alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009220EN.01003602.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/36

---

Action brought on 13 July 2009 — PVS v OHIM — MeDiTA Medizinischer Kurierdienst (medidata)

(Case T-270/09)

2009/C 220/77

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PVS — Privatärztliche Verrechnungsstelle Rhein-Ruhr GmbH (Mühlheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: F. Lindenberg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst- u. Handelsg. mbH (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 14 May 2009 in Appeal R 1724/2007-4 and reject the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 14 May 2009 in Appeal R 1724/2007-4 and reject the opposition;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the action and of the appeal proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the action and of the appeal proceedings;

| — | Enter judgment against the defendant without an oral hearing in its absence, in so far as it does not enter a defence in the appropriate form and in accordance within the prescribed time-limit. |
| --- | --- |

—

Enter judgment against the defendant without an oral hearing in its absence, in so far as it does not enter a defence in the appropriate form and in accordance within the prescribed time-limit.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: PVS

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘medidata’ in the colours blue, grey and white for services in Classes 35, 36, 41, 42 and 44 (Application No 4 495 842)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst- u. Handelsg. mbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word mark ‘MeDiTA’ for services in Classes 35 and 39, whereas the opposition is directed against registration in Class 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Grant of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
      Acting Chief Financial Officer of Energy Source, Inc. (f/k/a Bancorp
      International Group, Inc.) (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for
      the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.




Date:
                September 12, 2008
            /s/
                Thomas MegasThomas
                Megas,
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
Ronald GOLDBERG, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1230.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Anthony MOORE, petitioner, v. RHODE ISLAND.

No. 16-9373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00494-CV

In re Joshua Early

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied. See Tex. R. App. P.

52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Filed: August 14, 2015
II-O0170

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Adrianne Everson <adrianne.everson@gmail. corn>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 2:56 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Adrianne Everson

1115 12th St

Rapid City, SD 57701
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,856,096                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,845,361                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,539,398                       0
<PP&E>                                       5,954,946                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 676,556                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,121,334                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,800,578                       0
<BONDS>                                      5,651,961                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         3,601                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,673,168                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,121,334                       0
<SALES>                                    133,723,645              90,048,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           133,723,645              90,048,523
<CGS>                                      130,913,060              85,694,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              130,913,060              85,694,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             611,828               1,116,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (106,863)               1,608,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,635)                 549,650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (85,228)               1,059,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)                     .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34959-34960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Council on Disability (NCD).

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule of the forthcoming meeting 
for NCD's Youth Advisory Committee. Notice of this meeting is required 
under section 10(a)(1)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463).
    Youth Advisory Committee: The purpose of NCD's Youth Advisory 
Committee is to provide input NCD activities consistent with the values 
and goals of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DATES: August 6, 2001, 11 a.m.-12 p.m. EDT
    Location: Marriott at Metro Center, Montreal II Room, 775 12th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerrie Drake Hawkins, Ph.D., Program 
Specialist, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 
1050, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 
202-

[[Page 34960]]

272-2022 (fax), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#60070801170b090e13200e03044e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8cebe4edfbe7e5e2ffcce2efe8a2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail).
    Agency Mission: The National Council on Disability is an 
independent federal agency composed of 15 members appointed by the 
President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its 
overall purpose is to promote policies, programs, practices, and 
procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with 
disabilities, regardless of the nature of severity of the disability; 
and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-
sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all 
aspects of society.
    This committee is necessary to provide advice and recommendations 
to NCD on disability issues.
    We currently have a membership reflecting our nation's diversity 
and representing a variety of disabling conditions from across the 
United States.
    Open Meeting: This advisory committee meeting of the National 
Council on Disability will be open to the public. Those interested in 
attending the meeting should contact the appropriate staff member 
listed above. Space is limited.
    Records will be kept of all Youth Advisory Committee meetings calls 
and will be available after the meeting for public inspection at the 
National Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on June 26, 2001.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 01-16473 Filed 6-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
YTB International, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Report of YTB  International,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Derek J. Brent,  Chief  Financial and  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




Date: 08/25/2005




/s/ Derek J. Brent


-------------------------------------------------

[Signature] Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Michael ANGLIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9411.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Dean v. United States,* 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1170, 197 L.Ed.2d 490 (2017).
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Cyber Group Network Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ R. Scott Cramer
    ---------------------------

    R. Scott Cramer
    Chief  Executive  Officer


Dated: May 19, 2005
# C_2011252EN.01002804.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 April 2011 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-531/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/63

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
Scott David PERREAULT, petitioner, v. Anthony STEWART, Warden.

