alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00263

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Kirchner <Train462@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:45 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Kirchner

1002 Cottage Ave.

Fort Wayne, IN 46807
Edward BOYER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1156.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Henry OLEKSY, petitioner, v. GELERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.

No. 16-1427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone call with Dennis Kelleher, Better Markets
  
    



  Telephone call discussing cross-border final guidance.
      
  When
              06/06/2013

  Rulemaking(s)
              Cross-Border

  CFTC Staff
              Bart Chilton

  Visitor(s)
              Dennis Kelleher, Better Markets

  Organization(s)
              Better Markets


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Kennedy WRIGHT, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-6841.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

NO. WR-82,867-02

EX P ARTE DAVID RA Y LEA, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 52758-A IN THE 239TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM BRAZ ORIA COUNTY

Y E A R Y , J
. , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n .

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

T h e C o u r t t o d a y g r a n t s p o s t

- c o n v i c t i o n h a b e a s c o r p u s r e l i e f o n t h e g r o u n d s t h a t

A p p l i c a n t w a s c o n v i c t e d u n d e r a s t a t u t e t h a t w a s l a t e r d e c l a r e d t o b e u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y

o v e r b r o a d , n a m e l y , T e x a s ’ i m p r o p e r p h o t o g r a p h y s t a t u t e

. S e e M a j o r i t y O p i n i o n ( g r a n t i n g

r e l i e f b a s e d u p o n E

x p a r t e T h o m p s o n , 4 4 2 S

. W

. 3 d 3 2 5 ( T e x
. C r i m

. A p p

. 2 0 1 4 ) )

. H o w e v e r ,
I b e l i e v e t h e a r g u m e n t I m a d e i n m y d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n E x p a r t e F o u r n i e r , w h i l e

a d d r e s s i n g a d i f

f e r e n t s t a t u t e

— T e x a s ’ O n l i n e S o l i c i t a t i o n o f a M i n o r s t a t u t e

— s t i l l a p p l i e s

t o A p p l i c a n t i n t h i s c a s e

. S e e E x p a r t e F o u r n i e r , 4 7 3 S

. W

. 3 d 7 8 9 , 8 0 0

- 8 0 5 ( T e x
. C r i m

. A p p

.2 0 1 5 ) ( Y e a r y , J

. , d i s s e n t i n g ) ( a r g u i n g t h a t t h e C o u r t s h o u l d n o t g r a n t r e t r o a c t i v e r e l i e f i n

p o s t

- c o n v i c t i o n h a b e a s c o r p u s p r o c e e d i n g s w i t h o u t d e c i d i n g w h e t h e r a p p l i c a n t s w h o w e r e

c o n v i c t e d u n d e r a s t a t u t e t h a t h a s b e e n h e l d t o b e u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y o v e r b r o a d s h o u l d h a v e

t o s h o w t h a t t h e s t a t u t e w a s u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l a s a p p l i e d t o t h e m )

. T h e r e f o r e , I d i s s e n t f

o r t h e

r e a s o n s s t a t e d i n m y d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n F o u r n i e r
. S e e E x p a r t e C h a n g , _

_ _ S

. W

. 3 d
_

_ _ ,
N o

. W R

- 8 2 , 7 1 2

- 0 1 , 2 0 1 6 W L 1 1 6 1 0 9 2 ( T e x
. C r i m

. A p p

. M a r

. 2 3 , 2 0 1 6 ) ( Y e a r y , J

. , d i s s e n t i n g )

.

F i l e d : A p r i l 6 , 2 0 1 6 D o N o t P u b l i s h
David CRAMER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9562.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael Bradley WESTOVER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7607.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 50 
U.S.C. as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 16, 2001.
    TIME: 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 45 Natcher Bldg, Rm 5As.25u, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Richard J. Bartlett, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, Natcher Bldg./Bldg. 45, Room 5As36B, (301) 594-
4952.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHSS)
    Dated: June 21, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16356 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2009220EN.01003106.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C–11/09) (1)

1

2009/C 220/65

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jerry A. Dukes, Chief
Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 28, 2005



/s/ Jerry A. DukesJerry A. Dukes Chief Executive
Officer
Michael BROOKS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-1218.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
Kavin Maurice RHODES, petitioner, v. Sam OHTA, et al.

No. 17-7639.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009267EN.01006601.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/66

---

Action brought on 10 August 2009 — Hoelzer v OHIM (SAFELOAD)

(Case T-315/09)

2009/C 267/119

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Oliver Hoelzer (Remscheid, Germany) (represented by G. Rother and J. Vogtmeier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 June 2009 (R 1157/2008-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 June 2009 (R 1157/2008-4);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in connection with the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in connection with the appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘SAFELOAD’ for goods in Classes 6 and 12 (application No 6330831)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since the word element of the mark applied for does not describe the characteristics of the goods covered by the application.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
IBM/EMS Alliance Shift Announced

   May 29, 1997 8:23 PM EDT

   MILWAUKEE, May 29 /PRNewswire/ -- Effective Management Systems, Inc.
   (Nasdaq:  EMSI, EMSIW), the first provider of pre-integrated manufacturing
   software, said that the General Business Industrial Sector of IBM (NYSE: 
   IBM) has informed EMS as well as other participating IBM partners that it
   is transitioning away from the direct selling of the partners' Enterprise
   Resource Planning (ERP) software toward a cooperative marketing alliance.

