alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Peter Yip, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A, of CDC Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003), Release
No. 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and Release No. 33-8545 (March 2, 2005)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: July 2, 2007     
|                       
|/s/ Peter Yip          
|Peter Yip              
|Chief Executive Officer
#### POWELL v. MEYER, Warden.

No. 8738.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Argued Feb. 14, 1945.

Decided Feb. 16, 1945.

*607Thomas Potter, of Princeton, N. J., for appellant.

C. William Caruso, of Newark, N. J. (Walter D. Van Riper, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, and Jerome B. Litvak, Deputy Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges, and BARD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to issue a writ of habeas corpus. It appears from the face of the petition and admissions made in presenting it to the judge below that petitioner was convicted in a court of the State of Georgia of the crime of murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment; that he escaped from prison and came to the State of New Jersey; that he was arrested in the latter state on a warrant charging him with being a fugitive from justice; that the Governor of New Jersey in extradition proceedings ordered him returned to the State of Georgia; and that at the time of the filing of his petition for writ of habeas corpus he was held in custody under the warrant of extradition issued by the Governor of New Jersey.

Petitioner alleged in his petition that in the trial in Georgia which resulted in his conviction he was denied the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, although he admits that he was represented by competent counsel and that his conviction was appealed to and affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia. Powell v. State, 193 Ga. 398, 18 S.E.2d 678. He makes no showing of having exhausted his remedies under state law or that any rights which he may have cannot be adequately safeguarded by appeal to the state tribunals. Under such circumstances it is perfectly clear that he is not entitled to the writ of habeas corpus from a federal court. Aside from the fact that the confinement of which he complains arises from the warrant issued by the Governor on the admitted fact that he is a fugitive from justice, it is well settled that the writ of habeas corpus from a federal court may not be used as a substitute for a writ of error to review the proceedings of state court, nor, even where there is allegation that the denial of constitutional rights is so gross as to oust the court of jurisdiction and invalidate the proceedings, may it be availed of until all remedies under the law of the state have been exhausted. See Sanderlin v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 138 F.2d 729, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.
Waseem DAKER, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-9532.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-217-001]

Take notice that on June 15, 2001, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following with an effective date of June 1, 1996:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 70

Great Lakes states that this tariff sheet is being filed to correct a pagination error that occurred when reserving a range of sheets for future use in an earlier tariff filing. As a result of that error, the electronic Great Lakes tariff includes the reserved sheets as currently effective, with outdated text. The instant filing will resolve any inconsistencies in Great Lakes' electronic tariff, and it will conform the affected sheets to the Commission's pagination requirements.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-16059  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with Annual Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:March
                27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Weidong HuangName:
            Weidong
                HuangTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer
Darryl BURTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8215.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 21, 2019

NO. 03-18-00358-CV

Lynn Sheen, Appellant

v.

Nicholas Sheen, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 22, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2010037EN.01004102.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/41

---

Action brought on 7 December 2009 — ReValue Immobilienberatung v OHIM (ReValue)

(Case T-487/09)

2010/C 37/58

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ReValue Immobilienberatung GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by S. Fischoeder and M. Schork, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Fourth Board of Appeal) of 7 October 2009 in Case R 531/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Fourth Board of Appeal) of 7 October 2009 in Case R 531/2009-4;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘ReValue’ for services in classes 35, 36, 42 and 45 (Application No 6 784 292)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: registration rejected partially

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), on the grounds that the sign applied for is not descriptive in relation to the services in question and is not devoid of any distinctive character; infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, on the ground that the contested decision was not sufficiently reasoned in the necessary sections.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Jill MEYER, petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, et al.

No. 16-1473.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Bledar HAXHIA, petitioner, v. William LEE, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 15-9561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
II-00082

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

William Davis <rees@hvc.rr.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 12:38 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies. These corporations are crooks and

should be nationalized; their executives should be jailed. Do not aid and abet their schemes!

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach. Millions of people may starve otherwise, making a few

already-too-wealthy-assholes still richer!

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets. If a

transaction has to be hidden it is likely because it is a crime.

William Davis

129 Wittenberg Road

Bearsville, NY 12409
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains information extracted from Allegiant Bancorp, Inc.'s
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such report.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,497
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         461,616
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   765
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,862
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,869
<LOANS>                                        572,033
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 670,004
<DEPOSITS>                                     511,666
<SHORT-TERM>                                    52,946
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,236
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,250
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 670,004
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,918
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,452
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   112
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                37,482
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,893
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,037
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           18,445
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,592
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,287
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,776
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,776
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.580
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.574
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                        722
<LOANS-PAST>                                       137
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,442
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      720
<RECOVERIES>                                       168
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,482
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Garcia Glen WHITE, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-9453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Services,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jane Dietze, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated: November 21, 2005

                                   /s/ Jane Dietze
                                   ------------------------
                                   Jane Dietze
                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer
Craig MULLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1261.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3858 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3858

  To authorize appropriations for detention spaces for the purpose of 
        enforcing the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2019

  Mrs. Lesko introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize appropriations for detention spaces for the purpose of 
        enforcing the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETENTION SPACES.

    There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to provide for sufficient detention spaces as the Secretary 
of Homeland Security determines necessary to enforce the immigration 
laws.
                                 <all>
```
Jason WILD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8141.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Finao Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Arnold Salinas, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: July 26, 2004

/S/ Arnold Salinas
------------------
    Arnold Salinas
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Principal Accounting Officer
Ronan Carr

Chief Research Officer 

July 2023
BeZero Carbon is a global carbon ratings agency 

Rated 325 projects in 50+ 

countries 

● Our mission is to build markets in ecosystem assets, starting with 

the Voluntary Carbon Market

● We provide ratings and risk analytics for carbon credit projects 

globally

Founded in 2020

140+ staff

Who we are 

Multidisciplinary team 

located worldwide 
Carbon ratings are a market tool to improve integrity 

and transparency

The BeZero Carbon Rating is our opinion on the likelihood a carbon credit 

achieves a tonne of CO2e avoided and/or removed

● Carbon quality is probabilistic, not binary

● Improving market integrity requires project -level assessment

● The market needs a fungible risk metric to scale
4

The Voluntary 

Carbon Market 

is immature 

and faces 

barriers to 

scaling

Highly varied project quality due to a range of 

factors 

● Scarce and opaque data

● Historically poor price vs quality correlation

● Quality viewed as binary

● Limited tools for risk based analysis
5

For the market 

to mature, it 

needs 

improved 

market and 

policy 

infrastructure

Market initiatives, such as the Core Carbon 

Principles can help raise the bar for verified 

credits

Regulation can help to increase information 

disclosure and improve integrity

Ratings and other project-level analysis can 

help to improve market efficiency and pricing