alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/James Cawley, SDMA/Javelin
  
    



  Topics of discussion: SEFs, requests for quotes
      
  When
              05/15/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Megan Wallace

  Visitor(s)
              James Cawley, Javelin

  Organization(s)
              Javelin


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
---

CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Azco
Mining Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 9, 2006 | By:   /s/ Pierce Carson                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|                     | Pierce Carson                                  
|                     | Chief
      Executive Officer, President,      
|                     | Director
      and Principal Accounting Officer

---
Donald C. MARRO, petitioner, v. CITIBANK, N.A.

No. 17-7871.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 4, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Frizzell Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. Jennifer Moorefield CREWS.

No. 16-9614.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
James GAUGER, petitioner, v. Robert Lee STINSON.

No. 17-721.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Ronell JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Health Partnership Inc.
      (the “Corporation”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC
      (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
      below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.




/s/
      Lee
      Wiskowski


Treasurer
      and Principal Accounting Officer




May
      3,
      2006
Beth PALIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1221.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Aderemi J. AKEFE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9746.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Pamela MELVIN, petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17M113.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Authority withdraws such request(s). In the event of termination of this MOU, information 

obtained under this MOU will continue to be treated in the manner prescribed under Articles 

Six and Seven. 

This MOU is signed in duplicate. 

Rostin Behnam 

Chairman 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Date: October 26, 2023

12 

Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani 

Chair 

Autorite des marches financiers 

Date: 26 October 2023
# L_2006014EN.01002401.xml

| 19.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 14/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 14/24

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 135/2005

of 21 October 2005

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 90/2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 90/2004 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme (2).

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in Article 3(7) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

| ‘(d) | Community acts which shall take effect from 1 January 2005:






  — | 32002 D 1600: Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme (OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘(d)

Community acts which shall take effect from 1 January 2005:

—

32002 D 1600: Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme (OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p. 1).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 21 October 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 52.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Jose Emilio Rodriguez VILLALOBOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6886.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Robert A. COTTON, petitioner, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-7738.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009180EN.01006403.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/64

---

Action brought on 26 May 2009 — Maxwell v Commission

(Case F-55/09)

2009/C 180/120

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Allan Maxwell (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the claim for compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant during his leave on personal grounds taken to perform the duties of ‘EU Senior Adviser’ at the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO), loss resulting from the failure to reimburse accommodation and education expenses.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 2 September 2008 rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 2 September 2008 rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 132 900 by way of reimbursement for accommodation and education expenses which he incurred in the course of his duties as EU Senior Advisor at KEDO; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 132 900 by way of reimbursement for accommodation and education expenses which he incurred in the course of his duties as EU Senior Advisor at KEDO;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
Ezell BROWN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-691.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
The Honor able Ann A ldrich, United States District Judge f or the Nor

thern District of * Ohio, sitti ngby

designation. NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 07a0592n.06 F iled: August 15, 2007 No. 06-5925 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. WI L L I E J ACK, Def endant- Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DI STRI CT OF TEN NESSEE

Be fore : KENNEDYand COOK, Circ uit J udg es; and ALDRI CH, District J udg e. *
PER C URIAM. Having revie wed the parties’ briefs and joint appe ndix , the cour t affir ms the judgme nt of t he dis trict court as the record fails to demonstrate unrea sonablene ss in W illie J ack’ s sentenc e. We n o t e t h e district court’s: suffic ient revie w of the § 3553( a) f actor s releva

nt to a
revoc ation of super

vised rele ase pur suant to § 3583(e) ; corr ect application of the Guidelines (J ack’ s misunderstandingof U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 Application Notes, n. 3 notwithstanding) ; and the abse nce of improper judicial fac t-finding , as confirme d by J ack’ s revoc ation-hea ringadmission to viol ating
cer tain conditions of supervised r elea se.
J udg ment aff

irmed.- 2 -
Eric T. ALSTON, petitioner, v. CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN, et al.

No. 17-8036.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Order entered April 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00178-CV

IN RE CENTRAL NORTH CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03754

ORDER

Before the Court is real party’s request to file a letter brief addressing the Texas Supreme 

Court’s opinion in In re Ford Motor Co., 57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 415, 2014 WL 1258265 (Tex. Mar. 

28, 2014) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). The Court GRANTS real party’s request to file a 

letter brief. Real party may file a letter brief of no more than one page addressing the Texas 

Supreme Court’s opinion in In re Ford Motor Co. on or before April 7, 2014. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### L. Metcalfe WALLING, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Selman BELIKOFF, also known as Sam Belikoff, and Aaron Belikoff, co-partners doing business under the name and style of Belikoff Brothers, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 231.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1945.

Douglas B. Maggs and Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol., both of Washington, D. C., Irving Rozen, Regional Atty., of New York City, and George M. Szabad and Flora G. Chudson, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee L. Metcalfe Walling.

Max J. Lovell, of New York City (Max Milstein, of New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants Selman Belikoff, etc., et al.

Before EVANS, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the opinion of the District Court, 59 F.Supp. 167.
Isaac GRAY, petitioner, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, et al.

No. 16-9474.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*140Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2010 |  | /s/ George M. Davis                  
|                   |  | George M. Davis                      
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                 
|                   |  | Lawrence Rychlak                     
|                   |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
Alan M. BARTLETT, petitioner, v. ALASKA BAR ASSOCIATION.

No. 17-7892.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alaska denied.
Lucilla R. HARRELL, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-9235.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
# L_2006092EN.01004501.xml

| 30.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 16/2006

of 27 January 2006

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 156/2005 of 2 December 2005 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 156/2005 of 2 December 2005 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1099/2005 of 13 July 2005 implementing Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on the information society (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1099/2005 of 13 July 2005 implementing Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on the information society (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 28 (Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

| ‘28a. | 32005 R 1099: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1099/2005 of 13 July 2005 implementing Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on the information society (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 47).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘28a.

32005 R 1099: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1099/2005 of 13 July 2005 implementing Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on the information society (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 47).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1099/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 January 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 53, 23.2.2006, p. 60.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 47.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Andrew SUN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Christopher Cool WILMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9612.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
*

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Peter T. Fay has elected to not participate in further proceedings in

this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). 

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 95-8330.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and

appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit A attached, Defendant-Appellant,

451 Hope Court, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and

appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant,

Robert Richardson, Claimant-Appellant,

Carswell Denson, et al., Claimants.

Jan. 23, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:93-cv-913-

RLV); Robert L. Vining, Jr., Judge.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH,

DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.*

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion: 112 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir.1997)).

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should

be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service

having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous
panel's opinion is hereby

VACATED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 3, 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00798

- CR

Gerard Montrell Hicks, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO O DWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and t he parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
In Re Larry CHARLES, petitioner.

No. 17-7060.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Edwina ROBBINS, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-8479.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.