alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXH32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the report of Rezconnect Technologies, Inc. (the
         "Company) on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 filed
         herewith (the "Report") I, Michael Y. Brent, Chief Executive Officer,
         of the Company, certify, that to the best of my knowledge:

            1. the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
         or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
         required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
         Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
         1934, as amended.

         Dated: as of May 24, 2004

                                       /s/ Michael Y. Brent
                                       --------------------
                                       Michael Y. Brent, Chief Executive Officer
Carbon Offset Standards and Quality Initiatives

CFTC Voluntary Carbon Markets Convening

David Antonioli, Chief Executive Officer, Verra

2 June 2022 1
• Nonprofit, established 2007

• Certifies environmental and 

social impacts of projects

• VCS is world-leading certifier of 

emission reductions and removals

• Global: 

934 million credits, 1802 projects

• US:

48 million credits, 94 projects

2
Components of Verra’s VCS

• Project boundary

• Baseline scenario

• Additionality

• Monitoring 

procedures

• Quantification of 

outcomes

• Validate projects before registration

• Verify reductions/removals before issuance

• 6 accredited VVBs in US, 27 globally

• Accredited by:

 IAF member (ISO14065)

 UNFCCC

• Secure, publicly accessible platform

• Tracks project registrations, credit 

issuances and retirements

• Know Your Customer checks 

• https://registry.verra.org/

3

(overall requirements)
Uses of carbon credits

4

• VCM originated from projects and credits to meet voluntary corporate needs

• Continues as a transition tool, complementary to internal emission reductions

• Increasing acceptance of carbon credits from the VCM in compliance systems 

 Colombia, South Africa, ICAO, and others to come

• Ready-made, easily scalable infrastructure to finance reductions and removals, 

directing finance to mitigation opportunities in US and abroad

• VCM supports the national climate response and helps meet future challenges
Important initiatives

5

SUPPLY DEMAND

Establish guidance on claims 

corporates can make when 

purchasing/retiring carbon credits

Establish global threshold for highintegrity carbon credits

https://vcmintegrity.org/

https://icvcm.org/

Code of Practice to be released for 

public consultation 7 June 2022 

Core Carbon Principles + Assessment 

Framework expected in mid-2022
Regulatory implications?

6

• VCM historically has supplemented government emissions regulation

• Increasing maturity and momentum of VCM is creating initiatives that are 

harmonizing quality standards and increasing transparency

• Other VCM aspects on the buyer side may be candidates for strong regulation, 

driven by downside risk, asymmetrical access to information (e.g., consumer 

protection) and technical capacity

• Examples of potential regulation:

• Advertising or consumer protection regulation relating to claims about 

credit use

• Financial and securities regulations to promote market stability and 

confidence and to ensure investor protection
One Thomas Circle NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20005

www.verra.org

David Antonioli, CEO

dantonioli@verra.org

7
Marquail Lamont CURRIE, aka Quail, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Daniel MORIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8191.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Norvell MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Steven Michael BACKSTROM, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-5161.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         641,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,321,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                   285,900
<INVENTORY>                                  6,999,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,038,048
<PP&E>                                      13,263,448
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,802,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,541,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,128,499
<BONDS>                                     13,401,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,017
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,430,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,541,049
<SALES>                                     52,511,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,511,981
<CGS>                                       39,349,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,349,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,685,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (13,284)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,066,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,333,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                   152,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,180,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,718,854)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,461,676
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
        13.1**
 
 **SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION**
 
 In
        connection with Amendment No. 1 to the annual report of Wealth Minerals Ltd.
        (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2004 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Gary Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 */s/
        Gary Freeman*
 
 Name:
        Gary Freeman
 Title:
        Chief Executive Officer
 July
        5,
        2005
  *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided
        to
        the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
 
 *This
        certification accompanies the Form 20-F/A to which it relates, is not deemed
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
        by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of
        1933
        or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the
        date of
        the Form 20-F/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
        in such filing.*
# C_2011252EN.01002802.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 May 2011 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-486/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/61

