alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011355EN.01001601.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Alfastar Benelux v Council

(Case T-57/09) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of technical maintenance and help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council - Rejection of a tender - Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based)

2011/C 355/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alfastar Benelux (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: N. Keramidas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta, M. Vitsentzatos and M. Robert, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Council’s decision of 1 December 2008 to reject the tender submitted by the Alfastar-Siemens consortium, composed of Alfastar Benelux SA and Siemens IT Solutions and Services SA, in response to Call for Tenders UCA/218/07 for the provision of technical maintenance — help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council (OJ 2008/S 91-122796) and to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Council’s decision of 1 December 2008 to reject the tender submitted by the consortium composed of Alfastar Benelux SA and Siemens IT Solutions and Services SA, in response to Call for Tenders UCA/218/07 for the provision of technical maintenance — help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council and to award the contract to another tenderer; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Council’s decision of 1 December 2008 to reject the tender submitted by the consortium composed of Alfastar Benelux SA and Siemens IT Solutions and Services SA, in response to Call for Tenders UCA/218/07 for the provision of technical maintenance — help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council and to award the contract to another tenderer;

| 2. | Dismisses the claim for damages; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the claim for damages;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

AMIT AZOULAY, IDIT AZOULAY AND 

ASSAF LAVON

v.

PHILADELPHIA ZONING BOARD OF 

ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF 

PHILADELPHIA, HILLCREST 

PRESERVATION ALLIANCE, LLC, AND 

FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON

PETITION OF: AMIT AZOULAY, IDIT 

AZOULAY AND ASSAF LAVON

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 586 EAL 2018

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

AMIT AZOULAY, IDIT AZOULAY AND 

ASSAF LAVON

v.

PHILADELPHIA ZONING BOARD OF 

ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF 

PHILADELPHIA, HILLCREST 

PRESERVATION ALLIANCE, LLC, AND 

FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON

PETITION OF: AMIT AZOULAY, IDIT 

AZOULAY AND ASSAF LAVON

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 587 EAL 2018

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[586 EAL 2018 and 587 EAL 2018] - 2

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Stacia CROMARTIE, petitioner, v. THE LAW OFFICES OF E. PEYTON FAULK, LLC, et al.

No. 17-7547.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3976 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 12711 East Jefferson Avenue in Detroit, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Aretha Franklin Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3976 EH

1 SECTION 1. ARETHA FRANKLIN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 12711 East Jefferson Avenue in 

4 Detroit, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Aretha Franklin Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Aretha Franklin Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3976 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postlin Post Office Building’’. nue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Aretha Frank- al Service located at 12711 East Jefferson Ave-
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34698-34699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets of commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosures of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Cardiovascular Lung and Blood Immunology in 
Health and Disease.
    Date: July 12-13, 2001.
    Time: 8 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Ave., Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Arthur Freed, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Review Branch, Room 7190, Division of Extramural Affairs, National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)



[[Page 34699]]


    Dated: June 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16334 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Quintlin Renard Jimerson, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00201

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 276th District Court of Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F14989 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Quintlin Renard Jimerson, has adequately indicated his inability
to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 2 1 , 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2009282EN.01006001.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/60

---

Action brought on 24 September 2009 — Bianchin v OHIM — Grotto (GASOLINE)

(Case T-380/09)

2009/C 282/111

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luciano Bianchin (Asolo, Italy) (represented by: G. Massa and P. Massa, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Grotto SpA (Chiuppano, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 13 July 2009 on all the grounds set out in the application and order OHIM to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 13 July 2009 on all the grounds set out in the application and order OHIM to pay the costs;

| — | order the production of the documents filed in Case Nos B 630410, 000002087/C and R1455/2008-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the production of the documents filed in Case Nos B 630410, 000002087/C and R1455/2008-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:‘GASOLINE’ (application for registration No 2 901 064) for goods in Class 9.

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: GROTTO S.p.A.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: Italian figurative mark composed of the word element ‘GAS (keep it simple)’ (registration Nos 959 343 and 876 729) for, inter alia, goods in Class 9, and figurative Community trade mark composed of the word element ‘GAS’ (No 2 867 463) for goods in Class 9.

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: granted the application and declared that the registration of the Community trade mark in question was invalid.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissed the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Articles 8(1)(b) and 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 are wholly inadequate.

Pleas in law:

---
Lance K. POULSEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1207.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II-00922

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

GlennaMae Hendricks <glennamaes@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:02 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

GlennaMae Hendricks

1515 Young St

Alva, OK 73717
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3341]


State of Minnesota; Amendment #3

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated June 19, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration 
is hereby amended to reopen the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning on March 23, 2001 and continuing.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is July 15, 2001 and for 
economic injury the deadline is February 15, 2002.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-16283 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
II-00134

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Cindy Pawelski <cindyesprit@yahoo.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 9:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Cindy Pawelski

1328 N Astor St #5

Milwaukee, WI 53202
Dean LUGO-DIAZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7674.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Rene Israel RIVERA PEREZ, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-902.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Call with NFA
  
    



  Discussions concerning Internal Business Conduct Standards.
      
  When
              02/08/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              IV. Business Conduct Standards – Internal

  CFTC Staff
              Joseph CisewskiScott Reinhart

  Visitor(s)
              Dan Roth

  Organization(s)
              NFA


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 27, 2004, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 27, 2003, and for each of
the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 27, 2003, included in
this Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-79357, 333-79369, 333-79375, 333-79365, 333-80647, 333-69622,
333-60428, 333-73302, 333-100786) on Form S-8 of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
of our report (incorporated by reference in the December 27, 2003, annual report
on Form 10-K of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.) dated January 27, 2004 with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. as
of December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders' equity for
each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 27, 2003 and of
our report on the related financial statement schedule dated March 10, 2004
(which report appears above). Our report on the consolidated financial
statements refers to the adoption of FASB 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," as of December 30, 2001 and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16,
"Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration
Received from a Vendor," as of December 29, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 10, 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABRAHAM RIOS,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73579

Agency No. A205

- 297

- 724

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 11, 2017 **

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Abraham Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) order denying administrative closure and

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We

dismiss the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed . R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 73579

We lack jurisdiction to review t he BIA ’s denial of administrative closure.

Diaz

- Covarrubia s v. Mukasey , 551 F.3d 1114, 1118

- 20 (9th Cir. 2009).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rios’ unexhausted contention s that the IJ

failed to apply mandatory presumptions in his favor and applied legally erroneous

standards of proof. See Tijani v. Holder

, 628 F.3d 1071

, 1080 (9th Cir. 20 10 )

( “ We lack jurisdiction to review legal c laims not presented in an alien’ s

administrative proceedings before the BIA

. ” ).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
Victor MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9481.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kevin BURNS, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 16-9681.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
In Re Chandra BOZELKO, petitioner.

No. 17-1374.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
In Re Anthony Eric EMERSON, petitioner.

No. 16-9230.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Rick D. SALERNO, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR.

No. 17-7576.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Corey Levon BECKHAM, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 15-9652.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Darren Nolan CLARK, Sr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-7768.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.