alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010346EN.01003703.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/37

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland, Queen’s Bench Division — United Kingdom) — Seaport (NI) Ltd v Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland

(Case C-182/09) (1)

1

()

2010/C 346/66

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---
Cameron JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8100.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jacqueline TEDDER, petitioner, v. Patricia YELDELL, Warden.

No. 17-8434.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

*2010Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, petitioner, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.

No. 17-116.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: June 20, 2008
    /s/     John D. DohertyJohn D. DohertyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Victor IGBOANUGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7573.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Victor QUILES, petitioner, v. Paul CHAPPIUS, Jr., Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility.

No. 17M121.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
# L_2005205EN.01003901.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 205/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 205/39

---

Corrigendum to the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 31 of 4 February 2005
  )

On page 38, in the Annex, Protocol 1 concerning the arrangements applicable to imports into the Community of agricultural products orginating in Egypt, point 3, last subparagraph:

| for | : | ‘For the first year 2004, the volumes of the tariff quotas and the increases of the volumes of existing tariff quotas shall be calculated as a pro rata of the basic volumes specified in the Protocol, taking into account the part of the period elapsed before 1 May 2004.’, |
| --- | --- | --- |
| read | : | ‘For the year 2004, the volumes of the new tariff quotas and the increases of the volumes of existing tariff quotas shall be calculated as a pro rata of the basic volumes specified in the Protocol, taking into account the part of the period elapsed before 1 May 2004.’; |

for

:

‘For the first year 2004, the volumes of the tariff quotas and the increases of the volumes of existing tariff quotas shall be calculated as a pro rata of the basic volumes specified in the Protocol, taking into account the part of the period elapsed before 1 May 2004.’,

read

:

‘For the year 2004, the volumes of the new tariff quotas and the increases of the volumes of existing tariff quotas shall be calculated as a pro rata of the basic volumes specified in the Protocol, taking into account the part of the period elapsed before 1 May 2004.’;

and in point 4

for:

for

| ‘4. | For the products for which the specific provisions in column “D” refer to this paragraph, the tariff quota volumes listed in column “B” shall be increased annually by 3 % of the volume of the previous year; the first increase taking place one year after the entry into force of this agreement.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘4.

read:

read

| ‘4. | For the products for which the specific provisions in column “D” refer to this paragraph, the tariff quota volumes listed in column “B” shall be increased annually by 3 % of the volume of the previous year; the first increase taking place on the date when each tariff quota is opened for the second time.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4.

---
The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

*

District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3147SD

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of South Dakota.

*

Victoria M. Bobtail Bear, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: February 9, 1998

Filed: February 20, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge. *

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Victoria M. Bobtail Bear appeals her assault-related conviction and sentence.

On appeal, Bobtail Bear contends the district court improperly admitted evidence that

she tried to bribe an eyewitness. Bobtail Bear also contends the evidence was

insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Finally, Bobtail Bear challenges her sentence

because the district court imposed an obstruction of justice enhancement and refused

to grant a downward departure. A review of the record shows that Bobtail Bear's

claims are without merit. There was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict,
-2-

and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence or commit error

in its sentencing determinations. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Kurtis Lee WORTLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8120.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Letantia BUSSELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1052.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Martin GARZA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Julio Adolio Rivera, petitioner, v. United States; Jorge Alejandro Torres-Larraga, petitioner, v. United States; and Salvador Barajas, Jr., petitioner, v. United States

No. 17-8203.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Angela ANDERSON, Individually and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Princess Anderson, petitioner, v. MARSHALL COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, et al.

No. 15-1400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                                                                  ----------------

 

ALPHATRADE.COM

A Nevada corporation

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the "Company")on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Katharine Johnston, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

        Dated: May 7, 2010                        /s/Katharine Johnston

----------------------------------------------

Principal Financial Officer, 

Vice-President, Business Operations, Director
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Benjamin CARTER, petitioner, v. HALLIBURTON CO.,et al.

No. 17-1060.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Patrick Samir ASFOUR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8137.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Acadia National Park Bar, Harbor, ME; Acadia National Park 
Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 
10), that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a 
meeting on Monday, February 5, 2001.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-420, Sec. 
103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of 
the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management 
and development of the park, including but not limited to the 
acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation 
easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy.
    The meeting will convene at park Headquarters, McFarland Hill, Bar 
Harbor, Maine, at 1:00 PM to consider the following agenda:

1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held September 11, 
2000.
2. Committee reports
    Land Conservation
    Park Use
    Science
    Nomination
3. Old business
4. Chairman's report
5. Superintendent's report
6. Public comments
7. Proposed agenda for next Commission meeting on Monday, June 4, 2001.

