alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with Amendment No.1 to Annual Report of China 3C Group and its
      subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                August 11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Zhenggang WangName:
            Zhenggang
                WangTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer and Chairman
u.s. Department of Labor 

JAN 17,2012 

The Honorable Gary Gensler 

The Honorable Jill Sommers 

The Honorable Bart Chilton 

Assistant Secretary for 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

The Honorable Scott D. O'Malia 

The Honorable Mark Wetjen 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: Final Business Conduct Standards Rules Adopted January 11,2012 

Dear Chairman Gensler and Commissioners Sommers, Chilton, O'Malia and Wetjen: 

The Department of Labor has reviewed the final draft of the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission's ("CFTC's") rules to implement Section 4s(h) of the Commodity Exchange 

Act pursuant to Section 731 of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and The 

Consumer Protection Act of20l0. These rules prescribe external business conduct 

standards for swap dealers and major swap participants and will have a direct impact on 

ERISA-covered plans and plan fiduciaries. I very much appreciate the care that the 

CFTC has taken to coordinate its work on this project with the Department of Labor in 

light of the Department's regulatory and enforcement responsibilities with respect to 

ERISA fiduciaries. As we have worked with your staff, we have paid particular attention 

to the interaction between the original business conduct proposal and the Department's 

own fiduciary regulations and proposals. 

The Department of Labor has reviewed these [mal business conduct standards and 

concluded that they do not require swap dealers or major swap participants to engage in 

activities that would make them fiduciaries under the Department of Labor's current fivepart test defining fiduciary advice 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-21(c). In the Department's view, 

the CFTC's final business conduct standards neither conflict with the Department's 

existing regulations, nor compel swap dealers or major swap participants to engage in 

fiduciary conduct. Moreover, the Department states that it is fully committed to ensuring 

that any changes to the current ERISA fiduciary advice regulation are carefully 

harmonized with the final business conduct standards, as adopted by the CFTC and the 

SEC, so that there are no unintended consequences for swap dealers and major swap 

participants who comply with these business conduct standards. 
We look forward to continuing to work with you on these important projects and are 

grateful for your staffs thoughtful efforts to harmonize our work. 

JJ ~(I~ Phyllis C .. Borzi 

Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration 

2
# C_2010221EN.01004202.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Herhof v OHIM — Stabilator(stabilator)

(Case T-60/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for community figurative mark stabilator - Earlier Community word mark STABILAT - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 221/69

Language of the case: German.

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH (Solms, Germany) (represented by: A. Zinnecker and T. Bösling, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Stabilator sp. z o.o. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: M. Kacprzak, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 December 2008 (Cases R 483/2008-4 and R 705/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH and Stabilator sp. z o.o.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, of 1.5.2009.

1

---
Daniel J. TAYLOR, aka Danny K. Taylor, aka Billy J. Taylor, aka Germaine L. Taylor, aka Joseph Taylor, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8342.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 30, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT INDEX**

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that itmeets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 117 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 16th day of January 2014.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following personsin the capacities and on the dates indicated.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

	We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:

in addition to any other investment company for which Fidelity Management & Research Company ("FMR") or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment companyfor which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, Joseph R. Fleming, John V.O'Hanlon, Robert W. Helm and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements ofthe Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-EffectiveAmendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith,and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate,to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission.  We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause tobe done by virtue hereof.  This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after August 1, 2013.

	WITNESS our hands on this first day of August 2013.
Keith Allen KIEFER, petitioner, v. ISANTI COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

No. 17-1181.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
# C_2010100EN.01002402.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/24

---

Action brought on 29 January 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-50/10)

2010/C 100/36

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and C. Zadra, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, (1) by failing to take the necessary measures ‘to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 of that directive or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions’, that all existing installations within the meaning of Article 2(4) of Directive 2008/1/EC operate in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14(a) and (b) and 15(2) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, (1) by failing to take the necessary measures ‘to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 of that directive or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions’, that all existing installations within the meaning of Article 2(4) of Directive 2008/1/EC operate in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14(a) and (b) and 15(2) of that directive;

1

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC lays down that Member States are to take the necessary measures ‘to ensure that the competent authorities see to it, by means of permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 or, as appropriate, by reconsidering and, where necessary, by updating the conditions’, that not later than 30 October 2007 existing installations, as referred to in Article 2(4) of Directive 2008/1/EC, operate in accordance with the requirements set out in that directive.

However, in January 2010 — and, more specifically, at the time when the present action was brought — the Italian Government had still not fully complied with the obligations under Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC.

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 24, p. 8.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6750

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

AVAUN CORNELL JOHNSON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:06-cr-00554-CCB-2) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Avaun Cornell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Michael Giblin, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Avaun Cornell Johnson appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, 

No. 1:06-cr-00554-CCB-2 (D. Md. filed Mar. 30, 2009; entered 

Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 22004D0362 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22004D0362

**2004/362/EC: Decision No 1/2004 of the European Union-Mexico Joint Committee of 22 March 2004 relating to Annex III to Decision No 2/2000 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council of 23 March 2000, concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation **

*
Official Journal L 113 , 20/04/2004 P. 0060 - 0060 *

Decision No 1/2004 of the European Union-Mexico Joint Committee

of 22 March 2004

relating to Annex III to Decision No 2/2000 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council of 23 March 2000, concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation

(2004/362/EC)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Decision No 2/2000 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council of 23 March 2000 (hereinafter Decision No 2/2000), and in particular Notes 2 and 3 of Appendix II(a) to Annex III and Joint Declaration V thereto;

Whereas:

(1) Annex III to Decision No 2/2000, concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation sets out the rules of origin for the products originating in the territory of the Parties to the Agreement.

