alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      1,037,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,037,060
<CGS>                                          614,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  614,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               361,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,255
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than July 10, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (D. Michael Manies, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1.  Milton Allen Willnerd*, Lincoln, Nebraska; to acquire voting shares of Wheeler County Bancshares, Inc., Ericson, Nebraska; and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Ericson State Bank, Ericson, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-15871 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
James Aubrey BROWN, IV, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9537.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# U n i te d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

### N o . 1 0 - 5 2 8 4 S e p t e m b e r T e r m 2 0 1 1 1: 07-c v -017 56-RCL Filed O n: Jan uary 30, 201 2 Sierra Club , etal.,

App ellees
v
. Robe rt L. Van An tw erp, Lieu ten antGen eral, U.S. A rmy Corp of

En gineers, e t al., App ellees Sierra Pro pertie s I, L LC, e t al.,

App ellant s

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Conso lidate d with 10-5 297 , 10 -534 5
BEFORE: Garlan d a nd Kavana ugh, Circuit Ju dges, a nd W illiams, S enio r

Circuit Judge O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f

the gov ernm ent ’s pet ition for limite d reh earing an d th e respo nse the reto, it is ORDERED tha t th e p etition be granted . Itis FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e o pinion issued Novemb er 29 , 20 11, be am end ed as follows: (1) Slip Op ., p age 13 , line 9, in sert th e followi ng sent ence be fore t he sent ence beginnin g w ith th e words “Af ter issuin g” : “T he regulation s creat e a n e x cept ion t o th at obligation w here , as a resu lt of informa l consu ltation , th e “Fed eral a gency determ ines, w ith th e wr itten con currence of the Director [o f

the Fish a nd W ildlife Se rv ice], t hatthe prop osed actio n is n ot likely to a dversely af fect a ny listed spe cies or critical h abita t.” Id

. at § 40 2.1 4(b).”; a nd

# U n i te d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

### N o . 1 0 - 5 2 8 4 S e p t e m b e r T e r m 2 0 1 1
(2) Slip Op ., p age 13 , last para graph , line 2, d elete the w ords “It requires” and insert in lieu t here of , “Subject to the exception no ted ab ove, it requires”.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
Order entered November 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00822-CR

ANTWON CARTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-81511-2013

ORDER

On September 1, 2015, we ordered that Stephanie Hudson be removed as appellant’s 

attorney and that the trial court appoint new counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. On 

September 2, 2015, we received the trial court’s order appointing Pamela Lakatos as appellant’s 

new attorney and on September 4, 2015, we ordered counsel to file appellant’s brief within sixty 

days. To date, however, Ms. Lakatos has neither filed appellant’s brief nor communicated with 

the Court regarding the status of the brief.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings 

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Dragomir TASKOV, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-7662.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1082 

CA 14-00428 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

SHARELLE REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

RICHARD KELLY, BETTE KELLY AND MARK KELLY, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, NEW HARTFORD (MO ATHARI OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

BOEGGEMAN, GEORGE & CORDE, P.C., ALBANY (PAUL A. HURLEY OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David

A. Murad, J.), entered December 9, 2013. The order denied plaintiff’s

motion for, inter alia, a protective order striking a certain report.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

with costs (see Pagan v Rafter, 107 AD3d 1505, 1507).

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,196
<SECURITIES>                                    52,571
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,134
<PP&E>                                          35,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 514,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,696
<BONDS>                                        122,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           321
<OTHER-SE>                                     347,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   514,597
<SALES>                                         44,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,539
<CGS>                                           15,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,740
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
II-00489

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

PAT TAYLOR <marchplanter@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

PAT TAYLOR

323 17TH ST SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20003
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH CIR.R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 01-40782

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LEOPOLDO ALBA ONTIVEROS,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

 Southern District of Texas, Brownsville

______________________________________________

June 21, 2002

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, our opinion filed April 29, 2002, in this case

is WITHDRAWN. The motion for leave to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. Counsel has filed
a brief asrequired byAnders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our review of the brief, the record,

and the response of Ontiveros disclose no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s

request to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
# L_2005239EN.01005301.xml

| 15.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/53

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 66/2005

of 29 April 2005

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 43/2005 of 11 March 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Directive 2004/89/EC of 13 September 2004 adapting for the fifth time to technical progress Council Directive 96/49/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Directive 2004/89/EC of 13 September 2004 adapting for the fifth time to technical progress Council Directive 96/49/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 42b (Council Directive 96/49/EC) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 L 0089: Commission Directive 2004/89/EC of 13 September 2004 (OJ L 293, 16.9.2004, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 L 0089: Commission Directive 2004/89/EC of 13 September 2004 (OJ L 293, 16.9.2004, p. 14).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2004/89/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

the president

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 28.7.2005, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 293, 16.9.2004, p. 14.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. SAN JUAN CABLE LLC.

No. 17-1215.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the                “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”)                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                B. Amrey HardenB.                Amrey HardenPresident                and Chief Executive                Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
H. Res. 1715 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 17, 2010. 

Whereas Joe Paterno reached the milestone of 400 wins as 

head coach on November 6th, 2010; 

Whereas Joe Paterno has served the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) with honor and distinction for 60 

years since starting as an assistant coach in 1950; 

Whereas in 2009, the graduation rate of Joe Paterno’s players was 89 percent, and the graduation success rate was 

85 percent—both of which were the greatest among all 

football teams in the final 2009 Associated Press Top 25 

poll; 

Whereas the legacy Joe Paterno has left at Penn State 

reaches far beyond football, as he has personally given 

millions of dollars to the university and raised hundreds 

of millions more for the library and need-based scholarships; 

Whereas Joe Paterno has been very active in the community 

as a strong supporter of the Pennsylvania Special Olympics and a national spokesperson for the Charcot-MarieTooth Association; 

Whereas Joe Paterno has more wins as head coach than any 

other in NCAA Division 1A FBS history, surpassing leg-
2 

•HRES 1715 EH 

endary coaches Bear Bryant in 2001 and Bobby Bowden 

in 2008; 

Whereas Penn State is one of just seven teams with more 

than 800 wins in its history, and Joe Paterno has been 

active with the program for 692 of those games over 60 

seasons with an amazing record of 504–181–7 (72.8 percent); 

Whereas among Joe Paterno’s accolades in 45 years as head 

coach are two National Championships, seven undefeated 

seasons, 23 finishes in the top 10 rankings, and three 

Big Ten Conference Championships since joining the conference in 1993; 

Whereas Joe Paterno has 24 bowl game wins and 36 bowl 

game appearances, both of which are the most of any 

coach in history; and 

Whereas Joe Paterno’s continued dedication to his players 

and emphasis on academic integrity and education has 

resulted in Penn State fostering 15 Hall of Fame Scholar-Athletes, 34 first-team and 44 overall Academic AllAmericans, and 18 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship winners: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates Joe Paterno for his unparalleled 

success with both the Penn State football program and 

the University, resulting in 400 wins as head coach; and 

(2) commends Joe Paterno for setting an on- and 

off-the-field example of honor, success, integrity, and re-
3 

•HRES 1715 EH 

spect for thousands of players, coaches, students, and 

fans throughout the Nation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.