    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make 
oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written 
statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least 
seven days prior to the meeting.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, 
Maine 04609, tel: (207) 288-3338.

    Dated: January 9, 2001.
Len Bobinchock,
Acting Superintendent, Acadia National Park.
[FR Doc. 01-1575 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Teresa MILLER, petitioner, v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 17-6598.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., petitioners, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-1003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied without prejudice. It is assumed that the Court of Appeals will proceed expeditiously to decide this case.
Exhibit 31  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  June 30, 2008   /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Roberto Carlos ORTIZ-CERVANTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-730.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 386 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 

inclusion in, the Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. NEGUSE, and Mr. TIPTON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage 

available for inclusion in, the Florissant Fossil Beds 

National Monument. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAP UPDATE; MAXIMUM ACREAGE AVAILABLE 

4 FOR INCLUSION IN THE FLORISSANT FOSSIL 

5 BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

6 The first section of Public Law 91–60 (83 Stat. 101) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘entitled ‘Proposed Florissant 

9 Fossil Beds National Monument’, numbered NM– 

10 FFB–7100, and dated March 1967, and more parVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:06 Jan 19, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H386.IH H386

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 386 IH

1 ticularly described by metes and bounds in an at2 tachment to that map,’’ and inserting ‘‘entitled 

3 ‘Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument Pro4 posed Boundary Adjustment’, numbered 171/ 

5 132,544, and dated May 3, 2016,’’; and 

6 (2) by striking ‘‘six thousand acres’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘6,300 acres’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Branden HUERTAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-818.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Earnest Earl MATTHEWS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5876.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains information extracted from Allegiant Bancorp, Inc.'s
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such report.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,012
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         439,819
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     4
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     46,264
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,310
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,349
<LOANS>                                        543,627
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638,166
<DEPOSITS>                                     489,816
<SHORT-TERM>                                    58,664
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,460
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 638,166
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,543
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,588
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   102
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,233
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,794
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,238
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,995
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,012
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,913
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,347
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,347
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.357
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.353
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                        666
<LOANS-PAST>                                       167
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,442
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      426
<RECOVERIES>                                        57
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,085
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Ben Sheppard *v.*The State.

“Theft from a House” as a specific offense was abrogated in 1876, by the repeal of Article 764 of the Penal Code, and a conviction for that specific offense which was pending on appeal when it was so abrogated must be set aside; but if, as in the present case, the indictment be good for simple theft, the cause will be remanded for trial on that charge.

Appeal from the District Court of Houston. Tried below before the Hon. R. S. Walker.

No brief for the appellant.

*H. H. Boone,*Attorney General, and *W. B. Dunham,*for the State.

White, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of “ theft from a house,” of property of the value of $5, and his punishment affixed at two years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary. Since the appeal in this court was taken, Article 764 of the Penal Code (Pasc. Dig., Art. 2490) was repealed by acts of fifteenth legislature (233), and there is no longer any such specific offense known to our law as theft from a house.

The indictment, however, is good as an indictment for simple theft, and the case will be reversed and remanded in order that the defendant may be tried for this latter offense.

*Reversed and remanded.*
.1fl1CFTC 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Open Meeting of the Commission – Wednesday, July 27, 2022 

AGENDA 

1. Call to Order and Welcome 

2. Opening Statements 

Chairman Rostin Behnam 

Commissioner Kristin N. Johnson 

Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero 

Commissioner Summer K. Mersinger 

Commissioner Caroline D. Pham 

3. Proposed Rule: Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations 

a. Staff Presentation 

- Clark Hutchison, Division of Clearing and Risk (DCR) 

- Eileen A. Donovan, DCR 

- Tad Polley, DCR 

- Joseph Opron, DCR 

b. Motion 

c. Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion 

d. Vote 

4. Notice of Proposed Order and Request for Comment on an Application for a Capital 

Comparability Determination submitted by the Financial Services Agency of Japan 

a. Staff Presentation 

- Amanda Olear, Market Participants Division (MPD) 

- Thomas J. Smith, MPD 

- Joshua Beale, MPD 

b. Motion 

c. Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion 

d. Vote 

5. Chairman and Commissioners’ Closing Remarks 

6. Adjournment
Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, petitioner, v. Jose Rodolfo MAGANA-PENA.

No. 15-1494.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Adolph SPEARS, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8474.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Russell Lee FINLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9397.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Gerald Wesley MILLER, petitioner, v. George BALDWIN.

No. 17-8154.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.