alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.25

                                   IA Global

                               533 AIRPORT BLVD.,
                         SUITE 400 BURLINGAME, CA 94010
                                TEL: 650 685 2403

________________________________________________________________________________


Dear Mark Scott,

We are appreciative of the work you have performed for our company through the
agency, CFO2GO. We would like to offer you a full-time employment position with
our company based on the attached employment contract.

In summary the terms of the offer would be:

   o  $150,000 per annum

   o  Cash performance bonus plan of 13.5% ($20,250) linked to goals to be
      established between yourself and CEO, under guidance of Compensation
      Committee. These goals are expected to be linked to EBITDA of the company.

   o  400,000 stock options issued at 30 cents, representing the fair market
      value

   o  Standard holiday entitlements

We would ask that in addition to your duties as CFO of the company, you also
serve on the Board of Directors of the company, at such time as you are
nominated to do so during the period you remain CFO.

Should you accept our offer, we would contact CFO2GO to negotiate a release from
them. We would appreciate your immediate consideration of this appointment.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Alan Margerison

Alan Margerison
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-31802 and 333-31804) pertaining to the (i) USinternetworking,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan and (ii) USinternetworking,
Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of USinternetworking, Inc. of our report
dated March 23, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
I.I.T. Holding, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
USinternetworking, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 27, 2001
II-00045

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Anne Wolf <wolfmdst@sonic.net>

Thursday, December 9, 2010 12:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Anne Wolf

1452 Townview Ave.

Santa Rosa, CA 95405
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

POM OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AND CITY 

OF PHILADELPHIA

APPEAL OF: PENNSYLVANIA GAMING 

CONTROL BOARD

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 EAP 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: July 21, 2023

AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2023, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See

42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (limiting this Court’s jurisdiction to “appeals from final orders of the 

Commonwealth Court entered in any matter which was originally commenced in the 

Commonwealth Court”); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1) (defining a final order as one that “disposes 

of all claims and of all parties”); Pa.R.Civ.P. 232(a) (“A discontinuance or nonsuit shall 

not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a counterclaim theretofore filed.”). Cf. 

Melvin v. Doe, 836 A.2d 42, 44 n.4 (Pa. 2003) (“[A]n order denying a motion for summary 

judgment does not terminate the litigation, and thus is not an appealable order.”).

The Application for Leave to File Answer to Jurisdictional Statement Nunc Pro 

Tunc is DISMISSED as moot.
Michael HALL, petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 16-9716.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Carston Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8262.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
II-00702

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard McVay <rmcvay33 @hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:18 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Richard McVay

2090 Harbor Inn

Holland, MI 49424
Eric Lyle WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7603.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
 /s/ ERIK E. PRUSCH

Erik E. Prusch 
Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3979 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3979

   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any 
   estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint 
  Committee on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the 
                  public debt, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2019

Mr. Meuser (for himself and Mr. Womack) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any 
   estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint 
  Committee on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the 
                  public debt, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Budgetary Accuracy in Scoring 
Interest Costs Act of 2019'' or the ``BASIC Act''.

SEC. 2. CBO AND JCT ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERVICING COSTS.

    (a) In General.--The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) is amended by inserting after 
section 402 the following:

              ``estimates to include debt servicing costs

    ``Sec. 403. Any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget 
Office under section 402, and any estimate prepared by the Joint 
Committee on Taxation, shall include, to the extent practicable, the 
costs (if any) of servicing the public debt.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402 the 
following:

