alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
            BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V
                               (A Limited Partnership)


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Tax Credits L.P. V (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                        /s/Jenny Netzer
                                        Jenny Netzer
                                        Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
                                        Arch Street VIII, Inc, as
                                        Managing GeneralPartner of
                                        Boston FinancialQualified
                                        Housing TaxCredits L.P. V

                                        Date:  August14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40143 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**David Cabrera**

**- Lopez,**  also known as **Reynaldo Gonzalez ,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19

- CR

- 1956

- 1

Before **King, Southwick,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per**  **Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Cabrera

Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cabrera

- Lopez has filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 18, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40143 Document: 00515679307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2020No. 20

- 40143

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Cabrera

- Lopez ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

**.** 42. 2. Case: 20-40143 Document: 00515679307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Harry G. Kozee, Vice PresidentFinance, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer of IKON Receivables, LLC, (the Company), do hereby certify with
respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    February 6, 2004





|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    HARRY G. KOZEE                                                                  
|Harry G. Kozee                                                                         
|Vice President  Finance, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer
Marvel JONES, petitioner, v. Steven RACETTE.

No. 16-9669.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO, petitioner, v. Lorraine BARBOAN, et al.

No. 17-756.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2013189EN.01001701.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2013 — MRI v Commission

(Case T-154/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for marine hoses - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price-fixing, market-sharing and the exchange of commercially sensitive information - Concept of continuing or repeated infringement - Limitation period - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Legal certainty - Fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Extenuating circumstances - Cooperation)

2013/C 189/31

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Manuli Rubber Industries SpA (MRI) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: L. Radicati di Brozolo, M. Pappalardo and E. Marasà, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, S. Noë and L. Prete, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39406 — Marine hoses), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for annulment of or a substantial reduction in the fine imposed on it in that decision

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 2(f) of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39406 — Marine hoses); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 2(f) of Commission Decision C(2009) 428 final of 28 January 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39406 — Marine hoses);

| 2. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on MRI at EUR 4 900 000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on MRI at EUR 4 900 000;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3820 

To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act 

of 1998 to direct the Office of National Drug Control Policy to publish 

a list of drug control grant programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. ROUDA (for himself, Mr. BURCHETT, Mr. TRONE, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. 

MCADAMS, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mrs. TRAHAN, Mr. KING of 

New York, and Mr. JOYCE of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 to direct the Office of National 

Drug Control Policy to publish a list of drug control 

grant programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Effective Drug Control 

5 Strategy Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3820 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES. 

2 (a) PUBLICATION OF LIST.— 

3 (1) AMENDMENT.—Section 705(f) of the Office 

4 of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act 

5 of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1704(f)) is amended by inserting 

6 at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(5) PUBLICATION OF LIST.—The Director 

8 shall publish online a complete list of all drug con9 trol program grant programs and any other relevant 

10 information included in the system developed under 

11 paragraph (1).’’. 

12 (2) DEADLINE AND FREQUENCY.—Not later 

13 than one year after the date of the enactment of this 

14 Act, and annually thereafter, the Director of Na15 tional Drug Control Policy shall publish the list re16 quired under section 705(f)(5) of the National Drug 

17 Control Act of 1998, as added by paragraph (1). 

18 (b) NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL STRATEGY.—Section 

19 706(c)(1) of the National Drug Control Act of 1998 (21 

20 U.S.C. 1705(c)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 

21 following new subparagraph: 

22 ‘‘(O) A review of all federally funded de23 mand reduction activities, including an evalua24 tion of— 

25 ‘‘(i) the effectiveness of those activi26 ties; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3820 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the contribution of those activi2 ties to demand reduction activities funded 

3 by State, local, and Tribal governments; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(iii) whether any duplication or inef6 ficiency in federally funded demand reduc7 tion activities needs to be addressed.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Sherond Duron KING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8695.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

*2593Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   In connection with the Annual Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated:  June 16, 2010 By:“Bruce E. Schreiner” Bruce E. Schreiner President and Principal Financial Officer
Lawrence ABELA, petitioner, v. Heidi E. WASHINGTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8424.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Thomas F. BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17M98.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
#### SHELL OIL CO., Inc., v. COASTAL CLUB, Inc.

No. 11200.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1945.

*608Geo. C. Schoenberger, Jr., of Houston, Tex., for appellant.

LeDoux R. Provosty, of Alexandria, La., for appellee.

