alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Companys periodic report on form 20-F for the period ended June
30, 2005 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Managing Director
    
    
    
    Chief Financial OfferChristopher Naughton
    
    
    
    David SeatonDate:
December 23, 2005
    
    
    
    Date: December 23, 2005
Thomas William SCHWARTZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7687.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
David T. FRAZIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7562.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3339] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated June 21, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include Outagamie and Winnebago Counties as disaster areas caused by flooding, severe storms and tornadoes occurring between April 10, 2001 and continuing. 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in Brown, Calumet, Fond du Lac, Green Lake, Shawano, Waupaca and Waushara Counties in the State of Wisconsin may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not listed here have been previously declared. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                    the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is July 10, 2001 and for economic injury the deadline is February 11, 2002.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 22, 2001.

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 01-16432 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Anthony JORDAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9589.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael Vasiliy KOLESNIK, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-7280.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
Gregory C. KRUG, petitioner, v. Paul A. KASTNER, Warden.

No. 16-9435.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
# C_2009256EN.01003201.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/32

---

Action brought on 10 August 2009 — E v Parliament

(Case T-326/09)

2009/C 256/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: E (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision adopted by the Bureau of the Parliament of 9 March and 3 April 2009 amending the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme for Members of the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by the Bureau of the Parliament of 9 March and 3 April 2009 amending the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme for Members of the European Parliament;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant seeks annulment of the decisions of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 9 March and 3 April 2009 amending the rules on the Additional (Voluntary) Pension Scheme in Annex VIII of the Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament. The amendments essentially concern the withdrawal of the possibility to take early retirement from age 50 and the possibility to receive the pension as a lump sum, and the raising of the retirement age from 60 to 63 years.

The pleas in law and main arguments invoked by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those invoked in the context of Case T-219/09 Balfe and Others v Parliament
   (1).

Balfe and Others

Parliament

1

---

(1)  OJ 2009 C 205, p. 39.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Spore Review Genitourinary and Prostate Cancer.                    

*Date:*                         February 15-16, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 am to 6:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn—Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian E. Wojcik, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8019, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/402-2785.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institute of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-1631  Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2012133EN.01002302.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2012 — Slovak Telekom v Commission

(Joined Cases T-458/09 and T-171/10) (1)

1

(Competition - Administrative procedure - Decisions requesting information - Necessity for the information sought - Principle of good administration - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Proportionality)

2012/C 133/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Slovak Telekom a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented: initially by M. Maier, L. Kjølbye and D. Geradin, and subsequently by L. Kjølbye, D. Geradin and G. Berrisch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: in Case T-458/09, by F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz and in Case T-171/10, by F. Castillo de la Torre, K. Mojzesowicz and J. Bourke, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Applications for annulment, first, of Commission Decision C(2009) 6840 of 3 September 2009 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 18(3) and 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.523 — Slovak Telekom) and, second, of Commission Decision C(2010) 902 of 8 February 2010 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 18(3) and 24(1) of Regulation No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.523 — Slovak Telekom)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Slovak Telekom a.s. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Slovak Telekom a.s. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
Rudolph POLSON, petitioner, v. ALABAMA, et al.

No. 17-5986.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Petro USA, Inc. f/k/a All State Properties Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A2 for the year ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Joseph C. Passalaqua, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 2nd day of June 2022.

 

s/Joseph C. Passalaqua

Joseph C. Passalaqua

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Petro USA, Inc., and will be retained Petro USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Frederick WROTEN, petitioner, v. Christopher GORDY, Warden, et al.

No. 17-7605.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Lamalskiou LOWE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9405.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Zachary HOLLY, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 17-6514.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
# C_2012258EN.01001701.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — medi v OHIM (medi)

(Case T-470/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark medi - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2012/C 258/28

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: medi GmbH & Co. KG (Bayreuth, Germany) (represented by: H. Lindner, D. Terheggen and T. Kiphuth, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially S. Schäffner and subsequently G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 October 2009 (Case R 692/2008-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign medi as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Medi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Medi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Walter Leroy MOODY, Jr., applicant, v. ALABAMA.

No. 17A1150.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 19, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Carolyn D. Beaver, Principal Financial Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:


1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended December 31, 2015, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and


2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


I N W ITNESS W HEREOF , the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 9th day of March, 2016.











/s/ Carolyn D. BeaverCarolyn D. BeaverSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
ASSOCIATION FOR DIGITAL ASSET MARKETS 

BRAD VOPNI 

HUDSON RIVER TRADING 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction 

The Association for Digital Asset Markets (“ADAM”) is a private, non-profit, industryled, broad-based association of firms operating in the digital asset markets. 

- Initially met mid-2018 

- Formally registered on October 24, 2018 

ADAM’s membership includes marketplaces, custodians, lenders principal and agency 

trading firms, and prime brokers. Prospective members must be willing and able to 

sign our Code of Conduct to be considered for membership. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

ADAM’s Mission 

ADAM exists to foster fair and orderly digital asset markets where participants can 

transact with confidence. 

• Provide clear standards for efficient trading, custody, clearing and settlement of 

digital assets 

• Encourage professionalism and ethical conduct by market participants 

• Increase transparency and provide information to the public about digital assets 

markets 

• Seek to protect market participants from fraud and manipulation 
 

 

ADAM’s Founding Members 

• BitOoda 

• BTIG 

• Cumberland 

• Galaxy Digital 

• Genesis Global Trading 

• GSR 

• Hudson River Trading 

• Paxos 

• Symbiont 

• XBTO 
 

 

 

Recent Events 

• Developed a principles-based Code of Conduct (the “Code”). 

• Introductory events coinciding with Consensus: Invest 2019 

• New Members since founding 

◦ Anchorage 

◦ BitGo 

◦ BlockFi 

◦ CMT Digital 

◦ Tagomi 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Code of Conduct 

Created to establish standards of conduct and hold one other accountable, all members plan to 

sign the Code in March. The Code covers the following areas: 

• Governance, Compliance and Risk Management 

• Market Ethics 

• Conflicts of Interest 

• Transparency and Fairness 

• Market Integrity 

• Custody 

• Information Security and Business Continuity 

• Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Finance of Terrorism 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Looking forward 

Continued Membership Growth 

• Hire an Executive Director 

• Ongoing recruitment of participants in Digital Assets market 

• Grow membership by function, as well as geographic diversity 

Governance 

• Expand Board of Advisors 

Leveraging the ADAM Platform 

• Leverage signing and implementation of the Code of Conduct to raise awareness among 

Digital Assets market participants 

• Ongoing engagement with regulators and other key stakeholders 

• Identify opportunities for additional engagement and information sharing
# C_2010080EN.01001202.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/12

---

Action brought on 8 January 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-6/10)

2010/C 80/21

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. de Schiertere de Lophem, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2006/46/EC lapsed on 5 September 2008. On the date the present action was commenced, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not informed the Commission of those measures.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 224, p. 1.

1

---