alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00302

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

sheila goldmacher <sheinaleah@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

sheila goldmacher

2341 parker St. #8

berkelely, CA 94704
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 May 25, 2016 

Mr. Ted Baun 
 FCA Chicago, IL 

Dear Ted, 
 As we discussed previously, I am pleased to formally
offer you the position of Chief Commercial Officer effective June 1, 2016. 
 In this position, you will continue to handle all domestic and
international railcar commercial and business development responsibilities for the Company. All Sales and Marketing personnel will continue to report to you as will Kelly Bodway. Together you and Kelly will continue to drive the significant
anticipated growth in our Parts business by aligning all of our commercial activities and will ensure our systems and infrastructure are optimized to support our growth. You will continue to report directly to me as part of the Senior Leadership
Team. 
 The Board has approved an adjustment to your base salary effective May 1, 2016, from $300,000 to $350,000 annually. You will continue to
participate in the Company’s Long Term Incentive Program (LTIP) and Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP) at a 50% target. The goals for 2016 remain the same. You continue to be eligible to participate in all Company benefit plans, as outlined in
the 2016 JAC’s Salaried Employee Guide and all other benefits that your currently participate in, including the executive severance and pension plans. 

Employment with the Company is for no specific period of time. Your employment with the Company will be “at will,” meaning that either you or the
Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason, with or without cause. Any contrary representations that may have been made to you are superseded by this offer. This is the full and complete agreement between you and the
Company. Although your job duties, title, compensation and benefits, as well as the Company’s personnel policies and procedures, may change from time to time, the “at will” nature of your employment may only be changed in an express
written agreement signed by you, the President & CEO with the Board of Director’s approval. You continue to be subject to all protective covenants such as Confidentiality, Intellectual Property (IP), and Non-Solicitation. 

 
 Two North Riverside Plaza 

Suite 1300 
 Chicago, IL 60606 USA

 312.928.0850 
 Fax 312.928.0890

 www.freightcaramerica.com 








 



 
  

 All forms of compensation referred to in this letter are subject to reduction to reflect withholding for
applicable income, payroll and other taxes. 
 Ted, I look forward to continuing to work with you to enhance and progress your career at FCA. This is a
significant step forward. I believe this opportunity continues to allow you to make significant contributions to the business. 
 Sincerely, 

/s/ Joseph E. McNeely 
 Joseph E. McNeely 

President & CEO 
  

			
	 Accepted By:
	 	 /s/ Theodore W. Baun


 Date: May 25, 2016 
 Cc: J.
McNeely 
       File 

  
 Two
North Riverside Plaza 
 Suite 1300 

Chicago, IL 60606 USA 
 312.928.0850

 Fax 312.928.0890 

www.freightcaramerica.com
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-21004

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD WAYNE LEE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-149-1

- - - - - - - - - - September 24, 2001

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Richard Wayne Lee appeals his conviction following a jury

trial for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Lee argues that the district court abused its

discretion when it (1) denied his request for a missing witness

instruction, (2) prevented him from cross-examining a witness about

an indictment and deferred adjudication from a state-court

proceeding, and (3) admitted photographic, gang-related evidence at

trial.2

Lee has not demonstrated that it was within the Government’s

power to produce the missing witness. S ee United States v. Black

,

4 97 F.2d 1039, 1042 n.3 (5th Cir. 1974); U nited States v. Davis

,

487 F.2d 112, 126 (5th Cir. 1973); Ford v. United States

, 210 F.2d

313, 316-17 (5th Cir. 1954). Nor has he demonstrated that the

missing witness’ testimony would have been favorable. S ee id.

Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it

denied his request for a missing witness instruction. See United

States v. Pettigrew , 77 F.3d 1500, 1510 (5th Cir. 1996).

Lee has failed to provide any authority for his assertion that

Government witness Karen Bezet was prohibited from possess ing a

firearm while she was under a state court indictment. Accordingly,

he has failed to demonstrate that she would have been motivated to

falsify her testimony based on the state c ourt indictment and

deferred adjudication. Moreover, Bezet’s testimony regarding Lee’s

ownership of the firearms was corroborated by other witnesses. S ee

U nited States v. Gray , 105 F.3d 956, 965 (5th Cir. 1997). The

district court did not abuse its discretion when it limited Lee’s

cross-examination of Bezet. U nited Sta tes v. Freeman , 164 F.3d

243, 249 (5th Cir. 1999).

Lee’s assertion that the district court admitted impermissible

gang-related evidence is without merit. The parties and witnesses

were under instructions from the court not to make reference to

gangs or gang-related activities. No such testimony or argument

was presented to the jury. Lee makes only the speculative

assertion that the “SS” tattoo on his leg (which was displayed in3

one of the photographs) is “widely recognized” as den oting

membership in a white supremacist prison gang. The district court

did not abuse its discretion when it admitted photographs of Lee’s

tattoos. S ee United States v. Parsee

, 178 F.3d 374, 379 (5th Cir.

