alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ExecuƟve Summary for the Exchange VolaƟlity Controls Paper 

In today's rapidly evolving financial landscape, characterized by global uncertainties and 

unforeseen market events, the efficient management of financial market volatility is 

paramount. 

During recent crises, FIA has noted the pivotal role VCMs have played in preserving market 

integrity. Consequently, FIA engaged with global derivatives exchanges and market participants 

to explore the most effective ways to mitigate disruptions while ensuring transparent price 

discovery. 

The primary objective of this paper is to present principles‐based, flexible and adaptable best 

practices for the development of derivatives exchange VCMs. While not exhaustive, the paper 

covers a range of VCM tools including pre‐trade price bands, daily price limits, and various 

mechanisms used to interrupt continuous trading. It also addresses exchange rulesets that offer 

remedial measures for erroneous trade events. 

The paper acknowledges the various challenges contributing to extreme market volatility and 

emphasizes the significance of well‐designed and transparent exchange‐provided VCMs in 

maintaining market integrity, reliability, and utility. 

FIA makes specific recommendations for each type of VCM, in addition to high level 

recommendations for all VCMs. Some examples include: 

 VCMs should be designed to avoid unduly disrupting markets and interfering with price 

discovery. 

 Exchanges should focus on keeping markets trading and trading interruptions should 

only be triggered sparingly. 

 Design features of a VCM should be based on the specific characteristics of the market 

or the prevailing market environment, such as time of day effects. 

 Information on VCMs and how they operate in practice should be publicly available and 

replicable. 

GMAC RecommendaƟon: 

The GMAC recommends that the Commission use the best pracƟces as a tool for understanding 

exchange market risk controls and when engaging with global regulators and internaƟonal 

standard seƩers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     Company's unaudited financial statements for the period ended December 31,
     1997 and December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
     to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         $1,941,747             $1,995,165
<SECURITIES>                                   0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,204,594              2,792,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (102,654)              (268,638)
<INVENTORY>                                    0                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,133,288              4,898,324
<PP&E>                                         991,689                1,293,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (358,130)              756,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,079,337              5,591,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          691,217                745,281
<BONDS>                                        124,155                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                      0
<COMMON>                                       45,062                 45,164
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,218,903              4,801,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,079,337              5,591,768
<SALES>                                        0                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,736,869             13,881,632
<CGS>                                          0                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,676,534             13,609,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               30,654                 165,984
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                60,335                 272,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                      291,962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            60,335                 564,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                      0
<CHANGES>                                      0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   60,335                 564,362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02                    .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02                    .21
        


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3670 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to ensure access to appropriate 

temporary shelter, food, and water for individuals apprehended by U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself and Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to ensure 

access to appropriate temporary shelter, food, and water 

for individuals apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Short-Term Detention 

5 Standards Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3670 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY SHELTER, 

2 FOOD, AND WATER DURING SHORT-TERM DE3 TENTION. 

4 Paragraph (1) of section 411(m) of the Homeland 

5 Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 211(m)) is amended to 

6 read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(1) ACCESS TO APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY

8 SHELTER, FOOD, AND WATER.—The Commissioner 

9 shall make every effort to ensure the provision to an 

10 individual apprehended by the Commissioner of ap11 propriate temporary shelter with access to bathroom 

12 and shower facilities, water, appropriate nutrition, 

13 hygiene, personal grooming items, and sanitation 

14 needs.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Rufus Paul HARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF WESTPOINT STEVENS INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,472
<INVENTORY>                                    461,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               566,398
<PP&E>                                       1,246,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 473,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,482,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          362,842
<BONDS>                                      1,275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           711
<OTHER-SE>                                    (479,957)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,482,750
<SALES>                                        895,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               895,037
<CGS>                                          663,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  663,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61


</TABLE>
Glenn Lee SELDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.

No. 17-6849.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Dondrell Joseph CHANDLER, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8064.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Carston Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8266.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Dustin A. KING, petitioner, v. MARION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT.

No. 17-8159.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
In Re James R. YOUNG, petitioner.

No. 17-7508.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
II-00197

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

karin kachler <screamingredcat@att.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 7:25 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

karin kachler

1597 grandola ave

Los Angeles, CA 90041
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/Damon Silver, AFL-CIO
  
    



  When
              10/12/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              XXVI. Position LimitsXXVIII. Volcker Rule

  CFTC Staff
              Gary GenslerJohn Riley

  Visitor(s)
              Damon Silver, AFL-CIO

  Organization(s)
              AFL-CIO


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CUSTODIAN**
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Sun Oil
& Gas, Corp. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-KSB for the
period ended January
31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter G.
Wilson ,
President/Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Dated: May
16, 2005


/s/*Peter
G. Wilson*
Peter G.
Wilson
Sole
Officer and Director
Joseph Emil KLUG, petitioner, v. Nicole ENGLISH, Warden, et al.

No. 17-8111.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Vincent GILLESPIE, petitioner, v. Sandra STAUB, et al.

No. 17M112.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,879
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,299,494
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,467
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,297,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,879
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (111,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (111,282)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 430,357
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   319,075
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        
                      

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7000
ALTERIC HUNT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KIRKLAND R&E, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-58-6-13AK) Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alteric Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alteric Hunt appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Hunt that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Hunt failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Hunt has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2010080EN.01001402.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 11 January 2010 — Knubben Dak-en Leidekkersbedrijf BV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-13/10)

2010/C 80/25

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Knubben Dak- en Leidekkersbedrijf BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 EC), preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 1 and 1a of Belgian Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970, under which the reduced VAT rate may be applied to construction work only if the service provider is registered in Belgium as a contractor in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Wetboek van Inkomstenbelastingen (Belgian Income Tax Code) 1992? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 EC), preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 1 and 1a of Belgian Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970, under which the reduced VAT rate may be applied to construction work only if the service provider is registered in Belgium as a contractor in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Wetboek van Inkomstenbelastingen (Belgian Income Tax Code) 1992?

| 2. | Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 EC), preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 400 and 401 of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992 and in the Royal Decree of 26 December 1998, under which registration as a contractor in Belgium applies fully and identically to Belgian service providers and to service providers established in another Member State of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 EC), preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 400 and 401 of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992 and in the Royal Decree of 26 December 1998, under which registration as a contractor in Belgium applies fully and identically to Belgian service providers and to service providers established in another Member State of the European Union?

---
Christopher G. LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-735.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.