alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009167EN.01002702.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/27

---

Action brought on 12 May 2009 — Wendler v Commission of the European Communities

(Case F-49/09)

2009/C 167/54

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eberhard Wendler (Laveno Mombello, Italy) (represented by: M. Müller-Trawinski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s demand on the applicant to designate a bank account at his place of residence in Italy for his pension payments.

Forms of orders sought

Forms of orders sought

The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decision of the defendant of 9 September 2008, in the form of the dismissal of the applicant’s appeal of 19 February 2008, according to which he is obliged to designate a bank account at his place of residence for his pension payments; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the defendant of 9 September 2008, in the form of the dismissal of the applicant’s appeal of 19 February 2008, according to which he is obliged to designate a bank account at his place of residence for his pension payments;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3769 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3769

To authorize the Secretary of State to waive certain requirements with 
  respect to eligibility for civil service positions relating to the 
     departmental formulation and direction of foreign affairs and 
            international relations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2019

 Ms. Houlahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of State to waive certain requirements with 
  respect to eligibility for civil service positions relating to the 
     departmental formulation and direction of foreign affairs and 
            international relations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Technical Experts in 
Managing Diplomacy Act'' or the ``STEM Diplomacy Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR OCCUPATIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

    The Secretary of State may waive any or all of the individual 
occupational requirements with respect to an employee or prospective 
employee of the Department of State for a civilian position categorized 
under the GS-0130 occupational series if the Secretary determines that 
the individual possesses significant scientific, technological, 
engineering, or mathematical expertise that is integral to performing 
the duties of the applicable position, based on demonstrated job 
performance and qualifying experience. With respect to each waiver 
granted under this section, the Secretary shall set forth in a written 
document that is transmitted to the Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management the rationale for the decision of the Secretary to waive 
such requirements.
                                 <all>
```
II-01053

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mark Precious <presh7@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:42 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mark Precious

200 East 30th Street

San Bernardino, CA 92507
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Byron Carroll LOUDON.

No. D-3027.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Byron Carroll Loudon, of Overland Park, Kansas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Vincent F. PISCIOTTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9515.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 

Power of Attorney 
 I,
Meifang Liu, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification Card No.440105195704103043, and a holder of 2% of the entire registered capital in Guangzhou Cornerstone Capital Management Co., Ltd., (the “Cornerstone Capital”) (the
“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize Guangzhou Cornerstone Corporate Consulting Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of
Attorney: 
 The WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters
concerning My Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders’ meetings of Cornerstone Capital; 2) exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China
and Cornerstone Capital’s Articles of Association, including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the
executive director and/or director, supervisor, the chief executive officer and other senior management members of Cornerstone Capital. 

Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, the WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to
execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to
which I am a party. 
 All the actions associated with My Shareholding conducted by the WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the
documents related to My Shareholding executed by the WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by the WFOE. 

The WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any
other person or entity at its own discretion and without giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent. 
 This Power of Attorney is
coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as I am a shareholder of Cornerstone Capital. 

During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all the rights associated with My Shareholding, which have been authorized to WFOE
through this Power of Attorney, and shall not exercise such rights by myself. 
 This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese and English;
in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail. 

  
 1 

Strictly Confidential 








 
			
	Meifang Liu
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Meifang Liu

		
	Date:	 	October 12, 2017


  

			
	Mingqi Huang
		
	Witness:	 	 /s/ Mingqi Huang

		
	Date:	 	October 12, 2017


  
 2 

Strictly Confidential
Exhibit 4.2

 

M17 Entertainment Limited - Class A Ordinary Shares

 

(Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands)

 

Number of Shares

 

Share capital US$50,000 divided into 500,000,000 shares comprising of

 

(i) 460,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each and

 

(ii) 40,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each

 

	
THIS   IS TO CERTIFY THAT
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
is   the registered holder of
    	
 
    


 

Shares in the above-named Company subject to the memorandum and articles of association thereof.

 

EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on

 

	
DIRECTOR
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
I, Richard H. Casper, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of
DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statement were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: December 23, 2003              /s/ Richard H. Casper

                                     -----------------------------

                                     Richard. H. Casper, President
                                     and Principal Executive Officer
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 07, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A2028. JOHNNY JONES v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On July 25, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than August 01, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 07, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Donald LITTLE, et al., petitioners, v. TRIUMPH GEAR SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 17-1027.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2467

VISALAKSHI YOGARAJ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-95-3217-AW)

Submitted: February 4, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Visalakshi Yogaraj, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley James Reed, Susan

Berry Bloomfield, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's

complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 (1994). We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Yogaraj v. Washington Adventist Hosp., No. CA-95-

3217-AM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00333

- CV

JON CHRISTOPHER KRAATZ

v. C.P.Z.
On Appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- FAM

- 2191

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 31, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         494,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  802,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                    99,682
<INVENTORY>                                     13,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,284,459
<PP&E>                                       1,053,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                 654,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,886,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,112,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,640,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,886,969
<SALES>                                      4,212,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,212,310
<CGS>                                        3,089,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,867,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (22,912)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,632,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,632,760)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,632,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,632,760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Nielson,  certify  that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-K/A of  Pacific
Magtron International Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a.    designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and   procedures   and  presented  in  this  report  my  conclusion   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c.    disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.    all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: July 25, 2006

/s/ Martin Nielson
----------------------------
By: Martin Nielson
    Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Lock Ireland, the InterimChief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:	August 20, 2012

 

*/s/ Lock Ireland*

-----------------------------------

Name: Lock Ireland

Title: Interim Chief Executive Officer
Marco SALOMON-MACIAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7697.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.