alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of PBS Holding, Inc. (formerly, PrimaryBusiness Systems, Inc.) (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB as amended for the period ending December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Patrick Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick Matthews                                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick Matthews                                     |
| Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |
| September 30, 2005                              |

 

----
Frankie PETRIE, et al., petitioners, v. Rick SCOTT, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, et al.

No. 16-1485.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Cleared Derivatives during COVID-19

July 21, 2020
The analyses and views expressed herein are those of the 

authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the 

Commission or CFTC Staff.

DISCLAIMER

July 20, 2020 Privileged and Confidential 2
July 20, 2020 Privileged and Confidential 3

DCR Risk Surveillance Branch

• Margin model 

• Quantitative oversight of DCOs’ margin models

• Daily risk surveillance

• Hands-on quantitative surveillance of exposures 

for futures and swaps

• Risk analytics

• Data, analytics, supervisory stress testing
July 20, 2020 Privileged and Confidential 4

Initial Margin (IM) for Derivatives at DCOs 
July 20, 2020 Privileged and Confidential 5

Liquidity demand at DCOs

Red bars represent aggregate VM pays and blue bars represent net IM increases
July 20, 2020 Privileged and Confidential 6

VM generally correlated with volatility 

measures
July 20, 2020 Privileged and Confidential 7

Margin trends often dependent on 

participant type

Aggregate change in IM requirements for IRS customer accounts in Q1
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda 

Wednesday, April 22, 2020 

3:00 pm – 5:00 pm Eastern Time 

3:00-3:05 am Welcome and Introduction by Chairman 

3:05-3:15 pm 

The USDA’s Response to COVID-19 

 Sonny Perdue, Secretary, US Department of Agriculture 

3:15-3:45 pm 

Opening Statements by Commissioners 

 Commissioner Brian Quintenz 

 Commissioner Rostin Behnam 

 Commissioner Dawn Stump 

 Commissioner Dan Berkovitz 

3:45 – 4:00 pm 

Market Statements by Exchanges 

 Derek Sammann, Global Head of Commodities & Options Products, 

CME Group 

 David Farrell, Chief Operating Officer, ICE Futures US 

4:00 – 5:00 pm Question and Answer Period 

5:00 pm Adjournment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,676
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,139
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,139
<LOANS>                                         66,202
<ALLOWANCE>                                        457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,589
<DEPOSITS>                                      92,028
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                778
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           309
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 105,589
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,472
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  423
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    44
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,939
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 960
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 969
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              970
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    448
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         332
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.24
<LOANS-NON>                                        310
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,461
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   444
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        6
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  457
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               457
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

d1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145504

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145504

COA: 309065

Muskegon CC: 11

- 060534

- FH

RONNY JAMES BURR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 25, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
II-00133

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Anthony Arcure <newhope4us5@yahoo.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 10:19 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Anthony Arcure

4218 W. Fountain Way

Fresno, CA 93722
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-082)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Astronomical Search for Origins Planetary Systems Subcommittee. 

# DATES:

Wednesday, July 11, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursday, July 12, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Friday, July 13, 2001, 8 a.m. to 12 noon. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference Room 6H46, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Anne L. Kinney, Code S, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2150. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

—Space Interferometry Update 

—Next Generation Space Telescope Update 

—Keck Update 

—Education and Public Outreach

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: June 25, 2001. 

Beth M. McCormick, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-16449 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Shurron S. ROBERTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7421.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. HAWAII, et al.

No. 17-965.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Motion of David Boyle for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,209,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,793,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   927,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,703,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,486,000
<PP&E>                                     218,378,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             126,406,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             155,715,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,463,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (104,698,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               155,715,000
<SALES>                                    112,122,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           112,122,000
<CGS>                                       35,605,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,436,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,749,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,521,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,502,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,498,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              9,562,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,060,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013009EN.01000601.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Hildesheim v BLC Baumarkt GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-511/10) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 17(5), third subparagraph - Right to deduct input tax - Goods and services used for both taxable and exempt transactions - Letting of a building for commercial and residential purposes - Criterion for calculating the deductible proportion of VAT)

2013/C 9/07

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Hildesheim

Applicant:

