alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-196-CV

IN RE JOSEPH PIERCY P. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for temporary relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary

relief are denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: June 23, 2009
Order entered May 20, 2019 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00520-CV 

No. 05-19-00521-CV 

IN RE GENTRY S. LEONARD, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. M18-62976-I & M18-62478-I 

ORDER 

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s May 2, 2019 petition for 

writ of mandamus. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK 

 JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 3, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the year-to-date period ended July 3, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-3-1997
<CASH>                                          43,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,018
<INVENTORY>                                      7,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,648
<PP&E>                                       1,173,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,103,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,980
<BONDS>                                        509,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,316
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           491
<OTHER-SE>                                     445,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,103,051
<SALES>                                         25,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               390,143
<CGS>                                           27,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,205
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,276
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (154)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00081

- CR

TREKEYMIAN JAMAL ALLISON, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 46,569

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 O R D E R Court reporter Grelyn Freeman recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate caus e number 06

- 18

- 00081

- CR, styled Trekeymian Jamal Allison v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number 46,569

- A in the 188th Judicial District Court of Gregg County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due in these matters on July 3, 2018. That deadline was extended twice by this Court, on Freeman’s motions, resulting in the most recent due date of August 22, 2018. Although we warned Freeman that additional requests to extend the filing deadline would not be granted, she has nonetheless filed a third request for an extension of the filing deadline. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure t hat the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of time. Therefore, we order Freeman to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06

- 18

- 00081

- CR, styled Trekeymian Jamal Allison v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number 46,569

- A in the 1 88th Judicial District Court of Gregg County, Texas, to be received no later than Friday, September 7, 2018. If the reporter’s record is not received by September 7, we warn Freeman that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: August 28, 2018
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aztar Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul E. Rubeli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert M. Haddock, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|PAUL E. RUBELI    |                                                  
|----------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|Name:             | Paul E. Rubeli                                   
|Title:            | Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             | November 2, 2004                                 
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|                  |                                                  
|ROBERT M. HADDOCK |                                                  
|Name:             | Robert M. Haddock                                
|Title:            | President and
Chief Financial Officer            
|Date:             | November 2, 2004                                 
|                  |                                                  

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aztar Corporation and will be retained by Aztar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302





I, J. Dan Sifford , certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GYK Ventures, Inc. ;





2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: March 30, 2004  by











/s/ J. Dan Sifford


J. Dan Sifford


Officer/Director
Kosmas KOUSTAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9392.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Mary H. STEELE-KLEIN, petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 117, et al.

No. 17-7263.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jesus FLORES, petitioner, v. Kevin KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

No. 16-9704.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Yulian CARRILLO-TAMAYO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8021.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Bobby BOSTIC, petitioner, v. Billy DUNBAR, Acting Warden.

No. 17-912.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
Anthony Wayne WIGGINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8481.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EX 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rene Bernard, certify that:



1.

I have received this annual report of Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2003 of The Bralorne Mining Company, the registrant;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, other than financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c.

presented in this annual report our conclusion about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regards to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:

June 9, 2004

/s/Rene Bernard



Rene Bernard

Chief Executive Officer

President and Director
II-00831

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dianna Rimarcik <diannarimarcik@ymail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:01 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dianna Rimarcik

Sussex Park Drive

Sterling Heights, MI 48314
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of T REIT, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/
     Scott
D. PetersScott D. PetersChief Financial Officer
 Date: May 13, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provide to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general information language in such filing.
Marie HENRY, petitioner, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, et al.

No. 17-1322.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-01059

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Pat Rose <patdon@tampabay.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Pat Rose

563 Gershwin Dr.

Largo, FL 33771
Terrence M. BROWN, petitioner, v. Cheron NASH, Warden, et al.

No. 16-9556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011120EN.01000301.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/3

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 January 2011 — Heinz Helmuth Eriksen (C-205/10 P), Bent Hansen (C-217/10 P), Brigit Lind (C-222/10 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-205/10 P, C-217/10 P and C-222/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Actions for damages - Public health implications of the nuclear accident that occurred near Thule (Greenland, Denmark) - Directive 96/29/Euratom - Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State)

2011/C 120/04

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Heinz Helmuth Eriksen (C-205/10 P), Bent Hansen (C-217/10 P), Brigit Lind (C-222/10 P) (represented by: I. Anderson, Advocate)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and E. White, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeals brought against the orders of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 March 2010 in Case T-516/08 Erikson v Commission, Case T-6/09 Hansen v Commission and Case T-5/09 Lind v Commission whereby the General Court dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law actions for damages seeking compensation for harm allegedly suffered by the applicants following a failure by the Commission to take the measures necessary to oblige Denmark to comply with Directive 96/29 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation (OJ 1996 L 159, p. 1) and to apply those provisions to workers involved in the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland), disregarding the resolution of the European Parliament of 10 May 2007 on the consequences of that accident on public health (Petition 720/2002, 2006/2012 (INI))

Erikson

Commission

Hansen

Commission

Lind

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeals are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeals are dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Eriksen, Mr Hansen and Ms Lind shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Eriksen, Mr Hansen and Ms Lind shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael J. Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
Global Axcess Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the first quarter ended March
31, 2010  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  January
27, 2011





/s/ Michael J. LoiaconoName:  Michael
      J. LoiaconoTitle:  Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer