alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 July 2011 – Commission v Belgium**

**(Case C‐133/10)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2005/81/EC – Transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings – Undertaking subject to the obligation of keeping separate accounts – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 258 TFEU; Commission Directive 2005/81) (see paras
31, 39)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Right of the Commission to bring judicial proceedings – Assessment of the expediency
of bringing proceedings – To be exercised at its discretion (Art. 258 TFEU) (see para. 32)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/81/EC of 28 November 2005 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings (OJ 2005 L 312, p. 47). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/81/EC of 28 November 2005 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3726 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3726

   To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 to extend the 
   availability of identity protection coverage to individuals whose 
personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 
         breaches at Federal agencies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2019

Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Ruppersberger) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 to extend the 
   availability of identity protection coverage to individuals whose 
personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 
         breaches at Federal agencies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing the Effects of the 
Cyberattack on OPM Victims Emergency Response Act of 2019'' or the 
``RECOVER Act''.

SEC. 2. IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE FOR INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED BY 
              FEDERAL AGENCY DATA BREACHES.

    Section 633(a) of title VI of division E of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115-31), as amended by section 630 
of title VI of division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 
(Public Law 115-141), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) For fiscal years 2016 through 2026,'' 
        and inserting ``(a) In General.--For fiscal year 2016 and each 
        fiscal year thereafter,'';
            (2) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1); and
            (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) is effective for the remainder of the life of the 
        affected individual; and
            ``(3) includes not less than $5,000,000 in identity theft 
        insurance.''.
                                 <all>
```
Deborah ROLLE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17M100.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Dora L. ADKINS, petitioner, v. HBL, LLC.

No. 17-7663.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

AGENDA

9:00 a.m. Opening Remarks

• Commissioner Summer Mersinger

• Chairman Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Kristin Johnson

• Commissioner Christy Goldsmith-Romero

• Commissioner Caroline Pham 

9:30 a.m. Panel 1: Investment in Physical Energy Infrastructure

A discussion around the investment in physical energy infrastructure and the 

effect on price volatility in the commodities markets.

Lead Participants:

• Cortney Cowley, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

• Paul Wight, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

10:45 a.m. Panel 2: The Role of Metals in Transitional Energy 

A discussion exploring the role of the metals market as components in transitional 

energy sources and the potential impact on financial markets.

Lead Participants:

• Derek Sammann, CME

12:00 p.m. EEMAC Subcommittee Discussion

The EEMAC will discuss the formation of subcommittees and vote on whether to 

recommend that the Commission approve the formation of the subcommittees.

12:45 p.m. Closing Remarks 

1:00 p.m. Adjourn Meeting
# C_2011252EN.01000801.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/8

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I, Germany) — Robert Nicolaus Abt and Others v Hypo Real Estate Holding AG

(Case C-194/10) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Relevance of the question - No jurisdiction)

2011/C 252/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericth München I

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Robert Nicolaus Abt, Danieal Kalwarowskyj, Mangusta Beteiligungs GmbH, Karsetn Trippel, VC-Services GmbH, Henning Hahmann

Applicants:

Defendant: Hypo Real Estate Holding AG

Defendant:

Interveners: Klaus E. H. Zapf, Inge Jung-Arend

Interveners:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landgericht Munich I — Interpretation of Article 297 EC and of Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (OJ 2007 L 184, p. 17) — Period for convocation of general meeting of a listed company — National legislation, ceasing to have effect on the expiry of the transposition period for the directive, which provides for a shorter convocation period than the minimum period under the directive — Provision likely seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the directive, in the light of the national legislation according to which some decisions of the general meeting remain valid after being registered in the commercial register, even in the event of annulment following legal action

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the first question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Landgericth München I. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the first question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Landgericth München I.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
Delaware

The First State

Page 1

 

6702407 8300 Authentication: 202881041

SR# 20230934901 Date: 03-09-23

You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF

DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "BITNOMIAL CLEARINGHOUSE, LLC" IS DULY

FORMED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD

STANDING AND HAS A LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS OF THIS

OFFICE SHOW, AS OF THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH, A.D. 2023. 

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE SAID "BITNOMIAL

CLEARINGHOUSE, LLC" WAS FORMED ON THE TWENTY-NINTH DAY OF MARCH,

A.D. 2022.

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNUAL TAXES HAVE BEEN

ASSESSED TO DATE.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Marek Bakun |
|   | Marek Bakun |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
II-01198

