alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIX was born out of a public CIX Marketplace CIX Auctions CIX Exchange -

private initiative to e s tablis h 

Singapore as a climate services 

and carbon trading hub . 

Our mis s ion is to cre ate re al 

climate impact by turning trust in 

carbon cre dits into tangible & 

actionable outcomes. 

We de live r our trus t offe ring via a 

global marketplace , auctions 

house and exchange for carbon 

cre dits . 

TRUST IN

Execution

TRUST IN

Product Use

TRUST IN

Price

TRUST IN

the Product

CIX COMMUNITY 

Conne cting b uye rs , s upplie rs and ke y e cos ys te m e nab le rs J o in tly e s ta b lis he d b y:
CIX Exchange & our first contract Nature X

CIX Exchange CIX Nature X (CNX) deliverable projects

VCS 1477 Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project

VCS 1748 Southern Cardamom REDD+ Project

VCS 934 The Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project

VCS 674 Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project

VCS 985 Cordillera Azul National Park REDD Project

VCS 612 The Kasigau Corridor REDD Project Phase II – The Community Ranches

VCS 2252 Rio Anapu -Pacaja REDD Project

VCS 1650 Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary

VCS 1382 The Envira Amazonia Project – A Tropical Forest Conservation Project in Acre, Brazil

VCS 1622 REDD+ Project for Caribbean Guatemala: The Conservation Coast

VCS 1067 REDD in Tambopata National Reserve and Bahuaja -Sonene National Park

Nature X qualifying criteria

Size

Recognition

Trading Activity

Absence of non -standard project 

characteristics with a meaningful impact on 

tradability, market acceptance or price

Standard contracts 

and s ingle proje cts 

trade s ide by s ide

Daily liquidity s e s s ion 

at 5-5.30pm SGT

Powered by 

Nasdaq

Ins tant s e ttle me nt 

& de live ry
3

General enquiry: contact.us@climateimpactx.com

Data e nquiry: pricing@climate impactx.com

Register for 

CIX Carbon Daily
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov 

Office of Proceedings 

TREVOR ALBERTSEN, 

Complainant, 

v. 

FOREX CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC 

d/b/aFXCM, 

Respondent. 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

CFTC Docket No. 12-R23 

ORDER 

The parties have amicably settled their dispute, and FXCM has confirmed that it has 

made payment to Albe1isen under the terms of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, this 

matter is dismissed.
Sergi SHEVCHANKO, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.

No. 17-7790.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2013101EN.01001602.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 February 2013 — Nikolaou v Court of Auditors

(Case T-241/09) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - Court of Auditors - Conduct of internal investigations - Personal data - Illegality - Causal link - Limitation period)

2013/C 101/34

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kalliopi Nikolaou (Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos and G. Douka, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy and J.-M. Stenier, Agents, and by P. Tridimas)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of irregularities and infringements of European Union law that the Court of Auditors allegedly committed in the context of an internal investigation.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Kalliopi Nikolaou to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Kalliopi Nikolaou to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.

1

---
# C_2011186EN.01001701.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-408/10) (1)

1

2011/C 186/29

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 12

IKON RECEIVABLES LLC

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(dollars in thousands)



|                                   |     |   |                   |  |  |   |               |  |  |   | April 6, 1999 | 
|---------------------------------- | --- | - | ----------------- |  |  | - | ------------- |  |  | - | ------------- | 
|                                   |     |   | Fiscal Year Ended |  |  |   | (Inception) - | 
|                                   |     |   | September 30,     |  |  |   | September 30, | 
|                                   |     |   | 2001              |  |  |   | 2000          |  |  |   | 1999          | 
|                                   |     |   |                   |  |  |  
|Earnings                           |     |   |                   |  |  |   |               |  |  |   |               | 
|Income from continuing operations  |     | $ | 94,252            |  |  | $ | 66,113        |  |  | $ | 17,574        | 
|Add:                               |     |   |                   |  |  |   |               |  |  |   |               | 
|Fixed charges                      |     |   | 113,383           |  |  |   | 82,431        |  |  |   | 14,702        | 
|                                   |     |   |                   |  |  |  
|Earnings, as adjusted              | (A) | $ | 207,635           |  |  | $ | 148,544       |  |  | $ | 32,276        | 
|                                   |     |   |                   |  |  |  
|Fixed charges                      |     |   |                   |  |  |   |               |  |  |   |               | 
|Other interest expense, including  |     |   |                   |  |  |   |               |  |  |   |               | 
|interest on capital leases         | (B) | $ | 113,383           |  |  | $ | 82,431        |  |  | $ | 14,702        | 
|                                   |     |   |                   |  |  |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |     |   |                   |  |  |   |               |  |  |   |               | 
|(A) divided by (B)                 |     |   | 1.8               |  |  |   | 1.8           |  |  |   | 2.2           | 
|                                   |     |   |                   |  |  |
Exhibit 10.6


