alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10543

(Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOMMY HOWARD STRICKLIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(7:93-CR-012-Y-1)

February 26, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tommy Howard Stricklin appeals his convictions and sentence for possession with intent to

manufacture a compound and mixture containing phenylacetone and possession of a listed chemical,

phenylacetic acid, with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. Stricklin contends that the district

court reversibly erred in calculating the drug quantity used to establish his base offense level, in

refusing to provide the jury with an “intent” instruction that he requested, and in denying his motion

to suppress evidence seized during the search of his property. Stricklin also contends that he received

ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney had a conflict of interest.
2

We have reviewed the record and the briefs and perceive no reversible error. The record is

not sufficiently developed to properly evaluate Stricklin’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Accordingly, we affirm Stricklin’s convictions and sentence without prejudice to Stricklin’s right to

assert his ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding.
German ROBLES-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9491.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

STEVEN SHAREK,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-1044

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Steven Sharek, Bonifay, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the September 8, 2016 

judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2016-CF-18435-A, in the Circuit Court in 

and for Brevard County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
# C_2011269EN.01001703.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — État belge v Pierre Henfling, Raphaël Davin and Koenraad Tanghe, acting as administrators in the insolvency of Tiercé Franco-Belge SA

(Case C-464/10) (1)

1

(Taxation - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 6(4) - Exemption - Article 13(B)(f) - Gambling - Services provided by a commission agent ‘buraliste’ acting in his own name but on behalf of a principal operating a business of taking bets)

2011/C 269/29

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Mons

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: État belge

Applicant:

Defendants: Pierre Henfling, Raphaël Davin and Koenraad Tanghe, acting as administrators in the insolvency of Tiercé Franco-Belge SA

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d’appel de Mons — Interpretation of Articles 6(4) and 13(B)(f), of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ L 145, p. 1) — tax exemption in respect of services supplied by a commission agent acting in its own name, but on behalf of a principal who organises supply of services referred to in that directive.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 6(4) and 13(B)(f) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, must be interpreted as meaning that, in so far as an economic operator acts in his own name, but on behalf of an undertaking carrying on a bet-taking business, in the collection of bets covered by the exemption from value added tax under Article 13(B)(f), that latter undertaking is to be considered, in accordance with Article 6(4), to provide that operator with a supply of bets coming under that exemption.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 388 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 388

   To update thresholds for certain currency transaction reports and 
          suspicious activity reports, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

Mr. Loudermilk (for himself, Mr. Tipton, and Mr. Emmer) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To update thresholds for certain currency transaction reports and 
          suspicious activity reports, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Reporting Threshold 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATING THRESHOLDS FOR CERTAIN CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORTS 
              AND SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS.

    (a) Thresholds for Certain Currency Transaction Reports.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than the end of the 180-day 
        period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary of the Treasury shall revise regulations issued with 
        respect to section 5313 of title 31, United States Code, to 
        update each $10,000 threshold amount in such regulations to 
        $30,000.
            (2) Threshold for reports relating to coins and currency 
        received in nonfinancial trade or business.--Section 5331 of 
        title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking 
        ``$10,000'' each place such term appears in heading or text and 
        inserting ``$30,000''.
    (b) Thresholds for Suspicious Activity Reports.--Not later than the 
end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, each Federal department or agency that issues regulations 
with respect to reports on suspicious transactions described under 
section 5318(g) of title 31, United States Code, shall update each 
$5,000 threshold amount in such regulations to $10,000 and each $2,000 
threshold amount in such regulation to $3,000.
    (c) Updating the Money Services Business Definition Thresholds.--
Not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall revise 
section 1010.100(ff) of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, to 
update each $1,000 threshold amount in such regulations to $3,000.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011269EN.01001201.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberste Berufungs- und Disziplinarkommission — Austria) — Gentcho Pavlov, Gregor Famira v Ausschuss der Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien

(Case C-101/10) (1)

1

(External relations - Association agreements - National legislation excluding, before the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union, Bulgarian nationals from inclusion on the list of trainee lawyers - Compatibility of that legislation with the prohibition of all discrimination based on nationality, as regards working conditions, in the EC-Bulgaria Association Agreement)

2011/C 269/18

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberste Berufungs- und Disziplinarkommission

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Gentcho Pavlov, Gregor Famira

Applicants:

Defendant: Ausschuss der Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberste Berufungs- und Disziplinarkommission — Interpretation of Article 38(1) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Bulgaria, of the other part (OJ 1994 L 358 of 31 December 1994, p. 3) — Prohibition of any discrimination based on nationality as regards working conditions — Compatibility with that article of national rules excluding, before the accession of Bulgaria to the European Union, Bulgarian nationals from registration on the list of trainee lawyers — Direct effect of that provision

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of non-discrimination set out in the first indent of Article 38(1) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Bulgaria, of the other part, concluded and approved on behalf of the Communities by Decision 94/908/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the Council and the Commission of 19 December 1994, must be interpreted as not having precluded, before the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union, legislation of a Member State such as Paragraph 30(1) and (5) of the Austrian Code of Lawyers (Österreichische Rechtsanwaltsordnung), in the version applicable in the main proceedings, under which a Bulgarian national, because of a nationality condition laid down by that legislation, was unable to obtain inclusion on the list of trainee lawyers and, consequently, to obtain a certificate of entitlement to appear in court.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.

