alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00461- CV

Zac kery P hill ips, Ap pellant

v. Branch Ban kin g and T rust Com pany, Ap pellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 4 O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY NO. 10- 1637 -CC4, HO NORAB LE JO HN MCM ASTER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

I n this forc ible-deta iner action , a p p e ll e e B r a

n c h B a n k in g a n d T r u s t Co mp a

ny has filed a motion to dism iss the appea l as moot. Br anch Ba nking and Trust Company states that appe llant Zackery Phill ips failed to superse de the judgme nt, a writ of possession was issued, P h i l l i p s voluntarily vacated the subject proper ty , and Br anch Ba

nking and Trust Company h a s h a d p o s s e s s ion of the prope rty

since Mar ch 2, 2012. See Tex. P rop. Code Ann. § 24.007 ( West S upp. 2012).
Br anch Ba

nking and Trust Company also cer tifies t h at t he motion to dismiss is unopposed. See Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio , 198 S.W .3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006) (appe al from forc ible-deta iner judgme nt when the defe ndant is no lo n g er in possession of the premises is moot unless the defe ndant asser ts a “potentially meritorious cl ai m o f ri g ht to curr ent,actua l possession”); W il h e lm v
. F a n n ie Mae , 349 S.W .3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (sa

me). Ac cording ly , we g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l as moot. 1

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice
Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed as Moot Filed: September

20, 2012

Also pending befor e this Court is appellee ’s motion for extension of time to file response 1 brief. We a lso dismi ss this m otion as moot. 2
John DOE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17M106.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record denied.
# L_2005267EN.01002501.xml

| 12.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/25

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (1)

The exchange of Instruments of notification of completion of the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union, signed in Brussels on 20 December 2004, having been completed on 22 September 2005, that Protocol consequently entered into force on 1 October 2005 in accordance with Article 12 thereof.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 31, 4.2.2005, p. 31.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6377

JOSE MANUEL ZALDIVAR-FUENTES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00007-sgw; 7:06-cv-00465-sgw) Submitted: August 31, 2007 Decided: September 26, 2007 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Manuel Zaldivar-Fuentes, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jose Manuel Zaldivar-Fuentes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zaldivar-Fuentes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
# C_2011370EN.01002501.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/25

---

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2011 — Groupement Adriano, Jaime Ribeiro, Conduril v Commission

(Case T-335/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - MEDA I programme - Specific financing agreement - Mandate given to the European Union to recover debts owed by a third party to the Kingdom of Morocco - Debit note - Reminder letter - Acts inseparable from the contract - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 370/41

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Groupement Adriano, Jaime Ribeiro, Conduril — Construção, ACE (Porto, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pinto Cardoso and L. Fuzeta da Ponte, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët and S. Delaude, Agents, and R. Faria da Cunha, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of, first, debit note No 3230905272 issued by the Commission on 12 June 2009 and, second, of the letter of 3 August 2009 by which the Commission ordered payment of the sum claimed by means of the debit note and related default interest.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Groupement Adriano, Jaime Ribeiro, Conduril — Construção, ACE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Groupement Adriano, Jaime Ribeiro, Conduril — Construção, ACE.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
| 1.                              | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                             |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
| 2.                              |  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
| /s/ Robert M. Van Patten             |                                                                                                                                                          |
| Name:  Robert M. Van Patten     |                                                                                                                                                          |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |                                                                                                                                                          |
| Date:  August 12, 2010          |                                                                                                                                                          |

----
# L_2005161EN.01000901.xml

| 23.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/9

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 4/2005

of 8 February 2005

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 162/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 162/2004 of 3 December 2004 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2004/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Council Directive 92/24/EEC relating to speed limitation devices or similar speed limitation on-board systems of certain categories of motor vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2004/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Council Directive 92/24/EEC relating to speed limitation devices or similar speed limitation on-board systems of certain categories of motor vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 45e (Council Directive 92/24/EEC) of Chapter I of Annex II to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32004 L 0011: Directive 2004/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (OJ L 44, 14.2.2004, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32004 L 0011: Directive 2004/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (OJ L 44, 14.2.2004, p. 19).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2004/11/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 44, 14.2.2004, p. 19.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated

*1

---
NO. 06 -14 -0006 2

- CV

KRSTA LYNN GARDNER,

INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF

THE ESTATE OF LARRY RAY
TINER, Appellant,

V.