Defendant: BLC Baumarkt GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of the third subparagraph of Article 17(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Right to deduct input tax — Goods and services used for both taxable and exempt transactions — Letting of a building for commercial and residential purposes — Calculation of the deductible proportion on the basis of the turnover attributed to the commercial tenants — National legislation prescribing that the proportion is to be calculated on the basis of the building’s floor area attributed to those tenants

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The third subparagraph of Article 17(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as allowing Member States, for the purposes of calculating the proportion of input value added tax deductible for a given operation, such as the construction of a mixed-use building, to give precedence, as the key to allocation, to an allocation key other than that based on turnover appearing in Article 19(1) of that directive, on condition that the method used guarantees a more precise determination of the said deductible proportion.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
Christopher R. GRANTON, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY.

No. 17-1321.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Conrado PARTIDA-CALLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8026.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MATTIE LOMAX,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LUIS G. MONTALDO, SHIRLEY SHABAZZ, 

MICHAEL HENDERSON, LISA LESUER, 

CHARLENE STAFFORD, TANYA WATKING, ALAN 

ADRIAN TAYLOR,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2023-1456

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 1:09-cv-23293-KMM, 

Judge K. Michael Moore.

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

In response to this court’s order directing the parties to 

address whether this appeal should be dismissed, Luis G. 

Montaldo urges dismissal. Mattie Lomax opposes dismissal and requests summary judgment. Because we lack jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal.

Case: 23-1456 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2023
2 LOMAX v. MONTALDO

Ms. Lomax brought suit in the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida alleging that the 

Clerk and other employees of the state’s Eleventh Judicial 

Circuit of Florida conspired to deprive her of certain constitutional rights. On January 11, 2011, the district court 

dismissed her complaint. In March 2011, the district court 

denied reconsideration. The district court has since denied 

several submissions filed by Ms. Lomax. In particular, on 

January 22, 2020, the district court struck as “frivolous and 

vexatious” her “emergency notice of removal” filed that 

same day. ECF No. 1-2 at 31. On January 23, 2023, Ms. 

Lomax filed this appeal seeking review of that order.

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case 

is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 

205, 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within 30 days after entry of 

final judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A). Here, Ms. Lomax filed her notice of appeal three 

years after the January 2020 order she identified in her 

notice of appeal. At least because of this untimeliness, we 

lack jurisdiction over the appeal, and we cannot transfer 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 because the appeal would not be 

timely in any other court of appeals. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs. 

 June 13, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

 Jarrett B. Perlow

 Acting Clerk of Court

Case: 23-1456 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 06/13/2023
EXHIBIT 10.46

December 23, 2002

Mr. Christopher
Edgar
dELiA*s
435 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10014

Re:

First Amendment to Employment Agreement


Dear
Mr. Edgar:

This
letter, when countersigned by you, shall constitute the First Amendment to the Employment Agreement between you and dELiA*s Corp., dated as of December 20, 2001, and shall be
effective as of December 20, 2002.



If
you are in agreement with the foregoing, please countersign below in the space indicated.

| |  | Sincerely,   
| |  | -------------
| |  | dELiA*s Corp.
| |  | By:          

ACKNOWLEDGED
AND AGREED:

|/s/CHRISTOPHER EDGARCHRISTOPHER EDGAR |  |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Sample Error/Warning screen to demonstrate validation process.  This does not apply to this actual filing.
This screen gives firms the option of attaching supporting documentation to a filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 31, 2006

                                                   /s/ Charles B.  Pollock
                                                       -------------------
                                                   Charles B.  Pollock,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   Pangea Petroleum Corporation
Woodrow J. JONES, Sr., petitioner, v. TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.

No. 17-1265.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34729-34730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16429]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3348]

State of Louisiana; Amendment #2

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated June 22, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration 
is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as 
occurring between June 5, 2001 and continuing through June 22, 2001.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is August 10, 2001, and for 
loans for economic injury is March 11, 2002.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

[[Page 34730]]

    Dated: June 25, 2001.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-16429 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
CONNECTICUT, petitioner, v. Quavon TORRES.

No. 17-1112.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.