No. 17-1047.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.1

Lease Plan North America, Inc
c/o ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as Agent
Capital Markets-Syndications Group
1325 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10019
Attn: Linda Boardman

1.  Reference is made to that certain  Participation Agreement, dated as of 
December 5, 1997  (the "Participation Agreement"), among  Etec Systems, Inc.
("Lessee"), Lease Plan  North America, Inc. ("Lessor"), the  financial
institutions listed in Schedule  I to the Participation Agreement, (the 
"Participants") and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as  agent for the Participants (in such
capacity, "Agent"). Unless otherwise  indicated, all terms defined in the 
Participation Agreement have the same  respective meanings when used herein.

2.  Pursuant to Subparagraph  2.09(a) of the Participation Agreement,
Lessee hereby irrevocably requests Lessor  to extend (and the Participants to
consent  to such extension) the Unused 364-Day  Commitment $10,000,000 for an
additional  six (6) months by extending the current  364-Day Commitment
Termination Date from  December 4, 1998 to June 4, 1999.

3.  Lessee hereby certifies to  the Lessor Parties that, on the date of  this
364-Day Commitment Extension Request  and after giving effect to the extension 
requested hereby:

(a). The representation and warranties of  Lessee set forth in Paragraph 4.01
of the  Participation Agreement and in the other  Operative Documents are true
and correct  in all material respects as if made on  such date (except for
representations and  warranties expressly made as of a  specified date, which
shall be true as of  such date);

(b) No Default has occurred and is  continuing; and

(c) All of the Operative Documents are in  full force and effect.




 By: /S/ Richard W. Powell
------------------------------
Richard W.  Powell
Corporate Treasurer
Etec Systems, Inc.

Consented to and Acknowledged by:

Signature:Mary Beth Suhr
------------------------------
Name:  Mary Beth Suhr
------------------------------
Title:   V. P.      
------------------------------
Bank:  Comerica  
------------------------------
secretary 

From: Beurskens, John [JBeurskens@advance-trading.com] 

Sent: 

To: 

Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:09 PM CQMMENJ 

secretary 

Subject: CFTC proposal to expand speculative trading limits at various \3XChange~ 

I am vice president of Advance Trading, Inc., Bloomington, IL. We have composed a letter 

to you that you probably have received by now. We are represented on the National Grain 

and Feed's Commodity Exchange Committee by Jeff Hainline, President of the Board of 

Directors of Advance Trading, Inc. 

I wanted to let you know that I am opposed to the expansion of speculative trading limits 

at the various exchanges. 

As a time saving measure, I am not going to forward you another copy of our letter. 

Suffice it to say any expansion of speculative limits leads to a possibility of destroying 

the exchanges initial purpose: to provide a means of shifting risk via the hedge 

mechanism. If allowed, the grain trade will revert to archaic, inefficient transactions 

that retard the warehousemen ability to merchandise grain and depend upon the futures 

market as a legitimate medium for risk transfer and an expectation for convergence of cash 

and futures. 

Please do not bend to the pressures of a futures industry whose sole objective in this 

proposal is to expand volume for profit motives via increased transactions. 

It will not be healthy for the warehousing industry nor the general Agricultural 

community, in particular the American farmer. 

Sincerely, 

John Beurskens 

John Beurskens 

This data is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be used for 

specific trading strategies without consulting Advance Trading, Inc. No guarantee of any 

kind is implied or possible where projections of future conditions are attempted. Past 

results are no indication of future performance. All information is based upgn data that 

is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. Please clic~~here~ 

<http://www.advance-trading.com/disclaimer/> for full disclaimer. c~ ~ 

, .. :,,.... ... 

1
II-00335

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Tomczyszyn <mtomczyszyn@hotmail. com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 12:52 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Tomczyszyn

243 Ramsell St

San Francisco, CA 94132
Paysun LONG, petitioner, v. Randy PFISTER, Warden.

No. 17-991.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2009297EN.01001701.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/17

---

Action brought on 14 August 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-328/09)

2009/C 297/21

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by M. van Beek and K. Saaremäel-Stoilov, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Estonia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions for fully transposing Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, (1) or in any event by failing to notify the Commission of the adoption of the necessary provisions for fully transposing the directive, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17 of the directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions for fully transposing Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, (1) or in any event by failing to notify the Commission of the adoption of the necessary provisions for fully transposing the directive, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17 of the directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 21 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 373, p. 37.

1

---