   EMS was informed that the shift in strategy does not suggest a reduced
   commitment by IBM.  This change is intended to allow IBM and EMS to
   continue to work together in an effective manner.

   "Our very substantial growth in revenue over the last couple of years has
   been achieved independently from this program with IBM", says Michael
   Dunham, president and chief executive officer of EMS.

   "We have made an investment in EMS infrastructure associated with his
   program over the past two years.  While we are disappointed that a part of
   our initial investment will not be leveraged to the extent that we had
   hoped, we are pleased that EMS and IBM will continue to strengthen our
   overall relationship".

   "Over the past two years, we have developed excellent relationships with
   IBM personnel around the country," adds Tom Allen, vice president of sales
   and marketing for EMS.  "We are please that IBM will continue to
   complement our EMS field-sales efforts going forward".

   EMS's pre-integrated TCM and FACTORYnet I/S software supports management
   of manufacturing operations in discrete-manufacturing plants in the U.S.,
   Asia and Europe.  SOURCE Effective Management Systems, Inc.

     PR Newswire  All rights reserved.

   Additional sources of information
   Tell Me More - From Infoseek
   Company Profile - From E*TRADE:  EMSI,  IBM
   Stock Charts - From Quote.Com:  EMSI, IBM
   SEC Filings - From EDGAR Online:  EMSI, IBM
   Company Capsule - From Hoover's Online:  EMSI, IBM
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1779 

Honoring the 50th anniversary of the Freedom Rides. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2010 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 50th anniversary of the Freedom Rides. 

Whereas, on May 4, 1961, a Greyhound bus left Washington, 

DC with black and white passengers and traveled South 

to challenge discriminatory racial segregation laws; 

Whereas, while the travels of these passengers were initially 

called a Journey of Reconciliation, their efforts would 

come to be known as the Freedom Rides; 

Whereas these Southern-bound passengers, known as the 

Freedom Riders, were united by their commitment to end 

segregation and ongoing racial discrimination; 

Whereas the Freedom Riders traveled into states where Jim 

Crow laws were still prevalent, thus challenging the Federal Government to enforce its decision to overturn them 

by non-violently integrating the bus routes and rest stops; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1779 IH 

Whereas, on their journeys during the Summer of 1961, the 

Freedom Riders would stop at locations in Virginia, 

North Carolina, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, 

Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana; 

Whereas, at many times during the Freedom Rides, the Riders encountered antagonism, verbal abuse, acts of violence, and incarceration, yet never gave up their commitment to equality and social justice; 

Whereas, led by James Farmer and the Congress of Racial 

Equality, the Freedom Riders were successful in part due 

to their role-playing preparation and practice in non-violence and Gandhian principles; 

Whereas the Freedom Riders’ non-violent actions would help 

expose to the Nation and the world the cruelty and injustice of Jim Crow laws; and 

Whereas the Freedom Rides would spur the Kennedy Administration to enforce laws and judicial rulings that guaranteed the rights and safety of all passengers, regardless of 

race, gender, or religious background, to sit wherever 

they desired on bus routes and at rest stops: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the 50th anniversary of the Freedom 

3 Rides; and 

4 (2) recognizes the extraordinary leadership and 

5 sacrifice of the Freedom Riders in their commitment 

6 to ending racial segregation in America. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# C_2012025EN.01002301.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/23

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 September 2011 — Sociedade Quinta do Portal, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto SA

(Case C-541/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Community word mark PORTO ALEGRE - Earlier national word mark VISTA ALEGRE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Declaration of invalidity of the mark)

(2012/C 25/39)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellant: Sociedade Quinta do Portal, SA (represented by: F. Bolota Belchior, advogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. López Ronda and G. Macias Bonilla, abogados), Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto SA

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 September 2010 in Case T-369/09 Quinta do Portal v OHIM — Vallegre, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2009 (Case R 1012/2008-1) relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto SA and Sociedade Quinta do Portal, SA

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Quinta do Portal, SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Quinta do Portal, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 5.2.2011.

---
Glendon Scott CRAWFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7671.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Eleanor RIBERA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County denied.
II-00147

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert New <jwtusjp@comcast.net>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 3:25 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert New

2 Teenies Tiny Rd

Rutland, VT 05701-9820
Bradley Raymond CLEMENS, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 17-7068.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.
**Exhibit 15(a).4**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-12958, No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666 on Form S-8 and No. 333-145834 on Form F-3 of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries, of our report dated February 15, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Equity PacificLimited for the year ended December 31, 2005 which appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China 

June 27, 2008