996) of our report,  dated January 31, 2003,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Wells  Financial  Corp. for the
year ended December 31, 2002.




                                        /s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Rochester, Minnesota
March 25, 2003
CAUSE NUMBER 03—15—00318—CR 

JAMAAL BRADLEY X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 X 

V. X THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

 X 

STATE OF TEXAS X STATE OF TEXAS 

APPELLANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

COMES NOW THE APPELLANT, by and through his appointed 

attorney of record, Paul M. Evans, in the above entitled and numbered 

cause, and moves this Court, to grant the Appellant’s Motion to Extend 

Time for Filing Appellant’s Brief, and, in support thereof, would show the 

Court as follows: 

 I.

Appellant’s Brief was due before this Court on September 7, 2015. 

No previous Motions to Extend Time have been sought. 

 II. 

The undersigned counsel needs additional time to examine the record 

and complete the research necessary to complete the Appellant’s Brief. At 

this juncture, counsel has made a full review of the record on appeal and has 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00318-CR

6969454

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/17/2015 11:23:58 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/17/2015 11:23:58 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
identified all potential issues therein. However, counsel requires more time 

to draft the brief and research said issues. Counsel would hereby 

respectfully request the deadline be extended to November 1, 2015. In the 

meantime, counsel will endeavor to complete and file the Appellant’s Brief 

at the earliest opportunity. 

 III. 

This Motion is not made for purposes of delay, but so that justice 

might be served. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant respectfully 

prays that this Court, upon good cause shown, grant the Appellant’s Motion 

to Extend Time for Filing Appellant’s Brief.

 Respectfully submitted,

 Law Office of Paul M. Evans

 811 Nueces Street

 Austin, Texas 78701

 (512) 569-1418

 (512) 692-8002 FAX

 _/s/ Paul M. Evans________ 

 PAUL M. EVANS

 SBN 24038885

 Attorney for Defendant
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

was delivered by facsimile unto the office of the prosecuting attorney for the 

State of Texas—the Travis County District Attorney, mailing address P.O. 

Box 1748, Austin, TX, 78767, physical address 509 W. 11th Street, Austin, 

TX, 78701—on this the 17

th day of September, 2015. 

 

 _/s/ Paul M. Evans________ 

 PAUL M. EVANS

 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

 I hereby certify that the present document contains 365 words, all 

contents included. 

 _/s/ Paul M. Evans________ 

 PAUL M. EVANS
Marc R. REMENAR, petitioner, v. Dana SCARP, Attorney Admission Clerk, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

No. 16-6921.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Steven Maijoor
  
    



  Discussions concerning the cross-border guidance and exemptive order.
      
  When
              06/27/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              Cross-Border

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph Cisewski

  Visitor(s)
              Steven Maijoor

  Organization(s)
              ESMA


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-131503) pertaining to the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-125514) pertaining to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-109482) pertaining to the 1999 Omnibus Stock Plan of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-158586) pertaining to the registration of its senior debt securities, subordinate debt securities, convertible debt
securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, and units of up to a total dollar amount of $150,000,000; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-166954) pertaining to the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 23, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2011.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas

February 23, 2012
GENERAL MOTORS LLC, petitioner, v. Michael BAVLSIK, et al.

No. 17-1213.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Moses McCRAY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7803.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Adalberto AGUIRRE-ARELLANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; Luis Alberto Esparza-Casillas, petitioner, v. United States; Luis Martin Mendoza-Aceves, petitioner, v. United States; Daniel Rivera-Hernandez, petitioner, v. United States; Albin Alexander Torres, aka Alvin Alexander Torres, aka Albin Alexander Torres-Menjivar, aka Albin Torres-Menjybar, petitioner, v. United States; Jose Luis Valle-Ramirez, petitioner, v. United States; Jose Emilio Vanegas-Martinez, petitioner, v. United States; and Maximo Anastacio-Morales, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 16-8675.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
II-00085

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Raymond Murphy <murfoskir@sbcglobal.net>

Monday, December 6, 2010 7:28 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Raymond Murphy

672 M 89

Plainwell, MI 49080-9748
Warren Travis GOLDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5050.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Cristine DANIEL, aka Christine Chika Chesman, aka Chika Chima, aka Chika Cristine Chima, aka Christina Ononando Chima, aka Christina O. Chima, aka Chika Christine Daniel, aka Christine O. Daniel, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*190Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit99.1**

** **

**AMERICAN RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), theundersigned hereby certify as follows:

 

1.             Ralph S. Roberts isthe Chief Executive Officer of American Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

2.             William G.Taves  is the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company.

 

3.             Each of theundersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 
| (A) |   | The Company’s Form 10-Q/A accompanying this  Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (B) |   | The information in the Report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company. |
|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

The foregoing certifications are subject to thelimitations and qualifications set forth in the accompanying Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q/A and to the following qualifications: (i) because we wererequired to change our independent accountants, our new independent accountantshave not yet completed a reaudit of the Company’s prior results, and havetherefore been unable to review the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form10-Q/A in accordance with the requirement of SAS 71, although such a review isrequired by Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X, (ii) because the financialstatements have not been reviewed in accordance with SAS 71, they are deficientand do not comply with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commissionpromulgated thereunder, and (iii) when such review is concluded by theCompany’s new independent accountants, accounting errors or inaccuracies mightbe discovered by such new auditors and require correction.

 

Dated:    November15, 2002

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Ralph S. Roberts    |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Ralph S. Roberts        |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |   |   |                    |
|   |   |   |   |   |                    |
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/ William G. Taves    |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | William G. Taves        |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

17

----
Kevin ST. HILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Josephine SMITH, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-1208.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.