alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Leo Louis KACZMAR, III v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8148.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 2018.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.

Like a number of other capital defendants in Florida, petitioner Leo Louis Kaczmar has raised an important Eighth Amendment challenge to his death sentence that went unaddressed by the Florida Supreme Court. Specifically, he argues that the jury instructions in his case impermissibly diminished the jurors' sense of responsibility as to the ultimate determination of death, in violation of *Caldwell v. Mississippi,* 472 U.S. 320, 105 S.Ct. 2633, 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985). I have thrice dissented from this Court's unwillingness to intervene in the face of the Florida Supreme Court's failure to address this important question. See *Guardado v. Florida,* 584 U.S. ----, ----, 138 S.Ct. 1131, 200 L.Ed.2d 729 (2018) ; *Middleton v. Florida,* 583 U.S. ----, ----, 138 S.Ct. 829, 200 L.Ed.2d 326 (2018) ; *Truehill v. Florida,* 583 U.S. ----, ----, 138 S.Ct. 3, 199 L.Ed.2d 272 (2017). Recently, "[i]n light of the dissenting opinions to the denial of certiorari," the Florida Supreme Court in another capital case finally set out to "explicitly address" the *Caldwell* claim. *Reynolds v. State,* --- So.3d ----, n. 8, 2018 WL 1633075, *5, n. 8 (Fla. Apr. 5, 2018) (*per curiam* ). The resulting opinion, however, gathered the support only of a plurality, so the issue remains without definitive resolution by the Florida Supreme Court. Thus, for the reasons previously stated in *Truehill,* *Middleton,* and *1974*Guardado,* I again respectfully dissent from the denial of certiorari.
Open Meeting of the Commission – Thursday, October 15, 2020

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn D. Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Final Rule: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers 

and Major Swap Participants (Phase VI Compliance Date Extension)

Staff Presentation

Warren Gorlick, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO)

Carmen Moncada-Terry, DSIO

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

4. Final Rule: Exemption from Registration for Certain Foreign Intermediaries

Staff Presentation

Pamela Geraghty, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO)

Elizabeth Groover, DSIO 

Frank Fisanich, DSIO 

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

[continued on next page] 
5. Final Rule: Position Limits for Derivatives

Staff Presentation

Dorothy D. DeWitt, Division of Market Oversight (DMO)

Rachel Reicher, DMO Steven A. Haidar, DMO

Aaron Brodsky, DMO Steven Benton, DMO

Lillian Cardona, DMO Jeanette Curtis, DMO

Michael Ehrstein, DMO Harold Hild, DMO 

Rachel Hayes, Division of Enforcement (DOE) 

Brigitte Weyls, DOE

Chang Jung, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight 

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

6. Closing Remarks

7. Adjournment
Eric Forrest ANDERSON, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-5024.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Jesus MALDONADO-LANDAVERDE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9318.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                        <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          95,544
<SECURITIES>                                   223,693
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               621,557
<PP&E>                                       3,778,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               (181,900)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,129,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,831,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,300
<COMMON>                                        18,782
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,708,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,129,941
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,020
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (81,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (81,338)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (81,338)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.004)
        


</TABLE>
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/Damon Silvers, AFL-CIO
  
    



  Topics of Discussion:~~~ ~~~Upcoming Swap Dealer Rule
      
  When
              04/17/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              II. Definitions

  CFTC Staff
              Gary GenslerJohn Riley

  Visitor(s)
              Damon Silvers, AFL-CIO

  Organization(s)
              AFL-CIO


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Alan M. BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Wendy S. MORTON, Commissioner, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 17-6124.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (87)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,439
<PP&E>                                           2,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,287
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,275
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   137
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 COMMUNITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
            STATEMENT REGARDING:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                                                                March 31,           
                                                                                     ------------------------------
                                                                                         1997             1996     
                                                                                     -----------       ------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>               <C>
Income Per Common Share (1)

Net income (in thousands)                                                                 $302             $730
                                                                                          ====             ====

Net income per share                                                                      $.14             $.33
                                                                                          ====             ====

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                           2,227,610        2,213,284
                                                                                     =========        =========

Income Per Common Share, Assuming
  Full Dilution (1)

Net income (in thousands)                                                                 $302             $730
                                                                                          ====             ====

Net income per share                                                                      $.14             $.33
                                                                                          ====             ====

                                                                                     2,227,610        2,213,284
                                                                                     =========        =========
</TABLE>

(1)    Net income per share has been computed using the weighted average number
       of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each
       year presented.  Common stock equivalents include stock options.
       Warrants have not been included in CFGI's computation of earnings per
       share because the market price of CFGI's common stock has been less than
       the exercise price of the warrants for substantially all of the three
       month reporting period ended March 31, 1997.  See Note F to CFGI's
       consolidated financial statements.
Ray Albert PARKER, petitioner, v. HUNTING POINT APARTMENTS, LLC, aka Bridgeyard Apartments, et al.