Before HUTCPIESON and _ McCORD, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

It being made to appear to the Court that in this case the parties have compromised and settled the matters at issue between them, and having moved this Court for a judgment pursuant to said agreement;

It is accordingly ordered and adjudged by this Court that upon the agreement of the parties, the judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana appealed from be, and it is hereby, reversed, and that said cause be, and it is hereby remanded to the said District Court with directions to enter judgment for defendant in the case entitled: “The Coastal Club, Inc. versus Shell Oil Company, Incorporated,” bearing civil action No. 632 on the docket of said Court, dismissing with prejudice all the claims and demands made by plaintiff in said cause and providing that each party shall bear the costs in said litigation already paid by it so that neither party shall hereafter be responsible or liable to the other for any portion of the cost of said litigation, and further providing that the costs incident to dismissal in accordance with this judgment.be borne by defendant.

It is,further ordered and adjudged that the mandate of this Court issue without delay.
David Thomas SINGLETON, petitioner, v. Keith COOLEY, Warden.

No. 17-5294.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steven DEAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7992.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2009129EN.01001602.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/16

---

Action brought on 19 March 2009 — PromoCell bioscience alive v OHIM (SupplementPack)

(Case T-113/09)

2009/C 129/28

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PromoCell bioscience alive GmbH Biomedizinische Produkte (Heidelberg, Germany) (represented by K. Mende, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 January 2009 in Case R 996/2008-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 January 2009 in Case R 996/2008-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SupplementPack’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 3, 5, 41 and 42 (Application No 5 433 883)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 as the mark applied for has the requisite distinctive character and its availability does not have to be preserved

Pleas in law:

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6918
HENRY ALLEN BECKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGETOWN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, County of Georgetown, State of South Carolina; KEITH MCLEAN, Indivi dually and officially; DOUG GREEN, Individually and officially; H. JONES, Sergeant; NURSE CAROL, Individually and officially, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-859-2-23) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WID ENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Allen Beckman, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Lynn Kraftchick, MCNAIR & SANFORD, P.A., Georgetown, South Carolina; Hugh Willcox Buyck, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Beckman v. Georgetown County , No. CA-96-859-2-23 (D.S.C. June 30, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jeremy Randolph MARTIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7714.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
DEPOMED, INC., petitioner, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 17-114.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Venus SPRINGS, petitioner, v. ALLY FINANCIAL INC., fka GMAC Inc., et al.

No. 17-70.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2013129EN.01001903.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/19

---

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — UOP v Commission

(Case T-198/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 129/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: UOP Ltd (Guildford, United Kingdom)) (represented by: B. Hartnett and O. Geiss, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Talabér-Ritz and T. Scharf, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: IFP (Rueil Malmaison, France) (represented by: E. Morgan de Rivery and A. Noël Baron, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/157/EC of 16 July 2008 on the aid measure implemented by France for the IFP Group (C 51/05 (ex NN 84/05)) (OJ 2009 L 53, p. 13).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | UOP Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and IFP. |
| --- | --- |

2.

UOP Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and IFP.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Eddie Lee CLEMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5414.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Terry MARGHEIM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
CAUSE NO. 44,842-A
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

## vs. BENNIE RAY GREEN, JR. 

### § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS 188TM JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Today, this 

### 1/L day of

## D~**20~,** the Defendant, Bennie Ray Green, Jr., gives Notice ofAppeal ofhis judgment ofconviction and sentence in the above-styled cause to the Court ofAppeals ofthe State ofTexas.

# ~~ Defendant Respectfully submitted, 

# II& JeffT. Jackson State Bar No. 24069976 736-A Hwy. 259 N. Kilgore, TX 75662 Phone: (903) 654-3362 Fax: (817) 887-4333 Email: jefftjacksonlaw@gmail.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I have hand-delivered a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Motion to the Gregg County District Attorney's office at the address of such parties shown by the pleadings herein on this

## ~Z.day of

## Q~, 20J5. Respectfully submitted,

JeffT. Jackson Texas Bar No. 24069976 Attorney for Defendant
# L_2005197EN.01003001.xml

| 28.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 197/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 197/30

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Protocol to the Agreement on Cooperation and Customs Union between the European Economic Community and the Republic of San Marino, regarding the participation, as Contracting Parties, of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, pursuant to their accession to the European Union

The procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Protocol to the Agreement on Cooperation and Customs Union between the European Economic Community and the Republic of San Marino, regarding the participation, as Contracting Parties, of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, pursuant to their accession to the European Union, signed in Brussels on 4 May 2005, having been completed on 12 July 2005, this Protocol will enter into force, in conformity with its Article 4, on 1 August 2005.

---