alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010113EN.01001901.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/19

---

Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)

(Case C-56/10 P)

2010/C 113/29

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: D. Rzążewska, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 38(2) of the Community trade mark regulation (1) by applying incorrect legal criteria when finding that the Board of Appeal was justified in requesting that a statement be submitted disclaiming exclusive rights to the figures 100 and 300.

1

The appellant pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 7(1)(c) of the Community trade mark regulation by applying incorrect legal criteria when finding that the elements in respect of which a statement disclaiming exclusive rights was requested to be submitted are descriptive.

The appellant further pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 7(1)(c), Article 38(2) or Article 76 of the Community trade mark regulation, or all of those provisions, by not taking due account of OHIM’s practice relating to the registration of signs consisting of figures or indicating the content of a publication.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Joseph Irven POWELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8078.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit  32.01

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

April  15,  2010                    By:  /s/  Russell  Ivy
                                         -----------------
                                    Russell  Ivy
                                    Chief  Executive  Officer


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

April  15,  2010                              By:  /s/  Robert  Wilson
                                                   -------------------
                                              Robert  Wilson,
                                              Chief  Financial  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 21614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting--Revised

    Note: The Committee will meet for one day on April 27, 2022, 
instead of the two-day meeting published on April 8, 2022.
    The Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will 
meet on April 27, 2022, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. The 
meeting will be available via teleconference. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to information systems equipment and technology.

Wednesday, April 27

Open Session

1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Working Group Reports
3. Ideas for Wassenaar Proposals 2023
4. Old Business

Closed Session

5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6ffd0c3d2d2c388f5d6d4cfc8c1c3d4e6c4cfd588c2c9c588c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bee7c8dbcacadb90edceccd7d0d9dbccfedcd7cd90dad1dd90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than April 20, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee.
    The public may submit written statements at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that public presentation materials or comments be forwarded before the 
meeting to Ms. Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on January 7, 
2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 (10)(d))), that the portion of the meeting 
concerning trade secrets and commercial or financial information deemed 
privileged or confidential as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the 
portion of the meeting concerning matters the disclosure of which would 
be likely to frustrate significantly implementation of an agency action 
as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
10(a)(1) and l0(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be 
open to the public.
    For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-07801 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Alberto GRANADOS, petitioner, v. CROWLEY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al.

No. 17-104.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
sing_ex104.htm

EXHIBIT 10.4
  
  
  
  
  	 
	1

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	2

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	3

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	4

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	5

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	6

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	7

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	8

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	9

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	10

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	11

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	12

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	13

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	14

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	15

	 

	 


  
  
   
  	16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 29, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 29, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1999
<CASH>                                       8,270,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,786,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   606,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,326,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,552,000
<PP&E>                                     211,642,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             123,369,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             145,419,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       54,502,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (117,825,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               145,419,000
<SALES>                                    109,463,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           109,463,000
<CGS>                                       34,186,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,005,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,522,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,840,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,517,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,515,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,515,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
INTEGRATED CLAIMS SYSTEMS, LLC, petitioner, v. TRAVELERS LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-330.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
# L_2005133EN.01004401.xml

| 26.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 181/2004

of 16 December 2004

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 117/2004 of 6 August 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 117/2004 of 6 August 2004 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 626/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Decision No 508/2000/EC establishing the Culture 2000 programme (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 626/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Decision No 508/2000/EC establishing the Culture 2000 programme (2).

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place with effect from 1 January 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place with effect from 1 January 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

| ‘— | 32004 D 0626: Decision No 626/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 (OJ L 99, 3.4.2004, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 D 0626: Decision No 626/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 (OJ L 99, 3.4.2004, p. 3).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 5.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 99, 3.4.2004, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
James DeMarco RICHARDS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-5006.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
# C_2012025EN.01002101.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/21

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Milano (Italy)) — Cassina S.p.A v Alivar Srl, Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl

(Case C-198/10) (1)

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Industrial and commercial property - Directive 98/71/EC - Legal protection of designs - Article 17 - Obligation concerning the cumulation of design protection with copyright protection - National law precluding copyright protection in the case of designs which entered the public domain before its entry into force)

(2012/C 25/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cassina S.p.A

Defendants: Alivar Srl, Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corte d’appello di Milano — Interpretation of Articles 17 and 19 of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs — National legislation which transposed the directive into national law by introducing copyright protection for designs — Right of a Member State to extend the conditions for the grant of such protection

Operative part of the order

Article 17 of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which either excludes, either completely or within the limits of prior use, from protection by the law of copyright of that Member State designs which have entered the public domain before the entry into force of that legislation, with regard to all third parties who have previously manufactured or marketed in the national territory products based on those designs before that date.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

---
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 12, 2015 520613

________________________________ In the Matter of HENRY TORRES, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 22, 2015 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

__________ Henry Torres, Beacon, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.-2- 520613

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Burl Bailey BLAYLOCK, IV, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8196.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-O0050

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Moszyk <Johnmoszyk48@hotmail.com>

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 6:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Moszyk

4278 Bordeaux

St Louis, MO 63129
EXHIBIT 32.2 --  CERTIFICATION  OF CHIEF FINANCIAL  OFFICER OF PANGEA  PETROLEUM
CORPORATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002  AND
SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, Scott Duncan,  the Chief Financial  Officer of Pangea  Petroleum  Corporation
hereby  certify that to my  knowledge,  Pangea  Petroleum  Corporation's  annual
report on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  December 31, 2003,  fully  complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A and
the financial  statements  contained  therein fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of the  operations  of Pangea
Petroleum Corporation.

Date: May 26, 2004                        /s/ Scott Duncan
                                          ----------------
                                          Scott Duncan,
                                          Chief Financial Officer of
                                          Pangea Petroleum Corporation
Tabitha TRIPP, et al., petitioners, v. Charles W. SCHOLZ, et al.

No. 17-1129.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Beth O. MacLaughlin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avatech Solutions,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Beth MacLaughlin                    
|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|                        |  |  |  | Beth MacLaughlin Chief Financial Officer