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
Nicole C. EASON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5278.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Derek Schneideman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2004)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) As discussed above, disclosed in this report any change in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
      during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: December 31, 2007                 /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**504 CA 14-01456**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

SUSAN E. ROSE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KIM A. LEBERTH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

BRENNA, BRENNA & BOYCE, PLLC, ROCHESTER (ROBERT L. BRENNA, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. REDDY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered May 5, 2014. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when the motor vehicle she was operating collided with a vehicle operated by defendant on Mt. Hope Avenue in the City of Rochester. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was attempting to make a left-hand turn out of a parking lot onto Mt. Hope Avenue. She was waiting for a UPS truck to make a left-hand turn from the roadway into the parking lot and, as the UPS truck turned into the parking lot, plaintiff exited the parking lot onto Mt. Hope Avenue and collided with defendant’s vehicle, which, unseen by plaintiff, was coming from plaintiff’s left.

We conclude that Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “It is well settled that a driver ‘who has the right[-]of[-]way is entitled to anticipate that [the drivers of] other vehicles will obey the traffic laws that require them to yield’ ” ( Lescenski v Williams , 90 AD3d 1705, 1705, lv denied 18 NY3d 811). Because plaintiff was enteringthe roadway from a parking lot, she was required to yield the rightof-way to defendant’s vehicle regardless of whether it was in the curb lane, as defendant testified at her deposition, or in the center turn lane, as plaintiff asserts ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1143; Van Doren v Dressler , 45 AD3d 1366, 1366-1367). Moreover, in support of her motion, defendant established that she was traveling at or below the posted speed limit and did not otherwise negligently operate her vehicle. Defendant thus met her initial burden on the motion “by**-2- 504 CA 14-01456** 

establishing as a matter of law ‘that the sole proximate cause of the accident was [plaintiff’s] failure to yield’ ” the right-of-way to her ( Guadagno v Norward , 43 AD3d 1432, 1433), and in response plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact ( see generally Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562). Plaintiff’s contention that defendant violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1126 is raised for the first time on appeal and therefore is not properly before us ( see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora , 202 AD2d 984, 985).

Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Daniel Larios-VILLATORO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; Jaime Adrian Hernandez-Hernandez, petitioner v. United States.

No. 16-9660.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel Larios-Villatoro are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018). The petition for writ of certiorari as to Jaime A. Hernandez-Hernandez denied.
II-00561

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Margaret Sacco <saccomt@muohio.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:45 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Margaret Sacco

708 Marcia Dr.

Oxford, OH 45056-2432
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666) of CDC Corporation(formerly china.dotcom corporation) of our report dated June 20, 2006 (except for note 2, as to which the date is July 2, 2007), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CDC Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form20-F) of CDC Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young 

Hong Kong 

July 2, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT,
LTD. FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         235,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,799,000
<PP&E>                                      12,678,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,651,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,588,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,496,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,237,000
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (76,277,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,588,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               445,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,559,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,784,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,854,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,854,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,787,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Michael J.
      Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Global
      Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1) the
      Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the third quarter  ended September
      30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13
      (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m  or
      78o(d)); and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      November 14, 2006




/s/
            Michael
              J. LoiaconoName: Michael J. LoiaconoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
              & Chief
              Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4826-4827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1604]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
9:00 a.m. on Friday, January 19, 2001, to consider the following 
matters:
    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is 
anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a 
member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the 
discussion agenda.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Amendments to Part 308--Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, to implement the requirements of the Program 
Fraud Civil Remedies Act.
    Memorandum re: Information Sharing and Confidentiality Agreement 
Pursuant to Section 307 of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
    Discussion Agenda: Memorandum and Resolution Re: Proposed 
Amendments to Part 325--Capital Standards for Nonfinancial Equity 
Investments.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2089 (Voice); (202) 416-
2007 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: January 12, 2001.

[[Page 4827]]

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1604 Filed 1-16-01; 10:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M