No. 17-5342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
FIRST BANK


(Herein called "Bank")












SECOND NOTE REVISION AGREEMENT







	
ORIGINAL NOTE INFORMATION

	
AMOUNT


 

	
NOTE DATE

	
CURRENT MATURITY DATE


	
$20,000,000.00


 

	
June 5, 2017

	
June 1, 2018









               This Agreement is effective as of:  May 18, 2018.


ORIGINAL OBLIGATION:


This Agreement refers to the loan evidenced by the above Second Amended and Restated Master Revolving Note dated June 5, 2017 in favor of Bank executed by OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC., a Maryland corporation ("Borrower"), in the original principal amount of $20,000,000, payable in full on June 1, 2018.


CURRENT OBLIGATION:


The unpaid outstanding principal balance of said Note as of the beginning of the day on May 16, 2018 is $3,340,053.35.


REVISION:


The undersigned Borrower hereby requests Bank to revise the terms of said Note, in the following manner:  The Maturity Date of the Note is changed from "June 1, 2018" to "September 1, 2018".


In consideration of Bank's acceptance of the revision of said Note, all as set forth above, the Borrower does hereby acknowledge and admit to such indebtedness, and further does unconditionally agree to pay such indebtedness together with interest thereon within the time and in the manner as revised in accordance with the foregoing, together with any and all attorney's fees and cost of collection.


This Agreement is a revision only, and not a novation; and except as herein provided, all of the terms and conditions of said Note and all related documents shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


This Modification may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument







	
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


The foregoing is accepted.


 


FIRST BANK


 


 


By: /s/ Randy Lee

 Name: Randy Lee


Title: Vice President/RM

  

	
OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.,

a Maryland corporation

  


By: /s/ Bryan H. Draper

         Bryan H. Draper, President and

     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terri Hourigan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Asset Development, Inc. for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of American Asset Development, Inc.



|                     |  |        |  |                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | By:    |  | /S/    TERRI HOURIGAN                                                                      
|Date: March 23, 2011 |  | Name:  |  | Ms. Terri hourigan                                                                         
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Charles SMITH, petitioner, v. Paul ANDERSON.

No. 17-7647.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
II-00346

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Barbara Hodges <thehodgesl @prodigy.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 12:12 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Barbara Hodges

416 n bushnell #E

Alhambra, CA 91801
# C_2010113EN.01004501.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2010 — Parliament v Collée

(Case T-78/09) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2004 Promotion round - Procedure for the allocation of merit points - Distortion of the evidence - Statement of reasons - Value of the opinion of the Reports Committee - Principle of non-discrimination)

2010/C 113/72

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: initially C. Burgos and A. Lukošiūtė, and subsequently R. Ignătescu, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Laurent Collée (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 11 December 2008 of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-148/06 Collée v Parliament, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting-aside of that judgment

Collée

Parliament

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Laurent Collée in connection with the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Laurent Collée in connection with the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, of 1.5.2009.

1

---
David Anthony BELTRAN, petitioner, v. Warren L. MONTGOMERY, Warden.

No. 15-9431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

E-LYNXX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INNERWORKINGS, INC., CIRQIT.COM, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2014-1349

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 1:10-cv-02535-

CCC, Chief Judge Christopher Conner.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

DARREN PATRICK NICHOLSON, Sayles Werbner, P.C., 

Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARK STRACHAN; JONATHAN TAD SUDER, BRETT 

MICHAEL PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, 

TX.

DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for defendant-appellee InnerWorkings, Inc. 

Also represented by ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC; 
 

JENNIFER H. DOAN, JOSHUA R. THANE, Haltom & Doan, 

Texarkana, TX.

JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. 

Louis, MO, for defendant-appellee Cirqit.com, Inc. Also 

represented by JESSICA MENDEZ, RICHARD L. BROPHY.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and 

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court