PENNY HEDDIN TINER §
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§ IN THE SIXTH COURT OF

APPEALS IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELL EE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW PENNY HEDDIN TINER, by and through her attorney, Wm. Brandon
Baade, and makes this MOTION TO EXTEND TIME APPELL EE BRIEF :

1. The deadline for filing the Appellee ’s Brief i s January 2 8 , 2015

.

2. Appellee seeks and extension of four days (4) days until February 1, 2015 to file

Appell ee ’s Brief.

3. Facts relied on to reasonably explain the need for an extension:

Counsel for Appellee was granted a seven day extension because I was sick with

the flu. I anticipated getting better, I didn ’t. Indee d I got worse and was placed

on antibiotics the very day the brief was due four days ago. I am still sick, but I

have got it done. I apologize to the court for being late by four days. It was not

intentional, nor intended to be dilatory or seek any advantage. I have an

immune system that is weakened for which I take injections three times a week,

and when I get sick it is difficult to overcome it. The brief is filed with this

motion.

Appell ee has been granted one (2) extensions of time.

4. Appellee ’s brief is being filed simultaneously with this Motion to Extend Time

to File Appelllee Brief.

WHEREFORE, Penny Heddin Tiner, by her attorney, Wm. Brandon Baade, requests

the court extend time to file Appell ee ’s Brief in this case. ACCEPTED

06-14-00062-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

2/1/2015 6:53:54 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKRESPECTFULLY SUBMITT ED,

Wm. Brandon Baade 522 N Broadway Ave Tyler, TX 75702 Tel: (903) 526

- 5867 brandonbaadelaw@gmail.com

_______________________________ Wm. Brandon Baade

State Bar No. 00793189 Attorney for Appell ee

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I attempted to contact Lawrence Beason, Attorney for Appellant, in t his case at the phone number listed on the Appellant’s brief and the number was not in service.

_______________________________ Wm. Brandon Baade

State Bar No. 00793189 Attorney for Appell ee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing MOTION

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPEL EE’ S BRIEF was served on all counsel of record by U.S.

Mail on February 1, 201 5

.

_______________________________ Wm. Brandon Baade

State Bar No. 00793189 Attorney for Appellee
Walter D. BOOKER, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-5253.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
KIP CR P1 LP, Successor in Title to Crossroads Systems, Inc., petitioner, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-707.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with Goldman Sachs
  
    



  When
              04/28/2011

  Rulemaking(s)
              VII. DCO Core Principles

  CFTC Staff
              Jill SommersMarcia BlaseYousuf Siddiqui

  Visitor(s)
              Ken ConnollyTom RiggsMarty Chavez

  Organization(s)
              Goldman Sachs


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-811-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.                

*Description:*                     § 4(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule S-2 Interim ASA Tracker to be effective 3/1/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     4/5/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220405-5130.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 4/18/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: April 6, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-07764 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Robert Charles COOK, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-5361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Carl SKOW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9731.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
-

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0431

IN THE MATTER OF: 

# FILED FEB 08 2022
BCriNerl Greenwouo Clerk of Supreme Cc
. ,,, State of moni r. M.L.M., ORDER A Youth in Need ofCare.

Counsel for the appellant mother ofM.L.M. filed a motion and briefasking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that she has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother responded to counsel's brief and objected to counsel's motion. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,andAnders. Wehave consideredthe argumentsraisedby counsel andbythemother in her response. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant mother personally. DATED this day ofFebruary, 2022.

ChiefJustice 02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0431

# SL1

Justices
Henry N. HARPER, petitioner, v. Clark SCOTT, Warden.

No. 16-9703.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.