``403. Estimates to include debt servicing costs.''.
                                 <all>
```
Aaron OLSON, petitioner, v. Christopher KOPEL, et al.

No. 17-5324.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Scott,
Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

Date: December 31, 2007                 /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
Karen Frances ALLEN, petitioner, v. Molly HILL, Warden.

No. 17-8012.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          90,778
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          43,586
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 18,734,468
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     54,233,032
<ALLOWANCE>                                    842,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,218,582
<DEPOSITS>                                  64,476,066
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,935,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            883,200
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,000,000
<COMMON>                                     6,154,447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     769,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              79,218,582
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,764,249
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              883,748
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                11,900
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,972,687
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,989,362
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,231,248
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,428,649
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  110,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              33,072
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,366,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                900,296
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     900,296
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   596,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.39
<LOANS-NON>                                    114,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    24,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,674,531
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               739,062
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   46,104
<RECOVERIES>                                    39,751
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              842,709
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           647,368
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        195,341
        

</TABLE>
II-00993

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Neil Herrick <herrickrddng5@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:22 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Neil Herrick

163 Cross Hwy

Redding, CT 6896
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4040 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the temporary 

exception to the application of the site neutral IPPS payment rate 

to discharges from certain spinal cord specialty hospitals, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. LEWIS (for himself, Mr. CROW, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mrs. MCBATH, and 

Ms. DEGETTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

the temporary exception to the application of the site 

neutral IPPS payment rate to discharges from certain 

spinal cord specialty hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Access to 

5 Spinal Surgeries Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4040 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY EXCEPTION TO APPLI2 CATION OF SITE NEUTRAL IPPS PAYMENT 

3 RATE TO DISCHARGES FROM CERTAIN SPI4 NAL CORD SPECIALTY HOSPITALS. 

5 Section 1886(m)(6)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395ww(m)(6)(F)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal 

7 years 2018 and 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘any of fiscal years 

8 2018 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3871 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to preserve the independent 

funding of the Office of Financial Research. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2019 

Mr. FOSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to preserve 

the independent funding of the Office of Financial Research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting the Inde5 pendent Funding of the Office of Financial Research 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PRESERVING INDEPENDENT FUNDING. 

8 The Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5311 

9 et seq.) is amended— 

10 (1) in section 152— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3871 IH

1 (A) by amending subsection (c) to read as 

2 follows: 

3 ‘‘(c) BUDGET.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director shall have 

5 sole discretion to establish the annual budget of the 

6 Office. 

7 ‘‘(2) MINIMUM FUNDING LEVEL OF THE BUDG8 ET.—The annual budget of the Office in any given 

9 fiscal year shall not be less than a dollar amount 

10 equal to the budget of the Office in fiscal year 2017. 

11 ‘‘(3) ADJUSTMENT OF MINIMUM FUNDING

12 LEVEL.—The dollar amount referred to in para13 graph (2) shall be adjusted annually by the Director, 

14 using the percent increase, if any, in the employ15 ment cost index for total compensation for State and 

16 local government workers published by the Federal 

17 Government, or the successor index thereto, for the 

18 12-month period ending September 30 of the year 

19 preceding the annual budget.’’; 

20 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, in con21 sultation with the Chairperson,’’ each place 

22 such term appears; 

23 (C) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘, in con24 sultation with the Chairperson,’’; and 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3871 IH

1 (D) in subsection (i), by striking ‘‘, in con2 sultation with the Chairperson,’’; 

3 (2) in section 155— 

4 (A) in subsection (d), by inserting before 

5 the period the following: ‘‘, as determined in the 

6 sole discretion of the Director’’; and 

7 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(e) REVIEWABILITY.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of this subtitle, the funding pursuant to sub10 section (d) shall not be subject to review by the Commit11 tees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives 

12 and the Senate. 

13 ‘‘(f) PRESERVATION OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL

14 RESEARCH’S INDEPENDENCE.—Nothing in this section 

15 shall authorize the Secretary to influence the budget or 

16 the number or compensation of employees of the Office.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Order entered June 5, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00091

- CR

JOHN ALAN SUBLETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 80900

- 08



### O RDER

T he Court GRANTS appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file appellant’s brief as of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Leroy F. KING, petitioner, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA.

No. 15-9486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth District denied.
WEI ZHOU, petitioner, v. MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY.

No. 17-7817.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Dennis CRUMP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8563.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.