(2) According to Joint Declaration V, the Joint Committee shall review the necessity to extend beyond 30 June 2003 the rules of origin established in Notes 2 and 3 of Appendix II(a) to Annex III, where the economic conditions which formed the basis for establishing the rule set out in those Notes continue.

(3) In accordance with the analysis of the relevant economic conditions undertaken according to Joint Declaration V, it is considered appropriate to extend on a temporarily basis the application of the origin rules established in Notes 2 and 3 of Appendix II(a) to Annex III,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The origin rules set out in Notes 2 and 3 of Appendix II(a) to Annex III to Decision No 2/2000, shall be applied until 30 June 2006 instead of the origin rules set out in Appendix II to Annex III to Decision No 2/2000.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 July 2003.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 2004.

For the Joint Committee

Tomás Duplá Del Moral
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5430 

www.cftc.gov 

Division of Clearing and Risk 

John P. Davidson 

Chief Executive Officer 

Options Clearing Corporation 

125 S. Franklin Street, Suite 1200 

Chicago, IL 60606 

March 1, 2021 

Re: Options Clearing Corporation Subpart C Election 

Dear Mr. Davidson: 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "Commission") is in receipt of the 

Subpart C Election Form filed on February 3, 2021 by Options Clearing Corporation ("OCC") 

(the "Election Form") pursuant to Commission Regulation 39.31 (b ). 1

Pursuant to Regulation 39.31, a derivatives clearing organization ("DCO") that is 

registered with the Commission and that is not a systemically important DCO may elect to 

become a subpart C DCO subject to the provisions of subpart C of Part 39 of the Commission's 

regulations (the "Subpart C Provisions") by following the procedures set forth in Regulation 

39.3 l(b), which include filing a complete Election Form.2

The Division of Clearing and Risk ("OCR") notes that OCC's Election Form specifies 

March 1, 2021 as the effective date for OCC's election. While Regulation 39.31 (b )(5) permits 

the Commission to stay or deny such an election, OCR, acting pursuant to delegated authority, 3

has determined to neither stay nor deny OCC's election at this time. 

Thus, OCC's election is permitted to take effect as of March 1, 2021, and OCC will be 

subject to subparts A, Band C of Part 39 of the Commission's regulations as of that date. 

Moreover, as noted in Regulation 39.40, the Subpart C Provisions are intended to establish 

standards which, together with subparts A and B of Part 39, are consistent with the Principles for 

Financial Market Infrastructures (the "PFMls"). As a result, OCC will be subject to Commission 

standards that are consistent with the PFMis as of March 1, 2021. 

1 Commission regulations are found in 17 C.F.R. Chapter I 

2 17 C.F.R. § 39.3l{a)(l). 

3 Pursuant to Regulation 140.94(c)(l3), the Commission has delegated to DCR all functions reserved to the 

Commission under Regulation 39.31. 
John P. Davidson 

March I , 2021 

Page 2 

This letter does not constitute a finding by the Commission as to whether OCC is in 

compliance with the Subpart C Provisions. ln permitting OCC's election to take effect, the 

Commission is relying on the certification provided in OCC's submission that, as of March I, 

2021, OCC will be in compliance with the Subpart C Provisions. The Commission is also 

relying on the other materials submitted by OCC in connection with its Election Form, including 

all supplemental information submitted to DCR. 

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact August A. [mholtz Ill, 

Special Counsel (aimholtz@cftc.gov, (202) 418-5140). 

Sincerely, 

Clark 

Ck,i 

Hutchison 

��leff'

Director, Division of Clearing and Risk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0589

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s notice of intent to file reply 

brief and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s reply brief is due on 

or before October 3, 2022.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2022

09/02/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0589
TELEPHONE: 1-212-558-4000 

FACSIMILE: 1-212-558-3588 

WWW.SULLCROM.COM 

125 Broad Street 

New York, New York 10004-2498 

______________________ 

LOS ANGELES • PALO ALTO • WASHINGTON, D.C. 

BRUSSELS • FRANKFURT • LONDON • PARIS 

BEIJING • HONG KONG • TOKYO 

MELBOURNE • SYDNEY 

4883-4323-8974 v.3 

 November 11, 2022 

Via E-mail 

Clark Hutchison, 

 Director, Division of Clearing & Risk, 

 Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 

 Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W. 

 Washington, D.C. 20581. 

 Re: LedgerX LLC’s Application for an Amended Order of 

 Registration as a Derivatives Clearing Organization 

Dear Mr. Hutchison: 

 We write on behalf of LedgerX, LLC, d/b/a FTX US Derivatives (“FTX”) 

to withdraw FTX’s request, originally submitted to the Division of Clearing and Risk on 

December 6, 2021, that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission amend FTX’s 

Amended Order of Registration as a derivatives clearing organization to allow FTX to 

offer products that are not fully collateralized. 

Sincerely, 

Colin D. Lloyd 

cc: Eileen Donovan, DCR 

 Richard Haynes, DCR 

 Scott Sloan, DCR 

 Zach Dexter, FTX 

 Ryne Miller, FTX 

 

 David J. Gilberg, Sullivan & Cromwell 

 Aaron Levine, Sullivan & Cromwell
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with ICAP
  
    



  Discussions concerning SEFs.
      
  When
              09/06/2012

  Rulemaking(s)
              XIII. SEF Registration

  CFTC Staff
              Mark WetjenJoseph CisewskiTerry ArbitScott Reinhart

  Visitor(s)
              Pat McCartyMark Beeston Raf Pritchard

  Organization(s)
              ICAP TriOptima


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000