alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael J. Loiacono, the ChiefFinancial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 20, 2012

 

*/s/ MichaelJ. Loiacono*

----------------------------------

Name: Michael J. Loiacono

Title: Chief Financial Officer and ChiefAccounting Officer
# C_2011347EN.01004405.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/44

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — Inovis v OHIM — Sonaecom (INOVIS)

(Case T-502/09) (1)

1

2011/C 347/81

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ISN SOFTWARE CORPORATION

,

Respondent Below,

Appellant/ Cross

- Appellee,

v.

AD

- VENTUR E CAPITAL

PARTNERS, L.P., POLARIS

VENTURE PARTNERS FOUNDERS’

FUND VI, L.P.

, and POLARIS

VENTURE PARTNERS VI, L.P.

,

Petitioners Below,

Appellee s / Cross

- Appellants. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 43, 2017

Court Below: Court of Chancery

State of Delaware

C.A. No.: 8388

Submitted: October 11, 2017

Decided: October 30, 2017

Before VAUGHN

, SEITZ , and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 30 th day of October 30, 2017

, the Court having considered this matter

after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on th e basis of and for the

reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its opinion dated August 11, 2016 and

order dated January 9, 2017

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 224 P A1 5

Filed 18 March 2016

IN THE MATTER OF THE FORECLOSURE OF THE DEED S OF TRUST EXECUTED BY GROVER C. BROWN and wife, MARGARET C. BROWN, dated April 1, 1980, R ecorded in Book 9 49 at Page 109

, and Book 949 at Page 111 of the Buncombe County Registry

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 31 of a unanimous decision

of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 71 S.E.2d 829 (20 1 5 ), affirming an order

entered on 9 April 201 4 by Judge J. Thomas Davis in Superior Court, Buncombe

County

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 16 February 2016.

Bull and Reinhardt, PLLC, by Adam W. Bull , for petitioner

- appellee, Executor of the Estate of Merton L. Brown.

Wilder Wadford and Christopher Musial for respondent

- appellants.

John R. Dillard for First Choice Title, LLC, d/b/a First Choice Title Company of North Carolina, amicus curiae

.

PER CURI A M

.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC) 

July 10, 2023

Meeting Agenda

10:00 AM to

10:20 AM

Welcome (20 minutes)

• The Honorable Kristin N. Johnson, MRAC Sponsor and CFTC Commissioner

• CFTC Chair and Commissioners 

• Alicia Crighton, MRAC Chair, Chair of the Board of Directors, Futures Industry 

Association

• Marilee Dahlman, Special Counsel, Division of Market Oversight (Alternate 

Designated Federal Officer)

10:20 AM to

10:50 AM

CCP Risk and Governance Subcommittee – (10 minutes)

Updates on Working Group Workstream Progress on CCP Resolution and Recovery; 

Margin and Collateral Guidelines; Technology and Operations 

• Alessandro Cocco, Vice President and Head of Financial Markets Group, Federal 

Reserve Bank of Chicago

• Alicia Crighton, MRAC Chair, Chair of the Board of Directors, Futures Industry 

Association

• Chris Edmonds, Chief Development Officer, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 

MRAC Member Open Discussion (20 minutes) 

10:50 AM to

11:10 AM

Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – LIBOR Transition (10 minutes)

• Ann Battle, Senior Counsel, Market Transitions & Head of Benchmark Reform, 

International Swaps and Derivatives Association

MRAC Member Open Discussion (10 minutes)
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC) 

July 10, 2023

11:10 AM to

11:40 AM

Market Structure Subcommittee – (10 minutes) 

Update on Work Group Workstream Progress on (1) block implementation rules, (2) FCM 

concentration and capacity, (3) U.S. Treasury market reform, and (4) post-trade risk reduction

(10 minutes) 

• Biswarup Chatterjee, Managing Director and Head of Innovation for the Global 

Markets Division, Citigroup

MRAC Member Open Discussion (20 minutes) 

11:40 AM to

12:20 PM 

Future of Finance Roundtable (25 minutes) 

• Alessandro Cocco, Vice President and Head of Financial Markets Group, Federal 

Reserve Bank of Chicago (moderator)

