alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005239EN.01006601.xml

| 15.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/66

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 73/2005

of 29 April 2005

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 116/2004 of 6 August 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 116/2004 of 6 August 2004 (1).

| (2) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 593/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 July 2004 amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005) (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 593/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 July 2004 amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005) (2).

| (3) | Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following sub-indent shall be added in the seventh indent of Article 7(5) (Council Decision 2000/819/EC) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 D 0593: Decision No 593/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 July 2004 (OJ L 268, 16.8.2004, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 D 0593: Decision No 593/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 July 2004 (OJ L 268, 16.8.2004, p. 3).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 268, 16.8.2004, p. 3.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# C_2015213EN.01002401.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2015 — Niki Luftfahrt v Commission

(Case T-511/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Restructuring aid granted by Austria to the Austrian Airlines group - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market, subject to compliance with certain conditions - Privatisation of the Austrian Airlines group - Determination of the recipient of the aid - Guidelines for State aid for the rescue and restructuring of undertakings in difficulty))

(2015/C 213/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Niki Luftfahrt GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: H. Asenbauer and A. Habeler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Martenczuk and K. Gross, acting as Agents, and G. Quardt, lawyer, and subsequently by: B. Martenczuk and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and G. Quardt and J. Lipinsky, lawyers)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer and M. Klamert, acting as Agents); Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented initially by: H.-J. Niemeyer, H. Ehlers and M. Rosenberg and subsequently by: H.-J. Niemeyer, H. Ehlers, C. Kovács and S. Völcker, lawyers); Austrian Airlines AG (Vienna) (represented initially by: H.-J. Niemeyer, H. Ehlers and M. Rosenberg and subsequently by: H.-J. Niemeyer, H. Ehlers, C. Kovács and S. Völcker, lawyers), and Österreichische Industrieholding AG (Vienna) (represented by: T. Zivny, P. Lewisch and H. Kristoferitsch, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2010/137/EC of 28 August 2009, State aid C 6/2009 (ex N 663/2008) — Austria Austrian Airlines — restructuring plan (OJ 2010 L 59, p. 1), declaring the restructuring aid granted by the Republic of Austria to the Austrian Airlines Group in the course of its purchase by the Lufthansa group to be compatible with the common market, subject to compliance with certain conditions.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Niki Luftfahrt GmbH to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, Österreichische Industrieholding AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Austrian Airlines AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Niki Luftfahrt GmbH to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, Österreichische Industrieholding AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Austrian Airlines AG.

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Patricia ROOSA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7093.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Florida, Fifth District denied.
II-00793

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Maya Costley <oneflame@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Maya Costley

4390 Westminster West Rd.

Putney, VT 5346
Vernon TOLBERT, petitioner, v. Arthur F. HILL, Jr., Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County.

No. 17-7866.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
# C_2014071EN.01002901.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/29

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 October 2013 — Birkhoff v Commission

(Case F-60/09)

(Civil service - Officials - Referral to the Tribunal after annulment - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Child prevented by serious illness or invalidity from earning a livelihood - Application for extension of payment of the allowance)

(2014/C 71/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Gerhard Birkhoff (Weitnau, Germany) (represented by: C. Inzillo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Referral back to the Tribunal after annulment — Officials — Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for an extension of payment of the dependent child allowance under Article 2(5) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Birkhoff in Case F-60/09 and Case T-10/11 P. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Birkhoff in Case F-60/09 and Case T-10/11 P.

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs in Case F-60/09 RENV. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs in Case F-60/09 RENV.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,389,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,373,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   238,000
<INVENTORY>                                 70,397,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           148,009,000
<PP&E>                                     163,374,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              91,331,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             439,434,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       66,543,000
<BONDS>                                    367,875,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (106,131,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               439,434,000
<SALES>                                    277,772,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           277,772,000
<CGS>                                      148,000,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              148,000,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,680,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          27,994,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             60,525,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                24,616,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         35,909,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                35,909,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MARKET-BASED SOLUTION FOR U.S. ACID RAIN

5 

Source: U.S. EPA Extract from presentation to CFTC EEMAC, Daniel Scarbrough, IncubEx, November 7, 2019.
The Death of the SO2 Market

Schmalensee, R., & Stavins, R. N. (2013). The SO2 allowance trading system: the ironic history of a grand policy experiment. 

Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 103-22.

114 Journal of Economic Perspectives

Figure 2

SO2 Allowance Prices and the Regulatory Environment, 1994 –2012

(1995 dollars per ton)

Source: Data on spot prices compiled by Power & Energy Analytic Resources (PEAR) Inc. from Cantor 

Fitzgerald until September 11, 2001, and from ICAP United thereafter.

Notes: CAIR is “Clean Air Interstate Rule.” CATR is “Clean Air Transport Rule.” CSAPR is “Cross-State 

Air Pollution Rule.”

