alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission

* * * * *

# DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, January 23, 2001 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

* * * * *

# DATE & TIME:

Thursday, January 25, 2001 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes. Advisory Opinion 2000-40: Representative Jim McDermott.

Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-1638 Filed 1-16-01; 2:12 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Joseph Jody DUPLICHAN, Jr., petitioner, v. Jason KENT, Warden.

No. 17-7644.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jason BRIDDON, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 16-9538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
for the periods reflected therein.



|                   |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ George M. Davis                                 
|                   |  | George M. Davis                                     
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                                
|                   |  | Lawrence Rychlak                                    
|                   |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Jason Daniel SIMS.

No. 17-766.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 10-5284 September Term 2011

1:07-cv-01756-RCL

Filed On: January 30, 2012

Sierra Club, et al.,

Appellees

v.

Robert L. Van Antwerp, Lieutenant General,

U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, et al.,

Appellees

Sierra Properties I, LLC, et al.,

Appellants

------------------------------

Consolidated with 10-5297, 10-5345

BEFORE: Garland and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges, and Williams, Senior

Circuit Judge

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the government’s petition for limited rehearing and the

response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition be granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued November 29, 2011, be amended

as follows:

(1) Slip Op., page 13, line 9, insert the following sentence before the sentence

beginning with the words “After issuing”: “The regulations create an exception to that

obligation where, as a result of informal consultation, the “Federal agency determines,

with the written concurrence of the Director [of the Fish and Wildlife Service], that the

proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any listed species or critical habitat.” Id.

at § 402.14(b).”; and 
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 10-5284 September Term 2011

(2) Slip Op., page 13, last paragraph, line 2, delete the words “It requires” and

insert in lieu thereof, “Subject to the exception noted above, it requires”. 

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Jennifer M. Clark 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
# C_2011120EN.01001201.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2011 — Commission v Edificios Inteco

(Case T-235/09) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Programme concerning the promotion of energy technologies for Europe (Thermie) - Contract concerning the construction in Valladolid (Spain) of a commercial and business centre equipped with a solar powered air conditioning system - Non-performance of the contract - Reimbursement of sums advanced - Late payment interest - Procedure by default)

2011/C 120/29

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana)

Applicant:

Defendant: Edificios Inteco SL (Valladolid, Spain) (represented by: C. de la Red Mantilla, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought by the Commission pursuant to Article 238 EC for reimbursement of the sum of EUR 157 238,07, paid by it to the defendant in relation to a construction project in Valladolid of a commercial and business centre equipped with a solar powered air conditioning system (contract BU/104/93) plus late payment interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders Edificios Inteco SL to reimburse to the European Commission the sum of EUR 157 238,07, plus EUR 81 686,22 corresponding to interest due on 1 June 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders Edificios Inteco SL to reimburse to the European Commission the sum of EUR 157 238,07, plus EUR 81 686,22 corresponding to interest due on 1 June 2009;

| 2. | Orders Edificios Inteco to reimburse the Commission the sum of EUR 2 173 796 for each additional day’s delay from 2 June 2009 to payment in full of the debt. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Edificios Inteco to reimburse the Commission the sum of EUR 2 173 796 for each additional day’s delay from 2 June 2009 to payment in full of the debt.

| 3. | Orders Edificios Inteco to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Edificios Inteco to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.

1

---
# C_2010024EN.01002701.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 10 November 2009 — Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la Concurrence, Ministre de l’Economie de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi

(Case C-439/09)

2010/C 24/49

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS

Applicant:

Defendants: Président de l’Autorité de la Concurrence, Ministre de l’Economie de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does a general and absolute ban on selling contract goods to end users via the Internet, imposed on authorised distributors in the context of a selective distribution network, in fact constitute a ‘hardcore’ restriction of competition by object for the purposes of Article 81(1) EC which is not covered by the block exemption provided for by Regulation No 2790/1999 (1) but which is potentially eligible for an individual exemption under Article 81(3) EC?

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ 1999 L 336 p. 21)

1

---
Keith Nicholas OSER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8190.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Lan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





/s/Micahel H.LanMichael H. Lan

Chief Financial Officer

April 11, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michael C. DUNCAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
II-00023

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attach:

Jon_Hixson@cargill. corn

Friday, November 19, 2010 5:14 PM

OTCDefinitions <OTCDefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Sue_Cochran@cargill. corn

Definitions

CFTC Definitions Activities Language Final Nov 17 2010.pdf
November 17, 2010

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Definitions

Dear Chairman Gensler:

As the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) determines regulatory "Definitions," as

outlined in Section 721 ofP.L 111-203 (Dodd-Frank Act), we would like to call your attention to

provision (49) swap dealer, paragraph (B) inclusion.