• Rebecca Rettig, Chief Policy Officer, Polygon Labs 

• Yesha Yadav, Associate Dean and Milton R. Underwood Chair and Professor of Law

Vanderbilt University Law School 

, 

• Steven Schwarcz, Stanely A. Star Distinguished Professor of Law, Duke University 

Law School 

• Jason Allegrante, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer, Fireblocks 

• Chen Arad, Chief External Affairs Officer, Solidus Labs

MRAC Member Open Discussion (15 minutes)

12:20 PM to

12:40 PM 

Climate-Related Market Risk Roundtable (10 minutes) 

• Tyson Slocum, Director Public Citizen Energy Program 

• Peter Malyshev, Partner, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP; Adjunct Professor 

Georgetown University Law Center and George Washington University Law School 

MRAC Member Open Discussion (10 minutes)

12:40 PM to

1:00 PM

Closing Remarks from Chair Crighton and Commissioner Johnson and Adjournment

• The Honorable Kristin N. Johnson, MRAC Sponsor and CFTC Commissioner

• Alicia Crighton, MRAC Chair, Chair of the Board of Directors, Futures Industry 

Association
Order entered March 11, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01005-CV

GREG GUTMAN, Appellant

V.

JOE JAMESON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-05078-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s March 9, 2022 first partially opposed motion 

for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the 

brief be filed no later than April 11, 2022.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
II-00280

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lauri Heikkila <kiva41 @gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:52 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lauri Heikkila

6501 Greeley Street

Tujunga, CA 91042-2817
# C_2009141EN.01004302.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/43

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 3 April 2009 — UCAPT v Commission

(Case T-96/09 R)

(Interim measures - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the formal requirements - Inadmissible)

2009/C 141/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Union des Coopératives agricoles des producteurs de tabac de France (UCAPT) (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Peignot and D. Garreau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Moore and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Deborah J. SANDERS, petitioner, v. Angelia RAWSKI, Warden.

No. 16M64.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Marquise WRIGHT, petitioner, v. CALUMET CITY, ILLINOIS.

No. 16-9246.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# L_2005099EN.01001601.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/16

---

DECISION No 1/2005 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND CANADA

of 21 March 2005

related to the listing of a Conformity Assessment Body under the Sectoral Annex on Recreational Craft

(2005/312/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Canada and in particular Articles VII and XI,

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to the listing of a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

1.   The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Canada Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment 2 of the Sectoral Annex on Recreational Craft.

2.   The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Signed in Ottawa, 21 March 2005.

On behalf of Canada

Allison YOUNG

Signed in Brussels, 16 March 2005.

On behalf of the European Community

Joanna KIOUSSI

---

ATTACHMENT A

Canada Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment 2 of the Sectoral Annex on Recreational Craft

| IMCI-NA |
| --- |
| 1084 Cedar Grove Boulevard |
| Oakville, Ontario L6J 2C4 |
| Tel. (905) 84 54 99 99 |
| Fax (905) 849 37 76 |

IMCI-NA

1084 Cedar Grove Boulevard

Oakville, Ontario L6J 2C4

Tel. (905) 84 54 99 99

Fax (905) 849 37 76

---
Ramnarine PERSAUD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8250.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2009141EN.01004303.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/43

---

Action brought on 24 march 2009 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission

(Case T-114/09)

2009/C 141/93

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Kalsmose-Hjelmborg and M. Honoré, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission of 4 August 2008 in Case N 287/2008; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission of 4 August 2008 in Case N 287/2008; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this application, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 4 august 2008 in Case N 287/2008 (1) by which the Commission approved, on the basis of Article 87 (3) (c) EC rescue aid granted by the Danish State to TV 2 Danmark A/S (‘TV 2’).

1

The applicant submits that the aid does not comply with Article 87(3) (c) since it infringes the principle of proportionality enshrined in that provision according to which such aid must not ‘adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest’. In particular, the applicant claims first that the Commission erred in law when it held that TV 2 constituted a ‘firm in difficulty’ within the meaning of the Community guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (2). Secondly, the applicant contends that the Commission erred in law when holding that the rescue aid was limited to what was necessary to keep TV 2 business and that aid was maintained at a level which would not allow TV 2 to invest in new activities or to behave aggressively in commercial markets. Thirdly, the applicant claims that the Commission erred in law when it failed to take into account the State aid received by TV 2 in the past.

