alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.14




Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements


In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report, Alliance One International, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its directors and named executive officers. 


Compensation Arrangements for Directors 


Directors who are employees of the Company or its subsidiaries or who serve as paid consultants to the Company are not compensated for their services as director.   Non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer paid in quarterly installments.  As of June 1, 2018, such retainer payments for all non-employee directors, other than Mr. Kehaya, were based on the following schedule:


	
		
	Type of Service
	Annual Retainer

	Board Member
	$60,000

	Lead Independent Director
	+$10,000

	Audit Committee Member
	+$12,000

	Audit Committee Chairman
	+$10,000

	Executive Committee Member
	+$ 3,000

	Executive Committee Chairman
	+$ 5,000

	Executive Compensation Committee Member
	+$12,000

	Executive Compensation Committee Chairman
	+$ 7,500

	Governance & Nominating Committee Member
	+$ 7,500

	Governance & Nominating Committee Chairman
	+$ 5,000

	Social Responsibility & Corporate Affairs Committee Member
	+$ 7,500

	Social Responsibility & Corporate Affairs Committee Chairman
	+$ 5,000

	Special Committee Member
	+$ 7,500

	Special Committee Chairman
	+$ 5,000






In his capacity as Non-Executive Chairman, Mr. Kehaya receives an annual retainer in the amount of $120,000 as his exclusive cash compensation. 


Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers 


The board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer and its three other most highly compensated executive officers, based on fiscal 2018 total compensation (such five officers, the “named executive officers”).  As of June 1, 2018, the annual base salary rates for the named executive officers were as follows: 


	
				
	Named Executive Officer
	Base Salary

	J. Pieter Sikkel
	

	$700,000
	


	Joel L. Thomas
	

	$429,500
	


	Graham J. Kayes
	

	$352,600
	


	Jose Maria Costa Garcia
	

	$352,600
	


	William L. O’Quinn, Jr.
	

	$335,000
Vivek SHAH, petitioner, v. Francisco J. QUINTANA, Warden.

No. 17-8320.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,062,910
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         186,127
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,365,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,765,652
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         949,531
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           942,369
<LOANS>                                     49,391,647
<ALLOWANCE>                                    329,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,632,353
<DEPOSITS>                                  46,617,629
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            603,673
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,190,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       236,988
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,984,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              62,632,353
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,342,602
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              154,021
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               163,609
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,660,232
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,469,526
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,954,810
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,705,422
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,321,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                556,547
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     556,547
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   368,394
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.17
<LOANS-NON>                                    461,644
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               295,457
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   16,338
<RECOVERIES>                                       533
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              329,652
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           329,652
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
      Acting Chief Financial Officer of Bancorp International Group, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007
      (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except with
      respect to the modification of the Certification of our Chief Executive Officer
      and Acting Chief Financial Officer attached as Exhibit 31.1 to the Annual
      Report, and that information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.




Date:
                April 3, 2008
            /s/
                Thomas MegasThomas
                Megas,
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 9, 2015

a0831

Order 

Clerk

September 9, 2015

150260(31)

SC: 150260

In re Guardianship of GBH, Minor COA: 322245

Manistee CC: 13-014865-AV

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Aaron Scott PRUETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8347.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Kenneth M. Schwartz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of K&F Industries, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  KENNETH    M. SCHWARTZ    Kenneth M. Schwartz    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 11, 2006
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Telephone Call w/Paul Volcker
  
    



  The Chairman spoke with Mr. Volcker regarding the Volcker Rule and derivatives reform - in particular - credit default swaps.
      
  When
              05/16/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              VIII. Process for Review of Swaps

  CFTC Staff
              Gary Gensler

  Visitor(s)
              Paul Volcker


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
# C_2009055EN.01002102.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/21

---

Action brought on 9 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-13/09)

(2009/C 55/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and S. Mortoni, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

| — | Declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first subparagraph of Article 11(1) of Commission Directive 2006/86/EC (1) of 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/86/EC or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first subparagraph of Article 11(1) of Commission Directive 2006/86/EC (1) of 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/86/EC or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission.

1

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2006/86/EC expired on 1 September 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 294, p. 32.

1

---
Ahmad ADAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7197.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Rickey B. REED, petitioner, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al.

No. 17-8031.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GenTek Inc. (the "Company")
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard R. Russell, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew M. Walsh, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS' 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Richard R. Russell
--------------------------------------
    Richard R. Russell
    Chief Executive Officer
    March 16, 2005


/s/ Matthew M. Walsh
--------------------------------------
    Matthew M. Walsh
    Chief Financial Officer
    March 16, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005

                                          /s/ Michael Dodak
                                          ---------------
                                          Name: Michael Dodak
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
Quartavious DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7348.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jerry A. Dukes,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2004



/s/ Jerry A. DukesJerry A. Dukes President
Charles STEELE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6779.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Andres MARQUEZ, petitioner, v. COLORADO

No. 17-7247.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
CONSTITUTION PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, et al.

No. 17-1009.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 11127 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Leos Jaimes Perez,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 122

- 1

Before **Davis, Haynes**  **,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leos Jaimes
Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-11127 Document: 00515881411 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2021No. 20

- 11127

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellat e review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R. 42.2**

. Case: 20-11127 Document: 00515881411 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2021
Barry P. LUNDERVILLE, petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-1219.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.