Under this provision, Congress granted the Commission the flexibility to designate a person: (i)

as a swap dealer for certain activities; and (ii) as a non-swap dealer under the exceptions

provided to non-financial end-users when not engaging in swap dealer activities. This dual

activity-based designation is of great importance to Cargill due to the variety of its businesses

and activities.

Cargill routinely acts as an end-user, hedging commodity, interest rate, and foreign currency

risks based on the company’s global business of shipping, merchandising and processing a wide

range of commodities. Cargill also has a business unit that offers customized risk management

products to external customers. This particular activity may warrant the designation as swap

dealer, subject to compliance requirements like: 1) the obligation to report customer transactions

(Section 729) and 2) the obligation to register with the Commission (Section 731).

The above obligations will allow the Commission to differentiate between the swap dealer

activities in which Cargill engages, from the activities transacted under the exception provided to

non-financial end-users. Furthermore, when Cargill executes hedging transactions under the

exemption afforded to non-financial end-users, those transactions will be reported to the

Commission by the financial counterparty who is acting as the dealer.

Law

Linda L. Cutler

Vice President, Assistant Secretary and

Deputy General Counsel

15407 McGinty Road West

Wayzata, MN 55391-2399

P.O. Box 5624

Minneapolis, MN 55440-5624

Tel: (952) 742-6377

Fax: (952) 404-6334

Linda_Cutler@cargill.corn
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

November 17, 2010

Page 2

We appreciate your attention to this important provision and look forward to working with you

as the implementing regulations are developed.

Sincerely,

L. CutlelL/¢/’~’~’~~’/

Vice President, Assistant Secretary and

Deputy General Counsel

LLCiilb

(#308I 174)

Senator Amy Klobuchar

CFTC Rulemaking Area I: Definitions

CFTC Rulemaking Area V: Capital and Margin for Non-Banks

CFTC Rulemaking Area XI: End User Exception
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 45TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on October 22, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of M.J.W., J.A., and C.A., Appellant

V.

No. 04-14-00330-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2012-PA-02053

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order 

terminating the parental rights of Jessica B.W. is AFFIRMED. 

It is further ORDERED that no costs be assessed because appellant is 

indigent.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on December 30, 2014.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00330-CV

In the Interest of M.J.W., J.A., and C.A.

v.

(NO. 2012-PA-02053 IN 45TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING

$42.50

$73.50

$1,684.86

$195.00

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

RESPONDENT

BEXAR COUNTY

BEXAR COUNTY

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Fourth District of Texas, this December 30, 2014.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
Jonathan Leon TOLIVER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9349.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011252EN.01002705.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/27

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 17 March 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-278/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/56

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
Joseph BERGERON, petitioner, v. Tom ROY, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections.

No. 17-7133.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Albert F. IAQUINTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7864.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Gloria GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. ARIZONA, ex rel. Mark BRNOVICH, Attorney General of Arizona.

No. 17-7085.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two denied.
Jescell WHITTLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8140.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010024EN.01006001.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/60

---

Action brought on 23 November 2009 — Comercial Losan v OHIM — McDonald's International Property (Mc. Baby)

(Case T-466/09)

2010/C 24/106

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Comercial Losan (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd (Delaware, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | uphold the action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of 1 September 2009 — R 1706/2008-1 Mc Baby/Mc Kids in the opposition proceedings No B 1049362 (Community trade mark application 4 441 393), allow registration of the Community trade mark applied for, and order the opposing party to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of 1 September 2009 — R 1706/2008-1 Mc Baby/Mc Kids in the opposition proceedings No B 1049362 (Community trade mark application 4 441 393), allow registration of the Community trade mark applied for, and order the opposing party to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Comercial Losan

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Mc. Baby’ (registration application No 4 741 393) for goods and services in Classes 25, 35 and 39

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘McKids’ (mark No 3 207 354) for goods in classes 16, 25 and 28; Community word mark ‘McDONALD’S’ (mark No 62 497) for goods and services in Classes 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 41 and 42; and Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘McDONALD’S’ (mark No 62 521) for goods and services in Classes 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partial upholding of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial upholding of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94, replaced by Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
Charlie Warren PENDLETON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9564.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
William J. MABIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7935.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
PAICE LLC, et al., petitioners, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

No. 17-221.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Leroy Donovan COMBS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8065.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                             39,756
<SECURITIES>                      330,261
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  540,484
<PP&E>                          3,586,300
<DEPRECIATION>                   (181,900)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,963,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,653,264
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                         1,300
<COMMON>                           18,828
<OTHER-SE>                      1,433,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,963,884
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   20,020
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  318,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 72,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (370,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (370,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (218,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.012)
        

</TABLE>