alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: April 5, 2007                    /s/ Charles B.  Pollock
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Charles B.  Pollock,
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Pangea Petroleum Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3914 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3914

 To apologize for the treatment of Italian Americans during World War 
                                  II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2019

 Ms. Lofgren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To apologize for the treatment of Italian Americans during World War 
                                  II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ITALIAN AMERICANS DURING WORLD 
              WAR II.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Over 15 million Italians have immigrated to the United 
        States since 1852.
            (2) Italian immigrants have provided a culture and heritage 
        that has enriched American life.
            (3) The treatment of Italian Americans during World War II 
        was authorized by the Act of July 6, 1798 (Chapter 66, Sec. 1; 
        1 Stat. 577; 50 U.S.C. 21; commonly known as the Alien Enemies 
        Act).
            (4) Additional authority for the treatment of Italian 
        Americans during World War II was based on Executive Order 9066 
        (7 Fed. Reg. 1407) and Executive Order 9102 (7 Fed. Reg. 2165).
            (5) These orders required Italian-born citizens and their 
        families to carry identification cards, face travel 
        restrictions, and obey curfews.
            (6) These orders authorized the seizure of personal 
        property.
            (7) 10,000 Italian Americans living on the West Coast were 
        forced to leave their homes and were prohibited from entering 
        coastal zones during World War II.
            (8) Thousands of Italian-American immigrants were arrested 
        and hundreds were interned in military camps during World War 
        II.
            (9) The treatment of Italian Americans during World War II 
        needs to be acknowledged in order to remember those whose lives 
        were unjustly disrupted and whose freedoms were violated.
            (10) Acknowledging and apologizing for the treatment of 
        Italian Americans during World War II would help repair the 
        Italian-American community and would discourage the occurrence 
        of similar injustices and violations of civil liberties in the 
        future.
    (b) Statement of Congress.--For these fundamental violations of the 
basic civil liberties and constitutional rights of Italian Americans 
during World War II, Congress apologizes on behalf of the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
Michael Lee SNYDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7157.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2010080EN.01003102.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/31

---

Action brought on 28 December 2009 — PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM

(Case T-526/09)

2010/C 80/53

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PAKI Logistics GmbH (Ennepetal, Germany) (represented by M. Bergermann, P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, G. Rother, J. Bühling, A. Verhauwen, J. Künzel, D. Jestaedt and J. Vogtmeier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 October 2009 (R 180/2007-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 October 2009 (R 180/2007-1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in connection with the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in connection with the appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘PAKI’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 20, 37 and 39 (Application No 4 790 895)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Error of law in the application of Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the same Regulation, since the mark applied for is not contrary to accepted principles of morality

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Shomara M. AUSTIN, petitioner, v. JACKSONVILLE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

No. 17-7951.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 32.1



WRITTEN
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual
Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 23, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Zhenggang Wang                                                        
|--------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Name:  | Zhenggang Wang                                                            
|                      | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
        (Principal Executive Officer)
James Deon KORFHAGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5077.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# L_2007089EN.01004001.xml

| 29.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 161/2006

of 8 December 2006

amending Protocol 47 to the EEA Agreement on the abolition of technical barriers to trade in wine

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Protocol 47 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 128/2006 of 22 September 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Protocol 47 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 128/2006 of 22 September 2006 (1).

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 643/2006 of 27 April 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and establishing a Community code of oenological practices and processes, and Regulation (EC) No 884/2001 laying down detailed rules of application concerning the documents accompanying the carriage of wine products and the records to be kept in the wine sector (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 643/2006 of 27 April 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and establishing a Community code of oenological practices and processes, and Regulation (EC) No 884/2001 laying down detailed rules of application concerning the documents accompanying the carriage of wine products and the records to be kept in the wine sector (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 4 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000) of Appendix 1 of Protocol 47 to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32006 R 0643: Commission Regulation (EC) No 643/2006 of 27 April 2006 (OJ L 115, 28.4.2006, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32006 R 0643: Commission Regulation (EC) No 643/2006 of 27 April 2006 (OJ L 115, 28.4.2006, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 643/2006 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 December 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 333, 30.11.2006, p. 60.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 115, 28.4.2006, p. 6.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# C_2010246EN.01001501.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 July 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-8/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/46/EC - Annual accounts and consolidated accounts of companies - Failure to transpose completely within the prescribed period)

2010/C 246/25

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. de Schietere de Lophem, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or to communicate, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (OJ 2006 L 224, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Santiago Alejandro DIAZ-ESPARZA, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-820.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Austin, Texas

M A N D A T E

TRIAL COURT NO. 1328806

COURT OF APPEALS NO. 01-13-00415-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT C 

GREETINGS:

Before our COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, on JULY 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to review,

revise or reverse your Judgment between:

JAVIER NOEL CAMPOS

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

CCRA NO. PD-0054-15

was determined; and therein our said COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS made its order in these words:

"This cause came on to be heard on the APPELLANT'S Petition for Discretionary Review, and the same

being inspected, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the Petition for

Discretionary Review be GRANTED.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is VACATED and the cause is REMANDED to the Court of

Appeals, in accordance with the Opinion of this Court, and that this decision be certified below for observance."

WHEREFORE, We command you to observe the order of our said COURT OF CRIMINAL

APPEALS in this behalf and in all things to have it duly RECOGNIZED, OBEYED AND EXECUTED.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE SHARON KELLER,

Presiding Judge of our said COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS,

with the Seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin,

on this day Monday, August 24, 2015.