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lucas Sharp <me@lucassharp.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:46 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

Plutonomies exist, and explain much of the world’s imbalances. Please help the middle class, its in everybody who cares

about America’s best intrest.

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lucas Sharp

176 E 2nd Street #3B

New York, NY 10009
II-O0151

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Longobardi <lr1928@snet.net>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 3:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Linda Longobardi

16 Holmes

Glastonbury, CT 6033
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Primary Business Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Patrick Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick  Matthews                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick  Matthews                                    |
| Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
| March 29,  2004                                      |

 

----
Lucille FRIAL-CARRASCO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7808.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Victor J. STITT, II.

No. 17-765.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 5, 2004

                                      /s/ Michael Dodak
                                          ---------------
                                          Name: Michael Dodak
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
Richard A. HOUGHTALING, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 17-850.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Daily Flash Events for Selected 

Contracts

3
# C_2011298EN.01000801.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by Lotta Gistö

(Case C-270/10) (1)

1

(Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities - Article 14, first paragraph - Determination of the domicile for tax purposes of the spouse of a European Union official - National legislation under which a person who has lived abroad for three years is no longer regarded as resident in the country and thus no longer subject to general tax liability)

2011/C 298/13

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lotta Gistö

Applicant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Interpretation of Article 14 (now Article 13) of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union — Fixing of the residence for tax purposes of officials of the European Union and their spouses not separately engaged in a gainful occupation in the Member State of origin — National legislation laying down a rule for nationals under which, after the expiry of three years from the end of the year in which the national left the country, he is no longer regarded as resident in the country and hence no longer has general tax liability as regards his income

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The first paragraph of Article 14 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, originally annexed to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities and subsequently, by virtue of the Treaty of Amsterdam, to the EC Treaty, must be interpreted as meaning that the spouse of a person who, solely because that person enters the service of the European Union, establishes his residence in the territory of a Member State other than his Member State of domicile for tax purposes at the time when that person entered the service of the European Union is regarded as having maintained his domicile for tax purposes in the latter Member State if he is not separately engaged in a gainful occupation.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---
John Eric OCHOA, petitioner v. NEW MEXICO.

No. 17-7907.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Mexico denied.
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., petitioner, v. Stephen WENDELL, et al.

No. 17-747.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                             231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (484)
<INVENTORY>                                        266
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,280
<PP&E>                                           9,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6048)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,628
<SALES>                                          1,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,594
<CGS>                                              880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,896)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        33
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,929)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not required to be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009256EN.01001103.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/11

---

Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-305/09)

2009/C 256/22

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and E. Righini, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to take, within the prescribed time-limits, all the measures necessary to withdraw the aid scheme considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004 on the aid scheme for urgent measures to promote development and correct the trend in public finances (notified on 17 December 2004 under document No C(2004) 4746 (OJ 2005 L 335, p. 39) and to recover from the beneficiaries the aid granted under that scheme, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 4 of that decision and the EC Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to take, within the prescribed time-limits, all the measures necessary to withdraw the aid scheme considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004 on the aid scheme for urgent measures to promote development and correct the trend in public finances (notified on 17 December 2004 under document No C(2004) 4746 (OJ 2005 L 335, p. 39) and to recover from the beneficiaries the aid granted under that scheme, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 4 of that decision and the EC Treaty.

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time limit within which Italian Republic was required to withdraw the aid scheme and recover the unlawfully paid aid expired two months after the date of notification of the decision in question. More than four years later, the Italian authorities have recovered only approximately 65 % of the aid, in respect of which an order for payment has been issued, and have yet to communicate to the Commission the amount of aid paid to beneficiaries who were not entitled in the first place to benefit from scheme.

---