2

---

(1)  A summary of the contested decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2009 C 9, p. 2) and a non-confidential version of the decision was made available on http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

1

Official Journal of the European Union

(2)  Community guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ 2004 C 244, p. 2)

2

---
Michael COSCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1099.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
MARYLAND, petitioner, v. Joseph NORMAN, Jr.

No. 16-1547.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Retirement Villas Properties III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Abdo H. Khoury, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

| /s/ ABDO H. KHOURY |  
 
**Abdo H. Khoury Chief Financial Officer of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. its General Partner**

 
  
 
November 13, 2002

 
14

  |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Calvin WEDINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17M110.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
1

Filed 6/30/21 In re J.S. CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or

or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re J.S., a Person Coming Under

the Juvenile Court Law.

CONTRA COSTA CHILDREN AND

FAMILY SERVIC ES BUREAU,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

D.G. AND R.R.,

Defendants and Appellants. A160549

(Contra Costa County
Super. Ct. No. J1800636)

On July 6, 2020, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of

defend ants D.G. (mother) and R.R . (father) with respect to their shared son,

J.S., and ordered adoption as J.S.’s permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code,

§ 366.26 .) After filing notices of appeal, counsel for both mother and father

filed no

- issue statements pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 and

In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835. By separate communications, we

notified mother and father that their respective cou nsel had filed briefs

indicating there were no arguable issues on appeal, and we invited them to

file supplemental letters setting forth any issues they believed should be

reviewed by this court. Father filed a letter asking to be given “another2

chance,” but identifying no error by the juvenile court. Mother did not file a

supplemental letter

.
An appealed

- from judgment or order is presumed correct.

( Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 544, fn. 8.) It is therefore

an appellant ’ s burden to raise claims of reversible error or other defect and to

present argument and authority on each point made. If an appellant fails to

do so, the appeal may be dismissed. ( In re Sade C., supra , 13 Cal.4th at

p. 994.)

While we appreciate father’s statement t hat he loves his son and that it

would be a “dream come true” to be with J.S. again, we must conclude that

neither parent has made a showing that there is an arguable issue that

would merit further briefing with respect to the juvenile court order on

appeal. Under such circumstances, dismissal is appropriate. ( In re Phoenix

H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at pp. 844, 846.)

DISPOSITION

Because no claim of error or ot her defect has been raised in this matter,

the appeals are dismissed as abandoned. ( In re Phoenix H., supra , 47 Cal.4th

at pp. 844

– 846; In re Sade C., supra , 13 Cal.4th at p. 994.)

BROWN, J.

WE CONCUR:

POLLAK, P. J.
STREETER, J.

In re J.S. (A1 60 5 49 )
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th 

day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Royce William Tawater, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00094-CR

Trial Court No. 29,310

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Royce William Tawater, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 29th day of May, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
R.D., petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES.

No. 17-7745.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with Amendment No.2 to Annual Report of China 3C Group and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
      October 31, 2008
                By:
                /s/
      Weidong HuangName:
                Weidong
      HuangTitle:
                Chief
      Financial Officer
5100 West Lemon Street
Suite 109
Tampa, FL 33609

(LOGO)

NORTH AMERICAN
MORTGAGE COMPANY'
A DIME COMPANY

Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, North American  Mortgage Company
(the Company) has complied in all material  respects with the minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
following amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998:

Fidelity Bond

$ 47,050,000  from January 1, 1998 to March 1, 1998  $100,000,000  from March 2,
1998 to December 31, 1998

Errors and Omissions

$ 23,525,000 from January 1, 1998 to October 15. 1998
$ 20,000,000 from October 16, 1998 to December 31, 1998

Raymond G. Romano

SVP/Director of Residential Credit
Title

3-25-99
Date
Cesar VILLA-GOMEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7867.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.