ABEL ACOSTA, Clerk

By: Deana Williamson, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Paul RICHARDSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7728.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

                            DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF
                       MARATHON POWER TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of TransDigm Holding Company, hereby
constitute and appoint Gregory Rufus, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, as attorney-in-fact for each of the undersigned, and in the
name, place and stead of each of the undersigned, to execute on behalf of each
of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2000 pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 and to execute any and all amendments to such report and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents required to be filed in connection
therewith, granting to such attorney full power to act with or without the
others, and to have full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and
on behalf of each of the undersigned, every act whatsoever necessary, advisable
or appropriate to be done in the premises, hereby ratifying and approving the
act of said attorney and any such substitute.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

                        EXECUTED as of December 28, 2000.

              /s/Douglas W.  Peacock
-----------------------------------------------------
                Douglas W.  Peacock
            Chairman of the Board and
              Chief Executive Officer
           (Principal Executive Officer)




              /s/Albert J.  Rodriguez
-----------------------------------------------------
               Albert J.  Rodriguez
                     President
           (Principal Operating Officer)




              /s/ W.  Nicholas Howley
-----------------------------------------------------
               W.  Nicholas Howley
     Executive Vice President and Director

                                      vii
CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report of International Commercial Television Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Kelvin  Claney,  President  and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Karl
Redekopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   the Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


          Date: March 30, 2006

                                    Signed:  /s/  Kelvin  Claney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Signed:  /s/  Karl  Redekopp
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer
MANAGED CARE INSURANCE CONSULTANTS, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-948.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
CFTC 2024 Pay Table (as of JAN 2024)

Includes 2024 base pay structure adjustment of 4.7%, total pay cap adjustment, and 2024 locality rates.

Effective 01/14/2024

Base Incr 4.70%

Location 2024 Base Location 2024 DC Location 2024 CHI Location 

Locality 0.00% Locality 33.26% Locality 30.41% Locality

2024 NY

37.24% 

Band Min Max

CT‐1 $27,162 $38,293CT‐2 $30,536 $43,422CT‐3 $33,319 $48,941CT‐4 $37,402 $54,933CT‐5 $41,850 $61,459CT‐6 $46,647 $68,515CT‐7 $51,838 $76,144CT‐8 $57,408 $84,322CT‐9 $63,409 $93,138

CT‐10 $69,831 $102,570

CT‐11 $76,720 $112,698

CT‐12 $91,953 $135,062

CT‐13 $109,347 $160,615CT‐14 $129,213 $189,800CT‐15 $151,995 $223,250CT‐16 $175,883 $258,301CT‐17 $203,466 $284,600*

CT‐18 $235,409 $284,600*

Min Max

$36,196 $51,029$40,692 $57,864$44,401 $65,219$49,842 $73,204$55,769 $81,900$62,162 $91,303$69,079 $101,469$76,502 $112,367$84,499 $124,116

$93,057 $136,685

$102,237 $150,181

$122,537 $179,984$145,716 $214,036$172,189 $252,927$202,549 $284,600*$234,382 $284,600*$271,139 $284,600*

$284,600* $284,600*

Min Max

$35,422 $49,938$39,822 $56,627$43,451 $63,824$48,776 $71,638$54,577 $80,149$60,832 $89,350$67,602 $99,299$74,866 $109,964$82,692 $121,461

$91,067 $133,762

$100,051 $146,969

$119,916 $176,134$142,599 $209,458$168,507 $247,518$198,217 $284,600*$229,369 $284,600*$265,340 $284,600*

$284,600* $284,600*

Min Max

$37,277 $52,553$41,908 $59,592$45,727 $67,167$51,331 $75,390$57,435 $84,346$64,018 $94,030$71,142 $104,500$78,787 $115,724$87,023 $127,823

$95,836 $140,767

$105,291 $154,667

$126,196 $185,359$150,068 $220,428$177,332 $260,482$208,598 $284,600*$241,382 $284,600*$279,237 $284,600*

$284,600* $284,600*

Location 2023 Rate 2022 Rate 2021 Rate

DC 32.49% 31.53% 30.48%

CHI 29.79% 29.18% 28.59%

NY 36.16% 35.06% 33.98%

KC 18.18% 17.67% 17.13%

*Total Pay Capped at

$284,600
Wnited States Senate

WASHINGTON, DC 20510

June 12, 2019

The Honorable Rostin Behnam
Commissioner

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
1155 21 Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

Dear Commissioner Behnam:

We write to commend you for convening a public meeting on climate-related financial risks in your
capacity as the sponsor of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) Market Risk
Advisory Committee. As financial regulators around the world commit to addressing climate-related
risks, it is encouraging to see the CFTC begin to prepare for the market risks that climate change will
present. We hope our nation’s banking and securities regulators take note of your leadership on this
issue and take steps to identify and manage climate-related risks within their own jurisdictions.

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of episodic severe weather events like
droughts, floods, and wildfires; it is also changing long-term climate patterns in ways that will lower
productivity, devalue and destroy fixed assets, stress agricultural yields, and ultimately affect every
sector of our economy. The markets and market participants that the CFTC regulates will not be
immune to these risks. Climate change impacts are likely to exacerbate market volatility, erode
investor confidence, and increase the risk of financial crashes.

The CFTC will increasingly play an important role in identifying and helping market participants
mitigate these emerging risks. We strongly support your decision to assess climate-related risks to our
financial markets and the impact on the stability of the global financial system. We encourage you to
reach out to other financial regulatory agencies to urge them to follow your lead. We also encourage
you to engage with the group of 36 international central banks and bank supervisors working together
to develop analytic tools to assess climate-related financial risks.

Thank you for your efforts to begin reviewing climate-related financial risks. We understand you
cannot do this alone. All of our financial regulatory agencies and Congress must work together to
build resilience to this looming threat in our economy and financial markets. We look forward to
working with you on this going forward.

Sincerely, f
BRIAN SCHATZ SHERROD BROWN

U.S. Senator U.S. Senator