1

---
Richard KNIGHT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 17-7099.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - [Docket No. FAA-2022-0345]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation.

On April 4, 2022, the FAA issued a notice in the above-captioned matter. The notice indicated that the FAA would accept comments concerning the proposed modified grant assurances until “April 12, 2022.” This notice extends the comment due date to April 20, 2022.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 5, 2022.

Robert A. Hawks,

Deputy Director, Office of Airport Planning and Programming.

[FR Doc. 2022-07620 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Gregorio GONZALEZ-LONGORIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6259.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2009069EN.01002503.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/25

---

Action brought on 12 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-15/09)

(2009/C 69/47)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beck and L. Jelínek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that by not taking all necessary legal and administrative measures to comply with Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, or in any event by not communicating those measures to the Commission (1), the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by not taking all necessary legal and administrative measures to comply with Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, or in any event by not communicating those measures to the Commission (1), the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for the transposition of the directive into domestic law expired on 21 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 373, p. 37.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00028-CV

Carmelita RILEY and Anthony Pena,

Appellants

v.

Lizette TORRES, Paula Pueblitz, San Juanita Valdez and Puig Management and Rentals LLC.,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVF001192-D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On March 5, 2014, after sending appellants a show cause order, we dismissed this appeal 

for failure to pay the applicable filing fee. On March 21, 2014, appellants filed a motion to 

reinstate and attached an affidavit from appellants’ counsel, which affirmed that counsel had not 

been aware of this Court’s show cause order and that the internet service with counsel’s firm had 

been interrupted. We GRANT appellants’ motion to reinstate, WITHDRAW our opinion and 

judgment of March 5, 2014, and REINSTATE this appeal on the docket of this court.

We ORDER appellants, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, to pay the 

applicable filing fee in this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. If appellants fail to pay the applicable 

filing fee within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

It is so ORDERED on April 8, 2014

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
# C_2011252EN.01002805.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 2 May 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-570/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/64

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.

1

---
Vernon Rashaad JIGGETTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7343.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4814]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on April 26, 2001 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Maurice Silvera, Inc., Lumberton, North Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Dated: Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of June 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16159 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
In Re Michael H. WU, et ux., petitioners.

No. 17-1028.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Domenic TRICOME, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 15-9546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2012049EN.01000601.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Haltergemeinschaft LBL GbR v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf

(Case C-250/10) (1)

1

(Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Article 14(1)(b) - Exemption of energy products used as fuel for the purpose of air navigation - Fuel provided by a person chartering out an aircraft used by charterers of the aircraft for their flights for purposes other than the supply of air services for consideration)

2012/C 49/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Haltergemeinschaft LBL GbR

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Article 14(1)(b) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51) — Scope of the exemption envisaged for energy products supplied for use as fuel for the purpose of air navigation — Exemption of fuel provided by an entity — which is not an airline — leasing or chartering out an aircraft used by lessees of the aircraft for their flights for commercial purposes

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(1)(b) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity must be interpreted as meaning that the tax exemption on energy products supplied for use as fuel for the purpose of air navigation other than in private pleasure-flying provided for under that provision cannot apply in the case of a company, such as the applicant in the main proceedings, where it leases or charters out an aircraft belonging to it with the fuel to undertakings whose air navigation operations are not directly used for the supply, by those undertakings, of air services for consideration.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3897 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3897

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the monthly housing 
    stipend under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for 
 individuals who pursue programs of education solely through distance 
                learning on more than a half-time basis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2019

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the monthly housing 
    stipend under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for 
 individuals who pursue programs of education solely through distance 
                learning on more than a half-time basis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE OF MONTHLY HOUSING STIPEND UNDER THE POST-9/11 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO PURSUE 
              PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION SOLELY THROUGH DISTANCE LEARNING ON 
              MORE THAN A HALF-TIME BASIS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3313(c)(1)(B) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking clause (iii);
            (2) by redesignating clause (iv) as clause (iii); and
            (3) in clause (i), in the matter preceding subclause (I), 
        by striking ``clauses (ii) and (iii)'' and inserting ``clause 
        (ii)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to a quarter, semester, or term beginning on or after August 1, 
2020.
                                 <all>
```