1999).

Lee’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8553

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COURTNEY LODIAN FULLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CR-89-14)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtney Lodian Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting in

part and denying in part Appellant's motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fuller, No. CR-89-14

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1597]



[[Page 6701]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 72-8]


Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant; Notice of Docketing of the 
Materials License SNM-2505 Amendment Application for the Calvert Cliffs 
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

    By letter dated November 16, 2000, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power 
Plant (CCNPP) submitted an application to the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (NRC or the Commission) in accordance with 10 CFR Part 72 
requesting an amendment of the Calvert Cliffs independent spent fuel 
storage installation (ISFSI) license (SNM-2505) for the ISFSI located 
in Calvert County, Maryland. CCNPP is seeking Commission approval to 
amend the materials license to reflect changes to License Conditions 9, 
12, and 16. Changes to Conditions 9 and 12 involve eliminating 
references to certain documents. Changes to Condition 16 involve 
elimination of the helium leak test for the double-closure seal welds 
located at the bottom of the dry shielded canisters.
    This application was docketed under 10 CFR part 72; the ISFSI 
Docket No. is 72-8 and will remain the same for this action. The 
amendment of an ISFSI license is subject to the Commission's approval.
    The Commission may issue either a notice of hearing or a notice of 
proposed action and opportunity for hearing in accordance with 10 CFR 
72.46(b)(1) or, if a determination is made that the amendment does not 
present a genuine issue as to whether public health and safety will be 
significantly affected, take immediate action on the amendment in 
accordance with 10 CFR 72.46(b)(2) and provide notice of the action 
taken and an opportunity for interested persons to request a hearing on 
whether the action should be rescinded or modified.
    For further details with respect to this application, see the 
application dated November 16, 2000, which is available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, One White Flint 
North Building, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, or from the 
publically available records component of NRC's document system 
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web Site at http://www.nrc.gov/nrc/adams/index.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of January 2001.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E. William Brach,
Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 01-1597 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Melton JACKSON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8071.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael KING, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-8034.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00304

- CV
Margaret Haule v. Channel Austin

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2 of Travis County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 1

- CV

- 14

- 008537

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 12, 201 6.
John PASSMORE, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

No. 17-7373.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GE MONEY BANK,

 Appellant,

v.

LONA GRAVES, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00058-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2010-1722)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal. See

TEX.R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are

assessed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

May 27, 2011

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wealth Minerals Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Kinley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



3.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 15, 2007



/s/ Michael W. Kinley

Michael W. Kinley
  Chief Financial Officer
Giovanni VELEZ, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-9616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Rhonda Lewis MEISNER, petitioner, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC.

No. 17-5.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina denied.
Julio Hernandez ROJAS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-9718.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Thomas NASH, petitioner, v. OPTOMEC, INC.

No. 17-5124.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2011160EN.01002002.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Sociedad Agricola Requingua v OHIM — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Toro (TORO DE PIEDRA)

(Case T-358/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TORO DE PIEDRA - Earlier Community figurative mark D. ORIGEN TORO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Right to be heard - Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 160/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sociedad Agricola Requingua Ltda (Santiago, Chile) (represented by: E. Vorbuchner, C. Ley and M. Heidelberg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Toro (Toro, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2009 (Case R 1117/2008-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Toro and Sociedad Agricola Requingua Ltda.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sociedad Agricola Requingua Ltda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sociedad Agricola Requingua Ltda to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
# L_2005198EN.01003201.xml

| 28.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 198/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 198/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 37/2005

of 11 March 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 44/94 of 15 December 1994 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 44/94 of 15 December 1994 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2003/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 amending Directive 94/25/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2003/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 amending Directive 94/25/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 1 (Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXXI of Annex II to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32003 L 0044: Directive 2003/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 (OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32003 L 0044: Directive 2003/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 (OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 18).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2003/44/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 March 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 372, 31.12.1994, p. 20.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 18.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Christopher Michael EMTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9406.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In Re Reuben D. LEHMANN, petitioner.

No. 17-5108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Ljubo SKRBIC, petitioner, v. Catherine SOMMERS.

No. 17M85.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Jamie Cawley, Javelin
  
    



  Topics of discussion: block sizes, margin, clearing mandate
      
  When
              11/15/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              XII. DCM Core PrinciplesXIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Wallace

  Visitor(s)
              Jamie Cawley, Javelin

  Organization(s)
              Javelin


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Isaac MONTANEZ, petitioner, v. THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY RESTAURANTS, INC.

No. 17-5084.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.