alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,120
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                27,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     68,312
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        190,766
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,087
<DEPOSITS>                                     238,627
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,746
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,584
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 303,087
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,269
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,120
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   423
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,812
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,568
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,272
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,540
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       54
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (5)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,931
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,931
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,426
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.62
<LOANS-NON>                                        612
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    294
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,646
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      658
<RECOVERIES>                                       839
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,973
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,901
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,072


</TABLE>
David Christopher MAYHEW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7791.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES, ex rel. John KING, et al., petitioners, v. SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED.

No. 17-1370.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2012151EN.01000701.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung v Pfeifer & Langen KG

(Case C-564/10) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Articles 3 and 4 - Administrative measures - Recovery of wrongly obtained advantages - Default and compensatory interest due under national law - Application of the limitation rules in Regulation No 2988/95 to the recovery of default interest - Start of the limitation period - Concept of suspension - Concept of interruption)

2012/C 151/12

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung

Applicant:

Defendant: Pfeifer & Langen KG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Interpretation of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1) — Recovery of aid wrongly paid — Applicability of Article 3 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 to the limitation period in respect of interest payable under national law in addition to the reimbursement of the sums wrongly paid

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that the limitation period that it lays down for the principal claim, relating to the recovery of an advantage wrongly received from the European Union budget, does not apply to the recovery of interest arising from that claim, where that interest is not due under European Union law, but exclusively under an obligation of national law.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.

1

---
Zachary A. SMITH, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 16-9568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District denied.
Alexander Michael ROY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6110.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Devin SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6780.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC, petitioner, v. ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION.

No. 17-1085.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Robert William STONE, Jr., petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-7065.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Robert P. TUERK, petitioner, v. THE FLORIDA BAR.

No. 17-1240.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Kevin C. MOAN, petitioner, v. William B. WISE, III.

No. 16-5069.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>            JAN-01-1998     
<PERIOD-END>              MAR-31-1998     

<CASH>                        186832
<SECURITIES>                  162269 
<RECEIVABLES>                 1491787
<ALLOWANCES>                  (25000)
<INVENTORY>                   699489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2592540
<PP&E>                        129365
<DEPRECIATION>                (74562)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2670545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1157194
<BONDS>                       947500               
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0                        
<PREFERRED>                   0                             
<COMMON>                      809                           
<OTHER-SE>                    559273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2670545
<SALES>                       2287702                    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2287702
<CGS>                         1613361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1613361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              706735
<LOSS-PROVISION>              (48161)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            15767
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (48161)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0                 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (48161)
<DISCONTINUED>                0                          
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0                              
<CHANGES>                     0                              
<NET-INCOME>                  (48161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.02)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                19,046
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         59,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                          3,531
<INVENTORY>                                           32,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      115,104
<PP&E>                                                68,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                        46,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        156,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 63,069
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 9,896
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              2,625
<OTHER-SE>                                            40,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          156,189
<SALES>                                               151,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      151,995
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         73,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      68,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       8,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   4,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          4,774
<EPS-BASIC>                                         2.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.44


</TABLE>
Ericka SIMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7616.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
3:30 PM Introductory meeting with American Cotton Shippers Association on end-user issues.

2:00 PM Introductory meeting with Vitol on energy markets.

3:00 PM Introductory meeting with FTX US Derivatives on CFTC application.

2:00 PM FIA Law and Compliance Division Conference Fireside Chat (Washington, DC)

10:00 AM Introductory meeting with R3 on blockchain technology.

Commissioner Caroline Pham

Public External Calendar

April 14, 2022 to April 30, 2022

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

Wednesday, April 20, 2022

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Thursday, April 28, 2022
Lymon HENSON, petitioner, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution.

No. 17-5219.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3963 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3963

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow exclusion of gain 
          or loss on like-kind exchanges of virtual currency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

   Mr. Budd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow exclusion of gain 
          or loss on like-kind exchanges of virtual currency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may cited as the ``Virtual Value Tax Fix Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR LIKE-KIND EXCHANGES OF VIRTUAL CURRENCY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Special Rule for Virtual Currency.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this section, the 
        exchange of virtual currency for virtual currency of like kind 
        shall be treated in the same manner as the exchange of real 
        property for real property of like kind.
            ``(2) Termination.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with 
        respect to any exchange completed after December 31, 2024.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to exchanges completed after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Victor VIDES-CONTRERAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7258.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

                      

The undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the Annual Report on Form10-KSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

| Dated: March30, 2004 |    /s/ Jerry K. Wages                                            Jerry K. Wages Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Alan Justin SMITH, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 17-6743.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Lacey Mark SIVAK, petitioner, v. IDAHO.

No. 17-8257.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Jack ALLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-6175.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
MAXCREST LIMITED, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1377.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# L_2005066EN.01002801.xml

| 12.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/28

---

Notice of the date of entry into force of the Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of new Member States to the European Union

The contracting parties having notified one another of the completion of the procedures required for entry into force of the Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement, as approved by the Council of the European Union at its meeting on 31 January 2005, the Additional Protocol will enter into force with effect from 1 February 2005, in accordance with Article 5(2) thereof.

---
Derek Leroy McSMITH, petitioner, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

No. 17-5056.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: July 15, 2011




/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER



David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer and President
Michelle McMUNN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Eva Myers, et al., petitioners, v. BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC., et al.

No. 17-907.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Maria A. KITRAS, et al., petitioners, v. TOWN OF AQUINNAH, MASSACHUSETTS, et al.

No. 16-381.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
 /s/ TOD NIELSENTod Nielsen 
Chief Executive Officer
   52
Cassandra Lee MORROW, et al., petitioners, v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, et al.

No. 17-93.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-00696

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Sennhauser <bob.blues3 @gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:22 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Sennhauser

8342 Sorrel Dr.

Houston, TX 77064-8211
|  | (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 17, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.                           |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | Paul      B. Toms, Jr.                          |   |
|                            |   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                            |   |                                            |   |
|                            | By:    | /s/ E. Larry Ryder                              |   |
|                            |   | E.      Larry Ryder                             |   |
|                            |   | Executive      Vice President - Finance and     |   |
|                            |   | Administration      and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
PAICE LLC, et al., petitioners, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

No. 17-229.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Alexander J. GUREVICH.

No. D-3007.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.