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

8/94 8/96 8/98 8/00 8/02 8/04 8/06 8/08 8/10

Phase II begins

CAIR !nalized

CAIR

vacated 

Clear skies

announced 

Train derailments reduce

PRB coal deliveries 

Hurricane Katrina

Hurricane Rita

CSAPR

announced 

CATR

proposed 

CAIR remanded

to EPA 

EPA announces it will

re-examine CAIR 

North Carolina sues EPA

CSAPR

invalidated 

8/12
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
 I, Paul S. Feeley, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  June 18, 2010
    /s/ Paul S. FeeleyPaul S. FeeleySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|

|                                      |  |  | EXHIBIT
      23.1 | 
|------------------------------------- |  |  | ------------------ | 
|                                      |  |  |                    | 
|CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of DirectorsPacific Magtron International
  Corp.

We consent to
  the incorporation by reference to the Companys previously filed Registration
  Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-38944) of our report dated March 12, 2004, with
  respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Magtron International
  Corp. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements
  of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended,
  and the 2003 and 2002 financial information in the related financial statement
  schedule, which report appears in this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific
  Magtron International Corp.

Our report dated
  March 12, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company has
  suffered recurring losses from operations and is projecting losses in 2004.
  Further, during the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company triggered a redemption
  provision in its Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock agreement thereby
  creating a current liability. In addition, the Company was in violation of certain
  of its debt covenants, which violations were waived and the Companys common
  stock has been delisted from the NASDAQ SmallCap Market. These matters raise
  substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
  financial statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustment
  that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/  KPMG
  LLP

Mountain View,
  CaliforniaMarch 30, 2004

|
|
|
EXHIBIT 10.1

                         PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                         Salt Lake City, Utah
$132,193.97                                           Date: November 14, 2001


       FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, JHCRPN, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company, (hereinafter "Maker") promises to pay to the order of
TWINVIEW, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter "Payee"), the principal
sum of One Hundred Thirty Two Thousand One Hundred Ninety Three and 97/100
Dollars ($132,193.97) in lawful money of the United States of America,
together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8.0%) per annum
until paid in full.  Payment of the principal balance (and any accrued
interest thereon) shall be due upon demand from holder.

       Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and second to a
reduction of principal, unless designated otherwise by holder.

       The Maker of this Promissory Note shall have the privilege, without
penalty or premium, of paying in advance the entire principal or any portion
thereof.

       In the event that any portion of principal or interest is not paid when
due, it shall thereafter bear interest at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per
annum until paid in full.  In the event of default on any payment herein
provided for, then without notice, presentment or demand, the principal sum
hereof together with any accrued interest thereon shall, at the option of the
holder of this Promissory Note, become due and payable immediately.  Failure
to delay in exercising its option shall not constitute a waiver of any such
breach or default nor waiver of the holder's right to exercise said option
upon any subsequent breach or default.

      The undersigned hereby expressly waives all statutes of limitation
affecting the enforceability of this Promissory Note, and agrees to pay all
reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in collection of payments due, or
in the enforcement of any right or remedy hereunder.  The maker, assumers,
endorsers, sureties, and guarantors of this Promissory Note consent to all
renewals, indulgences, extensions, and all releases of security granted or
permitted by the owner or holder without notice.

      Payment of this Promissory Note is secured.


                              MAKER:


                              JHCRPN, LLC, a Utah limited liability company


                              By: /s/ Patrick K. Hogle
                                  Patrick K. Hogle, Manager


                              By: /s/ John S. Girvan
                                  John S. Girvan, Manager



                              By: /s/ Claire A. Singleton
                                  Claire A. Singleton, Manager



                              By: /s/ Ronald A. Johnson
                                  Ronald A. Johnson, Manager


Note:   A majority of the Managers of JHCRPN, LLC has consented to the loan
transaction evidenced by this Promissory Note, by signing above.
1 

Reconstruction of Full Limit Order Book: Oct 15 

 CFTC Market Surveillance
# L_2005133EN.01002901.xml

| 26.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 175/2004

of 3 December 2004

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 159/2004 of 29 October 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 159/2004 of 29 October 2004 (1).

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 concerning Community statistics on the information society (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 concerning Community statistics on the information society (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

| (3) | This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Decision is not to apply to Liechtenstein,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be inserted after point 27 (Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

‘
  INFORMATION SOCIETY STATISTICS

| 28. | 32004 R 0808: Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 concerning Community statistics on the information society (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 49).
  The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of the present Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
  This Regulation shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’ |
| --- | --- |

28.

The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of the present Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:

This Regulation shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 December 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 December 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 102, 21.4.2005, p. 43.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 49.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
II-00960

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Toni Notar <tnotar@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:39 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Toni Notar

2031 Serene Drive

Hollister, CA 95023
Joel Henrik STONE, petitioner, v. MONTANA.

No. 17-670.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.