 





AMENDMENT TO THE


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 23rd day of May 2016, by and between Home Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and Joseph B.
Zanco (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Bank and the Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2011 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.The
last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of
this Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on
June 22, 2018, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”


 


2.Except
to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


 





 





	 	HOME BANK, N.A.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ John W. Bordelon
	 	 	John W. Bordelon
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Joseph B. Zanco
	 	Joseph B. Zanco
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2099/2004

of 9 December 2004         

fixing the representative prices and the additional import duties for molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 10 December 2004         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the market in sugar (1), and in particular Article 24(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and the additional duties applying to imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1422/95 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 79/2003 (OJ L 13, 18.1.2003, p. 4).

(3)OJ L 145, 27.6.1968, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1422/95 (OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 12).

----

ANNEX

Representative prices and additional duties for imports of molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 10 December 2004

----

(1)  This amount replaces, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1422/95, the rate of the Common Customs Tariff duty fixed for these products.

(2)  For the standard quality as defined in Article 1 of amended Regulation (EEC) No 785/68.

----
Charles SOKPA-ANKU, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 16-1486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Jose Manuel AYALA-VENTURA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7200.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,317
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             170
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,401
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        117,073
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,423
<DEPOSITS>                                     160,246
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,258
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,235
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 200,423
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,936
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,032
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   286
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,254
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,849
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,405
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,313
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,313
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.98
<LOANS-NON>                                        387
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    630
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,878
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      149
<RECOVERIES>                                       216
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,020
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,249
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            771
        

</TABLE>
Cody William MARBLE, petitioner, v. Jared POOLE, et al.

No. 17-671.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Victor Everett REYNOLDS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-5217.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         679,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,674,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                    83,747
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,480,675
<PP&E>                                         531,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                 326,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,749,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,434,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,826
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,310,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,749,468
<SALES>                                     16,285,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,285,744
<CGS>                                       14,674,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,396,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,687,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (31,150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,504)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Tyrone GOODMAN, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 16-6635.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fifth District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 2, 2001.
    Time: 8 AM to 5:30 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Joyce A. Hunter, Review Branch, Room 7194, 
Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20872.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1642 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10762

Summary Calendar

 

MARCELINO MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FNU LUEVA; FNU GONZALEZ; JOHN DOE, 

Parole Officer; FNU GARRISON; FNU ORTIZ;

FNU GARCIA; FNU ANDERSON; BILL CHEATHAM,

SCC; JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL

DIVISION; JOHN DOE, SCC; JANE DOE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CV-126-BG

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marcelino Martinez, Texas prisoner #526628, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motions for a preliminary

injunction and for appointment of counsel. Martinez wishes to be

placed in "super-seg[regation] protective custody" pending a

disposition of his civil rights claims by the district court.
No. 03-10762

-2-

Martinez’s civil rights claims against the TDCJ-ID Connally

Unit personnel have been dismissed by the Western District of

Texas for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted, see Martinez v. Ambriz, No. SA-03-CA-319-EP (W.D. Tex.

May 21, 2003), and, although his claims against the TDCJ-ID Smith

Unit personnel are still pending before the Northern District,

Martinez is no longer housed at the Smith Unit and, thus, he is

in no danger from the personnel or inmates at the Smith Unit. 

Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying Martinez’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See

White v. Carlucci, 862 F.2d 1209, 1211 (5th Cir. 1989); Women’s

Med. Ctr. v. Bell, 248 F.3d 411, 419 n.15 (5th Cir. 2001). 

The district court also did not abuse its discretion in

denying Martinez’s motion for appointment of counsel, and his

motion to this court for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See

Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212, 213 (5th Cir. 1982). 

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA Special Committee 188 meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 188: Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for High Frequency Data Link.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held July 10, 2001 starting at 1 pm.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 188 meeting. The agenda will include:

## July 10, 2001

    - Opening Plenary Session (Chairman's Introductory Remarks, Approval of Previous Meeting Summary, Review of Agenda and Work Plan)
    - Working Group 1, Review of High Frequency Data Link (HFDL) Minimum Aviation System Performance Standard (MASPS) Status and Draft Report
    - Closing Plenary Session (Review Actions Items, Make Assignments, Other Business, Date, Place and Time of Next Meeting, Adjourn)

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                 

      ( print page 34987)    
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21, 2001. 

Janice L. Peters, 

FAA Special Assistant, RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 01-16477  Filed 6-29-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE FRANK JOHNSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2203

)

STATE OF FLORIDA )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 20, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte 

County; Donald H. Mason, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Rachel Kamoutsas,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.